See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/228988059

Virtual and Remote Laboratory Development: A Review

Article · March 2010

DOI: 10.1061/41096(366)368

CITATIONS READS
63 1,671

3 authors, including:

Xuemin Chen Yongpeng Zhang

Texas Southern University Prairie View A&M University
112 PUBLICATIONS   560 CITATIONS    36 PUBLICATIONS   396 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Virtual and Remote Laboratory (VR-Lab ) Development View project

CONTROLLER DESIGN View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Xuemin Chen on 28 July 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction,
and Operations in Challenging Environments © 2010 ASCE 3843

Virtual and Remote Laboratory Development: A Review

Xuemin Chen1, Gangbing Song2 and Yongpeng Zhang3
1
Department of Engineering Technology, Texas Southern University, 3100 Cleburne
Street, Houston, TX 77004; PH (713) 313-7285; FAX (713) 313-4486; email:
chenxm @tsu.edu
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston, 4800 Calhoun Road,
Houston, TX 77204; PH (713) 743-4525; FAX (713) 743-4503; email:
[email protected]
3
Department of Engineering Technology, Prairie View A&M University, P.O. Box
519, MS 2530, Prairie View, TX 77446; PH (936) 261-9869; FAX (936) 261- 9867;
email: [email protected]

ABSTRACT

The Internet technology has provided additional teaching strategies, with

online education being one of the most exciting enhancements. A particular challenge
for online education in engineering is how to extend the traditional hands-on
laboratories to the Internet. Currently, there are two approaches to conducting labs
online, virtual and remote labs. Virtual lab is based on software to simulate the lab
environment while remote lab, by definition, is an experiment which is conducted and
controlled remotely through the Internet. These experiments use real components or
instrumentation at a different location from where they are being controlled or
conducted. There are many emerging technologies which have been used to develop
the virtual and remote laboratory. However, there are few papers that review the
virtual and remote laboratory development. In this paper, a review of the different
online delivery methods for virtual and remote laboratory development is presented.
The open research issues and conclusion with possible future directions on the virtual
and remote engineering laboratory development is also presented.

INTRODUCTION

The rapid development of Internet technology and its increasing popularity

has had an enormous impact on engineering. This technology provides new tools
across the range of engineering disciplines; meanwhile, it also facilitates the
development of additional teaching strategies, including vivid and interactive ways of
illustration, simulation, demonstration, experimentation, operation, communication,
and so on (Selmer et al. 2007). Broadband access and data compression allow for the
delivery of audio and video streaming of lectures via the Internet. Nowadays,
computer and Internet based learning has become an important part of education.
The results of the Sloan Survey of Online Learning, “Staying the Course: Online
Education in the United States, 2008”, shows that over 3.9 million students were
Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction,
and Operations in Challenging Environments © 2010 ASCE 3844

