MCK - Retail Ops 2020 - FullIssue RGB Hyperlinks 011620 PDF
MCK - Retail Ops 2020 - FullIssue RGB Hyperlinks 011620 PDF
MCK - Retail Ops 2020 - FullIssue RGB Hyperlinks 011620 PDF
operations: Winning
in a digital era
This compendium explores the breadth of change
and risk throughout the modern retail industry.
January 2020
Cover image: Copyright © 2020 McKinsey &
© adventtr/Getty Images Company. All rights reserved.
Reta
Competition area Area at risk mon
(Amazon and retailer) (Amazon only) (reta
Hamburg
1
Relevant population areas defined as high density (>750 inhabitants/k
coverage defined as area within 30 minutes driving time from respecti
16
Cologne Bending the cost curve in brick-and-mortar retail
Source: Alteryx; BKG; ESRI ArcGIS; MB-Research; McKinsey analysis
Retailers can achieve next-generation store efficiency
by breaking down silos and optimizing total cost across the
value chain.
Viable market coverage for same-day
delivery via ship from store1
%
60
Supply chain
Munich 22 Supply chain of the future: Key principles in building
an omnichannel
50 distribution network
31 A retailer’s guide
20 to successfully navigating the race
for same-day delivery
Same-day delivery:10 Consumers’ expectation for same-day
delivery is rising and putting pressure on retailers’ supply
chains.
0
0 10 20
1
Supply chain
(continued) 44 The invisible hand: On the path to autonomous
planning in food retail
It’s not news to food retailers: sometimes your stocks are too
high, sometimes they’re too low. Advanced planning now gives
them entirely new options for solving the expensive problem—
and cuts costs in the process.
Procurement
67 Beyond procurement: Transforming indirect
spending in retail
If retailers treat indirect costs as an opportunity for business
transformation rather than just a procurement matter, they can
boost return on sales by as much as 2 percent.
Tech
94 The end of IT?
Retailers who want to stay ahead of the pack and drive
business results through technology innovation are rethinking
the setup of their IT departments.
Retail operations
We provide a new take on store operations—while flashy technology attracts and engages customers
in the “store of the future,” the make-or-break technology is actually behind the scenes. That’s the
technology that gathers and connects data for a seamless customer experience. In our own “store of the
future” this includes dwell sensing, RFID, heavy investments in the data lake, and the logic needed to map
the customer journey. But technology is only one piece of the puzzle; solving the operations equation also
involves analytics, new store processes, and upskilling the store team. Such a transformation can add
several points of profitability to the average store.
Introduction 3
In supply chain, we identify the measures successful companies have taken, which include fundamentally
transforming their supply chain to enable a true omnichannel experience, taking more agile approaches
when designing their supply chain network, building new capabilities, and adjusting their operating model.
We take a look at how retailers can keep up with customer expectations as omnichannel shopping becomes
the new normal—including building and maintaining a connected inventory strategy, which increases
transparency and access to stock wherever it sits in the supply chain to better fulfill customer needs.
We recognize that today, nearly every change a retailer makes depends on technology solutions—and
they often fall short of expectations. With an entrenched divide between the IT department and the rest
of the company, many brick-and-mortar retailers struggle to get value out of their IT investments—or get
started at all. Retailers must become technology-driven organizations, and that will require upending
the status quo. In the end, transforming mind-sets, capabilities, and ways of working is critical not only in
established IT areas like application development and infrastructure but in core commercial divisions like
sales, merchandising, supply chain, and marketing.
Through our research and analysis, we seek to identify opportunities, provide insight into how to act on
them, and learn from those that have forged ahead. We hope these perspectives on retail operations aids
your organization in embracing change and realizing a new vision for retail.
