The Root Canal Biofilm PDF

Springer Series on Biofilms
Luis E. Chávez de Paz
Christine M. Sedgley
Anil Kishen Editors
The Root
Canal
Biofilm
Series Editors
Mark E. Shirtliff, Baltimore, USA
Paul Stoodley, Southhampton, United Kingdom
Thomas Bjarnsholt, Copenhagen, Denmark
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7142
Luis E. Chávez de Paz • Christine M. Sedgley •
Anil Kishen
Editors
The Root Canal Biofilm
Volume 9
Editors
Luis E. Chávez de Paz Christine M. Sedgley
The Swedish Academy for Advanced Department of Endodontology
Clinical Dentistry Oregon Health & Science University
Gothenburg Portland
Sweden Oregon
USA
Anil Kishen
Department of Clinical Sciences
Discipline of Endodontics
University of Toronto
Faculty of Dentistry
Toronto
Ontario
Canada
ISSN 1863-9607 ISSN 1863-9615 (electronic)

ISBN 978-3-662-47414-3 ISBN 978-3-662-47415-0 (eBook)
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47415-0
Library of Congress Control Number: 2015953861
Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of
the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations,
recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission
or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or
dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt
from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained
herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
Printed on acid-free paper
Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg is part of Springer Science+Business Media

(www.springer.com)
Luis E. Chavez de Paz would like to dedicate
his contribution to Patricia, Luis Diego,
Nicolas, and Andrés, for all their
encouragement and support.
Anil Kishen acknowledges Arunthathi,
Abinav, and Aaryan for their encouragement
and patience.
Christine Sedgley dedicates her contribution
to Victor, her greatest supporter.
ThiS is a FM Blank Page
Preface
Biofilms are recognized as one of the earliest ecosystems on earth. They are
composed of aggregates of microbial cells enclosed in a self-produced matrix
adherent to a surface. Root canal biofilms are complex polymicrobial structures
adherent to the root canal surface that are formed by microorganisms invading the
pulpal space of teeth. Important histopathological studies published several decades
ago first noted the presence of adherent cells on root canal surfaces. However, it was
not until the introduction of advanced microscopy and molecular biology tech-
niques that they were recognized to be the dominant form of microbial life in the
root canal system. Similarly, it was only in the past decade that root canal infections
were acknowledged to be biofilm infections. Subsequently, recent studies have
shown that root canal biofilms are associated with persistent endodontic infections
and as such are likely to be significant contributing factors determining the outcome
of endodontic treatment.
Concerted efforts to study root canal biofilms have been made in the past decade
resulting in the publication of observational and experimental studies that detail the
morphology and biology of these structures in infected root canals. In addition to
confirming that bacteria in root canals do not exist in free-floating planktonic states
as previously assumed, this new information on root canal biofilm infections has
provided an opportunity to reevaluate conventional clinical protocols and improve
endodontic therapeutic measures.
The aim of this volume is to provide a current understanding of the basic
scientific aspects of root canal biofilm biology within a clinically applicable
context. This volume is divided into three sections. Part I discusses the basic
biology of root canal biofilms and addresses key questions about the ecological
and physiological aspects that play a role in the formation and resistance of biofilms
in root canals (chapter “Ecology and Physiology of Root Canal Microbial Biofilm
Communities”). The last two chapters of this section review the general mecha-
nisms of biofilm adhesion (chapter “Molecular Principles of Adhesion and Biofilm
Formation”), and the mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in endodontic-related
pathogens (chapter “Antimicrobial Resistance in Biofilm Communities”). In Part II,
vii
viii Preface
attention focuses on observational and experimental evidence of root canal micro-

bial biofilms. Part II starts with an overview of observations of biofilms in root
canals using scanning electron microscopy (chapter “The Use of Scanning Electron
Microscopy (SEM) in Visualizing the Root Canal Biofilm”). Evidence for biofilm
formation in histopathological preparations, and a review of novel molecular
techniques to identify bacteria in biofilm populations in clinical samples, is pro-
vided in chapter “Bacterial Biofilms and Endodontic Disease: Histobacteriological
and Molecular Exploration”. Part II closes with a description of common experi-
mental approaches utilized to study root canal biofilms including in vitro biofilm
modeling techniques (chapter “Laboratory Models of Biofilms: Development and
Assessment”) and examines the challenges behind anatomic complexities in root
canals as these may play a role in root canal disinfection (chapter “Root Canal
Anatomy: Implications in Biofilm Disinfection”). The final section, Part III, con-
siders how infections caused by root canal biofilms are clinically treated and review
the implementation of novel anti-biofilm approaches. An overview of the outcome
of persisting root canal biofilm infections and appropriate treatment options is first
presented (chapter “Biofilm-Associated Infections in Root Canals: Treatment and
Outcomes”). This is followed by an explanation of the influence of clinical irri-
gation techniques (chapter “Root Canal Irrigation”) and the importance of inter-
appointment medication on root canal biofilms (chapter “Inter-appointment Medi
cation with Calcium Hydroxide in Routine Cases of Root Canal Therapy”). Finally,
innovative methods and devices directed towards the removal of biofilms from root
canals are discussed (chapter “Advanced Therapeutic Options to Disinfect Root
Canals”).
This volume will be of interest to a wide range of endodontics-related profes-
sionals, including basic microbiologists, clinical microbiologists, and clinicians, and
should be useful to undergraduate, postgraduate, and postdoctoral scientists working
at the frontier of a new understanding of the role of microbial biofilms in endodontic
disease.
Gothenburg, Sweden Luis E. Chávez de Paz DDS, MS, PhD

Portland, USA Christine Sedgley MDS, MDSc, FRACDS,
MRACDS(ENDO), PhD
Toronto, Canada Anil Kishen
March 2015
Acknowledgements
It has been a fascinating journey since we started with the idea to edit a book
dedicated to microbial biofilms formed in root canals. First of all we wish to thank
all the authors for providing their excellent contributions, without their dedication
and involvement in this project it wouldn’t have been possible to complete it. We
wish to give a special acknowledgement to Dr. William Costerton, former book
series editor, for proposing that it is timely to publish a book on root canal biofilms.
The editors assembling the root canal biofilm project at a coffee shop at the Hynes Convention
Center in Boston, during the American Association of Endodontists Annual Session, April 2012
ix
ThiS is a FM Blank Page
Contents
Part I General Biological Aspects

Ecology and Physiology of Root Canal Microbial Biofilm
Communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Luis E. Chávez de Paz and Philip D. Marsh
Molecular Principles of Adhesion and Biofilm Formation . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Jens Kreth and Mark C. Herzberg
Antimicrobial Resistance in Biofilm Communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Christine Sedgley and Gary Dunny
Part II Observational and Experimental Evidence

The Use of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) in Visualizing the
Root Canal Biofilm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
Linda B. Peters, Brandon Peterson, David E. Jaramillo,
and Luc van der Sluis
Bacterial Biofilms and Endodontic Disease: Histobacteriological and
Molecular Exploration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
José F. Siqueira Jr., Domenico Ricucci, and Isabela N. Roças
Laboratory Models of Biofilms: Development and Assessment . . . . . . . 127
Anil Kishen and Markus Haapasalo
Root Canal Anatomy: Implications in Biofilm Disinfection . . . . . . . . . . 155
Marco A. Versiani and Ronald Ordinola-Zapata
Part III Outcome and Strategies of Treatment

Biofilm-Associated Infections in Root Canals: Treatment and
Outcomes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
Kishor Gulabivala and Yuan-Ling Ng
xi
xii Contents
Root Canal Irrigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259

Luc van der Sluis, Christos Boutsioukis, Lei-Meng Jiang, Ricardo Macedo,
Bram Verhaagen, and Michel Versluis
Inter-appointment Medication with Calcium Hydroxide in Routine
Cases of Root Canal Therapy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303
Gunnar Bergenholtz, Calvin Torneck, and Anil Kishen
Advanced Therapeutic Options to Disinfect Root Canals . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
Anil Kishen
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357
Part I
General Biological Aspects
Ecology and Physiology of Root Canal
Microbial Biofilm Communities
Luis E. Chávez de Paz and Philip D. Marsh
Abstract Microbial communities formed in root canals of teeth constitute the heart
of the infected root canal ecosystem, and yet their establishment and development
remains challenging to measure and predict. Identifying the ecological and physi-
ological drivers of microbial community colonization, including resistance (insen-
sitivity to disturbance) and resilience (the rate of recovery after disturbance), is
important for understanding their response to antimicrobial treatment. This chapter
will provide an overview of the ecological and physiological factors that are
relevant for root canal microbial communities in terms of their establishment and
endurance in root canal ecosystems. Initially, insights from ecological and physi-
ological parameters that are useful for defining and measuring activities in root
canal biofilm communities will be reviewed. The ecological progress of root canal
infections will be discussed in terms of three ecological processes: (1) selection of
successful root canal colonizers by habitat filtering, (2) selection of resistant
bacteria to major disturbances in the environment (e.g., provoked by antimicrobial
therapy in endodontics), and (3) resilience of the community after the disturbance.
Finally, current methods for analyzing these ecological processes will be described,
as these are key elements for identifying the biological features of individual
microorganisms and of root canal microbial communities.
1 Introduction
Our current understanding of the microbiota of infected root canals is based on the
findings from classical culture-based studies (M€oller 1966; Bergenholtz 1974;
Sundqvist 1976; Baumgartner and Falkler 1991) and in recent years from studies
that have applied modern culture-independent molecular technologies (Munson
L.E. Chávez de Paz (*)

Endodontics, The Swedish Academy for Advanced Clinical Dentistry, Gothenburg, Sweden
e-mail: [email protected]
P.D. Marsh
Division of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, and Public Health England,
Porton Down, Salisbury, UK
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 3

L.E. Chávez de Paz et al. (eds.), The Root Canal Biofilm, Springer Series on
Biofilms 9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47415-0_1
4 L.E. Chávez de Paz and P.D. Marsh
et al. 2002; Spratt 2004; Rocas and Siqueira 2010; Chugal et al. 2011). The
accumulated information from both these approaches has led to the characterization
of species diversity in different clinical situations from the necrotic tooth to the
chronically infected root-filled tooth. Notwithstanding this increase in valuable
information on the identification of members from root canal microbial communi-
ties in different clinical scenarios, there are still significant limitations in explaining
the fundamental ecological and physiological basis by which these microbial
communities form in root canals. In particular, we still lack a clear understanding
of the basis of ecology community-level functions and the potential physiological
role that key members of the microbial communities play to maintain stability and
structure after antimicrobial treatment. While studies based on 16S rRNA identifi-
cation have characterized communities of bacteria in root canals with tens to
hundreds of species (for a review see chapter “Bacterial Biofilms and Endodontic
Disease: Histo-Bacteriological and Molecular Exploration”), it is usually not pos-
sible to experimentally establish which species actively take part in the community
and perform pivotal functions. The development of root canal microbial commu-
nities might also depend on the nature of the primary root canal infection, as well as
on environmental selection and physiological adaptation, the effects of which
would be difficult to control or characterize under laboratory conditions.
Furthermore, the influence of each of the ecological drivers on the composition
of a community established in root canals can vary according to the temporal scale
of observation. For example, untreated necrotic root canals are found to be domi-
nated by proteolytic anaerobic organisms, while treated root canals seem to be
dominated by a less diverse community with species that can persist for long
periods of time under harsh conditions, e.g., facultative anaerobic Gram-positive
organisms (Sundqvist 1992, 1994; Figdor and Sundqvist 2007). The low numbers of
such facultative anaerobic species detected in untreated necrotic cases using
sequencing approaches create a further challenge in establishing the relation
between community composition and dynamics from one clinical state to the other.
In this chapter, an ecological concept is presented, focusing on three main
ecological processes. These will introduce an ecological and physiological inter-
pretation of the role of microbial biofilm communities in the pathobiology of root
canal infections. The first of these processes occurs after the invasion of bacteria
from the oral cavity into the root canal, in which the root canal environment acts as
a habitat filter to select for specific microorganisms. The second process occurs
after or during root canal treatment. It will be proposed that the application of
antibacterial solutions, dressings, etc., will cause a simplification in the root canal
microbiota, where stressful environmental changes will select for more resistant
microorganisms. Finally, the third process comprises the resilience of the
remaining community, where the multiple ecological adaptive factors by which
microorganisms will establish as a post-disturbance community are examined.
Insights obtained from studying the ecology of microbial communities in root
canals can be used to improve the management of endodontic infections.
Ecology and Physiology of Root Canal Microbial Biofilm Communities 5
2 Habitat Filtering: Selection of Root Canal Colonizers
A general consensus is that the growth and survival of microorganisms invading the
pulpal space is controlled by a variety of environmental factors occurring at the
time of the infection. These factors, of physical and chemical nature, constitute the
habitat filter that will limit the growth of certain organisms compared to others
(Fig. 1). To be able to define the factors included in this ecological filtering process,
it is important to first define the status of the pulp at the time of the microbial
invasion, i.e., the presence of a responsive or necrotized pulp. Clearly, the main
difference between these two states of the pulp is the capacity to exert an inflam-
matory reaction in response to the bacterial invasion (Bergenholtz 2001). In the
case of a responsive pulp that is exposed to the oral microbiota due to trauma as
well as in a pulp that is undergoing an acute inflammatory reaction due to a deep
carious process, the invading organisms must face an environment characterized by
the infiltration of neutrophils. In this case, the chemical composition of the envi-
ronment is represented by the tissue-destructive elements released by neutrophils,
including oxygen radicals, lysosomal enzymes, and high concentrations of nitric
oxide (NO).
Fig. 1 Selection of root Oral bacteria

canal colonizers by habitat
filtering. Schematic
depiction of the habitat-
filtering process, showing
invading oral bacteria (cells
in colors), the ecological
filtering factors, and the
successful root canal
colonizers (cells in green).
Oral bacteria invading the
pulp chamber after
exposure via caries, trauma, Habitat Filtering
or periodontal disease are factors in play: oxygen,
ecologically filtered by nutrients, nitric oxide
environmental factors such
as oxygen, nutrients, and
nitric oxide. The presence
of nitric oxide in the pulp
ecosystem is due to the
infiltration of neutrophils
during the inflammatory
process in the pulp.
Successful colonizers will
constitute the root canal
microflora
Root canal community

Nitric Oxide (NO) NO is a small, lipophilic, and freely diffusible radical that has
strong cytotoxic properties due to its high reactivity. NO directly affects the activity
of enzymes in bacteria by the reaction with bound free radicals or with metal ions
(Kim et al. 2008; Zagryazhskaya et al. 2010; Pearl et al. 2012). NO has been found
to affect bacterial respiration and amino acid biosynthesis, thereby causing cell
growth arrest and suppression of DNA synthesis (Jyoti et al. 2014; Kolpen
et al. 2014; Liu et al. 2015). Although the molecular interaction of NO with root
canal bacteria has not been clarified, the ability of bacteria to adapt their phenotype
in order to survive NO environments may be a crucial characteristic of oral
microorganisms for colonization in the root canal ecosystem.
Oxygen Oxygen is the terminal electron acceptor in aerobic respiration that is by
far the most efficient type of energy metabolism. Oxygen levels in the pulpal
ecosystem may play an important role in selection and in determining functional
interactions and spatial structures of root canal microbial communities. Studies on
the dynamics of root canal infections have shown that the relative proportions of
anaerobic microorganisms increase with time and that the facultative anaerobic
bacteria are outnumbered when the canals have been infected for 3 months or more
(M€oller et al. 1981; Dahlán et al. 1987; Fabricius et al. 2006). In the infected root
canal environment, there are concentration gradients in oxygen that can vary from
low to complete anoxia. Although the oxygen gradients can be relatively stable over
time, oxygen seems to be a major ecological factor in the root canal milieu and one
that promotes the development of an anaerobic or microaerophilic microbiota
(Sundqvist 1992, 1994).
Nutrients All organisms must scavenge nutrients and then coordinate central
metabolism, monomer synthesis, and macromolecule polymerization for biomass
synthesis and growth (Chubukov et al. 2014). Thus, one of the most important
environmental factors that will determine the selection of root canal bacteria is the
principal source of nutrient available to the microbiota for growth. The invading
oral microorganisms are usually influenced by saliva, its components, and the diet
of the host, but would be exposed in root canals primarily to serum constituents,
including glycoproteins from the inflamed pulp and periapical tissues (Svensäter
and Bergenholtz 2004).
The large and densely connected network of metabolites, enzymatic reactions,
and regulatory interactions makes it challenging to understand the metabolic and
regulatory network taking place at the time of colonization of the pulpal space in its
totality (Sundqvist 1992, 1994). However, by means of specific laboratory models,
it is possible to define in vitro individual regulatory circuits that will provide
specific information on the nutritional demands of individual members or groups
of the root canal microbial community (for a review see Sundqvist and Figdor
2003).
It is of great interest, however, that some of the actual molecular components
and mechanisms that control the nutritional demands of root canal bacteria are
determined by phenotypic adaptation to the environment. As the prime energy
source of facultative anaerobic bacteria is carbohydrates, it is believed that a

decrease in availability of carbohydrates in the root canal will limit the growth
opportunities for these organisms (Sundqvist 1994; Figdor and Sundqvist 2007).
However, bacteria from the oral cavity possess complementary patterns of glyco-
sidase and protease activities and combine their complementary metabolic capa-
bilities to degrade host glycoproteins in a synergistic manner (Bradshaw
et al. 1994). In a process known as phenotypic switching, dual metabolic patterns
found in some oral bacteria are proposed to play a role in the catabolism of complex
glycoproteins from saliva (Wickstr€om et al. 2009). For example, when the
saccharolytic organism S. oralis was exposed to carbohydrate-deprived environ-
ments, this organism upregulated a number of proteolytic enzymes that help them to
increase in numbers relative to other oral species (Beighton and Hayday 1986;
Homer et al. 1990; Heinemann and Sauer 2010). This particular ability in S. oralis
to digest protein could be considered as an advantage for their survival in the oral
community at the times of carbohydrate famine. Phenotypic switching is an effi-
cient strategy of bacteria to thrive in nutrient-limited environments, by a high
frequency and reversible switch (ON/OFF) of the expression of one or more
genes (Casadesus and Low 2013; Hammerschmidt et al. 2014). Phenotypic
switching by oral bacteria in response to the availability of nutrients in the envi-
ronment, e.g., in response to the lack of carbohydrates and presence of serum
proteins, is an important characteristic that may explain the persistence of faculta-
tive anaerobic organisms in all clinical stages of the endodontic infection.
Studies of the root canal environment as a habitat filter will aid us to understand
how oral microbes adapt their phenotypes in response to environmental changes to
successfully colonize the root canal. Concentrating basic research on these adaptive
mechanisms by, for example, using comparative genomic approaches to investigate
habitat filtering, will help us relate changes in individual microbial genomes and the
environments to which they are selected. In the future, this problem may be
approached from a single-species genomics, carefully tested in a range of environ-
mental conditions, and can be followed by the investigation of the complete
genomes of representative multispecies communities obtained directly from root
canal environments. Furthermore, with the advent of novel post-genomic tech-
niques such as microbial metabolomics, the complete set of metabolites within a
selected microorganism could be monitored, as well as their global outcome of
interactions between its development processes and its environment (Takahashi
et al. 2010). These results will finally help us elucidate the association between
sequenced root canal microorganisms and the root canal habitat.
3 Disturbance and Selection of Resistant Bacteria
In ecology, disturbances are causal events that alter the immediate environment and
have possible repercussions for a community of organisms (Gonzalez et al. 2011;
Shade et al. 2012). Ecological disturbances may also directly alter a community by
killing their members or change their relative abundances (Shade et al. 2012).
Disturbances occur at various spatial and temporal scales with different frequen-
cies, intensities, extents, and periodicities. Communities have nonlinear responses
to disturbances that are mainly determined by their levels of resistance and resil-
ience. Resistance is defined as the degree to which a community is insensitive to a
disturbance (Ding and He 2010; Wardle and Jonsson 2014), and resilience is the
rate at which a community returns to a pre-disturbance condition (see below
resilience process). A related concept, sensitivity, is the inverse of resistance and
defined as the degree of community change following a disturbance.
In endodontics, mechanical instrumentation in combination with chemical anti-
microbial agents is a good example of an ecological disturbance. In this example,
shear forces applied through direct contact of machine-driven files on the surfaces
of the root canals aim to achieve physical removal of biofilm communities. Root
canal biofilm control is further accomplished by the use of antimicrobials that aim
to kill bacteria. Recently, microbiological research in endodontics has focused on
evaluating the killing effect of chemicals with antimicrobial properties for disin-
fection (Kobayashi et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2014; Xhevdet et al. 2014). According
to such studies, however, it is apparent that a portion of the microbial biofilm
communities in root canals may tolerate and remain viable after treatment (see an
schematic depiction of selection in Fig. 2). For example, a recent study showed that
a) Environmental
disturbance
Root canal community Resistant community

b)
25 25 25
20 20 20
10 10 10
5 5 5
0 0 0
0 50 100 150 200 250 0 50 100 150 200 250 0 50 100 150 200 250
Fig. 2 Selection of resistant root canal bacteria. (a) Schematic depiction of the selective process
in a root canal community by environmental disturbances. Environmental disturbances in end-
odontics are the shear forces by mechanical instrumentation, irrigation with antimicrobials, and
intracanal medication. Affected cells are shown in red and the resistant bacteria selected after
disturbance are shown in light green. (b) 3D reconstructions show microscopic structure of
biofilms formed by oral bacteria grown on polystyrene surfaces and exposed to 2.5 % NaOCl
and stained with the LIVE/DEAD stain (green (viable cells) and red (damaged cells)). The units on
the axes are micrometers
it was not possible to eradicate wild strains of bacteria of endodontic origin grown
in vitro using ampicillin, doxycycline, clindamycin, azithromycin, or metronida-
zole (Al-Ahmad et al. 2014).
Clinical studies have also confirmed the tolerance of selected members of
microbial communities to endodontic procedures and that these organisms are likely
to play a role in treatment failures (Engstr€om et al. 1964; Gomes et al. 1996;
Molander et al. 1998; Sundqvist et al. 1998; Sunde et al. 2002). Not surprisingly,
bacteria that are tolerant to endodontic treatment are normal inhabitants of the oral
cavity, with some exceptions like E. faecalis (Sedgley et al. 2004). Gram-positive
facultative anaerobic bacteria from the genera Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, and
Actinomyces are frequently recovered from root canals of teeth after treatment
(Engstr€om et al. 1964; Molander et al. 1998; Sundqvist et al. 1998; Chávez de Paz
et al. 2003). The higher tolerance of Gram-positive bacteria may be related to
different structural and physiological factors, for example, in cell-wall structure,
innate resistance to antimicrobials, and phenotypic plasticity that allows them to
adapt and endure harsh environmental conditions (Dessen et al. 2001; Berger-Bachi
2002). However, the information about the mechanisms involved specifically in
tolerance to environmental disturbances in root canals is scarce. There have been
few studies that have tried to model the influence of environmental conditions on
microbial physiological responses and microbial community composition changes
(Chávez de Paz 2007, 2012). In this section, the hypothesis will be introduced that a
sudden change in the root canal environment will create conditions that are stressful
for microorganisms and to which they are obliged to adapt for survival. Under such a
selective ecological pressure, root canal microbes must have physiological adaptive
mechanisms to survive and remain active in the face of this stress or they will die.
Adaptive Mechanisms of Resistance The main mechanisms of microbial resis-
tance to survive disturbances in the environment rely on their ability to adapt their
phenotype in the form of a rapid physiological response. In general, the cellular
machinery of bacteria is prepared to change in response to various types of
environmental threats such as shifts from aerobic to anaerobic conditions and
rapid fluctuations of pH, temperature, and osmotic conditions (Bowden and Ham-
ilton 1998; Marsh 2003). In the case of changes provoked by antimicrobials,
immediate responses can often be achieved by regulation of the activities of
preformed enzymes (Svensäter et al. 2001). In the case of mechanisms of tolerance
by root canal bacteria, a recent study analyzed the survival of a selected group of
root canal bacteria in biofilms under alkaline stress. In this study, it was observed
that biofilm bacteria resisted by releasing specific enzymes out into the environment
(Chávez de Paz et al. 2007). Cytoplasmic housekeeping enzymes, such as
phosphocarrier HPr, the heat-shock chaperone DnaK, FBA, and GAPDH, were
the most frequently identified proteins. Although the physiological role of these
housekeeping enzymes outside the cell is presently unknown, most of these
enzymes have also been found to be associated with the bacterial response to
other similar environmental stresses such as acid challenge. Hence, it is not
unreasonable to consider that the molecular mechanisms of stress response are
orchestrated concomitantly from a main general stress response with the interplay
of various regulatory processes taking place at the same time.
In the case of continual changes in the environment, for example, with the
application of intracanal medicaments over a period of time, resistance may be
also accomplished by alterations in the pattern of gene expression. This can be
accomplished via an operon, where all related genes are located adjacent to each
other in the chromosome and transcribed as a single transcript controlled by a single
promoter site, or by means of regulatory units that utilize genes situated in different
locations on the chromosome (Ghazaryan et al. 2014; Raivio 2014). Unfortunately,
for most of the root canal microorganisms, we do not even have a minimal view of
these fundamental molecular adaptive processes. Even in general medical micro-
biology there are actually not many microorganisms whose physiology is thor-
oughly understood and little is known about conditions prevailing in biofilms
comprised of multispecies communities such as those in the root canals of teeth.
Recent studies on the whole genomes of a number of oral microorganisms have
shown that there are more similarities than differences in the way bacteria handle
stress (Jenkinson 2011; Zaura 2012; Wade 2013). As discussed above, an important
feature of adaptation and survival of bacterial cells in stressful environments seems
to be the expression of a range of proteins that promote the survival of the cells
(Hamilton and Svensäter 1998). To understand how a single microbial cell is able to
cope with an ecological disturbance within a multispecies community is an over-
whelming challenge since adaptation or response to stress may take place at
different levels in the community and vary in intensity among its members.
Tolerance to Antimicrobials by Biofilm Communities The physiology of a
microbial community, like the one established in root canals, is certainly distinct
from the physiology of individual members as the community lifestyle provides
advantages compared to those of the component populations. In a multispecies
community, the ranges of potential habitats for colonization are extended, resis-
tance to stress and host defenses increase, and cooperative degradation of complex
substrates can take place (Marsh 2003). Elucidating the physiologies of biofilm-
associated communities is necessary for our understanding of infection and survival
of bacteria in a changing environment.
In endodontics, there is an increasing interest in studying the effect of antimi-
crobials on multispecies biofilm communities. Studies have shown that mixed root
canal microbial communities are variably “resistant” to disturbances, as measured
by viability of the biofilm cells (Chávez de Paz 2012; Stojicic et al. 2013; Shrestha
and Kishen 2014). Generally, these ex vivo studies that explored the effect of
antimicrobials on multispecies communities are observational and typically involve
large-scale antimicrobial disturbances or nutrient starvation (e.g., sodium hypo-
chlorite, chlorhexidine, glucose starvation, etc.).
In a recent study, the phenotypic response of a multispecies biofilm model using
four root canal bacterial isolates to the absence of glucose was determined (Chávez
de Paz 2012). The results of this study showed a significant variation in the
three-dimensional structure of the multispecies biofilms in response to the absence

of glucose. In addition, physiological adaptation by members of the community to
glucose depletion was observed. The metabolic activity was concentrated in the
upper levels of the biofilms, while at lower levels, the metabolism of cells was
considerably decreased. Subpopulations of species with high glycolytic demands,
such as streptococci and lactobacilli, were found predominating in the upper levels
of the biofilms. This distinct spatial organization in biofilms grown in the absence of
glucose shows a clear reorganization of the community in order to satisfy their
members’ metabolism in order to enable the long-term persistence of the commu-
nity. This result lends support to the hypothesis that the reorganization of sub-
populations of cells in multispecies biofilms is also important for survival to stress
from the environment (Shapiro 2007).
The results of these in vitro studies, however, suggest that we have still much to
learn about the physiological adaptive mechanisms orchestrated by root canal
microbial communities. In addition, only few studies have implemented
multispecies models to investigate the compositional and functional responses to
disturbance by a community of bacteria, which hinders more quantitative cross-
system comparisons (see methodological review in chapter “Laboratory Models of
Biofilms: Development and Assessment” and alternative ecological methods
below). By developing laboratory experimentation on multispecies microbial com-
munities, the implications of ecological disturbance screenings and their effect on
root canal bacteria will advance. After these methodological systems are success-
fully established and results from different research groups are correspondingly
replicated, the question arises as to how and at what level these artificial root canal
multispecies communities (and data obtained from them) can be compared to their
counterparts in the original environment.
Nevertheless, from classical studies on general biofilm biology, we know that
the problem on the relative tolerance of bacteria, especially when growing as a
biofilm, to antimicrobial agents is accounted for due to transport-based and
physiology-based mechanisms or a combination (Mah and O’Toole 2001).
Transport-based mechanisms indicate that the biofilms act as barrier to antibiotic/
antimicrobial diffusion, although the main attributes of this mechanism rely on the
features that govern transport rates and generate structural, chemical, and biological
heterogeneity in biofilm communities (Stewart and Franklin 2008). Heterogeneity
in biofilm communities is a result of the distinct metabolic activities of the cells that
provoke different concentration gradients of nutrients and local chemical condi-
tions (for a review in biofilm heterogeneity see (Stewart and Franklin 2008)).
Inherent Resistance to Ecological Disturbances Inherent resistance involves
evolutionary selection of a growth form and a history strategy that allows a microbe
to resist disturbances without having to induce specific mechanisms at the time of
the disturbance. Developing such inherent resistance invariably involves physio-
logical trade-offs that affect microbial function (Mah and O’Toole 2001). Among
endodontically isolated organisms, for example, E. faecalis is thought to be more
inherently resistant to alkaline stress than oxygen-sensitive Gram-negative bacteria.
The mechanisms behind the innate resistance of enterococci to alkaline pH are

thought to include the activation of specific proton pumps and specific enzymatic
systems and/or buffering devices that help to keep the internal pH neutral
(Kayaoglu and Örstavik 2004). In a recent study, however, it was observed that in
response to alkaline pH, a general transcriptional process including the expression
of housekeeping genes, such as dnaK and GroEL, and the cytoskeletal molecule,
ftsZ, took place in E. faecalis (Appelbe and Sedgley 2007). Thus, it would seem that
a network of regulatory interactions including central cytoskeletal processes and
expression of chaperones regulate the response of E. faecalis to alkaline stress (see
chapter “Antimicrobial Resistance in Biofilm Communities”). Knowing the tran-
scriptional regulatory network in this organism could aid in understanding central
adaptive regulatory operations within a root canal biofilm community.
In conclusion, it is of importance to establish a stronger connection between
microbial resistance to ecological disturbances and root canal ecology. With an
enhanced understanding of microbial physiological responses to stress provoked by
clinical procedures in endodontics, we will have a better understanding of the
mechanisms employed by bacteria in response to antimicrobial therapies. Some
questions that remain unanswered are, for example, how does physiological resis-
tance to stress vary among microbial communities in root canals? How do those
patterns of resistance relate to ecosystem-level consequences in response to stress?
4 Resilience of Root Canal Microbial Communities
This third ecological process addresses the concept of resilience of root canal
microbial communities that have been selected by environmental disturbances
(see above) and that have resisted antimicrobial endodontic treatment. The resil-
ience of a microbial community focuses on its capacity to surmount ecological
disturbances and still preserve viability and physiological function. But there is also
another aspect of bacterial resilience that concerns the capacity for regrowth,
reorganization, and development, which in the case of endodontic infections is
essential for maintaining chronic inflammatory periapical lesions (Fig. 3).
In a resilient root canal microbial community, ecological disturbances may
cause important physiological consequences in cells. For instance, it is likely that
in the resilient community, stress-adapted cells may differentiate into low physio-
logical states or dormancy. In these states of low metabolism, bacteria are implicitly
driven to stasis to thrive in environments where nutrient resources may be scarce.
Dormancy and Adaptation to Starvation Bacteria under the stress of starvation
have developed efficient adaptive regulatory reactions to shift their metabolic
balance away from biosynthesis and reproduction, toward the acquisition of energy
for essential biological functions (Matin 1992; Nystr€om 1999). Under nutrient
limitation, bacteria rapidly reallocate cellular resources by stopping the synthesis
of DNA, stable RNAs, ribosomal proteins, and membrane components (Potrykus
Phenotypically adapted
Persister cells
Dormant
Fig. 3 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of a resilient root canal microbial community
in the apex of an infected root canal. The SEM image show false colors of green, yellow, and blue
representing cells that are phenotypically adapted, persister, and dormant, respectively
and Cashel 2008). This effective responsive process to nutrient stress, termed “the
stringent response,” is characterized by the production of factors that are crucial for
stress resistance, glycolysis, and amino acid synthesis (Dalebroux and Swanson
2012). The stringent response is accomplished in part by a massive switch in the
transcription profile, coordinated by an effective alarmone system that includes the
nucleotides guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) and guanosine pentaphosphate
(pppGpp). (p)ppGpp plays an important role in low-nutrient survival of
E. faecalis, an organism that is known to withstand prolonged periods of starvation
and remain viable in root-filled teeth for at least 12 months (Molander et al. 1998;
Sundqvist et al. 1998). Furthermore, the alarmone system (p)ppGpp has also a
profound effect on the ability of E. faecalis to form, develop, and maintain stable
biofilms (Chávez de Paz et al. 2012). These improved understandings of the
alarmone mechanisms underlying biofilm formation and survival by E. faecalis
may facilitate the identification of pathways that could be targeted to control
persistent infections by this organism.
From a physiological perspective, nutrient deprivation causes bacteria to revers-
ibly switch to a state of metabolic arrest (dormancy) (Nystr€om 1999). In the
dormant phenotype, bacteria will survive a wide range of environmental threats,
in addition to deprivation of nutrients, such as temperature shifts and extreme pH
changes, as well as exhibiting decreased sensitivity to antimicrobial agents (Stewart
and Franklin 2008). When the nutrient supply is favorable again, the stress response
is released and the bacteria resume metabolic activity and cell division. A large
amount of RNA and protein appears to be degraded rapidly at the onset of
starvation, which is believed to be part of a general stress response (GSR) that is
connected to survival responses in changing environments like the oral cavity

(Bowden and Hamilton 1998).
In some cases, the occurrence of persister cells has been identified. Persistence is
a feature where bacteria that are phenotypically susceptible to antibiotics are not
effectively eliminated upon exposure to high doses of those drugs. Persister cells do
not have specific regulatory mechanisms of resistance, but they undergo general
physiological changes, like diminishing their metabolism similar to a dormant state.
The persistent phenotype is believed to be responsible for the recalcitrant nature
and therapy unresponsiveness of several chronic infections (see chapters “Molecu
lar Principles of Adhesion and Biofilm Formation” and “Antimicrobial Resistance
in Biofilm Communities”).
Metabolic Reactivation In cases with a chronic periapical infection that suddenly
reactivates and causes an acute inflammatory response after many years, it is
reasonable to assume that resilient dormant cells have “woken up” and resumed
their metabolic activity to provoke acute periapical inflammation. Thus, from the
metabolic perspective, the reactivation of dormant cells will render biofilm bacteria
able to contribute to the persistence of inflammation. For example, a recent case
report of a tooth that was adequately treated and showed no signs of disease
revealed recurrent disease after 12 years. Histopathological analyses showed a
heavy dentinal tubule infection surrounding the area of a lateral canal providing
evidence on the persistence of an intra-radicular infection caused by bacteria
possibly located in dentinal tubules (Vieira et al. 2012). This hypothesis on the
metabolic reactivation of biofilm cells was tested in a recent study (Chávez de Paz
et al. 2008). Biofilm cultures of oral isolates of Streptococcus anginosus and
Lactobacillus salivarius were forced to enter a state of dormancy by exposing
them to nutrient deprivation for 24 h in PBS buffer. After the starvation period
the number of metabolically active cells decreased dramatically to zero and their
cell membrane integrity was kept intact. Biofilm cells were then exposed to a
“reactivation period” with fresh nutrients, but even after 96 h, the cultures were
dominated by undamaged cells that were metabolically inactive. The data produced
by this study showed that starved biofilm cells exhibit a slow physiological
response and do not reactivate in short time periods even in the presence of fresh
nutrients. This observation confirms the slower physiological response of biofilm
cells, which may act as a strategic mechanism to resist further disturbances (Mah
2012).
In conclusion, global regulators of bacterial physiology are involved in micro-
bial community resilience and have important roles in biofilm reorganization,
virulence, and antibiotic resistance. All these molecular processes can be taken
into consideration in the development of treatment strategies for bacterial infections
resistant to conventional antimicrobial root canal treatment.
5 Methods to Analyze Microbial Ecosystems
In order to monitor physiological responses of organisms in communities and

understand their relevance to resist and overcome environmental disturbances, it
is necessary to build up a strong database of information describing the physiology
of the participating organisms under controlled conditions. Many physiological
properties of bacteria can be investigated by means of common microscopic tools
and analytic strategies. Modern molecular tools offer approaches to in situ studies
of specific physiological processes in the presence of essential nutrients or in
disturbed environments (e.g., after application of antimicrobials). This section
describes some of the most common microbiological methods to analyze microbial
ecosystems in situ and under laboratory conditions.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Modern techniques to analyze microbial
ecosystems comprise a variety of traditional and modern microscopy techniques.
For example, electron microscopy has provided a vast amount of information on the
structure of microbial ecosystems. As discussed in chapter “The Use of Scanning
Electron Microscopy (SEM) in Visualizing the Root Canal Biofilm,” the use of
SEM analysis has increased due to its rapidity and sensitivity to detect structural
changes in microbial ecosystems. As seen in Fig. 3, imaging of the intra-radicular
biofilm alongside a segment of an infected root canal by scanning electron micros-
copy clearly demonstrates the heterogeneous architecture of the oral biofilm. The
biofilm is adherent adjacent to the dentinal tubule lumen and is characterized by
cocci, filaments, and both yeast and hyphal cell-forming networks of extracellular
matrix strands. In specific sections of the image, densely packed cells are accumu-
lated surrounded by extracellular material. Although detailed qualitative informa-
tion is obtained from these types of SEM images, other studies have showed
limitations of the SEM technique. In 1994, Sutton et al. (1994) compared conven-
tional scanning electron microscopy (SEM), low-temperature SEM, and electro-
scan wet mount SEM in monocultures of S. crista to expose large differences in the
final grayscale image. It was observed that under natural conditions, extracellular
polymeric substances (EPS) take over the resulting image, not yet allowing explo-
ration of the cellular distribution in the biofilm below. The use of SEM to analyze
oral biofilms and infected root canals is further reviewed in chapter “The Use of
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) in Visualizing the Root Canal Biofilm.”
Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy (CSLM) Confocal scanning laser micros-
copy (CSLM) has become the preferred technique to study the architecture of
biofilms because it provides a powerful microscopy tool to analyze microbial
communities in situ. Usually CSLM is applied with fluorescent probe techniques
that take advantage of the optical geometry construction of the CSLM. The
coherent light beams of CSLM have a very narrow depth of focus at the same
time as all out-of-focus information is discarded. CSLM produces a series of narrow
focal planes that are recorded at different depths throughout a three-dimensional
sample (Neu et al. 2010). Subsequently, the single-plane images can be assembled
using image-processing techniques to generate three-dimensional digitized images.

These three-dimensional reconstructions of microbial biofilm sections allow the
in-depth profile of a biofilm sample in situ. These techniques have helped reveal the
highly heterogeneous structure of microbial biofilm.
Fluorescent Probes The above-discussed CSLM technique is usually applied in
combination with fluorescent probes to discriminate between classes, genera,
species, and also the viability of individual organisms present in the microbial
ecosystem. Furthermore, chemical interactions within the biofilm can also be
monitored. Common fluorescent probes include negative stains such as fluorescein,
which provides a fluorescent background upon which the bacteria can be viewed as
unstained cells. Other agents such as resazurin are used to distinguish between
“live” and “dead” cells (Netuschil et al. 2014). Actively metabolizing cells reduce
resazurin to a colorless nonfluorescent form, in contrast to dead cells, which
maintain the fluorescent dye in their cytoplasm.
CSLM in combination with commercial fluorescent probes can aid in
distinguishing between living and dead organisms within a microbial biofilm
community. Although in traditional microbiology, a living cell could only be
determined as one that can grow and reproduce, in the end developing a colony,
with the advent of fluorescence microscopy, it is assumed that organisms capable of
catalyzing fluorescent metabolites are metabolically active. For example, tetrazo-
lium salts are markers that target oxidation/reduction reactions. In contrast, cell
membrane integrity can be investigated with the widely used commercial agent, the
LIVE/DEAD BacLight viability probe. In this technique, undamaged cells fluo-
resce green, whereas cells whose membrane structure is damaged (but not neces-
sarily dead) fluoresce red (Fig. 2b).
Other more sophisticated fluorescent techniques include fluorophores that are
linked to other agents in order to specify their target elements. For example,
conjugated lectins can be used to determine the distribution of oligosaccharides
in the biofilm matrix (Neu and Lawrence 2014). Monoclonal antibodies attached to
fluorophores can also be used to determine the location of species within a biofilm
(Chalmers et al. 2007). A more advanced technique is to use fluorophores attached
to 16S rRNA oligonucleotide sequences in order to identify bacterial species in situ
(see below).
In recent years, with the development of super-resolution microscopy, a suite of
cutting edge microscopy methods that are able to surpass the resolution limits of
light microscopy have dramatically improved both the localization and quantifica-
tion of target molecules in single cells (Moraru and Amann 2012). In a pilot study, a
combination of super-resolution microscopy and rRNA targeted oligonucleotide
probing provided the subcellular localization of ribosomes in E. coli (Moraru and
Amann 2012). It was observed that ribosomes were localized surrounding the
central nucleoid and that some of the cells have two distinct nucleoids. The inter-
nucleoid rRNA indicated the position of the division septum, most probably
following rRNA localization along the cell membrane during the division pro-
cesses. This highly advanced technique could be used to allow the tracking of
ribosome-associated changes in activity levels and subcellular localization at the

single-cell level in complex microbial communities. These would give insights into
variations occurring across community members and after different environmental
conditions.
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) The microbial compositions of
biofilm communities, such as those growing in the oral cavity or root canal of
teeth, are generally diverse. Thus, it is imperative that in situ determination of the
different species present and their distribution in a three-dimensional space are
accomplished for subsequent analysis and interpretations. Figure 4 depicts the main
methodological approach for identification of relevant organisms in biofilm com-
munities by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). FISH allows for the simul-
taneous detection of phylogenetically different bacteria. This method detects
bacteria at the species, genus, and family levels, and FISH with oligonucleotide
probes based on ribosomal RNA (rRNA) specifically identifies targeted bacteria
(Brileya et al. 2014).
Atto 488 5’ -TAG CCG TCC CTT TCT GGT -3’ Streptococcus (STR405)
Atto 565 5’ -YCA CCG CTA CAC ATG RAG TTC CAC T-3’ Lactobacillus & Enterococcus (LAC722)
Pacific blue 5’ -GCT ACC GTC AAC CCA CCC -3’ Actinomyces (JF201)
Atto 425 5’ -CCC TCT GAT GGG TAG GTT -3’ Enterococcus (EFS129)
Fig. 4 Identification of bacteria by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). 16S rRNA fluores-
cent probes used to identify four root canal bacteria on multispecies biofilms cultures, Strepto-
coccus gordonii (green), Lactobacillus salivarius (red), Actinomyces naeslundii (blue), and
Enterococcus faecalis (violet). The red probe for Lactobacillus targeted also Enterococcus;
hence, the addition of an additional blue probe for Enterococcus shows labeling results in violet
fluorescence. Bar ¼ 10 μm
With the aid of the FISH technique, the identification of individual bacterial cells
within a community will represent an important advantage in order to understand
the organization of microbial ecosystems. Oligonucleotide probes that are designed
to target specific regions of the 16S rRNA gene are then labeled with specific
fluorescent dyes. Different probes can be generated: for example, one that recog-
nizes the Lactobacillus, another for Streptococcus, and successively more specific
probes for particular groups of bacteria right down to individual species. Figure 4
illustrates an example of four-species biofilm targeted with a cocktail of fluorescent
oligonucleotide probes to detect L. salivarius (red), S. gordonii (green),
A. naeslundii (blue), and E. faecalis (violet) to map the diversity of a root canal
microbial population.
In conclusion, with the FISH technique, a nondestructive identification of a
complex microbial population could be accomplished.
6 Concluding Remarks
Understanding the adaptive mechanisms and implications of resistance in root canal

microbial biofilm communities depends on research into the ecological and phys-
iological processes occurring in the root canal ecosystem. This era is an exciting
time for microbial ecology research because the complete genomes of many oral
pathogens have been sequenced and are available for analysis on diverse laboratory
setups. It is therefore possible now to investigate regulatory genes in root canal
bacteria, including those needed to establish and adapt to different environmental
disturbances, so investigators will soon be able to analyze and monitor the respon-
siveness of bacteria to environmental threats, e.g., antimicrobials used in endodon-
tics. The availability of replication origins, chromosome ends, and many of the
genes for DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis will contribute to studies of basic
physiological responses during colonization, resistance, and resilience, as well as
providing access to some of the key elements in gene regulation and root canal
biofilm formation. The near future should see progress toward a clearer understand-
ing of how interspecies interactions lead to the coordination of physiological events
in microbial communities.
Acknowledgments The helpful suggestions of G. Bergenholtz are greatly appreciated.
References
Al-Ahmad A, Ameen H, Pelz K, Karygianni L, Wittmer A, Anderson AC, Spitzmuller B, Hellwig

E (2014) Antibiotic resistance and capacity for biofilm formation of different bacteria isolated
from endodontic infections associated with root-filled teeth. J Endod 40(2):223–230
Appelbe OK, Sedgley CM (2007) Effects of prolonged exposure to alkaline pH on Enterococcus

faecalis survival and specific gene transcripts. Oral Microbiol Immunol 22(3):169–174
Baumgartner JC, Falkler WA Jr (1991) Bacteria in the apical 5 mm of infected root canals. J Endod
17(8):380–383
Beighton D, Hayday H (1986) The influence of diet on the growth of streptococcal bacteria on the
molar teeth of monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Arch Oral Biol 31(7):449–454
Bergenholtz G (1974) Micro-organisms from necrotic pulp of traumatized teeth. Odontol Revy 25
(4):347–358
Bergenholtz G (2001) Factors in pulpal repair after oral exposure. Adv Dent Res 15:84
Berger-Bachi B (2002) Resistance mechanisms of gram-positive bacteria. Int J Med Microbiol 292
(1):27–35
Bowden GH, Hamilton IR (1998) Survival of oral bacteria. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 9(1):54–85
Bradshaw DJ, Homer KA, Marsh PD, Beighton D (1994) Metabolic cooperation in oral microbial
communities during growth on mucin. Microbiology 140(Pt 12):3407–3412
Brileya KA, Camilleri LB, Fields MW (2014) 3D-fluorescence in situ hybridization of intact,
anaerobic biofilm. Methods Mol Biol 1151:189–197
Casadesus J, Low DA (2013) Programmed heterogeneity: epigenetic mechanisms in bacteria.
J Biol Chem 288(20):13929–13935
Chalmers NI, Palmer RJ Jr, Du-Thumm L, Sullivan R, Shi W, Kolenbrander PE (2007) Use of
quantum dot luminescent probes to achieve single-cell resolution of human oral bacteria in
biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(2):630–636
Chávez de Paz LE (2007) Redefining the persistent infection in root canals: possible role of biofilm
communities. J Endod 33(6):652–662
Chávez de Paz LE (2012) Development of a multispecies biofilm community by four root canal
bacteria. J Endod 38(3):318–323
Chávez de Paz LE, Dahlén G, Molander A, M€ oller A, Bergenholtz G (2003) Bacteria recovered
from teeth with apical periodontitis after antimicrobial endodontic treatment. Int Endod J 36
(7):500–508
Chávez de Paz LE, Bergenholtz G, Dahlén G, Svensäter G (2007) Response to alkaline stress by
root canal bacteria in biofilms. Int Endod J 40(5):344–355
Chávez de Paz LE, Hamilton IR, Svensäter G (2008) Oral bacteria in biofilms exhibit slow
reactivation from nutrient deprivation. Microbiology 154(Pt 7):1927–1938
Chávez de Paz LE, Lemos JA, Wickstr€ om C, Sedgley CM (2012) Role of (p)ppGpp in biofilm
formation by Enterococcus faecalis. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(5):1627–1630
Chubukov V, Gerosa L, Kochanowski K, Sauer U (2014) Coordination of microbial metabolism.
Nat Rev Microbiol 12(5):327–340
Chugal N, Wang JK, Wang R, He X, Kang M, Li J, Zhou X, Shi W, Lux R (2011) Molecular
characterization of the microbial flora residing at the apical portion of infected root canals of
human teeth. J Endod 37(10):1359–1364
Dahlén G, Fabricius L, Holm SE, M€ oller A (1987) Interactions within a collection of eight
bacterial strains isolated from a monkey dental root canal. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2
(4):164–170
Dalebroux ZD, Swanson MS (2012) ppGpp: magic beyond RNA polymerase. Nat Rev Microbiol
10(3):203–212
Dessen A, Di Guilmi AM, Vernet T, Dideberg O (2001) Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic
resistance in gram-positive pathogens. Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord 1(1):63–77
Ding C, He J (2010) Effect of antibiotics in the environment on microbial populations. Appl
Microbiol Biotechnol 87(3):925–941
Engstr€om B, Hård AF, Segerstad L, Ramstr€ om G, Frostell G (1964) Correlation of positive
cultures with the prognosis for root canal treatments. Odontol Revy 15:257–270
Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Sundqvist G, Happonen RP, M€ oller AJ (2006) Influence of residual
bacteria on periapical tissue healing after chemomechanical treatment and root filling of
experimentally infected monkey teeth. Eur J Oral Sci 114(4):278–285
Figdor D, Sundqvist G (2007) A big role for the very small–understanding the endodontic
microbial flora. Aust Dent J 52(1 Suppl):S38–S51
Ghazaryan L, Tonoyan L, Ashhab AA, Soares MI, Gillor O (2014) The role of stress in colicin
regulation. Arch Microbiol 196(11):753–764
Gomes BP, Lilley JD, Drucker DB (1996) Variations in the susceptibilities of components of the
endodontic microflora to biomechanical procedures. Int Endod J 29(4):235–241
Gonzalez A, Clemente JC, Shade A, Metcalf JL, Song S, Prithiviraj B, Palmer BE, Knight R
(2011) Our microbial selves: what ecology can teach us. EMBO Rep 12(8):775–784
Hamilton IR, Svensäter G (1998) Acid-regulated proteins induced by Streptococcus mutans and
other oral bacteria during acid shock. Oral Microbiol Immunol 13(5):292–300
Hammerschmidt K, Rose CJ, Kerr B, Rainey PB (2014) Life cycles, fitness decoupling and the
evolution of multicellularity. Nature 515(7525):75–79
Heinemann M, Sauer U (2010) Systems biology of microbial metabolism. Curr Opin Microbiol 13
(3):337–343
Homer KA, Manji F, Beighton D (1990) Inhibition of protease activities of periodontopathic
bacteria by extracts of plants used in Kenya as chewing sticks (mswaki). Arch Oral Biol 35
(6):421–424
Jenkinson HF (2011) Beyond the oral microbiome. Environ Microbiol 13(12):3077–3087
Jyoti A, Singh AK, Dubey M, Kumar S, Saluja R, Keshari RS, Verma A, Chandra T, Kumar A,
Bajpai VK, Barthwal MK, Dikshit M (2014) Interaction of inducible nitric oxide synthase with
rac2 regulates reactive oxygen and nitrogen species generation in the human neutrophil
phagosomes: implication in microbial killing. Antioxid Redox Signal 20(3):417–431
Kayaoglu G, Örstavik D (2004) Virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis: relationship to
endodontic disease. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 15(5):308–320
Kim HA, Kim SH, Ko HM, Choi JH, Kim KJ, Oh SH, Cho KO, Choi IW, Im SY (2008) Nitric
oxide plays a key role in the platelet-activating factor-induced enhancement of resistance
against systemic candidiasis. Immunology 124(3):428–435
Kobayashi Y, Hayashi M, Yoshino F, Tamura M, Yoshida A, Ibi H, Lee MC, Ochiai K, Ogiso B
(2014) Passive ultrasonic irrigation in the presence of a low concentration of hydrogen
peroxide enhances hydroxyl radical generation and bactericidal effect against Enterococcus
faecalis. J Oral Sci 56(1):35–39
Kolpen M, Bjarnsholt T, Moser C, Hansen CR, Rickelt LF, Kuhl M, Hempel C, Pressler T,
Hoiby N, Jensen PO (2014) Nitric oxide production by polymorphonuclear leucocytes in
infected cystic fibrosis sputum consumes oxygen. Clin Exp Immunol 177(1):310–319
Liu H, Liang X, Wang D, Zhang H, Liu L, Chen H, Li Y, Duan Q, Xie K (2015) Combination
therapy with nitric oxide and molecular hydrogen in a murine model of acute lung injury.
Shock 43(5):504–511
Mah TF (2012) Biofilm-specific antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol 7(9):1061–1072
Mah TF, O’Toole GA (2001) Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends
Microbiol 9(1):34–39
Marsh PD (2003) Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes? Microbiology 149
(Pt 2):279–294
Matin A (1992) Physiology, molecular biology and applications of the bacterial starvation
response. Soc Appl Bacteriol Symp Ser 21:49S–57S
Molander A, Reit C, Dahlén G, Kvist T (1998) Microbiological status of root-filled teeth with
apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 31(1):1–7
M€oller ÅJR (1966) Microbiological examination of root canals and periapical tissues of human
teeth. Methodological studies. Odontol Tidskr 74(5):Suppl:1–380
M€oller AJ, Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Öhman AE, Heyden G (1981) Influence on periapical tissues of
indigenous oral bacteria and necrotic pulp tissue in monkeys. Scand J Dent Res 89(6):475–484
Moraru C, Amann R (2012) Crystal ball: fluorescence in situ hybridization in the age of super-
resolution microscopy. Syst Appl Microbiol 35(8):549–552
Munson MA, Pitt-Ford T, Chong B, Weightman A, Wade WG (2002) Molecular and cultural
analysis of the microflora associated with endodontic infections. J Dent Res 81(11):761–766
Netuschil L, Auschill TM, Sculean A, Arweiler NB (2014) Confusion over live/dead stainings for
the detection of vital microorganisms in oral biofilms–which stain is suitable? BMC Oral
Health 14:2
Neu TR, Lawrence JR (2014) Investigation of microbial biofilm structure by laser scanning
microscopy. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 146:1–51
Neu TR, Manz B, Volke F, Dynes JJ, Hitchcock AP, Lawrence JR (2010) Advanced imaging
techniques for assessment of structure, composition and function in biofilm systems. FEMS
Microbiol Ecol 72(1):1–21
Nystr€om T (1999) Starvation, cessation of growth and bacterial aging. Curr Opin Microbiol 2
(2):214–219
Pearl JE, Torrado E, Tighe M, Fountain JJ, Solache A, Strutt T, Swain S, Appelberg R, Cooper AM
(2012) Nitric oxide inhibits the accumulation of CD4 + CD44hiTbet + CD69lo T cells in
mycobacterial infection. Eur J Immunol 42(12):3267–3279
Potrykus K, Cashel M (2008) (p)ppGpp: still magical? Annu Rev Microbiol 62:35–51
Raivio TL (2014) Everything old is new again: an update on current research on the Cpx envelope
stress response. Biochim Biophys Acta 1843(8):1529–1541
Rocas IN, Siqueira JF Jr (2010) Identification of bacteria enduring endodontic treatment pro-
cedures by a combined reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and reverse-capture
checkerboard approach. J Endod 36(1):45–52
Sedgley CM, Lennan SL, Clewell DB (2004) Prevalence, phenotype and genotype of oral
enterococci. Oral Microbiol Immunol 19(2):95–101
Shade A, Peter H, Allison SD, Baho DL, Berga M, Burgmann H, Huber DH, Langenheder S,
Lennon JT, Martiny JB, Matulich KL, Schmidt TM, Handelsman J (2012) Fundamentals of
microbial community resistance and resilience. Front Microbiol 3:417
Shapiro JA (2007) Bacteria are small but not stupid: cognition, natural genetic engineering and
socio-bacteriology. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 38(4):807–819
Shrestha A, Kishen A (2014) Antibiofilm efficacy of photosensitizer-functionalized bioactive
nanoparticles on multispecies biofilm. J Endod 40(10):1604–1610
Spratt DA (2004) Molecular analysis in endodontic infections. Endod Topics 9
Stewart PS, Franklin MJ (2008) Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol 6
(3):199–210
Stojicic S, Shen Y, Haapasalo M (2013) Effect of the source of biofilm bacteria, level of biofilm
maturation, and type of disinfecting agent on the susceptibility of biofilm bacteria to
antibacterial agents. J Endod 39(4):473–477
Sunde PT, Olsen I, Debelian GJ, Tronstad L (2002) Microbiota of periapical lesions refractory to
endodontic therapy. J Endod 28(4):304–310
Sundqvist G (1976) Bacteriological studies of necrotic dental pulps. Umeå University, Umeå,
Sweden
Sundqvist G (1992) Ecology of the root canal flora. J Endod 18(9):427–430
Sundqvist G (1994) Taxonomy, ecology, and pathogenicity of the root canal flora. Oral Surg Oral
Med Oral Pathol 78(4):522–530
Sundqvist G, Figdor D (2003) Life as an endodontic pathogen. Endod Top 6(1):3–28
Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sj€ ogren U (1998) Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed
endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85(1):86–93
Sutton NA, Hughes N, Handley PS (1994) A comparison of conventional SEM techniques, low
temperature SEM and the electroscan wet scanning electron microscope to study the structure
of a biofilm of Streptococcus crista CR3. J Appl Bacteriol 76(5):448–454
Svensäter G, Bergenholtz G (2004) Biofilms in endodontic infections. Endod Topics 9:27–36
Svensäter G, Welin J, Wilkins JC, Beighton D, Hamilton IR (2001) Protein expression by
planktonic and biofilm cells of Streptococcus mutans. FEMS Microbiol Lett 205(1):139–146
Takahashi N, Washio J, Mayanagi G (2010) Metabolomics of supragingival plaque and oral

bacteria. J Dent Res 89(12):1383–1388
Vieira AR, Siqueira JF Jr, Ricucci D, Lopes WS (2012) Dentinal tubule infection as the cause of
recurrent disease and late endodontic treatment failure: a case report. J Endod 38(2):250–254
Wade WG (2013) The oral microbiome in health and disease. Pharmacol Res 69(1):137–143
Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M (2014) Dentin extends the antibacterial effect of endodontic sealers
against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. J Endod 40(4):505–508
Wardle DA, Jonsson M (2014) Long-term resilience of above- and below ground ecosystem
components among contrasting ecosystems. Ecology 95(7):1836–1849
Wickstr€om C, Hamilton IR, Svensäter G (2009) Differential metabolic activity by dental plaque
bacteria in association with two preparations of MUC5B mucins in solution and in biofilms.
Microbiology 155(Pt 1):53–60
Xhevdet A, Stubljar D, Kriznar I, Jukic T, Skvarc M, Veranic P, Ihan A (2014) The disinfecting
efficacy of root canals with laser photodynamic therapy. J Lasers Med Sci 5(1):19–26
Zagryazhskaya AN, Lindner SC, Grishina ZV, Galkina SI, Steinhilber D, Sud’ina GF (2010) Nitric
oxide mediates distinct effects of various LPS chemotypes on phagocytosis and leukotriene
synthesis in human neutrophils. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 42(6):921–931
Zaura E (2012) Next-generation sequencing approaches to understanding the oral microbiome.
Adv Dent Res 24(2):81–85
Molecular Principles of Adhesion and Biofilm
Formation
Jens Kreth and Mark C. Herzberg
Abstract Oral bacteria are responsible for oral health and disease, including
caries, periodontal disease, and endodontic infections. The development of oral
diseases is intimately linked with the ability of oral bacteria to form and reside in an
adherent multispecies consortium named biofilm. The oral biofilm provides a
protective environment for the bacterial community and its formation is a geneti-
cally controlled process. In this chapter, we present a general overview of devel-
opmental mechanisms employed by individual members of the oral biofilm. The
species composition of the oral biofilm and the oral microbiome is discussed
historically and in the context of newly developed next-generation sequencing
techniques. Furthermore, biofilm-specific regulatory mechanisms and phenotypic
traits are explained to provide the reader with a comprehensive overview of oral
biofilm formation and its role in health and disease.
1 Introduction
1.1 What Are Biofilms?
Microbial communities are commonly referred to as biofilms (Costerton

et al. 1995). These communities are found associated with humans, generally on
the skin or mucous membranes, but can also be found in natural (e.g., rivers and
streams or soil) and artificial environments (e.g., on the surfaces of the places where
we live and work). In general, biofilms connote the lifestyles of aggregated, sessile,
or attached microbes in any environment and contrast free-floating, planktonic
J. Kreth (*)
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences
Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
M.C. Herzberg
Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Mucosal and Vaccine
Research Center, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
MN, USA

Biofilms 9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47415-0_2
24 J. Kreth and M.C. Herzberg
counterparts. The definition of biofilms has changed over time to include relevant
new discoveries in biofilm research and to appreciate their structural and develop-
mental complexity. An early definition as microbial aggregates attached to a living
or nonliving surface embedded within extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of
bacterial origin has been extended to include aggregated cell masses floating in a
liquid phase and cell aggregates in air–liquid interfaces.
One of the defining steps in biofilm development is the production of extracel-
lular polysaccharides (EPS) (Flemming and Wingender 2010). In nature, what we
term EPS actually consists of bacterial polysaccharides, proteins, nucleic acids, and
lipids. The EPS contributes to the architecture of the biofilm community. In
medically relevant biofilms, host-derived components play an important role in
the initiation of biofilm development and should be considered a part of the EPS.
For example, a conditioning saliva-derived film (the acquired salivary pellicle) is
essential for the attachment of the initial oral biofilm forming bacteria (Hannig
et al. 2005). Hall-Stoodley et al. therefore suggested that biofilm with EPS exists as
“aggregated, microbial cells surrounded by a polymeric self-produced matrix,
which may contain host components” (Hall-Stoodley et al. 2012).
1.2 Why Do Biofilms Form?
Human microbes of medical interest live predominantly in biofilms. The microor-

ganisms dwelling in biofilm communities are estimated to cause about 80 % of
infections (Costerton et al. 1999; Costerton 2001), suggesting that virulence is
favored for the biofilm residents. Most human-associated microbial species are
highly adapted to a specific body site; residing in a biofilm avoids dislocation to a
less favorable environment. By residing in sessile communities, microorganisms
are less likely to face eradication. For example, to optimize retention on selected
oral surfaces, members of oral biofilms have developed mechanisms to optimize
binding to specific cell and tissue sites (Zhang et al 2005). The successive integra-
tion of new members into the initial biofilm is also promoted by specific cell surface
receptors to facilitate species–species aggregation (Jakubovics et al. 2014). To
enable growth in the selected oral niche, the colonizing microflora can effectively
metabolize salivary components.
The biofilm community also protects its ecological niche against invading,
nonresident species that would otherwise overrun the space. In a process called
colonization resistance, this community-based interference or antagonism prevents
integration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, for example, into human salivary micro-
bial biofilms (He et al. 2011; van der Waaij et al. 1971). The protective biofilm
environment also extends to the host–biofilm interface. The innate and adaptive
arms of the immune system more effectively eliminate planktonic cells than
microorganisms in biofilms. Several mechanisms can be in play. For example, in
biofilms Staphylococcus epidermidis cells resist deposition of the antimicrobial
complement component C3b and immunoglobulin G (IgG) on cell surfaces, thus
Molecular Principles of Adhesion and Biofilm Formation 25
diminishing opsonization required for phagocyte-mediated killing (Kristian

et al. 2008). Similarly, Staphylococcus aureus cells in biofilms resist macrophage
phagocytosis by circumventing bacterial recognition pathways mediated by toll-
like receptors TLR2 and TLR9 (Thurlow et al. 2011). Both TLRs usually recognize
bacterial components (pathogen-associated molecular patterns, PAMPs), which are
expressed on cells in the biofilm, but appear masked by the presence of the EPS.
Interestingly, initial biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa is facilitated by
the presence of human neutrophils through P. aeruginosa attachment to neutrophil-
derived actin and DNA (Walker et al. 2005), further illustrating that adaptation to
the protective, anti-phagocytic biofilm environment sustains viability and long-
term persistence.
The biofilm can likely modulate the host-immune response depending on the
species composition. Porphyromonas gingivalis, a member of the subgingival
biofilm community associated with the development of periodontal disease, can
downregulate specific immune mediators. For example, the presence of P. gingivalis
in a ten species in vitro biofilm model was required to downregulate
proinflammatory interleukin-Iβ and the NLRP3 inflammasome (Belibasakis
et al. 2012), which are required for the effective elimination of bacteria by the
host (Taxman et al. 2010). P. gingivalis is therefore suggested to use this strategy to
manipulate the local inflammatory immune response and evade host surveillance
with the ultimate benefit of survival at the host–biofilm interface (Bostanci and
Belibasakis 2012).
Microorganisms residing in a biofilm community also enjoy greater resistance
against antimicrobials. To combat infecting microbes in biofilms, conventional
antibiotics are required at 10- to 1000-fold greater concentrations. Bacteria are
also able to respond to the presence of antibiotics like methicillin by forming
biofilms, as shown for S. aureus and several other species (Kaplan 2011), indicating
a specific mechanistic behavior of bacterial cells encountering potentially life-
threatening conditions. Similarly, microbes encounter daily challenges from the
host innate immunity. Antimicrobial peptides are produced by the oral mucosa to
target bacteria residing or passing through the oral cavity (Diamond et al. 2008;
Gorr 2012). Found in saliva, antimicrobial peptides are less effective against
biofilms than planktonic cells (Helmerhorst et al. 1999; Mazda et al. 2012; Wei
et al. 2006).
1.2.1 Formation of Diffusion Barrier and Adsorbant Surface
Several factors influence biofilm susceptibility to antimicrobials as described in the

following section. The EPS can form both a diffusion barrier and affinity matrix,
partitioning the microbes from an antimicrobial compound or peptide. As an
affinity matrix, the EPS actively binds antimicrobial substances to limit penetration
into the biofilm. By slowing and limiting the diffusion of the antimicrobial, EPS
reduces the effective local concentration reaching the viable cells in the biofilm
community. The structure of the EPS affects the rate of diffusion of antimicrobials;
diffusion would be more limiting as the size of the antimicrobials increases. For
example, fluorescent probes of varying molecular weights—surrogates for antimi-
crobial compounds—penetrated into a preformed in vitro biofilm consortium with
different efficiencies. The diffusion limitation reflected molecular sieving, which
could be predicted by the molecular weight of the fluorescent probes. The pore
diameter for the particular biofilm EPS was estimated to be between 2.6 and 4.6 nm
(Thurnheer et al. 2003). The pore size of EPS is expected to vary with the microbial
species composition in the biofilm and the structure of the synthesized EPS, but
little is known. In some conditions, diffusion limitation is not achieved by the EPS.
For example, the antibiotics vancomycin and rifampin can effectively penetrate the
biofilms of S. epidermidis, but fail to eradicate the biofilm-dwelling bacteria
(Dunne et al. 1993), suggesting another mechanism responsible for the reduced
susceptibility.
Biofilms, including the EPS and the compact colonies of cells, also limit
diffusion of components required for the growth of the resident cells and removal
of secreted metabolic end products. The EPS and cell colonies function generally as
a constraint on diffusion and as a molecular sieve. As shown for ex vivo oral
biofilms, oxygen availability is limited in deeper parts of the biofilm (von Ohle
et al. 2010), repressing the respiratory activity of oral biofilm bacteria (Nguyen
et al. 2002). The cells grow slower because of suboptimal conditions for metabolic
activity. The microbial heterogeneity in segments of the biofilm community is both
a cause and consequence of regional differences in metabolic activity. Heteroge-
neous metabolic activity in biofilms leads to reduced cellular content of RNA and
proteins in some regions of the biofilm, while growth occurs elsewhere (Sternberg
et al. 1999; Xu et al. 1998). Regions with slow growth may show greater antibiotic
resistance. Mature subgingival ex vivo biofilms with limited nutrient supply are less
susceptible to chlorhexidine and other antibiotics when compared to newly formed,
metabolically active biofilms (Sedlacek and Walker 2007; Shen et al. 2011).
1.2.2 Biofilm-Specific Development of Genetic Resistance
During biofilm development, specific traits can be expressed that confer antibiotic
resistance, which is not observed in planktonic cells. For example, a glucosyl-
transferase (encoded by ndvB) in P. aeruginosa is responsible for the production of
cyclic periplasmatic glucans. The expression of ndvB is specific for biofilm cells
and seems to be absent in planktonic cells. Inactivation of ndvB leads to the loss of
high-level, biofilm-specific antibiotic resistance (Mah et al. 2003). The cyclic
glucans produced by NdvB can interact with antibiotics, thus sequestering antibi-
otics away from their cellular targets (Beaudoin et al. 2012; Mah et al. 2003).
Similarly, during biofilm development, cells of S. aureus and Salmonella enterica
serovar Typhimurium upregulate specific multidrug efflux pumps that transport
antimicrobial compounds out the cell (He and Ahn 2011). Candida albicans also
upregulates drug efflux pumps during biofilm formation, which may increase
resistance to antifungal components during oral candidiasis (Ramage et al. 2002).
1.2.3 Emergence of Persister Cells
Bacterial persistence during antibiotic treatment can be attributed to persister cells

(Bigger 1944). Persister cells are a small metabolically inactive, dormant subpop-
ulation found in biofilm and planktonic cultures (Balaban 2011; Lewis 2010). Their
minimal physiological activity facilitates extreme tolerance against antimicrobial
treatments. In contrast, resistant bacteria acquire either a mutation or encode a
specific gene conferring antibiotic resistance. The persistent state is not passed on to
the offspring. Once the antibiotic challenge to the population is removed, the
persister cells resume metabolic activity and repopulate the infected area, and
new persister cells can appear.
The biofilm can also shield inhabitants from clearance by the immune system,
contributing to the pathogenesis of chronic infections such as cystic fibrosis and
tuberculosis (Allison et al. 2011). Immune cells and antibodies can attack the
outermost surface of the biofilm, but bacterial cells within are protected. Antimi-
crobial therapy can also select for increased occurrence of persisters, as shown for
C. albicans isolated from biofilms of oral candidiasis patients (Lafleur et al. 2010).
For detailed information about the genetic regulation of persistence, see reference
Lewis (2010). Persisting bacteria and fungi can cause recurrence of infection once
antibiotic treatment concludes.
Biofilms, therefore, show greater resistance to antibiotics and immune defense
mechanisms due to several mechanisms, which may have evolved to protect the
community. The outermost layers of the biofilm form both an antibiotic diffusion
barrier and adsorbent. Since human-associated biofilms are typically polymicrobial
consortia, each resident species can create its own microenvironment. Bacterial
species differ in their susceptibility to antibiotic treatment. Under selective pressure
of antibiotic treatment, the less susceptible species will tend to survive. In concert
with the selective advantages provided by formation and growth in biofilms,
infections associated with biofilms tend to be treated ineffectively by antibiotics.
Growth of microbes in biofilm communities offers other advantages. During
starvation conditions, survival of bacteria generally favors species residing in a
community. Indeed, several species form biofilms to mitigate starvation conditions.
Within biofilms, the lower metabolic activity might help cells to survive times of
insufficient carbohydrates, nitrogen, and phosphorus in the oral biofilm. In general,
microbes in biofilms are more resistant to stress (Coenye 2010), which can include
nutrient deprivation, changes in oxygen tension, or extremes of pH and
temperature.
In a biofilm community, resident cells enjoy intercellular communication.
Microbial communication is crucial for concerted gene regulation as a response
to environmental changes. The close proximity of cells in the biofilm seems to
create an ideal environment to talk. A common form of communication between
bacteria is the production of signaling molecules, which can be sensed by neigh-
bors. The reduced diffusion in biofilms facilitates a localized critical increase of
signaling molecules, which can trigger a corresponding response in the
microenvironment. Intercellular communication is important for general stress

adaptation and community development. Intercellular communication is discussed
in detail in Sects. 5 and 6.
1.3 Challenges for Biofilms in the Oral Environment
Among the human-associated bacterial communities, oral biofilms reside in an

anatomical site that encounters diverse environmental challenges. These challenges
include perturbations from the external environment and microbial growth control
provided within the oral cavity by the innate arm of the immune system. The oral
cavity is bathed in saliva, which contains innate immune effector molecules that
originate in the salivary glands and in the mucosal epithelial cells that line the oral
surfaces. The net effect of the challenges to biofilm communities will vary in the
different niches found on the oral surfaces and within tissue folds and crevices. The
oral mucosal epithelium is a continuously shedding and renewing tissue. Cells
containing oral microorganisms are shed and replaced with new sterile cells,
which rapidly bind and are invaded by oral microorganisms. The cycle of shedding,
renewal, and reinfection repeats continuously.
Located in close proximity to the oral epithelium, teeth are non-shedding
surfaces. Tooth eruption and entry into the oral cavity breach the covering mucosal
epithelium. As the teeth erupt, the gingiva, a band of keratinized squamous mucosal
epithelium, surrounds and attaches to the tooth surface and forms a penetration
barrier. As the erupting tooth and the surrounding epithelium mature, a gingival
crevice forms between the tooth and the attached gingiva. The gingival crevice is
bathed with a specialized fluid called gingival crevice fluid, which arises as a serum
transudate that percolates from the connective tissues through the thin crevicular
epithelium. The oral surfaces are more generally bathed in saliva. The composition
of bathing saliva varies in intraoral locales based on proximity to the different major
and minor salivary glands. Oxygen tension, temperature, and humidity can also
differ because of proximity to ambient air. For microbes, the mouth contains,
therefore, an infinite number of microenvironments, each one contiguous with its
neighbors. The distinct ecological determinants tend to select for survival and
growth of certain microbial species while excluding others. Therefore, the bacterial
composition differs for the subgingival and supragingival biofilms, which also
differ from the species composition of the tongue.
Oral biofilms are also challenged frequently by sudden environmental changes
due to host behavior. During host food intake, low nutrient availability for biofilms
can be replaced by relative overabundance. Masticated foods and lactic acid
released mainly by oral streptococci and actinomyces after carbohydrate fermen-
tation cause sudden changes in pH. Additional physical and chemical stresses to the
biofilm communities can be caused by sudden changes in temperature, osmolarity,
and the mastication process during and after food ingestion. To accommodate to the
stresses, the oral biofilm communities have become genetically diverse.
In individual subjects, the species richness is estimated to be 250 to 300 different

species (Keijser et al. 2008; Zaura et al. 2009). The species diversity creates
intrinsic competition for space and nutrients. Nonetheless, the oral biofilms main-
tain homeostasis as a vital part of overall human oral health.
2 Species Composition of the Human Oral Biofilm
The first ever description of bacteria by Antonie Philips van Leeuwenhoek was
based on his own dental plaque samples. Visualized through his primitive com-
pound microscope, the initial drawings reported in 1683 suggested that the oral
biofilm is a multispecies consortium (Hall 1989). As technology has advanced in
the last several decades, our knowledge of the species composition of oral biofilms
has exploded in healthy subjects and others with oral diseases. Our understanding of
disease development has increased and potential pathogenic species have been
associated with caries and periodontal disease.
A new concept of disease development has been developed (Beighton 2005;
Kleinberg 2002; Marsh 2003; Takahashi and Nyvad 2008; van Houte 1994). Today,
the events leading to caries and periodontal disease are better explained by shifts in
bacterial ecology and disturbances in biofilm homeostasis than the presence of a
specific pathogen. The ecological plaque theory as defined by Marsh suggests that
environmental pressures like low pH cause a shift in the bacterial ecology of the
dental biofilm from health-promoting bacteria to primarily acidogenic, aciduric,
and cariogenic species (Marsh 2003, 2009). Furthermore, the polymicrobial syn-
ergy and dysbiosis (PSD) model acknowledge that the presence and biofilm-specific
activities of “keystone” species like Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella
forsythus are required to fully promote the pathogenic potential of the biofilm
(Hajishengallis and Lamont 2012). Healthy microbial homeostasis is usually pro-
moted by the interplay between host behavior, host defense mechanisms, and
biofilm intrinsic mechanisms. Excessive intake of fermentable carbohydrates can
perturb dental plaque homeostasis by lowering the pH. Higher proportions of
conditional pathogens are selected, whereas under healthy conditions the compo-
sition of the dental plaque would not cause any problems for the host.
More than 300 years after the first visualization of the life-forms in dental
plaque, new techniques and approaches are used to study oral microbial composi-
tion. Improvements in sensitivity and the development of high-throughput sequenc-
ing allow us to estimate that the oral biofilms contain up to 19,000 species/
phylotypes (Keijser et al. 2008). The complexity of oral biofilms is far greater
than previously realized. Reflecting the complexity of these communities, the
composition of oral biofilms is now called the microbiome. By use of informatics
approaches and continued technological advances, new understanding of the oral
microbiome in health and disease and breakthrough discoveries are to be expected.
2.1 Composition of Human Oral Biofilms:

Pre-microbiome Era
The microbial composition of dental plaque has been characterized using culture-
dependent and culture-independent approaches (Aas et al. 2005, 2008; Becker
et al. 2002; Kroes et al. 1999; Kumar et al. 2003; Paster et al. 2001, 2006). The
culture-independent method uses amplification of the species-specific 16S rRNA
gene, followed by cloning of the respective amplicons and sequencing. When
plaque was sampled from five subjects at nine different healthy intraoral sites
using this method, 141 predominant species were detected (Aas et al. 2005). The
genus Streptococcus is the most abundant, including the species Streptococcus
sanguinis, S. gordonii, S. mitis, S. oralis, and S. salivarius (Aas et al. 2005). The
streptococci constitute over 80 % of initial biofilm formers and 20 % of mature
plaque biofilms (Rosan and Lamont 2000). Because of their interactions with other
genera and species, the presence of certain species of streptococci specifies the
initial species succession of successful biofilm formation as discussed below.
Among the five subjects, several genera were identified to be in common including
Streptococcus, Veillonella, Granulicatella, and Gemella (Aas et al. 2005). The nine
intraoral plaque sites each showed distinct microflora. Interestingly, Streptococcus
mitis was isolated from all intraoral sites and was present in all 5 individuals.
Consistent with the absence of clinically detectable dental diseases, “red complex”
species associated with periodontal disease were not found including
Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia
(Socransky et al. 1998). Similarly cariogenic species like S. mutans, Lactobacillus
spp., and Bifidobacterium spp. were not isolated (Aas et al. 2005).
Using a more sensitive method in species detection, 16S rRNA amplification,
cloning, and sequencing, the bacterial diversity of the oral cavity was determined in
10 healthy subjects (Bik et al. 2010). Overall, 247 species-level phylotypes were
identified, including “red complex” species in three of the subjects. Periodontal
pathogens seem to be present in subjects with periodontal health, although at low
levels. All 10 subjects shared a core set of 15 bacterial genera, with subject-specific
differences at the species and strain level (Bik et al. 2010). Several species were
only found in 1 or 2 subjects, suggesting that the interindividual environment,
behavior, and genetic background contribute to the species composition of the
oral biofilm. These studies provided important contributions to our understanding
of the overall composition of normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity.
To understand bacterial ecology during caries development, the microbial com-
position of healthy enamel in 30 subjects was compared with caries lesions of
increasing severity in 30 subjects with childhood caries (Becker et al. 2002). The
23 most prominent bacterial species were investigated. As expected, cariogenic
S. mutans was identified in relatively high abundance in subjects with clinical signs
of caries development, and significantly fewer were recovered on sound enamel
surfaces and in subjects without any sign of caries. Actinomyces gerencseriae and
Bifidobacterium spp. were also more prevalent in caries than in healthy sites.
Conversely, S. sanguinis, S. gordonii, and Actinomyces serotype II were associated

with intact, caries-free teeth and lower caries prevalence. Caries-associated species
like S. mutans and Lactobacillus spp. increase in numbers during caries develop-
ment (Torlakovic et al. 2012). With more sophisticated analytical methods, how-
ever, the species composition is further defined and includes other previously not
detected species (Torlakovic et al. 2012). These data indicate that the species
composition of oral biofilms varies from health to disease and fully support the
ecological plaque theory.
2.2 Composition of Human Oral Biofilms: Microbiome Era
The Human Microbiome Project (HMP) Consortium seeks to provide a compre-

hensive overview of human microbial communities sampled on 18 sites of the
healthy body (Consortium 2012a) (and http://www.hmpdacc.org). In contrast to the
limited genus and species identification of methods in the pre-microbiome era, at
least 300 bacterial reference genomes will be sequenced. The HMP uses a deep-
sequencing approach and provides an in-depth analysis of the available data. New
species can be identified and the overall metabolic pathways can be constructed
when shared by the sampled body site and the inhabiting biofilm community. The
sampling protocols and processing are precisely defined allowing for direct com-
parison of results from the samples from each subject (Consortium 2012a).
What have we learned about the oral biofilm community so far from the HMP?
Nearly 5000 simultaneous samples were collected from 15 (male) to 18 (female)
body sites from 242 healthy adult men and women. The human ecosystem is now
known to be comprised of more than 10,000 microbial species; 81–99 % of the
genera have been identified. With the first milestone announcement on June
13, 2012, several of the many concurrent publications report on the oral biofilm
community (Consortium 2012b; Rho et al. 2012; Segata et al. 2012; Wu
et al. 2012). When compared to the other sampled sites, the oral communities
were among the most diverse (Huse et al. 2012). At the genus and species levels,
tooth-associated communities were moderately distinct from other oral surfaces
although some genera were widely present in most sites (Consortium 2012b; Huse
et al. 2012). The unique composition of each site during health appeared stable.
Genera with pathogenic members were well represented among this disease-free
cohort (Segata et al. 2012). Although the microbial composition differed from site
to site between buccal mucosa, supragingival plaque, and tongue dorsum, core
metabolic processes were expressed in most environments (Consortium 2012b). In
each environment, different consortia of species performed the core metabolic
processes. Refinements in the analysis of available data sets, notwithstanding,
core metabolic functions can be provided to the biofilm by previously unrecognized
functional and ecological biodiversity in different oral sites and dramatically
different distributions of oral species among individuals (Eren et al. 2014).
Clearly, the HMB project has given us a high-resolution overview of the species
composition of the human oral biofilm with novel insights into the microbial
collaborations needed for full metabolic capabilities of the community. The appre-
ciation of the diversity at different oral sites begs the question of how colonization
and metabolic activity reflects the health or disease potential of the biofilm in caries,
for example. To address this question, it is feasible to determine the functional gene
expression of dental plaque bacteria from different oral sites using RNA-seq. The
actual metabolically active proportion of the consortium can be identified in terms
of gene expression at any given oral site. RNA generation requires active metab-
olism and inactive or dead bacteria would be excluded from such an analysis. This
meta-transcriptomic approach has been used only recently, but the actively tran-
scribed gene sets and the resulting metabolic profile of the consortia were clearly
defined (Benitez-Paez et al. 2014; Peterson et al. 2014). By ascribing functions to
genes expressed in dental plaque and other oral communities, activities can be
characterized. Further exciting discoveries will increase our understanding of oral
biofilms at a different level.
3 First Steps in the Development of Biofilms
The crucial steps in the initial development of biofilms have been well documented.
For example, the spatiotemporal pattern of early oral biofilm formation has been
traced in the human host using specific removable appliances harboring dental
enamel chips (Diaz et al. 2006). After 4 and 8 h of chip placement, oral streptococci
were the predominant initially colonizing species. Indeed, the initial colonizers
generally belong to the genus Streptococcus; some species are constant members
representing a core group of initial biofilm formers (Diaz et al. 2006; Rosan and
Lamont 2000).
Initial attachment is considered a reversible process. Initial or pioneer colonizers
adhere and detach from the tooth surface, and the cycle repeats until permanent
attachment is achieved. This irreversible attachment stage is typically mediated by
high-affinity binding between proteins and polysaccharides on the bacterial cell
surface to specific receptors on the tooth or cell. Within the bacteria, adhesion is
controlled by a genetic program associated with a change in the expression of
biofilm-related genes (Cowan et al. 1987; Hasty et al. 1992; Nobbs et al. 2009).
Biofilm development progresses with the formation of small micro-colonies of
streptococci and a few non-streptococci (Diaz et al. 2006). This newly formed
biofilm matures into a complex mature biofilm community by intrinsic growth and
recruitment of other species into the developing biofilm. The growth and accrual of
a complex community of microbial cells is accompanied by EPS production.
To discuss the molecular principles of biofilm formation, we will concentrate on
oral streptococci as the best-studied oral bacterial species and initial biofilm former.
3.1 Attachment to the Tooth Surfaces
3.1.1 Salivary Pellicle Adhesion
The molecular principles of adhesion are based on successive steps. First, oral
streptococci adhere to macromolecular complexes found on the saliva-coated tooth
or mucosal cells. This salivary film is commonly called pellicle. Although oral
streptococci are able to adhere directly to hydroxyapatite (Tanaka et al. 1996), the
major mineral found in dental enamel, the initial attachment process involves the
pellicle since the teeth and oral surfaces are consistently bathed with saliva and
naked enamel occurs rarely in the oral cavity. All evidence indicates that the
streptococcal surface interacts with salivary components including salivary
proteins.
Salivary proteins solubilized in the liquid or gel fractions of saliva are able to
attach avidly to the tooth surface via negatively charged residues and electrostatic
interactions through the hydrophilic regions; when tightly bound to hydroxyapatite,
hydrophobic domains buried within the three-dimensional structure of the salivary
proteins can become exposed and facilitate additional interactions (Lamkin and
Oppenheim 1993; Lindh 2002). This adsorbed complex of proteins and other
macromolecules constitutes the acquired salivary pellicle, which immediately
forms on the emerging tooth or after tooth cleaning by bathing in the constant
flow of saliva. Components in saliva and in the pellicle known to interact with the
adhering microorganisms include proline-rich proteins, alpha-amylase, secretory
IgA, mucin glycoproteins, and glycoprotein (gp) 340 (for comprehensive reviews,
see Jenkinson and Lamont 1997, Nobbs et al. 2009, Nobbs et al. 2011).
Binding to salivary pellicle proteins is mediated by protein–protein or protein–
carbohydrate interactions between the pellicle surface and the streptococcal sur-
face. Amylase is the most abundant salivary protein and is present in the salivary
pellicle and dental plaque (Aguirre et al. 1987; Orstavik and Kraus 1973). Amylase
can complex with sIgA in the salivary pellicle to form a binding receptor for certain
oral streptococci (Gong et al. 2000). Several oral streptococci bind amylase alone.
S. gordonii and S. mitis encode specific amylase binding proteins (Li et al. 2002a;
Vorrasi et al. 2010). Amylase binding protein B, AbpB, contributes to biofilm
formation based upon the inability of an AbpB mutant to colonize starch-fed rats
(Tanzer et al. 2003). For initial biofilm formation, binding to amylase is of greater
physiological significance than the physical attachment process. After streptococcal
binding, amylase retains about 50 % of its enzymatic function to catalyze the
hydrolysis of α-1,4-glucosidic linkages in dietary starch (Scannapieco
et al. 1990). Ingestion of starch enzymatically produces glucose, maltose, and
maltodextrins in close proximity to the streptococcal surface. These hydrolysis
products of starch can be immediately transported into streptococci by
carbohydrate-specific transporters. Adhesion is therefore linked to a metabolic
advantage, which illustrates the complex nature of the oral biofilm.
Several other surface adhesins have been identified in oral streptococci mediat-
ing the binding to salivary components, including SsaB, FimA, Hsa, GspB, SspB,
and SpaA (Holmes et al. 1998; Nobbs et al. 2011). Streptococcus gordonii adhesins
Hsa and GspB recognize carbohydrate moieties of glycosylated salivary compo-
nents. Both proteins mediate adhesion to the salivary pellicle through lectin-like
recognition of sialic-acid-containing salivary mucin MG2 and salivary agglutinin.
It is not surprising that oral streptococci have evolved several surface proteins with
redundant function to ensure proper binding to their specific niche in the oral cavity.
The oral cavity contains the only ecological niches allowing long-term survival of
oral streptococci and these microorganisms must adhere or die. Interestingly, the
genetic regulatory circuit of adhesin expression can compensate for imbalances in
surface protein display, suggesting a fail-safe mechanism of adherence
(unpublished data).
3.2 Binding to Cellular Components
Streptococcal surface proteins also bind the bacteria to host cellular components
and salivary proteins that form a pellicle on mucosal epithelial cells. About 80 % of
the oral cavity surface consists of soft tissue, providing a large area for bacterial
attachment (Nobbs et al. 2011). Attachment to oral epithelial cells requires multiple
S. gordonii adhesin proteins (Davies et al. 2009). Certain oral streptococci bind to
mammalian fibronectin, a structural glycoprotein involved in cell–matrix interac-
tions (Labat-Robert 2012; Nobbs et al. 2011), which facilitates adhesion to cells
(Okahashi et al. 2010). S. gordonii Hsa mediates binding to sialic acid, which is
found on the N-linked glycans of fibronectin and other glycoproteins. Binding to
fibronectin is probably an important biological target evolutionarily since
S. gordonii adhesins CshA and CshB also bind to fibronectin peptide domains
present in the backbone. Similarly, the adhesins SspA and SspB also recognize
fibronectin (Jakubovics et al. 2009).
Oral bacteria employ other host components as binding receptors including the
integrin family of cell surface receptors responsible for cell–cell attachment (Nobbs
et al. 2009, 2011). For example, the S. mutans multi-ligand antigen I/II family
adhesin SpaP mediates interaction with α5β1 integrins (Engels-Deutsch
et al. 2011), other host components, and bacterial cells of other species. Antigen
I/II also mediates binding to fibronectin, collagen, salivary glycoproteins, glyco-
protein 340, platelets, integrins, and A. naeslundii (Brady et al. 2010). To confer
different binding capabilities, heterologous protein targets can bind distinct protein
domains in the antigen I/II protein. For example, the alanine-rich repeat domain
(A-region) found on the N-terminus binds to collagen type I. The C-terminal region
is responsible for interactions with P. gingivalis (Brady et al. 2010), whereas the
central variable domain (V-region) interacts with surface ligands of Actinomyces
naeslundii. The A-region and the V-region each interact with salivary
glycoproteins. The proline-rich repeated domain (P-region) plays a role in antigen

I/II protein folding and self-aggregation.
The periodontal pathogen P. gingivalis expresses cell surface fimbriae, encoded
by fimA, which is critical for interactions with host cell membrane components.
FimA mediates binding to epithelial cells through the interaction with extracellular
matrix proteins like fibrinogen, vitronectin, and type I collagen (Murakami
et al. 1996; Naito and Gibbons 1988; Nakamura et al. 1999). In a survey to connect
the periodontal health status to the prevalence of specific fimA genotypes, a corre-
lation was observed between fimA types II and IV and periodontitis patients. Type II
had a prevalence of 75 % and is most likely a contributing factor to the etiology of
periodontal disease (Amano et al. 2000; Amano 2003).
Interestingly, bacterial interactions with the host not only benefit colonization,
but it also stimulates cell signaling and immune response. For example, S. mutans
binding to epithelial surface receptors in the oral cavity induces the synthesis and
release of proinflammatory cytokines like interleukin-6 and interleukin-8, which
promote neutrophil chemotaxis and degranulation (Engels-Deutsch et al. 2003).
Binding also induces expression of epithelial surface molecules such as ICAM-1
and VCAM-1 (Vernier-Georgenthum et al. 1998), which facilitate transendothelial
migration of neutrophils during the inflammatory response. In contrast,
P. gingivalis binding to cell surfaces dampens or interferes with the host-immune
response and may also promote periodontal tissue destruction. P. gingivalis fim-
briae trap ECM proteins like fibronectin and vitronectin, thereby interfering with
integrin-mediated signal transduction. As a consequence, the periodontal pathogen
appears to subvert the response to repair and heal compromised tissue (Scragg
et al. 1999).
Therefore, surface adhesin proteins on oral bacteria do not only ensure binding
to oral surfaces during biofilm development but also contribute to the virulence of
the respective species and influence the capacity of the host to respond to the
presence of the biofilm communities.
3.3 EPS Production
After initial attachment of bacterial cells, the next step in biofilm formation is
defined by the production of EPS. The best investigated EPS in the oral cavity is
glucans produced by streptococcal glucosyltransferases (Gtfs) from monomeric
sugars. If dietary sucrose is available in excess, glucosyltransferase activity is
intimately linked to caries development. Several oral species express Gtfs, but
S. mutans appears to synthesize the majority of the glucans in oral biofilms. All
using sucrose as substrate, three different Gtfs (GtfBCD) have been identified in
S. mutans. GtfBCD each synthesize a chemically distinct glucan. GtfB synthesizes
primarily insoluble α-1,3-linked glucans, GtfC produces a mixture of soluble
(α-1,6-linked glucans) and insoluble glucans, and GtfD forms predominantly
soluble glucans. Of special interest is the ability of the secreted enzymes to
associate with the salivary pellicle. GtfC and GtfD can both bind to the pellicle,
GtfD through the association with alpha-amylase. The S. gordonii glucosyl-
transferase GtfD also binds to alpha-amylase. GtfB remains bound to the strepto-
coccal surface and is able to bind to surfaces of other bacterial species. On bacterial
surfaces and the pellicle, the adsorbed Gtfs actively synthesize the respective
glucan polymers, effectively rendering non-Gtf encoding species into glucan pro-
ducers (Koo et al. 2013).
Adherence of streptococci to the preformed glucan polymers is facilitated by
specific S. mutans glucan-binding proteins, mainly GbpC and GbpB. GbpC and
GbpB bind cells of S. mutans to the mesh of glucan polymers and associated
proteins forming an EPS superstructure important for morphogenesis and the 3D
architecture of the oral biofilm. Subsequently, other species are able to bind to the
glucans and increase the species richness of the biofilm.
The role of S. mutans in the oral biofilm has mainly been investigated in the
context of caries development. The role of S. mutans in healthy conditions, how-
ever, has not been defined. S. mutans is found in low abundance in healthy subjects,
and yet its ability to provide a mesh-like structure for attachment of several species
might contribute to initial biofilm development for healthy communities. The
transition from a healthy to a pathogenic cariogenic biofilm community would
occur if excess dietary sucrose selects for increased abundance of S. mutans.
Another EPS component present in oral biofilms is extracellular DNA (eDNA),
but its role in oral biofilm formation is less well studied. Several oral streptococci,
including S. mutans (Klein et al. 2010), are able to release DNA into the extracel-
lular environment through an autolytic process, which contributes to biofilm for-
mation. When treated with DNase I to hydrolyze extracellular DNA, S. mutans
biofilms grown in the presence of sucrose and starch showed a significant reduction
in biomass. Growth in sucrose and starch upregulates the autolysin lytT gene, which
correlates with presence of eDNA. Another mechanism of DNA release in
S. mutans involves a newly identified auto-active bacteriocin, which induces cell
death and release of eDNA from the bacteriocin producer (Perry et al. 2009).
Release of eDNA appears to be a highly conserved activity and other strepto-
cocci have evolved corresponding mechanisms. S. gordonii and S. sanguinis pro-
duce eDNA during aerobic growth closely associated with the production of H2O2
(Kreth et al. 2008). Both species release high molecular weight DNA of chromo-
somal origin (Kreth et al. 2009). Deletion of the gene encoding pyruvate oxidase
dramatically reduced H2O2 production and eDNA release (Kreth et al. 2009). When
H2O2 production is limited by growth in oxygen-limited conditions, eDNA is also
reduced (Zheng et al. 2011a, b). Unlike S. mutans, S. gordonii and S. sanguinis only
require H2O2 to induce the DNA release process. In S. gordonii, however, the major
autolysin AtlS can also be involved in DNA release (Liu and Burne 2011). Deletion
of AtlS in S. gordonii prevented autolysis and production of eDNA under aerobic
conditions (Liu and Burne 2011). In contrast, under anaerobic conditions, eDNA
release can be induced by H2O2 addition without any obvious bacterial cell lysis
(Itzek et al. 2011). Streptococci may, therefore, have several mechanisms to trigger
eDNA release in response to different internal and/or external stimuli.
The generation of eDNA as a consequence of aerobic growth in a H2O2-dependent

mechanism is consistent with the roles of S. gordonii and S. sanguinis as initial
biofilm colonizers. Once the biofilm establishes and matures with S. sanguinis and
S. gordonii as permanent residents, the oxygen tension inside the biofilm declines,
and these species would cease to produce H2O2 and eDNA. At that time point in
biofilm formation, the contribution of eDNA to the EPS matrix is complete.
Overall, the binding capacities of oral streptococci to the salivary pellicle, host
cellular components, and other members of the oral biofilm community allow for
the colonization of the oral cavity, spanning the hard surfaces of teeth and the oral
mucosa. Oral biofilms are, therefore, bacterial habitats with complex host–biofilm
interactions.
4 Bacterial Interactions Leading to Species Succession

in Biofilms: Co-aggregation and Adhesion
Oral biofilm formation is driven by individual species that adhere initially to

non-colonized surfaces. On these surfaces, the initial colonizers show clonal
growth. Other species are recruited, often by co-aggregation, or serendipitously
interact to form a mature biofilm community. Concurrently, co-aggregation of
genetically distinct bacteria can occur in saliva and multispecies complexes can
then intercalate into the maturing biofilm. Co-aggregation during biofilm formation
follows a specific colonization pattern based on the compatible co-aggregation
pairings between bacterial species. Co-aggregation pairs have been well investi-
gated in vitro and in situ over the years leading to a model of spatiotemporal tooth
colonization reviewed in numerous excellent articles.
In biofilms, different species reside and grow in close proximity. The localiza-
tion of colonies of different species is rooted in the mutual benefits each derives on
the metabolic and cell signal levels. Hence, co-aggregation of streptococci, occur-
ring through interactions between lectin-like adhesin with receptor polysaccharide
on the partner species, facilitates intergeneric cell–cell communication. Bringing
heterologous species into close proximity also facilitates metabolic collaborations.
For example, veillonellae are known to co-aggregate with streptococci and actino-
myces. In biofilms, the three species create a complex metabolic relationship.
Veillonella spp. are unable to metabolize carbohydrates but readily ferment organic
acids like lactic acid. The common end product of streptococcal and actinomyces
metabolism is lactic acid, which is used by Veillonella spp. for growth. At the same
time removal of lactic acid prevents acidification. Acidification would inhibit the
growth of the lactic acid producer itself.
The production of H2O2 by oral streptococci is another important factor in this
ménage a trois. Some species are producers of H2O2, whereas others are sensitive to
the oxidative stress. Certain oral streptococci have the ability to produce H2O2
that selects for the integration of compatible species into the developing biofilm
community since new members must be able to cope with oxidative stress.
A. naeslundii is inhibited by H2O2 produced by S. gordonii, but in co-aggregation
cultures both species grow together in close proximity (Jakubovics et al. 2008a, b).
S. gordonii in coculture grows more readily than A. naeslundii, becoming the
dominant species at a ratio of about 9 to 1. Why do S. gordonii need
A. naeslundii in the community? A. naeslundii provides the H2O2-degrading
enzyme catalase, which can reduce oxidative damage to surface proteins inflicted
by H2O2 produced by S. gordonii (Jakubovics et al. 2008b). This example of
interspecies cooperation compliments S. gordonii’s own mechanism to maintain
the reduced state and function of the adhesins by using the oxidative repair activity
of methionine sulfoxide reductase, MsrA (Lei et al. 2011). The low ratio of
A. naeslundii to S. gordonii would, therefore, allow for sufficient production of
H2O2 to inhibit susceptible species competing for the same niche. Like
A. naeslundii, some strains of Veillonella also produce catalase, which would
also protect S. gordonii. The interactions between streptococci, veillonellae, and
actinomyces occur in vivo given the spatial proximity of the three species in human
plaque samples (Valm et al. 2011), suggesting that the mutualisms actually occur in
nature.
A striking and seemingly antagonistic relationship exists between S. gordonii
and P. gingivalis. Both are aggregation partners and P. gingivalis can be found
together during initial biofilm formation at 8 h (Diaz et al. 2006). During initial
plaque formation, the environment shifts from oxygen-rich to microaerophilic. Yet,
P. gingivalis is a strictly anaerobic species (Naito et al. 2008). During initial biofilm
development, P. gingivalis is susceptible to oxidative stress resulting from the
relatively high oxygen tension produced by inspired air and H2O2 produced by
S. gordonii.
The initial interaction between oral streptococci and P. gingivalis is most likely
mediated by P. gingivalis FimA and the streptococcal surface located glyceralde-
hyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Maeda et al. 2004a, b, c). The binding increases
in strength through the subsequent interaction between S. gordonii SspAB with the
P. gingivalis short fimbrial protein subunit, Mfa (Demuth et al. 2001). During
biofilm community development with P. gingivalis, several required S. gordonii
genes were identified in a genetic screen (Kuboniwa et al. 2006). Among them is
spxB, which encodes the pyruvate oxidase responsible for the production of H2O2.
Why is this S. gordonii gene important for the interaction with P. gingivalis when
the gene product generates a toxic by-product? One important feature could be the
metabolic function of the pyruvate oxidase. The metabolic activity of streptococcal
cells appears to create an anaerobic environment by rapidly consuming oxygen. As
a consequence, H2O2 production declines. It is tempting to speculate that the initial
association of P. gingivalis with S. gordonii is not accompanied by growth of
P. gingivalis; but once the anaerobic environment is created, P. gingivalis can
proliferate.
The initial in vivo oral biofilm microbial community is not restricted to
P. gingivalis and S. gordonii but includes other streptococci and species like
Veillonella and Actinomyces. Over time, the complexity of the community
increases. The interplay between H2O2 and catalase production appears to be

important in spatial and temporal development of the community.
Biofilm development through selective integration of species into existing
microbial communities also reflects concurrent exclusion of certain other species.
For example, S. cristatus downregulates the expression of the P. gingivalis fimA
gene, which encodes the surface protein responsible for the attachment to other
bacteria (Xie et al. 2000). S. cristatus communicates with P. gingivalis to exclude
this species from the microenvironment. The downregulation of fimA requires
initial contact of the two organisms and appears to depend on the presence of
S. cristatus arginine deiminase (Lin et al. 2008). Hence, S. cristatus may have the
ability to shape its own neighborhood by selecting its interacting partners. It is not
hard to imagine how this ability could influence the acquisition of later successive
colonizers in the developing biofilm.
5 Regulation of Adhesion and Biofilm Formation
When compared to planktonic conditions (when cells grow unattached to a surface),

biofilm cells differentially regulate approximately 10 % of the bacterial genome,
suggesting biofilm-specific regulation of gene expression (Rendueles and Ghigo
2012). For example, S. mutans UA159 cells in biofilms regulate about 12 % of its
genome with about 139 genes activated and 104 genes repressed when compared to
planktonic cells (Shemesh et al. 2007). Interestingly, most of the genes significantly
downregulated were from cells in the depth of the biofilm close to the attachment
surface. The selectively downregulated genes were largely involved in attachment,
suggesting that those genes are involved in the transition from the planktonic to
sessile phenotype, but that these genes are downregulated when no longer required
for biofilm attachment or maturation (Shemesh et al. 2007). The initial step of
biofilm formation and the subsequent maturation of the biofilm community are
directed, therefore, by a genetically regulated developmental program.
The biofilm-specific regulation of genes seems to be specific for each species.
During the transition into the biofilm phenotype, the periodontal pathogen
Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans does not downregulate any genes but
upregulates about 355 open reading frames (ORF), including a large set of ribo-
somal genes and potential virulence genes. In contrast, P. gingivalis upregulated
only 26 ORFs and downregulated 193 ORFs, most encoding “hypothetical” pro-
teins (Frias-Lopez and Duran-Pinedo 2012).
The decision of planktonic cells to attach to a surface depends on environmental
conditions (Petrova and Sauer 2012). Well-known environmental triggers include
macrophages co-localized with planktonic bacteria and nutritional deficits
(discussed above). Generally, the response to environmental signals is mediated
by receptors complexed with response regulators (transcription factors). Typically
these signaling systems are termed two-component systems (TCSs). Ca2+ is a
common environmental cue and S. mutans regulates calcium-dependent biofilm
formation by signaling through the CiaXRH three-component system. CiaX is a

small, secreted peptide with a calcium-binding (SD) domain (He et al. 2008).
Mutation of CiaX diminished S. mutans biofilm formation in vitro, probably
because calcium is required to initiate biofilm developmental pathways.
Biofilm formation involves several other signal transduction systems. The TCS
BfrAB is indispensible for S. gordonii single-species biofilm development (Zhang
et al. 2004). By binding to a specific DNA consensus sequence, the response
regulator BfrA directly regulates the expression of several genes, including the
two ABC transporters encoded by the bfrCD and bfrEFG operons (Zhang
et al. 2009). Interestingly, the DNA binding domain of S. gordonii BfrA is able to
bind to the homologous operons identified in S. sanguinis, suggesting that BfrAB
controls biofilm development in S. sanguinis as well. Two other genes controlled by
BfrAB in S. gordonii, bfrC and bfrG, are also required for dual-species biofilm
maturation with P. gingivalis (Kuboniwa et al. 2006). Hence, in vivo biofilm
development requires coordinated signaling pathways to ensure adhesion and
interaction with other species.
In general, TCSs appear to be pleiotropic regulators. Planktonic and biofilm
phenotypes are influenced by more than one TCS, suggesting vigorous cross talk
between individual TCSs to enable the biofilm lifestyle. For example, the TCSs
VicRK, HdrRM, and CiaXRH all affect S. mutans biofilm formation, competence,
and virulence. The competence regulatory TCS ComED is also involved in biofilm
development and is discussed later in Sect. 6.
The transition from planktonic to sessile cells leading to the irreversible attach-
ment in several species has been associated with the level of the ubiquitous
intracellular messenger signaling molecule bis-(3’-5’)-cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP)
(Jonas et al. 2009). The production of c-di-GMP is under the control of diguanylate
cyclases (DGCs) and phosphodiesterases (PDEs). c-di-GMP is synthesized from
GTP by DGCs and degraded by PDEs (Mills et al. 2011). High c-di-GMP levels
promote adhesion by the production of adhesive extracellular matrix components
including fimbriae in S. typhimurium and P. aeruginosa (Kader et al. 2006;
Kulasekara et al. 2005). Low intracellular levels of c-di-GMP promote motility
behavior like swimming, swarming, and twitching motility (Simm et al. 2004).
Inactivation of a DGC ortholog (gcp) in S. mutans also leads to impaired biofilm
formation. Gcp encodes the only protein in S. mutans with DGC activity (Yan
et al. 2010).
The oral streptococci need to adhere or become extinct. These species are not
particularly invasive of soft tissues, and so to survive they clearly invest in
mechanisms that facilitate adhesion to surfaces. Indeed these species may possess
a fail-safe mechanism to ensure that the protein adhesins are always expressed
sufficiently to withstand blockade or loss of one or more of these crucial surface
proteins. For example, S. gordonii overexpresses two alternative, well-studied
adhesins when one or more major adhesins (SspAB) are mutated and deleted
(Zhang et al. 2005). Furthermore, when surface adhesins cannot be properly
presented on the cell wall by deletion of the enzyme, Sortase A, virtually all of
the protein adhesins are overexpressed (Nobbs et al. 2007a). Hence, the cells appear
to be genetically programmed to provide an ample abundance of surface adhesin

proteins to compensate for any loss of expression or defect in processing, and the
importance of adhesion and biofilm formation to the survival of these species is
evident from the multiple mechanisms that sustain and regulate these functions.
6 Ecological Aspects of Oral Biofilm Development
6.1 Communication and the Consequences
Bacteria use small diffusible molecules or peptides as signals for cell-to-cell

communication. Communication can be intra- and interspecies specific and aid in
the coordination of bacterial population behavior as needed in biofilm formation
and community development. During early biofilm formation on the tooth surface,
the sparse colonization and small clusters of cell aggregates attached to the salivary
pellicle influence the ability of members of the biofilm community to communicate
with each other. Only cells in the immediate vicinity of a communicating cell can
interact with diffusible signals or metabolites. The distance from the target cell
receptors (i.e., TCSs) and concentration of the diffusible signaling molecules are
crucial limiting parameters in cell-to-cell communication. For example, the impor-
tance of spatial clustering on the efficiency of diffusible signals has been suggested
by mathematical modeling (Hense et al. 2007). Communication can also be
influenced by intrinsic distortion in the biofilm. For example, the important
S. mutans communication peptide CSP (see below), which regulates stress adapta-
tion, biofilm formation, and competence development, is degraded in dual-species
biofilms with S. gordonii. Degradation is mediated by challisin, a secreted protease.
Since a challisin homologue is encoded in the genome of the early colonizer
S. sanguinis, other oral streptococci might use similar mechanisms.
Metabolic cooperativity between members of the oral biofilm also requires
communication. For example, S. gordonii amylase gene showed increased expres-
sion when cells grew in close proximity to V. atypica in a saliva-conditioned flow
cell (Egland et al. 2004). V. atypica benefits from induction of amylase gene
expression in S. gordonii. Amylase degrades starch to monomeric glucose, which
can be fermented by S. gordonii to lactic acid, promoting growth of V. atypica. This
cooperative interaction is only effective over short distances, suggesting the action
of a diffusible substance (Egland et al. 2004).
Diffusible signals are also required for dual-species biofilm formation of
S. gordonii with P. gingivalis and S. oralis with A. naeslundii (McNab
et al. 2003; Rickard et al. 2006). Biofilm development for these pairs of species
depends on the signal autoinducer 2 (AI-2). AI-2 is a cell-density-dependent
signaling molecule produced by many bacterial species. Although AI-2 shows
species–species structural differences, many species can sense and respond to
AI-2. Therefore, AI-2 is considered as a nonspecific signaling molecule for
inter-bacterial communication (McNab and Lamont 2003). Accordingly,

