0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views39 pages

Intro. To Aerospace Eng. Design

The document outlines the process of aerospace engineering design. It discusses gathering information through methods like literature reviews, surveys, interviews and focus groups to define problems and user needs. It then covers analyzing this information to establish objectives, constraints and functional requirements. Various tools for conceptual design are presented like morphological charts and pairwise comparison to generate and evaluate design alternatives. The process concludes with refining, optimizing and documenting the best solution.

Uploaded by

Auston Matthews
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views39 pages

Intro. To Aerospace Eng. Design

The document outlines the process of aerospace engineering design. It discusses gathering information through methods like literature reviews, surveys, interviews and focus groups to define problems and user needs. It then covers analyzing this information to establish objectives, constraints and functional requirements. Various tools for conceptual design are presented like morphological charts and pairwise comparison to generate and evaluate design alternatives. The process concludes with refining, optimizing and documenting the best solution.

Uploaded by

Auston Matthews
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 39

Intro.

To Aerospace
Eng. Design

• Design process
outline

• Summary
• A design process flow chart
• How to design
• Formal methods of design
• Gathering information
• Analyzing information
• Obtaining feedback

January 25, 2019 | 2


What is the process of design

• Design can be viewed as process whereby a problem is solved


with increasing levels of refinement and specificity.
• We may begin with a list of the client’s desires (and user
needs).
• We progress towards a clearly defined plan for fabrication and
implementation.
• This is largely done by asking questions, and knowing how (or
where) to find the answers.

January 25, 2019 | 3


Summary

1. Clarify and establish the client’s objectives.


2. Identify the constraints that govern the designs.
3. Establish the functions that a design must perform.
4. Determine the means by which these functions can be
performed.
5. Establish the formal requirements of the design.
6. Develop design alternatives

January 25, 2019 | 4


Summary (Cont.)

7. Model and analyze the design to test and evaluate the design
against the objectives and constraints.
8. Refine and optimize the design to produce the “best”
solution.
9. Document and communicate the design for fabrication.

January 25, 2019 | 5


A design process flow chart

January 25, 2019 | 6


Case study

January 25, 2019 | 7


Problem definition

The steps required to complete the problem definition process


January 25, 2019 | 8
Conceptual design

January 25, 2019 | 9


Preliminary design

The steps required to complete the preliminary design process resulting


in the assignment of primary design attributes

January 25, 2019 | 10


Detailed design

The steps required to complete the detailed design process


where the remaining attributes are defined.

January 25, 2019 | 11


Design communication

The final step is to communicate the design to he client in an appropriate format

January 25, 2019 | 12


Iterative process with feedback

January 25, 2019 | 13


Strategy of least commitment

• During the conceptual design phase, it is important to generate


as many candidate as possible before reducing the choices to
one chosen design.
• It is a good practice to defer the selection of a chosen design
until al design choices have been evaluated.
• In effect, you should be equally uncommitted to all deign
option until you are able to fully compare all your options.

January 25, 2019 | 14


Divide and conquer

• When dealing with a large and complicated design problem, it


is often effective to break it down into smaller sub-problems.
• It is likely easier to solve a sequence of smaller problems and
recombine your solution in the end.

January 25, 2019 | 15


Objective trees

• To better understand the client’s problem, we will devise a


hierarchical list or graph of the client’s objectives or goals.
• Similar to our breakdown of tasks in a WBS, we will present
the objectives either as a tree or outline, with higher
abstraction at the top-most level.

January 25, 2019 | 16


Objective tree (Ladder)

Source: “Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction, 4th ed.,


Clive L. Dym et al, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2014
January 25, 2019 | 17
Objective tree (Juice container)

Source: “Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction, 4th ed.,


Clive L. Dym et al, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2014
January 25, 2019 | 18
Pairwise comparison charts

• To rank the relative importance of our design objectives, we


will use tools such as Pairwise Comparison Charts (PCC) to
objectively compare our objectives.
• This is done by forming a matrix of all the design objectives
and comparing them against one another in pairs.
• By assigning an order of importance for each pair, we can
form a score that indicates a more objective ranking.

January 25, 2019 | 19


PCC (ladder design)

Source: “Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction, 4th ed.,


Clive L. Dym et al, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2014

January 25, 2019 | 20


PCC (juice container)

Source: “Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction, 4th ed.,


Clive L. Dym et al, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2014

January 25, 2019 | 21


Establishing metrics

• Prior to generating any design ideas, we will need to establish


a fair and objective method for establishing the satisfaction of
a design objective.
• For many objectives, this metric will depend upon a score
using a scale.
• The score
• may be derived from values that we can calculate directly
• Be based upon a rubric applied in an objective manner
• An important characteristic of any metric is that it is
repeatable and unambiguous.