A transformation
in store
Brick-and-mortar retail stores need to up their game. Technology
could give them a significant boost.
by Praveen Adhi, Tiffany Burns, Sebastien Calais, Andrew Davis, Gerry Hough, Shruti Lal, and Bill Mutell
© EyeEm/Getty Images
A transformation in store 5
S T O R E O P E R AT I O N S
Now should be a great time in US retail. Consumer Retailers are already wrestling with omnichannel’s
confidence has finally returned to pre-recession demands on their supply chains and back-office
levels. Americans have seen their per capita, operations. Now they need to think about how they
constant-dollar disposable income rise more than use emerging technologies and rich, granular data
20 percent between the beginning of 2014 and on customers to transform the in-store experience.
early 2019. The rewards for those that get this right will be
significant: 83 percent of customers say they want
Yet despite the buoyant economic environment, their shopping experience to be personalized in
many brick-and-mortar stores are struggling. some way, and our research suggests that effective
In part, that’s due to the rise of e-commerce, personalization can increase store revenues by
which since 2016 has accounted for more than 20 to 30 percent.
40 percent of US retail sales growth. In our
most recent consumer survey, 82 percent of US Several new technologies have reached a tipping
shoppers reported spending money online in the point and are set to spill over onto the retail
previous three months, and the same percentage floor. Machine learning and big-data analytics
used their smartphones to make purchasing techniques are ready to crunch the vast quantities
decisions. Not surprisingly, younger shoppers favor of customer data that retailers already accumulate.
e-shopping even more: 42 percent of millennials Robots and automation systems are moving out
say they prefer the online retail experience and of factories and into warehouses and distribution
avoid stores altogether when they can. centers. The Internet of Things allows products
to be tracked across continents or on shelves
Meanwhile, the strong economy and record-low with millimeter precision. Now is a great time for
unemployment are increasing wage pressure and retailers to embrace that challenge of bringing
store operating costs. In the last three years, more technology and data together in the off-line world.
than 45 US retail chains have gone bankrupt.
Exhibit 1
Technology powers
shopping convenience
In-store communications not
only help customers finish
their shopping lists but also
provide tailored promotions
and detailed product
information. And they
eliminate checkout lines.
shopping list he’s been building at home by scanning The evolving associate and
items with his phone as he uses them up. As he walks manager journeys
the aisles, smart shelf displays illuminate to show Technology won’t just reshape the customer
the location of those items, while also highlighting experience in tomorrow’s stores: working in retail
tailored offers, complementary items, and regular will look will look very different too (Exhibit 2).
purchases that didn’t make it onto the list.
David works part time as an associate in the store’s
Jonathan is tempted by a new, personalized fresh-foods department, fitting in shifts around his
promotion that pops up on his phone as he studies and family life. He negotiates his schedule
approaches the prepared-meals aisle. But because each week using a mobile app. The store runs a
he prefers organic foods, he wonders about the bidding system, and staff can earn a premium by
product’s ingredients. As he scans the package volunteering for busy or hard-to-fill shifts. The
with his smartphone, an augmented-reality display technology also makes it easy for David to trade
reveals the origin of its contents, along with its shifts when he has a conflict.
nutrition information and even its carbon footprint.
The store rarely struggles to get the people it needs,
His bag full, Jonathan leaves the store. There was however. David loves working there because he
no need to check out: RFID scanners and machine- is passionate and knowledgeable about food. His
vision systems have already identified every item duties include some manual tasks such as stocking
he packed, and his credit card, already on file in the or picking for online orders, but the work is light.
retailer’s systems, is debited as he passes through Sensors on and above the shelves monitor the
the doors. status of stock, a machine-learning system plans
A transformation in store 7
A transformation in store CJ
Exhibit 2 of 3
S T O R E O P E R AT I O N S
Exhibit 2
the replenishment schedule, and items are delivered presentation, and Rebecca spends most of her time
or taken away by robot carts that glide silently and working with colleagues to improve and fine-tune
safely through the store. its offerings. It helps that many previously time-
consuming tasks, such as associate scheduling and
David spends most of his time interacting with reporting, are now handled automatically by artificial-
customers, offering advice on new products and intelligence tools. Her phone alerts her when a
recipes or answering their questions. He has situation needs real attention in real time, such as a
a handheld terminal that he can use to acquire promotion that’s not selling as well as in other stores.
