Accounting Information System and Its Role On Business Performance: A Theoretical Study
Accounting Information System and Its Role On Business Performance: A Theoretical Study
Accounting Information System and Its Role On Business Performance: A Theoretical Study
4; 2017
Received: July 30, 2017 Accepted: August 9, 2017 Online Published: August 29, 2017
doi:10.5430/jms.v8n4p79 URL: https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v8n4p79
Abstract
While some researchers did not find a direct relationship between Accounting Information System and a firm’s
business performance, others did. In this regard, it has been confirmed that implementing a proper Accounting
Information System is an enabler to competitive advantage. Indeed, causal links were founded between Accounting
Information System and firm performance. This study aims to review the literature that relates to such links. The
conclusions of the current study are provided and areas for further research are also addressed.
Keywords: accounting information system, business performance
1. Introduction
Some researchers (i.e. Masa’deh, Tayeh, Al-Jarrah & Tarhini, 2015) argued that since the Accounting Information
System (AIS) has been an important concern to the business community (Abbasi et al., 2015; Masa’deh, 2013;
Shannak et al., 2012), as it is not only helps firms recognize the potential benefits from investments in IT (Alkalha et
al., 2012; Altamony et al, 2012), but also improves business performance (Abu-Shanab et al, 2015). However, it is
known that no single measure of performance could fully account for all aspects of firm performance (Ibrahim et al.,
2010; Masa’deh & Shannak, 2012; Obeidat et al., 2013). Moreover, although firm performance has been assessed
using a diversity of measures, there is no universal guideline regarding the appropriate choice. Researchers measure
performance objectively and/or subjectively, where objective measurements depend upon profit and financial data,
and subjective measurements rely on managerial assessments. On the other hand, some researchers used both
methods to ascertain firm performance, which enhances the reliability of their conclusions. Initially, the Financial
Reporting Standards (FRS’s) and Statements of Standard Practices (SSAP’s) dealt with the accounting standards, and
offered guidelines that covered a considerable variety of accounting issues. For instance, public companies are
required to disclose in their financial statements several figures such as the chairman’s statement; directors’ report;
profit and loss account; balance sheet; cash flow statement; notes to the accounts; and auditors’ report. In addition,
analysts use a well-known technique in analyzing the figures taken from company financial statement, ratio analysis.
The main purposes of the analysis of ratios can be summarized as ascertaining the performance of the company,
determining its financial strength, and using them for comparative purposes. Consequently, by applying ratio
analysis, researchers use profitability (accounting) ratios and/or financial (market) ratios.
2. Literature Review
Because Sys Trust was created after WebTrust, there is a lack of empirical research available in that perspective. In
their study of electronic data interchange (EDI), Khazanchi & Sutton (2001) give evidence of the requirement for
systems assurance, illustrating that numerous companies enforcing these systems do not use them to full benefit. This
shows that entities authorizing EDI for their clients or customers should require assurance of suitable functioning.
Results of these studies recommend a demand for trust services. Consequently, it follows that there should be a
positive effect on the business of clients that meet approved trust services standards. Moreover, a study from Havelka
et al. (1998) argues that expression of agreement on measurement criteria for assurance services among providers
and users will enable a more effective and efficient production of those services.
Sys Trust is one of the models to update Internal Control Systems (ICS) of AIS through frame working the
technological variables which affect designing AIS. Due to such nature, much of the practical studies have been
implemented using the principles and criteria of Sys Trust to examine quality and performance of AIS. The term ICS
has been used by COSO (1992) to refer to the risks associated with ineffectiveness management of public companies,
both large and small. Integrated framework of COSO has long served as a blueprint for establishing internal controls
that promote efficiency, minimize risks, help check the reliability of financial statements, and comply with laws and
regulations. According to COSO’s study, ICS is no longer accounting concept. COSO’s report has outlined 26
fundamental principles associated with the five key components of ICS: (i) control environment, (ii) risk assessment,
(iii) control activities, (iv) information and communication, and (v) monitoring. ISACF (2001) considers the control
objectives associated with use of IT. The study is widely known as COBIT. COBIT consists of three control groups:
business objectives, IT resources, and IT-based process. The key feature of COBIT is coming from the fact that it has
developed 36 standards of control related to security of IT-based AIS. The impact of IT formed an accounting
process on the operational variables of cost and productivity, and profitability has been addressed by Casolaro &
Gobbi (2004). The study was conducted on more than 600 banks belonging to the Italian banking industry. The study
concludes with the facts that intensive use of IT-based AIS has reasonable impact on: (i) reduction of banking
services cost, (ii) expansion of banking services package, and (iii) increasing banking profit. Another study was
conducted by Raupeliene & Stabingis (2003) has considered the effectiveness of IT based AIS. The study has
developed a quantitative model based on set of technological, economics, and social parameters.
