ART20178830
ART20178830
ART20178830
Abstract: Transport planning is intrinsically linked to land use planning and both need to be developed together in an integrated
manner. In developing such plans, attention should also be paid to the future growth of the city. Transport plans should, therefore,
enable a city to take an urban form that best suits the geographical constraints of its location and also one that best supports the key
social and economic activities of its residents.
4. Landuse Planning and Options (Express The second scenario (Master Plans) involves distribution of
Highways Options) population and employment based on the various master
plans in HMA (Core Area, Rest of HUDA area, and
As part of the long term transportation strategy with Extended HMA area). The 2031 and 2041 population
reference to land use is alternative options. Each of these projected based on extrapolation of the master plan data
alternatives will give a different set of distributions for the works out to be 26.9 million and 35.7 million respectively
planning parameters. It is to be noted that employment for HMA.
distribution has been further disaggregated in office,
industrial, agricultural, and other worker’s categories in all The third and fourth scenarios involve distribution of
the scenarios. population and employment based on appropriate
weightages given to factors such as availability of land for
The first scenario (Trend Based) assumes that population development and accessibility by various modes of transit
and employment distribution at the cluster level will be and transport. This approach is termed as land use and
based on past growth trends observed. The outcome of this transport scenario. The land use/transport based approach
method is highly dependent on the available time series data. is based on the underlying principle that the spatial
Cluster level population for 2041 is distributed based on the distribution of additional population in the study area will
trends observed in the 1991- 2001 and 2001-2011 decades depend on transport network options (accessibility) and land
and employment distribution is based on base year data and use (including concentration of population and employment
a series of assumptions. at growth centres). This scenario also helps us identify
clusters with higher potentials for development.
References
[1] Anji Reddy M, 2005, “Environmental Geoinformatics
and Modelling”; Proceedings of International
Conference on Environmental Management, B.S.
Publications.
[2] B.Purushothama Reddy 2004, Director, House
Numbering cell, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad,
The GIS Friendly Environment in Urban and Municipal
Governance – A case study of Andhra Pradesh.
[3] B.Purushothama Reddy and et al 2011, intelligent house
numbering system, published in geospatial today.
[4] D.P.Tiwari, Challenges in Urban Planning for local
bodies in India, I.A.S., Commissioner & Director, Town
and Country planning, Bhopal.
[5] FAO, 1989 : Guidelines of Land Use Planning. FAO of
the united Nations, Rome.
[6] Manual of Land use / Land cover mapping using
Satellite imagery”, Part I and II 1989, National Remote
Sensing Centre, Department of Space, Govt. of India.
[7] National Urban Information System 2006 (NUIS0
Scheme, Guidelines for Implementation by Town &
Country planning Organisation, Ministry of Urban
Development, Government of India.
[8] Prof. Anjana Vyas and Et.al 2004, School of Planning,
Cept, Ahmedabad, can RS and GIS be a policy
instrument for urban local Governements.
[9] Revised Development Plan (Master plan) 2010, of
Erstwhile Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Area
(HMDA Core Area) by Hyderabad Metropolitan
Development Authority, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh.
[10] Thomas M. Lillesand and Ralph W. Keifer 2000,
Remote sensing and Image interpretation, Fourth
Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York