LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF CHMTN STUDENTS ON

UB’s AVAILABLE LABORATORY FACILITIES

School Year 2016-2017

ACOJEDO, HEIDE

BARACE, MARIA AGNES

CRIETA, JED

FELISILDA, CRYSTAL F.

LAQUINTA, CHARRY A.

MADELO, RUTH D.

MUNIL, EPIFANIO Jr.

NOCALAN, RENELYN A.

ROSOLADA, KEVIN

UNIVERSITY OF BOHOL

City of Tagbilaran

2016-2017

i
 LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF CHMTN STUDENTS ON

UB’s AVAILABLE LABORATORY FACILITIES

School Year 2016-2017

A Thesis
Presented to the Dean and Faculty of the
College of Hospitality Management Tourism and Nutrition
University of Bohol
Tagbilaran City

In Partial Fulfilment
of the Requirements for the Degree of
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN HOTEL AND RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT
(BSHRM)

BY:

ACOJEDO, HEIDE
BARACE, MARIA AGNES
CRIETA, JED
FELISILDA, CRYSTAL F.
LAQUINTA, CHARRY A.
MADELO, RUTH D.
MUNIL, EPIFANIO Jr.
NOCALAN, RENELYN A.
ROSOLADA, KEVIN

2016-2017

ii
 Acknowledgement

This humble research is attribute to the Almighty Father

whose love and wisdom has always been the guiding light

of the researcher and who blessedthem with the following

people whose assistance paved the way to the realization of

this study . The writers wish to express deep love, sincere

appreciation, and profound gratitude to: Maria Asuncion Laxa

Bersabal, PhD , the devoted and understanding critic, who has

made every burden light by believing in the researchers’

capacity to undertake this study; Lot Pusta the adviser whose

guidance gave us direction to come up with the ways

that would yield the best results.; Reinalda Josephine O. Gamutan ,PhD ,

whose approval of the thesis proposalgave impetus to the pursuit

of the research;

Thank you very much.

The researcher 

Dedication

This humble and painstaking accomplishment is lovingly and Sincerely

dedicated to: The researcher parents, Benedicto Felisilda, Melit Najos and Lily

Felisilda, Raquel Laquinta and Rogelio Laquinta , Renario Nocalan Sr. and

iii
Luzviminda Nocalan , Saturnino Barace Sr. and Emiliana Barace. The researcher

understanding brothers and sisters, Phelfrancis Felisilda and Mark John

Felisilda, Rod Laquinta and Camille Laquinta Renario Nocalan Jr. and Rey

Boy Nocalan Rodel Barace and Michael Barace  

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER Title Page

Title Page ……………………………………………………. i

Acknowledgment ……………………………………………. iii

List of Tables …………………………………………………… viii

iv
 List of Figures ………………………………………………….. viii

List of Graphs …………………………………………………. viii

CHAPTER I THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE

Introduction ……………………………………………………. 1

Theoretical Background ……………………………………… 3

Related Literature …………………………………………….. 4

Related Studies ………………………………………………. 8

The Problem ………………………………………………….. 11

Null Hypothesis ………………………………………………. 12

Significance of the Study ……………………………………. 13

Research Mythology........................................................... 14

Environment ……………………………………………………. 14

Instrument ……………………………………………………….. 16

Data Gathering Procedure …………………………………….. 17

Statistical Treatment ……………………………………………. 18

Definition of terms................................................................... 20

CHAPTER II PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND

INTERPRETATION OF DATA

v
 Profile of Respondents ………………………………………… 22

Student Satisfaction................. …………………………. 25

CHAPTER III. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary ………………………………………………………. 33

Findings ………………………………………………………… 34

Conclusions ……………………………………………………. 35

Recommendations ……………………………………………. 37

BIBLIOGRAPHY

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Consent to Student Respondents

Appendix B – Questionnaire

Appendix C – Letter of Intent

VITAE

vi
 LIST OF TABLES

TABLE PAGE

I Distribution of Respondent...................................... 14

II Definition of Questionnaire...................................... 15

III Profile of Respondent.............................................. 21

VI Satisfaction of the Laboratory Facilities.................. 24

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE PAGE

1 Conceptual Framework ………………………………. 10

2 Location of University of Bohol……………………… 13

LIST OF GRAPHS

GRAPH PAGE

Graph I-A Profile of Respondents as regards to age…… 22

Graph I-B Profile of Respondents as regards to gender... 22

Graph 1-C Profile of Respondents as regards to year level. 23

vii