Taxation (Vietnam) : Thursday 7 June 2018
Taxation (Vietnam) : Thursday 7 June 2018
Taxation (Vietnam) : Thursday 7 June 2018
Taxation
(Vietnam)
Thursday 7 June 2018
F6 VNM MFSRV
Section A – A
LL 15 questions are compulsory and MUST be attempted
Section B – ALL
SIX questions are compulsory and MUST be attempted
The following tax rates and allowances are to be used in answering the questions
2
Personal income tax (PIT)
Regular income tax rates for Vietnamese citizens and other residents in Vietnam
Portion of monthly Tax rate
assessable income %
(VND million)
Up to 5 5
Over 5 to 10 10
Over 10 to 18 15
Over 18 to 32 20
Over 32 to 52 25
Over 52 to 80 30
Over 80 35
3 [P.T.O.
Personal deductions (per month)
Self VND 9,000,000
Dependant VND 3,600,000
Social insurance, health insurance and unemployment insurance on salary and allowances
Rates for the year 2017
Social insurance (SI) 8%
Health insurance (HI) 1·5%
Unemployment insurance (UI) 1%
Base salary (per month) for social insurance, health insurance, etc for the year 2017
Note: For simplicity, you should assume that this rate is applicable for the whole of the year 2017.
VND 26,000,000
Rates of exchange
The following rates of exchange are to be used in answering all questions in this paper (unless otherwise
stated):
USD 1 = VND 22,800
4
Section B – ALL SIX questions are compulsory and MUST be attempted
Please write your answers to all parts of these questions on the lined pages within the Candidate Answer Booklet.
1 EDM JSC, a joint stock company in Vietnam operating in the field of developing online learning courses, was established
in 2015 with four founding shareholders. Since its establishment, EDM JSC has achieved remarkable growth, however,
to expand further additional capital investment is needed. The founding shareholders have successfully issued additional
shares in the company to an angel investor for VND100 billion. The four founding shareholders actively manage the
day-to-day business of the company and the angel investor will supervise but not participate in the management of
EDM JSC’s day-to-day operations.
The following items have been reported in the financial statements of EDM JSC for the year ended 31 December 2017:
1. Payments of VND600 million made to individual freelance lecturers who are registered as business individuals.
No invoices were available, however, EDM JSC properly prepared the ‘Lists of goods and services purchased’ as
required. Of the above payments, 60% are attributed to lecturers who have revenue in excess of VND100 million
in the year 2017. All the payments were in excess of VND20 million and made in cash.
2. EDM JSC’s employees are allowed to study selected courses on a free-of-charge basis. In 2017, 320 free-of‑charge
courses, with a total market value of VND180 million, were provided to employees. 70% of these courses were
work-related training but the remaining 30% were not work related.
3. Expenses of VND160 million were incurred on negotiating with the angel investor and issuing the additional
shares.
4. Allowances of VND200 million were paid to each of the founding shareholders and of VND150 million to the angel
investor. Proper receipt documents are available.
5. Courses with a value of VND140 million were donated to some national schools, and of VND80 million to a
non‑licensed private education fund operated by the angel investor.
Required:
(a) Briefly state the principles, according to the prevailing regulations, to be applied when determining whether
a Vietnamese company can deduct the cost of goods and services purchased from business individuals who
have revenue below VND100 million per year. (3 marks)
(b) Calculate the adjustments EDM JSC should declare in its corporate income tax (CIT) return for the year ended
31 December 2017 in respect of each of items 1 to 5 above.
Note: You should indicate by the use of ‘0’ any item for which no adjustment is required. (7 marks)
(10 marks)
10
2 Mr Thinh Phan is a 35-year-old Vietnamese citizen. He has a full-time employment as a manager with TAC Co and has
also signed a part-time employment contract with KNT Co for the delivery of soft skills training courses. Both TAC Co
and KNT Co are Vietnamese companies.
Details of the income received by Mr Phan from the two companies in 2017 are as follows:
TAC Co KNT Co
Salary VND55 million/month VND10 million/month
Training allowances VND96 million VND360 million
Personal income tax Borne by employer Borne by employer
Employee insurance contributions Borne by Mr Phan N/A
Mr Phan has a son, Van Phan, who is 16 years old. From January 2018, Van has been enrolled to study in a secondary
school in Australia. In order to fund Van’s tuition fees, in 2017 Mr Phan sold an apartment for VND5,200 million.
He had purchased the apartment in 2015 for VND4,000 million as an investment and it was never his sole house. It
was agreed in the sales contract that the personal income tax (PIT) incurred from the transaction would be borne by
Mr Phan but that the buyer would be responsible for declaring and paying the tax. The sales contract was effective from
1 November 2017, however, the registration procedures were not completed by the buyer until 20 December 2017,
when the buyer settled the payment for the apartment in full.
