Modified Peek Formula For Calculating Positive DC Corona Inception Voltage On Polluted Insulator

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/333785348

Modified Peek formula for calculating positive DC corona inception voltage on


polluted insulator

Article  in  Electrical Engineering · June 2019


DOI: 10.1007/s00202-019-00797-7

CITATION READS
1 163

5 authors, including:

Amrani MOHAMED Lamine Slimane Bouazabia


University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene
3 PUBLICATIONS   4 CITATIONS    27 PUBLICATIONS   67 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Issouf Fofana Marouane Jabbari


University of Québec in Chicoutimi University of Québec in Chicoutimi
289 PUBLICATIONS   2,798 CITATIONS    9 PUBLICATIONS   51 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

power transformer condition evaluation View project

Transformer oil reclamation by combining several strategies enhanced by the use of four adsorbents View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Issouf Fofana on 15 July 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Modified Peek Formula for Calculating Positive DC Corona Inception Voltage on
polluted insulator

M. L. Amrani1, S. Bouazabia1, I. Fofana2, F. Meghnefi2 and M. Jabbari2


1
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene, BP 32 El
Alia, Bab Ezzouar, 16111, Algeria
2
International Research Center on Atmospheric Icing and Power Network Engineering (CenGivre), Department
of Applied Sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Québec, G7H 2B1, Canada

Corresponding author: [email protected]

 
Abstract:  In  this  contribution,  a  mathematical  model  is  proposed  to  predict  the  discharge  inception  voltage  on  polluted 
insulators under non‐uniform field of a high voltage DC system. The present study is derived from the modified Peek's law 
used  for  predicting  the  threshold  voltage  of  a  typical  corona  discharge.  An  onset  criterion  useful  for  practical  electrode 
geometries  was  experimentally  validated  by  considering  insulators’  level  of  pollution  along  with  the  electro‐geometric 
parameters including inter‐electrode distance, HV electrode radius, and width of ground electrode. It was observed that, the 
proposed  mathematical  model  is  much  precise  for  smaller  electrode  radii  and  inter‐electrode  distances  with  higher 
conductivity of the pollution layer. Since prediction of the electrical onset on a polluted surface is of general interest for 
designing HV equipment suitable for heavily polluted regions in the world, it is hoped that the results presented can be view 
as a benchmark and a challenge for further research. 
 
Keywords: outdoor insulation, polluted insulators, electric discharge, corona inception
circuit parameters along with the thermal characteristics of
1. Introduction the discharge. Different values are proposed from various
The electrical power network aims at delivering a authors. The fundamental shortcoming is related to the large
reliable power to the end users while transmitting bulk array between these values when comes the time to select
quantity of power from various power plants. With the values for a specific application.
increasing demand for high-level voltages, knowledge on From the investigation reported in this contribution explicit
design and performance improvement of conductors and information onto the role of the electric field in the
insulators for high voltage transmission is seen as an degradation mechanisms of the polluted insulators is derived.
interesting area of research. As transmission lines are
crossing several hundreds of kilometres, they are subjected to 2. Background
various climatic conditions [1]. These climatic conditions The electric field distribution along insulators is
also play a significant role in selecting the insulator and attributable to several factors and is non-uniformly
towers performance. distributed. When the intensity of the electric field exceeds a
Indeed, the presence of humidified pollution [2, 3] or threshold value, a discharge is initiated. If the propagation
icing [4, 5] on insulators and conductors may lead to an conditions of the arc are satisfied, electric discharge persists
outage of the line or introduce heavy damage in the power and propagates up to flashover [21]. Despite the large number
grid. Among these climatic conditions, deposition of of investigations in this field, there is a need to analyse and
pollution and accumulation of ice on insulators are major understand the root causes of arc initiation and propagation
factors that are to be considered and analysed [6, 7]. up to the insulator’s flashover. Such knowledge will be
The flashover of polluted insulator is an extremely helpful for predicting the behaviour of insulators and gather
complex phenomenon resulting from the interaction between: useful information to maintenance planners.
the electric field, conductivity of pollution layer and The study of the initiation and propagation of the
environmental conditions. It starts with corona discharges in electric discharge on polluted insulators are still not well
a region where the local electrical stress is high and evolves understood [23-33, 34 - 37]. Little investigations have been
into partial arcs [4, 5]. carried out with the aim of defining precise formulation to
The study of the electric arc evolution and its physical predict the arc initiation on polluted insulators.
phenomenon has been the subject of several contributions [8- Volat and Farzaneh [38] proposed an experimental
21]. Most of these models are empirical, semi-empirical or formula of the inception voltage corresponding to the
analytical. They are based on equations formulated from the minimum voltage required for the air gap breakdown, which
arc (n and N) parameters. The values of these parameters n depends on the initial length of the air gap and also on the
and N depend on the environment in which the discharge nature of the applied voltage. This propagation model also
develops. depends on the arc’s parameters (n and N).
Slama et al [2, 22] showed that the arc parameters, n Several researchers have also worked on defining a
and N are not static but depend on the equivalent electrical precise criterion for the air discharge inception in a point-

