Biomaterials For Hip Implants - Important Considerations Relating To The Choice of Materials
Biomaterials For Hip Implants - Important Considerations Relating To The Choice of Materials
net/publication/320301967
CITATIONS READS
2 16,079
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Development of X-ray diffraction methods to characterize the state of structure of materials after creeping and after plastic deformation View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Stanislaw Jan Skrzypek on 03 April 2018.
Review
Brought to you by | Akademia Gorniczo-Hutnicza AGH University w Krakowie (IM. STANISLAWA STASZICA)
Authenticated
Download Date | 11/16/17 2:30 PM
134 Choroszyński et al.: Biomaterials for hip implants
Brought to you by | Akademia Gorniczo-Hutnicza AGH University w Krakowie (IM. STANISLAWA STASZICA)
Authenticated
Download Date | 11/16/17 2:30 PM
Choroszyński et al.: Biomaterials for hip implants 135
Therefore, sliding contact of these alloys should be biomaterials will not introduce fibrous tissue barriers
avoided without modification of the surface layer by ther- during contact with healthy bone. This permits the bone
mochemical diffusion treatment (nitriding and/or car- to grow closer to the surface of the implant and to fill in
bonitriding) [18, 19]. However, the effective case (and the grooves or pores that have been deliberately introduced
total case) must be thick enough to be able to support the to a surface according to the Wolf law of bone growth to
case layer. Also, the case layer should have a proper gra- enable the device to become more firmly embedded.
dient-like distribution of microstructure, residual stress
and micro hardness versus thickness to avoid the stress
threshold or tension notch.
Wear rates for UHMWPE mated against the Ti-6Al-4V
General requirements for orthopedic
alloy are significantly higher than that for Co-Cr-Mo alloys implants
[6, 11]. Cobalt base alloys such as Co-Cr-Mo are the most
commonly used metals for the current metal on polymer Artificial solutions for human body disabilities must be
(UHMWPE) joint as friction couple in larger loaded bear- based on the mechanical design and actually available
ings of hip implant components for heavier patients. materials, which meet special requirements. These are
Femoral components are also made from Co-Ni-Cr-Mo mechanical, biological and chemical requirements that
alloys. Important reports on cobalt alloys have recently must be fulfilled for them to be used for the human body
been provided. It was about the easy diffusion of Co ions in line with the principles of medicine describing the
from hip implants to body fluids. In this way, concen- particular features of biomaterials. The above review of
tration of cobalt in blood can reach a higher level than the literature reveals complex issues, which are related
normal [20]. Although a majority of chemical elements of with medical, mechanical and material problems in hip
applied materials are building components of the human implants. Biomaterials used for hip prostheses should
body, it is usually harmful if their concentrations in some exhibit the following properties [6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 21]:
tissues, bone or in body liquids are over a natural level. 1. High biocompatibility (nontoxic and non-carcino-
The higher wear rates of UHMWPE associated with its genic, chemically stable and corrosion resistant);
counterpart made of titanium alloy are related to the 2. Nonmagnetic;
mechanical instability of the metal oxide layer under 3. The surface femoral stem should be bioactive in terms
high loading. Mechanical stress and chemical activity of osteointegration;
cause micromechanical and chemical mechanisms of 4. Adequate mechanical properties (Young modulus,
wear out called fretting corrosion. The fretting corrosion yield strength, tensile strength, ductility, hardness,
damage or mechanical fatigue is a major cause for failure toughness, fatigue strength and abrasive wear);
of orthopaedic implants. Fretting can mechanically 5. The femoral stem should be able to endure large and
damage the passive layer and generally surface layers variable stresses in the human body environment
of all metals. The Ti-6Al-4V and other similar alloys are relating to a large number of stress cycles, i.e. fatigue
used for hip implants in the annealed state. These alloys (e.g. during 10 years, assuming that the distance of
in the annealed condition are relatively soft and have 10 km in a day yields about 35 × 106 mechanical cycles,
low strength, and the substrates of these alloys are not i.e. steps) with additional stress corrosion, stress-
able to support the passive oxide layer exposed to heavy enhanced diffusion and even stress-induced phase
loading of working joints during use. Under a heavy load, transformation;
the oxide layer collapses (cracks) and produces a flux 6. Surface layer with gradient-like modulus of elasticity,
of particles. Normal stresses usually are high enough to i.e. with gradient-like porous distribution in surface
break down the surface passive layer causing oxide dis- layer;
ruption. The passive oxide surface layer on femoral heads 7. The surface of implants should be free of imperfec-
made of the titanium alloy results in an excessive wear tion, such as tool marks, scratches, nicks, cracks,
of the couple metal-UHMWPE socket [7]. On the other cavities, burrs and other defects;
hand, relatively soft alloy due to annealed microstructure 8. Surface texture as surface quality factor and surface
with lower internal stored energy is required because of geometry classification may vary from very smooth
stable bioactivity and corrosion resistance due to lower for bearings to rough for the femoral stem and socket.