Required:
(a) Calculate (in VND millions, rounded to one decimal) Mr Thinh Phan’s taxable income and personal income tax
(PIT) liability in respect of his employment income for the year 2017. (7 marks)
(b) Explain, by reference to the relevant provisions, when Mr Thinh Phan would be subject to tax on the sale of
his apartment and calculate his PIT liability in respect of the sale in the year 2017. (3 marks)
(10 marks)
11 [P.T.O.
3 INTSP Co, a Vietnamese company, entered into the following transactions with foreign partners in the year 2017:
Transaction 1: In March 2017, INTSP Co leased a specialised vehicle from LSPC Co, a Germany company, for the
period from 1 April to 31 December 2017 for USD900,000 net of all withholding tax in Vietnam. The rental covered
the following expenses for which LSPC Co obtained documents and presented them to INSTP Co:
– expenses of USD20,000 for negotiating the contract with INTSP Co;
– vehicle insurance of USD24,000 per annum; and
– transportation costs to Vietnam of USD30,000.
The operation of the vehicle requires special skills and LSPC Co assigned an expert to Vietnam to operate the vehicle
from 1 April to 30 September 2017. LSPC Co has sufficient documents to prove that it paid this expert USD10,000
per month.
Transaction 2: In November 2017, INTSP Co entered into an agreement to act as the shipping agent in Vietnam for
D-Line, a Danish maritime shipping line. According to the agency agreement, INTSP Co is responsible for receiving
goods from Vietnamese customers for international shipping, issuing bills of lading and collecting freight on behalf of
D-Line in Vietnam.
In December 2017, D-Line accepted an order from MCT Co, a Vietnamese customer, to ship goods from Vietnam to
Brazil for a freight cost of USD120,000 plus a surcharge of USD40,000 for over-sized goods (both amounts inclusive
of all taxes in Vietnam). As requested by D-Line, INTSP Co leased a vessel from a Vietnamese company to transport
the goods from Vietnam to Singapore (a hub of D-Line in Asia) from where the goods would be shipped on to Brazil.
The shipping freight cost from Vietnam to Singapore was USD30,000.
Required:
(a) Calculate (in USD) the corporate income tax (CIT) portion of the foreign contractor tax (FCT) which INTSP Co
should declare in its FCT return for 2017 in respect of the leasing contract with LSPC Co. (5 marks)
(b) (i) Briefly explain the principle to be applied when determining the taxable revenue for a shipping line such
as D-Line. (2 marks)
(ii) Calculate (in USD) the FCT which INTSP Co should declare in its FCT return for 2017 on behalf of D-Line
in respect of the shipping order from MCT Co. (3 marks)
(10 marks)
12
4 (a) EMRT Co is a chain of retail convenience stores operating in Vietnam, which has been registered for issuing
customised computerised invoices since its establishment in 2015.
EMRT Co expects to receive a tax audit in 2018 and the newly appointed chief accountant has concerns about
the invoicing requirements in the following cases:
Case 1: Customer A’s purchases regularly exceed VND200,000 but he refuses to request invoices. Is EMRT Co
required to issue invoices to Customer A?
Case 2: Each of Customer B’s purchases has a value of less than VND200,000, so EMRT Co has no obligation
to issue an invoice unless specifically requested by Customer B. Is EMRT Co required to do anything else?
Case 3: EMRT Co issued an invoice to Customer C. When the invoice was handed to Customer C, the parties
identified that although the tax code shown on the invoice was correct, the address of the customer was incorrect.
Is EMRT Co required to issue a revised invoice?
Required:
Explain the invoicing requirements for each of the cases 1 to 3 above as asked about by the chief accountant.
(5 marks)
(b) RETM Co is a real estate developer. In 2016, RETM Co purchased the land use right in relation to a 3,750m2
piece of land in Binh Duong for VND115,500 million (inclusive of value added tax (VAT) on infrastructure) from
TTN Co. The invoice issued to RETM Co by TTN Co was as follows:
VND million
Selling price (net of VAT) 112,500
Less: Land-use-right value (exempt from VAT) (VND22 million per m2) (82,500 )
––––––––
Equals: value of infrastructure 30,000
––––––––
Output VAT (10% of VND30,000 million) 3,000
Total amount payable (112,500 + 3,000) 115,500
––––––––
RETM Co subsequently built 15 villas on the land at a total development cost of VND49,500 million (including
VAT of VND4,500 million). In June 2017, RETM Co sold all of the villas to clients for VND13,800 million (net
of VAT) each. RETM Co agreed with the tax authorities that it would deduct the allocated land-use-right plus
infrastructure costs as charged by TTN Co based on the area (m2) from the VAT-taxable revenue of each villa.
Required:
Calculate the output value added tax (VAT) which RETM Co can charge on the invoice for each villa sold after
deduction of the land-use-right and infrastructure costs, and the total VAT payable to be declared by RETM
Co in June 2017.
Notes:
1. The sale of the villas by RETM Co is standard rated for VAT purposes.
2. You should assume that all the input VAT amounts are valid and supported by proper documents.
(5 marks)
(10 marks)
13 [P.T.O.
5 IVX Co is the parent company of a group of companies operating in diversified industries. IVX Co contributes capital
to companies in the group and participates in their operations management, and undertakes financial investments by
purchasing and selling shares in the group companies.
During 2017, IVX Co completed the following transactions:
(1) On 31 March 2017, IVX Co sold its entire 40% capital contribution in IVX-TCL Ltd, a joint venture limited
liability company between IVX Co and TCL (a foreign company), to TCL for USD6 million. The exchange rate
on 31 March 2017 was VND22,800–22,810 (i.e. the bank is buying and selling 1USD at VND22,800 and
VND22,810, respectively). At the time of the capital transfer, IVX-TCL Ltd was using VND as its functional
currency for book‑keeping purposes.
The joint venture was set up with a total capital contribution of USD10 million in February 2008 when the
exchange rate was VND16,000 for 1USD. The capital contribution in the joint venture remained unchanged up
to the date of sale, and the audited financial statements of IVX-TCL Ltd as at 31 March 2017 showed the capital
contribution using the exchange rate at the time of contribution.
(2) In October 2017, IVX Co sold 60% of the total shares of IVS JSC (equivalent to 80% of its total shareholding)
to BIH Co, a foreign investor, for VND150 billion. IVS JSC was established in 2015 as a joint stock company
with a share capital of VND100 billion, of which IVX Co contributed 45% at par value. In January 2017, IVX Co
purchased an additional 30% of the shares in IVS JSC, for VND70 billion. BIH Co settled VND50 billion of the
purchase price in October 2017, and the remaining VND100 billion in March 2018, together with late payment
interest of VND6 billion.
IVX Co incurred transfer expenses of VND200 million and VND150 million (supported by proper documents) for the
transfer of the capital in IVX-TCL Ltd and the shares in IVS JSC, respectively. IVX Co obtained written confirmation from
the tax authorities to apply the first-in-first-out (FIFO) mechanism for determining the historical cost of the IVS JSC
shares.
Required:
(a) Briefly explain the principles to be applied when determining the selling price and historical costs denominated
in foreign currency for corporate income tax (CIT) purposes where a capital contribution is transferred and:
(1) the target company uses a foreign currency as its functional currency; or
(2) the target company uses VND as its functional currency. (6 marks)
(b) Calculate (in VND millions) the CIT liabilities to be declared by IVX Co for the transfer of the IVX-TCL Ltd
capital contribution in 2017. (4 marks)
(c) Calculate (in VND millions) the CIT liabilities to be declared by IVX Co for the transfer of the IVS JSC shares
in 2017. (5 marks)
(15 marks)
14
6 Mr Narmey Lukuka is a New Zealand citizen, who works for PGS Co, a company in New Zealand. PGS Co has invested
in a Vietnam company, PGSVN Co. Mr Lukuka was assigned to work in PGSVN Co in Vietnam from 1 August 2016 to
31 December 2017.
Mr Lukuka was present in Vietnam throughout the period from his first arrival on 1 August 2016 until his departure on
31 December 2017 as follows:
– From 1 August 2016 to 31 December 2016: 80 days
– From 1 January 2017 to 31 July 2017: 125 days
– From 1 August 2017 to 31 December 2017: 135 days
During his assignment in Vietnam, Mr Lukuka received a salary of USD18,000 per month from PGS Co, from which
PGS Co deducted New Zealand tax of USD5,000 per month and paid the remainder directly into his account in
New Zealand. PGSVN Co also paid Mr Lukuka an allowance of VND50 million per month and rented him an apartment
at a cost of USD3,200 per month. On 1 October 2017, Mr Lukuka received an incentive bonus of USD50,000 from
PGS Co for his good performance.
The employment agreement between Mr Lukuka and PGS Co states that all taxes incurred on his income would be
borne by him.
While he was in Vietnam, on 20 September 2017, Mr Lukuka adopted Thien Nam, a Vietnamese new-born boy.
Required:
(a) State the basis period (i.e. the period subject to tax) applicable to Mr Narmey Lukuka for each of the tax years
2016 and 2017 and explain why he will be considered as tax resident in Vietnam in both of those tax years.
(3 marks)
(b) Calculate (in VND millions rounded to one decimal) the taxable income and personal income tax (PIT) liability
and PIT payable by Mr Lukuka for each of the tax years 2016 and 2017.
Note: You should ignore insurance contributions and any available overseas tax credits. (12 marks)
(15 marks)
15