Company Management: Appointment of Directors Under Companies Act 2013
Company Management: Appointment of Directors Under Companies Act 2013
Company Management: Appointment of Directors Under Companies Act 2013
Director may be defined as an individual who directs, controls or manages the affairs of the
Company. A director is a person who is appointed to perform the duties and functions of a
company in accordance with the provisions of the Company Act, 2013[1]. They are
comparatively known as the Board of Directors.
They play a very important role in managing the business and other affairs of the Company.
The appointment of Directors is very crucial for the growth and management of the
Company. Every Company shall have a Board of Directors consisting of individuals as
directors.
The Companies Act also permits the Articles to provide for the appointment of two-thirds of
the Directors according to the principle of proportional representation, if so adopted by the
company in question.
Nominee Directors can be appointed by a third party or by the Central Government in the
case of oppression or mismanagement.
Director’s appointment is covered under section 152[1] of Companies Act, 2013, along with
Rule 8 of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014.
The Companies Act does not prescribe any qualifications for Directors of any company. An
Indian company may, therefore, in its Articles, stipulated qualifications for Directors. The
Companies Act does, however, limit the specified share qualification of Directors which can
be prescribed by a public company or a private company that is a subsidiary of a public
company, to be five thousand rupees (Rs. 5,000/-).
1. Apply for DSC: In India, The appointment of directors can be only done thru the
digital signature and so 1st step is to create DSC.
2. Apply for DSC: That’s the mandatory requirement for becoming a director of a
Company. A person must have DIN i.e. Director Identification Number which can be
obtained online by filing DIR -3 on MCA.
3. Documentation Preparation: A letter in writing stating his consent as Director; A
letter in writing to the effect that the person is not disqualified to be appointed as
Director as specified under Law; Disclosure of Interest in Other Companies
(shareholding pattern); if any, else a NIL disclosure is sufficient.
Notice to call Board meeting with Explanatory Statement. Resolution to be passed at the
meeting for the appointment of a director. Appointment letter to be issued by the Company to
a director for its appointment.
Resident Director:
This is one of the most important changes made in the new regime, particularly in respect of
the appointment of Directors under section 149 of the Companies Act, 2013. It states that
every Company should have at least one resident Director i.e. a person who has stayed in
India for not less than 182 days in the previous calendar year.
Woman Director:
Now the legislature has made mandatory for certain classes of the company to appoint
women as director. As per section 149, prescribes for a certain class of the company their
women’s strength in the board should not be less than 1/3. Such companies either listed
company and any public company having-
The Companies Act prevents a Director from being a Director, at the same time, in more than
fifteen (15) companies. For the purposes of establishing this maximum number of companies
in which a person can be a Director, the following companies are excluded:
Failure of the Director to comply with these regulations will result in a fine of fifty thousand
rupees (Rs. 50,000/-) for every company that he or she is a Director of, after the first fifteen
(15) so determined.
Sign in Join
Home
Blog
Submit Article
Funding
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
India
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Women’s rights
Success Stories
o
o
o
o
Careers
Featured Student Assignments (LawSikho)
Law Notes
o
AIBE
Weekly Competition
o
Weekly Competition – December 2019
o
SIGN IN
Welcome!Log into your account
your username
your password
SIGN UP
your username
5+8=?
PASSWORD RECOVERY
Recover your password
your email
Sign in
About Us
Blog
Write an Article
iPleaders
HOME
BLOG
SUBMIT ARTICLE
FUNDING
INDIA
WOMEN’S RIGHTS
SUCCESS STORIES
CAREERS
FEATURED STUDENT ASSIGNMENTS (LAWSIKHO)
LAW NOTES
AIBE
WEEKLY COMPETITION
WEEKLY COMPETITION – DECEMBER 2019
Home Companies Act 2013 Position, Appointment & Powers of Directors under the Companies Act, 2013
Subodh Asthana
-
Share on Facebook
Tweet on Twitter
Image Source: https://bit.ly/2L4pqfb
This article has been written by Pankhuri Anand, a student of Banasthali Vidyapith, Rajasthan.
This article discusses the position of Directors in a corporate body, how directors are appointed,
and what are the powers of directors under the Companies Act 2013, along with the relevant
case laws.