1
plane arrangement [39 - 41]. Most of the research has been value using a conductivity meter of Yokogawa type by adding
emphasized on the stochastic nature of the discharge. sodium chloride (NaCl) to distilled water.
Farzaneh [34] and Fofana [35] experimentally researched on
the insulators covered with snow and proposed an empirical 3.1. Discharge Inception
threshold field expression while considering the tip radius A photomultiplier was used simultaneously with voltage and
and the ice/snow conductivity. It is inferred that the threshold current measurements to detect early stage discharge
field decreases with increasing conductivity and the radius of phenomena. These signals were recorded from three
the tip. However, the authors have not considered the effect programs developed in Matlab :
of electrode distance and climatic conditions in the i. receives, visualizes (in real time), and records various
expression. signals like voltage, current, and electric arc as shown in
F.W. Peek was the first to study the corona effect, Figure 3.
although from a very descriptive point of view. An empirical ii. Allows reading the recorded file, reconstructing various
law has been reported, which is still universally accepted, to signals and viewing the data.
determine the critical field of a cylindrical conductor [42]. iii. Eases the determination of the inception time of the first
In the present contribution an analytical approach of discharge and consequently the threshold voltage applied
the discharge inception voltage for a polluted system, to the study system based on the PMT signal.
considering the electro-geometrical and climatic parameters
is reported. This expression is inspired by the corona effect
and is based on the initial discharge that occurs when the
electric field exceeds the threshold value. The proposed
relationship also exploits the Peek's law while considering the
climatic conditions, nature of electrodes, inter-electrode gap,
radius and width of circular electrode, type of applied voltage,
and pollution state. An experimental investigation into the
electrical discharge initiation based on Claverie and
Porcheron’s model using a photomultiplier is reported.
The comparison of the computed initiation with
measured data indicates the feasibility of predicting the
discharge inception using the proposed model.

3. Experimental investigations
The experimental circuit adopted for the present study
consists of a high voltage transformer (110 kV, 5 kVA)
associated with a rectifier. The measuring systems (resistive
1. High voltage DC 5. Study system
divider), current measuring systems (shunt resistor) and a 2. Resistive divider DAQ: Data acquisition system
photomultiplier (PMT) (R928P Hamamatsu Photonics) and a 3. Bushing, PMT: photomultiplier
data acquisition system allowed collecting the data. The 4. Shunt resistance (RSH)
physical model was tested in darkness to ease acquisition with
the PMT. The applied voltage is increased at 1 kV/s using a
HIGH VOLT WSM3 regulator. The intensity of the light Fig. 1. Experimental setup of the DC breakdown test.
emission is recorded with the PMTR928P aligned towards the
laboratory physical model. The photomultiplier is designed to
detect any light emission of wavelength ranging from (185 to U Circular Electrode
900) nm with a maximum of efficiency at a wavelength of
400 nm [43]. The results of the measurements (current,
voltage, and PMT signals have been recorded through a
National Instrument data acquisition system (DAQ) (NI PCI
6251). The experimental circuit along with the laboratory
Pollution
physical model are presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2
𝛾
respectively.
X
The laboratory model presented in Figure 2 is based
Insulating
on Claverie and Porcheron’s plane model [3, 44, 45]. It
D

Plate
consists of a glass insulating plate, which disposes by
spraying a uniform pollution (salty distilled water) layer
having conductivity ‘γ’. This plate is provided with a circular
electrode of radius (Rp) subjected to a high voltage (U) and a L
Rectangular Electrode
rectangular ground electrode of length (L) and width (a). The a
distance between the circular and rectangular electrodes is
(D). It is also assumed that distance between the center of the
circular electrode and the end of the plane electrode is ‘X’.
The conductivity of pollution layer was adjusted to a desired
(a)
2
distance (D) between electrodes and that the latter is at the
reference potential. The expression of the electric field on the
radius of the circular electrode (R) is calculated using the
image method. That is, a charge + Q (at potential U) placed
at a distance (D) from the zero potential infinite plane will be
equal to two charges + Q (at potential U) and -Q (at potential
-U) separated by a distance 2D.

