Warpage in Casting - A Review
Warpage in Casting - A Review
Abstract— Foundry industries in developing countries suffer from poor quality and productivity due to involvement of number of
process parameter. Even in completely controlled process, defect in casting are observed and hence casting process is also
known as process of uncertainty which challenges explanation about the cause of casting defects. In order to reduce warpage
defects and problem related to warpage defects, the study is aimed in this paper. Many products are made by using casting
process as it is economical and has the ability to produce intricate shapes. So far, casting defect analysis has been carried out
using techniques like finite element method and modulus method to reduce defects. . Casting software can optimize the virtual
castings so that real castings can be produced ‘right first time and every time’.
1
International Journal of Advance Research in Engineering, Science & Technology(IJAREST),
ISSN(O):2393-9877, ISSN(P): 2394-2444,
Volume 2, Issue 4, April- 2015
c. Parting line
Parting line is the line or plane separating the upper and the
lower halves of molds. In general, the parting line should be
along a flat plane rather than be contoured. Whenever
possible, the parting line should be at the corners or edges of
castings rather than on flat surfaces in the middle of the Figure 2. Typical gating/riser system
casting. It should be placed as low as possible for less dense
metals and located at around mid-height for denser metals. [7]
i. Sprue
d. Core design It is a circular cross-section minimizing turbulence and heat
Cores are forms, usually made of sand, which are placed into a loss and its area is quantified from gating ratio. The area of the
mold cavity to form the interior surfaces of castings. Thus the
2
International Journal of Advance Research in Engineering, Science & Technology(IJAREST),
ISSN(O):2393-9877, ISSN(P): 2394-2444,
Volume 2, Issue 4, April- 2015
sprue top should be calculated using mass and energy balance Different combinations of gating system designs and mold
equations, to prevent flow separation in the sprue. filling are carried out to completely eliminate filling defects. A
A1 √H1 = A2 √H2 gating system can be assessed using the following criteria,
Where, H1 and H2 are the metallostatic pressure head at the
top and bottom of the sprue, respectively; A1 and A2 being the ii Mold filling time : The actual mold filling time must
respective cross-sectional areas. be close to the optimal filling time of the gating
system. This can be expressed as,
ii. Sprue well CG1 = 1-(tf actual – tf optimal)/ tf optimal
It is designed to restrict the free fall of molten metal by If a casting is found to have filling-related defects at the
directing it in a right angle towards the runner. It aids in optimal filling time, but is defect-free at some other filling
reducing turbulence and air aspiration. time, then the empirical equation for optimal filling time may
be corrected for the particular combination of geometry, metal
and process.
iii. Runner
Mainly slows down the molten metal that speeds during the iiiIngate velocity : The velocity of molten metal
free fall from sprue to the ingate. The cross section of runner emerging from the ingate must be as low as possible
should be greater than the sprue exit, it is recommended that to minimize turbulence. It can be expressed as,
the runner cross section area must be lowered after each ingate CG2 = 1-(Vingate/ vcritical)
connection to ensure smooth flow. Where, Vcritical is the recommended limit of velocity
depending on the metal: about 1 m/s for iron, and 0.5 m/s for
iv. Ingate aluminum.
It directs the molten metal from the gating system to the mold
cavity. It is recommended that ingate should be designed to iiii Gating yield : The volume of the gating system must
reduce the metal velocity. [10] be minimized to increase the yield. The criterion is
given by
f. Optimal Filling time CG4 = Nc vc / (Nc vc + vg)
Filling time is very crucial in casting as it decides the final Where, Nc is number of casting cavities per mould, vc is the
quality of product. A slow fill gives casting defects while a volume of each cavity, and vg is the volume of the common
fast fill can lead to solid and gaseous inclusions. gating system for all the cavities in the mould.
The ideal filling time is a function of cast metal, weight,
minimum section thickness and temperature and can be iiv Fettling : The ingate size must be small in
expressed as, comparison to the connected part of casting to avoid
tf = k0(kf Lf/1000)(ks +kt t/20)(kw W)P breakage and cracks. When several ingates are
Where tf is the casting time, W is the weight in kg, t is the present, one that is most likely to cause damage
section thickness in mm and Lf is the fluidity length in mm, determines the criteria assessment value.
whereas k0, kf, ks, kt, kw are all coefficients. The value of CG5 = mini (1 – (tgi / tci)
these coefficients can be set to achieve a perfect metal process Where, tgi is the thickness of ingate i and tci is the thickness
combination in specific castings. of the connected portion of casting.
The velocity of molten metal plays crucial role in deciding the
optimal filling time. The velocity usually varies within the h. Validation of gating design
gating channels and the mold cavity. It depends majorly on
gating ratio. The gating design can be validated using the following
techniques,
Gating ratio : Gating ratio is the ratio of sprue area to total i Shop floor trials : Samples are produced using the
runner area to total gating area. (As:Ar:Ag) actual materials and process that would be finally
Where, As, Ar, Ag are the cross-sectional areas of sprue exit, employed. These are observed for surface, sub-
runner(s) and ingate(s). If multiple runners and ingates are surface and internal quality and destructive and non-
present, the total area of all runners, or all ingates, respectively destructive testing methods.
must be considered. A converging diverging system, where
the ingate area is more than the sprue exit area, is to be ii High speed radiography : The mold filling
preferred. This ensures that the metal slows down thereby phenomenon is recorded using a high speed x-ray
reducing turbulence-related problems. [10] camera and observed of any defects.
