Scribd
Upload
75 views3 pages

Dawood College of Engineering and Technology: Quality Enhancement Cell

This document contains a student course evaluation questionnaire for a course at Dawood College of Engineering and Technology. The questionnaire contains 43 questions across several sections to gather student feedback on various aspects of the course like course content and organization, student contribution, learning environment and teaching methods, learning resources, quality of delivery, assessment, instructor evaluation, tutorials, and practicals. Demographic information like full-time/part-time status, disability, domicile, gender, age, and campus is also optional for students to provide.

Uploaded by

akash104
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
75 views3 pages

Dawood College of Engineering and Technology: Quality Enhancement Cell

This document contains a student course evaluation questionnaire for a course at Dawood College of Engineering and Technology. The questionnaire contains 43 questions across several sections to gather student feedback on various aspects of the course like course content and organization, student contribution, learning environment and teaching methods, learning resources, quality of delivery, assessment, instructor evaluation, tutorials, and practicals. Demographic information like full-time/part-time status, disability, domicile, gender, age, and campus is also optional for students to provide.

Uploaded by

akash104
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Dawood College of Engineering and Technology

Quality Enhancement Cell


Proforma - 1

Student Course Evaluation Questionnaire


(To be filled by each Student at the time of Course
Completion)

Department _______________________ ____Course No _________________________


Course Title __________________________Teacher Name:_______________________
Year of Study _______________________ Semester / Term ______________________
Please give us your views so that Course quality can be improved. You are encouraged to be frank and
constructive in your comments

CORE QUESTIONS
Strongly Agree Uncertain Disagree Strongly
Course Content and Organization Agree Disagree
1. The course objectives were clear     
2. The Course workload was manageable     
3. The Course was well organized (e.g. timely     
access to materials, notification of changes, etc.)
4. Comments

Student Contribution
5. Approximate level of your own attendance <20% 21- 41-60% 61-80% >81%
during the whole Course 40%
Strongly Agree uncertain Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
6. I participated actively in the Course     
7. I think I have made progress in this Course     
8. Comments

Strongly Agree Uncertain Disagree Strongly


Learning Environment and Teaching Methods Agree Disagree
9. I think the Course was well structured to achieve     
the learning outcomes (there was a good balance of
lectures, tutorials, practical etc.)
10. The learning and teaching methods encouraged     
participation.
11. The overall environment in the class was     
conducive to learning.
12. Classrooms were satisfactory     
13. Comments

Strongly Agree Uncertain Disagree Strongly


Learning Resources Agree Disagree
14. Learning materials (Lesson Plans, Course Notes     
etc.) were relevant and useful.
15. Recommended reading Books etc. were relevant     
and appropriate
16. The provision of learning resources in the library     
was adequate and appropriate
17. The provision of learning resources on the Web     
was adequate and appropriate ( if relevant)
18 Comments

Strongly Agree Uncertain Disagree Strongly


Quality of Delivery Agree Disagree
19. The Course stimulated my interest and thought on     
the subject area
20. The pace of the Course was appropriate     
21. Ideas and concepts were presented clearly     
22.Comments

Strongly Agree Uncertain Disagree Strongly


Assessment Agree Disagree
23. The method of assessment were reasonable     
24. Feedback on assessment was timely     
25. Feedback on assessment was helpful     
26. Comments

Additional Core Questions


Strongly Agree Uncertain Disagree Strongly
Instructor / Teaching Assistant Evaluation Agree Disagree
27. I understood the lectures     
28. The material was well organized and presented     
29. The instructor was responsive to student needs and     
problems
30. Had the instructor been regular throughout the     
course?
Strongly Agree Uncertain Disagree Strongly
Tutorial Agree Disagree
30. The material in the tutorials was useful     
31. I was happy with the amount of work needed for     
tutorials
32. The tutor dealt effectively with my problems     
Strongly Agree Uncertain Disagree Strongly
Practical Agree Disagree
33. The material in the practicals was useful     
34. The demonstrators dealt effectively with my     
problems.

Overall Evaluation
35.The best features of the Course were:

36.The Course could have been improved by:

Equal Opportunities Monitoring (Optional)


37. The Institute does not tolerate discrimination on any irrelevant distinction (e.g. race, age,
gender) and is committed to work with diversity in a wholly positive way. Please indicate
below anything in relation to this Course which may run counter to this objective:

Demographic Information: (Optional)


38. Full/part time study: Full Time  Part Time 
39.Do you consider yourself to be disabled: Yes  No 
40. Domicile:
41.Gender: Male  Female 
42. Age Group: less than 22  22-29  over 29 
43. Campus: Distance Learning/ Collaborative 

THANK YOU

You might also like