Boritz (2005) conducts an extensive review of the literature to identify the key attributes of information integrity and
related issues. He brought two focus groups of experienced practitioners to discuss the documented findings
extracted from the literature review through questionnaire examining the core concepts of information integrity and it
elements. Boritz (2005) considers information security as one of the core attributes for information integrity. This
security should cover the following areas: Physical access controls and Logical access controls. The results indicate
that the security has a lower impairment severity score than other severe practical aspects, such as availability and
verifiability. Boritz’s such findings refer to the effective use of security controls in the organizations represented. In
his study, Coe (2005) focuses on the fulfillment of Sarbanes-Oxley act 2002 that requires public companies to report
about the effectiveness of their internal control systems Coe. In this study, it is explained that the American
companies are using COBIT for Sarbanes-Oxley act 2002 compliance, and this is because its objectives have been
mapped to COSO in a publication entitled IT Control Objectives for Sarbanes-Oxley. COBIT also has been mapped
to popular enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, like SAP, Oracle and PeopleSoft.
This mapping and related guidance provides COBIT with framework references and methodologies for auditing and
testing the major ERP systems. But it is decided later to use Sys Trust service to ensure the company’s systems
carry-out business processes reliably. Herein, Coe establishes five-step processes showing how the CPAs can use the
trust service framework to evaluate a company's IT controls when the entity primarily uses the COSO approach.
These steps are: (i) Use COSO framework to identify the risks in each business cycle and the controls that mitigate
them, (ii). Gather initial IT information, (iii) Identify all information systems that relate to financial reporting. (iv) Be
used to trust services framework to create one overall IT matrix, (v) Assess the controls identified in the matrixes
created above. Martin (2005) mentions the same steps in his study, in which he tries to explain how information
system auditor can use the AICPA/CICA trust services framework to evaluate internal controls, particularly controls
over information technology. The participants in the experiment were 481 middle and upper-level managers from a
wide range of functional areas. The study concludes that auditor-provided assurances on information systems
availability security, integrity and maintainability will show significant key effects with respect to the probability of
the participant entering into a contractual agreement with the ASP organization. In addition, the comfort level of the
participant with the reliability of the ASP organization's ERP system will increase. In the same perspective, Mauldin
et al. (2006) investigate the possible demand for third-party assurance reports in business-to-business electronic
commerce (B2B e-commerce) by observing the purchase decisions of 95 professionals' to advise using a B2B
exchange. The experiment uses the 2×2 between subjects design, and varies the assurance scope (system related
assurance vs. data related assurance) and assurance timing (continuous assurance vs. static assurance) with another
control condition of no assurance. The results of the study show that there is more probability of purchasing
professionals advising using the exchange when general assurance over the reliability of the exchange's system exists,
than when specific assurance over the reliability of transaction information exists. There is also a greater chance of
purchasing professionals advising using the exchange when the assurance report is continuous than when it is static,
issued at a given time.