S. gordonii and S. oralis AI-2 mutants were not able to form a dual-species biofilm
with P. gingivalis or A. naeslundii (McNab et al. 2003). In the natural setting of the
oral biofilm, the metabolic signaling of AI-2 is likely to influence the response of
multiple species and the structure of the developing oral biofilm.
6.2 Interspecies Antagonism
The oral biofilm is a competitive environment. Even during initial biofilm forma-
tion when colonization space is ample, competition exists. For example, the initial
colonizers S. sanguinis and S. gordonii express specific cell surface adhesin mol-
ecules with similar binding specificities. Hence, they compete to bind similar sites
in the salivary pellicle (Nobbs et al. 2007b). Yet, S. sanguinis has a greater natural
prevalence in plaque and saliva, but fails to outcompete S. gordonii completly.
S. gordonii apparently survives because it competes to adhere to the saliva-coated
tooth more effectively with S. sanguinis than any other tested oral streptococci
(Liljemark et al. 1979, 1981). The competitive advantage of S. gordonii was
attributable to expression of the sialic-acid-binding protein Hsa based upon muta-
tional analysis (Nobbs et al. 2007b). This surface adhesin enables S. gordonii to
successfully compete for binding to the tooth surface with the genetically similar,
but more abundant S. sanguinis. Hence, the efficiency of adherence to certain
salivary components is crucial in the competitive oral environment.
Several oral bacteria can also express antimicrobial peptides (bacteriocins) to
antagonize competing species. Interspecies antagonism of S. sanguinis or
S. gordonii with S. mutans has been modeled with a specific deferred antagonism
assay, and the outcome is determined by the sequence of colonization, nutritional
availability, and environmental pressures (Kreth et al. 2005a, 2008). All three
streptococcal species produce small chromosomally encoded bacteriocins (Deng
et al. 2004; Fujimura and Nakamura 1979; Schlegel and Slade 1972). Bacteriocins
of S. mutans have been well characterized (84, 99), and a recent review highlights
the sophisticated regulation of their production (Merritt and Qi 2012; Qi et al. 2000,
2001). The production of certain bacteriocins by S. mutans is controlled in a cell-
density-dependent manner by the ComCDE system that controls competence
development and biofilm formation (Heng et al. 2007; Kreth et al. 2005b). One of
the distinctive features of bacteriocins is the target range of susceptible bacteria.
The bacteriocins produced by S. mutans are able to inhibit S. sanguinis and
S. gordonii among other oral streptococci (Kreth et al. 2005a). Conversely, the
bacteriocins produced by S. gordonii and S. sanguinis do not target S. mutans.
Nonetheless, S. gordonii and S. sanguinis are able to inhibit the growth of S. mutans
by generating an alternative antimicrobial compound, H2O2 (Kreth et al. 2005a), as
described above in Sect. 4.
During initial colonization when the cell density is relatively low, H2O2 pro-
duction might be ecologically advantageous relative to bacteriocin production,
which requires high cell density to trigger bacteriocin gene expression. H2O2
production is oxygen dependent (Kreth et al. 2008), and the oxygen tension in
saliva is sufficient to allow for aerobic respiration and hydrogen peroxide produc-
tion during initial colonization (Marquis 1995). In addition, both S. sanguinis and
S. gordonii are only weakly inhibited by their own H2O2 production. Once the
biofilm reaches a critical thickness and cell density, diffusion becomes limited and
the oxygen tension declines. The decline in oxygen tension might decrease H2O2
production to a non-inhibiting level. Under these biofilm conditions, S. mutans
might use bacteriocins to inhibit S. sanguinis and S. gordonii, since bacteriocin
production is oxygen independent (Kreth et al. 2008). In high-cell-density condi-
tions, S. mutans becomes an aggressive competitor for S. sanguinis and S. gordonii,
which may explain why it is able to initiate a shift in composition to the community
to create a caries-promoting environment.
Bacteriocins target the membrane of the susceptible species and cause leakage of
the cell contents (Oppegard et al. 2007). To effectively compete with S. sanguinis
and S. gordonii, S. mutans coordinates bacteriocin production with another impor-
tant cell function, competence development (see below) (Kreth et al. 2005b; van der
Ploeg 2005). Competence is the natural ability of some oral streptococci to incor-
porate extracellular DNA from the environment (Cvitkovitch 2001). Under the
control of the S. mutans competence system, mutacin IV is produced before
inducing the expression of genes required for DNA uptake. In this way, S. mutans
uses mutacin IV to kill the target organism and release the cellular contents,
including DNA. Subsequently, S. mutans cells become competent and take up the
released DNA (Kreth et al. 2005b). Although not beneficial for the lysed bacterial
species, this interspecies genetic exchange tends to promote evolutionary survival
of traits of the target species in the daughter cells of competent S. mutans.
6.3 Competence and Genetic Exchange
Competence-dependent genetic exchange requires availability of eDNA and the

ability of the competent species to take up DNA from the environment. The
development of competence is signaled by the accumulation of a species-specific
competence peptide, which is produced and secreted into the environment
(competence-stimulating peptide or CSP). CSP serves as a signal to induce com-
petence in the producing population and serves as a form of intraspecies
(or interspecies) communication (Johnsborg and Havarstein 2009).
Each streptococcal species produces a unique CSP (Whatmore et al. 1999).
Competence development facilitates cell-density-dependent cell regulation but
might also reflect other environmental conditions like flow rates and diffusion
from the producing species. Competence development follows a basic architecture
in most streptococci. Competence development is encoded in the comCDE operon,
including CSP and the TCS ComDE, which senses and provides transcriptional
response to the environmental peptide. Secreted CSP binds to the membrane-
spanning ComD sensor kinase (a receptor). Binding of CSP induces a conforma-
tional change in ComD, which activates the intracellular kinase domain and pro-
motes subsequent ComD autophosphorylation (P-ComD). ComE is the response
regulator and the recipient of the transferred phosphoryl group from P-ComD.
P-ComE is able to bind to chromosomal DNA to an imperfect direct repeat
(ComE-box) (Ween et al. 1999). This specific binding motif (ComE-box) is
found in the promoter region of several genes considered to be early competence
genes. The early genes include the comCDE operon itself and the comAB operon.
The comAB operon encodes the CSP-specific transporter ComAB, which processes
and exports the pre-peptide CSP as the CSP. The secreted CSP, therefore, signals an
increase in its own expression and production, secretion, and sensing via ComDE
(Claverys et al. 2006; Johnsborg et al. 2007).
Another early competence gene, the gene encoding the alternative sigma subunit
ComX of the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase, is transcribed. ComX is essential
for competence development and regulates other genes required for the synthesis of
the DNA uptake system and recombination. ComX recognizes a unique DNA
element named cin-box important for the activation of late competence genes
(Lee and Morrison 1999).
Competence development in S. sanguinis and S. gordonii seems to follow this
blueprint first described in S. pneumoniae. After CSP is added to non-competent
cell cultures, S. gordonii develops transient competence peaking at 10 to 20 min
(Vickerman et al. 2007). After 5 min of exposure, the initial responsive genes are
comCDE, comAB, and the comX homologue comR. Regulated by ComR, late genes
are expressed including genes encoding proteins required for uptake and DNA
recombination. Competence declines about 30 to 40 min after CSP addition
(Vickerman et al. 2007).
In S. sanguinis, the ComAB homologues are not encoded to transport and
process CSP. The pre-peptide lacks the double glycine processing site in the
N-terminal leader sequence as found in ComAB processed CSPs of other strepto-
cocci (Rodriguez et al. 2011; Xu et al. 2007). The usage of DNA microarray
technology enabled the identification of other genes not initially identified in the
competence developmental circuit. Addition of CSP to S. sanguinis induced about
122 genes and downregulated about 83, compared to S. gordonii with 162 induced
and 89 downregulated genes. However, the number of genes belonging to the early
competence genes was considerably lower in S. sanguinis with only five genes
compared to 28 for S. pneumoniae and 35 for S. gordonii. The group of early genes
in S. sanguinis contained comDE, comX, and two uncharacterized open reading
frames, suggesting that this constitutes a minimal set of early competence genes
(Rodriguez et al. 2011; Xu et al. 2007).
The high-cell-density oral biofilm seems to be a favorable environment for
genetic exchange (Li et al. 2002b). Several active mechanisms are employed by
oral bacteria to ensure the availability of eDNA. S. gordonii and S. sanguinis release
homologous and heterologous DNA in a H2O2-dependent process, and S. mutans is
able to release its own DNA and DNA from closely related species in a bacteriocin-
dependent process (Kreth et al. 2005b, 2008, 2009; Perry et al. 2009). The biofilm
matrix contains eDNA, which might be a source for competent bacteria (Flemming
and Wingender 2010). Oral bacteria are able to take up DNA during competence
development, including the abundant oral biofilm genus Streptococcus and the
periodontal pathogen P. gingivalis. Interestingly, a recent study with P. gingivalis
demonstrated that natural competence is the dominant form of chromosomal DNA
transfer in this perio-pathogen (Tribble et al. 2012). Indeed, eDNA is found in
P. gingivalis biofilms, further indicating that this EPS compound might have
multiple functions during biofilm development. Since competence development is
density dependent, the high-cell-density conditions in biofilms favor genetic
exchange.
S. mutans, S. sanguinis, and S. gordonii each show a competence-influenced
biofilm phenotype (Bizzini et al. 2006; Li et al. 2002b; Zhu et al. 2011). Although
the biofilm community seems to be better protected from outside environmental
perturbation than planktonic cells, the biofilm cannot afford to be evolutionarily
idle. Competence allows for a long-term adaptation due to the incorporation of new
genetic traits via horizontal gene transfer (Roberts and Kreth 2014). Not only is
horizontal gene transfer important in the evolution of bacterial genomes, it also
allows bacteria to repair DNA damage via homologous recombination, a mecha-
nism to swap and replace damaged segments of DNA with correct versions. Uptake
of eDNA, therefore, appears to promote species diversity and adaptation using
information stored in the DNA of any targeted bacterial species in the oral cavity.
S. sanguinis and S. gordonii control the expression of several other genes not
involved in the uptake of DNA in a CSP-dependent manner. For example, contact
with antibiotics can induce competence development. Consequently, it is now
widely accepted that the competence system is part of a general stress response
for oral streptococci to adapt to changing environmental conditions.
Acknowledgments Research in the authors’ labs that is referred to in this chapter was supported
by NIH-NIDCR R01DE021726, R00DE018400 and R03DE022601 (JK) and R01DE08590
(MCH).
References
Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE (2005) Defining the normal bacterial flora of
the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol 43:5721–5732
Aas JA, Griffen AL, Dardis SR, Lee AM, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE, Leys EJ, Paster BJ (2008) Bacteria
of dental caries in primary and permanent teeth in children and young adults. J Clin Microbiol
46:1407–1417
Aguirre A, Levine MJ, Cohen RE, Tabak LA (1987) Immunochemical quantitation of alpha-
amylase and secretory IgA in parotid saliva from people of various ages. Arch Oral Biol
32:297–301
Allison KR, Brynildsen MP, Collins JJ (2011) Heterogeneous bacterial persisters and engineering
approaches to eliminate them. Curr Opin Microbiol 14:593–598
Amano A (2003) Molecular interaction of Porphyromonas gingivalis with host cells: implication
for the microbial pathogenesis of periodontal disease. J Periodontol 74:90–96
Amano A, Kuboniwa M, Nakagawa I, Akiyama S, Morisaki I, Hamada S (2000) Prevalence of
specific genotypes of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimA and periodontal health status. J Dent Res
79:1664–1668
Balaban NQ (2011) Persistence: mechanisms for triggering and enhancing phenotypic variability.
Curr Opin Genet Dev 21:768–775
Beaudoin T, Zhang L, Hinz AJ, Parr CJ, Mah TF (2012) The biofilm-specific antibiotic resistance
gene ndvB is important for expression of ethanol oxidation genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
biofilms. J Bacteriol 194:3128–3136
Becker MR, Paster BJ, Leys EJ, Moeschberger ML, Kenyon SG, Galvin JL, Boches SK, Dewhirst
FE, Griffen AL (2002) Molecular analysis of bacterial species associated with childhood
caries. J Clin Microbiol 40:1001–1009
Beighton D (2005) The complex oral microflora of high-risk individuals and groups and its role in
the caries process. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 33:248–255
Belibasakis GN, Guggenheim B, Bostanci N (2012) Down-regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome in
gingival fibroblasts by subgingival biofilms: involvement of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Innate
Immun 19(1):3–9
Benitez-Paez A, Belda-Ferre P, Simon-Soro A, Mira A (2014) Microbiota diversity and gene
expression dynamics in human oral biofilms. BMC Genomics 15:311
Bigger JW (1944) Treatment of staphylococcal infections with penicillin by intermittent sterili-
zation. Lancet 2:497–500
Bik EM, Long CD, Armitage GC et al (2010) Bacterial diversity in the oral cavity. ISME J. 4
(8):962–974
Bizzini A, Beggah-Moller S, Moreillon P, Entenza JM (2006) Lack of in vitro biofilm formation
does not attenuate the virulence of Streptococcus gordonii in experimental endocarditis. FEMS
Immunol Med Microbiol 48:419–423
Bostanci N, Belibasakis GN (2012) Porphyromonas gingivalis: an invasive and evasive opportu-
nistic oral pathogen. FEMS Microbiol Lett 333(1):1–9
Brady LJ, Maddocks SE, Larson MR, Forsgren N, Persson K, Deivanayagam CC, Jenkinson HF
(2010) The changing faces of Streptococcus antigen I/II polypeptide family adhesins. Mol
Microbiol 77:276–286
Claverys JP, Prudhomme M, Martin B (2006) Induction of competence regulons as a general
response to stress in Gram-positive bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 60:451–475
Coenye T (2010) Response of sessile cells to stress: from changes in gene expression to phenotypic
adaptation. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 59:239–252
Consortium HMP (2012a) A framework for human microbiome research. Nature 486:215–221
Consortium HMP (2012b) Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome.
Nature 486:207–214
Costerton JW (2001) Cystic fibrosis pathogenesis and the role of biofilms in persistent infection.
Trends Microbiol 9:50–52
Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM (1995) Microbial
biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49:711–745
Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent
infections. Science 284:1318–1322
Cowan MM, Taylor KG, Doyle RJ (1987) Energetics of the initial phase of adhesion of Strepto-
coccus sanguis to hydroxylapatite. J Bacteriol 169:2995–3000
Cvitkovitch DG (2001) Genetic competence and transformation in oral streptococci. Crit Rev Oral
Biol Med 12:217–243
Davies JR, Svensater G, Herzberg MC (2009) Identification of novel LPXTG-linked surface
proteins from Streptococcus gordonii. Microbiology 155:1977–1988
Demuth DR, Irvine DC, Costerton JW, Cook GS, Lamont RJ (2001) Discrete protein determinant
directs the species-specific adherence of Porphyromonas gingivalis to oral streptococci. Infect
Immun 69:5736–5741
Deng H, Ding Y, Fu MD, Xiao XR, Liu J, Zhou T (2004) Purification and characterization of
sanguicin–a bacteriocin produced by Streptococcus sanguis. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue
Ban 35:555–558
Diamond G, Beckloff N, Ryan LK (2008) Host defense peptides in the oral cavity and the lung:
similarities and differences. J Dent Res 87:915–927
Diaz PI, Chalmers NI, Rickard AH, Kong C, Milburn CL, Palmer RJ Jr, Kolenbrander PE (2006)
Molecular characterization of subject-specific oral microflora during initial colonization of
enamel. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:2837–2848
Dunne WM Jr, Mason EO Jr, Kaplan SL (1993) Diffusion of rifampin and vancomycin through a
Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37:2522–2526
Egland PG, Palmer RJ Jr, Kolenbrander PE (2004) Interspecies communication in Streptococcus
gordonii-Veillonella atypica biofilms: signaling in flow conditions requires juxtaposition. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16917–16922
Engels-Deutsch M, Pini A, Yamashita Y, Shibata Y, Haikel Y, Scholler-Guinard M, Klein JP
(2003) Insertional inactivation of pac and rmlB genes reduces the release of tumor necrosis
factor alpha, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8 induced by Streptococcus mutans in monocytic,
dental pulp, and periodontal ligament cells. Infect Immun 71:5169–5177
Engels-Deutsch M, Rizk S, Haikel Y (2011) Streptococcus mutans antigen I/II binds to
alpha5beta1 integrins via its A-domain and increases beta1 integrins expression on periodontal
ligament fibroblast cells. Arch Oral Biol 56:22–28
Eren AM, Borisy GG, Huse SM, Mark Welch JL (2014) Oligotyping analysis of the human oral
microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:E2875–E2884
Flemming HC, Wingender J (2010) The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:623–633
Frias-Lopez J, Duran-Pinedo A (2012) Effect of periodontal pathogens on the metatranscriptome
of a healthy multispecies biofilm model. J Bacteriol 194:2082–2095
Fujimura S, Nakamura T (1979) Sanguicin, a bacteriocin of oral Streptococcus sanguis.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 16:262–265
Gong K, Mailloux L, Herzberg MC (2000) Salivary film expresses a complex, macromolecular
binding site for Streptococcus sanguis. J Biol Chem 275:8970–8974
Gorr SU (2012) Antimicrobial peptides in periodontal innate defense. Front Oral Biol 15:84–98
Hajishengallis G, Lamont RJ (2012) Beyond the red complex and into more complexity: the
polymicrobial synergy and dysbiosis (PSD) model of periodontal disease etiology. Mol Oral
Microbiol 27(6):409–419
Hall AR (1989) The Leeuwenhoek lecture, 1988. Antoni van Leeuwenhoek 1632–1723. Notes Rec
R Soc Lond 43:249–273
Hall-Stoodley L, Stoodley P, Kathju S, Hoiby N, Moser C, William Costerton J, Moter A,
Bjarnsholt T (2012) Towards diagnostic guidelines for biofilm-associated infections. FEMS
Immunol Med Microbiol 65:127–145
Hannig C, Hannig M, Attin T (2005) Enzymes in the acquired enamel pellicle. Eur J Oral Sci
113:2–13
Hasty DL, Ofek I, Courtney HS, Doyle RJ (1992) Multiple adhesins of streptococci. Infect Immun
60:2147–2152
He X, Ahn J (2011) Differential gene expression in planktonic and biofilm cells of multiple
antibiotic-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol
Lett 325:180–188
He X, Wu C, Yarbrough D, Sim L, Niu G, Merritt J, Shi W, Qi F (2008) The cia operon of
Streptococcus mutans encodes a unique component required for calcium-mediated
autoregulation. Mol Microbiol 70:112–126
He X, Hu W, He J, Guo L, Lux R, Shi W (2011) Community-based interference against integration

of Pseudomonas aeruginosa into human salivary microbial biofilm. Mol Oral Microbiol
26:337–352
Helmerhorst EJ, Hodgson R, van’t Hof W, Veerman EC, Allison C, Nieuw Amerongen AV (1999)
The effects of histatin-derived basic antimicrobial peptides on oral biofilms. J Dent Res
78:1245–1250
Heng NC, Tagg JR, Tompkins GR (2007) Competence-dependent bacteriocin production by
Streptococcus gordonii DL1 (Challis). J Bacteriol 189:1468–1472
Hense BA, Kuttler C, Muller J, Rothballer M, Hartmann A, Kreft JU (2007) Does efficiency
sensing unify diffusion and quorum sensing? Nat Rev Microbiol 5:230–239
Holmes AR, Gilbert C, Wells JM, Jenkinson HF (1998) Binding properties of Streptococcus
gordonii SspA and SspB (antigen I/II family) polypeptides expressed on the cell surface of
Lactococcus lactis MG1363. Infect Immun 66:4633–4639
Huse SM, Ye Y, Zhou Y, Fodor AA (2012) A core human microbiome as viewed through 16S
rRNA sequence clusters. PLoS ONE 7, e34242
Itzek A, Zheng L, Chen Z, Merritt J, Kreth J (2011) Hydrogen peroxide-dependent DNA release
and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in Streptococcus gordonii. J Bacteriol
193:6912–6922
Jakubovics NS, Gill SR, Iobst SE, Vickerman MM, Kolenbrander PE (2008a) Regulation of gene
expression in a mixed-genus community: stabilized arginine biosynthesis in Streptococcus
gordonii by coaggregation with Actinomyces naeslundii. J Bacteriol 190:3646–3657
Jakubovics NS, Gill SR, Vickerman MM, Kolenbrander PE (2008b) Role of hydrogen peroxide in
competition and cooperation between Streptococcus gordonii and Actinomyces naeslundii.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol 66:637–644
Jakubovics NS, Brittan JL, Dutton LC, Jenkinson HF (2009) Multiple adhesin proteins on the cell
surface of Streptococcus gordonii are involved in adhesion to human fibronectin. Microbiology
155:3572–3580
Jakubovics NS, Yassin SA, Rickard AH (2014) Community interactions of oral streptococci. Adv
Appl Microbiol 87:43–110
Jenkinson HF, Lamont RJ (1997) Streptococcal adhesion and colonization. Crit Rev Oral Biol
Med 8:175–200
Johnsborg O, Havarstein LS (2009) Regulation of natural genetic transformation and acquisition
of transforming DNA in Streptococcus pneumoniae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33:627–642
Johnsborg O, Eldholm V, Havarstein LS (2007) Natural genetic transformation: prevalence,
mechanisms and function. Res Microbiol 158:767–778
Jonas K, Melefors O, Romling U (2009) Regulation of c-di-GMP metabolism in biofilms. Future
Kader A, Simm R, Gerstel U, Morr M, Romling U (2006) Hierarchical involvement of various
GGDEF domain proteins in rdar morphotype development of Salmonella enterica serovar
Typhimurium. Mol Microbiol 60:602–616
Kaplan JB (2011) Antibiotic-induced biofilm formation. Int J Artif Organs 34:737–751
Keijser BJ, Zaura E, Huse SM, van der Vossen JM, Schuren FH, Montijn RC, ten Cate JM,
Crielaard W (2008) Pyrosequencing analysis of the oral microflora of healthy adults. J Dent
Res 87:1016–1020
Klein MI, DeBaz L, Agidi S, Lee H, Xie G, Lin AH, Hamaker BR, Lemos JA, Koo H (2010)
Dynamics of Streptococcus mutans transcriptome in response to starch and sucrose during
biofilm development. PLoS ONE 5, e13478
Kleinberg I (2002) A mixed-bacteria ecological approach to understanding the role of the oral
bacteria in dental caries causation: an alternative to Streptococcus mutans and the specific-
plaque hypothesis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 13:108–125
Koo H, Falsetta ML, Klein MI (2013) The exopolysaccharide matrix: a virulence determinant of
cariogenic biofilm. J Dent Res 92:1065–1073
Kreth J, Merritt J, Shi W, Qi F (2005a) Competition and coexistence between Streptococcus

mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis in the dental biofilm. J Bacteriol 187:7193–7203
Kreth J, Merritt J, Shi W, Qi F (2005b) Co-ordinated bacteriocin production and competence
development: a possible mechanism for taking up DNA from neighbouring species. Mol
Kreth J, Zhang Y, Herzberg MC (2008) Streptococcal antagonism in oral biofilms: Streptococcus
sanguinis and Streptococcus gordonii interference with Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol
190:4632–4640
Kreth J, Vu H, Zhang Y, Herzberg MC (2009) Characterization of hydrogen peroxide-induced
DNA release by Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus gordonii. J Bacteriol
191:6281–6291
Kristian SA, Birkenstock TA, Sauder U, Mack D, Gotz F, Landmann R (2008) Biofilm formation
induces C3a release and protects Staphylococcus epidermidis from IgG and complement
deposition and from neutrophil-dependent killing. J Infect Dis 197:1028–1035
Kroes I, Lepp PW, Relman DA (1999) Bacterial diversity within the human subgingival crevice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:14547–14552
Kuboniwa M, Tribble GD, James CE, Kilic AO, Tao L, Herzberg MC, Shizukuishi S, Lamont RJ
(2006) Streptococcus gordonii utilizes several distinct gene functions to recruit
Porphyromonas gingivalis into a mixed community. Mol Microbiol 60:121–139
Kulasekara HD, Ventre I, Kulasekara BR, Lazdunski A, Filloux A, Lory S (2005) A novel
two-component system controls the expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa fimbrial cup
genes. Mol Microbiol 55:368–380
Kumar PS, Griffen AL, Barton JA, Paster BJ, Moeschberger ML, Leys EJ (2003) New bacterial
species associated with chronic periodontitis. J Dent Res 82:338–344
Labat-Robert J (2012) Cell-Matrix interactions, the role of fibronectin and integrins. A survey
Pathol Biol (Paris) 60:15–19
Lafleur MD, Qi Q, Lewis K (2010) Patients with long-term oral carriage harbor high-persister
mutants of Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:39–44
Lamkin MS, Oppenheim FG (1993) Structural features of salivary function. Crit Rev Oral Biol
Med 4:251–259
Lee MS, Morrison DA (1999) Identification of a new regulator in Streptococcus pneumoniae
linking quorum sensing to competence for genetic transformation. J Bacteriol 181:5004–5016
Lei Y, Zhang Y, Guenther BD, Kreth J, Herzberg MC (2011) Mechanism of adhesion maintenance
by methionine sulphoxide reductase in Streptococcus gordonii. Mol Microbiol 80:726–738
Lewis K (2010) Persister cells. Annu Rev Microbiol 64:357–372
Li L, Tanzer JM, Scannapieco FA (2002a) Identification and analysis of the amylase-binding
protein B (AbpB) and gene (abpB) from Streptococcus gordonii. FEMS Microbiol Lett
212:151–157
Li YH, Tang N, Aspiras MB, Lau PC, Lee JH, Ellen RP, Cvitkovitch DG (2002b) A quorum-
sensing signaling system essential for genetic competence in Streptococcus mutans is involved
in biofilm formation. J Bacteriol 184:2699–2708
Liljemark WF, Bloomquist CG, Ofstehage JC (1979) Aggregation and adherence of Streptococcus
sanguis: role of human salivary immunoglobulin A. Infect Immun 26:1104–1110
Liljemark WF, Bloomquist CG, Germaine GR (1981) Effect of bacterial aggregation on the
adherence of oral streptococci to hydroxyapatite. Infect Immun 31:935–941
Lin X, Lamont RJ, Wu J, Xie H (2008) Role of differential expression of streptococcal arginine
deiminase in inhibition of fimA expression in Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Bacteriol
190:4367–4371
Lindh L (2002) On the adsorption behaviour of saliva and purified salivary proteins at solid/liquid
interfaces. Swed Dent J Suppl 1–57
Liu Y, Burne RA (2011) The major autolysin of Streptococcus gordonii is subject to complex
regulation and modulates stress tolerance, biofilm formation, and extracellular-DNA release.
J Bacteriol 193:2826–2837
Maeda K, Nagata H, Kuboniwa M, Kataoka K, Nishida N, Tanaka M, Shizukuishi S (2004a)

Characterization of binding of Streptococcus oralis glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydroge-
nase to Porphyromonas gingivalis major fimbriae. Infect Immun 72:5475–5477
Maeda K, Nagata H, Nonaka A, Kataoka K, Tanaka M, Shizukuishi S (2004b) Oral streptococcal
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mediates interaction with Porphyromonas
gingivalis fimbriae. Microbes Infect 6:1163–1170
Maeda K, Nagata H, Yamamoto Y, Tanaka M, Tanaka J, Minamino N, Shizukuishi S (2004c)
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of Streptococcus oralis functions as a coadhesin
for Porphyromonas gingivalis major fimbriae. Infect Immun 72:1341–1348
Mah TF, Pitts B, Pellock B, Walker GC, Stewart PS, O’Toole GA (2003) A genetic basis for
Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm antibiotic resistance. Nature 426:306–310
Marquis RE (1995) Oxygen metabolism, oxidative stress and acid–base physiology of dental
plaque biofilms. J Ind Microbiol 15:198–207
Marsh PD (2003) Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes? Microbiology
149:279–294
Marsh PD (2009) Dental plaque as a biofilm: the significance of pH in health and caries. Compend
Contin Educ Dent 30:76–78, 80, 83–77; quiz 88, 90
Mazda Y, Kawada-Matsuo M, Kanbara K, Oogai Y, Shibata Y, Yamashita Y, Miyawaki S,
Komatsuzawa H (2012) Association of CiaRH with resistance of Streptococcus mutans to
antimicrobial peptides in biofilms. Mol Oral Microbiol 27:124–135
McNab R, Lamont RJ (2003) Microbial dinner-party conversations: the role of LuxS in interspe-
cies communication. J Med Microbiol 52:541–545
McNab R, Ford SK, El-Sabaeny A, Barbieri B, Cook GS, Lamont RJ (2003) LuxS-based signaling
in Streptococcus gordonii: autoinducer 2 controls carbohydrate metabolism and biofilm for-
mation with Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Bacteriol 185:274–284
Merritt J, Qi F (2012) The mutacins of Streptococcus mutans: regulation and ecology. Mol Oral
Mills E, Pultz IS, Kulasekara HD, Miller SI (2011) The bacterial second messenger c-di-GMP:
mechanisms of signalling. Cell Microbiol 13:1122–1129
Murakami Y, Iwahashi H, Yasuda H, Umemoto T, Namikawa I, Kitano S, Hanazawa S (1996)
Porphyromonas gingivalis fimbrillin is one of the fibronectin-binding proteins. Infect Immun
64:2571–2576
Naito Y, Gibbons RJ (1988) Attachment of Bacteroides gingivalis to collagenous substrata. J Dent
Res 67:1075–1080
Naito M, Hirakawa H, Yamashita A et al (2008) Determination of the genome sequence of
Porphyromonas gingivalis strain ATCC 33277 and genomic comparison with strain W83
revealed extensive genome rearrangements in P. gingivalis. DNA Res 15:215–225
Nakamura T, Amano A, Nakagawa I, Hamada S (1999) Specific interactions between
Porphyromonas gingivalis fimbriae and human extracellular matrix proteins. FEMS Microbiol
Lett 175:267–272
Nguyen PT, Abranches J, Phan TN, Marquis RE (2002) Repressed respiration of oral streptococci
grown in biofilms. Curr Microbiol 44:262–266
Nobbs AH, Vajna RM, Johnson JR, Zhang Y, Erlandsen SL, Oli MW, Kreth J, Brady LJ, Herzberg
MC (2007a) Consequences of a sortase A mutation in Streptococcus gordonii. Microbiology
153:4088–4097
Nobbs AH, Zhang Y, Khammanivong A, Herzberg MC (2007b) Streptococcus gordonii Hsa
environmentally constrains competitive binding by Streptococcus sanguinis to saliva-coated
hydroxyapatite. J Bacteriol 189:3106–3114
Nobbs AH, Lamont RJ, Jenkinson HF (2009) Streptococcus adherence and colonization.
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 73:407–450, Table of Contents
Nobbs AH, Jenkinson HF, Jakubovics NS (2011) Stick to your gums: mechanisms of oral
microbial adherence. J Dent Res 90:1271–1278
Okahashi N, Nakata M, Sakurai A et al (2010) Pili of oral Streptococcus sanguinis bind to

fibronectin and contribute to cell adhesion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 391:1192–1196
Oppegard C, Rogne P, Emanuelsen L, Kristiansen PE, Fimland G, Nissen-Meyer J (2007) The
two-peptide class II bacteriocins: structure, production, and mode of action. J Mol Microbiol
Biotechnol 13:210–219
Orstavik D, Kraus FW (1973) The acquired pellicle: immunofluorescent demonstration of specific
proteins. J Oral Pathol 2:68–76
Paster BJ, Boches SK, Galvin JL, Ericson RE, Lau CN, Levanos VA, Sahasrabudhe A, Dewhirst
FE (2001) Bacterial diversity in human subgingival plaque. J Bacteriol 183:3770–3783
Paster BJ, Olsen I, Aas JA, Dewhirst FE (2006) The breadth of bacterial diversity in the human
periodontal pocket and other oral sites. Periodontol 2000(42):80–87
Perry JA, Jones MB, Peterson SN, Cvitkovitch DG, Levesque CM (2009) Peptide alarmone
signalling triggers an auto-active bacteriocin necessary for genetic competence. Mol Microbiol
72:905–917
Peterson SN, Meissner T, Su AI, Snesrud E, Ong AC, Schork NJ, Bretz WA (2014) Functional
expression of dental plaque microbiota. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:108
Petrova OE, Sauer K (2012) Sticky situations: key components that control bacterial surface
attachment. J Bacteriol 194:2413–2425
Qi F, Chen P, Caufield PW (2000) Purification and biochemical characterization of mutacin I from
the group I strain of Streptococcus mutans, CH43, and genetic analysis of mutacin I biosyn-
thesis genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3221–3229
Qi F, Chen P, Caufield PW (2001) The group I strain of Streptococcus mutans, UA140, produces
both the lantibiotic mutacin I and a nonlantibiotic bacteriocin, mutacin IV. Appl Environ
Ramage G, Bachmann S, Patterson TF, Wickes BL, Lopez-Ribot JL (2002) Investigation of
multidrug efflux pumps in relation to fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans biofilms.
J Antimicrob Chemother 49:973–980
Rendueles O, Ghigo JM (2012) Multi-species biofilms: how to avoid unfriendly neighbors. FEMS
Microbiol Rev 36(5):972–989
Rho M, Wu YW, Tang H, Doak TG, Ye Y (2012) Diverse CRISPRs evolving in human
microbiomes. PLoS Genet 8, e1002441
Rickard AH, Palmer RJ Jr, Blehert DS, Campagna SR, Semmelhack MF, Egland PG, Bassler BL,
Kolenbrander PE (2006) Autoinducer 2: a concentration-dependent signal for mutualistic
bacterial biofilm growth. Mol Microbiol 60:1446–1456
Roberts AP, Kreth J (2014) The impact of horizontal gene transfer on the adaptive ability of the
human oral microbiome. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:124
Rodriguez AM, Callahan JE, Fawcett P, Ge X, Xu P, Kitten T (2011) Physiological and molecular
characterization of genetic competence in Streptococcus sanguinis. Mol Oral Microbiol
26:99–116
Rosan B, Lamont RJ (2000) Dental plaque formation. Microbes Infect 2:1599–1607
Scannapieco FA, Bhandary K, Ramasubbu N, Levine MJ (1990) Structural relationship between
the enzymatic and streptococcal binding sites of human salivary alpha-amylase. Biochem
Biophys Res Commun 173:1109–1115
Schlegel R, Slade HD (1972) Bacteriocin production by transformable group H streptococci.
Scragg MA, Cannon SJ, Rangarajan M, Williams DM, Curtis MA (1999) Targeted disruption of
fibronectin-integrin interactions in human gingival fibroblasts by the RI protease of
Porphyromonas gingivalis W50. Infect Immun 67:1837–1843
Sedlacek MJ, Walker C (2007) Antibiotic resistance in an in vitro subgingival biofilm model. Oral
Microbiol Immunol 22:333–339
Segata N, Haake SK, Mannon P, Lemon KP, Waldron L, Gevers D, Huttenhower C, Izard J (2012)
Composition of the adult digestive tract bacterial microbiome based on seven mouth surfaces,
tonsils, throat and stool samples. Genome Biol 13:R42
Shemesh M, Tam A, Steinberg D (2007) Differential gene expression profiling of Streptococcus

mutans cultured under biofilm and planktonic conditions. Microbiology 153:1307–1317
Shen Y, Stojicic S, Haapasalo M (2011) Antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine against bacteria in
biofilms at different stages of development. J Endod 37:657–661
Simm R, Morr M, Kader A, Nimtz M, Romling U (2004) GGDEF and EAL domains inversely
regulate cyclic di-GMP levels and transition from sessility to motility. Mol Microbiol
53:1123–1134
Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Smith C, Kent RL Jr (1998) Microbial complexes in
subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol 25:134–144
Sternberg C, Christensen BB, Johansen T, Toftgaard Nielsen A, Andersen JB, Givskov M, Molin S
(1999) Distribution of bacterial growth activity in flow-chamber biofilms. Appl Environ
Takahashi N, Nyvad B (2008) Caries ecology revisited: microbial dynamics and the caries process.
Caries Res 42:409–418
Tanaka H, Ebara S, Otsuka K, Hayashi K (1996) Adsorption of saliva-coated and plain strepto-
coccal cells to the surfaces of hydroxyapatite beads. Arch Oral Biol 41:505–508
Tanzer JM, Grant L, Thompson A, Li L, Rogers JD, Haase EM, Scannapieco FA (2003) Amylase-
binding proteins A (AbpA) and B (AbpB) differentially affect colonization of rats’ teeth by
Streptococcus gordonii. Microbiology 149:2653–2660
Taxman DJ, Huang MT, Ting JP (2010) Inflammasome inhibition as a pathogenic stealth mech-
anism. Cell Host Microbe 8:7–11
Thurlow LR, Hanke ML, Fritz T et al (2011) Staphylococcus aureus biofilms prevent macrophage
phagocytosis and attenuate inflammation in vivo. J Immunol 186:6585–6596
Thurnheer T, Gmur R, Shapiro S, Guggenheim B (2003) Mass transport of macromolecules within
an in vitro model of supragingival plaque. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1702–1709
Torlakovic L, Klepac-Ceraj V, Ogaard B, Cotton SL, Paster BJ, Olsen I (2012) Microbial
community succession on developing lesions on human enamel. J Oral Microbiol 4
Tribble GD, Rigney TW, Dao DH, Wong CT, Kerr JE, Taylor BE, Pacha S, Kaplan HB (2012)
Natural competence is a major mechanism for horizontal DNA transfer in the oral pathogen
Porphyromonas gingivalis. MBio 3
Valm AM, Mark Welch JL, Rieken CW, Hasegawa Y, Sogin ML, Oldenbourg R, Dewhirst FE,
Borisy GG (2011) Systems-level analysis of microbial community organization through
combinatorial labeling and spectral imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:4152–4157
van der Ploeg JR (2005) Regulation of bacteriocin production in Streptococcus mutans by the
quorum-sensing system required for development of genetic competence. J Bacteriol
187:3980–3989
van der Waaij D, Berghuis-de Vries JM, Lekkerkerk L-v (1971) Colonization resistance of the
digestive tract in conventional and antibiotic-treated mice. J Hyg (Lond) 69:405–411
van Houte J (1994) Role of micro-organisms in caries etiology. J Dent Res 73:672–681
Vernier-Georgenthum A, al-Okla S, Gourieux B, Klein JP, Wachsmann D (1998) Protein I/II of
oral viridans streptococci increases expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells and
promotes transendothelial migration of neutrophils in vitro. Cell Immunol 187:145–150
Vickerman MM, Iobst S, Jesionowski AM, Gill SR (2007) Genome-wide transcriptional changes
in Streptococcus gordonii in response to competence signaling peptide. J Bacteriol
189:7799–7807
von Ohle C, Gieseke A, Nistico L, Decker EM, DeBeer D, Stoodley P (2010) Real-time micro-
sensor measurement of local metabolic activities in ex vivo dental biofilms exposed to sucrose
and treated with chlorhexidine. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:2326–2334
Vorrasi J, Chaudhuri B, Haase EM, Scannapieco FA (2010) Identification and characterization of
amylase-binding protein C from Streptococcus mitis NS51. Mol Oral Microbiol 25:150–156
Walker TS, Tomlin KL, Worthen GS et al (2005) Enhanced Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm
development mediated by human neutrophils. Infect Immun 73:3693–3701
Ween O, Gaustad P, Havarstein LS (1999) Identification of DNA binding sites for ComE, a key
regulator of natural competence in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol 33:817–827
Wei GX, Campagna AN, Bobek LA (2006) Effect of MUC7 peptides on the growth of bacteria and
on Streptococcus mutans biofilm. J Antimicrob Chemother 57:1100–1109
Whatmore AM, Barcus VA, Dowson CG (1999) Genetic diversity of the streptococcal competence
(com) gene locus. J Bacteriol 181:3144–3154
Wu YW, Rho M, Doak TG, Ye Y (2012) Oral spirochetes implicated in dental diseases are
widespread in normal human subjects and carry extremely diverse integron gene cassettes.
Appl Environ Microbiol 78:5288–5296
Xie H, Cook GS, Costerton JW, Bruce G, Rose TM, Lamont RJ (2000) Intergeneric communica-
tion in dental plaque biofilms. J Bacteriol 182:7067–7069
Xu KD, Stewart PS, Xia F, Huang CT, McFeters GA (1998) Spatial physiological heterogeneity in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm is determined by oxygen availability. Appl Environ
Xu P, Alves JM, Kitten T et al (2007) Genome of the opportunistic pathogen Streptococcus
sanguinis. J Bacteriol 189:3166–3175
Yan W, Qu T, Zhao H, Su L, Yu Q, Gao J, Wu B (2010) The effect of c-di-GMP (3’-5’-cyclic
diguanylic acid) on the biofilm formation and adherence of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol
Res 165:87–96
Zaura E, Keijser BJ, Huse SM, Crielaard W (2009) Defining the healthy “core microbiome” of oral
microbial communities. BMC Microbiol 9:259
Zhang Y, Lei Y, Khammanivong A, Herzberg MC (2004) Identification of a novel two-component
system in Streptococcus gordonii V288 involved in biofilm formation. Infect Immun
72:3489–3494
Zhang Y, Lei Y, Nobbs A, Khammanivong A, Herzberg MC (2005) Inactivation of Streptococcus
gordonii SspAB alters expression of multiple adhesin genes. Infect Immun 73:3351–3357
Zhang Y, Whiteley M, Kreth J, Lei Y, Khammanivong A, Evavold JN, Fan J, Herzberg MC (2009)
The two-component system BfrAB regulates expression of ABC transporters in Streptococcus
gordonii and Streptococcus sanguinis. Microbiology 155:165–173
Zheng L, Itzek A, Chen Z, Kreth J (2011a) Environmental influences on competitive hydrogen
peroxide production in Streptococcus gordonii. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:4318–4328
Zheng LY, Itzek A, Chen ZY, Kreth J (2011b) Oxygen dependent pyruvate oxidase expression and
production in Streptococcus sanguinis. Int J Oral Sci 3:82–89
Zhu L, Zhang Y, Fan J, Herzberg MC, Kreth J (2011) Characterization of competence and biofilm
development of a Streptococcus sanguinis endocarditis isolate. Mol Oral Microbiol
26:117–126
Antimicrobial Resistance in Biofilm
Communities
Christine Sedgley and Gary Dunny
Abstract Biofilms are composed of microcolonies encased in an extracellular

polymeric substance (EPS) matrix. Wide-ranging differences exist between the
biofilm and planktonic states in growth, structure, behavior, and physiology, all
of which can have profound effects on their susceptibility to antimicrobials. Other
factors that can contribute to the decreased susceptibility of biofilm microorganisms
to antimicrobial agents include provision of a physical barrier to antimicrobial
agents by the EPS matrix, facilitation of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of DNA
trapped within the extracellular matrix, quorum sensing and stress responses
resulting in the recruitment and expression of resistance determinants such as
multidrug resistance efflux pumps, the presence of persister cells that survive
antibiotic treatment, and metabolic heterogeneity throughout the biofilm resulting
in slow growth and protection against antibiotics active on rapidly growing bacte-
ria. While further work is needed to fully understand antimicrobial resistance in
biofilm communities, including the multispecies biofilms found in root canal
infections, the accumulative effects of various processes, rather than individual
involvement, are likely to be important. It is clear that much remains to be learned
about the critical events in the development of antimicrobial resistance in biofilm
communities.
1 Introduction
Biofilms are composed of microcolonies encased in an extracellular polymeric

substance (EPS) matrix. They vary greatly among different species, strains, and
in different environments. Much has been discovered about the structure of med-
ically important biofilms from detailed evaluation of pathogens such as
C. Sedgley (*)
Department of Endodontology, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University,
Portland, OR, USA
G. Dunny
Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Biofilms 9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47415-0_3
56 C. Sedgley and G. Dunny
Fig. 1 Scanning electron

micrographs showing
biofilm (a) on the root canal
wall (b) and within dentinal
tubules
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus spp. and mixed

species biofilms from oral plaque (Kolenbrander et al. 2010; Elias and Banin 2012;
Rendueles and Ghigo 2012) and endodontic infections (Ricucci et al. 2009; Ricucci
and Siqueira 2010; Carr et al. 2009) (Fig. 1).
Compared to growth in planktonic conditions, biofilm growth has been shown to
increase resistance to multiple antibiotics in many diverse species (Hoiby
et al. 2010; Mah and O’Toole 2001). For example, the antibiotic susceptibilities
of E. coli, S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa were up to 1000-fold higher for biofilm
populations compared to planktonic forms in minimal biofilm eradication concen-
tration (MBEC) assays (Ceri et al. 1999). The resistance to antimicrobial agents by
biofilms has resulted in considerable difficulties in the clinical management of
recalcitrant infections seen in patients with infected medical indwelling devices
and cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with P. aeruginosa lung infections (Hoiby
et al. 2010; Costerton et al. 1999; Stewart and Costerton 2001). In addition,
resistance to antimicrobial agents by biofilms has been described as a major
Antimicrobial Resistance in Biofilm Communities 57
obstacle to successful endodontic treatment (Siqueira et al. 2010). This chapter will
discuss factors and mechanisms that contribute to the decreased susceptibility of
biofilm communities to antimicrobial agents.
2 Factors and Mechanisms Involved in Antimicrobial

Resistance in Biofilms
Based on the detection of antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria from 4 million

years ago, “antibiotic resistance is natural, ancient, and hard wired in the microbial
pangenome” (Bhullar et al. 2012). This section provides examples of how microbial
cells in biofilms can utilize a variety of factors and mechanisms for survival under
challenging conditions that include exposure to antimicrobial agents (Mah and
O’Toole 2001; Fux et al. 2005; Hoiby et al. 2010; Lewis 2010; Roberts and Mullany
2010; Poole 2012; Stewart and Franklin 2008). While further work is needed to
fully understand these processes, their accumulative effects, rather than individual
involvement, are likely to contribute to increased resistance in biofilm communities
(Zhang and Mah 2008).
2.1 EPS Matrix
The role of the EPS matrix, or “glycocalyx,” was initially described in terms of
functioning to provide intercellular adhesion and adherence to surfaces (Costerton
et al. 1981). It is now understood that the EPS matrix has a broader range of
functions that also includes aggregation of bacterial cells, water retention, protec-
tion, energy sink, ionic exchange, sorption of organic and inorganic compounds,
nutrient source, and exchange of genetic information. The EPS matrix can account
for more than 90 % of the dry mass of most biofilms and provides a “scaffold” for
the biofilm, as well as a physical barrier to antimicrobial agents (Sutherland 2001;
Flemming and Wingender 2010). The structure and specific components of the EPS
matrix are highly heterogeneous and depend on species, strains, and the different
environmental conditions. For example, components of the matrix can be cationic
or anionic, hydrophilic or hydrophobic (Donlan and Costerton 2002; Flemming and
Wingender 2010).
The major component of the EPS matrix is water which moves around, and not
through, cell clusters (Stewart 2012). Water channels allow the inflow of nutrients
and the outflow of waste materials (Lawrence et al. 1991). Fluid flow plays an
important role in the movement of nutrients and metabolic products in and out of
the biofilm. Slow moving fluid adjacent to the biofilm limits diffusive transport of
solutes into and out of the biofilm and decreases opportunities for biofilm detach-
ment and dispersion (Stewart 2012; McDougald et al. 2012). The percentage of
water will depend on the specific system under examination but can be as high as
97 % in reactors (Zhang et al. 1998). In addition to water, major components of the
highly hydrated EPS include exopolysaccharides, extracellular proteins, and extra-
cellular DNA (eDNA) (Fig. 2).
Phages
Toxins
Protozoa
Nitric
oxide
Oxygen
Signals
Food Waste
Microorganism
eDNA Fay acid
Protein Amyloid fiber
Exopolysaccharide Bacteriophage
Fig. 2 Structure of microcolony in a mature biofilm. Microcolonies in the mature biofilm are
characterized by an EPS matrix, composed of water, eDNA, polysaccharides, and proteins, among
other components. The EPS matrix functions as a shield to protect the bacterial community or
population from predators such as protozoa or lytic phages as well as from chemical toxins (e.g.,
biocides and antibiotics). The EPS matrix may help to sequester nutrients and, along with the
underlying microorganisms, is also responsible for the establishment of gradients (e.g., oxygen and
nutrients diffusing inward and waste products as well as signals such as nitric oxide diffusing
outward) [Adapted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature Reviews in Microbiol-
ogy (McDougald et al. 2012), ©2012]
2.1.1 Exopolysaccharides
Exopolysaccharides provide structural stability (Sutherland 2001) and can act as a

scaffold for proteins that mediate intercellular attachments and adhesion of the
biofilm to a surface (Absalon et al. 2011). The importance of exopolysaccharides to
biofilm formation has been confirmed in P. aeruginosa and E. coli monospecies
biofilms by the inability of non-polysaccharide producing mutants to form mature
biofilms (Danese et al. 2000; Ma et al. 2009). The production of exopolysaccharides
can vary within genera. For example, the matrix of S. aureus and Staphylococcus
epidermidis biofilms differs markedly in their surface polysaccharide poly-N-
acetylglucosamine (PNAG), with biofilm integrity facilitated more by PNAG for
S. epidermis than for S. aureus (Izano et al. 2008). In addition, in multispecies
biofilms synergistic interactions might allow polysaccharide production by one
species that allows the integration of nonproducing species into the biofilm
(Sutherland 2001), as demonstrated in dual-species biofilms by the greater contri-
bution of EPS to the matrix by Enterobacter agglomerans compared with Klebsiella
pneumoniae (Skillman et al. 1998).
Exopolysaccharides can also play a role in antimicrobial resistance in biofilms.
This was demonstrated by the sequestration of tobramycin by glucose polymers
produced by P. aeruginosa in the periplasm, preventing the antibiotic from
reaching its site of action (Mah et al. 2003). Another study has shown that the
production of matrix polysaccharide by S. epidermis was enhanced by subinhibitory
concentrations of tetracycline, quinupristin–dalfopristin, and erythromycin (Rachid
et al. 2000). Exopolysaccharides can also play a role in protection of the biofilm
from the host defenses; S. epidermis mutants defective in polysaccharide
intercellular adhesin production had increased susceptibility to phagocytosis by
neutrophils and other components of the innate host defense system (Vuong
et al. 2004).
In contradistinction, exopolysaccharides in biofilms may have antimicrobial
properties. Antibiofilm polysaccharides have been identified in gram-negative
bacteria biofilms (Rendueles et al. 2011) and gram-positive bacteria supernatants
(Kim et al. 2009) that appear to act on biofilms by means other than those that
utilize bactericidal or bacteriostatic activity (Rendueles et al. 2012; Bandara
et al. 2010; Benitez et al. 1997). For example, the presence of lipopolysaccharide
(LPS), a well-established virulence factor in endodontic infections (Dahlen
et al. 1981), inhibited biofilm formation of Candida species (Bandara et al. 2010)
and partially inhibited the adherence of Vibrio cholerae to a human intestinal cell
line (Benitez et al. 1997).
2.1.2 Extracellular Proteins
Extracellular proteins in the EPS matrix provide important structural and enzymatic
functions. Matrix proteins are involved in maintaining biofilm architecture by
linking bacteria and exopolysaccharides seen, for example, with the glucan-binding
proteins in Streptococcus mutans (Lynch et al. 2007) and the protein Lec-B of
P. aeruginosa (Tielker et al. 2005). Disruption of the biofilm-associated surface
proteins (Bap) found in S. aureus (Cucarella et al. 2001) completely impaired
biofilm formation (Trotonda et al. 2005). In Bacillus subtilis biofilms, an amphi-
philic biofilm-surface layer protein, BslA, responsible for the hydrophobic surface
layer, may play a role in antimicrobial resistance by facilitating liquid repellency
(Kobayashi and Iwano 2012). Enzymes within the EPS matrix also digest polymers
to provide carbon and energy sources for the biofilm (Flemming and Wingender
2010). In addition, enzymatic degradation of the EPS matrix allows dispersion of
cells to form new biofilms (Sauer et al. 2004).
2.1.3 eDNA
eDNA functions in adhesion, aggregation, cohesion, and exchange of genetic

information (Whitchurch et al. 2002; Flemming and Wingender 2010). It also
plays a critical role in the initial establishment of biofilms as demonstrated by the
dissolution of early biofilms of P. aeruginosa and Enterococcus faecalis treated
with DNAse (Whitchurch et al. 2002; Thomas et al. 2008; Barnes et al. 2012).
eDNA in the matrix can vary, even between species in the same genus. For
example, the eDNA component was shown to be more important for the structural
integrity of S. aureus compared to S. epidermidis biofilms (Izano et al. 2008).
eDNA has also been shown to have antimicrobial activity in P. aeruginosa biofilms,
causing cell lysis by chelating (Mg2+) cations that stabilize lipopolysaccharide and
the bacterial outer membrane (Mulcahy et al. 2008).
The primary source of eDNA appears to be autolyzed cells (Qin et al. 2007;
Allesen-Holm et al. 2006; Thomas et al. 2009), controlled by a quorum-sensing
mechanism in P. aeruginosa biofilms (Allesen-Holm et al. 2006) and via altruistic
suicide and fractricidal release of DNA in E. faecalis (Thomas et al. 2009). Actively
excreted eDNA appears to provide another source. A recent study showed the
production of eDNA during early biofilm formation in E. faecalis in a manner
that was independent of cell lysis (Barnes et al. 2012). Further, the well-defined
structure of the eDNA suggested a novel form of DNA secretion by viable cells
(Barnes et al. 2012). In the case of E. faecalis, the cumulative data suggests that
active eDNA secretion may be one of the earliest events in biofilm development
that occurs following initial surface attachment by planktonic cells. The eDNA
component of the matrix plays an essential role in the development of
microcolonies and ultimately mature biofilms with characteristic three-dimensional
architecture (Fig. 3). As the population density of the adherent community
increases, expression of the GelE and SpreE proteases in a subpopulation of cells
serves to both immunize the producer cells from autolysis (SpreE) and render non-
protease-secreting neighbors susceptible to autolysis (GelE) and eDNA release
(Thomas et al. 2009). Thus, the first 8–16 h of biofilm development entail two
different mechanisms of eDNA production. SEM analysis (Barnes et al. 2012)
suggests that eDNA structure may be different for the material released by each
mechanism. Most studies have focused on biofilms grown for at least 24 h.
Fig. 3 Ultrastructural analysis of eDNA distribution in early biofilms. (a and b) Long intercellular
strands (yarn structures) visible in early (4-h) E. faecalis OG1RF biofilms (arrows) (bar, 5 μm). (c)
Strong punctate labeling of the strands visualized by using an anti-dsDNA monoclonal antibody
conjugated to an immunogold particle (asterisks). The image shows the significant eDNA com-
ponent (the central area is magnified in panel d). Bar, 250 nm. (e) Surface morphology can be
appreciated in the corresponding secondary electron image. Bar, 1 μm [Reprinted from (Barnes
et al. 2012), with permission]
As exemplified by these recent studies of eDNA production, it is clear that much

remains to be learned about the critical events in early biofilm development,
including how antibiotic sensitivities of biofilm cells change during development.
2.2 Cell–Cell Communication and Quorum Sensing
The fundamental processes in biofilm formation involve attachment to a surface

(initial followed by irreversible), cell proliferation, adherence to other bacteria,
production of an extracellular polymeric substance matrix, maturation, and dis-
persal (Costerton et al. 1999). Much has been learned about these processes from
studies of the oral microflora and dental plaque (Kolenbrander et al. 2010). From
these observations, it is apparent that spatial distribution of species within biofilms
and cell–cell distance are critical factors for intermicrobial communication
processes. Interactions are highly specific as demonstrated, for example, by the

coinvasion of dentinal tubules by Porphyromonas gingivalis with Streptococcus
gordonii that is facilitated by the recognition of the antigen I/II polypeptide (Love
and Jenkinson 2002; Love et al. 2000). Similarly, in isolates recovered from root
canal infections, both autoaggregation and coaggregation interactions have been
observed, particularly in association with Prevotella, Streptococcus, and
Fusobacterium species (Khemaleelakul et al. 2006) and between E. faecalis and
Fusobacterium nucleatum and between F. nucleatum and Streptococcus anginosus,
Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, and Prevotella oralis (Johnson et al. 2006). By
forming ordered assemblies of bacteria with species-specific molecular interac-
tions, bacteria are better able to adapt to fluctuating environmental conditions in
biofilms (Fux et al. 2005).
Bacteria can communicate, cooperate, and alter their behavior in response to
changes in their communal environment by individual and social processes (Elias
and Banin 2012) (Fig. 4). Some bacteria communicate and coordinate behavior via
Changes in EPS
composion Morphological
changes
Quorum sensing
Increased
Spaal resistance to
distribuon anbiocs
Metabolic interacons
Nutrion
Cooperaon Compeon
Fig. 4 Individual and social processes occurring within biofilm communities. Microorganisms
within a mixed biofilm interact via quorum sensing and/or metabolically. Interactions can be
synergistic or antagonistic and result in phenotypic changes, such as increased resistance to
antimicrobial agents or to host defense systems, spatial distribution, or emergence of variants.
Nutritional interactions can be either competitive or cooperative [Adapted by permission from
John Wiley and Sons: FEMS Microbiology Reviews (Elias and Banin 2012) ©2012]
the constitutive synthesis of small signaling molecules using an intercellular sig-

naling system called quorum sensing (Parsek and Greenberg 2005; Keller and
Surette 2006), possibly in association with cyclic di-GMP (Srivastava and Waters
2012; Cotter and Stibitz 2007). When a high density population reaches a certain
threshold (“quorum”), the concentration of normally low levels of certain signal
molecules becomes high enough to act as autoinducers that trigger a synchronized
response throughout the biofilm population. The increased expression of specific
operons that enhance survival is important in bringing about the next stage of a
colonization or virulence process (Parsek and Greenberg 2005). Binding of
autoinducer to cognate receptors initiates transcription of genes involved in regu-
lation of cell density. Gram-negative bacteria use N-acyl homoserine lactone-based
signaling (Fuqua and Greenberg 2002). Small peptides are often involved in gram-
positive bacteria, while autoinducer-2 (AI-2) signal is used by both gram-negative
and gram-positive bacteria (Li and Nair 2012; Parsek and Greenberg 2005).
Quorum sensing allows the coordinated regulation of expression of key proteins
in biofilms, with potential implications for pathogenicity. For example, AI-2 pro-
duced by the oropharyngeal flora in CF patients can modulate gene expression of
P. aeruginosa to enhance pathogenicity (Duan et al. 2003), and S. mutans mutants
with a defective quorum-sensing signaling system produced abnormal biofilms
(Allegrucci and Sauer 2007). In P. aeruginosa, carbapenum antibiotic resistance
and the las quorum-sensing system were shown to be under the control of CzcR, a
key transcriptional regulator (Dieppois et al. 2012). Antimicrobials that disrupt
quorum sensing appear to result in inhibition of pathogen virulence, but not
necessarily lethality (Hentzer et al. 2003; Clatworthy et al. 2007). A key challenge
remains to determine whether the induction of quorum sensing influences the
antimicrobial tolerance of the biofilm (Parsek and Greenberg 2005).
2.3 Horizontal Gene Transfer
Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) allows the movement of genetic information both
within and between species. The horizontal gene pool includes plasmids, bacterio-
phages, transposons, insertion sequences, and pathogenicity islands. These are
particularly important from a clinical perspective because of their involvement in
the dissemination of antibiotic resistance (Clewell and Francia 2004; Salyers
et al. 1995).
HGT occurs by three basic methods: transformation, transduction, and conjuga-
tion. Extracellular DNA acquired by natural transformation includes fragments of
DNA that can recombine with homologous regions of the recipient genome or with
plasmids (Lorenz and Wackernagel 1994). The most efficient HGT process in
bacteria is conjugation, with the requirement for cell-to-cell contact distinguishing
conjugation from transduction and transformation. Elements similar to the
conjugative transposon Tn916 have been detected in tetracycline-resistant bacteria
(Streptococcus mitis and Neisseria sp.) isolated from root canals (Rossi-Fedele
et al. 2006). Some plasmids conjugatively transfer copies of themselves from one
bacterial cell to another using small peptides called pheromones as essential signals
in the process. Conjugative plasmids that make use of pheromones were first
observed in an oral E. faecalis strain recovered from a patient with acute periodon-
titis (Dunny et al. 1978, 1979). Specifically, when conjugation functions are
activated, there is a dramatic “clumping response” mediated by the appearance of
a surface adhesin (“aggregation substance” or “AS”) that facilitates the attachment
of the donor cells to enterococcal binding substance (EBS) which is present on the
surface of recipients as well as donors (Dunny et al. 1979). Even though the
probability of random meetings of cells in suspension is greater than in biofilms,
the relative spatial stability of bacteria in biofilms should favor conjugation
(Hausner and Wuertz 1999). Recent data have shown that growth in biofilms alters
the induction of conjugation by a sex pheromone in E. faecalis, resulting in
increased plasmid copy number and heterogeneity under biofilm compared to
planktonic growth conditions; however, it is likely that this process occurs only
when donor cells are in extremely close proximity, or direct contact, with recipient
cells (Cook et al. 2011).
Biofilm growth has also been shown to enhance genetic exchange via transfor-
mation, as exemplified by several streptococcal species naturally competent for
transformation. In a series of seminal studies, Li et al. showed that peptide-
mediated intercellular signaling actually co-regulates both biofilm formation and
expression of competence in S. mutans (Li et al. 2001a, b, 2002). They also found
that biofilm growth represents an efficient ecological niche for transformation; in
fact their studies suggest that this may be where the process generally occurs in
nature. A similar situation applies in the case of biofilm formation and competence
in S. pneumoniae (Claverys and Havarstein 2007; Claverys et al. 2007; Havarstein
et al. 2006). In this case, the fratricidal activities of the “early responder” cells to the
competence stimulating peptide pheromone seem to cause lysis and eDNA release
by neighboring cells. This likely contributes to the structural integrity of the biofilm
matrix as well as providing a DNA substrate for uptake and genome incorporation
by the highly competent cells in the population.
Biofilms are uniquely suited for DNA exchange since they sustain high bacterial
density, and DNA can be trapped within the extracellular matrix (Sorensen
et al. 2005; Kolenbrander et al. 2010). Open channels and pores may enable more
frequent cell collisions, leading to rapid spread of plasmid-borne genes by
conjugative gene transfer (Sorensen et al. 2005). It has been hypothesized that
gene transfer takes place within biofilms with “bottlenecks” in the process due to
the density of the biofilm structure increasing the likelihood of plasmid transfer
(Molin and Tolker-Nielsen 2003). Nonetheless, when bacteria are dispersed from a
“resistant” biofilm, they usually rapidly become susceptible to antibiotics (Spoering
and Lewis 2001), which suggests that bacterial resistance in biofilms is not acquired
via mutations or mobile genetic elements (Stewart and Costerton 2001).
The significance of these findings regarding gene transfer between microorgan-
isms in root canal infections remains to be established. However, in enterococcal
isolates recovered from dental patients in Sweden, phenotypic studies showed that
16 of the plasmid-positive strains exhibited a “clumping response” (characteristic

of a response to pheromone) when exposed to a culture filtrate of a plasmid-free
strain, suggesting the potential for conjugative transfer of genetic elements in these
endodontic isolates (Sedgley et al. 2005). In addition, in an ex vivo model,
antibiotic resistance gene transfer occurred between S. gordonii and E. faecalis in
root canals of teeth, demonstrating the potential for the adoption of an optimal
genetic profile for survival in the root canal (Sedgley et al. 2008).
2.4 Stress Responses
Environmental conditions in biofilms are constantly changing, and bacteria encoun-

ter a multitude of different types of stresses and challenges. Stress responses that
positively impact the recruitment of resistance determinants, or promote physio-
logical changes that compromise antimicrobial activity, include exposure to nutri-
ent starvation/limitation (nutrient stress), reactive oxygen and nitrogen species
(oxidative/nitrosative stress), membrane damage (envelope stress), elevated tem-
perature (heat stress), and ribosome disruption (ribosomal stress) (Poole 2012).
Global response systems facilitate adaptation and survival by modulating intra-
cellular metabolic processes in response to stress. Shared features of several stress
responses include downregulation of error-correcting enzymes, upregulation and
activation of error-prone DNA polymerases, and HGT of mobile genetic elements
(Rice 1998; Foster 2007). Controlling these responses are a number of global
regulators that include the alternative sigma factors RpoS (Hengge-Aronis 2002;
Adnan et al. 2010) and RpoH (Guisbert et al. 2008), gene repressor LexA (Kelley
2006), and small molecule effectors such as (p)ppGpp induced by the stringent
response (Potrykus and Cashel 2008). The role of rpoS may depend on strain-
specific cofactors and specific growth conditions, as was demonstrated by impair-
ment of biofilm growth by rpoS mutant E. coli (Schembri et al. 2003) and the higher
antimicrobial tolerance shown by rpoS mutant P. aeruginosa (Whiteley et al. 2001).
In addition, changes in (p)ppGpp pools can have profound effects on the ability of
E. faecalis to form, develop, and maintain stable biofilms in vitro; strains lacking
(p)ppGpp had a diminished capacity to sustain biofilm formation over an extended
period of time and expressed abundant proteolytic activity (Chavez de Paz
et al. 2012).
Toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems are also involved in responses to stress stimuli
(Hayes and Van Melderen 2011). Within these two-component systems, toxins are
stable proteins directed against specific intracellular targets, while antitoxins are
degradable proteins or small RNAs that neutralize the toxin or inhibit toxin
synthesis. TA systems may be important regulators of the switch from planktonic
to biofilm lifestyles; in E. coli the antitoxin MqsA repressed rpoS which in turn
reduced the concentration of the internal messenger cyclic di-GMP, resulting in
increased motility and decreased biofilm formation (Wang et al. 2011). Among
other functions, TA systems are also involved with persister cell formation
(Kim et al. 2010) and quorum sensing (Belitsky et al. 2011). The above diverse
responses to stress have been described as “insurance effects” (Boles et al. 2004)
and are likely to provide the biofilm with a greater chance of surviving environ-
mental stresses such as exposure to antimicrobials.
2.5 Heterogeneity and Oxygen Gradients
The availability of nutrients and electron acceptors can vary throughout the biofilm.
Subsequently, since the metabolic activity, growth status, and gene expression
pattern of individual strains are heterogeneous, the growth of cells can range
from rapidly growing to dormant (Stewart and Franklin 2008). This has been
observed in P. aeruginosa biofilms using fluorescent reporter gene constructs;
mature P. aeruginosa biofilms were shown to simultaneously harbor active, grow-
ing cells as well as large numbers of cells that were inactive and not growing
(Werner et al. 2004). The high level of activity on the surface and limited or absent
growth deeper in the biofilm reduce the susceptibility to antibiotics (Mah and
O’Toole 2001) and are considered to contribute to the poor response of biofilm
infections to antimicrobial chemotherapy (Borriello et al. 2004). For example, slow
growth and dormancy by microbial cells provide protection against antibiotics such
as the beta-lactams that are active on rapidly growing bacteria.
Similarly, cells located more deeply in the biofilm are exposed to decreased
oxygen tension resulting in altered phenotypes in terms of growth rate and gene
transcription. In P. aeruginosa biofilms, oxygen limitation and consequential low
metabolic activity have been shown to contribute to antibiotic tolerance (Walters
et al. 2003; Borriello et al. 2004). Oxygen depletion locally within the biofilm could
cause bacteria in the anoxic zone to enter a stationary-phase state in which they are
less susceptible to an antibiotic (Walters et al. 2003). Indeed, compared with cells at
or near the surface, both oxygen levels and metabolic rates are reduced at the center
of a microcolony (Sternberg et al. 1999; de Beer et al. 1994).
Oxygen dynamics in biofilms also depend on complex interactions between fluid
flow, the distribution of the biomass and mass transfer resistance, or mass transport
limitation occurring external to the biofilm subsequent to diffusion limitation
occurring internally (Staal et al. 2011). An increase in external mass transfer
resistance is thought to have multiple effects including exacerbation of oxygen or
nutrient limitations in biofilms, an increase in the concentration of metabolic
products in the biofilms, the development of tall, fingerlike biofilm clusters, and
possible effects on quorum sensing (Stewart 2012). It is likely that these factors are
also critical in the movement of antimicrobial agents throughout the biofilm matrix.
2.6 Low Penetration of Antimicrobials
The extent of exposure of cells in biofilms to antimicrobials will depend on many

factors, including the thickness of the biofilm and the concentration of the antimi-
crobials and their ability to penetrate the matrix. While superficial cells can be
rapidly exposed to high concentrations of antibiotics, in deeper parts of the biofilm,
exposure to increasing concentrations of antibiotic will be more gradual and depend
on the ability of the antibiotic to diffuse through the biofilm (Stewart and Costerton
2001). An inability of the antimicrobial agent to penetrate the entire depth of the
biofilm is one mechanism of biofilm resistance (Costerton et al. 1999). Biofilms can
reduce antibiotic penetration to a varying extent depending on the antibiotic (Suci
et al. 1994; Vrany et al. 1997). However, while the biofilm matrix can slow
diffusion of the agent (Konig et al. 2001), it does not necessarily prevent it
(Spoering and Lewis 2001; Anderl et al. 2000). For example, rifampin penetrated
S. epidermidis biofilms, but was ineffective in killing the bacteria (Zheng and
Stewart 2002). Similarly ampicillin and ciprofloxacin penetrated through
K. pneumoniae biofilms but failed to kill the bacteria (Zahller and Stewart 2002;
Anderl et al. 2000). This response has been attributed to areas within the biofilms
experiencing localized nutrient limitation that cause cells to enter stationary phase,
thereby becoming less susceptible to killing by antibiotics that target dividing cells
(Anderl et al. 2000). In addition, when bacteria are dispersed from a “resistant”
biofilm, they usually rapidly become susceptible to antibiotics (Spoering and Lewis
2001), which suggests that bacterial resistance in biofilms is not acquired via
mutations or mobile genetic elements (Stewart and Costerton 2001).
Interestingly, a recent study has identified “swimmer cells” propelled by flagella
in Bacillus thuringiensis biofilms that form a subpopulation (0.1–1 %) that remain
motile and move through the biofilm mass; their role might be to create pores in the
biomass that facilitate the diffusion of nutrients and macromolecules (Houry
et al. 2012). Alternatively, swimmers could express a bactericidal substance or
provide the opportunity for penetration of environmental toxins such as antimicro-
bials into the biomass.
2.7 Upregulated Efflux Pumps
Efflux systems can actively pump toxic substances and antibiotics out of cells
(Li and Nikaido 2009). For example, in P. aeruginosa grown under planktonic
conditions, increased efflux pump activity resulting from mutations is a major
resistance mechanism against aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and tobramycin
(Ciofu 2003; Jalal et al. 2000; Islam et al. 2009). Multidrug resistance efflux pumps
may also contribute to antibiotic resistance in biofilms (Li and Nikaido 2009; Kvist
et al. 2008; Zhang and Mah 2008). In addition, antibiotics at subinhibitory
concentrations have been shown to induce gene expression of efflux pumps in

E. coli that contributed to biofilm maturation (May et al. 2009).
From a therapeutic perspective, efflux pump inhibitors may be useful for
decreasing biofilm formation (Kvist et al. 2008; Matsumura et al. 2011; Baugh
et al. 2012). The inclusion of efflux pump inhibitors thioridazine, Phe-Arg
β-naphthylamide (PAβN), and NMP resulted in decreased biofilm formation by
E. coli, Klebsiella, S. aureus, and Pseudomonas putida strains (Kvist et al. 2008).
Similarly, the addition of an efflux pump inhibitor (verapamil) to endodontic
antimicrobial medicaments (calcium hydroxide, chitosan nanoparticles, and light-
activated disinfection) enhanced their antibiofilm activity against E. faecalis
biofilms (Upadya et al. 2011).
2.8 Persister Cells
Persister cells are nondividing dormant cells forming a small subpopulation of a

susceptible and genetically homogeneous population of bacteria that survive anti-
biotic exposure (Lewis 2010). The cells are phenotypic variants genetically iden-
tical to the susceptible cells within a clonal population (Keren et al. 2004a; Wiuff
et al. 2005) that demonstrate very slow or arrested growth and diminished protein
synthesis (Shah et al. 2006; Lewis 2010). Persisters are thought to be formed
through a combination of continuously occurring random events (“stochastic”) or
in response to an environmental stimulus (“deterministic”) (Gefen and Balaban
2009; Lewis 2010). For the biofilm “community,” the presence of these tolerant
phenotypic variants ensures that the population survives. Following treatment of
biofilms with antibiotics, the rapidly growing cells are killed, leaving the dormant
cells to repopulate the biofilm.
As distinct to antimicrobial-resistant cells that prevent the interaction of an
antibiotic with its intended target, persister cells appear to exhibit tolerance to
bactericidal antibiotics independent of resistance mechanisms (Lewis 2010). This
is supported by the analyses of high-level persistent (hip) mutants with hip gain-of-
function loci (Moyed and Bertrand 1983). The hip locus shares the characteristics
of toxin–antitoxin modules. Mutations of the hipA7 gene increased tolerance in
E. coli, likely by inducing (p)ppGpp synthesis and potentiating the transition to a
dormant state upon application of stress (Korch et al. 2003). Furthermore, growth of
E. coli hipA7 mutants with ampicillin or ofloxacin resulted in a 10 to 10(5)-fold
higher level of persister cells (Keren et al. 2004a). Mutant strains lacking persisters
have not been isolated, indicating that dormancy mechanisms are redundant (Lewis
2010). In spite of this, investigators have shown that persistence results from the
inhibition of translation of antibiotic targets by toxin/antitoxin modules (Keren
et al. 2004b). In the case of E. coli persisters, there was increased expression of
RelE, the toxin component of a toxin/antitoxin (TA) module (Keren et al. 2004b),
and ciprofloxacin treatment promoted the formation of ciprofloxacin-resistant per-
sisters; this action was dependent on the SOS response (Dorr et al. 2009) which
activates expression of DNA repair enzymes. Knockout of the SOS response-

inducible TA locus tisAB/istR markedly reduced the levels of ciprofloxacin-
resistant persisters. Furthermore, ciprofloxacin was shown to induce expression of
the tisB toxin gene, and TisB-expressing cells were tolerant to other antibiotics; the
formation of dormant persisters was found to be associated with decreasing proton
motive force and ATP levels in response to the toxin TisB (Dorr et al. 2010). These
findings have been supported by other reports of the role of toxin–antitoxin
(TA) gene pairs/module role in persister formation in E. coli biofilms (Wang and
Wood 2011).
Persister cells have been associated with recalcitrant biofilm infections
(Spoering and Lewis 2001; Lewis 2010; Fauvart et al. 2011). Overexpression of
hip mutants over the course of antimicrobial treatment was shown in P. aeruginosa
recovered from CF patients with chronic lung infections (Mulcahy et al. 2010) and
C. albicans recovered from cancer patients with oral thrush (Lafleur et al. 2010). It
is feasible that persister cells in immunocompetent patients are eventually targeted
by immune cells (Lewis 2007). However, in chronic diseases, such as tuberculosis
and CF lung infections where the immune system is compromised, this is less likely
to occur, and persister cells could become a nidus for recurrent infectious episodes
(Lewis 2010). A recent study has implicated oxidative stress in the formation of
E. coli persister tolerance; and the intriguing scenario was raised that immune cells,
by way of producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species
(RNS) compounds, could activate multidrug tolerance in pathogens
(Wu et al. 2012).
2.9 Biofilm Phenotype, Phase Variation, and Genetic

Variation
Costerton and colleagues hypothesized that some cells in a biofilm adopt a distinct
and protected biofilm phenotype that is a biologically programmed response to
growth on a surface (Costerton et al. 1999). This hypothesis has been supported by
observations of distinct protein expression patterns at different stages of biofilm
growth shown by P. aeruginosa in proteomic studies (Sauer et al. 2002) and the
existence of a regulatory protein (PvrR) that controls the conversion between
antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant forms (Drenkard and Ausubel
2002). It was proposed that antibiotic treatment and biofilm growth selected for
the high frequency of antibiotic-resistant phenotypic variants of P. aeruginosa and
contributed to chronic colonization of lungs in CF patients (Drenkard and Ausubel
2002). Further support was provided by DNA microarray analyses of biofilms and
planktonic cultures grown under similar environmental conditions, where gene
expression differed by only 6 % in B. subtilis (Stanley et al. 2003) and 1 % in
P. aeruginosa (Whiteley et al. 2001). However, when P. aeruginosa biofilms were
exposed to high levels of tobramycin, differential expression of 20 genes occurred,
suggesting that existence in the biofilm mode induces moderate levels of resistance
to antimicrobial treatments by inducing genes specific to that antibiotic (Whiteley
et al. 2001).
Phase variation, or the random on–off switching of phenotypes identified in
several bacterial species (Henderson et al. 1999), is thought to play an important
role in the formation of diverse phenotypes in the biofilm community (Stewart and
Franklin 2008; Tormo et al. 2007). Phase variation involves two general properties:
reversible and inheritable gene mutations for inducing a phenotypic change and
internal genome rearrangements that can utilize mobile genetic elements that have
inserted into, or recombined with, the host genome (Chia et al. 2008). Pathogenic
bacteria can utilize phase variation strategies to avoid detection by the host immune
system by switching on the expression of proteins when they are needed and
switching them off when they are likely to trigger an immune response. For
example, in S. aureus biofilms a phase variation process controls expression of
the ica genes involved in exopolysaccharide synthesis (Valle et al. 2007). Similarly,
in S. epidermidis, biofilm-negative variants can be produced by the reversible
inactivation of ica (Ziebuhr et al. 1999), staphylococcal accessory regulator sarA,
and sigmaB regulator gene rsbU by the insertion sequence IS256 (Conlon
et al. 2004).
Genetic variation occurs through mutations or recombinations that result in
changes to the DNA sequence. Mutagenicity and efficient acquisition of resistance
genes via HGT within biofilms (Molin and Tolker-Nielsen 2003) are both involved
in the development of antibiotic resistance (Hoiby et al. 2010). Variants can
comprise as much as 10 % of a mature biofilm population (Kirisits et al. 2005;
Boles et al. 2004). Mutations in either the DNA oxidative lesion repair system
(Oliver et al. 2002) or the mismatch repair system (Mandsberg et al. 2009) have
contributed to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains of P. aeruginosa. For
example, in CF patients administered repeated doses of antibiotics for lung infec-
tions, the hypermutability of P. aeruginosa in biofilms promotes the selection of
mutants conferring resistance to multiple antibiotics such as beta-lactams because
of mutations in the regulatory genes of beta-lactamase production (Ciofu 2003).
3 Antimicrobial Resistance in Mixed Species Biofilms
Multispecies biofilms have been shown to be significantly more resistant to anti-

microbial treatment than single-species biofilms (Kara et al. 2006; Burmolle
et al. 2006; Leriche et al. 2003). This has been attributed to the cooperative behavior
of the biofilm community enabling survival upon exposure to antimicrobial agents
(Elias and Banin 2012). Further, it has been shown that there are potential advan-
tages to be gained by residing in multispecies biofilms compared to single-species
biofilms (Burmolle et al. 2006). For example, when grown together as a
multispecies biofilm, the biomass of four marine-derived isolates increased com-
pared to single-species biofilms, and further, when exposed to hydrogen peroxide
and tetracycline to evaluate oxidative stress and protein synthesis, multispecies

biofilms demonstrated fitness advantages over single-species growth (Burmolle
et al. 2006). Extracellular secreted factors and species-specific physical interactions
between cells were associated with increased resistance to antimicrobial agents.
Likewise, in dual-species biofilms of C. albicans and S. epidermidis, both species
benefited by their association (Adam et al. 2002). Further, the presence of Candida
albicans protected the slime-negative staphylococcus against vancomycin, and
fluconazole penetration into the yeast was inhibited by the extracellular polymer
produced by S. epidermidis (Adam et al. 2002).
Similarly, dual-species biofilms of oral plaque species S. mutans and Veillonella
parvula were less susceptible to chlorhexidine, cetylpyridinium chloride, zinc
chloride, erythromycin, hydrogen peroxide, and amine chloride than single-species
biofilms of the same microorganisms (Kara et al. 2006; Luppens et al. 2008).
Subsequent analyses of biofilm spatial arrangements showed differences between
the single- and dual-species biofilms in microstructural alterations in response to
chlorhexidine exposure. Dual-species biofilms, but not single-species biofilms, had
formed distinct clusters that were considered to account for the increased resistance
to chlorhexidine (Kara et al. 2007). Further, transcript levels in S. mutans growing
in dual-species biofilms compared to single-species biofilm exhibited several dif-
ferences, indicating that V. parvula induced gene expression changes in S. mutans
(Luppens et al. 2008). Although not tested, the authors proposed that increased
expression induced by V. parvula of S. mutans genes encoding ribosomal proteins
could facilitate repair mechanisms after exposure of the dual-species biofilms to
antimicrobials (Luppens et al. 2008). It is clear that much remains to be discovered
about antibiotic sensitivities of multispecies biofilms.
4 Antimicrobial Resistance in the Root Canal Microflora
Intraradicular biofilms (Fig. 5) have been attributed as the primary cause of root
canal infections and longstanding pathologic processes such as large periapical
lesions and cysts (Ricucci et al. 2009; Ricucci and Siqueira 2010). Genera that have
been frequently cultured from infected root canals and periapical abscesses include
Prevotella, Porphyromonas, Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus,
Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Actinomyces, Propionibacterium, and Candida. Ana-
lyses of endodontic infection samples using molecular techniques have shown a
highly diverse flora composed of a large proportion of unidentifiable and
unculturable species (Siqueira and Rocas 2005), and recent investigations using
pyrosequencing have revealed a flora even more diverse than shown with tradi-
tional Sanger sequencing (Li et al. 2010; Ozok et al. 2012; Siqueira et al. 2011).
The antimicrobial activity of root canal irrigants, intracanal medicaments, and
root filling materials have for the most part been evaluated using strains (predom-
inantly E. faecalis) grown under planktonic conditions, although more recent
studies have included biofilms. These studies will be further discussed in chapter
Fig. 5 Mesial root tip of an infected human lower molar tooth showing multispecies biofilm. (a)
Semi-thin histologic section showing part of isthmus that communicates between the mesiobuccal
and mesiolingual root canals. (b) Transmission electron microscopic examination of boxed area in
(a) showing varied multispecies biofilm. (c) Higher magnification of small insert area from (b)
showing multiple phenotypes within a complex biofilm. (d) Higher magnification of larger insert
in (b) showing complex biofilm community [Reprinted from Journal of Endodontics, Vol 35(9),
Carr GB, Schwartz RS, Schaudinn C, Gorur A, Costerton JW. Ultrastructural examination of failed
molar retreatment with secondary apical periodontitis: an examination of endodontic biofilms in an
endodontic retreatment failure, 1303–9, ©2009, with permission from Elsevier]
“Inter-appointment Medication with Calcium Hydroxide in Routine Cases of Root

Canal Therapy.” Information on antibiotic resistance characteristics of root canal
isolates has been primarily acquired by using standardized MIC tests on a limited
group of culturable species (Table 1).
The available data show that while antibiotic resistance is not uncommon, there
is a low incidence of multidrug-resistant strains. A recent study using molecular
techniques evaluated the effects of root canal treatment procedures (including
interappointment medication with calcium hydroxide) on the eradication of micro-
bial antibiotic resistance genes in 45 patients undergoing primary endodontic
treatment or retreatment (Jungermann et al. 2011). Polymerase chain reaction was
used to screen for genes associated with resistance to beta-lactams [blaTEM-1, cfxA,
and blaZ], tetracycline (tetM, tetW, tetQ), and vancomycin (vanA, vanD, and vanE).
The authors reported that bla TEM-1 was more prevalent in primary than persistent
root canal infections. After treatment procedures, the prevalence of tetM was
unchanged. However, the prevalence of bla TEM-1 and tetW was significantly
Table 1 Studies on antibiotic resistance associated with root canal bacteria
Clinical features Species (strains) Antibiotics testeda Resistance (% where provided) Country Reference
Root canals
Primary Mixed anaerobes (38) AMC, AMX, TET None France Le Goff
treatment et al. (1997)
Primary E. faecalis (26), E. faecium AMP, CLI, ERY, MTZ, PEN, TET, AMP, CLI (96), MTZ (100), Sweden Dahlen
treatment (3) VAN PEN, TET et al. (2000)
Primary and P. prevotii (13), AMC, AMX, AZM, CLI, ERY, AZM, ERY Brazil de Sousa
acute apical abscess F. necrophorum (7) MTZ, PEN et al. (2003)
Primary and F. necrophorum (10), AMC, AMX, AZM, CEC, CLI, CLI, ERY, MTZ, PEN Brazil Jacinto
symptomatic F. nucleatum (9), P. micros ERY, MTZ, PEN et al. (2003)
(10), P. prevotii (9)
“Black-pigmented
bacteria”
Retreatment E. faecalis (10), AMC, AMX, AZM, ERY, PEN AZM, ERY Brazil Pinheiro
Antimicrobial Resistance in Biofilm Communities
Peptostreptococcus (6) et al. (2003)

Retreatment E. faecalis (21) AMC, AMX, AZM, CHL, CIP, AZM (38), DOX (14), ERY Brazil Pinheiro
DOX, (10), TET (14) et al. (2004)
ERY, MOX, PEN, TET, VAN
Primary and E. faecalis (31), E. faecium AMP, CHL, CLI, ERY, FUS, GEN, GEN (3), TET (16) Sweden Sedgley
retreatment (2) KAN, PEN, RIF, STR, TET, VAN et al. (2005)
Primary and E. faecalis (59) AMP, CHL, CIP, CLI, CTX, ERY, CTX (7), ERY (10), RIF (58), Finland, Reynaud Af
retreatment GEN, LZD, PEN, Q-D, RIF, STR, STR (7), TET (29) Lithuania Geijersstam
TEC, TET, VAN et al. (2007)
Primary and api- P. gingivalis (20) AMC, AMX, AZM, CEC, CLI, AZM (40), ERY (5) Brazil Jacinto
cal abscess ERY, MTZ, PEN, TET et al. (2006)
Primary F. nucleatum (38) AMC, AMX, AZM, CEC, CLI, CLI, ERY, MTZ, PEN Brazil Jacinto
F. necrophorum (20) ERY, MTZ, PEN, TET et al. (2008)
(continued)
73
Table 1 (continued)
74
Clinical features Species (strains) Antibiotics testeda Resistance (% where provided) Country Reference
Primary and F. nucleatum (44) AMC, AMX, CLI, ERY, MTZ, PEN CLI, ERY, PEN Brazil Gomes
symptomatic et al. (2011)
Collected 2000– P. intermedia/nigrescens (35) Increased CLI and PEN resis-
2008 P. oralis (23), P. micra (34) tance over time
Primary and DNA from 45 samples Resistance genes to beta-lactams, Preoperative: blaTEM-1 (33), USA Jungermann
retreatment (blaTEM-1, cfxA, and blaZ), TET blaZ (2), cfxA (11), tetM (18), et al. (2011)
(tetM, tetQ, tetW), VAN (vanA, tetW (18), tetQ (9)
vanD, vanE) Preobturation: blaTEM-1 (9),
blaZ (0), cfxA (0), tetM (22),
tetQ (0), tetW (2)
Root canal and pus aspirates
Primary and Mixed (66) AMC, AMP, AMX, CLI, ERY, MTZ (~50), TET (~40) Lithuania Skucaite
retreatment, apical MTZ, PEN, TET, VAN et al. (2010)
abscess aspirates
Root canals and saliva
Retreatment E. faecalis (19) AMP, CHL, ERY, GEN, MTZ, MTZ (100), STR (100) China Zhu
PEN, STR, TET, VAN et al. (2010)
Pus aspirates
Acute apical Mixed (118) AMC, AMX, CLI, CLR, MTZ, PEN AMX (15), CLI (11), MTZ Thailand Khemaleelakul
abscess aspirates (12), PEN (19) et al. (2002)
(17)
Apical abscess Mixed (98) AMC, AMX, CLI, CLR, MTZ, PEN AMX (9), CLI (4), MTZ (55), USA Baumgartner
aspirates (12) PEN (15) and Xia (2003)
From abscess Prevotella spp. (139) cfxA and cfxA2 (beta-lactamase cfxA and cfxA2 (31) Japan Iwahara
(72), root canal (15) genes) Production of lactamase (31) et al. (2006)
Production of lactamase
C. Sedgley and G. Dunny
Periradicular tissues
22 periapical Mixed (53) CLI, CTX, ERY, FOX, MTZ, PEN, CLI (6), CTX (11), ERY (4), USA Vigil
lesions TET FOX (15), MTZ (25), PEN et al. (1997)
(19), TET (6)
Method used was Etest® for all studies except Reynaud Af Geijersstam et al. (2007), agar dilution plus Etest®; Iwahara et al. (2006), real-time PCR;
Jungermann et al. (2011), PCR
a
AMX amoxicillin, AMC amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, AMP ampicillin, AZM azithromycin, CEC cefaclor, CTX cefotaxime, FOX cefoxitin, CHL chloram-
phenicol, CIP ciprofloxacin, CLR clarithromycin, CLI clindamycin, DOX doxycycline, ERY erythromycin, FUS fusidic acid, GEN gentamicin, KAN
kanamycin, LZD linezolid, MTZ metronidazole, MOX moxyfloxacin, PEN penicillin, Q-D quinupristin–dalfopristin (Synercid), RIF rifampin, STR strepto-
mycin, TEC teicoplanin, TET tetracycline, VAN vancomycin
Antimicrobial Resistance in Biofilm Communities
75
reduced, while of cfxA, blaZ, and tetQ was eliminated. No specimens contained
vanA, vanD, or vanE (Jungermann et al. 2011).
It is reasonable to expect that the close proximity of microorganisms in infected
root canals (Fig. 5) would facilitate interspecies communication, although support
is limited. In an ex vivo tooth model, the bidirectional transfer of a conjugative
plasmid carrying antibiotic resistance determinants was demonstrated between two
endodontic infection-associated species, S. gordonii and E. faecalis (Sedgley
et al. 2008). While considerable advances have been made in the identification of
the microflora associated with endodontic infections, presently there are no avail-
able data on antibiotic resistance in clinical root canal biofilms in situ. Future
studies using metaproteomic, metagenomic, and metabolomic methods should
provide greater insight. However, obstacles to overcome include the absence of
standardized methods for determining the antibiotic sensitivity of cells in
multispecies biofilms as well as challenges in recovering and analyzing intact
root canal biofilms using nondestructive methods.
A broad range of factors can contribute to the decreased susceptibility of biofilm

microorganisms to antimicrobial agents. These include provision of a physical
barrier to antimicrobial agents by the EPS matrix, facilitation of HGT of DNA
trapped within the extracellular matrix, quorum sensing and stress responses
resulting in the recruitment and expression of resistance determinants such as
multidrug resistance efflux pumps, the presence of persister cells that survive
antibiotic treatment, and metabolic heterogeneity throughout the biofilm resulting
in slow growth and protection against antibiotics active on rapidly growing bacte-
ria. While further work is needed to fully understand antimicrobial resistance in
biofilm communities, the accumulative effects of various processes, rather than
individual involvement, are likely to be important. Much remains to be learned
about the critical events in the development of antimicrobial resistance in biofilm
communities.
References
Absalon C, Van Dellen K, Watnick PI (2011) A communal bacterial adhesin anchors biofilm and
bystander cells to surfaces. PLoS Pathog 7, e1002210
Adam B, Baillie GS, Douglas LJ (2002) Mixed species biofilms of Candida albicans and
Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Med Microbiol 51:344–349
Adnan M, Morton G, Singh J et al (2010) Contribution of rpoS and bolA genes in biofilm formation
in Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655. Mol Cell Biochem 342:207–213
Allegrucci M, Sauer K (2007) Characterization of colony morphology variants isolated from
Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilms. J Bacteriol 189:2030–2038
Allesen-Holm M, Barken KB, Yang L et al (2006) A characterization of DNA release in

Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures and biofilms. Mol Microbiol 59:1114–1128
Anderl JN, Franklin MJ, Stewart PS (2000) Role of antibiotic penetration limitation in Klebsiella
pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
44:1818–1824
Bandara HM, Lam OL, Watt RM et al (2010) Bacterial lipopolysaccharides variably modulate
in vitro biofilm formation of Candida species. J Med Microbiol 59:1225–1234
Barnes AM, Ballering KS, Leibman RS et al (2012) Enterococcus faecalis produces abundant
extracellular structures containing DNA in the absence of cell lysis during early biofilm
formation. MBio 3:e00193–e00112
Baugh S, Ekanayaka AS, Piddock LJ et al (2012) Loss of or inhibition of all multidrug resistance
efflux pumps of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium results in impaired ability to form a
biofilm. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2409–2417
Baumgartner JC, Xia T (2003) Antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria associated with endodontic
abscesses. J Endod 29:44–47
Belitsky M, Avshalom H, Erental A et al (2011) The Escherichia coli extracellular death factor
EDF induces the endoribonucleolytic activities of the toxins MazF and ChpBK. Mol Cell
41:625–635
Benitez JA, Spelbrink RG, Silva A et al (1997) Adherence of Vibrio cholerae to cultured
differentiated human intestinal cells: an in vitro colonization model. Infect Immun
65:3474–3477
Bhullar K, Waglechner N, Pawlowski A et al (2012) Antibiotic resistance is prevalent in an
isolated cave microbiome. PLoS ONE 7, e34953
Boles BR, Thoendel M, Singh PK (2004) Self-generated diversity produces “insurance effects” in
biofilm communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16630–16635
Borriello G, Werner E, Roe F et al (2004) Oxygen limitation contributes to antibiotic tolerance of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2659–2664
Burmolle M, Webb JS, Rao D et al (2006) Enhanced biofilm formation and increased resistance to
antimicrobial agents and bacterial invasion are caused by synergistic interactions in
multispecies biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3916–3923
Carr GB, Schwartz RS, Schaudinn C et al (2009) Ultrastructural examination of failed molar
retreatment with secondary apical periodontitis: an examination of endodontic biofilms in an
endodontic retreatment failure. J Endod 35:1303–1309
Ceri H, Olson ME, Stremick C et al (1999) The calgary biofilm device: new technology for rapid
determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. J Clin Microbiol
37:1771–1776
Chavez de Paz LE, Lemos JA, Wickstrom C et al (2012) Role of (p)ppGpp in biofilm formation by
Enterococcus faecalis. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:1627–1630
Chia N, Woese CR, Goldenfeld N (2008) A collective mechanism for phase variation in biofilms.
Ciofu O (2003) Pseudomonas aeruginosa chromosomal beta-lactamase in patients with cystic
fibrosis and chronic lung infection. Mechanism of antibiotic resistance and target of the
humoral immune response. APMIS Suppl 116:1–47
Clatworthy AE, Pierson E, Hung DT (2007) Targeting virulence: a new paradigm for antimicrobial
therapy. Nat Chem Biol 3:541–548
Claverys JP, Havarstein LS (2007) Cannibalism and fratricide: mechanisms and raisons d’etre. Nat
Rev Microbiol 5:219–229
Claverys JP, Martin B, Havarstein LS (2007) Competence-induced fratricide in streptococci. Mol
Clewell DB, Francia MV (2004) Conjugation in gram-positive bacteria. In: Funnell BE, Phillips
GJ (eds) Plasmid biology. ASM Press, Washington, D.C., pp 227–256
Conlon KM, Humphreys H, O’Gara JP (2004) Inactivations of rsbU and sarA by IS256 represent
novel mechanisms of biofilm phenotypic variation in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Bacteriol
186:6208–6219
Cook L, Chatterjee A, Barnes A et al (2011) Biofilm growth alters regulation of conjugation by a
bacterial pheromone. Mol Microbiol 81:1499–1510
Costerton JW, Irvin RT, Cheng KJ (1981) The bacterial glycocalyx in nature and disease. Annu
Rev Microbiol 35:299–324
infections. Science 284:1318–1322
Cotter PA, Stibitz S (2007) c-di-GMP-mediated regulation of virulence and biofilm formation.
Curr Opin Microbiol 10:17–23
Cucarella C, Solano C, Valle J et al (2001) Bap, a Staphylococcus aureus surface protein involved
in biofilm formation. J Bacteriol 183:2888–2896
Dahlen G, Magnusson BC, Moller A (1981) Histological and histochemical study of the influence
of lipopolysaccharide extracted from Fusobacterium nucleatum on the periapical tissues in the
monkey Macaca fascicularis. Arch Oral Biol 26:591–598
Dahlen G, Samuelsson W, Molander A et al (2000) Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility
of enterococci isolated from the root canal. Oral Microbiol Immunol 15:309–312
Danese PN, Pratt LA, Kolter R (2000) Exopolysaccharide production is required for development
of Escherichia coli K-12 biofilm architecture. J Bacteriol 182:3593–3596
de Beer D, Stoodley P, Roe F et al (1994) Effects of biofilm structures on oxygen distribution and
mass transport. Biotechnol Bioeng 43:1131–1138
de Sousa EL, Ferraz CC, Gomes BP et al (2003) Bacteriological study of root canals associated
with periapical abscesses. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96:332–339
Dieppois G, Ducret V, Caille O et al (2012) The transcriptional regulator CzcR modulates
antibiotic resistance and quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS ONE 7, e38148
Donlan RM, Costerton JW (2002) Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microor-
ganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:167–193
Dorr T, Lewis K, Vulic M (2009) SOS response induces persistence to fluoroquinolones in
Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet 5, e1000760
Dorr T, Vulic M, Lewis K (2010) Ciprofloxacin causes persister formation by inducing the TisB
toxin in Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol 8, e1000317
Drenkard E, Ausubel FM (2002) Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are
linked to phenotypic variation. Nature 416:740–743
Duan K, Dammel C, Stein J et al (2003) Modulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa gene expression
by host microflora through interspecies communication. Mol Microbiol 50:1477–1491
Dunny GM, Brown BL, Clewell DB (1978) Induced cell aggregation and mating in Streptococcus
faecalis: evidence for a bacterial sex pheromone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:3479–3483
Dunny GM, Craig RA, Carron RL et al (1979) Plasmid transfer in Streptococcus faecalis:
production of multiple sex pheromones by recipients. Plasmid 2:454–465
Elias S, Banin E (2012) Multi-species biofilms: living with friendly neighbors. FEMS Microbiol
Rev 36:990–1004
Fauvart M, De Groote VN, Michiels J (2011) Role of persister cells in chronic infections: clinical
relevance and perspectives on anti-persister therapies. J Med Microbiol 60:699–709
Foster PL (2007) Stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 42:373–397
Fuqua C, Greenberg EP (2002) Listening in on bacteria: acyl-homoserine lactone signalling. Nat
Rev Mol Cell Biol 3:685–695
Fux CA, Costerton JW, Stewart PS et al (2005) Survival strategies of infectious biofilms. Trends
Gefen O, Balaban NQ (2009) The importance of being persistent: heterogeneity of bacterial
populations under antibiotic stress. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33:704–717
Gomes BP, Jacinto RC, Montagner F et al (2011) Analysis of the antimicrobial susceptibility of
anaerobic bacteria isolated from endodontic infections in Brazil during a period of nine years. J
Endod 37:1058–1062
Guisbert E, Yura T, Rhodius VA et al (2008) Convergence of molecular, modeling, and systems
approaches for an understanding of the Escherichia coli heat shock response. Microbiol Mol
Biol Rev 72:545–554
Hausner M, Wuertz S (1999) High rates of conjugation in bacterial biofilms as determined by
quantitative in situ analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3710–3713
Havarstein LS, Martin B, Johnsborg O et al (2006) New insights into the pneumococcal fratricide:
relationship to clumping and identification of a novel immunity factor. Mol Microbiol
59:1297–1307
Hayes F, Van Melderen L (2011) Toxins-antitoxins: diversity, evolution and function. Crit Rev
Biochem Mol Biol 46:386–408
Henderson IR, Owen P, Nataro JP (1999) Molecular switches–the ON and OFF of bacterial phase
variation. Mol Microbiol 33:919–932
Hengge-Aronis R (2002) Signal transduction and regulatory mechanisms involved in control of the
sigma(S) (RpoS) subunit of RNA polymerase. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:373–395
Hentzer M, Wu H, Andersen JB et al (2003) Attenuation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence by
quorum sensing inhibitors. Embo J 22:3803–3815
Hoiby N, Bjarnsholt T, Givskov M et al (2010) Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. Int J
Antimicrob Agents 35:322–332
Houry A, Gohar M, Deschamps J et al (2012) Bacterial swimmers that infiltrate and take over the
biofilm matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:13088–13093
Islam S, Oh H, Jalal S et al (2009) Chromosomal mechanisms of aminoglycoside resistance in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:60–66
Iwahara K, Kuriyama T, Shimura S et al (2006) Detection of cfxA and cfxA2, the beta-lactamase
genes of Prevotella spp., in clinical samples from dentoalveolar infection by real-time PCR. J
Clin Microbiol 44:172–176
Izano EA, Amarante MA, Kher WB et al (2008) Differential roles of poly-N-acetylglucosamine
surface polysaccharide and extracellular DNA in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus
epidermidis biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:470–476
Jacinto RC, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC et al (2003) Microbiological analysis of infected root canals
from symptomatic and asymptomatic teeth with periapical periodontitis and the antimicrobial
susceptibility of some isolated anaerobic bacteria. Oral Microbiol Immunol 18:285–292
Jacinto RC, Gomes BP, Shah HN et al (2006) Incidence and antimicrobial susceptibility of
Porphyromonas gingivalis isolated from mixed endodontic infections. Int Endod J 39:62–70
Jacinto RC, Montagner F, Signoretti FG et al (2008) Frequency, microbial interactions, and
antimicrobial susceptibility of Fusobacterium nucleatum and Fusobacterium necrophorum
isolated from primary endodontic infections. J Endod 34:1451–1456
Jalal S, Ciofu O, Hoiby N et al (2000) Molecular mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
44:710–712
Johnson EM, Flannagan SE, Sedgley CM (2006) Coaggregation interactions between oral and
endodontic Enterococcus faecalis and bacterial species isolated from persistent apical peri-
odontitis. J Endod 32:946–950
Jungermann GB, Burns K, Nandakumar R et al (2011) Antibiotic resistance in primary and
persistent endodontic infections. J Endod 37:1337–1344
Kara D, Luppens SB, Cate JM (2006) Differences between single- and dual-species biofilms of
Streptococcus mutans and Veillonella parvula in growth, acidogenicity and susceptibility to
chlorhexidine. Eur J Oral Sci 114:58–63
Kara D, Luppens SB, van Marle J et al (2007) Microstructural differences between single-species
and dual-species biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Veillonella parvula, before and after
exposure to chlorhexidine. FEMS Microbiol Lett 271:90–97
Keller L, Surette MG (2006) Communication in bacteria: an ecological and evolutionary perspec-

tive. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:249–258
Kelley WL (2006) Lex marks the spot: the virulent side of SOS and a closer look at the LexA
regulon. Mol Microbiol 62:1228–1238
Keren I, Kaldalu N, Spoering A et al (2004a) Persister cells and tolerance to antimicrobials. FEMS
Microbiol Lett 230:13–18
Keren I, Shah D, Spoering A et al (2004b) Specialized persister cells and the mechanism of
multidrug tolerance in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 186:8172–8180
Khemaleelakul S, Baumgartner JC, Pruksakorn S (2002) Identification of bacteria in acute
endodontic infections and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Oral Radiol Endod 94:746–755
Khemaleelakul S, Baumgartner JC, Pruksakom S (2006) Autoaggregation and coaggregation of
bacteria associated with acute endodontic infections. J Endod 32:312–318
Kim Y, Oh S, Kim SH (2009) Released exopolysaccharide (r-EPS) produced from probiotic
bacteria reduce biofilm formation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Biochem
Biophys Res Commun 379:324–329
Kim Y, Wang X, Zhang XS et al (2010) Escherichia coli toxin/antitoxin pair MqsR/MqsA regulate
toxin CspD. Environ Microbiol 12:1105–1121
Kirisits MJ, Prost L, Starkey M et al (2005) Characterization of colony morphology variants
isolated from Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4809–4821
Kobayashi K, Iwano M (2012) BslA(YuaB) forms a hydrophobic layer on the surface of Bacillus
subtilis biofilms. Mol Microbiol 85:51–66
Kolenbrander PE, Palmer RJ Jr, Periasamy S et al (2010) Oral multispecies biofilm development
and the key role of cell-cell distance. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:471–480
Konig C, Schwank S, Blaser J (2001) Factors compromising antibiotic activity against biofilms of
Staphylococcus epidermidis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 20:20–26
Korch SB, Henderson TA, Hill TM (2003) Characterization of the hipA7 allele of Escherichia coli
and evidence that high persistence is governed by (p)ppGpp synthesis. Mol Microbiol
50:1199–1213
Kvist M, Hancock V, Klemm P (2008) Inactivation of efflux pumps abolishes bacterial biofilm
formation. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:7376–7382
Lafleur MD, Qi Q, Lewis K (2010) Patients with long-term oral carriage harbor high-persister
mutants of Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:39–44
Lawrence JR, Korber DR, Hoyle BD et al (1991) Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms. J
Bacteriol 173:6558–6567
Le Goff A, Bunetel L, Mouton C et al (1997) Evaluation of root canal bacteria and their
antimicrobial susceptibility in teeth with necrotic pulp. Oral Microbiol Immunol 12:318–322
Leriche V, Briandet R, Carpentier B (2003) Ecology of mixed biofilms subjected daily to a
chlorinated alkaline solution: spatial distribution of bacterial species suggests a protective
effect of one species to another. Environ Microbiol 5:64–71
Lewis K (2007) Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:48–56
Lewis K (2010) Persister cells. Annu Rev Microbiol 64:357–372
Li Z, Nair SK (2012) Quorum sensing: how bacteria can coordinate activity and synchronize their
response to external signals. Protein Sci 21(10):1403–1417
Li XZ, Nikaido H (2009) Efflux-mediated drug resistance in bacteria: an update. Drugs
69:1555–1623
Li YH, Hanna MN, Svensater G et al (2001a) Cell density modulates acid adaptation in Strepto-
coccus mutans: implications for survival in biofilms. J Bacteriol 183:6875–6884
Li YH, Lau PC, Lee JH et al (2001b) Natural genetic transformation of Streptococcus mutans
growing in biofilms. J Bacteriol 183:897–908
Li YH, Tang N, Aspiras MB et al (2002) A quorum-sensing signaling system essential for genetic
competence in Streptococcus mutans is involved in biofilm formation. J Bacteriol
184:2699–2708
Li L, Hsiao WW, Nandakumar R et al (2010) Analyzing endodontic infections by deep coverage

pyrosequencing. J Dent Res 89:980–984
Lorenz MG, Wackernagel W (1994) Bacterial gene transfer by natural genetic transformation in
the environment. Microbiol Rev 58:563–602
Love RM, Jenkinson HF (2002) Invasion of dentinal tubules by oral bacteria. Crit Rev Oral Biol
Med 13:171–183
Love RM, McMillan MD, Park Y et al (2000) Coinvasion of dentinal tubules by Porphyromonas
gingivalis and Streptococcus gordonii depends upon binding specificity of streptococcal
antigen I/II adhesin. Infect Immun 68:1359–1365
Luppens SB, Kara D, Bandounas L et al (2008) Effect of Veillonella parvula on the antimicrobial
resistance and gene expression of Streptococcus mutans grown in a dual-species biofilm. Oral
Microbiol Immunol 23:183–189
Lynch DJ, Fountain TL, Mazurkiewicz JE et al (2007) Glucan-binding proteins are essential for
shaping Streptococcus mutans biofilm architecture. FEMS Microbiol Lett 268:158–165
Ma L, Conover M, Lu H et al (2009) Assembly and development of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa
biofilm matrix. PLoS Pathog 5, e1000354
Mah TF, O’Toole GA (2001) Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends
Microbiol 9:34–39
Mah TF, Pitts B, Pellock B et al (2003) A genetic basis for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm
antibiotic resistance. Nature 426:306–310
Mandsberg LF, Ciofu O, Kirkby N et al (2009) Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
strains with increased mutation frequency due to inactivation of the DNA oxidative repair
system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:2483–2491
Matsumura K, Furukawa S, Ogihara H et al (2011) Roles of multidrug efflux pumps on the biofilm
formation of Escherichia coli K-12. Biocontrol Sci 16:69–72
May T, Ito A, Okabe S (2009) Induction of multidrug resistance mechanism in Escherichia coli
biofilms by interplay between tetracycline and ampicillin resistance genes. Antimicrob Agents
Chemother 53:4628–4639
McDougald D, Rice SA, Barraud N et al (2012) Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and
ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:39–50
Molin S, Tolker-Nielsen T (2003) Gene transfer occurs with enhanced efficiency in biofilms and
induces enhanced stabilisation of the biofilm structure. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14:255–261
Moyed HS, Bertrand KP (1983) hipA, a newly recognized gene of Escherichia coli K-12 that
affects frequency of persistence after inhibition of murein synthesis. J Bacteriol 155:768–775
Mulcahy H, Charron-Mazenod L, Lewenza S (2008) Extracellular DNA chelates cations and
induces antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. PLoS Pathog 4, e1000213
Mulcahy LR, Burns JL, Lory S et al (2010) Emergence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains
producing high levels of persister cells in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Bacteriol
192:6191–6199
Oliver A, Baquero F, Blazquez J (2002) The mismatch repair system (mutS, mutL and uvrD genes)
in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: molecular characterization of naturally occurring mutants. Mol
Ozok AR, Persoon IF, Huse SM et al (2012) Ecology of the microbiome of the infected root canal
system: a comparison between apical and coronal root segments. Int Endod J 45:530–541
Parsek MR, Greenberg EP (2005) Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing
and biofilms. Trends Microbiol 13:27–33
Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC et al (2003) Evaluation of root canal microorganisms isolated
from teeth with endodontic failure and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Oral Microbiol
Immunol 18:100–103
Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Drucker DB et al (2004) Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus
faecalis isolated from canals of root filled teeth with periapical lesions. Int Endod J 37:756–763
Poole K (2012) Bacterial stress responses as determinants of antimicrobial resistance. J
Antimicrob Chemother 67(9):2069–2089
Potrykus K, Cashel M (2008) (p)ppGpp: still magical? Annu Rev Microbiol 62:35–51
Qin Z, Ou Y, Yang L et al (2007) Role of autolysin-mediated DNA release in biofilm formation of
Staphylococcus epidermidis. Microbiology 153:2083–2092
Rachid S, Ohlsen K, Witte W et al (2000) Effect of subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations on
polysaccharide intercellular adhesin expression in biofilm-forming Staphylococcus
epidermidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:3357–3363
Rendueles O, Ghigo JM (2012) Multi-species biofilms: how to avoid unfriendly neighbors. FEMS
Microbiol Rev 36(5):972–989
Rendueles O, Travier L, Latour-Lambert P et al (2011) Screening of Escherichia coli species
biodiversity reveals new biofilm-associated antiadhesion polysaccharides. MBio 2:e00043–
e00011
Rendueles O, Kaplan JB, Ghigo JM (2012) Antibiofilm polysaccharides. Environ Microbiol 15
(2):334–346
Reynaud Af Geijersstam A, Culak R, Molenaar L et al (2007) Comparative analysis of virulence
determinants and mass spectral profiles of Finnish and Lithuanian endodontic Enterococcus
faecalis isolates. Oral Microbiol Immunol 22:87–94
Rice LB (1998) Tn916 family conjugative transposons and dissemination of antimicrobial resis-
tance determinants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:1871–1877
Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr (2010) Biofilms and apical periodontitis: study of prevalence and
association with clinical and histopathologic findings. J Endod 36:1277–1288
Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr, Bate AL et al (2009) Histologic investigation of root canal-treated teeth
with apical periodontitis: a retrospective study from twenty-four patients. J Endod 35:493–502
Roberts AP, Mullany P (2010) Oral biofilms: a reservoir of transferable, bacterial, antimicrobial
resistance. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 8:1441–1450
Rossi-Fedele G, Scott W, Spratt D et al (2006) Incidence and behaviour of Tn916-like elements
within tetracycline-resistant bacteria isolated from root canals. Oral Microbiol Immunol
21:218–222
Salyers AA, Shoemaker NB, Stevens AM et al (1995) Conjugative transposons: an unusual and
diverse set of integrated gene transfer elements. Microbiol Rev 59:579–590
Sauer K, Camper AK, Ehrlich GD et al (2002) Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple
phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J Bacteriol 184:1140–1154
Sauer K, Cullen MC, Rickard AH et al (2004) Characterization of nutrient-induced dispersion in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm. J Bacteriol 186:7312–7326
Schembri MA, Kjaergaard K, Klemm P (2003) Global gene expression in Escherichia coli
biofilms. Mol Microbiol 48:253–267
Sedgley CM, Molander A, Flannagan SE et al (2005) Virulence, phenotype and genotype
characteristics of endodontic Enterococcus spp. Oral Microbiol Immunol 20:10–19
Sedgley CM, Lee EH, Martin MJ et al (2008) Antibiotic resistance gene transfer between
Streptococcus gordonii and Enterococcus faecalis in root canals of teeth ex vivo. J Endod
34:570–574
Shah D, Zhang Z, Khodursky A et al (2006) Persisters: a distinct physiological state of E. coli.
BMC Microbiol 6:53
Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN (2005) Uncultivated phylotypes and newly named species associated with
primary and persistent endodontic infections. J Clin Microbiol 43:3314–3319
Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN, Ricucci D (2010) Biofilms in endodontic infections. Endod Topics
22:33–49
Siqueira JF Jr, Alves FR, Rocas IN (2011) Pyrosequencing analysis of the apical root canal
microbiota. J Endod 37:1499–1503
Skillman LC, Sutherland IW, Jones MV (1998) The role of exopolysaccharides in dual species
biofilm development. J Appl Microbiol 85(Suppl 1):13S–18S
Skucaite N, Peciuliene V, Vitkauskiene A et al (2010) Susceptibility of endodontic pathogens to
antibiotics in patients with symptomatic apical periodontitis. J Endod 36:1611–1616
Sorensen SJ, Bailey M, Hansen LH et al (2005) Studying plasmid horizontal transfer in situ: a
critical review. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:700–710
Spoering AL, Lewis K (2001) Biofilms and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have
similar resistance to killing by antimicrobials. J Bacteriol 183:6746–6751
Srivastava D, Waters CM (2012) A tangled web: regulatory connections between quorum sensing
and cyclic Di-GMP. J Bacteriol 194:4485–4493
Staal M, Borisov SM, Rickelt LF et al (2011) Ultrabright planar optodes for luminescence life-
time based microscopic imaging of O2 dynamics in biofilms. J Microbiol Methods 85:67–74
Stanley NR, Britton RA, Grossman AD et al (2003) Identification of catabolite repression as a
physiological regulator of biofilm formation by Bacillus subtilis by use of DNA microarrays. J
Bacteriol 185:1951–1957
Sternberg C, Christensen BB, Johansen T et al (1999) Distribution of bacterial growth activity in
flow-chamber biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4108–4117
Stewart PS (2012) Mini-review: convection around biofilms. Biofouling 28:187–198
Stewart PS, Costerton JW (2001) Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 358:135–138
Stewart PS, Franklin MJ (2008) Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol
6:199–210
Suci PA, Mittelman MW, Yu FP et al (1994) Investigation of ciprofloxacin penetration into
Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38:2125–2133
Sutherland I (2001) Biofilm exopolysaccharides: a strong and sticky framework. Microbiology
147:3–9
Thomas VC, Thurlow LR, Boyle D et al (2008) Regulation of autolysis-dependent extracellular
DNA release by Enterococcus faecalis extracellular proteases influences biofilm development.
Thomas VC, Hiromasa Y, Harms N et al (2009) A fratricidal mechanism is responsible for eDNA
release and contributes to biofilm development of Enterococcus faecalis. Mol Microbiol
72:1022–1036
Tielker D, Hacker S, Loris R et al (2005) Pseudomonas aeruginosa lectin LecB is located in the
outer membrane and is involved in biofilm formation. Microbiology 151:1313–1323
Tormo MA, Ubeda C, Marti M et al (2007) Phase-variable expression of the biofilm-associated
protein (Bap) in Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiology 153:1702–1710
Trotonda MP, Manna AC, Cheung AL et al (2005) SarA positively controls bap-dependent biofilm
formation in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 187:5790–5798
Upadya M, Shrestha A, Kishen A (2011) Role of efflux pump inhibitors on the antibiofilm efficacy
of calcium hydroxide, chitosan nanoparticles, and light-activated disinfection. J Endod
37:1422–1426
Valle J, Vergara-Irigaray M, Merino N et al (2007) sigmaB regulates IS256-mediated Staphylo-
coccus aureus biofilm phenotypic variation. J Bacteriol 189:2886–2896
Vigil GV, Wayman BE, Dazey SE et al (1997) Identification and antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria
isolated from periapical lesions. J Endod 23:110–114
Vrany JD, Stewart PS, Suci PA (1997) Comparison of recalcitrance to ciprofloxacin and
levofloxacin exhibited by Pseudomonas aeruginosa bofilms displaying rapid-transport char-
acteristics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:1352–1358
Vuong C, Voyich JM, Fischer ER et al (2004) Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) protects
Staphylococcus epidermidis against major components of the human innate immune system.
Cell Microbiol 6:269–275
Walters MC 3rd, Roe F, Bugnicourt A et al (2003) Contributions of antibiotic penetration, oxygen
limitation, and low metabolic activity to tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to
ciprofloxacin and tobramycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:317–323
Wang X, Wood TK (2011) Toxin-antitoxin systems influence biofilm and persister cell formation
and the general stress response. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:5577–5583
Wang X, Kim Y, Hong SH et al (2011) Antitoxin MqsA helps mediate the bacterial general stress
response. Nat Chem Biol 7:359–366
Werner E, Roe F, Bugnicourt A et al (2004) Stratified growth in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6188–6196
Whitchurch CB, Tolker-Nielsen T, Ragas PC et al (2002) Extracellular DNA required for bacterial
biofilm formation. Science 295:1487
Whiteley M, Bangera MG, Bumgarner RE et al (2001) Gene expression in Pseudomonas
aeruginosa biofilms. Nature 413:860–864
Wiuff C, Zappala RM, Regoes RR et al (2005) Phenotypic tolerance: antibiotic enrichment of
noninherited resistance in bacterial populations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:1483–1494
Wu Y, Vulic M, Keren I et al (2012) Role of oxidative stress in persister tolerance. Antimicrob
Agents Chemother 56(9):4922–4926
Zahller J, Stewart PS (2002) Transmission electron microscopic study of antibiotic action on
Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:2679–2683
Zhang L, Mah TF (2008) Involvement of a novel efflux system in biofilm-specific resistance to
antibiotics. J Bacteriol 190:4447–4452
Zhang XQ, Bishop PL, Kupferle MJ (1998) Measurement of polysaccharides and proteins in
biofilm extracellular polymers. Water Sci Technol 37:345–348
Zheng Z, Stewart PS (2002) Penetration of rifampin through Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms.
Zhu X, Wang Q, Zhang C et al (2010) Prevalence, phenotype, and genotype of Enterococcus
faecalis isolated from saliva and root canals in patients with persistent apical periodontitis. J
Endod 36:1950–1955
Ziebuhr W, Krimmer V, Rachid S et al (1999) A novel mechanism of phase variation of virulence
in Staphylococcus epidermidis: evidence for control of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin
synthesis by alternating insertion and excision of the insertion sequence element IS256. Mol
Part II
Observational and Experimental Evidence
The Use of Scanning Electron Microscopy
(SEM) in Visualizing the Root Canal Biofilm
Linda B. Peters, Brandon Peterson, David E. Jaramillo,

and Luc van der Sluis
Abstract Apical periodontitis is caused by microorganisms in planktonic or bio-

film state present in the root canal system and/or attached to the outer apical root
surface. Knowledge about the microorganisms and biofilm structure within and
external to the root canal system is important in order to effectively treat apical
periodontitis. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been used to visualize and
morphologically describe the presence of biofilm and microorganisms associated
with teeth with apical periodontitis. This chapter provides a short outline of the
applications of SEM in endodontics with the intention to describe the benefits and
shortcomings of this microscopic technique.
1 Introduction
The landmark study by Kakehashi et al. (1965) demonstrated the cause and effect
relationship between infection of the root canal system and apical periodontitis. The
aim of endodontic treatment is to eliminate infection in the root canal system and
create an environment that allows healing of apical periodontitis. However, despite
appropriate treatment procedures, healing of apical periodontitis is not always
predictable (Ricucci and Langeland 1998; Ørstavik et al. 2004). Further, new
treatment modalities have had only limited success in influencing the healing of
apical periodontitis (Ng et al. 2008a, b).
L.B. Peters • L. van der Sluis (*)

Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen,
The Netherlands
B. Peterson
W. J. Kolff Institute, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center
Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
D.E. Jaramillo
Department of Endodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA

Biofilms 9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47415-0_4
88 L.B. Peters et al.
The probable cause of reduced healing has been attributed to biofilm infections
rather than an infection with planktonic microorganisms (Costerton et al. 1999).
Persistent infection has also been strongly associated with the biofilm state (Parsek
and Singh 2003; Costerton et al. 2005). It therefore follows that an enhanced
understanding of root canal infections must include the study of endodontic
biofilms. However, demonstration of biofilms in the root canal system presents
challenges because few techniques are capable of simultaneously imaging both the
extracellular matrix and microorganisms within biofilm communities (Schaudinn
et al. 2009; Bridier et al. 2013).
In this chapter we focus on the use of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to
visualize and describe biofilms associated with infected root canals and dentinal
tubules and extraradicular biofilms associated with persistent infections.
2 General Information on the SEM Technique
In the seventeenth century, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek used a simple microscope to

visualize the poor penetration of vinegar into oral plaque. He wrote “the vinegar
with which I wash my teeth, kill’d only those animale which were on the outside of
the scurf., but dis not pass thro the whole substance of it” (van Leeuwenhoek 1684).
Subsequent developments in technology provided the scanning electron micro-
scope and, more recently, advanced microscopy techniques incorporating fluores-
cence and confocal laser scanning that can evaluate specific microbial targets.
While the more advanced scanning microscopy techniques can provide valuable
information about the viability and composition of oral biofilms, the resolution of
these methods cannot compare to that of SEM.
Electron microscopy uses an electron-dense material, typically gold, to coat the
surface of the object of interest. The electron-rich environment is more sensitive
and thus able to magnify the object to larger magnifications by using just light
sources and lenses. The most commonly used electron microscopy technique, SEM,
scans the electron-dense material, providing a detailed, high-resolution image of the
sputter-coated surfaces, including bacterial cell surfaces, and can identify cellular
membrane damage (Appelbaum et al. 1979; Okte et al. 1999). However, the high
vacuum conditions required during sample preparation for SEM distort hydrated
local environments, such as the extracellular polymeric matrix. After vacuum, the
extracellular matrix is reduced to a dark rim of condensed matter around bacterial
cells (Stewart and Costerton 2001) and does not show its expansive connective
network observed under hydrated conditions. Additionally, the electron-dense
coating applied to the sample for detection “freezes” the sample, rendering a single
sample unavailable for detection at multiple time points. The use of multiple
microscopic techniques is currently required to fulfill the high-resolution and 3D
reconstruction of hydrated biofilms (Bridier et al. 2013).
The Use of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) in Visualizing the Root Canal. . . 89
Fig. 1 Comparison of ESEM (a) and SEM (b) images demonstrating differences in resolution.
(a) Fusobacterium nucleatum species (arrows) in mixed culture with Enterococcus faecalis;
(b) Colonies of F. nucleatum and E. faecalis. Both species could clearly be distinguished
(5000, Fe-CSEM) [Reproduced with permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc from Bergmans L,
Moisiadis P, van Meerbeek B, Quirynen M, Lambrechts P. Microscopic observation of bacteria:
review highlighting the use of environmental SEM. International Endodontic Journal 38(11):775–
88 ©2005]
In an effort to overcome the difficulties of “traditional” SEM, many modified

methods of electron microscopy have been developed that can target otherwise
undetectable parts of the sample. These include environmental scanning electron
microscopy (ESEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and focused ion
beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM). ESEM does not need vacuum
conditions or a surface coating and consequently is capable of imaging a more
“natural” sample (Danilatos and Postle 1982; Bergmans et al. 2005). TEM requires
ultrathin samples and still uses vacuum conditions to prepare the samples; however,
because the samples are thin, the interior components of the cell can be visualized
(Reese and Guggenheim 2007). FIB-SEM uses a destructive milling process to
access the layers of the sample in order to reconstruct a 3D representation (Wallace
et al. 2011). Overall, SEM, TEM, and FIB-SEM are inadequate to visualize biofilms
because the matrix structure is destroyed due to dehydration. In contrast, ESEM
does not affect the matrix structure because dehydration of the biofilm is not
necessary for the procedure. However, ESEM has a poor resolution and limited
magnification (Alhede et al. 2012). In contrast, SEM can provide higher-resolution
images that facilitate observations of microbial communities, such as those found in
root canal biofilms (Fig. 1).
3 Visualization of Microorganisms/Biofilm in the

Root Canal and Tubules by SEM
3.1 Root Canal
In light and electron microscopy studies, Nair described the dense plaque in the root
canal that harbored large numbers of bacteria and polymorphonucleocytes that were
Fig. 2 Biofilm within the root canal lumen. SEM apical section through dentine (D) and biofilm
(B) within the canal lumen (L) (μ bar represents 60 μm) [Reproduced with permission of
John Wiley & Sons, Inc from Richardson N, Mordan NJ, Figueiredo JA, Ng YL, Gulabivala
K. Microflora in teeth associated with apical periodontitis: a methodological observational study
comparing two protocols and three microscopy techniques. International Endodontic Journal
42(10):908–921 ©2009]
invading the bacterial plaque on the root canal wall (Nair 1987). SEM studies have
demonstrated biofilms within the canal lumen (Richardson et al. 2009) (Figs. 2 and
3) and adhering to the root canal wall surface in teeth with associated periapical
pathology; these biofilms may have contained various cellular morphotypes such as
cocci, rods, filaments, and spirochaetes (Molven et al. 1991; Richardson et al. 2009;
Siqueira and Lopes 2001; Baldasso et al. 2012) (Figs. 4 and 5). These investigators
also reported that more bacteria were found on the root canal wall when extensive
carious lesions were present (Baldasso et al. 2012) (Fig. 6) and that the apical part
of the root canal was more heavily infected than the coronal part (Molven
et al. 1991; Richardson et al. 2009). Also, yeastlike structures and fungal hyphae
have been observed under SEM to colonize infected root canals (Sen et al. 1995;
Baldasso et al. 2012) (Fig. 7).
Fig. 3 Biofilm within the root canal. (a) Radiograph showing maxillary left first premolar. Crown
delivered 3 years previously. Patient presented with intermittent pain, particularly upon chewing,
and absence of deep probing. Diagnosis: necrotic pulp and symptomatic apical periodontitis. Patient
elected extraction. (b) SEM image of middle section of the root canal wall showing necrotic pulp
tissue and debris covering dentinal tubules; (c) Close-up of circled area in (b); (d) Close-up of circled
area in (c) showing dentinal collagen fibers and bacteria inside the dentinal tubule; (e) Close-up of
circled area in (d) showing bacteria inside dentinal tubule. (Images from David Jaramillo)
Fig. 4 Biofilm within the root canal. (a) Radiograph showing mandibular left second molar.
Patient presented with no symptoms and absence of deep probing. Diagnosis: necrotic pulp and
asymptomatic apical periodontitis. Patient elected extraction. (b) SEM image of middle section of
the root canal wall showing dentinal wall as a niche for biofilms; (c and d) Close-up images of left
circled area labeled in (b) showing dentinal collagen fibers and bacteria inside dentinal tubules;
(e and f) Close-up images of right circled area in (b) showing multi-species biofilms with cocci,
rods, and long filaments (Images from David Jaramillo)
Fig. 5 Microorganisms observed in biofilms on root canals walls of teeth with primary endodontic
infections. Cocci (a), spirochetes (b), filaments (c), and bacilli (d) could be observed, although a
direct correlation between bacterial morphological differences and clinical/radiographic findings
was not established by means of SEM evaluation (Reproduced with permission of John Wiley &
Sons, Inc from Baldasso FE, Stürmer CP, Luisi SB, Petruzzi MN, Scarparo RK, de Figueiredo
JA. Microflora associated with primary endodontic infections: correlations among SEM evalu-
ation, clinical features, and radiographic findings. Microscopy Research and Technique 75(11):
1557–63 ©2012)
3.2 Dentinal Tubules
Using light microscopy and culture techniques, investigators have shown that
bacteria enter the dentinal tubules (Peters et al. 2001; Nair et al. 2005; Vieira
et al. 2012). SEM imaging has also demonstrated invasion of the dentinal tubules
(Richardson et al. 2009) (Fig. 8) with cocci, rods, and yeasts invading to depths of
up to 150 μm (Sen et al. 1995). Richardson et al. (2009) showed that the dentinal
tubules in the coronal and middle section of the root were most heavily infected,
while Sen et al. (1995) also observed heavily infected tubules in the apical area.
Fig. 6 Bacteria forming dense biofilms on the root canal walls of a lower canine with extensive
caries and a periapical lesion. Biofilm, mainly comprised of cocci and rods (*), can be observed at
cervical (a), middle (b), and apical (c, d) thirds of the canal. In some areas, bacteria could also be
detected into dentinal tubules (~). (DC refers to defense cells.) (Reproduced with permission of
John Wiley & Sons, Inc from Baldasso FE, Stürmer CP, Luisi SB, Petruzzi MN, Scarparo RK, de
Figueiredo JA. Microflora associated with primary endodontic infections: correlations among
SEM evaluation, clinical features, and radiographic findings. Microscopy Research and Technique
75(11):1557–63 ©2012)
Fig. 7 Fungal hyphae

(FH) in root canal biofilm
located at the cervical level
of a maxillary first molar
with extensive caries,
periapical lesion, and
clinically detectable
periodontal pocket
(Reproduced with
permission of John Wiley &
Sons, Inc from Baldasso FE,
Stürmer CP, Luisi SB,
Petruzzi MN, Scarparo RK,
de Figueiredo
JA. Microflora associated
with primary endodontic
infections: correlations
among SEM evaluation,
clinical features, and
radiographic findings.
Microscopy Research and
Technique 75(11):1557–63
©
2012)
Fig. 8 Invasion by
microorganisms into dentinal
tubules of infected root
canal. SEM of apical section
showing bacteria (arrows)
within the dentine tubules
(μ bar represents 10 μm)
(Reproduced with permission
of John Wiley & Sons, Inc
from Richardson N, Mordan
NJ, Figueiredo JA, Ng YL,
Gulabivala K. Microflora in
teeth associated with apical
periodontitis: a methodological
observational study
comparing two protocols and
three microscopy techniques.
International Endodontic
Journal 42(10):908–921
©
2009)
4 Visualization of Extraradicular Microorganisms/Biofilm

by SEM
Apical extraradicular biofilm is an important clinical phenomenon because they

may be inherently resistant to antimicrobial agents and their location renders them
difficult to remove by biomechanical preparation (Tronstad et al. 1990; Siqueira
and Lopes 2001). This may cause failure of endodontic treatment as a consequence
of persistent apical infection rather than intracanal persistent infection. Although it
is not fully understood in which cases extraradicular biofilm infection can be
expected, SEM studies have shown biofilm attached to the apical external root
surface (Tronstad et al. 1990; Lomçali et al. 1996; Leonardo et al. 2002; Signoretti
et al. 2011; Baldasso et al. 2012) (Fig. 9) and to apically extruded gutta-percha
(Noiri et al. 2002) (Fig. 10).
Extraradicular biofilms have been proposed as etiological factors associated with
failed endodontic treatment (Tronstad et al. 1990; Wang et al. 2013). In 1990,
Tronstad et al. reported “apical plaque” on the root surface of teeth with apical
periodontitis refractory to endodontic treatment visualized by SEM and described
as “a continuous, smooth and structureless coating.” At higher magnification
predominantly cocci and rods were described as present in the “coating” and in
Fig. 9 Resected distal root apex of a failed endodontically retreated lower left first molar showing
biofilm surrounding the apical foramen and external radicular surface. (a) Uninstrumented apical
foramen (200); (b and c) Bacterial colonies adhering to external radicular surface (1500 and
3300). (Reprinted from Journal of Endodontics, 37(12), Signoretti FG, Endo MS, Gomes BP,
Montagner F, Tosello FB, Jacinto RC (2011) Persistent extraradicular infection in root-filled
asymptomatic human tooth: scanning electron microscopic analysis and microbial investigation
after apical microsurgery, 1696–700 ©2011, with permission from Elsevier)
Fig. 10 Biofilm on extruded gutta-percha cone recovered from previously treated tooth with
refractory periapical periodontitis. (a) Radiograph of tooth. Filling material (gutta-percha point) is
observed outside the palatal root canal; (b) SEM image of gutta-percha specimen after removal.
The apically extruded material (arrows) is approximately 2 mm in length (original magnification
50; bar ¼ 500 um); (c) SEM image of extruded gutta-percha (original magnification 350;
bar ¼ 50 um); (d) High magnification of arrowhead area in (c). Glycocalyx structure is present
in the upper right area but not in lower left area. Filamentous or spirochete-shaped bacteria are
observed in lower left (original magnification 3500; bar ¼ 5 um) (Reprinted from Journal of
Endodontics, 28(10), Noiri Y, Ehara A, Kawahara T, Takemura N, Ebisu S. Participation of
bacterial biofilms in refractory and chronic periapical periodontitis,679–83, ©2011, with permis-
sion from Elsevier)
irregularities. Fibrillar forms were also seen mainly attached to cocci, and the
bacteria were held together by an extracellular material. These findings were
supported by Rocha et al. (2008) who observed biofilm on the external surfaces
of the apical one third of roots of primary teeth with necrotic pulps and radiographi-
cally evident apical pathosis (Fig. 11); in contradistinction, teeth with vital pulps
showed no evidence of apical infection, and normal collagen fibers were seen on the
root surface. These findings are also supported by Wang et al. 2013 who reported
the presence of extraradicular biofilm in all samples with persistent periapical
periodontitis and in three samples with chronic periapical periodontitis. The cases
with vital pulps were covered by fibers, with no extraradicular microorganisms
present. Leonardo et al. (2002) also reported that teeth with pulp necrosis without
radiographic signs of apical periodontitis harbored bacteria but the infection was
confined to the lumen of the main root canal. When radiographic breakdown was
clearly visible, the root surface was covered by different bacterial cells. The
resorptive lacunae mainly harbored cocci and bacilli but spirochetes and filaments
were also present on the outer surface of the root (Fig. 12). Lacunar resorptive zones
Fig. 11 Extraradicular biofilm associated with the apical one third of roots of primary teeth with
necrotic pulps and radiographically evident apical pathosis (Reproduced with permission of John
Wiley & Sons, Inc from Rocha CT, Rossi MA, Leonardo MR, Rocha LB, Nelson-Filho P, Silva
LA. Biofilm on the apical region of roots in primary teeth with vital and necrotic pulps with or
without radiographically evident apical pathosis. International Endodontic Journal 41(8):664–9
©
2008)
Fig. 12 External surface of the root apex of tooth with pulp necrosis and chronic periapical lesion.
(a) Morphological changes in the radicular cementum close to the apical foramen showing areas of
intact cementum (arrowhead) between areas of resorption (arrow) (400). (b) Higher magnifi-
cation of cementum resorption in (a) with areas of microorganisms (arrow) (1650); (c) Higher
magnification of (b) (arrow), showing the presence of cocci forming apical biofilm (6000)
(Reprinted from Journal of Endodontics, 28(12), Leonardo MR, Rossi MA, Silva LA, Ito IY,
Bonifácio KC, EM evaluation of bacterial biofilm and microorganisms on the apical external root
surface of human teeth, 815–818, ©2002, with permission from Elsevier)
close to the apical foramen on the outer surface of the root have also harbored yeasts
according to another SEM study (Lomçali et al. 1996).
In contrast to the above studies, no evidence of extraradicular infection asso-
ciated with periapical periodontitis in 26 out of 27 cases visualized by SEM was
found by Siqueira and Lopes (2001). Although bacteria could be observed close to
the apical foramen, they were confined to the canal lumen.
The use of SEM to investigate endodontic infections has provided important

information. However, it is difficult to show microorganisms embedded in the
polysaccharide matrix (Richardson et al. 2009). The matrix is composed mainly
of water and its three-dimensional structure changes when samples are prepared for
SEM imaging by fixation and dehydration (Bridier et al. 2013). Further, while SEM
can provide information on the size and morphology of microorganisms, definitive
microbial identification is not feasible, nor is the ability to observe the changes in
size and shape of microorganisms when embedded in a biofilm structure (Webster
et al. 2004). It is apparent that a combination of different microscopic techniques is
more likely to facilitate a deeper and more realistic analysis of biofilm architecture.
For example, Schaudinn et al. (2009) demonstrated that by combining SEM with
FISH/cLSM, the limitations of each technique could be overcome. In five teeth
extracted due to failed endodontic treatment, the presence of bacteria and a matrix
were shown by using SEM images overlaid with corresponding cLSM and FISH
images of the same area (Fig. 13). Baldasso et al. (2012) also reported that by using
the combination of clinical and radiographic findings with SEM imaging, a better
understanding of the location and extent of the infection is possible.
Fig. 13 Evaluation of root canal biofilm architecture using a combination of different microscopic
techniques. (a) Overview of root canal of tooth extracted due to failed endodontic treatment.
Certain parts of the canal surface were covered with a thick matrix layer (encircled areas 1, 2),
whereas other regions showed only sparse and comparatively thin islands of matrix (encircled area
3). (b) The size and shape of some structures of the matrix suggested the presence of bacteria
(arrows 1, 2), but without conclusive evidence. (c) Other areas of the matrix consisted of so
densely composed material that no traces of bacterial presence could be found. (d) After labeling
the split tooth with the EUB338 (Cy3) probe, distinct parts of the canal showed a strong red
fluorescence signal in the cLSM (arrow 1). The red signal was also clearly present at a lateral spot
at some distance from the main root canal (arrow 2). (e) The overlay of corresponding SEM and
FISH/cLSM (Fig. 1a, d) images of the same regions revealed matching areas of the FISH signal
and the amorphous matrix, suggesting the presence of bacterial biofilm. The laterally located FISH
signal was within a lateral canal in the root (arrow 1). (f) Higher magnifications of the FISH-
labeled root canal surface with cLSM indicated a biofilm, composed of bacteria with short rod or
coccus-like morphology (arrow 1) (Reprinted by permission from John Wiley and Sons from
Schaudinn C, Carr G, Gorur A, Jaramillo D, Costerton JW, Webster P. Imaging of endodontic
biofilms by combined microscopy (FISH/cLSM—SEM). Journal of Microscopy 235(2):124–127
©
2009)
References
Alhede M, Qvortrup K, Liebrechts R, Høiby N, Givskov M, Bjarnsholt T (2012) Combination of

microscopic techniques reveals a comprehensive visual impression of biofilm structure and
composition. Fems Immunol Med Microbiol 65:335–342
Appelbaum B, Golub E, Holt SC, Rosan B (1979) In vitro studies of dental plaque formation:
adsorption of oral streptococci to hydroxyapatite. Infect Immun 25:717–728
Baldasso FE, Stürmer CP, Luisi SB, Petruzzi MN, Scarparo RK, de Figueiredo JA (2012)
Microflora associated with primary endodontic infections: correlations among sem evaluation,
clinical features, and radiographic findings. Microsc Res Tech 75:1557–1563
Bergmans L, Moisiadis P, van Meerbeek B, Quirynen M, Lambrechts P (2005) Microscopic
observation of bacteria: review highlighting the use of environmental SEM. Int Endod J 38:
775–788
Bridier A, Meylheuc T, Briandet R (2013) Realistic representation of bacillus subtilis biofilms
architecture using combined microscopy (cLSM, ESEM and FESEM). Micron 48:65–69
infections. Science 284(5418):1318–1322
Costerton JW, Montanaro L, Arciola CR (2005) Biofilm in implant infections: its production and
regulation. Int J Artif Organs 28:1062–1068
Danilatos GD, Postle R (1982) The environmental scanning electron microscope and its appli-
cations. Scan Electron Microsc P-1:1–16
Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ (1965) The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in
germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 20:340–349
Leonardo MR, Rossi MA, Silva LA, Ito IY, Bonifácio KC (2002) EM evaluation of bacterial
biofilm and microorganisms on the apical external root surface of human teeth. J Endod 28:
815–818
Lomçali G, Sen BH, Cankaya H (1996) Scanning electron microscopic observations of apical root
surfaces of teeth with apical periodontitis. Endod Dent Traumatol 12:70–76
Molven O, Olsen I, Kerekes K (1991) Scanning electron microscopy of bacteria in the apical part
of root canals in permanent teeth with periapical lesions. Endod Dent Traumatol 7:226–229
Nair PNR (1987) Light and electron microscopic studies of root canal flora and periapical lesions.
J Endod 29–39
Nair PN, Henry S, Cano V, Vera J (2005) Microbial status of apical root canal system of human
mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after “one-visit” endodontic treat-
ment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 99:231–252
Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K (2008a) Outcome of primary root canal
treatment: systematic review of the literature – Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J
41:6–31
Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K (2008b) Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: a systematic
review of the literature. Int Endod J 41:1026–1046
Noiri Y, Ehara A, Kawahara T, Takemura N, Ebisu S (2002) Participation of bacterial biofilms in
refractory and chronic periapical periodontitis. J Endod 28:679–683
Okte E, Sultan N, Dogan B, Asikainen S (1999) Bacterial adhesion of actinobacillus actino-
mycetemcomitans serotypes to titanium implants: SEM evaluation a preliminary report.
J Periodontol 70:1376–1382
Ørstavik D, Qvist V, Stoltze K (2004) A multivariate analysis of the outcome of endo-
dontic treatment. Eur J Oral Sci 112:224–230
Parsek MR, Singh PK (2003) Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis.
Annu Rev Microbiol 57:677–701
Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Buijs JF, van Winkelhoff AJ (2001) Viable bacteria in root dentinal
tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 27:76–81
Reese S, Guggenheim B (2007) A novel TEM contrasting technique for extracellular poly-
saccharides in in vitro biofilms. Microsc Res Tech 70:816–822
Richardson N, Mordan NJ, Figueiredo JA, Ng YL, Gulabivala K (2009) Microflora in teeth
associated with apical periodontitis: a methodological observational study comparing two
protocols and three microscopy techniques. Int Endod J 42:908–921
Ricucci D, Langeland K (1998) Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part
2. A histological study. Int Endod J 31:394–409
Rocha CT, Rossi MA, Leonardo MR, Rocha LB, Nelson-Filho P, Silva LA (2008) Biofilm on the
apical region of roots in primary teeth with vital and necrotic pulps with or without radio-
graphically evident apical pathosis. Int Endod J 41:664–669
Schaudinn C, Carr G, Gorur A, Jaramillo D, Costerton JW, Webster P (2009) Imaging of
endodontic biofilms by combined microscopy (FISH/cLSM - SEM). J Microsc 235:124–127
Sen BH, Piskin B, Demirci T (1995) Observation of bacteria and fungi in infected root canals and
dentinal tubules by sem. Endod Dent Traumatol 11:6–9
Signoretti FG, Endo MS, Gomes BP, Montagner F, Tosello FB, Jacinto RC (2011) Persistent
extraradicular infection in root-filled asymptomatic human tooth: scanning electron micro-
scopic analysis and microbial investigation after apical microsurgery. J Endod 37:1696–1700
Siqueira JF Jr, Lopes HP (2001) Bacteria on the apical root surfaces of untreated teeth with
periradicular lesions: a scanning electron microscopy study. Int Endod J 34:216–220
Stewart PS, Costerton JW (2001) Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 358:135–138
Tronstad L, Barnett F, Cervone F (1990) Periapical bacterial plaque in teeth refractory to
endodontic treatment. Endod Dent Traumatol 6:73–77
van Leeuwenhoek A (1684) Letter to the Royal Society of London, 17 Sept 1683
Vieira AR, Siqueira JF Jr, Ricucci D, Lopes WS (2012) Dentinal tubule infection as the cause of
recurrent disease and late endodontic treatment failure: a case report. J Endod 38:250–254
Wallace PK, Arey B, Mahaffee WF (2011) Subsurface examination of a foliar biofilm using
scanning electron- and focused-ion-beam microscopy. Micron 42:579–585
Wang J, Chen W, Jiang Y, Liang J (2013) Imaging of extraradicular biofilm using combined
scanning electron microscopy and stereomicroscopy. Microsc Res Tech 76:979–983
Webster P, Wu S, Webster S, Rich KA, Mcdonald K (2004) Ultrastructural preservation of
biofilms formed by non-typeable hemophilus influenza. Biofilms 1:165–182
Bacterial Biofilms and Endodontic Disease:
Histobacteriological and Molecular
Exploration
José F. Siqueira Jr., Domenico Ricucci, and Isabela N. Roças
Abstract Recent evidence brought about by morphological studies has indicated

that apical periodontitis is a disease caused by or at least highly associated with
bacterial biofilms. Histobacteriological studies revealed that biofilm-like structures
are the main form in which bacteria infecting the root canal system are organized.
Bacterial biofilms can be found in virtually all areas of the root canal system,
including the main canal, apical and lateral ramifications, isthmuses, and recesses.
Biofilms are very frequent in the apical part of root canals of teeth with primary or
posttreatment apical periodontitis. Morphology of endodontic biofilms can vary
from case to case and a unique pattern has not been established. Bacterial biofilms
are expected to be even more prevalent in the root canals of teeth associated with
long-standing pathologic processes, including large apical radiolucencies and cysts.
The bacterial diversity associated with endodontic biofilms is broader than previ-
ously anticipated, and several culture-difficult or as-yet-uncultivated bacteria can
participate in these communities. The clinician should be aware that, when
performing root canal treatment or retreatment, he or she is dealing with a biofilm
infection, which may be very difficult to reach and eradicate and may require
special strategies for successful management.
1 Introduction
Apical periodontitis is an inflammatory disease caused primarily by bacterial

infection of the dental root canal. As long as the dental pulp is vital, it can protect
itself from bacterial infection. Infection of the root canal can only occur in a tooth
whose dental pulp became necrotic as a result of advanced caries, trauma, or
J.F. Siqueira Jr. (*) • I.N. Roças

Department of Endodontics and Molecular Microbiology Laboratory, Estácio de Sá
University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
D. Ricucci
Private Practice, Cetraro, Italy

Biofilms 9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47415-0_5
104 J.F. Siqueira Jr. et al.
periodontal disease or was removed for previous root canal therapy. Primary
endodontic infection is the one that develops in the necrotic root canal and repre-
sents the prime cause of primary apical periodontitis. Secondary or persistent
infections occur in treated teeth with posttreatment apical periodontitis. Microor-
ganisms (generally bacteria) colonizing the root canal space are usually members of
the normal oral microbiota. Once the root canal infection advances and reaches the
apical part of the root canal, bacteria elicit inflammatory changes in the tissues
surrounding the root apex, giving rise to the development of apical periodontitis.
It has been shown by morphological studies that the root canal microbiota in
untreated (primary infection) and treated (persistent/secondary infection) teeth is
usually organized in structured communities resembling typical biofilms (Nair
1987; Molven et al. 1991; Siqueira et al. 2002a; Ricucci et al. 2009; Ricucci and
Siqueira 2010a). These findings permitted to include apical periodontitis in the list
of human diseases associated with biofilm infections. Actually, estimates indicate
that about 80 % of the human infections in the developed world have been ascribed
to biofilms (Costerton 2004). In the oral cavity, apical periodontitis joins caries,
gingivitis, and marginal periodontitis as typical biofilm-associated diseases. In
certain aspects, multispecies biofilm communities can behave as a multicellular
organism, which can result in collective pathogenic effects on the host. This
community-as-pathogen concept may well be applied to the etiology of apical
periodontitis (Siqueira and Rôças 2009b). The recognition of apical periodontitis
as a biofilm-associated disease has significant clinical implications, because
biofilms are recognizably resistant to several antimicrobial agents and may require
special strategies to be eliminated (Chávez de Paz et al. 2010; Kishen 2010; Kishen
and Haapasalo 2010; Alves et al. 2013; Stojicic et al. 2013).
This chapter highlights the findings from histobacteriological and molecular
biology identification studies evaluating diverse aspects of endodontic biofilms,
including prevalence, morphology, association with clinical and histopathological
conditions, and species diversity.
2 Biofilms and the Community-As-Pathogen Concept
Biofilm can be defined as a sessile multicellular microbial community characterized

by cells that are firmly attached to a surface and enmeshed in a self-produced matrix
of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) (Donlan and Costerton 2002; Costerton
2007). In bacterial biofilms, individual cells grow and aggregate to form
microcolonies (populations) that are embedded and nonrandomly distributed in
the EPS matrix and separated by water channels (Costerton et al. 1999; Donlan
and Costerton 2002; Socransky and Haffajee 2002; Stoodley et al. 2002). In most
biofilms, the bacterial populations account for about 10–15 % and the EPS matrix
can account for over 85–90 % of the biofilm dry mass (Lawrence et al. 1991;
Flemming and Wingender 2010). Most of the matrix (about 95 %) is water
(Lawrence et al. 1991). It has been reported that dental biofilms are usually
Bacterial Biofilms and Endodontic Disease: Histobacteriological and. . . 105
multilayered and can be up to 300 (or even more) cell thick (Socransky and
Haffajee 2002).
The EPS matrix that embeds bacterial populations in biofilms is hydrated bio-
polymers (generally polysaccharides but also DNA, proteins, and lipids) (Costerton
2007). They are secreted by the biofilm cells and are of vital importance to the
community. EPS mediates adhesion to surfaces; traps and concentrates essential
nutrients for the community members; keeps biofilm cells in close proximity
favoring intercellular interactions such as quorum sensing, genetic exchanges,
and pathogenic synergism; and also provides protection against phagocytosis and
antimicrobial agents (Flemming and Wingender 2010).
Biofilm communities are characterized by a great genetic and phenotypic diver-
sity. The bacterial transcriptional profile radically changes after transition from the
planktonic to the sessile (biofilm) state. Genes expressed by cells in biofilms can
differ by 20–70 % from those expressed by the same cells occurring in a planktonic
state (Oosthuizen et al. 2002; Sauer et al. 2002; Beloin et al. 2004). This leads to a
different biofilm phenotype that is usually more resistant to antimicrobial agents,
stress, and host defenses when compared to counterparts living in planktonic state.
Of especial therapeutic interest is the gradient of metabolic activity that can be
observed throughout the biofilm structure. Bacteria present in the bottom of the
biofilm, and thereby close or directly attached to the host surface, are usually in a
low metabolic state and are more resistant to antimicrobial agents (Lewis 2007;
Rhoads et al. 2008). In contrast, those bacteria present in the most superficial areas
have increased metabolic activity and are generally more vulnerable to the effects
of antimicrobial agents (Rhoads et al. 2008). Therefore, a gradient is formed so that
bacteria in diverse metabolic states are distributed throughout the biofilm structure.
Biofilm communities have the ability to reconstitute themselves even after an event
that resulted in dramatic ecological and structural changes by destroying a large
proportion of the community (Wolcott et al. 2010; Wolcott and Dowd 2011). Such
an event may consist of treatment procedures that eliminated a large portion of the
community but did not succeed in completely eradicating it. The remaining biofilm
left behind over a host surface may reconstitute itself, reactivating its metabolism
and orchestrating the reconstruction of the community by means of quorum-sensing
systems and other mechanisms (Wolcott and Dowd 2011), provided there is still
space available for recolonization.
In summary, the most important features and strengths of the biofilm lifestyle are
metabolic and genetic heterogeneity, interspecies cooperation, protection against
exogenous threats, enhanced pathogenicity, and ability to reconstitute after drastic
events (Costerton et al. 1987, 1995; Donlan and Costerton 2002; Socransky and
Haffajee 2002; Stoodley et al. 2002; Marsh 2003, 2005; Hall-Stoodley et al. 2004;
Percival et al. 2010).
Actually, most endogenous infections have been shown to be caused by mixed
biofilm communities, which is in contrast to the “single-species etiology” concept
established since Koch’s classic studies. Therefore, it has been proposed that the
microbial community as a whole is indeed the unit of pathogenicity for these
endogenous diseases, including apical periodontitis (Jenkinson and Lamont 2005;
Kuramitsu et al. 2007; Siqueira and Rôças 2009b). The concept of the community
as pathogen is based on the principle that “teamwork is what eventually counts.” By
this, the community behavior and the outcome of the host/bacterial community
interaction will ultimately depend upon the community membership and the myriad
of associations within the community. Virulence usually differs for a given bacte-
rial species when it is living in pure culture, forming pairs with other species, or
taking part of a large bacterial “society” coexisting with several other species
(community) (Sundqvist et al. 1979; Baumgartner et al. 1992; Siqueira
et al. 1998; Socransky et al. 1998; Kuramitsu et al. 2007; Siqueira and Rôças
2009b).
This concept holds that the pathogenesis of apical periodontitis is resultant of the
concerted action of bacteria in a multispecies community. Bacterial virulence
factors involved in the pathogenesis of apical periodontitis consist of a summation
of structural cellular components, antigens, and secreted substances that accumu-
late in the biofilm (Siqueira and Rôças 2007). The concentration and virulence of
this bacterial “soup” will depend upon the population density, species composition,
and bacterial interactions in the community. Once the biofilm forms in the apical
canal, this “soup” of antigens and virulence factors becomes in constant and direct
contact with the periradicular tissues to cause damage and stimulate/modulate the
host immune responses (Siqueira 2011).
3 Biofilm and Apical Periodontitis
The first report on the occurrence of biofilm-like structures in infected root canals is
claimed to be from Nair (1987), who described those structures as “bacterial
condensation on the surface of the dentin wall, forming thin- or thick-layered
bacterial plaques.” Similar observations were subsequently reported by in situ
morphological investigations of teeth with primary or posttreatment apical perio-
dontitis (Molven et al. 1991; Siqueira et al. 2002a; Carr et al. 2009; Ricucci
et al. 2009; Schaudinn et al. 2009). In addition to the main root canal, bacterial
biofilms have also been disclosed in anatomical variations of the root canal system,
including apical ramifications, lateral canals, and isthmuses (Nair et al. 2005;
Ricucci and Siqueira 2008, 2010b). Biofilms adhered to the apical root surface
(extraradicular biofilms) have also been described in some teeth evincing
posttreatment apical periodontitis (Tronstad et al. 1990; Ferreira et al. 2004;
Ricucci et al. 2005).
3.1 Histobacteriological Analysis of Endodontic Biofilm

Communities
The observations reported above contributed to the assumption of apical peri-

odontitis as a disease caused by or at least associated with bacterial biofilms.
However, the prevalence of biofilms and their association with diverse present-
ations of apical periodontitis were only determined after a recent histobacterio-
logical and histopathological study by Ricucci and Siqueira (2010a). The study
evaluated the prevalence of biofilms in the apical root canal of untreated teeth with
primary apical periodontitis and treated teeth with posttreatment disease. Asso-
ciations with clinical and histopathological findings were also determined. The
main findings of this study were as follows:
1. Intraradicular biofilm arrangements were in general observed in the apical
segment of 77 % of the root canals of teeth with apical periodontitis (80 % in
untreated canals and 74 % in treated canals). There were cases in which the
biofilm formed even onto the inflamed soft tissue near the apical foramen
(Fig. 1).
2. Morphologically, intraradicular bacterial biofilms were usually thick and com-
posed of several layers of bacterial cells. Different morphotypes were commonly
seen per biofilm. The relative proportions between bacterial cells/populations
and the extracellular matrix were highly variable. Therefore, endodontic biofilm
morphology differed consistently from individual to individual (interindividual
variability) and even when different areas of the same canal were examined
(intraindividual variability) (Fig. 2).
3. Dentinal tubules underneath biofilms covering the walls of the main apical canal
were very often invaded by bacteria from the bottom of the biofilm structure
(Fig. 3). In addition, biofilms were also commonly seen covering the walls of
apical ramifications, lateral canals, and isthmuses (Fig. 4).
4. Bacterial biofilms were visualized in 62 % and 82 % of the root canals of teeth
with small and large apical periodontitis lesions, respectively. All root canals
associated with very large lesions (>10 mm in radiographic diameter) were
found to harbor intraradicular biofilms.
5. The prevalences of intraradicular biofilms in teeth associated with apical cysts,
abscesses, and granulomas were 95 %, 83 %, and 69.5 %, respectively. Biofilms
were significantly associated with epithelialized lesions (Fig. 5).
6. No correlation was found between biofilms and clinical symptoms or sinus tract
presence.
7. Extraradicular biofilms were very infrequent, being observed in only 6 % of the
cases (Fig. 6). Except for one case, they were always associated with intra-
radicular biofilms. All cases showing an extraradicular biofilm exhibited clinical
symptoms. Thus, it seems that extraradicular infections in the form of biofilms or
planktonic bacteria are not a common occurrence, are usually dependent on the
intraradicular infection, and are more frequent in symptomatic teeth.
Fig. 1 (a) Distobuccal root of a maxillary first molar in a 55-year-old man. Repeated abscesses
were reported. Overview of a section passing through the main foramen. No epithelium could be
observed in this section and in the rest of the serial sections, leading to the diagnosis of
non-epithelialized granuloma (Taylor’s modified Brown & Brenn, original magnification 16).
(b) Detail of the apical canal. A thick biofilm fills completely the canal lumen just short of the
foramen, while the most apical canal is occupied by granulation tissue (100). (c) High power
view of the biofilm showing high density of filamentous bacterial forms (400). (d) Magnification
of the area indicated by the arrow in (b). The biofilm structure is faced apically with a concen-
tration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (400)
Fig. 2 (continued)
Fig. 2 (a) Palatal root of a maxillary first molar in a 48-year-old woman. The tooth was
asymptomatic at the moment of extraction and no symptoms were reported previously.
(b) Section passing through the main foramen. The lesion is a “pocket cyst” (Taylor’s modified
Brown & Brenn, original magnification 16). (c) High magnification of the most coronal area
indicated by the arrow in (b). The thick biofilm is composed mainly by filamentous forms (400).
(d) Section taken at a considerable distance from that shown in (b), passing through the canal but
not encompassing the foramen (16). (e) Detail of the root canal. A biofilm is present on the
opposite root canal walls, with inflammatory tissue in between (100). (f) High power view of the
area of the left canal wall indicated by the upper arrow in (e). The biofilm is composed mainly by
coccoid forms. Bacterial density is higher in the deepest part, while superficially the extracellular
matrix is abundant (1000). (g, h) Progressive magnifications of the area of the canal wall
indicated by the middle arrow in (e). Few filamentous and coccoid forms in an abundant
extracellular matrix (400 and 1000). (i–j) Progressive magnifications of the area of the canal
wall indicated by the lower arrow in (e). The biofilm appears thinner at this level and composed by
a high density of filamentous forms and reduced extracellular matrix (400 and 1000).
Considerations. The morphology of the biofilm observed in different areas of the same canal
may vary consistently. In this case, cocci were present in some areas, while filamentous forms
dominated in others. Also the concentrations of bacterial cells may be different. In some areas,
bacteria may appear more concentrated in the deepest parts, while in others they can be more
numerous superficially, and an apparently bacteria-free extracellular matrix is attached to the
canal wall
Fig. 3 (a) Mandibular premolar with long-standing pulp necrosis and apical radiolucency in a
32-year-old woman. An abscess with severe pain and swelling was present before extraction.
(b) Transition between the middle and apical third. A biofilm is present on the root canal wall
(Taylor’s modified Brown & Brenn, original magnification 100). (c) Detail from (b) (400).
(d) High power view of the area indicated by the arrow in (b). Some tubules are colonized by
bacteria (400). (e) Area of the root canal wall where dentin tubules were cut transversally. Some
tubules are colonized by bacteria (400). (f) Apical canal wall. Severe bacterial colonization of
some dentinal tubules (400)
Fig. 4 (a) Mandibular first molar in a 39-year-old woman. The tooth had been root canal-treated
10 years before. A radiolucency is present on the mesial root apex. (b) Retreatment was performed.
It was not possible to negotiate mesial canals for their full length. After more than 4 weeks of
calcium hydroxide medication, the canals were filled. (c) 2 years later the patient presented with a
flare-up. The radiolucency had remained the same size. (d) Apicoectomy was scheduled and a
cone beam computed tomography scan was performed to ascertain the relationship of the root apex
with the mandibular nerve. (e) Crosscut sections of the removed mesial root apex, taken approxi-
mately at the level of the line in (d). An isthmus connecting the two main canals is present, with an
expansion (Taylor’s modified Brown & Brenn, original magnification 16). (f) The expansion is
clogged with a thick biofilm (100). (g) High power view from the area indicated by the left arrow
in (f). Condensations of filamentous bacterial forms and accumulation of inflammatory cells
(400). (h) High power view from the area indicated by the right arrow in (f). The lumen is
occupied by a thick bacterial biofilm at this level (400)
Fig. 5 (a) Maxillary third molar with a history of repeated abscess episodes in a 40-year-old man.
Several “soft tissue lesions” can be seen attached to the root apex after extraction. (b)
Section encompassing the middle and bigger soft tissue lesion. A cyst cavity completely lined
by epithelium and containing necrotic tissue can be observed (H&E, original magnification 16).
(c) After approximately 120 sections, a communication can be observed between the cyst lumen
and the root canal space, and the diagnosis of “pocket cyst” is made (16). (d, e) Sections stained
with the modified B&B technique confirm that the lesion is a pocket cyst (Taylor’s modified
Brown & Brenn, original magnification 16). (f, g) Consecutive magnifications of the apical canal
show the presence of a thick bacterial biofilm faced with a concentration of polymorphonuclear
leukocytes (100 and 400)
Fig. 6 (continued)
Fig. 6 (a) Symptomatic maxillary third molar in a 50-year-old man. At presentation, no sinus tract
could be seen. The bridge had been decemented for long time (years). Endodontic treatment was
recommended, but the patient opted for an alternative treatment plan including extraction of the
tooth. (b, c) After extraction, calculus was noted at the tip of the mesiobuccal root, located
concentrically around its foramen. (d) Sections passing through the mesiobuccal canal. Severe
apical resorption (Taylor’s modified Brown & Brenn, original magnification 16). (e) Magnifi-
cation of the area indicated by the arrow in (d). A dense biofilm extends uninterruptedly from the
apical root canal wall to the external root surface (100). (f) High power view of the external root
surface indicated by the arrow in (e). The biofilm is composed of two layers (400). (g) Detail of
the apical canal in (d) (50). (h) High magnification of the area of the left canal wall indicated by
the left arrow in (g). Bacterial biofilm with a higher bacterial density in the deepest area (400).
(i) High magnification of the area of the right canal wall indicated by the right arrow in (g).
The bacterial biofilm exhibits a reduced bacterial density at this level (400)
8. Bacteria were also seen in the lumen of the main canal, ramifications, and
isthmuses as flocs and planktonic cells, either intermixed with necrotic pulp
tissue or possibly suspended in a fluid phase. Bacterial flocs may exhibit many of
the same characteristics as biofilms and probably originate from growth of cell
aggregates/coaggregates in a fluid, or they may have detached from biofilms
(Hall-Stoodley et al. 2004; Hall-Stoodley and Stoodley 2009).
3.2 Criteria to Classify Apical Periodontitis

as a Biofilm-Induced Disease
In 2003, Parsek and Singh (2003) proposed 4 criteria to determine whether a given
infectious disease can be classified as a disease caused by biofilm communities.
Later, a 5th criterion was suggested by Hall-Stoodley and Stoodley (2009), and a
6th criterion was added by Ricucci and Siqueira (2010a). The six criteria are as
follows:
1. The infecting bacteria are adhered to or associated with a surface. By “associated

with,” the authors meant that bacterial aggregates/coaggregates do not need to be
firmly attached to the surface.
2. Direct examination of infected tissue shows bacteria forming clusters or micro-
colonies encased in an extracellular matrix.
3. The infection is generally confined to a particular site, and although dissemi-
nation may occur, it is a secondary event.
4. The infection is difficult or impossible to eradicate with antibiotics despite the
fact that the responsible microorganisms can be susceptible to killing in the
planktonic state.
5. Ineffective host clearance. This may be evidenced by the location of microbial
colonies in areas usually surrounded by host defense cells. Accumulation of
polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) and macrophages near bacterial aggre-
gates/coaggregates in situ considerably strengthens the point for biofilm involve-
ment with disease causation.
6. Elimination or drastic disruption of the biofilm structure and ecology leads to
remission of the disease process.
The findings from the Ricucci and Siqueira study (Ricucci and Siqueira 2010a)
showing biofilm structures in the great majority of cases of primary and post-
treatment apical periodontitis along with the observed morphological features of
these biofilms were considered to fulfill 4 of the 6 criteria:
(a) Bacterial communities were observed adhered to or at least associated with the
root canal dentin surface (criterion 1).
(b) Bacterial colonies were seen in the huge majority of the specimens encased in
an amorphous extracellular matrix (criterion 2).
(c) Endodontic biofilms were often confined to the root canal system, in only a
few cases extending to the external root surface, but dissemination through the
lesion never occurred (criterion 3).
(d) In the great majority of cases, biofilms were directly faced by inflammatory
cells (mostly PMNs) accumulated in the very apical part of the root canal
system, including the main canal, apical ramifications, and isthmuses (crite-
rion 5).
Criterion 4 was not assessed in that study, but it is well established that
intraradicular endodontic infections cannot be effectively treated by systemic
antibiotic therapy, even though most endodontic bacteria in the planktonic cell
state are susceptible to currently used antibiotics (Khemaleelakul et al. 2002;
Baumgartner and Xia 2003; Gomes et al. 2011). The lack of efficacy of systemic
antibiotics against intraradicular infections is mainly due to the fact that the
bacterial pathogens are not reached by the drug because they are located in an
avascular necrotic space. The recognition of biofilms as the main mode of bacterial
establishment in the root canal system further strengthens the explanations for the
lack of antibiotic effectiveness against endodontic infections. As for criterion 6, the
specific direct effects of treatment on endodontic biofilms have not been
demonstrated, but culture studies demonstrate that a better treatment outcome can
be achieved when the bacterial load in the root canal is reduced to levels that are
undetectable by the culture approach (Engstr€om et al. 1964; Sj€ogren et al. 1997;
Sundqvist et al. 1998; Waltimo et al. 2005). Since biofilms are the main form in
which endodontic infections are organized, then one may infer that biofilms were
eliminated or substantially disrupted when culture yields negative results. In addi-
tion, the frequent observation of biofilms in treated canals with posttreatment
disease (Ricucci and Siqueira 2008, 2010a; Ricucci et al. 2009) adds further
potential for meeting this 6th criterion.
4 Molecular Analysis of Endodontic Biofilm Communities
The traditional method using paper points to sample infected root canals in the
clinical setting does not allow specific sampling of bacteria present in biofilms.
Bacteria also present in a planktonic state in the main root canal are conceivably the
most accessible to sampling by this method. To improve detection of bacteria
present in biofilms adhered to the root canal walls, it is important to use instruments
to gently file the root canal walls circumferentially previously to sampling so as to
dislodge bacteria from biofilms and suspend them in the root canal fluid. Even so,
biofilms present in ramifications and isthmuses are highly likely to remain not
sampled. Cryogenic pulverization of root fragments from extracted teeth improves
detection of bacteria from the entire root canal system, but still it is not selective to
biofilms as cells floating in the main canal can also be included in analysis. Thus far,
no single study has selectively identified bacteria in endodontic biofilms. A possi-
bility for further research is using fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of
target species in the endodontic biofilm or using a combination of paraffin-
embedded samples and broad-range PCR for open-ended identification of bacteria
in endodontic biofilms.
Even considering the limitations of the sampling approaches currently available
to selectively detect bacteria from endodontic biofilms, one may consider that many
of the floating bacteria suspended in the main canal can be conceivably cells that
detached from the biofilms adhered to the root canal walls. However, the possibility
also exists that they are bystanders, latecomers, or individuals that did not succeed
in taking part of the community because of lack of competitivity. Anyway, all
species present in the main canal allegedly assume importance as to the patho-
genesis of apical periodontitis and whether or not they are or were members of the
biofilm may have more implications in terms of resistance to treatment.
The diversity of the endodontic microbiota has been unveiled by numerous
culture and molecular microbiology studies. As for the identification of microbial
species, molecular methods have been directly used in clinical samples to detect the
unexpected (open-ended analysis) or to target-specific taxa (closed-ended analysis).
Examples of open-ended molecular techniques used for microbial identification in
samples taken from infected canals include polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
followed by cloning and Sanger sequencing and more recently pyrosequencing;

closed-ended methods include species-specific PCR and checkerboard DNA–DNA
hybridization. Application of these methods in endodontic microbiology research
was reviewed elsewhere (Siqueira and Rôças 2009a).
Most culture and molecular studies have used the paper-point-sampling tech-
nique and only a few used cryopulverized root fragments. Collectively, nearly
500 different microbial species/phylotypes have been identified in endodontic
samples from teeth with different forms of apical periodontitis (Siqueira and
Rôças 2009c). These taxa are usually found in combinations involving many
species/phylotypes in primary infections and fewer ones in secondary/persistent
infections (Siqueira and Rôças 2005a).
Bacteria are by far the most common microorganisms found in endodontic
infections and then implicated with the etiology of apical periodontitis. At high
phylogenetic levels, endodontic bacteria fall into 18 phyla, with the most common
representative species/phylotypes belonging to the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes,
Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria, Proteobacteria, Spirochaetes, and Synergistetes
(Munson et al. 2002; Siqueira and Rôças 2005b; Saito et al. 2006; Sakamoto
et al. 2006, 2007; Rôças and Siqueira 2008; Li et al. 2010; Santos et al. 2011;
Siqueira et al. 2011, 2012; Ozok et al. 2012; Hong et al. 2013). In spite of the
relatively long list of bacterial taxa so far identified in samples from infected root
canals, 20–30 bacterial species are invariably among the most prevalent in different
studies and then considered to be major candidate endodontic pathogens (Siqueira
and Rôças 2014). These species are shown in Table 1.
Microorganisms other than bacteria have also been found in endodontic infec-
tions, but usually in low prevalence. Archaea and fungi have been only occasionally
found in intraradicular infections (Waltimo et al. 1997; Siqueira et al. 2002b;
Vianna et al. 2006; Vickerman et al. 2007), though the latter can be more prevalent
in treated teeth with posttreatment disease (Siqueira and Sen 2004).
Because of the polymicrobial nature of endodontic infections, with no single
species being regarded as the main pathogen, molecular methods for bacterial
community profiling have been conducted in an attempt to identify possible pat-
terns related to clinical conditions and other factors (Siqueira and Rôças 2009b).
Examples of these community profiling techniques include denaturing gradient gel
electrophoresis, terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and
pyrosequencing. Community profiles are essentially determined by species richness
(number of different species) and abundance (proportion of each member in the
community). Many molecular microbiology techniques used to profile communities
in different environments have been applied to the study of the microbial commu-
nities associated with human healthy and diseased sites (Siqueira et al. 2010).
Application of these techniques to the study of endodontic communities has
demonstrated that:
(a) The different types of endodontic infections are composed of multispecies
bacterial communities (Siqueira et al. 2004; Machado de Oliveira et al. 2007;
Chugal et al. 2011). This is also true for persistent/secondary infections
Table 1 Bacterial species/phylotypes commonly detected in endodontic infections

Gram
Species staining Phylum Type of infection
Bacteroidetes oral clone Gram- Bacteroidetes Primary
X083 negative
Campylobacter rectus Gram- Proteobacteria Primary
negative
Dialister invisus Gram- Firmicutes Primary; persistent/secondary
negative
Fusobacterium Gram- Fusobacteria Primary; persistent/secondary;
nucleatum negative extraradicular
Porphyromonas Gram- Bacteroidetes Primary; extraradicular
endodontalis negative
Porphyromonas Gram- Bacteroidetes Primary; extraradicular
gingivalis negative
Prevotella intermedia Gram- Bacteroidetes Primary; extraradicular
negative
Prevotella nigrescens Gram- Bacteroidetes Primary
negative
Prevotella baroniae Gram- Bacteroidetes Primary
negative
Pyramidobacter Gram- Synergistetes Primary; persistent/secondary
piscolens negative
Tannerella forsythia Gram- Bacteroidetes Primary
negative
Treponema denticola Gram- Spirochaetes Primary
negative
Treponema socranskii Gram- Spirochaetes Primary
negative
Treponema maltophilum Gram- Spirochaetes Primary
negative
Veillonella parvula Gram- Firmicutes Primary
negative
Actinomyces israelii Gram- Actinobacteria Primary; persistent/secondary;
positive extraradicular
Enterococcus faecalis Gram- Firmicutes Persistent/secondary
positive
Filifactor alocis Gram- Firmicutes Primary; persistent/secondary
positive
Olsenella uli Gram- Actinobacteria Primary; persistent/secondary
positive
Parvimonas micra Gram- Firmicutes Primary; persistent/secondary
positive
Propionibacterium acnes Gram- Actinobacteria Primary; persistent/secondary
positive
Propionibacterium Gram- Actinobacteria Primary; persistent/secondary;
propionicum positive extraradicular
(continued)
Table 1 (continued)
Gram
Species staining Phylum Type of infection
Pseudoramibacter Gram- Firmicutes Primary; persistent/secondary
alactolyticus positive
Streptococcus anginosus Gram- Firmicutes Primary; persistent/secondary
positive
Streptococcus Gram- Firmicutes Primary; persistent/secondary
constellatus positive
Streptococcus Gram- Firmicutes Primary; persistent/secondary
intermedius positive
Streptococcus mitis Gram- Firmicutes Primary; persistent/secondary
positive
associated with treated teeth (Rôças et al. 2004, 2008; Siqueira and Rôças
2004; Blome et al. 2008; Sakamoto et al. 2008; Li et al. 2010; Chugal
et al. 2011), which had been previously regarded as being composed of only
one or two species on the basis of culture studies.
(b) There is a great interindividual variability in the composition of endodontic
bacterial communities in teeth with the same clinical disease (Rôças
et al. 2004; Siqueira et al. 2004; Machado de Oliveira et al. 2007; Li
et al. 2010; Chugal et al. 2011; Santos et al. 2011; Hong et al. 2013). This
means to say that every individual has its unique endodontic microbiota in
terms of species diversity. This finding indicates that apical periodontitis has a
heterogeneous etiology.
(c) Bacterial community structures follow specific patterns according to the
clinical condition (asymptomatic apical periodontitis, acute apical abscesses,
and posttreatment apical periodontitis) (Rôças et al. 2004; Siqueira et al. 2004;
Sakamoto et al. 2006; Santos et al. 2011). Disease severity, as determined by
the intensity of signs and symptoms, or response to endodontic treatment may
be affected by the bacterial community composition. This finding indicated
that some bacterial communities are more related to certain forms of the
disease than others (Siqueira et al. 2004; Sakamoto et al. 2006; Santos
et al. 2011);
(d) Community profiles also seem to follow patterns related to the geographic
location of the individuals. Despite interindividual variability in the commu-
nity structure, individuals from the same location share more similarities
among them when compared to individuals from distant geographic locations
(Rôças et al. 2004; Siqueira et al. 2004, 2008; Machado de Oliveira
et al. 2007). This may have implications in terms of effectiveness of anti-
microbial treatments in different countries.
(e) In addition to the high interindividual variability, there is also an intra-
individual variability. Differences have been reported for the bacterial com-
munity profiles in different teeth from the same individual or even for
communities living in different regions of the same tooth (apical versus
cervical root canal) (Alves et al. 2009; Rôças et al. 2010).
Apical periodontitis is a disease frequently associated with bacterial biofilms.

Apparently, the older the disease process (as inferred by histopathological and
radiographic features), the higher the possibility of bacterial biofilms being found
in the apical root canal. The essential role of bacteria in causation of apical
periodontitis is well established, and in most teeth with apical periodontitis, bacteria
in the root canal are organized in biofilms. The concept of apical periodontitis is an
infectious disease highly associated with bacterial biofilms should be understood by
clinicians and researchers before planning the best therapeutic strategies. Thus,
treatment of apical periodontitis in the huge majority of cases involves management
of a biofilm infection present not only in the main apical root canal but also
distributed throughout the entire root canal system.
References
Alves FR, Siqueira JF Jr, Carmo FL, Santos AL, Peixoto RS, Rôças IN, Rosado AS (2009)
Bacterial community profiling of cryogenically ground samples from the apical and
coronal root segments of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 35:486–492
Alves FR, Neves MA, Silva MG, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr (2013) Antibiofilm and antibacterial
activities of farnesol and xylitol as potential endodontic irrigants. Braz Dent J 24:224–229
Baumgartner JC, Xia T (2003) Antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria associated with endodontic
abscesses. J Endod 29:44–47
Baumgartner JC, Falkler WA Jr, Beckerman T (1992) Experimentally induced infection by oral
anaerobic microorganisms in a mouse model. Oral Microbiol Immunol 7:253–256
Beloin C, Valle J, Latour-Lambert P, Faure P, Kzreminski M, Balestrino D, Haagensen JA,
Molin S, Prensier G, Arbeille B, Ghigo JM (2004) Global impact of mature biofilm lifestyle
on Escherichia coli K-12 gene expression. Mol Microbiol 51:659–674
Blome B, Braun A, Sobarzo V, Jepsen S (2008) Molecular identification and quantification of
bacteria from endodontic infections using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Oral Microbiol
Immunol 23:384–390
Carr GB, Schwartz RS, Schaudinn C, Gorur A, Costerton JW (2009) Ultrastructural examination
of failed molar retreatment with secondary apical periodontitis: an examination of endo-
dontic biofilms in an endodontic retreatment failure. J Endod 35:1303–1309
Chávez de Paz LE, Bergenholtz G, Svensater G (2010) The effects of antimicrobials on
endodontic biofilm bacteria. J Endod 36:70–77
Chugal N, Wang JK, Wang R, He X, Kang M, Li J, Zhou X, Shi W, Lux R (2011)
Molecular characterization of the microbial flora residing at the apical portion of
infected root canals of human teeth. J Endod 37:1359–1364
Costerton B (2004) Microbial ecology comes of age and joins the general ecology community.
Costerton JW (2007) The biofilm primer. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Costerton JW, Cheng KJ, Geesey GG, Ladd TI, Nickel JC, Dasgupta M, Marrie TJ (1987)
Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annu Rev Microbiol 41:435–464
Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM (1995)
Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49:711–745
Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of
persistent infections. Science 284:1318–1322
Donlan RM, Costerton JW (2002) Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant micro-
organisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:167–193
Engstr€om B, Hard AF, Segerstad L, Ramstr€ om G, Frostell G (1964) Correlation of
positive cultures with the prognosis for root canal treatment. Odontol Revy 15:257–270
Ferreira FB, Ferreira AL, Gomes BP, Souza-Filho FJ (2004) Resolution of persistent peri-
apical infection by endodontic surgery. Int Endod J 37:61–69
Gomes BP, Jacinto RC, Montagner F, Sousa EL, Ferraz CC (2011) Analysis of the antimicrobial
susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria isolated from endodontic infections in Brazil during a
period of nine years. J Endod 37:1058–1062
Hall-Stoodley L, Stoodley P (2009) Evolving concepts in biofilm infections. Cell Microbiol 11:
1034–1043
Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P (2004) Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environ-
ment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:95–108
Hong BY, Lee TK, Lim SM, Chang SW, Park J, Han SH, Zhu Q, Safavi KE, Fouad AF, Kum KY
(2013) Microbial analysis in primary and persistent endodontic infections by using pyro-
sequencing. J Endod 39:1136–1140
Jenkinson HF, Lamont RJ (2005) Oral microbial communities in sickness and in health.
Trends Microbiol 13:589–595
Khemaleelakul S, Baumgartner JC, Pruksakorn S (2002) Identification of bacteria in acute
endodontic infections and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Kishen A (2010) Advanced therapeutic options for endodontic biofilms. Endod Topics 22:99–123
Kishen A, Haapasalo M (2010) Biofilm models and methods of biofilm assessment. Endod Topics
22:58–78
Kuramitsu HK, He X, Lux R, Anderson MH, Shi W (2007) Interspecies interactions within
oral microbial communities. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 71:653–670
Lawrence JR, Korber DR, Hoyle BD, Costerton JW, Caldwell DE (1991) Optical sectioning of
microbial biofilms. J Bacteriol 173:6558–6567
Lewis K (2007) Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:48–56
Li L, Hsiao WW, Nandakumar R, Barbuto SM, Mongodin EF, Paster BJ, Fraser-Liggett CM,
Fouad AF (2010) Analyzing endodontic infections by deep coverage pyrosequencing. J Dent
Res 89:980–984
Machado de Oliveira JC, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Baumgartner JC, Xia T, Peixoto RS, Rosado AS
(2007) Bacterial community profiles of endodontic abscesses from Brazilian and USA subjects
as compared by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis. Oral Microbiol Immunol 22:
14–18
Marsh PD (2003) Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes? Microbiology 149:
279–294
Marsh PD (2005) Dental plaque: biological significance of a biofilm and community life-style.
J Clin Periodontol 32(Suppl 6):7–15
Molven O, Olsen I, Kerekes K (1991) Scanning electron microscopy of bacteria in the apical part
of root canals in permanent teeth with periapical lesions. Endod Dent Traumatol 7:226–229
Munson MA, Pitt-Ford T, Chong B, Weightman A, Wade WG (2002) Molecular and
cultural analysis of the microflora associated with endodontic infections. J Dent Res 81:
761–766
J Endod 13:29–39
Nair PN, Henry S, Cano V, Vera J (2005) Microbial status of apical root canal system of
human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after “one-visit” endodontic
treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 99:231–252
Oosthuizen MC, Steyn B, Theron J, Cosette P, Lindsay D, Von Holy A, Brozel VS (2002)
Proteomic analysis reveals differential protein expression by Bacillus cereus during
biofilm formation. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2770–2780
Ozok AR, Persoon IF, Huse SM, Keijser BJ, Wesselink PR, Crielaard W, Zaura E (2012)
Ecology of the microbiome of the infected root canal system: a comparison between apical
and coronal root segments. Int Endod J 45:530–541
Parsek MR, Singh PK (2003) Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis.
Annu Rev Microbiol 57:677–701
Percival SL, Thomas JG, Williams DW (2010) Biofilms and bacterial imbalances in
chronic wounds: anti-Koch. Int Wound J 7:169–175
Rhoads DD, Wolcott RD, Percival SL (2008) Biofilms in wounds: management strategies.
J Wound Care 17:502–508
Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr (2008) Apical actinomycosis as a continuum of intraradicular and
extraradicular infection: case report and critical review on its involvement with treatment
failure. J Endod 34:1124–1129
Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr (2010a) Biofilms and apical periodontitis: study of prevalence and
Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr (2010b) Fate of the tissue in lateral canals and apical ramifications in
response to pathologic conditions and treatment procedures. J Endod 36:1–15
Ricucci D, Martorano M, Bate AL, Pascon EA (2005) Calculus-like deposit on the apical external
root surface of teeth with post-treatment apical periodontitis: report of two cases. Int Endod J
38:262–271
Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr, Bate AL, Pitt Ford TR (2009) Histologic investigation of root canal-
treated teeth with apical periodontitis: a retrospective study from twenty-four patients. J Endod
35:493–502
Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr (2008) Root canal microbiota of teeth with chronic apical periodontitis.
J Clin Microbiol 46:3599–3606
Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr, Aboim MC, Rosado AS (2004) Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
analysis of bacterial communities associated with failed endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98:741–749
Rôças IN, Hülsmann M, Siqueira JF Jr (2008) Microorganisms in root canal-treated teeth from a
German population. J Endod 34:926–931
Rôças IN, Alves FR, Santos AL, Rosado AS, Siqueira JF Jr (2010) Apical root canal microbiota as
determined by reverse-capture checkerboard analysis of cryogenically ground root samples
from teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 36:1617–1621
Saito D, de Toledo LR, Rodrigues JLM, Tsai SM, Hofling JF, Gonçalves RB (2006) Identification
of bacteria in endodontic infections by sequence analysis of 16S rDNA clone libraries. J Med
Sakamoto M, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr, Benno Y (2006) Molecular analysis of bacteria in
asymptomatic and symptomatic endodontic infections. Oral Microbiol Immunol 21:112–122
Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Benno Y (2007) Bacterial reduction and persistence after
endodontic treatment procedures. Oral Microbiol Immunol 22:19–23
Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Benno Y (2008) Molecular analysis of the root canal
microbiota associated with endodontic treatment failures. Oral Microbiol Immunol 23:
275–281
Santos AL, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Jesus EC, Rosado AS, Tiedje JM (2011) Comparing the
bacterial diversity of acute and chronic dental root canal infections. PLoS ONE 6, e28088
Sauer K, Camper AK, Ehrlich GD, Costerton JW, Davies DG (2002) Pseudomonas aeruginosa
displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J Bacteriol 184:1140–1154
Schaudinn C, Carr G, Gorur A, Jaramillo D, Costerton JW, Webster P (2009) Imaging of
endodontic biofilms by combined microscopy (FISH/cLSM - SEM). J Microsc 235:124–127
Siqueira JF Jr (2011) Treatment of endodontic infections. Quintessence, London
Siqueira JF Jr, Fouad AF, Rôças IN (2012) Pyrosequencing as a tool for better understanding of
human microbiomes. J Oral Microbiol 4. doi:10.3402/jom.v3404i3400.10743
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2004) Polymerase chain reaction-based analysis of microorganisms
associated with failed endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod 97:85–94
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2005a) Exploiting molecular methods to explore endodontic infections:
Part 2-redefining the endodontic microbiota. J Endod 31:488–498
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2005b) Uncultivated phylotypes and newly named species associated
with primary and persistent endodontic infections. J Clin Microbiol 43:3314–3319
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2007) Bacterial pathogenesis and mediators in apical periodontitis.
Braz Dent J 18:267–280
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2009a) Molecular analysis of endodontic infections. In: Fouad AF
(ed) Endodontic microbiology. Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, Iowa, pp 68–107
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2009b) Community as the unit of pathogenicity: an emerging concept as
to the microbial pathogenesis of apical periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
Radiol Endod 107:870–878
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2009c) Diversity of endodontic microbiota revisited. J Dent Res 88:
969–981
Siqueira JF, Rôças IN (2014) Present status and future directions in endodontic microbiology.
Endod Topics 30:3–22
Siqueira JF Jr, Sen BH (2004) Fungi in endodontic infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Siqueira JF Jr, Magalhaes FA, Lima KC, de Uzeda M (1998) Pathogenicity of facultative and
obligate anaerobic bacteria in monoculture and combined with either Prevotella intermedia or
Prevotella nigrescens. Oral Microbiol Immunol 13:368–372
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Lopes HP (2002a) Patterns of microbial colonization in primary root
canal infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 93:174–178
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Moraes SR, Santos KR (2002b) Direct amplification of rRNA gene
sequences for identification of selected oral pathogens in root canal infections. Int Endod J
35:345–351
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Rosado AS (2004) Investigation of bacterial communities associated
with asymptomatic and symptomatic endodontic infections by denaturing gradient gel electro-
phoresis fingerprinting approach. Oral Microbiol Immunol 19:363–370
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Debelian G, Carmo FL, Paiva SS, Alves FR, Rosado AS (2008)
Profiling of root canal bacterial communities associated with chronic apical periodontitis
from Brazilian and Norwegian subjects. J Endod 4:1457–1461
Siqueira JF Jr, Sakamoto M, Rosado AS (2010) Microbial community profiling using
terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) and denaturing gradient gel
electrophoresis (DGGE). Methods Mol Biol 666:71–85
Siqueira JF Jr, Alves FR, Rôças IN (2011) Pyrosequencing analysis of the apical root canal
microbiota. J Endod 37:1499–1503
Sj€ogren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G (1997) Influence of infection at the time of root filling
on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J
30:297–306
Socransky SS, Haffajee AD (2002) Dental biofilms: difficult therapeutic targets. Periodontol 28:
12–55
Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Smith C, Kent RL Jr (1998) Microbial complexes in
subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol 25:134–144
Stojicic S, Shen Y, Haapasalo M (2013) Effect of the source of biofilm bacteria, level of
biofilm maturation, and type of disinfecting agent on the susceptibility of biofilm bacteria to
antibacterial agents. J Endod 39:473–477
Stoodley P, Sauer K, Davies DG, Costerton JW (2002) Biofilms as complex differentiated commu-
nities. Annu Rev Microbiol 56:187–209
Sundqvist GK, Eckerbom MI, Larsson AP, Sjogren UT (1979) Capacity of anaerobic bacteria from
necrotic dental pulps to induce purulent infections. Infect Immun 25:685–693
Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjogren U (1998) Microbiologic analysis of teeth with
failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surg Oral
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85:86–93
Tronstad L, Barnett F, Cervone F (1990) Periapical bacterial plaque in teeth refractory to
endodontic treatment. Endod Dent Traumatol 6:73–77
Vianna ME, Conrads G, Gomes BPFA, Horz HP (2006) Identification and quantification of
archaea involved in primary endodontic infections. J Clin Microbiol 44:1274–1282
Vickerman MM, Brossard KA, Funk DB, Jesionowski AM, Gill SR (2007) Phylogenetic analysis
of bacterial and archaeal species in symptomatic and asymptomatic endodontic infections.
J Med Microbiol 56:110–118
Waltimo TM, Siren EK, Torkko HL, Olsen I, Haapasalo MP (1997) Fungi in therapy-resistant
apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 30:96–101
Waltimo T, Trope M, Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D (2005) Clinical efficacy of treatment procedures in
endodontic infection control and one year follow-up of periapical healing. J Endod 31:863–866
Wolcott R, Dowd S (2011) The role of biofilms: are we hitting the right target? Plast Reconstr Surg
127(Suppl 1):28S–35S
Wolcott RD, Rumbaugh KP, James G, Schultz G, Phillips P, Yang Q, Watters C, Stewart PS,
Dowd SE (2010) Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time- dependent
therapeutic window. J Wound Care 19:320–328
Laboratory Models of Biofilms: Development
and Assessment
Anil Kishen and Markus Haapasalo
Abstract Microbial biofilms are surface-adherent consortia formed by microbes

and regulated by environmental changes. Currently, there are several reports on the
existence of bacterial biofilms in infected root canal systems. Thus it is mandatory
to simulate such biofilm modes in laboratory models for applied microbiological
experiments in endodontics. This chapter covers different considerations for devel-
oping biofilm models in endodontics. In addition, different types of in vitro root
canal biofilm models and the methods of assessment are described.
1 Introduction
Endodontic microbes dwell within the root canal as surface-adherent biofilm

(intraradicular biofilm). These microbial presence and activities that are usually
confined to the intracanal spaces may under certain conditions disseminated to
locations beyond the apical foramen (extraradicular biofilm) (Costerton et al. 1994;
Ramachandran Nair 1987; Nair 2006; Nair et al. 1990). The anatomical complex-
ities in a root canal system tend to shelter the bacteria from disinfectants and
instrumentation procedures (Nair et al. 1990). Further, the progression of bacterial
infection within the root canals can alter the nutritional and environmental status
within the root canal system, apparently rendering it more anaerobic and depleted
of nutrients. These environmental changes result in a tough ecological niche for the
surviving microorganisms within the root canal (Sundqvist and Figdor 2003). The
biofilm mode of bacterial growth, in addition to higher resistance of antimicrobials,
allow the resident bacteria to survive the unfavorable environmental and nutritional
conditions (Baumgartner et al. 2008; Grenier and Mayrand 1986). Therefore, it is
A. Kishen (*)
Department of Endodontics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
M. Haapasalo
Division of Endodontics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Biofilms 9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47415-0_6
128 A. Kishen and M. Haapasalo
crucial to consider bacterial biofilms as an indispensible in vitro model for micro-

biological investigations. These methods are used to assess different disinfectants
and disinfection strategies in endodontics. They are also utilized to study microbial
interactions within the root canals or interactions between bacteria and host
immune cells (Al-Hashimi and Levine 1989). Currently they are more commonly
employed to examine the antimicrobial efficacy of different irrigants/medicaments
and irrigation procedures in endodontics (Handley et al. 1984).
2 Factors to Be Considered in Biofilm Model Systems
The antimicrobial resistance observed in biofilm bacteria is not largely due to the
classic genetic mechanisms; instead this arises due to certain peculiarities associ-
ated with the biofilm growth. The types of resident bacterial species, nature of
bacterial adherence to substrate, physicochemical characteristics of the substrate,
thickness of the biofilm, bacterial cell density, amount of EPS, and phenotypical/
genotypical modification of the resident bacteria are all features that could contrib-
ute to antimicrobial resistance in biofilm bacteria. Typically, different antimicrobial
resistance mechanisms may act concurrently or synergistically in a biofilm. Under-
standing some of these mechanisms is key in developing biofilm model systems for
different applications in endodontics (Baumgartner et al. 2008; Handley
et al. 1985). In general, different factors associated with bacterial type, bacterial
adherence, bacteria-substrate interaction, and biofilm ultrastructure should be stan-
dardized to develop useful biofilm models for in vitro experiments (Baumgartner
et al. 2008). There is currently no universally accepted in vitro model that repro-
duces biofilm infection in endodontics.
2.1 Bacterial Type and Bacteria-Substrate Interaction
First stage in the formation of oral biofilms is the adsorption of macromolecules

from tissue fluids such as saliva onto a biomaterial (natural or synthetic) surface,
leading to the formation of a conditioning layer. The conditioning layer of adsorbed
inorganic and organic molecules will alter the physical and chemical characteristics
of the surface. The conditioning layer formed prior to the influx of microorganisms
will selectively promote the adhesion of microbial cells to the surface. They may
also serve as a source of nutrition for adherent bacteria. Bacteria can generally form
biofilms on any surface that is coated with such conditioning fluids (Miron
et al. 2001). This step is followed by the adhesion of microbial cells to the substrate.
The adhesive potential of microbes is considered to be an important ecological and
pathological determinant in biofilm-mediated infections.
The adherence of bacteria to a surface is influenced by (1) the environmental
conditions such as pH, temperature, fluid flow rate, nutrient availability, etc.; (2) the
Laboratory Models of Biofilms: Development and Assessment 129
bacterial factors such as the type of bacterial species/strain, growth phase of

bacteria (log or stationary phase), type and charge of the surface molecules, etc.;
and (3) the substrate factors such as the physical and chemical characteristics of the
substrate. It is crucial to standardize these parameters to develop clinically realistic
biofilm models that are ideal model systems for in vitro evaluations (Cowan
et al. 1987; Costerton 1999).
The initial phase of bacteria-substrate interaction is determined by the physical
and chemical properties of bacteria/substrate (e.g., surface energy and charge
density) (phase 1: bacterial adherence). This phase is responsible for bringing
microbial cells to the substrate surface. This reversible interaction is followed by
the molecular-level nonspecific interactions between the bacterial surface and
substrate. This phase is mediated by the bacterial surface structures such as fim-
briae, pili, flagella, and EPS (phase 2: initial nonspecific microbial-substrate
adherence phase). The bacterial surface structures form bridges between bacteria
and conditioning film (Miron et al. 2001). Porphyromonas gingivalis, Streptococ-
cus mitis, Streptococcus salivarius, Prevotella intermedia, Prevotella nigrescens,
Streptococcus mutans, and Actinomyces naeslundii are some of the oral bacteria
possessing surface structures (Miron et al. 2001; Cowan et al. 1987). The molecular
bridges established between bacteria and substrate are a combination of electro-
static attraction and covalent/hydrogen bonding. Initially the bond between bacteria
and substrate may not be strong. With time these bonds strengthen, making the
bacterial attachment irreversible.
In the final stage, a more specific bacterial adhesion to the substrate is
established via polysaccharide adhesin or ligand formation (phase 3: specific
microbial-substrate adherence phase). In this phase, adhesin or ligand molecules
on the bacterial cell surface will bind to the specific receptors on the substrate. The
specific bacterial adhesion is less affected by the environmental changes (Costerton
1999; Costerton and Lewandowski 1997). The phases involved in adherence of
bacteria to a substrate are dynamic in nature and require time. The reversible and
irreversible steps in the phase I of bacterial adherence occurs in a few seconds to
minutes, while the phases 2 and 3 take a few hours to days to occur. The develop-
ment and maturation of biofilm structure occurs subsequent to bacterial adherence.
Therefore, it is important to provide sufficient bacteria-substrate interaction time
and optimum environmental conditions while developing in vitro biofilms. The
final biofilm model should represent all the important characteristics of a biofilm
structure that would influence the requirement of the in vitro experiment.
2.2 Biofilm Ultrastructure
Two types of microbial interactions occur at the cellular level during the formation
of biofilm. One is the process of recognition between a suspended cell and a cell
already attached to substratum. This type of interaction is termed coadhesion. In the
second type of interaction, genetically distinct cells in suspension recognize each
other and clump together. This type of interaction is called coaggregation. This
association is highly specific and occurs between coaggregating partners only.
Interestingly, most oral bacteria recognize each other as coaggregating partners.
Fusobacterium nucleatum, a gram-negative filamentous anaerobe, can coaggregate
with all oral bacteria tested and can act as a bridging bacterium that binds together
even non-aggregating bacteria (Baumgartner et al. 2008). The association of long-
filamentous bacteria and surface-adsorbed spherical-shaped cocci produces the
characteristic corncob structure of oral biofilms (Rosan et al. 1999). The attachment
of cocci to filamentous bacteria is mediated via fimbriae of oral streptococci.
Although the genetic makeup of bacteria is the chief determinant of coaggregation,
the physicochemical characteristics of the environment also play a crucial role
(Rosan et al. 1999). Bacteria in a coaggregated suspension are significantly more
resistant to antimicrobials when compared to planktonic suspension, while bacteria
in a biofilm mode showed the highest resistance to antimicrobials (Upadya and
Kishen 2010). Hence antimicrobials selected on the basis of traditional suscepti-
bility methods such as broth-based minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) may
not be very appropriate to eliminate coaggregated or biofilm bacteria.
During biofilm development, the resident bacteria proliferate with further
accrual of EPS, leading to the expansion of biofilm structure. In this stage, the
monolayer of microbes (primary colonizers) attracts the secondary colonizers
forming the microcolonies, and the collection of microcolonies gives rise to the
final structure of biofilm. A biofilm ultrastructure consists of bacterial cell
populations attached irreversibly on a substrate and encased in a hydrated,
polyanionic matrix of EPS, proteins, polysaccharides, and nucleic acids (del Pozo
and Patel 2007; Vakulenko and Mobashery 2003). Typically, bacteria themselves
account for 5–35 % of the total biofilm volume (Costerton and Stewart 2001). A
mature biofilm will be a metabolically active community of microorganisms, where
individuals share duties and benefits (Vakulenko and Mobashery 2003). For
instance, some microorganism in the community helps in adhering to the solid
surface, while some others create bridges between different species. This signifies
the relevance of a polymicrobial biofilm over a monospecies biofilm. The physio-
logical characteristics of the resident microorganisms in a biofilm offer an addi-
tional resistance to antimicrobial agents (Costerton and Stewart 2001; Sun
et al. 2005). (Sun et al. 2005; Stoodley et al. 1994; Lim et al. 2009). The above
facts further signify the relevance of developing multispecies biofilm models over
monospecies biofilm models.
It is reported that biofilms formed in pure cultures of bacteria under laboratory
conditions and the mixed-species biofilms formed in natural ecosystems showed a
basic organization, in which the cells grow in a matrix-enclosed microcolonies
separated by a network of open-water channels (Shen et al. 2010a). The thickness of
EPS will influence the permeability of substances through the biofilm and provides
a significant degree of protection or “barrier effect” against physical and chemical
threats. Each step in the development of biofilm, starting from the adherence of
bacteria to the final formation of a matured biofilm structure, as well as protein
expression/slime production, is all modulated by a large number of variables. Some
of these variables are the type of resident bacteria, growth/environmental condi-

tions, and age of biofilm. Previous studies on endodontic biofilm models have
shown that the mature biofilms with limited nutrient supply are more resistant to
irrigants such as chlorhexidine and light-activated disinfection than early biofilms
grown under normal nutrient conditions. These studies have emphasized relevance
of the age or degree of maturation and nutritional condition as the major
confounding factors in designing in vitro biofilm models that could be applied to
test endodontic disinfectants (Kolenbrander et al. 1995; Jones 1972). Furthermore,
it is important to use relevant bacterial species (primary colonizer), and provide
ideal environmental conditions (substrate, fluid conditioning, nutritional condi-
tions, and temperature) and optimum interaction time (matured biofilm) to achieve
a standardized endodontic biofilm model for in vitro applications.
3 Bacterial Biofilm Models: In Vitro Development
Laboratory (in vitro) models are used to obtain standardized biofilms for different
experimental purposes. Conventional biofilm models range from monocultures in
static growth conditions to diverse mixed cultures in dynamic growth conditions.
The static biofilm models used different substrates (e.g., glass, polycarbonate,
silicon, hydroxyapatite, nitrocellulose, enamel, dentin) to grow biofilms, while
the dynamic biofilm models used reactors or fermenting systems to grow biofilms
on a substrate. Both aerobic and anaerobic environments can be employed for
in vitro biofilm development. Figures 1 and 2 show different in vitro biofilms
grown on different substrates. Given that the in vivo environmental conditions
are commonly dynamic, studies evaluating biofilm formation under static condi-
tions might be somewhat misleading, depending on the research question (McBain
2009). These in vitro bacterial biofilm models are routinely applied to (1) examine
the adherence of specific bacterial species to any biomaterial surface (Kishen
et al. 2008), (2) study the nature and pattern of early microbial biofilm formation
on a particular substrate (George et al. 2010), (3) study the interaction between
different biofilm bacteria and host immune cells (Mathew et al. 2010), and test the
efficacy of antimicrobial agents or antimicrobial treatment strategies (Pratten and
Ready 2010; Merritt et al. 2005).
Currently in endodontics most in vitro biofilms are utilized for testing antimi-
crobials and root canal irrigation strategies (Table 1). As a result, the activity of
disinfectants showed noticeable discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo exper-
iments. This discrepancy in antimicrobial efficacy may be attributed to the diversity
of microbes, bacterial growth phase, type of biofilm models, and methods employed
for analysis. So a number of parameters have to be considered in designing a
biofilm model for applications in endodontics (Fig. 3).
If laboratory strains are used for bacterial adherence assays, it is imperative that
they are representative of clinical isolates. In addition, assays that do not take into
account the presence of saliva may be unsuitable to study adhesion and early
Fig. 1 (a) A photograph of

a biofilm grown in vitro for
3 weeks on collagen-coated
hydroxyapatite disk. The
biofilm is coated with a
palladium-gold mixture for
SEM. (b) SEM image of a
6-month-old biofilm grown
anaerobically in BHI broth
on collagen-coated
hydroxyapatite disk.
Several bacterial
morphotypes, including
coiled spirochetes, can
be seen (Kishen and
Haapasalo 2010)
biofilm formation (George et al. 2010). Although there is little doubt that the results
from planktonic killing studies must be interpreted with caution, a comparison of
the planktonic and biofilm tests in a study indicated that planktonic killing tests may
be useful for the preliminary screening of new disinfectants before proceeding into
more complex biofilm models (Merritt et al. 2005).
4 Biofilm Devices: Flow Cells and Fermentors
Several in vitro devices are used to develop biofilms. Some of these devices irrigate
fresh culture medium, which allows the growing biofilm to experience a continuous
flow of medium supplemented with fresh nutrients. These in vitro devices are used
to grow dynamic biofilm models. The flow cell system is one of the most utilized
Fig. 2 (a) A multispecies biofilm grown anaerobically for 3 weeks on glass cover slip conditioned
with media for 24 h. The biofilm was sparse and not uniform. (b) High-magnification image of the
previous SEM picture showing mixed bacterial flora with abundant extracellular matrix (Kishen
and Haapasalo 2010)
dynamic models. It consists of a transparent chamber of fixed depth through which

the growth medium flows. The inlet tubing supplies growth medium and the outlet
tubing drains the medium to the waste reservoir. The growth medium is passed
through the cell with the aid of a peristaltic pump, which controls the flow rate of
the medium. Prefabricated flow cell systems are available commercially, or they
can be custom-made for any particular application. In conjunction with a micro-
scope, charge-coupled device (CCD) camera, or confocal laser scanning micros-
copy (CLSM), these systems can be used to study early events in biofilm formation
in real time (Pavarina et al. 2011).
Chemostats are also used to grow dynamic biofilms of bacteria on experimental
substrates. One of the most important features of chemostats is that microbial
biofilms can be grown at a constant rate and under constant culture conditions
(temperature, pH). Similar to chemostats, there is another category of reactors in
which biofilms are formed on thin filter membranes in a physiological steady state.
These systems permit the evaluation of growth rate dependence and cell cycle
specificity of antibacterial agents. Finally, there are constant-depth reactors in
which surface growth is periodically removed to maintain a constant geometry of
biofilms. In these reactors, microorganisms can be grown in a physiological steady
state with all culture parameters constant. The systems can generate a large number
of biofilms with comparable and reproducible data (Pavarina et al. 2011).
The static biofilm systems do not allow frequent refreshing of cutural medium.
They generate biofilms that have exhausted important nutritional components at the
Table 1 List of literature using in vitro biofilm models for different endodontic applications
Preparation of
Authors Type of model Purpose biofilm
Torabinejad In vitro The antimicrobial Extracted human
(2003) E. faecalis effect of MTAD: an teeth contaminated
in vitro investigation with E. faecalis for
4 weeks
Dentinal shavings
and CFU-based
method were used
for the analysis
Duggan and In vitro Biofilm formation of 96-well plates for
Sedgley E. faecalis strains oral and endodontic 24 h
(2007) recovered from root E. faecalis Crystal violet assay
canals, oral cavity, and used for assessment
non-oral sources (optical density at
570 nm)
George and In vitro Methylene blue Two-day-old
Kishen E. faecalis (gram- (MB) dissolved in biofilms in multiwell
(2007) positive), Actinobacillus different formula- plates (polystyrene)
actinomycetemcomitans tions: water, 70 % Four-day-old
(gram-negative) glycerol, and 70 % biofilms in human
polyethylene glycol, teeth
and a mixture of CFU-based method
glycerol-ethanol-
water (30:20:50) was
tested
George and In vitro This study aimed to Human teeth
Kishen E. faecalis investigate the effect (10-week-old bio-
(2008) of including an oxi- film)
dizer and oxygen CFU-based method
carrier in photosensi-
tization formulation
to disinfect a matured
endodontic biofilm
by light-activated
disinfection
McGill et al. (2008) In vitro The efficacy of A collagen-based
E. faecalis dynamic irrigation “biomolecular film”
using a commercially formed on extracted
available system human teeth
(RinsEndo®) Digital image analy-
sis of the canal sur-
faces (ipWin4)
Sainsbury Ex vivo DIAGNOdent laser Extracted teeth with
et al. (2009) fluorescence assess- endodontic pathol-
ment of endodontic ogy
infection Fluorescence emis-
sions in the near-
infrared range was
measured
(continued)
Table 1 (continued)
Preparation of
Shen et al. (2009) In vitro Evaluation of the Collagen-coated
Multispecies effect of two chlor- hydroxyapatite
hexidine preparations (CHA) and uncoated
on biofilm bacteria hydroxyapatite
in vitro: a three- (HA) disks
dimensional quantita- Confocal laser scan-
tive analysis ning microscopy
was used for the
analysis of dead ver-
sus viable cells
Williamson In vitro Antimicrobial sus- Glass substrate
et al. (2009) E. faecalis ceptibility of mono- CFU-based method
(clinical isolate) culture biofilms to
6 % NaOCl, 2 %
CHX, <6 % NaOCl
with surface modi-
fiers (Chlor-XTRA),
and 2 % CHX with
surface modifiers
(CHX-Plus)
Lim et al. (2009) In vitro biofilms The efficacy of an Two different
E. faecalis improved light- biofilms were tested:
activated disinfection (1) four-day-old
technique utilizing a (immature) and
specific photosensi- (2) four-week-old
tizer formulation, liq- (mature) human
uid optical conduit, teeth
oxygen carrier, and CFU-based method
light energy of
appropriate wave-
length was tested
Shahriari In vitro The study the effect Dentin tubes pre-
et al. (2010) E. faecalis of hydrogen peroxide pared from maxil-
on the antibacterial lary central and
effect of lateral incisors
chlorhexidine CFU-based method
was used
Kishen et al. (2010) In vitro Efflux pump inhibitor Microwell plates
E. faecalis potentiates antimi- CFU-based method
crobial photodynamic and confocal laser
inactivation of scanning
Enterococcus microscopy
faecalis biofilm
Hiraishi In vitro Antimicrobial effi- Membrane filters
et al. (2010) E. faecalis cacy of 3.8 % silver CFU-based method
diamine fluoride
(continued)
Table 1 (continued)
Preparation of
Shrestha In vitro Nanoparticulates for Microwell plates/
et al. (2010) E. faecalis antibiofilm treatment saliva
and effect of aging on CFU-based method
its antibacterial and confocal laser
activity scanning
microscopy
Liu et al. (2010) In vitro Biofilm formation Human dentin and
E. faecalis capability of Entero- polystyrene blocks
coccus faecalis cells CFU-based method
in starvation phase and SEM
and its susceptibility
to sodium
hypochlorite
Chávez de Paz In vitro (clinical iso- The effects of anti- 24-hour biofilm
et al. (2010) lates) microbials on end- within a miniflow
E. faecalis odontic biofilm cell system
L. paracasei bacteria Confocal micros-
S. anginosus copy and image
S. gordonii analysis
Su et al. (2010) In vivo This study explored Resected root-end
the effect of surgical samples
endodontic treatment
of refractory
periapical periodonti-
tis with extraradicular
biofilm
Soares et al. (2010) In vitro Effectiveness of Human teeth
E. faecalis chemomechanical (21-day-old biofilm)
preparation with SEM and
alternating use of CFU-based method
sodium hypochlorite
and EDTA in elimi-
nating intracanal
Enterococcus
faecalis biofilm
Bhuva et al. (2010) In vitro The effectiveness of Human teeth
E. faecalis passive ultrasonic SEM-based image
irrigation on analysis
intraradicular Entero-
coccus faecalis
biofilms in extracted
single-rooted human
teeth
Shen et al. (2010a) In vitro The synergistic anti- Collagen-coated
Multispecies biofilm microbial effect by hydroxyapatite
(subgingival plaque) mechanical agitation (CHA) disks
and two chlorhexi- (3 weeks old)
dine preparations Confocal laser scan-
ning microscopy
(continued)
Table 1 (continued)
Preparation of
Pappen et al. (2010) In vitro To investigate the Collagen-coated
Multispecies biofilm antibacterial effect of hydroxyapatite
(subgingival plaque) Tetraclean, MTAD, (CHA) disks
and five experimental (2 weeks old)
irrigants using both Confocal laser scan-
direct exposure test ning microscopy
with planktonic cul-
tures and mixed-
species in vitro bio-
film model
Shen et al. (2010b) In vitro The aim of this study Collagen-coated
Multispecies biofilm was to enumerate hydroxyapatite
(subgingival plaque) viable bacteria at dif- (CHA) disks
ferent growth stages Confocal laser scan-
of a multispecies oral ning microscopy and
biofilm and to com- CFU-based method
pare results obtained
with the LIVE/
DEAD BacLight Kit
with those from cul-
turing and plate
counting
Lundstrom In vitro (multispecies) Bactericidal activity Permanent bovine
et al. (2010) Streptococcus sanguinis, of stabilized chlorine incisors coated with
Actinomyces viscosus, dioxide as an end- mucin and inocu-
Fusobacterium odontic irrigant in a lated with standard-
nucleatum, Peptostrep- polymicrobial biofilm ized suspensions of
tococcus micros, and tooth model system bacteria (anaerobi-
Prevotella nigrescens cally for 14 days)
CFU-based method
Hope et al. (2010) In vitro A direct comparison Human teeth
E. faecalis between extracted CFU-based method
tooth and filter-
membrane biofilm
models of endodontic
irrigation
Upadya and Kishen In vitro To evaluate the effi- Monospecies
(2010) E. faecalis and cacy of light- biofilms in 24-well
P. aeruginosa activated disinfection polystyrene plates
(LAD) using methy- (4 days)
lene blue (MB) and a CFU-based method
non-coherent light Confocal laser scan-
source on gram- ning microscopy
positive and gram-
negative bacteria in
different growth
modes. The influence
of different
(continued)
Table 1 (continued)
Preparation of
photosensitizer
(PS) formulations in
the MB-mediated
LAD of biofilms was
also evaluated
George et al. (2010) In vitro This study examined Gutta-percha condi-
E. faecalis the biofilm-forming tioned with saliva or
capacity of serum (2, 4, and
E. faecalis on gutta- 12 weeks)
percha points under Biofilm growth for
different nutrient sta- 2 weeks
tuses and surface CFU-based method
conditioning with and SEM
saliva and serum
Badr et al. (2011) In vitro A laboratory evalua- Grown on cellulose
E. faecalis tion of the nitrate membrane
antibacterial and filters
cytotoxic effect of CFU-based method
licorice when used as
root canal
medicament
Shen et al. (2011) In vitro The aim of this study Collagen-coated
Multispecies biofilm was to examine the hydroxyapatite
(subgingival plaque) susceptibility of (CHA) disks (2 days
multispecies biofilms to months)
at different phases of Confocal laser scan-
growth to root canal ning microscopy and
irrigants (2 % chlor- CFU-based method
hexidine (CHX) or
CHX-Plus)
end of an overnight incubation. The key feature of this system is that numerous
biofilms can be handled at any given time. It does not require time-consuming
sterilization and setting up procedures, allowing it to be used as a high-throughput
system for biofilm analysis (Merritt et al. 2005). This system provides a basis for the
rapid screening of biofilm mutants (Kulasekara et al. 2005), biomass development,
and biofilm-forming capacity (Watnick and Kolter 1999), as well as extracellular
matrix composition (Friedman and Kolter 2004). However, this system is incom-
patible with CLSM, which is the preferred methodology to study the structure of
biofilms. Structural evaluation of biofilm requires an irrigated or flow-through cell
system, which allows the examination of biofilm development over a period of
time. This system can be used to analyze the temporal and spatial expressions of
selected genes and the complete life cycle of biofilm formation and dispersal.
Fig. 3 Different features influencing the structure and development of in vitro biofilm
Several findings on the unique behavioral responses by biofilm cells that cannot be
obtained using static systems are studied with the flow cell systems (Davey and
O’Toole 2000).
5 Biofilm Assays
Biofilm assays are used to characterize (1) the number and type of microorganism,
(2) the vitality (dead/living cells) of the resident microbial population, (3) the age,
(4) the thickness (monolayered or multilayered), (5) the structure (homogeneous,
irregular, dense, porous), and (6) the surface topography (peaks and valleys) of
biofilms. Currently different techniques such as (1) microbiological culture method,
(2) colorimetric techniques, (3) microscopy, (4) physical methods, (5) biochemical
methods, and (6) molecular methods are used as biofilm assays. The basic steps
required to assess the antibacterial efficacy of endodontic antimicrobials is shown
in Fig. 4.
6 Microbiological Culture Techniques
Enumerating the colony-forming units (CFU) is an easy method for the quantifica-
tion of biofilm bacteria. The CFU measurement provides information on the amount
of viable bacteria present within a biofilm. However, the CFU-based method may
detect only bacteria that are able to initiate cell division at a sufficient rate to form
colonies, and their growth requirements are supported by the culture medium used.
Several protocols recommend the removal of biofilm bacteria from the substrate by
sonication or centrifugation process and use the supernatant to determine the CFU.
The recovery of viable microbes is an important step in these experiments, and the
bacteria can be sensitive to the procedures used for their removal from substrate. An
in vitro study showed that in older, starved biofilms, bacteria are viable based on
Outline of methodologies to assess antibacterial efficacy of disinfectants
· Set the objective
· Bacterial strains: Choose appropriate bacterial strain(s): Gram positive, Gram negative
· Infection model: Planktonic suspension, coaggregated suspension, biofilm
· Inoculum: Adjust suspension of bacterial culture obtained under specific conditions
· Interaction time and temperature
· Eliminate test agent in the subcultures
· Method of assessments: Count of survivors (Colony Forming Units) (quantitative analysis);

structural analysis (Scanning Electron Microscopy) (Qualitative or quasi-quantitative);
Structural and viable/dead cell estimation (quasi quantitative, quantitative)
· Interpretation of the result
Fig. 4 The basic steps for assessing antimicrobial efficacy using in vitro biofilm model
green staining pattern as observed under CLSM, but over 99 % of these bacteria
could not be grown when removed from the biofilm and grown using a culture
method (Shen et al. 2010a). Ultrasonic vibrations and enzymes are suggested to
remove bacterial biofilms before quantification. It is imperative in these cases to use
the appropriate energy level of ultrasonic vibration and concentration of enzymes,
since few studies have highlighted their possible lethal effect on bacterial cells
(Johansen et al. 1997).
7 Colorimetric Techniques
The colorimetric assay is a semiquantitative method that applies the principles of

dye uptake by bacterial cells to determine the biofilm biomass. In this assay, after
the bacterial biofilm is stained with a dye (e.g., crystal violet), it is disrupted using a
known quantity of alcohol or a surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate), and the
intensity of the eluted dye is measured using a spectrophotometer (Fig. 5). This is
an easy assay that allows the rapid quantification of biofilm bacteria. This test on the
other hand may be difficult to interpret, since the optical density measured is an
indication of the number of bacteria and is not a true indicator of EPS in the biofilm
structure. The assay usually work well for strains, which are strong biofilm pro-
ducers, while they may not be very useful to differentiate weak biofilm producers
from biofilm-negative strains (McBain 2009).
Fig. 5 A multiwell plate showing E. faecalis biofilms quantified using a calorimetric (crystal
violet) assay (Kishen and Haapasalo 2010)
Fig. 6 Light microscopic image of a monospecies biofilm of E. faecalis grown on a polycarbonate

membrane
Fig. 7 A fluorescence
microscopy image of
bacterial colonies stained
with LIVE/DEAD
fluorescent stain
8 Microscopic Techniques
Light microscopy is the fundamental technique used for the examination of

biofilms, either directly on in vitro samples or in vivo histopathological sections.
It is a relatively inexpensive, rapid, and readily available method. Different micro-
scopic methods have been used to assess the adherence of bacteria to substrates,
structure of biofilms, and distribution/type/viability of bacteria in a biofilm struc-
ture (Figs. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9). In a microscopic method, the bacterial biofilm is
stained with a suitable dye that is fluorescent (e.g., propidium iodide) or
non-fluorescent in nature (e.g., safranin). Most high-resolution light microscopy
will enable counting of bacterial cells on a substrate surface. The biofilm slime may
be stained with Alcian Blue, a phthalocyanine dye that stains acidic mucopolysac-
charides and glycosaminoglycans in the EPS (Di Bonaventura et al. 2006). The
stained portions will appear as a blue to bluish-green color. Bacterial cells may be
visualized under fluorescence microscopes without using fluorescent probes by
using plasmid-encoded green fluorescent protein (GFP). This transformed E. coli
O157:H7 has been applied to study their attachment onto a surface (Burnett
et al. 2000; Takeuchi and Frank 2001). The viability of these cells may be
determined by staining the transformed cells with membrane-impermeable fluores-
cent dye (Takeuchi and Frank 2001).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy
(Yavari et al. 2010) have been effective workhorses in biofilm analysis for many
years. They have been employed for the morphological and structural
Fig. 8 A three-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy reconstruction of E. faecalis

biofilm (60)
characterization of biofilms. The main disadvantage with these techniques is the

need for extensive sample preparation steps such as fixation, dehydration, freeze-
drying or critical point drying, and sputtering. These steps can deeply affect the
original biofilm morphology. Environmental SEM (ESEM) is a relatively new
technique that represents a powerful alternative to conventional SEM (high vac-
uum), as it allows the imaging of biological samples in their original hydrated
conditions at relatively high resolution (McKinlay et al. 2004). Structural modifi-
cations in microbial biofilm architecture, particularly an overall loss of matrix
volume, were appreciable when comparing conventional high-vacuum SEM to
ESEM images. Sutton et al. (1994) compared different dehydration techniques
and showed that the freeze-dried samples presented significant detachment of
Fig. 9 Atomic force

microscopy images
showing the details of the
bacterial cell surface in the
nanometric range (Kishen
and Haapasalo 2010)
microbial biofilm from the substrate, while more complex dehydration procedures
such as critical point drying caused almost complete disappearance of the EPS
matrix. Although proper fixation processes were applied, the collapse of the biofilm
structure upon dehydration is mainly due to the lack of a self-sustaining scaffold in
the EPS matrix. Yet, after fixation bacterial cells maintained their shape and size in
vacuum and could be identified by SEM. In the ESEM mode, the semitransparent
appearance of EPS and the low signal-to-noise ratio at high pressures result in a
limited resolution of images. In brief, ESEM represents an effective technique for
detecting highly hydrated bacterial biofilms by preserving the substantial EPS
component. On the contrary, conventional high-vacuum SEM allowed detailed
examination of cellular components and favored the detection of the three-
dimensional hollow structures, but failed to show the actual biofilm architecture
consisting of a large volume of EPS matrix surrounding the cells. The combined use
of conventional SEM and ESEM techniques can therefore provide complementary
information on different biofilm components, bacterial cells, and extracellular
matrices (Sutton et al. 1994).
The epifluorescence microscope is used to study the microstructure of bacterial
biofilm. Biofilms grown on biomaterial surfaces are usually stained with a fluores-
cent dye and viewed under an epifluorescence microscope. In a study, binary-
species biofilms were stained using two different fluorescent probes for each
microorganism and observed under an epifluorescence microscope using two exci-
tation wavelengths. Two different images and background biofilms are captured
with appropriate wavelengths. The images are then combined to construct a new
image that simultaneously showed both microorganisms (Trachoo and Frank 2002).
Epifluorescence microscopy is used to determine the viable cells, cell arrangement,
microcolony formation, biofilm pH, and distribution of chemicals in a biofilm
structure (Wolfaardt et al. 1993).
CLSM is a particularly important biofilm analysis technique that is restricted to