information on each customer’s preferences and This means she can focus her efforts on performance
shopping habits. If a customer can’t find something and service improvements, aided by the store’s
on the shelves, he can pinpoint the location and sophisticated performance-analysis systems.
real–time stock level of every item at a glance or
suggest different items based on that customer’s David and Rebecca already have a pretty good
shopping habits. idea of how the new promotional set will work
because they’ve tried it out in virtual reality using an
Meanwhile, Rebecca, the store manager, is thinking interactive digital twin of the store. Conversations
about plans for a big new promotion that starts next with customers have given them an idea for
week. The project will involve significant changes tweaking the offer’s presentation, and they are
to the range of items on display including setting discussing the possible changes now to boost
new fixturing in the produce area. But that’s nothing sales, rather than rigidly adhering to a formula
new: the store is always adapting its stock and devised and handed down from above.
The profile of the workforce will change as well: Are you ready?
skilled and knowledgeable associates will expect The store of the future is still in its infancy, but every
2019 to earn more, pushing hourly rates up by about one of the technologies described above exists
A transformation 20
in percent.
store CJ Total wages are likely to fall, however, as today as a commercial product not just a prototype
Exhibit 3 of 3 automation and technology help shift the balance or proof-of-concept. Retail leaders should act now
Exhibit 3
1-2% 5-9%
0.5-1%
1-2%
2-4% Increase of
3 to 5
percentage
2-4% points
-2-3%
20% increase Warehouse- Reduction in 10% reduction Use of in-store Each retailer will
in minimum to-shelf shrink in store- assets to drive decide what
wages automation, by 20% from management sales (electronic portion of EBIT
and benefits next-gen advanced analytics and SG&A² shelf tags, to reinvest
increases cameras, costs consultative into price/customer
supply chain selling tools)
optimization
1
Earnings before interest and taxes.
2
Sales, general, and administrative.
A transformation in store 9
S T O R E O P E R AT I O N S
to prepare their organizations for a technology- — Are you already testing and piloting new
enabled revolution in customer experience and technologies in store or across the network?
efficiency. Ask yourself how your organization is
doing: — Do you have the capabilities to ramp up your use
of technology- and data-driven retail innovations?
— Do you understand the level of performance
your network will need to achieve over the In forthcoming articles, we’ll take a closer look at the
next decade? technologies that are shaping the store of the future,
and how they are set to transform retail P&L.
— Have you identified the primary use cases for
technology-enabled improvements to efficiency
or customer experience?
Praveen Adhi and Andrew Davis are partners in McKinsey’s Chicago office, where Gerry Hough is a senior expert, and
Shruti Lal is an associate partner; Tiffany Burns is a partner in the Atlanta office, where Bill Mutell is an associate partner;
Sebastien Calais is an associate partner in the Paris office.
© Maskot/Getty Images
Labor scheduling is an evergreen topic for retail every day (or, better, every hour) of the week, then
operators with tools, processes, and personnel customers would get prompt sales assistance,
demands that are constantly changing. While these shelves would be replenished in a timely manner,
changes bring new constraints and innovations employees would be neither idle nor overworked,
to a well-defined concept, the fundamentals remain. and, in most stores, labor costs would go down.
Companies that have a clear understanding of
the fundamental building blocks of scheduling That is already happening at a few leading retailers.
have an advantage over peers in identifying and Chief operating officers have begun looking closely
operationalizing innovation into store operations. at store activities and taking a more data-driven
The following article outlines the most critical approach to labor scheduling and budgeting. In doing
elements of labor scheduling that hold true in so, they have captured between 4 and 12 percent in
virtually any context. cost savings while also improving customer service—
for example, by shortening checkout queues or
In recent years, retailers have taken steps to “lean having more staff available on the sales floor to assist
out” their processes and gain efficiencies—with customers—and boosting employee satisfaction. This
impressive results. Lean-retailing initiatives have level of impact has been achieved at several different
yielded as much as a 15 percent reduction in types of retailers, from large supermarket chains in
retailers’ operating costs.¹ But with competition the United States and Europe to specialty retailers in
intensifying and customers expecting ever-higher emerging markets.