taking at least one online course during the 2007 Fall semester, a 12 percent increase
over the number reported the previous year (Allen and Seaman 2008).
A particular challenge for online education in engineering is how to extend
the traditional hands-on laboratory settings over the Internet. From the earliest days
of engineering education, hands-on laboratories have been an essential part of
undergraduate engineering programs (Feisel and Rosa 2005); concepts taught through
lectures are often complemented with laboratory experimentations. Hands-on
education allows students to experience the backbone of engineering by conducting
experiments, observing dynamic phenomena, testing hypotheses, learning from their
mistakes, and reaching their own conclusions. With the rapid progress of the
microprocessor and communication technologies, more and more instrumentations
can be reconfigured and controlled remotely. These new functionalities have been
making remote hands-on training via Internet possible. New possibilities in the way
lab exercises are performed include the simulation lab environment, the automated
data acquisition and the remote control of instruments, all of which are online.
Currently, there are two approaches to conducting labs online, virtual and remote
labs.
The virtual lab is based on software such as LabVIEW (short for Laboratory
Virtual Instrumentation Engineering Workbench), Matlab/Simulink, Java Applet,
Flash or other software to simulate the lab environment. Virtual labs can be used for
experiments that would normally require equipment that are too expensive, unsafe
(e.g. nuclear reactor) or unavailable. Virtual labs also allow students to repeat an
experiment multiple times, giving them the opportunity to see how changed
parameters and settings affect the outcome. One of the very important features of the
virtual lab is to let the students learn from failures without causing any real damages.
Learning from failure is one of the nine objectives for the engineering education
laboratory defined by ABET (Feisel and Peterson 2002). The “Virtual Reality
Laboratory Accidents” project was developed at University of Illinois Chicago (Bell
and Fogler 2001) by using virtual reality technologies such as Virtual Reality
Modeling Language (VRML) and Java 3D. It is believed that these accidents will
have more impact on users than written rules, even if it is not as much as real
accidents.
Remote lab, by definition, is an experiment which is conducted and controlled
remotely through the Internet. The experiments use real components or
instrumentation at a different location from where they are being controlled or
conducted. For example, the University of Houston offers access to their remote
laboratory for the Smart Materials and Structures Laboratory (Song et al. 2007). The
logistics of tailoring a real laboratory, particularly when dealing with a large number
of students, is often a big problem to universities; the requirements for space,
instrumentation, and human support are high. Remote laboratories are more suited to
handle a large number of students, especially some small in size or limited in
availability experiments, e.g. the nanotechnology experiments (Chang et al. 2002).
A large amount of research on virtual and remote laboratory technologies has
been recently reported, ranging from LabVIEW and Matlab/Simulink to Java applet,
Flash, Ajax and other techniques. Our objective is to provide a deeper understanding
of the current technology for online laboratory development, and to identify some
Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction,
and Operations in Challenging Environments © 2010 ASCE 3845

open research issues on virtual and remote laboratory development. Ibrahim and
Morsi (2005) compared the different delivery methods for online engineering
education; however, there are few papers to review the virtual and remote laboratory
development.

WEB-BASED EXPERIMENT FRAMEWORK

The system block diagram of the Virtual and Remote Laboratory (VR-Lab) is
shown in Figure 1. The functionality of the server is to work as the web publisher, the
lab scheduler, the data and database manager. The workstations are used to execute
the users’ requirements and control the lab devices such as the National Instruments
Educational Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Suite (NI ELVIS) to conduct the
experiments. The camera will let the user to see the system response in real time. The
users can use the client computers to do the experiments virtually and remotely.

34 U

4U Router

Lab Device Workstation

Firewall

8U Server

Internet
3U Storage
Lab Device Workstation

2U UPS
2U

Clients
NI ELVIS

Figure 1. Web-based experiment framework.

VIRTUAL AND REMOTE LABORATORY DEVELOPMENT TOOLS

Java
Java was released in 1995 as a core component of Sun Microsystems' Java
platform. It promised "Write Once, Run Anywhere" (WORA), providing no-cost run-
time plug-in on popular platforms. Major web browsers soon incorporated the ability
Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction,
and Operations in Challenging Environments © 2010 ASCE 3846

to run secure Java applets within web pages, and Java quickly became popular
(Morelli and Walde 2006). Java has been involved in many virtual and remote
laboratories since then. A Java Applet virtual lab was created by Chen et al. (2008).
This virtual laboratory was for teaching the Resistor Color Code. It has two modes,
the learn mode and the quiz mode, the default being the learn mode. In this mode, the
user can use the combo box to select different combinations of the color bands. The
resistor value is then calculated by Java Applet. When the user picks the quiz mode,
the Java Applet randomly generates a combination of color bands, after which the
user inputs the resistor value into the textbox. A SUBMIT button is built for users
submitting the answer for checking. Röhrig and Jochheim (2000) presented a
framework using Java applets in the MySQL database for remote experiments at the
University of Hagen, Germany. The developers developed a platform for setting up
the remote experiments. A similar Internet based control engineering laboratory was
later developed by Wu et al. (2006) that used Java applets to control a servo motor,
inverted pendulum, coupled tank and fan-plate systems for the Zhejiang University,
China. The control algorithms are implemented on PC-based or embedded
microcontroller-based control servers. However, the developer developed the remote
laboratory for some experiments but did not develop a standard framework so that
others can use that framework and develop other experiments from different
disciplines. Also, to run the remote experiments, the users had to install Java Runtime
Environment (JRE). And the client does not communicate strictly by web based
protocols and ports. Firewall transparency is, therefore, not possible.

