Wo3 Nanorods
Wo3 Nanorods
Wo3 Nanorods
com
Abstract
Electrophoretic deposition (EPD) was applied in coating hydrothermally synthesized crystalline tungsten oxide (WO3 ) nanorods onto ITO glass for
electrochromic application. Nanorods suspension of 10 mg/cm3 was used in the EPD with optimum electric field of 5–6 V/cm. Saturation in WO3
deposited amount at electric field >7 V/cm was observed during constant voltage EPD. This could be attributed to the oxide layer shielding effect
on the electric field induced electrophoresis. Constant current EPD from 0.2 mA/cm2 to 1.4 mA/cm2 was also performed for the WO3 nanorods.
The deposited amount of nanorods was found to be proportional to the current density from 0.2 mA/cm2 to 0.8 mA/cm2 under constant deposition
duration. However, the deposited amount decreased at current density >0.8 mA/cm2 . This could be due to the high deposition rate that resulted in
poor adhesion and hence nanorods peel off during the substrate removal. It was noted that the EPD of nanorods followed a linear relationship in I
vs. t−1/2 plot according to Cottrell equation, which implied that the reaction was a diffusion controlled process. The EPD coated substrate was tested
in 1 M LiClO4 /propylene carbonate (PC) electrolyte for electrochromic studies. The porous WO3 nanorods layer exhibited optical modulation
T700 nm of 40%, moderate coloration time tc70% of 28.8 s and improved bleaching time tb70% of 4.5 s, which could be due to the porous oxide layer
with large surface area that facilitates the ion insertion/extraction and the electrolyte penetration in the oxide layer shortens the ionic diffusion
length of Li.
© 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Transition metal oxides WO3 ; Optical properties; Suspensions; Functional applications; Electrochromic
0955-2219/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.05.014
1140 E. Khoo et al. / Journal of the European Ceramic Society 30 (2010) 1139–1144
fully demonstrated the EPD of titanate nanotubes with diameter ried out in an electrolyte of 1.0 M LiClO4 in propylene carbonate
around 10 nm. These results suggest that the EPD is also (PC). Transmittance variation and color changes were detected
applicable in 1D nanostructures assembly. In this work, WO3 through UV–vis spectrometer (Shimadzu UV-2501PC) at visible
1D nanorods constant voltage and constant current EPD were wavelength ranged from 300 nm to 900 nm. Optical modula-
performed on a transparent conductive substrate (ITO glass). tion and switching time were extracted from the transmittance
Optimum deposition conditions were identified with a discus- spectra.
sion in the deposition mechanism. The resultant electrochromic
performances such as optical modulation and switching time of 3. Results and discussion
the WO3 nanorods coated substrates were also studied.
3.1. Electrophoretic deposition (EPD)
2. Experimental details
WO3 nanorods suspension of 10 mg/cm3 was used in the con-
2.1. WO3 synthesis stant voltage EPD. The applied electric field ranged from 3 V/cm
to 8 V/cm for 900 s deposition and the I–t behaviors are recorded
Tungsten oxide (WO3 ) nanorods were prepared through in Fig. 1a. With the various electric field strength studied, the
hydrothermal process: 0.825 g of Na2 WO4 ·2H2 O (Aldrich, EPD of WO3 nanorods can be characterized into three regions:
99%) and 0.290 g of NaCl (Sigma Ultra, 99.5%) were dissolved no deposition (<4 V/cm), uniform deposition (5–6 V/cm) and
in 20 ml of de-ionized water with a mole ratio of 1:2. The solu- saturated deposition (>7 V/cm). For the electric field <4 V/cm,
tion was adjusted with 3.0 M HCl until a pH of 2, then transferred the electric field induced driving force is not strong enough to
into the Teflon liner of the stainless steel autoclave and heated drive the WO3 nanorods onto the ITO glass. Hence, only small
at 180 ◦ C for 24 h. White precipitate of nanorods was obtained amount of nanorods is observed under the FESEM (Fig. 2a).
and centrifuged with ethanol and de-ionized water for several When the electric field is increased beyond 5 V/cm, uniform
times to remove any left over precursors. The WO3 nanorod WO3 nanorods deposition was is observed as a porous oxide
was found to be a hexagonal single crystal with a growth direc- layer on top of the ITO (Fig. 2b). However, for the electric field
tion of (0 0 0 2). The diameter and length of the nanorod were >7 V/cm, the deposition ceases after a period of time as showed
around 100 nm and 2 m, respectively.18 in Fig. 1a with a sharp drop in the current density until nearly
Fig. 2. FESEM images of the deposited WO3 nanorods on ITO glass under (a) 4 V/cm and (b) 6 V/cm and (c) higher magnification of 6 V/cm deposited WO3
nanorods.
zero. This might be due to the electrical resistance on the work- maximum voltage of the potentiostat (10 V) after a period of
ing electrode increases with the oxide layer thickness and hence deposition while optimum deposition was observed to be around
decreases the electric field induced electrophoresis in the sus- 0.8 mA/cm2 . The deposited amount of WO3 is plotted with
pension. The oxide layer will weaken the driving force (due to respect to the current density (Fig. 3b). The deposited amount
the voltage drop across the oxide layer) and hence decrease the is found to increase with respect to the current density, which
nanorods motion.13 The nearly zero current density implies that implies that the passed charges (current) are proportional to the
the electric field induced driving force is not strong enough to electrophoresis deposited nanorods. However, at the higher cur-
drive the nanorods onto the electrode after the build-up of the rent density (>0.8 mA/cm2 ), the deposited amount is recorded
oxide layer. In addition, oxide layer peeling was observed at to be reduced, which could be due to the ITO substrate degra-
7 V/cm and higher electric field during the substrate removal, dation or poor adhesion of the nanorods to the substrate. ITO
which causes non-uniform coverage on the ITO surface and is glass has been demonstrated as the working electrode for aque-
undesirable for the electrochromic application. Thus, it is noted ous system EPD up to 40 V/cm21 and 2.5 mA/cm2 22 and no ITO
that 5–6 V/cm gives the optimum deposition electric field for degradation was observed. Thus, ITO electrochemical degrada-
the present nanorods suspension. Fig. 1b shows the deposited tion at high current density is not the reason for the decrease in
amount with respect to the deposition duration under 5 V/cm. deposited amount. Hence, the decrease of deposited mass can be
The relationship turns non-linear after 900 s with a nearly con- attributed to the accumulation of large amount of WO3 nanorods
stant deposited amount, which corresponds to a thickness of at the electrode within a short duration under a high driving
1.2 m. This result further supports that EPD will cease after force, which results in the formation of a very porous, inho-
the build-up of the oxide layer and longer deposition duration mogeneous film with reduced adhesion at the electrode surface.
