Scribd
Upload
60 views3 pages

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering: Siruganur, Tiruchirappalli - 621 105

This document outlines rubrics used to assess attainment levels for an electronics and communication engineering project at M.A.M. College of Engineering and Technology. Students can receive high, medium, or low marks in various categories such as identification of the problem domain, study of existing systems, methodology of implementation, presentation skills, depth of knowledge, documentation, results, and conclusions. To receive high marks, students must demonstrate a full understanding of the problem, comprehensive analysis, well-defined implementation steps, appropriate and well-delivered presentations, clear documentation, results that meet acceptable levels, and effective summarization of the project work and outcomes.

Uploaded by

susan william
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
60 views3 pages

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering: Siruganur, Tiruchirappalli - 621 105

This document outlines rubrics used to assess attainment levels for an electronics and communication engineering project at M.A.M. College of Engineering and Technology. Students can receive high, medium, or low marks in various categories such as identification of the problem domain, study of existing systems, methodology of implementation, presentation skills, depth of knowledge, documentation, results, and conclusions. To receive high marks, students must demonstrate a full understanding of the problem, comprehensive analysis, well-defined implementation steps, appropriate and well-delivered presentations, clear documentation, results that meet acceptable levels, and effective summarization of the project work and outcomes.

Uploaded by

susan william
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

M.A.M.

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND


TECHNOLOGY
Siruganur, Tiruchirappalli – 621 105.
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering
Attainment Level
Rubrics High Medium Low
(25-18) (17-10) (9-0)
Identification of Full understanding Partial Understanding of Poor understanding of
Problem Domain of the problem the problem and average problem and minimal
and Detailed and comprehensible explanation of the need of explanation of the
Analysis (25) explanation of the need the project; purpose and need of the
of the Project. project.
Study of the Detailed and extensive Moderate study of the Minimal explanation of
Existing Systems explanation limitations of existing systems; collects the specifications and the
and Feasibility of the existing systems and some basic information limitations of the
Project Proposal feasibility of the Project existing system.
(25) is well analysed Feasibility is not
Zeroth Review

analysed.
Methodology of Methodology of Moderate study of Methodology of
Implementation implementation is well implementation. Steps are Implementation is not
(25) defined and steps to be mentioned but unclear; defined.
followed to solve the
defined problem are
clearly specified
Presentation (25) Contents of presentations Contents of presentation Contents of the
are appropriate and well are average and delivered Presentation are not
delivered with clear with unclear voice and appropriate.
voice, good spoken Confidence level not high. Poor delivery of
language and confidence. presentation with lack of
confidence.
First Review

Depth of Cleary know all the Moderate knowledge in Lack in fundamental


knowledge (25) fundamental concept the fundamental while applying the
related to the project and acquired knowledge for
project implementation
Detailing of the In depth insight is Specified the details to Very less detailing
module/work observed about the certain extent. implies less
flow/block (25) detailing of the module understanding of the
concept.
Planning of Project Time frame work Time frame work properly Time frame work not
Work , regularity properly specified but not being properly specified. Not at
and work progress specified and being followed. Not regularly all reporting to the guide.
(25) followed. Report to the meet and report to the No progress in work
guide regularly. Good guide. Moderate progress.
progress in work
Presentation skill, Well organized and Moderate presentation. Inaudible; several
Attitude and team excellent presentation. Attitude indicates awkward pauses.
work Attitude indicates confidence but not Attitude indicates lack
confidence and enthusiasm. Moderate of confidence and/or
enthusiasm. The team team work. disinterest in subject.
worked well together to Lack of Team work
achieve objectives
Work effectively in Very effective team; Team functioned at Dysfunctional team;
M.A.M. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND
TECHNOLOGY
Siruganur, Tiruchirappalli – 621 105.
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering
software Team members not only minimal level of Members blamed each
development teams. worked as a cohesive unit effectiveness; Members other for problems in
Outcome: during design and concentrated on distinct project; Team spirit
development of the parts of system without completely lacking
system but also went out concern for impact on
of the way to assign other members' work.
appropriate credit to each
member for his/her
contributions to various
aspects of the project.
Ability to engage in Excellent documentation Documentation partly Documentation consisted
effective written of all aspects of the effective at conveying the of little more than (poorly
communication. system including design technical aspects of commented) system code
Outcome: (g) system; Rationale for
design choices, testing
approach, etc., unclear;
Skimpy user manual;
Information future teams
may need to evolve
system lacking
Project Conclusion Good interpretation Moderated interpretation To be improved
(30) (0-14)

Results- Results obtained are good Results obtained are in Results are poor & cannot
Experimental Model & inacceptable level satisfactory level be acceptable
/ Simulation (30) (25-30) (15-24)

Conclusi Results are Conclusi Results are Results Conclusi Results are Results Conclusi Results are
Results are Results are Results Results are Results Results Results Results are Results Results
Results Results are Results are not on and are not on and presented in Results are not on and
not on and presented presented in presented in presented in presented are presented in presented in
in presented in presented are presented presented presented presented are presented
presented are presented Discussi very Discussi very good manner presented Discussi very
presented presented good manner not much are not much are not properly good manner not much are
Discussi very good not properly on on appropriate Project not properly on
manner not much appropriate Project work work satisfactory much appropriate Project work
are not properly on satisfactory much Project Project work manner satisfactory much Project
appropriate Project work manner summary and summary and Project work work manner summary
work satisfactory Project work satisfactory satisfactory is not Project and Project work
much Project work is not Project work is work is conclusion summary satisfactory is not Project
manner summary conclusion summary and and Project summarized work is conclusion
and Project work Project summarized well well not very conclusion not summary and Project
M.A.M. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND
TECHNOLOGY
Siruganur, Tiruchirappalli – 621 105.
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering
satisfactory is not not very conclusion not work and concluded summarized well not very
Project work is work and concluded summarized appropriate conclusion not work and
conclusion summary summarized appropriate very summary Future and concluded summarized
and Project very summary Future and concluded Future appropriate very summary
summarized well not concluded Future appropriate and extensions Future and concluded
very conclusion not appropriate and extensions in Future extensions in Future appropriate and
work and concluded in Future extensions in Future conclusion the extensions in Future
summarized Future conclusion the project extensions in the extensions in Future
appropriate very project extensions in the project extensions in not conclusion the project
summary Future project extensions in not very are not the project are extensions in the project
and concluded very are not the project are are specified the project are extensions in not very are
Future appropriate are specified the project appropriate specified well not the project are are
and extensions in are appropriate specified specified specified Future specified the project are
Future extensions well specified specified extensions in the project are appropriate specified well
in Future conclusion Future extensions in the not specified specified specified Future
the project project are not specified extensions in the project
extensions in the are not specified
project extensions in
not very are not the
project are are
specified the project
are appropriate
specified well
specified specified
Future extensions
in the project are not
specified
Project –Rubrics

You might also like