50 μm to 200 μm thick biofilm structures. CLSM has overcome some of the
limitations exhibited by most of the earlier microscopic techniques such as
epifluorescence, SEM, and TEM. Together with improvements in the molecu-
lar microbiological techniques, CLSM has become an important tool for studying
biofilms. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) tagging of certain bacterial strains such
as Pseudomonas aeruginosa is utilized to study biofilm formation. This method
uses fluorescence imaging or CLSM to quantify biofilms. The preferred method of
tagging has been to construct chromosomal insertions to ensure a stable gene
dosage of the tag sequence (Harraghy et al. 2006; Sheppard and Shotton 1997).
Recently a time-lapse CLSM together with the gfp reporter system has been applied
to study the role of accessory gene regulation (agr) in biofilm formation. This
approach has given an interesting insight into gene regulation during the course of
biofilm development (Bagge et al. 2004). This technique is likely to be an important
tool for future studies on the regulators and genes, involved in biofilm development.
CLSM generates a thin (~0.3 μm) plane of focus (optical sections) in which out-
of-focus light is blocked by optical barriers or by applying the physics of light
absorption as in multiphoton microscope (Bakke et al. 2001). These optical sections
can then be stacked by software to generate a three-dimensionally reconstructed
image of the entire biofilm. The CLSM images can be used to determine the
thickness and distribution of cells in a biofilm. CLSM can also be used to determine
the pH gradients in biofilms. The interior pH of biofilms can be measured by a
fluorescence lifetime imaging technique using fluorescein as a pH indicator. The
use of fluorescent dyes, in combination (LIVE/DEAD BacLight) with CLSM, has
become a routine practice for biofilm analysis. The LIVE/DEAD Bacterial Viabil-
ity Kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) contains separate vials of the two compo-
nent dyes (SYTO 9 and propidium iodide). The dyes are used in 1:1 mixture for
staining the biofilm bacteria following manufacturer’s instructions. The dead cells
emitted red light and the viable cells emitted green light under CLSM examination
(George and Kishen 2008) (Fig. 8). In a recent in vitro study, it was shown that
bacteria in the multispecies anaerobic biofilm grown under nutrient deprivation
changed into a viable but nonculturable (VBNC) state but could be returned to the
normal physiological state and cultured by reestablishing the supply of nutrients
while it was still in the biofilm. The results from this study indicated that viability
staining better reflected the “true viability” state of biofilm bacteria than culture
method during starvation. This point has to be taken into account when employing
culture-based methods for analyzing in vivo root canal biofilms (Shen et al. 2010b).
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a recognized tool for the specific
and sensitive identification of target microbes within a complex microbial commu-
nity. The FISH technique uses probes to target-specific 16S rRNA sequences in
bacteria. It is applied for the simultaneous evaluation of the spatial distribution of
both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in biofilms. Visualization of FISH-
labeled cells in biofilms can be carried out by fluorescence microscopy and CLSM
(Sheppard and Shotton 1997; Main et al. 1984). However, CLSM is preferred in a
biofilm analysis, since it allows a three-dimensional noninvasive visualization of
cells and computational reconstruction of the mature biofilms without distortion of

their structure (Mattila-Sandholm and Wirtanen 1992).
9 Physical Methods: Thickness, Weight, Area, and Density

Measurements
Physical parameters such as biofilm thickness, area, weight (wet and dry), and
density estimates are used to quantify biofilm growth. Thickness measurement by
light microscopy is usually effective in thin biofilms; however it may not work with
thick biofilms. In this method, the biofilm is placed on the stage of a microscope,
which has calibration scales on the fine control. The objective is lowered until the
biofilm surface is in focus and the fine adjustment dial setting of the microscope
recorded. The microscope objective is then focused on the substrate surface,
preferably in an area with no biofilm (Stewart 1990). The difference in the fine
adjustment setting can be used to calculate the thickness. A simple, manual-gauge
needle method (Walker et al. 1994) and an electronic probe have also been used to
measure biofilm thickness (Marshall et al. 1971). A properly prepared SEM sample
or cryosection enables the estimation of biofilm thickness and also revealed
layering of embedded bacterial cells (Marshall 1997). Biofilm wet weight is a
useful measure of the biomass especially on tared substrates. This is a very simple
and quick procedure. The substrate is weighed before biofilm growth and then
weighed again in order to record the dry biofilm weight. In this case, assumption is
made that no substrate solubilization has occurred during biofilm growth. If both
wet and dry weight measurements on the same biofilm sample were measured, the
approximate density may be determined. For comparative purposes, physical
parameters such as film density and weight can be calculated per unit area of the
substratum (Marshall et al. 1971; Marshall 1997).
10 Biochemical Methods: Biomass and Extracellular

Matrix
The microbial biomass denotes the total number of microbes in a given area. The
measurements of (1) microbial biomass are considered to be a rapid method and
include measurements of wet or dry weight of the whole biofilm, (2) measurements
of the cell contents (3) measurements of cellular activities or viable cells. In this
line, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence is widely used to determine
the metabolic activity of bacterial population. This technique requires a cell lysis
step to release ATP, which is determined by a luciferin-luciferase reaction (de Beer
et al. 1994). However, it should be noted that the rate of lysis and the ATP content
vary depending on the microorganism. Hence, the ATP assay cannot be correlated
with the initial number of microbial cells. Genetically modified strains containing
genes for bioluminescence have also been developed (McAllister et al. 1994) and
applied for some in vitro analysis. All these methods present advantages and
disadvantages. Except for the microscopy-based techniques, most other methods
require an optimum number of viable cells with the ability to multiply to a
significant number in a brief period of time. Further research is required before
employing rapid biochemical methods more routinely for the detection of viable
bacteria in biofilm assays.
11 Molecular Biological Methods
Molecular biological techniques provide genetic information on the biofilm bacte-

ria. Microarray analysis (Millsap et al. 1997) and the use of defined regulatory
mutants (Lee et al. 1990; Bauer-Kreisel et al. 1996) have been important tools for
studying biofilms. In addition, cloning and expression of bacterial virulence factors
in less pathogenic organisms (Perez-Osorio and Franklin 2008; Kindaichi
et al. 2006) are another important tool for assessing the role of bacteria in
biofilm-mediated infections. It should be realized that when molecular-based ana-
lyses of bacterial adherence and biofilm formation are performed, the bacteria are
mostly grown under ideal laboratory conditions. These conditions might not be a
clinically realistic situation. Although such experiments can be used for a relative
comparison between experimental groups, there is a possibility of disparity between
laboratories and in vivo situations.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a very sensitive method used
to detect the presence of antigens or antibodies of interest in a sample. ELISA can
be used for quantitative evaluation when used in conjunction with standard curves.
ELISA is typically performed using one of the two detection methods: the direct or
indirect assays. In direct ELISA, an enzyme-linked (labeled) antibody is used to
directly detect the captured antigen or antibody of interest. In the more common
indirect ELISA, a primary antibody is bound to the sample antigen/antibody and
then a secondary labeled antibody (antiglobulin) is used to detect the primary
antibody. For any ELISA procedure the sample antigens/antibodies of interest are
concentrated and solubilized in an appropriate buffer. ELISA has been used as an
alternative method to quantify biomass within biofilms and even protein expression
in biofilms (Davey and O’Toole 2000; Heydorn et al. 2002). ELISA may be used to
quantify the population of a particular bacterium in a mixed biofilm. An ELISA-
based approach can circumvent errors due to cell clumping and EPS production,
which can lead to significant errors in bacterial quantification. The disadvantages of
ELISA are related to the cross-reactivity and nonspecificity of signals. This method
is poorly suited for low concentrations of antigens (Davey and O’Toole 2000).
Detection of differential gene expression may serve as a novel high-resolution
and specific assay to understand gene expressions in a biofilm community. How-
ever, current assays may only depict the average signal or response from all the
cells in a biofilm. This measurement would not provide signals from the specific
cell population in a biofilm. Further, there are several factors in an in vivo envi-
ronment, which may influence biofilm formation, and questions are raised whether
the assessment of gene expression in vitro is really an indicative of gene expression
in vivo.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a method that allows exponential amplifi-
cation of short DNA sequences. The method relies on thermal cycling and enzy-
matic replication of the DNA. Primers, which consist of short DNA fragments/
sequences complementary to the target region and a DNA polymerase are key
components to enable selective and repeated amplification. As PCR progresses, the
DNA generated is used as a template for replication, setting up a chain reaction in
which the DNA template is exponentially amplified. This method of analysis is
mostly used as a qualitative tool for detecting the presence or absence of a particular
bacterial DNA. A real-time polymerase chain reaction, also called quantitative
real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), is based on PCR and is employed to
amplify and simultaneously quantify a targeted DNA molecule. RT-PCR enables
both detection and quantification of one or more specific sequences in a DNA
sample. The key feature in RT-PCR is that the amplified DNA is detected as the
reaction progresses in real time (Wimpenny et al. 2000). This is a new approach
compared to the standard PCR, where the product of the reaction is detected at the
end. Two common methods for detection of products in real-time PCR are:
(1) nonspecific fluorescent dyes that intercalate with any double-stranded DNA
and (2) sequence-specific DNA probes consisting of oligonucleotides that are
labeled with a fluorescent reporter which permits detection only after hybridization
of the probe with its complementary DNA target. RT-PCR can be used to estimate
the number of copies of a target gene in a sample and is reported to be more
sensitive than conventional qualitative PCR. This method has been used to detect
and quantify bacterial population in a biofilm. Often, the RT-PCR is combined with
reverse transcription to quantify messenger RNA and noncoding RNA in cells or
tissues. Quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) can be used
effectively to quantify the number of RNA transcripts of specific genes from
bacteria growing in biofilms. qRT-PCR has a large dynamic range and may be
used to verify gene expression data obtained from microarrays. In addition,
qRT-PCR is sensitive and therefore may be used to quantify gene expression
from biofilm samples where only a small amount of biological material is available
(Wimpenny et al. 2000; Thurnheer et al. 2004).
12 Miscellaneous Advanced Techniques
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been applied to study the forces of interaction
between bacterial cells and between bacterial cell and substrate (Postollec
et al. 2006) (Fig. 9). In order to use AFM to determine bacteria-substrate interac-
tion, the bacterial cell or substrate particle is attached to an AFM tip and the forces
of interaction are studied. Briefly, as the AFM tip approaches the substrate and the
gap between the two interacting bodies closes to nanometer range, the interacting
forces developed are registered by the AFM tip (Razatos et al. 1998). The AFM
force curves can be used to estimate the adhesion events and interaction forces in
the interaction between the bacteria and substrate (Gaboriaud and Dufrene 2007). In
an AFM analysis, positively charged polymers, such as polyethyleneimine and
poly-L-lysine, are necessary to securely attach bacteria onto the cantilever tips.
Based on this concept, an investigation was aimed to study the effects of endodontic
irrigants on the adherence of E. faecalis to dentin (Sum et al. 2008). This study
highlighted that chemicals that altered the physicochemical properties of dentin
might influence the nature of bacterial adherence and adhesion force to dentin. The
physical attachment of bacterial cells using positively charged polymers might
promote structural rearrangements in bacterial cell surface structures (Vadillo-
Rodriguez et al. 2004), which in turn may affect the value of forces measured.
Recently micromanipulators are employed to study individual cells or biofilm
compartments. Laser-based optical tweezers are a noninvasive and noncontact
tool that can probe interaction between microscopic objects such as bacteria and
collagen with sub-pN sensitivity. The optical tweezers technique gives more quan-
titative information about the forces of interaction between bacteria and substrate
(Sum et al. 2008).
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is used to characterize the
chemical composition of biofilm structures. In an FTIR spectroscopic analysis,
infrared radiation is interacted with a test sample. During this interaction, some
of the infrared radiation is absorbed by the sample. The resulting spectrum repre-
sents the molecular-level absorption/transmission, which is a molecular fingerprint
of the sample. The FTIR spectroscopy can be used for the qualitative and quanti-
tative analyses of the chemical constituents on a biofilm structure (Kishen
et al. 2006). Similarly, biophysical techniques such as solid-state nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR) are a powerful analytical tool to study the chemical constituents
of a biofilm structure (Grivet et al. 2003). NMR spectroscopy is useful to obtain
metabolic information in planktonic cells, adherent bacterial cells, and in situ
biofilm bacteria (Majors et al. 2005).
A variety of biofilm models are used for different experimental purposes in

endodontics. Making a rational choice regarding the best model to be used for a
particular research remains to be a problem. Generally, biofilm model that closely
reproduce in vivo condition or standardized model for repeated assessments should
be selected. There is, however, no single, ideal biofilm model for all applications.
Direct, nondestructive visualization of biofilms is advantageous in monitoring
changes in biofilm bacteria and structures. In spite of all the recent advances, the
quantification of bacterial biofilm and evaluation of the efficacy of disinfectants
remain to be a major challenge in endodontics. Future efforts are warranted to

standardize the type of in vitro biofilm models and in vivo test methods for
assessing antimicrobials.
References
Al-Hashimi I, Levine MJ (1989) Characterization of in vivo salivary-derived enamel pellicle. Arch

Oral Biol 34(4):289–295
Badr AE, Omar N, Badria FA (2011) A laboratory evaluation of the antibacterial and cytotoxic
effect of Liquorice when used as root canal medicament. Int Endod J 44(1):51–58
Bagge N et al (2004) Dynamics and spatial distribution of beta-lactamase expression in Pseudo-
monas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48(4):1168–1174
Bakke R, Kommedal R, Kalvenes S (2001) Quantification of biofilm accumulation by an optical
approach. J Microbiol Methods 44(1):13–26
Bauer-Kreisel P, Eisenbeis M, Scholz-Muramatsu H (1996) Quantification of dehalospirillum
multivorans in mixed-culture biofilms with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Appl
Environ Microbiol 62(8):3050–3052
Baumgartner JC, Siqueira J Jr, Sedgley C, Kishen A (2008) Microbiology of endodontic disease.
In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC (eds) Ingle’s endodontics, BC Decker, Ontario
Bhuva B, Patel S, Wilson R, Niazi S, Beighton D, Mannocci F (2010) The effectiveness of passive
ultrasonic irrigation on intraradicular Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in extracted single-rooted
human teeth. Int Endod J 43(3):241–250
Burnett SL, Chen J, Beuchat LR (2000) Attachment of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to the surfaces
and internal structures of apples as detected by confocal scanning laser microscopy. Appl
Environ Microbiol 66(11):4679–4687
Chávez de Paz LE, Bergenholtz G, Svensäter G (2010) The effects of antimicrobials on endodontic
biofilm bacteria. J Endod 36(1):70–7
Costerton JW (1999) Introduction to biofilm. Int J Antimicrob Agents 11(3–4):217–221, discus-
sion 237–9
Costerton JWL, Lewandowski Z (1997) The biofilm lifestyle. Adv Dent Res 11:192–195
Costerton JW, Stewart PS (2001) Battling biofilms. Sci Am 285(1):74–81
Costerton JW et al (1994) Biofilms, the customized microniche. J Bacteriol 176(8):2137–2142
Cowan MM, Taylor KG, Doyle RJ (1987) Energetics of the initial phase of adhesion of Strepto-
coccus sanguis to hydroxylapatite. J Bacteriol 169(7):2995–3000
Davey ME, O’Toole GA (2000) Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics.
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64(4):847–867
de Beer D et al (1994) Effects of biofilm structures on oxygen distribution and mass transport.
Biotechnol Bioeng 43(11):1131–1138
del Pozo JL, Patel R (2007) The challenge of treating biofilm-associated bacterial infections. Clin
Pharmacol Ther 82(2):204–209
Di Bonaventura G et al (2006) Biofilm formation by the emerging fungal pathogen Trichosporon
asahii: development, architecture, and antifungal resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50
(10):3269–3276
Duggan JM, Sedgley CM (2007) Biofilm formation of oral and endodontic Enterococcus faecalis.
J Endod 33(7):815–818
Friedman L, Kolter R (2004) Genes involved in matrix formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
PA14 biofilms. Mol Microbiol 51(3):675–690
Gaboriaud F, Dufrene YF (2007) Atomic force microscopy of microbial cells: application to
nanomechanical properties, surface forces and molecular recognition forces. Colloids Surf B:
Biointerfaces 54(1):10–19
George S, Kishen A (2007) Photophysical, photochemical, and photobiological characterization of

methylene blue formulations for light-activated root canal disinfection. J Biomed Opt 12
(3):034029
George S, Kishen A (2008) Augmenting the antibiofilm efficacy of advanced noninvasive light
activated disinfection with emulsified oxidizer and oxygen carrier. J Endod 34(9):1119–1123
George S, Basrani B, Kishen A (2010) Possibilities of gutta-percha-centered infection in end-
odontically treated teeth: an in vitro study. J Endod 36(7):1241–1244
Grenier D, Mayrand D (1986) Nutritional relationships between oral bacteria. Infect Immun 53
(3):616–620
Grivet JP, Delort AM, Portais JC (2003) NMR and microbiology: from physiology to
metabolomics. Biochimie 85(9):823–840
Handley PS, Carter PL, Fielding J (1984) Streptococcus salivarius strains carry either fibrils or
fimbriae on the cell surface. J Bacteriol 157(1):64–72
Handley PS et al (1985) Surface structures (peritrichous fibrils and tufts of fibrils) found on
Streptococcus sanguis strains may be related to their ability to coaggregate with other oral
genera. Infect Immun 47(1):217–227
Harraghy N et al (2006) Advances in in vitro and in vivo models for studying the staphylococcal
factors involved in implant infections. Int J Artif Organs 29(4):368–378
Heydorn A et al (2002) Statistical analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development:
impact of mutations in genes involved in twitching motility, cell-to-cell signaling, and
stationary-phase sigma factor expression. Appl Environ Microbiol 68(4):2008–2017
Hiraishi N, Yiu CK, King NM, Tagami J, Tay FR (2010) Antimicrobial efficacy of 3.8% silver
diamine fluoride and its effect on root dentin. J Endod 36(6):1026–1029
Hope CK, Garton SG, Wang Q, Burnside G, Farrelly PJ (2010) A direct comparison between
extracted tooth and filtermembrane biofilm models of endodontic irrigation using Enterococcus
faecalis. Arch Microbiol 192(9):775–781
Johansen C, Falholt P, Gram L (1997) Enzymatic removal and disinfection of bacterial biofilms.
Appl Environ Microbiol 63(9):3724–3728
Jones SJ (1972) A special relationship between spherical and filamentous microorganisms in
mature human dental plaque. Arch Oral Biol 17(3):613–616
Kindaichi T et al (2006) Population dynamics and in situ kinetics of nitrifying bacteria in
autotrophic nitrifying biofilms as determined by real-time quantitative PCR. Biotechnol
Bioeng 94(6):1111–1121
Kishen A, George S, Kumar R (2006) Enterococcus faecalis-mediated biomineralized biofilm
formation on root canal dentine in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 77(2):406–415
Kishen A, Haapasalo M (2010) Biofilm models in endodontics. Endod Top 22(1):58–78
Kishen A et al (2008) Influence of irrigation regimens on the adherence of Enterococcus faecalis to
root canal dentin. J Endod 34(7):850–854
Kishen A, Upadya M, Tegos GP, Hamblin MR (2010) Efflux pump inhibitor potentiates antimi-
crobial photodynamic inactivation of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Photochem Photobiol 86
(6):1343–1349
Kolenbrander PE et al (1995) Intergeneric coaggregation of oral Treponema spp. with
Fusobacterium spp. and intrageneric coaggregation among Fusobacterium spp. Infect Immun
63(12):4584–4588
Kulasekara HD et al (2005) A novel two-component system controls the expression of Pseudo-
monas aeruginosa fimbrial cup genes. Mol Microbiol 55(2):368–380
Lee HA et al (1990) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Salmonella typhimurium in food:
feasibility of 1-day Salmonella detection. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(6):1541–1546
Lim Z et al (2009) Light activated disinfection: an alternative endodontic disinfection strategy.
Aust Dent J 54(2):108–114
Liu H, Wei X, Ling J, Wang W, Huang X (2010) Biofilm formation capability of Enterococcus
faecalis cells in starvation phase and its susceptibility to sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 36
(4):630–635
Lundstrom JR, Williamson AE, Villhauer AL, Dawson DV, Drake DR (2010) Bactericidal activity
of stabilized chlorine dioxide as an endodontic irrigant in a polymicrobial biofilm tooth model
system. J Endod 36(11):1874–1878
Main C et al (1984) Instrumentation for measurement of dental plaque thickness in situ. J Biomed
Eng 6(2):151–154
Majors PD et al (2005) NMR methods for in situ biofilm metabolism studies. J Microbiol Methods
62(3):337–344
Marshall KC (1997) Colonization, adhesion and biofilms. In: Hurst CJK, Knudsen GR, McInerney
MJ (eds) Manual of environmental microbiology. American Society for Microbiology Press,
Washington, DC, pp 358–365
Marshall KC, Stout R, Mitchell R (1971) Selective sorption of bacteria from seawater. Can J
Microbiol 17(11):1413–1416
Mathew S, Yaw-Chyn L, Kishen A (2010) Immunogenic potential of Enterococcus faecalis
biofilm under simulated growth conditions. J Endod 36(5):832–836
Mattila-Sandholm TW, Wirtanen G (1992) Biofilm formation in the industry: a review. Food Rev
Int 8:573–603
McAllister TA et al (1994) Microbial attachment and feed digestion in the rumen. J Anim Sci 72
(11):3004–3018
McBain AJ (2009) Chapter 4: in vitro biofilm models: an overview. Adv Appl Microbiol
69:99–132
McGill S, Gulabivala K, Mordan N, Ng YL (2008) The efficacy of dynamic irrigation using a
commercially available system (RinsEndo) determined by removal of a collagen ‘bio-molec-
ular film’ from an ex vivo model. Int Endod J 41(7):602–608
McKinlay KJ et al (2004) Comparison of environmental scanning electron microscopy with high
vacuum scanning electron microscopy as applied to the assessment of cell morphology.
J Biomed Mater Res A 69(2):359–366
Merritt JH, Kadouri DE, O’Toole GA (2005) Growing and analyzing static biofilms. Curr Protoc
Microbiol (Chapter 1: p. Unit 1B 1)
Millsap KW et al (1997) Adhesion of Lactobacillus species in urine and phosphate buffer to
silicone rubber and glass under flow. Biomaterials 18(1):87–91
Miron J, Ben-Ghedalia D, Morrison M (2001) Invited review: adhesion mechanisms of rumen
cellulolytic bacteria. J Dairy Sci 84(6):1294–1309
Nair PN (2006) On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. Int Endod J 39
(4):249–281
Nair PN et al (1990) Intraradicular bacteria and fungi in root-filled, asymptomatic human teeth
with therapy-resistant periapical lesions: a long-term light and electron microscopic follow-up
study. J Endod 16(12):580–588
Pavarina ACD, Dovigo LN, Sanitá PV, Machado AL, Giampaolo ET, Vergani CE (2011)
Dynamic models for in vitro biofilm formation. In: Bailey WC (ed) Biofilms: formation,
development and properties. Nova Science, New York
Pappen FG, Shen Y, Qian W, Leonardo MR, Giardino L, Haapasalo M (2010) In vitro antibacterial
action of Tetraclean, MTAD and five experimental irrigation solutions. Int Endod J 43(6):528–
535
Perez-Osorio AC, Franklin MJ (2008) qRT-PCR of Microbial Biofilms. CSH Protoc 2008:p. pdb
prot5066
Postollec F et al (2006) Interactive forces between co-aggregating and non-co-aggregating oral
bacterial pairs. J Dent Res 85(3):231–234
Pratten J, Ready D (2010) Use of biofilm model systems to study antimicrobial susceptibility.
Methods Mol Biol 642:203–215
Ramachandran Nair PN (1987) Light and electron microscopic studies of root canal flora and
periapical lesions. J Endod 13(1):29–39
Razatos A et al (1998) Molecular determinants of bacterial adhesion monitored by atomic force
microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95(19):11059–11064
Rosan B, Correeia FF, DiRienzo JM (1999) Corncobs: a model for oral microbial biofilms. In:
Busscher HJ , Evans LV (eds) Oral biofilms and plaque control: concepts in dental plaque
formation. Harwood Academic Publishers, India, pp 145–162
Sainsbury AL, Bird PS, Walsh LJ (2009) DIAGNOdent laser fluorescence assessment of end-
odontic infection. J Endod 35(10):1404–7
Shahriari S, Mohammadi Z, Mokhtari MM, Yousefi R (2010) Effect of hydrogen peroxide on the
antibacterial substantivity of chlorhexidine. Int J Dent 2010:946384
Shen Y, Qian W, Chung C, Olsen I, Haapasalo M (2009) Evaluation of the effect of two
chlorhexidine preparations on biofilm bacteria in vitro: a three-dimensional quantitative
analysis. J Endod 35(7):981–985
Shen Y, Stojicic S, Haapasalo M (2010a) Bacterial viability in starved and revitalized biofilms:
comparison of viability staining and direct culture. J Endod 36(11):1820–1823
Shen Y, Stojicic S, Qian W, Olsen I, Haapasalo M (2010b) The synergistic antimicrobial effect
by mechanical agitation and two chlorhexidine preparations on biofilm bacteria. J Endod
36(1):100–104
Shen Y, Stojicic S, Haapasalo M (2011) Antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine against bacteria in
biofilms at different stages of development. J Endod 37(5):657–661
Sheppard CRJS, Shotton DM (1997) Confocal laser scanning microscopy. BIOS Scientific, Oxford
Shrestha A, Shi Z, Neoh KG, Kishen A (2010) Nanoparticulates for antibiofilm treatment and
effect of aging on its antibacterial activity. J Endod 36(6):1030–1035
Soares JA, de Carvalho MA R, Cunha Santos SM, Mendonça RM, Ribeiro-Sobrinho AP, Brito-
Júnior M, Magalhães PP, Santos MH, de Macêdo Farias L (2010) Effectiveness of
chemomechanical preparation with alternating use of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in
eliminating intracanal Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. J Endod 36(5):894–898
Stewart GS (1990) In vivo bioluminescence: new potentials for microbiology. Lett Appl Microbiol
10(1):1–8
Stoodley P, Debeer D, Lewandowski Z (1994) Liquid flow in biofilm systems. Appl Environ
Microbiol 60(8):2711–2716
Su L, Gao Y, Yu C, Wang H, Yu Q (2010) Surgical endodontic treatment of refractory periapical
periodontitis with extraradicular biofilm. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
110(1):e40–4
Sum C et al (2008) Influence of endodontic chemical treatment on Enterococcus faecalis adher-
ence to collagen studied with laser scanning confocal microscopy and optical tweezers: a
preliminary study. J Biomed Opt 13(4):044017
Sun D, Accavitti MA, Bryers JD (2005) Inhibition of biofilm formation by monoclonal antibodies
against Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A accumulation-associated protein. Clin Diagn Lab
Immunol 12(1):93–100
Sundqvist G, Figdor D (2003) Life as an endodontic pathogen: ecological differences between the
untreated and root-filled root canals. Endod Topics 6(1):3–28
Sutton NA, Hughes N, Handley PS (1994) A comparison of conventional SEM techniques, low
temperature SEM and the electroscan wet scanning electron microscope to study the structure
of a biofilm of Streptococcus crista CR3. J Appl Bacteriol 76(5):448–454
Takeuchi K, Frank JF (2001) Expression of red-shifted green fluorescent protein by Escherichia
coli O157:H7 as a marker for the detection of cells on fresh produce. J Food Prot 64
(3):298–304
Thurnheer T, Gmur R, Guggenheim B (2004) Multiplex FISH analysis of a six-species bacterial
biofilm. J Microbiol Methods 56(1):37–47
Torabinejad M, Shabahang S, Aprecio RM, Kettering JD (2003) The antimicrobial effect of
MTAD: an in vitro investigation. J Endod 29(6):400–403
Trachoo N, Frank JF (2002) Effectiveness of chemical sanitizers against Campylobacter jejuni-
containing biofilms. J Food Prot 65(7):1117–1121
Upadya MH, Kishen A (2010) Influence of bacterial growth modes on the susceptibility to light-
activated disinfection. Int Endod J 43(11):978–987
Vadillo-Rodriguez V et al (2004) Comparison of atomic force microscopy interaction forces

between bacteria and silicon nitride substrata for three commonly used immobilization
methods. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(9):5441–5446
Vakulenko SB, Mobashery S (2003) Versatility of aminoglycosides and prospects for their future.
Clin Microbiol Rev 16(3):430–450
Walker AJ, Stewart GSAB, Sheppard F, Bloomfield SF, Holah JT (1994) Bioluminescence
imaging as a tool for studying biocide challenge upon plantonic and surface attached bacteria.
Bin Comp Microbiol 6:16–17
Watnick PI, Kolter R (1999) Steps in the development of a Vibrio cholerae El Tor biofilm. Mol
Microbiol 34(3):586–595
Williamson AE, Marker KL, Drake DR, Dawson DV, Walton RE (2009) Resin-based versus gutta-
percha-based root canal obturation: influence on bacterial leakage in an in vitro model system.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108(2):292–296
Wimpenny J, Manz W, Szewzyk U (2000) Heterogeneity in biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Rev 24
(5):661–671
Wolfaardt GM et al (1993) Development of steady-state diffusion gradients for the cultivation of
degradative microbial consortia. Appl Environ Microbiol 59(8):2388–2396
Yavari HR et al (2010) Effect of Er, Cr: YSGG laser irradiation on Enterococcus faecalis in
infected root canals. Photomed Laser Surg 28(Suppl 1):S91–S96
Root Canal Anatomy: Implications in Biofilm
Disinfection
Marco A. Versiani and Ronald Ordinola-Zapata
Abstract The primary goals of endodontic treatment are to disinfect and to seal the
root canal system as effectively as possible, aiming to establish or maintain healthy
periapical tissues. Treating complex and anomalous anatomy requires knowledge
of the internal anatomy of all types of the teeth before undertaking endodontic
therapy. Recently, three-dimensional imaging using micro-computed tomography
has been used to reveal the internal anatomy of the teeth to the clinician, bringing
new perspectives on the overall quality of the endodontic treatment and confirming
the inability of shaping tools in acting within the anatomical complexity of the root
canal. Furthermore, the disinfecting effects of instruments and irrigants may be
additionally hampered in the presence of accessory canals, ramifications, intercanal
connections, fins, isthmuses, and apical deltas, which can be ideal sites for micro-
bial biofilm formation and cannot be properly assessed by conventional techniques.
Apart from biofilms, these hard-to-reach areas may also be packed with dentin
debris generated and pushed therein by endodontic instruments, interfering with
disinfection by both preventing the irrigant flow into them and by neutralizing its
efficacy. This chapter provides an overview of recent information on the complex-
ity of root canal anatomy and discusses its relationship to the understanding of the
principles and problems of microbial biofilm elimination.
1 Introduction
The goal of endodontic therapy is the removal of all vital or necrotic tissue,
microorganisms, and microbial by-products from the root canal space (Siqueira
2005; Hargreaves and Cohen 2011). Among the treatment steps, chemomechanical
procedures play a pivotal role in eliminating or reducing bacterial populations from
M.A. Versiani (*)

Department of Endodontics, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo,
São Paulo, Brazil
R. Ordinola-Zapata
Dental School of Bauru, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Biofilms 9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47415-0_7
156 M.A. Versiani and R. Ordinola-Zapata
the main root canal, but the disinfecting effects of instruments and irrigants may be
somewhat hampered in cases with complex anatomy and the resistance of microbial
biofilms (Siqueira 2005; Shen et al. 2012; Siqueira et al. 2013). Thus, a thorough
understanding of the canal morphology and its variations in all groups of teeth is a
basic requirement for the success of the endodontic therapy.
The concept of a “single” root canal with a “single” apical foramen is mistaken
(Siqueira 2005; Hargreaves and Cohen 2011). The root canal space is often
complex, with canals that divide and rejoin, isthmuses, fins, anastomosis, accessory
canals, and apical deltas. For this reason, it has been referred as a system. The
complexity of the root canal system has been demonstrated by several authors since
nineteenth century. Carabelli (1842) was probably the first author to provide a
comprehensive description of the number and location of root canals. Some years
later, the first systematic study on the root canal anatomy using sectioned teeth was
published by Mühlreiter (1870). After a few decades, Black (1890) systematized the
dental terminology and detailed the internal and external anatomy of the teeth, and
in 1894, Gysi and R€ose published pictures of histological sections of human teeth,
demonstrating the complexity of the root canal. In the early twentieth century,
Preiswerk (1903) introduced the “modeling technique” and obtained metal replicas
of the internal anatomy of all groups of teeth by injection of molten metal. Fischer
(1908) and Dewey (1916) improved this method and obtained full replicas of the
canal ramifications and lateral branches by injection of collodion solution or
paraffin into the root canal system. Hess (1917) and Hess and Zurcher (1925)
used the demineralizing method to study the canal morphology of approximately
3000 teeth, after injection of natural rubber within the root canal space. At this time,
diaphanization (clearing technique) was also used for several authors to the study of
the root canal anatomy (Adloff 1913; Fasoli 1913; Moral 1915; Okumura 1927). In
this method, hard tissues of the teeth were rendered transparent through deminer-
alization after injecting fluid materials, such as molten metal (Adloff 1913), gelatin-
containing cinnabar (Fasoli 1913), and different types of ink (Moral 1915;
Okumura 1927), into the root canal system.
In the following decades, the morphology of the root canal system was described
by using several in vivo and ex vivo methods such as three-dimensional wax models
(Meyer and Scheele 1955), conventional (Mueller 1933; Barker et al. 1969; Sykaras
1971; Pineda and Kuttler 1972; Kaffe et al. 1985; Fabra-Campos 1989; Pécora
et al. 1991; Pécora et al. 1993a; Estrela et al. 1995; Sousa Neto et al. 1998; Ferraz
et al. 2001; Baratto-Filho et al. 2002) and digital radiography (Nattress and Martin
1991; Burger et al. 1999; Schäfer et al. 2002), resin injection (Barker et al. 1973,
1974a, b), macroscopic (Green 1955, 1973; Baratto-Filho et al. 2002) and micro-
scopic evaluation (Green 1956; Burch and Hulen 1972; Kerekes and Tronstad
1977a, b, c), tooth sectioning on different planes (Green 1955; Green 1958;
Weine et al. 1969; Kerekes and Tronstad 1977a, b, c; Mauger et al. 1998), clearing
techniques (Robertson et al. 1980; Vertucci 1984; Pécora et al. 1992a, b; Pécora
et al. 1993b, c; Rocha et al. 1996; Guerisoli et al. 1998; Sharma et al. 1998; Venturi
et al. 2003; Weng et al. 2009), radiographic methods with radiopaque contrast
Root Canal Anatomy: Implications in Biofilm Disinfection 157
media (Naoum et al. 2003), and scanning electron microscopy (Gilles and Reader
1990).
The aforementioned techniques have been used successfully over many years for
the study of the root canal anatomy (Bergmans et al. 2001); however, their
destructive nature produced irreversible changes in the specimens (Grover and
Shetty 2012) and many artifacts (Perrini and Castagnola 1998) which, therefore,
may not accurately reflect the canal morphology (Versiani et al. 2011a, 2012).
Furthermore, these techniques did not allow for the three-dimensional analysis of
the external and internal anatomy of the teeth at the same time (Grande et al. 2012).
These inherent limitations have encouraged the search for new methods with
improved possibilities (Bergmans et al. 2001).
Computer-assisted imaging was introduced in the field of endodontic research in
1986 by Mayo et al. . By combining different radiographic views of the tooth, a
mathematically determined three-dimensional representation of the canals was
obtained (Pao et al. 1984; Gullickson and Montgomery 1987; Dobo-Nagy
et al. 2000). Some years later, an improved computerized method for visualization
of the canal, based on the cross-sectional images of the root, was also introduced
(Berutti 1993; Blašković-Šubat et al. 1995; Lyroudia et al. 1997a, b; Hegedus
et al. 2000; Lyroudia et al. 2002). These methods allowed the development of 3D
models as well as the quantitative measurements of some morphological parameters
of the root canal; however, they were still destructive methods and the thickness of
sections and material loss were found to influence the accuracy of the results
(Hegedus et al. 2000).
In 1990, Tachibana and Matsumoto (1990) suggested the use of computed
tomographic (CT) imaging in endodontics, but they concluded that CT had only a
limited usefulness because of its low spatial resolution. Further improvements in
the digital image systems allowed the study of the root canal anatomy using
conventional medical CT (Gambill et al. 1996; Robinson et al. 2002; Cimilli
et al. 2005; Reuben et al. 2008; Garg et al. 2013; Nayak and Singh 2013), magnetic
resonance microscopy (Baumann et al. 1993; Baumann 1994; Baumann and Doll
1997; Appel and Baumann 2002; Tanasiewicz 2010; Idiyatullin et al. 2011;
Sustercic and Sersa 2012), tuned-aperture computed tomography (Nance et al. 2000;
Barton et al. 2003), optical coherence tomography (Shemesh et al. 2007), and cone-
beam CT (Matherne et al. 2008; Huang et al. 2010; Michetti et al. 2010; Wang
et al. 2010; Bauman et al. 2011; Lee et al. 2011; Neelakantan et al. 2011; Zhang
et al. 2011a, b; Zheng et al. 2011; Han et al. 2012; Hassan et al. 2012; Kim et al. 2012;
Seo et al. 2012; Shenoi and Ghule 2012; Szabo et al. 2012; Tian et al. 2012; Yu
et al. 2012). These methods hindered their use for the detailed study of the internal
anatomy mainly because of their insufficient spatial resolution and slice thickness
for detailing the small size of the root canal structures (Nielsen et al. 1995; Dowker
et al. 1997).
A few years later, high-resolution X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-
CT) was suggested to be used as an advanced tool for detailed endodontic research
(Nielsen et al. 1995). This is a nondestructive reproducible accurate technique that
could be applied quantitatively as well as qualitatively for two- and three-
dimensional assessment of the root canal system (Peters et al. 2000; Versiani
et al. 2011b; Siqueira et al. 2013; Versiani et al. 2013b; Keleş et al. 2014;
Ordinola-Zapata et al. 2014; Marceliano-Alves et al. 2014; Versiani et al. 2015).
Nowadays, despite the impossibility of employing micro-CT for in vivo human
imaging, it has been considered the most important research tool for the study
of root canal anatomy (Peters et al. 2000; Versiani et al. 2011a, 2012, 2013a).
Morphological studies on the pulp canal space using this new technology have
shown a wide variety of shapes and configurations of the root canal system (Peters
et al. 2000; Peters et al. 2001; Versiani et al. 2011a, c; Villas-Boas et al. 2011;
Versiani et al. 2012; Ordinola-Zapata et al. 2013; Versiani et al. 2013a, c; Ordinola-
Zapata et al. 2014). Thus, the purpose of this chapter is to discuss the complexity of
root canal system and understand its implications in biofilm disinfection.
2 Macroscopic Anatomy of the Root Canal System
2.1 Pulp Chamber
Didactically speaking, the root canal system may be divided into two parts: the pulp
chamber, located within the anatomic dental crown, and the root canal, found inside
the radicular portion of the tooth (Fig. 1a) (Woelfel and Scheid 2002; Hargreaves
and Cohen 2011; Nanci and Ten Cate 2013).
The pulp chamber is a single cavity that occupies the center of the crown and
resembles the shape of the crown surface (Bjørndal et al. 1999). In anterior teeth,
the pulp chamber is contiguous with the root canal, but in posterior teeth it usually
presents a square shape with six sides: the floor, the roof, and the axial walls. The
walls are located in the four axial surfaces of the pulp chamber, and they are
identified as mesial, distal, buccal, or lingual (palatal) walls. The pulp-chamber
roof is located just below the occlusion or incisal ridge and usually presents pro-
jections or prominences associated to the cusps or mamelons, occupied by pulpal
tissues, the so-called pulp horns (Woelfel and Scheid 2002). The floor of the pulp
chamber is nearly flat in young teeth, later becoming convex. The natural anatomy
of the pulp-chamber floor frequently indicates the location of the entrances of the
root canals (orifices). The orifice is an opening leading from the pulp chamber
into a root canal, especially in a tooth with multiple canals (AAE 2012) (Fig. 1b).
However, the size of the pulp chamber may be reduced and changed in shape by
apposition of secondary or tertiary dentin because of aging physiological process or
as a pathological response to pulpal irritation such as caries, restorative treatment,
occlusal loading, or abrasion (Peiris et al. 2008). As a consequence, calcifications
may hide the canal orifices by altering their original configurations, blocking the
access to the root canals (Hargreaves and Cohen 2011).
Accessory canals that connect the pulp chamber to the periodontal ligament in
the furcation region of a multi-rooted tooth (Vertucci and Williams 1974) may also
Fig. 1 (a) The root canal system is divided into the pulp chamber, located in the anatomic crown
of the tooth, and the root canals, within the root. (b) Other important anatomical endodontic
landmarks are the pulp horns (1), the pulpal roof (2), the pulpal floor (3), the canal orifice (4), the
anatomic apex (5), the furcation (6), the apical foramen (7), the accessory foramina, and furcation
canals (arrows in c and d)
occur. Furcation canals are derived from entrapment of periodontal vessels during
the fusion of the parts of the diaphragm, which will become the floor of the pulp
chamber (Cutright and Bhaskar 1969). They represent a through communication
between the pulp canal space and the periodontal tissues and may be the cause of
primary endodontic lesions in the interradicular region of multi-rooted teeth
(Seltzer et al. 1967). Vertucci and Williams (1974) observed the presence of
furcation canals in 13 % of mandibular first molars. In most of them, the canal
extended from the center of the pulpal floor, but also from the mesial and distal
aspects of the floor. Later, Vertucci and Anthony (1986) observed the presence of
foramina on both the pulp-chamber floor and the furcation surface in 36 % of
maxillary first molars, 12 % of maxillary second molars, 32 % of mandibular first
molars, and 24 % of mandibular second molars. Recently, micro-computed tomo-
graphic studies have demonstrated the presence of furcation canals in two-rooted
mandibular canines (Fig. 1c) (Versiani et al. 2011a) and three-rooted mandibular
premolars (Fig. 1d) (Ordinola-Zapata et al. 2013).
Missed anatomy is one of the main causes of endodontic failure. In this way,
special attention needs to be addressed to the anatomy of the pulp chamber in order
to locate all the root canal orifices. After evaluating 500 pulp chambers of extracted
teeth, Krasner and Rankow (2004) proposed some laws for aiding in the determi-
nation of the pulp-chamber position and the exact location and number of root
canals in any individual tooth. They demonstrated that specific and consistent pulp-
chamber floor and wall anatomy exist and proposed laws for assisting clinicians
identify canal morphology. These laws are:
• Law of centrality: The floor of the pulp chamber is always located in the center
of the tooth at the level of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ).
• Law of concentricity: The walls of the pulp chamber are always concentric to the
external surface of the tooth at the level of the CEJ, i.e., the external root surface
anatomy reflects the internal pulp-chamber anatomy.
• Law of the CEJ: The distance from the external surface of the clinical crown to
the wall of the pulp chamber is the same throughout the circumference of the
tooth at the level of the CEJ—the CEJ is the most consistent, repeatable
landmark for locating the position of the pulp chamber.
• Law of symmetry 1: Except for maxillary molars, the orifices of the canals are
equidistant from a line drawn in a mesial-distal direction, through the pulp-
chamber floor.
• Law of symmetry 2: Except for the maxillary molars, the orifices of the canals lie
on a line perpendicular to a line drawn in a mesial-distal direction across the
center of the floor of the pulp chamber.
• Law of color change: The color of the pulp-chamber floor is always darker than
the walls.
• Law of orifice location 1: The orifices of the root canals are always located at the
junction of the walls and the floor.
• Law of orifice location 2: The orifices of the root canals are located at the angles
in the floor-wall junction.
• Law of orifice location 3: The orifices of the root canals are located at the
terminus of the root developmental fusion lines.
2.2 Root Canal
The root canal is the portion of the pulp space within the root of the tooth that tapers
toward the apex, following the external outline of the root. The main root canal
usually has a funnel shape and is ovoid in its cross section, having the greatest
diameter at the orifice level. In general, canals are wider buccolingually than in the
mesiodistal plane in longitudinal section. As previously mentioned, the anatomy of
the root canal system is often complex, and the presence of a tapering canal and a
single foramen is the exception rather than the rule (Vertucci 2005). Considering
the large amount of dissimilarities in the classification of canal configuration,
avoiding the comparison of the results among the reports, different classification
systems have been proposed (Weine et al. 1969; Vertucci et al. 1974; Weine 1996;
Gulabivala et al. 2001; Ng et al. 2001; Gulabivala et al. 2002; Sert and Bayirli 2004;
Al-Qudah and Awawdeh 2006; Peiris et al. 2008; Gu et al. 2011; Kim et al. 2013;
Leoni et al. 2013). These systems are based on the number of root canals that begin
at the pulp-chamber floor, arise along the course of the canal, and open through an
apical foramen (Vertucci 2005).
2.3 Root Canal System Configurations
Together with diagnosis and treatment planning, the knowledge of common root
canal morphology and its frequent variations is a basic requirement for endodontic
success (Vertucci 2005). Its significance is also highlighted by studies demonstrat-
ing that variations in the preoperative canal geometry, such as the presence of
oval-shaped canals or isthmuses, had a greater effect on the changes that occurred
during preparation than the instrumentation techniques themselves (Peters
et al. 2001).
Weine et al. (1969) provided the first clinical classification of more than one
canal system in a single root. He studied mesiobuccal roots of extracted maxillary
first molars by the sectioning and radiographic methods and classified the canal
configuration into four categories:
• Type I: a single canal from the pulp chamber to the apex (1 configuration)
• Type II: two separate canals leaving the chamber but merging short of the apex
to form a single canal (2–1 configuration)
• Type III: two distinct canals from the pulp chamber to the apex (2 configuration)
• Type IV: a single canal leaving the chamber and dividing into two separate
canals at the apex (1–2 configuration)
Vertucci et al. (1974) studied 200 cleared maxillary second premolars which had
their pulp cavities stained with dye and found a much more complex systems,
identifying eight different configurations:
• Type I: a single canal from the pulp chamber to the apex (1 configuration)
• Type II: two separate canals leaving the chamber but merging short of the apex
to form a single canal (2–1 configuration)
• Type III: a single canal that divides into two and subsequently merges to exit as
one (1–2–1 configuration)
• Type IV: two distinct canals from the pulp chamber to the apex (2 configuration)
• Type V: a single canal leaving the chamber and dividing into two separate canals
at the apex (1–2 configuration)
• Type VI: two separate canals leaving the pulp chamber, merging in the body of
the root, and dividing again into two distinct canals short from the apex (2–1–2
configuration)
• Type VII: a single canal that divides, merges, and exits into two distinct canals
short from the apex (1–2–1–2 configuration)
• Type VIII: three distinct canals from the pulp chamber to the apex
(3 configuration)
Despite the efforts to systematize the diversity of canal configurations, authors
studying other groups of teeth in different racial groups observed additional types of
root canal morphology (Gulabivala et al. 2001; Ng et al. 2001; Gulabivala
et al. 2002; Sert and Bayirli 2004; Al-Qudah and Awawdeh 2006; Peiris
Fig. 2 Diagrammatic representation of root canal configurations, organized by the number of root
canals at the apex, found by (a) Weine et al. (1969), (b) Vertucci et al. (1974), (c) Sert and Bayirli
(2004), (d) Gulabivala et al. (2001), (e) Al-Qudah and Awawdeh (2006), (f) Gu et al. (2011), (g)
Kim et al. (2013), (h) Leoni et al. (2014), (i) Ng et al. (2001), (j) Peiris et al. (2008), and (k)
Gulabivala et al. (2002)
et al. 2008; Gu et al. 2011; Kim et al. 2013; Leoni et al. 2013). Figure 2 summarizes
the varieties of root canal configurations found by different authors, organized by
the number of root canals at the apex.
With the improvements of the imaging methods to evaluate the root canal
anatomy, such as the micro-CT technology and the magnification approach in
clinical practice, an increase in the reporting of complex anatomy is expected. To
the clinician, it is important to be aware of the variability in the root canal
configuration, because it calls the attention to their existence so that the anatomy
may be properly recognized and treated (Vertucci 2005).
2.4 Root Canal Anomalies
Although statistics regarding the global prevalence of the anatomical configurations

described in Fig. 2 are not available, it probably embraces 99 % of all variations.
However, anomalous root and root canal morphology that do not correspond to any
of those reported configurations can be found mostly associated with posterior teeth
with varying frequency. Dental anomalies are formative defects due to genetic
disturbances during the morphogenesis of the teeth. Anomalies may occur during
the developmental stages of the tooth, which are manifested clinically in the later
life once the tooth is fully formed (Woelfel and Scheid 2002; Hargreaves and
Cohen 2011; Nanci and Ten Cate 2013). Failure to diagnose the teeth with
Fig. 3 Frontal and lateral views of molar (a) and premolar (b) taurodont teeth presenting a large
pulp chamber with apical displacement of the pulpal floor and furcation of the roots; (c) frontal and
lateral views of the roots of a mandibular first molar presenting a curved radix entomolaris
(arrows)
anomalous anatomy may lead to misdiagnosis and a treatment plan that could cause
permanent damage and tooth loss (Vertucci 2005). In this way, the clinician must be
aware of the existence of some anatomical anomalies in order to implement an
appropriate treatment plan. The most common anomalies with impact on endodon-
tic practice include taurodontism, dens invaginatus, radix entomolaris, radix
paramolaris, and C-shaped canals.
2.4.1 Taurodontism
Taurodontism is a dental morphologic variation in which the body of the tooth is

enlarged and the roots are reduced in size. A taurodont tooth presents a large pulp
chamber with apical displacement of the pulpal floor and furcation of the roots
(Fig. 3a, b) (AAE 2012). The etiology of taurodontism is unclear. It is thought to be
caused by the failure of Hertwig’s epithelial sheath diaphragm to invaginate at the
proper horizontal level, resulting in a tooth with normal dentin, short roots, elon-
gated body, and enlarged pulp (Woelfel and Scheid 2002; Regezi et al. 2008; Nanci
and Ten Cate 2013). The teeth involved are almost invariably molars or premolars.
The condition can be uni- or bilateral and may affect single or multiple teeth (Sert
and Bayrl 2004). Taurodontism has been graded according to its severity: least
pronounced (hypotaurodontism), moderate (mesotaurodontism), and most severe
(hypertaurodontism) (Shaw 1928). Clinically, the crowns of these teeth have
normal characteristics; therefore, the diagnosis is radiological (Sert and Bayrl
2004). Owing to the complexity of the root canal anatomy and the proximity of
the orifices to the root apex, the root canal filling procedures may be challenging.
Because the pulp of a taurodont is usually voluminous, control of bleeding in case
of pulpitis may take some time and effort compared to teeth with normal anatomy.
Additional efforts such as application of ultrasonic combined with sodium hypo-
chlorite as irrigant solution should be made to dissolve as much organic material as
possible (Tsesis et al. 2003; Sert and Bayrl 2004; Metgud et al. 2009).
2.4.2 Dens Invaginatus/Dens Evaginatus
Dens invaginatus is a developmental defect resulting from invagination in the

surface of the tooth crown before calcification has occurred. Clinically, it may
appear as an accentuation of the lingual pit in the anterior teeth and, in its more
severe form, gives a radiographic appearance of a tooth within a tooth, hence the
term dens in dente (AAE 2012). Its etiology malformation is controversial and
remains unclear. The affected teeth radiographically show an infolding of enamel
and dentin which may extend deep into the pulp cavity and into the root and
sometimes even reach the root apex (Hülsmann 1997). The most common associ-
ated clinical finding is an early pulpal involvement, explained by the existence of a
canal extending from the invagination into the pulp (Ridell et al. 2001). The
invagination also allows entry of irritants into an area which is separated from
pulpal tissue by only a thin layer of enamel and dentin and presents a predisposition
for the development of dental caries (Hülsmann 1997). Therefore, this condition
must be recognized early and the tooth prophylactically restored (Metgud
et al. 2009). The variability of its root canal system configuration is unlimited.
Clinically, however, it can only be speculated upon from radiographs (Rotstein
et al. 1987). In this way, the most commonly referred classification was proposed by
Oehlers (1957a) who categorized this anatomic variation into three types:
• Type 1: The invagination is confined to the crown and does not extend beyond
the amelocemental junction.
• Type 2: The invagination extends past the cementoenamel junction and does not
involve the periradicular tissues, but may communicate with the dental pulp.
• Type 3: The invagination extends beyond the cementoenamel junction and may
present a second apical foramen, with no immediate communication with
the pulp.
In the literature, the reported prevalence of this anomaly varies from 0.25
(Poyton and Morgan 1966) to 10 % (Ruprecht et al. 1987), and the most affected
teeth are maxillary lateral incisors, despite it may occur in any tooth
(Oehlers 1957b; Hülsmann 1997). This high range frequency of dens invaginatus
has been associated with the study design, sample size and composition, and
diagnostic criteria (Hülsmann 1997; Ridell et al. 2001).
Dens evaginatus is an anomalous outgrowth of tooth structure resulting from the
folding of the inner enamel epithelium into the stellate reticulum with the projection
of structure exhibiting enamel, dentin, and pulp tissue (AAE 2012). It arises most
frequently from the occlusal surface of involved posterior teeth, mainly premolars,
and primarily from the lingual surface of associated anterior teeth (Oehlers
et al. 1967; Levitan and Himel 2006). Its etiology remains unclear; however, it
predominantly occurs in people of Asian descent with varying estimates reported
from 0.5 (Kocsis et al. 2002) to 15 % (Merrill 1964), depending upon the population
group studied. The presence of pulp within the cusp-like tubercle has great clinical
significance. Because the tubercle may extend above the occlusal surface,
malocclusion with the opposing tooth may cause abnormal wear or fracture of the
tubercle, and this is how pulp exposure occurs (Levitan and Himel 2006). Subse-
quent pulpal inflammation or infection will most likely ensue. It is important for the
clinician to be able to recognize and treat the entity soon after the affected teeth
have erupted into the oral cavity in order to avoid the development of pathological
conditions (Levitan and Himel 2006).
2.4.3 Radix Entomolaris/Radix Paramolaris
Radix entomolaris has been defined as a supernumerary root on a mandibular molar

located distolingually, while radix paramolaris is an extra root located
mesiobuccally (AAE 2012). The presence of these anatomical anomalies has
been associated with certain populations with Mongoloid traits, such as Chinese,
Eskimo, and American Indians (De Moor et al. 2004; Calberson et al. 2007). Radix
paramolaris is a very rare structure, and its prevalence was found to be 0, 0.5, and
2 % for the mandibular first, second, and third molars, respectively (Carlsen and
Alexandersen 1991), while radix entomolaris occurs with a higher frequency,
ranging from 0.2 % (Tratman 1938) to 32 % (Turner 1971) of the studied sample.
In radix molars, each root usually contains a single root canal. The orifice of the
radix entomolaris is located disto- to mesiolingually from the main canal or canals
of the distal root; the orifice of the radix paramolaris is located mesio- to
distobuccally from the main mesial canals (Calberson et al. 2007). A dark line or
groove from the main root canal on the pulp-chamber floor leads to these orifices
(De Moor et al. 2004); however, they provide a limited practical aid for its
identification in clinical practice (Wang et al. 2011). These anatomic variations
present definite challenges to therapy because of their orifice inclination and root
canal curvature (Fig. 3c). In this way, preoperative periapical radiographs at
different horizontal angles or a CBCT exam are required to identify this additional
root, which will also result in a modified opening cavity. An accurate diagnosis of
these anatomic variations is important to avoid missed canals.
2.4.4 C-Shaped Canals
The C-shaped configuration was firstly reported in the endodontic literature by

Cooke and Cox (1979) ; however, this canal configuration is well known since the
early twentieth century (Keith and Knowles 1911). This anatomic variation is so
named for the root and root canal cross-sectional shape of the capital letter “C”
(Jafarzadeh and Wu 2007). Its main feature is the presence of one or more
isthmuses connecting individual canals, which can change the cross-sectional and
three-dimensional canal shape along the root (Melton et al. 1991; Jafarzadeh and
Wu 2007; Fan et al. 2008). Typically, this configuration is found in teeth with
fusion of the roots either on its buccal or lingual aspect and results from the failure
Fig. 4 Three-dimensional and cross-sectional micro-CT models of a C-shaped mandibular second

molar (a), a C-shaped maxillary first molar with palatal and distobuccal radicular fusion (b), and a
C-shaped mandibular first premolar (c)
of Hertwig’s epithelial sheath to develop or fuse in the furcation area during the
developing stage of the teeth (Woelfel and Scheid 2002; Nanci and Ten Cate 2013).
Failure on the buccal side will result in a lingual groove, and the opposite cases
would be possible (Nanci and Ten Cate 2013). In such teeth, the floor of the pulp
chamber is frequently situated deeply and may assume an unusual anatomic
appearance (Fan et al. 2008). Below the orifice level, the root structure of a
C-shaped tooth can harbor a wide range of anatomic variations (Jafarzadeh and
Wu 2007), which make it a challenge with respect to disinfection (Fig. 4a)
(Solomonov et al. 2012). This variation may occur in different types of teeth
(Boveda et al. 1999; Yilmaz et al. 2006; Cleghorn et al. 2008; Fan et al. 2008;
Fan et al. 2012; Gu et al. 2013b); however, it is most commonly found in mandib-
ular second molars (Fig. 4b) (Yang et al. 1988b; Manning 1990; Min et al. 2006;
Rahimi et al. 2008; Zheng et al. 2011) with a reported prevalence ranging from 2.7
(Weine et al. 1988) to 44.5 % (Jin et al. 2006). There is significant ethnic variation
in the frequency of C-shaped molars, being much more common in Asians than in
Caucasians (Vertucci 2005). In Asian population, the reported prevalence was
10.6 % in Saudi Arabians (Al-Fouzan 2002), 19.14 % in Lebanese (Haddad

et al. 1999), 31.5 % in Chinese (Yang et al. 1988b), and 44.5 % in Koreans (Jin
et al. 2006). To date, only a few studies have addressed the efficacy of different
systems in the preparation of C-shaped mandibular molar canals and showed a
significant percentage of canal area unaffected by the instrumentation procedure
(Cheung and Cheung 2008; Solomonov et al. 2012).
In 1991, Melton et al. proposed the first classification system for C-shaped canal
configurations in mandibular second molars based on its cross-sectional shape:
• Category I: a continuous C-shaped canal running from the pulp chamber to the
apex
• Category II: a semicolon-shaped orifice in which dentin separates a main
C-shaped canal from one mesial distinct canal
• Category III: two or more discrete and separate canals which could join in the
apical (subdivision I), middle (subdivision II), or coronal (subdivision III) thirds
It is important to point out that C-shaped mandibular molar teeth can present
irregularities in their canal systems throughout the root, and the presence of these
categories may vary from the pulp chamber to the apex (Jin et al. 2006). In this way,
Fan et al. (2004) modified Melton’s method and recommended to classify each
portion of the same tooth using five categories:
• Category I: The shape was an uninterrupted “C” with no separation or division.
• Category II: The canal shape resembled a semicolon resulting from a discontin-
uation of the “C” outline.
• Category III: Two or three separate canals.
• Category IV: Only one round or oval canal in the cross section (normally found
near the apex).
• Category V: No canal lumen (usually seen near the apex only).
Melton’s classification (Melton et al. 1991) stated that categories II and III have
separated canals, but no description was provided to differentiate them. In this
modified classification, one of the canals in the category II would appear as an arc
and would be more likely to extend into the “fused” area of the root where the
dentin wall may be quite thin (Fan et al. 2004).
Based on radiographic features revealed by intraradicular contrast medium,
three types of C-shaped canal systems of mandibular second molars were also
described by Gao et al. (2006):
• Type I (merging type): Canals merge into one major canal before exiting at the
apical foramen; partial dentin fusion area may appear in the coronal and
(or) middle third of the root.
• Type II (symmetrical type): Separated mesial and distal canals are located at the
mesial and distal parts of the root, respectively. From the buccolingual view,
symmetry of the mesial and distal canals is present along the longitudinal axis of
the root.
• Type III (asymmetrical type): Separate mesial and distal canals are evident.
From a buccolingual view, the distal canal may have a large isthmus across the
furcation area, which commonly makes the mesial and distal canals
asymmetrical.
Based on the shape of the pulp-chamber floor and the location of the dentin
fusion, Min et al. (2006), using micro-CT technology, classified the pulp floor and
orifice into four types:
• Type I: A peninsula-like floor with a continuous C-shaped orifice.
• Type II: A buccal, strip-like dentin connection exists between the peninsula-like
floor and the buccal wall of the pulp chamber that separates the C-shaped groove
into mesial and distal orifices. Sometimes the mesial orifice was separated into a
mesiobuccal and a mesiolingual orifice by another strip-like dentin between the
peninsula-like floor and the mesial wall of the pulp chamber.
• Type III: Only one mesial, strip-like dentin connection exists between the
peninsula-like floor and the mesial wall, which separates the C-shaped groove
into a small mesiolingual orifice and a large mesiobuccal-distal orifice. The
mesiobuccal-distal orifice was formed by the merging of the mesiobuccal orifice
and the distal orifice.
• Type IV: Non-C-shaped floors. One distal canal orifice and one oval or two
round mesial canal orifices are present.
The presence of C-shaped canal anatomy has also been reported in third molars
(Sidow et al. 2000), lateral incisors (Boveda et al. 1999; Gu 2011), mandibular first
premolars (Cleghorn et al. 2008; Fan et al. 2008; Gu et al. 2013a, b; Ordinola-
Zapata et al. 2013), mandibular first molars (Rice and Gilbert 1987), and maxillary
first (Newton and McDonald 1984; De Moor 2002; Martins et al. 2013) and second
(Yang et al. 1988a) molars. In maxillary molars, C-shaped canal configuration is a
rare condition resulted from the fusion of the roots, and its prevalence appears to be
below 1 % (De Moor 2002; Cleghorn et al. 2006; Martins et al. 2013). When the
radicular fusion does not involve the mesiobuccal root, an additional canal in this
root, the so-called MB2, can also be present (Fig. 4b). A recent review has identified
three types of C-shaped configuration in maxillary molars, based on the fusion of
the roots (Martins et al. 2013):
• Type A: fusion between palatal and distobuccal canals
• Type B: fusion between mesiobuccal and distobuccal canals
• Type C: fusion between two palatal canals
Mandibular first premolars present a variety of root canal configurations that
include the presence of a C-shaped configuration system (Fig. 4c) (Vertucci 1984;
Ordinola-Zapata et al. 2013). As in mandibular molars, C-shaped canal systems in
mandibular first premolar vary among different ethnic groups with its prevalence
being reported to range from 1 % (Yu et al. 2012) to 18 % (Lu et al. 2006) in
different ethnic populations. This configuration has been highly associated with the
presence of groove or concavity on the external root surface and Vertucci’s type V
configuration (Fan et al. 2012), i.e., a single canal that bifurcates at the middle third
(Fan et al. 2008; Ordinola-Zapata et al. 2013). Radicular grooves in mandibular first
premolars usually began 3 mm from the CEJ on the proximal lingual area of the
middle root, not always extending to the root apex (Lu et al. 2006; Fan et al. 2008).
Preoperative diagnosis of C-shaped canals is complex, mainly because these
unique anatomic features are not easily recognized on a traditional two-dimensional
periapical radiograph (Solomonov et al. 2012). With the increased use of CBCT
scanning, clinicians may be able to detect C-shaped canals before endodontic
treatment. Nevertheless, even when recognized, the disinfection procedure will
remain a challenge, mostly because of the isthmus areas. Irregular areas in a
C-shaped canal that may house soft-tissue remnants or infected debris may escape
thorough cleaning and may be a source of bleeding and severe pain (Fan
et al. 2009). In this way, the use of dental microscope associated with sonic or
ultrasonic instrumentation techniques may make treatment outcome more predict-
able (Vertucci 2005). Because of its challenging morphology, the C-shaped canal
anatomy would increase the difficulty in root canal therapy and may account for the
frequent occurrence of endodontic treatment failure (Lu et al. 2006).
2.5 Isthmuses
An isthmus is a narrow, ribbon-shaped communication between two root canals that

may contain vital tissue, necrotic pulp, biofilms, or residual filling material (Fig. 5)
(Weller et al. 1995; Vertucci 2005). It has been also reported as lateral intercon-
nection or transverse anastomosis (Manning 1990). Any root that contains two or
more root canals has the potential to contain an isthmus (Vertucci 2005).
Researchers have also considered the presence of a partial isthmus, which was
described as an incomplete communication with one or more patent openings
Fig. 5 (a) Lateral, (b) frontal, and (c) cross-sectional views of the mesial (m) and distal (d) roots
of a micro-CT model of a mandibular first molar showing the presence of isthmuses (*) and
a lateral canal (LC)
between two main canals (Weller et al. 1995). Studies in posterior teeth have shown
the presence of necrotic pulp tissue and biofilms after chemomechanical prepara-
tion indicating that conventional disinfection methods have limited results in these
hard-to-reach areas (Adcock et al. 2011; Endal et al. 2011). If surgery becomes
necessary, the natural anatomy of the root canal is altered, and additional anatomic
features such as an undebrided isthmus may become exposed and need to be
addressed (Leoni et al. 2013). In this case, surgical microscopy and ultrasonic
root-end preparation would help the clinician to better visualize the apex, incorpo-
rating both canals and the isthmus into the root-end preparation to ensure a proper
debridement and sealing of the root canal system (Weller et al. 1995; Hsu and Kim
1997; Mauger et al. 1998; Adcock et al. 2011).
The knowledge about the morphology and prevalence of root canal isthmuses in
posterior teeth is relevant for nonsurgical and surgical endodontic treatment (Hsu
and Kim 1997). A summary of the isthmus prevalence in mandibular and maxillary
molars found in laboratory studies using cross-sectioning and micro-CT methods is
shown in Table 1.
Isthmuses may present different configurations, and its prevalence is dependent
on the type of teeth, the root level, and the patient’s age. Hsu and Kim (1997)
classified the isthmus configuration into five types:
• Type I: Two canals with no notable communication.
• Type II: A hair-thin connection between the two main canals.
• Type III: Differs from type II because of the presence of three canals instead
of two.
• Type IV: An isthmus with extended canals into the connection.
• Type V: There is a true connection or wide corridor of tissue between two main
canals.
Fan et al. (2010), using micro-CT technology, described the configuration of the
isthmuses in the mesial roots of mandibular molars into four categories:
• Type I (sheet connection): Narrow sheet and complete connection existing
between two canals from the top to bottom of the isthmus. Sometimes, one or
more small dentin fusions were discerned in the isthmus area.
• Type II (separate): Narrow but incomplete connection existing between two
canals from the top to bottom of the isthmus.
• Type III (mixed): Incomplete isthmus existing above and/or below a complete
isthmus.
• Type IV (cannular connection): Narrow cannular communication between two
canals.
Isthmuses connecting multiple canals are the type of anatomical configuration
that presents a clinical challenge directly related to the irrigating protocols because
all preparation techniques often leave behind accumulated hard- and soft-tissue
remnants as well as microorganisms in these hard-to-reach areas. The recognition
and treatment of root canal isthmuses may be one factor that reduces the failure rate
of endodontic treatment (Hsu and Kim 1997). Usually, a large amount of the
Table 1 Summary of laboratory studies on the prevalence and position of isthmuses in the mesial
root canal system of mandibular molars and mesiobuccal (MB) root canal system of maxillary
molars
Authors Methodology Conclusion
Weller Transverse serial 1-mm-thick sections The mean frequency of isthmuses was
et al. (1995) from the apical 6 mm of 50 MB roots of 30, 65, 90, 100, 82, and 81 % from 1-
maxillary first molars were examined to 6-mm levels from the apex
under surgical operating microscope
Teixeira Transverse serial 1-mm-thick sections Maxillary molars: the mean frequency
et al. (2003) from the apical 6 mm of 50 MB roots of of isthmuses was 11.4, 20, 31.5, and
maxillary molars and 50 mesial roots of 23.6 % from 3 to 6 mm from the apex;
mandibular first molars were examined mandibular molars: the mean % fre-
through a light microscope quency of isthmuses was 6.6, 11.9,
20.5, 30.3, 33.3, and 32.4 % from 1 to
6 mm from the apex
Mannocci 800 cross sections from the apical 5 mm The mean frequency of isthmuses was
et al. (2005) of 20 mesial roots of mandibular first 17.2, 36.7, 50.2, 33, and 34.7 % from
molars were investigated by means of 1 to 5 mm from the apex
micro-CT technology
Jung Transverse serial 1-mm-thick sections Maxillary molars: the mean frequency
et al. (2005) from the apical 5 mm of 47 MB roots of of isthmuses was 52.7, 52.6, 63.2, and
maxillary first molars and 50 mesial 44.7 % from 2 to 5 mm from the apex;
roots of mandibular first molars were mandibular molars: the mean fre-
examined through microscope quency of isthmuses was 60, 80, 82.5,
and 70 % from 2 to 6 mm from the
apex
Degerness Transverse serial 0.44-mm-thick sec- The mean percentage of sections with
and Bowles tions from the apex of 153 MB roots of isthmus up to 5 mm from the apex was
(2008) maxillary first and second molars were 8.5 (0.64 mm), 35.3 (1.62 mm), 43.8
examined through stereomicroscope (2.15 mm), 51.6 (3.12 mm), 60.2
(3.64 mm), 66.7 (4.58 mm), and
76.5 % (5.1 mm)
Fan Cross-sectional images from the apical The frequency of isthmus in the apical
et al. (2010) 5 mm of mesial roots of mandibular 5 mm of the mesial roots was 85 %.
first (n ¼ 70) and second (n ¼ 56) Mandibular first molars had more
molars, respectively, were investigated isthmuses with separate and mixed
by means of micro-CT technology types, whereas second molars had
more isthmuses with sheet connections
Villas-Boas 1.0-mm increment cross-sectional The mean frequency of isthmuses was
et al. (2011) images from the apical 4 mm of mesial 45, 55, 71, and 68 % from 1 to 4 mm
roots of 60 mandibular molars were from the apex
investigated by means of micro-CT
technology
Harris 0.5-mm increment cross-sectional Isthmuses were found along the length
et al. (2013) images from the apical 6 mm of mesial of all mesial roots. On average, isth-
roots of 22 mandibular molars were mus started at 4-mm level and ended
investigated by means of micro-CT 8.1 mm from the apex
technology
isthmus area is left unaffected by the endodontic procedures (Siqueira et al. 2013).
Besides, the dentin debris created during canal preparation may prevent the
antibacterial activity of irrigant solution such as sodium hypochlorite or chlorhex-
idine because they do not have a significant effect against inorganic compounds.
These findings support the clinical observation that isthmuses in failure cases were
not adequately filled, probably because of the presence of debris or organic tissue in
these areas (von Arx 2005). Currently, with the advent of microscopic endodontic
techniques, it is possible to visualize, identify, and treat most of the isthmus areas
with thin ultrasonic tips in both surgical and nonsurgical endodontic procedures.
2.6 Accessory and Lateral Canals
Accessory canal is referred here as any branch of the main pulp canal or chamber
that communicates with the external surface of the root, while a lateral canal is
defined as an accessory canal located in the coronal or middle third of the root
(Fig. 5b, c) (AAE 2012). They are formed after a localized fragmentation of the
epithelial root sheath develops, leaving a small gap, or when blood vessels running
from the dental sac through the dental papilla persist (Ricucci and Siqueira 2010;
Nanci and Ten Cate 2013). Accessory canals comprise potential pathways through
which bacteria and/or their products from the necrotic root canal might reach the
periodontal ligament and cause disease, and likewise, bacteria from periodontal
pockets might reach the pulp, being difficult to reach, clean, disinfect, and fill
during the endodontic treatment (Ricucci and Siqueira 2010). De Deus (1975)
studied the frequency, location, and direction of the accessory canals in 1140
teeth using the diaphanization technique and showed that 27.4 % of the sample
(n ¼ 330) had accessory canals, mostly in the apical area (17 %) and less frequently
in the middle (8.8 %) and coronal (1.6 %) thirds. Vertucci (1984) evaluated 2400
teeth and also observed lower occurrence of canal ramifications in the middle
(11.4 %) and coronal (6.3 %) thirds compared to the apical level (73.5 %). On the
other hand, using histological sections, Ricucci and Siqueira (2010) observed a
much higher overall frequency of canal ramifications (75 %). This may be
explained due to differences in the sample origin and evaluation methods; however,
in all of these studies (De Deus 1975; Vertucci 1984; Ricucci and Siqueira 2010),
premolars and molars have showed the highest frequency of accessory canals.
Recent micro-CT studies on the root canal anatomy of mandibular anterior teeth
showed that lateral canals are rare and were observed only in 4 % of the canines
(Leoni et al. 2013; Versiani et al. 2013a).
Lateral canals are not usually visible in preoperative radiographs, but its pres-
ence can be suspected when there is a localized thickening of the periodontal
ligament or a lesion on the lateral surface of the root. Morphological studies have
demonstrated that the largest diameter (10–200 μm) of the accessory foramina was
up to three times smaller than the mean diameter reported for the main apical
foramen in permanent maxillary and mandibular molars (Dammaschke et al. 2004).
While this difference might explain why apical periodontitis is observed far more
than lateral periodontitis (Ricucci and Siqueira 2010), the presence of accessory
foramina with large diameters may imply that an inflammatory process can spread
from pulpal to periodontal tissues and vice versa (Dammaschke et al. 2004). Large
and patent lateral foramina might allow a higher amount of bacteria to reach and
contact a larger area of the lateral periodontal ligament to cause disease, while the
quantity of bacterial irritants in small ramifications might be insufficient to induce
significant disease to be radiographically discernible (Ricucci and Siqueira 2010).
According to Weine (1996), lateral lesions can be radiographically classified
into three types:
• Type I: Lateral lesion with no apical lesion: as the infection progresses apically,
it might reach a sufficiently large lateral canal to allow a substantial amount of
bacteria and bacterial products to reach the lateral periodontium to cause
inflammation.
• Type II: Separate lateral and apical lesions: if the pathological process advances
without professional intervention, an apical periodontitis lesion can also be
visible.
• Type III: Coalescence of lateral and apical lesions: in some cases, the type II
condition can progress to the so-called “wraparound” lesion.
Actually, these types might represent different stages of the disease progression
within the root canal space once the conditions of the tissue within lateral canals
and apical ramifications reflect the conditions of the pulp in the main root canal
(Ricucci and Siqueira 2010). Clinically, it is also relevant that lateral canals cannot
be instrumented. In this way, its content can only be neutralized by means of
effective irrigation with a suitable antimicrobial solution or with an additional use
of an intracanal medication.
2.7 Apical Canal
A hallmark of the apical region is its variability and unpredictability, which have
fed considerable controversy concerning the termination point for endodontic pro-
cedures and for the final size of enlarging instruments (Bergenholtz and Spångberg
2004; Vertucci 2005). The main root canal ends at the apical foramen (major
foramen), which usually opens laterally on the root surface at a distance of between
0.2 and 3.8 mm from the anatomic apex (Gutierrez and Aguayo 1995). The apical
foramen is the main apical opening in the root structure that communicates with the
dental pulp and generally contains neural, vascular, and connective elements, while
the anatomic apex is the tip or the end of the root as determined morphologically
(AAE 2012). Apical foramen has been observed to coincide with the anatomic apex
in a frequency that ranged from 6.7 to 46 % (Green 1956; Burch and Hulen 1972;
Pineda and Kuttler 1972; Vertucci 1984; Mizutani et al. 1992). Its mean size varied
from 0.21 to 0.39 mm (Morfis et al. 1994) and its shape can be asymmetrical
Fig. 6 Three-dimensional micro-CT models of root and root canals of different groups of teeth
showing the presence of (a) apical constriction (AC), apical foramen (AF), and (b) apical delta, as
well as, a gradual (c) and abrupt (d) apical curvature of the root canal
(Blašković-Šubat et al. 1992). The mesial root of mandibular molars, the maxillary
premolar roots, and the mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars present the highest
frequency of multiple apical foramina (Morfis et al. 1994). A previous study on the
root apexes of all groups of permanent teeth has also demonstrated that the number
of foramina on each root may vary from 1 to 16 (Gutierrez and Aguayo 1995).
The apical portion of the root canal having the narrowest diameter is called
apical constriction (minor foramen) (AAE 2012). From the apical constriction, the
canal widens as it approaches the apical foramen (Fig. 6a). The topography of the
apical constriction is not constant (Dummer et al. 1984; Versiani et al. 2013a) and,
when present, is usually located 0.5–1.5 mm from the center of the apical foramen
(Vertucci 2005). The cementodentinal junction (CDJ) is the point at which the
cemental surface terminates at or near the apex of a tooth and meets the dentin
(AAE 2012). At this highly variable histological landmark that usually does not
coincide with the apical constriction, pulp tissue ends and periodontal tissues begin
(Ponce and Vilar Fernandez 2003). Despite canal cross sections have shown
different shapes in different levels of the root in the same tooth, at the apical
third, the canal used to be more round or slightly oval in shape in comparison
with the middle and cervical thirds (Wu et al. 2000; Versiani et al. 2013a).
Another important configuration of the root canal at or near the apex is the apical
delta, defined as a morphology in which the main canal divides into multiple
accessory canals (Fig. 6b) (AAE 2012). In maxillary teeth, the percentage fre-
quency of apical delta ranges from 1 % (central incisors) to 15.1 % (second
premolars), while in mandibular teeth its frequency varies from 5 % (central
incisors) to 14 % (distal root of first molars) (Vertucci 1984). Clinically speaking,
the complex anatomical configuration of the apical delta, with several portals of exit
which may harbor biofilms and infected dentinal tubules, makes disinfection
procedure more challenging.
Knowledge of the root canal curvature is also an important factor for testing
newly developed instruments and choosing the appropriate protocol for the
cleaning and shaping procedures. Accidents reported after preparation of curved
canals with different instruments including zip, separate instruments, ledge, and
perforation, may considerably decrease the efficacy of the cleaning procedures at

the apical third. Thus, preoperative determination of the degree of the canal
curvature is of utmost importance. Nearly all root canals are curved in the apical
third, particularly in a buccolingual direction, which is not evident on a standard
radiograph (Vertucci 2005). Curvature may be a gradual curve of the entire canal
(Fig. 6c) or a sharp curvature near the apex (Fig. 6d). Numerous methods have been
proposed to determine, measure, and classify the root canal curvature (Backman
et al. 1992; Cunningham and Senia 1992; Luiten et al. 1995; Nagy et al. 1995;
Shearer et al. 1996; Weine 1996; Sert and Bayirli 2004), but the Schneider’s
method has been the most widely used. Schneider (1971) classified single-rooted
permanent teeth according to the degree of curvature of the root, which was
determined by firstly drawing a line parallel to the long axis of the canal and then
a second line connecting the apical foramen to the point in the first line where the
canal began to leave the long axis of the tooth. The angle formed by these two lines
was the angle of curvature and its degree was classified as straight ( 5 ), moderate
(10 to 20 ), or severe (25 to 70 ). Later, Pruett et al. (1997) stated that two canals
with similar angles measured by the Schneider method could have very different
abruptness of curvatures, i.e., the shorter the length of curvature, the more abrupt
the deviation at same the degree of curvature, hence representing a smaller radius of
curvature. Thus, authors suggested that a more precise method for describing the
canal curvature would be to consider both the degree and the radius of curvature.
Clinically, different angled views are necessary to determine the presence,
direction, and severity of the root canal curvature. Schäfer et al. (2002) evaluated
radiographically the degree and radius of curvature of 1163 root canals from all
groups of teeth. The degree of curvature ranged from 0 to 75 and from 0 to 69
degrees in a clinical and proximal views, respectively. The highest median degree
of curvature was observed in the clinical view of the mesiobuccal canal of maxillary
molars and in the mesial canals of mandibular molars. The smallest median radii of
curvature were 2.1 and 1.3 mm, observed in the clinical view of the palatal root of
maxillary first molars and in the proximal view of mandibular first premolars,
respectively. In several cases, the medians of the angles of proximal curvatures
were greater than those of the clinical view curves. Additionally, a secondary
curvature (S-shaped canal) was observed in 12.3 and 23.3 % of the maxillary and
mandibular teeth, respectively.
3 Microscopic Anatomy of the Root Canal System
Dentin has been defined as a mineralized tissue that forms the bulk of the crown and
root of the tooth, and its composition is approximately 67 % inorganic, 20 %
organic, and 13 % water. It surrounds coronal and radicular pulp, forming the
walls of the pulp chamber and root canals presenting porous irregularities known as
dentinal tubules. Dentinal tubules are circular ducts in the dentin matrix that
contains an odontoblastic process and fluid. A typical dentinal tubule has a diameter
of 3–4 μm at its pulpal end and about 1 μm at the dentinoenamel or dentinocemental
Fig. 7 Confocal laser scanning microscopy of biofilm-infected dentin. The images show the
adherence of several morphotypes to the dentinal tubules and peritubular dentin. Dentin was
labeled with the live/dead fluorescence kit: green represents live cells and red dead cells. (a, b)
Deep and superficial layer of the attached biofilm (scanned area: 275 275 μm). Magnification of
the infected dentin (c) shows a dense infection of bacteria organized in colonies of different
morphotypes
Fig. 8 Necrotic teeth of experimentally induced apical periodontitis in an animal model. The
sample was stained using the acridine orange dye; the microbial RNA is usually stained in
red/orange. (a) Panoramic view of the root canal content showing a large mass of necrotic tissue
and organic structures attached to root canal walls (arrows). (b) Magnification of the dentin
showing a dense infection within dentinal tubules. (c) Biofilm/dentin interface. A complex
microbial amorphous structure heavily stained attached to the root canal wall (square). (c)
Magnification of the dentin/biofilm interface (shown in b) revealing microbial cells invading the
predentin and several dentinal tubules (arrow)
junction. The number of dentinal tubules ranges from 20,000 to 75,000 per square
millimeter of dentin from the apex to the coronal level, respectively (AAE 2012;
Nanci and Ten Cate 2013).
The dentin is usually exposed to the oral cavity by caries or fracture. These
conditions expose dentin to the oral microorganisms, which may adhere to its
surface, colonize, and invade the dentinal tubules (Figs. 7 and 8). Some factors
can influence the infection of the dentin; basically, colonization is limited by dentin
permeability and the bacteria ability to adhere to dentin substrate (Love and
Jenkinson 2002). Morphological analysis of the dentinal tubules in the apical area
showed that fine (300–700 mm in diameter) and micro (25–200 mm diameter)
tubular branches, which run at 45 and 90 to the main tubules, respectively, were
also frequently present. On the other hand, in some areas no tubules were observed
(Mj€or 2009). Additionally, in the presence of apical periodontitis, exposure of the
dentinal tubules in the apical region may occur due to the development of external
apical root resorption, which may favor the spreading of microorganisms, compli-
cating the disinfection procedures at this level (Vertucci 2005).
Outcomes of nonsurgical and surgical endodontic procedures are highly influenced

by variations in complex canal anatomies. The high frequency of fins and commu-
nications between canals within the same root make it almost impossible for any
mechanical or chemical technique to completely disinfect the root canal system.
Some factors, such as aging, pathology, occlusion, and the secondary deposition of
cement, can increase the aforementioned variations, thus, the purpose of the
treatment must be toward reducing the level of contamination as much as possible
and to entomb the remaining microorganisms. Careful interpretation of angled
radiographs, proper access preparation, and a detailed exploration of the tooth,
ideally under magnification, are essential prerequisites for a successful treatment
outcome.
Spreading and flushing the irrigant throughout the canal space assume a pivotal
role in treatment because it acts mechanically and chemically on remnants of
necrotic pulp tissue and microbial biofilm communities. In order to circumvent
limitations generated by the unpredictable anatomical configuration of the root
canal, making cleaning and disinfection procedures more predictable, several
instruments and techniques have been developed. Ideally, efficient irrigation solu-
tions and protocols are required to provide fluid penetrability to such an extent as to
accomplishing a microcirculation flow throughout the intricate root canal anatomy.
In laboratory-based studies, several experimental models have been used to
understand the intracanal effect of irrigants by different irrigation protocols. It
includes artificially created grooves, histological cross sections, computational
fluid dynamics, and in vivo use of radiopaque solutions. These methodological
approaches provide valuable information about the quality of cleaning and shaping
procedures which cannot otherwise be obtained, but they are unable to show some
critical factors, such as the volume of the solution or the root canal areas effectively
touched by the irrigant.
An ideal experimental model should allow a reliable in situ volumetric quanti-
tative evaluation of the root canal space, offering a deeper and comprehensive
understanding on capabilities and limitations of different irrigation protocols.
Recently, a nondestructive experimental model that allows a two- and three-

dimensional in situ quantification of several outcome parameters related to irriga-
tion in the complex root canal space was proposed. These interesting aspects
definitely open a new methodological appraisal to study the efficiency of irrigation
procedures to combat microbial biofilm infections.
References
AAE (2012) Glossary of endodontics terms, 8th edn. American Association of Endodontists,
Chicago
Adcock JM, Sidow SJ, Looney SW et al (2011) Histologic evaluation of canal and isthmus
debridement efficacies of two different irrigant delivery techniques in a closed system. J
Endod 37:544–548
Adloff P (1913) Das Durchsichtigmachen von Zähnen und unsere Wurzelfüllungsmethoden. Dtsch
Monatsschr Zahnheifkd 31:445
Al-Fouzan KS (2002) C-shaped root canals in mandibular second molars in a Saudi Arabian
population. Int Endod J 35:499–504
Al-Qudah AA, Awawdeh LA (2006) Root canal morphology of mandibular incisors in a Jordanian
population. Int Endod J 39:873–877
Appel TR, Baumann MA (2002) Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy demonstrat-
ing human dental anatomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 94:256–261
Backman CA, Oswald RJ, Pitts DL (1992) A radiographic comparison of two root canal instru-
mentation techniques. J Endod 18:19–24
Baratto-Filho F, Fariniuk LF, Ferreira EL, Pécora JD, Cruz-Filho AM, Sousa-Neto MD (2002)
Clinical and macroscopic study of maxillary molars with two palatal roots. Int Endod J
35:796–801
Barker BC, Lockett BC, Parsons KC (1969) The demonstration of root canal anatomy. Aust Dent J
14:37–41
Barker BC, Parsons KC, Mills PR, Williams GL (1973) Anatomy of root canals. I. Permanent
incisors, canines and premolars. Aust Dent J 18:320–327
Barker BC, Parsons KC, Mills PR, Williams GL (1974a) Anatomy of root canals. III. Permanent
mandibular molars. Aust Dent J 19:408–413
Barker BC, Parsons KC, Mills PR, Williams GL (1974b) Anatomy of root canals. II. Permanent
maxillary molars. Aust Dent J 19:46–50
Barton DJ, Clark SJ, Eleazer PD, Scheetz JP, Farman AG (2003) Tuned-aperture computed
tomography versus parallax analog and digital radiographic images in detecting second
mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod 96:223–228
Bauman R, Scarfe W, Clark S, Morelli J, Scheetz J, Farman A (2011) Ex vivo detection of
mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars using CBCT at four different isotropic voxel dimen-
sions. Int Endod J 44:752–758
Baumann MA (1994) A new approach to demonstration of root canal anatomy. J Dent Educ
58:704–708
Baumann MA, Doll GM (1997) Spatial reproduction of the root canal system by magnetic
resonance microscopy. J Endod 23:49–51
Baumann MA, Schwebel T, Kriete A (1993) Dental anatomy portrayed with microscopic volume
investigations. Comput Med Imaging Graph 17:221–228
Bergenholtz G, Spångberg LS (2004) Controversies in endodontics. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med
15:99–114
Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Wevers M, Lambrechts P (2001) A methodology for

quantitative evaluation of root canal instrumentation using microcomputed tomography. Int
Endod J 34:390–398
Berutti E (1993) Computerized analysis of the instrumentation of the root canal system. J Endod
19:236–238
Bjørndal L, Carlsen O, Thuesen G, Darvann T, Kreiborg S (1999) External and internal
macromorphology in 3D-reconstructed maxillary molars using computerized X-ray
microtomography. Int Endod J 32:3–9
Black GV (1890) Descriptive anatomy of the human teeth. The Wilmington Dental Manufacturing
Co, Philadelphia
Blašković-Šubat V, Marićić B, Sutalo J (1992) Asymmetry of the root canal foramen. Int Endod J
25:158–164
Blašković-Šubat V, Smojver B, Marićić B, Sutalo J (1995) A computerized method for the
evaluation of root canal morphology. Int Endod J 28:290–296
Boveda C, Fajardo M, Millan B (1999) Root canal treatment of an invaginated maxillary lateral
incisor with a C-shaped canal. Quintessence Int 30:707–711
Burch JG, Hulen S (1972) The relationship of the apical foramen to the anatomic apex of the tooth
root. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 34:262–268
Burger CL, Mork TO, Hutter JW, Nicoll B (1999) Direct digital radiography versus conventional
radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals. J Endod 25:260–263
Calberson FL, De Moor RJ, Deroose CA (2007) The radix entomolaris and paramolaris: clinical
approach in endodontics. J Endod 33:58–63
Carabelli G (1842) Systematisches Handbuch der Zahnheilkunde II Anatomic des Mundes.
Braumuller and Siedel, Vienna
Carlsen O, Alexandersen V (1991) Radix paramolaris in permanent mandibular molars: identifi-
cation and morphology. Scan J Dent Res 99:189–195
Cheung LH, Cheung GS (2008) Evaluation of a rotary instrumentation method for C-shaped canals
with micro-computed tomography. J Endod 34:1233–1238
Cimilli H, Cimilli T, Mumcu G, Kartal N, Wesselink P (2005) Spiral computed tomographic
demonstration of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol
34:164–167
Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC (2006) Root and root canal morphology of the human
permanent maxillary first molar: a literature review. J Endod 32:813–821
Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC (2008) Anomalous mandibular premolars: a mandibular
first premolar with three roots and a mandibular second premolar with a C-shaped canal
system. Int Endod J 41:1005–1014
Cooke HG 3rd, Cox FL (1979) C-shaped canal configurations in mandibular molars. J Am Dent
Assoc 99:836–839
Cunningham CJ, Senia ES (1992) A three-dimensional study of canal curvatures in the mesial
roots of mandibular molars. J Endod 18:294–300
Cutright DE, Bhaskar SN (1969) Pulpal vasculature as demonstrated by a new method. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol 27:678–683
Dammaschke T, Witt M, Ott K, Schafer E (2004) Scanning electron microscopic investigation of
incidence, location, and size of accessory foramina in primary and permanent molars. Quin-
tessence Int 35:699–705
De Deus QD (1975) Frequency, location, and direction of the lateral, secondary, and accessory
canals. J Endod 1:361–366
De Moor RJ (2002) C-shaped root canal configuration in maxillary first molars. Int Endod J
35:200–208
De Moor RJ, Deroose CA, Calberson FL (2004) The radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars:
an endodontic challenge. Int Endod J 37:789–799
Degerness R, Bowles W (2008) Anatomic determination of the mesiobuccal root resection level in
maxillary molars. J Endod 34:1182–1186
Dewey M (1916) Dental anatomy. C.V. Mosby Company, St. Louis

Dobo-Nagy C, Keszthelyi G, Szab o J, Sulyok P, Ledeczky G, Szab o J (2000) A computerized
method for mathematical description of three-dimensional root canal axis. J Endod 26:639–643
Dowker SE, Davis GR, Elliott JC (1997) X-ray microtomography: nondestructive three-
dimensional imaging for in vitro endodontic studies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
Dummer PM, McGinn JH, Rees DG (1984) The position and topography of the apical canal
constriction and apical foramen. Int Endod J 17:192–198
Endal U, Shen Y, Knut A, Gao Y, Haapasalo M (2011) A high-resolution computed tomographic
study of changes in root canal isthmus area by instrumentation and root filling. J Endod
37:223–227
Estrela C, Pereira HL, Pécora JD (1995) Radicular grooves in maxillary lateral incisor: case report.
Braz Dent J 6:143–146
Fabra-Campos H (1989) Three canals in the mesial root of mandibular first permanent molars: a
clinical study. Int Endod J 22:39–43
Fan B, Cheung GS, Fan M, Gutmann JL, Bian Z (2004) C-shaped canal system in mandibular
second molars: part I–Anatomical features. J Endod 30:899–903
Fan B, Yang J, Gutmann JL, Fan M (2008) Root canal systems in mandibular first premolars with
C-shaped root configurations. Part I: Microcomputed tomography mapping of the radicular
groove and associated root canal cross-sections. J Endod 34:1337–1341
Fan B, Min Y, Lu G, Yang J, Cheung GS, Gutmann JL (2009) Negotiation of C-shaped canal
systems in mandibular second molars. J Endod 35:1003–1008
Fan B, Pan Y, Gao Y, Fang F, Wu Q, Gutmann JL (2010) Three-dimensional morphologic analysis
of isthmuses in the mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod 36:1866–1869
Fan B, Ye W, Xie E, Wu H, Gutmann JL (2012) Three-dimensional morphological analysis of
C-shaped canals in mandibular first premolars in a Chinese population. Int Endod J
45:1035–1041
Fasoli G (1913) Sull’anatomia dei canali radicolari dei denti umani. Stomatologia 11:409–415
Ferraz JA, de Carvalho Junior JR, Saquy PC, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD (2001) Dental anomaly:
dens evaginatus (talon cusp). Braz Dent J 12:132–134
Fisher G (1908) Beitrage zur behandlung enkrankter zahne mit besonderer beucksichtigung der
anatomie und pathologie der wurzelkanale. Georg Thiéme, Leipzig
Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE (1996) Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-
file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod 22:369–375
Gao Y, Fan B, Cheung GS, Gutmann JL, Fan M (2006) C-shaped canal system in mandibular
second molars part IV: 3-D morphological analysis and transverse measurement. J Endod
32:1062–1065
Garg AK, Tewari RK, Agrawal N (2013) Prevalence of three-rooted mandibular first molars
among Indians using SCT. Int J Dent 2013:183869
Gilles J, Reader A (1990) An SEM investigation of the mesiolingual canal in human maxillary first
and second molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 70:638–643
Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G et al (2012) Present and future in the use of micro-CT
scanner 3D analysis for the study of dental and root canal morphology. Ann Ist Super Sanita
48:26–34
Green D (1955) Morphology of pulp cavity of the permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol 8:743–759
Green D (1956) A stereomicroscopic study of the root apices of 400 maxillary and mandibular
anterior teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 9:1224–1232
Green EN (1958) Microscopic investigation of root canal diameters. J Am Dent Assoc 57:636–644
Green D (1973) Double canals in single roots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 35:689–696
Grover C, Shetty N (2012) Methods to study root canal morphology: a review. Quintessence Int
6:171–182
Gu YC (2011) A micro-computed tomographic analysis of maxillary lateral incisors with radicular

grooves. J Endod 37:789–792
Gu Y, Lee JK, Spangberg LS et al (2011) Minimum-intensity projection for in-depth morphology
study of mesiobuccal root. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 112:671–677
Gu YC, Zhang YP, Liao ZG, Fei XD (2013a) A micro-computed tomographic analysis of wall
thickness of C-shaped canals in mandibular first premolars. J Endod 39:973–976
Gu Y, Zhang Y, Liao Z (2013b) Root and canal morphology of mandibular first premolars with
radicular grooves. Arch Oral Biol 58:1609–1617
Guerisoli DM, de Souza RA, de Sousa Neto MD, Silva RG, Pécora JD (1998) External and internal
anatomy of third molars. Braz Dent J 9:91–94
Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, Ng YL (2001) Root and canal morphology of Burmese
mandibular molars. Int Endod J 34:359–370
Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Alavi A (2002) Root and canal morphology of Thai
mandibular molars. Int Endod J 35:56–62
Gullickson DC, Montgomery S (1987) The study of root canal morphology using a digital image
processing technique. J Endod 13:158–163
Gutierrez JH, Aguayo P (1995) Apical foraminal openings in human teeth. Number and location.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 79:769–777
Gysi A, R€ose C (1894) Sammlung von Mikrophotographien zur Veranschaulichung der
mikroscopischen Struktur der Zähne des Menschen. Mikrophotographien der Zahnhistologie.
Schweiz, Zürich
Haddad GY, Nehme WB, Ounsi HF (1999) Diagnosis, classification, and frequency of C-shaped
canals in mandibular second molars in the Lebanese population. J Endod 25:268–271
Han X, Yang H, Li G, Yang L, Tian C, Wang Y (2012) A study of the distobuccal root canal orifice
of the maxillary second molars in Chinese individuals evaluated by cone-beam computed
tomography. J Appl Oral Sci 20:563–567
Hargreaves KM, Cohen S (2011) Cohen’s pathways of the pulp, 10th edn. Mosby, St. Louis
Harris SP, Bowles WR, Fok A, McClanahan SB (2013) An anatomic investigation of the
mandibular first molar using micro-computed tomography. J Endod 39:1374–1378
Hassan BA, Payam J, Juyanda B, van der Stelt P, Wesselink PR (2012) Influence of scan setting
selections on root canal visibility with cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41:645–648
Hegedus C, Flora-Nagy E, Martos R et al (2000) 3D reconstruction based on hard tissue
microtome cross-section pictures in dentistry. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 63:77–84
Hess W (1917) Die pulpaamputation als selbstandige wurzelbehandlungs method. Georg Thiéme,
Leipzig
Hess W, Zurcher E (1925) The anatomy of the root canals of the teeth of the permanent and
deciduous dentitions. John Bale, Sons & Danielsson, Ltd., London
Hsu YY, Kim S (1997) The resected root surface. The issue of canal isthmuses. Dent Clin North
Am 41:529–540
Huang CC, Chang YC, Chuang MC et al (2010) Evaluation of root and canal systems of
mandibular first molars in Taiwanese individuals using cone-beam computed tomography. J
Formos Med Assoc 109:303–308
Hülsmann M (1997) Dens invaginatus: aetiology, classification, prevalence, diagnosis, and treat-
ment considerations. Int Endod J 30:79–90
Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Moeller S, Prasad HS, Garwood M, Nixdorf DR (2011) Dental magnetic
resonance imaging: making the invisible visible. J Endod 37:745–752
Jafarzadeh H, Wu YN (2007) The C-shaped root canal configuration: a review. J Endod
33:517–523
Jin GC, Lee SJ, Roh BD (2006) Anatomical study of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars
by analysis of computed tomography. J Endod 32:10–13
Jung IY, Seo MA, Fouad AF et al (2005) Apical anatomy in mesial and mesiobuccal roots of
permanent first molars. J Endod 31:364–368
Kaffe I, Kaufman A, Littner MM, Lazarson A (1985) Radiographic study of the root canal system
of mandibular anterior teeth. Int Endod J 18:253–259
Keith A, Knowles FHS (1911) The description of teeth of palaeolithic man from Jersey. J Anat
Physiol 46:12–27
Keleş A, Alcin H, Kamalak A, Versiani MA (2014) Micro-CT evaluation of root filling quality in
ovalshaped canals. Int Endod J 47(12):1177–1184
Kerekes K, Tronstad L (1977a) Morphometric observations on the root canals of human molars. J
Endod 3:114–118
Kerekes K, Tronstad L (1977b) Morphometric observations on root canals of human anterior teeth.
J Endod 3:24–29
Kerekes K, Tronstad L (1977c) Morphometric observations on root canals of human premolars. J
Endod 3:74–79
Kim Y, Lee SJ, Woo J (2012) Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-
beam computed tomography in a korean population: variations in the number of roots and
canals and the incidence of fusion. J Endod 38:1063–1068
Kim Y, Chang SW, Lee JK et al (2013) A micro-computed tomography study of canal configu-
ration of multiple-canalled mesiobuccal root of maxillary first molar. Clin Oral Investig
17:1541–1546
Kocsis G, Marcsik A, Kokai E, Kocsis K (2002) Supernumerary occlusal cusps on permanent
human teeth. Acta Biol Szeged 46:71–82
Krasner P, Rankow HJ (2004) Anatomy of the pulp-chamber floor. J Endod 30:5–16
Lee JH, Kim KD, Lee JK et al (2011) Mesiobuccal root canal anatomy of Korean maxillary first
and second molars by cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
Leoni GB, Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD (2014) Micro–computed tomographic
analysis of the root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. J Endod 40(5):710–716
Levitan ME, Himel VT (2006) Dens evaginatus: literature review, pathophysiology, and compre-
hensive treatment regimen. J Endod 32:1–9
Love RM, Jenkinson HF (2002) Invasion of dentinal tubules by oral bacteria. Crit Rev Oral Biol
Med 13:171–183
Lu TY, Yang SF, Pai SF (2006) Complicated root canal morphology of mandibular first premolar
in a Chinese population using the cross section method. J Endod 32:932–936
Luiten DJ, Morgan LA, Baugartner JC, Marshall JG (1995) A comparison of four instrumentation
techniques on apical canal transportation. J Endod 21:26–32
Lyroudia K, Mikrogeorgis G, Nikopoulos N, Samakovitis G, Molyvdas I, Pitas I (1997a) Com-
puterized 3-D reconstruction of two “double teeth”. Endod Dent Traumatol 13:218–222
Lyroudia K, Samakovitis G, Pitas I, Lambrianidis T, Molyvdas I, Mikrogeorgis G (1997b) 3D
reconstruction of two C-shape mandibular molars. J Endod 23:101–104
Lyroudia K, Mikrogeorgis G, Bakaloudi P, Kechagias E, Nikolaidis N, Pitas I (2002) Virtual
endodontics: three-dimensional tooth volume representations and their pulp cavity access. J
Endod 28:599–602
Manning SA (1990) Root canal anatomy of mandibular second molars. Part II. C-shaped canals.
Int Endod J 23:40–45
Mannocci F, Peru M, Sherriff M, Cook R, Pitt Ford TR (2005) The isthmuses of the mesial root of
mandibular molars: a micro-computed tomographic study. Int Endod J 38:558–563
Marceliano-Alves MF, Sousa-Neto MD, Fidel SR, Steier L, Robinson JP, Pécora JD, Versiani MA
(2014) Shaping ability of single-file reciprocating and heat-treated multifile rotary systems: a
micro-CT study. Int Endod J. doi:10.1111/iej.12412 [Epub ahead of print]
Martins JN, Quaresma S, Quaresma MC, Frisbie-Teel J (2013) C-shaped maxillary permanent first
molar: a case report and literature review. J Endod 39:1649–1653
Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D (2008) Use of cone-beam computed tomography
to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod 34:87–89
Mauger MJ, Schindler WG, Walker WA 3rd (1998) An evaluation of canal morphology at
different levels of root resection in mandibular incisors. J Endod 24:607–609
Mayo CV, Montgomery S, de Rio C (1986) A computerized method for evaluating root canal
morphology. J Endod 12:2–7
Melton DC, Krell KV, Fuller MW (1991) Anatomical and histological features of C-shaped canals
in mandibular second molars. J Endod 17:384–388
Merrill RG (1964) Occlusal anomalous tubercles on premolars of alaskan Eskimos and Indians.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 17:484–496
Metgud S, Metgud R, Rani K (2009) Management of a patient with a taurodont, single-rooted
molars associated with multiple dental anomalies: a spiral computerized tomography evalua-
tion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108:e81–e86
Meyer W, Scheele E (1955) Die Anatomie der Wurzelkanäle der oberen Frontzähne. Deutsch
Zahnärztl 10:1041–1045
Michetti J, Maret D, Mallet JP, Diemer F (2010) Validation of cone beam computed tomography
as a tool to explore root canal anatomy. J Endod 36:1187–1190
Min Y, Fan B, Cheung GS, Gutmann JL, Fan M (2006) C-shaped canal system in mandibular
second molars Part III: the morphology of the pulp chamber floor. J Endod 32:1155–1159
Mizutani T, Ohno N, Nakamura H (1992) Anatomical study of the root apex in the maxillary
anterior teeth. J Endod 18:344–347
Mj€or IA (2009) Dentin permeability: the basis for understanding pulp reactions and adhesive
technology. Braz Dent J 20:3–16
Moral H (1915) Uber das vorkommen eines vierten kanals in oberen molaren. Österr-Ungar Vjschr
Zahnheilk 31:313–325
Morfis A, Sylaras SN, Georgopoulou M, Kernani M, Prountzos F (1994) Study of the apices of
human permanent teeth with the use of a scanning electron microscope. Oral Surg Oral Med
Oral Pathol 77:172–176
Mueller AH (1933) Anatomy of the root canals of the incisors, cuspids and bicuspids of the
permanent teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 20:1361–1386
Mühlreiter E (1870) Anatomie des menschlichen Gebisses von med. Th. E. de Jonge Cohen.
Arthur Felix, Leipzig
Nagy CD, Szabo J, Szabo J (1995) A mathematically based classification of root canal curvatures
on natural human teeth. J Endod 21:557–560
Nance R, Tyndall D, Levin LG, Trope M (2000) Identification of root canals in molars by tuned-
aperture computed tomography. Int Endod J 33:392–396
Nanci A, Ten Cate AR (2013) Ten Cate’s oral histology: development, structure, and function, 8th
edn. Elsevier, St. Louis
Naoum HJ, Love RM, Chandler NP, Herbison P (2003) Effect of X-ray beam angulation and
intraradicular contrast medium on radiographic interpretation of lower first molar root canal
anatomy. Int Endod J 36:12–19
Nattress BR, Martin DM (1991) Predictability of radiographic diagnosis of variations in root canal
anatomy in mandibular incisor and premolar teeth. Int Endod J 24:58–62
Nayak BG, Singh I (2013) Using spiral computed tomography for endodontic management of a
mandibular first molar with a middle mesial canal: a case report. Gen Dent 61:43–46
Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Ahuja R, Subbarao CV, Gutmann JL (2011) Cone-beam computed
tomography study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars in an
Indian population. J Endod 36:1622–1627
Newton CW, McDonald S (1984) A C-shaped canal configuration in a maxillary first molar. J
Endod 10:397–399
Ng YL, Aung TH, Alavi A, Gulabivala K (2001) Root and canal morphology of Burmese
maxillary molars. Int Endod J 34:620–630
Nielsen RB, Alyassin AM, Peters DD, Carnes DL, Lancaster J (1995) Microcomputed tomogra-
phy: an advanced system for detailed endodontic research. J Endod 21:561–568
Oehlers FA (1957a) Dens invaginatus (dilated composite odontome). I. Variations of the invag-
ination process and associated anterior crown forms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
10:1204–1218, contd
Oehlers FA (1957b) Dens invaginatus (dilated composite odontome). II. Associated posterior
crown forms and pathogenesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 10:1302–1316
Oehlers FA, Lee KW, Lee EC (1967) Dens evaginatus (evaginated odontome). Its structure and
responses to external stimuli. Dent Pract Dent Rec 17:239–244
Okumura T (1927) Anatomy of the root canals. J Am Dent Assoc 14:632–636
Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Villas-Boas MH, Cavenago BC, Duarte MH, Versiani MA
(2013) Morphologic micro–computed tomography analysis of mandibular premolars with
three root canals. J Endod 39:1130–1135
Ordinola-Zapata R, Monteiro Bramante C, Gagliardi Minotti P, Cavalini Cavenago B,
Gutmann JL, Moldauer BI, Versiani MA, Hungaro Duarte MA (2014) Micro-CT evaluation
of C-shaped mandibular first premolars in a Brazilian subpopulation. Int Endod J. doi:10.1111/
iej.12380. [Epub ahead of print]
Pao YC, Reinhardt RA, Krejci RF, Taylor DT (1984) Computer-graphics aided instruction of
three-dimensional dental anatomy. J Dent Educ 48:315–317
Pécora JD, Saquy PC, de Souza JE, Sousa-Neto MD (1991) Endodontic treatment of a maxillary
lateral incisor presenting dens invaginatus and transposition to the region of the canine–case
report. Braz Dent J 2:5–8
Pécora JD, Saquy PC, Sousa-Neto MD, Woelfel JB (1992a) Root form and canal anatomy of
maxillary first premolars. Braz Dent J 2:87–94
Pécora JD, Woelfel JB, Sousa Neto MD, Issa EP (1992b) Morphologic study of the maxillary
molars. Part II: Internal anatomy. Braz Dent J 3:53–57
Pécora JD, Conrado CA, Zuccolotto WG, Sousa-Neto MD, Saquy PC (1993a) Root canal therapy
of an anomalous maxillary central incisor: a case report. Endod Dent Traumatol 9:260–262
Pécora JD, Sousa Neto MD, Saquy PC (1993b) Internal anatomy, direction and number of roots
and size of human mandibular canines. Braz Dent J 4:53–57
Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD, Saquy PC, Woelfel JB (1993c) In vitro study of root canal anatomy of
maxillary second premolars. Braz Dent J 3:81–85
Peiris HR, Pitakotuwage TN, Takahashi M, Sasaki K, Kanazawa E (2008) Root canal morphology
of mandibular permanent molars at different ages. Int Endod J 41:828–835
Perrini N, Castagnola L, Hess W, Keller’s O (1998) Anatomical plates: studies on the anatomical
structure of root canals in human dentition by a method of making the tooth substance
transparent (1928). Altini Communicazioni Grafiche, Milan
Peters OA, Laib A, Ruegsegger P, Barbakow F (2000) Three-dimensional analysis of root canal
geometry by high-resolution computed tomography. J Dent Res 79:1405–1409
Peters OA, Laib A, Gohring TN, Barbakow F (2001) Changes in root canal geometry after
preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. J Endod 27:1–6
Pineda F, Kuttler Y (1972) Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7275
root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 33:101–110
Ponce EH, Vilar Fernandez JA (2003) The cemento-dentino-canal junction, the apical foramen,
and the apical constriction: evaluation by optical microscopy. J Endod 29:214–219
Poyton HG, Morgan GA (1966) Dens in dente. Dent Radiogr Photogr 39:27–33, passim
Preiswerk G (1903) Leherbuch und Atlas der Zahnheilkunde mit Einschluβ der Mund-
Krankheiten. J. F. Lehmann, Munich
Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr (1997) Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic
instruments. J Endod 23:77–85
Rahimi S, Shahi S, Lotfi M, Zand V, Abdolrahimi M, Es’haghi R (2008) Root canal configuration
and the prevalence of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars in an Iranian population. J
Oral Sci 50:9–13
Regezi JA, Sciubba JJ, Jordan RCK (2008) Oral pathology: clinical pathologic correlations, 5th
edn. Saunders/Elsevier, St. Louis
Reuben J, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D (2008) The evaluation of root canal morphology of the
mandibular first molar in an Indian population using spiral computed tomography scan: an
in vitro study. J Endod 34:212–215
Rice RT, Gilbert BO Jr (1987) An unusual canal configuration in a mandibular first molar. J Endod
13:515–515
Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr (2010) Fate of the tissue in lateral canals and apical ramifications in
Ridell K, Mejare I, Matsson L (2001) Dens invaginatus: a retrospective study of prophylactic
invagination treatment. Int J Paediatr Dent 11:92–97
Robertson D, Leeb IJ, McKee M, Brewer E (1980) A clearing technique for the study of root canal
systems. J Endod 6:421–424
Robinson S, Czerny C, Gahleitner A, Bernhart T, Kainberger FM (2002) Dental CT evaluation of
mandibular first premolar root configurations and canal variations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 93:328–332
Rocha LF, Sousa Neto MD, Fidel SR, da Costa WF, Pécora JD (1996) External and internal
anatomy of mandibular molars. Braz Dent J 7:33–40
Rotstein I, Stabholz A, Heling I, Friedman S (1987) Clinical considerations in the treatment of
dens invaginatus. Endod Dent Traumatol 3:249–254
Ruprecht A, Sastry KA, Batniji S, Lambourne A (1987) The clinical significance of dental
invagination. J Pedod 11:176–181
Schäfer E, Diez C, Hoppe W, Tepel J (2002) Roentgenographic investigation of frequency and
degree of canal curvatures in human permanent teeth. J Endod 28:211–216
Schneider SW (1971) A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 32:271–275
Seltzer S, Bender IB, Nazimov H, Sinai I (1967) Pulpitis-induced interradicular periodontal
changes in experimental animals. J Periodontol 38:124–129
Seo DG, Gu Y, Yi YA et al (2012) A biometric study of C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular
second molars using cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 45:807–814
Sert S, Bayirli GS (2004) Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and
maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod 30:391–398
Sert S, Bayrl G (2004) Taurodontism in six molars: a case report. J Endod 30:601–602
Sharma R, Pécora JD, Lumley PJ, Walmsley AD (1998) The external and internal anatomy of
human mandibular canine teeth with two roots. Endod Dent Traumatol 14:88–92
Shaw JC (1928) Taurodont teeth in South African races. J Anat 62:476–498
Shearer AC, Wasti F, Wilson NH (1996) The use of a radiopaque contrast medium in endodontic
radiography. Int Endod J 29:95–98
Shemesh H, van Soest G, Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR (2007) The ability of optical
coherence tomography to characterize the root canal walls. J Endod 33:1369–1373
Shen Y, Gao Y, Lin J, Ma J, Wang Z, Haapasalo M (2012) Methods and models to study irrigation.
Endod Topics 27:3–34
Shenoi RP, Ghule HM (2012) CBVT analysis of canal configuration of the mesio-buccal root of
maxillary first permanent molar teeth: an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 3:277–281
Sidow SJ, West LA, Liewehr FR, Loushine RJ (2000) Root canal morphology of human maxillary
and mandibular third molars. J Endod 26:675–678
Siqueira JF Jr (2005) Reaction of periradicular tissues to root canal treatment: benefits and
drawbacks. Endod Topics 10:123–147
Siqueira JF Jr, Alves FRF, Versiani MA et al (2013) Correlative bacteriologic and micro–
computed tomographic analysis of mandibular molar mesial canals prepared by Self-Adjusting
File, Reciproc, and Twisted File systems. J Endod 39:1044–1050
Solomonov M, Paque F, Fan B, Eilat Y, Berman LH (2012) The challenge of C-shaped canal
systems: a comparative study of the self-adjusting file and ProTaper. J Endod 38:209–214
Sousa Neto MD, Paiva EP, Saquy PC, Pécora JD (1998) Treatment of dens invaginatus in
supernumerary teeth. Aust Endod J 24:85–87
Sustercic D, Sersa I (2012) Human tooth pulp anatomy visualization by 3D magnetic resonance
microscopy. Radiol Oncol 46:1–7
Sykaras SN (1971) Endodontic treatment of teeth with variations of the root canals. J Br Endod
Soc 5:28–31
Szabo BT, Pataky L, Mikusi R, Fejerdy P, Dobo-Nagy C (2012) Comparative evaluation of cone-
beam CT equipment with micro-CT in the visualization of root canal system. Ann Ist Super
Sanita 48:49–52
Tachibana H, Matsumoto K (1990) Applicability of X-ray computerized tomography in endodon-
tics. Endod Dent Traumatol 6:16–20
Tanasiewicz M (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging in human teeth internal space requirements
for visualization of dental prosthetics. J Exp Clin Dent 2:19–24
Teixeira FB, Sano CL, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Souza-Filho FJ (2003) A preliminary
in vitro study of the incidence and position of the root canal isthmus in maxillary and
mandibular first molars. Int Endod J 36:276–280
Tian YY, Guo B, Zhang R et al (2012) Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a
Chinese subpopulation evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J
45:996–1003
Tratman EK (1938) Three-rooted lower molars in man and their racial distribution. Br Dent J
64:264–274
Tsesis I, Shifman A, Kaufman AY (2003) Taurodontism: an endodontic challenge. Report of a
case. J Endod 29:353–355
Turner CGN (1971) Three-rooted mandibular first permanent molars and the question of American
Indian origins. Am J Phys Anthropol 34:229–241
Venturi M, Prati C, Capelli G, Falconi M, Breschi L (2003) A preliminary analysis of the
morphology of lateral canals after root canal filling using a tooth-clearing technique. Int
Endod J 36:54–63
Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD (2011a) The anatomy of two-rooted mandibular canines
determined using micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J 44:682–687
Versiani MA, Pécora JD, de Sousa-Neto MD (2011b) Flat-oval root canal preparation with self-
adjusting file instrument: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 37(7):1002–1007
Versiani MA, Sousa-Neto MD, Pécora JD (2011c) Pulp pathosis in inlayed teeth of the ancient
Mayas: a microcomputed tomography study. Int Endod J 44(11):1000–1004
Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD (2012) Root and root canal morphology of four-rooted
maxillary second molars: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 38:977–982
Versiani MA, Cristescu RC, Saquy PC, Pécora JD, de Sousa-Neto MD (2013a) Enamel pearls
in permanent dentition: case report and micro-CT evaluation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol
42(6):20120332
Versiani MA, Leoni GB, Steier L, De-Deus G, Tassani S, Pécora JD, de Sousa-Neto MD (2013b)
Microcomputed tomography study of oval-shaped canals prepared with the self-adjusting file,
Reciproc, WaveOne, and ProTaper universal systems. J Endod 39(8):1060–1066
Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD (2013c) Microcomputed tomography analysis of the
root canal morphology of single-rooted mandibular canines. Int Endod J 46:800–807
Versiani MA, De-Deus G, Vera J, Souza E, Steier L, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD (2015)
3D mapping of the irrigated areas of the root canal space using micro-computed tomography.
Clin Oral Investig 19(4):859–866
Vertucci FJ, Williams RG (1974) Furcation canals in the human mandibular first molar. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol 38:308–314
Vertucci F, Seelig A, Gillis R (1974) Root canal morphology of the human maxillary second
premolar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 38:456–464
Vertucci FJ (1984) Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol 58:589–599
Vertucci FJ, Anthony RL (1986) A scanning electron microscopic investigation of accessory

foramina in the furcation and pulp chamber floor of molar teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol 62:319–326
Vertucci FJ (2005) Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod
Topics 10:3–29
Villas-Boas MH, Bernardineli N, Cavenago BC et al (2011) Micro-computed tomography study of
the internal anatomy of mesial root canals of mandibular molars. J Endod 37:1682–1686
von Arx T (2005) Frequency and type of canal isthmuses in first molars detected by endoscopic
inspection during periradicular surgery. Int Endod J 38:160–168
Wang Y, Zheng QH, Zhou XD et al (2010) Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of
mandibular first permanent molars in a western Chinese population by cone-beam computed
tomography. J Endod 36:1786–1789
Wang Q, Yu G, Zhou XD, Peters OA, Zheng QH, Huang DM (2011) Evaluation of x-ray
projection angulation for successful radix entomolaris diagnosis in mandibular first molars
in vitro. J Endod 37:1063–1068
Weine FS, Healey HJ, Gerstein H, Evanson L (1969) Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root
of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
28:419–425
Weine FS, Pasiewicz RA, Rice RT (1988) Canal configuration of the mandibular second molar
using a clinically oriented in vitro method. J Endod 14:207–213
Weine FS (1996) Endodontic therapy, 5th edn. Mosby-Yearbook, St. Louis
Weller RN, Niemczyk SP, Kim S (1995) Incidence and position of the canal isthmus. Part
1. Mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar. J Endod 21:380–383
Weng XL, Yu SB, Zhao SL et al (2009) Root canal morphology of permanent maxillary teeth in
the Han nationality in Chinese Guanzhong area: a new modified root canal staining technique. J
Endod 35:651–656
Woelfel JB, Scheid RC (2002) Dental anatomy: its relevance to dentistry, 6th edn. Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Wu MK, R’Oris A, Barkis D, Wesselink PR (2000) Prevalence and extent of long oval canals in
the apical third. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:739–743
Yang ZP, Yang SF, Lin YC, Shay JC, Chi CY (1988a) C-shaped root canals in mandibular second
molars in a Chinese population. Endod Dent Traumatol 4:160–163
Yang ZP, Yang SF, Lee G (1988b) The root and root canal anatomy of maxillary molars in a
Chinese population. Endod Dent Traumatol 4:215–218
Yilmaz Z, Tuncel B, Serper A, Calt S (2006) C-shaped root canal in a maxillary first molar: a case
report. Int Endod J 39:162–166
Yu X, Guo B, Li KZ et al (2012) Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal
morphology of mandibular premolars in a western Chinese population. BMC Med Imaging
12:18
Zhang R, Yang H, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, Dummer PM (2011a) Use of CBCT to identify the
morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation. Int Endod J
44:162–169
Zhang R, Wang H, Tian YY, Yu X, Hu T, Dummer PM (2011b) Use of cone-beam computed
tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular molars in Chinese individ-
uals. Int Endod J 44:990–999
Zheng Q, Zhang L, Zhou X et al (2011) C-shaped root canal system in mandibular second molars
in a Chinese population evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J
44:857–862
Part III
Outcome and Strategies of Treatment
Biofilm-Associated Infections in Root Canals:
Treatment and Outcomes
Kishor Gulabivala and Yuan-Ling Ng
Abstract Root canal infections are essentially characterised by microbial biofilms

that adhere to the root canal dentine and extend to the apical foramina and in some
cases beyond. Primary objectives of root canal treatment are to eliminate these
biofilms by using chemomechanical treatment protocols and to prevent reinfection.
Desired outcomes of effective treatment are the discontinuation of destructive
aspects of the host immune response and apical healing. This chapter reviews
different treatment factors and their influence on the outcome of biofilm-associated
infections in root canals.
1 Nature of the Biological Problem
The picture of the intraradicular microbiota is under continual review and improve-
ment through new scientific insight, but it still remains relatively crude. The picture,
at present, is synthesised from a variety of data sources that may be divided into two
main streams of knowledge: microscopy (sometimes with in situ hybridisation) and
diversity determination (through culture-dependent and culture-independent or
molecular techniques). The distribution and diversity of the microbiota within the
root canal system and dentine is unique to the individual tooth and notably variable.
The state at any given time may represent the stage of infection with the bacterial
biofilm extending up to and only sometimes beyond the apical canal terminus.
Bacteria may proliferate beyond the apical foramina and into the periapical lesion,
but this seems rare. The depth of penetration into dentine is also variable but
confined to the area close to the root canal lumen.
Assuming all root canal infections originate from coronal breaches in tooth
structure or exposure of natural communications, such as lateral canals, periapical
lesion development would seem to be dependent upon initial microbial contamina-
tion of dentinal surfaces (root canal wall and dentinal tubules), successful initial
K. Gulabivala (*) • Y.-L. Ng

