Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    SHIFTS (No. of Pieces Sorted) : 1st Worker 2nd Worker 3rd Worker 4th Worker 5th Worker

    Uploaded by

    devavrat.singh
    The document presents data on the number of pieces sorted by workers across three shifts (A, B, C). It includes summary statistics for each shift such as sample sizes, means, standard deviations, and variances. A one-way ANOVA was conducted to test if the mean number of pieces sorted differs across the three shifts. The results of the ANOVA show that the p-value is 0.099, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis that all shifts are equal cannot be rejected. Post-hoc tests using Tukey and Scheffe methods also found no significant differences between the shifts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    SHIFTS (No. of Pieces Sorted) : 1st Worker 2nd Worker 3rd Worker 4th Worker 5th Worker

    Uploaded by

    devavrat.singh
    14 views9 pages
    The document presents data on the number of pieces sorted by workers across three shifts (A, B, C). It includes summary statistics for each shift such as sample sizes, means, standard deviations, and variances. A one-way ANOVA was conducted to test if the mean number of pieces sorted differs across the three shifts. The results of the ANOVA show that the p-value is 0.099, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis that all shifts are equal cannot be rejected. Post-hoc tests using Tukey and Scheffe methods also found no significant differences between the shifts.

    Original Title

    ANOVA workout

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document presents data on the number of pieces sorted by workers across three shifts (A, B, C). It includes summary statistics for each shift such as sample sizes, means, standard deviations, and variances. A one-way ANOVA was conducted to test if the mean number of pieces sorted differs across the three shifts. The results of the ANOVA show that the p-value is 0.099, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis that all shifts are equal cannot be rejected. Post-hoc tests using Tukey and Scheffe methods also found no significant differences between the shifts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    14 views9 pages

    SHIFTS (No. of Pieces Sorted) : 1st Worker 2nd Worker 3rd Worker 4th Worker 5th Worker

    Uploaded by

    devavrat.singh
    The document presents data on the number of pieces sorted by workers across three shifts (A, B, C). It includes summary statistics for each shift such as sample sizes, means, standard deviations, and variances. A one-way ANOVA was conducted to test if the mean number of pieces sorted differs across the three shifts. The results of the ANOVA show that the p-value is 0.099, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis that all shifts are equal cannot be rejected. Post-hoc tests using Tukey and Scheffe methods also found no significant differences between the shifts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 9

    SHIFTS(No.

    of pieces sorted )
    Shift A Shift B Shift C
    58 58 48 1st worker
    64 69 57 2nd worker
    55 71 59 3rd worker
    66 64 47 4th worker
    67 68 69 5th worker

    H0(claim) A=B=C By plant manager


    H1(hypothesis) Not all shifts are equal
    A=B!=C A!=B=C
    62 66 56
    5.244 5.148 9.000
    27.50 26.50 81.00
    5 5 5
    4 4 4
    Across - VAR
    Group mean n
    Shift A 62.0 5
    Shift B 66.0 5
    Shift C 56.0 5
    total shifts total workers
    3 15
    Aggregate 920
    (demerits are that the variablity within shift n 61.3
    Grand Mean orMean time / worker

    * Tot Var of GROUP, not ITEMS


    Plant Manager : worker performance does not differ across shifts
    Finance Head: there is a major difference across shifts

    alpha 5%

    At first view,Going only be the averages we can say B is most pro


    Here 3 groups of samples. 3C2 hypothesis tests could be done.BU
    mean
    stdev
    var Total
    n 15
    dof 12

    devn sqrd x f Within (Here we take into accou


    2.2 * SSE 540.0
    108.9 dof (deno) 12
    142.2 Var 45.000

    253.3 SSTR Total squared deviation of the 15 workers. SS


    (Total no. of diamonds sorted by 15 workers working in all shift using average of eac
    126.7 MSTR (Meaure of variance)
    Mean time / worker Also called across variance. Here across shifts
    2 Across DOF
    s not differ across shifts
    across shifts

    we can say B is most productive


    s tests could be done.BUT tiring if groups more

    Here we take into account variab. Within shift) F


    SSE (Sum of squared deviation of errors) across/within
    We lose one DOF for each shift MSTR/MSE
    MSE Variance per shift within shifts 2.814815
    MSE more believable than MSTR
    n of the 15 workers. SSTR= Sum of squared deviation of treament
    hift using average of each shift)

    ance. Here across shifts.But ignores the variablity within shift


    p-value
    0.099 p-value>alpha Claim wins
    p-value of F. for multi product testing, F acts as the Sample mean differernce
    We want this value less than or closer to 1
    than MSTR
    n differernce
    Shift A Shift B Shift C
    58 58 48
    64 69 57
    55 71 59
    66 64 47
    67 68 69
    Results of one-way ANOVA

    Summary stats for samples


    Shift A Shift B Shift C
    Sample sizes 5 5 5
    Sample means 62.000 66.000 56.000
    Sample standard deviations 5.244 5.148 9.000
    Sample variances 27.500 26.500 81.000
    Weights for pooled variance 0.333 0.333 0.333

    Number of samples 3
    Total sample size 15
    Grand mean 61.333
    Pooled variance 45.000
    Pooled standard deviation 6.708

    OneWay ANOVA table


    Source SS df MS F p-value
    Between variation 253.333 2 126.667 2.815 0.0995
    Within variation 540.000 12 45.000
    Total variation 793.333 14

    Confidence intervals for mean differences


    Confidence level 95.0%
    Tukey method
    Difference Mean diff Lower Upper Signif?
    Shift A - Shift B -4.000 -15.310 7.310 No
    Shift A - Shift C 6.000 -5.310 17.310 No
    Shift B - Shift C 10.000 -1.310 21.310 No
    Scheffe method
    Difference Mean diff Lower Upper Signif?
    Shift A - Shift B -4.000 -15.827 7.827 No
    Shift A - Shift C 6.000 -5.827 17.827 No
    Shift B - Shift C 10.000 -1.827 21.827 No
    If alpha is =5%, pvalue is >alpha indicating all three shifts are statistically equal
    If alpha is =10%, pvalue is <alpha indicating the challenge is right. Having concluded thus, we still do not k
    In this case we might have to go back to do pairwise T-test to check who is different from whom. This can

    If ANOVA fails ie. Challenge wins, check Tukey test


    If Tukey Test fails, check the Scheffe Test
    If scheffe test fails, nothin can be done
    ncluded thus, we still do not know which shift or shifts is statistically the problem child.
    different from whom. This can be laborious. A way out of this is Tukey Test

    You might also like