V (kV), PMT (a.u), I (mA)


(b)

(a) Schematic illustration. (b) Photo (a)


Fig. 2. Laboratory model.

0.055

The inception voltage is the voltage value at which a 0.05


light emission was first detected by the photomultiplier.
0.045
Figure 3 shows typical observed RMS waveform envelope
V (kV), PMT (a.u), I (mA)

Discharge inception
derived from the photomultiplier, including applied voltage 0.04

and the current measurement from the shunt resistance. The 0.035

time to first discharge is obtained from the PMT signal and 0.03
the corresponding onset voltage deduced from the voltage
0.025
wave shape (Figure 3b).
0.02

For the third system, the variation of three units of the 0.015

electric arc amplitude (PMT) is taken as reference to 0.01


determine the electric discharge initiation. This choice is 5 10 15 20
based on signal analysis and all the external disturbances are Time (s)
eliminated before luminous activity. A subroutine for (b)
searching the first PMT signal peak, which represents the (a) Real applied voltage, photomultiplier and current
initial light activity, is used to determine the inception voltage. signals, (b) Zoom of inception discharge
The obtained values are compared with the theoretical
inception voltage. Figure 3. A typical waveform of the applied voltage,
photomultiplier and current signals.

4. Mathematical model of the Threshold voltage To determine electric field distribution, Gauss's
and influence of various factors theorem and field-voltage relationships are used:

4.1. Mathematical model of the Threshold 𝐷⃗ 𝑑𝑠⃗ 𝑄 1


voltage for discharge
In this section, an analytical equation for the threshold 0 𝑈 𝐸⃗ 𝑑𝑟⃗ 2
voltage of the discharge based on the electro-geometrical
parameters is proposed. The influence of the electro- The electric field expression on the circular electrode radius
geometric parameters on the inception voltage for the study may be written as
system was investigated. In addition, the influence of 𝑈 1 1
different electro-geometrical parameters such as the pollution 𝐸 𝑅𝑝 3
ln 𝑅𝑝 2𝐷 𝑅𝑝
uniformity on the insulating surface, the distance between the
two electrodes, the dimensions of the plane electrode and the
active electrode, were also investigated. Assuming, the
dimensions of the plane are very large as compared to the
3
The threshold voltage of the first discharge may be deduced voltage for discharge inception has been also investigated for
as: a given configuration (radius, inter-electrode distance and
plane width).Variation of the threshold voltage for discharge
𝑙𝑛 inception as a function of the above said electro-geometric
𝑈𝑐 𝐸 4 parameters and pollution state of the insulator under DC
voltage has been illustrated in Figures 4 to 9.

Threshold voltage for discharge inception(kV)


300
If initiation field is considered as the threshold field of the Highly polluted
corona effect [42, 46-48], then it yields: 250
Moderately polluted
Slightly polluted
𝐾 Clean plate
𝐸 𝐸 𝛿 1 𝑚 .𝑚 5
𝛿𝑅 200

Where, 150
Eai = 30 kV/cm;
K = 0.308
100
Rp is radius of circular electrode in cm;
m1: geometric correction coefficient (between 0 and 1).
Considering efficiency area [49, 50, 44], m1 represents a 50

defined distance X:
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
𝐿 Inter-electrode distance(cm)
𝑚 𝑋 𝑅𝑝 𝐷 6
2
With X [m]: distance between the centre of the circular Fig. 4. Simulated threshold voltage vs inter-electrode
electrode and the edge of the plane electrode. distance for different pollution levels (Rp=1.5cm, L=25.5cm).

