Scribd
Upload
4K views1 page

Interview Rubric

This rubric outlines the criteria for evaluating interview performance across four levels: outstanding, proficient, consolidating, and emerging. For an outstanding performance, the introduction would creatively preview discussion topics and skillfully introduce the interviewee. Questions would be well-informed by context and the initial discussion. A detailed summary would indicate questions asked and answers received, and the conclusion would identify at least three discussion points conveying understanding. Writing would demonstrate sophistication in clarity, conciseness, and organization.

Uploaded by

Remi Rajan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
4K views1 page

Interview Rubric

This rubric outlines the criteria for evaluating interview performance across four levels: outstanding, proficient, consolidating, and emerging. For an outstanding performance, the introduction would creatively preview discussion topics and skillfully introduce the interviewee. Questions would be well-informed by context and the initial discussion. A detailed summary would indicate questions asked and answers received, and the conclusion would identify at least three discussion points conveying understanding. Writing would demonstrate sophistication in clarity, conciseness, and organization.

Uploaded by

Remi Rajan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Rubric: Interview

Criteria Outstanding Proficient Consolidating Emerging


Introduction Introduction is creative and Introduction is clear and Introduction lacks sufficient Interview lacks an effective
detailed to give an excellent provides important details to provide information introduction. Very little
preview about the topics to information about the about the interview event or description about the
be covered in the interview. interview event and the the person interviewed. interview event or the person
Person interviewed is skilfully person interviewed. interviewed.
introduced.
Questions Prepares and asks relevant Prepares and asks largely Prepares and asks question Questions and their delivery
questions that are aptly relevant questions that that demonstrate a minimal indicate little preparation and
informed by the context and demonstrate an understanding of the context, attention to context, and the
the subject’s initial query understanding , if not and the subjects’ initial query subjects’ initial query.
mastery, of the context and
the subject’s initial query
Summary A detailed summary of the A summary of the interview A hasty summary of the The summary of the interview
interview with a clear with indication of the interview with little indication received has no indication of
indication of the questions questions asked and answers of the questions asked and the questions asked and
asked and answers received received answers received answers received.
Conclusion At least three main points At least two main points Conveys some understanding Conveys very little, if any,
identified from the interview identified from the interview of the topic/area of research understanding of the
that convey a clear sense of that convey a clear sense of topic/area of research
understanding of the understanding of the
topic/area of research topic/area of research
Writing Writing demonstrates a Writing is accomplished in Writing lacks clarity or Writing is unfocused,
mechanics sophisticated clarity, terms of clarity and conciseness and contains rambling, or contains serious
and conciseness, and correctness; conciseness and contains only numerous errors; report lacks errors; report is poorly
organization report is extremely well a few errors; report is well organization. organized.
organized. organized.

You might also like