Flash
A big advantage of Flash is that there is practically no browser compatibility
issue. Since Flash files are only viewable with a plug-in, Flash will work the same
when the user is on Firefox or Safari or IE, on Mac or PC. Flash has found a lot of
applications in virtual laboratory design. A virtual microscopy was developed with
Flash at the University of Delaware (Barrett et al. 2009). However, few people report
using Flash for remote laboratory design. One of the Flash based remote laboratories
was developed at the HAMK University of Applied Sciences, Finland (Goffart 2007).
A Flash interface was developed for the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)
control and real time PLC data display.

VPN
The work by Eslami et al. (2008), an online operation of a remotely controlled
PLC unit is presented. Software including Remote Desktop and Virtual Private
Network (VPN) has to be installed in the client computer.

XML
XML stands for EXtensible Markup Language (Bray et al. 2008). It is a
markup language much like HyperText Markup Language (HTML). However, XML
is not a replacement for HTML; XML was designed to transport and store data, with
the focus on the type of data. HTML was designed to display data, with focus on how
the data looks.
Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction,
and Operations in Challenging Environments © 2010 ASCE 3847

A XML-based remote control lab and electronic laboratory were reported by

Pastor et al. (2005) and Bagnasco et al. (2005), respectively. Both of the works used
XML to write the experiment configuration file; a Java enabled web browser was
required to operate the experiments. The XML-based approach allows educators to
create new Internet-based labs using legacy code (Pastor et al. 2005).

Matlab/Simulink
Matlab and Simulink are common tools in engineering and technology
degrees in most universities. The Matlab environment, the Simulink toolbox and the
Real-Time Workshop toolbox enable educators and students to focus on system
design, implementation, and evaluation rather than on time-consuming, low-level
programming. In Schmid (2001), a virtual laboratory which uses Matlab/Simulink for
simulations using virtual reality is presented. In Casini et al. (2001), an Automatic
Control Telelab (ACT) using Matlab/Simulink and Java servlet (interface) was
developed. In Sánchez et al. (2004), a Matlab/Java based remote control system
experiment for an inverted pendulum is presented. In their approach, they were using
Matlab software with WinCom from Quanser as an interface.

LabVIEW
National Instruments’ (NI) LabVIEW is popularly deployed software for
academic and industrial application. It is easy to control a real time process with NI’s
graphic interface, hardware and drivers. DataSocket, an Internet programming
technology included in the LabVIEW package, simplifies real time data exchange
among computers connected through network (Edwards 1999; Edwards 2000).
DataSocket is designed specifically for sharing, subscribing, and publishing real time
data to multiple clients where a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) is used by the
users to connect to a data source location in the DataSocket server. It provides the
capability of the remote laboratory system to be accessed by multiple clients to do
different experiments simultaneously.
In Chang et al. (2002), Yang et al. (2005), Cotfas et al. (2006), just to name a
few, LabVIEW and DataSocket based remote laboratories are developed. To bring
the expensive and availability limited nanotechnology experiments into class, a
nanopositioner control experiment for a senior undergraduate class is reported in
Chang et al. (2002). Even with the graphic programming language, DataSocket,
Internet Toolkit and other techniques provided by NI, the developers still need to take
a lot of efforts to develop a remote laboratory. To simplify this procedure, a software
prototype named Remote Lab Generator (RLGen) was proposed by Hasnim and
Abdullah (2007). Based on the experiment design and the HTML documents for the
experiment, RLGen will auto-generate the student’s website where the student will
then take the experiment through Internet. However, the RLGen did not solve the
known compatibility issues of the ActiveX that is used for measurement and control
purposes with the NI LabVIEW.
One of the well developed remote labs is the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology (MIT) iLab (Harward et al. 2008). iLab relies on a three-tier Web
architecture including client applications, service broker and lab servers (Harward et
al. 2008). However, some of the iLab control interfaces are based on LabVIEW and
Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction,
and Operations in Challenging Environments © 2010 ASCE 3848

