Percent (%) of functional Child Protection Structures, Groups etc

Kitgum - Agago - Gulu -

Dokolo - Adita
Ibakara Patongo Punena
Child Protection structures with functional Status (N=95 Structures interviewed) Community
Community Community Community
(N=35)
(N=13) (N=19) (N=24)
1. % of structures whose representative of social services (GOV) regularly attend their meetings -documented. 43% 69% 53% 54%
2. % of CP structures whose representative of social services (GOV) regularly participate in their community activities
(mobilization etc) - documented 69% 69% 42% 38%
3. % of CP structures formally registered or recognized by any government - verified 97% 100% 79% 96%
4. % of structures with documented up-referral (from structures to the social services providers - GOV / NGO) in their referral
protocol protocols. 57% 69% 37% 50%
No. of CP structures with Police as an up referral in their protocol 17 9 12 8
No. of CP structures with Physical Health Services as an up referral in their protocol 11 4 9 12
No. of CP structures with Social Workers/Social Welfare as an up referral in their protocol 13 6 5 9
No. of CP structures with Court as an up referral in their referral protocol 9 7 4 6
No. of CP structures with Mental Health Services as an up referral in their protocol 6 5 5 9
No. of CP structures with Home Visiting as an up referral in their protocol 8 2 4 8
No. of CP structures with others CP structures; NGOs, CBOs, FBOs and Cultural Leaders 11 1 5 5
5. % of CP structures with documented Down referral (from social services providers to the structure) in their referral
protocols. 43% 54% 42% 42%
No. of CP structures with Police as an Down referral in their protocol 14 7 19 4
No. of CP structures with Social Workers/Social Welfare as an up referral in their protocol 11 2 19 6
No. of CP structures with Physical Health Services as an up referral in their protocol 10 1 19 7
No. of CP structures with Court as an up referral in their protocol 7 5 19 5
No. of CP structures with Home Visiting as an up referral in their protocol 5 2 19 5
No. of CP structures with Mental Health Services as an up referral in their protocol 6 2 19 3
No. of CP structures with others CP structures (LCs, Local leaders, Cultural Leaders) 11 1 5 1
6. % of functional CP structures; documented regularly meetings, social representative attends their activities, effective
referral systems - registered or licensed 46% 46% 21% 38%
 Percent (%) of Structures that referred cases of HAC to social services in the past year
Adita (N=35), Ibakara (N=13), Patongo (N=19) and Punena (N=24)
 HAC Community No 0-5 Girls 0-5 Boys 6-14 6-14 15-24 15-24 Handled Referred Referred to other
CBCPM Girls Boys Girls Boys by the to Social community support
Not CBCPM Services services – e.g. traditional
referred a by the healers, traditional
VAC case CBCPM leaders, religious leaders
Adita 9 (26%) 13 (37%) 15 (43%) 18 (51%) 18 (51%) 10 (29%) 8 (23%) 17 (49%) 10 (29%) 7 (2)
Ibakara 2 (15%) 7 (54%) 8 (62%) 6 (46%) 9 (69%) 4 (31%) 2 (15%) 7 (54%) 3 (23%)
