Axler2015 Chapter Polynomials
Axler2015 Chapter Polynomials
4
Statue of Persian
mathematician and poet
Omar Khayyám
(1048–1131), whose
algebra book written in
1070 contained the first
serious study of cubic
polynomials.
Polynomials
This short chapter contains material on polynomials that we will need to
understand operators. Many of the results in this chapter will already be
familiar to you from other courses; they are included here for completeness.
Because this chapter is not about linear algebra, your instructor may go
through it rapidly. You may not be asked to scrutinize all the proofs. Make
sure, however, that you at least read and understand the statements of all the
results in this chapter—they will be used in later chapters.
The standing assumption we need for this chapter is as follows:
4.1 Notation F
F denotes R or C.
4.2 Definition Re z, Im z
Suppose z D a C bi , where a and b are real numbers.
z D Re z C .Im z/i:
Re z D 3 and Im z D 2;
zN D 3 2i ;
p p
jzj D 32 C 22 D 13.
sum of z and zN
z C zN D 2 Re z;
difference of z and zN
z zN D 2.Im z/i;
product of z and zN
z zN D jzj2 ;
additivity and multiplicativity of complex conjugate
w C z D wN C zN and wz D wNN z;
conjugate of conjugate
zN D z;
real and imaginary parts are bounded by jzj
j Re zj jzj and j Im zj jzj
absolute value of the complex conjugate
jzj
N D jzj;
z
multiplicativity of absolute value
jwzj D jwj jzj;
w
Triangle Inequality
jw C zj jwj C jzj. wz
Proof Except for the last item, the routine verifications of the assertions
above are left to the reader. To verify the last item, we have
jw C zj2 D .w C z/.w
N C z/
N
D ww
N C z zN C wzN C z w
N
D jwj2 C jzj2 C wzN C wzN
D jwj2 C jzj2 C 2 Re.wz/
N
jwj2 C jzj2 C 2jwzj
N
D jwj2 C jzj2 C 2jwj jzj
D .jwj C jzj/2 :
Taking the square root of both sides of the inequality jw C zj2 .jwj C jzj/2
now gives the desired inequality.
120 CHAPTER 4 Polynomials
4.6 p.z/ D a0 C a1 z C a2 z 2 C C am z m
for all z 2 F.
a0 C a1 z C C am z m D 0
Proof We will prove the contrapositive. If not all the coefficients are 0, then
by changing m we can assume am ¤ 0. Let
ja0 j C ja1 j C C jam1 j
zD C 1:
jam j
The result above implies that the coefficients of a polynomial are uniquely
determined (because if a polynomial had two different sets of coefficients,
then subtracting the two representations of the polynomial would give a
contradiction to the result above).
Recall that if a polynomial p can be written in the form 4.6 with am ¤ 0,
then we say that p has degree m and we write deg p D m.
The 0 polynomial is declared to The degree of the 0 polynomial is
have degree 1 so that excep- defined to be 1. When necessary, use
tions are not needed for various the obvious arithmetic with 1. For
reasonable results. For example, example, 1 < m and 1 C m D
deg.pq/ D deg p C deg q even if 1 for every integer m.
p D 0.
CHAPTER 4 Polynomials 121
p D sq C r
Zeros of Polynomials
The solutions to the equation p.z/ D 0 play a crucial role in the study of a
polynomial p 2 P.F/. Thus these solutions have a special name.
p.z/ D .z /q.z/
for every z 2 F.
Now we can prove that polynomials do not have too many zeros.
CHAPTER 4 Polynomials 123
p.z/ D .z /q.z/
Although the proof given above is probably the shortest proof of the
Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, a web search can lead you to several other
proofs that use different techniques. All proofs of the Fundamental Theorem
of Algebra need to use some analysis, because the result is not true if C is
replaced, for example, with the set of numbers of the form c C d i where c; d
are rational numbers.
The cubic formula, which was Remarkably, mathematicians have
discovered in the 16th century, proved that no formula exists for the ze-
is presented below for your ros of polynomials of degree 5 or higher.
amusement only. Do not memorize But computers and calculators can use
it. clever numerical methods to find good
approximations to the zeros of any poly-
Suppose
nomial, even when exact zeros cannot
3 2
p.x/ D ax C bx C cx C d; be found.
For example, no one will ever be
where a ¤ 0. Set able to give an exact formula for a zero
9abc 2b 3 27a2 d of the polynomial p defined by
uD
54a3 p.x/ D x 5 5x 4 6x 3 C17x 2 C4x7:
and then set However, a computer or symbolic cal-
3ac b 2 3 culator can find approximate zeros of
v D u2 C : this polynomial.
9a2
The Fundamental Theorem of Alge-
Suppose v 0. Then
bra leads to the following factorization
q q
b 3 p 3 p result for polynomials with complex co-
C uC vC u v
3a efficients. Note that in this factorization,
is a zero of p. the numbers 1 ; : : : ; m are precisely
the zeros of p, for these are the only
values of z for which the right side of
the equation in the next result equals 0.
CHAPTER 4 Polynomials 125
p.z/ D c.z 1 / .z m /;
where c; 1 ; : : : ; m 2 C.
p.z/ D .z /q.z/
.z 1 / .z m / D .z 1 / .z m /
for all z 2 C, then because the left side of the equation above equals 0 when
z D 1 , one of the ’s on the right side equals 1 . Relabeling, we can assume
that 1 D 1 . Now for z ¤ 1 , we can divide both sides of the equation
above by z 1 , getting
.z 2 / .z m / D .z 2 / .z m /
Proof Let
p.z/ D a0 C a1 z C C am z m ;
where a0 ; : : : ; am are real numbers. Suppose 2 C is a zero of p. Then
a0 C a1 C C am m D 0:
a0 C a1 N C C am N m D 0;
where we have used basic properties of complex conjugation (see 4.5). The
equation above shows that N is a zero of p.
x 2 C bx C c D .x 1 /.x 2 /
for some polynomial q 2 P.C/ with degree two less than the degree of p.
If we can prove that q has real coefficients, then by using induction on the
degree of p, we can conclude that .x / appears in the factorization of p
N
exactly as many times as .x /.
To prove that q has real coefficients, we solve the equation above for q,
getting
p.x/
q.x/ D 2
x 2.Re /x C jj2
for all x 2 R. The equation above implies that q.x/ 2 R for all x 2 R.
Writing
q.x/ D a0 C a1 x C C an2 x n2 ;
where n D deg p and a0 ; : : : ; an2 2 C, we thus have
for all x 2 R. This implies that Im a0 ; : : : ; Im an2 all equal 0 (by 4.7). Thus
all the coefficients of q are real, as desired. Hence the desired factorization
exists.
Now we turn to the question of uniqueness of our factorization. A factor
of p of the form x 2 C bj x C cj with bj 2 < 4cj can be uniquely written
as .x j /.x j / with j 2 C. A moment’s thought shows that two
different factorizations of p as an element of P.R/ would lead to two different
factorizations of p as an element of P.C/, contradicting 4.14.
CHAPTER 4 Polynomials 129
EXERCISES 4
a subspace of P.F/?
3 Is the set
f0g [ fp 2 P.F/ W deg p is eveng
a subspace of P.F/?
7 Prove that every polynomial of odd degree with real coefficients has a
real zero.
8 Define T W P.R/ ! RR by
8
< p p.3/
ˆ
if x ¤ 3;
Tp D x3
:̂p 0 .3/ if x D 3:
N
q.z/ D p.z/p.z/: