0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views38 pages

Chapter 7: Practical Considerations in Modeling: With Examples From Other Chapters

Uploaded by

Hectistyle
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views38 pages

Chapter 7: Practical Considerations in Modeling: With Examples From Other Chapters

Uploaded by

Hectistyle
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 38

Chapter 7:

Chapter 7 Practical
Considerations in Modeling:
with examples from other
chapters

ME 501 chapter 7 1
Key considerations when
generating a FE model
 Number of elements being used in the mesh
 Referred to as mesh density
 The type of element
 1-D or 2-D (with and w/o bending), 3-D
 Plane assumption vs. shell assumption (chapt 12)
 Linear or some higher order displacement function
 What is the quality of the mesh
 This has a significant effect on the solution (crashing)
 Classic question:
 Use many simple elements or few complex element
ME 501 chapter 7 2
© 2002 Brooks/Cole Publishing / Thomson Learning™

Figure 7-1a (a) Beam with


loading: effects of the aspect
ratio (AR) illustrated by the
five cases with different
aspect ratios

May not have effect in a


Constant strain field, such
as axial load

ME 501 chapter 7 3
© 2002 Brooks/Cole Publishing / Thomson Learning™

--Using Element from 10.2 in Logan,


a LINEAR strain rectangular
element
--Other formulations are
probably LESS sensitive

Figure 7-1b (b) Inaccuracy of solution as a function of the aspect


ratio (numbers in parentheses correspond to the cases listed in
Table 7-1)
ME 501 chapter 7 4
© 2002 Brooks/Cole Publishing / Thomson Learning™

Always try to avoid generating a mesh with too many elements that
have these characteristics. You can get away with a few.

Figure 7-2 Elements with poor shapes

ME 501 chapter 7 5
Transition triangle
used to go from
fine to coarse

© 2002 Brooks/Cole Publishing / Thomson Learning™

Figure 7-4 Use of symmetry applied to a uniaxially loaded


member with a fillet
ME 501 chapter 7 6
Rather than using “transition triangles”, you can also use quads
when you transition from a fine mesh to a coarse mesh.

You can also


use a 3:1 ratio

ME 501 chapter 7 7
© 2002 Brooks/Cole Publishing / Thomson Learning™

Figure 7-5 Problem reduction


using axes of symmetry applied
to a plate with a hole subjected
to tensile force

If you choose to solve the full


problem, make sure you apply
appropriate BCs to eliminate
rigid body motion.

ME 501 chapter 7 8
Sharp Corners or
Discontinuities
 If they exist, local yielding will occur
 Linear FEM will not calculate infinite stress
 Use realistic radius in design and FEM
model
 Or account for yielding (plasticity model)

ME 501 chapter 7 9
Concentrated forces and solid
elements
 Per linear theory of elasticity, Point load
gives infinite stress & displacement
 Actual material would yield, redistribute
force
 In finite elements, displacement function
does not allow infinite displacement or
stress (approaches with very fine mesh)

ME 501 chapter 7 10
© 2002 Brooks/Cole Publishing / Thomson Learning™

If you actually decide to model


a point force, you need to resolve
the mesh in that region in order
to capture the stress and strain
gradient.

Figure 7-6 Natural subdivisions


at discontinuities, i.e., where to
put element edges.

Resolve the mesh


near corners.

Use elements to
distribute load.

ME 501 chapter 7 11
Concentrated Forces in Solids
 Either ignore locally high stresses
 i.e., don’t use stress right at force location
 Or, input a more realistic loading
distribution (non-uniform pressure)
 Hertzian contact stress distribution

ME 501 chapter 7 12
© 2002 Brooks/Cole Publishing / Thomson Learning™

Figure 7-17 (a) Connecting rod subjected to tensile loading and (b)
principal stress throughout the rod
ME 501 chapter 7 13
Mesh Refinement
 h-Method
 Keep element formulation the same
 Refine by creating more elements
 Evaluate error

 p-method
 Keep mesh the same
 Use increasingly higher polynomials for shape
function
 Evaluate error
ME 501 chapter 7 14
This gives more
refined solution
inside the element

ME 501 chapter 7 15
Element Selection
 Personal Preference
 Sometimes depends on industry
 Type of System
 What are the physics being modeled
 Solids, fluids, heat transfer
 FE program Emphasis
 The program Continuity (cardiac modeling)
only uses cubic hermite elements
ME 501 chapter 7 16
CST
 Generally too stiff in bending
 Requires too many elements to resolve
 Higher-order element is needed
 Approach 1 – More external nodes
 higher order means more DOF
 Approach 2 – Use 4 node quad elements
 These can be derived in several ways.
 Isoparametric formulation (Chapt 10)
 Static condensation (Chapt 7)
ME 501 chapter 7 17
Example: 4 CST 1 Quad

Figure 7-13 Quadrilateral element with an internal node

Assemble quad from 4 CST, then


“condense” out internal DOF (node 5) prior
to assembly of global stiffness matrix

ME 501 chapter 7 18
10 X 10 8X8
1 2 3 4 5
# # # # #  U1xy 
#  U 
 # # # #   2 xy 
  The mathematical details are

# # # # #  U 3 xy  given in Section 7.5. We will


only focus on the isoparametric
   formulation in Chapt 10.

