See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/242509844

Design and Construction of Interior Duct System

Article · January 2001

CITATIONS READS
0 227

3 authors, including:

Janet Mcilvaine Philip Fairey

University of Central Florida University of Central Florida
22 PUBLICATIONS   194 CITATIONS    38 PUBLICATIONS   196 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Solar and Energy Conservation Measure Feasibility Analysis for the City of New Smyrna Beach View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Janet Mcilvaine on 14 November 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Design and Construction
of Interior Duct System

Authors
Janet E.R. McIlvaine
David Beal
Philip W. Fairey, III

Original Publication
McIlvaine, J., Beal, D., Fairey, P., “Design and Construction of Interior Duct
System”, Presented at the Affordable Comfort Conference 2001, April 30 –
May 5, 2001, Milwaukee, WI., April 2002, Revised July 2002.

Publication Number
FSEC-PF-365-01

Copyright
Copyright © Florida Solar Energy Center/University of Central Florida
1679 Clearlake Road, Cocoa, Florida 32922, USA
(321) 638-1000
All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The Florida Solar Energy Center/University of Central Florida nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees,
makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,
completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use
would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or
service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its
endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Florida Solar Energy Center/University of Central Florida or
any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of
the Florida Solar Energy Center/University of Central Florida or any agency thereof.
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was sponsored by the United States Department of Energy (DOE), National
Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Cooperative Agreement DE-FC26-99FT40642. The
authors appreciate the support and encouragement of the program manager, Esher Kweller,
DOE, and the contract administrator, William Hasslebacher, NETL.

This project would have been impossible without the cooperation of our builder partners,
James Sargent of Bentwood Custom Homes in Dallas, TX, Kenneth Fonorow of Florida
Home Energy and Resources Organization and affiliated builders, Robert Calhoun of the
Durham County Habitat for Humanity, NC and Mary Lou Bowman and Russell Cubbins of
the Broward County Habitat for Humanity, FL. Their willingness to share their ideas, and see
their work validated, made the project possible.

The technical assistance rendered by Jon Andrews of Brookhaven National Laboratory,

James Cummings and Neil Moyer of the Florida Solar Energy Center, and Bruce McKendry
of WattsRight/Building Science Alliance was invaluable.

i
 DISCLAIMER

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States
Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their
employees makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or
responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus,
product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned
rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade
name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its
endorsement, recommend ation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency
thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or
reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

ii
 Interior Duct System Design, Construction and Performance
Janet McIlvaine, Florida Solar Energy Center
David Beal, Florida Solar Energy Center

ABSTRACT
To combat the energy, durability, and indoor air quality penalties of duct leakage,
energy experts have recommended putting the duct system and air handler inside the
conditioned space. Two paths of accomplishing this have emerged: unvented attics/crawl
spaces and interior chases. This study focuses on the design, construction, and performance
of the interior chase approach as implemented by five different builders in Texas, North
Carolina, and Florida.
Researchers found that, in many cases, breeches of the air barrier were evident from
simple visual inspection. Critical points of design and construction were identified and will
be presented through photos, design and construction guidelines, and drawings suitable for
construction documents.

iii
Introduction

Energy efficiency experts agree that minimizing duct leakage is one of the most
important energy conservation measures. Reducing duct leakage provides rapid payback
from energy savings, and mitigates the health and durability issues associated with duct
leakage to and from unconditioned spaces. Over the past 15 years, researchers and
builders have developed three primary strategies to reduce the impact of duct leakage:
sealing ducts, placing ducts in unvented attics or crawl spaces, and placing the ducts in
conditioned space. This material focuses on placing the ducts within the conditioned
space. The design and construction guidelines in this report are the results of working
with four builders and one energy consultant who routinely build homes with ducts in the
conditioned space.