internal stored energy. The bioactive surface of applied All this depends on the design, material, application
alloys for orthopaedic applications is very important for and the area involved in the metallic implant (e.g. the
achieving improved biocompatibility. It is important that fatigue crack initiation is significantly lowered when
Brought to you by | Akademia Gorniczo-Hutnicza AGH University w Krakowie (IM. STANISLAWA STASZICA)
Authenticated
Download Date | 11/16/17 2:30 PM
136 Choroszyński et al.: Biomaterials for hip implants
the surface is highly polished, whereas a rough sur- The resistance to fatigue crack nucleation depends on
face is demanded for better osteointegration); stress, microstructure and modulus of elasticity accord-
9. Well-balanced chemistry and proper metallurgical ing to the Paris law and Irvin and Weibull considerations
conditions of the alloy, i.e. proper chemical, phase [22, 23]. Fatigue cracks usually nucleate at the surface of
and microstructure composition, absence of segrega- the stressed metal, where the stresses are at a maximum
tion, nonmetallic inclusions and martensitic phase; taking into account surface residual stresses and the prin-
10. Availability, with reasonable balance between qual- ciple of superposition of any existing stress component.
ity, durability and price. In contact loading, the Hertz and Bielajew point with the
maximum reduced stress must be taken into account. Any
design or manufacturing defects and tensile surfaces with
Mechanical and materials require- residual stresses encourage nucleation and development
ments for orthopedic implants of fatigue cracks. The fatigue resistance of the material
can be expressed as the crack growth rate (da/dN) related
to applied stress, strength (s, K) and Young modulus (E) of
One of the goals in the development of new materials
the material [23]:
for hip implants was and still is an optimal ratio of the
elasticity modulus of metallic, ceramic and polymer parts da K
3.6
= C ∆K m = C a (2)
and the bone. The modulus is an important concern in dN
E
the orthopaedic application of biomaterials in terms of
the mechanical interaction between the implant and the
where
bone. The stiffness of the material can be described by
da/dN is the crack growth rate [mm/cycle]
Young’s modulus of elasticity (E). The ratio of stress (s)
C, Ca and m are the experimental constants
to strain (e) in the elastic deformation region is known as
ΔK = Δσ is the stress intensity factor during fatigue
the modulus of elasticity (E), or Young’s modulus. Young’s
factor
modulus is the tangent of slope angle of the σ = Ee strain
line function in the elastic region of the tensile test. The
where sharp crack occurs, the existence of a critical stress
constant of the proportion between the stress and strain
for rapid crack propagation is given by the relation
in the linear elastic region during tension is known as
Young’s modulus and defined as σ crict = E γ / πa (3)
Table 1: Young modulus and mechanical properties of the bone and selected biomaterials.
Brought to you by | Akademia Gorniczo-Hutnicza AGH University w Krakowie (IM. STANISLAWA STASZICA)
Authenticated
Download Date | 11/16/17 2:30 PM
Choroszyński et al.: Biomaterials for hip implants 137
strength of the material increases, the resistance to fatigue Rm, yield strength (R0.2), bending strength (Rb), torsion
also increases by the crack growth rate decrease [Eq. (2)]. strength, toughness and fatigue strength of the alloys con-
If Young’s modulus is larger, the crack growth rate is sidered should be also measured and analyzed (Table 1).
smaller and the critical stress to develop crack must be Mechanical properties depend on the microstruc-
larger [Eq. (3)]. ture which is characterized by grain size, grain crystal-
Reciprocal relation appears when there are differ- lographic orientation, crystal lattice defect density and
ences in an elastic module of the bone and the implant. phase composition. The last one is formed by phase trans-
Significant differences in the elastic moduli of the bone formation due to heat, thermochemical and thermome-
and the implant may lead to stress concentrations at their chanical treatments. Metal forming, i.e. cold and/or heat
interface, i.e. the stress threshold. An insufficient load plastic deformation, are important technological opera-
transfer from the artificial implant to the adjacent natural tions which influence lattice defects, grain size and their
bone may result in bone desorption and loss of the bone- orientation. Segregation of alloying elements can result in
implant joint, and finally, the whole hip implant can be the formation of non-uniform phases and microstructure
rejected. The low modulus of alloys reduces the mismatch composition with different crystallographic structures,
between the modulus of the implant and that of the bone, lowered corrosion resistance and fatigue strength and
which in turn reduces the so-called “stress shielding increased residual stresses and pitting corrosion. Agglom-
phenomenon”, which can be responsible for potentially eration or large amounts of other phases can reduce the
damaging resorption of bone on the inner surface of the fatigue life of implants. Segregation of non-uniform clus-
natural femur. Stress shielding is related to the difference ters acts as stress threshold in the microstructure. An alloy
in flexibility/susceptibility or stiffness between natural with segregated alloying elements is sensitive to nuclea-
bone and the implant alloy. The lower modulus of tita- tion of fatigue cracks. The fatigue or stress corrosion
nium alloys is a positive factor in reducing bone resorp- damage and abrasive wear are the major causes for failure
tion. However, the modulus of elasticity should not be too of orthopaedic implants. The fatigue strength yield point
low. An implant made from alloy with the too low Young’s ratio of applied biomaterials is small and ranges between
modulus of elasticity will have low resistance to nuclea- 0.3 and 0.7 with additional large safety coefficient which
tion of fatigue cracks and larger cracking velocity [Eq. makes the calculations of mechanical strength and total
(3)]. From this point of view the modulus of elasticity (E) reduced stress rather complex and difficult.