# U
# # # #  4 xy
 
 # # # # #  U 5 xy 

ME 501 chapter 7 19
Additional Elements
8-node PLANE82 in ANSYS
(quadratic)

Lin-quad
LST
Linear Strain
Triangle
cubic

ME 501 chapter 7 20
Quick look at shell elements
(chapter 12 – plate bending elements)

The key difference between plane


elements and shell elements is the ability
to model transverse loads that create
bending, and rotational DOF’s

ME 501 chapter 7 21
Shells – very useful for projects

ME 501 chapter 7 22
The same principle holds for 3-D solid elements and shell elements.
8-node hex (brick) elements only solve for displacments, whereas
4-node shell elements solve for displacement and rotation.

7-23
Stresses in Solid Elements
 Depend on element shape function
 Linear stress = const
 Quadratic stress = linear

 In general, Less accurate than


displacements

ME 501 chapter 7 24
Element vs. Nodal
CST  A B 
   BC 
 2   
B  2 

A C

 A D 
D CD
   
Calculate stress at  2   2 
center of element

 A B C  D 
 
 2 

ME 501 chapter 7 25
More Complex Elements

  f ( x, y ) (not constant)

 Not continuous across element boundaries


 Still need contour plots

ME 501 chapter 7 26
Typical Approach

 Within each element, calculate stress at


nxn matrix of loc’ns (gauss or
integration points – chapter 10)
 Curve fit to extrapolate stress to nodes
(SX, SY, SXY)
 Average stress at common nodes

ME 501 chapter 7 27
Draw Contour Plots
10
50
. . . These are usually isobars,
that represent lines of constant
value. So, the values should

. . . 90
scale in between these lines

. . .
ME 501 chapter 7 28
Typically average component
Stresses (SX, SY, SXY),
then compute principal stresses
SIG1,SIG2,SIG3  1   2   3
SIGE  Distortion Energy
SI  2* max  stress intensity
Use for design calcs – theory of yielding
Theory of failure

ME 501 chapter 7 29
© 2002 Brooks/Cole Publishing / Thomson Learning™

Note the local


mesh refinement
near the hole,
where stresses
are expected to
be high.

Figure 7-7 Plate of steel (20 in. long, 20 in. wide,l in. thick, and
with a l-in.-radius hole) discretized using a preprocessor program
[15] with automatic mesh generation
ME 501 chapter 7 30
© 2002 Brooks/Cole Publishing / Thomson Learning™

Figure 7-9 Maximum


principal stress contour
plot for a plate with a hole
(original plot is in color).
Largest principal stresses
of 301 psi occur at the top
and the bottom of the hole,
which indicated a stress
concentration of 3. Stresses
were obtained by using an
average of the nodal values
(called smoothing)

ME 501 chapter 7 31
Verification of Elements/Results
 Run a “patch test” to ensure the element
satisfies our standard requirements
 Comparison to handbook solution
 Create coarse model and refine mesh for
convergence check
 Thisis a typical requirement when publishing
results from an FE study

ME 501 chapter 7 32
© 2002 Brooks/Cole Publishing / Thomson Learning™

Incompatible element

Figure 7-11 Convergence of a finite element solution based on the


compatible displacement formulation

ME 501 chapter 7 33
© 2002 Brooks/Cole Publishing / Thomson Learning™

Figure 7-16 Flowchart


of plane/strain finite
element process

ME 501 chapter 7 34
Subtle Boundary Condition Effects
UX1 = UX2 = 0 UY1 = UY2 = 0
3002
-5000
2
Reactions

1
-5000
Load
-3002
10000 lb
total

ME 501 chapter 7 35
Another option
UX1 = UX2 = 0 UY1 = 0
0
-5000
2

Reactions

1
-5000
Load
0
10000 lb
total

ME 501 chapter 7 36
Solid Elements (some
examples)
 SOLID45
 3D Solid element, linear with extra modes
 8 node E,I,J,K,L,M,N,O,P
 Other shape options
 SOLID95
 20 node element with mid side nodes, quadratic
 Other shape options
 Solid 92 Tetrahedron
 quadratic

ME 501 chapter 7 37
Thermal Elements
 Thermal55 Solid 2D
 Thermal34 Radiation
 Thermal70 3D Solid
 KXX conductivity
 C thermal capacity
 DENS Density

ME 501 chapter 7 38

You might also like