Flit 3 - 1ST Long Quiz

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

FELIX O. ALFELOR SR. FOUNDATION COLLOEGES INC.

San Juan Avenue, Sipocot, Camarines Sur

FLIT 3- Survey in the Philippine Literature in English

Bromacom, Marlon T.
BSEd- English 2nd year
Part I.

This question will appear on the final examination, though the


list of terms will be reduced from twenty to ten. Define ten (10)
of the concepts listed below as they have been used by the
critics or theorists. In defining each term, please explain what
the term means. Then, briefly identify the term's source or
origin (as it appeared in our subject) and/or the theorist(s) who
used the term. If the term has been relevant to multiple
theorists, you do not need to cite each theorist who used it, but
please try to identify the theorist or theorists for whom the
term was most important. Finally, briefly explain the term's
significance to history of literary theory since 1900.

Gender/Sex

Gender/sex or Gender Criticism describe and analyze the ways in


which in literature portrays the narrative male domination in
regard to female bodies by exploring the economic, social,
political, and psychological forces embedded within literature.
This was called as feminist criticism. Elaine showalter describes
the development of feminist theory as having three phases. The
first she call "feminist critique” which means feminist reader
examines the ideologies behind the literary piece. Second is the
gynocriticsm in which woman is producer of textual meaning and
the third is the "gender theory" which the ideological
inscription and the literary effects of Sex/gender systems are
explored. In 1900s the Gender Criticism help some female author
to address the women's voice and corroborate to make using
literature on how gender discrimination affects them socially and
mentally. This feminist sought to fight for the equal rights and
with these the theory enlightened the readers how women important
and powerful is.

Defamiliaration

Is the routine of ordinary experience, Shklovsky contended,


rendered invisible the uniqueness and particularity of the
objects of existence. Literary language, partly by calling
attention to itself as language, estranged the reader from the
familiar and made fresh the experience of daily life.

“Postcolonial Criticism”

Investigates the relationships between colonizers and colonized


in the period post-colonization. Though the two fields are
increasingly finding points of intersection—the work of bell
hooks, for example—and are both activist intellectual
enterprises, “Ethnic Studies and “Postcolonial Criticism” have
significant differences in their history and ideas.
“Postcolonial” theory reverses the historical center/margin
direction of cultural inquiry: critiques of the metropolis and
capital now emanate from the former colonies. Moreover, theorists
like Homi K. Bhabha have questioned the binary thought that
produces the dichotomies—center/margin, white/black, and
colonizer/colonized—by which colonial practices are justified.
“Postcolonial Criticism” pursues not merely the inclusion of the
marginalized literature of colonial peoples into the dominant
canon and discourse. “Postcolonial Criticism” offers a
fundamental critique of the ideology of colonial domination and
at the same time seeks to undo the “imaginative geography” of
Orientalist thought that produced conceptual as well as economic
divides between West and East, civilized and uncivilized, First
and Third Worlds.

Androgyny

In Modern Literature engages with the ways in which the trope of


androgyny has shifted during the late nineteenth and twentieth-
centuries. Alchemical, platonic, sexological, psychological and
decadent representations of androgyny have provided writers with
an icon which has been appropriated in diverse ways. This
fascinating new study traces different revisions of the psycho-
sexual, embodied, cultural and feminist fantasies and
repudiations of this unstable but enduring trope across a broad
range of writers from the fin de siècle to the present.

Semiotics

The study of signs, has experienced a great rise in interest


since the 1990s primarily through its application in the
interpretation of literary texts and, by extension, culture. The
role of semiotics in literary criticism is to establish key
theoretical models that can provide insights so that the
connection of the texts to broader meaning structures within
literary practices can be better understood. The sign is analyzed
within two fundamental frameworks as established by Saussure and
Peirce. Introductions to the field, such as Chandler 2002 and
Nöth 1990, typically see these two models as incompatible.
PART II. (30 points)

Which of the theories or texts we studied this semester seems to


you the most useful for the analysis and interpretation of
literary texts? Which of these seems the most distant from the
actual practice of interpreting and analyzing literary texts?

Write an essay that explains your answer to these two questions


and compares the two selected texts.

In literature, literary criticism defined as the supplemental


need of reader to explore the author’s interest in writing the
particular piece and these criticism tend to see the hidden
character of the writer. In this subject, I think the theory or
text that we studied which is most useful for analysis and
interpretation of literary texts is the reader’s response. The
Readers Response suits on how student analyse the piece in
literature. The main use of Readers Response criticism attempts
to describe what had been happened in a text through the
interpretation of the readers mind which includes how the reader
is being creative in thinking hence they will focus on their own
perspectives. Readers Response criticism creates and recognize
the importance of an author’s wit that give readers to provide
such a meaning to a text and allowing them to think critically.

In our subject, the theory or literary criticism that seems the


most distant from the actual practice of interpreting and
analysing the literary text is the psychoanalytic theory. A
Psychoanalytic reading aims to better understand the inner
workings of human behaviour by conceptualising meaning from
everyday human experiences such as anxieties, trauma, sexuality,
repression of the unconscious and dream meanings, as well as the
meaning of death. We use our experiences in order for us to
relate in that particular text, we see ourselves as a character
by putting ourselves into the world of literature or in one
masterpiece/work which we can easily describe and interpret what
is the meaning of a text and the purpose of the author by
creating a story. This psychoanalytic theory by Sigmund Freud
helps the reader to understand some meaning of a context. It is
also necessary for readers to look for the deeper meaning that
led to readers to think and critic concisely yet determining how
idea of a human works.

You might also like