We are IntechOpen,

the world’s leading publisher of

Open Access books
Built by scientists, for scientists

4,800
Open access books available
122,000
International authors and editors
135M
Downloads

Our authors are among the

154
Countries delivered to
TOP 1%
most cited scientists
12.2%
Contributors from top 500 universities

Selection of our books indexed in the Book Citation Index

in Web of Science™ Core Collection (BKCI)

Interested in publishing with us?

Contact [email protected]
Numbers displayed above are based on latest data collected.
For more information visit www.intechopen.com
Chapter

Introductory Chapter: Livestock

Health and Farming - Regional to
Global Perspectives
Muhammad Abubakar, Abdullah Iqbal, Shumaila Manzoor
and Muhammad Javed Arshed

1. Introduction

Livestock comprises a global asset of more than $1.4 trillion. The livestock sector
is important in both developed and developing counties. Almost 1.3 billion peoples
are involved with the livestock sector directly or indirectly. Animals are an impor-
tant source of nutrients in the form of meat and milk. Livestock products provide
33% of total protein intake throughout the world [1].
Livestock is one of the major subsectors of agriculture that is growing rapidly
because of the increase in demand for livestock products [2]. According to esti-
mates, global meat production would increase to 465 million tons by 2050 from
229 million tons in 1999. Similarly, milk production is expected to increase to 1043
million tons by 2050 from 580 million tons in 1999 [3].
There is a vast difference between the livestock sector of developed countries
and developing countries [4]. There are more chances of an increase in the value
of livestock in developing countries due to growing demand, but in industrialized
countries, demand is stagnant. To meet this requirement, farmers should work on
the vertical expansion of livestock [5].
The livestock sector has many environmental impacts. Globally, the livestock
sector is the second-largest pollution-producing sector after the electricity industry
[6]. Animals are responsible for emissions of gasses such as ammonia (NH3), carbon
dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). These gasses are the cause
of global warming and acid rains [7].
The health of animals can be described as normal physiological functioning of
all the systems of the body of animals to achieve the highest production or the lack
of disease. Whenever an animal gets ill, economic issue arises. Livestock diseases
result in loss of production, treatment cost, prevention cost, and a barrier to
trade [8].
In developed countries, any livestock disease outbreak would affect the economy
of the farm and country. On the other hand, in developing countries in case of any
livestock disease outbreak, additional factors like food scarcity, loss of draught
power, and social security are also emphasized [9]. Public health is also an issue
related to livestock disease as many of these diseases are zoonotic. Transmission of
these diseases takes place either by direct contact (tuberculosis, brucellosis) or via
vectors (Lyme disease, West Nile disease, Rift Valley fever) [10]. Spread of anti-
microbial resistance because of the misuse and abuse of antibiotics in the livestock
sector is also an iceberg that we are facing today [11].

1
Livestock Health and Farming

2. Animal production systems

Animals are reared under different types of production systems throughout the
world. Animal production systems are mostly categorized on the basis of capital
investment and outputs. The first and most primitive animal production system is
an exploitation production system, which is categorized by no capital investment
and minimal human labor. Animals depend upon environmental resources and
outputs are highly variable [12].
Animal production system is an extensive production system. This production
system is categorized by minimal inputs and outputs. The survival of animals is
important as compared to peak productivity. This system is a not market-oriented
system. Subsistence farming and ranching are two examples of the extensive pro-
duction system. In subsistence farming, animals are kept to fulfill the need of the
family of a farmer [13]. Sometimes extra products are sold. Ranching includes large
herds of animals grazing here and there. Treatment or vaccinations are performed
rarely in the extensive production system [14].
The intensive animal production system is featured by high input and high
output. Animals are kept in a favorable environment and all the nutrition require-
ments are met. Animals are vaccinated according to schedule. Prompt treatment
of diseased animals is also a silent feature of intensive farming. To get maximum
production from animals is the main aim of this system [14].

3. Effect of climate change on livestock health

Climate change has the potential to affect animal health both positively and
negatively. Climate change can affect animal health directly, indirectly, and by
altering environmental conditions. The direct impact of climate change on animal
health is manifested by an increase in temperature and heat waves [15]. Heat stress
in animals can cause metabolic problems, immunosuppression, and oxidative stress.
These complications can eventually lead to the death of the affected animal [16].
Indirect impacts due to climate change on animal health can be due to change of
microbial distribution or density, the incidence of vector-borne diseases, and water
and food scarcity. For instance, a slight temperature change can alter the relative
humidity and promote the reproduction of insects. These insects can act as a vector
of many protozoan and viral diseases [17].
Climate change also affects the parasitic diseases of animals as most of the
gastrointestinal parasites of animals live only a short life span inside the body of the
animal and most of the remaining life cycle of these parasites is completed outside
the body of their host. So, the life cycle of gastrointestinal parasites is affected by
climate change [15, 18].