should be in the optimum range owing to the selection of
proper materials and/or proper production technology.
Recent attempts to minimize the modulus of elasticity
and improve biocompatibility have led to the introduction Biomedical, mechanical and
of some metastable β titanium alloys with elastic modulus
values as low as about 70–80 GPa [24–26]. However, there
material engineering of hip
has been, and still is, concern about too large elastic implants
modulus of implant alloys compared to that of compact
bone (30 GPa). The high difference in the modulus of The natural constitution of the hip joint, loading stresses,
elasticity of the alloy and of the bone causes stress incom- residual stresses and corrosion, mechanical design
patibility by stress, stress concentration and stress thresh- of human bearing and the materials which are avail-
old. The modulus of elasticity should be optimum which able define problems to solve for artificial hip implants.
assures better transfer of stresses between femoral stem Mechanical, chemical and physical properties as well as
with flange and a porous coating of alloy with gradient biocompatibility requirements define suitable solutions
porosity, which means a gradient-like distribution of for this complex problem. Typical components of hip
Young’s modulus. The modulus of elasticity depends on implants are shown in Figure 1.
the degree of porosity. The modulus of elasticity decreases As shown in Figure 1, a typical hip prosthesis consists
with increasing the porosity of coating from the implant of a femoral stem, a femoral head and socket. The femoral
surface to the bone. stem is usually manufactured from Co-Cr-Mo or Co-Ni-Cr-
Amongst metallic biomaterials, the elastic modulus of Mo alloys or from titanium base alloys (Ti-6Al-4V or new
Ti-6Al-4V alloy (E = 110 GPa) is much lower than that of one Ti-Nb-Zr). The head is made of highly polished Co-Cr-
316L (X3CrNiMnMo18-14-5-3) stainless steel (E = 210 GPa) Mo alloy, of Al2O3 sintered ceramic composite or of stabi-
or Co-Cr-Mo alloy (E = 230 GPa). Other mechanical prop- lized ZrO2 with Al2O3 and yttrium oxide additives [10]. The
erties like hardness, ultimate tensile strength (UTS), metal-backed shell and the screws are made of titanium
Brought to you by | Akademia Gorniczo-Hutnicza AGH University w Krakowie (IM. STANISLAWA STASZICA)
Authenticated
Download Date | 11/16/17 2:30 PM
138 Choroszyński et al.: Biomaterials for hip implants
Table 2: Chemical composition of commercially pure titanium grades in wt.% according to ASTM F 67.
alloy Ti-6Al-4V or CP titanium (Tables 1 and 2). The socket the parameters of annealing according to the principle: the
(cup) is made of UHMWPE usually with metallic shell. higher the temperature of annealing, the larger the grain
Modular designs, where the stem and head are made of size and the smaller the mechanical properties. Mechani-
two materials, are common [11]. However, when two dif- cal properties of this alloy can be controlled over significant
ferent metallic alloys are applied, problems with galvanic range through hot and/or cold working and heat treatment.