m2 is correction coefficient of the conductors pollution, From the above results, it is observed that the
between 0.3 and 0.9 [48] inception voltage decreases with increasing pollution layer
m2 = 0.9 for clean insulator surface, conductivity. It can also be seen that with increasing inter-
= 0.7 slightly polluted insulator surface, electrodes distance and electrode radius, the inception voltage
= 0.5 moderately polluted insulator surface, of the first discharge increases regardless the electro-
= 0.3 highly polluted insulator surface. geometrical parameters.
. This is due to the fact that the electric field decreases with
and, 𝛿 7
increase in these parameters, thus requiring a higher voltage
p is air pressure in cm Hg, for the discharge (arc initiation). Importantly, it is noticed that
t is temperature in °C, with increase in the inter-electrode distance the inception
From equation (4) and equation (5), the threshold voltage is voltage of the Claverie and Porcheron’s system increases.
written as: The plane electrode width also influences the inception
voltage. However, its effect is less important than that of the
𝐾 𝑙𝑛 radius and the inter-electrodes distance. The inception
𝑈𝑐 𝐸 𝛿 1 𝑚 𝑚 8 voltage is much higher when the conductivity is low.
𝛿𝑅𝑝
Threshold voltage for discharge inception(kV)

90
Highly polluted
80 Moderately polluted
Slightly polluted
70 Clean plate
The final expression of the threshold voltage of the corona
effect may be written as 60

𝐾 𝑙𝑛 𝑙 50
𝑈𝑐 𝐸 𝛿 1 𝑅𝑝 𝐷 𝑚 9
𝛿𝑅𝑝 2 40

The above expression will allow determining the threshold 30

voltage according to the electro-geometrical parameters and 20


climatic condition.
10

4.2. Effect of conductivity, radius, inter- 0


electrode gap and plane width 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Electrode radius (cm)
The threshold voltage for discharge inception was Fig. 5. Simulated threshold voltage vs electrode radius for
simulated while considering the effect of various electro- different pollution levels (D=20 cm, L=25.5 cm) with the
geometric parameters such as the inter-electrode distance, simulated model.
HV electrode radius, and width of ground electrode. The
effect of the polluted insulator conditions on the threshold
4
Threshold voltage for discharge inception(kV)
180

Threshold voltage for discharge inception(kV)


55
highly polluted 160 Rp=0.5cm
50 moderately polluted Rp=1.5cm
slightly polluted 140 Rp=2.5cm
45 clean plate Rp=3.5cm
120 Rp=4.5cm
40
100
35
80
30
60
25
40
20
20
15
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
10
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Inter-electrode distance (cm)
Plane width(cm) Fig. 9. Simulated threshold voltage vs inter-electrode
Fig. 6. Simulated threshold voltage vs plane width for distance for different electrode radius (highly polluted plate,
different pollution levels (Rp=2.5 cm, D=20 cm) with the L=25.5 cm) with the simulated model.
simulated model. The obtained results are in good agreement with those
obtained theoretically. The voltage applied to the system
affects the electric field distribution that depends on the inter-
Threshold voltage for discharge inception(kV)

70
electrode geometry, conductivity and potential distribution
highly polluted
moderately polluted
along this pollution.
60 slightly polluted The phenomena that occur on a polluted insulator are
clean plate fundamentally related to the presence of charged-particles,
50 and electric field distribution.
By increasing the conductivity, for a fixed inter-
40
electrode distance and radius, we increase the number of free
electrons thus reducing the electric field necessary for the
initiation of the discharge. The threshold voltage is thus
30
reduced. For a given conductivity, increasing of both inter-
electrode distance and the radius of circular electrode reduces
20 the electric field. For these reasons, the threshold applied
voltage should increase to initiate the corona discharge. The
10 electric field is obviously the determining factor in initiating
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
the discharge on a polluted insulator.
Plane width(cm)
Fig. 7. Simulated threshold voltage vs plane width for
different pollution levels (Rp=1.5 cm, D=20 cm) with the 5. Validation of the results
simulated model. To validate the proposed model, the simulation (SIMU)
results are compared with the experimental (EXP) data. The
comparison results are illustrated in Figures 10 to 15.
Threshold voltage for discharge inception(kV)

160
D=10cm
D=30cm
140
D=50cm
D=70cm
120 D=90cm

100

80

60

40

20

0
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Electrode radius (cm)
Fig. 8. Simulated threshold voltage vs electrode radius for
different inter-electrode distance (highly polluted plate, Fig. 10. Threshold voltage vs pollution layer conductivity
L=25.5 cm) with the simulated model. Simulation and experimental results (Rp=1.5 cm L 25.5 cm).