the user interface is based on ASP and ASP.NET web pages for web publishing.
LabVIEW generally leads to version compatibility problems when updated and both
ASP and ASP.NET pages are proprietary and only compatible with Microsoft
Windows servers. The adaptability to other operating systems (Linux and Mac) and
web browser is still not guaranteed.

Web 2.0
The term “Web 2.0” first became notable after the O'Reilly Media Web 2.0
conference in 2004 (O’Reilly 2005). Web 2.0 is not any updated technical
specification as one might think. It also does not represent any great technological
advancement, since most of the technologies have been around since the early days of
the commercial Internet. Web 2.0 refers to a perceived second generation of web
development and design that aims to facilitate communication, secure information
sharing, interoperability, and collaboration on the World Wide Web (Wikipedia
2009b). Web 2.0 has been widely applied in the last few years as the Internet
continues to develop and mature. Examples of Web 2.0 web sites are Wikipedia,
Gmail, YouTube, and Facebook. One of the rich media techniques used to develop
Web 2.0 web site is Ajax; one successful example is Gmail.
Res

Res
st
t
Reques

pon

Reque

p
ons
se

Full page refresh Full page refresh

Figure 2. The traditional web traffic. Figure 3. The AJAX web traffic.

AJAX stands for Asynchronous JavaScript and XML (Wikipedia 2009a).

Ajax is a development technique that mixes (X)HTML, JavaScript, Cascading Style
Sheets (CSS), Document Object Model (DOM), XML and XSL Transformations
(XSLT) to create interactive Web applications. XML and XSLT are for the
interchange, manipulation and display of data, respectively. XML is not required for
data interchange and therefore XSLT is not required for the manipulation of data
(Wikipedia 2009a). If one does not use JavaScript and/or XML, the acronym AJAX
has thus changed to the term Ajax. JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) is often used
as an alternative format for data interchange if the XML is not used for data
Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction,
and Operations in Challenging Environments © 2010 ASCE 3849

interchange. The traditional web traffic flow is shown in Figure 2. When using
AJAX, the page is loaded entirely only once, the first time it is requested. Not
including the HTML and CSS code that make up the page, JavaScript files in some of
the AJAX engines are also downloaded. All requests for data to the sever will then be
sent as JavaScript calls to this engine. The AJAX engine then requests information
from the web server asynchronously. Thus, only small page bits are requested and
sent to the browser as they are needed by the user. The engine then displays the
information without reloading the entire page as shown in Figure 3. This leads to a
much more interactive and responsive interface because only the necessary
information is passed between the client and server, not the whole page. This
produces the feeling that information is displayed immediately, which brings web
applications closer to their desktop relatives (Alikonweb 2007).
Using Web 2.0 concepts to design remote laboratory interfaces is relatively
new to the web-based engineering lab designer. A work was reported by de Ipiña et
al. (2006), where transforming a conventional WebLab into a Web 2.0-enabled
application was described. Since Ajax was used in their remote lab design, fragments
rather than the whole web pages are updated after user interaction. Therefore, the
amount of data transferred between web server and client application is reduced
dramatically and thus it is very suitable for the mobile domain.

