Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    Mabassa Table 1a. Profile of The Respondents Profile Frequency (N 69) Percentage (100%) Rank

    Uploaded by

    Alaine Danica Dimaandal
    The document contains tables that analyze the occupational stress levels of 69 respondents from the Mabassa region. Table 1 provides demographic information about the respondents such as their rank, gender, age, and years in service. Table 2 shows the mean stress levels for 15 different statements. Tables 3a through 3d analyze whether stress levels differ significantly when respondents are grouped by rank, gender, age, and years in service, showing F or T-values and p-values for each grouping and statement. Overall stress levels had a grand mean of 2.93 according to the descriptive rating.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Mabassa Table 1a. Profile of The Respondents Profile Frequency (N 69) Percentage (100%) Rank

    Uploaded by

    Alaine Danica Dimaandal
    18 views3 pages
    The document contains tables that analyze the occupational stress levels of 69 respondents from the Mabassa region. Table 1 provides demographic information about the respondents such as their rank, gender, age, and years in service. Table 2 shows the mean stress levels for 15 different statements. Tables 3a through 3d analyze whether stress levels differ significantly when respondents are grouped by rank, gender, age, and years in service, showing F or T-values and p-values for each grouping and statement. Overall stress levels had a grand mean of 2.93 according to the descriptive rating.

    Original Title

    tables MABASSA.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document contains tables that analyze the occupational stress levels of 69 respondents from the Mabassa region. Table 1 provides demographic information about the respondents such as their rank, gender, age, and years in service. Table 2 shows the mean stress levels for 15 different statements. Tables 3a through 3d analyze whether stress levels differ significantly when respondents are grouped by rank, gender, age, and years in service, showing F or T-values and p-values for each grouping and statement. Overall stress levels had a grand mean of 2.93 according to the descriptive rating.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    18 views3 pages

    Mabassa Table 1a. Profile of The Respondents Profile Frequency (N 69) Percentage (100%) Rank

    Uploaded by

    Alaine Danica Dimaandal
    The document contains tables that analyze the occupational stress levels of 69 respondents from the Mabassa region. Table 1 provides demographic information about the respondents such as their rank, gender, age, and years in service. Table 2 shows the mean stress levels for 15 different statements. Tables 3a through 3d analyze whether stress levels differ significantly when respondents are grouped by rank, gender, age, and years in service, showing F or T-values and p-values for each grouping and statement. Overall stress levels had a grand mean of 2.93 according to the descriptive rating.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    MABASSA

    Table 1a. Profile of the Respondents


    Profile Frequency Percentage
    (n=69) (100%)
    Rank
    fo1 47 68.1
    fo2 5 7.2
    fo3 5 7.2
    sfo1 4 5.8
    sfo2 6 8.7
    cinsp 1 1.4
    senior inspector 1 1.4

    Sex
    male 51 73.9
    female 18 26.1

    Age
    25.00 1 1.4
    26.00 1 1.4
    27.00 4 5.8
    28.00 7 10.1
    29.00 9 13.0
    30.00 9 13.0
    31.00 2 2.9
    32.00 5 7.2
    33.00 6 8.7
    34.00 4 5.8
    35.00 1 1.4
    36.00 2 2.9
    37.00 3 4.3
    39.00 2 2.9
    40.00 2 2.9
    41.00 1 1.4
    42.00 1 1.4
    43.00 1 1.4
    44.00 1 1.4
    45.00 1 1.4
    48.00 1 1.4
    49.00 1 1.4
    50.00 2 2.9
    52.00 1 1.4
    55.00 1 1.4

    Years in Service
    1.00 1 1.4
    2.00 2 2.9
    3.00 3 4.3
    4.00 1 1.4
    5.00 23 33.3
    6.00 11 15.9
    7.00 7 10.1
    8.00 1 1.4
    9.00 1 1.4
    10.00 3 4.3
    11.00 4 5.8
    12.00 2 2.9
    13.00 1 1.4
    16.00 1 1.4
    20.00 4 5.8
    21.00 2 2.9
    22.00 1 1.4
    23.00 1 1.4
    Table 2. Computed Mean on the Level of Occupational Stress
    Statements Mean Descriptive Rating
    q1 2.95
    q2 2.65
    q3 2.78
    q4 2.75
    Q5 2.78
    Q6 3.27
    Q7 3.04
    Q8 2.78
    Q9 3.08
    Q10 2.85
    Q11 2.88
    Q12 3.05
    Q13 3.15
    Q14 2.71
    Q15 3.13
    Grand Mean 2.93

    Table 3a. Significant difference on the Occupational Stress of the Respondents when they
    are grouped according to Rank

    Statements F-Value P-Value


    q1 3.16 .00
    q2 1.78 .11
    q3 1.40 .22
    q4 .86 .53
    q5 .62 .70
    q6 1.95 .08
    q7 1.60 .16
    q8 1.87 .09
    q9 1.46 .20
    q10 2.09 .06
    q11 3.08 .01
    q12 3.13 .00
    q13 3.81 .00
    q14 2.55 .02
    q15 2.54 .02

    Table 3b. Significant difference on the Occupational Stress of the Respondents when they
    are grouped according to Gender

    Statements T-Value P-Value


    q1 .33 .56
    q2 .26 .61
    q3 8.42 .04
    q4 .32 .56
    q5 .44 .50
    q6 .51 .47
    q7 .55 .46
    q8 .69 .40
    q9 1.21 .27
    q10 .84 .36
    q11 9.12 .01
    q12 .81 .37
    q13 9.73 .00
    q14 .12 .72
    q15 8.37 .04
    Table 3c. Significant difference on the Occupational Stress of the Respondents when they
    are grouped according to Age

    Statements F-Value P-Value


    q1 1.69 .06
    q2 1.38 .17
    q3 2.66 .00
    q4 1.35 .19
    q5 1.21 .28
    q6 1.79 .04
    q7 2.09 .01
    q8 1.68 .06
    q9 2.33 .00
    q10 1.91 .03
    q11 1.30 .21
    q12 1.58 .09
    q13 1.09 .39
    q14 2.04 .01
    q15 .95 .53

    Table 3d. Significant difference on the Occupational Stress of the Respondents when they
    are grouped according to Years in Service

    Statements F-Value P-Value


    q1 1.13 .35
    q2 2.60 .00
    q3 1.45 .15
    q4 1.03 .44
    q5 1.36 .19
    q6 1.69 .07
    q7 1.89 .04
    q8 1.35 .19
    q9 1.35 .20
    q10 2.15 .01
    q11 1.45 .15
    q12 2.30 .01
    q13 3.12 .00
    q14 1.81 .05
    q15 2.42 .00

    You might also like