3
International Journal of Advance Research in Engineering, Science & Technology(IJAREST),
ISSN(O):2393-9877, ISSN(P): 2394-2444,
Volume 2, Issue 4, April- 2015
iii Open mold : In this a portion of cope above casting Warping is an undesirable deformation in a casting which
cavity is cut and a flow of molten metal stream from occurs during or after solidification. Large and flat sections
ingate and gradual filling of the mold is recorded. are particularly prone to wrapage. Wrapage defects may
occurs due to
iv Water in transparent mold : Flow of water in a i Insufficient gating system that may not
transparent mold is a very useful tool. Addition of allow rapid pouring of metal
color marker, oil droplets can help in better ii Due to low green strength of the sand mold
visualization and recording velocities in different iii Inadequate / inappropriate draft allowance in
sections.[10] the pattern / mold cavity.
4
International Journal of Advance Research in Engineering, Science & Technology(IJAREST),
ISSN(O):2393-9877, ISSN(P): 2394-2444,
Volume 2, Issue 4, April- 2015
vi Resisting or assisting normal contraction at B in this eq. is a factor that depends on the thermal properties
local points by the use of gaggers. of the metal and mold material. [12]
vii Increase injection pressure or time which
allows the cooling of the entire part while it c. Criterion function method
is getting constrained.
viii Study of the shrinkage curve for reinforced Criteria functions are simple rules that relate the local
materials. conditions (e.g., cooling rate, solidification velocity, thermal
ix Incorporation of flow aids or flow restrictors gradient, etc.) to the propensity to form shrinkage. Since that
help in the alteration of the melt flow profile time, many different criteria functions have been proposed;
that in turn prevents warping. some were based upon statistical analysis of experimental
x In asymmetrical parts provide blind cores observations, while others were based upon the physics of one
during mold planning and design. of the driving forces. [12]
xi Use computer simulation technology.
xii Multipoint gating system design helps d. Solidification simulation using FEM
eliminate warpage problems by achieving a
high pressure gradient. A FEM based commercial software; ANSYS® is used for
solidification simulation. The output of the analysis is thermal
C. Methods gradient and temperature at each node. The analysis is carried
out in three steps as given below:
Many numerical techniques, including finite element method Pre-processing is used to define geometry, material property,
(FEM) and finite difference method (FDM) etc. have been and element type for the analysis.
developed to solve these differential equations with complex Processing phase defines analysis type like transient or steady
boundary conditions arising from material processing. state, apply loads and solve the problem. It can also be
referred as solution phase
a. Finite element simulation[12] of casting Post processing is to review the result in the form of graphs or
solidification process is one of the best ways to tables. The general postprocessor is used to review results at
analyze the process of solidification. It involves the one sub step (time step) over the entire model. [12]
physical approximation of the domain, wherein the
given domain is divided into sub-domains called as The following assumptions are made for the analysis:
elements. The field variable inside the elements is i. Contact resistance between the mold and cooling
approximated using its value at nodes. Elemental material is negligible.
matrices are obtain using Galerkin’s weighted ii. In practice the temperature difference between the
residual or variational principles and are assembled in mould surface and surrounding air is not substantial
the same way, as the elements constitute the domain. hence radiation transfer can be ignored.
This process results in the set of simultaneous iii. Mould cavity is instantaneously filled with molten
equations. The solution of these set of equations metal.
gives the field variables at the nodes of the elements. iv. Outer surface of the mould is initially assumed to be
at ambient temperature.
Following approaches are given as result of which can be v. The bottom surfaces of the casting are always in
classified: contact with the mould.
(1) Modulus and equisolidification time method, which vi. The vertical surfaces of casting are in contact with
determines the areas that solidify last. the mould i.e. no air gap in between.
(2) Criterion function method, which calculates parameters to
characterize resistance to interdendritic feeding. D. Software
(3) Direct simulation method, which directly simulates the by
mathematically modeling the solidification process. a. Autocast
b. Modulus method DR.B.Ravi [3] also used intelligent assistant for casting
Engineers (AutoCAST) and describes how it assists in
The modulus method is based on Chvorinov’s rule that designing, modeling, simulating, analyzing and improving cast
solidification time, Tf of a casting area is proportional to the products. Autocast software can automate casting design,
square of its volume to area ratio, V/A, named modulus. modeling, simulation, analysis and suggestions for
Tf = B (V/A) 2 improvising while allowing user to control all decision, also
used computer simulation for casting solidification [3,4].
Casting simulation has become a powerful tool to visualize
5
International Journal of Advance Research in Engineering, Science & Technology(IJAREST),
ISSN(O):2393-9877, ISSN(P): 2394-2444,
Volume 2, Issue 4, April- 2015
6
International Journal of Advance Research in Engineering, Science & Technology(IJAREST),
ISSN(O):2393-9877, ISSN(P): 2394-2444,
Volume 2, Issue 4, April- 2015