Assignment 1

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Topic chosen: Systems of control over marginalized individuals/groups (e.g.

, women's

bodies, or Indigenous bodies, or people with disabilities)

There was a horrible amount of governmental/social control over marginalized

individuals, especially women, in the late 19th century. The rise of different movements in the

1880s and 1890s were greatly concerned with the Survival of the Fittest theory - those who are

physically, intellectually, financially, and morally inferior to the Eurocentric-Christian ideal are

considered weak and unable to survive, therefore disposable by society. This idea was hugely

supported by the Eugenics, the majority of social reformers at this time were advocates for the

Eugenics Movement which fit into their white middle class Christian beliefs. The Eugenics

Movement focused greatly on breeding a ‘quality’ generation - encouraged fertility and

reproduction of the ‘idealized/’desirable groups (white, middle-class, Christian, able-bodied,

intelligent, etc.), and monitored fertility and reproduction of the ‘inferior’/’burdensome’ groups

(the poor, individuals of colour, disabled members, patients suffering psychiatric illness, non-

Christians, etc.). It was thought that the ‘weak’ and ‘inferior’ population were to procreate, what

they would end up doing is creating more ‘problems’ for society: prostitution, poverty, crimes,

inconvinience (in reasons of different religious practices, cultures, economical needs, etc.). The

big idea was to eliminate individuals who were seen as a societal burden, and create a generation

of ‘fit’ people.

In 19th-century Canada, the Eugenics Movement also thrived. Using the language

of science (‘survival of the fittest’ and ‘fitness of future generations’), the Eugenics gained a lot

of credibility. With the amount of immigration (particularly from Italy and Eastern Europe)

coming into the country, white middle class social workers panicked that the immigrants may

eventually outnumber themselves. Many of these middle class ’social reformers’ advocated for
birth control for the undesirable population (immigrants, working class, indeginous people,

physically and intellectually disabled people etc.). Margaret Sanger who was the

inventor/advocate of birth control at the time, supported the Eugenics Movement in the United

States. Sanger opened the first birth control clinic in the US in Brooklyn, where there was a

concentrated population of Italian and Easter European Jewish immigrants. Sanger believed that

these working class immigrants were too poor to have children, and the societal burden on the

middle class would be much lighter if the working class didn’t reproduce. In an age of sexual

revolution and liberty, women lined up down the street to acquire information and gadgets for

birth control, partially out of the desires to have control over their own bodies, as well as

financial distress of family planning.

On a much more ugly side, compulsory sterilization on marginalized individuals (women,

especially) demonstrated ultimate power the state/government had over people’s bodies. By the

1930s, 34 states passed sterilization legislation. Alberta passed the Alberta Sexual Sterilization

Act in 1828, under which more than 3 thousand women were sterilized. British Columbia and

Ontario passed similar acts, as well. Initially, in 1828, the act only allowed sterilization with a

consent by the person or their legal guardian, but it was made to allow sterilization without any

form of consent in 1937. Unsurprisingly, the act targeted particularly aboriginal people,

indiginous people, and mentally defective youths. The majority of sterilization procedures took

place in residential schools, mental institutions, prisons, and other facilities in which contained

people that were deemed ‘undesirable’. These procedures were performed without the

individual’s consent. This continued on for a couple of decades as common practices in many

places. Society supported this crime because it was thought to have economic and scientific

benefits. Another reason for compulsive sterilization to take place was to minimize the
inconvenience that may be caused by inmates, students, patients and so on becoming pregnant

after sexual assaults, or other complications that may come with menstruation and other

reproduction-related issues. Particularly in the 1930s, partly due to the Great Depression,

sterilization law was extremely popular in both Canada and the US. By 1939, more than 33

thousand people, both male and female in the US were legally sterilized.

The Eugenics Movement shows the government’s power on how people perceive their

bodies by idealizing certain parts of the population and marginalizing others. Compulsory

sterilization gives an extreme example of the government’s ultimate control over people’s

physical bodies. In both cases, individuals are perceived and judged by third-party standards,

caused to suffer societal marginalization and restraints. But there is a close-to-complete absence

of one’s consent and mindful control of their own body, which is insanely inhumane by today’s

standards.

Bibliography

Clark, Anna, ed. The History of Sexuality in Europe: A Sourcebook and Reader. New York:

Routledge, 2011
Peiss, Kathy, ed. Major Problems in the History of American Sexuality: Documents and Essays.

Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.

Zingel, Avert. Indigenous Women Come Forward With Accounts of Forced Sterilization, Says

Lawyer. CBC News, 2019. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/forced-sterilization-lawsuit-

could-expand-1.5102981

Province of Alberta. (1928). The Sexual Sterilization Act of Alberta. Statutes of the Province of
Alberta. Retrieved from: http://www.ourfutureourpast.ca/law/page.aspx?id=2906151

You might also like