$ Bentwood Custom Homes (Waxahachie, TX)

$ Builders affiliated with Ken Fonorow of the Florida Home Energy and Resourses
Organization (Gainesville, FL)
$ Durham County Habitat for Humanity (Durham, NC)
$ Broward County Habitat for Humanity (Ft. Lauderdale, FL)

Duct leakage concepts. Conventional forced air heating and cooling systems employ an
air distribution system that includes an air handler and a duct system. The air handler is
designed to remove air from the house, condition it, and supply it back to each room.
Duct leakage (Figure 1) can occur on either the supply side or the return side of
the air handler as well as in the air handler itself. Both supply and return leaks cause air
to move in unplanned, unpredictable ways, usually through unconditioned spaces and
often bypassing air, thermal, and moisture barriers.

Supply leakage. When supply ducts leak, they create a negative pressure in the house
because more air is being removed than is being supplied. The negative pressure draws
air from outside and/or unconditioned spaces (infiltration) through holes in the house’s
air barrier potentially leading to:

$ Back drafting of atmospheric combustion devices

$ Introduction of outside air pollution, pollen, and other allergens
$ Introduction of air borne particles (dust, insulation, VOCs, building material
particles) from floor, wall, ceiling cavities
$ Degraded comfort (temperature, humidity)
$ Greater conditioning load
$ Reduced system life

Supply leaks also spill conditioned air into unconditioned spaces, wasting energy, and
creating the potential for mold growth, condensation, and rot.

Return leakage. When return ducts leak, part of the return air is drawn form
unconditioned spaces, or outside, instead of the house. This dirty air often bypasses the
system’s filter. The leakage creates a positive pressure in the house because more air is

Copyright © 2002 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

1
being supplied than is being removed. The positive pressure forces air through holes in
the house’s air barrier (exfiltration). Return duct leakage leads to:

$ Lowered heating and cooling capacity with degraded comfort.

$ Introduction of outside and/or unconditioned air into the air handler, with its
attendant moisture, dirt, and pollutants.
$ Increased conditioning load
$ Reduced system life

Figure 1 Leaky ducts in unconditioned spaces cause

unbalanced air flow and can gain or lose heat sufficient
to change the supply air temperature by 40 to 50 F

Reducing duct leakage: Three primary approaches.

1. Sealed ducts: Researchers and builders have studying the duct leakage
phenomenon for approximately 15 years have found that sealing the duct system
with a combination of fiberglass mesh and mastic (Figure 2) is inexpensive and
cost effective. Several residential studies have shown that these simple repairs can
reduce duct leakage to less than 3-5%1 , saving 15 or 20% of cooling and heating

1
Duct leakage to outside measured at test pressure of 25 pascals divided by conditioned floor area
multiplied by 100, sometimes referred to as Qn.

Copyright © 2002 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

2
 costs respectively or about $60 annually 2 . At an installed cost of about $200, this
improvement generally pays for itself in less than 4 years. The basic premise of
this concept is that the air barrier of the duct system needs to be continuous and
directly connected to the air barrier of the house.

2. Unvented attics or crawlspaces: In recent years, researchers began to explore

other ways to reduce the impacts of duct leakage (Rudd 1998). Relocating the
thermal and air barriers of the house to the outer edges of the structure creates
either an insulated roof deck or foundation walls. The space containing the ducts
is not vented to the outside, nor is it conditioned. Research to evaluate the
effectiveness of this method is in progress. Code issues and construction process
logistics factor large in this approach.

Figure 2 An unsealed duct (left), and a duct sealed with mesh and mastic (right)

3. Interior ducts: This concept involves putting the entire forced air system,
including the air handler, inside the conditioned space (Figure 3). Technically,
this means inside the air boundary as well as the thermal boundary, and within the
space that is served by the conditioning system. Field data evaluating the success
of this strategy is scant. The primary challenges in this approach involve
establishing an air barrier around the ducts, overcoming code challenges, and
integrating the new detail into the design and construction process. Theoretically,
interior ducts will yield the savings of eliminating duct leakage plus the savings of
reduced thermal gain/loss of the duct system.

2
Compilation of findings by: Cummings, Tooley, and Moyer, 91 and 93. Davis, 91. Evans and
Tsal, 96. Manclark and Davis, 96. See References.)

