Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 88 views

    Tutorial For Modeling of Metraloop Using Caepipe: General

    Uploaded by

    FRANCISCO
    This document provides steps for modeling a MetraLoop flexible pipe joint in CAEPIPE. The MetraLoop can be modeled as an elastic element between nodes using its spring rates from manufacturer data. For loops without a middle support, the axial displacement between nodes should not exceed 1.5 inches allowable movement. For loops with a middle support, the lateral displacement between nodes should not exceed this limit. Modeling the braided hoses as bellows elements with calculated stiffnesses results in displacements meeting this criterion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Tutorial For Modeling of Metraloop Using Caepipe: General

    Uploaded by

    FRANCISCO
    88 views9 pages
    This document provides steps for modeling a MetraLoop flexible pipe joint in CAEPIPE. The MetraLoop can be modeled as an elastic element between nodes using its spring rates from manufacturer data. For loops without a middle support, the axial displacement between nodes should not exceed 1.5 inches allowable movement. For loops with a middle support, the lateral displacement between nodes should not exceed this limit. Modeling the braided hoses as bellows elements with calculated stiffnesses results in displacements meeting this criterion.

    Original Title

    MetraLoop CAEPIPE

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides steps for modeling a MetraLoop flexible pipe joint in CAEPIPE. The MetraLoop can be modeled as an elastic element between nodes using its spring rates from manufacturer data. For loops without a middle support, the axial displacement between nodes should not exceed 1.5 inches allowable movement. For loops with a middle support, the lateral displacement between nodes should not exceed this limit. Modeling the braided hoses as bellows elements with calculated stiffnesses results in displacements meeting this criterion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    88 views9 pages

    Tutorial For Modeling of Metraloop Using Caepipe: General

    Uploaded by

    FRANCISCO
    This document provides steps for modeling a MetraLoop flexible pipe joint in CAEPIPE. The MetraLoop can be modeled as an elastic element between nodes using its spring rates from manufacturer data. For loops without a middle support, the axial displacement between nodes should not exceed 1.5 inches allowable movement. For loops with a middle support, the lateral displacement between nodes should not exceed this limit. Modeling the braided hoses as bellows elements with calculated stiffnesses results in displacements meeting this criterion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 9

    Tutorial for Modeling of MetraLoop using CAEPIPE

    The following are the Steps for modeling and including MetraLoop in CAEPIPE analysis.
    General
    The MetraLoop is simply a flexible variation of the traditional hard pipe loop. For any given length of pipe and given
    temperature change, the amount of thermal growth/contraction can be calculated and an appropriate MetraLoop
    can be designed. When installed in a pipe run, the MetraLoop’s legs simply bend as shown in the figure below to
    compensate for the pipe’s expansion or contraction. Unique to the loop is the low amount of force required to bend
    its legs, minimizing anchor loads, guiding and installation costs.

    Illustrated above is a typical MetraLoop. No support is required for the 180° return bend for standard loops 2-1/2” diameter
    and smaller. However, due to the weight of the return bend and the extreme flexibility of the loop, larger sizes require
    support (as shown below) to prevent the loop from sagging in all orientations except when installed hanging down. Guides
    are recommended but not always required.

    The Steps provided in this tutorial are applicable for different types of MetraLoop such as SWEAT Ends, Threaded
    Ends, Flanged Ends, etc. with and without supports at the middle of the U-bend.
    MetraLoop without Support at the middle of the U-bend
     As an example, dimensional details and mechanical properties corresponding to 6” 150# FLANGED ENDS •
    FITTINGS - SCHED. 40 CARBON STEEL • HOSE & BRAID - SERIES 300 STAINLESS STEEL of MetraLoop are
    referred from http://www.metraflex.com/literature/metraloop/literature/Metraflex-Metraloop.pdf.
     The same is presented below for quick reference. The PDF file downloaded from the link mentioned above
    is attached herewith for convenience.

