Assignment 1
Assignment 1
Assignment 1
, women's
individuals, especially women, in the late 19th century. The rise of different movements in the
1880s and 1890s were greatly concerned with the Survival of the Fittest theory - those who are
physically, intellectually, financially, and morally inferior to the Eurocentric-Christian ideal are
considered weak and unable to survive, therefore disposable by society. This idea was hugely
supported by the Eugenics, the majority of social reformers at this time were advocates for the
Eugenics Movement which fit into their white middle class Christian beliefs. The Eugenics
intelligent, etc.), and monitored fertility and reproduction of the ‘inferior’/’burdensome’ groups
(the poor, individuals of colour, disabled members, patients suffering psychiatric illness, non-
Christians, etc.). It was thought that the ‘weak’ and ‘inferior’ population were to procreate, what
they would end up doing is creating more ‘problems’ for society: prostitution, poverty, crimes,
inconvinience (in reasons of different religious practices, cultures, economical needs, etc.). The
big idea was to eliminate individuals who were seen as a societal burden, and create a generation
of ‘fit’ people.
In 19th-century Canada, the Eugenics Movement also thrived. Using the language
of science (‘survival of the fittest’ and ‘fitness of future generations’), the Eugenics gained a lot
of credibility. With the amount of immigration (particularly from Italy and Eastern Europe)
coming into the country, white middle class social workers panicked that the immigrants may
eventually outnumber themselves. Many of these middle class ’social reformers’ advocated for
birth control for the undesirable population (immigrants, working class, indeginous people,
physically and intellectually disabled people etc.). Margaret Sanger who was the
inventor/advocate of birth control at the time, supported the Eugenics Movement in the United
States. Sanger opened the first birth control clinic in the US in Brooklyn, where there was a
concentrated population of Italian and Easter European Jewish immigrants. Sanger believed that
these working class immigrants were too poor to have children, and the societal burden on the
middle class would be much lighter if the working class didn’t reproduce. In an age of sexual
revolution and liberty, women lined up down the street to acquire information and gadgets for
birth control, partially out of the desires to have control over their own bodies, as well as
especially) demonstrated ultimate power the state/government had over people’s bodies. By the
1930s, 34 states passed sterilization legislation. Alberta passed the Alberta Sexual Sterilization
Act in 1828, under which more than 3 thousand women were sterilized. British Columbia and
Ontario passed similar acts, as well. Initially, in 1828, the act only allowed sterilization with a
consent by the person or their legal guardian, but it was made to allow sterilization without any
form of consent in 1937. Unsurprisingly, the act targeted particularly aboriginal people,
indiginous people, and mentally defective youths. The majority of sterilization procedures took
place in residential schools, mental institutions, prisons, and other facilities in which contained
people that were deemed ‘undesirable’. These procedures were performed without the
individual’s consent. This continued on for a couple of decades as common practices in many
places. Society supported this crime because it was thought to have economic and scientific
benefits. Another reason for compulsive sterilization to take place was to minimize the
inconvenience that may be caused by inmates, students, patients and so on becoming pregnant
after sexual assaults, or other complications that may come with menstruation and other
reproduction-related issues. Particularly in the 1930s, partly due to the Great Depression,
sterilization law was extremely popular in both Canada and the US. By 1939, more than 33
thousand people, both male and female in the US were legally sterilized.
The Eugenics Movement shows the government’s power on how people perceive their
bodies by idealizing certain parts of the population and marginalizing others. Compulsory
sterilization gives an extreme example of the government’s ultimate control over people’s
physical bodies. In both cases, individuals are perceived and judged by third-party standards,
caused to suffer societal marginalization and restraints. But there is a close-to-complete absence
of one’s consent and mindful control of their own body, which is insanely inhumane by today’s
standards.
Bibliography
Clark, Anna, ed. The History of Sexuality in Europe: A Sourcebook and Reader. New York:
Routledge, 2011
Peiss, Kathy, ed. Major Problems in the History of American Sexuality: Documents and Essays.
Zingel, Avert. Indigenous Women Come Forward With Accounts of Forced Sterilization, Says
could-expand-1.5102981
Province of Alberta. (1928). The Sexual Sterilization Act of Alberta. Statutes of the Province of
Alberta. Retrieved from: http://www.ourfutureourpast.ca/law/page.aspx?id=2906151