corrosion should be considered and taken into account. The compacting and sintering technology is used to
produce ceramic components. The following technologi-
cal operations are heat or thermochemical treatments
Brought to you by | Akademia Gorniczo-Hutnicza AGH University w Krakowie (IM. STANISLAWA STASZICA)
Authenticated
Download Date | 11/16/17 2:30 PM
Choroszyński et al.: Biomaterials for hip implants 139
Brought to you by | Akademia Gorniczo-Hutnicza AGH University w Krakowie (IM. STANISLAWA STASZICA)
Authenticated
Download Date | 11/16/17 2:30 PM
140 Choroszyński et al.: Biomaterials for hip implants
thermomechanical cold or hot working. During these discharge which produces single ions (in statu nascendi)
processes, graphite or molybdenum disulphide is used, according to the following reaction:
whereas glass powder may be used for a more severe
process like hot extrusion [27]. N2 → N2+ + N2+ + 4e
Brought to you by | Akademia Gorniczo-Hutnicza AGH University w Krakowie (IM. STANISLAWA STASZICA)
Authenticated
Download Date | 11/16/17 2:30 PM
Choroszyński et al.: Biomaterials for hip implants 141
was experimentally introduced as a good biocompat- modulus than alloy Ti-6Al-4V, excellent hot and cold work-
ible alloy for medical application. Gradually, aluminium ability and superior corrosion resistance. The Ti-13Nb-13Zr
and later vanadium were substituted by elements more alloy is a metastable beta titanium alloy developed for use
friendly for the human body (Table 3). A new generation in biomedical implants that combines a high biocompat-
of titanium alloys with niobium was introduced in 1979 [5, ibility, superior corrosion resistance, high strength, excel-
25, 26, 32–34]. New β or near β titanium alloys contain bio- lent hot and cold workability and lower elastic modulus.
compatible alloying elements: Nb, Zr and Ta. They have Mechanical properties of this alloy can be controlled over
a lower modulus of elasticity as compared to α + β alloys. significant range through hot working, cold working and
The β alloys have excellent formability, cold rolling capa- heat treatment. The mechanical properties of Ti-13Nb-13Zr
bilities, good ductility and formability. The main disad- can vary by thermomechanical treatment. This alloy con-
vantage of β alloys in comparison with α + β alloys is their tains a high percentage of high-density alloying elements.
higher density. Most recently developed alloys based on Because of the high density of zirconium and niobium,
the Ti-Nb-Zr-Ta alloying elements appeared as β alloy has there is a problem of segregation during melting and
the lowest modulus of elasticity, E = 70 GPa [3, 24]. solidification of alloys containing these elements.
Alloy Ti-13Nb-13Zr was originally developed for Also, because of the high density of niobium and zir-
medical implant applications [24]. This alloy combines conium, special techniques of mixing liquid metal during
a high biocompatibility, high strength, lower elastic melting and casting process are required to prevent seg-
regation of alloying elements. Niobium and zirconium
have larger atomic diameter than titanium. Special ther-
Table 3: Selected experimental and applied titanium alloys for
mochemical treatment which provides point defects and
implant applications.
dislocations should be applied to increase the diffusion
Alloy designation and type Developed in rate of alloying elements in order to obtain the proper
response during homogenization treatment. Segrega-
α + β alloys
tion of alloying elements cannot be tolerated in metal-
Ti-6Al-4V USA
Ti-6Al-4VELI USA lic implants. Segregation of alloying elements decreases
Ti-6Al-7Nb Switzerland resistance to corrosion and fatigue crack initiation, lowers
Ti-5Al-2.5Fe Germany resistance to an impact load and fracture resistance and
Ti-3Al-2.5V USA decreases biocompatibility. The newest development of
Ti-15Zr-4Nb-2Ta-0.2Pd Japan
titanium alloys is directed to Ti-Au composition with an
Ti-5Al-3Mo-4Zr Japan
Ti-15Sn-4Nb-2Ta Japan
expectation of better mechanical and biomedical proper-
β alloys ties. Another titanium base alloy with nickel, nitinol, is
Ti-15Mo-5Zr-3Al Japan also an important biomaterial [35, 36].
Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.5Zr Japan
Ti-13Nb-13Zra USA
Ti-12Mo-6Zr-2Fe USA
Ti-16Nb-10Hf USA Cobalt base alloys for hip implants
Ti-35Nb-7Zr-5Ta USA
Ti-15Mo-2.8Nb-0.2Si-0.26O USA Cobalt-chromium alloys have good resistance to pitting
and crevice corrosion in the human body. The main cobalt
a
The only alloy with homogeneous microstructure is single-phase β.
Alloy with segregation of Nb and Zr is not acceptable. Segregation of alloys (Table 4) used for hip implants are
alloying elements (Nb and Zr) causes not homogeneous microstruc- –– ASTM F75, (Co-28Cr-6Mo) casting alloy
ture sensitive to corrosion and fracture. –– ASTM F90, (Co-20Cr-15W-10Ni) wrought alloy
Table 4: Chemical composition in wt.% of selected cobalt base alloys used for hip implants (Co balance).