Copyright © 2002 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

3
 Figure 3 Interior duct chase, with supply register

Interior Duct System Design And Construction Considerations

Developing Standardized Design and Detail Guidelines

Usually an interior duct system is installed either in a fur-down chase below the
ceiling insulation or in a fur- up chase in the attic and insulated with the ceiling. Though
ducts in floor cavities between upstairs and downstairs are often thought of as being in
conditioned space, this is rarely the case. The floor cavity is not normally bound by a
definitive air barrier. However, with careful attention to sealing the perimeter of the floor
cavity this may be a viable option.

Fur-up chases. Seen from the living area, the fur- up chases are indistinguishable from
the finished ceiling; seen from the attic, they appear as a boxed out area covered with
insulation. All sealing should be complete before insulation is installed since access to the
chase from below will be limited after the ducts and drywall are installed. All sides of the
chase should be thoroughly covered with insulation. Since fur-ups are more obvious from
the attic than fur-downs, they are more likely to be targeted for wiring and plumbing runs
(Figure 4). The chase needs to be carefully inspected before the builder releases the
house. Upon completion of the house, all penetrations should be filled with a code-
approved sealant and any missing pieces of the air barrier replaced and sealed.

Copyright © 2002 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

4
 Figure 4 Fur-up chase compromised by plumbing and wiring

Fur-down chases. Chases built down into the conditioned space generally occupy the
upper portion of hallways, run along walls, and/or cut across open living areas as
architectural elements (Figure 5). The lowered ceiling height can be offset by widening
the hallway and can be used to define living spaces in open floor plans. Most of the
houses included in this field study featured fur-down chases.

A standard definition for “conditioned space”. The “conditioned space” is defined by

the location of the air barrier and thermal barrier. The air inside these barriers is cycled
through the air handler and conditioned. To be in the conditioned space, the duct system
must be isolated from all adjacent unconditioned spaces (including wall cavities) by a
continuous air barrier and be within the thermal barrier of the house. The benefits, both
thermal and air exchange, of interior duct systems will be severely diminished if not
completely lost without these barriers.

Figure 5 Chase used as an architectural detail

Copyright © 2002 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

5
Standard duct materials and duct sizes. Interior duct work in a fur-down system
typically consists of metal or fiberglass duct board. Space limitations generally rule out
the use of flex duct. (Note that the unvented attic/crawlspace strategy, mentioned above,
as well as a fur-up system, does not.)
Usually, ceiling heights cannot be less than 7'0" to meet code and allow for door
framing (Figure 6). For homes with 8' ceilings, that allows 12"or less for the ducts and
the structure of the chase. To minimize the space needed for chase structure, detail the
smallest available framing member that will support the weight of the drywall (for the
bottom of chase) and ducts (if not supported by straps). This might be 2 x 2s or light
gauge metal framing.

Figure 6 Chase in hallway, note 7'0” ceiling and

door clearance

Integrating interior ducts into plans. In ranch style homes (homes with all bedrooms
grouped together at one end of the house, also incorporating a main hallway), the chase
runs the length of the hallway (flanked by bedrooms) and extends out into the main living
area (Figure 7).
In split plan homes (homes with bedrooms on either end of the house, separated
by the main living area) the duct chase runs from the master bedroom area, across the
main living area, and into the other bedrooms. Whereas the hallway fur-down makes use
of the upper portion of the hall walls, chases in open areas are built out from one wall
(Figure 8) and down from the ceiling framing.

Copyright © 2002 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

6
 Figure 7 Chase under construction in ranch house hallway

To locate the chase in a specific design, start by examining the plan for an
obvious path. The air handler can be located either centrally or at one end of the chase,
but as the heart of the duct system, it must be inside the conditioned space. To avoid long
run-out ducts, the chase should trace a path down the center of the house and go to all
spaces to be served. Otherwise, small supply runs in unconditioned spaces or excessive
chase construction will be required to reach distant rooms. Align the central chase with
closets, cabinets, or transverse halls to achieve coverage of all rooms.