However, the results also suggest that those participating are less probable to recommend using the exchange when
specific information assurance or static assurance exists than when assurance does not exist at all. Also, Meharia
(2011) aims to study the effects of assurance services and the trust in the mobile payment system on how users' use
the system. To demonstrate this matter, the study depends on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The study
finds that the users' intention to use their attitude towards the system determines their real use. Their attitude towards
the system is decided by the apparent usefulness of the system and the simplicity of use. However, the study adds
that the assurance on the security, availability, confidentiality, privacy, and process integrity of the system will have
a positive influence on the users' attitude towards the system, in combination with the apparent usefulness and
simplicity of use. Also, from a security perspective, Siponen & Oinas-Kukkonen (2007) reconcile prior security
research literature and emphasize the distinct importance of accessibility and availability as it relates to
communication issues, like user authentication and appropriate maintenance of data retention. Strong et al. (1997)
also segregate and highlight the importance of accessibility as a determinant of data quality. In particular, they
emphasize the importance of access security and timely availability to data. Likewise, Nelson et al. (2005) argue that
accessibility represents a system attribute that is distinct but similar in importance to the system’s ability to produce
reliable data, although they argue that this impact of accessibility is second in order of influence to the system’s
processing reliability. Consequently, it is apparent that system assurance has a positive influence on system users,
their reliance and, therefore, on their decisions, particularly when this assurance is provided constantly, which is
more suitable according to the present changing environment. In reviewing the literature, it can be seen that Certified
Public Accountants (CPAs) can provide assurance on RTA Information Systems. CPAs are accepted as independent
parties that provide assurance concerning the accuracy and fairness of financial information. Also, CPAs are
well-informed about the subject matter to be assured and the assurance matters, recognized for their independence,
objectivity and reliability (Boritz & Hunton, 2002), and acquire advanced technical competencies (Burton, et al.,
2012).
Boritz & Hunton (2002) aim to assess the extent to which auditor-provided systems reliability assurance affects
potential service recipients' (i) likelihood of recommending that their company should enter into a contractual
agreement with the service provider, and (ii) comfort level with the reliability of the service provider's information
systems. Based on an experiment on 481 middle- and upper-level managers from a broad spectrum of functional
areas participating in the study, the conclusion is that auditor-provided assurances on information systems
availability security, integrity and maintainability will exhibit significant main effects with respect to the participants'
likelihood of entering into a contractual agreement with the ASP firm and the participants' comfort level with the
reliability of the ASP firm's ERP system will increase. Similarly, Greenberg et al. (2012) attempt to investigate the
impact of Sys Trust criteria (availability, integrity and security) on users' intention to use online accounting systems
and their reliability. Based on the TAM, the study posits that the intention to adopt online systems depend on the
perceived usefulness of the system, perceived ease of use, trust in system reliability, and trust in the internet. The
study finds that users' intention to adopt the online accounting system is higher when users' trust in system reliability
and trust in the internet are higher. The results of the study suggest that the reliability of a system, as measured by
Sys Trust criteria, is relevant to the decisions related to the intention to adopt online accounting systems.
Furthermore, it is predicted that accounting organizations will benefit from their long experience of financial audits
and will probably surpass other types of assurance providers in the formal application of non-financial assurance
services (Perego, 2009). Additionally, when providing financial matters, CPAs should follow strict and
comprehensive ethical and professional standards (Boritz & Hunton, 2002). For this reason, the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) considers assurance service on electronic systems a logical and natural
extension to the already present services that the auditor provides (www.aicpa.org, 2007).
Experimental work indicates that there would be demand for both WebTrust (Hunton et al., 2000; Lala et al., 2002)
and Sys Trust (Boritz & Hunton, 2002) in the marketplace. Yet, as Bedard et al. (2005) note, there are a lot of issues,
questions and risks in Sys Trust engagements, and most auditors are leery about delving into the ill-defined arena of
systems reliability assurance. Only limited research to date has looked at ways in which to improve and deliver
systems reliability assurance. Havelka et al. (1998) conduct a series of focus groups with systems development teams
in order to establish criteria for assessing the quality of the information. Arnold et al. (2000) explore the market
demand for graded reporting of systems quality versus use of a traditional auditor’s binary reporting model. These
studies represent the first incremental steps in understanding systems reliability assurance. The domain is wide, open,
and in great need of additional research. While Sys Trust provides some broad criteria that must be considered in
assessing systems reliability, little is known about how to go about assessing these criteria effectively. Given the
major role that IT systems play, particularly in enterprise systems environments, the profession must rapidly advance
its ability to assess systems quality and academic researchers need to step forward in helping answer the difficult
questions that to date present barriers to widespread systems reliability assurance efforts.
After reviewing the previous studies, in this specific area of research, relating to reliability of CAIS control systems,
it can be observed that there are not enough studies available, and this could be due to the fact that this area of
research is reasonably new. In addition, many of the studies in this subject are administered on a small level and
connected with combined studies from the fields of business management, computer science, and at times
engineering. They are often in the form of reports or descriptive studies, and rarely experimental. To summarize,
there is a lack of academic literature on the issues of trust services and its influence on the quality of financial. It
should also be noted that some of the investigations are conducted in isolation, without benefit from the experience
of findings from other studies.