F75 R30075 27.0–30.0 5.0–7.0 1.0 0.75 0.35 1.0 1.0 0.20 0.020 0.01 0.25 N, 0.30 Al
F90 R3065 19.0–21.0 – 9.0–11 3.0 max 0.05–0.15 0.40 0.40 14.0–16.0 0.040 0.03 –
F562 R30563 19.0–21.0 9.0–10.5 33.0–37.0 1.0 max 0.025 max 0.15 0.15 – 0.015 0.01 1.0 Ti
F563 R30563 18.0–22.0 3.0–4.0 15.0–25.0 4.0–6.0 0.05 0.50 1.0 3.0–4.0 – 0.01 0.50–3.50 Ti
F799 R31537 26.0–30.0 5.0–7.0 1.0 0.75 0.35 1.0 1.0 – – – 0.25 N
Brought to you by | Akademia Gorniczo-Hutnicza AGH University w Krakowie (IM. STANISLAWA STASZICA)
Authenticated
Download Date | 11/16/17 2:30 PM
142 Choroszyński et al.: Biomaterials for hip implants
Table 5: Chemical compositions (in wt.%) of austenitic stainless steels used for surgical implants according to the ASTM specifications
(Fe balance).a
F138 0.03 17.00–19.00 13.0–15.00 2.00 2.25–3.00 0.50 0.10 0.025 0.010 –
F1314 0.03 20.50–23.50 11.50–13.50 4.00–6.00 2.00–3.00 0.50 0.20–0.40 0.025 0.010 0.10–0.30 Nb; 0.10–0.30 V
F1586 0.08 19.50–22.00 9.00–11.00 2.00–4.25 2.00–3.00 0.25 0.25–0.50 0.25 0.010 0.25–0.80 Nb
F2229 0.08 19.00–23.00 0.10 21.00–24.00 0.50–1.50 0.25 0.90 min 0.03 0.010 0.95 N
–– ASTM F999, (Co-28Cr-6Mo) thermomechanically 3. M6C carbides, where “M” stands for tungsten or
processed molybdenum; these carbides form when the tungsten
–– ASTM F562, Co-35Ni-20Cr-10Mo wrought alloy or molybdenum content exceeds about 5 at.%.
–– ASTM F 1058 (Co-20Cr-15, 5 Ni-7Mo-Fe) wrought alloy
–– MP35N, (35Co-35Ni-20Cr-10Mo) thermomechanically Components made of cobalt alloys are designed as
processed perfect spherical head of hip bearing so that the metal
always articulates against a low friction plastic (e.g.
UHMWPE or high cross-linking polyethylene), which
Biophysics and physical metallurgy of cobalt provides smooth relative movement, small friction and
alloys minimum abrasive wear. The recent reports on cobalt
alloys applied for hip implants show an easy diffusion
Cobalt is beneficial for humans because it is a component of Co ions from the hip implant to body fluids. This type
of vitamin B12 (cobalamin), which is essential for human of implementation with cobalt alloy implants caused
health. However, too high concentrations of cobalt may excessive concentration of Co in blood [20]. Therefore,
be toxic to health. A cobalt-based alloy was first used as a some limitations in this type of application have been
material for hip implants in the USA in 1936. At tempera- prepared.
tures below 417°C cobalt exhibits a hexagonal close-packed
structure. Between 417°C and its melting point of 1493°C,
cobalt has a face-centred cubic (FCC) structure. The melting Austenitic stainless steels
point of cobalt is 1768°C. The elastic modulus of cobalt is
about 210 GPa in tension and about 183 GPa in compres- The main components of stainless steels are iron, nickel
sion. Cobalt has a density of 8.90 g/cm3. Typically, the and chromium. Generally, stainless steels are divided into
microstructure of cobalt-based alloys consists of FCC as (γ) three groups: ferritic, martensitic (tool steels) and austen-
phase as matrix and various types of carbides. A strength- itic. Only the last type of stainless steels called bio-steels
ening in cobalt-based alloys is obtained primarily through a is applied for a hip prosthesis for short-term use. Auste-
combination of solid solution strengthening (by Cr, Mo and nitic stainless steels were first used as a material for hip
Fe atoms) and carbide precipitation. Strength and tough- implants in the USA in 1926.
ness depend on the amount of solved foreign atoms and Nevertheless, iron ions are important components of
amount, size and distributions of carbides. A fine disper- blood; other chemical components are rather harmful to
sion of carbides contributes significantly to the strength of human body.
these alloys. Dislocation movement is strongly impeded by Austenitic stainless steels are used for implant appli-
carbide precipitations. Carbide precipitations are barriers cations because they are relatively inexpensive. Passiva-
for dislocation movements. This carbon content in these tion of stainless steel implants is enhanced by nitric acid.