4. Impact of livestock movement and trade on disease incidence

Infectious diseases can be transmitted from one host to other susceptible hosts in
different ways like direct contact, vector-borne, and airborne transmission. Animal
diseases can be controlled by decreasing the direct contact of healthy animals with
sick ones. Trade of livestock and its products is a complex process [19].
Although the OIE has set standards about animal health and the spread of
zoonotic diseases, still, most of the livestock trade is based on the bilateral agree-
ment of countries. Two main areas of focus by the OIE in livestock trade are animal

2
Introductory Chapter: Livestock Health and Farming - Regional to Global Perspectives
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91679

health and the welfare of animals. Movement of animals can introduce exotic
animal diseases or zoonotic pathogens [20, 21].
FMD outbreak of 2001 in England is one of the major examples of the spread of
disease by animal movement. The first outbreak of FMD was reported in February
2001 from the North of England. Within 2 months, FMD virus had spread to France
and the Netherlands by the transportation of animals from England. This outbreak
resulted in the loss of almost £8 billion to the public and private sectors [1, 22].
Another example of the spread of disease by the movement of animals is the
rabies outbreak in Flores Island in Indonesia. Until 1997, Flores Island was rabies-
free. Rabies outbreak was reported after the import of three dogs from rabies-
endemic area. This outbreak resulted in the death of 113 humans and 50% of the
dog population was culled. But still, rabies is endemic in Flores Island [23, 24].
Markets play a very important role in the spread of livestock diseases. It is vital
to understand the role of quarantine measures and risks associated with the move-
ment of animals. Spread of diseases by animal movements and trade is not the issue
of any one country, rather it is a global problem. Following standards for animal
trade and global cooperation can help in minimizing the disease spread by animal
movements [1, 20].

5. Political instability and livestock health

Political stability and food security of any country are directly linked. A politi-
cally stable country would be superior to a country that is politically unstable in
terms of food availability, the health of humans and animals, and education [1].
In any emergency situation, migration of people and animals would increase the
chances of zoonotic outbreaks. For instance, during the Gulf War, rinderpest was
introduced in Turkey by the migration of animals from Iraq. Rinderpest outbreak
caused panic in Turkish farmers too, and they started to sell their sick animals in the
markets. This panic approach further spread the disease [25].
Before 2014 uprising Syria was at stage 3 of Health “Progressive Control
Pathway” for FMD. But after that due to lack of veterinary services, that status is
lost. Vaccination of animal herds against brucellosis was also impeded by this revolt
which resulted in a marked increase in brucellosis incidence in the human popula-
tion [26]. In 2014, political instability in Nigeria became one of the reasons for the
re-emergence of H5N1 in poultry. Because of improper control strategies, H5N1
outbreaks were also documented in the next 2 years from neighboring countries [1].

6. The social effects of livestock diseases

The diseases of livestock can affect the community at different levels varying
from an individual farmer to a multinational food chain. Due to livestock disease in
any area, society would be affected either directly or indirectly. A direct effect of
livestock disease includes the zoonotic aspect and possible morbidity and mortality
due to these zoonotic pathogens. An indirect effect of livestock diseases includes
financial burden and social and indirect health consequences [27].
In developing countries, livestock farming is not only their business but the way
of their life. Livestock diseases in developing countries where most of the livestock
is kept under subsistence farming can seriously affect the social norms [28]. The
decrease in livestock production would affect the total income of farmers and hence
living standards. Indirect health consequences due to animal disease include stress,

3
Livestock Health and Farming

anxiety, and depression to livestock producers [29]. For example, culling of animals
due to the outbreak of bovine spongiform encephalitis in Canada resulted in stress
and guilt feeling in owners of those animals. Many of these livestock owners were
keeping inherited herd [27].