2.1 The Business Performance Concepts
According to the researchers, Miller (1992), Bledsoe (1997), Abernethy & Lilis (1995), and Choe (2002);
non-financial performance provides various strategic advantages, such as quality improvement and cutting down the
delivery time. Non-financial performance was used by Tuanmat & Smith (2011) to measure organizational outcome,
as with respect to product availability, product quality, and sales service and support. Sousa, et al. (2006) also used
productivity, customer satisfaction, and customer needs to assess the company’s performance. Furthermore, Isobe, et
al. (2008) developed a list of long-term performance indicators, including new product and technological innovations.
In addition, there is a growing literature on the use of non-financial measures in the West. For example, in the UK,
Bhimani (1994) and Dugdale (1994) wrote that companies were quite open to the use of non-financial measures.
According to Pierce & O’Dea (1998), over 50% of respondents in Ireland ranked the use of non-financial measures
as very frequent or often. Furthermore, Ittner & Larcker (2003, p.95) looked into implementation issues for
non-financial performance measures, and concluded by saying that “they have become a shabby substitute for
financial performance” and “they will offer little guidance unless the process for choosing and analyzing them comes
to rely less on generic performance measurement frameworks and managerial guesswork and more on sophisticated
quantitative and qualitative inquiries into the factors actually contributing to economic results”.
The shortfalls of outdated financial performance measures have steered organizations towards embracing
non-financial performance measures, nonetheless these measures also have shortcomings. These relate to the range
of non-financial performance measures, and the problem arising from choosing suitable measures, given that there is
no ideal mix of performance measures. Moreover, measuring organizations’ financial performance is intrinsically
straightforward, because there are rules and guidelines that define the financial measures. On the other hand,
non-financial performance measures cannot be subject to the same rules or guidelines. Still, the establishment of
non-financial performance measures should be related to the target settings, and rewards and incentives also need to
be reflected (Otley, 2001). Arguments in support of such subjective measures also include difficulties with collecting
qualitative performance data from firms and with the reliability of such data arising from divergent accounting
methods used by firms.
At the same time, using financial performance as a measure of the success or failure of IS has various advantages
(Antonio Pérez-Méndez & Ángel Machado-Cabezas, 2015). Among these, the fact that performance measurement is
vital to the success of the company because it creates understanding, forms behavior, and improves competitiveness
(Gunasegaran, Williams & McGaughey, 2005). Furthermore, financial performance reflects a common objective of
all the company's IS and/or management processes, which makes it simpler to access their service. Lastly, despite
their limitations, financial data has the advantage of being accurate and objective (Parker, 2000), while intermediary,
non-financial aims are often subjective, since they rely on personal opinions. Therefore, the assessment of
non-financial aims may rely on the job held by the respondent (Anderson & Young, 1999). Branch (2000) maintains
that financial indicators based on accounting information are adequate enough to determine the value for
shareholders. A manufacturing firm financial performance is directly impacted by its position in the market.
Profitability can be decomposed into its two key components, namely its net turnover and its net profit margin. Ross
et al. (1996) argues that both can influence the profitability of a company one time. If a high turnover indicates the
improved use of the assets its and therefore higher efficiency, a higher profit margin means that the entity has
marked market power. Menon & Williams (1994) found out that, objective performance measures comprise
indicators such as profit growth, revenue growth, as well as return on the capital employed.
