Synchronous Occurrence of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma and Colonic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)
Synchronous Occurrence of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma and Colonic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)
Synchronous Occurrence of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma and Colonic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)
Synchronous
colon GIST and adeno-Ca x xx 197
x
ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2009, 22(3):197-200
Case Report
were normal. Abdominal computed tomography showed or related stem cells, that usually express the KIT protein
wall thickening of ascending colon and cecum in a length (-95%) and, that often harbour mutation of a gene that en-
of more than 7 cm. codes for a type III receptor tyrosine kinase.12-14
Total colonoscopy revealed the already known ste- Although they are the commonest gastrointestinal soft
nosis at sigmoid colon, covered by endoscopically nor- tissue tumors and can originate anywhere in the digestive
mal mucosa and also a massive polypoid mass (diame- tract, colon GIST’s are relatively infrequent.8,15
ter almost 5cm) in ascending colon, close to the ileocecal
valve. On the other hand, the synchronous occurrence of
GIST’s and other primary gastrointestinal malignancies has
Multiple biopsies were obtained with conventional bi- been rarely reported in the literature.7-11,16-22 The vast major-
opsy forceps from the cecal lesion. Histology revealed ity of these synchronous tumors are adenocarcinomas.9
mild/moderate dysplastic alterations from a mixed type
(hyperplastic-adenomatous) colonic polyp. To the best of our knowledge, the synchronous occur-
rence of two independent malignancies of colon, a GIST
The patient underwent left subtotal colectomy and il- and an adenocarcinoma, has never been reported.
eorectal J-pouch anastomosis without diverting stoma 10
days after.
Pathology Report
Pathology department was examined three surgical
specimens. The first one (total length 60 cm), consisted
of a 7 cm lenth portion of small intestine adjoining by the
ileocecal valve, the cecum and a portion of large intestine.
Grossly, was observed a 5x5 cm cecal papillary mass close
to the ileocecal valve with intracanalicular growth. Histol-
ogy revealed a well differentiated adenocarcinoma limit-
ed to the muscularis propria, stage Dukes A and B1. None
of the twelve examined lymph nodes presented metastatic
invasion. The second (8 cm, large intestine) was without
macroscopic alterations.
Gross examination of the third specimen revealed, 8
cm from the distal surgical margin, a 2,8x2,5x2 cm mass Figure 1. Spindle and epitheliod cells. H-E x 400.
producing from the outer muscularis propria to the muco-
sa with a small ulceration and central cystic degeneration
filled with blood. Histologically, the tumor demonstrated
a mixed cell type appearance of a) epithelioid and b) uni-
form spindle cells (Fig. 1) which stained positive for CD
117 (KIT) (Fig. 2) and CD 34, slight positive for SMA
and negative for vimentin, S-100 and desmin, with a mi-
totic activity <3 per 50 high power fields (HPF). None of
the 12 lymph nodes recovered from the specimen showed
evidence of metastatic disease. The final pathological di-
agnosis of this tumor was GIST of low grade malignancy
with no metastatic involvement.
DISCUSSION
At present, GIST’s may be defined as morphologically
spindle cell, epitheloid, or occasionally pleomorphic, mes-
enchymal tumors, originated from interstitial cells of Cajal Figure 2. Spindle and epithelioid cells. CD117 positive x 100.
Synchronous
colon GIST and adeno-Ca 199
24. Pidhorecky I, Cheney RT, Kraybill WG, Gibbs JF. Gastroin- therapy: the gastrointestinal stromal tumor model. Ann Surg
testinal stromal tumors: current diagnosis, biologic behavior 2006;244:176–184.
and management. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7: 705–712. 30. van der Zwan SM, DeMatteo RP. Gastrointestinal stromal
25. Miettinen M, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal tumor: 5 years later. Cancer 2005; 104:1781–1788.
stromal tumors: recent advances in understanding of their 31. Hornick JL, Fletcher CD. The role of KIT in the manage-
biology. Hum Pathol 1999; 30:1213-1220. ment of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Hum
26. Ludwig DJ, Traverso LW. Gut stromal tumors and their clin- Pathol 2007; 38:679 –687.
ical behavior. Am J Surg 1997;173:390-394. 32. Gupta P, Tewari M, Shukla HS. Gastrointestinal stromal tu-
27. Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal mor. Surg Oncol 2008 [Epub ahead of print].
tumors of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohisto- 33. Weisberg E, Wright RD, Jiang J, et al. Effects of PKC412,
chemical and molecular genetic study of 1765 cases with nilotinib, and imatinib against GIST-associated PDGFRA
long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29:52-68. mutants with differential imatinib sensitivity. Gastroentero-
28. Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gas- logy 2006;131:1734–1742.
trointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. Hum 34. von Mehren M. Beyond imatinib: second generation c-KIT
Pathol 2002; 33:459–465. inhibitors for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tu-
29. Gold JS, Dematteo RP. Combined surgical and molecular mors. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2006; 6 Suppl 1: S30 –S34.
xx xx xx xx x xx