5
R 1.5 cm - L 25.5 cm EXP

Threshold voltage for discharge inception(kV)

Threshold voltage for discharge inception(kV)


50 50 R 1.5 cm - L 25.5 cm SIMU
D=10 cm simulation R 2.5 cm - L 25.5 cm EXP
45 45 R 2.5 cm - L 25.5 cm SIMU
D=10 cm experimental
D=20 cm simulation R 1.5 cm - L 15.5 cm EXP
40
40 D=20 cm experimental R 1.5 cm - L 15.5 cm SIMU
35 R 2.5 cm - L 15.5 cm EXP
35 R 2.5 cm - L 15.5 cm SIMU
30
30
25
25
20
20
15
15
10

10 5

5 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Pollution layer conductivity (µS /cm) Inter-electrodes distance
Fig. 11. Threshold voltage vs pollution layer conductivity Fig. 14. Threshold voltage vs inter-electrode distance
Simulation and experimental results (Rp=2.5 cm L 25.5 cm). Simulation and experimental results (γ=900 µ S/cm.)

R 1.5 cm - L 25.5 cm EXP

Threshold voltage for discharge inception(kV)


45
R 1.5 cm - L 25.5 cm SIMU
Threshold voltage for discharge inception(kV)

35 R 2.5 cm - L 25.5 cm EXP


D=10 cm simulation 40 R 2.5 cm - L 25.5 cm SIMU
30 D=10 cm experimental R 1.5 cm - L 15.5 cm EXP
D=20 cm simulation 35 R 1.5 cm - L 15.5 cm SIMU
D=20 cm experimental R 2.5 cm - L 15.5 cm EXP
25 R 2.5 cm - L 15.5 cm SIMU
30

20 25

15 20

15
10

10
5

5
0 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Inter-électrode Distance D (cm)
Pollution layer conductivity (µS /cm) Fig. 15. Threshold voltage vs inter-electrode distance
Fig. 12. Threshold voltage vs pollution layer conductivity Simulation and experimental results (γ=400 µ S/cm.)
Simulation and experimental results (Rp=1.5 cm L 15.5 cm).
It is noticed that, the threshold voltage increases with
increasing distance between electrodes and this, regardless
the radius of circular electrode and width of the plane
electrode. The inception voltage decreases with increase in
conductivity and decrease in radius. For a given radius and
inter-electrodes distance, it is noticed that the measured data
have the same dimension as those predicted with the
analytical expression.

Figures 16-18 show the error between the


experimental and simulation results. It can be seen that the
simulation results are to some extent close to the experimental
ones. Three main factors might have affected the difference
between the experimental and simulation results:
- The discharge phenomena are so complex that many
simplifying assumptions have to be made in order to
render mathematical modelling possible. The error in the
inception voltage prediction may therefore be related to
Fig. 13. Threshold voltage vs pollution layer conductivity simplifying assumptions (Peek formula), the influence of
Simulation and experimental results (Rp=2.5 cm L 15.5 cm). humidity, and/or the empirical correction coefficients
derived from laboratory experiments.
- Contrary to simulation, it is difficult to obtain a perfectly
uniform pollution layer;

6
- The discharge inception conditions might have been Fig. 18.The error between the experimental and theoretical
affected by residual/space charges from previous results of Threshold (γ=400 µ S/cm).
discharges;
Clearly, the complexity of an electrical discharge 6. Conclusions
increases as it takes place on a polluted surface. The pollution
Since corona inception is an important phase of the
layer not only influences the inception/propagation of a
flashover over a polluted surface, it is no wonder that a great
surface discharge, but is itself influenced by this discharge.
deal of effort must be devoted to mathematical modeling or
The difference between the simulation and
computer simulation. A mathematical model was proposed to
experimental results is reduced when the radius of circular
predict the initiation of the corona discharge on a polluted
electrode decreases and when the width of the plane electrode
insulating surface, based essentially on the calculation of the
increases.
electric field distribution in the studied system and the Peek’s
law. This model takes into account some macroscopic
electro-geometrical parameters that influence the discharge
inception and development on the polluted insulating surface.
The model was validated against experiments results carried
out on a polluted insulating surface. During the tests, the
applied voltage, the leakage current and a photomultiplier
signals were recorded.
From the investigations, it is reported that the
threshold voltage increases with increasing inter-electrodes
distance and high voltage electrode radius. It decreases with
increasing conductivity. This is because discharge inception
(due to ionization processes) is highly pollution layer
conductivity and electrical field intensity dependant. The
obtained results make it possible to quantify the influence of
electro-geometrical and climatic parameters on the initiation
Fig. 16. The error between the experimental and theoretical of a discharge on the polluted insulator.
results of Threshold voltage (Rp=1.5 cm L 25.5 cm). Since prediction of the electrical onset on a polluted
surface is of general interest for designing HV equipment
suitable for heavily polluted regions, it is hoped that the
results presented can be view as a benchmark and a challenge
for further research. It is also likely to have an impact on
further modelling/simulation of corona inception on polluted
surface.