3. Conclusions
Financial consultants Stern Stewart & Co. created Market Value Added (MVA), a measure of the excess value a
company has given to its shareholders over the total amount of their investments. This ranking is based on eight
more traditional aspects of financial performance such as, total return for one and three years, sales growth for one
and three years, profit growth for one and three years, net margin, besides a return on equity. Further, Verschoor
(1999) draws attention to other financial measures such as value of long-term investment, financial soundness, and
use of corporate assets. Ejoh & Ejom (2014) mention accounting-based performance using three indicators: return on
assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and return on sales (ROS). Each measure was calculated by dividing net
income by total assets, total common equity, and total net sales. However, several authors (e.g., Kaplan & Norton,
1992; Ibrahim, 1999) indicated that although financial measures are important, they are not sufficient for a good
performance evaluation system. The system should further include non-financial measures of performance. Kelly
(2007) justifies this by indicating that firm value is developed through various activities that promote critical success
factors. These factors include innovation, quality, productivity, and customer satisfaction. Also, Gu (2005)
mentioned that such success factors improve future financial performance, in due course. Current summary financial
measures that report financial results, such as operating income and return on investment, are not likely to fully
reveal the long-term consequences of these activities. So, numerous firms supplement summary financial measures
with nonfinancial measures that demonstrate principal value-creating activities (Kaplan & Norton, 2001a, b, c).
In addition, scholars (e.g. Al Azmi et al., 2012; Alshurideh, et al., 2012; Masa’deh, 2012; Obeidat, et al., 2012;
Kannan & Gharibeh, 2013; Hajir, et al., 2015; Masa’deh, et al. 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017; Vratskikh et al., 2016;
Obeidat et al., 2017; Tarhini et al., 2017) emphasize the need for large firms to integrate their IT systems with their
Knowledge Management (KM) strategies and processes in order to survive in their highly competitive business
environments, which in turn could accelerate the managerial decisions as well. Consequently, further research is
required to examine the role of AIS on financial and nonfinancial performance.
References
Abbasi, M.S., Tarhini, A., Elyas, T., & Shah, F. (2015). Impact of individualism and collectivism over the
individual’s technology acceptance behaviour: A multi-group analysis between Pakistan and Turkey. Journal of
Enterprise Information Management, 28(6), 747-768. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2014-0124
Abernethy, M.A., & Lillis, A.M. (1995). The Impact of Manufacturing Flexibility on Management Control System
Design. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 20(4), 241-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)E0014-L
Abu-Shanab, E., Abu-Shanab, R., & Khairallah, M. (2015). Critical Success Factors for ERP Implementation: The
Case of Jordan. The International Arab Journal of e-Technology, 4(1), 1-7.
Al Azmi, N., Al-Lozi, M., Al-Zu’bi, Z., Dahiyat, S., & Masa’deh, R. (2012). Patients Attitudes toward Service
Quality and its Impact on their Satisfaction in Physical Therapy in KSA Hospitals. European Journal of Social
Sciences, 34(2), 300-314.
Alalwan, A., Rana, N., Algharabat, R., & Tarhini, A. (2016). A Systematic Review of Extant Literature in Social
Media in the Marketing Perspective, The 15th IFIP Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society,
Swansea, UK (13-15, Sep 2016) (pp.79-89). Springer International Publishing.
Al-Badi, A., Tarhini, A., & Al-Kaaf, W. (2017). Financial Incentives for Adopting Cloud Computing in Higher
Educational Institutions. Asian Social Science, 13(4), 162-174. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n4p162
Al-Badi, A., Tarhini, A., & Al-Sawaei, S. (2017). Utilizing Social Media to Encourage Domestic Tourism in Oman.
International Journal of Business and Management, 12(4), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v12n4p84
Alenezi, H., Tarhini, A. Masa’deh, R. Alalwan, A., & Al-Qirim, N. (2017). Factors Affecting e-Government
Adoption in Kuwait: A Qualitative study. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 15(2), 84-102.
Alkalha, Z., Al-Zu’bi, Z., Al-Dmour, H., & Alshurideh, M. (2012). Investigating the Effects of Human Resource
Policies on Organizational Performance: An Empirical Study on Commercial Banks Operating in Jordan.
European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 51, 44-64.
Almajali, D. A., Masa’deh, R., & Tarhini, A. (2016). Antecedents of ERP Systems Implementation Success: A Study
on Jordanian Healthcare Sector. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(4), 549-565.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2015-0024
Alrowwad, A., Obeidat, B.Y., & Aqqad, N. (2017). The impact of transformational leadership on organizational
performance via the mediating role of corporate social responsibility: A structural equation modeling approach.
International Business Research, 10(1), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v10n1p199
Alshurideh, M., Masa'deh, R., & Alkurdi, B. (2012). The Effect of Customer Satisfaction on Customer Retention in
the Jordanian Mobile Market: An Empirical Investigation. European Journal of Economics, Finance and
Administrative Sciences, 47, 69-78.