7. Role of biosecurity in livestock farming

Biosecurity at the farm level involves all the steps taken to limit the entry of
pathogens and the spread of disease at the farm. Biosecurity applies to both contact
of farm animals with other live animal and indirect contact with any contaminated
vehicle or equipment [30]. External biosecurity measures are those that are used to
decrease the chances of entry of pathogens into a farm. Internal biosecurity includes
steps taken to prevent the spread of disease to healthy animals within a farm from
diseased animals [31].
Enforcement of biosecurity at every farm and country border is a global respon-
sibility for combating threats like food security and animal and human diseases.
Good farm biosecurity can play a vital role in minimizing the outbreaks of both
endemic and exotic diseases [32].
Farm biosecurity is based on four principles. The first is limiting the introduc-
tion of new animals in the herd and adopting quarantine measures. The second
biosecurity principle is controlled movements of people and vehicle and equipment
hygiene. The provision of feed and water that is free from pathogenic contamina-
tion is the third principle. The fourth principle is the regular vaccination of animals
against endemic diseases along with accurate surveillance and reporting of trans-
boundary animal diseases [33].

8. Conclusion

Animal health is directly linked to food security. Now the world should accept
the fact that animal diseases are not a problem of any specific country or region,
rather they are global issues. Developing countries should adopt the international
standard for the trade of animals and augment the disease surveillance system. For
a better future of the world, decision-makers should turn their attention toward the
food-producing system and epizootics.

Author details

Muhammad Abubakar*, Abdullah Iqbal, Shumaila Manzoor

and Muhammad Javed Arshed
National Veterinary Laboratory, Pakistan

*Address all correspondence to: [email protected]

© 2020 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.

4
Introductory Chapter: Livestock Health and Farming - Regional to Global Perspectives
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91679

References

[1] Lubroth J, Idrissi AE, Myers L, [8] Ducrot C, Bedhom B, Béringue V,

Hasibra M, Black P, Burgeon D. Linking Coulon J-B, Fourichon C, Guérin J-L,
animal diseases and social instability. et al. Issues and special features of
Revue Scientifique Et Technique animal health research. Veterinary
De LOIE. 2017;36(2):445-457. DOI: Research. 2011;42(1):96. DOI:
10.20506/rst.36.2.2665 10.1186/1297-9716-42-96

[2] Thornton PK. Livestock production: [9] Rich KM, Perry BD. The

Recent trends, future prospects. economic and poverty impacts
Philosophical Transactions of the of animal diseases in developing
Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences. countries: New roles, new demands
2010;365(1554):2853-2867. DOI: for economics and epidemiology.
10.1098/rstb.2010.0134 Preventive Veterinary Medicine.
2011;101(3-4):133-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.
[3] Dopelt K, Radon P, Davidovitch N. prevetmed.2010.08.002
Environmental effects of the livestock
industry: The relationship between [10] Tomley FM, Shirley MW. Livestock
knowledge, attitudes, and behavior infectious diseases and zoonoses.
among students in Israel. International Philosophical Transactions of the
Journal of Environmental Research and Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences.
Public Health. 2019;16(8):1359. DOI: 2009;364(1530):2637-2642. DOI:
10.3390/ijerph16081359 10.1098/rstb.2009.0133

[4] Morand S. Impact of climate change [11] Ayukekbong JA, Ntemgwa M,

on livestock disease occurrences. In: Atabe AN. The threat of antimicrobial
Climate Change Impact on Livestock: resistance in developing countries:
Adaptation and Mitigation. New Causes and control strategies.
Delhi: Springer; 2015:113-122. DOI: Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection
10.1007/978-81-322-2265-1_8 Control. 2017;6(1). DOI: 10.1186/
s13756-017-0208-x
[5] Reynolds LP, Wulster-Radcliffe MC,
[12] Pingali PL. From subsistence to
Aaron DK, Davis TA. Importance of
commercial production systems: The
animals in agricultural sustainability
transformation of Asian agriculture.
and food security. The Journal of
American Journal of Agricultural
Nutrition. 2015;145(7):1377-1379. DOI:
Economics. 1997;79(2):628-634. DOI:
10.3945/jn.115.212217
10.2307/1244162

[6] Grossi G, Goglio P, Vitali A, [13] Temple D, Manteca X, Velarde A,

Williams AG. Livestock and climate Dalmau A. Assessment of animal
change: Impact of livestock on climate welfare through behavioural parameters
and mitigation strategies. Animal in Iberian pigs in intensive and extensive
Frontiers. 2018;9(1):69-76. DOI: conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour
10.1093/af/vfy034 Science. 2011;131(1-2):29-39. DOI:
10.1016/j.applanim.2011.01.013
[7] Rojas-Downing MM, Nejadhashemi
AP, Harrigan T, Woznicki SA. Climate [14] Castel JM, Mena Y, Delgado-
change and livestock: Impacts, Pertı́ñez M, Camúñez J, Basulto J,
adaptation, and mitigation. Climate Caravaca F, et al. Characterization of
Risk Management. 2017;16:145-163. semi-extensive goat production Systems
DOI: 10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001 in Southern Spain. Small Ruminant

