Psychological Influences On Surgical Recovery: Perspectives From Psychoneuroimmunology
Psychological Influences On Surgical Recovery: Perspectives From Psychoneuroimmunology
Psychological Influences On Surgical Recovery: Perspectives From Psychoneuroimmunology
Greater fear or distress prior to surgery is associated immune and endocrine function (Liebeskind, 1991).
with a slower and more complicated postoperative recov- Thus, viewing the psychological literature on postsurgical
ery. Although anxiety presumably interferes with recuper- recovery within a PNI context suggests a new conceptual
ation through both behavioral and physiological mecha- framework, illustrated in Figure 1.
nisms, the pathways have been unclear. Recent work in The model suggests that psychological variables
psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) has demonstrated that could influence wound healing, a key variable in short-
stress delays wound healing. In addition, a second line term postsurgical recovery, through several pathways: (a)
of research has illustrated the adverse effects of pain on Emotions have direct effects on "stress" hormones, and
endocrine and immune function. A biobehavioral model they, in turn, can modulate immune function. (b) The
is described that is based on these and other data; it patient's emotional response to surgery can influence the
suggests a number of routes through which psychological type and amount of anesthetic, and anesthetics vary in
and behavioral responses can influence surgery and post- their effects on the immune and endocrine systems. (c)
surgical outcomes. Clinical and research implications Certain health behaviors may dictate differences in
are highlighted. choice of anesthetic (e.g., alcohol intake), or extent of
surgery (e.g., obesity). In addition, health habits such as
smoking that are themselves stress-responsive can have
direct deleterious consequences for immune function and
HEALTH
/I
nAVE I | It I ",. "~
SURGERY I | I
| ? I " - ~ TYPE/EXTENT I • IMMUNE WOUND
*'
PSYCHOLOGICAIJ
I/
IsuOFERY
SURGERY [FUNCTION IHEAUNG
STATUS I \ ~ - - ~ "---'J f / f
NEUROENDOCRINE
FUNCTION
Note. This figure is intended to illustrate our conceptual framework for understanding the complex relationships among relevant domains rather than providing a
formal testable model. For simplicity, most paths are described as moving in one causal direction, and all possible connections are not illustrated (e.g., psychological
variables such as stress and appraisal may influence the relationship between extent of surgery and immune function). Psychological appraisals of the resulting
physical stressor may modulate immune function and wound healing. In addition, direct connections between the central nervous system (CNS) and immune function
are also possible, through direct CNS innervation of lymphoid tissue (Fehen & Felten, 1991 ).
Wound Healing: Immune and the ability of fibroblasts and epithelial cells to remodel
Neuroendocrine Influences the damaged tissue (Lowry, 1993).
A number of hormones and neuropeptides can in-
Wound repair progresses through several overlapping fluence this immunological cascade (Htibner et al., 1996;
stages (Htibner et al., 1996). In the initial inflammatory Zwilling, 1994). For example, mice treated with gluco-
stage, vasoconstriction and blood coagulation are fol- corticoids showed impairments in the induction of IL-1
lowed by platelet activation and the release of platelet- and TNF, as well as defects in wound repair (Htibner et
derived growth factors (Van De Kerkhof, Van Bergen, al., 1996). Human studies have also demonstrated that
Spruijt, & Kuiper, 1994). The factors act as chemoattrac-
stress-induced elevations in glucocorticoids can tran-
tants for the migration of phagocytes (neutrophils and
siently suppress both IL-1 and TNF production (DeRijk
monocytes) to the site, starting the proliferative phase
et al., 1997). Accordingly, dysregulation of glucocorti-
that involves the recruitment and replication of cells nec-
coid secretion provides one obvious mechanism by
essary for tissue regeneration and capillary regrowth.
Wound remodeling, the final step, may continue for which stress can alter wound healing.
weeks or months. The healing process is a cascade, and In contrast to the generally negative effects of gluco-
success in the later stages of wound repair is highly de- corticoids, growth hormone (GH) can enhance wound
pendent on initial events (HUbner et al., 1996). healing (Veldhuis & Iranmanesh, 1996). GH serves as a
Immune function plays a key role early in this cas- macrophage activator (Zwilling, 1994); among its activi-
cade. Proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 1 ties, it stimulates monocyte migration. GH also amplifes
(IL-1) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) are essential to superoxide anion generation and bacterial killing by mac-
this effort; they help to protect a person from infection rophages, influential mechanisms for protection from in-
and prepare injured tissue for repair by enhancing phago- fection after wounding (Zwilling, 1994).
cytic cell recruitment and activation (Lowry, 1993). Fur- Although acute stressors can provoke transient in-
thermore, cytokines released by recruited cells regulate creases in GH (Kiecolt-Glaser, Malarkey, Cacioppo, &