Unit of Endodontology, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London,
UK

Biofilms 9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47415-0_8
192 K. Gulabivala and Y.-L. Ng
colonisation (leading to an established microbial population), propagation and

consolidation of its polymicrobial nature with generation of exopolymeric sub-
stances, succession of bacterial species within the growing biofilm community with
establishment of anaerobic properties leading to critical colonisation and thence its
definitive survival as an ‘infection’. This progression may be tracked both tempo-
rally (M€oller et al. 1981; Fabricius et al. 1982; Tani-Ishii et al. 1994) and spatially
(Fabricius et al. 1982). Deep insight about the nature and course of apical advance-
ment of the intraradicular biofilm is lacking, but inferences may be drawn from
microbiota distribution and composition studies. The establishment of the
microbiota within the apical canal complexities is associated with the opportunity
for an imbalance to arise between microbiota and host, leading to ensuing apical
pathosis. It is, however, not unknown that periapical host responses may commence
earlier, whilst there is still intervening, viable and sometimes even healthy pulp
tissue in the apical root anatomy (Moore 1967; Jordan et al. 1978; Byers et al. 1990;
Caliskan 1995). The periapical tissue status in such cases may vary from frank
periapical radiolucency to condensing periapical osteitis.
As the microbial biofilm gains further maturity and overwhelms the host mech-
anisms, the bioburden is said to be critical enough for a state of infection to exist.
Bioburden is the presence of bacteria at the body tissue interface where microbes
compete for a limited supply of oxygen and nutrients, creating a burden on the
attempts at healing in the chronic inflammatory process. Bioburden is more than
just the number of bacteria; it includes the diversity, virulence, and interaction of
organisms (Daeschlein 2013). The progressive advancement of the bacterial biofilm
in the root canal system from the coronal to the apical terminus is influenced by, as
yet, undefined ecological factors in the root canal system. Speculative hypotheses
about the mechanisms inherent in the process abound. They are based on ecological
theory, seem plausible and are probably true, but positive proof remains elusive so
far. Studies have, therefore, focused on the nature of microbial interactions within
the consortia and with their environment. Interactions amongst microorganisms and
their biotic (living) and abiotic (nonliving) surroundings are important in enabling
their survival. The relatively restricted nature of the root canal microbiota suggests
selective pressures (Fabricius et al. 1982). The positive and negative associations
are thought to be due to nutritional interactions, local physiological conditions (Eh,
pH), bacteriocins and bacterial coaggregation or physical attraction and binding.
The classic ‘infection continuum’ described above as contamination, colonisation,
critical colonisation and then infection may not reflect the full picture based on
microbial/host relationship. An alternative description may be contamination,
attachment, proliferation and critical concentration of signalling molecules rather
than bacterial counts, followed by the subsequent natural adoption of a biofilm
phenotype, which becomes progressively polymicrobial given opportunity (Jones
and Kennedy 2012).
Microbial interactions within communities enable them to evolve depending on
the local environmental variations, much like the differences between supragingival
and subgingival plaque, which at only a few millimetres apart develop vastly
differently depending on their salivary and serum nutritional sources, respectively.
Biofilm-Associated Infections in Root Canals: Treatment and Outcomes 193
A similar model is proposed for the root canal microbiota: coronal leakage may
allow salivary ingress and facultative organisms to grow in the coronal part of the
canal, whereas serum from the apical part of the canal may favour the growth of
proteolytic bacteria at the root apex. The difference in the root canal system is that
the nutritional sources are separated by a much greater distance in relative terms at
15–25 mm apart. This, therefore, also raises the question of what sustains biofilm
progression in the mid-root. Evidence for different patterns of bacterial growth
found in root canal systems comes from morphological and diversity studies
(Richardson et al. 2009; Ozok et al. 2012).
The root canal environment has a unique natural history from the perspective of
a nutritional source for bacteria in the human body, though it has not been
characterised adequately in its necrotic, infected state from an ecological point of
view. The pulp may provide a very rich supply of vital tissue and serum exudate
during the stages of pulpal inflammation, but once it becomes necrotised, the
nutritional supply is presumably rapidly exhausted as the environment is secluded
by the dentine shell. The key fluid-based nutritional resources such as saliva, serum,
blood and inflammatory exudate from pulpal tissues may dwindle. Where even
minimal nutritional streams are available in the form of salivary leakage coronally
and inflammatory exudate apically, bacterial communities may become established
and reach maturity. As the initial habitat is altered by the primary colonisers,
secondary invaders join and may replace them. According to classical ecological
theory, succession ends when a relatively stable assembly of populations, called a
climax community, is achieved. This concept has been difficult to apply to micro-
bial communities in the general environment as random disturbances prevent the
community from ever-reaching equilibrium although this may well be achieved in
the secluded root canal environment in chronic cases. In the later stages (or perhaps
throughout the process) of an enclosed root canal infection therefore, the bacteria
presumably enter some sort of a starvation or dormant phase, although there is little
published literature on this aspect in root canal sites. Although in animal models,
periapical lesions may be induced in relatively short spans of time by direct
inoculation of the pulp space (Gulabivala 2004), the actual amount of time taken
may presumably vary enormously given the time taken for pulps to succumb from
clinical evidence. The ‘slow-burning’ nature of a biofilm infection with starvation
and dormancy states may play a significant part in the sustenance of chronic
periapical disease (Costerton et al. 2003).
The overall ecological picture is one of a complex polymicrobial community
that may function as one in response to its environment and presumably to treat-
ment as well. The biofilm has a patchy and variable distribution through the root
canal system. Depending upon the stage of infection, the colonisation may be
dominant coronally, apically or in the middle (Fig. 1). The biofilm may have
variable thickness from a few cells to hundreds (Fig. 2); the groups of organisms
within each niche may vary and certainly each tooth will have its own unique
diversity signature. Teeth with gross carious exposures may exhibit almost com-
plete biofilm coverage of the root canal wall with prolific thickness (Fig. 3). Whilst
it is tempting to speculate that enclosed root canal systems may exhibit restricted
Fig. 1 Patchy distribution of the root canal biofilm, (a) radiographic image of root, (b) extracted
split root, (c) composite SEM image of root, (d) composite CLSM image of root canal with
fluorescent in situ hybridisation using bacterial probes, (e) SEM and CLSM superimposed images
microbiota with minimal diversity and teeth with open pulp chambers, wide
microbial diversity, the truth is that such correlation is not proven.
The relative amount and composition of extracellular matrix (ECM) in biofilms
within root canal systems (Fig. 4) are likely to be dictated by bacterial diversity and
the microbiota’s nutritional sources. However, insight about the ECM in root canal
biofilms is currently lacking. It is important to determine these properties because
they would presumably play a major role in biofilm eradication.
Where the resident infection propagates to the apical canal terminus with
evidence of periapical suppuration, it is probable that PMNs will be found in the
canal system, often lining the bacterial biofilm (Fig. 3) and indeed attempting to
phagocytose the cells (Fig. 5). The extravascular life span of such cells is regarded
as being 2–3 days, implying a very dynamic and nutritionally rich environment, in
stark contrast to the notion of a stable ecosystem with minimal shift and disturbance
(Richardson et al. 2009).
When the biofilm front extends beyond the confines of the root canal system
apically, the bacteria involved are often mainly anaerobic, perhaps associated with
foreign or dead (cellular or dentinal) material, to which defence cells have no or
limited access. Given the richer nutritional source in this location, the biofilm may
Moribund
pulp ssue Biofilm
Pre-denne Denne
Fig. 2 Variable thickness of biofilm adherent to the root canal predentine with moribund pulp
tissue towards the canal lumen
Biofilm
Moribund
pulp ssue
Pre-denne Denne
Fig. 3 Thick and rich biofilm layer coating canal wall in a cariously exposed tooth, with a PMN
layer covering the biofilm towards the canal lumen aspect
Surface view of biofilm

Showing clusters of columns
and channels
Profile view of biofilm

showing peak
and trough
Fig. 4 Surface and cross-sectional views of the extracellular matrix (ECM) structure of a biofilm
of a clinical strain using a dual staining method with the lectin distributed on the surface of the
biofilm cells, field depth ¼ 63 μm
exhibit a richer and thicker extracellular matrix covering and extending over the
external surface of the root. Bacterial occupants of such plaques have been
observed to be mainly coccal and rod forms, but fibrillar structures may also be
present. Those implicated in periapical tissue invasion include Actinomyces species
and Propionibacterium propionicum. Many others from the root canal microbiota
have also been implicated, but their genuine presence as invaders of periapical
tissues remains controversial because of the difficulties of obtaining
uncontaminated samples. By definition, chronic periapical lesions without suppu-
ration do not contain bacteria, whereas suppurative lesions must exhibit bacterial
invasion of the periapical tissues. The problem inherent in such clinical classifica-
tion lies in the difficulty of clinical discrimination between the two states. Whilst
suppuration may be evident at a tissue level, it may not yet have manifested
clinically.
The variations in the nature of intra- and extra-radicular infections, together with
variations in host responses, probably result in the diverse clinical presentations of
apical periodontitis. Given the association between infection and root canal treat-
ment outcome, it is not surprising that clinical presentation (pain, swelling and
sinus) might predict outcomes of treatment (Ng et al. 2011).
Fig. 5 PMN phagocytosis of root canal bacteria in situ
2 Nature of the Clinical Challenge
The previous section applied available biofilm concepts to develop a picture of

biofilm physiology and distribution in root canal systems. Root canal infection then
is essentially a bacterial biofilm coating the dentine surface (including the tubules)
to variable depths and extending to the apical foramina and sometimes beyond. The
biofilm is usually patchy and discontinuous; different populations of bacteria may
communicate with each other through fluid films or columns by the medium of
molecular messengers. Individual cells within this cooperative may respond to their
immediate surroundings and neighbours by switching on or off relevant genes for
survival or launching virulence gene expression. Nutrition depletion may slow
down their metabolism and allow some to enter a dormant state. This may also
make them more resistant to killing and uncultivable if sampled for culture. The
bacterial population may therefore be diverse in terms of species and phenotypes
(both biofilm and planktonic—although the true balance is unknown). This inter-
reliance of the bacterial species is both therapeutically useful and potentially

problematic.
The morphological complexity of the root canal system and the nature of
microbial infection pitted against the limitations of contemporary instrumentation
and irrigation techniques serve to characterise the severity of the clinical challenge.
The morphological complexity of the root canal system is defined by variations in
the shape and configurations of the root canal wall with narrow channel-like spaces
and their blind-ending, surface- or space-connecting branches (Gulabivala
et al. 2001). Its small size and volume also impose physical limitations on the
resident fluid dynamics (Gulabivala et al. 2010). The previously described biofilm
physiology imposes biological limitations on the ability of interventions to eradi-
cate the infection (Abdullah et al. 2005; Bryce et al. 2009), depending on the
agent used.
In a conceptually ideal model of biofilm eradication and wound dressing, a fluid
agent would be delivered precisely to the apical termini of the root canal system
without any canal enlargement, to disable the virulence of the biofilm and to
disintegrate/detach and remove it. The perfectly debrided surfaces would then be
rendered with a dressing delivered in fluid form to achieve perfect adaptation and
prevent any repeat/subsequent microbial attachment or contamination. The empty
space could be filled with a (removable) gel–sol precipitate to prevent bulk flow,
ingress/egress of fluid or microbes. Such a treatment concept is a distant possibility
that awaits development through multidisciplinary effort. In contrast, contemporary
treatment techniques exhibit only a weak similarity to these idealised goals. Pre-
dictable and controlled delivery of fluids to the apical termini is currently not
possible without some degree of canal enlargement by abrasive shaping, although
the noninstrumentation technique did attempt to meet the basic principle of the
approach (Lussi et al. 1995). Furthermore, the chemical activity of available fluid
agents is limited in potency or by activity and therefore becomes spent on contact at
a rate dictated by concentration, diffusion and mixing. The viscous domination of
the root canal space compromises the delivery, flow and mixing of fluids throughout
this space. Fresh unreacted fluid thus needs to be constantly circulated into the root
canal system and spent reacted fluid must be moved out of the system without
stagnation at the wall boundaries, a feat that is technologically challenging.
The sum total of the effect of chemomechanical intervention in the root canal
system is therefore dictated by the combined interaction between root canal system
shaping, nature of irrigant (type, concentration), irrigation regimen (method and
rate of delivery, volume and concentration, method and frequency of agitation) and
root canal system medication (type, activity and release profile of active ionic/
molecular species, placement efficacy and chemical equilibria). Even within the
confines of a putatively standardised chemomechanical protocol, intra-operator or
interoperator variations would in all likelihood yield variations in outcome, even in
controlled laboratory tests where anatomy and infection could be standardised. The
outcomes of clinical/microbiological studies on root canal treatment would there-
fore be expected to reflect this complexity and variation. Such studies may reflect
key unresolved challenges and point to possible pathways for optimisation.
The efficacy of root canal treatment has been evaluated using in vitro, ex vivo
and in vivo study models. The outcome measures tested are diverse and include
shaping efficacy and efficiency together with the maintenance of centring ratio,
presence of residual root canal debris, extent of predentine removal, presence of
smear layer, presence of residual biofilm, bacterial load reduction, altered bacterial
diversity, periapical healing (radiographic or histological), tooth survival and
patient reported outcomes. These measures may individually or collectively indi-
cate the potential effectiveness and variability of the procedure, as well as any
ceiling thresholds that may exist.
3 Rationale, Practical Concepts and Principles

Underpinning Root Canal Treatment
3.1 Rationale
Based on the fact that periapical lesions develop as a result of the interaction
between bacteria (and their products) and the host defences, it is clear that their
prevention or resolution depends upon preventing or terminating this interaction.
Given the relatively long history of root canal treatment and the relatively recent
establishment of biological rationale (Gulabivala and Ng 2009), a series of different
conceptual frameworks have been used over the decades and centuries to justify the
approach used. Curiously, the principles of the approach have not altered for a very
long time (Hall 1928), whilst technological advancements have made the proce-
dures more efficient and amenable to the technical achievement of shaping and
filling the root canal systems.
The treatment rationale for teeth without clinical evidence for apical periodon-
titis and for those with associated apical periodontitis is biologically different. In
the former case, depending upon the precise clinical reason (elective, restorative,
endodontic) for treatment, the main goal will be to prevent introduction of micro-
bial infection into the apical anatomy, either from the environment or from the
coronal part of the root canal system. The focus is therefore on prevention of
microbial contamination/infection spread. On the whole, root canal treatment
under such circumstances may have slightly different technical and biological
challenges and is accompanied by evidence that a wide variety of protocols may
suffice, giving high success rates with a relatively narrow range, as judged by
continued clinical absence of apical periodontitis (Fig. 6).
Once the periapical lesion has become established, variations in the technical
aspects of the chemomechanical protocol appear to have a greater impact on
outcome (Fig. 7). Overall, the challenge is a different one because the purpose
under these circumstances is not merely to prevent new contamination/infection but
to eradicate the established bacterial biofilm and effect switching off of the host
immune response coupled with accelerating wound healing. The challenge seems to
Adenubi & Rule 1976
Heling & Shapira 1978
Jokinen et al. 1978
Halse & Molven 1987
Safavi et al. 1987
Akerblom & Hasselgren 1988
Sjogren et al. 1990
Peak 1994
Peretz et al. 1997
Lilly et al. 1998
Cheung 2002
Hoskinson et al. 2002
Chugal et al. 2003
Chu et al. 2005
Moshonov et al. 2005
Aqrabawi 2006
Doyle et al. 2006
Gesi et al. 2006
Conner et al. 2007
Chevigny et al. 2008
Liang et al. 2011
Ng et al. 2011
Ricucci et al. 2011
Liang et al. 2012
Combined
0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1
Probability of success for primary root canal treatment on teeth with vital pulp
Fig. 6 Forest plot of clinical outcome data on presence/absence of apical radiolucency following
treatment of teeth without prior apical periodontitis
Auerbach 1938
Buchbinder 1941
Castagnola & Orlay 1952
Heling & Tamshe 1970
Cvek 1972
Werts 1975
Adenubi & Rule 1976
Jokinen et al 1978.
Barbakow et al 1980.
Cvek et al 1982.
Boggia 1983
Pekruhn 1986
Bystrom et al 1987.
Halse & Molven 1987
Safavi et al 1987.
Akerblom & Hasselgren 1988
Sjogren et al 1990.
Murphy et al 1991.
Friedman et al 1995.
Calisken & Sen 1996
Peretz et al 1997.
Sjogren et al 1997.
Lilly et al 1998.
Weiger et al 2000.
Cheung 2002
Hoskinson et al 2002.
Peters & Wesselink 2002
Chugal et al 2003.
Huumonen et al 2003.
Khedmat 2004
Chu et al 2005.
Aqrabawi 2006
Doyle et al 2006.
Conner et al 2007.
Molander et al 2007.
Sari & Duruturk 2007
Chevigny et al 2008.
Cotton et al 2008.
Penesis et al 2008.
Siqueira et al 2008.
Hsiao et al 2009.
Mente et al 2009.
Tervit et al 2009.
Ng et al 2011.
Ricucciet al. 2011
Combined
.1 .3 .5 .7 .9 1
Fig. 7 Forest plot of clinical outcome data on presence/absence of apical radiolucency following
treatment of teeth with prior apical periodontitis
be greater still if the periapical lesion is larger as it is associated with a microbiota

of greater diversity. A number of protocols and conceptual models (Gulabivala
and Ng 2009) have been used to achieve this general aim with an overall lower
and broader range of success rates than in the case of teeth without apical
periodontitis.
3.2 Practical Concepts and Principles
Root canal treatment is a multistep procedure, where each subsequent step is

dependent on the effectiveness of the previous step. Root canal treatment is thought
of in practical terms as comprising of the following steps:
Mechanical intraradicular preparation:
Preceded by entry access and length determination
Chemical intraradicular preparation:
Intra-appointment medication (root canal irrigation)
Inter-appointment medication (root canal dressing)
Root canal system obturation
3.2.1 Principles of Mechanical Intraradicular Preparation
The first step involves creation of access to the root canal system by drilling a cavity
from the occlusal surface to the root canal system: the coronal access cavity.
Historically, mechanical preparation of the entire wall of the root canal system
had been considered the most important means of bacterial biofilm removal.
However, there has been a paradigm shift in the way this phase is now viewed,
since it is now regarded as no more than an extension of the coronal access cavity
into the root, that is, a radicular access cavity (Gulabivala and Stock 1995). This is
principally because up to half of the surface of the root canal system surface
remains uninstrumented, requiring the remainder to be cleansed of biofilm by
means other than planing with metal instruments.
It has traditionally been held that canals should be prepared by controlled
dentine removal so as to produce a regular taper with the minimum diameter at
the apical constriction or canal terminus and the maximum diameter at the coronal
end. The central axis of the canal should remain undeviated regardless of curvature,
whilst the taper should be the minimal compatible with the delivery of irrigant and
root filling material, so that root strength and integrity are preserved.
The apical diameter size and degree of taper selected as optimal have been the
subject of much debate. The choice is usually based on personal preference and
individual clinical experience rather than on sound scientific rationale. Widely
tapered canals may allow better irrigant penetration, debridement and obturation,
but these benefits are achieved at the expense of root strength and, possibly, long-
term survival of the tooth. Advocates of narrowly prepared canals argue that a
taper that allows irrigant penetration using narrow needles is sufficient for debride-
ment and that obturation of such canals can be satisfactorily achieved with
thermoplasticised gutta-percha techniques. Narrowly tapered preparations, if they
allow adequate cleaning and obturation, are more desirable as they do not compro-
mise root strength. Based on the irrigation requirements of the root canal system,
teeth may be divided into those with simple or complex canal systems.
Simple Canal Systems (Types A, B and C)
In simple canal systems with narrow circular cross sections (Type A), preparation to
a regularly tapered radicular access cavity may entirely (Fig. 8) encompass the
original canal system. In such cases, biofilm removal may be achieved almost
wholly by mechanical preparation with little reliance on the irrigant.
Fig. 8 Simple Type A

canal system with canals so
narrow and circular that
complete wall debridement
may be achieved by
mechanical means alone
without reliance on a
chemical effect of the
irrigant
Fig. 9 Simple Type B

canal system with broad
cross section that precludes
complete canal wall
debridement with
mechanical means alone
and requires reliance on a
chemical effect of the
irrigant
In contrast, in simple canal systems with wide non-circular but regular cross
sections (Type B), such as canines, some premolars, distal and palatal roots of
molars and teeth with ‘C’-shaped canals, even preparation to a regularly tapered
radicular access cavity may not allow complete biofilm debridement solely by
mechanical preparation (Fig. 9). Access for irrigation is excellent in such teeth
making canal enlargement by filing, redundant.
In further contrast, in simple canal systems with narrow circular cross sections
and fins and ramifications extending off them (Type C), mechanical preparation
would remove biofilms from the accessible walls but not from the uninstrumented
accessory anatomy (Fig. 10). Examples of such anatomy may be drawn from all
tooth types.
Complex Canal Systems
In teeth with more morphologically complex and irregular canal systems, the
prepared radicular access cavity remains encompassed or surrounded by the orig-
inal irregular canal system to a greater or lesser degree and may only be partly
discernible or not at all. Examples may be drawn from mesial roots of mandibular
or maxillary molars, mandibular incisors and some premolars, usually only when
viewed proximally though (Fig. 11).
Fig. 10 Simple Type C

canal system with narrow
main canal and blind ending
of communicating spaces
extending the main canal at
various angles that allows
complete wall debridement
of the main canal (as in
Type A) but precludes wall
debridement of the
extensions without
chemical means
3.2.2 Principles of Chemical Intraradicular Preparation (Root Canal

Irrigation)
In order for the chemical fluid agent to reach all surfaces of the root canal system, a
sufficient path must exist and the flow of the fluid irrigant must be facilitated. This
requires that obstructions in the path have to be cleared of pulp tissue, dystrophic
pulp calcification, pulp stones and bacterial biofilm. The mechanical shaping
process may disrupt and displace such contents; any dentine chips generated from
the shaping process would add a further element to the canal content. This hetero-
geneous mass of organic and inorganic tissue should ideally be flushed out of the
canal system.
Pure flushing action is restricted by the viscously dominated environment of the
root canal system, so an understanding of fluid dynamics is mandatory (Gulabivala
et al. 2010). Strategies for delivering, mixing and replacing the irrigant must be
effective. In addition, pure flushing action is only effective for loose debris; most of
Fig. 11 Complex canal system whose overall wall geometry would remain predominantly
unaltered by mechanical instrumentation and that would preclude debridement of the majority
of the canal wall surface without the aid of chemical irrigation means: two separate examples, (a)
unprepared and (b) root filled
the contents are likely to be attached or adherent and must therefore be loosened by
agitation or chemical solvent action. Therefore, the act of flushing must exert a wall
shear stress, be prolonged or repetitive and preferably also occur during mechanical
preparation, although post-mechanical flushing is also considered advantageous.
The process of bacterial biofilm disruption by antibacterial fluids is complicated
by the challenge of delivering the irrigant to the narrow, confined and distant apical
anatomy and to the deepest layers of the multilayered microbial biofilm with its
polysaccharide matrix protection. The first problem is overcome by enlarging and
shaping the radicular access sufficiently to allow the irrigant to be delivered to the
apical anatomy using an appropriately sized, narrow-gauge ‘endodontic’ needle,
together with some form of agitation. The second problem is overcome by using a
high enough concentration and/or sufficient volume of irrigant through continuous
replenishment to provide sustained chemical potency. The combined action of
mechanical and chemical cleaning is more efficient than either method alone in
biofilm removal.
Once the mechanical shaping is completed, a final effort is made to reach all
instrumented and, particularly, uninstrumented surfaces to allow chemical ‘scrub-
bing’ of the entire root canal wall to remove biofilm from the uninstrumented
surface and any contaminated smear layer from the instrumented surface
(Fig. 12). The strategies for delivering, agitating and mixing the irrigant into the
complex anatomy from the prepared radicular access have increased multifold in
recent years as this need became better understood. The approaches may be
classified into (Gulabivala et al. 2010):
Fig. 12 (a) Unprepared complex root canal system, (b) instrumented root canal system revealing
uninstrumented surfaces, (c) green uninstrumented area requires debridement by chemical irrigant
delivered via the radicular preparation
• Manual agitation: using hand files propelled in a push–pull motion, a gutta-

percha cone used in a push–pull motion
• Sonic agitation: using SonicAire® activated file, EndoActivator® and Vibringe®
(vibrating needle attached to a syringe)
• Ultrasonic agitation: using Irrisafe file, ProUltra syringe (vibrating needle) and
ultrasonically activated normal file
• Pressure/vacuum agitation: EndoVac, RinsEndo and NIT system
• Laser-induced agitation
The simplest method is to reciprocate a gutta-percha cone to agitate the irrigant.
With this method, there is an increased risk of irrigant extrusion through the apical
foramina. The optimal method for maximising wall shear stress and reducing apical
extrusion is to use a gutta-percha cone that fits well apically but is slightly loose
coronally.
Activation of irrigant with sonic or ultrasonic devices involves the agitation of
either a syringe-delivered bolus of fluid in the canal or by simultaneous delivery
(via a custom reservoir) and agitation. The sonic devices available for irrigant
agitation include the Sonic Air Endo Handpiece (Micromega 1500, Besancon,
France), which is driven by air pressure to produce vibration frequencies of
1500–3000 Hz and which also drives stainless steel files to aid simultaneous
canal preparation. The EndoActivator® system (Advanced Endodontics, Santa
Barbara, CA, USA) is electrically driven and works at the much lower frequencies
of 33, 100 and 167 Hz. It was designed to use polymer tips of various sizes (ISO size
15, 25, 35) and tapers (0.02, 0.04) for agitation of the irrigant to avoid the potential
risks of instrument separation associated with metal files, ledge formation and canal
transportation. Preliminary data on debris and smear layer removal was promising
(Ruddle 2007). Vibringe consists of a sonically activated device attached to a
syringe, which creates agitation as the irrigant is delivered.
Much higher frequencies of vibration of the working tip (in the ultrasonic range,
20–40 kHz) are achieved with either magnetostrictive or piezoelectric devices.
Magnetostrictive transducers produce an elliptical motion at the working tip, whilst
piezoelectric transducers produce longitudinal or transverse linear motions. In
either case, the oscillations are damped by contact of the file with the canal wall,
also reducing the acoustic micro-streaming. Acoustic micro-streaming is enhanced
by higher power output and greater flexibility of the file; therefore a small size is
better. To maximise acoustic micro-streaming, it is best to use the ultrasonically
energised file without contacting the canal walls; this is achieved by precurving the
instrument and using it after canal preparation is complete, that is, the so-called but
miss-labelled passive ultrasonic irrigation.
EndoVac® is a simple but ingenious device that delivers the irrigant into the
coronal chamber but sucks the irrigant down into the canal through an attachment
that passes to the apical end of the radicular preparation. There are two sizes of
attachments; the smaller of the two is liable to blockage if the instructions are not
followed. So far, the research has proved positive. Another device, the NIT®, also
uses simultaneous delivery and suction, but this time through a single needle
allowing separate flows in the inner and outer casings.
RinsEndo is an automated device operated by attachment to a handpiece cou-
pling. It uses alternating positive and negative pressure changes to drive irrigant
into the root canal system. It is moderately effective.
Apart from agitation, the exchange of irrigant relies on diffusion along a
concentration gradient from the main radicular access, where the bolus is deposited
towards the peripheral anatomical aspects. The efficacy of this also demands a
higher delivered concentration, which could damage the dentine in the radicular
preparation. If the antibacterial agents reach the bacteria in subinhibitory doses,
there is a high chance of inducing resistance to them. This has been demonstrated
not only for antibiotics but also for the antiseptic agents mentioned above.
In the majority of cases, these efforts are sufficient to eradicate the microbiota
from the coronal aspects of the canal and also mostly from the middle aspects of the
root canal system. However, the challenge lies in complete eradication from the
apical part, where the bacterial biofilm usually remains virtually intact in the apical
anatomy (Nair et al. 2005). It is therefore useful to use additional antibacterial
measures that continue to work in the inter-appointment period (Vera et al. 2012).
Overenthusiastic efforts to deliver the irrigant to the apical anatomy could result in
irrigant extrusion. The consequences may range from minimal exacerbation of
irritation to a severe sodium hypochlorite accident with tissue destruction.
3.2.3 Principles of Chemical Intraradicular Preparation (Root Canal

Dressing)
The rationale for intra-canal medication between appointments is to help complete

the aim of root canal system preparation, that is, to degrade residual microbial
biofilm and organic tissue and to kill remaining bacteria that have escaped intra-
appointment primary debridement. The medicament should, therefore, also prevent
bacterial recolonisation of the root canal system from either those bacteria left
behind after preparation or new invaders through lateral communications or the
coronal access.
3.2.4 Principles of Root Canal System Obturation
Following debridement and medication of the root canal system, migration of

microorganisms and their products from the oral cavity or root canal system to
the periradicular tissues is prevented by obturating the space and sealing the access
cavity permanently. The purpose is therefore to ‘seal’ the entire root canal system,
including the coronal entry, whilst encouraging healing of the chronically inflamed
periapical wound.
3.3 Conceptualisation of the Periapical Healing Process
The healing process after root canal treatment has not been deeply researched but
can be conceptualised using the ‘zones of Fish’ in a chronic inflammatory lesion
(Fish 1939). The removal of bacteria and their products should result in the
reduction, if not (ideally) elimination, of the zones of infection and contamination.
This allows the macrophages in the zone of irritation to invade the areas previously
occupied by the zones of infection and contamination in order to remove dead cells
and debris. This process also makes way for the osteoblasts and fibroblasts, together
with new in-growing blood vessels and nerve fibres from the outermost and active
zone of stimulation to proliferate into the zone of irritation. In this way, gradual
healing may take place from the boundary of the lesion inwards until a normal
periodontal ligament is established. Provided that the pluripotential cells in the
periodontal tissues, in particular, have not been irreversibly damaged, ideal healing
would eventually result in regeneration and the formation of cementum over the
apical terminus, isolating the root canal system completely from the periapex, but
this is not an inevitable end result. Incomplete removal of the infection would
reduce but not eliminate the inflammatory area, resulting in suppression of the
impetus for wound healing.
4 Evidence for Root Canal Treatment Efficacy
Studies conducted over many decades provide some insight about the relative
efficacy of the various aspects or steps of the root canal treatment procedure(s).
4.1 Effect of Chemomechanical Procedures

on Intraradicular Microbiota
The effect of different stages of root canal treatment on the intraradicular

microbiota has been evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively. Some studies
merely report positive culture tests, whereas others have identified and quantified
intraradicular microbiota before and after various stages of treatment, mostly using
culture-dependent approaches and some using culture-independent approaches
(Table 1).
The effect of the steps up to and including the ‘mechanical preparation’ of the
canal(s) on the microbiota has been tested using only water or saline as the irrigant.
Taken collectively, the studies show that negative cultures were achieved on
average in 25 % of the cases (range 4.6–53 %). When sodium hypochlorite
(concentration range 0.5–5.0 %) irrigation supplemented the steps up to ‘mechani-
cal preparation’, the frequency of negative cultures immediately after debridement
increased to an average of 75 % (range 25–98 %).
Most studies report culture reversals during the inter-appointment period when
active antibacterial dressing is not used in the root canal system between appoint-
ments. The reversals are due to regrowth of residual bacteria or recontamination by
bacterial leakage around the access cavity dressing.
Classical and well-controlled studies (Bystrom and Sundqvist 1981, 1983, 1985)
evaluated the effect of various root canal treatment procedures on the microbiota,
both qualitatively and quantitatively. They tested the effect of mechanical prepa-
ration, saline or sodium hypochlorite irrigation (0.5, 5.0, 5.0 % with EDTA), the
addition of ultrasonic activation to the irrigation and calcium hydroxide dressing;
each addition to the chemical canal preparation improved the antibacterial effect,
reducing residual bacteria further. They found the antibacterial action to reduce the
number of bacteria from an initial range of 102–108 cells to 102–103 fewer cells
after initial debridement, further reducing down to no recoverable cells (from the
prepared part of the root canal system) after inter-appointment dressing with
calcium hydroxide. It was notablethat the infection was more difficult to control
when the diversity of the initial infection was greater, i.e., there were more species
in greater abundance. Calcium hydroxide dressing is also effective after mechan-
ical preparation and irrigation with water. The efficacy of dressing with calcium
hydroxide has recently become controversial because of emerging studies showing
limited efficacy.
The collective antibacterial action during root canal treatment has not been
shown to cause persistence of any particular species. Specific bacteria, therefore,
Table 1 Summary of studies evaluating the effect of root canal treatment procedures on the microbiota. For information on terms used within the table, refer the
210
KEY at the end of the table

Outcomes
Tx Percentage of samples with bacterial presence/mean bacterial load
type After
Study and year M/I/D Sample size RD Decont At baseline preparation irrigation Next visit (after dressing) Persistent species (frequency)
Cultural
Auerbach M/I 60 teeth ✓ – 93 % (56/60) Chlorinated soda (dou- – Not analysed
(1953) ble strength: 22 %
(12/56)
Stewart (1955) M/I 50 teeth ✓ ✓ – 3 %H2O2 and 0.5 % No dressing: 24 % (12/50) Not analysed
NaOCl: 6 % (3/50)
Ingle and M 89 teeth ✓ ✓ 73 % (65/89) H2O: 70 % (62/89) – Not analysed
Zeldow (1958) Some initially –ve
became +ve after Tx
Stewart M/I 77 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (77/77) 0.5 %NaOCl + Gly- No dressing: 0.5 %NaOCl Not analysed
et al. (1961) oxide: 2 % (1/44) 0.5 % + Gly-oxide: 34 % (15/44)
NaOCl + 3 %H2O2: 0.5 %NaOCl + 3 %H2O2: 39 %
9 % (3/33) (17/33)
Melville and M/D 392 root ✓ ✓ – – Eugenol beechwood creosote, 695 pure isolates from 601 spec-
Slack (1961) canals tricresol, CMCP, or antibi- imens: streptococci (36 %),
otics: no data lactobacilli (2 %), staphylococci
(27 %), micrococci (11 %),
Neisseria (6 %), G ve rods
(4 %), yeasts (7 %)
Nicholls (1962) M/I 155 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % Alkaline chloramine: – Not analysed
(155/155) 53 % (39/74)
H2O2 and 2 %NaOCl:
50 % (30/60)
H2O and 2 %NaOCl:
71 % (15/21)
K. Gulabivala and Y.-L. Ng
Grahnén and M/I 97 teeth ✓ ✓ 77 % (75/97) NaCl: 72 % (23/32) No dressing: Not analysed
Krasse (1963) Biocept: 66 % (21/32) NaCl: 47 % (15/32)
Nebacin: 36 % (12/33) Biocept: 47 % (15/32)
Some initially –ve Nebacin: 18 % (6/33)
became +ve after Tx
Engstr€om M/I/D 223 teeth ✓ ✓ 60 % (134/223), Biosept or iodophor, 5 % I2 in 10 % IKI: Enterococci persisted in canals
(1964) 20/134 +ve for plus alcohol, chloro- 2nd visit: 43 % (58/134), at each visit with greater fre-
enterococci form and 0.5 % NaOCl: 13/20 +ve E.f quency than other organisms.
(E) (21 % in no data 3rd visit: 22 % (29/134), 5/20 Enterococci present more fre-
RTxed teeth, +ve E.f quently in proximal areas of
12 % in UnTxed 4th visit: 8 % (9/134), 2/20 +ve teeth with enterococci, 67 %
teeth) E.f vs. 31 %
5th visit: 3 % (4/134), 2/20 +ve
E.f
6th visit:2 % (3/134), 2/20 +ve
E.f
7th visit:16 % (22/134), 3/20
+ve E.f
Engstr€
om and M/I/D 1170 ✓ ✓ – Biocept, alcohol, chlo- 5 % I2 in 10 % IKI: 25 % Before root filling, surviving
Frostell (1964) samples roform, 0.5 % NaOCl: (332/1170) species included:
no data UnTxed with no pa:31 % Streptococcus, Staphylococcus,
(91/297) Enterococcus, yeast, aerobic G
UnTxed with pa: 37 % +ve spore forming rods, Micro-
(97/261) cocci, diphtheroids, typical G
Txed with no pa: 21 (80/377) +ve rods
Biofilm-Associated Infections in Root Canals: Treatment and Outcomes
UnTxed with pa: 23 (54/235)

Olgart (1969) M/I/D 207 teeth ? ✓ 72 % (149/207) 43 % (88/207) No dressing: 34 % (70/207) Streptococcus, Lactobacillus,
No difference between Peptococcus, Peptostrep-
H2O2 and 0.5 %NaOCl tococcus, Veillonella,
vs. H2O2 and 1 % Fusobacterium, Corynebacte-
NaOCl rium, Eubacterium, Leptotrichia
All types persistent, simply
dependent upon initial types
(continued)
211
Table 1 (continued)
212
Outcomes
type After
Goldman and M/I 563 patients ? ? – NaOCl: 24 % – 242 organisms identified:
Pearson (1969) (133/563) Enterococci (most common),
streptococci (64 %), staphylo-
cocci (17 %), Neisseria, Lacto-
bacillus, Micrococcus,
Corynebacteria, AnO2 G +ve
cocci
Myers ? 214 Txed ? ? – – r culture: S. faecalis (21 %), streptococci
et al. (1969) teeth After 1 –ve: 26 % (28/108) (52 %), staphylococci (8 %),
After 2 –ve: 13 % (14/106) Corynebacteria (4 %), unclassi-
Reversal rate after 1 –ve fied G +ve rods (8 %)
culture ¼ 26 %, after 2 –ve
cultures ¼ 13 %
Bence M/I 33 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (33/33) Pre-irritation: No dressing: Not analysed
et al. (1973) 1st file: 93 %, enlarge- 8 % dentine, 12 % pp samples
ment with # 3 ¼ 14 %, of teeth with negative culture
#4 ¼ 11 %, #5 ¼ 21 % after irrigation
(32 % of instruments
showed +ve culture,
regardless of size)
5.25 %NaOCl
48 h culture: 4 % den-
tine, 10 % pp
5 day culture: 8 %
dentine, 26 % pp
Tsatsas M/I/D 205 teeth ? ? – – Cresatin, CMCP, or Streptococci (82 %), Bacillus
et al. (1974) with a –ve polyantibiotic paste: (33 %), staphylococci (8 %),
culture after 2nd culture: 24 % (49/205) Candida (3 %), Pseudomonas
treatment** 3rd culture: 80 % (39/49) pyocyaneus (3 %)

Mejare (1975) NA 612 cultures ✓ ✓ – – r culture: 15 % (92/612), 27/92 S. faecalis, subspecies faecalis
at RF with a yielded 29 isolates of (10), zymogens (3), liquefaciens
–ve previous enterococci (8), atypical variate (6).
culture S. faecium, var faecium (1), var
durans (1)
Akpata (1976) M/D 20 extracted NA ✓ 100 % (20/20) NaCl: 65 % (13/20) 38 %CMCP: 20 % (2/10) Not analysed
teeth Load ¼ 200 CFUs/ Load ¼ 50 CFUs/tooth
tooth When PP sample –ve, crushed
tooth yielded –ve culture
When PP +ve, crushed teeth
yielded +ve or –ve cultures
Cvek M/I 108 teeth ✓ ✓ NaCl group: NaCl: 83 % (15/18) – Staphylococci, S. faecalis,
et al. (1976) 53 % (18/34) 0.5 % NaOCl: 59 % Micrococcus, Peptostrep-
0.5 % NaOCl (17/29) tococcus, Lactobacillus,
group: 5 % NaOCl: 68 % Corynebacteria, Propioni-
63 % (29/46) (15/22) bacterium, Actinomyces,
5 % NaOCl Veillonella, Bacteroides spp.,
group: 79 % Eubacterium alactolyticum,
(22/28) Fusobacterium, Leptotrichia,
Haemophilus, Bacillus subtilis
Bystrom and M/I 15 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % 15/15, Saline: 100 % (15/15) No dressing: 47 % (7/15) (5th No specific species were persis-
Sundqvist load ¼ 105 (102– visit) tent
(1981) 107) Where initial bacteria load Streptococci, Peptostrep-
89 strains in all. high, difficult to eliminate tococcus, Arachnia, Eubacte-
1–10 strains/ rium, Lactobacillus,
canal Actinomyces spp.,

Fusobacterium, Bacteroides,
Wolinella recta,
Capnocytophaga, Enterobacter
agglomerans, Veillonella
parvula, Selenomonas
sputigena, Eikenella corrodens
(continued)
213
Table 1 (continued)
214
Outcomes
type After
Bystrom and M/I 15 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (15/15); 0.5 % NaOCl: 87 % No dressing: 20 % (3/15) (5th None of the species were more
Sundqvist 169 strains iso- (13/15) visit) resistant to Tx
(1983) lated; 1–11 Streptococci, Peptostrep-
strains/canal; tococcus, Arachnia, Eubacte-
2/canal if 105 rium, Lactobacillus,
cells and 8 if Actinomyces spp.,
more cells Fusobacterium, Bacteroides,
Wolinella recta,
Capnocytophaga, Enterobacter
agglomerans, Veillonella
parvula
Bystrom and M/I 60 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (60/60) 0.5 % NaOCl: no data No dressing 44 strains recovered at 3rd visit;
Sundqvist Load ¼ 105 5 % NaOCl: no data 0.5 % NaOCl: 12/20 (2nd 80 % AnO2. No indication that
(1985) 5 % NaOCl + 15 % visit); 8/20 load ¼ 105 (3rd specific bacteria were resistant to
EDTA: no data visit) Tx
5 % NaOCl: 10/20 (2nd visit); Streptococci, Peptostrep-
6/20, load ¼ 106 (3rd visit) tococcus, Arachnia, Eubacte-
5 % NaOCl + 15 % EDTA: rium, Lactobacillus,
11/20 (2nd visit); 3/20, Actinomyces spp.,
load ¼ 105 (3rd visit) Fusobacterium, Bacteroides,
Wolinella recta,
Capnocytophaga ochracea,
Veillonella parvula
Bystr€om M/I/D 65 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (65/65) 0.5 % NaOCl: no data CH: 0/35 (1 month), 1/35 (2–4 Mostly AnO2 G +ve bacteria
et al. (1985) Load: 5.0 % NaOCl: no data days) Bacteroides, Fusobacterium,
CH gp: 102–107 CP/CMCP (2 weeks): 10/30, Propionibacterium, Peptostrep-
CP/CMCP gp: load ¼ 105 tococcus, Eubacterium, Strepto-
103–107 coccus, Actinomyces,
Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium,
Enterococcus spp.
Sj€ogren and M/I 31 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (31/31) 0.5 % NaOCl plus No dressing: Fusobacterium nucleatum,
Sundqvist Load ¼ 104 ultrasonic debride- 29 % (9/31) at 2nd visit Arachnia propionica, Actinomy-
(1987) ment: no data 23 % (7/31) at 3rd visit ces, Streptococcus intermedius,
Peptostreptococcus, Streptococ-
cus milleri
Koontongkaew M/I/D 15 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (15/15) 3 % H2O2/5.25 % CMCP: Not analysed
et al. (1988) NaOCl: no data 1 day dressing: 40 % (2/5)
3 day dressing: 20 % (1/5)
7 day dressing 10 % (1/10)
No dressing:
60 % (3/5) after 1 day, 20 %
(1/5) after 3 or 7 days
Reit and M/I/D 35 teeth ✓ ✓ 91 % (32/35) 0.5 % NaOCl: no data CH: After 21-day CH dressing:
Dahlén (1988) 1–7 strains/ After 14 days: 23 % (8/35) 12 strains were isolated from
canal After 21 days: 26 % (9/35) 9 canals
Species included G +ve AnO2
rods, Enterococcus,
Lactobacillus
Cavalleri M/I 10 teeth ✓ ? – 5 % NaOCl: no data – Persistent species: Streptococcus
et al. (1989) epidermidis (40 %), Aerococci
(30 %), Bacteroides fragilis
(20 %)
New species: Klebsiella
rhinoscleromatis (20 %),
S. faecalis (20 %), Acinetobacter
calcoaceticus (20 %), Actino-

myces odontolyticus (10 %)
Molander M/I/D 25 teeth ✓ ✓ 96 % (24/25) 0.04 % iodine: no data Clindamycin: Only two strains of enterococci
et al. (1990) 81 strains after 14 days: 16 % (4/25) in pre-Tx flora but post-Tx flora
isolated After 21 days: 24 % (6/25) dominated by enterococci
(continued)
215
Table 1 (continued)
Outcomes
Percentage of samples with bacterial presence/mean bacterial load
216
Tx
type After
Sj€
ogren M/I/D 30 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (30/30) 0.5 % NaOCl: CH: Fusobacterium, Bacteroides,
et al. (1991) Load: 50 % (15/30) 10 min: 50 % (6/12) at 1 week E. faecalis, Actinomyces,
10 min samples, Load: 102–103 later Peptostreptococcus, Eubacte-
3 2 8
10 (10 –10 ) 7 day: 0 % (0/18) (none after rium, Lactobacillus, Wolinella
7 day samples, 1–5 weeks later without recta
104 (102–106) dressing)
Ørstavik M/I/D 23 teeth ✓ ✓ 96 % (22/23) NaCl irrigation and CH: 34 % (8/23); load ¼ 104 Not analysed
et al. (1991) enlarged to #35/40: 40 % (6/15)
#20–25: 87 % (20/23); # > 40: 25 % (2/8)
load ¼ 104
further to #35–80. No
data
Yared and Bou M/I/D 60 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (60/60) 1 % NaOCl, CH: 0 % (0/60) Not analysed
Dagher (1994) enlarged to #25, 73 %
(22/30)
enlarged to #40, 23 %
(7/30)
Gomes M/I 42 root ✓ ✓ 95 % (40/42); 2.5 % NaOCl: no data Empty canal (7–10 days): After instrumentation and dress-
et al. (1996) canals 1–9 strains/ 73 % (29/40); 1–8 strains/tooth ing, Oblig AnO2 (52 %), facul-
Primary Tx tooth tative AnO2 (64 %); G +ve
(n ¼ 15) (74 %); G ve (36 %) were
Secondary found
Tx (n ¼ 27) In 1 cases, no significant quali-
tative change in microbiota
In 2 cases: prevalence com-
pared with initial samples
Decreased ¼ Peptostreptococcus
Increased ¼ Veillonella,
Porphyromonas, Propioni-
bacterium, Enterococcus
Same ¼ staphylococci,
Bacteroides, Fusobacterium
Sj€
ogren M/I 55 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (55/55) 0.5 % NaOCl: 40 % – After instrumentation 1–6 spe-
et al. (1997 (single (22/55) cies per canal. Surviving species
canal) included:
Enterococcus, Streptococcus,
Peptostreptococcus, Eubacte-
rium, Actinomyces, Propioni-
bacterium, Bacteroides,
Prevotella, Fusobacterium,
Campylobacter
Siren ? 80 +ve canal ✓ ✓ – – – Enteric gp; E. faecalis
et al. (1997) samples 24 (8 monoinfections),
(40 with Enterobacter cloacae 5(2),
enterics, Enterobacter agglomerans 1(1),
40 with Enterobacter sakazakii 1, Kleb-
non-enterics) siella oxytoga 1, Acinetobacter
spp. 1, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
1(1) brackets ¼ pure cultures.
These occurred with Streptococ-
cus, Actinomyces, Micrococcus,
Staphylococcus, Neisseria,
P. micros, Fusobacterium,
Prevotella, Campylobacter and
Candida
Non-enteric gp; Streptococcus,
Actinomyces, Micrococcus, Lac-
tobacillus, Neisseria, P. micros,

Fusobacterium, Prevotella,
Porphyromonas and Candida;
Assoc with clinical factors all
significant
(continued)
217
Table 1 (continued)
Outcomes
218

type After
Waltimo ? 967 canal ✓ ✓ – – No medication for 2 days 48 isolates; all except one Can-
et al. (1997) samples before sampling: 72 % dida albicans, C. glabrata,
(resistant (692/967), 7 % (47/692) +ve C. guilliermondii,
cases) for yeasts C. inconspicua; exception was
Geotrichum candidum; 6 (13 %)
in pure culture and 41 (87 %) in
mixed culture; of these faculta-
tive bacteria were G +ve in
39/41 samples; 1 had G ve
bacteria (Capnocytophaga &
Neisseria). Most frequent G +ve
bacteria were streptococci.
AnO2 bacteria (P. micros &
Fusobacterium) were isolated
from 12 canals (26 %)
Dalton M/I 46 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (46/46) NaCl + NiTi files, 68 % – Not analysed
et al. (1998) Load ¼ 105 (15/22);
NaCl + K files, 75 %
(18/24)
Load ¼ 102
Reit M/I/D 50 teeth ✓ ✓ 84 % (42/50) Enlarged to #35 5 % IKI (5–7 days): 44 % After instrumentation and dress-
et al. (1999) (curved) or (22/50) ing, 58 % persistent bacteria
#50 (straight) with Empty (7 days): 44 % (22/50) were facultative. Surviving spe-
0.5 % NaOCl: no data cies included Prevotella,
Porphyromonas,
Capnocytophaga, Eubacterium,
Veillonella, Peptostreptococcus,
Lactobacillus, Streptococcus,
Enterococcus, Staphylococcus
Peciuliene M/I/D 25 teeth ✓ 80 % (20/25); 2.5 % NaOCl and 17 % Medication unknown: 28 % All residual E. faecalis were
et al. (2000) 70 % (14/20) EDTA: no data (7/25); present in pure culture

+ve E. faecalis 71 % (5/7) +ve E. faecalis
Shuping M/I/D 42 teeth ✓ ✓ 98 % (41/42) 1.25 % NaOCl: 38 % CH: 8 % (3/40) Not analysed
et al. (2000) Load ¼ 105 (16/42) Load ¼ <10
Load ¼ 101
Lana M/I/D 31 teeth ✓ ✓ 87 % (27/31) 2.5 % NaOCl: no data CH: 13 % (4/31) Yeasts, Lactobacillus, Strepto-
et al. (2001) Empty for 7 days: 23 % (7/31) coccus, facultative anaerobic G
ve rods. Gemella and Pseudo-
monas were found in only one
canal
Peciuliene M/I/D 40 teeth ✓ ✓ 83 % (33/40) 2.5 % NaOCl and 17 % 50 % of sample: CH (10–14 After instrumentation and irri-
et al. (2001) EDTA: 30 % (10/33) days): gation, E. faecalis was present in
50 % of sample: 2 % I2 in 10 % 6 teeth (5 as pure culture), other
IKI (10 min):5 % (1/20) species included Proteus
mirabilis; facultative or anaero-
bic G +ve bacteria
Peters and M/I/D 42 teeth ✓ ✓ Instrumentation Enlarged to #35 with CH (4 weeks): 71 % (15/21); Surviving species after instru-
Wesselink to #20: 2 % NaOCl: 23 % load ¼ 103, 2.1 species/canal mentation and dressing:
(2002) 100 % (42/42); (10/42); load ¼ 103, 2.8 Further irrigation: 43 % (9/21); Fusobacterium, Prevotella,
load ¼ 106, 4.6 species/canal load ¼ 102 Bacteroides, Capnocytophaga,
species/canal Eubacterium, Actinomyces,
Bifidobacterium, Propioni-
bacterium acnes, Veillonella,
Peptostreptococcus, Gemella
morbillorum, Streptococcus,
Staphylococcus
Surviving species after final irri-
gation:
Fusobacterium, Prevotella,
Capnocytophaga, Actinomyces,
Propionibacterium acnes,
Veillonella, Peptostreptococcus
(continued)
219
Table 1 (continued)
Outcomes
220
type After
Card M/I 40 mandibu- ✓ ✓ 95 % (38/40) 1 % NaOCl No data Not analysed
et al. (2002) lar teeth/ Profile instrumentation
canals (.04 taper):
0/13 of cuspids and
bicuspids, 5/27 of
mesio-buccal canals
Further LightSpeed
instrumentation to size
57.5–65: 3/27 mesio-
buccal canals of molars
Only 1/16 of those
mesio-buccal canals
with detectable com-
munication with the
mesio-lingual canals
had +ve culture after
the first preparation
using ProFile
instruments
Chávez de Paz M/I/D 200 teeth ✓ ✓ Initial samples Type: unknown. No CH or IKI: 54 % (107/200) After instrumentation and dress-
et al. (2003) were not taken data Tooth type, crown and pulpal ing, 235 strains isolated with
status had no significant asso- 2 strains per case. Surviving
ciation species included:
Size of lesion, persistent pain, non-mutant or mutant group
type of medication had signif- streptococci, Enterococcus,
icant association coagulase-negative staphylo-
cocci, Peptostreptococcus, Lac-
tobacillus, Bifidobacterium,
Propionibacterium, Actinomy-
ces, Eubacterium, Clostridium,
Veillonella, Prevotella,
Fusobacterium, Enterobacter
(lactose positive),
Porphyromonas
Kvist M/I/D 96 teeth ✓ ✓ 98 % (94/96) 0.5 % NaOCl: 63 % CH (7 days): 36 % (16/44) After instrumentation and dress-
et al. (2004) (60/96) IPI (10 min): 29 % (15/52) ing, 59 strains isolated. Surviv-
Number of treatment visits, ing species included:
bacterial load, number of fusiform rods, Prevotella, Acti-
strains in the initial samples nomyces, Other G+ anaerobic
had no significant effects rods, Peptostreptococcus, Pro-
teus, Lactobacillus, G+ aerobic
spore-forming rods, Streptococ-
cus, Enterococcus,
Staphylococcus
Chu M/I/D 88 canals ✓ ✓ 99 % (87/88) 0.5 % NaOCl: no data CH, Septomixine forte, or After instrumentation and dress-
et al. (2006) Ledermix: 36 % (32/88) ing, 88 strains isolated. Surviv-
All canals showed significant ing species included:
reduction of bacterial load Campylobacter, Fusobacterium,
Exposure of pulp, tooth type, Porphyromonas, Wolinella,
acute vs. chronic condition, Capnocytophaga, Kingella,
size of lesion and type of Suttonella indologenes, Actino-
medication had no significant myces, Bifidobacterium, Clos-
effect tridium subterminale,
Actinobacillus, Corynebacte-
rium, Lactobacillus, Veillonella,
Neisseria, Peptostreptococcus,
Gemella, Leuconostoc, Staphy-
lococcus, Streptococcus
Paquette M/I/D 22 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (22/22) 2.5 % NaOCl: 68 % 2 % CHX: 45 % (10/22) Not analysed
et al. (2007) (single Load ¼ 105 (15/22) Load ¼ 102

canal) Load ¼ <10
Siqueira M/I/D 11 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (11/11) 2.5 % NaOCl: 55 % CH/CPMC: 9 % (1/11) After instrumentation and irri-
et al. (2007a) (single Load ¼ 104–107 (6/11) Load ¼1–102 gation; 11 isolates; most preva-
rooted) Load ¼ 1–104 lent streptococci. After
instrumentation and dressing,
only 1 strain (Propionibacterium
acnes) isolated
(continued)
221
Table 1 (continued)
222
Outcomes
type After
Siqueira M/I/D 11 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (11/11) 2.5 % NaOCl: 45 % CH: 18 % (2/11) After instrumentation and irri-
et al. (2007b) (single Load ¼ 103–108 (5/11) Load ¼ 1–105 gation: 7 isolates (amongst them
7
rooted) Load ¼ 1–10 streptococci and staphylococci).
After instrumentation and dress-
ing, only 2 strains
(Fusobacterium nucleatum,
Lactococcus garvieae) isolated
Vianna M/I/D 24 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (24/24) Saline + 2 %CHX gel: 2 %CHX, CH or mixture: 54 % After instrumentation and dress-
et al. (2007) (single root) Load ¼ 105 33 % (8/24) (13/24) ing, 30 strains isolated. Surviv-
Load ¼ 102 (in positive Load ¼ 102 (in positive cases) ing species included:
cases) Type of medication had no Aerococcus, Gemella,
significant effect. Peptostreptococcus, Neisseria,
Veillonella, Capnocytophaga,
Actinomyces, Bifidobacterium,
Clostridium, Lactobacillus,
Propionibacterium
Wang M/I/D 43 canals ✓ ✓ 91 % (39/43) Saline + 2 %CHX gel: 2 %CHX + CH: 8 % (3/36) Not analysed
et al. (2007) Load ¼ 105 8 % (4/39), Load ¼ <10
Load ¼ <10 Size of apical preparation
(40 vs. 60) had no significant
effect
Markvart M/I 24 teeth 88 % (21/24) 2.5 % NaOCl: 63 % Further 17 % EDTA irrigation After instrumentation and dress-
et al. (2012) (15/24) and 10 min 5 % IKI medica- ing, surviving species included:
tion: 50 % (12/24) Fusobacterium, Prevotella,
Box preparation (#60): 67 % Gram +ve anaerobic rods, Lac-
(8/12) tobacillus, Streptococcus,
Cone preparation (#25–30): Enterococcus, Staphylococcus
33 % (4/12); no significant
difference
Xavier M/I/D 48 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (40/40) 1 % NaOCl: 75 % CH: 75 % (18/24) Not analysed
et al. (2013) (single (9/12)
canal) 2 % CHX: 75 % (9/12)
No significant differ-
ence between NaOCl
and CHX
Molecular
Rolph M/I/D 41 teeth ✓ ✓ UnTx: 75 % 4 % NaOCl and 15 % CH: Not analysed
et al. (2001) 15 unTx (6/8) culture/ EDTA: no data UnTx: 43 % (3/7) culture,
26 RTxed PCR 71 % (5/7) PCR
RTx: 45 % RTx: 27 % (4/15) culture,
(5/11) culture, 47 % (7/15) PCR
91 % (10/11)
PCR
Sakamoto M/I/D 15 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (15/15) 2.5 % NaOCl and 17 % CH/CMCP: After instrumentation and dress-
et al. (2007) qPCR EDTC: 67 % (10/15) ing, surviving species included:
Load ¼ 107 67 % (10/15) Load ¼ 104 Streptococcus, Fusobacterium,
Load ¼ 104 Neisseria, Prevotella, Propioni-
bacterium, Rothia, Veillonella,
uncultured Lautropia
Rocas and M/I/D 24 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (24/24) 2.5 % NaOCl: 54 % CH or CH/CMCP: After instrumentation and dress-
Siqueira (2011) qPCR (13/24) 38 % (9/24) ing, 18 taxa isolated in the CaOH
No significant difference group and 3 in the CaOH/CMCP
between CH and CH + CMCP group (the finding may be con-
founded by the difference in the
initial samples). Surviving spe-
cies included:
Selenomonas, Propioni-
bacterium, Porphyromonas,
Actinomyces, Bacteroidetes,
Filifactor, Dialister,
Parvimonas, Streptococcus,
Enterococcus, Pyramidobacter,
Treponema, Prevotella,
Fusobacterium, Tannerella,
Peptostreptococcus, Campylo-
223
bacter, Solobacterium,
Eikenella, Olsenella
(continued)
Table 1 (continued)
224
Outcomes
type After
Paiva M/I/D 14 teeth for ✓ ✓ 100 % (12/12) 2.5 % NaOCl, 17 % CH/CHX: After instrumentation and dress-
et al. (2013) PCR, qPCR EDTA/2 % CHX: 42 % (5/12) ing, 13 taxa isolated. Surviving
12 teeth Load ¼ 106 50 % (6/12) Load ¼ 103 (included –ve species included:
qPCR Load ¼ 104 samples) Eubacterium, Fusobacterium,
Campylobacter, Prevotella,
Corynebacterium, Clostridium,
Hydrogenophilus, Massilia,
uncultured actinobacterium and
2 uncultured bacteria
Provenzano M/I 12 teeth ✓ ✓ 100 % (12/12) 2.5 % NaOCl: 67 % – Not reported
et al. (2013) PCR (4/6)
2 % CHX: 83 % (5/6)
M mechanical preparation, I irrigation, D dressing, RD rubber dam, NV non-vital, V vital, Tx treatment, UnTx untreated, CH calcium hydroxide, NaOCl sodium
hypochlorite, PP paper point sample, RTx retreated, G ve Gram negative, Rfed root filled, r culture culture test before obturation, CFU colony forming unit, ve no
growth after culture, +ve growth after culture, Oblig obligate, CP camphorated phenol, CMCP camphorated monochlorophenol
were not implicated in persistent infections during primary (first attempt) root canal
treatment. In contrast, data from secondary (second attempt) root canal treatment
(Table 2) showed that certain species were more prevalent after biomechanical
procedures than others suggesting that they may be more resistant to treatment
protocols, contrary to the previous view. The persistent species often included
Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus species, Staphylococcus species, Lactobacil-
lus species, Propionibacterium species, Actinomyces species, yeasts and other
Gram-positive bacteria.
Even though most longitudinal studies of the root canal microbiota do not
definitively show resistance of particular species, other studies suggest that
Gram-positive bacteria are found with an unexpectedly high frequency in
posttreatment cultures. In further monkey-model experiments from M€oller’s
group (M€ oller et al. 2004), facultative bacteria were found to be more resistant to
chemomechanical treatment than anaerobic species from a 4-strain infection (Strep-
tococcus milleri, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, Prevotella oralis, Fusobacterium
nucleatum). In addition, the survival rate of a 5-strain infection including Entero-
coccus faecalis was higher.
4.2 Effect of Obturation Procedures on Intraradicular

Microbiota
The role of the root filling appears to be a subsidiary one in helping to control
residual infection, since absence of a root filling makes no apparent difference to
the healing (Klevant and Eggink 1983; Sabeti et al. 2006). Obturation of infected
but already prepared canals resulted in some degree of effect in controlling the
remaining infection, presumably by incarcerating residual microbiota (Katebzadeh
et al. 1999, 2000). Apart from aiding reduction of the bioburden, the root filling may
also serve to help control periapical wound healing and regeneration of the normal
anatomical architecture of the periodontal ligament.
4.3 Effect of Persistent Bacteria on Root Canal Treatment

Outcome
Numerous studies (Table 3), mostly historical, have analysed the effect of
preobturation culture test on root canal treatment outcome. The original rationale
for the test was established at the beginning of the last century following the demise
in root canal treatment procedures due to the focal infection debate (Gulabivala and
Ng 2009). In essence, given the obsession with potential systemic complications
putatively due to residual root canal infection, the culture test was introduced to
reassure the clinician and patient alike that the treatment had in some demonstrable
way eliminated the infection. This proved a sufficiently effective quality control
Table 2 Summary of studies evaluating the microbiota in root-treated teeth with periapical disease. For information on terms used within the table, refer the KEY at
the end of the table
226
Sample Previous treatment details Harvest method Microbial findings

Study and Size/Pa/Pain/RF RF removal Bacterial load and species recovered from
year quality and exposure I/D time to RTx Mechanical Solvent Canal sampling +ve samples more than 2 samples and other findings
Cultural
Engstr€
om 113 teeth/54 with I/D: none given ✓ CHCl3 Filed to apex, NaCl 43/113 E. faecalis found in 8 % of all samples (39 %
(1964) Pa/Pain?/RF quality? Time to RTx:? in some and PP (38 %) of teeth with Pa, 37 % of teeth without Pa)
and 20.9 % of positive samples (24 % of
teeth with Pa, 18 % of teeth without Pa).
Main enterococcus was S. faecalis
Moller 264 teeth/261 with I/D: none given ? ✓ H2O, H2O + meat 120/264 FacAnO2: Streptococcus including Entero-
(1966) pa/Pain?/RF quality infusion, or VMGI (45 %) coccus (19 % E. faecalis), Lactobacillus,
unknown and had no and PP Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, Neisseria,
exposure to oral Pseudomonas, Proteus, Escherichia,
cavity Bacillus
Time to RTx:? AnO2: Peptostreptococcus, Veillonella,
Bacteroides, Fusobacterium, Lactobacillus,
Actinomyces, Leptotrichia, Candida
Gomes et al. 21 teeth/12 with I/D: none given ? ? PP moisten with – FacAnO2: Propionibacterium (most
(1996) Pa/13 with pain/RF NaCl frequently recovered), Streptococcus,
quality? Lactobacillus, Actinomycetes
Time to RTx:? washed AnO2: Prevotella, Peptostreptococcus,
with Eubacterium
H2O
Molander 120 teeth/100 with I/D: none given GG and H CHCl3 Filed to #25 at WL 68/100 (Pa) Pa group: 117 strains; 1–2 strains in most
et al. (1998) Pa/no pain/RF within files in (85 %); v. heavy growth in 20 teeth; Pre-
4 mm of apex 21 cases dominance of G +ve facultative AnO2
(69 %); Species included: Enterococcus (32),
Streptococcus (14), Lactobacillus (11),
Escherichia (8), G +ve anaerobic rods (8),
Staphylococcus (7), Fusobacterium (5),
Prevotella (5), Peptostreptococcus (4),
Propionibacterium (4), Lactobacillus (3),
Candida (3), Actinomyces (2), Enterobacter

(2), Klebsiella (2); chloroform had major
negative impact on recovery
Time to RTx: 4+ years VMGA I and PP 20-Sep No Pa group : 13 strains; 8 strains v. sparse
(No Pa) growth (listed); length of RF, presence of
post, size of lesion and tooth type did not
influence recovery
Sundqvist 54 teeth/Pa/no I/D: none given Burs and ✗ Filed, NaCl and PP 24/54 In 19, single species present; when
et al. (1998) pain/RF good except files (sample 1) E. faecalis present (9), it was sole organism;
one Time to RTx: 4+ years Sealed PP in canal (44 %) species included E. faecalis (9), Streptococ-
(sample 2) cus spp. (6), P. micros (2), Actinomyces (3),
20/54 (sam- Propionibacterium (2), Bacteroides gracilis
ple 1 & 2) (3), Candida albicans (2)
Peciuliene 25 teeth/Pa/No pain/ I/D:?/CH not used ✓ ✗ Same as Molander 20/25 E. faecalis in 14 samples; 5 of these were in
et al. (2000) RFquality? Time to RTx:? et al. (1998) pure culture. Other species not reported
Peciuliene 40 teeth/Pa/No pain/ I/D: none given ✓ ✗ Accessed to 1 mm 33/40 Bacterial load: 101–107 CFUs
et al. (2001) RF unsatisfactory Time to RTx: 5+ years from apex Microbiological exam focussed on yeasts, G
ve enterics and E. faecalis
Prevalence in canals: E. faecalis (21),
C. albicans (6), G ve enteric (3), other
bacteria (17)
Yeast: 50 % with E. faecalis; 50 % with other
bacteria; E. faecalis, 52 % as pure culture;
48 % with other bacteria but as dominant
isolate in all except one sample. No differ-
ence in lesion size by bacterial groups
Hancock 54 teeth/Pa/Pain?/RF I/D:?/4 had CH; GG and H Filed to #35 at 0.2– 34/54 PP: mean 1.69 spp./tooth (14 cases 1 sp.,
✗
et al. (2001) within 4 mm of apex; files 2 mm from apex; 14 cases 2 spp., 2 cases 3 spp., 1 had 4 spp.);
21 had good, 28 had LDTM and PP 57 strains recovered E. faecalis (10 with 6 as
inadequate, 5 had + 4 mm of last 3–5 F pure culture), Peptostreptococcus (9), Acti-
poor restorations nomyces (8), Streptococcus (7), Prevotella
(4), Staphylococcus (3), Corynebacterium
(3), Fusobacterium (3), Lactobacillus (2),
Eubacterium (2), Porphyromonas (2)
(continued)
227
Table 2 (continued)
228
Time to RTx: 3+ years 4 had (33/54 by PP) F: mean 1.5 spp./tooth (17 cases 1 sp.; 8 cases
fracture diagnosed after 2 spp.; 3 cases 3 spp.); 42 strains recovered
sampling with predominance of G +ve AnO2 (88 %):
E. faecalis (9 with 6 as pure culture), Acti-
nomyces (9), Streptococcus (6), Corynebac-
terium (3), Staphylococcus (2), Lactobacillus
(2), Peptostreptococcus (2), Eubacterium
(2), Prevotella (2), Porphyromonas (2)
(28/54 by F) RF ended > 2 mm from apex; Pa lesions
exceeding 5 mm were significantly associ-
ated with increase in bacterial recovery
Cheung and 24 teeth/Pa/No pain/ I/D: none given GG and H ✗ Filed to #25 at 0.5– 12/18 Bacterial load: 100 – 105
Ho (2001) RF quality files 1 mm from apex, (6 excluded) (median ¼ 103 CFU/mL)
and exposure to Time to RTx:4+ years RTF and PP 22 species recovered (1–3 spp./tooth):
oral cavity not Streptococcus (6), Pseudomonas (4), coagu-
standardised lase –ve staphylococci (4), Gemella
morbillorum (2), Neisseria (2), Peptostrep-
tococcus (3), Candida albicans (2)
Poor RFs were associated with highest
counts (103–105) and spp./canal (3–6)
Egan 25 teeth/Pa/Pain?/RF I/D: none given H files CHCl3 Filed to WL, NaCl 4/25 +ve for Yeasts were 14 more likely to be present in
et al. (2002) quality and exposure Time to RTx:? in and PP yeasts canals if already present in saliva
to oral cavity not 3 cases
standardised
Pinheiro 60 teeth/Pa/6 with I/D: none given GG and ✗ NaCl and PP 51/60 1–9 spp./canal (28 cases 1 sp., 8 cases 2 spp.,
et al. (2003) pain/38 with poor RF files 15 cases 3+ spp.)
and 60 with poor Time to RTx:? 118 isolates belonging to 37 species: 57 %
restoration were facultative anaerobes, 43 % were obli-
gate anaerobes; Gram +ve species (83 %)
dominant
Bacterial species included Enterococcus
(27 with 18 as pure culture), Streptococcus
(17), Peptostreptococcus (13), Actinomyces
(10), Prevotella (10), Propionibacterium (5),
Gemella (4), Veillonella (4), Fusobacterium
(3), Lactobacillus (2), Staphylococcus (2),
Candida (2)
Significant associations were found between
history of pain and polymicrobial infection
and anaerobes (Prevotella, Fusobacterium);
spontaneous pain and Peptostreptococcus;
tenderness to percussion and P. intermedia/
P. nigrescens; sinus and Streptococcus and
Actinomyces; coronally unsealed and Strep-
tococcus and Candida; suboptimal RF and
polymicrobial infections
Molecular/Cultural
Kalfas 2 teeth (anterior)/Pa I/D: none given NA NA Filed, NaCl and PP 2 reports of The isolates which were similar to each other
et al. (2001) in one case/pain/no persistent were identified as Actinomyces radicidentis
Time to RTx:?
RF but dressed with infection by 16S gene sequencing; cells had a coccoid
CH for 7 years in one morphology
case
Hashimura 12 teeth/6 with I/D: none given ? ? Debris from F 7/12 (specific Species specific PCR: Slackia exigua (3),
et al. (2001) Pa/3 with pain/RF Time to RTx:? species) Mogibacterium timidum (3), Eubacterium
quality? saphenum (2)
(continued)
229
Table 2 (continued)
230

Rolph 26 teeth/Pa/no I/D: none given ISO 35 ori- ✗ Filed to WL, NaCl 26-Nov Comparison of culture and PCR +ve;
et al. (2001) pain/RF quality? fice shaper and PP
Tx judged to have Time to RTx:? 5/26 (culture) Isolates from 9 refractory cases: Actinomyces
failed israelii, Eubacterium, Lactobacillus aci-
dophilus, Peptostreptococcus spp.,
Porphyromonas, Streptococcus, Veillonella,
Propionibacterium; no E. faecalis
10/26 (PCR) Bacterial clones from 5 cases: Streptococcus
mitis, gordonii, intermedius, salivarius;
Prevotella oris, nigrescens; Selenomonas
infelix; Capnocytophaga gingivalis;
Cytophaga sp.; Dialister spp.; Eubacterium
yurii, brachy; Gemella haemolysins;
Veillonella dispar; Peptostreptococcus spp.;
Fusobacterium nucleatum; Mogibacterium
spp.; Propionibacterium acnes;
Solobacterium moorei; Micrococcus; Rothia
dentocariosa
Sakamoto 9 teeth/Pa/no pain/ I/D: none given GG and ✗ Filed to #15 at 1 mm 9/9 (Taxa) 74 taxa identified (mean 10 taxa/canal); most
et al. (2008) RF within 2 mm of files from apex dominant taxon: Bacteroidetes*, Synergistes,
apex and had no Time to RTx: 5+ years NaCl and PP + #15- Flavobacteriaceae, Saprospiraceae*,
direct exposure to file + retrieved RF Pseudoramibacter alactolyticus, Coryne-
oral cavity bacterium durum, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa*, Prevotella nigrescens. Only
11 taxa were found in more than one case: the
above taxa with * and Prevotella oris,
Prevotella baroniae, Streptococcus mutans,
Synergistes, Dialister, Enterococcus
faecalis, Flavobacteriaceae,
Peptostreptococcus
Rocas and 42 teeth/Pa/no pain/ I/D: none given Same as Sakamoto et al. (2008) 34/34 (Taxa) 24/28 of target taxa identified with 1–12 per
Siqueira RF within 4 mm of Time to RTx:2+ years sample; only 5 cases harboured 5 target taxa;
(2008) apex and had no most frequently detected taxa included:
direct exposure to Propionibacterium acnes (22),
oral cavity. Fusobacterium nucleatum subspecies
nucleatum (10), Streptococcus (7),
Propionibacterium acidifaciens (6),
Pseudoramibacter alactolyticus (6), Entero-
coccus faecalis (5), Tannerella forsythia (5)
Anderson 21 teeth/Pa/no I/D: none given GG, NiTi ✗ File #35 at 0.5–2 mm 7/21 (culture) Culture: 14 species (1–7 per sample)
et al. (2012) pain/RF within 4 mm and K files from apex (Enterococcus, Faecalis*, Parvimonas
of apex and had no micra, Proteus hauseri/vulgaris, Streptococ-
direct exposure to cus oralis, S. salivarius, Lactobacillus
oral cavity fermentum, Actinomyces oris, Neisseria
elongata, Dialister invisus, Streptococcus
mutans, S. parasanguinis, Propioni-
bacterium acnes*, Rothia dentocariosa,
Corynebacterium minutissimum, Rummelii-
bacillus stabekisii) with the *species recov-
ered in 2 samples
Time to RTx:2+ years NaCl and PP 7/21 (DNA) Cloning: 14 taxa (Enterococcus gallinarum/
different casseliflavus, Candida parapsilosis, Lacto-
subsets bacillus gasseri, Proteus hauseri/vulgaris,
Streptococcus mutans, Peptostreptococcus
stomatis, Selenomonas sp., Olsenella
profusa, Delftia sp., Exiguobacterium

aurantiacum, Pantoea agglomerans,
uncultured Neisseria clone, Phocaeicola
abscessus) with none of the taxa identified in
2+ samples
Majority of taxa Firmicutes (14 taxa),
followed in rank order by Actinobacteria,
Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes
(continued)
231
Table 2 (continued)
232

Wang 58 teeth/Pa/6 with I/D: none given NiTi files ✗ Patency achieved 54/55 Culture: E. faecalis plus 1–4 species per
et al. (2012) pain/RF quality and (culture) canal, which increased with poor RF
exposure to oral cav- Time to RTx: ? NaCl and PP Species-specific PCR: E. faecalis in 38 % of
ity not standardised canals which had no significant association
with tooth location, clinical symptoms, res-
toration type and status, number of canals,
quality of RF
Anderson 50 teeth/Pa/25 with I/D: none given GG and ✗ Filed to 0.5–2 mm 40/50 450+ sequences/sample, 14 phyla and
et al. (2013) pain/RF within 4 mm NiTi files from apex 277 genera identified; 741 species-level
of apex and had no OTUs assigned using pyrosequencing
direct exposure to Time to RTx:2+ years NaCl and PP 17 from Most abundant phyla in rank order:
oral cavity symptomatic Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria,
Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria
23 from Most abundant genera: Streptococcus,
asymptomatic Prevotella, Lactobacillus, Kocuria, Neisseria,
Acinetobacter, Atopobium, Rothia, Pseudo-
monas, Propionibacterium, Schlegelella,
Enterococcus, Phocaeicola, Leptotrichia,
Fusobacterium, Enterobacter, Veillonella,
TM7 genera incertae sedis, Haemophilus,
Pseudoramibacter, Sphingomonas,
Paracoccus, unclassified Pasteurellaceae,
Pyramidobacter, Cellulosimicrobium
Ex-vivo
Fukushima 21 extracted teeth/?/ I/D: none given Stored in RTF under AnO2 Interpret with caution, because (a) teeth fro-
et al. (1990) no pain/RF quality Tx to extraction:? Apex cut at 5 mm, frozen, longitudinal zen (b) decontamination not verified; 62 %
unknown but had no sectioned, one part fragmented into RTF +ve for bacteria (52 % mixed cultures; 10 %
direct exposure to pure cultures); AnO2 bacteria in all except
oral cavity one; facultatives in 38 %; G +ve rods and
cocci dominant; G +ve cocci dominant in
3 cases; G +ve bacteria: Eubacterium, Lac-
tobacillus, Propionibacterium, Actinomyces,
Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus; G ve
bacteria: Bacteroides, Fusobacterium,
Selenomonas, Veillonella
Adib 8 extracted teeth (/ I/D: none given Tooth sectioned at crown/restoration level, 8-Aug 6–41 species and 7–77 isolates per tooth
et al. (2004) Pa/?/RF quality var- root split longitudinally
ied but had no direct Tx to extraction: 4+ years or Sample taken from dentine, restoration or Predominance of FacAnO2 (75 %), followed
exposure to oral frank evidence of failure GP using PP soaked in RTF by AnO2 (17 %), aerobes (5.6 %), Candida
cavity (2.4 %)
G +ve (82 %) was more prevalent than G
ve (15 %)
FacAnO2: Staphylococcus (6), Streptococcus
(6), Enterococcus (5), Actinomyces (8)
AnO2: Peptostreptococcus (7), Pseudomonas
(7)
Rubber dam isolation was used in all studies; sampling field was decontaminated using various protocols in all studies except Hashimura et al. (2001) in which such
information was not provide

M mechanical preparation, I irrigation, D dressing, Pa periapical lesion, Tx treatment, UnTx untreated, ReTx retreatment, RFed root filled, G ve Gram negative, PP
paper point sample, F file sample, RTF reduced transport fluid, LDTM liquid dental transport medium, 1 primary cases, 2 secondary cases, GP gutta-percha, AnO2
anaerobic, FacAnO2 facultative anaerobe, CHCl3 chloroform, ? no information, ✓ applies, ✗ does not apply
233
Table 3 Summary of studies evaluating effect of preobturation culture test on treatment outcome (success). For information on terms used within the table, refer the
KEY at the end of the table
234
Study and Success with Success with Qualifying comments and other
year Sample size RD Decont Treatment details ve culture +ve culture findings
Rhein 340 ve; ? ? Electrolytic medication 94 % 85 % Data from Zeldow and Ingle (1963)
et al. (1926) 152 +ve
Buchbinder 1930–1936: ✓ ? Mechanical preparation; Dakin’s solu- 1930–1936: Strict criteria; overall success rate 69 %;
(1941) 94 ve tion, creosote–iodine and eugenol; 63 % reports result with negative (ve) and
1936–1940: 1930–1936 obturated by clinical criteria; 1936–1940: without (?) culture test; initially single –
76 ve 1936–1940 obturated by culture test 78 % ve required and then 2 –ve cultures
All with Pa required
Morse and 265 ve ✓ I2 tincture Mechanical preparation; chlorinated 93 % – All RFed after –ve culture; loose criteria
Yates 237 pa soda Dakin’s solution; 2–3 visits followed; positive cultures had single or
(1941) mixed flora: Streptococcus (α,β,γ),
Staphylococcus, Lactobacillus, Bacillus
subtilis, yeasts
Abramson 97 ve; 38 +ve ✓ ? ? 97 % 84 % Data from Zeldow and Ingle 1963
(1961)
Ingle (1961) 162 ve ? ? ? 95 % – Data from Zeldow and Ingle (1963)
Oliet (1962) 31 ve, 67 +ve ✓ Metaphen No details; RF single cone or lateral 84 % 55 % Loose criteria
condensation; some silver points
Glick - 819 ve ? ? ? 96 % – Data from Zeldow and Ingle (1963)
Zeldow and 14 ve; 42 +ve ? Aseptic Mechanical preparation and irrigation 93 % 83 % Loose criteria; 2+-yr follow-up; +ve
Ingle (1963) single canals regimen with sterile water; RF at 2nd visit; cultures reduced success rates by 10 %
regardless of culture test if no clinical
S/S; no AnO2
Seltzer 1835 ve, ? ? Mechanical preparation and irrigation? Overall 84 % Overall 82 % Loose criteria and 6-month follow-up.
et al. (1963) 500 +ve Single cone or lateral condensation No pa 93 % No pa 92 % Microbes in teeth when cultures +ve
Pa 76 % Pa 75 % Bacillus subtilis, yeasts, diphtheroids,
E. coli, Flavobacterium, Micrococcus,
Neisseria, Proteus, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, Staphylococcus,
Streptococcus
Frostell 138 ve, ✓ 30 % Reaming and 1 % cetylpyridinium chlo- 85 % 69 % Strict criteria; 4–5-year follow-up; per-
(1963) 114 +ve, H2O2 ride; if narrow canals, EDTA; widened centage failures by residual bacterial
252 including 10 % I2 to H file 2–3; irrigation with chloroform; species (1-year outcome): staphylococci
RFed teeth tincture EtOH, Dakin’s solution; dressing with (6/22, 28 %); enterococci (6/11, 55 %);
5 % I2 in 10 % KI; sampled at every visit streptococci (18/20, 90 %)
Residual bacteria: Staphylococcus,
Streptococcus (α,β,γ), Enterococcus,
Veillonella, Lactobacillus, diphthe-
roids, coliform organisms, yeasts
Bender 493 ve, ? ? Mechanical preparation and irrigation? @ 6 m 84 % @ 6 m 82 % Loose criteria, 6-month and 2-year fol-
et al. (1964) 213 +ve Single cone/lateral condensation; no No pa 93 % No pa 92 % low-up; subset of data shows that at
details of microbiological procedures Pa 76 % Pa 75 % 6 months and lat cond, signif diff
@ 2 years @ 2 years between +ve (73 %) and ve (83 %)
82 % 82 % cultures; but after 2 years no difference;
No pa 88 % No pa 91 % suggests that this was due to slower
Pa 77 % Pa 77 % healing
Engstrom 169 ve, ? ? Details not given Overall 83 % Overall 69 % Strict criteria, 4–5-year follow-up
(1964) 137 +ve Txed No pa 95 % No pa 81 % residual bacteria: Staphylococcus,
by students Pa 73 % Pa 59 % Streptococcus (α,β,γ), Enterococcus,
1956–1959 Veillonella, Lactobacillus, diphthe-
roids, coliform bacteria, yeasts, Pseu-
domonas
Failure associated with Streptococcus,
Veillonella, uncertain healing associ-
ated with AnO2Streptococcus, Entero-
coccus, yeasts
Engstrom 80 ve, 49 +ve ✓ Aseptic Pulp extirpation with Hedstrom files; @ 4 years @ 4 years Strict criteria, 3.5–4-year follow-up;
and No pa technique irrigation with Biosept or Iodopax 85 % 61 % bacteria not identified
Lundberg (0.02 % I2); dressing with 2 % I2 in 10 %
(1965) KI; RF at 2nd visit; culture before RF
Oliet and 195 ve, ✓ Tincture Mechanical preparation, irrigation, Overall 94 % Overall 81 % Criteria: healed or retrogressed;
Sorin 165 +ve of medication and absence of S/S; culture No pa 95 % No pa 83 % 6-month to 1-year follow-up; results
(1969) metaphen taken at preceding visit +ve; final sample Pa 91 % Pa 80 % analysed by tooth type, age, RF material
taken and root canals filled with GP and and duration of follow-up; analysis
235
Ag points or both showed differences in healing were not

(continued)
Table 3 (continued)
236
Study and Success with Success with Qualifying comments and other
year Sample size RD Decont Treatment details ve culture +ve culture findings
influenced by diagnosis, tooth type, age,
RF material, duration after Tx; culture
test was the most significant factor
Heling and 60 ve, 20 +ve ✓ 2.5 % I2 Chemomechanical preparation with Overall 80 % Overall 70 % Strict criteria, 1–5-year follow-up
Shapira 118 teeth tincture 15 % EDTA, irrigation with 5 % NaOCl @ 1–3 years @ 1–3 years Other results:
(1978) & 3 % H2O2, CPC dressing and Obtura- 74 % 73 % By culture –ve/+ve for: overfilled 60 %/
tion with GP and AH26; 2 –ve cultures @ 4–5 years @ 4–5 years 50 %; underfilled 90 %/80 %; flush
before RF; Sample just before RF 86 % 60 % filled 89 %/60 %; with restoration 83 %/
No Pa 82 % No Pa 80 % 75 %; without restoration 71 %/67 %
Pa 78 % Pa 67 %
Eggink 1007 ve, ✓ Xylene Extirpate pulp or RF; initial culture at 40 % 36 % Strict criteria, 1–3-year follow-up;
(1982) 144 +ve 6 % I2 WL; medication with CPC; 2nd visit: evaluated relation between initial cul-
Previously tincture reaming and irrigation with saline; no ture (no. of bacteria) and size of pa
UnTxed and Rf without –ve culture result; follow-up lesion; the pattern in ReTxed teeth less
ReTxed teeth; at 1, 2, 3 years regular; found a relation between initial
classified by infection and healing but did not find a
size of Pa relation between r culture and healing;
suggested the relation may be between
no. of bacteria and outcome
Sjogren 33 ve, 22 +ve ✓ Moller’s Narrow canals enlarged to size 20 to 94 % 68 % Strict criteria, 5-year follow-up
et al. (1997) All with Pa; protocol WL; endosonics in coronal portion with Number of persistent bacteria; 1–6;
53 teeth recalled 0.5 % NaOCl, NaS2O3 and culture test; 93 % AnO2; number of bacteria low
then sample just before RF 102–103; number and diversity of
remaining bacterial cells; no indication
that certain species were resistant to Tx;
most common persistent bacteria:
Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus,
Eubacterium, Prevotella, Actinomyces
Peters and 30 ve, 8 +ve ✓ 80 % Chemomechanical preparation to 35–60 @ 4–5 years @ 4–5 years Strict criteria, 4–5-year follow-up;
Wesselink All with Pa ethanol apical size, 2 % NaOCl irrigation; sam- 74 % 88 % residual bacterial load: <102 to 104
(2002) ples before canal enlargement, after Single visit Single visit
debridement, after removal of dressing 79 % 86 %
material, and before RF. Multi-visit Multi-visit
69 % 100 %
Waltimo 44 ve, 6 +ve ✓ 0.12 % Chemomechanical preparation with 2 % @1 year: @1 year: At completion of Tx, 4/20 (20 %) of
et al. (2005) All with Pa CHX NaOCl irrigation, Ca(OH)2; samples 1.53 0.79 single visit group, 0/18 (0 %) of two
before canal enlargement, after debride- change in change in visits with Ca(OH)2 group, and 2/12
ment, and after removal of dressing PAI PAI (17 %) of two visits with no dressing
material before RF group still had bacteria. Gram-positive
facultative rods were the most domi-
nant; bacteria identified: Streptococcus
(α), Peptostreptococcus, Veillonella,
Prevotella, E. faecalis, Bacteroides
Molander 61 ve, 27 +ve ✓ Moller’s Chemomechanical preparation with @ 2 years @ 2 years Strict criteria, 2-year follow-up; culture
et al. (2007) All with protocol 0.5 %NaOCl irrigation, dressed with 80 % 44 % result did not have significant associa-
asymptomatic 5 %IKI for 10 min or CaOH for 1 week. tion with periapical healing
pa Samples after medication before RF
Tervit 7 ve, 10 +ve ✓ Moller’s Chemomechanical preparation with @ 2 years @ 2 years Strict criteria, 2-year follow-up; resid-
et al. (2009) All with pa protocol 2.5 % NaOCl irrigation, dressed with 86 % 100 % ual bacterial load before RF: 103–104
2 %CHX for 1–2 weeks. Samples before
and after canal enlargement, after
medication before RF
RD rubber dam, Pa periapical lesion, Tx treatment, UnTx untreated, RTxed root treated, ReTx retreated, CaOH calcium hydroxide, H2O2 hydrogen peroxide,
NaOCl sodium hypochlorite, ? unknown, EtOH alcohol, PP paper point sample, I2tinc iodine tincture, NaS2O3 sodium thiosulfate, S/S signs and symptoms,
Appt appointment, lat cond lateral condensation, RFed root filled, GP gutta-percha, Ag silver point, AnO2 anaerobic, KI potassium iodide, r culture
before obturation, CHX chlorhexidine gluconate, loose criteria reduction in size of periapical lesion accepted as success, strict criteria complete healing only
successful
237
measure for the antimicrobial aspect of the treatment for that time period, and it
gained acceptance.
The test was performed following completion of the chemomechanical phase of
root canal treatment. It involved the deposition of a sampling fluid into the canal
and filing of the dentinal surface to release dentine shavings. The canal fluid,
together with any dentine shavings and bacterial biofilm, was soaked up using
paper points. The paper points were immediately transferred to a sterile bottle
containing bacterial culture broth, which was incubated at 37 C. The root canal
system would be sealed with an antibacterial agent until the next visit, when a
negative culture result would signal readiness for obturation and a positive result,
further debridement with another culture test. The data from such tests are diverse
because of variations in protocols tested, as well as the sampling procedures, yet
some interesting findings emerge.
Taken collectively, a preobturation negative culture result may increase treat-
ment success (as judged by radiographic reduction/elimination of the periapical
lesion) by an average of 12 % (range 0–26 %). Despite this, a number of factors led
to the gradual abandoning of the culture test in clinical practice. One criticism was
that numerous factors could have potentially accounted for the treatment outcome
but were not all considered in these studies. One large study (Seltzer et al. 1963) in
particular contributed to the demise of the culture test, but even their study showed
a 10 % difference in success in favour of the negative culture test when periapical
disease was present. The outcome is even worse when a positive culture test result
combines with the presence of a periapical lesion (Fig. 13).
Rhein et al. 1926
Appleton 1932
Buchbinder 1941
Seltzer et al.1963
Frostell 1963
Engstrom & Frostell 1961
Bender et al. 1966
Engstrom & Lundberg 1965
Storms 1969
Oliet & Sorin 1969
Matsumoto et al. 1987
Sjogren et al. 1997
Peters & Wesselink 2002
Combined
.041568 10 20 30 40
In favour of negative culture
Fig. 13 Effect of negative vs. positive culture on root canal treatment outcome (included studies
with retreatment cases) (OR ¼ 1.9: 95 % CI 1.4, 2.6)
The bacteria in preobturation cultures include Enterococcus, Streptococcus,

Staphylococcus, Lactobacillus, Veillonella, Pseudomonas and Fusobacterium spe-
cies and yeasts. Some studies found no relationship between individual species and
treatment failure, but others have. Whilst the overall failure rate for cases with
positive cultures was 31 %, that for teeth with Enterococcus species was 55 % and
for teeth with Streptococcus species was 90 % (Frostell 1963). In another study,
good quality root canal treatment on 54 teeth with asymptomatic periapical disease
gave an overall success rate of 74 %, but teeth with Enterococcus faecalis had a
success rate of 66 % (Sundqvist et al. 1998). These associations cannot be regarded
as cause–effect and a relationship should also be sought between numbers of
bacteria and treatment outcome. The success rate for teeth with no bacteria was
80 %, whilst that for teeth with bacteria in the canal before obturation was 33 %.
A more recent monkey-model study (Fabricius et al. 2006) used 4- or 5-strain
infection model to test the effect of debridement and obturation procedures on
outcome. When bacteria remained after chemomechanical debridement, 79 % of
the root canals were associated with non-healed periapical lesions, compared
with 28 % when no bacteria were found to remain. Combinations of several
residual bacterial species were more frequently related to non-healed lesions than
were single strains. When no bacteria remained at the end of chemomechanical
debridement, healing occurred independently of the quality of the root filling.
In contrast, when bacteria remained, there was a greater correlation with
non-healing in poor quality root fillings than in technically well-performed
fillings. In root canals where bacteria were found after removal of the root filling,
97 % had not healed, compared with 18 % for those root canals with no bacteria
detected upon removal of root filling. The study emphasises the importance of
reducing bacteria below detection limits (at least from the part of the canal
system accessible for sampling) before permanent root filling in order to achieve
optimal healing conditions for the periapical tissues. It also reinforces the view
that obturation does indeed play a role when there is residual infection. The
ability to properly seal a surface still coated in biofilm must be questioned, yet
even such an act of incarceration appears to inflict some suppression of the
microbiota.
Regardless of the technique for obtaining a culture, the use of a negative culture
to inform progress of treatment has a positive impact on treatment outcome. The
association of specific species with treatment failure is not well established, but the
identity of the small group of species isolated from positive cultures is relatively
constant and may hold answers to treatment resistance and failure. It is, however,
important to account for the other factors that influence root canal treatment
outcome. Bacterial load reduction in the sample-able part of the root canal system
alone may sometimes show no obvious correlation with periapical healing
(Bystrom et al. 1987). Other factors also may need to be taken into account.
4.4 Factors Affecting Outcome of Root Canal Treatment
Clinical judgement of the outcome of treatment is based on the absence of signs of

infection and inflammation, such as pain, tenderness to percussion of the tooth,
tenderness to palpation of the related soft tissues, absence of swelling and sinus and
radiographic demonstration of healing of the periapical lesion (if sufficient time has
lapsed), with regeneration of a completely normal periodontal ligament space.
Absence of signs and symptoms of periapical disease but a persistence of a
periapical radiographic radiolucency may indicate either healing by fibrous repair
or persistent chronic inflammation. Only time and acute exacerbation may identify
the latter, whereas the former should remain asymptomatic.
A systematic review and meta-analysis (Ng et al. 2007, 2008) of the factors
affecting root canal treatment outcome revealed the following: the mean success
rate was 83 % when a vital pulpectomy was performed as there was no
established infection; this reduced to 72 % when the root canal treatment
procedure was aimed at eradicating an established infection associated with a
periapical lesion.
The individual factors having a major impact on root canal treatment outcome
were:
• Presence and size of preoperative periapical lesion
• Apical extent of root canal treatment (instrumentation and root filling) in relation
to radiographic apex
• Outcome of culture test prior to obturation
• Quality of root canal treatment judged by radiographic appearance of root filling
• Quality of the final coronal restoration
The factors having minimal effect on root canal treatment outcome were:
• Age of patient
• Gender of patient
• General health of patient
• Type of treatment technique (preparation, irrigation and obturation material and
technique) other than length control
The improvements in techniques of mechanical and chemical canal preparation
have not resulted in increases in success rates over the last century (Fig. 14). It is
notable that all the factors having a strong influence on treatment outcome may be
associated in some way with root canal infection. Further improvements in root
canal treatment outcomes may therefore be obtained by understanding the nature of
the root canal infection (especially that in the complex apical anatomy) and the
manner in which the microbiota is altered by treatment.
Probability of success based on strict criteria (studies published before 1960)
Probability of success based on strict criteria (studies published in the 1960s)
Fig. 14 (continued)
Probability of success based on strict criteria (studies in 2000s and after)
Fig. 14 Forest plots of root canal treatment outcomes, stratified by decades, showing a lack of
improvement in outcomes
5 Root Canal Treatment Failure and Persisting Infection
When guideline standard root canal treatment is performed, the failure rate is
17–28 %. When the treatment is technically below guideline standard, as described
for a high proportion of root canal treatments performed in general practice across
the world (Fig. 15), the success rates are lower. The causes of root canal treatment
failure (persistent periapical inflammation) may be summarised as follows
according to Nair (2004):
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Fig. 15 Prevalence of periapical radiolucencies associated with root-treated teeth
Microbial
• Intraradicular (persistent or new infection)
• Extra-radicular (pre-existing or precipitated by treatment)
Non-microbial (persistent periapical inflammation/pathosis or new inflamma-
tion/pathosis)
• True cyst
• Foreign body reaction
• Fibrous healing
• Initial misdiagnosis
5.1 Intraradicular Microbiota Associated with Failed Root

Canal Treatment
Microbial species recovered from root-treated teeth with persistent periapical

disease show a different spectrum compared to that in untreated teeth. The
microbiota is dominated by Gram-positive bacteria, many of which are coccoid
facultative anaerobes. The retrieval of bacterial samples from obturated root canal
systems is compromised by the need to remove root-filling material first, which
may kill the bacteria present. The most frequently identified species are Entero-
coccus faecalis, Propionibacterium species, Streptococcus species, Lactobacillus
species, Peptostreptococcus species and yeasts.
The species recovered from root-treated teeth reside in accessory canals, in

dentinal tubules or in the main canal alongside the root filling. They are a subset
of those found in untreated teeth, though the diversity and load are reduced. Unlike
untreated teeth, treated teeth appear to contain few mixed cultures; often only three,
two or one cultivable species are found with a mean of only 1.7 species per tooth.
Teeth with poor root fillings have the highest bacterial counts (103–105) with a
maximum of 3–6 cultivable species per canal and a diversity that resembles that of
untreated teeth, perhaps reflecting poor treatment technique from a biological
perspective. Enterococcus faecalis is the commonest species and when it is present
in small numbers in the primary infection, it is easily eliminated, but if it infects in
large numbers, it is difficult to eradicate.
Although specific bacterial species have not been implicated as being resistant to
treatment in longitudinal studies, the presence of specific groups of bacteria in root-
treated teeth suggests that other than being survivors from the pre-existing infec-
tion, they may be contaminants introduced during treatment. This may be due to
inadequate tooth isolation, poor asepsis, leakage of the access dressing or access
cavity being left open for drainage. It may also be the case that the presence of
E. faecalis in the preliminary infection makes the infection more difficult to
eradicate as a whole (Fabricius et al. 2006). If a particularly recalcitrant strain
survives in the presence of poor obturation, it may colonise and contaminate the
major part of the root canal system and root filling surface (Fig. 16).
5.2 Extra-radicular Microbiota Associated with Failed Root

Canal Treatment
Obtaining a sample from the periapical tissues without contamination is notoriously

difficult. Approaches include either sampling through the root canal or directly
through the soft tissues, either method being susceptible to contamination. Many
studies that have obtained periapical tissue have taken scrapings, which may
include microorganisms from the apical part of the root canal system.
The bacterial front may extend beyond the apical foramen and into the
periapical lesion. It is possible that the establishment of infection in this site
may lead to its change to adapt to the new site. Such a periapical infection may
then seed new infection into the root canal system and become a source of
treatment resistance. This has been a topical area of research interest and contro-
versy. The problem of its study is compounded by the assertion that extraction of
teeth causes pumping motion that may move the bacterial front and artificially
alter the morphological relationships existing in vivo (Dahlen and M€oller 1992).
Therefore not only can periapical tissues be contaminated from the root canal, but
the root canal may be contaminated from the periapical tissues. Such movement
of bacteria due to bulk flow of fluid caused by pressure changes could indeed
occur but is less likely when the coronal part of the tooth is intact (Kapalas
et al. 2011).
Tooth section EUB image SEM image
(mesial)
Biofilm rich in coccal- and rod-

shaped bacteria on surface of gua
percha
Biofilm rich in rod-shaped bacteria

on surface of gua-percha
Biofilm rich in coccal-shaped

bacteria on surface of gua-percha
Distal section EUB image SEM image
Mixed biofilm on GP
Fig. 16 Correlative images of root-treated tooth with persistent disease (images of split tooth), in
situ hybridisation of bacterial presence by EUB probe (red fluorescence, and SEM images
confirming bacterial morphotypes)
Periapical abscesses associated with untreated teeth appear to be dominated by