6. References
[1] S. Venkataraman, R. S. Gorur, ‘Prediction of flashover Voltage of non-
ceramic Insulators under Contaminated Conditions’, IEEE Trans on
Dielec and Elect Insult . Vol13, No 4;August 2006; pp862-869
[2] M. EI-A. Slama, A. Beroual and H. Hadi, ’Influence of the Linear Non-
uniformity of pollution layer on the insulator flashover under impulse
voltage-estimation of the effective pollution thickness’, IEEE
Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical insulation, 2011, 18(2): 384-
392
[3] A. Mekhaldi, ’Etude des phénomènes de conduction et de décharge
Fig. 17. The error between the experimental and theoretical électrique sur des surfaces isolantes polluées sous tension alternative
results of Threshold voltage (γ=900 µ S/cm). 50 Hz’. Thèse de Doctorat d’état, ENP, département
d’électrotechnique, laboratoire de Haute Tension, Alger, ALGERIE,
50 juin 1999.
[4] CIGRE Task Force 33.04.09, ‘Influence of ice and snow on the flashover
R 1.5 cm - L 25.5 cm
45
R 1.5 cm - L 15.5 cm
performance of outdoor insulators, part I: Effects of Ice’, Electra, Vol.
187, 1999, pp. 91-111.
40
[5] M. Farzaneh (Chair), T. Baker, A. Bernstorf, J. T. Burnham, T. Carreira,
35 E. Cherney, W. A. Chisholm, R. Christman, R. Cole, J. Cortinas, C. de
Tourreil, J. F. Drapeau, J. Farzaneh-Dehkordi, S. Fikke, R. Gorur, T.
30 Grisham, I. Gutman, J. Kuffel, A. Phillips, G. Powell, L. Rolfseng, M.
Error(%)

Roy, T. Rozek, D. L. Ruff, A. Schwalm, V. Sklenicka, G. Stewart, R.


25
Sandrarajan, M. Szeto, R. Tay and J. Zhang,.: ‘Selection of Station
20 Insulators with Respect to Ice or Snow - Part I: Technical Context and
Environmental Exposure’, A Position paper prepared by IEEE Task
15 Force on Icing Performance of Station Insulators, IEEE Trans. Power
Delivery, Vol. 20, pp. 264-270, 2005
10 [6] R. Sundararajan and R. S. Gorur, ’Computer Aided Design of Porcelain
5
Insulators under Polluted Conditions’, IEEE Trans. on Dielectrics and
Electrical Insulation, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1995, pp. 121-127.
0 [7] M. Farzaneh, A. C. Baker, R. A. Bernstorf, J. T. Burnhan, E. A. Cherney,
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 W. A. Chisolm, I. Fofana, R. S. Gorur, T. Grisham, I. Gutman, L.
Inter-electrodes distance Rolfseng and G. A. Stewart.: ‘Selection of Line Insulators with respect