    Spring Rates for NS 6” MetraLoop are received from the manufacturer as given below.
    The Spring Rates provided in the above Table are for the whole loop (End to End) and NOT for the Braided Hose.
    Hence, the whole loop (End to End) is modeled as an Elastic element between Nodes 30 and 40 with its Spring Rates
    taken from the above Table. The lengths of the various elements of this MetraLoop are derived using the overall
    dimensions A and B given in the catalog. Weight of the flanged MetraLoop including the weight of the single flange
    at each end is included in the two (2) flange weights (= 27 + 148 + 27 = 202 lbs for 2 flanges or 101 lbs for each
    flange).
    Step 1:
    Snap shots shown below are from the CAEPIPE model input file (in Version 10.20 format, can be read by later
    versions of CAEPIPE) wherein the MetraLoop is modeled as an Elastic Element as mentioned above.
    Step 4:
    Select the Load Cases shown below for analysis through Layout Window > Loads > Load cases. Save the model and
    perform the analysis through Layout window > File > Analyze.
    Step 5:
    From the Displacements results of CAEPIPE for “Operating (W+P1+T1)” Load case for the model with temperature
    Increase, note the following.

    The differential Axial Deflection (local x direction) between Nodes 30 - 40 = 0.370” < 1.5” (Allowable Movement
    specified in the catalog).
    Summary
    From the above, it is noted that the differential axial displacement of 0.37” computed by CAEPIPE for Operating
    Load Case 1 for the Elastic element between Nodes 30 and 40 is less than the Allowable Movement (1.5”) provided
    in the catalog, thereby meeting the criteria.
    MetraLoop with Support at the middle of the U-bend
    Step 1:
    Attached is a sample CAEPIPE input file (in Version 10.20 format, can be read by later versions of CAEPIPE) wherein
    the two “Hose Braid” Pipes of the Flexible U joint are modeled using CAEPIPE’s Bellow Elements. The lengths of the
    various elements of this Flexible U joint are derived using the overall dimensions A and B given in the catalog.
    Step 2:
    From the attached model, you may observe that the Bellows are modelled between Nodes 30-40 and Nodes 70-80.
    The stiffnesses of the bellows are calculated and entered as listed in Step 3 below.
    Step 3:
    Pipe OD = 6.625”
    Pipe Wall Thickness = 0.28”
    Length of Braided Pipe = 19”
    Elastic Modulus = 28.5E+06 psi
    The Braided Hose of the MetraLoop is normally “stiff” in axial and torsional directions and “flexible” for lateral and
    bending directions. Accordingly, the stiffnesses for Braided Hose are calculated and assumed as given below.
    Axial Stiffness = 1% of Adjoining Pipe Stiffness = (1/100) * (AE/L) = 83700 lb/in
    Lateral Stiffness = 0.1% of Adjoining Pipe Stiffness = (0.1/100) * (3EL/L3) = 351 lb/in
    Bending Stiffness = 0.1% of Adjoining Pipe Stiffness = (0.1/100) * (EI/L) = 737 in-lb/deg
    Torsional Stiffness = 1% of Adjoining Pipe Stiffness = (1/100) * (GJ/L) = 5670 in-lb/deg
    Pressure Thrust is not entered as it is not applicable for Braided Hose.
    Lastly, the weight of each bellow is entered as 29 lbs, so that after performing a separate analysis for a stand-alone
    MetroLoop, the total empty weight of 148 lbs for the MetroLoop assembly matches with the value given in the
    catalog.

    Step 4:
    Select the Load Cases shown below for analysis through Layout Window > Loads > Load cases. Save the model and
    perform the analysis through Layout window > File > Analyze.
    Step 5:
    From the Displacements results of CAEPIPE for “Operating (W+P1+T1)” Load case for the model with temperature
    Increase, note the following.

    The differential Lateral Deflection (in Z direction) between Nodes 30 and 80 = 2 * 0.22 = 0.44” < 1.5” (Allowable
    Movement specified in the catalog).
    Summary
    From the above, it is noted that the differential lateral displacement computed by CAEPIPE for Operating Load Case
    between Nodes 30 and 80 are less than the Allowable Movement (1.5”) provided in the catalog, thereby meeting
    the criteria.
    Lastly, the differential displacement of 0.37” computed from the MetraLoop model without Support at the middle
    of U-bend is closer to the differential displacement of 0.44” computed for this model with a vertical support at the
    middle of U-bend thereby confirming that the stiffnesses assumed for the braided hoses are reasonable.

    You might also like