Loop Diagram - 1
Loop Diagram - 1
Here we see that the P&ID didn’t show us all the instruments in this control
“loop.” Not only do we have two transmitters, a controller, and a valve; we also
have two signal transducers. Transducer 42a modifies the flow transmitter’s
signal before it goes into the controller, and transducer 42b converts the
electronic 4 to 20 mA signal into a pneumatic 3 to 15 PSI air pressure signal.
Each instrument “bubble” in a loop diagram represents an individual device,
with its own terminals for connecting wires.
Note that dashed lines now represent individual copper wires instead of whole
cables. Electrical terminals where these wires connect to are represented by
squares with numbers in them. Fluid ports on instruments are also
represented by labeled squares. Cable numbers, wire colors, junction block
numbers, panel identification, and even grounding points are all shown in loop
diagrams.
The only type of diagram for this system more detailed than a loop diagram
would be an electronic schematic diagram for an individual instrument, which
of course would only show details pertaining to that one instrument. Thus, the
loop diagram is the most detailed form of diagram for a control system as a
whole, and as such it must contain all details omitted by PFDs and P&IDs
alike.
To the novice it may seem excessive to include such trivia as wire colors in a
loop diagram. To the experienced instrument technician who has had to work
on systems lacking such documented detail, this information is highly valued.
The more detail you put into a loop diagram, the easier it makes the inevitable
job of maintaining that system at some later date. When a loop diagram
shows you exactly what wire color to expect at exactly what point in an
instrumentation system, and exactly what terminal that wire should connect to,
it becomes much easier to proceed with any troubleshooting, calibration, or
upgrade task.
Loop diagrams are fairly constrained in their layout as per the ISA 5.1
standard. Field instruments are always placed on the left-hand side, while
control-panel or control-room instruments must be located on the right-hand
side. Text describing instrument tags, ranges, and notes are always placed on
the bottom.
Unlike PFDs and P&IDs where component layout is largely left to the whim of
the designer drawing the diagram, loop sheets offer little room for creativity.
This is intentional, as creativity and readability are mutually exclusive in cases
where there is an immense amount of technical detail embedded in a
diagram. It is simply easier to find details you’re looking for when you know
exactly where they ought to be.
You can use the same input-versus-output test procedure to verify the proper
operation of a pneumatic (3 to 15 PSI) level transmitter or an analog
electronic (4 to 20 mA) flow transmitter or a digital (fieldbus) temperature
transmitter alike. Each and every instrument has an input and an output, and
there is always a predictable (and testable) correlation from one to the other.
Another interesting detail seen on this loop diagram is the direction of action
of each instrument. You will notice a box and arrow (pointing either up or
down) next to each instrument bubble. An “up” arrow (↑) represents a direct-
acting instrument: one whose output signal increases as the input stimulus
increases. A “down” arrow (↓) represents a reverse-acting instrument: one
whose output signal decreases as the input stimulus increases. All the
instruments in this loop are direct-acting with the exception of the pressure
differential transmitter PDT-42:
Here, the “down” arrow tells us the transmitter will output a full-range signal
(20 mA) when it senses zero differential pressure, and a 0% signal (4 mA)
when sensing a full 200 PSI differential. While this calibration may seem
confusing and unwarranted, it serves a definite purpose in this particular
control system.