Streptococcus, Peptostreptococcus and Bacteroides species, a finding consistent
with the presence of these groups in root canals of teeth associated with symptoms.
The profile of bacteria found in periapical tissues in cases of ‘extra-radicular
infection’ is somewhat different. In addition to the above groups, they include
Actinomyces, Propionibacterium, Fusobacterium, Prevotella and Staphylococcus

species; these groups overlap considerably with those observed in teeth with
symptoms. Some regard the two main groups of bacteria involved in extra-radicular
infections to be confined to Actinomyces and Propionibacterium species (Sundqvist
and Reuterving 1980; Nair and Schroeder 1984; Nair et al. 1990a, b).
A. israelii is a repeated culprit in therapy-resistant cases and is by far the most
common species involved in actinomycosis. A. israelii is the most prevalent
Actinomyces species isolated from human abscesses; however, Actinomyces
gerencseriae (formerly A. israelii serotype II) is also prevalent, found in 56 %
and 25 % of human abscesses, respectively. Using checkerboard DNA–DNA
hybridisation analysis of root canal samples from teeth diagnosed with periapical
abscesses, A. israelii and A. gerencseriae have been reported in 14.8 % and 7.4 % of
samples, respectively; however, the role of A. gerencseriae in persistent infection
after root filling is unknown. Recently, a new Actinomyces species, Actinomyces
radicidentis, was found to be involved in posttreatment disease. Using PCR-based
detection, it has been shown to be present in untreated root canal infections and
root-filled teeth with chronic apical periodontitis, although its prevalence in both
types of infection was low (Figdor and Gulabivala 2008).
6 How Root Canal Treatment Works
In summary, root canal treatment is nothing more than the microbicidal control of
an infected wound, albeit a wound secluded within the dark depths and reaches of a
volume and space restricted root canal system in a tooth. Reaching the infection,
specifically the infected wound, involves some technical skill. Indeed, there is some
correlation between the technical standard of treatment and biological outcome;
however, the relationship is not absolute. This must be because the technical
manipulation does not have a direct and sole bearing on changing the nature of
the resident microbial infection. The survival or demise of the resident microbial
population is probably dependent upon the fundamental laws of biofilm physiology.
It is a community of cells with inter-reliance and interdependence amongst its
constituent members. Interference with the environment, even in a nonspecific
way, may therefore facilitate the demise of the more fastidious species, triggering
a chain reaction akin to a ‘domino effect’, which by deprivation of nutrients and
stimulants (such as quorum sensing) from their neighbouring partner species allows
a more global killing effect. Root canal treatment therefore probably works by a
combination of direct and indirect killing effects. The importance of indirect killing
is underestimated in modern root canal treatment and that is why knowledge of
biofilm physiology may be therapeutically highly advantageous.
Conversely, biofilm existence also confers a range of defensive survival strate-
gies. If a sufficiently effective attempt is not made to eradicate the biofilm, then its
innate tendency would be to detect the changes and adapt to facilitate survival.
Recognition that root canal infection is a collection of ECM-enclosed bacteria that
behaves in the manner of an ‘intelligent’, multicellular organism (biofilm) is
important in devising strategies for treatment because bacteria in biofilms are
more resistant to killing. This is attributed to different factors including the obser-
vations that:
• The exopolysaccharide in which the bacteria are embedded may restrict diffu-
sion of the antibacterial agents to the cells.
• Different layers of cells may similarly act as barriers to diffusion.
• Slower-growing bacterial cells, persister cells, metabolically inactive cells or
dormant cells are more resistant to killing.
• Cells may exhibit specific resistance mechanisms.
• Biofilm phenotypes may be inherently more resistant.
The interdependence amongst different bacterial species with their environ-
ment must be the key to the success of root canal treatment as we know it. The
treatment procedures (mechanical and chemical) essentially interfere with the
environment, killing some bacteria and, by a domino effect, indirectly killing
other species by altering the nutritional, physiological and toxic balance. The
surviving bacteria are usually those physiologically ‘hardy’ enough to resist or
adapt to changes in the environment induced by the treatment and capable of
living independently of other species in the unique nutrition-depleted conditions.
The organisms are described as ‘hardy’ because of their capacity to adapt. This
means that a half-hearted first attempt at root canal treatment may result in a more
recalcitrant infection to eradicate at the next attempt. It is therefore biologically
most sensible to launch the most comprehensive effort at eradicating the infection
at the first attempt.
6.1 Degradation of the Microbial Biofilm
The microbial biofilm contains an aggregate of microbes and extracellular poly-

saccharide matrix (ECPM), which are both highly adherent to the canal wall. The
multiple bacterial cell layers covered by the additional thickness of ECPM, which
exceeds the bacterial cell volume, render biofilm removal a difficult task.
Removal is certainly facilitated by organic tissue solvents such as sodium hypo-
chlorite and chelating agents such as EDTA. The EDTA helps by chelating and
sequestering heavy metal ions which normally act as bridges to bond bacteria
together in the biofilm. EDTA is routinely used in microbiology laboratories to
wash bacterial cells free of the extracellular polysaccharide and to separate them.
EDTA is likely to play an important role in degrading the biofilm on the
uninstrumented walls of the root canal system; this is therefore a more significant
function than smear layer removal.
Table 4 Relative efficacy of root canal irrigant agents in their different properties
Action/agent Sodium hypochlorite Iodine Chlorhexidine EDTA
Bacterial killing +++++ +++++ +++ +
Dissolution +++++ +
Biofilm penetration +++++ ++++ ++ ++
Biofilm break-up +++++ ++++
+ relative degree of potency, no potency
6.2 Antibacterial Action Against the Root Canal Microbiota
Perhaps the most significant action of the irrigant must be its ability to kill all
elements of the root canal microbiota. A number of different antibacterial agents
have been used, which exhibit a range of actions against the various bacteria
(Table 4).
It is a view that since biofilm exhibits multiple mechanisms of resistance or
survival, multiple avenues of attack need to be used to facilitate its optimal
eradication (Wolcott et al. 2009), known as multiple concurrent therapies. How-
ever, the approach of using multiple chemical agents against root canal isolates has
not proven effective. The temptation to use multiple agents should be avoided
because whilst at best they may potentiate each other (although the literature does
not currently support this suggestion) or at worst they may neutralise each other. An
example of the latter is the precipitate formed by mixing chlorhexidine with sodium
hypochlorite. The latter combination has been shown to reduce the success rates of
root canal treatment. The conceptual approach makes sense, but the right combi-
nation of therapies needs to be found.
6.3 Derivation of Guidelines
Optimal conditions for root canal treatment, as far as possible based on available
best evidence, have been grouped into guidelines for root canal treatment by
various organisations (European Society of Endodontology 2006; Canadian Acad-
emy of Endodontics 2006). Under such conditions of operation, it may be stated
that using appropriate instruments in conjunction with adequate technical skill, the
canals may be enlarged and predictably shaped, maintaining their original curvature
and patency of the apical termini. Using appropriate concurrent irrigation regimens,
the coronal and middle parts of root canal system are amenable to relatively
effective and predictable debridement, whilst the peripherally extending fins and
complex anatomy may remain contaminated to varying extents. Likewise, the
apical and more complex anatomy is the most difficult to debride predictably.
Under less than optimal conditions of debridement (non-guideline standards), the
coronal and middle parts of the root canal system may remain at least partly
contaminated, whilst the apical part will remain predictably contaminated. Despite
such residual apical contamination by biofilms (Nair et al. 2005), clinical success
rates, as measured by radiographic detection of residual periapical lesions, remain
relatively high (Ng et al. 2007, 2011). It can only be surmised that total bacterial
eradication in the apical anatomy is fortunately unnecessary in the majority
of cases.
7 Nature of Future Challenges
The studies by Nair et al. (2005) and Vera et al. (2012) confirm the trends in
residual apical infection during contemporary root canal treatment procedures.
This implies that residual infection in the apical anatomy is the norm following
completion of root canal treatment and that an ongoing interaction beyond the end
of treatment, between the residual infection, root filling material and host
defences, plays a definitive role in determining the final biological outcome.
This explains several clinical observations about periapical healing outcomes. It
explains why, despite variations and changes in the technical aspects of the
chemomechanical protocol, the success rates of root canal treatment have not
improved over the last century (Fig. 14). It also explains why the success rates are
so sensitive to the apical length of root canal debridement (Fig. 17). It further
explains why the periapical lesion can take so long to heal after termination of the
treatment procedure (Fig. 18).
Matsumiya and Kitamura (1960) made very interesting observations from
an animal study, in which artificially infected root canal systems were
chemomechanically debrided and dressed with calcium hydroxide. Over the course
of time, they observed that periapical healing occurred in parallel with a concurrent
reduction in the bacterial presence. Their interpretation was not that periapical
healing was facilitated by a gradual bacterial demise but that the bacterial demise
was facilitated by periapical healing. This insightful statement probably indicates
part of the truth. The nature of infection and its activity (expressed genes), the
nature of host response and its activity (expressed genes) and any ongoing effect of
the root canal filling (and prior chemomechanical treatment) collectively and
interactively determine the final outcome over time. The outcome per individual
tooth is therefore unpredictable save that we know about 70–80 % will ultimately
result in regeneration to various degrees. Future challenges to improving success
rates therefore depend upon effective research along the lines of residual biofilm
physiology, host response and genetics, treatment effects on microbiota and host
and the physics of fluid dynamics.
Harty et al. 1970
Adenubi & Rule 1976
Jokinen et al. 1978
Kerekes 1978
Kerekes 1978
Heling & Kischinovsky 1979
Barbakow et al. 1980
Klevant & Eggink 1983
Halse & Molven 1987
Peak 1994
Aqrabawi 2006
Doyle et al. 2006
Liang et al. 2011
Ng et al. 2011
Ricucci et al. 2011
Combined
0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1
Probability of success in teeth with "flush" root fillings
Harty et al. 1970
Adenubi & Rule 1976
Jokinen et al. 1978
Kerekes 1978
Kerekes 1978
Halse & Molven 1987
Peak 1994
Aqrabawi 2006
Doyle et al. 2006
Liang et al. 2011
Ng et al. 2011
Ricucci et al. 2011
Combined
0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1
Probability of success in teeth with "short" root fillings
Harty et al. 1970
Adenubi & Rule 1976
Jokinen et al. 1978
Kerekes 1978
Kerekes 1978
Boggia 1983
Halse & Molven 1987
Sjogren et al. 1990
Cvek 1992
Peak 1994
Aqrabawi 2006
Doyle et al. 2006
Liang et al. 2011
Ng et al. 2011
Ricucci et al. 2011
Combined
0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1
Probability of success in teeth with "long" root fillings
Fig. 17 Forest plots of root canal treatment outcome data (based on strict criteria) partitioned by
apical extent of root filling
Fig. 18 (continued)
Fig. 18 Forest plots of outcomes of root canal treatment data partitioned by duration after
treatment
References
Abdullah M, Ng Y-L, Gulabivala K, Moles DR, Spratt DA (2005) Susceptibilties of two Entero-
coccus faecalis phenotypes to root canal medications. J Endod 31(1):30–36
Abramson II (1961) A frank appraisal of the present status of the bacterial culture test as a positive
endodontic procedure. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of
Endodontists, Chicago, ILL
Adib V, Spratt D, Ng Y-L, Gulabivala K (2004) Cultivable microbial flora associated with
persistent periapical disease and coronal leakage after root canal treatment: a preliminary
study. Int Endod J 37(8):542–551
Akpata ES (1976) Effect of endodontic procedures on the population of viable microorganisms in
the infected root canal. J Endod 2:369–373
Anderson AC, Al-Ahmad A, Elamin F et al (2013) Comparison of the bacterial composition and
structure in symptomatic and asymptomatic endodontic infections associated with root-filled
teeth using pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE 8(12), e84960
Anderson AC, Hellwig E, Vespermann R et al (2012) Comprehensive analysis of secondary dental
root canal infections: a combination of culture and culture-independent approaches reveals
new insights. PLoS ONE 7(11), e49576
Auerbach M (1953) Antibiotics vs. instrumentation in endodontics. NY State Dent J 19:225–228
Bence R, Madonia JV, Weine FS, Smulson MH (1973) A microbiologic evaluation of endodontic
instrumentation in pulpless teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 35:676–683
Bender IB, Seltzer S, Turkenkopf S (1964) To culture or not to culture? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol 18:527–540
Bryce G, O’Donnell D, Ready D, Ng Y-L, Pratten J, Gulabivala K (2009) Contemporary root canal
irrigants are able to disrupt and eradicate single- and dual-species biofilms. J Endod 35
(9):1243–1248
Buchbinder M (1941) A statistical comparison of cultured and non-cultured root canal cases.
J Dent Res 20(2):93–96
Byers MR, Taylor PE, Khayat BG, Kimberly CL (1990) Effects of injury and inflammation on
pulpal and periapical nerves. J Endod 16(2):78–84
Bystrom A, Happonen RP, Sjogren U, Sundqvist G (1987) Healing of periapical lesions of pulpless
teeth after endodontic treatment with controlled asepsis. Endod Dent Traumatol 3(2):58–63
Bystrom A, Sundqvist G (1981) Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal
instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 89(4):321–328
Bystrom A, Sundqvist G (1983) Bacteriologic evaluation of the effect of 0.5 percent sodium
hypochlorite in endodontic therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 55(3):307–312
Bystrom A, Sundqvist G (1985) The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in
60 cases of endodontic therapy. Int Endod J 18:35–40
Bystr€om A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G (1985) The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramono-
chlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root
canals. Dent Traumatol 1(5):170–175
Caliskan MK (1995) Pulpotomy of carious vital teeth with periapical involvement. Int Endod J 28
(3):172–176
Canadian Academy of Endodontics (2006) Standards of practices. http://www.caendo.ca/about_
cae/standards/standards_english.pdf. Accessed 31 Jul 2008
Cheung GS, Ho MW (2001) Microbial flora of root canal-treated teeth associated with asymp-
tomatic periapical radiolucent lesions. Oral Microbiol Immunol 16(6):332–337
Card SJ, Sigurdsson A, Orstavik D, Trope M (2002) The effectiveness of increased apical
enlargement in reducing intracanal bacteria. J Endod 28:779–783
Cavalleri G, Cuzzolin L, Urbani G, Benoni G (1989) Root canal microflora: qualitative changes
after endodontic instrumentation. J Chemother 1(2):101–102
Chávez de Paz LE, Dahlén G, Molander A, M€ oller A, Bergenholtz G (2003) Bacteria recovered
from teeth with apical periodontitis after antimicrobial endodontic treatment. Int Endod J 36
(7):500–508
Costerton W, Veeh R, Shirtliff M, Pasmore M, Post C, Ehrlich G (2003) The application of biofilm
science to the study and control of chronic bacterial infections. J Clin Invest 112
(10):1466–1477
Chu FC, Leung WK, Tsang PC, Chow TW, Samaranayake LP (2006) Identification of cultivable
microorganisms from root canals with apical periodontitis following two-visit endodontic
treatment with antibiotics/steroid or calcium hydroxide dressings. J Endod 32:17–23
Cvek M, Nord CE, Hollender L (1976) Antimicrobial effect of root canal debridement in teeth
with immature root. A clinical and microbiologic study. Odontol Revy 27(1):1–10
Daeschlein G (2013) Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management. Int Wound J
10(Suppl 1):9–14
Dahlen G, M€oller Å (1992) Microbiology of endodontic infections. Oral microbiology with basic
microbiology and immunology, 4th edn. Mosby, St Louis
Dalton BC, Orstavik D, Phillips C, Pettiette M, Trope M (1998) Bacterial reduction with nickel-
titanium rotary instrumentation. J Endod 24:763–767
Egan MW, Spratt DA, Ng Y-L, Lam JM, Moles DR, Gulabivala K (2002) Prevalence of yeasts in
saliva and root canals of teeth associated with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 35(4):321–329
Eggink CO (1982) The value of the bacteriological culture in endodontics. I. The influence of
infection during and after treatment. Int Endod J 15(2):79–86
Engstrom B (1964) Correlation of positive culture with the prognosis for root canal treatment.
Odontol Revy 15:257–270
Engstr€om B (1964) The significance of enterococci in root canal treatment. Odontol Revy
15:87–106
Engstr€om B, Frostell G (1964) Experiences of bacteriological root canal control. Acta Odontol
Scand 22:43–69
Engstrom B, Lundberg M (1965) The correlation between positive culture and the prognosis of
root canal therapy after pulpectomy. Odontol Revy 16(3):193–203
European Society of Endodontology (2006) Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consen-
sus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 39(12):921–930
Fabricius L, Dahlen G, Ohman AE, Moller AJ (1982) Predominant indigenous oral bacteria
isolated from infected root canals after varied times of closure. Scand J Dent Res 90
(2):134–144
Fabricius L, Dahlen G, Sundqvist G, Happonen RP, Moller AJ (2006) Influence of residual
experimentally infected monkey teeth. Eur J Oral Sci 114(4):278–285
Figdor D, Ggulabivala K (2008) Survival against the odds: microbiology of root canals associated
with post‐treatment disease. Endod Top 18(1):62–77
Fish E (1939) Bone infection. J Am Dent Assoc 26:691
Frostell G (1963) Clinical significance of the root canal culture. Transactions of the Third
International Conference on Endodontics. University of Pensylvania, PA, pp 112–122
Fukushima H, Yamamoto K, Hirohata K, Sagawa H, Leung KP, Walker CB (1990) Localization
and identification of root canal bacteria in clinically asymptomatic periapical pathosis. J Endod
16(11):534–538
Goldman M, Pearson AH (1969) Postdébridement bacterial flora and antibiotic sensitivity. Oral
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 28(6):897–905
Gomes BP, Lilley JD, Drucker DB (1996) Clinical significance of dental root canal microflora.
J Dent 24(1–2):47–55
Grahnén H, Krasse B (1963) The effect of instrumentation and flushing of non-vital teeth in
endodontic therapy. Odontol Rev 14:167–177
Gulabivala K (2004) Species richness of gram-positive coccoid morphotypes isolated from

untreated and treated root canals of teeth associated with periapical disease, University of
London
Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, Ng Y-L (2001) Root and canal morphology of Burmese
mandibular molars. Int Endod J 34(5):359–370
Gulabivala K, Ng Y-L (2009) Endodontology. In: Wilson NHF (ed) Clinical dental medicine 2020.
Quintessence, New Malden, pp 147–182
Gulabivala K, Ng Y-L, Gilbertson M, Eames I (2010) The fluid mechanics of root canal irrigation.
Physiol Meas 31(12):R49–R84
Gulabivala K, Stock C (1995) Preparation of the root canal. Color atlas and text of endodontics,
2nd edn. Mosby-Wolfe, London, pp 97–144
Hall E (1928) Pulpless teeth. Dental Cosmo 19:145–150
Hancock HH 3rd, Sigurdsson A, Trope M, Moiseiwitsch J (2001) Bacteria isolated after unsuc-
cessful endodontic treatment in a North American population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Oral Radiol Endod 91(5):579–586
Hashimura T, Sato M, Hoshino E (2001) Detection of Slackia exigua, Mogibacterium timidum and
Eubacterium saphenum from pulpal and periradicular samples using the Polymerase Chain
Reaction (PCR) method. Int Endod J 34(6):463–470
Heling B, Shapira J (1978) Roentgenologic and clinical evaluation of endodontically treated teeth,
with or without negative culture. Quintessence Int Dent Dig 9(11):79–84
Ingle J, Zeldow B (1958) An evaluation of mechanical instrumentation and the negative culture in
endodontic therapy. J Am Dent Assoc 57:471–476
Jones CE, Kennedy JP (2012) Treatment options to manage wound biofilm. Adv Wound Care
(New Rochelle) 1(3):120–126
Jordan RE, Suzuki M, Skinner DH (1978) Indirect pulp-capping of carious teeth with periapical
lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 97(1):37–43
Kalfas S, Figdor D, Sundqvist G (2001) A new bacterial species associated with failed endodontic
treatment: identification and description of Actinomyces radicidentis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Kapalas A, Spratt DA, Ng Y-L, Gulabivala K (2011) An investigation of a potential confounder in
ex vivo microbiological studies–the bulk flow of fluid through apical foramina during tooth
extraction. Int Endod J 44(6):534–542
Katebzadeh N, Hupp J, Trope M (1999) Histological periapical repair after obturation of infected
root canals in dogs. J Endod 25(5):364–368
Katebzadeh N, Sigurdsson A, Trope M (2000) Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing after
obturation of infected root canals: an in vivo study. Int Endod J 33(1):60–66
Klevant FJ, Eggink CO (1983) The effect of canal preparation on periapical disease. Int Endod J 16
(2):68–75
Koontongkaew S, Silapichit R, Thaweboon B (1988) Clinical and laboratory assessments of
camphorated monochlorophenol in endodontic therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
65:757–762
Kvist T, Molander A, Dahlen G, Reit C (2004) Microbiological evaluation of one- and two-visit
endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized, clinical trial. J Endod
30:572–576
Lana MA, Ribeiro-Sobrinho AP, Stehling R et al (2001) Microorganisms isolated from root canals
presenting necrotic pulp and their drug susceptibility in vitro. Oral Microbiol Immunol
16:100–105
Lussi A, Messerli L, Hotz P, Grosrey J (1995) A new non-instrumental technique for cleaning and
filling root canals. Int Endod J 28(1):1–6
Markvart M, Dahlén G, Reit CE, Bjørndal L (2013) The antimicrobial effect of apical box versus
apical cone preparation using iodine potassium iodide as root canal dressing: a pilot study. Acta
Odontol Scand 71(3–4):786–791
Matsumiya S, Kitamura M (1960) Histo-pathological and histo-bacteriological studies of the

relation between the condition of sterilization of the interior of the root canal and the healing
process of periapical tissues in experimentally infected root canal treatment. Bull Tokyo Dent
Coll 1(1):1–19
Mejare B (1975) Characteristics of Streptococcus milleri and Streptococcus mitior from infected
dental root canals. Odontol Rev 26(4):291–308
Melville TH, Slack GL (1961) Bacteria isolated from root canals during endodontic treatment.
Br Dent J 110:127–130
Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G (1990) Microbiological evaluation of clindamycin as a root canal
dressing in teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 23:113–118
Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G, Kvist T (1998) Microbiological status of root-filled teeth with
Molander A, Warfvinge J, Reit C, Kvist T (2007) Clinical and radiographic evaluation of one- and
two-visit endodontic treatment of asymptomatic necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis: a
randomized clinical trial. J Endod 33(10):1145–1148
M€oller AJ (1966) Microbiological examination of root canals and periapical tissues of human
teeth. Methodological studies. Odontol Tidskr 74(5 Suppl):1–380
M€oller AJ, Fabricius L, Dahlen G, Ohman AE, Heyden G (1981) Influence on periapical tissues of
indigenous oral bacteria and necrotic pulp tissue in monkeys. Scand J Dent Res 89(6):475–484
M€oller AJ, Fabricius L, Dahlen G, Sundqvist G, Happonen RP (2004) Apical periodontitis
development and bacterial response to endodontic treatment. Experimental root canal infec-
tions in monkeys with selected bacterial strains. Eur J Oral Sci 112(3):207–215
Moore DL (1967) Conservative treatment of teeth with vital pulps and periapical lesions: a
preliminary report. J Prosthet Dent 18(5):476–481
Morse F, Yates M (1941) Follow up studies of root-filled teeth in relation to bacteriologic findings.
J Am Dent Assoc 28:956–971
Myers JW, Marshall FJ, Rosen S (1969) The incidence and identity of microorganisms present in
root canals at filling following culture reversals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 28(6):889–
896
Nair PN (2004) Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures. Crit Rev
Oral Biol Med 15(6):348–381
ment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 99(2):231–252
Nair PNR, Schroeder HE (1984) Periapical actinomycosis. J Endod 10:567–570
Nair PN, Sj€ogren U, Krey G, Kahnberg KE, Sundqvist G (1990a) Intra-radicular bacteria and fungi
in root-filled, asymptomatic human teeth with therapy-resistant periapical lesions: a long-term
light and electron microscopic follow-up study. J Endod 16:580–588
Nair PN, Sj€ogren U, Krey G, Sundqvist G (1990b) Therapy-resistant foreign body giant cell
granuloma at the periapex of a root-filled human tooth. J Endod 16:589–595
Ng Y-L, Mann V, Gulabivala K (2011) A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of
nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J 44(7):583–609
Ng Y-L, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K (2007) Outcome of primary root canal
treatment: systematic review of the literature - part 1. Effects of study characteristics on
probability of success. Int Endod J 40(12):921–939
Ng Y-L, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K (2008) Outcome of primary root canal
treatment: systematic review of the literature – Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J
41(1):6–31
Nicholls E (1962) The efficacy of cleansing of the root canal. Br Dent J 112(4):167–170
Olgart LG (1969) Bacteriological sampling from root canals directly after chemomechanical
treatment. A clinical and bacteriological study. Acta Odontol Scand 27(1):91–103
Oliet S (1962) Evaluation of culturing in endodontic therapy. A preliminary clinical report. Oral
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 15:727–730
Oliet S, Sorin SM (1969) Evaluation of clinical results based upon culturing root canals. Int Endod
J 3(1):3–6
Ørstavik D, Kerekes K, Molven O (1991) Effects of extensive apical reaming and calcium
hydroxide dressing on bacterial infection during treatment of apical periodontitis: a pilot
study. Int Endod J 24(1):1–7
Ozok AR, Persoon IF, Huse SM et al (2012) Ecology of the microbiome of the infected root canal
system: a comparison between apical and coronal root segments. Int Endod J 45(6):530–541
Paiva SS, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Carmo FL, Leite DC, Ferreira DC, Rachid CT, Rosado AS
(2013) Clinical antimicrobial efficacy of NiTi rotary instrumentation with NaOCl irrigation,
final rinse with chlorhexidine and interappointment medication: a molecular study. Int Endod J
46(3):225–233
Paquette L, Legner M, Fillery ED, Friedman S (2007) Antibacterial efficacy of chlorhexidine
gluconate intracanal medication in vivo. J Endod 33:788–795
Peciuliene V, Balciuniene I, Eriksen HM, Haapasalo M (2000) Isolation of Enterococcus faecalis
in previously root-filled canals in a Lithuanian population. J Endod 26(10):593–595
Peciuliene V, Reynaud AH, Balciuniene I, Haapasalo M (2001) Isolation of yeasts and enteric
bacteria in root-filled teeth with chronic apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 34(6):429–434
Peters LB, Wesselink PR (2002) Periapical healing of endodontically treated teeth in one and
two visits obturated in the presence or absence of detectable microorganisms. Int Endod J
35:660–667
Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Sousa EL, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ (2003) Microorgan-
isms from canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions. Int Endod J 36(1):1–11
Provenzano JC, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Domingues RR, Paes Leme AF, Silva MR (2013)
Metaproteome analysis of endodontic infections in association with different clinical condi-
tions. PLoS ONE 8(10), e76108
Reit C, Dahlén G (1988) Decision making analysis of endodontic treatment strategies in teeth with
Reit C, Molander A, Dahlen G (1999) The diagnostic accuracy of microbiologic root canal
sampling and the influence of antimicrobial dressings. Endod Dent Traumatol 15:278–283
Rhein M, Krasnow F, Gies W (1926) A prolonged study of the electrolytic treatment of dental
focal infection–a preliminary report. Dent Cosmos 17:971–981
Richardson N, Mordan NJ, Figueiredo JA, Ng Y-L, Gulabivala K (2009) Microflora in teeth
associated with apical periodontitis: a methodological observational study comparing two
protocols and three microscopy techniques. Int Endod J 42(10):908–921
Rocas IN, Siqueira JF Jr (2008) Root canal microbiota of teeth with chronic apical periodontitis.
J Clin Microbiol 46(11):3599–3606
Rocas IN, Siqueira JF Jr (2011) In vivo antimicrobial effects of endodontic treatment procedures
as assessed by molecular microbiologic techniques. J Endod 37(3):304–310
Rolph HJ, Lennon A, Riggio MP et al (2001) Molecular identification of microorganisms from
endodontic infections. J Clin Microbiol 39(9):3282–3289
Ruddle C (2007) Hydrodynamic disinfection: tsunami endodontics. Dent Today 26(5):110–112,
114
Sabeti MA, Nekofar M, Motahhary P, Ghandi M, Simon JH (2006) Healing of apical periodontitis
after endodontic treatment with and without obturation in dogs. J Endod 32(7):628–633
Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Benno Y (2007) Bacterial reduction and persistence after
endodontic treatment procedures. Oral Microbiol Immunol 22(1):19–23
Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN, Benno Y (2008) Molecular analysis of the root canal
microbiota associated with endodontic treatment failures. Oral Microbiol Immunol 23
(4):275–281
Seltzer S, Bender IB, Turkenkopf S (1963) Factors affecting successful repair after root canal
therapy. J Am Dent Assoc 67:651–662
Shuping GB, Orstavik D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M (2000) Reduction of intracanal bacteria using
nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications. J Endod 26:751–755
Siqueira JF Jr, Magalhães KM, Rôças IN (2007a) Bacterial reduction in infected root canals
treated with 2.5% NaOCl as an irrigant and calcium hydroxide/camphorated paramono-
chlorophenol paste as an intracanal dressing. J Endod 33(6):667–672
Siqueira JF Jr, Guimarães-Pinto T, Rôças IN (2007b) Effects of chemomechanical preparation
with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and intracanal medication with calcium hydroxide on cultiva-
ble bacteria in infected root canals. J Endod 33(7):800–805
Siren EK, Haapasalo MP, Ranta K, Salmi P, Kerosuo EN (1997) Microbiological findings and
clinical treatment procedures in endodontic cases selected for microbiological investigation.
Int Endod J 30(2):91–95
Sjogren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G (1997) Influence of infection at the time of root filling
on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 30
(5):297–306
Sj€ogren U, Figdor D, Spangberg L, Sundqvist G (1991) The antimicrobial effect of calcium
hydroxide as a short-term intracanal dressing. Int Endod J 24:119–125
Sj€
ogren U, Sundqvist G (1987) Bacteriologic evaluation of ultrasonic root canal instrumentation.
Stewart GG (1955) The importance of chemomechanical preparation of the root canal. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol 8(9):993–997
Stewart GG, Cobe H, Rappaport H (1961) Study of new medicament in chemomechanical
preparation of infected root canals. J Am Dent Assoc 63:33
Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjogren U (1998) Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed
Sundqvist G, Reuterving CO (1980) Isolation of Actinomyces israelii from periapical lesion.
J Endod 6(6):602–606
Tani-Ishii N, Wang CY, Tanner A, Stashenko P (1994) Changes in root canal microbiota during
the development of rat periapical lesions. Oral Microbiol Immunol 9(3):129–135
Tervit C, Paquette L, Torneck CD, Basrani B, Friedman S (2009) Proportion of healed teeth with
apical periodontitis medicated with two percent chlorhexidine gluconate liquid: a case-series
study. J Endod 35(9):1182–1185
Tsatsas B, Tzamouranis A, Mitsis F (1974) A bacteriological examination of root canals before
filling. J Br Endod Soc 7(2):78–80
Vera J, Siqueira JF Jr, Ricucci D et al (2012) One- versus two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth
with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study. J Endod 38(8):1040–1052
Vianna ME, Horz HP, Conrads G, Zaia AA, Souza-Filho FJ, Gomes BP (2007) Effect of root canal
procedures on endotoxins and endodontic pathogens. Oral Microbiol Immunol 22:411–418
Waltimo TM, Sirén EK, Torkko HL, Olsen I, Haapasalo MP (1997) Fungi in therapy-resistant
Waltimo T, Trope M, Haapasalo M, Orstavik D (2005) Clinical efficacy of treatment procedures in
endodontic infection control and one year follow-up of periapical healing. J Endod
31(12):863–866
Wang CS, Arnold RR, Trope M, Teixeira FB (2007) Clinical efficiency of 2% chlorhexidine gel in
reducing intracanal bacteria. J Endod 33:1283–1289
Wang QQ, Zhang CF, Chu CH, Zhu XF (2012) Prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis in saliva and
filled root canals of teeth associated with apical periodontitis. Int J Oral Sci 4(1):19–23
Wolcott RD, Gontcharova V, Sun Y, Dowd SE (2009) Evaluation of the bacterial diversity among
and within individual venous leg ulcers using bacterial tag-encoded FLX and Titanium
amplicon pyrosequencing and metagenomic approaches. BMC Microbiol 9:226
Xavier AC, Martinho FC, Chung A et al (2013) One-visit versus two-visit root canal treatment:
effectiveness in the removal of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria. J Endod 39:959–964
Yared GM, Dagher FE (1994) Influence of apical enlargement on bacterial infection during
treatment of apical periodontitis. J Endod 20:535–537
Zeldow BI, Ingle JI (1963) Correlation of the positive culture to the prognosis of endodontically
treated teeth: a clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 66:9–13
Root Canal Irrigation
Luc van der Sluis, Christos Boutsioukis, Lei-Meng Jiang, Ricardo Macedo,
Bram Verhaagen, and Michel Versluis
Abstract The aims of root canal irrigation are the chemical dissolution or disrup-
tion and the mechanical detachment of pulp tissue, dentin debris and smear layer
(instrumentation products), microorganisms (planktonic or biofilm), and their prod-
ucts from the root canal wall, their removal out of the root canal system. Each of the
endodontic irrigation systems has its own irrigant flow characteristics, which should
fulfill these aims. Without flow (convection), the irrigant would have to be distrib-
uted through diffusion. This process is slow and depends on temperature and
concentration gradients. On the other hand, convection is a faster and more efficient
transport mechanism. During irrigant flow, frictional forces will occur, for example,
between the irrigant and the root canal wall (wall shear stress). In this chapter the
irrigant flow and wall shear stress produced by different irrigation systems will be
described. Furthermore, the effect of the flow on the biofilm and the chemical effect
of irrigants on the biofilm will be discussed.
1 Introduction
Root canal irrigation can be defined as the procedure to deliver a liquid or irrigant
in the root canal system before, during, and after instrumentation of the root canal.
The aims of this procedure are the chemical dissolution or disruption and the
mechanical detachment of pulp tissue, dentin debris and smear layer (instrumenta-
tion products), microorganisms (planktonic or biofilm), and their products
L. van der Sluis (*)

Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen,
The Netherlands
C. Boutsioukis • L.-M. Jiang • R. Macedo
Department of Endodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA),
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
B. Verhaagen • M. Versluis
Physics of Fluids group, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine,
MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, The Netherlands

Biofilms 9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47415-0_9
260 L. van der Sluis et al.
(all together hereafter named substrate) from the root canal wall and their removal
out of the root canal system. The objectives of irrigation are to induce a flow of
irrigant:
• Which ensures an adequate delivery throughout the root canal system and a close
contact with the substrate
• That can achieve frequent refreshment and mixing of the irrigant, in order to
retain an effective concentration of the active chemical component(s) and com-
pensate for its rapid inactivation
• That carries away the substrate and provides lubrication for the instruments
• That applies a force on the root canal wall (wall shear stress), in order to detach/
disrupt the substrate
• Which is restricted within the constraints of the root canal, thus preventing
irrigant extrusion toward the periapical tissues
Each of the irrigation systems has its own flow characteristics, which should
fulfill these objectives. Without the flow (also termed convection), the irrigant
would have to be delivered throughout the root canal system by diffusion, which
is the result of the random movement of individual particles (molecules/ions) in the
fluid. This process is slow and depends, for example, on temperature and concen-
tration gradients. On the other hand, convection is a faster and more efficient
transport mechanism in which molecules are transported by the motion of fluid
(Incropera and de Witt 1990) which contributes to effective delivery, refreshment,
and mixing of the irrigant. The flow of irrigants is also affected by their physical
properties, which will be discussed in section 5.2.
Within the irrigation procedure, two phases can be distinguished: the flow phase,
during which the irrigant is delivered and flows in and out of the root canal, and a
rest phase, when the irrigant is at rest in the root canal. Irrigant activation systems
introduce an additional activation phase, to enable an energy source to enhance the
streaming of the irrigant. The flow and activation phase assists the mechanical and
chemical activity through convection and diffusion of the molecules/ions of the
irrigant and the rest phase mostly through diffusion.
Because both the mechanical and chemical aspects are determined by the
irrigant flow, the main goal of this chapter is to describe in detail this flow provoked
by the different irrigation systems (syringe, negative pressure, manual dynamic
activation (MDA), (ultra)sonics, laser) (Fig. 1) combined with its chemical or
mechanical effects. Recently, a new irrigation system, the Multisonic Ultracleaning
System (Sonendo Inc., Laguna Hills, CA, USA), has been introduced onto the
market (Haapasalo et al. 2014). Although the manufacturer claims the working
mechanism relies on “a wide frequency range of acoustic energy” (oral communi-
cation), they were not willing to share the working principles with us. Therefore, it
is not possible to critically analyze this system within this chapter.
Unfortunately, only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) is available on the
effect of root canal irrigation on the endodontic outcome (Liang et al. 2013).
Root Canal Irrigation 261
Fig. 1 Sketches of the flow induced by different irrigation systems: a) positive pressure, b)
negative pressure, c) MDA, d) sonic activation, e) ultrasonic activation, and f) laser activation.
The images are not to scale
Therefore, we have to rely on ex vivo and in vitro research, which mostly provides
information on a certain predefined effect of different irrigation procedures, with
the exception of some studies which provide data on the irrigant flow. Because
often different methodologies are used, it is not always possible to compare the
results. Furthermore, we excluded debris and smear layer studies conducted by
SEM and studies with planktonic microorganisms or paper point analysis and only
included biofilm studies. It is important to realize that the success of cleaning of the
root canal system depends on many factors that are intertwined and interact with
each other and that the exact contribution of each one of them is not known.
2 Irrigation Systems
Conventional irrigation with a syringe and needle remains widely accepted (Dutner
et al. 2012; Savani et al. 2014; Willershausen et al. 2015). However, motivation to
improve irrigation efficacy and safety led to the development of other systems
(Gu et al. 2009). The mechanism of energy transfer determines the specific flow
characteristics of the irrigation systems and consequently their efficacy. A
non-instrumentation technique would still be the ideal method, preventing instru-
mentation of the root canal with its related disadvantages like smear layer and
dentin debris production, iatrogenic errors, weakening of the root structure, and
apical crack formation (Şen et al. 1995; Gorni and Gagliani 2004; Wu et al. 2004;
Shemesh et al. 2010). Such a system has been proposed by Lussi et al. (1993)
however, establishing an alternating negative and positive pressure which would
enable an effective irrigation procedure and prevent extrusion of the irrigant
without introducing instruments/devices in the apical part of the canal seems, for
the moment, to be the major limitation. Combinations of syringe irrigation to
deliver the irrigant in the root canal and various ways to activate/energize the
irrigant have established a rich variety of irrigation techniques (Table 1).
3 Irrigant Flow (Table 2)
3.1 Irrigant Flow During Syringe Irrigation (Positive

Pressure)
During syringe irrigation, the irrigant is normally delivered by a needle preferably

positioned as close to WL as possible. For very low flow rates, in the order of
0.01 mL/s in combination with a 30G needle, a steady laminar flow is developed
(Boutsioukis et al. 2009; Verhaagen et al. 2012b). For higher flow rates up to
0.26 mL/s, which is close to the clinical limits, the flow becomes unsteady, but
remains laminar (Boutsioukis et al. 2009, 2010a; Verhaagen et al. 2012b), contrary
to previous reports (Kahn et al. 1995). An unsteady flow changes over time, but is
not necessarily turbulent. Turbulent flows are highly unsteady, random,
unpredictable, and chaotic (Pope 2000). The flow pattern depends primarily on
the type of needle used, while needle insertion depth, (apical) root canal size, and
taper have a limited influence (Boutsioukis et al. 2009, 2010a, b, c, d, e; Verhaagen
et al. 2012b) (Fig. 2). Based on the needle outlet and the resulting flow, needles can
be categorized into two main groups, namely, the open-ended and closed-ended
needles. All needles create a jet at their outlet, which can be defined as a high-
velocity fluid stream forced out of a small-diameter opening or nozzle (Tilton 1999;
White 1999); the shape of the outlet determines the orientation and, to some extent,
the velocity and stability of the jet (Boutsioukis et al. 2010b; Verhaagen
et al. 2012b).
When open-ended needles (flat, beveled, notched) are used, the velocity of the
jet is relatively high, and the flow extends along the longitudinal axis of the root
canal, apically to their tip. Within a certain distance, which depends on the
geometry of the root canal and the insertion depth of the needle, the jet appears to
break up gradually. In the case of the closed-ended needles (side vented, double
side vented), the jet of irrigant is formed near the apical side of the outlet (the one
proximal to the tip for the double side vented) and is directed toward the apex with a
divergence of approximately 30 following a curved path around the tip
(Boutsioukis et al. 2009, 2010b) (Fig. 2). A series of counterrotating vortices
Table 1 Different Irrigation Systems
Technique Machine Simultaneous Flush
Delivery method Activation method assisted instrumentation method Lit.
SyringeP No No No Cont Boutsioukis et al. (2007)
No No Brush No Cont Al-Hadlaq et al. (2006)
needle
Gutta-percha No No Int Huang et al. (2008), Jiang et al. (2012)
Brush No No Int Keir et al. (1990)
Rotary brush Yes No Int Weise et al. (2007)
Oscillating Sonic Yes No Int Jiang et al. (2010a, b)
tip Ultrasonic Yes No Int van der Sluis et al. (2006)
Laser Yes No Int Blanken and Verdaasdonk (2007),
de Groot et al. (2009)
UltrasonicP Needle Oscillating Yes No Cont Castelo-Baz et al. (2012), Jiang
needle et al. (2012)
Handpiece Oscillating Yes No Cont van der Sluis et al. (2006)
tip
File Yes Yes Cont/int Guerisoli et al. (1998)
NITP,N No Yes Yes Cont Lussi et al. (1993)
Quantec-EP No Yes Yes Cont Walters et al. (2002)
SAFP No Yes Yes Cont Metzger et al. (2010)
RinsEndoP No Yes No Cont Hauser et al. (2007)
Safety No Yes No Cont Jiang et al. (2012)
irrigatorP
IAC No Yes No Cont Fukumoto et al. (2006)
needleN
EndoVacN No Yes No Cont Nielsen and Baumgartner (2007)
P ¼ positive pressure; N ¼ negative pressure
263
Table 2 Irrigation technique characteristics, assuming a root canal of size #35/.06 filled with water
264
Technique Characteristics Flow velocity Pressure Shear stress

Positive- Flow through a needle Inside needle: 10 m/s Apical pressure: Open-ended nee- Up to 500 N/m2
pressure needle • Driving pressure: 150 kPa (Boutsioukis et al. 2010d) dle: 26 kPa Highest shear stress
irrigation • Flow rate: 0.2 mL/s Outside the needle: depends Closed-ended needle: 18 kPa locally, depending on
(Boutsioukis et al. 2007) strongly on needle type and loca- (Boutsioukis et al. 2010d) needle type
• Needle size: 27–31G tion in the root canal For a 45/.06 canal 3 mm away from Away from needle shear
Flow is not likely to enter side WL stress much lower
canals (Boutsioukis
et al. 2010d)
Negative- Flow aspirated through a needle Inside needle: average 0.6 m/s, Values for the apical pressure are Up to 100 N/m2
pressure needle • Flow rate: 0.05 mL/s (Brunson max 1.6 m/s not reported in literature, but Highest values near the
irrigation et al. 2010) Outside needle: 0.2 m/s between expected to be small tip of the micro-cannula
• Needle size: 30G the needle and the walls; details in
the apical area unknown
Flow is not likely to enter side
canals
Manual Gutta-percha cones that are 0.05 m/s, depending on how well Apical pressures not reported in the Around 1 N/m2
dynamic moved up and down the cone fits into the root canal literature Equally distributed on
irrigation • Frequency: 3 Hz all walls of the root canal
• Amplitude: 2.5 mm
• Gutta-percha cone:
fitting the canal
(Jiang et al. 2012)
Sonic irrigation Oscillation of a plastic tip Steady: Next to oscillating file: Steady:
• Frequency: 160–190 Hz Oscillating: 1 m/s Steady: Oscillating: 8 N/m2
• Amplitude: 1 mm Maximum velocities only at the Oscillating: 7 Pa (if it could oscillate
• File diameter: 200 μm free end of the plastic tip Apical pressure: unknown, but unconstrained)
(Data for EndoActivator) (Jiang expected to be small Highest shear stress near
et al. 2010a) the tip
Oscillating file has one node and
one antinode
L. van der Sluis et al.
Passive ultra- Oscillation of a file Steady: 2.5 m/s Next to oscillating file: Steady: 2 N/m2
sonic irrigation • Frequency: 30 kHz Oscillating: 10 m/s Steady: 3 kPa Oscillatory: 3000 N/m2
• Amplitude: 50 μm Maximum velocities at each anti- Oscillating: 9 kPa Highest shear stresses at
• File diameter: 200 μm node; decreasing toward the Apical pressure: unknown, but each antinode
Oscillating file has around six nodes expected to be small (Verhaagen (Verhaagen et al. 2014b)
nodes and six antinodes, with a High directivity of the flow in the et al. 2014b)
spacing of ca. 5 mm (Ahmad direction of oscillation
et al. 1993)
Laser-activated Transmission of laser energy into 1–10 m/s Apical pressures not available in 1000 N/m2
irrigation irrigant (Blanken and Verdaasdonk 2007; literature, but irrigant extrusion is (de Groot et al. 2009)
• Laser type: Er:YAG or Er,Cr: de Groot et al. 2009) reported (George and Walsh 2008)
YSGG
• Laser energy: < 250 mJ/pulse
• Pulse repetition rate: 1–25 Hz
(de Groot et al. 2009)
265
Fig. 2 (1) Time-averaged contours of velocity magnitude (left) and vectors (right) along the z-y
plane in the apical part of the root canal for flat (A), beveled (B), and notched (C) open-ended
needles and side-vented (D), double side-vented (E) and multi-vented (F) closed-ended needles.
The reverse flow toward the canal orifice was noted mainly near the canal wall. (2) Streamlines
indicating the route of massless particles released downstream from the needle inlet and colored
according to time-averaged velocity magnitude. Particle trajectories provide visualization of the
fresh irrigant main flow in three dimensions. Both presence and density of the streamlines are
important to indicate the degree of irrigant penetration. (3) Time-averaged distribution of shear
stress on the root canal wall. Only half of the root canal wall is presented to allow simultaneous
evaluation of the needle position. Needles are colored in red. Reprinted from Boutsioukis et al.
(2010b) with permission from Elsevier.
(flow structures where the fluid is rotating) extending to the apical terminus of the
canal are formed apically to the tip. Their size, position, and number may differ
according to needle insertion depth, root canal size and taper, and flow rate. The
velocity of the irrigant inside each vortex decreases significantly toward the apex.
When a double side-vented needle is used, 93.5 % of the irrigant flows out of the
outlet proximal to the tip (Boutsioukis et al. 2010b). The apical irrigant refresh-
ment/mixing of the closed-ended needles is limited and does not exceed 1–1.5 mm
beyond the needle tip for flow rates up to 0.26 mL/s, even in large root canals
(Boutsioukis et al. 2009; Boutsioukis et al. 2010b, c, d, e; Verhaagen et al. 2012b),
in contrast to what is reported in earlier studies (Kahn et al. 1995), probably
depending on the limitations of the study design. The jet formation and the
differences between open-ended and closed-ended needles have also been identified
in moderately curved root canals (Šnjarić et al. 2012).
A reverse flow toward the canal orifice occurs near the canal wall for both needle
types. Regardless of type, small-diameter needles seem to be more effective even
when positioned at the same depth (Chow 1983). Keeping the variables constant,
the use of a larger needle would directly result in a decrease of the space available
for the reverse flow between the needle and the root canal wall and consequently
increase apical pressure for open-ended needles and decrease irrigant refreshment/
mixing apically to the tip for closed-ended needles (Boutsioukis et al. 2010d, e). As
expected, an increase in the preparation size or taper leads to a more efficient flow in
the apical root canal (Chow 1983; Falk and Sedgley 2005; Hsieh et al. 2007; Huang
et al. 2008; Bronnec et al. 2010a; Boutsioukis et al. 2010d, e). Effective irrigant
refreshment/mixing starts from apical size 30, 0.06 taper, allowing refreshment/
mixing 2 mm apically to an open-ended needle and 1 mm apically to the tip of a
closed-ended needle (Boutsioukis et al. 2010e). The increase of size or taper results
in a significant increase in irrigant refreshment/mixing for open-ended needles but
not for closed-ended needles (Hockett et al. 2008; Boutsioukis et al. 2010d, e).
Surprisingly, a minimally tapered root canal preparation (size 60, 0.02 taper) may
present a significant advantage over the tapered ones in terms of irrigant refresh-
ment/mixing (Boutsioukis et al. 2010e); however, a decision on the optimal instru-
mentation strategy should also take into account the possibility of iatrogenic errors,
weakening of the root structure, and obturation technique requirements. A larger
volume of irrigant has been associated with improved canal cleanliness (Baker
et al. 1975) and irrigant refreshment/mixing (Sedgley et al. 2004, 2005; Bronnec
et al. 2010b). An increase in the volume of irrigant can be translated in increased
duration of irrigation, assuming a constant flow rate, which allows for improved
irrigant refreshment/mixing and chemical effect. Root canal curvature doesn’t seem
to create additional obstacles for irrigant flow, provided that the needle is placed
within 1 mm of working length (WL) (Nguy and Sedgley 2006). Small-size (30G)
flexible irrigation needles available nowadays can facilitate irrigant delivery near
WL even in severely curved canals, provided that the canal is enlarged at least to
size 30 or 35. Tooth orientation (mandibular, maxillary, horizontal) has only a
minor influence on the resulting irrigant flow (Boutsioukis et al. 2009, 2010a;
Boutsioukis 2010). In a single-phase system, such as a root canal completely filled
with irrigant, gravity affects the flow through hydrostatic pressure. The latter is very
low compared to the dynamic pressure developed due to the flow of the irrigant.
When considering root canal irrigation, it should be emphasized that the root canal
is closed at the apex (Hockett et al. 2008; Boutsioukis et al. 2009; Parente
et al. 2010; Tay et al. 2010). The apex being closed results in a more complicated
flow pattern compared to a canal open from both sides.
3.2 Irrigant Flow During Negative-Pressure Irrigation
Negative-pressure irrigation systems are based on a flow generated by aspiration of

irrigant through a needle, placed in the middle part of the root canal or close to or at
WL. Fresh irrigant is delivered in the pulp chamber by a larger needle, so there is no
forced ejection of fluid near WL and consequently no risk of irrigant extrusion
through the apical foramen (Mitchell et al. 2010, 2011). Different negative-pressure
systems have been described in the literature (Fukumoto et al. 2004, 2006), but
because most of the information has been published on the EndoVac system,
this system is used for the estimation of the flow characteristics. The maximum
possible flow rate through the EndoVac micro-cannula (30G), and thus its cleaning
efficiency, is determined by the aspiration pressure of the system, which is difficult
to assess on the dental unit; under ideal conditions, the maximum flow rate is
0.05 mL/s for an aspiration pressure of 25.4 kPa (Brunson et al. 2010). The
results of in vitro studies are therefore difficult to relate to clinical practice.
Assuming a root canal of size 40, 0.04 taper, which is recommended for optimal
flow rate under clinical conditions (Brunson et al. 2010), an average irrigant
velocity of 1.1 m/s can be calculated for the root canal near the tip of the micro-
cannula. Therefore, due to the low velocity, laminar flow is expected for the
negative-pressure systems (Rothfus et al. 1950), which has been confirmed in a
recent study (Chen et al. 2014).
3.3 Irrigant Flow During Manual Dynamic Activation
In manual dynamic activation (MDA), a tightly fitting gutta-percha (GP) cone is

being moved in and out of the root canal in order to activate the irrigant. As the GP
cone is moved toward WL, the change in the space between the cone and the root
canal wall, the reflux space (Bronnec et al. 2010b), forces the fluid to be displaced
coronally and apically. Closer adaptation of the tapered GP cone to the root canal
wall could result in a higher irrigant velocity. An estimation of the average flow
velocity during MDA can be obtained by considering the change in volume that is
occupied by the irrigant. Assuming that the frequency of the up-and-down move-
ments is 30 strokes per 10 s (3 Hz) (Jiang et al. 2012), the displacement is within
the apical 5 mm of the root canal (Huang et al. 2008; Jiang et al. 2012), a 15-mm
root canal prepared to size 35, .06 taper and a matching GP cone, the maximum
velocities 5 mm from WL are on the order of 0.05 m/s. In reality the root canal
geometry is irregular, with not only a non-smooth wall but also side canals, oval
extensions, and isthmuses into which the fluid can be pushed. This could enhance
the removal of debris from canal irregularities, but also increases the effective
area and decreases the velocity in the main canal.
3.4 Irrigant Flow During (Ultra)Sonically Activated

Irrigation (UAI, SAI)
The term passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) has been used in the past to describe
ultrasonic activation of irrigants (Jensen et al. 1999; van der Sluis et al. 2007);
however, recent findings suggest that this term may be inaccurate and confusing
(Boutsioukis et al. 2013b).
During sonically and ultrasonically activated irrigation, instruments like files
(cutting or non-cutting), plastic, or NiTi tips or needles oscillate while being driven
at one end with a specific frequency, which is below 20 kHz for sonic devices and
above 20 kHz for ultrasonic devices. For the relatively new sonic devices, like
EndoActivator or Vibringe, the frequency was found to be in the range of 160–
190 Hz (Jiang et al. 2010a); for systems like SONICflex (KaVo), the frequency goes
up to 6000 Hz; for most ultrasonic devices, the frequency is approximately 30 kHz.
The oscillation patterns of sonically and ultrasonically driven files are very distinct
(Lumley et al. 1991), with sonically driven files having only one node and one
antinode (Lumley et al. 1991; Jiang et al. 2010a), while ultrasonic files have around
six nodes with a spacing of approximately 5 mm (Fig. 1) (Ahmad et al. 1993;
Verhaagen et al. 2012a). The oscillation amplitude, measured outside the root
canal, was around 1 mm for the EndoActivator tip (Jiang et al. 2010a) and around
50 μm for ultrasonically activated instruments (Ahmad et al. 1987; Lea et al. 2010;
Verhaagen et al. 2012a). Oscillating instruments act as a mixer producing
microstreaming of the irrigant that enhances delivery of the irrigant throughout
the root canal system and refreshment/mixing of the irrigant. The ultrasonically
oscillating instruments can generate acoustic streaming, contrary to the sonically
driven systems (Duck and Smith 1979; Lumley et al. 1991; Jiang et al. 2010a;
Verhaagen et al. 2014b). The induced flow consists of an oscillatory component that
follows the oscillation of the instrument and dominates the flow near it and a steady
component that always moves away from the file; the latter dominates the flow
further away from the instrument (Fig. 3). The characteristics of each flow compo-
nent are determined by the oscillation characteristics of the instrument together
with the presence of a wall or confinement which affects the formation of steady jets
and increases the oscillatory velocities and associated pressure and shear stress
(Verhaagen et al. 2014b) (Fig. 4). The lateral component of the flow is relatively
strong in comparison to the apical or coronal component. This lack of the reverse
flow should be compensated by syringe irrigation after the activation of the irrigant
or the use of ultrasonically activated needles allowing a continuous flow in the
apical root canal and an effective reverse flow of the irrigant. A continuous flow
directed into the pulp chamber does not result in an effective refreshment/mixing of
irrigant in the apical root canal (van der Sluis et al. 2009). The lateral flow
component can enhance irrigant flow and tissue dissolution in side canals
(De Gregorio et al. 2009; Al-Jadaa et al. 2009a), isthmuses (Burleson
et al. 2007), or oval extensions (Jiang et al. 2010b). The oscillation perpendicular
to the main oscillation direction is less than 25 % of the main oscillation direction
Fig. 3 Two-dimensional (cross section) view of the velocity vectors and pressure magnitudes
induced by a file oscillating ultrasonically next to a wall (a) or inside a root canal (b). The radius of
the file is 100 μm. The results are obtained with a computational fluid dynamics code and are
shown at one instant of time (top row) and the time average over 5 cycles (bottom row). Reprinted
with permission from Verhaagen et al. (2014b). Copyright 2014, Acoustic Society of America.
Fig. 4 Visualization of a laser-generated vapor bubble inside a glass root canal model. The laser
energy was 60 mJ per pulse. Image sequence is from left to right; the interframe time is 140 Âμs.
The first panel shows a sketch of the setup, with 1) the root canal model, 2) the laser fiber tip (outer
diameter 280 lm), 3) the laser-induced cavitation bubble, and 4) a stable cavitation bubble at
the apex. Reprinted with permission from Verhaagen et al. (2014b). Copyright 2014, Acoustic
Society of America.
(Lea et al. 2010; Verhaagen et al. 2012a). For ultrasonic activation of the irrigant,
an increase of the power setting results in an increase in the oscillation amplitude
which enhances the irrigant flow and the cleaning efficacy mostly in the oscillation
direction of the file (Lumley et al. 1993; Jiang et al. 2010b, c). The coronal-to-apical
component of the flow extends beyond the tip of the instrument decreasing after
2 mm (Malki et al. 2012). It is assumed that the fluid dynamics is not affected by a
curvature, as the typical streaming length scale is smaller than the curvature (Malki
et al. 2012). However, it has been reported that in curved canals, the cleaning
efficacy of sonic or ultrasonic files is affected by the curvature (Amato et al. 2011).
Damping of the oscillatory movement by placing the ultrasonically activated
instruments to WL (Boutsioukis et al. 2013b) could have been the reason for this
effect. Pre-bending the instrument could bring it closer to WL and reduce contact
and possible canal transportation (Al-Jadaa et al. 2009a); however, bending signif-
icantly changes the oscillation pattern (Ahmad et al. 1992; Lumley and Walmsley
1992; Verhaagen et al. 2012a). During ultrasonic activation of the irrigant, cavita-
tion may be induced (Ahmad et al. 1988; Jiang et al. 2010c), which is the formation,
behavior, and collapse of bubbles under an applied changing/oscillating/alternating
pressure. The collapse of these bubbles close to a wall can generate a high-velocity
jet directed toward the wall (a process called transient cavitation) (Brennen 1995),
enhancing its cleaning (Ohl and Wolfum 2003). If present, soft material (like
biofilm) might be pulled from the wall toward the bubble (Brujan et al. 2001).
Gas-filled bubbles might be stable for a relatively long time and oscillate together
with the oscillating pressure field induced by the oscillating file. This stable
cavitation might enhance the streaming and consequently the cleaning locally,
through unsteady oscillations of the bubble shape (Brennen 1995). Both transient
and stable cavitations have been observed in a number of studies; the location of
transient cavitation occurrence seemed to coincide with oscillation antinodes on the
file (Ahmad et al. 1988; Lumley et al. 1988; Felver et al. 2009; Jiang et al. 2010c;
Macedo et al. 2014a). Although stable cavitation was seen throughout the root
canal, transient cavitation occurred closely to the file (Macedo et al. 2014a). Pre-
vious work has ruled out cavitation as a significant contribution to root canal
cleaning (Ahmad et al. 1988; Lumley et al. 1988), but a recent study showed that
it is not that clear-cut; its contribution depends on different factors (Macedo
et al. 2014b). A non-tapered instrument will produce cavitation at all antinodes
alongside the instrument, whereas tapered instruments only produce cavitation at
the tip; in addition, a smaller confinement (root canal) leads to an increase in
cavitation (Macedo et al. 2014a). More research is needed to clarify the role of
cavitation in cleaning procedures.
3.5 Irrigant Flow During Laser-Activated Irrigation
Laser-activated irrigation (LAI) employs laser energy to activate the irrigant and
relies primarily on cavitation. Normally, Er:YAG or Er,Cr:YSGG lasers are used
with a wavelength in the infrared region (2796–2940 nm) which is well absorbed by
water (Robertson and Williams 1971). The dynamics of LAI have been studied
using high-speed imaging (Blanken and Verdaasdonk 2007; de Groot et al. 2009;
Matsumoto et al. 2011). The working mechanism of LAI is believed to be related to
the growth and collapse of a laser-induced cavitation bubble; its collapse causes
shock waves and a fluid flow in the coronal, lateral, and mainly apical direction with
velocities of a few meters per second (de Groot et al. 2009), resulting in a high
cleaning efficacy (de Groot et al. 2009; de Moor et al. 2010). The effect of the
implosion of the bubble seems to be directed to the apical root canal because of its
smaller dimension. The size of the laser-induced bubble and consequently the
collapse velocity depend on the energy output, pulse duration, and frequency, and
its absorption by the irrigant; up to a certain extent, more energy means a larger
bubble. However, the influence of the different parameters on the cleaning efficacy
of the flow has not yet been clarified. Recently, good results have been published
applying laser energy in the pulp chamber just above the canal orifice with specially
developed tips (PIPS) (Peters et al. 2011; Lloyd et al. 2014; Ordinola-Zapata
et al. 2014). It is believed that irrigant streaming in the complete root canal can
be induced by shock waves. The mechanisms have not yet been clarified.
3.6 Apical Flow
It has been reported that negative-pressure irrigation, ultrasonic activation of the

irrigant, patency files, or laser-activated irrigation can deliver irrigant solutions
more efficiently into the apical third than syringe irrigation (de Gregorio et al. 2009,
2010; Vera et al. 2011, 2012; Munoz and Camacho-Cuadra 2012; Castelo-Baz
et al. 2012; Peeters et al. 2014; Peeters and Gutknecht 2014). This has been related
to bubble entrapment in the apical part of the root canal, also termed “apical vapor
lock,” during syringe irrigation, ex vivo (de Gregorio et al. 2009; Tay et al. 2010)
and in vivo (Vera et al. 2011, 2012). This bubble could obstruct effective irrigant
delivery specifically in the apical area of the root canal system. However, its
formation and extent are dependent on the irrigant flow rate, needle type, and
insertion depth and apical size of the root canal, and it has been shown in vitro
that it can be removed or prevented by positioning the closed-ended needle within
1 mm away from WL or by using high irrigant flow rates in the order of 0.2 mL/s
(Boutsioukis et al. 2014a). The abovementioned studies all used low flow rates
and/or positioned the needle farther away from WL than 1 mm. A related argument
is the so called “dead-water” or “stagnation” zone apically to the needle tip in areas
of the root canal where no irrigant refreshment/mixing takes place, even if no
bubble entrapment is assumed (Gao et al. 2009; Shen et al. 2010). However,
high-speed imaging experiments and computer simulations have shown that in
those areas, the irrigant flow is just very slow (Boutsioukis et al. 2010a, b, c, d, e,
Verhaagen et al. 2012b).
3.7 Irrigant Flow in Lateral Canals, Oval Extensions,

and Isthmuses
Irrigant flow into lateral canals (Al-Jadaa et al. 2009a; de Gregorio et al. 2010),
isthmuses (Burleson et al. 2007), or oval extensions (Jiang et al. 2010a) is limited
for irrigation systems producing a flow parallel to the root canal wall and for sonic
activation of the irrigant. The flow in the main canal will drive the flow in the lateral
canal, and penetration of the irrigant is limited to a few times the diameter of the
canal entrance (Shankar and Deshpande 2000). It has been confirmed that syringe
irrigation is not very effective in isthmuses and oval extensions (Burleson
et al. 2007; Ricucci and Siqueira 2010) contrary to ultrasonic or laser-activated
irrigation, which produces a lateral flow component, improving irrigant penetration
and tissue dissolution in side canals (Al-Jadaa et al. 2009b; de Gregorio et al. 2009,
2010; Castelo-Baz et al. 2012), isthmuses (Burleson et al. 2007) or oval extensions
(de Groot et al. 2009; de Moor et al. 2010; Jiang et al. 2010c). Recently, a modified
apical negative-pressure technique was used to clean the isthmus between the
mesial roots of mandibular molars. Irrigant was delivered near WL in one of the
root canals by a syringe and needle, while a suction tip was positioned near WL in
the second root canal, forcing the irrigant through the isthmus. The new technique
showed improved removal of dentin debris from the isthmus, compared to syringe
irrigation, a traditional apical negative-pressure system, and ultrasonic activation
(Thomas et al. 2014).
3.8 Irrigant Flow in Dentinal Tubules
The geometry of the dentinal tubules (typical diameter 0.5–3.2 μm, length 1–2 mm)
poses a serious difficulty for the irrigant to penetrate (Haapasalo and Orstavik 1987;
Orstavik and Haapasalo 1990). Diffusion through the small opening in the root
canal lumen is slow (Zou et al. 2010), whereas convection is limited to a few
micrometers from the entrance, provided that the tubule is filled with liquid
(Verhaagen et al. 2014a). Advanced treatment strategies specifically aimed at the
tubules might be necessary to enhance the cleaning of the tubules (Shrestha
et al. 2009).
3.9 Irrigant Extrusion
During root canal irrigation, part of the irrigant may be extruded toward the
periapical tissues (Boutsioukis et al. 2013a). Irrigant extrusion does not seem to
take place in vital cases, provided that root canal instrumentation has been limited
within the root canal (Salzgeber and Brilliant 1977). The presence of a pulp stump
and a healthy periodontal ligament seems to create a sufficient barrier against

extrusion. However, in necrotic cases, extrusion seems more likely (Salzgeber
and Brilliant 1977), which could be attributed to the absence of such a barrier.
Several studies have investigated the irrigant pressure developed near the apical
foramen during root canal irrigation, in an effort to compare the safety of different
techniques (Boutsioukis et al. 2010b, c, d, e; Shen et al. 2010; Conard 2012;
Verhaagen et al. 2012b; Park et al. 2013). Attempts to define a threshold for irrigant
extrusion, such as the capillary pressure, have also been reported (Park et al. 2013).
However, recently, it has been argued that apical irrigant pressure is not the only
factor determining extrusion (Psimma et al. 2013a); therefore, extrusion cannot be
predicted simply by comparing the irrigant pressure to a fixed threshold. Rather, the
condition of the periapical tissues may have a significant effect on the pressure
balance. A periapical lesion entirely surrounded by cortical bone could provide an
effective barrier, thus reducing irrigant extrusion to a minimum. To the contrary, in
cases of longstanding periapical lesions where the integrity of the cortical bone has
been compromised and a direct pathway has been established from the apical
foramen toward soft tissues, the oral cavity, or the maxillary sinus (e.g., in the
form of a sinus tract or apical fenestration), the resistance (back pressure) of the
lesion may be reduced. A series of ex vivo studies provided support for this
hypothesis (Psimma et al. 2013a, b; Boutsioukis et al. 2013b). Extrusion during
syringe irrigation depends on various technique-related parameters. Open-ended
needles can extrude more irrigant than closed-ended needles under identical con-
ditions. In both cases, extrusion decreases as the needles move away from WL or
with increasing apical root canal size (Psimma et al. 2013a, b). Wedging of the
needle inside the root canal causes a significant increase in extrusion, especially
when open-ended needles are used (Psimma et al. 2013b). A higher irrigant flow
rate has also been linked to increased extrusion (Boutsioukis et al. 2013b); however,
contrary to common belief, flow rate should not be considered as the primary cause
of irrigant extrusion in the absence of evidence (Boutsioukis et al. 2013a). Its effect
seems comparable to the effect of other technique-related parameters discussed
above and considerably inferior to the effect of the condition of the periapical
tissues (Psimma et al. 2013a, b; Boutsioukis et al. 2013b). Anatomy-related factors
such as the diameter of the apical constriction (range 0.15–0.35 mm) and the
curvature of the root canal (range 0–30 ) don’t seem to affect irrigant extrusion
during syringe irrigation (Psimma et al. 2013a, b; Boutsioukis et al. 2013b).
Negative-pressure systems do not employ forced ejection of fluid near the WL, so
the risk of irrigant extrusion through the apical foramen is very low (Mitchell
et al. 2010, 2011), and these methods are generally considered safer than
positive-pressure syringe irrigation. Similarly, sonic and ultrasonic agitation
seems not to cause any measurable extrusion, irrespective of the power setting
and the insertion depth of the file/tip. To the contrary, MDA has been verified to
extrude significantly more irrigant compared to both sonic and ultrasonic agitation
(Boutsioukis et al. 2014b). LAI also seems to extrude large volumes of irrigant
ex vivo (George and Walsh 2008); however, the methodology used has major
drawbacks, so it is difficult to extrapolate the results to the clinical situation.
An in vivo study demonstrated that when the laser tip is placed in the pulp chamber
just above the root canal entrance, no extrusion of irrigant is to be expected (power
setting 1 W and 35 Hz) (Peeters and Mooduto 2013). Furthermore, using PIPS,
irrigant extrusion seems to be related with the power setting (Arslan et al. 2014).
It must be emphasized that irrigant extrusion of any amount of irrigant doesn’t
necessarily result into an extrusion accident with pronounced symptomatology. The
minimum amount of extruded irrigant that can cause such accidents has not been
elucidated (Boutsioukis et al. 2013a). For instance, passive extrusion of minute
amounts of irrigant may continuously occur very slowly even during the rest phase
(Chu 2010; Psimma et al. 2013a), but this has not been linked to an accident yet.
4 Fluid Wall Interaction (Wall Shear Stress) (Table 2)
4.1 Shear Stress
During irrigant flow, frictional forces occur within the irrigant and between the
flowing irrigant and solid bodies at rest (e.g., root canal walls) or between a moving
solid body (ultrasonically oscillating file) and irrigant at rest (Mott 1999; Tilton
1999; White 1999). The magnitude of such friction between the irrigant and the root
canal wall is described by wall shear stress and is proportional to the difference of
the velocity between adjacent “layers” of irrigant close to the wall. Irrigants with
higher viscosity will develop higher wall shear stress; however, they will also resist
flow and require more energy to be delivered or activated. Wall shear stress is of
particular interest to irrigation because it determines the mechanical effect on the
biofilm, tissue remnants, dentin debris, or smear layer attached to the root
canal wall.
4.1.1 Wall Shear Stress Produced by Syringe Irrigation
Similar to the developed irrigant flow, two basic wall shear stress patterns can be
distinguished for the open- and closed-ended needles. Regarding the open-ended
needles, an area of increased shear stress (~200 N/m2) with an approximately
uniform circumferential distribution is developed apically to the needle tips, in
the region where the unsteadiness, due to jet breakup, is strongest (Fig. 2). On the
other hand, the closed-ended needles lead to higher maximum shear stress
(~500 N/m2); however, the areas are limited near the tip, on the wall facing the
needle outlet (the proximal outlet for the double side vented) (Boutsioukis
et al. 2010b; Chen et al. 2014). Therefore, optimum debridement is expected near
the tip of the needle, as reported by Huang et al. (2008), and continuous displace-
ment of the needle tip is necessary during syringe irrigation, to increase the area
affected by high wall shear stress.
Needle depth, canal size, and taper do not seem to affect the overall distribution
of wall shear stress (Fig. 2). The maximum shear stress decreases as needles move
away from the working length or with increasing size or taper, because more space
is available for the reverse flow of the irrigant. This reduces the irrigant velocity
gradients, but the area affected by high shear stress becomes larger (Boutsioukis
et al. 2010c, d, e). No data are available on the flow rate, but, as long as the flow
characteristics are unchanged, a higher flow rate will lead to a higher shear stress.
4.1.2 Wall Shear Stress Produced by Negative-Pressure Systems
During negative-pressure systems, the flow that is aspirated toward the apex
induces shear stress on the wall. The shear stress appears to have an approximately
equal circumferential distribution along the main root canal walls, with highest
values (50–100 N/m2) occurring near the apex and decreasing magnitude toward
the coronal part (Chen et al. 2014), as the flow velocity and shear stress are related
to the increasing cross-section area between the micro-cannula and root canal wall.
As irrigant velocities produced during positive-pressure irrigation (like syringe
irrigation) are higher in certain areas (Boutsioukis et al. 2010a; Verhaagen
et al. 2012b), negative-pressure systems seem to be inferior to syringe irrigation
regarding the shear stress produced on the root canal wall (Table 2). This has been
recently verified by computer simulations (Chen et al. 2014).
4.1.3 Wall Shear Stress Produced by MDA
The GP cone that is moved up and down in the root canal creates a flow and
therefore a shear stress on the wall, whose magnitude depends on the reflux space
available (Bronnec et al. 2010b; Jiang et al. 2012). With the help of a simple model
based on two concentric cones, the shear stress can be estimated and seems to be on
the order of 1 N/m2, which is much lower than for other systems.
4.1.4 Wall Shear Stress Produced by (Ultra)Sonically Activated

Irrigation
The oscillating flow induced by the sonic and ultrasonic devices gives rise to a
nonuniform shear stress on the wall of the root canal and is highest where the
oscillation amplitude is highest, i.e., near the antinodes of the file. This shear stress
during ultrasonic activation has been estimated by computer simulation to be in the
order of 500 N/m2 (Chen et al. 2014), but the model lacked experimental validation.
The influence of the oscillatory component of the flow on the pressure and shear
stress is two or three orders of magnitude higher than the steady component, and
the shear stress was calculated to be 3000 N/m2 for the oscillatory and 2 N/m2
for the steady component. The steady jets are known to exert a constant shear stress
on the wall, which is highest at a location slightly off axis in the direction of
oscillation (Deshpande and Vaishnav 1982; Phares et al. 2000) (Fig. 4). The
oscillatory shear stress and pressure result in a loading cycle on the biofilm on the
wall. Being a viscoelastic material, a biofilm will lose energy through a loading
cycle (Guelon et al. 2011); therefore, the oscillation can lead to fatigue of the
biofilm, which in turn leads to biofilm failure. In sonic irrigation, the frequency is
much lower than in ultrasonic irrigation; therefore, biofilm fatigue is less likely to
occur with sonic irrigation.
4.1.5 Wall Shear Stress Produced by Laser-Activated Irrigation
During LAI, the shear stress is expected to be induced by the flow produced by the
formation and collapse of a laser-induced bubble. The observed flow is similar to
negative-pressure systems, except that for LAI, the magnitude of the shear stress is
one order of magnitude higher (1000 N/m2).
4.2 Biofilm Disruption by Wall Shear Stress
Wall shear stress could mechanically disrupt biofilm. Biofilms are structured by a
matrix of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS), which can reach up to 90 % of
the biofilm. This matrix provides the biofilm its viscoelastic properties, facilitates
nutrition, and acts as protection from chemical and mechanical attacks imposed by
cleaning procedures and disinfectants (Stewart and Franklin 2008). Therefore, the
viscoelastic properties can be seen as a virulence factor (He et al. 2013). Under
small stresses, a biofilm can deform elastically, whereas under large stresses, it can
flow viscously (K€ orstgens et al. 2001; Flemming and Wingerder 2010). Forces on
the biofilm exerted by irrigant flow could cause absorption of energy into the
biofilm leading to volumetric expansion (Busscher et al. 2003). Deformation
beyond the yield point could disrupt the top layers of the biofilm, or its EPS matrix
(cohesive failure), or could completely remove the biofilm (adhesive failure). If
deformation is in the plastic range but below the yield point, the biofilm is expanded
but not removed (Busscher et al. 2003). However, disruption of the top layers or
EPS matrix or expansion of the biofilm facilitates irrigant penetration in the biofilm
and could already enhance the chemical effect of irrigants (He et al. 2013). Fur-
thermore, a disruption of the biofilm matrix could leave “footprints” in the
remaining biofilm, facilitating adhesion of microorganisms, thereby influencing
reorganization of the biofilm (Busscher et al. 2003). However, not much informa-
tion is available in the literature on the effect of fluid flow on a biofilm, mainly
because of a large variety of biofilm constituents and associated physical properties.
Moreover, measurement of the mechanical properties should take place on a short
time scale (within minutes), because the biofilm is a living organism and will adapt
to its environment (Flemming et al. 2011). In addition, the time scale of irrigant
activation systems should be considered, as the behavior of a biofilm under 30 kHz

ultrasonic oscillations or laser pulsations may be different than when deforming it
slowly.
Critical loads necessary to disrupt biofilms by a variety of different techniques
have recently been reviewed (B€ol et al. 2012). It was found that the sensitivity to
certain loading modes, such as normal or shear stresses, varies extensively among
biofilms. Furthermore, the reported values of adhesion strength depend greatly on
the testing technique, which range from coarse macroscale measurements down to
atomic force microscopy (AFM) operating on a nanoscale (B€ol et al. 2012). Typical
values found in the literature give an elastic modulus on the order of 101–102 Pa
and a cohesive shear strength of 101–103 Pa (Flemming et al. 2011; B€ol et al. 2012).
Pressures and shear stresses produced by different irrigation techniques show that
some techniques should be able to remove biofilm. Unfortunately, the mechanical
properties of an endodontic biofilm are not known; therefore, a prediction of the
effect of fluidic stresses on biofilm removal in the root canal is not yet possible. A
3D numerical study on the effect of fluid flow on biofilm has shown that for high
EPS matrix stability, only exposed structures at the surface of the biofilm are
detached. Low EPS matrix stabilities may lead to the detachment of large portions
from the top of the biofilm. Interestingly, it has been observed that a smooth basal
biofilm surface structure remains after detachment in both cases (B€ol et al. 2009).
This is confirmed by another study where smooth base biofilms remain after the
biofilm had been subjected to high shear stresses using the fluid dynamic gauging
(FDG) technique (M€ohle et al. 2007). These observations can be explained by the
stratification of biofilms, which leaves older, stronger layers at the base of the
biofilm, typically adhering strongly to the substrate (M€ohle et al. 2007; Derlon
et al. 2008). Therefore, complete removal of the biofilm from the root canal wall
could be a difficult task, and a combination of mechanical and chemical stress on
the biofilm remains crucial.
4.2.1 Interaction Between a Biofilm and the Flow Created by Sonic,

Ultrasonic, or Laser Activation
Weak forces (low pressures and shear stresses) or a high EPS matrix stability causes
only an elastic deformation of the biofilm that reverses as soon as the stress is
removed. Repeated loading of the biofilm structure with a periodic stress, as is the
case with sonic, ultrasonic, and laser activation, may result in cohesive failure or
fatigue of the biofilm (Flemming et al. 2011); however, the threshold (force and
number of loading cycles) for damage due to fatigue is unknown. At increased force
(or lower EPS matrix stability), viscous deformation of the biofilm may occur. The
biofilm deforms and is displaced in order to distribute and minimize the applied
stresses (Klapper et al. 2002). When a steady force is applied, for example, in the
case of a steady flow, the biofilm will attain a steady state, and no further defor-
mation or removal will take place. Therefore, it may be advantageous to generate a
nonsteady flow, for example, by unsteady oscillations of the ultrasonic file or by
generating pulsations with ultrasound or laser. At stresses exceeding the cohesive or

adhesive strength of the biofilm, parts of the biofilm may detach from the bulk
biofilm or from the substrate, respectively.
4.2.2 Interaction with Cavitation Bubbles Created by Ultrasonic or

Laser Activation
The gradients associated with the time scales and length scales of the exerted stress
are important with regard to the behavior of a viscoelastic material. Cavitation
bubbles, such as those created by fast irrigant vaporization with a laser device,
typically exhibit large velocities and accelerations on a small time scale, making
them efficient in plastic deformation of the biofilm. For transient cavitation, veloc-
ities of 100 m/s are feasible at micrometer scales (Brujan et al. 2001). To clean
larger areas such as the entire root canal system, many cycles (laser pulses) may be
required.
Biofilm models that allow for effectively screening the efficacy of irriga-
tion systems are not available yet; therefore, it is difficult to determine the real
impact of irrigation procedures on biofilms. To evaluate the effect of irrigant flow
on the viscoelastic behavior of a biofilm, a standardized hydrogel of gelatine and
hyaluronan has been used. When a hydrogel with a density of 1.07 0.07 · 103 kg/
m3 and a Young’s modulus and adhesive strength of 101 Pa was used, the flow
induced by an ultrasonically oscillating file at a distance of 100 μm from the
hydrogel always removed the hydrogel, except at the lowest power setting. The
visualizations confirmed that acoustic streaming consisted of a steady and oscilla-
tory component of the flow and that the former is dominant for viscous deforma-
tion of the hydrogel and the latter induces an elastic deformation (Macedo
et al. 2014b). More research is needed to study the interaction of a fluid flow with
a biofilm in the typical endodontic environment.
5 Chemical Effect
5.1 Introduction
The chemical effect of irrigants will be significantly influenced by its concentration,

the contact surface between the substrate and the irrigant, contact time, type of
reactant, pH, temperature, interaction with other chemicals, and volume. Irrigant
refreshment is a crucial requirement to ensure adequate chemical effect, as irrigants
are (rapidly) inactivated when they come in contact with tissue remnants, dentin,
microorganisms/biofilm (Moorer and Wesselink 1982; Druttman and Stock 1989;
Haapasalo et al. 2005), or irrigants themselves (Rossi-Fedele et al. 2012). The
efficacy of a certain flow in refreshing consumed irrigant can be characterized
with the second Damk€ohler number, which is defined as the ratio of typical irrigant
transport time to reaction time. The reaction time will be directly influenced by the
reaction rate (RR) or speed of reaction, which is the change in concentration of the
reactants or the change in concentration of the products of a given chemical reaction
per unit time. The transport time can be determined from the local flow velocity
U and vorticity Ω (measure of circulation of a fluid) scaled with a typical length L.
For areas with low velocity, diffusion (with coefficient D) may also play a role.
The second Damk€ohler number (Da) is then given by
L
Uflow þΩflow Lþ D2
Da ¼ L
τreaction
At Da 1, the mixing is optimal, meaning that the consumed irrigant is effec-

tively replaced in time by fresh irrigant. At Da > 1 however, the reaction is slowed
down because of a lack of fresh irrigant. Both the velocity U and vorticity Ω of the
irrigant can be obtained from experiment; the diffusion coefficient D depends on the
irrigant used. The length scale L is a typical length over which the reaction takes
place; in a root canal, the L corresponds to the working length. Consequently, in
order to predict the efficacy of our irrigation procedures, the RR of the irrigants is
needed. Time is an important aspect and is directly related to the RR. However,
because the properties of endodontic biofilm are unknown, it is impossible to make
an estimation of the RR and consequently the required time of irrigant application.
The chemical effects of the irrigants are regulated by convection or diffusion.
During the rest phase, diffusion seems to be the main mechanism of molecular
transport. To what extent and how fast this occurs will depend on the concentration
gradients in the root canal and the contact surface between the irrigant and substrate
(e.g., biofilm, pulp, dentin). However, the contact surface between the substrate and
irrigant is quite limited in a human root canal, e.g., a root canal of size 30, .06 taper,
with a length of 15 mm has a ratio of volume (V)/surface (S) of 0.2 mm
(V ¼ 7.4 mm3 and S ¼ 35.4 mm2). Furthermore, the typical structure of the root
canal system contains many areas which are difficult to reach, limiting both
convection and diffusion of the irrigant. This will severely hamper the chemical
effect of the irrigants (Rosenfeld et al. 1978; Moorer and Wesselink 1982). During
the delivery and activation phase, convection is expected to be the dominant
transport mechanism in the main canal, whereas in the confined areas of the root
canal system, diffusion may still be important.
According to Zehnder (2006), the ideal irrigant should:
• Have a broad antimicrobial spectrum and high efficacy against anaerobic and
facultative microorganisms organized in biofilms
• Dissolve pulp tissue remnants
• Inactivate endotoxin
• Prevent the formation of a smear layer during instrumentation or dissolve the
latter once it has formed
• Be biocompatible
A high efficacy against biofilms is only possible when the irrigant has the ability
to diffuse through or break down the EPS matrix of the biofilm; without this
capacity, the irrigant cannot exert its antimicrobial action. This aspect is important
when the biofilm is still intact but also when the top layers have been removed by
instrumentation or irrigation because the structure of the remaining basal layer is
characterized by high adhesion and cohesion forces. In this section we focus on the
most frequently used irrigants in endodontics which are sodium hypochlorite
(NaOCl), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and chlorhexidine (CHX)
(Dutner et al. 2012; Willershausen et al. 2015).
NaOCl is widely used as the primary root canal irrigant (Dutner et al. 2012;
Savani et al. 2014; Willershausen et al. 2015) due to its unparalleled action against
microorganisms (McDonnell and Russell 1999), and biofilm (Bryce et al. 2009;
Chávez de Paz et al. 2010; Stojicic et al. 2013), and its unique capacity to dissolve
pulp tissue (Naenni et al. 2004; Sirtes et al. 2005) and organic components of the
smear layer (Baumgartner and Mader 1987). In spite of its low clinical toxicity
(Zehnder 2006), NaOCl has been shown to be extremely caustic when in contact
with organic tissue in vitro (Pashley et al. 1985), even at concentrations lower than
0.1 % (Chang et al. 2001; Heling et al. 2001; Barnhart et al. 2005). The choice of the
NaOCl concentration to be used is generally considered a trade-off between
cleaning efficiency and tissue damage in the case of inadvertent extrusion (Spencer
et al. 2007). Clinically, the use of concentrations between 0.5 % and 6 % is
suggested; however, the optimal clinical concentration is still a subject of contro-
versy (Zehnder 2006). A recent systematic review reported that higher concentra-
tions appear to improve the outcome of root canal treatment, but the evidence was
weak (Fedorowicz et al. 2012).
Once delivered inside the root canal, NaOCl reacts with its organic content such
as pulp tissue, biofilm, or dentin (canal wall, smear layer, or debris) causing
depletion of the free available chlorine (Baker 1947) and resulting in protein
degradation, rise of temperature (Baker 1947), and changes in pH (Jungbluth
et al. 2011; Macedo et al. 2014d). Even though this reaction occurs faster during
the first minute, it evolves with time being limited by the amount of free available
chlorine on the irrigant and/or the amount of organic substance available for the
irrigant to react with. A stagnant (non-agitated) NaOCl solution can retain a
considerable amount of available chlorine (0.1 %) inside a root canal ex vivo
even after 100 min (Ragnarsson et al. 2015), but this amount of chlorine may not
actually be available near the substrate. A recent optical method to measure the
NaOCl concentration in human root canals ex vivo was introduced in the endodon-
tic literature (Rechenberg et al. 2014). The authors reported that NaOCl at clinically
relevant initial concentrations (1 %) remains chemically active (above 0.1 %) for
more than 10 min (Ragnarsson et al. 2015). Nonetheless, such a method has a
reduced accuracy to quantify concentrations higher than 0.1 %; therefore, such
information has limited clinical value. The speed of the reaction between chlorine
and substrate will be increased by the initial concentration of the irrigant, ultrasonic
or laser activation (Macedo et al. 2010), frequent irrigant refreshment (Macedo
et al. 2014c), and temperature (Sirtes et al. 2005). It should be noted that the
temperature increase lasts only as long as the irrigant delivery (Macedo

et al. 2014e). The pH of the NaOCl solution determines the equilibrium between
the hypochlorite ion (OCl) and the hypochlorous acid (HOCl) (Baker 1947). The
biological effect of NaOCl, which can be defined as its tissue-dissolving capacity
and antimicrobial effect, will be influenced by this equilibrium. In alkaline solu-
tions (pH > 7.5), OCl prevails, which has a powerful oxidative effect and there-
fore a higher tissue-dissolving capacity than HOCl (Baker 1947). On the other
hand, HOCl prevails in acidic or neutral solutions (3 < pH < 7.5). It has a powerful
bactericidal effect probably because it is a smaller and uncharged molecule, which
can penetrate the bacterial membrane relatively easily. Differences in pH, which
affects the free available chlorine form (HOCl/OCl), do not affect the reaction rate
of 2 % NaOCl with dentin (Macedo et al. 2010). Therefore, the reported differences
in the tissue dissolution capacity (Jungbluth et al. 2011) and/or antimicrobial
efficacy (Bremer et al. 2002) can be better explained by chemical differences in
the predominant chlorine form at pH ¼ 5 (HOCl) and pH ¼ 12 (OCl) than by the
amount of molecules involved in the reaction. On the other hand, the reaction of the
NaOCl with the organic content of the root canal buffers its pH (Baker 1947;
Jungbluth et al. 2011; Macedo et al. 2014c); nonetheless, the observed buffer effect
of dentin was too limited to change the form of free chlorine available (HOCl/
OCl) in both pH ¼ 12 and pH ¼ 5 NaOCl solutions (Macedo et al. 2014d). There-
fore, the biological effect (antimicrobial/tissue dissolution capacity) of the irrigant
is not expected to change inside the root canal during final irrigation.
The effect of activation could be due to a sonochemical effect and/or agitation/
mixing (Joyce Tiong and Price 2012; Macedo et al. 2014a, c). The influence of
activation was also observed during the subsequent rest phase (Macedo et al. 2010).
Nevertheless, it seems that frequent refreshment does not compensate for the lower
concentration (Macedo et al. 2014c).
5.1.1 EDTA
Chelation is defined as a process whereby chemicals form soluble complexes with

certain metal ions, binding the ions so that they cannot react with other molecules or
ions. During root canal therapy, calcium-chelating agents such as 17 % EDTA
(580 mM) or 30 % citric acid are used to dissolve inorganic components of the
smear layer that NaOCl is unable to dissolve (Şen et al. 1995).
5.1.2 Chlorhexidine
CHX bis-guanide has a broad antimicrobial spectrum and is widely used in den-
tistry for chemical plaque control mostly in a 0.2 % concentration (Mohammadi and
Abbott 2009). It is a positively charged hydrophobic molecule with high affinity to
negatively charged molecules present in cell membranes (R€olla et al. 1970) and/or
to the organic component of hard tissues (Carrilho et al. 2010). CHX penetrates the
outer cell wall layers of the microorganisms and attacks the cytoplasmic membrane
(Shaker et al. 1988; Russell and Day 1993). It has the ability to coagulate intracel-
lular organelles of the microbial cells (McDonnell and Russell 1999). CHX does not
have the capacity to dissolve organic tissues (Naenni et al. 2004), which impedes its
use as a main root canal irrigant in endodontics (Zehnder 2006). As root canal
irrigant, a high concentration (2 %) is mostly used. CHX presents a dose-dependent
cytotoxic effect (Lee et al. 2010). It inhibits osteoblastic cells growth, proliferation,
and collagen synthesis; therefore, its extrusion toward the periapical tissues should
also be avoided.
5.2 Physical Properties of Irrigants
The flow of irrigants is affected by their physical properties, namely, density,

viscosity, and surface tension (White 1999). These properties have been studied
for commonly used endodontic irrigants, and they have been found very similar to
those of distilled water (Guerisoli et al. 1998; Taşman et al. 2000; Estrela
et al. 2005; Zehnder et al. 2005; Giardino et al. 2006; van der Sluis et al. 2010),
which can be explained by the fact that irrigants are mainly sparse aqueous
solutions. The surface tension of endodontic irrigants has received extra attention,
under the assumption that it may have a significant effect on irrigant penetration in
dentinal tubules and accessory root canals (Abou-Rass and Patonai 1982; Taşman
et al. 2000) and on dissolution of pulp tissue (Stojicic et al. 2010). The addition of
wetting agents (surfactants) to commonly used irrigation solutions has also been
suggested to reduce their surface tension (Abou-Rass and Patonai 1982; Taşman
et al. 2000), although their exact concentration in the solutions is rarely reported
and mixing of NaOCl with other chemicals, like alcohol, in order to reduce the
surface tension will reduce its effect (Cunningham et al. 1982). While density and
viscosity affect the flow in all cases, the effect of surface tension is important only
in cases where two immiscible fluids are present (e.g., irrigant and air) (White
1999; Kundu and Cohen 2004). However, dentin is hydrophilic, and the dentinal
tubules are likely to contain dentinal fluid with fluidic properties similar to water
(Berggren and Brännstr€om 1965), which will probably soak the root canal wall
directly limiting the effect of surfactants since the two fluids are miscible. Recent
studies have also shown that surfactants did not enhance the ability of NaOCl to
dissolve pulp tissue (Jungbluth et al. 2012; Clarkson et al. 2012; De-Deus et al.
2013) and the ability of common chelators to remove calcium from dentin
(Zehnder et al. 2005) or to remove the smear layer (Lui et al. 2007; De-Deus
et al. 2008). To the contrary, it appears that the use of irrigants with a reduced
surface tension ex vivo may result in deeper penetration of the smear layer into the
dentinal tubules (Aktener et al. 1989). The presence of an air bubble occupying the
apical part of the root canal has been partially demonstrated ex vivo (Tay
et al. 2010; de Gregorio et al. 2009; Vera et al. 2012) and in vivo (Vera
et al. 2011, 2012) recently. In such a case, surface tension effects could be
important for the irrigant flow. However, routine entrapment of air bubbles in the
apical part or side canals of the root canal during endodontic treatment still
remains a speculation (see also the section 3.6).
5.3 Reaction with the Biofilm
Because microorganisms in the root canal function in a biofilm state, they are
consequently protected by the matrix structure (EPS). Chemical agents should
diffuse or break through the EPS matrix before they can affect the microorganisms.
Disruption or poration of this matrix will enhance an antimicrobial effect. There-
fore, the potential of EPS penetration, disruption, and killing of the microorganisms
are all inherently related. Disruption of the top layers or EPS matrix or expansion of
the biofilm induced by shear stress on the biofilm during irrigation procedures
facilitates irrigant penetration into the biofilm and could therefore enhance the
chemical effect of irrigants (He et al. 2013). Furthermore, chemical agents can
alter the mechanical properties of the EPS, which may be explained by an influence
of these agents on the EPS network formation (K€orstgens 2003). This alteration can
directly influence the removal of the biofilm (Brindle et al. 2011). Mass transfer
inside a biofilm occurs by convection and (mainly) diffusion processes (de Beer
et al. 1994a, b). It has been described that the surface-averaged relative effective
diffusion coefficient (Drs) decreases from the top of the biofilm toward the bottom.
The Drs profiles differ for biofilms of different ages and generally decrease over
time; furthermore, different biofilms tested showed similar Drs profiles near the top
of the biofilm but different Drs profiles near the bottom of the biofilm (Renslow
et al. 2010). This bottom layer also determines the attachment to the surface, in our
case dentin, and is normally the most difficult to remove (Derlon et al. 2008). There
are no data available on the diffusion through a biofilm for endodontic irrigants.
5.3.1 NaOCl
The EPS consists mainly of polysaccharides and different proteins (Flemming and
Wingerder 2010). NaOCl reacts strongly with proteins (Baker 1947). Therefore,
probably, NaOCl will react stronger with the proteins in the EPS than the poly-
saccharides which seems to be confirmed in the study of Agarwal and colleagues
(Agarwal et al. 2012). If so, the distribution of proteins and polysaccharides in the
EPS and the polysaccharide bonding structures will determine the penetration or
disruption of the matrix and consequently its antimicrobial capacity. NaOCl reacts
with proteins producing chloramines in the form of gas bubbles, which can be
imprisoned in a polysaccharide matrix (unpublished data). Furthermore, the strong
reactivity of NaOCl could hamper its diffusion in the biofilm. De Beer et al. (1994a,
b) studied the penetration of chlorine through a Pseudomonas aeruginosa/Klebsi-
ella pneumoniae biofilm and concluded that the diffusion into the biofilm is slow,
the diffusion rate depends on the concentration, the chlorine is reduced in the
matrix, there is a diffusion–reaction mechanism, and there is a large variation due
to local differences (highly resistant spots). These highly resistant spots show a
higher cell density with subpopulations with higher reducing capacity per cell.
Furthermore, these spots have a higher density of EPSs with a higher reducing
potential. Combined with the phenomenon of rapid regrowth after biocide treat-
ment, these highly resistant spots are serious threats for our antimicrobial treat-
ments. A NaOCl solution with a lower pH contains more HOCl which is more
antimicrobial in relation to planktonic bacteria (Bremer et al. 2002). It is not
completely clear if the same is true for biofilm (Bremer et al. 2002). However, it
has been shown that the buffer capacity of dentin is such that a low pH solution of
NaOCl will probably not result in a higher antimicrobial effect (Macedo
et al. 2014d). More recent studies using biofilm models show an increasing
antibiofilm effect when the concentration of the NaOCl solution increases (Arias-
Moliz et al. 2009; Retamozo et al. 2010; Jiang et al. 2011; del Carpio-Perochena
et al. 2011). We find contradictory results on the effect of lower concentrations of
NaOCl on the biofilm. Some authors claim that a 1 % NaOCl solution can partially
disrupt and decrease the viability of a biofilm (Chávez de Paz et al. 2010; Carpio-
Perochena et al. 2011), whereas Ordinola-Zapata and coauthors (2012) show that
5-min application of 1 % NaOCl cannot disrupt or decrease the viability of a
biofilm. On the other hand, it was still more effective than water. Retamozo and
coauthors concluded that a 1.3 % NaOCl solution did not have any antibiofilm
effect at all (Retamozo et al. 2010). It is reported that both 2.5 % and 5.25 % NaOCl
solutions have an antibiofilm effect (disruption and decrease of viability)
(Retamozo et al. 2010; del Carpio-Perochena et al. 2011). The antibiofilm effect
seems to be time dependent; a 5.25 % solution was significantly more effective after
40 min compared to 15 min. Furthermore, a 1 % and 2.5 % NaOCl solution was
almost as effective after 30 min as a 5.25 % NaOCl solution after 5 min (Retamozo
et al. 2010; del Carpio-Perochena et al. 2011). In the study of del Carpio-Perochena,
the irrigant was refreshed every 5 min in the 15- and 30-min group. Two different
volumes of NaOCl were used, 500 μL and 1 mL, but there was no difference in the
results indicating that under these circumstances, 500 μL already produced the
maximum chemical effect for that typical concentration. The biofilm is more
resistant against NaOCl when it is in the starvation phase (Liu et al. 2010). From
these results we can conclude that the chemical antibiofilm effect of NaOCl
increases with its concentration and the time of application provided an excess of
available chlorine. Lower concentrations like the 1 % and 2 % are significantly less
effective, and the reaction rate is lower, which could be a problem for the disruption
for the apical biofilm, where fresh irrigant is only available when the root canal has
enough space for the irrigant penetration. Furthermore, we have to realize that in all
these studies, the biofilm was in direct contact with an excess of NaOCl. In the root
canal, direct contact and excess of NaOCl will be difficult due to the morphology of
the root canal system, as mentioned earlier.
5.3.2 EDTA
The generally anionic, negatively charged, nature of EPS encourages the interaction
with positively charged, polyvalent ions, for instance, Ca2+ or Mg2+ (van der Waal
and van der Sluis 2012). These calcium bonds strengthen the structure of the EPS.
Calcium is present in the oral environment including the root canal and could
therefore be incorporated in the EPS. Consequently, chelators could help disrupt
the EPS by breaking the cationic bonds (van der Waal and van der Sluis 2012). In
the biofilm literature, it has been reported that EDTA can decrease biofilm mass
(Turakhia and Characklis 1989; Chen and Stewart 2000; Kite et al. 2004; Percival
et al. 2005; Shanks et al. 2006; Devine et al. 2007), adhesion (Dunne and Burd
1992; Ramage et al. 2007), and formation (Rose and Turner 1998; Sherertz
et al. 2006; Shanks et al. 2006). Additionally, a reduction of viscosity of the biofilm
has been described (Chen and Stewart 2002). Also complete eradication of in vivo
generated biofilms was observed after 24-h treatment with EDTA (Kite et al. 2004).
The longer the application time, the better the chelating effect although it starts
right from the first contact. A higher concentration results in higher chelation
efficacy, and biofilm formation decreases when the EDTA concentration increases
(Ramage et al. 2007; Ang et al. 2006). In the study of Ang and coworkers, the
influence of pH, temperature, and flow velocity of the EDTA application on biofilm
removal was evaluated. A higher pH and temperature were associated with
improved cleaning (pH 4.9 and 11 and 20 C and 40 C); a higher flow velocity
(volume, refreshment) did not make a difference. Most studies were performed
without refreshment of the EDTA. It is important to realize that the contact time in
the abovementioned studies varied from 1 to 24 h and the concentration from 10 to
100 mM which are both different from the endodontic literature. The application
time is shorter and the concentration is higher (580 mM). The endodontic literature
shows somewhat contrasting results on the biofilm disruption or antimicrobial
effect of chelators on the biofilm and roughly varies from no effect to some effect,
but always less effective than NaOCl (Ordinola-Zapata et al. 2012; Chávez de Paz
et al. 2010; Arias-Moliz et al. 2009). This could be related to the short application
time. A synergistic effect of EDTA with antimicrobials like antibiotics has been
reported (Sherertz et al. 2006; Banin et al. 2006). Weakening the biofilm structure
encourages diffusion of antimicrobials into the biofilm (Gordon et al. 1991). There-
fore, a synergistic effect with NaOCl could be envisaged, which has already been
reported in the endodontic literature (Soares et al. 2010; Ozdemir et al. 2010).
However, more research is necessary to draw conclusions for the clinical
application.
5.3.3 Chlorhexidine
Although CHX is very effective in killing planktonic microorganisms, it seems that

it is not a powerful medicament to disrupt biofilm (Bryce et al. 2009). In the study
of Ordinola-Zapata et al. (2012), neither disruption of the biofilm nor a decrease in

the viability could be detected. Normally, an antimicrobial effect is seen there
where CHX is able to penetrate the biofilm but without signs of biofilm disruption
(Shen et al. 2010; Chávez de Paz et al. 2010). It should be taken into consideration
that the use and function of CHX in biofilm control in the mouth are completely
different from its use and possible function in the root canal. In the former, killing
of the planktonic microorganisms could be more important than in the root canal
where NaOCl is already a potent agent. Recently, a stiffening of a S. epidermidis
biofilm was reported after the use of 0.2 % CHX (Brindle et al. 2011).
5.4 Reaction with Dentin
5.4.1 NaOCl
Dentin is a substrate with a complex organic and inorganic structure. Type I

collagen dominates the organic matrix (around 30 % vol) and hydroxylapatite,
the inorganic part. NaOCl has predominantly an impact on its organic matrix
because it is a nonspecific proteolytic agent. It splits up the long peptide chains
by chlorination of the final protein groups (Davies et al. 1993). Consequently, this
will affect the mechanical properties of dentin (Saleh and Ettman 1999). It has been
hypothesized that, in spite of the theory that inorganic components can largely
protect the organic collagen matrix (Kronick and Cooke 1996) due to the low
molecular size of hypochlorous acid (MW ¼ 52.5) or the hypochlorite anion
(MW ¼ 51.5), NaOCl can penetrate and react with the apatite-encapsulated colla-
gen matrix to a certain depth (Zhang et al. 2010a, b). Several studies reported that a
5.25 % solution of NaOCl degrades the physical properties of the dentin: the
resistance to flexure, tension strength, the elastic modulus, and microhardness
(Saleh and Ettman 1999; Sim et al. 2001; Marending et al. 2007; Grigoratos
et al. 2001). However, none of these properties are directly related to fracture
resistance of teeth (Kishen 2006). Hu and coworkers (2010) highlight that the
concentration of NaOCl is the principal factor of dentin deproteination. Depending
on the concentration of NaOCl, the application time will positively influence the
effect (Hu et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2010a, b). The concentration, activation, and
time influence positively the reaction rate of NaOCl with dentin (Macedo
et al. 2010).
5.4.2 EDTA Combined with NaOCl
In general we can say that NaOCl will remove mostly the organic component and
chelators the inorganic component of dentin. Thus, after contact with EDTA, the
inorganic component will be removed from the intertubular dentin to a depth of 1–
5 μm and from the peritubular dentin up to 20 μm (Lottanti et al. 2009), leaving the
organic matrix to be dissolved by NaOCl. The erosive effect is stronger when

EDTA is used before NaOCl than the other way around (Moreira et al. 2009; Qian
et al. 2011).
Sobhani et al. (2010) concluded that the alternate use of NaOCl and EDTA had
less effect on the surface strength of a treated tooth in vitro than NaOCl alone
(EDTA was replaced by NaOCl). They used a more clinical setup where the
irrigation procedure was simulated. Zhang et al. (2010a, b) claim that the flexure
strength significantly reduces after contact of a 5.25 % NaOCl solution with dentin
for 1 h because of the collagen reduction of the dentin. The decline in flexure
strength is probably attributed to the generation of a brittle layer of apatite crystal-
lites that are not supported by a structurally intact collagen matrix. This process is
time and concentration dependent. The effect is rather caused by NaOCl than by the
application of EDTA during 2 min. In general, the studies quoted here make use of
dentin powder or dentin disks, except for Sobhani et al. (2010). Therefore, the
contact irrigant–dentin is different from the clinical setting where the surface
contact irrigant–dentin is less than ideal. Moreover, the effect of irrigants on dentin
is not only determined by the contact surface but also by the condition of the dentin
surface. Furthermore, in the study of Sobhani et al. (2010), extracted teeth were
used in an in vitro setup, so the tubules may not be filled with dentinal fluid.
Therefore, the surface conditions were different from the clinical situation.
5.4.3 Chlorhexidine
Although CHX binds to dentin (Kim et al. 2010), the typical effects on the mineral
or organic components of dentin are not well described except for the formation of a
layer of debris (Perdigao et al. 1994). When CHX is mixed with NaOCl, a brown
precipitate containing parachloroaniline (PCA) will form on dentin (Rossi-Fedele
et al. 2012) leading to its discoloration. PCA has been suggested to be a toxic and
carcinogenic substance; hence, its accumulation inside the canal or at the periapical
tissues should be avoided.
5.5 Reaction with Pulp Tissue
5.5.1 NaOCl
Several studies reported a direct proportion between the concentration of NaOCl

and its organic tissue dissolution capacity (Hand et al. 1978; Thé 1979; Cunning-
ham and Balekjian 1980; Koskinen et al. 1980; Abou-Rass and Oglesby 1981;
Moorer and Wesselink 1982; Sirtes et al. 2005; Christensen et al. 2008). For a
concentration lower than 1 % at room temperature, the overall effect is comparable
to water (Thé 1979), saline, and 3 % H2O2 (Hand et al. 1978). According to Sirtes
et al. (2005), an increase of the solution’s temperature will reduce the differences in
the dissolution effect between a pre-heated 1 % and a non-heated 5.25 % solution,

with a better result for the solutions with a low concentration. Furthermore, heated
hypochlorite solutions remove organic debris more efficiently from dentin shavings
than unheated counterparts (Sirtes et al. 2005). Recently, it has been shown that a
significant decrease of the pH from 12 to 6 decreases the tissue dissolution capacity
(Christensen et al. 2008). On the contrary, stabilization of the NaOCl solution at a
higher pH of 13.5 improves the tissue dissolution and the effects on dentin prop-
erties (Jungbluth et al. 2011).
5.5.2 EDTA and Chlorhexidine
There is no available data to support that either EDTA or CHX dissolves pulp
tissue.
6 Effect of Irrigation on Endodontic Outcome
Among the irrigant activation systems discussed in this chapter, ultrasonic and laser
activation contributes positively to both the mechanical and the chemical aspects of
the irrigation procedure. However, it is not exactly known to what extent this will
contribute to the disinfection procedure in vivo and if this eventually will improve
the outcome of the treatment. Both systems have the potential to disrupt or remove
biofilm, but it is not known to what extent they can remove biofilm from the root
canal wall and from more remote regions such as oval extensions, lateral canals,
and tubules. No reliable endodontic biofilm models are currently available for
research. Apical periodontitis is a multifactorial disease, and therefore, its healing
also depends on a range of aspects, not only on the irrigation during the endodontic
treatment. From clinical research, it is clear that the length and the quality of the
root canal filling are risk factors. However, the influence of the irrigation procedure,
complex canal anatomy (apical delta and dentinal tubules), structure of the biofilm,
and extraradicular biofilm around the root apex on the endodontic outcome is not
known. Recently, it was demonstrated in an RCT that an ultrasonic-assisted irriga-
tion protocol did not improve significantly the endodontic outcome compared to
syringe irrigation alone (Liang et al. 2013) although the improvement of the
mechanical and chemical aspects of the irrigation procedures by ultrasound has
convincingly been demonstrated in in vitro research. This could indicate that either
we need a more significant improvement of the mechanical and chemical aspects of
the irrigation procedure or that other influential factors are more important in
determining the endodontic outcome.
Although recently more information became available on flow characteristics of

different irrigation systems, it is still difficult to establish evidence-based irrigation
protocols. This is mainly due to the fact that the properties of endodontic biofilm are
not known. Furthermore, our knowledge of the reaction rate of the irrigants used in
endodontics is not complete. Another important aspect is that we do not know
enough about the influential factors determining endodontic outcome. Therefore, to
improve or establish our irrigation protocols, more knowledge of endodontic
biofilm is crucial, and more RCTs are imperative to get to know more about
endodontic procedures in vivo.
References
Abou-Rass M, Oglesby SW (1981) The effects of temperature, concentration, and tissue type on
the solvent ability of sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 7:376–7
Abou-Rass M, Patonai FJ Jr (1982) The effects of decreasing surface tension on the flow of
irrigating solutions in narrow root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 53:524–6
Agarwal A, Xu H, Ngab WJ, Liu Y (2012) Biofilm detachment by self-collapsing air
microbubbles: a potential chemical-free cleaning technology for membrane biofouling.
J Mater Chem 22:2203–7
Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TR, Crum LA (1987) Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic
streaming and its possible role. J Endod 13:490–9
Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TR, Crum LA, Walton AJ (1988) Ultrasonic debridement of root canals:
acoustic cavitation and its relevance. J Endod 14:486–93
Ahmad M, Roy RA, Kamarudin AG (1992) Observations of acoustic streaming fields around an
oscillating ultrasonic file. Endod Dent Traumatol 8:189–94
Ahmad M, Roy RA, Kamarudin AG, Safar M (1993) The vibratory pattern of ultrasonic files
driven piezoelectrically. Int Endod J 26:120–4
Aktener BO, Cengiz T, Pişkin B (1989) The penetration of smear material into dentinal tubules
during instrumentation with surface-active reagents: a scanning electron microscopic study.
J Endod 15:588–90
Al-Hadlaq SM, Al-Turaiki SA, Al-Sulami U, Saad AY (2006) Efficacy of a new brush-covered
irrigation needle in removing root canal debris: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod
32:1181–4
Al-Jadaa A, Paqué F, Attin T, Zehnder M (2009a) Acoustic hypochlorite activation in simulated
curved canals. J Endod 35:1408–11
Al-Jadaa A, Paqué F, Attin T, Zehnder M (2009b) Necrotic pulp tissue dissolution by passive
ultrasonic irrigation in simulated accessory canals: impact of canal location and angulation. Int
Endod J 42:59–65
Amato M, Vanoni-Heineken I, Hecker H, Weiger R (2011) Curved versus straight root canals: the
benefit of activated irrigation techniques on dentin debris removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Path Oral Rad Endod 111:529–34
Ang WS, Lee S, Elimelech M (2006) Chemical and physical aspects of cleaning of organic-fouled
reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 272:198–210
Arias-Moliz MT, Ferrer-Luque CM, Espigares-Garcia M, Baca P (2009) Enterococcus faecalis
biofilms eradication by root canal irrigants. J Endod 35:711–4
Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H, Capar ID, Saygili G, Meşe M (2014) Effect of PIPS technique at
different power settings on irrigating solution extrusion. Lasers Med Sci In press DOI.
doi:10.1007/s10103-014-1633-1
Baker RW (1947) Studies on the reaction between sodium hypochlorite and proteins: 1. Physico-
chemical study of the course of the reaction. Biochem J 41:337–42
Baker NA, Eleazer PD, Averbach RE, Seltzer S (1975) Scanning electron microscopic study of the
efficacy of various irrigating solutions. J Endod 1:127–35
Banin E, Brady KM, Greenberg EP (2006) Chelator-induced dispersal and killing of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa cells in a biofilm. Appl Environm Microbiol 72:2064–2069
Barnhart BD, Chuang A, Lucca JJ, Roberts S, Liewehr F, Joyce AP (2005) An in vitro evaluation
of the cytotoxicity of various endodontic irrigants on human gingival fibroblasts. J Endod
31:613–5
de Beer D, Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z (1994a) Liquid flow in heterogeneous biofilms. Biotechnol
Bioeng 44:636–641
de Beer D, Srinivasan R, Stewart PS (1994b) Direct measurement of chlorine penetration into
biofilms during disinfection. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:4339
Baumgartner JC, Mader CL (1987) A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal
irrigation regimens. J Endod 13:147–57
Berggren G, Brännstr€om M (1965) The rate of flow in dentinal tubules due to capillary attraction.
J Dent Res 44:408–15
Blanken JW, Verdaasdonk RM (2007) Cavitation as a working mechanism of the Er, Cr:YSGG
Laser in endodontics: a visualization study. J Oral Laser App 7:97–106
B€
ol M, M€ohle RB, Haesner M, Neu TR, Horn H, Krull R (2009) 3D finite element model of
biofilm detachment using real biofilm structures from CLSM data. Biotechnol Bioeng
103:177–86
B€
ol M, Ehret A, Bolea AA, Hellriegel J, Krul R (2012) Recent advances in mechanical charac-
terisation of biofilm and their significance for material modeling. Crit Rev Biotechnol
33145–71
Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Kastrinakis E, Bekiaroglou P (2007) Measurement of pressure and
flow rates during irrigation of a root canal ex vivo with three endodontic needles. Int Endod J
40:504–13
Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Kastrinakis E (2009) Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal
using different flow rates: a Computational Fluid Dynamics study. Int Endod J 42:144–55
Boutsioukis C, Verhaagen B, Kastrinakis E, Versluis M, van der Sluis LWM (2010a) Irrigant flow
in the root canal: experimental validation of a Computational Fluid Dynamics model using
high-speed imaging. Int Endod J 43:393–407
Boutsioukis C, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Kastrinakis E, Wesselink PR, van der Sluis LWM
(2010b) Evaluation of irrigant flow in the root canal using different needle types by an unsteady
computational fluid dynamics model. J Endod 36:87–9
Boutsioukis C, Verhaagen B, Kastrinakis E, Versluis M, van der Sluis LWM (2010c) The effect of
needle penetration depth on the irrigant flow in the root canal: evaluation by an unsteady
Computational Fluid Dynamics model. Int Endod J 36:1664–8
Boutsioukis C, Verhaagen B, Kastrinakis E, Versluis M, van der Sluis LWM (2010d) The effect of
preparation size on the irrigant flow in the root canal: evaluation using an unsteady Compu-
tational Fluid Dynamics model. Int Endod J 43:874–81
Boutsioukis C, Verhaagen B, Kastrinakis E, Versluis M, van der Sluis LWM (2010e) The effect of
root canal taper on the irrigant flow: evaluation using an unsteady Computational Fluid. Int
Endod J 43:909–16
Boutsioukis C (2010) Application of a Computational Fluid Dynamics model to the study of root
canal irrigation. Doctoral Dissertation. Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of
Thessaloniki, 2010. pp.1-530.
Boutsioukis C, Psimma Z, van der Sluis LWM (2013a) Factors affecting irrigant extrusion during
root canal irrigation: a systematic review. Int Endod J 46:599–618
Boutsioukis C, Verhaagen B, Walmsley AD, Versluis M, van der Sluis LWM (2013b) Measure-
ment and visualization of file-to-wall contact during ultrasonically activated irrigation in
simulated canals. Int Endod J 46:1046–55
Boutsioukis C, Kastrinakis E, Lambrianidis T, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, van der Sluis LWM
(2014a) Formation and removal of apical vapor lock during syringe irrigation: a combined
experimental and Computational Fluid Dynamics approach. Int Endod J 47:191–201
Boutsioukis C, Psimma Z, Kastrinakis E (2014b) The effect of flow rate and agitation technique on
irrigant extrusion ex vivo. Int Endod J 47:487–96
Bremer P, Monk I, Butler R (2002) Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes/Flavobacterium spp.
biofilms using chlorine: impact of substrate, pH, time and concentration. Letters Appl
Brennen CE (1995) Cavitation and bubble dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York (NY),
USA. 1st ed.
Brindle ER, Miller DA, Stewart PS (2011) Hydrodynamic deformation and removal of Staphylo-
coccus epidermidis biofilms treated with urea, chlorhexidine, iron chloride, or dispersinB.
Biotechnol Bioeng 108:1–10
Bronnec F, Bouillaguet S, Machtou P (2010a) Ex vivo assessment of irrigant penetration and
renewal during the cleaning and shaping of root canals: a digital subtraction radiographic
study. Int Endod J 43:275–82
Bronnec F, Bouillaguet S, Machtou P (2010b) Ex vivo assessment of irrigant penetration and
renewal during the final irrigation regimen. Int Endod J 43:663–72
Brujan E-A, Nahen K, Schmidt P, Volgel A (2001) Dynamics of laser-induced cavitation bubbles
near an elastic boundary. J Fluid Mech 433:251–81
Brunson M, Heilborn C, Johnson JD, Cohenca N (2010) Effect of apical preparation size and
preparation taper on irrigant volume delivered by using negative pressure irrigation system.
J Endod 36:721–4
Bryce G, O’Donnell D, Ready D, Ng YL, Pratten J, Gulabivala K (2009) Contemporary root canal
irrigants are able to disrupt and eradicate single- and dual-species biofilms. J Endod 35:1243–8
Burleson A, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M (2007) The in vivo evaluation of hand/rotary/
ultrasound instrumentation in necrotic, human mandibular molars. J Endod 33:782–7
Busscher HJ, Rustema-Abbink M, Bruinsma GM, de Jager M, Gottenbos B, van der Mei HC
(2003) Non-contact removal of coadhering and non-coadhering bacterial pairs from pellicle
surfaces by sonic brushing and de novo adhesion. Eur J Oral Sci 111:459–64
del Carpio-Perochena AE, Bramante CM, Duarte MA, Cavenago BC, Villas-Boas MH, Graeff
MS, Bernardineli N, de Andrade FB, Ordinola-Zapata R (2011) Biofilm dissolution and
cleaning ability of different irrigant solutions on intraorally infected dentin. J Endod 37:1134–8
Carrilho MR, Carvalho RM, Sousa EN, Nicolau J, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Tjäderhane L, Tay FR,
Agee K, Pashley DH (2010) Substantivity of chlorhexidine to human dentin. Dent Mater
26:779–85
Castelo-Baz P, Martin-Biedma B, Cantatore G, Varela-Patino P (2012) In vitro comparison of
passive and continuous ultrasonic irrigation in simulated lateral canals of extracted teeth.
J Endod 38:688–91
Chang YC, Huang FM, Tai KW, Chou MY (2001) The effect of sodium hypochlorite and
chlorhexidine on cultured human periodontal ligament cells. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Chávez de Paz LE, Bergenholtz G, Svensäter G (2010) The effects of antimicrobials on endodontic
biofilm bacteria. J Endod 36:70–7
Chen JE, Nurbakhsh B, Layton G, Bussmann M, Kishen A (2014) Irrigation dynamics associated
with positive pressure, apical negative pressure and passive ultrasonic irrigations: A compu-
tational fluid dynamics analysis. Aust Endod J 40:54–60
Chen X, Stewart PS (2000) Biofilm removal caused by chemical treatments. Wat Res 34:4229–33
Chen X, Stewart PS (2002) Role of electrostatic interactions in cohesion of bacterial biofilms.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59:718–720
Chow TW (1983) Mechanical effectiveness of root canal irrigation. J Endod 9:475–9