alloys has a significant effect on the number of carbides. In Austenitic stainless steels are not sufficiently corrosion
general, three main types of carbides can be present in the resistant for long-term use as an implant material. Pitting
microstructure of cobalt-based alloys [8, 14–17]: corrosion in austenitic stainless steels is usually caused
1. M23C6 carbides, where “M” is mostly chromium but by chlorine ions and starts at nonmetallic inclusions
can be substituted by tungsten and molybdenum; (sulphur inclusions) and other heterogenic places. Molyb-
2. MC carbides, where M stands for the reactive metals denum is added to stainless steels usually in amounts of
tantalum, titanium, zirconium and niobium; 2–3% to increase resistance to pitting corrosion in saline
Brought to you by | Akademia Gorniczo-Hutnicza AGH University w Krakowie (IM. STANISLAWA STASZICA)
Authenticated
Download Date | 11/16/17 2:30 PM
Choroszyński et al.: Biomaterials for hip implants 143
environments. Nitrogen-strengthened alloys are used for The capacity for joining implant with the bone, i.e. oste-
the bone plate and bone screws. ointegration, which is direct bone anchorage to an implant
Austenitic stainless steels have excellent formability, into bone with no fibrous capsule interface, makes it pos-
and their response to deformation depends on the nickel sible to transmit the loading forces directly to the bone.
content. Formability increases with an increase in the All the beneficial passive layers on metals can be
content of nickel. Magnetic alloys should not be used in mechanically damaged by the fretting of metal against
the human body because they could become dislodged in metal.
the strong magnetic field of magnetic resonance imaging. Titanium alloys are used for hip implants due to excel-
Pitting corrosion in the stainless steels occurs when the lent combination of mechanical properties, low density,
protective film is broken, exposing the steel to Cl− ions. Aus- acceptable tissue tolerance, high strength to weight ratio,
tenitic stainless steels for hip implants can be divided into outstanding resistance to corrosion by body fluids, high
1. low carbon stainless steels biocompatibility, low density and nonmagnetic properties.
2. nitrogen-strengthened stainless steels Titanium induces the formation of a fibrous tissue
3. nickel-free stainless steels barrier when placed in contact with a healthy bone. This
permits the bone to grow closely on the surface of the
Examples of major ASTM austenitic stainless steels for femoral stem and fill pores that have been deliberately
implant materials: introduced to facilitate bone ingrowths.
Contaminations of titanium alloys by interstitial ele-
Low carbon stainless steels: ASTM F138/139 316 L, ments such as hydrogen and oxygen during fabrication
(21Cr-10Ni-3Mn-2.5 Mo). This steel contains 0.25–0.50% N. (melting, thermomechanical treatment and thermochemi-
cal surface hardening) must be avoided because these ele-
Nitrogen-strengthened stainless steels: ASTM 1314 ments have an embrittling effect on titanium.
(22Cr-12, 5Ni-5Mn-2.5Mo-0.30 N). This steel contains 0.20– In the presence of hydrogen, titanium hydrides (TiH2)
0.40% N. may form into long thin needles in titanium alloys and
these hydrides decrease resistance to fracture.
Nickel free stainless steel and nitrogen-strengthened Austenitic stainless steel, particularly nickel-free
steels: ASTM 1314 F2229 (23Mn-21 Cr-1Mo –0.95N). stainless steel with nitrogen strengthened like ASTM 1314
F2229 (23Mn-21Cr-1Mo-0.95N), can be used for some ele-
The substitution of nickel atoms is important due to its ments of hip implants.
harmful activity in the human body. Because of that, Cobalt-chromium alloys are the most commonly used
Ni-free stainless steels were elaborated (Table 5). metals for current metal on polymer implants. A typical
microstructure of cobalt base alloys consists of FCC (γ)
phase matrix and carbides of various types.
Summary Hydroxyapatite is widely used as bioactive porous
coating of the femoral stem and the metallic shell in hip
The review, as presented above, i.e. titanium and cobalt implants.
alloys, bio-steels, their specific treatments, surface layers A special type of polyethylene, i.e. special grade
and coatings on alloys used for hip prosthetic can be sum- UHMWPE with additional cross linking bonding, is
marized as follows: widely used (as socket) in hip implants as the load-bear-
The synergy of some branches of science and techno- ing material (in hip implants with combination metal on
logy, i.e. medicine (surgery), mechanical design and polymer).
material science and technology has led to progress and The final decision about the type and material of hip
achievements in hip implants. implants made in the hospital by medics is supported by
All of the chemical elements of the materials applied many additional factors like accessibility, availability of
in implants are building components of the human body, the material, the patient’s weight and age, etc.