Altamony, H., Alshurideh, M., & Obeidat, B. (2012). Information Systems for Competitive Advantage:
Implementation of an Organizational Strategic Management Process. Proceedings of the 18th IBIMA
Conference on Innovation and Sustainable Economic Competitive Advantage: From Regional Development to
World Economic, Istanbul, Turkey, 9th-10th May.
Anderson, S. W., & Young, S. M. (1999).The Impact of Contextual and Factors on the Evaluation of Activity-based
Costing Systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 525-559.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00018-5
Arnold, V., Lampe, J., Masselli, J., & Sutton, S. (2000). An Analysis of the Market for Systems Reliability
Assurance Services. Journal of Information Systems, 14, 65-82. https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.2000.14.s-1.65
Bledsoe, N. L., & Ingram R. W. (1997).Customer Satisfaction through Performance Evaluation. Journal of Cost
Management, Winter, 43-50.
Boritz, E., & Hunton, J. (2002). Investigating the Impact of Auditor-Provided Systems Reliability Assurance on
Potential Service Recipients. Journal of Information Systems, 16, 69-88.
https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.2002.16.s-1.69
Branch, B., & Gale, B. (2000).Linking Corporate Stock Price Performance to Strategy Formulation. The Journal of
Business Strategy, 4, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb039005
Bromwich, M., & Bhimani, A. (1994). Management Accounting: Pathways to Progress. London: Chartered Institute
of Management Accountants.
Choe, J.M. (2002). The Organizational Learning Effect of Management Accounting Information under Advanced
Manufacturing Technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 11, 142-158.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave/ejis/3000424
Coe, M. (2005). Trust Services: A Better Way to Evaluate IT Controls. Journal of Accountancy, 199(3).
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treaway Commission (COSO). (1992). Internal Control-Integrated
Framework. Coopers & Lybrand, September, 1-4.
Dugdale, D. (1994). Theory and Practice: The Views of CIMA and Students. Management Accounting (UK), 56-59.
El-Masri, M., & Tarhini, A. (2015). A Design Science Approach to Gamify Education: From Games to Platforms.
Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Münster, Germany. 26-29 May 2015.
El-Masri, M., Orozco, J., Tarhini, A., & Tarhini, T. (2015). The Impact of IS-Business Alignment Practices on
Organizational Choice of IS-Business Alignment Strategies. The 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Information
Systems (PACIS 2015), Paper 215, Singapore, 6-9 July 2015.
Gu, F. (2005). Innovation, Future Earnings, and Market Efficiency. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance,
20(4), 385-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0502000405
Gunasekarana, A., Williamsb, J., & McGaughey, R. (2005). Performance Measurement and Costing System in New
Enterprise. Technovation, 25, 523-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00176-7
Hajir, J., Obeidat, B., & Al-dalahmeh, M. (2015). The Role of Knowledge Management Infrastructure in Enhancing
Innovation at Mobile Telecommunication Companies in Jordan. European Journal of Social Sciences, 50(3),
313-330.
Hassouna, M., Elyas, T., & Abou Trab, M. S. (2015). Customer Churn in Mobile Markets: A Comparison of
Techniques. International Business Research, 8(6), 224-237. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v8n6p224
Havelka, D., Sutton, S.G., & Arnold, V. (1998). A Methodology for Developing Measurement Criteria for Assurance
Services: An Application in Information Systems Assurance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory,
73-92.
Hunton, J.E., Benford, T., Arnold, V., & Sutton, S.G. (2000).The Impact of Electronic Commerce Assurance on
Financial Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts and Stock Price Estimates. Audit J Pract Theory, 18, 5-22.
Ibrahim, A.R., Zolait, A.H., & Sundram, V.P. (2010). Supply Chain Management Practices and Firm Performance:
An Empirical Study of the Electronics Industry in Malaysia. International Journal of Technology Diffusion,
1(3), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.4018/jtd.2010070103
Ibrahim, M. E. (1999). Recent Trends to Modernize Performance Evaluation Systems in Economic Enterprises.
Administrative Research Review, 11(3), 91-99.