5
Livestock Health and Farming

Research. 2003;47(2):133-143. DOI: Economics. 2003;9(4):449-465. DOI:

10.1016/s0921-4488(02)00250-x 10.5367/000000003322663221

[15] Lacetera N. Impact of climate [23] Wera E, Mourits MCM,

change on animal health and welfare. Hogeveen H. Uptake of rabies control
Animal Frontiers. 2018;9(1):26-31. DOI: measures by dog owners in Flores
10.1093/af/vfy030 Island, Indonesia. PLoS Neglected
Tropical Diseases. 2015;9(3). DOI:
[16] Akbarian A, Michiels J, Degroote J, 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003589
Majdeddin M, Golian A, Smet SD.
Association between heat stress [24] Putra AAG, Hampson K, Girardi J,
and oxidative stress in poultry; Hiby E, Knobel D, Mardiana W, et al.
mitochondrial dysfunction and dietary Response to a Rabies Epidemic, Bali,
interventions with phytochemicals. Indonesia, 2008-2011. Emerging
Journal of Animal Science and Infectious Diseases. 2013;19(4):648-651.
Biotechnology. 2016;7(1). DOI: 10.1186/ DOI: 10.3201/eid1904.120380
s40104-016-0097-5
[25] Food and Agriculture Organization
[17] Bernabucci U. Climate change: of the United Nations (FAO).
Impact on livestock and how can we The impact of political and social
adapt. Animal Frontiers. 2019;9(1):3-5. instability on animal health. FAO
DOI: 10.1093/af/vfy039 Animal Production and Health Papers.
2002;153:47
[18] Rust JM. The impact of climate
change on extensive and intensive [26] Food and Agriculture Organization
livestock production systems. Animal of the United Nations (FAO). FAO/OIE
Frontiers. 2018;9(1):20-25. DOI: progressive control pathway for foot and
10.1093/af/vfy028 mouth disease. 2011. Available from:
www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/
[19] Bate AM, Jones G, Kleczkowski A, eufmd/docs/PCP/PCP_Guidelines_
Naylor R, Timmis J, White PCL, et al. Eng_2012web.pdf [Accessed: 08 January
Livestock disease management for 2020]
trading across different regulatory
regimes. EcoHealth. 2018;15(2):302-316. [27] Evans B. The social and political
DOI: 10.1007/s10393-018-1312-y impact of animal diseases. Veterinaria
Italiana. 2006;42(4):399-406
[20] Perry BD, Grace D, Sones K. Current
drivers and future directions of global [28] Kaplan M. Social effects of
livestock disease dynamics. Proceedings animal diseases in developing
of the National Academy of Sciences. countries. Bulletin of the Atomic
2011;110(52):20871-20877. DOI: Scientists. 1966;22(9):15-21. DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1012953108 10.1080/00963402.1966.11454985

[21] Brooks-Pollock E, Jong MD, [29] Crimes D, Enticott G. Assessing

Keeling M, Klinkenberg D, Wood J. the social and psychological impacts
Eight challenges in modelling infectious of endemic animal disease amongst
livestock diseases. Epidemics. 2015;10: farmers. Frontiers in Veterinary
1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2014.08.005 Science. 2019;6. DOI: 10.3389/
fvets.2019.00342
[22] Blake A, Sinclair MT,
Sugiyarto G. Quantifying the impact [30] Robertson ID. Disease control,
of foot and mouth disease on tourism prevention and on-farm biosecurity:
and the UK economy. Tourism The role of veterinary epidemiology.

6
Introductory Chapter: Livestock Health and Farming - Regional to Global Perspectives
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91679

Engineering. 2020;6(1):20-25. DOI:

10.1016/j.eng.2019.10.004

[31] Brennan M, Kemp R, Christley R.

Direct and indirect contacts between
cattle farms in north-West England.
Preventive Veterinary Medicine.
2008;84(3-4):242-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.
prevetmed.2007.12.009

[32] Nöremark M, Sternberg-Lewerin S.

On-farm biosecurity as perceived by
professionals visiting Swedish farms. Acta
Veterinaria Scandinavica. 2014;56(1).
DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-56-28

[33] Higgins V, Bryant M,

Hernández-Jover M, Rast L,
Mcshane C. Devolved responsibility
and on-farm biosecurity: Practices of
biosecure farming care in livestock
production. Sociologia Ruralis;
2016;58(1):20-39. DOI: 10.1111/
soru.12155