but some of them are even poisonous and others, like
aluminium, vanadium and nickel, are classified as toxic
elements. Conclusions
Biomedical implant reliability depends largely on the
corrosion, abrasive wear and fatigue strength/resistance 1. The synergy of medicine, biochemistry, biophys-
of the materials used in production technology. ics, mechanical engineering, materials science and
Brought to you by | Akademia Gorniczo-Hutnicza AGH University w Krakowie (IM. STANISLAWA STASZICA)
Authenticated
Download Date | 11/16/17 2:30 PM
144 Choroszyński et al.: Biomaterials for hip implants
informatics succeeds in achieving real progress in Author contributions: All the authors have accepted
orthopaedic surgery of hip joint implants. responsibility for the entire content of this submitted
2. Although the majority of chemical elements of the manuscript and approved submission.
materials applied to make implants are building com- Research funding: The results of research and this paper
ponents of the human body, it is usually harmful if were supported by the Faculty of Metals Engineering and
their concentrations in some tissues, bone or in body Industrial Computer Science, Department of Physical
liquids are over the natural level. and Powder Metallurgy of AGH-University of Science and
3. The fatigue and stress corrosion damage are the major Technology in Krakow under project no 11.11.110.299.
causes for the failure of orthopaedic implants. The Employment or leadership: None declared.
fatigue strength and yield point ratio of biomateri- Honorarium: None declared.
als applied are small and range between 0.3 and 0.7, Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played
which, with additional large safety coefficient, cause no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and
mechanical strength and total reduced stress calcula- interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the
tions to be rather complex and difficult. decision to submit the report for publication.
4. The majority of parts of hip joint implants are made
of metallic materials due to heavy and cyclic loaded
bearings. Additionally, they work in the bioactive
environment. Titanium alloys are most advanced References
materials in this type of application; however, Co-
1. Niinomi M. Recent titanium R&D for biomedical applications in
Cr-Mo alloys and austenitic stainless like bio-steels
Japan. Jovi Optimo Maximo 1999;51:32–4.
mated with appropriate metallic alloys are the main 2. Wong J, Bronzino J. Biomaterials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2007.
materials for components of hip implants. 3. Zhou YL, Niinomi M, Akahori T. Effects of Ta content on Young’s
5. The natural constitution of the hip joint; the stresses modulus and tensile properties of binary Ti-Ta alloys for bio-
resulting from loading, residual stresses and cor- medical applications. Mater Sci Eng A 2004;371:283–90.
rosion; mechanical design of human bearing; and 4. Niinomi M. Mechanical properties of biomedical titanium alloys.
Mater Sci Eng A 1998;243:231–6.
accessible materials define problems to solve for arti-
5. Davidson JA, Kovacs P. New biocompatible, low modulus
ficial hip implants. titanium alloy for medical implants. U.S. Patent, No.5, 169, 597,
6. The contemporary modular structure of hip implants December 8, 1992.
still needs to be developed in the field of design, man- 6. Gebeau RC, Brown RS. Tech spotlight: biomedical implant
ufacturing technology and materials. The advanced alloys. Adv Mater Proc 2001;159:46–8.
7. Brunski B. Metals. In: Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons
metallic, ceramic, composite and polymer materials
JE, editors. Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in
are an important key to the progress of hip prosthesis medicine. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1996:37–50.
and of biomedical engineering. 8. Devine TM, Wulff J. Cast vs. wrought cobalt chromium surgical
implant alloys. J Biomed Mater Res 1975;9:151–67.
Note 9. Marciniak J. Biomaterialy: Wyd. Polit. Śląskiej, Gliwice, 2002.
The information in this article is for informational and 10. Błażewicz S, Stoch L. Biomateriały t.4 w Biocybernetyka i
inżynieria biomedyczna 2000 pod red. M. Nalęcza, Akademicka
educational purposes and is not meant as medical advice
Oficyna Wyd. EXI, Warsaw, 2003.
or recommendation. Only a qualified orthopaedic surgeon 11. Long M, Rack HJ. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement – a
can determine which material implant system is best for materials science prospective. Biomaterials 1998;19:1621–39.
an individual person. There are many factors that the 12. Grosse S, Haugland HK, Lilleng P, Elison P, Hallan G, Hel PJ. Wear
surgeon uses when recommending hip implants (state of particles and ion from cemented and uncemented titanium-
based hip protheses – a histological and chemical analysis.
health, weight, age, life activity, anatomy etc.). Any ques-
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2015;103B:709–17.
tions and concerns regarding specific type of materials 13. Okazaki Y, Rao S, Tateishi T, Ito Y. Cytocompatibility of vari-
and implants should be discussed with the professional ous metal and development of new titanium alloys for medical
orthopaedic surgeon. Every patient’s case is unique, and implants. Mater Sci Eng A 1998;243:250.
each patient should follow specific instructions of his or 14. Cobalt base alloys. In: Davis JR, editor. ASM specialty handbook:
her doctor. The information in this article does not replace nickel, cobalt, and their alloys. OH: ASM International, 2000:
362–70. ISBN: 978-0-87170-685-0.
orthopaedic doctor’s specific instructions.
15. Williams DF. The properties and clinical uses of cobalt chromium
alloys. In: Williams DF, Williams EF, editors. Biocompatibility
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank MSc of clinical implant materials, vol 1, Boca Raton USA: CRS Press,
Kamil Nawojowski for his support. 1981:99–127.