A corporation is an artificial person which is intangible and invisible. For making any decision
and to have knowledge and intention, a living person has a mind and hands by which he carries
out his actions. But a corporate body being an artificial person has none of these. So it needs to
act through a living person. The company’s business is entrusted in the hands of directors.
Position of Directors
The position held by the directors in any corporate enterprise is a tough subject to explain as held
in the case of Ram Chand & Sons Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd.v. Kanhayalal Bhargava. The position
of a director has been cited by Bowen LJ in the case of Imperial Hydropathic Hotel Co
Blackpool v. Hampson as a versatile position in a corporate body. Directors are sometimes
described as trustees, sometimes as agents and sometimes as managing partners. These
expressions are from indicating point by which directors are viewed in particular circumstances.
The directors are the professional men of the company who are hired to direct the affairs of the
company. They are the officers of a company and not a servant. In the case of Moriarty v.
Regent’s Garage Co, it was held that a director is not a servant of the company, but a
controller of the affairs of a company.
Directors as agents
In the landmark case of Ferguson v. Wilson, it was clearly recognised that the directors are
the agents of a company in the eyes of law. The company being an artificial person can act only
through the directors. Regarding this, the relation between the directors and the company is
merely like the ordinary relation of principal and agent.
The relation between the directors and the company is similar to the general principle of
agency. When a director signs on behalf of the company, it is a company that is held liable and
not the director. Also, like agents, they have to declare any personal interest if they have in a
transaction of the company.
One of the important points to be noted is that they are not agents of its individual members. They
are the agents of the institution.
In the case of Indian Overseas Bank v. RM Marketing, it has been held that the directors of a
company could not be made liable merely because he is a director if he has not given any
personal guarantee for a loan taken by the company,
Directors as Trustees
In a strict sense, the directors are not the trustees, but they are always considered and treated as
trustees of money and properties which comes to their hand or which is under their control. As
observed by the Madras High Court in the case of Ramaswamy Iyer v. Brahamayya & Co.,
regarding their power of applying funds of the company and for the misuse of power, the
directors are liable as trustees and after their death, the cause of action survives against their legal
representative.
Another reason due to which the directors are described as trustees is because of their nature of
the office. Directors are appointed to manage the affairs of the company for the benefit of
shareholders. But, the director of a company is not exactly a trustee, as a trustee of will or
marriage settlement. He is a paid officer of a company.
As per the principles laid down in the case of Percival v. Wright, directors are not the trustees of
the shareholders. They are trustees of the company. The same principle was repeated again in the
case of Peskin v. Anderson that the directors are not trustees for shareholders and hold no
fiduciary duty to them.
A corporation has no mind or body and its action needs to be done by a person and not merely as
an agent or trustee but by someone for whom the company is liable as his action is the action of
the company itself. If we consider a company as a human body, the directors are the mind and the
will of the company and they control the actions of the company
Appointment of Directors
The appointment of Directors of a company is strictly regulated by the Company’s Act, 2013.
There can be a maximum of 15 directors. A company may appoint more than 15 directors after
passing a special resolution.
The Central Government may prescribe a class or classes of a company have a minimum one
women director. Every company is also required to have a minimum of one director who has
stayed in India in the previous year for a period of 182 days or more.
Independent Directors
The provisions of Independent Directors has been laid down under section 149(4) of the
Companies Act, 2013. This section lays down that at least one-third of the total number of
directors should be independent directors in every listed company The Central Government may
prescribe the minimum number of independent directors in public companies.
Sub-section (6) of section 149, defines that an independent director stands for a director other
than a managing director, whole-time director or a nominee director:
1. Who is a person with integrity and has relevant expertise and experience.
2. Who has not been a promoter of the company, its subsidiary or holding company
either in past or present.
3. Who himself or his relative has no pecuniary relationship with the company, its
holding or subsidiary company, directors or promoters.
4. Who himself or his relative, do not hold the position in key managerial personnel, or
not an employee of the company.
The independent director has to declare his independence at the first meeting of the Board and
subsequently every year at the first meeting of the Board in the financial year.
An independent director holds office for a term of five years on the Board. He is also eligible for
being reappointed after passing a special resolution, but no independent director is to hold the
office for more than two consecutive terms.
The independent directors are to be selected from a data bank which contains certain information
such as name, address and qualifications of persons who are eligible and willing to act as an
independent director. The data bank is maintained by anybody, institute or association with
expertise in the creation and maintenance of data bank and notified by the Central Government. A
company has to pick up a person with due diligence, as stated in section 150.
The appointment has to be approved by the company in general meeting, and the manner and
procedure for selection of independent directors who fulfil the qualification stated under section
149 may be prescribed by the Central Government.
First Directors
The subscribers of the memorandum appoint the first directors of a company. They are generally
listed in the articles of the company. If the first director is not appointed, then all the individuals,
who are subscribers become directors. The first director holds the office only up to the date of the
first annual general meeting, and the subsequent director is appointed as per the provisions laid
down under section 152.
Appointment at the general meeting
Section 152 lays down the provision that directors should be appointed by the company in the
General Meetings. The person so appointed is assigned with a director identification number. He
also has to make sure in the meeting that he is not disqualified from becoming a director.
The individual appointed has also to file his consent to act as a director within 30 days with the
registrar.
Annual rotation
The retirement of the directors by annual rotation can be prescribed by the company in the
Articles. If not so, only one-third of the directors can be given a permanent appointment. The
tenure of the rest of them must be determined by rotation.
At an annual general meeting, one-third of such directors will go out, and the directors who were
appointed first and has been in the office for the longest period will retire in the first place. When
two or more directors have been in the office for an equal period of time, their retirement will be
determined by mutual agreement, or by a lot.
The vacancies created should be filled up at the same general meeting. The general meeting may
also adjourn the reappointment for a week. When the meeting resembles and no fresh
appointment is made neither there is any resolution for the appointment, then the retiring directors
are considered to be reappointed.
The exception to this practice is that the retired directors will not be considered to be
reappointed when:
1. The appointment of that director was put to the vote but lost.
2. If the director who is retiring has addressed to the company and its board in writing
that he is unwilling to continue.
3. If he is disqualified.
4. When an ordinary or special resolution is required for his appointment.
5. When a motion for appointment of two or more directors by a single resolution is void
due to being passed without unanimous consent under section 162.
Fresh Appointment
When it is proposed that a new director should be appointed in the place of retiring director, then
the procedure laid down under section 160 of the Companies Act, 2013 is followed:
1. A written notice for his appointment as a director should be left at the office of the
company at least 14 days prior to the date of the meeting along with a deposit of
Rs.1,00,000.
2. That amount should be refunded to the person if he is elected as a director, or
3. He gets more than 25% of the total valid votes cast.
Appointment by nomination
The appointment of Directors can also be made with respect to the Company’s articles and not
only through the general meetings. When an agreement between the shareholders has been
included in the articles that entitles every shareholder with more than 10% share to be appointed
as a director, then they can be nominated as director.
Also, subject to the articles of the company, the Board can appoint any nominated person by an
institution in pursuance of law, as a director.
As held in the case of Raghunath Swarup Mathur v. Raghuraj Bahadur Mathur, when two or
more directors are appointed on the basis of single resolution and voting then it is considered to
be void in the eyes of law.
Appointment by proportional representation
As per section 163 of the Companies Act, 2013, the article of a company can enable the
appointment of directors through the system of voting by proportional representation. This system
of voting is used to make effective minority votes. This system of proportional representation can
be followed by a single transferable vote or by the system of cumulative voting or other means.
1. If the article empowers the Board to appoint additional directors along with
prescribing the maximum number.
2. Section 161 of the Act also authorises the directors to fill casual vacancies.
Appointment by Tribunal
Under section 242(j) of the Companies act 2013, the Company Law Tribunal has the power to
appoint directors.
Disqualifications
The minimum eligibility requirement for the appointment of directors has been laid down
under section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013. The disqualification for a person to be appointed
as a director are:
1. Unsoundness of mind.
2. If he is an undischarged insolvent.
3. When is applied to be declared as insolvent and such application is pending.
4. When he is sentenced for imprisonment for an offence involving moral turpitude for a
period of a minimum of 6 months.