Christensen CE, McNeal SF, Eleazer P (2008) Effect of lowering the pH of sodium hypochlorite
on dissolving tissue in vitro. J Endod 34:449–52
Chu A (2010) Penetration of sodium hypochlorite into periapical lesions in necrotic dog teeth.
J Endod 2010;36:558 (abstract).
Clarkson RM, Kidd B, Evans GE, Moule AJ (2012) The effect of surfactant on the dissolution of
porcine pulpal tissue by sodium hypochlorite solutions. J Endod 38:1257–60
Conard M (2012) A prospective study of fluid pressures of irrigation during root canal therapy.
Ohio State University, Master Thesis, Columbus, OH, USA, pp 1–124
Cunningham WT, Balekjian AY (1980) Effect of temperature on collagen-dissolving ability of
sodium hypochlorite as endodontic irrigant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 49:175–7
Cunningham WT, Cole JS, Balekjian AY (1982) Effect of alcohol on the spreading ability of
sodium hypochlorite endodontic irrigant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 54:333–5
Davies JM, Hortwitz DA, Davies KJ (1993) Potential roles of hypochlorous acid and
N-chloroamines in collagen breakdown by phagocytic cells in synovitis. Free Radical Biol &
Med 15:637–643
De-Deus G, Namen F, Galan JJ, Zehnder M (2008) Soft chelating irrigation protocol optimizes
bonding quality of Resilon/Epiphany root fillings. J Endod 34:703–705
De-Deus G, de Berredo Pinho MA, Reis C, Fidel S, Souza E, Zehnder M (2013). Sodium
hypochlorite with reduced surface tension does not improve in situ pulp tissue dissolution.
J Endod 39:1039–43
de Groot de SD, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Wu M-K, Wesselink PR, van der Sluis LWM (2009)
Laser-activated irrigation within root canals: Cleaning efficacy and flow visualization. Int
Endod J 42:1077–83.
Derlon N, Massė A, Escudié R, Bernet N, Paul E (2008) Stratification in the cohesion of biofilms
grown under various environmental conditions. Water Res 42:2102–10
Deshpande MD, Vaishnav RN (1982) Submerged laminar jet impingement on a plane. J Fluid
Mech 114:213–36
Devine DA, Percival RS, Wood DJ et al (2007) Inhibition of biofilms associated with dentures and
toothbrushes by tetrasodium EDTA. J Appl Microbiol 103:2516–24
Druttman ACS, Stock CJR (1989) An in vitro comparison of ultrasonic and conventional methods
of irrigant replacement. Int Endod J 22:174–8
Duck PW, Smith FT (1979) Steady streaming induced between oscillating cylinders. J Fluid Mech
91:93–110
Dunne WM, Burd EM (1992) The effects of magnesium, calcium, EDTA, and pH on the in vitro
adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis to plastic. Microbiol Immunol 36:1019–1027
Dutner J, Mines P, Anderson A (2012) Irrigation trends among American Association of End-
odontists members: a web-based survey. J Endod 38:37–40
Estrela C, Estrela CRDA, Guimarães LF, Silva RS, Pécora JD (2005) Surface tension of calcium
hydroxide associated with different substances. J Appl Oral Sci 13:152–6
Falk KW, Sedgley CM (2005) The influence of preparation size on the mechanical efficacy of root
canal irrigation in vitro. J Endod 31:742–5
Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M, Sequeira-Byron P, de Souza RF, Carter B, Heft M (2012) Irrigants for
non-surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
12;9:CD008948.
Felver B, King DC, Lea SC, Price GJ, Walsmley AD (2009) Cavitation occurrence around
ultrasonic dental scalers. Ultrasonic Sonochem 16:692–7
Flemming HC, Wingerder J (2010) The biofilm matrix. Nature Rev Micro 8:623–33
Flemming HC, Wingender J, Szewzyk U (2011) Biofilm highlights, Springer Series on Biofilms,
1st edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany
Fukumoto Y, Yoshioka T, Suda H (2004) Intra-canal aspiration technique for root canal irrigation.
Part 1. Overflow of irrigating solution beyond the apical foramen. Japanese J Cons Dent
47:37–42
Fukumoto Y, Kikuchi I, Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H (2006) An ex vivo evaluation of a new

root canal irrigation technique with intracanal aspiration. Int Endod J 39:93–9
George R, Walsh LJ (2008) Apical extrusion of root canal irrigants when using Er:YAG and Er,
CR:YSGG with optical fibers: an in vitro dye study. J Endod 34:706–8
Giardino L, Ambu E, Becce C, Rimondini L, Morra M (2006) Surface tension comparison of four
common root canal irrigants and two new irrigants containing antibiotic. J Endod 32:1091–3
Gordon CA, Hodges NA, Marriott C (1991) Use of slime dispersants to promote antibiotic
penetration through the extracellular polysaccharide of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Gorni FG, Gagliani MM (2004) The outcome of endodontic retreatment: a 2-yr follow-up. J Endod
30:1–4
de Gregorio C, Estevez R, Cisneros R, Heilborn C, Cohenca N (2009) Effect of EDTA, sonic, and
ultrasonic activation on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals: an
in vitro study. J Endod 35:891–5
de Gregorio C, Estevez R, Cisneros R et al (2010) Efficacy of different irrigation and activation
systems on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals and up to
working length: an in vitro study. J Endod 36:1216–21
Gao Y, Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wu H, Li B, Ruse ND, Zhou X (2009) Development and validation
of a three-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics model of root canal irrigation. J Endod
35:1282–7
Grigoratos D, Knowles J, Ng YL, Gulabivala K (2001) Effect of exposing dentin to sodium
hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide on its flexural strength and elastic modulus. Inter Endod J
34:113–119
Gu L, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2009) Review of contemporary irrigant
agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 35:791–804
Guelon T, Mathias J-D, Stoodley P (2011) ‘Advances in Biofilm Mechanics’, In: Biofilm high-
lights, Flemming, H-C, Wingender, J and Szewzyk, U, eds. Springer. 1st ed.
Guerisoli DMZ, Silva RS, Pecora JD (1998) Evaluation of some physico-chemical properties of
different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite solutions. Braz Endod J 3:21–3
Haapasalo M, Orstavik D (1987) In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res
66:1375–9
Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil JM (2005) Eradication of endodontic infection by instru-
mentation and irrigation solutions. Endo Top 10:77–102
Haapasalo M, Wang Z, Shen Y, Curtis A, Patel P (2014) Tissue dissolution by a novel multisonic
ultracleaning system and sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 40:1178–81
Hand RE, Smith ML, Harrison JW (1978) Analysis of the effect of dilution on the necrotic tissue
dissolution property of sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 4:60–4
Hauser V, Braun A, Frentzen M (2007) Penetration depth of a dye marker into dentine using a
novel hydrodynamic system (RinsEndo). Int Endod J 40:644–52
He Y, Peterson BW, Jongsma MA, Ren Y, Sharma PK, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC (2013)
Stress relaxation analysis facilitates a quantitative approach towards antimicrobial penetration
into biofilms. PLoS One 8, e63750. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063750
Heling I, Rotstein I, Dinur T, Szwec-Levine Y, Steinberg D (2001) Bactericidal and cytotoxic
effects of sodium hypochlorite and sodium dichloroisocyanurate solutions in vitro. J Endod
27:278–80
Hockett JL, Dommisch JK, Johnson JD, Cohenca N (2008) Antimicrobial efficacy of two
irrigation techniques in tapered and nontapered canal preparations: an in vitro study. J Endod
34:1374–7
Hsieh YD, Gau CH, Kung Wu SF, Shen EC, Hsu PW, Fu E (2007) Dynamic recording of irrigating
fluid distribution in root canals using thermal image analysis. Int Endod J 40:11–7
Hu X, Peng Y, Sum CP, Ling J (2010) Effects of concentrations and exposure times of sodium
hypochlorite on dentin deproteination: attenuated total reflection fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy study. J Endod 36:2008–11
Huang TY, Gulabivala K, Ng YL (2008) A bio-molecular film ex-vivo model to evaluate the
influence of canal dimensions and irrigation variables on the efficacy of irrigation. Int Endod J
41:60–71
Incropera FP, de Witt DP (1990) Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer, 3rd edn. John Wiley &
Sons, NJ, USA
Jensen SA, Walker TL, Hutter JW, Nicoll BK (1999) Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of
passive sonic activation and passive ultrasonic activation after hand instrumentation in molar
root canals. J Endod 25:735–8
Jiang L-M, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, van der Sluis LWM (2010a) Evaluation of a sonic device
designed to activate irrigant in the root canal. J Endod 36:143–6
Jiang L-M, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, van der Sluis LWM (2010b) Influence of the oscillation
direction of an ultrasonic file on the cleaning efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation. J Endod
36:1372
Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Zangrillo C, Cuckovic D, van der Sluis LWM (2010c) An
evaluation of the effect of pulsed ultrasound on the cleaning efficacy of passive ultrasonic
irrigation. J Endod 36:1887–91
Jiang LM, Hoogenkamp MA, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR, Crielaard W, Deng DM (2011)
Resazurin metabolism assay for root canal disinfectant evaluation on dual-species biofilms.
J Endod 37:31–5
Jiang L-M, Lak B, Eijsvogel E, Wesselink PR, van der Sluis LWM (2012) A cleaning efficacy
comparison of different irrigation techniques as final irrigation. J Endod 38:838–41
Joyce Tiong T, Price GJ (2012) Ultrasound promoted reaction of Rhodamine B with sodium
hypochlorite using sonochemical and dental ultrasonic instruments. Ultrasonic Sonochem
19:358–64
Jungbluth H, Marending M, De-Deus G, Sener B, Zehnder M (2011) Stabilizing sodium hypo-
chlorite at high pH: effects on soft tissue and dentin. J Endod 37:693–6
Jungbluth H, Peters C, Peters O, Sener B, Zehnder M (2012) Physicochemical and pulp tissue
dissolution properties of some household bleach brands compared with a dental sodium
hypochlorite solution. J Endod 38:372–5
Kahn FH, Rosenberg PA, Gliksberg J (1995) An in vitro evaluation of the irrigating characteristics
of ultrasonic and subsonic handpieces and irrigating needles and probes. J Endod 21:277–80
Keir DM, Senia ES, Montgomery S (1990) Effectiveness of a brush in removing postinstru-
mentation canal debris. J Endod 16:323–7
Kim J, Uchiyama T, Carillho M, Agee KA, Mazzoni A, Breschi L, Carvalho RM, Tjaderhane L,
Looney S, Wimmer C, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2010) Chlorhexidine
binding to mineralized versus demineralized dentin powder. Dent Materials 6:771–8
Kishen A (2006) Mechanisms and risk factors for fracture predilection in endodontically treated
teeth. Endod Top 13:57–83
Kite P, Eatswood K, Sugden S et al (2004) Use on in vivo-generated biofilms from hemodialysis
catheters to test the efficacy of a novel antimicrobial catheter lock for biofilm eradication in
vitro. J Clin Microbiol 42:3073–76
Klapper I, Rupp CJ, Cargo R, Purvedorj B, Stoodley P (2002) Viscoelastic fluid description of
bacterial biofilm material properties. Biotech Bioeng 80:289–96
K€orstgens V, Flemming H-C, Wingender J, Borchard W (2001) Uniaxial compression measure-
ment device for investigation of the mechanical stability of biofilms. J Microbiol Meth 46:9–17
K€orstgens V (2003) Die mechanische stabilität bakterieller biofilme. Eine untersuchung
verschiedener einflüsse auf biofilme von. Dissertation Universität Duisburg-Essen, Pseudomo-
nas aeruginosa
Koskinen KP, Stenvall H, Uitto VJ (1980) Dissolution of bovine pulp tissue by endodontic
solutions. Scand J Dent Res 88:406–11
Kronick PL, Cooke P (1996) Thermal stabilization of collagen fibers by calcification. Connect Tiss
Res 33:275–82
Kundu PK, Cohen IM (2004) Fluid mechanics, 3rd edn. San Diego, CA, USA: Elsevier Academic
Press 1–23:271–377
Lea SC, Walmsley AD, Lumley PJ (2010) Analyzing endosonic root canal file oscillations: an
in vitro evaluation. J Endod 36:880–3
Lee TH, Hu CC, Lee SS, Chou MY, Chang YC (2010) Cytotoxicity of chlorhexidine on human
osteoblastic cells is related to intracellular glutathione levels. Int Endod J 43:430–5
Liang Y-H, Jiang L-M, Jiang L, Chen X-B, Liu Y-Y, Tian F-C, Bao X-D, Gao X-J, Versluis M,
Wu M-K, van der Sluis LWM (2013) Radiographic healing following root canal treatments
performed in single-rooted teeth with and without ultrasonic activation of the irrigant: a
randomized controlled trial. J Endod 39:1218–1225
Liu H, Wei X, Ling J, Wang L, Huang X (2010) Biofilm formation capability of Enterococcus
faecalis cells in starvation phase and its susceptibility to sodium hypochlorite. J Endod
36:630–635
Lloyd A, Uhles JP, Clement DJ, Garcia-Godoy F (2014) Elimination of intracanal tissue and debris
through a novel laser-activated system assessed using high-resolution micro-computed tomog-
raphy: a pilot study. J Endod 40:584–7
Lottanti S, Gautschi H, Sener B, Zehnder M (2009) Effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic,
etidronic and peracetic acid irrigation on human root dentine and the smear layer. Int Endod
J 42:335–43
Lui JN, Kuah HG, Chen NN (2007) Effect of EDTA with and without surfactants or ultrasonics on
removal of smear layer. J Endod 33:472–5
Lumley PJ, Walmsley AD, Laird WRE (1988) An investigation into cavitational activity occurring
in endosonic instrumentation. J Dent 16:120–2
Lumley PJ, Walmsley AD, Laird WRE (1991) Streaming patterns produced around endodontic
files. Int Endod J 24:290–7
Lumley PJ, Walmsley AD (1992) Effect of precurving on the performance of endosonic K files.
J Endod 18:232–6
Lumley PJ, Walmsley AD, Walton RE, Rippin JW (1993) Cleaning of oval canals using ultrasonic
or sonic instrumention. J Endod 19:453–7
Lussi A, Nussbächer U, Grosrey J (1993) A novel noninstrumented technique for cleansing the
root canal system. J Endod 19:549–53
Macedo RG, Wesselink PR, Zaccheo F, Fanali D, van Der Sluis LW (2010) Reaction rate of
NaOCl in contact with bovine dentine: effect of activation, exposure time, concentration and
pH. Int Endod J 43:1108–15
Macedo RG, Verhaagen B, Fernandez Rivas D, Gardeniers JGE, van der Sluis LWM, Wesselink
PR, Versluis M (2014a) Sonochemical and high-speed optical characterization of cavitation
generated by an ultrasonically oscillating dental file in root canal models. Ultrason Sonochem
21:324–35
Macedo RG, Robinson JP, Verhaagen B, Walmsley AD, Versluis M, Cooper PR, van der Sluis LW
(2014b) A novel methodology providing insights into removal of biofilm mimicking hydrogel
from lateral morphological features of the root canal during irrigation procedures. Int Endod J
47:1040–51
Macedo RG, Verhaagen B, Wesselink PR, Versluis M, van der Sluis LWM (2014c) Influence of
refreshment/activation cycles and temperature rise on the reaction rate of sodium hypochlorite
with bovine dentine during ultrasonic activated irrigation. Int Endod J 47:147–54
Macedo RG, Pascual Herrero N, Wesselink PR, Versluis M, van der Sluis LWM (2014d) Influence
of the dentinal wall on the pH of NaOCl during root canal irrigation. J Endod 40:1005–8
Macedo RG, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, van der Sluis LWM (2014e) Temperature evolution of
preheated irrigant injected into a root canal ex vivo. Int Endod J (submitted)
Malki M, Verhaagen B, Jiang L-M, Nehme W, Naaman A, Versluis M, Wesselink PR, van der
Sluis LWM (2012) Irrigant flow beyond the insertion depth of an ultrasonically oscillating file
in straight and curved root canals: visualization and cleaning efficacy. J Endod 38:657–61
Marending M, Luder HU, Brunner TJ, Knecht S, Stark WJ, Zehnder M (2007) Effect of sodium
hypochlorite on human root dentin - mechanical, chemical and structural evaluation. Int Endod
J 40:786–93
Matsumoto H, Yoshimine Y, Akamine A (2011) Visualization of irrigant flow and cavitation
induced by Er:YAG laser within a root canal model. J Endod 37:839–43
McDonnell G, Russell AD (1999) Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance.
Clin Microbiol Rev 12:147–79
Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Cohen R, Zary R, Paqué F, Hülsmann M (2010) The self-adjusting file
(SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study.
J Endod 36:697–702
Mitchell RP, Yang SE, Baumgartner JC (2010) Comparison of apical extrusion of NaOCl using the
EndoVac or needle irrigation of root canals. J Endod 36:338–41
Mitchell RP, Baumgartner JC, Sedgley CM (2011) Apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite using
different root canal irrigation systems. J Endod 37:1677–1681
Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV (2009) Antimicrobial substantivity of root canal irrigants and medica-
ments: a review. Aust Endod J 35:131–9
M€ohle RB, Langemann T, Haesner M, Augustin W, Scholl S, Neu TR, Hempel DC, Horn H (2007)
Structure and shear strength of microbial biofilms as determined with confocal laser scanning
microscopy and fluid dynamic gauging using a novel rotating disc biofilm reactor. Biotechnol
Bioeng 98:747–55
de Moor RJ, Meire M, Goharkhay K, Moritz A, Vanobbergen J (2010) Efficacy of ultrasonic
versus laser-activated irrigation to remove artificially placed dentin debris plugs. J Endod
36:1580–3
Moorer WR, Wesselink PR (1982) Factors promoting the tissue dissolving capability of sodium
hypochlorite. Int Endod J 15:187–96
Moreira DM, Affonso Almeida JF, Ferraz CCR, Gomes BP, Line SR, Zaia AA (2009) Structural
analysis of bovine root dentin after use of different endodontics auxiliary chemical substances.
J Endod 35:1023–7
Mott RL (1999) Applied fluid mechanics, 5th edn. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall 1–188:221–38
Munoz HR, Camacho-Cuadra K (2012) In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation
techniques for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars.
J Endod 38:445–8
Naenni N, Thoma K, Zehnder M (2004) Soft tissue dissolution capacity of currently used and
potential endodontic irrigants. J Endod 30:785–7
Nguy D, Sedgley C (2006) The influence of canal curvature in the mechanical efficacy of root
canal irrigation in vitro using real-time imaging of bioluminescent bacteria. J Endod
32:1077–80
Nielsen BA, Baumgartner CJ (2007) Comparison of the EndoVac system to needle irrigation of
root canals. J Endod 33:611–5
Ohl C-D, Wolfum B (2003) Detachment and sonoporation of adherent HeLa-cells by shock wave-
induced cavitation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1624:131–8
Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Cavenago B, Graeff MS, Gomes de Moraes I, Marciano M,
Duarte MA (2012) Antimicrobial effect of endodontic solutions used as final irrigants on a
dentine biofilm model. Int Endod J 45:162–8
Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Aprecio RM, Handysides R, Jaramillo DE (2014) Biofilm
removal by 6% sodium hypochlorite activated by different irrigation techniques. Int Endod J
47: 659–666
Orstavik D, Haapasalo M (1990) Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings of experi-
mentally infected dentinal tubules. Endod Dent Traumatol 6:142–9
Ozdemir HO, Buzoglu HD, Calt S et al (2010) Effect of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and
sodium hypochlorite irrigation on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm colonization in young and old
human root canal dentin: in vitro study. J Endod 36:842–846
Parente JM, Loushine RJ, Susin L, Gu L, Looney SW, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2010)
Root canal debridement using manual dynamic agitation or the EndoVac for final irrigation in a
closed system and an open system. Int Endod J 43:1001–12
Park E, Shen Y, Khakpour M, Haapasalo M (2013) Apical pressure and extent of irrigant flow
beyond the needle tip during positive-pressure irrigation in an in vitro root canal model.
J Endod 39:511–5
Pashley EL, Birdsong NL, Bowman K, Pashley DH (1985) Cytotoxic effects of NaOCl on vital
tissue. J Endod 11:525–8
Peeters HH, Mooduto L (2013) Radiographic examination of apical extrusion of root canal
irrigants during cavitation induced by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation: an in vivo study. Clin
Oral Invest 17:2105–2112.
Peeters HH, Iskandar B, Suardita K, Suharto D (2014) Visualization of removal of trapped air from
the apical region of the straight root canal models generating 2-phase intermittent counter flow
during ultrasonically activated irrigation. J Endod 40:857–61
Peeters HH, Gutknecht N (2014) Efficacy of laser-driven irrigation versus ultrasonic in removing
an airlock from the apical third of a narrow root canal. Aust Endod J 40:47–53
Percival SL, Kite P, Eastwood K et al (2005) Tetrasodium EDTA as a novel central venous
catheter lock solution against biofilm. Infect Contr Hosp Epidem 26:515–19
Perdigao J, Denehy GE, Swift EJ (1994) Effects of chlorhexidine on dentin surfaces and shear
bond strength. Am J Dent 7:81–4
Peters OA, Bardsley S, Fong J, Pandher G, Divito E (2011) Disinfection of root canals with
photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming. J Endod 37:1008–12
Phares DJ, Smedley GT, Flagan RC (2000) The wall shear stress produced by the normal
impingement of a jet on a flat surface. J Fluid Mech 418:351–75
Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press:3–9.
Psimma Z, Boutsioukis C, Vasiliadis L, Kastrinakis E (2013a) A new method for real-time
quantification of irrigant extrusion during root canal irrigation ex vivo. Int Endod J 46:619–31
Psimma Z, Boutsioukis C, Kastrinakis E, Vasiliadis L (2013b) The effect of needle insertion depth
and root canal curvature on irrigant extrusion ex vivo. J Endod 39:521–4
Qian W, Shen Y, Haapasalo M (2011) Quantitative analysis of the effect of irrigant solution
sequences on dentin erosion. J Endod 37:1437–1441
Ragnarsson KT, Rechenberg DK, Attin T, Zehnder M (2015) Available chlorine consumption
from NaOCl solutions passively placed in instrumented human root canals. Int Endod J
48:435–40.
Ramage G, Wickes BL, L opez-Ribot JL (2007) Inhibition on Candida albicans biofilm formation
using divalent cation chelators (EDTA). Mycopath 164:301–6
Rechenberg DK, Ragnarsson KT, Rüeger S, Held L, Mohn D, Zehnder M (2014) A new method to
assess available chlorine in small volumes of liquid. J Endod 40:534–7
Renslow RS, Majors PD, McLean JS, Fredrickson JK, Ahmed B, Beyenal H (2010) In situ
effective diffusion coefficient profiles in live biofilms using pulsed-field gradient nuclear
magnetic resonance. Biotechnol Bioeng 106:928–37
Retamozo B, Shabahang S, Johnson N, Aprecio RM, Torabinejad M (2010) Minimum contact
time and concentration of sodium hypochlorite required to eliminate Enterococcus faecalis.
J Endod 36:520–3
Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr (2010) Fate of the tissue in lateral canals and apical ramifications in
Robertson CW, Williams D (1971) Lambert absorption coefficients of water in the infrared. J Opt
Soc Am 61:1316–20
R€
olla G, L€oe H, Rindom Schiøtt C (1970) The affinity of chlorhexidine for hydroxyapatite and
salivary mucins. J Perio Res 5:90–5
Rose RK, Turner SJ (1998) Extracellular volume in streptococcal model biofilms: effects of pH,
calcium and fluoride. Biochim Biophys Acta 1379:185–190
Rosenfeld EF, James GA, Burch BS (1978) Vital pulp tissue response to sodium hypochlorite.
J Endod 4:140–6
Rossi-Fedele G, Dogramaci EJ, Guastalli AR, Steier L, Poli de Figueiredo JA (2012) Antagonistic
interactions between sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine, EDTA, and citric acid. J Endod
38:426–31
Rothfus RR, Monrad CC, Senecal VE (1950) Velocity distribution and fluid friction in smooth
concentric annuli. Ind Eng Chem 42:2511–20
Russell AD, Day MJ (1993) Antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine. J Hosp Infect 25:229–38
Saleh AA, Ettman WM (1999) Effect of endodontic irrigation solutions on microhardness of root
canal dentine. J Dent 27:43–6
Salzgeber RM, Brilliant JD (1977) An in vivo evaluation of the penetration of an irrigating
solution in root canals. J Endod 3:394–8
Savani GM, Sabbah W, Sedgley CM, Whitten B (2014) Current trends in endodontic treatment by
general dental practitioners: report of a United States national survey. J Endod 40:618–24
Sedgley C, Applegate B, Nagel A, Hall D (2004) Real-time imaging and quantification of
bioluminescent bacteria in root canals in vitro. J Endod 30:893–8
Sedgley CM, Nagel AC, Hall D, Applegate B (2005) Influence of irrigant needle depth in
removing bacteria inoculated into instrumented root canals using real-time imaging in vitro.
Şen BH, Wesselink PR, Türkün M (1995) The smear layer: a phenomenon in root canal therapy.
Shaker LA, Furr JR, Russell AD (1988) Mechanism of resistance of Bacillus subtilis spores to
chlorhexidine. J Appl Bacteriol 64:531–9
Shankar PN, Deshpande MD (2000) Fluid mechanics in the driven cavity. Ann Rev Fluid Mech
32:93–136
Shanks RMQ, Sargent JL, Martinez RM et al (2006) Catheter lock solutions influence staphylo-
coccal biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:2247–55
Shemesh H, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. (2010) Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal filling
procedures. Int Endod J.43:995–1000.
Shen Y, Gao Y, Qian W, Ruse ND, Zhou X, Wu H, Haapasalo M (2010) Three-dimensional
numeric simulation of root canal irrigant flow with different irrigation needles. J Endod
36:884–9
Sherertz RJ, Boger MS, Collins CA et al (2006) Comparative in vitro efficacies of various catheter
lock solutions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:1865–8
Shrestha A, Fong S-W, Khoo B-C, Kishen A (2009) Delivery of antibacterial nanoparticles into
dentinal tubules using high-intensity focused ultrasound. J Endod 35:1028–33
Sim TP, Knowles JC, Ng YL, Shelton J, Gulabiala K (2001) Effect of sodium hypochlorite on
mechanical properties of dentin and tooth surface strain. Inter Endod J 34:120–132
Sirtes G, Waltimo T, Schaetzle M, Zehnder M (2005) The effects of temperature on sodium
hypochlorite short-term stability, pulp dissolution capacity, and antimicrobial efficacy.
J Endod 31:669–71
van der Sluis LW, Gambarini G, Wu MK, Wesselink PR (2006) The influence of volume, type of
irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root
canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation. Int Endod J 39:472–6
van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR (2007) Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the
root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 40:415–26
van der Sluis L, Wu MK, Wesselink P (2009) Comparison of 2 flushing methods used during
passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal. Quintessence Int 40:875–9
van der Sluis LWM, Vogels MP, Verhaagen B, Macedo R, Wesselink PR (2010) Study on the
influence of refreshment/activation cycles and irrigants on mechanical cleaning efficiency
during ultrasonic activation of the irrigant. J Endod 36:737–40
Šnjarić D, Čarija Z, Braut A, Halaji A, Kovačević M, Kuiš D (2012) Irrigation of human prepared
root canal – ex vivo based computational fluid dynamics analysis. Croat Med J 53:470–9.
Soares JA, Roque de Carvalho MA, Cunha Santos SM et al (2010) Effectiveness of

chemomechanical preparation with alternating use of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in
eliminating intracanal Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. J Endod 36:894–898
Sobhani OE, Gulabivala K, Knowles LC, Ng YL (2010) The effect of irrigation time, root
morphology and dentin thickness on tooth surface strain when using 5% sodium hypochlorite
and 17% EDTA. Inter Endod J 43:190–199
Spencer HR, Ike V, Brennan PA (2007) Review: the use of sodium hypochlorite in endodontics—
potential complications and their management. Br Dent J 202:555–9
Stojicic S, Zivkovic S, Qian W, Zhang H, Haapasalo M (2010) Tissue dissolution by sodium
hypochlorite: effect of concentration, temperature, agitation, and surfactant. J Endod
36:1558–62
Stojicic S, Shen Y, Haapasalo M (2013) Effect of the source of biofilm bacteria, level of biofilm
maturation, and type of disinfecting agent on the susceptibility of biofilm bacteria to
antibacterial agents. J Endod 39:473–7
Stewart PS, Franklin MJ (2008) Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nature Rev Microbiol
6:199–210
Taşman F, Cehreli ZC, O gan C, Etikan I (2000) Surface tension of root canal irrigants. J Endod
26:586–7
Tay FR, Gu LS, Schoeffel GJ, Wimmer C, Susin L, Zhang K, Arun SN, Kim J, Looney SW,
Pashley DH (2010) Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented
needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery. J Endod 36:745–50
Thé SD (1979) The solvent action of sodium hypochlorite on fixed and unfixed necrotic tissue.
Thomas AR, Velmurugan N, Smita S, Jothilatha S (2014) Comparative evaluation of canal
isthmus debridement efficacy of modified Endovac technique with different irrigation systems.
J Endod 40:1676–80
Tilton JN (1999) Fluid and particle dynamics. In: Perry RH, Green DW, Maloney JO (eds) Perry’s
chemical engineer’s handbook, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, pp 6.1–6.50
Turakhia MH, Characklis WG (1989) Activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms: effect of
calcium. Biotechnol Bioengin 33:406–414
Verhaagen B, Lea SC, De Bruin GJ, van der Sluis LWM, Walmsley AD, Versluis M (2012a)
Oscillation characteristics of endodontic files: numerical model and its validation. IEEE -
Trans Ultr Ferr Freq Contr 59:2448–59
Verhaagen B, Boutsioukis C, Heijnen GL, van der Sluis LWM, Versluis M (2012b) Role of the
confinement of a root canal on jet impingement during endodontic irrigation. Exp Fluids
53:1841–53
Verhaagen B, Boutsioukis C, Sleutel CP, Kastrinakis E, Versluis M, van der Sluis LWM (2014a)
Irrigant transport into dental microchannels. Microfluid Nanofluidics 16:1165–77
Verhaagen B, Boutsioukis C, van der Sluis LWM, Versluis M (2014b) Acoustic streaming induced
by an ultrasonically oscillating endodontic file. J Acoust Soc Am 135:1717–30
Vera J, Arias A, Romero M (2011) Effect of maintaining apical patency on irrigant penetration
into the apical third of root canals when using passive ultrasonic irrigation: an in vivo study.
J Endod 37:1276–8
Vera J, Arias A, Romero M (2012) Dynamic movement of intracanal gas bubbles during cleaning
and shaping procedures: the effect of maintaining apical patency on their presence in the
middle and cervical thirds of human root canals-an in vivo study. J Endod 38:200–3
van der Waal SV, van der Sluis LWM (2012) Potential of calcium to scaffold an endodontic
biofilm, thus protecting the micro-organisms from disinfection. Med Hypotheses 79:1–4
Walters MJ, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG (2002) Efficacy of irrigation with rotary instrumenta-
tion. J Endod 28:837–9
Weise M, Roggendorf MJ, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R (2007) Four methods for
cleaning simulated lateral extensions of curved root canals: a SEM evaluation. Int Endod J
40:991–2
White FM (1999) Fluid Mechanics, 4th edn. Boston, USA: McGraw-Hill: 1–56, 129–214, 541.
Willershausen I, Wolf TG, Schmidtmann I, Berger C, Ehlers V, Willershausen B, Brise~ no B
(2015) Survey of root canal irrigating solutions used in dental practices within Germany. Int
Endod J 48:654–60.
Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR (2004) Comparison of mandibular premolars and
canines with respect to their resistance to vertical root fracture. J Dent 32:265–8
Zhang K, Tay FR, Kyung Kim Y, Mitchell JK, Ryul KJ, Carrilhof M, Pashley DH, Ling J (2010a)
The effect of initial irrigation with two different sodium hypochlorite concentrations on the
erosion of instrumented radicular dentin. Dent Materials 26:514–523
Zhang K, Kyung Kim Y, Cadenaro M, Brian TE, Sidow SJ, Loushine RJ, Ling J, Pashley DH, Tay
FR (2010b) Effect of different exposure times and concentrations of sodium hypochlorite/
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on the structural integrity of mineralised dentin. J Endod
36:105–10
Zehnder M, Schmidlin P, Sener B, Waltimo T (2005) Chelation in root canal therapy reconsidered.
J Endod 31:817–820
Zehnder M (2006) Root canal irrigants. J Endod 32:389–398
Zou L, Shen Y, Li W, Haapasalo M (2010) Penetration of sodium hypochlorite into dentin.
J Endod 36:793–6
Inter-appointment Medication with Calcium
Hydroxide in Routine Cases of Root Canal
Therapy
Gunnar Bergenholtz, Calvin Torneck, and Anil Kishen
Abstract This chapter discusses the use of an inter-appointment application of

calcium hydroxide in the endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis,
from a historic and evidence-based perspective. Despite a long history of clinical
use and the publication of numerous in vitro, in vivo, and treatment outcome
studies, strong scientific evidence in support of its use in this capacity is still not
available. Today’s “best scientific evidence” is based primarily on a just a small
number of studies that by today’s standard are not considered “strong.” However,
given that elimination of bacteria from the root canal before placement of a root
canal filling appears to enhance the treatment outcome, inter-appointment place-
ment of calcium hydroxide could be an easy and appropriate way of promoting
it. Any perceived advantage of its use, however, must be balanced by the risk of
altering the physical properties of the root dentin due to its caustic action, partic-
ularly when it is present in the root canal for a long period of time. While clinical
confirmation of an increased risk of root fracture in calcium hydroxide-treated fully
developed teeth is still not verifiable, prudence dictates that caution should be
exercised when calcium hydroxide is used in this manner in permanent teeth that
are not completely developed.
1 Introduction
For over 100 years inter-appointment antiseptic dressings have been considered an
important adjunct to root canal infection control. Over this period of time, many
medicaments and compounds were used for this purpose, with ebbs and flows in the
consensus as to which was considered best. In recent decades, a paste of calcium
G. Bergenholtz (*)
Department of Endodontics, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg,
Gothenburg, Sweden
C. Torneck • A. Kishen

Biofilms 9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47415-0_10
304 G. Bergenholtz et al.
hydroxide has been used as a treatment dressing and has been viewed as a valuable
adjunct to control infection and subsequently improving treatment outcome. By
virtue of its tissue-dissolving property, calcium hydroxide has also been used to
necrotize pulp tissue remnants left on the canal walls after pulpectomy, remnants
that can be more readily removed with sodium hypochlorite irrigation at a subse-
quent treatment session. Additionally, calcium hydroxide has been used in the long
term in cases of teeth with a necrotic pulp and a large periapical lesion, symptom-
atic apical periodontitis, advanced root resorption, and root perforation (for reviews
see, e.g., Fava and Saunders 1999; Mohammadi and Dummer 2011).
The lack of convincing scientific evidence in support of calcium hydroxide
treatment, augmented by the recent introduction of advanced options for root
canal irrigation, has challenged the use of calcium hydroxide and the concept of
inter-appointment dressings in general. The use of rotary root canal instrumentation
in combination with super-flexible Ni–Ti files currently allows the clinician to
complete root canal preparation for most teeth within a relatively short time.
Thus, to many endodontists, in such instances, it seems impractical to extend the
treatment time unless there is compelling evidence to the contrary. In addition,
patients often appreciate a single-visit treatment when they have to spend as little
time in the chair as possible, if the same result can be achieved. However, concerns
have been raised by clinicians and dental researchers alike as to whether it is
possible to effectively inhibit persistence of bacterial aggregates and biofilms in
an infected root canal in one treatment session and thereby minimize persistent or
recurrent periapical disease (Trope and Bergenholtz 2002; Bergenholtz and
Spångberg 2004). This philosophy also has been voiced in numerous clinical and
in vitro observational studies, where the total removal of infected tissue from the
root canal systems, whether by hand or rotary instrumentation, has been deemed to
be an unachievable goal (Walton 1976; Wu and Wesselink 1995). All too often,
tissue remnants, debris, and bacteria are left behind in the root canal, especially in
oval canals and “c”-shaped canals, and in intercanal isthmuses of multirooted teeth.
This provides the bacteria that survive the initial treatment with both substrate and
an environment necessary to develop virulent characteristics that may lead to
treatment failure. This concept has been supported by clinical studies and case
reports, which have found that the intracanal biofilm remains intact, even after the
conscientious completion of treatment (Nair et al. 2005; Carr et al. 2009; Vera
et al. 2012).
This chapter will discuss the value of inter-appointment medication in the
endodontic management of teeth with an infected root canal and will focus mainly
on the use of calcium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide-based medicaments for that
purpose. Their use today will be supported by historical perspectives and a narrative
review of the studies that provide us with what has been termed “scientific evi-
dence.” It will be obvious to the reader that despite the publication of numerous
clinical and laboratory reports, strong scientific evidence in support of inter-
appointment dressings with calcium hydroxide is not yet available and that the
current “best scientific evidence,” which is drawn upon to formulate clinical
protocol, is based upon only on a small number of relatively weak clinical studies.
Inter-appointment Medication with Calcium Hydroxide in Routine Cases of Root. . . 305
2 Historical Perspectives
The need for an inter-appointment dressing in root canal therapy has been a topic of
debate for more than a century. In the late nineteenth century, an ongoing debate
between Drs. C. Edmund Kells Jr. and J. Smith Dodge Jr. regarding the appropri-
ateness of immediate root canal filling was published in the Dental Cosmos (1887).
Dr. J. Smith Dodge Jr. (Dodge 1887) argued that immediate root filling was suitable
only for teeth with vital pulp tissue, while Dr. C. Edmund Kells Jr. stated (Kells
1887): “I believe that dentists all over the country are filling at one sitting, pulpless
roots, roots in all stages of inflammation, as well as those in which the pulps are
wholly or partly alive; and not only filling them, but doing so successfully. Any root
may be cleaned as well in one sitting as in a dozen.” It should be noted that this
debate took at a time, when the role of microbes in the etiology of the pulp and
periapical inflammation was poorly understood. Willoughby D Miller’s hallmark
textbook Microorganisms of the Human Mouth(1890) introduced the possibility of
a causal relationship between microorganisms and oral disease. This information
had a great impact on the profession and supported the view that effective elimi-
nation of bacteria from the infected root canals was a necessary component to its
treatment, which required the use of bactericidal chemicals in addition to mechan-
ical debridement and root filling. Onderdonk (1901) (cited by Coolidge 1960) went
further and proposed the routine bacteriological culturing of the root canals to
assess the efficacy of antimicrobial treatment. This step not only supported but
also mandated the concept of multiple treatment appointments in root canal treat-
ment. A virtual hunt was subsequently initiated in search for an effective antimi-
crobial for root canal treatment. In that context, numerous drugs and compounds
were clinically tested in a more or less trial and error type of studies over the
ensuing years with the patient as the test subject!
During the early 1900s, strong antiseptics were used for root canal disinfection,
and little attention was given to their potential harmful local and systemic effects.
Creosote, called oil of smoke, and phenol were in common use, having been used
earlier to control oral malodor (Grossman 1976). Compounds based on parafor-
maldehyde including formalin, tricresolformalin and formocresol were also advo-
cated. Paraformaldehyde, used earlier along with arsenic to devitalize pulps that
had been exposed by caries (so-called mortal treatment), became a popular disin-
fection agent to avoid pain experienced during pulp extirpation, when profound
local anesthetics were not as yet available. Because these were all highly toxic
agents, concerns were expressed by several opinion leaders in the profession, such
as G.V. Black (Grossman 1971) and Carl Grove (1913), that they had a potential to
severely injure periapical tissue, when placed in a root canal. Formaldehyde and
formaldehyde compounds nevertheless gained widespread popularity and remain in
common use today as a root canal disinfectant. They are also an active component
of some root filling materials such as N2, Endomethasone, and SPAD. It is
noteworthy to mention that Strindberg, in his classic thesis on treatment outcomes
(1956), used tricresolformalin as a root canal disinfectant in 35 % of the teeth
included in his study. Similarly, in an often-cited treatment outcome study under-

taken by undergraduate dental students in Oslo (Kerekes and Tronstad 1979), a
solution of 3.7 % formaldehyde was used to disinfect the root canals of teeth with
necrotic pulps.
Calcium hydroxide surfaced, at the beginning of the twentieth century, in the
profession’s search for an effective root canal disinfectant. That was at a time when
endodontics was condemned as a health risk by those who believed in the focal
infection theory. Their published and voiced disapproval of endodontics retarded its
scientific advancement for many years (Grossman 1976). Although highly caustic
in nature, calcium hydroxide was introduced as a potential replacement for the more
tissue-toxic and potentially allergenic medicaments that were commonly used in
treatment at that time. BW Hermann (1920) has been generally acknowledged as
the individual who introduced calcium hydroxide into endodontics. However,
according to Staehle (1990), calcium hydroxide had been used in root canal therapy
long before then. Nevertheless, Hermann in his dissertation and his subsequent
publications was admittedly the first to emphasize its antimicrobial effect and its
tissue compatibility when placed in a root canal (Staehle 1990). He reported that a
dressing of calcium hydroxide, when sealed into the root canal over a period of
time, could produce bacteria-free root canal and induce apical root closure by hard
tissue (cementum or a dentin-like tissue) (Hermann 1930). However, this occurred
less frequently than when it was used as a capping agent for an exposed vital pulp
(Hermann 1930). The above observations paved the way for the use of calcium
hydroxide and calcium hydroxide-containing materials as a routine agent for
capping dental pulps exposed by caries and trauma in the years that followed (for
reviews, see by Staehle 1990 and Bergenholtz 2005).
In the wake of Hermann’s observations, many other clinical applications for
calcium hydroxide were identified (for a recent review, see Mohammadi and
Dummer 2011). Calcium hydroxide, however, never gained universal acceptance
as a root filling material or as an inter-appointment dressing until well into the
second half of the twentieth century. The basis for the use of calcium hydroxide in
the treatment of exposed vital pulp (Rohner 1940) and in the endodontic manage-
ment of immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis (Granath 1959; Frank 1966;
Heithersay 1970) was nevertheless established. In 1960, Matsumiya and Kitamura
(1960) demonstrated that a paste of calcium hydroxide could reduce or eliminate
the microbial population present in the experimentally infected root canals of dog
teeth. Engstr€om and Spångberg (1967) described the benefits of calcium hydroxide
use in the management of partially pulpectomized teeth. They observed in their
study that when a portion of the pulp of young, human, healthy premolar teeth was
not removed and calcium hydroxide was placed into the root canal, hard tissue was
deposited at the interface of calcium hydroxide and residual pulp and at the orifices
of accessory canals present along the main canal. A likely reason for the delay in the
application of these findings to clinical practice was the strong belief held by
clinicians of that time, that liquid antimicrobials were superior to calcium hydrox-
ide use in root canal therapy. This philosophy prevailed in both North America and
in Scandinavia.
Although proposed earlier, routine use of culture tests was not incorporated into
clinical endodontic practice until the late 1930s, when follow-up studies highlight-
ing the use of bacteriological controls to improve treatment outcomes were
published (Coolidge 1960). Subsequently, culture tests and inter-appointment liq-
uid medicaments became a standard component of endodontic practice and a
protocol recommended in contemporary textbooks (e.g., Sommer et al. 1966).
The protocol, however, had several shortcomings. One limitation was the volatility
of most liquid antimicrobials that resulted in their antibacterial effectiveness being
rapidly depleted in the root canal environment (Messer and Chen 1984). This meant
that the root canals medicated with these agents remained virtually unmedicated
between appointments, which allows residual microorganisms to repopulate the
root canal prior to the placement of root canal filling. This was later confirmed in
reports published by Bystr€om and Sundqvist in 1983and 1985. Another reason was
the need to schedule at least three sessions to complete the endodontic treatment to
comply with the protocol (Molander 2000). Mechanical and chemical cleansing of
the root canal and the placement of the liquid disinfectant into the root canal for a
period of days was done at the first treatment session. The second treatment session
was devoted to bacterial sampling of the root canal and the placement of another
antimicrobial dressing, and filling of the root canal was done at the third treatment
session, if the tooth was asymptomatic and no growth of bacteria was noted in the
culture sample. A positive culture sample on the third visit would prompt repetition
of the disinfection procedure necessitating even more appointments to be sched-
uled. Needless to say this approach was inconvenient to both practitioner and
patient.
The lack of scientific validation for this protocol in subsequent clinical follow-up
studies and the doubts that some researchers had about the reliability of the culture
test finally led to the elimination of bacteriologic control in endodontics at many
dental schools. Seltzer and Bender in a classic debate article (1965) pointed out the
inherent risk of false-positive and false-negative results in the culture testing and
stated: “the possibilities of obtaining false negative cultures are so numerous that
the credibility of a negative culture is constantly in doubt. All we hope for is a
reduction in the number of microorganisms.” Their paper contributed not only to
the abandonment of the culture concept in clinical practice but unfortunately helped
de-emphasize the singular role of microorganisms in the development of primary
periapical disease. Their philosophy was quickly adopted in North America and
prompted a shift in the direction of endodontic research from infection control to
endodontic technology. A widely read chapter in a textbook authored by Schilder
(1974) supported this technical perspective and stated that only technical excel-
lence, that is, proper root canal preparation and filling of the canal space in all its
dimensions, was decisive in predicting a favorable outcome of treatment.
The belief that elimination of bacteria from the root canal prior to filling was
critical to a favorable treatment outcome remained firm in the minds of clinicians in
other parts of the world, particularly in Scandinavia. Investigators there lacked
confidence in the ability of a mechanical approach to adequately eliminate bacteria
from the root canal and the ability of contemporary root filling materials to provide
an effective seal against their ingress and egress from the root canal. No medica-
ment appeared to be available at that time, to ensure safe and effective infection
control, until it was realized that calcium hydroxide might be an answer to that
problem. This breakthrough occurred when it was noted that calcium hydroxide,
placed in the root canal of teeth with a suppurating periapical lesion, could initiate
remission in the suppurative process. An important contributing factor to this effect
was the ability of the calcium hydroxide to effectively block the apical foramen. By
eliminating seepage of inflammatory exudate into the root canal from the periapical
tissue, a nutrient source for the proteolytic microorganisms, which was responsible
for the infection, was thus eliminated. Subsequently bacterial activity was lessened
and the apical inflammation reduced leading to an abatement of the clinical
symptoms. It was reasoned that if this was an effective approach to curb active
signs of root canal infection, why not place calcium hydroxide into all teeth
receiving root canal therapy to act as a “space holder” after instrumentation,
regardless of the presenting clinical symptoms. It was also speculated that the
high pH of the material (>12) might suppress the growth of bacteria that remain
in the root canal after it had been mechanically debrided. Hence a two-appointment
approach to endodontic treatment was adopted by some clinicians. The concept of a
two-appointment approach using calcium hydroxide as an inter-appointment dress-
ing gained wider recognition after the publication of case series reports by Bystr€om
and Sundqvist in 1981, 1983, 1985 and Bystr€om et al. (1985) that demonstrated that
mechanical instrumentation, irrigation with different strengths of sodium hypo-
chlorite, or inter-appointment medication with paramonochlorophenol or phenol
camphor could not predictably eliminate cultivable bacteria from the infected root
canal. This, they claimed, could only be achieved over time with an intracanal
dressing of calcium hydroxide.
3 Scientific Evidence
3.1 Experimental Observations
Over the years numerous in vitro studies were carried out to evaluate the effect of
calcium hydroxide on bacterial cells and bacterial byproducts. Various strains of
Enterococcus faecalis were often employed as the test organism, due to their ability
to survive in the presence of many antimicrobial drugs and the harsh nutritional
conditions present in a mechanically prepared root canal. Stevens and Grossman
(1983) concluded from a combined series of in vivo and in vitro experiments that
calcium hydroxide, in a water-based slurry, had a limited ability to destroy this
microbe. Using an agar diffusion test, they noted, that there were only small zones
of inhibition around calcium hydroxide suggesting that the slurry needed close
contact with the microbes in order to exert a killing effect. Haapasalo and Ørstavik
(1987) confirmed this observation using a dentin model infected with E. faecalis.
Calcium hydroxide failed to eliminate the microorganism from dentinal tubules in

24 h, while camphorated p-monochlorophenol did. A subsequent study using the
same model reported that with a 10-day application of calcium hydroxide, it was
possible to significantly reduce their presence in the tubules (Ørstavik and
Haapasalo 1990). Parmar et al. (2011) used a similar in vitro model but employed
fluorescence image analysis to identify live/dead bacteria in the tubules. They too
reported that calcium hydroxide significantly reduced the number of viable bacte-
rial cells when compared to nonmedicated controls. Another study (Barnard
et al. 1996) demonstrated that calcium hydroxide was effective against Actinomyces
israelii. Estrela et al. (1999a, b), on the other hand, showed that calcium hydroxide
had no significant antimicrobial activity against E. faecalis, S. aureus, B. subtilis,
and P. aeruginosa after 2, 3, and 7 days of application.
Gomes et al. (2002) suggested that anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria were more
susceptible to calcium hydroxide pastes than facultative Gram-positive microor-
ganisms. Wei et al. (2003) showed that the antimicrobial action of calcium hydrox-
ide could be enhanced when it is mixed with 2 % chlorhexidine rather than water.
However, it was observed that the antibacterial efficacy of calcium hydroxide was
inactivated by dentin powder, hydroxylapatite, and serum (Portenier et al. 2001, see
also review by Haapasalo et al. 2007), while it cannot disrupt biofilm matrix in vitro
(Upadya et al. 2011).
The resistance of E. faecalis to calcium hydroxide raised several questions on
their resistance mechanisms. In an attempt to answer at least part of the above
questions, Evans et al. (2002) studied the mechanism that permitted E. faecalis to
survive the high environmental pH related to the presence of calcium hydroxide. It
was observed that E. faecalis was resistant to calcium hydroxide at a pH of 11.1, but
not at a pH of 11.5. It was also noted that there was no difference in E. faecalis
survival when protein synthesis was blocked during stress induction. Interestingly,
the addition of a proton pump inhibitor to the media resulted in a dramatic reduction
in the survival of E. faecalis when it was reexposed to the calcium hydroxide. It was
therefore concluded that the survival of E. faecalis in calcium hydroxide was a
function of the proton pump, which was activated as the pH rose to a point, where it
reached its maximum capacity. Distel et al. (2002) studied the ability of E. faecalis
to form biofilms on calcium hydroxide-medicated root dentin in vitro and con-
cluded that E. faecalis had the potential to form biofilms even after the dentin was
previously medicated. Exposure of E. faecalis to collagen and EDTA was also
shown to increase its resistance to calcium hydroxide disinfection (Kayaoglu
et al. 2009; George and Kishen 2008). Chávez de Paz et al. (2007) demonstrated
that a biofilm of E. faecalis, Lactobacillus paracasei, Olsenella uli, Streptococcus
anginosus, S. gordonii, S. oralis, or Fusobacterium nucleatum was more resistant to
alkaline stress than growth present in planktonic form.
The effect of calcium hydroxide treatment on bacterial endotoxin/lipopolysac-
charide (LPS) and lipoteichoic acid (LTA) components of the Gram-negative and
Gram-positive bacterial cell wall, respectively, has been studied because of the role
they play in periapical inflammation (Hong et al. 2004; Costa Junior et al. 2003).
Inactivation of LPS by calcium hydroxide was first reported by Safavi and Nichols
in 1993 using LPS derived from the Gram-negative bacterium Salmonella

typhimurium. The study was repeated in 1994 using LPS derived from the root
canal bacterium P. intermedia. Calcium hydroxide’s ability to eliminate LPS
bioactivity in both of these studies was attributed to its ability to hydrolyze ester
bonds and cause a release of fatty acids from the LPS molecule (Safavi and Nichols
1993, 1994). Like Safavi and Nichols, Buck et al. (2001) used S. typhimurium LPS
to test the efficacy of calcium hydroxide, but did so by comparing its efficacy
relative to other agents commonly used in endodontic treatment. While chlorhex-
idine (0.12 %), sodium hypochlorite (2.62 %), EDTA (15 %), and ethanol (95 %) all
proved to be ineffective against LPS when used separately, they did prove to have
the same effectiveness in 30 min as calcium hydroxide had in 1 day, if used in
combination. This trend, however, was short-lived, and in days 2 and 5 of the study,
calcium hydroxide proved to be the most effective. Several years later, Baik
et al. (2011) reported that, while calcium hydroxide displayed limited efficacy
against E. faecalis, it was able to inactivate E. faecalis LTA through a deacylation
of its lipid moiety. These studies all used an in vitro model. Calcium hydroxide
efficacy against LPS was also shown in an in vivo animal study. Tanomaru
et al. (2003) demonstrated that only calcium hydroxide was effective in suppressing
the pro-inflammatory activity of LPS when compared with 5 % sodium hypochlo-
rite and 2 % chlorhexidine digluconate. An in vitro study by de Oliveira
et al. (2007)) later confirmed those findings. Additional support for calcium
hydroxide’s ability to inactivate LPS appeared in a recent paper by Guo
et al. (2014) that reported that calcium hydroxide could suppress P. endodontalis
LPS from inducing osteoclastogenesis in a mouse calivarium model.
In vitro studies have yielded variable results regarding the antibacterial effect of
calcium hydroxide on Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms. Many
studies have employed E. faecalis as the test organism and reported a limited ability
of calcium hydroxide in an aqueous slurry to effectively kill this organism, espe-
cially when it was present in dentinal tubules or in a biofilm. It should be remem-
bered that while commonly recovered from the root canals of endodontically
treated teeth, this species has a low incidence in primary root canal infections.
Further, investigations comparing the prevalence of E. faecalis in teeth with/
without periapical lesions suggested that E. faecalis, though present, does not
play a significant role in the posttreatment endodontic infections (Kaufman
et al. 2005; Zoletti et al. 2006.
3.2 Clinical Observations
Systematic reviews have examined the strength of the scientific evidence for and
against the use of a calcium hydroxide dressing in teeth with vital and non-vital
pulps (Sathorn et al. 2005, 2007; Figini et al. 2008; SBU 2010). Primarily two
clinical outcome parameters were used for the assessment: culture-negative sam-
ples (Sathorn et al. 2007) and an absence of clinical and/or radiographical signs of
apical periodontitis following a variable postoperative period (Sathorn et al. 2005;

Figini et al. 2008; SBU 2010).
A meta-analysis by Sathorn et al. (2007) (included the following eight studies
Ørstavik et al. 1991; Sj€ogren et al. 1991; Yared and Dagher 1994; Shuping
et al. 2000; Peters et al. 2002; Kvist et al. 2004; McGurkin-Smith et al. 2005;
Waltimo et al. 2005) concluded that a calcium hydroxide root canal dressing has
only limited efficacy in eliminating cultivable bacteria from root canals of human
teeth. The study failed to confirm the results of the “classic” study published by
Bystr€om et al. (1985) several years earlier. Though no significant effect was
reported, all the studies included in this systematic review with the exception of
Peters et al. (2002) and Waltimo et al. (2005) reported a reduced number of culture-
positive samples, when a calcium hydroxide dressing was used when compared to
the control. However, the incidence of culture-positive samples in the calcium
hydroxide group ranged from 0 % (Sj€ogren et al. 1991) to 71 % (Peters
et al. 2002) and demonstrated a wide inconsistency that was worthy of further
investigation.
There are several reasons for inconsistencies in the culture test results reported in
these studies. In the paper by Sj€ogren et al. (1991) and the case series reports
published by Bystr€om and Sundqvist (1981–1985), the high incidence of culture-
negative test results occurred only in single-rooted teeth with intact pulp chambers,
that is, teeth with only minor or no restoration. The studies that reported a higher
incidence of culture-positive test results, after calcium hydroxide use (Reit and
Dahlén 1988; Peters et al. 2002; Kvist et al. 2004), included multirooted teeth (teeth
with more complex canal anatomy), as well as teeth with less stringent restrictions
on the preoperative status of the crown than those in the Bystr€om and Sundqvist
(1981–1985) reports. Hence, the root canal microbiota present in the treatment and
control group teeth may have differed significantly in regard to their type, number,
and antimicrobial sensitivity. In addition, teeth with more complex root canal
anatomy of multirooted teeth have proven to be more difficult to clean and
disinfect, particularly when biofilm is present in non-accessible areas. Calcium
hydroxide is only slightly soluble and therefore has limited antimicrobial action at
sites distant to where it is placed (Nerwich et al. 1993). This limits its antimicrobial
effect not only in dentinal tubules but also in the irregularities and canal spaces
distant from the main root canal. Another factor that may have contributed to the
variable results seen in culture-dependent studies is the difference in the degree of
calcium hydroxide carry-over from the root canal into the culture media, when a
sample is taken. Significant amounts of carryover can impede bacterial growth and
lead to a false-negative finding, when the results are tabulated. The era of
noncultivation (molecular) identification of bacteria has also shown that many of
the bacteria found in infected root canals are noncultivable even when present in
large numbers (Siqueira and Rôças 2009; Ribeiro et al. 2011; Sakamoto et al. 2006,
see also chapter “Bacterial Biofilms and Endodontic Disease: Histo-Bacteriological
and Molecular Exploration” by Siqueira et al.). These nonculturable bacteria are not
reported, when cultivation-based identification is used. While the role played by
many of the noncultivable species found in the root canal has yet to be determined,
others such as species in the phyla Synergistetes and Spirochaetes have been
classified as putative endodontic pathogens (Foschi et al. 2006; Vianna
et al. 2007; Montagner et al. 2010). Other factors such as variances in collection
methods, specificity of the growth media used, and variances in sample handling
could also skew results and lead to false conclusions.
The systematic review undertaken by Sathorn et al. (2007) was also weakened
by the fact that only one of the studies they included, Kvist et al. (2004), was a
randomized controlled study. The others had variable designs and small patient
numbers. Therefore, it could be argued that even with a meta-analysis, these studies
were too weak to scientifically support or refute the efficacy of intracanal calcium
hydroxide in altering the outcome of treatment. Its impact was also weakened by
the fact that only studies that used cultivation identification of bacteria were
included in the systematic review. From what we have already noted, this would
overestimate the incidence of a negative culture result (Siqueira and Rôcas 2005). It
is nevertheless interesting to note that in several studies that used the cultivation
method to identify bacteria in the root canal, a positive relationship was found
between the incidence of apical and the absence of bacteria in the culture test
(Sj€
ogren et al. 1997; Waltimo et al. 2005; Fabricius et al. 2006). In a case series that
included 55 single-rooted teeth with pulp necrosis and apical infection, Sj€ogren
et al. (1997) reported complete healing in the radiograph 5-year after treatment in
94 % of teeth with a negative culture test prior to root canal filling, while the healing
rate for those with a positive culture test was only 68 %. The difference proved to be
significantly lower. In a randomized controlled study based on the cases included in
the Kvist et al. (2004) study, Molander et al. (2007) found no difference in the
treatment outcomes for teeth medicated between appointments with calcium
hydroxide or 5 % iodine potassium iodide, but did find there was a significantly
more favorable healing outcome in teeth where prefill culture was negative as
compared to those that were positive.
There have been only three published studies that meet the requirements neces-
sary for a proper systematic review (Sathorn et al. 2005). These were Trope
et al. (1999), Weiger et al. (2000), and Peters and Wesselink (2002). The Cochrane
Institute rated only two of these studies, Trope et al. and Weiger et al. low risk for
bias, but neither was classified as a strong study (Figini et al. 2008). Another study
concerned with the outcome of calcium hydroxide use after pulpectomy was also
rated as low risk for bias (Gesi et al. 2006), but this study was not concerned with
non-vital, infected root canals. In summary then, it is not possible to take a
scientifically defensible position on the positive use of calcium hydroxide dressings
in the endodontic treatment of teeth with a necrotic pulp and apical disease. The
evidence as we have seen is controversial and weak by Cochrane standards, and we
will have to wait until stronger evidence is available to conclusively answer that
question.
In a recent survey conducted by SBU (Swedish Council on Health Technology
Assessment, a Swedish Governmental Agency for the critical evaluation of
methods for preventing, diagnosing, and treating health problems), it was reported
that only two studies satisfied their criteria for a moderate level of evidence (Weiger
et al. 2000; Molander et al. 2007). Both studies reported similar incidences of
periapical healing regardless of whether the teeth received an inter-appointment
dressing of calcium hydroxide or were prepared and root filled in one session. SBU
also concluded that there is a lack of scientific evidence to verify that root canal
medication with calcium hydroxide has a positive effect on the outcome of
treatment.
The significance of a negative prefilling culture test on apical healing has been
investigated in an animal model (Fabricius et al. (2006). In that study, the healing of
lesions created by exposure to specific groups of bacteria placed into the root canals
of monkeys was correlated with the absence of the very same bacteria at the time
the root canal filling was placed. An assessment of healing of lesions induced was
made 2–2.5 years after the completion of treatment. They found that when bacteria
were recovered from the root canal prior to filling, 79 % of the apical lesions failed
to heal. By contrast, when bacteria were not recovered, 28 % of the lesions failed to
heal. It was a reverse way of showing that the presence of cultivable bacteria at the
time of root canal filling had a negative impact on the treatment outcome. An
interesting finding in that study was the relationship of the technical quality of the
root canal filling to the presence of recoverable bacteria. It appeared that quality of
the root canal filling only was a significant factor in treatment outcome, when
bacteria were present at the time of the filling. It was not a factor when the filling of
the canal met what they stated to be “an acceptable standard.”
To date, clinical outcome studies appear to be the best and most practical way to
assess the clinical impact of residual bacteria in the root canal. A radiographic and
clinical assessment of endodontically treated teeth over time can determine whether
a new periapical lesion has emerged and whether an existing lesion has persisted,
enlarged, or resolved, either in total or in part. They can also determine whether
symptoms of apical disease have appeared, abated, or persisted. While the assess-
ment of the clinical status is relatively straightforward, the accuracy of an intraoral
radiograph to assess the periapical status is more challenging. In a large cohort of
888 consecutive patients, Estrela et al. (2008) compared the ability of intraoral
radiography to cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in their ability to depict
periapical bone loss. They found that many more areas of bone loss could be
detected when CBCT was used. In view of CBCT’s greater sensitivity, Wu
et al. (2009) suggested that future outcome studies of endodontic treatment should
utilize CBCT, rather than intraoral radiography, which had been used in the past.
However, it was pointed out that, to date, CBCT results have not been measured
against a proper reference standard and may, by virtue of the greater ability to show
minor bone tissue changes, lead to false conclusions when healing assessments are
made (Petersson et al. 2012; Pope et al. 2014). Furthermore, the increased radiation
necessary to generate a CBCT image cannot be justified, especially when dealing
with a young patient, when a standard intraoral radiograph can in most cases supply
the same information (European Society of Endodontology 2014).
To conclude, there is as yet no clinical study that gives convincing and unequiv-
ocal support to the premise that an inter-appointment dressing with calcium
hydroxide is important to the outcome of root canal therapy. Currently published
reports are often based upon relatively small numbers of patient, and only, but in a
few instances, have they followed a rigid, well-controlled, experimental protocol.
There is also a lack of convincing scientific evidence to show that the use of a
calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing impacts upon the short-term incidence of
postoperative symptoms and flare-ups during treatment. This implies that despite
the publication of numerous studies concerned with calcium hydroxide use in the
management of root canal infection, the clinician has relatively weak evidence to
support the choice of protocol. Some evidence does exist to indicate that a reduced
bacterial presence at the time of root canal filling may lead to a better treatment
outcome. Reducing the presence of bacteria at a site of injury is in keeping with the
general philosophy of wound management and seems a reasonable course to follow
for root canal therapy. However, we will have to wait until better scientific evidence
is presented before a valid answer to the question “to dress or not to dress” is
available.
3.3 Effects of Calcium Hydroxide on the Mechanical

Characteristics of Dentin
Dentin is a composite connective tissue consisting of organic (30 %) and inorganic

(50 %) components as well as water (20 %) by weight (Linde and Goldberg 1993).
The mineral fraction of dentin is mainly carbonated nanocrystalline apatite, depos-
ited on a tight mesh of randomly oriented type I collagen fibrils (Butler and Ritchie
1995). Type I collagen is a heterotrimer, composed of two α1 (I) and one α2
(I) chains. Hydrogen bonding between closely packed trimers stabilizes the sec-
ondary and tertiary structure of collagen (Brodsky et al. 2008). Other
non-collagenous proteins and enzymes crucial in the formation of dentin are
bound up in the mineralized dentin matrix. These include phosphoproteins, Gla
proteins, proteoglycans, acidic glycoproteins, etc. and constitute about 10 % of the
organic matrix (Linde 1989). The inorganic, organic, and water fractions of dentin
play a distinctive role in the mechanical characteristics of dentin. The inorganic
phase contributes to its elastic modulus and compressive strength, while the organic
phase contributes to its toughness and tensile strength. The water phase contributes
to its fracture resistance and viscoelasticity (Kishen et al. 2006). Biased removal or
depletion of any phase or combination of phases, from the dentin during root canal
treatment, can, over time, alter its physical and mechanical characteristics. Con-
cerns have been raised that calcium hydroxide medication of the root canal can
weaken the root by denaturing its collagen content (Whitbeck et al. 2011). This, in
the presence of other attending factors, may predispose a root treated with calcium
hydroxide to fracture. While clinical confirmation of this potential risk is lacking
for treated teeth with fully developed roots, caution is advisable when treating
incompletely developed, permanent teeth (Andreasen et al. 2006; Rosenberg
et al. 2007). Cvek (1992) in a retrospective study that included 885 luxated
non-vital incisors with immature roots, dressed with calcium hydroxide for 3–54
months, reported that 19 % of the teeth sustained a cervical root fracture during the
3.5–5 years follow-up period. He reported a relationship between the potential for
root fracture and the stage of root development.
Calcium hydroxide, also known as slaked lime, is made by adding water to
calcium oxide. It has a molecular mass of 74.093 g/mol and a low solubility index
of approximately 0.185 g/100 cm3 at room temperature (25 C). Unlike many
substances, calcium hydroxide solubility is exothermic, meaning that it becomes
less soluble as the temperature rises. It has a pH of 12–12.5. In vitro experiments
have shown that the hydroxyl ions released, when calcium hydroxide is placed into
the root canal, diffuse throughout the root dentin. Nerwich et al. (1993) using
microelectrodes buried in small cavities in the apical and coronal parts of the
root, as well as the lumen of the root canal, and the exterior surface of the root,
found that when calcium hydroxide was placed into the root canal, the pH of dentin
rose to 10.8 in the cervical portion of the tooth and 9.7 near the apex. The pH of the
dentin near the root surface rose rapidly from day 1 to day 7 and dropped to 9.3 at
the cervix and 9 near the apex 2–3 weeks later. They noted that the carrier medium
used with the calcium hydroxide and the duration of calcium hydroxide played an
important role in the degree of pH change that occurred. Hosoya et al. (2001)
suggested that water was an important carrier medium, while Alaçam et al. (1998)
suggested that water in combination with glycerin facilitated ionic diffusion and
therefore was better than water alone. It is highly probable, that the degree of pH
change observed in dentin exposed to calcium hydroxide is sufficient to alter the
organic content of its matrix. In addition, since calcium hydroxide can also denature
and hydrolyze the other extracellular matrix proteins, it can also disrupt interactions
between collagen fibrils and the hydroxyapatite crystals. Collectively the effect can
undermine the mechanical integrity of the dentin (Andreasen et al. 2002; Grigoratos
et al. 2001).
The Grigoratos et al. (2001) study evaluated the effect of sodium hypochlorite
solutions (3 % and 5 %) and saturated calcium hydroxide solution, individually and
consecutively, on the flexural strength and elastic modulus of a standardized dentin
specimen. The flexural strength represents the highest stress experienced within a
material at the moment of fracture, and elastic modulus represents the stiffness of a
material. The higher its stiffness, the higher its elastic modulus. Their investigation
revealed that 3 % and 5 % sodium hypochlorite significantly decreased the modulus
of elasticity and the flexural strength of dentin. Calcium hydroxide, on the other
hand, significantly reduced flexural strength but had no effect on its elastic modu-
lus. Dentin treated with sodium hypochlorite, followed by calcium hydroxide, had a
significantly different elastic modulus and flexural strength than those treated with
sodium hypochlorite alone.
In light of the decrease in mechanical strength of dentin noted when calcium
hydroxide is placed into the root canal, it is not surprising to find that a similar effect
occurs in dentin when it is exposed to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (White
et al. 2002). After 5 weeks of exposure the decrease was similar and reached 32%
for calcium hydroxide and 33% for MTA. A most notable decrease in mechanical
strength, 59%, was noted with sodium hypochlorite (White et al. 2002). In a later
study, Doyon et al. (2005), demonstrated a significant decrease in peak load at
fracture in human dentin exposed to calcium hydroxide for 180 days as compared
with dentin exposed for 30 days. He reported that a 10–20 % decrease in dentin
strength was sufficient to significantly increase the likelihood of fracture in teeth
that were already structurally compromised.
Changes in the fracture resistance of human root dentin treated with calcium
hydroxide over different time intervals were also the topic of investigation by Zarei
et al. (2013). In this study, the root canals of single-rooted decoronated human
premolars were endodontically prepared to a standard size. Half of the roots were
treated with aqueous calcium hydroxide, the remainder was left untreated, and both
groups were incubated at body temperature for periods of 1 week, 1 month,
3 months, or 6 months before testing. A significant reduction in compressive
strength to fracture was found to be present in roots treated with calcium hydroxide
after 1, 3, and 6 months, leading them to conclude that the extended use of a calcium
hydroxide intracanal dressing significantly reduces the physical and mechanical
characteristics of the dentin and therefore should be avoided when possible.
4 Clinical Perspectives
Current scientific evidence does not support the choice of single or multiple visits as
an approach to the endodontic management of apical periodontitis. Furthermore,
controlled clinical trials do not confirm an enhanced treatment outcome with the use
of calcium hydroxide or, for that matter, any other intracanal medicament. How-
ever, while reviewing the details of many of the studies used as a basis, one must
bear in mind that these studies, especially those advocating single-visit treatment,
did not take into account the presence of situations, other than those that were
bacteria related, that might preclude the use of a one-visit approach. Examples of
such situations might be (a) the extended time required to adequately find and
prepare the root canals of teeth with complicated root canal anatomy and (b) cases
with suppuration or bleeding from the apical lesion that cannot be arrested within in
the time period available to the clinician. In addition, since properly controlled
clinical trials require proper case selection to avoid bias between test and control
groups, teeth that presented extraordinary challenges were most likely excluded
from some or all of the outcome studies. In face of the realities of endodontic
practice, decisions on the number of appointments necessary to complete the
treatment must be based on factors other than scientific evidence, even when the
strength of that evidence is even higher. Hence, they have to take into account all
the features specific to a case and its clinical presentation. This means that some
situations will lend themselves to completion in one visit, while others will require
multiple sessions, if all the criteria for a favorable treatment outcome are to be met.
What are the reasonable clinical considerations that lend some teeth to be treated
in a single visit while others require more? The health status of the pulp is certainly
an important criterion. Teeth with inflamed and infected pulps and no evidence of
apical periodontitis generally can be viewed as good candidates for preparation and
filling in one appointment. During the early phases of pulp infection, much of the
pulp is still intact, and the inflammation present is likely to be caused only by
bacterial byproducts from infected dentin and superficially located planktonic
bacteria. It is highly likely that all bacteria will be removed from the root canal in
these cases. Immediate filling and sealing of the access opening will reduce the
chances of new bacterial ingress. Certainly from a clinical perspective, such teeth
are more easily managed than teeth with advanced infection, where the entire pulp
tissue is necrotic and the root canals is replete with dense bacterial biofilm.
On the other hand, calcium hydroxide medication has long been seen as a
valuable adjunct in treatment after pulpectomy. One advantage of calcium hydrox-
ide is its ability to necrotize pulp tissue remnants that are inadvertently left on the
root canal walls after the instrumentation procedure (Hasselgren et al. 1988; Ander-
sen et al. 1992). These necrotized tissue remnants are removed more easily at a
second appointment by sodium hypochlorite irrigation in that state. The use of
calcium hydroxide in such instances theoretically renders the root canal cleaner and
thereby optimizes the potential of filling the root canal space more completely in
the final phase of treatment (Tûrkün and Cengiz 1997). It also removes a potential
source of nutrients in the event that bacteria remain in the root canal after instru-
mentation and irrigations or gain access to the root canal after treatment has been
completed. The efficacy of this regimen was not substantiated in a randomized
clinical trial, where instrumentation and filling of the root canal of pulpectomized
teeth completed in one session was compared to a two-session treatment in which
calcium hydroxide was employed as an inter-appointment dressing (Gesi
et al. 2006). Both treatment regimens resulted in similar and highly favorable
outcomes clinically and radiographically, 2–3 years after treatment was completed.
It should be stressed that in this study a rigid aseptic approach to treatment was
followed leading the authors to also conclude that when bacterial contamination of
the root canal system is effectively prevented during pulpectomy, predictable,
uneventful wound healing is likely to take place, if the material used to fill the
root canal is biocompatible as demonstrated by Engstr€om and Spångberg (1967).
Teeth with non-vital pulps and no obvious clinical signs of root canal infection,
viz., painful symptoms, and displaying radiographic evidence of apical periodon-
titis are also candidates for one-visit treatment. Teeth in this category include those
with ischemic pulp necrosis caused by trauma and previously root-filled teeth with
technical deficiencies that require retreatment for restorative reasons. In both
instances, the endodontic treatment could be considered prophylactic in nature,
aimed at preventing infection, due to a compromised clinical state, than in treating
it. Despite a high probability for a successful treatment outcome, some teeth in this
category may offer a high risk for misadventure and special care, and extra time
may be required to minimize the risk. Teeth that have a prior root filling or teeth that
have been previously post restored present a risk of root fracture. Extrusion of
material into the apical tissue and perforation of the root canal wall during
retreatment are examples of some of the misfortunes that might occur. These events
can establish a pathway for the ingress of bacteria from the oral cavity or provide
nutrients for dormant microorganisms present in the root canal system, leading to a
persistence or initiation of apical disease. Clinical follow-up studies of teeth
retreated due to a technically poor root canal filling have shown that overinstru-
mentation of the root canal leads to an increased risk of posttreatment disease
(Bergenholtz et al. 1979). While some clinicians have recommended the use of a
calcium hydroxide dressing, when the root canal is overinstrumented, to allow time
to clinically assess the effect of a complication over time, currently there is no
convincing scientific proof to support its efficacy.
The approach to teeth with necrotic infected pulps or previously treated teeth
with an apical lesion may vary. When there is seepage of inflammatory exudate
from an apical lesion into the root canal that cannot be stopped, attempting to
complete the treatment in a single visit is fraught with risk. A wet root canal implies
wet dentin, and this is likely to undermine the ability of the clinician to properly
“seal” the root canal system. As previously cited, clinical case reports have indi-
cated that an inter-appointment calcium hydroxide dressing or a series of dressings
can be helpful to suppress the exudate production in these cases and improve the
chances for a proper seal and decrease the risk of a poor treatment outcome
(Heithersay 1975; Calişkan 2004).
In teeth with non-suppurating apical lesions, the complexity of the root canal
anatomy and the time necessary to achieve all the treatment goals often dictate the
strategy used in treatment. It is generally understood that the more difficult it is to
access the root canal and the more complex the root canal anatomy, the longer it
will take to complete its preparation and disinfection. It may be more convenient
and more practical for both patient and clinician to schedule more than one
treatment session. In fact, it is practical to view the treatment in such teeth as
consisting of two critical and separate steps, (1) the preparation and antimicrobial
treatment of the root canal system and (2) placement of a filling of a root canal,
where every attempt has been made to reduce its content of necrotic and bacterial
contents. In teeth that present no anatomical or technical complications and canal
preparation, in all aspects, has been uneventful, completion of the treatment in one
session can most likely be completed in one treatment session without an impact on
the treatment outcome (Weiger et al. 2000; Molander et al. 2007).
In instances where the clinician chooses to postpone the placement of a root
filling for another session, a question arises as to whether it is necessary to place a
root canal dressing and if so which one. While randomized clinical trials have not
supported either choice, there are compelling theoretical reasons to support the use
of an interim dressing rather than allowing canal(s) to remain “empty” between
patient visits. Several studies that have used bacteriological controls during the
various stages of treatment have demonstrated that elimination of all cultivable
bacteria from an infected root canal is rarely possible (Bystr€om and Sundqvist
1983; 1985; Bystr€ om et al. 1985; Sj€ogren et al. 1997; Dalton et al. 1998; Shuping
et al. 2000; Sundqvist et al. 1998; Siqueira et al. 2007). This means that without a
long-acting antimicrobial in the instrumented root canal space between treatment
visits, bacteria, although greatly reduced in number at the completion of the
preparation phase, continue to grow and can achieve amounts comparable to those
that were originally present. It is also possible that some of the surviving strains can
emerge as a more virulent and resistant strain and thereby make their subsequent
removal more difficult (Chávez de Paz et al. 2003).
Calcium hydroxide, particularly in a paste-like form, possesses several impor-
tant properties that make it particularly useful as an intracanal dressing between
treatment visits. Its alkaline capacity not only helps destroy bacteria in the main
portions of the root canal but also serves as an important deterrent to the growth of
bacteria in the noninstrumented sites of the root canal and in dentinal tubules
adjacent to the main canal. It produces contact killing of most planktonic bacteria
species, wherever it is placed, and its physical presence occupies space, limiting
that available for bacterial regrowth. As pointed out previously, the dressing will
also deprive surviving organisms of a nutritional supply by separating them from
residual tissue within the root canal and limiting the seepage of apically derived
exudate into the root canal. Hence, when the entire instrumented root canal space is
properly filled with a calcium hydroxide dressing, microbial–host interaction in the
periapex is reduced to a minimum. While we have advocated caution with regard to
the deleterious effect on dentin with long-term use, it is less likely to do so when
used in the short term.
Convenient scheduling to allow assessment of the effects of infection control on
the signs and symptoms of periapical disease is another clinical reason for the inter-
appointment use of a calcium hydroxide dressing. Not all cases are straightforward,
and a period of time is at times required to determine whether additional and/or
different approach to treatment is necessary. Examples of this are teeth with large
periapical lesions, teeth with apical–marginal communications, teeth with root
perforations, teeth with open or grossly overinstrumented apices, and teeth with
long-standing clinical symptoms. Disappearance of painful symptoms and sinus
tracts and a reduction in the size of a periapical lesion are positive signs of
successful infection control, and it offers encouragement that with completion of
the treatment, that is, after filling the root canal, a successful outcome can be
expected. This insight is of practical value, when the patient’s treatment plan
includes complex and costly restorations. In such cases the increased risk of
adversely changing the physical properties of the dentin also has to be considered.
Support for a calcium hydroxide inter-appointment dressing’s ability to suppress
growth of bacteria in the endodontically prepared root canal appeared in a recently
published study by Vera et al. (2012) and is worthy of mention. They examined the
postoperative microbiological status of the endodontically treated mesial roots of
mandibular molars with primary apical periodontitis. Teeth were treated in either
one or two visits. A dressing of calcium hydroxide mixed in saline was placed into
the prepared root canals for 1 week prior to the completion of treatment in the teeth
that were treated in two visits. This represented the only difference in treatment
between the teeth in the two groups. After treatment, teeth were extracted and
prepared histologically using H&E and a modified Brown and Brenn stain, to
identify the presence of bacteria. Microscopic examination revealed a reduced
bacterial presence in the root canals of teeth in the medicated (2 visit) group,
especially in areas where calcium hydroxide had been placed. The root canals in
2 of the teeth in the two-visit group were found to be free of bacteria. In the root
canals of the remaining 5 teeth in this group, bacterial concentrations appeared
markedly reduced in the main portion of the root canal and in the adjacent dentinal
tubules. The root canals in the nonmedicated teeth (1 visit) all had bacteria present
in the main portion of the root canal and in their ramifications and isthmuses as well
as the dentinal tubules adjacent to it. Since there are limitations associated with the
identification of bacteria by Brown and Brenn stain and since this was only a short-
term study, it is difficult to predict whether the differences found between the two
groups would impact on the future expression of disease. It was, however, a visual
endorsement of the value of a calcium hydroxide dressing in endodontic treatment.
It was also in agreement with the general principles of wound management, the
elimination of bacteria from the injured site to the extent that is possible.
Over the years, total disinfection of the root canal has been, and still remains, an
important goal to achieve in endodontic treatment. Disinfecting agents are still used
for root canal irrigation and as an intracanal dressing for short and long periods of
time to reduce its microbial concentrations. In recent years, calcium hydroxide has
been accepted by many clinicians as a preferred inter-appointment dressing. While
subject to limitations, its antimicrobial efficacy has been demonstrated in laboratory
and clinical studies. There is, to date, no convincing scientific evidence to indicate
that its use enhances the eventual outcome of treatment. Clinical, as well as
experimental evidence, nevertheless suggests that the absence of demonstrable
bacteria in the root canal prior to root canal filling is a strategic goal in treatment
and that the intracanal placement of calcium hydroxide between appointments is an
easy and appropriate adjunct in achieving it. As with all the choices made by the
clinician, the advantages of its use must be balanced by the potential risk in its use,
and like all wise choices, it should always be “what is best for the patient” that
becomes the deciding factor.
References
Alaçam T, Yoldaş HO, Gülen O (1998) Dentin penetration of two calcium hydroxide combina-
tions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 86:469–472
Andersen M, Lund A, Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM (1992) In vitro solubility of human pulp
tissue in calcium hydroxide and sodium hypochlorite. Endod Dent Traumatol 8:104–108
Andreasen JO, Farik B, Munksgaard EC (2002) Long-term calcium hydroxide as a root canal
dressing may increase risk of root fracture. Dent Traumatol 18:134–137
Andreasen JO, Munksgaard EC, Bakland LK (2006) Comparison of fracture resistance in root
canals of immature sheep teeth after filling with calcium hydroxide or MTA. Dent Traumatol
22:154–156
Baik JE, Jang KS, Kang SS, Yun CH, Lee K, Kim BG, Kum KY, Han SH (2011) Calcium
hydroxide inactivates lipoteichoic acid from Enterococcus faecalis through deacylation of the
lipid moiety. J Endod 37:191–196
Barnard D, Davies J, Figdor D (1996) Susceptibility of Actinomyces israelii to antibiotics, sodium
hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J 29:320–326
Bergenholtz G (2005) Advances since the paper by Zander and Glass (1949) on the pursuit of
healing methods for pulpal exposures – historical perspectives. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Oral Radiol Endod 100(suppl):S102–S108
Bergenholtz G, Spångberg L (2004) Controversies in endodontics. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med
15:99–114
Bergenholtz G, Lekholm U, Milthon R, Engstr€ om B (1979) Influence of apical overinstru-
mentation and overfilling on re-treated root canals. J Endod 5:310–314
Brodsky B, Thiagarajan G, Madhan B, Kar K (2008) Triple-helical peptides: an approach to
collagen conformation, stability, and self-association. Biopolymers 89:345–353
Buck RA, Cai J, Eleazer PD, Staat RH, Hurst HE (2001) Detoxification of endotoxin by endodon-
tic irrigants and calcium hydroxide. J Endod 27:325–327
Butler WT, Ritchie H (1995) The nature and functional significance of dentin extracellular matrix
proteins. Int J Dev Biol 39:169–179
Bystr€om A, Sundqvist G (1981) Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal
instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 89:321–328
Bystr€om A, Sundqvist G (1983) Bacteriologic evaluation of the effect of 0.5 percent sodium
hypochlorite in endodontic therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 55:307–312
Bystr€om A, Sundqvist G (1985) The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in
60 cases of endodontic therapy. Int Endod J 18:35–40
Bystr€om A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G (1985) The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramono-
chlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root
canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 1:170–175
Calişkan MK (2004) Prognosis of large cyst-like periapical lesions following nonsurgical root
canal treatment: a clinical review. Int Endod J 37:408–416
Carr GB, Schwartz RS, Schaudinn C, Gorur A, Costerton JW (2009) Ultrastructural examination
of failed molar retreatment with secondary apical periodontitis: an examination of endodontic
biofilms in an endodontic retreatment failure. J Endod 35:1303–1309
Chávez de Paz LE, Dahlén G, Molander A, M€ oller Å, Bergenholtz G (2003) Bacteria recovered
from teeth with apical periodontitis after antimicrobial endodontic treatment. Int Endod J
36:500–508
Chávez de Paz LE, Bergenholtz G, Dahlén G, Svensäter G (2007) Viability and mechanisms of
response to alkaline stress by selected root canal bacteria. Int Endod J 40:344–355
Coolidge ED (1960) Past and present concepts in endodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 61:676–688
Costa Junior SV, deSouza-Filho FJ, Barbosa SV (2003) Tissue reactions to a component of root
canal system bacteria: lipoteichoic acid. Braz Dent J 14:95–98
Cvek M (1992) Prognosis of luxated non-vital maxillary incisors treated with calcium hydroxide
and filled with gutta-percha. A retrospective clinical study. Endod Dent Traumatol 8:45–55
Dalton BC, Ørstavik D, Phillips C, Pettiette M, Trope M (1998) Bacterial reduction with
nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. J Endod 24:763–767
de Oliveira LD, Jorge AO, Carvalho CA, Koga-Ito CY, Valera MC (2007) In vitro effects of
endodontic irrigants on endotoxins in root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod 104:135–142
Distel JW, Hatton JF, Gillespie MJ (2002) Biofilm formation in medicated root canals. J Endod
28:689–693
Dodge JS Jr (1887) Immediate root-filling. Dent Cosmos 29:234–235
Doyon GE, Dumsha T, von Fraunhofer JA (2005) Fracture resistance of human root dentin
exposed to intracanal calcium hydroxide. J Endod 31:895–897
Engstr€om B, Spångberg L (1967) Wound healing after partial pulpectomy. A histological study
performed on contralateral tooth pairs. Odontol Tidskr 75:5–18
Estrela C, Pécora JD, Souza-Neto MD, Estrela CR, Bammann LL (1999a) Effect of vehicle on
antimicrobial properties of calcium hydroxide pastes. Braz Dent J 10:63–72
Estrela C, Pimenta FC, Ito IY, Bammann LL (1999b) Antimicrobial evaluation of calcium
hydroxide in infected dentinal tubules. J Endod 25:416–418
Estrela C, Bueno MR, Leles CR, Azevedo B, Azevedo JR (2008) Accuracy of cone beam
computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical
periodontitis. J Endod 34:273–279
European Society of Endodontology, Patel S, Durack C, Abella F, Roig M, Shemesh H,
Lambrechts P, Lemberg K (2014) European society of endodontology position statement:
the use of CBCT in endodontics. Int Endod J 47:502–504
Evans M, Davies JK, Sundqvist G, Figdor D (2002) Mechanisms involved in the resistance of
Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J 35:221–228
Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Sundqvist G, Happonen R-P, M€ oller ÅJ (2006) Influence of residual
experimentally infected monkey teeth. Eur J Oral Sci 114:278–285
Fava LRG, Saunders WP (1999) Calcium hydroxide pastes: classification and clinical indications.
Figini L, Lodi G, Gorni F, Gagliani M (2008) Single versus multiple visits for endodontic
treatment of permanent teeth: a Cochrane systematic review. J Endod 34:1041–1047
Foschi F, Izard J, Sasaki H, Sambri V, Prati C, Muller R, Stashenko P (2006) Treponema in
disseminating endodontic infections. J Dent Res 85:761–765
Frank AL (1966) Therapy for the divergent pulpless tooth by continuing apical formation. J Am
Dent Assoc 72:87–93
George S, Kishen A (2008) Effect of sub-lethal doses of EDTA and calcium hydroxide on the
physiochemical surface properties of Enterococcus faecalis and its adherence to collagen-
in vitro study. Biofilm. Cambridge University Press, pp 1–10
Gesi A, Hakeberg M, Warfvinge J, Bergenholtz G (2006) Incidence of osteolytic lesions and
clinical symptoms after pulpectomy – a clinical evaluation of one versus two-session treat-
Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Garrido FD, Rosalen PL, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, de Souza-Filho FJ (2002)
Microbial susceptibility to calcium hydroxide pastes and their vehicles. J Endod 28:758–761
Granath L-E (1959) Några synpukter på behandlingen av traumatiserade incisiver på barn.
Odontol Revy 10:272–286
Grigoratos D, Knowles J, Ng YL, Gulabivala K (2001) Effect of exposing dentine to sodium
hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide on its flexural strength and elastic modulus. Int Endod J
34:113–119
Grossman LI (1971) Endodontics: then and now. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 32:254–259
Grossman LI (1976) Endodontics 1776–1996: a bicentennial history against the background of
general dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 93:78–87
Grove CJ (1913) A warning against the indiscriminate use of formaldehyde preparations. Dent
Cosmos 50:147–150
Guo J, Yang D, Okamura H, Teramachi J, Ochiai K, Qiu L, Haneji T (2014) Calcium hydroxide
suppresses Porphyromonas endodontalis lipopolysaccharide-induced bone destruction. J Dent
Res 93:508–513
Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D (1987) In vitro infection of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res 66:1375–1379
Haapasalo M, Qian W, Portenier I, Waltimo T (2007) Effects of dentin on the antimicrobial
properties of endodontic medicaments. J Endod 33:917–925
Hasselgren G, Olsson B, Cvek M (1988) Effects of calcium hydroxide and sodium hypochlorite on
the dissolution of necrotic porcine muscle tissue. J Endod 14:125–127
Heithersay GS (1970) Stimulation of root formation in incompletely developed pulpless teeth.
Heithersay GS (1975) Calcium hydroxide in the treatment of pulpless teeth with associated
pathology. J Br Endod Soc 8:74–98
Hermann BW (1920) Calciumhydroxyd als Mittels zum Behandel und Füllen von
Zahnwurzelkanälen. Würzburg Medical Dissertation 29
Hermann BW (1930) Dentinobliteration der Wurzelkanälen nach Behandlung mit Kalzium.

Zahnärztl Rundschau 21:888–899
Hong C-Y, Lin S-K, Kok S-H, Cheng S-J, Lee M-S, Wang T-M (2004) The role of lipopolysac-
charide in infectious bone resorption of periapical disease. J Oral Path Med 33:162–169
Hosoya N, Takahashi G, Arai T, Nakamura J (2001) Calcium concentration and pH of the
periapical environment after applying calcium hydroxide into root canals in vitro. J Endod
27:343–346
Kaufman B, Spångberg L, Barry J, Fouad AF (2005) Enterococcus spp. in endodontically treated
teeth with and without periradicular lesions. J Endod 31:851–856
Kayaoglu G, Erten H, Bodrumlu E, Ørstavik D (2009) The resistance of collagen-associated,
planktonic cells of Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydroxide. J Endod 35:46–49
Kells CE Jr (1887) Immediate root-filling. Dent Cosmos 29:366–367
Kerekes K, Tronstad L (1979) Long-term results of endodontic treatment performed with a
standardized technique. J Endod 5:83–90
Kishen A, George S, Kumar R (2006) Enterococcus faecalis-mediated biomineralized biofilm
formation on root canal dentine in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 77:406–415
Kvist T, Molander A, Dahlén G, Reit C (2004) Microbiological evaluation of one- and two-visit
endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized, clinical trial. J Endod
30:572–576
Linde A (1989) Dentin matrix proteins: composition and possible functions in calcification. Anat
Rec 224:154–166
Linde A, Goldberg M (1993) Dentinogenesis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 4:679–728
Matsumiya S, Kitamura M (1960) Histopathological and histobacteriological studies of the
relation between the condition of sterilization of the interior of the root canal and the healing
process of periapical tissues in experimentally infected root canal treatment. Bull Tokyo Dent
College 1:1–19
McGurkin-Smith R, Trope M, Caplan D, Sigurdsson A (2005) Reduction of intracanal bacteria
using GT rotary instrumentation, 5.25 % NaOCl, EDTA, and Ca(OH)2. J Endod 31:359–363
Messer HH, Chen RS (1984) The duration of effectiveness of root canal medicaments. J Endod
10:240–245
Miller WD (1890) Microorganisms of the human mouth. The local and general diseases which are
caused by them. Philadelphia, pp 1–364
Mohammadi Z, Dummer P (2011) Properties and applications of calcium hydroxide in endodon-
tics and dental traumatology. Int Endod J 44:697–730
Molander A (2000) On testing microbial presence in the root canal. Thesis, University of
Gothenburg
Molander A, Warfvinge J, Reit C, Kvist T (2007) Clinical and radiographic evaluation of one- and
two-visit endodontic treatment of asymptomatic necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis: a
randomized clinical trial. J Endod 33:1145–1148
Montagner F, Jacinto RC, Signoretti FG, Gomes BP (2010) Treponema species detected in
infected root canals and acute apical abscess exudates. J Endod 36:1796–1799
mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after “one visit” endodontic treat-
Nerwich A, Fidgor D, Messer HH (1993) pH changes in root dentine over a 4-week period
following root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide. J Endod 19:302–306
Ørstavik D, Haapasalo M (1990) Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings of experi-
mentally infected dentinal tubules. Endod Dent Traumatol 6:142–149
Ørstavik D, Kerekes K, Molven O (1991) Effects of extensive apical reaming and calcium
hydroxide dressing on bacterial infection during treatment of apical periodontitis: a pilot
study. Int Endod J 24:1–7
Parmar D, Hauman CH, Leichter JW, McNaughton A, Tompkins GR (2011) Bacterial localization
and viability assessment in human ex vivo dentinal tubules by fluorescence confocal laser
scanning microscopy. Int Endod J 44:644–651
Peters L, Wesselink PR (2002) Periapical healing of endodontically treated teeth in one and two
visits obturated in the presence or absence of detectable microorganisms. Int Endod J
35:660–667
Peters LB, van Winkelhoff AJ, Buijs JF, Wesselink PR (2002) Effects of instrumentation,
irrigation and dressing with calcium hydroxide on infection in pulpless teeth with periapical
bone lesions. Int Endod J 35:13–21
Petersson A, Axelsson S, Davidson T, Frisk F, Hakeberg M, Kvist T, Norlund A, Mejare I,
Portenier I, Sandberg H, Tranæus S, Bergenholtz G (2012) Radiological diagnosis of periapical
bone tissue lesions in endodontics. A systematic review. Int Endod J 45:783–801
Pope O, Sathorn C, Parashos P (2014) A comparative investigation of cone-beam computed
tomography and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of a healthy periapex. J Endod
40:360–365
Portenier I, Haapasalo H, Rye A, Waltimo T, Ørstavik D, Haapasalo M (2001) Inactivation of root
canal medicaments by dentine, hydroxylapatite and bovine serum albumin. Int Endod J
34:184–188
Reit C, Dahlén G (1988) Decision making analysis of endodontic treatment strategies in teeth with
Ribeiro AC, Matarazzo F, Faveri M, Zezell DM, Mayer MP (2011) Exploring bacterial diversity of
endodontic microbiota by cloning and sequencing 16S rRNA. J Endod 37:922–926
Rohner W (1940) Calxyl als Wurzelfüllungs Material nach Pulpa Extirpation. Schweiz Monatssch
Zahnmed 50:903–948
Rosenberg B, Murray PE, Namerow K (2007) The effect of calcium hydroxide root filling on
dentin fracture strength. Dent Traumatol 23:26–29
Safavi KE, Nichols FC (1993) Effect of calcium hydroxide on bacterial lipopolysaccharide.
J Endod 19:76–78
Safavi KE, Nichols FC (1994) Alteration of biological properties of bacterial lipopolysaccharide
by calcium hydroxide treatment. J Endod 20:127–129
Sakamoto M, Rôcas IN, Siqueira JF Jr, Benno Y (2006) Molecular analysis of bacteria in
asymptomatic and symptomatic endodontic infections. Oral Microbiol Immunol 21:112–122
Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer HH (2005) Effectiveness of single- versus multiple-visit endodon-
tic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int
Endod J 38:347–355
Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer HH (2007) How useful is root canal culturing in predicting
treatment outcome? J Endod 33:220–225
Schilder H (1974) Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 18:269–296
Seltzer S, Bender IB (1965) Cognitive dissonances in endodontics. Oral Surg 20:505–515
Shuping GB, Ørstavik D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M (2000) Reduction of intracanal bacteria using
nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications. J Endod 26:751–755
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôcas IN (2005) Exploiting molecular methods to explore endodontic infections:
part 2 – Redefining the endodontic microbiota. J Endod 31:488–498
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2009) Diversity of endodontic microbiota revisited. J Dent Res 88:969–981
Siqueira JF Jr, Magalhães KM, Rôças IN (2007) Bacterial reduction in infected root canals treated
with 2.5 % NaOCl as an irrigant and calcium hydroxide/camphorated paramonochlorophenol
paste as an intracanal dressing. J Endod 33:667–672
Sj€ogren U, Figdor D, Spångberg L, Sundqvist G (1991) The antimicrobial effect of calcium
hydroxide as a short-term intracanal dressing. Int Endod J 24:119–125
Sj€ogren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G (1997) Influence of infection at the time of root filling
on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J
30:297–306
Sommer RF, Ostrander FD, Crowley MC (1966) Clinical endodontics. A manual of scientific
endodontics, 3rd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia/London
Staehle HJ (1990) Calciumhydroxid in der Zahnheilkunde. Carl Hanser Verlag, München, Wien
Stevens RH, Grossman LI (1983) Evaluation of the antimicrobial potential of calcium hydroxide
as an intracanal medicament. J Endod 9:372–374
Strindberg LZ (1956) The dependence of the results of pulp therapy on certain factors. An
analytical study based on radiographic and clinical follow-up examinations. Acta Odontol
Scand 14 (suppl 21)
Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjögren U (1998) Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85:86–93
Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU) (2010) Methods of diagnosis and
treatment in endodontics. A systematic review. Report no. 203. Available at: http://www.sbu.se
Tanomaru JHG, Leonardo MR, Filho M, Silva LAB (2003) Effect of different irrigation solutions
and calcium hydroxide on bacterial LPS. Int Endod J 36:733–739
Trope M, Bergenholtz G (2002) Microbiological basis for endodontic treatment: can a maximal
outcome be achieved in one visit. Endod Topics 1:40–53
Trope M, Delano EO, Ørstavik D (1999) Endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis:
single vs. multivisit treatment. J Endod 25:345–350
Tûrkün M, Cengiz T (1997) The effect of sodium hypoclorite and calcium hydroxide on tissue
dissolution and root canal cleanliness. Int Endod J 30:335–342
Upadya M, Shrestha A, Kishen A (2011) Role of efflux pump inhibitors on the antibiofilm efficacy
of calcium hydroxide, chitosan nanoparticles, and light-activated disinfection. J Endod
237:1422–1426
Vera J, Siqueira JF Jr, Ricucci D, Loghin S, Fernández N, Flores B, Cruz AG (2012) One- versus
two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study.
J Endod 38:1040–1052
Vianna ME, Conrads G, Gomes BPFA (2007) Quantification and characterization of synergistes in
endodontic infections. Oral Microbiol Immunol 22:260–265
Waltimo T, Trope M, Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D (2005) Clinical efficacy of treatment procedures in
endodontic infection control and one year follow-up of periapical healing. J Endod 31:863–866
Walton RE (1976) Histologic evaluation of different methods of enlarging the pulp canal space.
J Endod 2:304–311
Wei M, Evans JH, Bostrom T, Grøndahl L (2003) Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyap-
atite, fluoride-substituted hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite. J Mater Sci Mater Med 14:311–320
Weiger R, Rosendahl R, L€ ost C (2000) Influence of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressings on the
prognosis of teeth with endodontically induced periapical lesions. Int Endod J 33:219–226
Whitbeck ER, Quinn GD, Quinn JB (2011) Effect of calcium hydroxide on the fracture resistance
of dentin. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 116:743–749
White JD, Lacefield WR, Chavers LS, Eleazer PD (2002) The effect of three commonly used
endodontic materials on the strength and hardness of root dentin. J Endod 28:828–830
Wu MK, Wesselink PR (1995) Efficacy of three techniques in cleaning the apical portion of curved
root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 79:492–496
Wu MK, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR (2009) Limitations of previously published systematic
reviews evaluating the outcome of endodontic treatment. Int Endod J 42:656–666
Yared GM, Dagher FE (1994) Influence of apical enlargement on bacterial infection during
treatment of apical periodontitis. J Endod 20:535–537
Zarei M, Afkhami F, Malek Poor Z (2013) Fracture resistance of human root dentin exposed to
calcium hydroxide intervisit medication at various time periods: an in vitro study. Dent
Traumatol 29:56–60
Zoletti GO, Siqueira JF Jr, Santos KR (2006) Identification of Enterococcus faecalis in root-filled
teeth with or without periradicular lesions by culture-dependent and-independent approaches.
J Endod 32:722–726
Advanced Therapeutic Options to Disinfect
Root Canals
Anil Kishen
Abstract Bacterial biofilms in the root canals are challenging targets for conven-
tional antimicrobial irrigants and medicaments. Advanced endodontic disinfection
strategies are tested to enhance the antibiofilm effectiveness during root canal
treatment. The primary goal of different advanced theraputic options is to eliminate
intracanal biofilms from the anatomical complexities and uninstrumented portions
of the root canal system, without producing deleterious effects on the host tissues.
This chapter describes the challenges offered by bacterial biofilm as a therapeutic
target and discusses the current antibiofilm options in root canal disinfection.
1 Bacterial Biofilm as a Therapeutic Target in Root Canal

Disinfection
The infected root canal harbors a diverse population of aerobic, anaerobic, gram-
positive, gram-negative, spiral, and filamentous bacteria often existing as a struc-
tured community, known as a biofilm (Nair et al. 1990; Nair 1987, 2006; Sundqvist
and Figdor 2003; Baumgartner et al. 2008). Gram-positive and gram-negative
bacteria manifest significant differences in the structure of their cell wall (Denyer
and Maillard 2002). The susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial agents depends
upon the nature of their cell wall and the capsule that at times surrounds it. Bacteria
present in a biofilm demonstrates a considerably higher degree of resistance to
antimicrobial agents than those that are planktonic (free floating) (Costerton
et al. 1994). The increased antimicrobial resistance of biofilm bacteria can generally
be attributed to (1) the presence of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS), a
polysaccharide and protein matrix that surrounds and embeds the bacteria, (2) an
increased rate of growth and nutrient availability, and (3) the evolution of resistant
phenotypes due to horizontal transfer of resistance genes. In general, biofilm
bacteria do not rely on a single resistance mechanism, but utilize different
A. Kishen (*)

Biofilms 9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47415-0_11
328 A. Kishen
AM may fail to penetrate beyond the surface

layers of the biofilm. Outer biofilm cells may AM may be trapped and
be killed. The antimicrobial activity may be destroyed by enzymes in
the biofilm matrix Stress response and expression of
impaired by the lack of penetration or altered biofilm-specific resistance genes
environment conditions (pH, pO2, etc.) (efflux pumps) may increase
biofilm bacterial resistance to AM
Growth rate is altered in biofilm
bacteria. AM may not be active against
non-growing microbes (persister cells)
Substrate (biotic or abiotic)
Actively growing biofilm bacteria on the surface

Antimicrobial neutralizing enzyme
Biofilm persister bacteria
Biofilm mode of growth or stress induced over expression molecules
Quorum sensing molecule
AM: Antimicrobial agent
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram showing different methods by which bacteria in a biofilm gain
resistance against antimicrobials (Kishen 2010)
mechanisms that act in concert, to evade destruction (Dunne et al. 1993; Gilbert
et al. 2002) (Fig. 1).
In the root canal, mature biofilm consists of multiple layers of bacteria embed-
ded in EPS, which often accounts for over 50 % of the biofilm content. EPS has the
potential to alleviate the response of the resident bacteria to antimicrobial agents by
acting as a diffusion shield and reaction neutralizer. This is because of its highly
charged and interwoven structure (Anderl et al. 2000; Vrany et al. 1997; Prince
2002). The chemical components in a biofilm matrix further enhance its barrier
effect since certain constituents in the matrix posses a potential to react chemically,
and subsequently neutralize, some antimicrobials, such as iodine, iodine-
polyvinylpyrrolidone complexes, chlorine, and peroxygens (Nichols et al. 1989;
del Pozo and Patel 2007). The antimicrobial resistance associated with biofilm
bacteria is also linked to the slow growth and starvation of the bacteria that exist in a
biofilm. The spatial arrangement of bacterial species within a biofilm, allows those
that inhabit the deeper layers to receive lesser nutrients and have a lower redox
potential than those closer to the surface. This makes antimicrobial agents that use
penetration, as a vector, less effective. Since nutrient and gas gradients increase
with the thickness and maturity of a biofilm, the resistance of deeply located
bacteria becomes even more marked in a matured or aged biofilm (del Pozo and
Patel 2007; Al Cunningham et al. 2011).
Certain bacteria when exposed to environmental stress or low-level antimicro-
bial develop as survivor cells called persister cells (Lewis 2005). These persister
cells are nongrowing phenotypic variants of their general cell population. Follow-
ing the removal of environmental and chemical stresses, persister cells can grow
rapidly if an adequate nutrient supply is available. Biofilm population that are rich
in persister cells, therefore, have a greater potential to survive antimicrobial treat-
ment and restore robustness to the biofilm once antimicrobial treatment has been
Advanced Therapeutic Options to Disinfect Root Canals 329
terminated (Al Cunningham et al. 2011). In addition, bacteria that exist in biofilm
can upregulate the expression of stress-response genes, shock proteins, and
multidrug pumps (efflux pumps) and develop into a more antimicrobial-resistant
phenotype (Al Cunningham et al. 2011). In general it can be stated that the nature of
biofilm structure and the physiological characteristics of the resident bacteria offer
the community a high degree of resistance to many types of antimicrobials
(Costerton 1999; Rosan et al. 1999).
Endodontic disease, that is apical periodontitis, has recently been categorized as
a biofilm-mediated infection (Ricucci and Siqueira 2010). The pattern of arrange-
ment of bacterial community in root canal is consistent with the criteria that were
originally used to classify periodontitis as a biofilm-mediated disease. Numerous
studies have revealed a high prevalence of bacterial biofilms in the root canal and
on the root surface of teeth with apical periodontitis (Ricucci and Siqueira 2010). A
significant reduction of biofilm during endodontic treatment and prevention of its
reestablishment subsequent to treatment are essential goods for root canal treat-
ment. Clinical studies have shown that even after meticulous
chemomechanical preparation and obturation of the root canal, a significant amount
of biofilm is often present in the anatomical complexities of the root canal system
and on the wall of main canal that was not engaged by the root canal file. (Ricucci
and Siqueira 2010; Nair et al. 2005). While a favorable treatment outcomes using
these protocols still occurs in 73–90 % of the teeth that are treated, the level of
favorable outcomes has shown little change over the past 50 years (Friedman 2002).
It appears that new antibiofilm strategies will have to be introduced into clinical
practice if a rise in favorable treatment outcomes is to be realized. These novel strat-
egies should routinely capable of not only disrupting biofilm but also doing so
safely throughout the entire root canal system. At present several new strategies
have been developed and are currently being tested in endodontics. These, as well
as those in current use, will be discussed in the following sections.
2 Therapeutic Strategies for Endodontic Biofilm

Management
Generally, the strategies designed to eliminate bacterial biofilms are directed at

(1) inactivating resident bacteria within the biofilm structure or (2) disrupting
biofilm structure and simultaneously killing resident bacteria (Fig. 2). These objec-
tives can be met by employing a variety of antimicrobial agents and/or treatment
strategies. Among the antimicrobials are agents that (1) produce slow destruction of
biofilm structure, (2) destroy persister cells, (3) disrupt the quorum sensing signals
that are necessary to maintain the biofilm, (4) diffuse into the biofilm structure to
initiate killing of resident bacteria or are used in combination with other strategies
that enhance diffusion and then initiate killing, and (5) destroy both biofilm matrix
and resident bacteria (Prince 2002). Another approach in the biofilm management is
330 A. Kishen
AM that destroys persister cellsor

use of quorum-quenching enzymes
Untreated biofilm structure
AM that combines strategies

to enhance their diffusion
AM that causes slow self-

destruction of biofilm
AM that causes biofilm

AM that destroys biofilm bacterial killing
matrix
Fig. 2 Schematic diagram showing different antibiofilm strategies (Kishen 2010)
the prevention of bacterial cell adherence, which is the first step in biofilm forma-
tion. This particular strategy involves the use of chemically or ultrastructurally
modified biomaterials that resist bacterial adherence (Kishen et al. 2008a;
An et al. 1996).
The newer antimicrobial strategies adapted for endodontic should be directed at
disrupting biofilm structure and destroying resident and persister bacteria in a
highly irregular environment such as a root canal system. They have to do so in a
manner that does not cause detrimental physical, mechanical, and/or chemical
damages to the root dentin and periodontal tissues. In the next section, several of
the new and advanced therapeutic approaches designed to manage endodontic
biofilm will be reviewed and discussed.
2.1 Antibacterial Nanoparticles
Nanoparticles are microscopic particles with one or more dimensions in the range
of 1–100 nm. They possess unique physico-chemical properties that are very
different from their bulk or powder counterparts. Nanoparticles that are antimicro-
bial, for example, possess a broad spectrum of antimicrobial action and possess a
much lower potential of inducing microbial resistance than conventional antibi-

otics. Magnesium oxide and calcium oxide slurries have demonstrated bactericidal
action against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (Sawai 2003). Zinc
oxide slurry has been shown to be bacteriostatic, but more so against gram-positive
bacteria than gram-negative bacteria (Yamamoto 2001). The antimicrobial proper-
ties of these metallic oxides arise from their ability to generate an active oxygen
species (ROS), a radical form of oxygen that is cytotoxic for bacteria. Their
antimicrobial potential further increases if they possess a high surface area, a
high charge density, and a high potential for bacterial interaction (Sawai
et al. 1998). The electrostatic interaction of a positively charged nanoparticle and
a negatively charged bacterial cell allows a large number of nanoparticles to
accumulate on the bacterial cell membrane when they interact. This produces an
increase in membrane permeability and a rapid loss of membrane function that
ultimately leads to bacterial cell death. Heavy metal ions can disrupt bacterial cell
function in a variety of ways (Stohs and Bagchi 1995; Yoon et al. 2007; Reddy
et al. 2007). Copper ions, for example, induce oxidative stresses (Cioffi et al. 2005)
and a disruption in redox cycling, which causes damage to the bacterial cell
membrane and the bacterial ribosomal DNA. Zinc ions, in concentrations above
the essential threshold level, on the other hand, inhibit bacterial enzymes including
dehydrogenase. This impedes cell metabolism and causes cell death (Beard
et al. 1995). Silver ions inactivate proteins and inhibit DNA replication (Feng
et al. 2000). The nanoparticles can be synthesized from powders of silver, copper
oxide, and zinc oxide, for broad antimicrobial applications (Kim et al. 2007).
A reverse strategy in biofilm management is inhibiting its development. As
previously mentioned, adherence of microorganisms to a substrate is the first step
in biofilm formation. In the oral cavity, adherence to tooth structure enables
bacteria to resist the normal flushing action of saliva and to survive under rather
harsh growth conditions (Jefferson 2004; Busscher and van der Mei 1997; Busscher
et al. 1995; An and Friedman 1998). Bacterial adherence experiments have
highlighted that different endodontic irrigants can reduce adherence of E. faecalis
to root dentin. The degree to which this occurs is dependent upon the irrigant and its
concentration. Irrigation with EDTA (17 %, pH 7.3) following the use of sodium
hypochlorite (5.2 %), for example, raises bacterial adherence to root dentin by
33 % (Kishen et al. 2008b). This most likely occurs because EDTA, a chelating
agent, can demineralize dentin to a depth of 20–30 μm following 5 min of
application (Marshall et al. 1995; Habelitz et al. 2002) and leave the collagen
component of the matrix exposed on the dentin surface. Collagen is an excellent
substrate for the adherence of many bacterial species including E. faecalis. If
sodium hypochlorite is used after EDTA, exposed collagen is removed and the
opportunity for bacterial adherence is negated (Kishen et al. 2008b; Basrani
et al. 2007). Adherence to dentin may also be altered by cationic nanoparticles in
an aqueous suspension if they are allowed to settle onto the negatively charged
dentin surface (Kishen et al. 2008b). These are examples of how alterations in the
physicochemical properties of dentin can change its potential as a substrate for
biofilm formation.
332 A. Kishen
Chitosan is a natural bioactive biopolymer derived by the deacetylation of chitin.

