Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 47 views

    Howe Truss Analysis by Finite Element Method Based On 2018 IBC / 2019 CBC

    Uploaded by

    Bißék Śílwàl
    The document summarizes the finite element analysis of a Howe truss based on 2018 IBC and 2019 CBC design criteria. Loads of varying magnitudes are applied to the truss model. Key dimensions of the truss are provided. The analysis results include maximum section forces and displacements at joints. Section forces like axial force, shear and moment are reported for each element. Reactions and internal forces indicate the truss resists the applied loads through compression and tension in the members.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Howe Truss Analysis by Finite Element Method Based On 2018 IBC / 2019 CBC

    Uploaded by

    Bißék Śílwàl
    47 views1 page
    The document summarizes the finite element analysis of a Howe truss based on 2018 IBC and 2019 CBC design criteria. Loads of varying magnitudes are applied to the truss model. Key dimensions of the truss are provided. The analysis results include maximum section forces and displacements at joints. Section forces like axial force, shear and moment are reported for each element. Reactions and internal forces indicate the truss resists the applied loads through compression and tension in the members.

    Original Title

    Howe-Truss

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes the finite element analysis of a Howe truss based on 2018 IBC and 2019 CBC design criteria. Loads of varying magnitudes are applied to the truss model. Key dimensions of the truss are provided. The analysis results include maximum section forces and displacements at joints. Section forces like axial force, shear and moment are reported for each element. Reactions and internal forces indicate the truss resists the applied loads through compression and tension in the members.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    47 views1 page

    Howe Truss Analysis by Finite Element Method Based On 2018 IBC / 2019 CBC

    Uploaded by

    Bißék Śílwàl
    The document summarizes the finite element analysis of a Howe truss based on 2018 IBC and 2019 CBC design criteria. Loads of varying magnitudes are applied to the truss model. Key dimensions of the truss are provided. The analysis results include maximum section forces and displacements at joints. Section forces like axial force, shear and moment are reported for each element. Reactions and internal forces indicate the truss resists the applied loads through compression and tension in the members.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    PROJECT : PAGE :

    CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
    JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
    Howe Truss Analysis by Finite Element Method Based on 2018 IBC / 2019 CBC
    DESIGN CRITERIA
    1. The Ix & A of Web, Cripple and/or Post may be input zero for Queen Post, King Post or Triangle truss.
    2. The loads w1, w2, w3, and w4 may be negative (outward) based on IBC/CBC 1605 wind/seismic load combination results.

    INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY


    LOADS
    w1 = 0.3 kips / ft, (4.4 kN / m)
    w2 = 0.5 kips / ft, (7.3 kN / m)
    w3 = 0.2 kips / ft, (2.9 kN / m)
    w4 = -0.5 kips / ft, (-7.3 kN / m)

    DIMENSIONS
    H= 10 ft, (3.05 m)
    h= 3 ft, (0.91 m)
    L= 60 ft, (18.29 m)

    Max. Section Force


    A (in2) Ix (in4) E (ksi) L (ft) k Lx (ft) N (kips) V (kips) M(ft-kips)
    Top Chord 76.9 1441 1800 41.11 15.81 9.60 2.86 21.63
    Bottom Chord 53.8 494 1800 60.00 30.00 4.63 0.11 0.68
    Post 30.3 76 1600 10.00 10.00 1.84 0 0
    Cripple 30.3 76 1600 5.00 5.00 0.17 0 0
    Web 30.3 76 1600 15.81 15.81 -4.28 0 0 <== Tension
    (Note: Sine statically indeterminate pinned supports, the bottom chord axial force is based on reactions.)
    ANALYSIS
    No. Location Drift (in)
    Joint X (ft) Y (ft) Dx Dy
    1 -39.00 -13.00 0.26 -0.77
    2 -30.00 -10.00 0 0
    3 -22.50 -7.50 -0.01 0.01
    4 -15.00 -5.00 0.02 -0.09
    5 -7.50 -2.50 0.02 -0.13
    6 0 0 0.00 -0.07
    7 7.50 -2.50 -0.01 -0.07
    8 15.00 -5.00 -0.01 -0.06
    9 22.50 -7.50 -0.02 -0.06
    10 30.00 -10.00 0 0 RH2 = -4.63 kips RH10 = 9.83 kips
    11 39.00 -13.00 0.11 0.34 RV2 = -11.45 kips RV10 = -0.25 kips
    12 0.00 -10.00 0.01 -0.07
    13 -15.00 -10.00 0.00 -0.09
    14 15.00 -10.00 0.00 -0.06

    No. Joint I Sec. Forces (kips, ft-kips) J Sec. Forces (kips, ft-kips)
    Element Start, I End, J Axial Shear Moment Axial Shear Moment
    1 1 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 2.28 -21.63
    2 2 3 9.45 2.86 21.63 -9.45 -2.86 0.94
    3 3 4 9.60 0.02 -0.94 -9.60 -0.02 1.12
    4 4 5 6.45 0.43 -1.12 -6.45 -0.43 4.54
    5 5 6 6.74 -1.38 -4.54 -6.74 1.38 0.00
    6 6 7 7.52 0.24 0.00 -7.52 -0.24 1.17
    7 7 8 7.72 -0.34 -1.17 -7.72 0.34 -1.55
    8 8 9 8.71 0.37 1.55 -8.71 -0.37 1.41
    9 9 10 8.59 0.74 -1.41 -8.59 -0.74 7.28
    10 10 11 0.26 -0.77 -7.28 0.00 0.00 0.00
    11 2 13 -1.45 0.11 0.00 1.45 -0.11 0.68
    12 10 14 1.45 -0.06 0.00 -1.45 0.06 -0.32
    13 4 12 4.28 0.00 0.00 -4.28 0.00 0.00
    14 6 12 -1.84 0.00 0.00 1.84 0.00 0.00
    15 8 12 -1.23 0.00 0.00 1.23 0.00 0.00
    16 12 13 -1.45 -0.06 -0.24 1.45 0.06 -0.68
    17 12 14 1.45 0.04 0.24 -1.45 -0.04 0.32
    18 4 13 0.17 0.00 0.00 -0.17 0.00 0.00
    19 8 14 0.09 0.00 0.00 -0.09 0.00 0.00

    You might also like