5. If the Tribunal or court has passed an order disqualifying him for being appointed as a
director.
6. If he has not paid his calls in respect to any shares of the company.
7. When he is convicted of an offence which deals with related party transaction.
8. When he has not complied with the requirements of Director Identification Number.
Removal of directors
1. Shareholders
2. Company Law Tribunal
3. Resignation
Removal by Shareholders
Section 169 of the Companies Act 2013 provides that a director can be removed from his office
before the expiration of his term of office by an ordinary resolution. This section does not apply
when:
To remove a director, special notice is required, and such notice should contain the intention to
remove the director and the notice should be served at least 14 days prior to such meeting.
As soon as the company receives such notice, the copy of such notice is furnished to the director
concerned. Then the concerned director has the right to make a presentation against the resolution
in the general meeting. If a director makes a representation, then its copy needs to be circulated
among the members.
Resignation
Earlier, there was no provision for the resignation that by what procedure a director can resign.
The resignation was recognised under the provisions laid down under section 318 of the
Companies Act, 1956. Under this section, it was held that when a director resigns his office, he is
not entitled to compensation.
If the articles mention the provisions for resignation then it will be followed. In the case
of Mother Care (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Ramaswamy P Aiyar, the court held that the resignation of a
director is effective even if he is the only director in the office.
1. The director can resign from his office by giving written notice to the company.
2. On receiving the notice, the board has to take notice of it.
3. The registrar needs to be informed by the company within the prescribed time period.
4. The fact of resignation needs to be placed by the company in the director’s report in
the immediately following general meeting.
5. The director has to send his copy of the resignation to the registrar along with the
detailed reasons within 30 days of the resignation.
Even after resignation, the director is held responsible for any wrong associated with him and
which happened during his tenure.
Powers of Directors
The powers of directors are co-extensive with the powers of the company itself. The director once
appointed, they have almost total power over the operations of the company.
There are two limitations on the exercise of the power of directors which are as follows.
1. The board of directors are not competent to do the acts which the shareholders are
required to do in general meetings.
2. The powers of directors are to be exercised in accordance with the memorandum and
articles.
The individual directors have powers only as prescribed by memorandum and articles.
1. To make calls.
2. To borrow money.
3. To issue funds of the company.
4. To grant loans or give guarantees.
5. To approve financial statements.
6. To diversify the business of the company.
7. To apply for amalgamation, merger or reconstruction.
8. To take over a company or to acquire a controlling interest in another company.
The shareholders in a general meeting may impose restrictions on the exercise of these powers.
1. To sale, lease or otherwise dispose of the whole or any part of the company’s
undertakings.
2. To invest otherwise in trust securities.
3. To borrow money for the purpose of the company
4. To give time or refrain the director from repayment of any debt.
When the director has breached the restrictions imposed under the sections, the title of lessee or
purchaser is affected unless he has acted in good faith along with due care and diligence. This
section does not apply to the companies whose ordinary business involves the selling of property
or to put a property on lease.
The audit committee is required to act in accordance with the terms of reference specified by the
Board in writing.
Power to constitute Nomination and Remuneration
Committees and Stakeholders Relationship Committee
The Board of directors can constitute the Nomination and Remuneration Committee and
Stakeholders Relationship Committee under section 178. The Nomination and Remuneration
Committee should be consisting of three or more non-executive directors out of which one half
are required to be independent directors.
The Board can also constitute the Stakeholders Relationship Committee, where the board of
directors consist of more than one thousand shareholders, debenture holders or any other security
holders. The grievances of the shareholders are required to be considered and resolved by this
committee.
Also, the amount of contribution should not exceed 7.5% of the company’s net profit in the three
immediately preceding financial years. The contribution needs to be sanctioned by a resolution
passed by the Board of Directors.
Conclusion
The directors of a company are like its brain. They have a major contribution to a company’s
growth and development and their position is very important for the company. They are given
certain powers under the Companies Act 2013 so that they can contribute their best to the
company. Along with powers, certain restrictions are also imposed on its exercise to avoid any
misuse of such powers.