Copyright © 2002 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

7
 Figure 8 Chase along wall of open living
area. Note chase sealing with drywall
compound

The top of the chase should be uninterrupted by framing. Miscellaneous bracing

that interrupts the upper air barrier creates additional cutting, fitting, and sealing work. In
most cases, the air barrier will be made of an air-tight material (e.g. drywall, rigid
insulation) sealed at the edges and seams, and the thermal barrier will be ceiling
insulation installed over the top of the chase, plus the sides for fur-ups.
Often it is tempting to use the chase as a “ducted” return to the air handler, as the
chase goes to all rooms. This practice is not currently recommended because reliable
sealing of the chase from surrounding unconditioned spaces has proven difficult to
achieve. Any leakage in the chase air barrier can cause sever return leaks. This is similar
to the pitfalls of using building cavities as ducts, such as panned floor joists.

Integrating the new strategy into current construction processes. Indicate the chase
and air handler on both the mechanical drawings and dimensional drawings. After laying
out the chase on the plans, detail it in section (Figure 12) for clarity, indicating materials,
critical dimensions, and sealing details.
To clearly communicate both the intent and specifications to all crews working
with the chase provide the plans and detail to each. This may include framing, drywall,
insulation, and finishing crews as well as the mechanical contractor. Include the electrical
and plumbing contractors who need to either avoid putting holes in the chase or fill any
hole they make.
Be sure the mechanical contractor takes the location of the ducts into
consideration for system sizing calculations as well as the size of the chase (less than 12"
clearance for 8' ceilings) for duct sizing calculations. The duct design should incorporate
sizing and design considerations to insure adequate air distribution into all rooms. Fur-
down chase systems are difficult to use with a perimeter duct installation, as the chase
typically runs down the center of the building. Fur-down chases limit register size and
placement.

Before construction of the chase. Clearly indicate the chase location at the construction
site. Most of the chase is built after rough framing and before the mechanical rough-in. A

Copyright © 2002 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

8
copy of the mechanical system plan showing the duct chase location in hatch marks
should be posted in the house for reference. Mark the location of the chase after rough
framing. Ken Fonorow of Gainesville, Florida, recommends marking the location of the
chase for the crew building it. The construction supervisor responsible for the chase spray
paints the floor (Figure 9) along the bottom plate of all the walls where the chase is to be
built. He starts at the air handler and traces the path of the chase to its end. After the
chase is installed, mark the location of supply registers also (Figure 10).

Figure 9 Spray paint marking chase location

Figure 10 Spray paint marking supply register location

Make sure materials for building the continuous air barrier (and later thermal
barrier) are available when needed. If any special materials are needed make sure they are
on hand (light gauge metal framing for the chase support, etc.).

Copyright © 2002 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

9
Correctly and Successfully Executing the Design and Detailing

General construction guidelines. Let the guiding principal for building an interior duct
system be the establishment and maintenance of an air barrier. After an air barrier is
established, a thermal barrier in the same location is needed. The chase’s ceiling air
barrier should be placed first. Next, place the side(s) of the chase. Then, all joints and
seams should be sealed with code-approved sealant, including the gap between the air
barrier and the top plates of adjacent walls (Figure 11). At this point, the chase’s principle
air barrier is complete. The open sides face conditioned space and will be finished later
when the rest of the house is drywalled (Figure 8).
Next, the mechanical system is roughed in and the rest of the chase is framed.
Much of the duct system can be assembled on the floor then lifted and strapped into
place. The remaining chase framing is put into place within the chase’s air barrier such
that it will not interrupt the house air barrier.