Isobe, T., Makino, S., & Montgomery, D.B. (2008). Technological Capabilities and Firm Performance: The Case of
Small Manufacturing Firms in Japan. Asia Pacific Journal, 25, 413-428.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9098-z
Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2003). Coming up Short on Nonfinancial Performance Measurement. Harvard
business review, 81(11), 88-95.
Kanaan, R., & Gharaibeh, A. (2013). The Impact of Knowledge Sharing Enablers on Knowledge Sharing Capability:
An Empirical Study on Jordanian Telecommunication Firms. European Scientific Journal, 9(22), 237-258.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992, January-February). The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance.
Harvard Business Review, 78, 71-79.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001a). The Strategy focused Organisation – How Balanced Scorecard
Organisations Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001b). Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to
Strategic Management, Part 1. American Accounting Association, 15(1), 87-104.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001c). Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to
Strategic Management, Part 2. American Accounting Association, 15(2), 147-160.
Kelly, K. O. (2007). Feedback and Incentives on Nonfinancial Value Drivers: Effects on Managerial Decision
Making. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(2), 523-556. https://doi.org/10.1506/Q5X8-5912-W613-0UTL
Khazanchi, D., & Sutton, S.G. (2001). Assurance Services for Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce: A
Framework and Implications. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1, 1-53.
Lala, V., Arnold, V., Sutton, S. G., & Guan, L. (2002). The Impact of Relative Information Quality of Ecommerce
Assurance Seals on Internet Purchasing Behavior. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems,
3(4), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1467-0895(02)00069-6
Masa’deh, R. (2013). The Impact of Information Technology Infrastructure Flexibility on Firm Performance: An
Empirical Study of Jordanian Public Shareholding Firms. Jordan Journal of Business Administration, 204-224.
https://doi.org/10.12816/0002054
Masa’deh, R., Gharaibeh, A., Maqableh, M., & Karajeh, H. (2013). An Empirical Study of Antecedents and
Outcomes of Knowledge Sharing Capability in Jordanian Telecommunication Firms: A Structural Equation
Modeling Approach. Life Science Journal, 10(4), 2284-2296.
Masa’deh, R., Obeidat, B.Y., & Tarhini, A. (2016). A Jordanian Empirical Study of the Associations Among
Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, Job Performance, and Firm
Performance: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Journal of Management Development, 35(5),
681-705. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-09-2015-0134
Masa’deh, R., Tayeh, M., Al-Jarrah, I., & Tarhini, A. (2015). Accounting vs. Market-based Measures of Firm
Performance Related to Information Technology Investments. International Review of Social Sciences and
Humanities, 9(1), 129-145.
Masa'deh, R. (2012). The Impact of Management Information Systems (MIS) on Quality Assurance (QA): A Case
Study in Jordan. International Journal of Information, Business, and Management, 93-110.
Masa'deh, R., & Shannak, R. (2012). Intermediary Effects of Knowledge Management Strategy and Learning
Orientation on Strategic Alignment and Firm Performance. Research Journal of International Studies, 112-128.
Masa'deh, R., Gharaibeh, A., Tarhini, A., & Obeidat, O. (2015). Knowledge Sharing Capability: A Literature Review.
In Fourth Scientific & Research Conference on New Trends in Business, Management and Social Sciences,
Istanbul, Turkey, 19-20 September 2015 (pp. 1-16). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2696924
Masa'deh, R., Maqableh, M., & Karajeh, H. (2014). A Theoretical Perspective on the Relationship between
Leadership Development, Knowledge Management Capability, and Firm Performance. Asian Social Science,
10(6), 128.
Masa'deh, R., Shannak, R., Maqableh, M., & Tarhini, A. (2017). The Impact of Knowledge Management on Job
Performance in Higher Education: The Case of the University of Jordan. Journal of Enterprise Information
Management, 30(2), 244-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2015-0087
Meharia, P. (2012). Assurance on the Reliability of Mobile Payment System and its Effects on its' Use: An Empirical
Examination. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 11(1), 97-111.
Menon, K., & Williams, J. D. (1994).The Use of Audit Committees for Monitoring. Journal of Accounting and
Public Policy, 13(2), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(94)90016-7
Miller, J.A. (1992). Designing and Implementing a New Cost Management System. Journal of Cost Management,
Winter, 41-53.
Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H. (2005). Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical
Examination within the Context of Data Warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4),
199-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045823
Obeidat, B., El-Rimawi, S., Maqableh, M., & Al-Jarrah, I. (2013). Evaluating the Profitability of the Islamic Banks
in Jordan. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 56, 27-36.
Obeidat, B., Sweis, R., Zyod, D., & Alshurideh, M. (2012). The Effect of Perceived Service Quality on Customer
Loyalty in Internet Service Providers in Jordan. Journal of Management Research, 4(4), 224-242.
https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v4i4.2130
Obeidat, B., Tarhini, A., Masa'deh, R., & Aqqad, N. (2017). The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Innovation via the
Mediating Role of Knowledge Management: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. International Journal
of Knowledge Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKMS.2017.10007246
Obeidat, B.Y., Al-Hadidi, A., Tarhini, A., & Masa’deh, R. (2017). Factors Affecting Strategy Implementation: A
Case Study of Pharmaceutical Companies in the Middle East. Review of International Business and Strategy,
27(3), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-10-2016-0065
Obeidat, B.Y., Al-Sarayrah, S., Al-Dmour, R. H., Al-Salti, Z., & Sweis, R. (2016). Cultural Influence on Strategic
Human Resource Management Practices: A Jordanian case study. International Business Research, 9(10),
94-114. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v9n10p94
Otley, D. (2001). Extending the Boundaries of Management Accounting Research: Developing Systems for
Performance Management. British Accounting Review, 33(3), 243-261. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.2001.0168
Perego, P. (2009, December). Causes and Consequences of Choosing Different Assurance Providers: An
International Study of Sustainability Reporting. International Journal of Management, 26(3), 412-425.
Pierce, B., & O’Dea, T. (1998). Management Accounting Practices in Ireland–The Preparers’ Perspective. DUCBS
Research Papers No. 34, Dublin City University Business School.
Ross, S.A., Westerfield, R.W., & Jaffe, J. (1996). Corporate Finance. Boston, MA, Ediţia.
Shannak, R., Obeidat, B., & Almajali, D. (2010). Information Technology Investments: A Literature Review.
Proceedings of the 14th IBIMA Conference on Global Business Transformation through Innovation and
Knowledge Management: An Academic Perspective, Istanbul-Turkey, 23rd-24th June, pp.1356-1368.
Siponen M. T., &Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2007). A Review of Information Security Issues and Respective Research
Contributions. ACM SIGMIS Database, 38(1), 60-80. https://doi.org/10.1145/1216218.1216224
Sousa, S., Elaine, M., Aspinwal, A., & Guimaraes, R. (2006). Performance Measures in English Small Medium
Enterprises: Survey Result. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 13(1), 120-134.
https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770610644628
Strong, D. M., Lee, Y. W., & Wang, R. Y. (1997). Data Quality in Context. Communications of the ACM, 40(5),
103-110. https://doi.org/10.1145/253769.253804
Tarhini, A., Arachchilage, N. A. G., Masa'deh, R., & Abbasi, M.S. (2015). A Critical Review of Theories and
Models of Technology Adoption and Acceptance in Information System Research. International Journal of
Technology Diffusion (IJTD), 6(4), 58-77. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTD.2015100104
Tarhini, A., El-Masri, M., Ali, M., & Serrano, A. (2016). Extending the UTAUT model to understand the customers’
acceptance and use of internet banking in Lebanon: A structural equation modeling approach. Information
Technology and People, 29(4), 830-849. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2014-0034
Tarhini, A., Masa’deh, R., Al-Badi, A., Almajali, M., & Alrabayaah, SH. (2017). Factors Influencing Employees’
Intention to Use Cloud Computing. Journal of Management and Strategy, 8(2), 47.
https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v8n2p47
Tuanmat, Z., & Smith, M. (2011). The Effect of Changes in Competition, Technology and Strategy on
Organizational Performance in Small and Medium Manufacturing Companies. Asian Review of Accounting,
19(3), 208-220. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217341111185137
Verschoor, C. C. (1999). Corporate Performance is Closely Linked to strong ethical commitment. Business and
Society Review, 104(4), 407-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/0045-3609.00074
Vratskikh, I., Al-Lozi, M., & Maqableh, M. (2016). The Impact of Emotional Intelligence on Job Performance via
the Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Management, 69-91.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v11n2p69