OPEN ISSUES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

There are lot of virtual and remote laboratories developed with LabVIEW,
Java Applet and Flash. LabView is a graphic programming language. The laboratory
experiments based on the VI concept can be easily made ready for Internet delivery.
A LabView Run-Time Engine must be installed on client side, but it has
compatibility issues between the different versions. Java applet and Flash are
becoming more popular. Most of the PC distributors have preinstalled software for
the users, but Object Orientated programming skills are required for the virtual and
remote laboratory development (Chen et al. 2009). From the perspective of users, the
plug-in, platform and operating system compatible are big issues.
To develop a remotely accessible laboratory, the developers have to master
computer hardware and software, data digitization and collection, data transmission
and visualization, and network. An engineering education laboratory developer
usually has expertise in their research field, but not necessarily in remote laboratory
development. The development of a unified user friendly remote laboratory
publishing tool for laboratory developer is in great demand.
In the remote laboratory setup, the end users use a thin client (web browser) to
run experiments. Compared to desktop application based on thick clients (also called
a rich client or a fat client), the first generation web browser (Web 1.0) is less
interactive. Consequently, many technologies have been developed (and are still
being developed) to add accessibility and power to web applications. Notable
examples include Java applets and Flash, which require the users to install separate
runtime engines into their web browsers. Web 2.0 websites allow users to do more
than just retrieve information. They can build on the interactive facilities of Web 1.0
to provide Network as Platform computing, allowing users to run software-
Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction,
and Operations in Challenging Environments © 2010 ASCE 3850

applications entirely through a browser (Wikipedia 2009b). Web 2.0 sites often
feature a rich, user friendly interface based on Ajax, OpenLaszlo, Flex or similar rich
media (Wikipedia 2009). Bringing the web 2.0 technology to develop a lightweight,
more interactive and responsive remote laboratory is a new challenge to remote
laboratory developers.

ACKNOWLEGEMENT

This work is partially supported by the National Science Foundation under

Grant Numbers EEC-0935008, DUE-0942778, HRD-0928921 and DUE-0942807.

REFERENCES

Alikonweb (2007), “What is AJAX.” Online,

<http://www.alikonweb.it/451/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&i
d=172&Itemid=2>. Accessed 22-November-2009.
Allen, I. E. and Seaman, J. (2008). “Staying the course: Online education in the
United States, 2008.” The Sloan Consortium.
Bagnasco, A., Parodi, G., Ponta, D., and Scapolla, A. M. (2005). “A modular and
extensible remote electronic laboratory.” International Journal of Online
Engineering, 1(1).
Barrett, M., Cona, J., Hyde, P., Ketcham, B., Kinney, B., and Schakelman, J. (2009).
“Virtual microscopy.” University of Delaware,
< http://www.udel.edu/biology/ketcham/microscope/>
Bell, J. T. and Fogler, H. S. (2001). “Virtual reality laboratory accidents.” Proc.
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and
Exposition, ASEE, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C. M., Maler, E., and Yergeau, F. (2008).
“Extensible markup language (xml) 1.0,
< http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/>
Casini, M., Prattichizzo, D., and Vicino, A. (2001). “The automatic control telelab: a
remote control engineering laboratory.” Proc., 40th IEEE Conference on
Decision and Control, IEEE, Orlando, FL. 3342–3347.
Chang, T., Jaroonsiriphan, P., and Sun, X. (2002). “Integrating nanotechnology into
undergraduate experience: a web-based approach.” International Journal of
Engineering Education, 18(5), 557–565.
Chen, X., Jiang, L., Shahryar, D., Kehinde, L., and Olowokere, D. (2009).
“Technologies for development of virtual and remote laboratories – a case
study.” Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual
Conference & Exposition, ASEE, Austin, TX.
Chen, X., Olowokere, D., and Thomas, G. (2008). “Teaching Java – objects first with
Bluej.” Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual
Conference & Exposition, ASEE, Pittsburgh, PA.
Cotfas, P., Ursutiu, D., and Samoila, C. (2006). “Self growing remote controlled
laboratory.” International Journal of Online Engineering, 2(1), 1–5.
Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction,
and Operations in Challenging Environments © 2010 ASCE 3851