Figure 11 Fur-down chase detail, note sealing details

The joints and seams (Figure 8) of the chase must be sealed, as well as any
penetrations in the chase that intersect an unconditioned space. Note that unconditioned
spaces are any cavity or room that is not served by the mechanical system. These include
obvious spaces such as attics, garages and storage rooms as well as hidden areas such as
wall and floor cavities.
The penetration in the chase wall for the supply run-out intersects an
unconditioned space; the interior wall cavity (Figure 11). To prevent air from coming
down from the attic between the drywall and the top plate, the joint between the chase

Copyright © 2002 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

10
wall and the interior wall framing must be sealed OR the joint between the top plate and
the drywall must be sealed. Without this continuous air barrier, any duct leakage will be
in communication with an unconditioned space, either the attic directly or the interior
wall cavity. This type of sealing is especially important in the air handler closet since the
return side of the air handler induces strong negative pressures, significantly increasing
the leakage through any gaps.
Special attention must also be paid to the platform that the air handler sits on in
the house. Preferably, central returns should be ducted from the air handler to the return
grill instead of being open to the walls of the air handler closet (Figure 12).
A supervisor who understands the intent of the chase should regularly check
progress and follow the chase construction through to completion, meaning the ducts are
all installed, holes have been sealed (Figure 13), and the chase is ready for close- in. The
chase is closed- in as the house gets dry-walled

Protecting the chase after completion. Protect chase from cable, phone and other
installers who may want to use it as a convenient way to run wires. The holes that
typically result will compromise the air barrier (Figure 13). Identifying the chase as a
space intended to be separate from surrounding unconditioned spaces is difficult at best.
The authors have not yet seen a consistently effective method. Communication is again
an important factor.

Figure 12 Conventional platform return. Rough framing connected

to attic through walls of air handler closet, resulting in return leaks

Advisory notices to cable, security, and phone installers should be posted in

conspicuous locations such as the panel box, attic access hatch, wiring service entrance,
etc. Since these cannot clearly identify the location of the air boundary in the attic, the

Copyright © 2002 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

11
notices should advise the installer to seal any penetrations to drywall made from
unconditioned spaces. Though this should be standard practice and is often required by
code, virtually all services installed post-occupancy are never inspected.

Figure 13 Holes for wiring, plumbing,

cables, etc. need to be sealed with a code
approved sealant

Conclusions and Further Needs

The authors worked with four builders who adopted interior duct design for both
health and energy benefits. A battery of air tightness tests was conducted at more than
two dozen homes. For details and experimental results please refer to “Field Study of
Interior Duct System Design, Construction, and Performance – Final Report” (McIlvaine,
Beal & Fairey 2001).
It is possible to correctly construct the chase so as to achieve the goal of true
interior duct work, as was seen in one case during the study, and seen several times by
the authors. The methods described in this paper are based on the successfully executed
interior duct systems seen in the study and in the field. However, the experimental results
and visual observations have shown that chases are typically leaky, meaning they are not
isolated from unconditioned spaces. Despite the care taken to ensure the ducts were in
conditioned space, the integrity of the chase air barrier was often thwarted by lack of
communication among the many trades and the complexity of the chase construction.
The authors and the builder partners agree that it is easier to make an air tight duct
system than it is to make an airtight chase, and that it would be a mistake to assume that
tight duct systems are not needed when the ducts are placed in an interior chase. Leaky
ducts placed in leaky chases will not provide the desired energy or health benefits.
Whereas, an airtight duct system in a leaky chase still derives some of the energy benefits
of interior ductwork, while not causing the building durability and health problems
associated with leaking duct work.

