Romans 7 Study Guide
Romans 7 Study Guide
Romans 7 Study Guide
Page 1 of 2
#DeeperLearning TESDA@Study – 16May2020
NOTES
There is no need of any argument in this chapter for the perpetuity of the law. That is not the question under
consideration. The apostle is not making a special argument to prove that the law is not abolished. His
argument starts from that point as one already settled and shows the practical working of the law in
individual cases. He brings it right home to the hearts of men that they are under the law; and if they are
under it, how can it be abolished?
Note the class of people to whom Paul is writing. "I speak to them that know the law.” This epistle is
addressed to professed followers of Christ. We find that in the second chapter, commencing with the
seventeenth verse: "Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God."
The question arises, what is meant by our being dead to the law by the body of Christ? That brings us to the
point where the illustration fails us. The illustration fails us, —why? Because it is utterly impossible to find
anything in life that will correctly represent in every particular divine things. There is no illustration that will
serve in every particular. That is why we have so many types of Christ. No one person could serve as a
complete type of him. We have Adam in one place as a type of Christ; we have Abel; we have Moses; we have
Aaron; David; and Melchisedek, and many others who represent different phases of Christ, because there is
no one of them who could represent him in every particular.
So when the apostle would represent the union of all people with the house of Israel, he says, "I would not,
brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery." It is a mystery, it is something unnatural. He says that it
is a grafting process, but that it is contrary to the natural method. Therefore this illustration of marriage
cannot be considered as complete in every particular. And yet, after all, the illustration does not fail, if we
choose to consider that the union with the first husband is a criminal connection. It is so in the application.
Those who are united to the flesh are guilty of a capital crime. The law holds them in that connection,—i.e., it
will not allow them to lightly dissolve the union, and pass it by as though nothing had taken place,—but it
demands their life. With this explanation we can understand the chapter.
Page 2 of 2