It binds to a negatively charged surface and possesses excellent antimicrobial and
antifungal properties. The exact mechanism by which chitosan and its derivatives
act on bacteria is still not fully understood. It is believed that the electrostatic
interaction between positively charged chitosan nanoparticles and a negatively
charged bacterial cell membrane alters the membrane permeability to dysregulate
cell function (Rabea et al. 2003). A recent study examined the antimicrobial
properties of ZnO and resin-based root canal sealers that contained chitosan and
ZnO nanoparticles. The study demonstrated that adding these nanoparticles to the
root canal sealers improved their direct (based on a direct antibacterial assay) and
diffusible antibacterial action (based on a membrane-restricted antibacterial assay)
(Kishen et al. 2008c) without adversely altering their flow characteristics. Another
study examined the ability of chitosan nanoparticles and ZnO nanoparticles to
eliminate bacterial biofilm under normal and experimentally aged conditions
(nanoparticles conditioned by tissue fluids). It was found that the rate of bacterial
killing depended upon the concentration of the nanoparticles and the duration of
their exposure to biofilm. Interestingly, both chitosan nanoparticles and ZnO
nanoparticles reportedly retained their antibacterial potential after aging for
90 days (Shrestha et al. 2010).
Bioactive glass, has received some interest as a vehicle for root canal disinfec-
tion. Bioactive glass is antibacterial and is composed of SiO2, Na2O, CaO2, and
P2O5 in different concentrations. Its antibacterial properties have been attributed to
several factors most notably its high pH, its osmotic effects (relative to cytosol
pressure), and its ability to precipitate Ca/P (Stoor et al. 1998). The feasibility of
using bioactive glass as a root canal disinfectant was tested in vitro (Zehnder
et al. 2004, 2006; Gubler et al. 2008) and shown to be significantly less antibacterial
than calcium hydroxide (Zehnder et al. 2006). It also did not effectively prevent
recontamination of a previously cleaned root canal (Gubler et al. 2008). It was
theorized that a suspensions/slurries of 45S5 bioactive glass would be an effective
antibacterial agent in the root canal because of its high and sustainable pH (Waltimo
et al. 2009). While it was shown that a nanometric slurry of bioactive glass has a
12-fold higher specific surface area than its micrometric counterpart, the latter
demonstrated considerably higher alkalinity and antimicrobial efficacy. This was
in contrast to a previous study reported by the same authors that claimed higher
antibacterial efficacy when the materials shifted from micron- to nano-size
(Waltimo et al. 2007). Bioactive glass was used in an attempt to promote mineral
deposition within the root canal in another. It was thought that by doing so, the use
of root canal sealers would not be required. A combination of polyisoprene or
polycaprolactone and nanometric bioactive glass 45S5 (bioactive glass) was
employed for this purpose. Incorporating bioactive glass fillers into the polyiso-
prene and polycaprolactone resulted in a bioactive composite material with
improved mineralization characteristics (Mohn et al. 2010). Although the authors
concluded that the composite of polyisoprene, polycaprolactone, and bioactive
glass showed potential as a “single” root canal filling material, more rigorous
investigations are warranted before adopting this approach for routine clinical use.
In summary, most of the nanoparticles that have been tested have shown a higher
antibacterial potential than their powder counterpart. Their higher reactivity and
their ability to resist aging have also proven to be a clinical advantage. Most
cationic antibacterial particles show excellent interaction with biomaterials, bacte-
ria, and biofilms. In root canal therapy, nanoparticles may be introduced into the
root canal as slurry or in combination with a root canal sealer. Though they have the
ability to diffuse deep into the dentin, additional research is needed to assess their
ability to inactivate biofilm in the anatomical complexities of the root canal system.
Their interaction with the host tissues/immune cells also requires further investi-
gation. Their acceptance for routine clinical use will depend upon both their
antimicrobial effectiveness and a simple and practical method of delivering them
into the root canal.
2.2 Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is based on the concept that a nontoxic dye, termed a
photosensitizer (PS), can be preferentially localized in a tissue and subsequently be
activated by light of an appropriate wavelength to generate cytotoxic singlet oxygen
and other reactive oxygen species to create a desired therapeutic effect. A success-
ful outcome with PDT is dependent upon optimal interaction among three ele-
ments—light, PS, and oxygen. Light-activated disinfection (LAD) has been known
by a variety of names such as photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT),
photoactivated disinfection (PAD), light-activated therapy (LAT), and antimicro-
bial photodynamic therapy (APDT).
The emitted light should have a specific wavelength, one that corresponds to the
maximum wavelength absorption property of a photosensitizer. A photosensitizer
molecule in its ground state is at a spectroscopic singlet (S0). After the absorption of
a photon (light), it passes from the ground state to its first excited state (S1). In this
state, the photosensitizer can return again to a ground state, or it can pass into a
triplet excited state (T1) via intersystem crossing. The photosensitizer in the triplet
state is extremely reactive and can interact along either one or both of the following
pathways to destroy a bacterial cell: (1) type I reaction: the photosensitizer triplet
state can react with a target, other than oxygen, through hydrogen or electron
transfer, to form radical ions that can react with oxygen, to produce a cytotoxic
species, such as hydrogen peroxide, superoxide anion, and/or lipid derived radicals;
(2) type II reaction: the photosensitizer triplet state can transfer excitation energy to
ground state molecular oxygen to produce excited state singlet oxygen (1O2) (Dai
et al. 2009).
Singlet oxygen is a strong oxidizing agent. They are highly reactive within a
radius of action of less than 0.02 μm and has a lifetime of less than 0.04 μs in a
biological environment (Moan and Berg 1991). The reaction of singlet oxygen with
a cellular target leads to cell death. Two basic mechanisms that have been proposed
to account for the lethal injury sustained by bacteria exposed to APDT are DNA
334 A. Kishen
damage and cytoplasmic membrane damage (Bertoloni et al. 2000; Menezes

et al. 1990). During lethal photosensitization, singlet oxygen may interact with
photo-oxidizable amino acid residues, such as His, Cys, Trp, and Tyr, in one protein
molecule, to produce reactive species that may in turn interact with residues or free
amino groups in another protein, to form a cross-link (Shen et al. 1996). The photo-
oxidative effect caused by a phenothiazinium photosensitizer on bacteria has
damaged multiple bacterial targets such DNA (Menezes et al. 1990), cell membrane
(Wakayama et al. 1980), protease activity, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (K€omerik
et al. 2000). Functional impairment of cell wall, extensive damage to chromosomal
DNA, and degradation of membrane proteins, following methylene blue-mediated
APDT of E. faecalis, has also been reported (George and Kishen 2008a).
APDT has the potential to destroy mammalian cells as well as microbial cells.
Yet several studies have shown the selective killing of microbial cells over host
cells, especially at photosensitization periods, and light fluence, required for an
antimicrobial action. Soukos et al. compared the effect of APDT using a combina-
tion of toluidine blue O (TBO) and red light against S. sanguis and human gingival
keratinocytes and fibroblasts. They reported effective bacteria killing with no loss
of human cell vitality (Soukos et al. 1996). Soncin et al. reported selective killing of
S. aureus and no effect on human fibroblasts and keratinocytes (four to sixfold)
when exposed to APDT and cationic phthalocyanine, at relatively low light flu-
encies (Soncin et al. 2002), and George and Kishen demonstrated a 97.7 % killing
for E. faecalis and a 30 % human fibroblast dysfunction rate with APDT and
methylene blue (George and Kishen 2007a). Tissue toxicity becomes a serious
issue when a high concentration or volume of photosensitizer is applied in an
attempt to improve the treatment outcome. Tissue toxicity can also occur with the
use of initially nontoxic photosensitizers if they interact with target tissue in a way
that gives rise to interaction by-products, which are toxic. This indirect form of
tissue toxicity has yet to be fully explored, particularly within the framework of
human applications of this technology. In spite of all these potential side effects,
there are, at present, several photosensitizers useful in APDT that are in various
stages of testing for FDA approval.
Compounds based on a phenothiazinium chromophore are emerging as promis-
ing candidates for use as an APDT photosensitizer (George and Kishen 2008a).
Methylene blue and TBO, members of the phenothiazinium group of photosensi-
tizers, have already gained acceptance for clinical use (Wainwright and Crossley
2002). Phenothiaziniums are generally cationic molecules, with a core structure
composed of a planar tricyclic aromatic ring system that functions as the chromo-
phore (Wainwright and Giddens 2003). In addition to phenothiaziniums, cationic
porphyrins (Merchat et al. 1996), phthalocyanines (Minnock et al. 1996), and
chlorins (Hamblin et al. 2002) have also gained acceptance as photosensitizers,
because of their ability to inactivate gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.
Methylene blue, TBO, rose bengal, erythrosine, chlorin (e6), and hematoporphyrin
are currently being investigated for use in the same way.
Soukos and co-workers proposed that by covalently conjugating a suitable
photosensitizer to a poly-L-lysine chain, a bacteria-targeted photosensitizer delivery
vehicle could be constructed that would effectively kill gram-positive and gram-
negative microorganisms (Soukos et al. 1997). They tested their hypothesis against
selected species of these microorganisms, by preparing a conjugate of chlorin
(e6) and a poly-L-lysine chain (20 lysine residues) and illuminating them after
1 min of incubation with red light. This produced a killing rate of >99 % for
gram-positive Actinomyces viscosus and gram-negative Porphyromonas gingivalis
(Soukos et al. 1997). Later, Polo et al. used a conjugate of poly-L-lysine and
porphycenes and reported a significant killing of gram-negative microorganisms
(Polo et al. 2000) and Hamblin et al. used a poly-L-lysine-ce6 conjugate with a chain
length of lysine, to kill selected gram-positive and gram-negative species (Hamblin
et al. 2002). Nanoparticles are ideal carriers for photosensitizer molecules in APDT.
The combination of nanoparticles and photosensitizer molecules has led to a new
and expanding field of interdisciplinary research. Nanomaterials, such as TiO2,
ZnO, as well as fullerenes and their derivatives, can generate the singlet oxygen
necessary for killing bacteria. Nanoparticles are also combined with photosensitizer
molecules to enhance their action. Different strategies used with this technology are
shown in Fig. 3. Basically they are (1) photosensitizer supplemented with
nanoparticles; (2) photosensitizer encapsulated within nanoparticles, (3) photosen-
sitizer bound or loaded to nanoparticles, and (4) nanoparticles that serve as a
photosensitizer. The effectiveness of APDT against E. faecalis biofilm and
human dental plaque bacteria has been investigated in vitro using methylene
blue-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic) (PLGA) nanoparticles, activated with red
light (665 nm). These cationic methylene blue-loaded nanoparticles exhibited
bacterial phototoxicity against planktonic and biofilm forms of the bacteria. The
nanoparticles were found to be concentrated on the bacterial cell walls at all test
time points. It was concluded that the methylene blue-loaded PLGA nanoparticles
displayed a potential for use in APDT disinfection of the root canal (Klepac-Ceraj
et al. 2011; Pagonis et al. 2010).
Light sources used in APDT can be coherent (lasers) or noncoherent (lamps).
The choice of light source is determined by the nature of the site, the required light
dose, and the choice of photosensitizer. Lasers provide monochromatic, coherent,
and collimated light, and a wide range of output power. Laser light can be easily
coupled into a fiber optic cable, which can serve as a delivery system (probe) for
irradiating complex anatomy, such as that found in the root canal. Nd:YAG, KTP,
HeNe, GaAlAs, and diode lasers, light emitting diodes, and xenon arc lamps have
all been employed in APDT. To date, none has shown superiority over the other
(Prasad 2003).
336 A. Kishen
Fig. 3 Schematic diagram (A)

showing different methods
of combining nanoparticles
and photosensitizers Photosensitizer supplemented nanoparticles
(Kishen 2010)
(B)
Nanoparticles as photosensitizer
(C)
Photosensitizer encapsulated nanoparticles
(D)
Photosensitizer bound to nanoparticles
There have been numerous in vitro studies reported in the literature regarding the
use of APDT in root canal disinfection. Meire et al. (2009) and George and Kishen
(2007b, 2007b, 2008b) showed that E. faecalis could be effectively killed by APDT
using methylene blue and TBO as a photosensitizer and red light as an activator.
Soukos et al. tested APDT using methylene blue as a photosensitizer on a broad
range of endodontic pathogens and reported it was effective in eliminating all the
test organisms with the exception of E. faecalis, which in part survived (Soukos
et al. 2006). In another study, Williams et al. used TBO and red light and reported a
significant reduction in the bacterial load for suspensions of S. intermedius,
P. micros, P. intermedia, and F. nucleatum (George and Kishen 2007b). The
application of this technology in clinical endodontics still has to overcome several
hurdles.
The effective use of APDT in root canal disinfection is limited by several tissue-
specific factors. These factors are (1) the penetration of the activating light energy
into the infected tissue, (2) the penetration of optimum photosensitizer
concentration into the infected tissue, (3) the limited availability of environmental
oxygen in the infected tissue, and (4) the ability of excess photosensitizer to
produce dentin discoloration. Light propagation through tissue is influenced by
processes dealing with reflection, absorption, scattering, and transmission. In gen-
eral, approximately 4–6 % of light is lost to reflection. Light is also absorbed by
tissue. This is mainly due to the presence of free water molecules, proteins,
pigments, and other macromolecular constituents of the tissue. Different tissues
have different absorption coefficients, which is a reflection of its transparency per
unit of length. This creates a gradient, where intensity light at the surface is greater
than in deeper areas of the tissue. Since different wavelengths of light possess
different abilities to penetrate the tissue “transparency,” is also influenced to a great
extent by the wavelength of the incoming light/laser irradiation. Light is also
scattered in tissue. Scattering has a marked effect on light intensity and direction-
ality. Scattering and refraction causes widening of the light beam, a change in its
directionality and a proportional loss in its fluence rate (power per unit area) (Prasad
2003). A loss of light energy in tissue such as dentin can compromise the antimi-
crobial action when APDT is used. In an attempt to overcome this, George and
Kishen dissolved methylene blue in different solutions—water, 70 % glycerol,
70 % polyethylene glycol (PEG), and a mixture of glycerol, ethanol, and water
(MIX) in a ratio of 30:20:50—and analyzed their photophysical, photochemical,
and photobiological characteristics in a dentin substrate (George and Kishen
2007b). They found that aggregation of methylene blue molecules was significantly
higher in water as compared to the other solutions. The MIX-based methylene blue
formulation demonstrated effective penetration into dentinal tubules, enhanced
singlet oxygen generation, and in turn improved overall bactericidal action. It
also proved to be significantly better than methylene blue in causing bacterial cell
wall impairment and chromosomal DNA damage (George and Kishen 2008a).
George and Kishen also showed that an oxidizer and oxygen carrier was incorpo-
rated with the photosensitizer formulation to form an emulsion; it produced a
significant increase in the photo-oxidation capabilities and facilitates the compre-
hensive disruption of a mature endodontic biofilm structure (George and Kishen
2008b).
Prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells possess a family of membrane proteins termed
efflux pumps. The efflux pumps remove amphiphilic molecules from cell cytosol.
Since many drugs, such as chlorpromazine, azithromycin, and tetracaine, are
amphiphilic in nature, efflux pumps can effectively clear them from that location.
Efflux is the process by which bacteria transport potentially toxic compounds from
the cytosol to outside of the cell (Ryan et al. 2001). Many of these efflux systems
have broad substrate profiles that allow structurally diverse drugs, chemicals, and
compounds to be extruded to the surface making its expression a virulence charac-
teristic. Efflux pump expression has been shown to be enhanced when bacteria exist
as a biofilm bacteria as compared its planktonic state. This makes bacteria in a
biofilm potentially more resistant to certain types of antimicrobial treatment. It was
speculated that the use of an efflux pump inhibitor (EPI) could overcome this
resistance. Tegos and Hamblin showed that phenothiazinium dyes, which are
338 A. Kishen
structurally characterized as amphipathic cations, are also substrates of multidrug

efflux pumps (MEP). They showed that when inhibitors of bacterial MEP were used
in combination with phenothiazinium dyes, the antimicrobial action of APDT could
be potentiated (Tegos and Hamblin 2006; Tegos et al. 2008). Since efflux pumps
are usually highly active in biofilm, they are strategic targets for antibiofilm
treatment (Kvist et al. 2008; Zhang and Mah 2008). This was shown in a study
by Kishen et al. who used an EPI in combination with phenothiazinium photosen-
sitizer, to assist in the disruption and destruction of biofilm (Kishen et al. 2010).
The potential of APDT in root canal disinfection has been investigated in vitro by
different studies. Results of these investigations are summarized in Table 1 (Bonsor
et al. 2006a, b; Garcez et al. 2008, 2010). It was generally concluded that when
combined with standard chemomechanical preparation of the root canal, APDT had
the potential to significantly reduce the microbial load if it could be optimized for
use in a root canal environment. Currently, APDT is not considered to be an
optional protocol in root canal disinfection, only a supplement to them. Further
research is still necessary in order to maximize its antibiofilm potential. This will
involve improving its performance in the presence of tissue inhibitors, optimizing
light delivery to the root canal, introducing new photosensitizers (and formulations)
for use in the root canal, and defining a clinical approach that will produce
consistent results. Research into ways to achieve this end is currently underway
and involves combining the use of photodynamic therapy with bioactive micro-
(Pagonis et al. 2010) and nanoparticles (Shrestha and Kishen 2011).
2.3 Laser-Assisted Root Canal Disinfection
A laser (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation) is a device that

emits light through a process of optical amplification. The photons in a laser beam
are emitted as a coherent, unidirectional, monochromatic light beam that can be
collimated into an intensely focused ray of energy. The nature of laser–tissue
interaction is influenced by the properties of laser (e.g., wavelength, energy density,
and pulse duration) and the optical characteristics of the tissue (e.g., absorption,
reflection, transmission, and scattering). Different types of lasers can produce
different effects on the same tissue, and the same laser can have varying effects
on different tissues. The nature of light absorption by a tissue, and transmission of
light through a tissue as mentioned before, is wavelength dependent. It should be
noted that light intensity does not remain constant as it passes through a defined
volume of tissue; hence, its biological effect changes in accordance with its depth of
penetration. Tissue response to laser energy is complex and influenced by the
thermal properties of the target tissue as well as the type of laser. These thermal
properties are thermal diffusivity, thermal coefficient of expansion, heat capacity,
phase transformation temperatures, and latent heat of transformation. The clini-
cian selects the laser type which generally has the ability to control the (a) applied
power (power density), (b) total energy applied over a given area of tissue (energy
Table 1 Summary of relevant in vivo studies carried out using antimicrobial photodynamic
therapy
Objective and
No Author/date materials Methodology Conclusion
1 Bonsor Aimed to evaluate the Irrigation with 20 % Cleaning and shaping
et al. (2006a) antimicrobial efficacy citric acid and 2.25 % resulted in complete
of root canal disinfec- sodium hypochlorite bacterial killing in
tion by combining PDT with TBO and 86.7 % of samples
PDT with conven- diode laser (12.7 mg/L- Combination of
tional endodontic 1, 100 mW, 120 s) cleaning and shaping
treatment Samples collected by + PDT resulted in
Clinical study: 32 root filing complete bacterial
canals from 14 patients killing in 96.7 % of
samples
2 Bonsor Aimed to compare the Procedure similar to Combination of 20 %
et al. (2006b) effect of a combination previous study citric acid + PDT
of 20 % citric acid resulted in complete
+ PDT with the use of bacterial killing in
20 % citric acid + 25 % 91 % of samples
sodium hypochlorite 20 % citric acid
on bacterial load in + 2.25 % sodium
prepared root canals hypochlorite resulted
Clinical study: in complete bacterial
64 patients killing in 82 % of
samples
3 Garcez Aimed to analyze the Irrigation with 2.5 % First session produced
et al. (2008) antimicrobial effect of sodium hypochlorite, 98.5 % bacterial
PDT in association 3 % hydrogen perox- reduction (1.83 log
with endodontic treat- ide and 17 % EDTA reduction)
ment PDT with polyethy- Second session pro-
Clinical study: leneimine (PEI) duced 99.9 % bacte-
20 patients chlorin (e6 [ce6]) con- rial reduction (1.14
First session of jugate (2 min, 9.6 J, log reduction)
cleaning/shaping 240 s) Second session PDT
+ PDT; at the end of Paper point sampling was more effective
the first session, the than the first session
root canal was filled
with Ca(OH)2, and
after 1 week, PDT was
also performed in the
second session
4 Garcez Studied the antimicro- PDT used Endodontic therapy
et al. (2010) bial effect of PDT polyethylenimine- alone produced a sig-
combined with end- chlorin (e6) as a pho- nificant reduction in
odontic treatment in tosensitizer and a numbers of microbial
patients with necrotic diode laser (40 mW, species (only 3 teeth
pulp, infected with 4 min, 9.6 J) were free of bacteria)
microflora resistant to The combination of
antibiotic therapy endodontic therapy
Clinical study: 30 teeth with PDT eliminated
from 21 patients with all drug-resistant
periapical lesions that
(continued)
340 A. Kishen
Table 1 (continued)
Objective and
No Author/date materials Methodology Conclusion
had been treated with species and all teeth
conventional endodon- were bacteria free
tic treatment and anti-
biotic therapy
density), (c) rate and duration of laser irradiation (pulse repetition), and (d) mode of
energy delivery (continuous/pulsed energy; direct/indirect tissue contact)
(Miserendino and Robert 1995).
Lasers have been primarily used in root canal treatment to enhance elimination
of microorganisms from the root canal system, subsequent to its conventional
biomechanical enlargement, as the parameters of laser use for disinfection do not
produce ablative effects on dentin (Miserendino and Robert 1995; Moshonov
et al. 1995). Infrared lasers such as CO2, Nd:YAG, diode, and erbium lasers have
been the lasers of choice for disinfection. The bactericidal effect of laser depends
upon the wavelength and energy level of the laser used, as well as its thermal effect.
The laser-induced thermal effect produces an alteration in the bacterial cell wall
that changes its osmotic gradient, causing swelling and cell death. It is interesting to
also note that gram-negative bacteria have shown a higher resistance to destruction
by laser irradiation than have gram-positive bacteria. This may be due to differ-
ences in the cell wall structure (Miserendino and Robert 1995).
When used in the root canal, the depth of penetration of the laser into the dentin
will depend upon the other parameters, such as wavelength and power density. As
previously mentioned, the depth of penetration generally decreases with an increase
in the degree of tissue absorption. The delivery of laser energy throughout the root
canal system and absorption of laser energy by the dentin are important consider-
ations in laser root canal disinfection, since they influence not only the degree to
which biofilm can be destroyed but also the degree to which dentin may be
structurally and physically altered.
Laser killing of biofilm bacteria was investigated in an in vitro study by Rooney
et al. in which an energy absorber, either black Indian ink or 38 % silver ammonium
solution, was placed into an infected root canal before irradiating with it with a
pulsed Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm). They reported bacterial killing rates in the main
root canal in a range of 80–90 % (Rooney et al. 1994). Schoop et al. in another
in vitro study compared the antibacterial potential of two lasers, the Nd:YAG and
the Diode laser (810 nm). They found that the Nd:YAG laser reduced the bacterial
load by 85 % to a depth of 1 mm in the dentin, while the diode laser (810 nm)
reduced the load by only 63 % and to a depth of 750 μm in the dentin. The
difference in laser penetration and bacterial killing was attributed to differences
in the degree of absorption of the wavelengths emitted by the two laser types
(Schoop et al. 2004). Bergmans et al. studied the effect of Nd:YAG laser irradiation
on several endodontic pathogens in vitro. They found that biofilms containing these
pathogens were difficult to eradicate, even with direct exposure to laser light. This
led them to conclude that Nd:YAG laser irradiation should be a supplement and not
an alternative to existing root canal disinfection protocols (Bergmans et al. 2006).
Stabholz et al. studied the bactericidal potential of an erbium laser in a root canal
model and found it to be inferior to that of Nd:YAG laser. Thermal energy produced
by the erbium laser has a high affinity for water molecules; therefore, most of its
energy is absorbed on the surface making it less active below it (Wang et al. 2007).
There are several limitations associated with the intracanal use of high-power
laser energy. The emission of laser energy from the tip of an optical fiber or laser
guide is directed downwards into the root canal and not laterally toward the root
canal walls where biofilm is also present. Thus, it is almost impossible to obtain
uniform killing throughout the entire root canal let alone in its anatomical com-
plexities (Goodis et al. 2002; Stabholz et al. 2003). Safety is another limitation,
particularly in regard to the potential for thermal damage to the dentin and the
periapical tissues. This effect can be dangerous in teeth with close proximity to vital
structures such as the mental foramen or the mandibular nerve (Stabholz
et al. 2003). A modified beam delivery system has been tested for Er:YAG laser
to deflect direct transmission of laser energy from the laser tip or fiber optic to the
apex. This system consists of a hollow tube that permits lateral emission of Er:YAG
laser radiation (side firing), rather than straight-line emission through the single
opening at its terminal end, that was previously used (Stabholz et al. 2003). This
new endodontic side-firing spiral tip was designed to comply with the shape and
volume of root canals prepared by rotary nickel–titanium instrumentation. The tip
is also sealed at its distal end, to prevent transmission of irradiation to and through
the apical foramen (George and Walsh 2011). This design was introduced to
enhance the ability of the laser to penetrate into and destroy microbes on the lateral
walls of the root canal and in the dentinal tubules. Its clinical effectiveness is yet to
be reported.
Noiri et al. investigated the antibiofilm effect of Er:YAG laser on in vitro
monospecies biofilm of A. naeslundii, E. faecalis, L. casei, P. acnes,
F. nucleatum, P. gingivalis, and P. nigrescens grown on hydroxyapatite disks for
21 days (aerobically for 7 days and anaerobically for 14 days). They reported that
despite significant reductions in the numbers of viable cells in most of the biofilms
tested, complete elimination of biofilm structure/bacteria did not occur with any of
the Er:YAG laser irradiation energy densities tested. Interestingly, during growth,
the L. casei decalcified the HA disks to a depth of approximately 200 μm and then
invaded the porous decalcified layer, where they remained protected for the laser
irradiation (Noiri et al. 2008). It has already been noted that the antibiofilm potential
of the Er:YAG laser is influenced by the water content, components of extracellular
matrix, cell density, and the absorption coefficient of the dentin. The temperature
increase during irradiation can range from 7.3 C at 20 mJ to 40.2 C at 80 mJ.].
Yavari examined the ability of high-power settings of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation
(2 W and 3 W output powers for 16 s) to eradicate monospecies biofilm of
E. faecalis (48 h) in vitro. He concluded that though 2- and 3-W of Er,Cr:YSGG
laser could kill E. faecalis in root canal models, its effect was less remarkable than
that produced by NaOCl (Yavari et al. 2010). It is important to realize that surface
342 A. Kishen
degradation, microbial penetration into the dentin, as well as the presence of biofilm
in inaccessible site are common occurrences in root canal infection and that if this
technology is to have clinical applicability, it must be safe and effective under those
conditions.
Earlier studies have studied potential changes in the ultrastructure of root canal
dentin as a concomitant/adverse effect to root canal disinfection using different
lasers. It was noted that when lasers were used in a dry root canal, both near- and
mid-infrared lasers produce characteristic thermal injury to the dentin. Human
dentin has low absorption coefficients in the near-infrared range; nonetheless, Nd:
YAG laser irradiation is still capable of melting the dentin surface (Fried
et al. 1995). Moriyama et al. showed morphological changes could be produced
on the dentin of endodontically prepared root canals by Nd:YAG laser irradiation.
The changes were thermally related and appeared as cracks in the dentin, partial
removal of smear layer, and sealing of many dentinal tubules due to melting of the
dentin. Longer pulses of laser delivery caused more severe and more extensive
melting. While the thought of eventually creating a more regular surface with
sealed tubules by increasing the number of pulses appeared desirable, there were
fears that the high number of thermal cycles necessary to achieve this effect could
lead to deeper dentin cracks (Moriyama et al. 2004). During the photothermal
interaction, tissue molecules absorb photons and generate heat that is dissipated
through the tissue. Since tissue needs time to propagate the heat, longer laser pulses
result in the production of higher temperatures in deeper regions of the tissue. With
shorter pulses that use the same average energy, the higher temperatures develop at
the surface (Armon and Laufer 1995). Thermal damage to tissue is a temperature/
time-dependent process. The resultant confinement of thermal stress depends upon
the laser pulse duration and the tissue absorption coefficient (μa). The use of longer
pulses leads to longer interaction times and results in more evidence of a thermal
effect (van Leeuwen et al. 1995). In separate studies, Marchesan et al. and Gurbuz
et al. showed that the presence of water or irrigation solution in the root canal limits
thermal interaction of laser beam from a diode laser (2.5 W, 15 Hz) and Nd:YAG
laser (1.5 W, 100 mJ, 15 Hz) with the dentin on the root canal wall (Marchesan
et al. 2008; Gurbuz et al. 2008). It has also been shown that the presence of water in
root canal space prevents dentin damage when an erbium laser is used (Yamazaki
et al. 2001). Several relevant clinical studies that examined the antimicrobial
efficacy of high-power laser in endodontics are summarized in Table 2 (Koba
et al. 1999; Dostálová et al. 2002; Leonardo et al. 2005). At present there is no
strong evidence available to support the use of high-power lasers in endodontic
disinfection.
Application of the fundamentals of liquid –laser interaction has created a new
area of research. This principle is the basis for laser-activated irrigation (LAI) and
photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) as an approach to root canal
irrigation and disinfection (Kimura et al. 2011; Blanken et al. 2009; De Moor
et al. 2009). The interaction of Er,Cr:YSGG laser with liquid irrigant in the root
canal has been attributed to the efficient absorption of the mid-infrared wavelength
light by water. This leads to the vaporization of irrigant and formation of vapor
Table 2 Summary of relevant in vivo studies carried out using laser-assisted disinfection
Objective and
No: Author/date materials Methodology Conclusion
1 Koba Evaluated the postop- Nd:YAG (1 W, 15 pps No significant differ-
et al. (1999) erative symptoms and for 1 s) ences was found
healing after root canal 5 % NaOCl and 3 % between the groups
treatment with pulsed H2O2 used to disinfect regarding
Nd:YAG laser (control) periapical healing
44 teeth from
38 patients
Radiological evalua-
tion used to assess the
reduction of periapical
lesions at 3 and
6 months
2 Dostálová Studied the ability of 5.25 % NaOCl used to Conventional treat-
et al. (2002) Er:YAG laser radiation disinfect (control) ment was effective in
with a movable wave- Er:YAG (100 mJ, 60 % of the root canal
guide to disinfect root 30 pulses, repetition Application of cal-
canals rate 4 Hz) cium hydroxide was
Root canal of 44 pre- Before and after treat- effective in 80 % of
molars and molars ment, the colony- the root canal
were treated using a forming units were Er:YAG laser irradia-
step-back technique; counted to determine tion via movable
10 teeth were then 21 different waveguide was effec-
treated with calcium microorganisms tive in 100 % of the
hydroxide, and 22 teeth root canal
were irradiated with
the waveguide
3 Leonardo Evaluated the antimi- Group I –cleaning and Er:YAG laser applied
et al. (2005) crobial effect of Er: shaping only after cleaning and
YAG laser applied Group II –cleaning and shaping did not reduce
after cleaning and shaping and Er:YAG microorganisms in the
shaping of root canals laser application root canal system
of dog’s teeth with (63-mJ output/15 Hz)
apical periodontitis After coronal sealing,
40 root canals of dogs’ the root canals were
premolar teeth with left empty for 7 days
periapical lesions were before microbiological
used analysis
bubbles, which expand and implode with secondary cavitation effects that induce
high-speed fluid motions into and out of the root canal. The thermal component of
this interaction is moderate in intensity. The creation of bubbles is similar in both
water and sodium hypochlorite solution. If the liquid does not absorb radiation,
there are no bubbles, cavitation, pressure buildup, or fluid motion. At the beginning
of the laser pulse, the laser energy is absorbed in a 2 mm-thick layer on liquid,
which is instantly superheated to a boiling temperature at high pressure and
converted into vapor. This vapor, at high pressure, expands at high speed and
provides an opening in front of the fiber transmitting the laser light. As the laser
344 A. Kishen
continues to emit energy, the light passes through the bubble and evaporates the
water surface in front of the bubble, driving a channel through the liquid, until the
pulse ends (Kimura et al. 2011; Blanken et al. 2009).
The laser system used for PIPS/LAI is equipped with a novel 400 mm diameter
radial and stripped tip. Subablative parameters (average power 0.3 W, 20 mJ at
15 Hz) are used to produce photomechanical effects, when light energy is pulsed in
liquid. When activated in a limited volume of fluid, the high absorption of the Er:
YAG wavelength in water, combined with the high peak power derived from the
short pulse duration that is used (50 μs), results in a photomechanical phenomenon
(De Moor et al. 2009). Earlier it was demonstrated that middle-infrared laser energy
when delivered with conical modified fibers influences the configuration of the
shock wave and subsequently improves the photomechanical effect in the root canal
(George and Walsh 2011). Peters et al. studied the efficacy of laser-activated and
ultrasonically activated root canal disinfection with conventional irrigation, specif-
ically its ability to remove in vitro 3-week-old bacterial biofilm formed on root
canal walls. This study showed that the laser-activated disinfection did not
completely remove bacterial biofilms from the apical third of the root canal or
from infected dentinal tubules. However, the fact that laser activation generated
more bacteria-free samples and left less bacteria/biofilm in the apical canal than
ultrasonic activation warrants further investigation (Peters et al. 2011).
Thus it could be concluded that the current evidence is insufficient to recom-
mend laser therapies as an adjunct to chemomechanical disinfection of infected root
canals. This does not imply that lasers should not be used as an adjunct to
conventional chemomechanical preparation, but instead emphasize the need for
future high-quality research in this field before it acts as a “frontline” protocol.
2.4 Ozone
Ozone (O3) is an energized, unstable gaseous form of oxygen, which dissociates

readily back into oxygen (O2), liberating a reactive form of oxygen, called singlet
oxygen (O1). The singlet oxygen is highly reactive and is capable of oxidizing cells.
Ozone has been suggested as a means of destroying microorganisms without
promoting the development of drug resistance (Restaino et al. 1995; Paraskeva
and Graham 2002). Ozone gas (HealOzone, KaVo, Biberach, Germany) is currently
being used clinically for that purpose in endodontic treatment. However, studies
have yielded inconsistent results regarding its efficacy in destroying endodontic
pathogens. This inconsistency has been attributed to the lack of information about
the optimum duration of application and concentration of the ozone to be used
(Nagayoshi et al. 2004; Arita et al. 2005; Hems et al. 2005). An ozone gas with a
concentration of 4 g m3 is currently being used in endodontics for root canal
disinfection. At that concentration it is slightly less cytotoxic than NaOCl (2.5 %)
to periapical tissue and oral mucosa. In vitro studies have shown that aqueous ozone
(up to 20 μg mL-1) is essentially nontoxic to oral cells (Estrela et al. 2007;

Ebensberger et al. 2002; Noguchi et al. 2009).
Hems et al. evaluated the antibacterial potential of ozone against E. faecalis, in
planktonic and biofilm cultures (48-h-old biofilm grown on cellulose nitrate mem-
brane filter). Interaction times that ranged from 30 s to 240 s were used in both
instances. It was concluded that ozone had an antibacterial effect on the planktonic
form of E. faecalis and those suspended in fluid, but little effect when it was present
as a biofilm. Its overall antibacterial efficacy was less than that of sodium hypo-
chlorite, under the test conditions of the study (Hems et al. 2005; Estrela
et al. 2007). Huth et al. assessed the antimicrobial efficacy of aqueous (1.25–
20 μg mL 1) and gaseous ozone (1–53 g m 3) as an antiseptic against endodontic
pathogens in suspension and in a biofilm. E. faecalis, Candida albicans,
Peptostreptococcus micros, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were grown for
3 weeks in planktonic culture and as monospecies biofilm in root canals of extracted
teeth and then exposed to the two forms of ozone. It was concluded that high
concentrations of gaseous and aqueous ozone had a dose-, strain-, and time-
dependent effect in destroying the test microorganisms in suspension and biofilm
form (Huth et al. 2006). In another study, the antimicrobial efficacy of dissolved
ozone was tested against planktonic and biofilm models of Pseudomonas
fluorescens. It was observed that even at low concentrations, ozone (0.1 0.3 ppm)
could completely kill the test bacteria in planktonic form after 15 or 30 min of
contact time. Killing in the biofilm models was less effective and resulted only in a
decrease of approximately two orders of magnitude, when compared to the plank-
tonic model. No significant increase in the antibiofilm action was observed with an
increase in the contact time (Viera et al. 1999). Kuştarci et al. evaluated the
antimicrobial potential of potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser and gaseous
ozone in experimentally infected root canals. They reported that both KTP laser and
gaseous ozone demonstrated significant antibacterial action. The gaseous ozone
proved to be more effective than the KTP laser, but neither was as effective as 2.5 %
NaOCl (Kuştarci et al. 2009). A summary of relevant antimicrobial studies carried
out to using ozone is shown in Table 3.
The reduced effectiveness of ozone against sessile bacteria when compared to
planktonic bacteria appears to be attributable to several different factors (Viera
et al. 1999): (1) The EPS in biofilm structure may form a physical/chemical barrier
that prevents deep penetration of the dissolved ozone into the biofilm (Stoodley
et al. 1994). (2) Biofilm has microbial colonies surrounded by water channels
through which liquid movement is controlled by convective flow (Stoodley
et al. 1994; Rasmussen and Lewandowski 1998). Blockage of these biofilm chan-
nels by oxidation products of ozone can impede the penetration of ozone into the
inner layers of the biofilm (Lawrence et al. 1994). (3) There is the presence of
phenotypically altered microbial communities that possess enhanced resistance to
antimicrobials in the deeper aspects of the biofilm. A recent study has also
suggested that ozone dissolved in oil can be used as root canal medicament during
treatment (Silveira et al. 2007). However, questions on the flow characteristics of
ozonized oil, the chemical stability of ozonized oil, and the nature, if any, of its
346 A. Kishen
Table 3 Summary of relevant antimicrobial studies carried out to using ozone

No Author/date Objective/methodology Authors/conclusion
1 Nagayoshi Effect of ozonated water against Ozonated water application might
et al. (2004) E. faecalis- and S. mutans-infected be useful for root canal irrigation
dentin of bovine incisors
2 Hems To evaluate the potential of ozone as NaOCl was found to be superior to
et al. (2005) an antibacterial agent using ozonated water in killing E. faecalis
E. faecalis. The antibacterial effi- in broth culture and in biofilms
cacy of ozone was tested against
both broth and biofilm cultures.
Ozone was sparged for 30, 60,
120, and 240 s
3 Estrela To determine the antimicrobial effi- The irrigation of infected human
et al. (2007) cacy of ozonated water, gaseous root canals with ozonated water,
ozone, 2.5 % sodium hypochlorite, 2.5 % NaOCl, and 2 % chlorhexi-
and 2 % chlorhexidine in human dine and the application of gaseous
root canals infected by E. faecalis ozone for 20 min was not sufficient
for 60 days to inactivate E. faecalis
4 Kuştarci Evaluated the antimicrobial activity 2.5 % NaOCl was superior in its
et al. (2009) of potassium titanyl phosphate antimicrobial abilities compared
(KTP) laser and gaseous ozone in with KTP laser and gaseous ozone
experimentally infected root canals
(E. faecalis for 24 h)
interaction with root dentin/obturating materials have to be answered before advo-

cating its routine clinical use (Ng 2004; Guinesi et al. 2011). A systematic review
by Azarpazhooh and Limeback highlighted conflicting evidence on the antimicro-
bial efficacy, making the routine use of ozone questionable (Azarpazhooh and
Limeback 2008).
2.5 Herbal and Enzyme Alternatives
Recent trends in antibiofilm research point toward the possible use of natural
extracts from plants in the treatment of biofilm-mediated infection. Polyphenols
are naturally present in a variety of plants (Bravo 1998; Duthie and Crozier 2000).
They are characterized by the presence of more than one phenol units per molecule
(Bravo 1998). These substances are well known for their antimicrobial activity. For
example, anacardic acid found in the liquid extract of cashew nut shell has been
shown to exhibit antimicrobial activities against Streptococcus mutans and Staph-
ylococcus aureus (Kubo et al. 1992, 2003). Other polyphenols have been used for
the preservation of food against microbial contaminants. Many factors such as
bacterial species/strains, type of polyphenol, concentration of polyphenol, micro-
bial cells density, temperature, and synergistic and inhibitive effect when used with
other antimicrobials can influence their antimicrobial potential.
Morinda citrifolia (MCJ) is a herb, which has a broad range of antibacterial,

antiviral, antifungal, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and immune-enhancing effects
(Li et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2002). MCJ contains the antibacterial compounds L-
asperuloside and alizarin. An in vitro study that investigated the antimicrobial
activity of 2 % chlorhexidine gel, propolis, MCJ, 2 % povidone-iodine (POV-I),
and calcium hydroxide on E. faecalis-infected root dentin reported that chlorhex-
idine gluconate produced the best antimicrobial effect (100 %), followed by 2 %
POV-I (87 %), propolis (71 %), MCJ (69 %), and calcium hydroxide (55 %)
(Kandaswamy et al. 2010). Another in vitro study compared the effectiveness of
MCJ with sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate to remove the smear
layer from the canal walls of endodontically instrumented teeth and reported that its
efficacy was comparable to that of NaOCl in conjunction with EDTA (Murray
et al. 2008).
Turmeric (Curcuma longa) has been used extensively as a food preservative in
Southeast Asia and has been used in traditional medicine for the treatment of
numerous diseases. Curcumin (diferuloylmethane), the main bioactive component
of turmeric, has been shown to have a wide spectrum of biological actions,
including antisepsis, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidative (Cowan 1999). A recent
report suggests that curcumin in aqueous form exhibits phototoxic effect against
gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (Rukkumani et al. 2003). Triphala,
another traditional preparation, consists of dried and powdered fruits of three
medicinal plants: Terminalia bellerica, Terminalia chebula, and Emblica officinalis
in equal proportions. Triphala can reportedly kill 100 % of E. faecalis in culture in
6 min. In formulations such as this, different plants can enhance the potency of the
compound, through an additive or synergistic effect (Prabhakar et al. 2010). Green
tea polyphenols are derived from the young shoots of the tea plant Camellia
sinensis. Green tea polyphenols have also shown statistically significant
antibacterial action against E. faecalis biofilm present on tooth substrate (Prabhakar
et al. 2010). Phenol and natural phenolic compounds except ethyl linoleate and
tocopherol have also shown a significant ability to reduce biofilm formation by
P. aeruginosa but not eradicate it, at the concentration level used in the study.
However, the exact mechanism by which it accomplished this was not reported
(Jagani et al. 2009).
The major advantages of using herbal products are that they are readily avail-
able, are cost-effective, have long shelf life, have low toxicity, and do not initiate
microbial resistance. Combination of natural polyphenol with nanoparticles and
photodynamic therapy may open newer vistas in bacteria-specific killing (targeted
bacterial killing) without undue effects on healthy tissues and mammalian cells. At
the moment however, that remains speculative. Table 4 summarizes the major class
of antimicrobial compounds extracted from plants (Cowan 1999).
Enzymes have been suggested for the removal of biofilm components, especially
EPS from inanimate surfaces such as orthopedic implants (Donelli et al. 2007). Two
carbohydrate-containing moieties of staphylococcal biofilms, a linear poly-b-(1–6)-
N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (PNAG) and teichoic acid, have been targeted using
enzymes such as dispersin B and proteinase K (Donelli et al. 2007; Chaignon
348 A. Kishen
Table 4 Summary of the major class of antimicrobial compounds from plants [164]
No Class Example(S) Mechanism
1 Phenolics Catechol Membrane disruption
Hypericin Bind to adhesins, complex with cell wall,
inactivate enzymes
Warfarin Bind to adhesins
Interaction with eukaryotic DNA (antiviral
activity)
2 Terpenoids, Capsaicin Membrane disruption
essential oils
3 Alkaloids Berberine Intercalate into cell wall and/or DNA
Piperine
4 Lectins and Mannose-specific Block viral fusion or adsorption
polypeptides agglutinin
et al. 2007; Sadovskaya et al. 2006). These studies have shown that rinsing the
implant surface with these enzymes can prevent formation of staphylococcal
biofilms. Yet, applying these enzymes in an in vivo environment that is home to
multispecies pathogenic biofilms may pose some challenges due to the specificity
of their action. Further studies are required to evaluate whether these enzymes work
synergistically or additively with other antibiofilm strategies. In addition, the effect
of these enzymes on a biological substrate and their mechanism of action have to be
better understood before implementing such treatment strategies clinically.
Current understanding emphasizes that endodontic disease is a biofilm-mediated

infection and that elimination of bacterial biofilm from the root canal system and
the exterior root surface may be necessary to maximize the prospects for a favorable
treatment outcome in the management of this disease. Unfortunately, the root canal
environment is a challenging locale to accomplish this goal. It has been for this
reason that different protocols ranging from antimicrobial root canal irrigation to
advanced methods that incorporate lasers, photoactivated disinfection, and
nanoparticles have been tried. While several of the advanced antimicrobial pro-
tocols have shown a significant inhibitory effect against several types of microbial
biofilms under in vitro conditions, more in vivo studies are required to evaluate
whether they are clinically practical and effective. These studies will also have to
verify their safety and their biocompatibility with dental and dentally related tissue.
The most promising direction of this research appears to be the development of
strategies aimed at the disruption of biofilm and prevention of biofilm formation. In
bringing this new technology to the marketplace, it is important to combine potent
antibiofilm strategies with an effective and easy-to-use delivery system, if it is to
enjoy broad acceptance. Those engaged in research in this field feel confident that
the coming years will herald a new and effective approach to treat biofilms in
endodontics.
References
Al Cunningham, RR, Stewart P, Camper A, Stoodley P, Lennox J, Anderson V (2011) Center for
Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Biofilms: hypertext book. http://www.
hypertextbookshop.com/biofilmbook/v004/r003/2011
An YH, Friedman RJ (1998) Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterial
surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 43:338–348
An YH, Stuart GW, McDowell SJ, McDaniel SE, Kang Q, Friedman RJ (1996) Prevention of
bacterial adherence to implant surfaces with a crosslinked albumin coating in vitro. J Orthop
Res 14:846–849
Anderl JN, Franklin MJ, Stewart PS (2000) Role of antibiotic penetration limitation in Klebsiella
pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
44:1818–1824
Arita M, Nagayoshi M, Fukuizumi T, Okinaga T, Masumi S, Morikawa M, Kakinoki Y, Nishihara
T (2005) Microbicidal efficacy of ozonated water against Candida albicans adhering to acrylic
denture plates. Oral Microbiol Immunol 20:206–210
Armon E, Laufer G (1995) Analysis to determine the beam parameters which yield the most
extensive cut with the least secondary damage. J Biomech Eng 107:286–290
Azarpazhooh A, Limeback H (2008) The application of ozone in dentistry: a systematic review of
literature. J Dent 36:104–116
Basrani BR, Manek S, Sodhi RN, Fillery E, Manzur A (2007) Interaction between sodium
hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate. J Endod 33:966–969
Baumgartner JC, Siqueira JF, Sedgley CM, Anil K (2008) Microbiology of endodontic disease. In:
Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC (eds) Ingle’s endodontics, 6th edn. BC Decker, Ontario,
pp 221–222
Beard SJ, Hughes MN, Poole RK (1995) Inhibition of the cytochrome bd-terminated NADH
oxidase system in Escherichia coli K-12 by divalent metal cations. FEMS Microbiol Lett
131:205–210
Bergmans L, Moisiadis P, Teughels W, Van Meerbeek B, Quirynen M, Lambrechts P (2006)
Bactericidal effect of Nd:YAG laser irradiation on some endodontic pathogens ex vivo. Int
Endod J 39:547–557
Bertoloni G, Lauro FM, Cortella G, Merchat M (2000) Photosensitizing activity of hematopor-
phyrin on Staphylococcus aureus cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1475:169–174
Blanken J, De Moor RJ, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R (2009) Laser induced explosive vapor and
cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 1: a visualization study. Lasers
Surg Med 41:514–519
Bonsor SJ, Nichol R, Reid TM, Pearson GJ (2006a) Microbiological evaluation of photo-activated
disinfection in endodontics (an in vivo study). Br Dent J 25:337–341
Bonsor SJ, Nichol R, Reid TM, Pearson GJ (2006b) An alternative regimen for root canal
disinfection. Br Dent J 201:101–105
Bravo L (1998) Polyphenols: chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism, and nutritional significance.
Nutr Rev 56:317–333
Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC (1997) Physico-chemical interactions in initial microbial adhesion
and relevance for biofilm formation. Adv Dent Res 11:24–32
Busscher HJ, Bos R, van der Mei HC (1995) Initial microbial adhesion is a determinant for the
strength of biofilm adhesion. FEMS Microbiol Lett 128:229–234
350 A. Kishen
Chaignon P, Sadovskaya I, Ragunah C, Ramasubbu N, Kaplan JB, Jabbouri S (2007) Suscepti-

bility of staphylococcal biofilms to enzymatic treatments depends on their chemical composi-
tion. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 75:125–132
Cioffi N, Ditaranto N, Torsi L, Picca RA, Sabbatini L, Valentini A, Novello L, Tantillo G, Bleve-
Zacheo T, Zambonin PG (2005) Analytical characterization of bioactive fluoropolymer ultra-
thin coatings modified by copper nanoparticles. Anal Bioanal Chem 381:607–616
Costerton JW (1999) Introduction to biofilm. Int J Antimicrob Agents 11:217–221
Costerton JWLZ, DeBeer D, Caldwell D, Korber D, James G (1994) Biofilms, the customized
microniche. J Bacteriol 176:2137–2142
Cowan MM (1999) Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 12:564–582
Dai T, Huang YY, Hamblin MR (2009) Photodynamic therapy for localized infections–state of the
art. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 6:170–188
De Moor RJ, Blanken J, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R (2009) Laser induced explosive vapor and
cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 2: evaluation of the efficacy.
Lasers Surg Med 41:520–523
del Pozo JL, Patel R (2007) The challenge of treating biofilm-associated bacterial infections. Clin
Pharmacol Ther 82:204–209
Denyer SP, Maillard JY (2002) Cellular impermeability and uptake of biocides and antibiotics in
Gram-negative bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 92:35S–45S
Donelli G, Francolini I, Romoli D, Guaglianone E, Piozzi A, Ragunath C, Kaplan JB (2007)
Synergistic activity of dispersin B and cefamandole nafate in inhibition of staphylococcal
biofilm growth on polyurethanes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:2733–2740
Dostálová T, Jelı́nková H, Housová D, Sulc J, Nemeć M, Dusková J, Miyagi M, Krátky M (2002)
Endodontic treatment with application of Er:YAG laser waveguide radiation disinfection.
J Clin Laser Med Surg 20:135–139
Dunne WM Jr, Mason EO Jr, Kaplan SL (1993) Diffusion of rifampin and vancomycin through a
Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37:2522–2526
Duthie G, Crozier A (2000) Plant-derived phenolic antioxidants. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care
3:447–451
Ebensberger U, Pohl Y, Filippi A (2002) PCNA-expression of cementoblasts and fibroblasts on the
root surface after extraoral rinsing for decontamination. Dent Traumatol 18:262–266
Estrela C, Estrela CR, Decurcio DA, Hollanda AC, Silva JA (2007) Antimicrobial efficacy of
ozonated water, gaseous ozone, sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in infected human root
canals. Int Endod J 40(2):85–93
Feng QL, Wu J, Chen GQ, Cui FZ, Kim TN, Kim JO (2000) A mechanistic study of the
antibacterial effect of silver ions on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J Biomed
Mater Res 52:662–668
Fried D, Glena RE, Featherstone JD, Seka W (1995) Nature of light scattering in dental enamel
and dentin at visible and near-infrared wavelengths. Appl Opt 34:1278–1285
Friedman S (2002) Prognosis of initial endodontic therapy. Endod Top 2:59–88
Garcez AS, Nu~nez SC, Hamblin MR, Ribeiro MS (2008) Antimicrobial effects of photodynamic
therapy on patients with necrotic pulps and periapical lesion. J Endod 34:138–142
Garcez AS, Nu~nez SC, Hamblim MR, Suzuki H, Ribeiro MS (2010) Photodynamic therapy
associated with conventional endodontic treatment in patients with antibiotic-resistant micro-
flora: a preliminary report. J Endod 36(9):1463–1466
George S, Kishen A (2007a) Advanced noninvasive light-activated disinfection: assessment of
cytotoxicity on fibroblast versus antimicrobial activity against Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod
33:599–602
George S, Kishen A (2007b) Photophysical, photochemical, and photobiological characterization
of methylene blue formulations for light-activated root canal disinfection. J Biomed Opt
12:034029
George S, Kishen A (2008a) Influence of photosensitizer solvent on the mechanisms of
photoactivated killing of Enterococcus faecalis. Photochem Photobiol 84:734–740
George S, Kishen A (2008b) Augmenting the anti-biofilm efficacy of Advanced Noninvasive

Light Activated Disinfection with emulsified oxidizer and oxygen carrier. J Endod
34:1119–1123
George R, Walsh LJ (2011) Performance assessment of novel side firing safe tips for endodontic
applications. J Biomed Opt 16:048004
Gilbert P, Allison DG, McBain AJ (2002) Biofilms in vitro and in vivo: do singular mechanisms
imply cross-resistance? J Appl Microbiol 92:98S–110S
Goodis HE, Pashley D, Stabholz A (2002) Pulpal effects of thermal and mechanical irritant. In:
Hargreaves KM, Goodis HE (eds) Seltzer and Benderı́s dental pulp. Quintessence, Hanover
Park, IL, pp 371–410
Gubler M, Brunner TJ, Zehnder M, Waltimo T, Sener B, Stark WJ (2008) Do bioactive glasses
convey a disinfecting mechanism beyond a mere increase in pH? Int Endod J 41:670–678
Guinesi AS, Andolfatto C, Bonetti Filho I, Cardoso AA, Passaretti Filho J, Farac RV (2011)
Ozonized oils: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. Braz Dent J 22:37–40
Gurbuz T, Ozdemir Y, Kara N, Zehir C, Kurudirek M (2008) Evaluation of root canal dentin after
Nd:YAG laser irradiation and treatment with five different irrigation solutions: a preliminary
study. J Endod 34:318–321
Habelitz S, Balooch M, Marshall SJ, Balooch G, Marshall GW Jr (2002) In situ atomic force
microscopy of partially demineralized human dentin collagen fibrils. J Struct Biol
138:227–236
Hamblin MR, O’Donnell DA, Murthy N, Rajagopalan K, Michaud N, Sherwood ME, Hasan T
(2002) Polycationic photosensitizer conjugates: effects of chain length and Gram classification
on the photodynamic inactivation of bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 49:941–951
Hems RS, Gulabivala K, Ng YL, Ready D, Spratt DA (2005) An in vitro evaluation of the ability
of ozone to kill a strain of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J 38:22–29
Huth KC, Jakob FM, Saugel B, Cappello C, Paschos E, Hollweck R, Hickel R, Brand K (2006)
Effect of ozone on oral cells compared with established antimicrobials. Eur J Oral Sci
114:435–440
Jagani S, Chelikani R, Kim DS (2009) Effects of phenol and natural phenolic compounds on
biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biofouling 25:321–324
Jefferson KK (2004) What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm? FEMS Microbiol Lett
236:163–173
Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N, Gogulnath D, Kindo AJ (2010) Dentinal tubule disinfection
with 2 % chlorhexidine gel, propolis, morinda citrifolia juice, 2 % povidone iodine, and
calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J 43:419–423
Kim JS, Kuk E, Yu KN, Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee HJ, Kim SH, Park YK, Park YH, Hwang CY, Kim
YK, Lee YS, Jeong DH, Cho MH (2007) Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles.
Nanomedicine 3:95–101
Kimura Y, Tanabe M, Imai H, Amano Y, Masuda Y, Yamada Y (2011) Histological examination
of experimentally infected root canals after preparation by Er:YAG laser irradiation. Lasers
Med Sci 26:749–754
Kishen A (2010) Advanced therapeutic options for endodontic biofilms. Endod Top 22(1):99–123
Kishen A, Shi Z, Neoh KG (2008a) Antibacterial nanoparticulates to prevent post-treatment
endodontic infection. J Endod 34:15–20
Kishen A, Sum CP, Mathew S, Lim CT (2008b) Influence of irrigation regimens on the adherence
of Enterococcus faecalis to root canal dentin. J Endod 34:850–854
Kishen A, Shi Z, Shrestha A, Neoh KG (2008c) An investigation on the antibacterial and
antibiofilm efficacy of cationic nanoparticulates for root canal disinfection. J Endod
34:1515–1520
Kishen A, Upadya M, Tegos GP, Hamblin MR (2010) Efflux pump inhibitor potentiates antimi-
crobial photodynamic inactivation of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Photochem Photobiol
86:1343–1349
352 A. Kishen
Klepac-Ceraj V, Patel N, Song X, Holewa C, Patel C, Kent R, Amiji MM, Soukos NS (2011)
Photodynamic effects of methylene blue-loaded polymeric nanoparticles on dental plaque
bacteria. Lasers Surg Med 43:600–606
Koba K, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K, Gomyoh H, Komi S, Harada S, Tsuzuki N, Shimada Y (1999)
A clinical study on the effects of pulsed Nd:YAG laser irradiation at root canals immediately
after pulpectomy and shaping. J Clin Laser Med Surg 17:53–56
K€omerik N, Wilson M, Poole S (2000) The effect of photodynamic action on two virulence factors
of gram-negative bacteria. Photochem Photobiol 72:676–680
Kubo I, Muroi H, Himejima M (1992) Antibacterial activity of totarol and its potentiation. J Nat
Prod 55:1436–1440
Kubo I, Nihei K, Tsujimoto K (2003) Antibacterial action of anacardic acids against methicillin
resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Agric Food Chem 51:7624–7628
Kuştarci A, Sümer Z, Altunbaş D, Koşum S (2009) Bactericidal effect of KTP laser irradiation
against Enterococcus faecalis compared with gaseous ozone: an ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107:e73–e79
Kvist M, Hancock V, Klemm P (2008) Inactivation of efflux pumps abolishes bacterial biofilm
formation. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:7376–7382
Lawrence JR, Wolfaardt GM, Korber DR (1994) Determination of diffusion coefficients in
biofilms by confocal laser microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:1166–1173
Leonardo MR, Guillén-Carı́as MG, Pécora JD, Ito IY, Silva LA (2005) Er:YAG laser: antimicro-
bial effects in the root canals of dogs’ teeth with pulp necrosis and chronic periapical lesions.
Photomed Laser Surg 23:295–299
Lewis K (2005) Persister cells and the riddle of biofilm survival. Biochem Mosc 70:267–274
Li RW, Myers SP, Leach DN, Lin GD, Leach G (2003) A cross-cultural study: anti-inflammatory
activity of Australian and Chinese plants. J Ethnopharmacol 85(1):25–32
Marchesan MA, Brugnera-Junior A, Souza-Gabriel AE, Correa-Silva SR, Sousa-Neto MD (2008)
Ultrastructural analysis of root canal dentine irradiated with 980-nm diode laser energy at
different parameters. Photomed Laser Surg 26:235–240
Marshall GW Jr, Balooch M, Kinney JH, Marshall SJ (1995) Atomic force microscopy of
conditioning agents on dentin. J Biomed Mater Res 29:1381–1387
Meire MA, De Prijck K, Coenye T, Nelis HJ, De Moor RJ (2009) Effectiveness of different laser
systems to kill Enterococcus faecalis in aqueous suspension and in an infected tooth model. Int
Endod J 42:351–359
Menezes S, Capella MA, Caldas LR (1990) Photodynamic action of methylene blue: repair and
mutation in Escherichia coli. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 5:505–517
Merchat M, Bertolini G, Giacomini P, Villanueva A, Jori G (1996) Meso-substituted cationic
porphyrins as efficient photosensitizers of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.
J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 32:153–157
Minnock A, Vernon DI, Schofield J, Griffiths J, Parish JH, Brown ST (1996) Photoinactivation of
bacteria. Use of a cationic water-soluble zinc phthalocyanine to photoinactivate both gram-
negative and gram-positive bacteria. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 32:159–164
Miserendino L, Robert PM (1995) Lasers in Dentistry. Quintessence, Hanover Park, IL
Moan J, Berg K (1991) The photodegradation of porphyrins in cells can be used to estimate the
lifetime of singlet oxygen. Photochem Photobiol 53:549–553
Mohn D, Bruhin C, Luechinger NA, Stark WJ, Imfeld T, Zehnder M (2010) Composites made of
flame-sprayed bioactive glass 45S5 and polymers: bioactivity and immediate sealing proper-
ties. Int Endod J 43:1037–1046
Moriyama EH, Zângaro RA, Villaverde AB, Lobo PD, Munin E, Watanabe IS, Júnior DR,
Pacheco MT (2004) Dentin evaluation after Nd:YAG laser irradiation using short and long
pulses. J Clin Laser Med Surg 22:43–50
Moshonov J, Orstavik D, Yamauchi S, Pettiette M, Trope M (1995) Nd:YAG laser irradiation in
root canal disinfection. Endod Dent Traumatol 11:220–224
Murray PE, Farber RM, Namerow KM, Kuttler S, Godoy FG (2008) Evaluation of Morinda
citrifolia as an endodontic irrigant. J Endod 34:66–70
Nagayoshi M, Kitamura C, Fukuizumi T, Nishihara T, Terashita M (2004) Antimicrobial effect of
ozonated water on bacteria invading dentinal tubules. J Endod 30:778–781
J Endod 13:29–39
Nair PNR (2006) On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. Int Endod J
39:249–281
Nair PNR, Sj€ogren U, Krey G, Kahnberg K-E, Sundqvist G (1990) Intraradicular bacteria and
fungi in root-filled, asymptomatic human teeth with therapy-resistant periapical lesions: a long-
term light and electron microscopic follow-up study. J Endod 16:580–588
Ng RPY (2004) Sterilization in root canal treatment: current advances. Hong Kong Dent J 1:52–57
Nichols WW, Evans MJ, Slack MPE, Walmsley HL (1989) The penetration of antibiotics into
aggregates of mucoid and non-mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Gen Microbiol
135:1291–1303
Noguchi F, Kitamura C, Nagayoshi M, Chen KK, Terashita M, Nishihara T (2009) Ozonated water
improves lipopolysaccharide-induced responses of an odontoblast-like cell line. J Endod
35:668–672
Noiri Y, Katsumoto T, Azakami H, Ebisu S (2008) Effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation on biofilm-
forming bacteria associated with endodontic pathogens in vitro. J Endod 34:826–829
Pagonis TC, Chen J, Fontana CR, Devalapally H, Ruggiero K, Song X, Foschi F, Dunham J,
Skobe Z, Yamazaki H, Kent R, Tanner AC, Amiji MM, Soukos NS (2010) Nanoparticle-based
endodontic antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. J Endod 36:322–328
Paraskeva P, Graham NJ (2002) Ozonation of municipal wastewater effluents. Water Environ Res
74:569–581
Peters OA, Bardsley S, Fong J, Pandher G, Divito E (2011) Disinfection of root canals with
photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming. J Endod 37:1008–1012
Polo L, Segalla A, Bertoloni G, Jori G, Schaffner K, Reddi E (2000) Polylysine-porphycene
conjugates as efficient photosensitizers for the inactivation of microbial pathogens.
J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 59:152–158
Prabhakar J, Senthilkumar M, Priya MS, Mahalakshmi K, Sehgal PK, Sukumaran VG (2010)
Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of herbal alternatives (Triphala and green tea polyphe-
nols), MTAD, and 5 % sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formed on
tooth substrate: an in vitro study. J Endod 36:83–86
Prasad PN (2003) Introduction to biophotonics. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Prince AS (2002) Biofilms, antimicrobial resistance, and airway infection. N Engl J Med
347:1110–1111
Rabea EI, Badawy ME, Stevens CV, Smagghe G, Steurbaut W (2003) Chitosan as antimicrobial
agent: applications and mode of action. Biomacromolecules 4:1457–1465
Rasmussen K, Lewandowski Z (1998) Microelectrode measurements of local mass transport rates
in heterogeneous biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng 59:302–309
Reddy KM, Feris K, Bell J, Wingett DG, Hanley C, Punnoose A (2007) Selective toxicity of zinc
oxide nanoparticles to prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems. Appl Phys Lett
24:2139021–2139023
Restaino L, Frampton EW, Hemphill JB, Palnikar P (1995) Efficacy of ozonated water against
various food-related microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3471–3475
Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr (2010) Biofilms and apical periodontitis: study of prevalence and
Rooney J, Midda M, Leeming J (1994) A laboratory investigation of the bactericidal effect of a
Nd:YAG laser. Br Dent J 17:61–64
354 A. Kishen
Rosan B, Correeia FF, DiRienzo JM (1999) Corncobs: a model for oral microbial biofilms. In:
Busscher HJ, Evans LV (eds) Oral biofilms and plaque control: concepts in dental plaque
formation, Harwood Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 145–162
Rukkumani R, Sri Balasubashini M, Menon VP (2003) Protective effects of curcumin and photo-
irradiated curcumin on circulatory lipids and lipid peroxidation products in alcohol and
polyunsaturated fatty acid-induced toxicity. Phytother Res 17:925–929
Ryan BM, Dougherty TJ, Beaulieu D, Chuang J, Dougherty BA, Barrett JF (2001) Efflux in
bacteria: what do we really know about it? Expert Opin Investig Drugs 10:1409–1422
Sadovskaya I, Chaignon P, Kogan G, Chokr A, Vinogradov E, Jabbouri S (2006) Carbohydrate-
containing components of biofilms produced in vitro by some staphylococcal strains related to
orthopaedic prosthesis infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 47:75–82
Sawai J (2003) Quantitative evaluation of antibacterial activities of metallic oxide powders (ZnO,
MgO and CaO) by conductimetric assay. J Microbiol Methods 54:177–182
Sawai J, Shoji S, Igarashi H, Hashimoto A, Kokugan T, Shimizu M, Kojima H (1998) Hydrogen
peroxide as an antibacterial factor in zinc oxide powder slurry. J Ferment Bioengin 86:521–522
Schoop U, Kluger W, Moritz A, Nedjelik N, Georgopoulos A, Sperr W (2004) Bactericidal effect
of different laser systems in the deep layers of dentin. Lasers Surg Med 35:111–116
Shen HR, Spikes JD, Kopecekova P, Kopecek J (1996) Photodynamic crosslinking of proteins
I. Model studies using histidine- and lysine-containing N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide
co-polymers. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 34:203–210
Shrestha A, Kishen A (2011) Polycationic chitosan conjugated photosensitizer for antibacterial
photodynamic therapy. Photochem Photobiol. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.01026.x
Shrestha A, Shi Z, Neoh KG, Kishen A (2010) Nanoparticulates for antibiofilm treatment and
effect of aging on its antibacterial activity. J Endod 36:1030–1035
Silveira AM, Lopes HP, Siqueira JF Jr, Macedo SB, Consolaro A (2007) Periradicular repair after
two-visit endodontic treatment using two different intracanal medications compared to single-
visit endodontic treatment. Braz Dent J 18:299–304
Soncin M, Fabris C, Busetti A, Dei D, Nistri D, Roncucci G, Jori G (2002) Approaches to
selectivity in the Zn(II)–phthalocyanine photosensitized inactivation of wild-type and
antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Photochem Photobiol Sci 1:815–819
Soukos NS, Wilson M, Burns T, Speight PM (1996) Photodynamic effects of toluidine blue on
human oral keratinocytes and fibroblasts and Streptococcus sanguis evaluated in vitro. Lasers
Surg Med 18:253–259
Soukos NS, Hamblin MR, Hasan T (1997) The effect of charge on cellular uptake and phototox-
icity of polylysine chlorin e6 conjugates. Photochem Photobiol 65:723–729
Soukos NS, Chen PS, Morris JT, Ruggiero K, Abernethy AD, Som S, Foschi F, Doucette S,
Bammann LL, Fontana CR, Doukas AG, Stashenko PP (2006) Photodynamic therapy for
endodontic disinfection. J Endod 32:979–984
Stabholz A, Zeltser R, Sela M, Peretz B, Moshonov J, Ziskind D, Stabholz A (2003) The use of
lasers in dentistry: principles of operation and clinical applications. Compend Contin Educ
Dent 24:935–948
Stohs SJ, Bagchi D (1995) Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions. Free Radic Biol
Med 18:321–336
Stoodley P, Debeer D, Lewandowski Z (1994) Liquid flow in biofilm systems. Appl Environ
Stoor P, S€oderling E, Salonen JI (1998) Antibacterial effects of a bioactive glass paste on oral
microorganisms. Acta Odontol Scand 56:161–165
Sundqvist G, Figdor D (2003) Life as an endodontic pathogen: ecological differences between the
untreated and root-filled root canals. Endod Topics 6:3–28
Tegos G, Hamblin MR (2006) Phenothiazinium antimicrobial photosensitizers are substrates of
bacterial multidrug resistance pumps. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:196–203
Tegos GP, Masago K, Aziz F, Higginbotham A, Stermitz FR, Hamblin MR (2008) Inhibitors of
bacterial multidrug efflux pumps potentiate antimicrobial photoinactivation. Antimicrob
Agents Chemother 52:3202–3209
van Leeuwen TG, Jansen ED, Motamedi M, Borst C, Welch AJ (1995) Pulsed laser ablation of soft
tissue. In: Welch AJ, van Gemert MJC (eds) Optical-thermal response of laser-irradiated tissue.
Plenum, New York
Viera MR, Guiamet PS, de Mele MFL, Videla HA (1999) Use of dissolved ozone for controlling
planktonic and sessile bacteria in industrial cooling systems. Int Biodeter Biodegrad
44:201–207
Vrany JD, Stewart PS, Suci PA (1997) Comparison of recalcitrance to ciprofloxacin and
levofloxacin exhibited by Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms displaying rapid-transport char-
acteristics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:1352–1358
Wainwright M, Crossley KB (2002) Methylene blue–a therapeutic dye for all seasons?
J Chemother 14:431–443
Wainwright M, Giddens RM (2003) Phenothiazinium photosensitisers: choices in synthesis and
application. Dyes Pigm 57:245–257
Wakayama Y, Takagi M, Yano K (1980) Photosensitized inactivation of E. coli cells in toluidine
blue-light system. Photochem Photobiol 32:601–605
Waltimo T, Brunner TJ, Vollenweider M, Stark WJ, Zehnder M (2007) Antimicrobial effect of
nanometric bioactive glass 45S5. J Dent Res 86:754–757
Waltimo T, Mohn D, Paqué F, Brunner TJ, Stark WJ, Imfeld T, Schätzle M, Zehnder M (2009)
Fine-tuning of bioactive glass for root canal disinfection. J Dent Res 88:235–238
Wang MY, West BJ, Jensen CJ, Nowicki D, Su C, Palu AK et al (2002) Morinda citrifolia (Noni):
a literature review and recent advances in Noni research. Acta Pharmacol Sin 23:1127–1141
Wang QQ, Zhang CF, Yin XZ (2007) Evaluation of the bactericidal effect of Er, Cr:YSGG, and
Nd:YAG lasers in experimentally infected root canals. J Endod 33:830–832
Yamamoto O (2001) Influence of particle size on the antibacterial activity of zinc oxide. Int J Inorg
Mater 3:643–646
Yamazaki R, Goya C, Yu DG, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K (2001) Effects of erbium, chromium:
YSGG laser irradiation on root canal walls: a scanning electron microscopic and thermo-
graphic study. J Endod 27:9–12
Yavari HR, Rahimi S, Shahi S, Lotfi M, Barhaghi MH, Fatemi A, Abdolrahimi M (2010) Effect of
Er, Cr: YSGG laser irradiation on Enterococcus faecalis in infected root canals. Photomed
Laser Surg 28:S91–S96
Yoon KY, Hoon Byeon J, Park JH, Hwang J (2007) Susceptibility constants of Escherichia coli
and Bacillus subtilis to silver and copper nanoparticles. Sci Total Environ 15:572–575
Zehnder M, S€oderling E, Salonen J, Waltimo T (2004) Preliminary evaluation of bioactive glass
S53P4 as an endodontic medication in vitro. J Endod 30:220–224
Zehnder M, Luder HU, Schätzle M, Kerosuo E, Waltimo T (2006) A comparative study on the
disinfection potentials of bioactive glass S53P4 and calcium hydroxide in contra-lateral human
premolars ex vivo. Int Endod J 39:952–958
Zhang L, Mah TF (2008) Involvement of a novel efflux system in biofilm-specific resistance to
antibiotics. J Bacteriol 190:4447–4452
Index
A phenothiazinium chromophore, 334

Actinomyces, 9 photo-oxidative effect, 334
A. gerencseriae, 30, 246 poly-L-lysine, 334–335
A. israelii, 246 potential of, 338
A. naeslundii singlet oxygen, 333, 334
binding to cellular components, 34 spectroscopic singlet, 333
biofilm development, 41–42 tissue-specific factors, 336–337
co-aggregation, 38 tissue toxicity, 334
FISH technique, 17, 18 toluidine blue O, 334
A. radicidentis, 246 triplet state, 333
serotype II, and caries development, 31 wavelength absorption property, 333
Adhesins Antimicrobial resistance
role in biofilm formation, 39–40 biofilm phenotype, phase variation, and
role in streptococcal binding, 34 genetic variation, 69–70
Adhesion, 37–39 efflux pumps, 67–68
regulation of, 39–41 EPS matrix, 25–26
salivary pellicle, 33–34 eDNA, 60–61
Adsorbant surface, formation of, 25–26 exopolysaccharides, 59
Affinity matrix, 25 extracellular proteins, 59–60
Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, 39 heterogeneity and oxygen gradients, 66
AI-2. See Autoinducer-2 (AI-2) horizontal gene transfer, 63–65
Alkaline stress, tolerance of microorganisms intracellular communication and quorum
to, 9 sensing, 61–63
α5β1 integrins, streptococcal, 34 in mixed species biofilms, 70–71
Ampicillin, 67 penetration ability, 67
Amylase, streptococcal binding to, 33 persister cells, 68–69
Antibiotics, 25 in root canal microflora, 71–76
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (APDT) stress responses, 65–66
destroy mammalian cells, 334 tolerance of biofilm communities, 8–11
E. faecalis, 334 APDT. See Antimicrobial photodynamic
efflux pump, 337–338 therapy (APDT)
in vitro studies, 336, 339–340 Apical foramen, 95
light sources, 335 Apical pathosis, 97
methylene blue, 336 Apical periodontitis, 96, 103–104, 106
nanoparticles, 335, 336 classification, 115–117

Biofilms 9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47415-0
358 Index
Apical periodontitis (cont.) clinical observations

histobacteriological analysis, 107–115 apical healing, 313
and root canal system, 87 CBCT, 313
Apical plaque, 95 clinical outcome, 313
Apical vapor lock, 272 convincing and unequivocal support,
Atomic force microscopy (AFM), 148–149 313–314
Autoinducer-2 (AI-2), 41–42, 63 culture-negative samples, 310, 311
periapical healing, 313
radiographical signs, 310
B randomized controlled study, 312
Bacillus controlled clinical trials, 316
B. subtilis, extracellular proteins in, 660 dentin, 314–316
B. thuringiensis, 68 historical perspective, 305–308
Bacterial biofilm microbial host interaction, 319
antimicrobial resistance, 327, 328 microscopic examination, 319–320
chemical components, 328 necrotic infected pulps, 318
endodontic biofilm management necrotize pulp tissue remnants, 304
antibiofilm strategies, 329, 330 non-suppurating apical lesions, 318
antimicrobial strategies, 330 non-vital pulps, 317
APDT (see Antimicrobial paste-like form, 319
photodynamic therapy (APDT)) periapical disease, 319
disease, 329 pulpectomy, 317
enzymes, 347–348 root filling, 318
laser-assisted (see Laser-assisted root scientific evidence, 304
canal disinfection) Actinomyces israelii, 309
nanoparticles, 330–333 anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria, 309
ozone, 344–346 Enterococcus faecalis, 308–310
from plants, 346–348 Gram-positive microorganisms, 310
meticulous chemomechanical LPS, 309–310
preparation, 329 LTA, 309
nutrient and gas gradients, 328 treatment, 318
obturation, 329 visual endorsement, 320
persister cells, 328 wet root canal, 318
schematic diagram, 328 Candida albicans, 24, 26, 27, 71
Bacterial endotoxin, 309 Carbohydrates
Bacteriocins, 42–43 and facultative anaerobic bacteria, 7
Barrier effect, 130 and microbial homeostasis, 29
Beta-lactams, 66, 71, 76 Caries development, 30–31, 36, 93
bfrC gene, 40 Cavitation bubbles, 279
bfrG gene, 40 Cellular components, binding of biofilms to,
Bifidobacterium spp., and caries 34–35
development, 30 Challisin, 41
Biofilm-associated infectionssss. See Checkerboard DNA–DNA hybridization, 118
Intraradicular microbiota Chemical effect of irrigants
Biofilms, 23–24 chlorhexidine
biofilm, 286–287
definition, 282–283
C dentin, 288
Calcium hydroxide pulp tissue, 289
advantage, 317 EDTA
apical periodontitis, 316, 317 biofilm, 286
Brown and Brenn stain, 320 definition, 282
Index 359
dentin, 287–288 Dens evaginatus, 164–165

pulp tissue, 289 Dens invaginatus, 164
NaOCl Dental anomalies
biofilm, 284–285 accessory canal, 172
dentin, 287, 288 apical canal, 173–175
hypochlorite ion, 282 C-shaped configuration
hypochlorous acid, 282 Hertwig’s epithelial sheath, 166
pulp tissue, 288–289 mandibular first premolars, 166, 168
uses, 281 mandibular molar canals, 166–167
physical properties, 283–284 mandibular second molars, 166–168
second Damk€ohler number, 280 Melton’s method, 167
Zehnder, 280 micro-CT models, 166
Chlorhexidine (CHX), 25 preoperative diagnosis, 169
biofilm, 286–287 pulp floor and orifice, 168
definition, 282–283 Vertucci’s type V configuration, 168
dentin, 288 dens evaginatus, 164–165
pulp tissue, 289 dens invaginatus, 164
Ciprofloxacin, 68–69 developmental stages, 162
CLSM. See Confocal laser scanning isthmuses
microscopy (CLSM) configurations, 170
Coadhesion, 129 dentin debris, 172
Co-aggregation, 37–39, 130 lateral interconnection/transverse
Colonization resistance, 24 anastomosis, 169
Colony-forming units (CFU), 139–140 mandibular and maxillary molars,
comAB gene, 44 170, 171
comCDE gene, 44 morphology and prevalence, 170
Communication. See Intercellular posterior teeth, 170
communication lateral canals, 172–173
Community-as-pathogen concept, 104–106 radix entomolaris, 165
Comparative genomics, 7 taurodontism, 163
Competence-stimulating peptide (CSP), 43–44 Dentinal tubules, 175–177
Competence system, 43–45 in endodontic infections, 107, 112
Computed tomographic (CT) imaging, 157–158 SEM of microorganisms/biofilm
comR gene, 44 in, 92, 94
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) Development of biofilms
C-shaped canals, 169 attachment to tooth surfaces, 33–34
periapical bone loss, 313 binding to cellular components, 34–35
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), ecological aspects
15–16, 69, 142, 143, 145–146 communication and consequences,
Conjugated gene transfer, 63–64 41–42
Conventional biofilm models, 131 competence and genetic exchange,
Cryogenic pulverization, 117 43–45
CSP. See Competence-stimulating peptide interspecies antagonism, 42–43
(CSP) EPS production, 35–36
Culture-dependent/independent methods of regulation of, 39–41
mircobial composition, 30 DGCs. See Diguanylate cyclases (DGCs)
Cytoplasmic housekeeping enzymes, response Diaphanization, 156
to environmental stress, 9 Diffusion barrier, formation of, 25–26
Diguanylate cyclases (DGCs), 40
Dns evaginatus, 164–165
D Dormancy, 12–14, 66
Dead-water/stagnation zone, 272 Dual-species biofilms, antimicrobial
Demineralizing method, 156 resistance in, 71
360 Index
E structure and development, 131, 139

Ecological disturbance of bacteria, 7–12 laser-assisted (see Laser-assisted root canal
Ecological plaque theory, 29 disinfection)
Ecosystems microarray analysis, 147
analysis methods, 15–18 microbial biomass, 146–147
confocal scanning laser microscopy, microscopic techniques
15–16 AFM, 148–149
fluorescence in situ hybridization, atomic force microscopy images, 142,
17–18 144
fluorescent probes, 16–17 CLSM, 142, 143, 145–146
scanning electron microscopy, 15 epifluorescence microscope, 144
eDNA. See Extracellular DNA (eDNA) ESEM, 143
EDTA. See Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid fluorescence, 142
(EDTA) FTIR spectroscopy, 149
Efflux pumps, 67–68 light microscopic image, 141
Electron microscopy. See Scanning electron NMR spectroscopy, 149
microscopy (SEM) scanning electron microscopy, 132, 133,
EndoActivator® system, 206 142, 144
EndoActivator/Vibringe, 269 transmission electron microscopy, 142
Endodontic biofilm models nanoparticles, 330–333
antibiofilm strategies, 329, 330 ozone, 344–346
antimicrobial resistance, 128 PCR, 148
antimicrobial strategies, 330 physical parameters, 146
APDT (see Antimicrobial photodynamic from plants, 346–348
therapy (APDT)) ultrastructure, 128–131
bacterial adherence, 128–129, 131 Endodontic infections, 104
bacteria-substrate interaction, 129 bacterial species/phylotypes commonly
CFU, 139–140 detected in, 119–120
chemostats, 133 biofilm communities
colorimetric techniques, 140, 141 histobacteriological analysis of, 107
conditioning layer, 128 interindividual/intraindividual
constant-depth reactors, 133 variability, 120
disease, 329 molecular analysis of, 117–120
ELISA, 147 morphology, 107, 109–110
enzymes, 347–348 profiling, 118–119
extracellular matrix, 146–147 soft tissue lesions, 113–114
flow cell system, 132–133, 138–139 Endodontic treatment. See Calcium hydroxide
in vitro biofilm models EndoVac®, 207
aerobic and anaerobic Enterobacter agglomerans, 59
environments, 131 Enterococcus faecalis, 17, 18
antimicrobials and root canal irrigation adaptation to starvation, 13
strategies, 131, 134–138 antibiotic resistance gene transfer in, 65
biofilm bacteria and host immune cells APDT, 334
interaction, 131 calcium hydroxide, 308–310
collagen-coated hydroxyapatite disk, calorimetric assay, 141
131, 132 confocal laser scanning microscopy, 143
conventional biofilm models, 131 eDNA of, 60
glass cover, 131, 133 failed root canal treatment, 244
microbial biofilm formation, 131 horizontal gene transfer in, 64
planktonic killing tests, 132 inherent resistance to alkaline stress, 11–12,
static and dynamic biofilm models, 131 131, 134–136, 138
Index 361
light microscopic image, 141 F

Environmental scanning electron microscopy Facultative anaerobic bacteria
(ESEM), 89, 143 and nutrients, 7
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay recovery after treatment, 9
(ELISA), 147 FH. See Fungal hyphae (FH) in root canal
Enzymes, role during environmental biofilm
disturbance, 9 Fibronectin, streptococcal binding to, 34
EPS. See Extracellular polymeric substances FIB-SEM. See Focused ion beam scanning
(EPS) electron microscopy (FIB-SEM)
Escherichia coli fimA, 35
antimicrobial resistance, 56, 65 FISH. See Fluorescence in situ hybridization
efflux pumps in, 68 (FISH)
persister cells, 68–69 Fluid dynamic gauging (FDG) technique, 278
subcellular localization of ribosomes in, Fluid wall interaction. See Wall shear stress
16–17 Fluorescein, 16
ESEM. See Environmental scanning electron Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH),
microscopy (ESEM) 17–18, 99, 117, 145
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 286 Fluorescent probes, 16–17
and chlorhexidine, 289 Fluorophores, 16
definition, 282 Focused ion beam scanning electron
microbial biofilm degradation, 247 microscopy (FIB-SEM), 89
pulp tissue, 289 Formation of biofilms, 24–28
vs. NaOCl, 287–288 biofilm-specific development of genetic
Exopolysaccharides, 59 resistance, 26
Extracellular DNA (eDNA), 36 diffusion barrier and adsorbant surface,
and antimicrobial resistance, 60–61 25–26
ultrastructural analysis, 61 persister cells, 27–28
Extracellular matrix (ECM), 194, 196 Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), 15, spectroscopy, 149
24, 57–58, 104–105 Fungal hyphae (FH) in root canal biofilm, 94
antimicrobial resistance, 25–26 Furcation canals, 159
eDNA, 60–61 Fusobacterium nucleatum, 130
exopolysaccharides, 59
extracellular proteins, 59–60
irrigants G
chlorhexidine, 286–287 Gemella, 30
critical loads, 278 Gene expression, and survival, 10
diffusion coefficient (Drs), 284 General stress response (GSR), 13–14
EDTA, 286 Genetic exchange, 43–45
FDG technique, 278 Genetic resistance, biofilm-specific
footprints, 277 development of, 26
NaOCl, 284–285 Genetic variation, and antimicrobial resistance,
ultraasonic/laser activation, 278–279 69–70
viscoelastic properties, 277 Gene transfer. See Horizontal gene transfer
production, 35–36 (HGT)
Extracellular polysaccharides, 25 Gingiva, 28
Extracellular proteins, and antimicrobial Gingival crevice fluid, 28
resistance, 59–60 Glucans, 35–36
Extra-radicular microbiota, 244–246 Glucose, and tolerance to antimicrobials,
Extraradicular microorganisms/biofilm, SEM 10–11
visualization of, 95–98 Glucosyltransferases (Gtfs), 35–36
362 Index
Glycocalyx. See Extracellular polymeric chemomechanical intervention, 198

substances (EPS) chronic periapical lesions, 196
Gram-positive bacteria, tolerance to climax community, 193
environmental disturbances, 9 coronal breaches, 191
Granulicatella, 30 coronal leakage, 193
Green fluorescent protein (GFP), 145 dentine surface, 197
GSR. See General stress response (GSR) distribution and diversity, 191
Gtfs. See Glucosyltransferases (Gtfs) diversity determination, 191
Guanosine pentaphosphate (pppGpp), 13 ECM, 194, 196
Guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp), 13 fluid-based nutritional resources, 193
Gutta-percha (GP) cone, 96, 268 fresh unreacted fluid, 198
infection continuum, 192
microbial interactions, 192
H microscopy, 191
Habitat filtering, 5–7 morphological complexity, 198
Heterogeneity, and antimicrobial resistance, 66 nutrition depletion, 197
HGT. See Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) patchy and variable distribution, 193, 194
HMP. See Human Microbiome Project (HMP) periapical tissue status, 192
Consortium PMN phagocytosis, 194, 197
H2O2, and bacteriocin production, 43 polymicrobial community, 193
Homeostasis, microbial, 29 root canal treatment (see Root canal
Horizontal gene transfer (HGT), 63–65 treatment)
Host behavior, environmental changes due slow-burning nature, 193
to, 28 speculative hypotheses, 192
Host–biofilm interface, 24–25 thick and rich biofilm layer, 193, 195
Housekeeping enzymes, 9 thickness of, 193, 195
Human Microbiome Project (HMP) vs. extra-radicular infections, 196
Consortium, 31–32 Irrigation systems
Hydroxyapatite, 33 chemical effect (see Chemical effect of
Hypochlorite ion (OCl-), 282 irrigants)
Hypochlorous acid (HOCl), 282 conventional irrigation, 261
definition, 259–260
endodontic outcome, 289
I extrusion, 273–275
Inherent resistance, to environmental flow characteristics
disturbances, 11–12 dentinal tubules, 273
Insurance effects, 66 isthmuses, 273
Integrins, streptococcal interaction with, 34–35 laser-activated irrigation, 265, 271–272
Inter-appointment medication. See Calcium lateral canals, 273
hydroxide manual dynamic activation, 264, 268
Intercellular communication, 27–28, 41–42 negative-pressure irrigation, 264, 268
Interspecies antagonism, 42–43 oval extensions, 273
Intracellular communication, and antimicrobial SAI, 264, 269–271
resistance, 61–63 syringe irrigation, 262, 264, 266–267
Intraradicular endodontic infections, 107, UAI, 264, 269–271
116–117 flow phase, 260, 261
Intraradicular microbiota fluid wall interaction (see Wall shear stress)
bacterial occupants, 196 intraradicular microbiota
bacterial population, 197 acoustic micro-streaming, 207
bioburden, 192 EndoVac®, 207
biofilm eradication and wound laser-induced agitation, 206
dressing, 198 magnetostrictive transducers, 207
Index 363
manual agitation, 206 LIVE/DEAD BacLight viability probe, 16

mechanical shaping, 205, 206 LPS. See Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)
post-mechanical flushing, 205 Lumen, root canal, 90
pressure/vacuum agitation, 206 lytT gene, 36
pure flushing action, 204–205
RinsEndo, 207
sonic agitation, 206 M
sonic devices, 206–207 Macroscopic anatomy
ultrasonic agitation, 206 configurations, 161–162
non-instrumentation technique, 261–262 dental anomalies (see Dental anomalies)
objectives of, 260 pulp canal space, 160
predefined effect, 261 pulp chamber, 158–160
randomized controlled trial (RCT), 260 Manual dynamic activation (MDA), 264, 268
rest phase, 260 MBEC. See Minimal biofilm eradication
techniques, 262, 263 concentration (MBEC) assays
Isthmuses Mechanical instrumentation, as ecological
configurations, 170 distribution, 8
dentin debris, 172 Melton’s method, 167
lateral interconnection/transverse Metabolic reactivation of biofilm cells, 14
anastomosis, 169 Methicillin, 25
mandibular and maxillary molars, 170, 171 Microbiome, 29
morphology and prevalence, 170 Microflora, antimicrobial resistance in, 71–76
posterior teeth, 170 Microscopic anatomy, 175–177
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), 315
Minimal biofilm eradication concentration
L (MBEC) assays, 56
Lactic acid, 37 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), 130
Lactobacillus, 9, 30 Mixed species biofilms, antimicrobial
caries-associated species, 31 resistance in, 70–71
L. salivarius, 14, 17, 18 Molecular sieving, 25
preobturation cultures, 239 Monkey-model study, 240
Laser-activated irrigation (LAI), 342, 344 Monoclonal antibodies, linked to
Laser-assisted root canal disinfection fluorophores, 16
biofilm bacteria killing, 340 Morinda citrifolia (MCJ), 347
chemomechanical disinfection, 344 Multidrug efflux pumps (MEP), 338
depth of penetration, 340 Multidrug resistance efflux pumps, 67
Er,Cr:YSGG laser, 342 Mutacin IV, 43
Er:YAG laser, 341
infrared lasers, 340
in vivo studies, 342, 343 N
LAI and PIPS, 342, 344 ndvB gene, 26
limitations, 341 Neutrophils, 5, 25
longer pulses of, 342 Nitric oxide (NO), role in selection of root
Nd:YAG laser irradiation, 341, 342 canal bacteria, 6
optical amplificatio, 338 Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), 149
thermal properties, 338 Nutrients, role in selection of root canal
tissue response, 338 bacteria, 6–7
treatment, 340 Nutrition depletion, 197
ultrastructure, 342
water/irrigation solution, 342
Lectins, linked to fluorophores, 16 O
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), 59, 309 Oral environment, challenges for biofilms in,
Lipoteichoic acid (LTA), 309 28–29
364 Index
Oral mucosal epithelium, 28 antimicrobial resistance of, 56, 65

Oscillatory component, 269 dormancy in, 66
Oxygen eDNA of, 60
gradients, and antimicrobial resistance, 66 efflux pumps in, 67
role in selection of root canal bacteria, 6 GFP, 145
hypermutability of, 70
oxygen depletion in, 66
P quorum sensing, 63
Paper-point-sampling technique, 118 Pulp necrosis, 96–97
Passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), 269 Pulp, status during microbial invasion, 5
PCR. See Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Pyrosequencing, 71, 118
PDEs. See Phosphodiesterases (PDEs)
Penetration ability, of antimicrobials, 67
Peptides, antimicrobial, 25 Q
Periapical lesion, 97 Quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time
Persistence, definition, 14 PCR (qRT-PCR), 148
Persister cells, 14, 27–28, 68–69, 328 Quorum sensing, and antimicrobial resistance,
Phase variation, phenotype, 69–70 61–63
Phenotype, biofilm
adaptation, to environmental disturbance, 9
and antimicrobial resistance, 69–70 R
Phenotypic switching, 7 Radix entomolaris/radix paramolaris, 165
Pheromones, 64 Red complex bacterial species, 30
Phosphodiesterases (PDEs), 40 Resazurin, 16
Photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming Resilience, definition, 8
(PIP), 342, 344 Resilience of root canal microbial
Photo-oxidizable amino acid residues, 334 communities, 12–14
Physiological adaptive mechanisms, 9, 11 dormancy and adaptation to starvation,
Planktonic cells, 24 12–14
PNAG. See Polysaccharide poly- metabolic reactivation, 14
Nacetylglucosamine (PNAG) scanning electron microscopy, 13
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Resistance
117–118, 148 definition, 8
Polymicrobial synergy and dysbiosis (PSD) to environmental disturbances
model, 29 adaptive mechanisms, 9–10
Polysaccharide poly-Nacetylglucosamine inherent resistance, 11–12
(PNAG), 59 Rifampin, 26, 67
Porphyromonas gingivalis, 25, 29, 30, 41–42 Root canal treatment
binding to cellular components, 34, 35 antibacterial action against, 247
co-aggregation, 38 biofilm existence, 246
genetic exchange in, 44–45 biological rationale, 199–201
regulation of gene expression, 39 chemomechanical procedures
ppGpp. See Guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) antibacterial action, 209
pppGpp. See Guanosine pentaphosphate culture-dependent and independent
(pppGpp) approaches, 209–225
Primary endodontic infection, 104 root-treated teeth, periapical disease,
Protein expression, and survival, 10 225–233
PSD. See Polymicrobial synergy and dysbiosis direct and indirect killing effects, 246
(PSD) model ECM-enclosed bacteria, 247
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 24, 25, 40 efficacy of, 199
antibiotic-resistant phenotypic variants factors, 240–242
of, 69 failed root canal treatment
Index 365
extra-radicular microbiota, 244–246 visualization of microorganisms/biofilm

intra-radicular microbiota, 243–244 in dentinal tubules, 92, 94
guidelines, 248–249 extraradicular microorganisms/biofilm,
heal after termination, 249, 251–252 95–98
irrigation system in root canal, 89–94
acoustic micro-streaming, 207 Secondary endodontic infection, 104
EndoVac®, 207 SEM. See Scanning electron microscopy
laser-induced agitation, 206 (SEM)
magnetostrictive transducers, 207 Sensitivity, definition, 8
manual agitation, 206 Signaling molecules, 27–28
mechanical shaping, 205, 206 Slaked lim. See Calcium hydroxide
post-mechanical flushing, 205 Soft tissue lesions, 113–114
pressure/vacuum agitation, 206 Sonic Air Endo Handpiece, 206
pure flushing action, 204–205 Sortase A, 40
RinsEndo, 207 Species
sonic agitation, 206 composition, of human oral biofilm, 29–32
sonic devices, 206–207 microbiome era, 31–32
ultrasonic agitation, 206 pre-microbiome era, 30–31
mechanical intraradicular preparation succession in biofilms, 37–39
complex canal systems, 203, 205 Species-specific polymerase chain
coronal access cavity, 201 reaction, 118
tapered canals, 201–202 16S rRNA gene
thermoplasticised gutta-percha amplification, 30
techniques, 202 oligonucleotide sequences, linked to
Type A canal systems, 202 fluorophores, 16
Type B canal systems, 203 Stable cavitation, 271
Type C canal systems, 203, 204 Staphylococcus
microbial biofilm, 247 S.aureus, 25, 26
obturation, 208 antimicrobial resistance of, 56
obturation procedures, 225 eDNA of, 60
periapical healing process, 208 exopolysaccharides, 59
periapical radiolucencies, 242, 243 phase variation in, 70
preobturation culture test S. epidermidis, 24–25
bacteria in, 239 antimicrobial resistance of, 71
chemomechanical phase, 238 exopolysaccharides, 59
effect of, 225, 234–237 phase variation in, 70
focal infection, 225 Starvation, adaptation to, 12–14, 27
monkey-model study, 240 Streptococcus, 9, 30, 32. See also Development
negativevs. positive culture, 238 of biofilms
root canal debridement, 249, 250 co-aggregation, 37–38
root canal dressing, 208 composition, 30
rRNA targeted oligonucleotide probing, 16 S. anginosus, dormancy of, 14
S. gordonii, 17, 18, 30
adhesins, 34, 40
S antibiotic resistance gene transfer in, 65
Saliva, 28, 33–34 and caries development, 31
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, 26 co-aggregation, 38
Salmonella typhimurium, 309 competence development in, 44, 45
Sanger sequencing, 118 eDNA, 36–37
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), 15, 56, glucosyltransferase, 36
88–89 intercellular communication, 41
of resilient root canal microbial interspecies antagonism, 42–43
community, 13 regulation of gene expression, 40
366 Index
Streptococcus (cont.) Tetrazolium salts, 16

S. mitis, 30 Three-dimensional wax models, 156
S. mutans TLR2, 25
antimicrobial resistance of, 71 TLR9, 25
binding to cellular components, 34 Tobramycin, 59, 69
biofilm formation in, 40 Toluidine blue O (TBO), 334
in caries development, 30, 31, 36 Tooth eruption, 28
competence development in, 45 Tooth surfaces, attachment of biofilms to,
competence system, 43 33–34
horizontal gene transfer in, 64 Toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems, 65
intercellular communication, 41 Transduction, gene transfer, 63, 64
interspecies antagonism, 42–43 Transformation, gene transfer, 63, 64
quorum sensing, 63 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), 89
regulation of gene expression, 39–40 Transport-based mechanisms, and
S. oralis, 7, 30, 41–42 antimicrobial tolerance, 11
S. salivarius, 30 Treponema denticola, 30
S. sanguinis, 30 Turmeric (Curcuma longa ), 347
biofilm development in, 40 Two-component systems (TCSs), 39–40
and caries development, 31
competence development in, 44, 45
eDNA, 36–37 V
interspecies antagonism, 42–43 Vancomycin, 26, 71, 76
Stress responses and antimicrobial resistance, Veillonella, 30, 37
65–66 preobturation cultures, 239
Stringent response, 13 V. parvula, antimicrobial resistance of, 71
Super-resolution microscopy, 16 Viable but nonculturable (VBNC), 145
Swimmer cells, 68 Virulence, bacterial, 106
Syringe irrigation, 262, 264, 266–267
W
T Wall shear stress
TA. See Toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems biofilm disruption, 277–279
Tannerella forsythia, 29, 30 LAI, 265, 277
Taurodontism, 163 MDA, 264, 276
TCSs. See Two-component systems (TCSs) negative-pressure system, 264, 276
TEM. See Transmission electron microscopy sonic and ultrasonic devices, 265, 276–277
(TEM) syringe irrigation, 264, 275–276
Tetracycline, 71, 76 Water, in EPS matrix, 57–58, 104

The Root Canal Biofilm PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Root Canal Biofilm PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Root Canal Biofilm PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Springer Series on Biofilms

The Root Canal Biofilm

ISSN 1863-9607 ISSN 1863-9615 (electronic)

Library of Congress Control Number: 2015953861

Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London

Printed on acid-free paper

Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg is part of Springer Science+Business Media

attention focuses on observational and experimental evidence of root canal micro-

Gothenburg, Sweden Luis E. Chávez de Paz DDS, MS, PhD

Part I General Biological Aspects

Part II Observational and Experimental Evidence

Part III Outcome and Strategies of Treatment

Root Canal Irrigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259

Luis E. Chávez de Paz and Philip D. Marsh

L.E. Chávez de Paz (*)

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 3

2 Habitat Filtering: Selection of Root Canal Colonizers

Fig. 1 Selection of root Oral bacteria

Root canal community

source of facultative anaerobic bacteria is carbohydrates, it is believed that a

3 Disturbance and Selection of Resistant Bacteria

Root canal community Resistant community

three-dimensional structure of the multispecies biofilms in response to the absence

The mechanisms behind the innate resistance of enterococci to alkaline pH are

4 Resilience of Root Canal Microbial Communities

connected to survival responses in changing environments like the oral cavity

5 Methods to Analyze Microbial Ecosystems

In order to monitor physiological responses of organisms in communities and

using image-processing techniques to generate three-dimensional digitized images.

ribosome-associated changes in activity levels and subcellular localization at the

Understanding the adaptive mechanisms and implications of resistance in root canal

Acknowledgments The helpful suggestions of G. Bergenholtz are greatly appreciated.

Al-Ahmad A, Ameen H, Pelz K, Karygianni L, Wittmer A, Anderson AC, Spitzmuller B, Hellwig

Appelbe OK, Sedgley CM (2007) Effects of prolonged exposure to alkaline pH on Enterococcus

Takahashi N, Washio J, Mayanagi G (2010) Metabolomics of supragingival plaque and oral

Jens Kreth and Mark C. Herzberg

1.1 What Are Biofilms?

Microbial communities are commonly referred to as biofilms (Costerton

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 23

1.2 Why Do Biofilms Form?

Human microbes of medical interest live predominantly in biofilms. The microor-

diminishing opsonization required for phagocyte-mediated killing (Kristian

1.2.1 Formation of Diffusion Barrier and Adsorbant Surface

Several factors influence biofilm susceptibility to antimicrobials as described in the

1.2.2 Biofilm-Specific Development of Genetic Resistance

1.2.3 Emergence of Persister Cells

Bacterial persistence during antibiotic treatment can be attributed to persister cells

microenvironment. Intercellular communication is important for general stress

1.3 Challenges for Biofilms in the Oral Environment

Among the human-associated bacterial communities, oral biofilms reside in an

In individual subjects, the species richness is estimated to be 250 to 300 different

2 Species Composition of the Human Oral Biofilm

2.1 Composition of Human Oral Biofilms:

Conversely, S. sanguinis, S. gordonii, and Actinomyces serotype II were associated

2.2 Composition of Human Oral Biofilms: Microbiome Era

The Human Microbiome Project (HMP) Consortium seeks to provide a compre-

3 First Steps in the Development of Biofilms

3.1 Attachment to the Tooth Surfaces

3.1.1 Salivary Pellicle Adhesion