7
to ice and snow, Part II: Selection Methods and Mitigations Options -- through a needle-plate electrode gap’, Journal of Electrostatics 92 (2018)
A position paper prepared by the IEEE Task Force on icing performance pp24–30.
of line insulators’, IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, Vol. 22, Oct 2007, pp. [31] M. Kachi, L. Dascalescu, ‘Corona discharges in asymmetric electrode
2297-2304. configurations’, Journal of Electrostatics72 (2014) 6-12,
[8] E. H .A. M. Rahal, ‘ Sur les mécanismes physiques du contournement des [32] R. S. Sigmond and M. Goldman, ‘Coronas Discharge Physiques and
isolateurs HT’. Thèse de Doctorat en sciences physiques, université Paul Applications’, Electrical Breakdown and Gas Discharge part B, E. E.
Sabatier, Toulouse, France, 1979. Kunhardt and L. H. Luessen, United States 1981.
[9] H. Matsuo, T. Fujishima, T. Yamashita, ‘Shape of Contacting Surface [33] I. Ndiaye, M. Farzaneh, I. Fofana and K. D. Srivastava, ‘Computer
between an Electrolytic Solution and Local Discharge on it’, IEEE Modeling of Corona Streamer Inception on an Ice Surface’, 2005 Annual
Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena,
634-640, August 2003. pp 144-147.
[10] H. Matsuo, T. Fujishima, T. Yamashita, ‘Propagation Velocity and [34] M Farzaneh and I Fofana.: ‘Experimental study and analysis of corona
Photoemission Intensity of a Local Discharge on an Electrolytic Surface’, discharge parameters on an ice surface’, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 37 (2004)
IEEE Trans. on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 721–729.
444-449, June 1996. [35] I. Fofana, M. Farzaneh, H. Hemmatjou and C. Volat, ’ Study of
[11] R. Wilkins and Al Baghdadi, A. A. J, ‘Arc propagation along an Discharge in Air from the Tip of an Icicle’, IEEE Transactions on
electrolyte surface’, Proc. of IEE, Vol. 118, No. 12, 1971, pp. 1886-1892. Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 15, No. 3;pp 730-740, June
[12] R. Wilkins, ‘Flashover Voltage of High Voltage Insulators with 2008.
Uniform Surface Pollution Films’, Proc. of IEE, Vol. 116, No. 3, 1969, [36] M. Farzaneh, I. Fofana, I. Ndiaye, C.Volat and Srivastava, ’Corona
pp. 457-465. streamer inception at an ice surface’, IASTED Int. Conf. on Power and
[13] F. Obenaus, Fremdschicht, ‘Uberschlag und Kriechweglange’, Energy Systems (Crete, Greece, 23–26 June 2002).
Deutsche Electrotechnik, 1958, pp. 135–136. [37] I. Ndiaye,’ Study of the inception and propagation of corona discharge
[14] B. F. Hampton, ‘Flashover Mechanism of Polluted Insulation’, Proc. of at an ice surface’, Master Thesis University of Quebec in Chicoutimi
IEE, Vol. 11, No. 5, 1964, pp. 985-990. (2003).
[15] P. S. Gohsh, S. Chakvravorti and N. Chatterjee, ‘Estimation of Time to [38] C. Volat, M. Farzaneh, ‘Three-dimensional modelling of potential and
Flashover Characteristics of Contaminated Electrolytic Surfaces using a electric-field distributions along an EHV ceramic post insulator covered
Neural Network’, IEEE Trans. on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, with ice - part II : effect of air gaps and partial arc’, IEEE Trans. on
Vol. 2, N° 6, 1995, pp. 1064-1074. Power Delivery, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 2014-2021, 2005.
[16] D.C. Jolly, ‘Physical process in the flashover of insulators with [39] J. M. Meek and J. D. Graggs, ‘Electrical Breakdown of gases’, John
contaminated surfaces’, PhD thesis MIT, USA, May 1971. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1978.
[17] A. Rumeli, M. Hızal and Y. Demir, ‘Analytical Estimation of Flashover [40] G. Le Roy, C. Gary, B. Hutzler, J. Lalot and C. Dubanton, ‘Les
Performances of Polluted Insulators’, MADRAS, Vol. 1.02, 1981, pp. propriétés diélectriques de l’air et les très hautes tensions’, Éditions
01-06. Eyrolles, Paris, 1984.
[18] E. Nasser, ‘Contamination Flashover of Outdoor Insulation’, ETZ-A, [41] P. Ortéga, ’Comportement diélectrique des grands intervalles d’air
Vol. 93, 1972, pp. 321-325. soumis à des ondes de tension de polarité positive ou négative’, Thèse
