Introduction To Mass Communication - MCM 101 VU
Introduction To Mass Communication - MCM 101 VU
LESSON 08
MESSAGE – ROOT OF COMMUNICATION II
No other type of communication suffers this intrinsic property of a message more than the mass
communication. Same set of words bring so different a meanings to different receivers that a conflict
get on deepening instead of moving towards solution.
For example, Pakistan says it wants a peaceful solution of Kashmir. Exactly same set of words is said
by India. The United Nations in a number of resolutions on Kashmir has used the same words. The
US and all other western powers, and even the people of the valley say the same. Question arises:
then why Kashmir is bleeding? Answer is simple; for every people meanings in the same set of words
are different!
Misgivings
Treading in such a sensitive area of mass communication by composing an effective message
is bound to cause doubts in the mind of receiver. A message at the mass communication level is
never understood from the face value of the words, does not matter how smartly they are chosen,
and so misgivings are very likely to arise.
Such a situation also occurs when one is going through a newspaper story, a book of history or
watches a play on TV. The contents of a TV play may carry lines which may infuriate some and cause
laughter for others.
A cartoon in a newspaper, a blend of verbal and non verbal communication may brings smiles on the
faces of political workers of one party and outrage others belonging to another.
Conflicts
The most difficult situation in composing a message for mass communication arises when
the subject matter is already caught in a conflict. As has been cited in the Kashmir example above,
even the softest and most carefully picked words by one party in the conflict may not appease the
people living on other side of the conflict.
At times – in given context, an observation in its most objective form causes a conflict. For instance
a Pakistani bowler is not performing well; an observation on his performance by an Indian
commentator would generate a heated debate among their Pakistani counterparts or vice versa.
Things may be different if the same observation is passed by a Pakistani commentator, obviously.
The world of mass communication abounds in surfacing conflicts across political, economic and
social lines in almost all societies.
But it is not that conflict is a natural result of a message, though messages are generally under-
understood. There are ways to overcome such a situation.
Solution
Since the gravity of misunderstood messages in communication is enormous, experts
continue to work on lines to diffuse the negativity in this part of communication.
Best example of this phenomenon is witnessed when foreign offices of different countries issue
representative statements on behalf of their respective governments especially on issues of
disagreements. Though the meaning still differ for different end-users of these statements, they
generally remain safe to avoid escalation of a problem.
Brevity of Message
In case of severe conflicts, issuing a brief and calculated statement offers another solution to
avoid the controversies to get to a point of no return. Fewer words are bound to cause fewer
infringements and a situation is saved from spilling over and generating more confusion or tension.
Ethics
The world is multicultural. This composition of the world is most embarrassing for students
of mass communication for it is next to impossible to address all the people belonging to different
cultures which give one meaning to the words said.
Screening a TV play written and produced in one part of the world (culture) may hurt viewers of
another part of the world where cultural values are different. But within one society the same
problem may exist with same intensity. It is advisable to take care of ethics while composing a
message – which may be writing a script for a play, or even news. Religious and social values are very
dear to people. A message would do a great deal of justice if it abides by these values.