Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 98 views

    Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-513232431
    This rubric assesses student teams arguing for or against slavery in the Caribbean on four criteria: organization and clarity of arguments, use of arguments to support their position, use of cross-examination and rebuttals, and persuasive presentation style. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being the strongest. Scores are given for how well the team presents clear and orderly main arguments, provides persuasive reasons to support their side, identifies weaknesses in the opposing position and defends their own, and uses an engaging speaking style. Individual scores in each category will be averaged to calculate the team's total grade out of 16. The rubric aims to reward cooperation and teamwork in planning and delivering a compelling case

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-513232431
    98 views2 pages
    This rubric assesses student teams arguing for or against slavery in the Caribbean on four criteria: organization and clarity of arguments, use of arguments to support their position, use of cross-examination and rebuttals, and persuasive presentation style. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being the strongest. Scores are given for how well the team presents clear and orderly main arguments, provides persuasive reasons to support their side, identifies weaknesses in the opposing position and defends their own, and uses an engaging speaking style. Individual scores in each category will be averaged to calculate the team's total grade out of 16. The rubric aims to reward cooperation and teamwork in planning and delivering a compelling case

    Original Title

    rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This rubric assesses student teams arguing for or against slavery in the Caribbean on four criteria: organization and clarity of arguments, use of arguments to support their position, use of cross-examination and rebuttals, and persuasive presentation style. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being the strongest. Scores are given for how well the team presents clear and orderly main arguments, provides persuasive reasons to support their side, identifies weaknesses in the opposing position and defends their own, and uses an engaging speaking style. Individual scores in each category will be averaged to calculate the team's total grade out of 16. The rubric aims to reward cooperation and teamwork in planning and delivering a compelling case

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    98 views2 pages

    Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-513232431
    This rubric assesses student teams arguing for or against slavery in the Caribbean on four criteria: organization and clarity of arguments, use of arguments to support their position, use of cross-examination and rebuttals, and persuasive presentation style. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being the strongest. Scores are given for how well the team presents clear and orderly main arguments, provides persuasive reasons to support their side, identifies weaknesses in the opposing position and defends their own, and uses an engaging speaking style. Individual scores in each category will be averaged to calculate the team's total grade out of 16. The rubric aims to reward cooperation and teamwork in planning and delivering a compelling case

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Rubric to Assess Sample Task

    Levels of Performance for PRO-SLAVERY/ANTI-SLAVERY Team

    Criteria 4 3 2 1 Grade:

    1. Organization Completely Mostly clear and Clear in some Unclear and  


    & Clarity:  clear and orderly orderly in all parts but not disorganized
    presentation parts overall throughout
    Main arguments and
    responses are
    outlined in a clear
    and orderly way.
    2. Use of Very strong and Many good Some decent Few or no real  
    Argument:  persuasive arguments arguments, but arguments given, or
    arguments given given, with only some significant all arguments given
    throughout minor problems problems had significant
    Reasons are given to problems
    support the
    continuation of
    slavery in the
    Caribbean.
    3. Use of cross- Excellent cross- Good cross- Decent cross- Poor cross-exam or  
    examination and exam and exam and exam and/or rebuttals, failure to
    defense against rebuttals, with rebuttals, but point out problems in
    rebuttal:  Negative team’s only minor slip- with some Negative team’s
    objections ups significant position or failure to
    Identification of problems defend itself against
    weakness in Negative attack.
    team’s arguments and
    ability to defend
    itself against attack. 
    4. Presentation All style Most style Few style Very few style
    Style:  features were features were features were features were used,
    used used used none of them
    convincingly convincingly convincingly convincingly
    Tone of voice, clarity
    of expression,
    precision of
    arguments all
    contribute to keeping
    audience’s attention
    and persuading them
    of the team’s case.
    Grade:
    How to use the rubric

    The rubric is constructed to reward the efforts of cooperation and teamwork. In order for

    students to receive an exceptional score they need to work together as a team to plan and deliver

    very strong arguments. The rubric is divided into 4 criteria which focuses on the information

    gathered in parts 1, 2 and 3 of the task out-line. Criteria 1 and 2 looks at how the information is

    organised and the groups’ ability to provide supporting information to strengthen their

    arguments. Criteria 3 look assesses the teams’ knowledge of both sides of the situation to

    validate their stand-point. Each criterion is divided into four marking sections which looks at the

    team’s level of strength (4-1), 4 being the strongest. Each team member will be given an

    individual score for each criterion and then an average grade is calculated for each criteria. The

    maximum points that can be allocated to each team is 16 .

    You might also like