January 25, 2019 | 22


Scales for awarding points

Source: “Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction, 4th ed.,


Clive L. Dym et al, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2014
January 25, 2019 | 23
Objective tree and constraints

A combined objectives (rectangles) and constraints (Ovals)


Source: “Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction, 4th ed.,
Clive L. Dym et al, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2014
January 25, 2019 | 24
Functional analysis

• A functional analysis is used to identify what it is that a design


must do.
• One method for doing this is the so-called “black box”
approach, in which the inputs and outputs that cross the
boundaries of the device are considered.
• By assessing the flow of energy, information, or material from
input to output, we can assign a function to the black box to
make this occur.

January 25, 2019 | 25


Function analysis (Power drill)

January 25, 2019 | 26


Performance specification method

• To assist in the development of design requirements, we


develop solution-independent specifications of design
attributes and performance.
• Performance specifications provide values or numbers to
attach to a design requirement.
• Using models, simulation, and testing we will be able to
evaluate a design for satisfaction of the design requirements.

January 25, 2019 | 27


Morphological chart

• A morphological chart is used to identify ways or means by


which a function could be made to occur.
• Functions are expressed as verb-noun action pairs, while
means are specific ways in energy can be converted, material
moved, or information processed.
• A morph chart is a matrix for visualization and comparing all
possible means to obtain a function.
• Conceptual design ideas can then be constructed by selecting
different combinations of means.
• This allows for a structured exploration of the design space.

January 25, 2019 | 28


Function-means (lighter)

Functions (rectangles) and Means (trapezoid)


Source: “Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction, 4th ed.,
January 25, 2019 | 29
Clive L. Dym et al, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2014
Literature review

• A literature review is a classical method for researching what


has been done in the past to solve this or similar problems.
• For example, we can search patents, technical literature, and
vendor publications.
• This may be useful for refining the problem definition or idea
generation.
• During detail design, we may need to research applicable
codes or standards, look up material properties, or use
engineering handbooks.

January 25, 2019 | 30


Survey and focus groups

• To determine the needs of the user, we may conduct user


surveys or questionnaires as par of our market research.
• Surveys may also be used to gather information from the client
or other stakeholders to better define the problem.
• Market research may also use focus groups to test design
alternatives, or to gather information from users.
• This is more commonly used in the production of commercial
products, and requires significant effort to produce statistically
significant results.

January 25, 2019 | 31


Interviews

• Informal or structured interviews can be used to gather


information during the problem definition stage.
• A structured interview, using a pre-defined list of questions, is
an efficient use of everyone’s time, especially if the questions
are provided to the interviewee in advance.
• However, an informal interview ay provide an opportunity to
develop ideas that may not have been thought of in advance.

January 25, 2019 | 32


Brainstorming

• Brainstorming is a useful group activity that can provide


further insight if done correctly.
• As discussed previously, brainstorming involves members of a
group taking turns coming up with ideas without immediate
evaluation.
• Brainstorming may be done during the problem definition
stage to question the attributes of the design problem,
• This may then be used to further guide other information
gathering processes.

January 25, 2019 | 33


Evaluating designs

• Using experiments we can make measures (e.g. measure the


strength of materials).

January 25, 2019 | 34


Evaluating designs

• During conceptual design, we can test a proof-of-concept to


check if an idea is likely going to satisfy design requirements
under specific conditions.

January 25, 2019 | 35


Evaluating designs

• By building and testing a prototype we can test a feature of a


final design to confirm function.

January 25, 2019 | 36


Evaluating designs

• If building a prototype is cost prohibitive, we can use


simulation to model a device and predict its behavior.
• Simulation may be used to determine design details.
• More often than not, simulation is done using computer simulation.

January 25, 2019 | 37


Design with feedback

• In industry, the design process typically involves feedback


from the client and user during the design process.
• This is typically done as a formal design review at regular
intervals in meetings with stakeholders.

January 25, 2019 | 38


Design with feedback

• In industry, the design process typically involves feedback


from the client and users during the design process.
• This is typically done as a formal design review at regular
intervals in meetings with stakeholders.
• A formal design review should present a snapshot of the
current design(s) with sufficient detail that the design can be
explored and discussed.
• Stakeholders are provided an opportunity to provide feedback
and constructive criticism.
• A formal design review is helpful as it can expose oversights,
errors, or mistaken assumptions.

January 25, 2019 | 39

You might also like