The document discusses various literary theories that can be used to analyze texts, including gender criticism, defamiliarization, postcolonial criticism, androgyny, semiotics, and reader response theory. It provides definitions and explanations of these theories, along with their origins and significance. The document also asks which theory seems most useful for analyzing texts and which seems most distant from actual practice. In response, it argues that reader response theory is most useful as it focuses on the reader's interpretations, while psychoanalytic theory seems most distant as it analyzes unconscious meanings and desires rather than direct interpretations of the text.
The document discusses various literary theories that can be used to analyze texts, including gender criticism, defamiliarization, postcolonial criticism, androgyny, semiotics, and reader response theory. It provides definitions and explanations of these theories, along with their origins and significance. The document also asks which theory seems most useful for analyzing texts and which seems most distant from actual practice. In response, it argues that reader response theory is most useful as it focuses on the reader's interpretations, while psychoanalytic theory seems most distant as it analyzes unconscious meanings and desires rather than direct interpretations of the text.
The document discusses various literary theories that can be used to analyze texts, including gender criticism, defamiliarization, postcolonial criticism, androgyny, semiotics, and reader response theory. It provides definitions and explanations of these theories, along with their origins and significance. The document also asks which theory seems most useful for analyzing texts and which seems most distant from actual practice. In response, it argues that reader response theory is most useful as it focuses on the reader's interpretations, while psychoanalytic theory seems most distant as it analyzes unconscious meanings and desires rather than direct interpretations of the text.
The document discusses various literary theories that can be used to analyze texts, including gender criticism, defamiliarization, postcolonial criticism, androgyny, semiotics, and reader response theory. It provides definitions and explanations of these theories, along with their origins and significance. The document also asks which theory seems most useful for analyzing texts and which seems most distant from actual practice. In response, it argues that reader response theory is most useful as it focuses on the reader's interpretations, while psychoanalytic theory seems most distant as it analyzes unconscious meanings and desires rather than direct interpretations of the text.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
FELIX O. ALFELOR SR. FOUNDATION COLLOEGES INC.
San Juan Avenue, Sipocot, Camarines Sur
FLIT 3- Survey in the Philippine Literature in English
Bromacom, Marlon T. BSEd- English 2nd year Part I.
This question will appear on the final examination, though the
list of terms will be reduced from twenty to ten. Define ten (10) of the concepts listed below as they have been used by the critics or theorists. In defining each term, please explain what the term means. Then, briefly identify the term's source or origin (as it appeared in our subject) and/or the theorist(s) who used the term. If the term has been relevant to multiple theorists, you do not need to cite each theorist who used it, but please try to identify the theorist or theorists for whom the term was most important. Finally, briefly explain the term's significance to history of literary theory since 1900.
Gender/Sex
Gender/sex or Gender Criticism describe and analyze the ways in
which in literature portrays the narrative male domination in regard to female bodies by exploring the economic, social, political, and psychological forces embedded within literature. This was called as feminist criticism. Elaine showalter describes the development of feminist theory as having three phases. The first she call "feminist critique” which means feminist reader examines the ideologies behind the literary piece. Second is the gynocriticsm in which woman is producer of textual meaning and the third is the "gender theory" which the ideological inscription and the literary effects of Sex/gender systems are explored. In 1900s the Gender Criticism help some female author to address the women's voice and corroborate to make using literature on how gender discrimination affects them socially and mentally. This feminist sought to fight for the equal rights and with these the theory enlightened the readers how women important and powerful is.
Defamiliaration
Is the routine of ordinary experience, Shklovsky contended,
rendered invisible the uniqueness and particularity of the objects of existence. Literary language, partly by calling attention to itself as language, estranged the reader from the familiar and made fresh the experience of daily life.
“Postcolonial Criticism”
Investigates the relationships between colonizers and colonized
in the period post-colonization. Though the two fields are increasingly finding points of intersection—the work of bell hooks, for example—and are both activist intellectual enterprises, “Ethnic Studies and “Postcolonial Criticism” have significant differences in their history and ideas. “Postcolonial” theory reverses the historical center/margin direction of cultural inquiry: critiques of the metropolis and capital now emanate from the former colonies. Moreover, theorists like Homi K. Bhabha have questioned the binary thought that produces the dichotomies—center/margin, white/black, and colonizer/colonized—by which colonial practices are justified. “Postcolonial Criticism” pursues not merely the inclusion of the marginalized literature of colonial peoples into the dominant canon and discourse. “Postcolonial Criticism” offers a fundamental critique of the ideology of colonial domination and at the same time seeks to undo the “imaginative geography” of Orientalist thought that produced conceptual as well as economic divides between West and East, civilized and uncivilized, First and Third Worlds.
Androgyny
In Modern Literature engages with the ways in which the trope of
androgyny has shifted during the late nineteenth and twentieth- centuries. Alchemical, platonic, sexological, psychological and decadent representations of androgyny have provided writers with an icon which has been appropriated in diverse ways. This fascinating new study traces different revisions of the psycho- sexual, embodied, cultural and feminist fantasies and repudiations of this unstable but enduring trope across a broad range of writers from the fin de siècle to the present.
Semiotics
The study of signs, has experienced a great rise in interest
since the 1990s primarily through its application in the interpretation of literary texts and, by extension, culture. The role of semiotics in literary criticism is to establish key theoretical models that can provide insights so that the connection of the texts to broader meaning structures within literary practices can be better understood. The sign is analyzed within two fundamental frameworks as established by Saussure and Peirce. Introductions to the field, such as Chandler 2002 and Nöth 1990, typically see these two models as incompatible. PART II. (30 points)
Which of the theories or texts we studied this semester seems to
you the most useful for the analysis and interpretation of literary texts? Which of these seems the most distant from the actual practice of interpreting and analyzing literary texts?
Write an essay that explains your answer to these two questions
and compares the two selected texts.
In literature, literary criticism defined as the supplemental
need of reader to explore the author’s interest in writing the particular piece and these criticism tend to see the hidden character of the writer. In this subject, I think the theory or text that we studied which is most useful for analysis and interpretation of literary texts is the reader’s response. The Readers Response suits on how student analyse the piece in literature. The main use of Readers Response criticism attempts to describe what had been happened in a text through the interpretation of the readers mind which includes how the reader is being creative in thinking hence they will focus on their own perspectives. Readers Response criticism creates and recognize the importance of an author’s wit that give readers to provide such a meaning to a text and allowing them to think critically.
In our subject, the theory or literary criticism that seems the
most distant from the actual practice of interpreting and analysing the literary text is the psychoanalytic theory. A Psychoanalytic reading aims to better understand the inner workings of human behaviour by conceptualising meaning from everyday human experiences such as anxieties, trauma, sexuality, repression of the unconscious and dream meanings, as well as the meaning of death. We use our experiences in order for us to relate in that particular text, we see ourselves as a character by putting ourselves into the world of literature or in one masterpiece/work which we can easily describe and interpret what is the meaning of a text and the purpose of the author by creating a story. This psychoanalytic theory by Sigmund Freud helps the reader to understand some meaning of a context. It is also necessary for readers to look for the deeper meaning that led to readers to think and critic concisely yet determining how idea of a human works.