Brought to you by | Akademia Gorniczo-Hutnicza AGH University w Krakowie (IM. STANISLAWA STASZICA)
Authenticated
Download Date | 11/16/17 2:30 PM
Choroszyński et al.: Biomaterials for hip implants 145
16. Kuhm AT. Corrosion of Co-Cr alloys in aqueous environments – a 27. Choroszyński M, Choroszyński MR, Skrzypek StJ. Diffusional
review. Biomaterials 1981;2:68–77. nitrided surface layers of some titanium components of
17. Kilner T, Pilliar RM, Weatherly GC, Allibert C. Phase identifica- hip implants (in preparation for publication in Biomaterials
tion and incipient melting in cast Co–Cr surgical implant alloy 2017).
J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:63–79. 28. Massalski TB. Binary alloys phase diagrams, 7th ed., vol 1–3,
18. Sobiecki JR, Wierzchoń T, Rudnicki J. The influence of glow 1990, OH: ASM International, ISBN: 0-87170-405-6.
discharge nitriding, oxynitriding and carbonitriding on surface 29. Bochniak W, Przybyłowicz K. Defekty w sieci krystalicznej
modification of Ti–1Al–1Mn titanium alloy. Vacuum 2001;64:41–6. i ich rola, oraz K. Kubiak: Tytan i jego stopy, Rozdz., w:
19. Jurczyk K. Badanie wybranych właściwości chemicznych, Inżynieria metali iich stopów/red. Stanisław J. Skrzypek, Karol
mechanicznych i biokompatabilości nanokompozytów typu Przybyłowicz. Kraków: Wydawnictwa AGH, 2012.
tytan-ceramika w warunkach in vitro, PhD thesis, Poznan Univer- 30. Skrzypek SJ. Nowe możliwości pomiaru makro-naprężeń
sity of Medical Science, Poznan, 2010, promoter Prof. J. Stopa. własnych w materiałach przy zastosowaniu dyfrakcji prom-
20. Le Parisien, BFM TV, France info (Tygodnik ANGORKA, Warszawa- ieniowania X w geometrii stałego kąta padania, ROZPRAWY i
Chicago Nr 17 (1077) Rok XXI 26 kwietnia 2015. MONOGRAFIE 108, Uczelniane Wyd. Nauk.-Dydaktyczne AGH,
21. Boyer R. Titanium and titanium alloys. In: Davis JR, editor. Kraków 2002.
Metals handbook, desk edition, 2nd ed. OH: ASM International, 31. Knychalska-Karwan Z, Ślósarczyk A. Hydroxyapatyt w stomatologii,
ISBN: 978-0-87170-654-6, 1998:575–88. Druk. TECHNET, Kraków, 1994.
22. Long M, Rack HJ. Total joint replacement – a materials science 32. Kuroda D, Niinomi M, Morinaga M, Kato Y, Yashiro T. Design and
perspective. Biomaterials 1998;19:1621–39. mechanical properties of new β type titanium alloys for implant
23. Kocańda S. Zmęczeniowe niszczenie metali, Warszawa, WNT 1978. materials. Mater Sci Eng 1998;243:244–9.
24. Mishra AK, Davidson JA, Kovacs P, Poggie RA. Ti-13Nb-13Zr: a 33. Niinomi M. Development of β type titanium alloys for biomedical
new low modulus, high strength, corrosion resistant near-beta applications. Mater Jap 1998;37:843–6.
alloy for orthopaedic implants. In: Eylon D, Boyer RR, Koss DA, 34. Dąbrowski R. The phase transformations during continuous
editors. Beta titanium alloys in the 1990s. Warrendale, PA: The cooling of Ti6Al7Nb alloy from the two-phase α + β range.
Mineral, Metals and Materials Society, 1993:61–72. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 2013;59:7–12.
25. Dąbrowski R. Effect of heat treatment on the mechanical proper- 35. Castleman LS, Motzkin SM. The biocompatibility of nitinol. In:
ties of two-phase titanium alloy Ti6Al7Nb. Arch Metal Mater Williams DF, editor. Biocompatibility of clinical implant materi-
2014;59:1713–6. als, vol 1. Boca Raton USA: CRC Press, 1981:129–54.
26. Dąbrowski R, Krawczyk J, Rożniata E. Influence of the ageing 36. Goryczka T, Van Humbeeck J. NiTICu shape memory alloy pro-
temperature on the selected mechanical properties of the duced by powder technology. J Alloys Comp 2008;456:
Ti6Al7Nb alloy. Key Eng Mater 2015;641:120–3. 194–200.
Brought to you by | Akademia Gorniczo-Hutnicza AGH University w Krakowie (IM. STANISLAWA STASZICA)
Authenticated
Download Date | 11/16/17 2:30 PM
View publication stats