[19] Von Cron, H. and Estorff, W.: ‘The HV insulator as a problem of de doctorat Université de Pau, 1992.
extraneous films’, E.T.Z, 1952, pp1260-1266. [42] C. Gray et M.Moreau, ’L’effet de couronne en tension alternative,
[20] I. Ndiaye, M. Farzaneh and I. Fofana, "Study of the Development of Eyrolles 1976.
Positive Streamers Along an Ice Surface", IEEE Transactions on [43] R928 and R954 Photo multiplier Tubes Data Sheets, Hamamatsu
Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, Special Issue on Ice-Covered Photonics K. K., Electoron Tube Center, TPMS1001E06, May 1997.
Insulators, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 1436-1445, December 2007. [44] P. Claverie.: ’Predetermination of the Behaviour of Polluted Insulators,
[21] M. El-A Slama: 'Etude expérimentale et modélisation de l'influence de IEEE Trans. PAS, Vol. 90, N° 4, pp. 1902 - 1908, July 1971.
la constitution chimique et de la répartition de la pollution sur le [45] P. Claverie and Y. Porcheron.: ‘How to Choose Insulators for Polluted
contournement des isolateurs haute tension'. Thèse de doctorat, Ecole Areas’, IEEE Trans. PAS, Vol. 92, N° 3, pp. 1121 - 1131, 1973.
Centrale de Lyon, France, 2011. [46] F.W.PEEK, ‘Dielectric phenomena in high voltage engineering’,
[22] M. El-A. Slama, A. Beroual, and H. Hadi, ‘Analytical Computation of McGraw-Hill, New York, 1929
Discharge Characteristic Constants and Critical Parameters of Flashover [47] R. PELISSIER, ‘ L’effet couronne sur les lignes aériennes’, Technique
of Polluted Insulators’, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical de l’ingénieur, tome 1, indice D-160,1951
Insulation, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 1764-1771, December 2010. [48] A. Maudit, ‘Installations électriques à haute et basse tension’, tome 1,
[23] S. Flazi, ‘Étude du contournement électrique des isolateurs HT pollués. Dunod, Paris, 1964
Critères d'élongation de la décharge et dynamique du phénomène’, [49] A. Mekhaldi, D. Namane, S. Bouazabia and A. Beroual, ‘Flashover of
Thèse de doctorat ès Sciences Physiques, Université Paul Sabatier, Discontinuous Pollution Layer on HV Insulators’, IEEE Transactions on
Toulouse, France, 1987. Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 6 No. 6, December 1999,
[24] Boylett and I.G. Maclean, "The Propagation of Electric Discharges pp900-906
across the Surface of an Electrolyte", Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A., Vol. 324, [50] A. Mekhaldi and S. Bouazabia, ‘Conduction Phenomena on Polluted
pp. 469-489, 1971. Insulating Surfaces under AC High Voltage’, 9th International
[25] H. P. Mercure and M. G. Drouet, "Dynamic measurements of the current Symposium on HV Engineering, paper No.31.74, Graz 1995.
distribution in the foot of an arc propagating along the surface of an
electrolyte", IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. pas-
101, N° 3, pp. 725-736, March 1998.
[26] S. Brettschneider, ‘ Contribution à l’étude de I ’apparition et du
développement des décharges visibles à la surface de la glace’. Thèse
présentée à L’Université du Québec à Chicoutimi comme exigence
partielle du doctorat en ingénierie, Octobre 2000.
[27] Xingliang Jiang, Ze Xiang, Zhijin Zhang, Jianlin Hu, Qin Hu, Lichun
Shu, ‘AC pollution flashover performance and flashover process of glass
insulators at high altitude site’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2014, Vol.
8, Iss. 3, March 2014, pp. 495–502.
[28] B. H. Tan, H. Rodrigo , N. L. Allen, ‘Positive corona progression over
profiled insulator surfaces near the breakdown condition’, IET Science,
Measurement & Technology ,Vol. 2, No. 4, July 2008, pp. 196-207.
[29] H. Terrab, H. Boulanouar, A. Bayadi ‘Flashover process analysis of
non-uniformly polluted insulationsurface using experimental design
methodology and finite elementmethod’, Electric Power Systems
ResearchVol163 (2018),pp 581–589.
[30] A. Berendta, M. Budnarowskab, J. Mizeraczykb, ‘DC negative corona
discharge characteristics in air flowing transversely and longitudinally

View publication stats

You might also like