does not significantly improve the deposited amount.13,19,20 As a result, peel-off was observed during the deposited sub-
Constant current density EPD was carried out using strate removal and lower deposited amount was remained on the
0.6–1.4 mA/cm2 (Fig. 3a). The voltage increased up to the substrate.
1142 E. Khoo et al. / Journal of the European Ceramic Society 30 (2010) 1139–1144
Fig. 3. (a) Constant current EPD of 10 mg/cm3 WO3 nanorods suspension for
900 s deposition and (b) deposited amount of WO3 nanorods on ITO glass for Fig. 4. Currents density vs. inverse square root of deposition duration plot under
900 s deposition duration at various current densities. (a) 5 V/cm and (b) 6 V/cm deposition.
In summary, the moderate electric field of 5–6 V/cm and detected current containes significant parasitic currents such as
current density 0.8 mA/cm2 are reckoned to be the optimum water electrolysis.
depositions condition for uniform coverage and avoiding poor
nanorods adhesion. Oxide layer shielding effect is observed and 3.2. Electrochromic studies
it could be probably solved by constant current EPD, with fur-
ther increased deposition voltage, a longer deposition duration The EPD coated WO3 nanorods were tested for UV–vis
and optimum current density. transmittance under a switching voltage of ±3 V (Fig. 5a).
As reported by Koura et al.,23 a diffusion controlled process The WO3 nanorods were bleached at +3 V with around 60%
can be described by Cottrell equation: of transmittance at 700 nm and exhibited strong absorption of
KC red-end light at −3 V biasing. The transmittance modulation
i= (2) at 700 nm (T700 nm ) is found to be around 40%, which is
(πDt)1/2 comparable to other crystalline films.24,25 Switching time of
where i is the current, K is the kinetic constant, D is the diffusion the WO3 nanorods is extracted from the transmittance data
coefficient and t is the deposition duration. The equation can be in Fig. 5b by applying a square wave voltage of ±3 V to the
simplified to i = kt−1/2 when K, C and D are kept as constant. oxide layer (simulating the switching condition). The switch-
Fig. 4a and b show the experimental data of 5 V/cm and 6 V/cm ing time – bleaching (tb ) and coloring (tc ) time are calculated
deposition separately. It is observed that both cases follow the as the time required for 70% optical modulation in order to
Cottrell equation where the i–t−1/2 curves shows an almost linear compare with literatures. Coloration time tc70% is found to be
relationship with a similar slope, which suggests the deposition 28.8 s, which is comparable to the reported values (tb ∼ 25 s).26
presented in this work is a diffusion controlled process. Devi- However, the bleaching time tb70% of 4.5 s is found to be much
ation from the slope is observed at long deposition time. This superior than the crystalline26 (tb ∼ 22 s) and amorphous WO3
deviation could be due to the build-up of the oxide layer which (tb ∼ 18–36 s).26,27 This improvement is attributed to the porous
decreases the nanorods electrophoresis in the suspension and the nature of the oxide layer which consists of nanorods. The porous
E. Khoo et al. / Journal of the European Ceramic Society 30 (2010) 1139–1144 1143
References
20. Ma, J. and Cheng, W., Deposition and packing study of sub-micron PZT 24. Liao, C.-C., Chen, F.-R. and Kai, J.-J., WO3−x nanowires based elec-
ceramics using electrophoretic deposition. Mater. Lett., 2002, 56, 721–727. trochromic devices. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2006, 90, 1147–1155.
21. Jung, S. M., Jung, H. Y. and Suh, J. S., Horizontally aligned carbon nan- 25. Joraid, A. A., Comparison of electrochromic amorphous and crystalline
otube field emitters fabricated on ITO glass substrates. Carbon, 2008, 46, electron beam deposited WO3 thin films. Curr. Appl. Phys., 2009, 9, 73–79.
1973–1977. 26. Sallard, S., Brezesinski, T. and Smarsly, B. M., Electrochromic stability of
22. Yui, T., Mori, Y., Tsuchino, T., Itoh, T., Hattori, T., Fukushima, Y. et al., Syn- WO3 thin films with nanometer-scale periodicity and varying degrees of
thesis of photofunctional titania nanosheets by electrophoretic deposition. crystallinity. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 7200–7206.
Chem. Mater., 2005, 17, 206–211. 27. Deepa, M., Singh, D. P., Shivaprasad, S. M. and Agnihotry, S. A., A
23. Koura, N., Tsukamoto, T., Shoji, H. and Hotta, T., Preparation of vari- comparison of electrochromic properties of sol–gel derived amorphous
ous oxide films by an electrophoretic deposition method: a study of the and nanocrystalline tungsten oxide films. Curr. Appl. Phys., 2007, 7,
mechanism. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 1995, 34, 1643–1647. 220–229.