Neglect
Patongo 5 (26%) 2 (11%) 3 (16%) 10 (53%) 8 (42%) 3 (16%) 1 (5%) 14 (74%) 7 (37%) 3 (16%)
Punena 12 (5) 4 (17%) 5 (21%) 7 (29%) 3 (13%) 7 (29%) 2 (8%) 6 (25%) 5 (21%) 1 (4%)
Adita 23 (66%) 4 (11%) 1 (3%) 7 (2) 5 (14%) 4 (11%) 3 (9%) 5 (14%) 4 (11%) 4 (11%)
Ibakara 10 (77%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 2 (15%) 1 (8%) 2 (15%) 1 (8%)
Humiliation
Patongo 15 (79%) 3 (16%) 2 (11%) 4 (21%) 2 (11%)
Punena 19 (79%) 1 (4%) 4 (17%) 2 (8%) 4 (17%) 1 (4%) 3 (13%) 2 (8%)
Adita 21 (6) 2 (6%) 2 (6%) 7 (2) 5 (14%) 7 (2) 7 (2) 9 (26%) 2 (6%) 1 (3%)
Psychological Ibakara 9 (69%) 1 (8%) 3 (23%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 2 (15%) 3 (23%)
abuse/
Patongo 11 (58%) 5 (26%) 1 (5%) 3 (16%) 2 (11%) 6 (32%) 4 (21%)
Intimidation
Punena 15 (63%) 2 (8%) 3 (13%) 6 (25%) 2 (8%) 6 (25%) 3 (13%)
Adita 25 (71%) 10 (29%) 8 (23%) 3 (9%) 3 (9%) 19 (54%) 3 (9%)
Ibakara 9 (69%) 1 (8%) 4 (31%) 5 (38%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 4 (31%)
Child labor
Patongo 11 (58%) 6 (32%) 5 (26%) 1 (5%) 7 (37%) 3 (16%) 1 (5%)
Punena 19 (79%) 4 (17%) 3 (13%) 2 (8%) 1 (4%) 2 (8%) 2 (8%) 1 (4%)
Adita 16 (46%) 2 (6%) 3 (9%) 7 (2) 9 (26%) 7 (2) 6 (17%) 2 (6%) 16 (46%) 1 (3%)
Physical Ibakara 8 (62%) (5%) 5 (38%) 3 (23%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 3 (23%) 3 (23%)
Injury Patongo 11 (58%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 2 (11%) 5 (26%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 6 (32%) 4 (21%)
Punena 18 (75%) 1 (4%) 2 (8%) 3 (13%) 3 (13%) 3 (13%) 2 (8%) 4 (17%) 2 (8%)
Adita 26 (74%) 2 (6%) 2 (6%) 3 (9%) 2 (6%) 9 (26%) 4 (11%) 5 (14%) 5 (14%) 1 (3%)
Intimate Ibakara 9 (69%) 2 (15%) 1 (8%) 4 (31%) 1 (8%) 3 (23%)
partner
Patongo 13 (68%) 2 (11%) 1 (5%) 3 (16%) 2 (11%) 5 (26%) 1 (5%)
violence
Punena 22 (92%) 2 (8%) 1 (4%) 2 (8%)
Child/early Adita 24 (69%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%) 5 (14%) 3 (9%) 8 (23%) 1 (3%) 2 (6%) 11 (31%) 1 (3%)
marriage Ibakara 8 (62%) 3 (23%) 4 (31%) 1 (8%) 4 (31%)
Patongo 7 (37%) 3 (16%) 9 (47%) 3 (16%) 7 (37%) 8 (42%)
 Punena 17 (71%) 1 (4%) 3 (13%) 7 (29%) 1 (4%) 6 (25%) 1 (4%)
Adita 31 (89%) 1 (3%) 4 (11%) 2 (6%) 2 (6%) 2 (6%) 4 (11%)
Child Ibakara 11 (85%) 1 (8%) 2 (15%) 1 (8%) 2 (15%) 1 (8%)
trafficking Patongo 15 (79%) 1 (5%) 2 (11%) 3 (16%) 1 (5%) 4 (21%)
Punena 22 (92%) 2 (8%) 1 (4%) 1 (4%) 1 (4%)
Adita 20 (57%) 3 (9%) 1 (3%) 9 (26%) 2 (6%) 9 (26%) 3 (9%) 3 (9%) 10 (29%) 1 (3%)
Sexual Ibakara 7 (54%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 5 (38%) 3 (23%) 5 (38%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 6 (46%)
violence Patongo 14 (74%) 1 (5%) 3 (16%) 1 (5%) 3 (16%) 4 (21%)
Punena 13 (54%) 2 (8%) 6 (25%) 1 (4%) 9 (38%) 1 (4%) 2 (8%) 8 (33%) 1 (4%)
Female Adita 35 (10)
genital Ibakara 13 (10) 1 (8%)
mutilation/cu Patongo 19 (10)
tting Punena 24 (10)
% of the CP structures with functional referral system
Adita                   69%
Ibakara                   85%
Patongo                   74%
Punena                   79%