de Ipiña, D. L., García-Zubia, J., and Orduña, P. (2006). “Remote control of web 2.0-
enabled laboratories from mobile devices.” Proc., Second IEEE International
Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, IEEE. 123–126.
Edwards, H. (1999). “Building an interactive web page with datasocket.” Application
Note 127, National Instruments.
Edwards, H. (2000). “Connecting measurement stdio user interface activex controls
to remote data.” Application Note 151, National Instruments.
Eslami, A., Williams, A., Lapat, L., and Krauss, K. (2008). “A remote control project
to enhance undergraduate students’ interest and knowledge in industrial
automation.” Proc., IAJC-IJME International Conference.
Feisel, L. and Rosa, A. (2005). “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate
engineering education.” Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 121–130.
Feisel, L. D. and Peterson, G. D. (2002). “A colloquy on learning objectives for
engineering education laboratories.” Proc. American Society for Engineering
Education Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE, Montréal, Quebec,
Canada.
Goffart, J. (2007). “Design of a web-based remote lab for a brewery process. Master
thesis, HAMK University of Applied Sciences, Finland.
Harward, V. J., Alamo, J. A. D., R.Lerman, S., Bailey, P. H., Carpenter, J., Delong,
K., Felknor, C., Hardison, J., Harrison, B., Jabbour, I., Long, P. D., Mao, T.,
Naamani, L., Northbidge, J., Schulz, M., Talavera, D., Varadharajan, C.,
Wang, S., Yehia, K., Zbib, R., and Zych, D. (2008). “The iLab shared
architecture: A web services infrastructure to build communities of internet
accessible laboratories.” Proceedings of the IEEE, 96(6), 931–950.
Hasnim, H. and Abdullah, M. Z. (2007). “Remote lab generator (RLGen): A software
tool using auto-generating technique to develop a remote lab.” International
Journal of Online Engineering, 3(4), 49–51.
Ibrahim, W. and Morsi, R. (2005). “Online engineering education: A comprehensive
review.” Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual
Conference & Exposition, ASEE, Portland, Oregon.
Morelli, R. and Walde, R. (2006). Java, Java, Java: Object-Oriented Problem
Solving. Pearson Education, 3rd edition.
O’Reilly, T. (2005). “What is web 2.0.” O’Reilly Network.
<http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-
20.html>.
Pastor, R., Martín, C., Sánchez, J., and Dormido, S. (2005). “Development of an xml-
based lab for remote control experiments on a servo motor.” International
Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 42(2), 173–184.
Röhrig, C. and Jochheim, A. (2000). “Java-based framework for remote access to
laboratory experiments.” Proc., IFAC/IEEE Symposium on Advances in
Control Education, Gold Coast, Australia.
Schmid, C. (2001). “Virtual control laboratories and remote experimentation in
control engineering.” Proc., 11th Annual Conference on Innovations in
Education for Electrical and Information Engineering. 213–218.
Selmer, A., Kraft, M., Moros, R., and Colton, C. (2007). “Weblabs in chemical
engineering education.” Education for Chemical Engineers, 2(1), 38–45.
 Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction,
and Operations in Challenging Environments © 2010 ASCE 3852

Sánchez, J., Dormido, S., Pastor, R., and Morilla, F. (2004). “A Java/Matlab-based
environment for remote control system laboratories: Illustrated with an
inverted pendulum.” IEEE Trans. on Educ., 47(3), 321–329.
Song, G., Olmi, C., and Bannerot, R. (2007). “Enhancing vibration and controls
teachings with remote laboratory experiments.” Proc. American Society for
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, ASEE, Honolulu,
HI.
Wikipedia (2009a). “Ajax (programming) — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.”
Online, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajax_(programming)>.
Accessed 22-November-2009.
Wikipedia (2009b). “Web 2.0 — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.” Online,
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0>. Accessed 22-November-2009.
Wu, H., Yang, Y., Wang, Q., and Zhu, S. (2006). “An internet-based control
engineering laboratory for undergraduate and graduate education.” Proc.,
IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering,
IFAC. 546–550.
Yang, X., Pan, J., and Wang, Y. (2005). “Design and implementation of control
system for 4MeV LIA.” Proc., 10th ICALEPCS Int. Conf. on Accelerator &
Large Expt. Physics Control System, Geneva.

View publication stats