Copyright © 2002 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

12
 Typical interior ductwork is not insulated, being in conditioned space, and should
never have condensation problems. The results of this work lead the authors to believe
that it is better to err on the side of caution, and to use insulated duct materials, as the
majority of the systems seen in the study were not truly interior duct systems, and could
see dew point temperatures that could cause condensation problems.
The fur-down chase system rarely lends itself to perimeter duct installation as it
typically runs down the center of the building. This type of duct system limits register
size and placement. The duct design should incorporate sizing and design considerations
to insure adequate air distribution into all rooms.
Based on builder experience, it is apparent that there is a commitment needed
from the builder and the site supervisor to perform the necessary duties required to place
the ducts in the conditioned space. There is additional work required from the framers
and the drywall crew to build the chase, often requiring additional job site visits to build
the chase. There can be added costs for materials, such as custom trusses for a fur-up
installation, or additional framing and drywall, or a more expensive duct system required
due to space limitations. Field observations and testing consistently revealed
compromised chases due to sub-contractors not understanding the purpose of the chase,
and it’s convenient location for wiring or plumbing runs. The site supervisor or the
builder must constantly monitor the progress of the house to insure the chase integrity is
not compromised. Ideally, inspection after the mechanical, electrical, and plumbing
rough- in should specifically include a visual check of the duct chase.
Other contractors appear after the house is occupied to install security, phone, and
cable runs at the owner’s discretion. These contractors are not aware of the function of
the chase, and often find it a convenient place to run their wiring. Notices to fill all
penetrations to the duct chase with code-approved foam should be posted on the electrical
panel, by the attic light and on the exterior of the chase itself in several places. The
homeowner needs to be briefed on the function of the chase, and the potential for damage
to the chase to compromise its function.
It is possible to successfully execute an interior duct system in a chase, building
the chase airtight and truly incorporating the ductwork into the interior space. As builders
continue experimenting with this technique, patterns of problems and successful solutions
will develop. Much like duct sealing a decade ago, this strategy is still in development.

Acknowledgments
This work was sponsored by the United States Department of Energy (DOE),
National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Cooperative Agreement DE-FC26-
99FT40642. The authors appreciate the support and encourage ment of the program
manager, Esher Kweller, DOE, and the contract administrator, William Hasslebacher,
NETL.
This project would have been impossible without the cooperation of our builder
partners, Jim Sargent of Bentwood Custom Homes in Dallas TX, Ken Fonorow of
Florida Home Energy and Resources Organization and affiliated builders, Robert
Calhoun of the Durham County Habitat for Humanity, NC, and Mary Lou Bowman and
Russell Cubbins of the Broward County Habitat for Humanity, FL. Their willingness to
share their ideas, and see their work validated, made the project possible.

Copyright © 2002 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

13
 The technical assistance rendered by Jon Andrews of Brookhaven National
Laboratory, James Cummings and Neil Moyer of the Florida Solar Energy Center, and
Bruce McKendry of WattsRight/Building Science Alliance was invaluable.

Help!
For design assistance related to duct systems, contact Janet E. R. McIlvaine,
[email protected], 321-638-1434 or David Beal, [email protected].,edu, 321-638-1433,
at the Florida Solar Energy Center

References
Cummings, J. B., J .J. Tooley, N. A. Moyer. Investigation of Air Distribution System
Leakage and Its Impact in Central Florida Homes. Contract Report, Florida Solar
Energy Center, Cocoa, FL, FSEC-CR-397-91.

Cummings, J. B., J. J. Tooley, N. A. Moyer, Duct Doctoring; Diagnosis and Repair of

Duct System Leaks, DRAFT, Florida Solar Energy Center, Cocoa, Florida, May
1993.

Davis, B. E., The Impacts of Air Distribution System Leakage on Heating Energy
Consumption in Arkansas Homes. Report submitted to the Arkansas Energy
Office, 1991.

Evans, Richard A., and Robert J. Tsal. “Basic Tips for Duct Design”, ASHRAE Journal,
July 1996.

Manclark, Bruce, and Bob Davis. “Duct Improvement in the Northwest, Part II: Mobile
Homes.” Home Energy Magazine, January/February 1996.

McIlvaine, J. E. R., D. Beal, P. Fairey. Field Study of Interior Duct System Design,
Construction, and Performance.- Final Report Contract Report, Florida Solar
Energy Center, Cocoa, FL, FSEC-CR-1256-01 October 2001

Rudd, Armin, J. W. Lstiburek. “Vented and Sealed Attic in Hot Climates.” ASHRAE
Symposium on Attic and Cathedral Ceilings. June 1998

Copyright © 2002 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

14
View publication stats