service levels, many retailers are now looking for new
ways to further improve productivity and enhance A mismatch between supply and demand
customer service. Many retailers use workforce-management
software to generate a weekly staffing schedule
One major area of opportunity is workforce that is unique to each store. This schedule is usually
management: specifically labor scheduling and based on revenue forecasts—more employees
budgeting. Because of the complexity inherent work during hours or days when sales are projected
in creating accurate staffing schedules and budgets to be the highest. Revenue is a sensible criterion
for a large number of stores, even sophisticated for scheduling, but it’s an insufficient one because
retailers find substantial room for improvement in customers’ buying patterns (average basket size,
this area. average purchase price per item, and more) can
vary by hour and by day. A European grocer found,
Off-the-shelf software and solutions—although for example, that manned service counters, such
useful for important tasks such as monitoring as deli and bakery counters, account for a much
employee attendance and managing payroll— higher share of revenues on weekends than they
typically produce generic schedules that don’t take do during the week. On weekends, therefore,
into account store-specific factors and workload the required labor hours increase at a higher rate
fluctuations. The unfortunate results include high than revenues.
labor costs, inconsistent customer service, and
dissatisfied customers. Furthermore, most retailers don’t have a systematic
way to account for store-specific factors that
If a retailer could better predict the number and affect how long activities take—such as the distance
skill set of employees that each of its stores needs that an employee must walk to transport a pallet
from a delivery truck to the storeroom or how many
1
For more on lean retailing, see Stefan Görgens, Steffen Greubel, and Andreas Moosdorf, “How to mobilize 20,000 people,” December 2013,
McKinsey.com.
Exhibit
Stores should be allotted the same amount of time for the same task, with some adjustments
based on each store’s unique context.
Total time for store Target time for an activity; Additional time needed due Number of times the activity is
employees to should be the same for entire to local store characteristics performed; variable (can be
perform a core activity store network (eg, store layout, average derived from historical data)
in a department basket size)
A large European retailer, with annual The retailer subsequently tested the operations. Furthermore, the approach
revenue in excess of $20 billion, knew that prototype in six additional stores that were helped expose poor store management.
its stores’ labor scheduling and budgeting quite different from one another to ensure For example, one store was perceived
processes weren’t rigorous enough. that the tool’s outputs would be relevant in the company as being well managed
At every store, both the standard weekly to the entire store network. Along the because it had notably low labor costs.
staffing schedule and the annual labor way, the retailer discovered and quickly But bottom-up calculation of the store’s
budget were based primarily on revenues implemented a number of best practices annual labor budgets showed that the low
and managerial judgment. and process improvements. labor costs were entirely due to favorable
store specifics, such as short distances
Seeking a more data-driven approach, the The new staffing schedules and labor for transporting products and shelves that
retailer decided to pilot activity-based budgets yielded an efficiency improvement were relatively easy to stock. Once labor
labor scheduling and budgeting in two of along with an improvement in customer costs were adjusted for those specifics,
its stores over a four-month period. The service—gratifying results, particularly the store was shown to be among the least
effort involved calculating the timing of in light of the fact that the retailer had efficient in the network. These and similar
65 activities and building an Excel-based recently undertaken a successful lean- insights allowed the retailer to better
prototype of a new labor-scheduling and retailing transformation and in many evaluate and train its store managers.
budgeting tool. ways already had best–practice store
up to date and relevant, retailers should consider changes in service levels or process standards. And in
setting up a scheduling team of people who have the the event that labor budget cuts become necessary,
requisite analytical skills and who are familiar with management teams—instead of just imposing top-
store operations. The team would be responsible for down percentage cuts—will be equipped to lead
maintaining and updating the tool and adjusting the practical and detailed discussions about which store
workload calculations to new processes. activities could be speeded up or eliminated entirely,
or where service-level targets could be relaxed.
In this way, they will be able to ensure sustained
improvements in store productivity, customer service,
An activity-based approach can reveal opportunities and employee satisfaction, all while keeping labor
for improving store processes. In fact, it can serve costs firmly under control. In future publications, we
as the backbone for a continuous-improvement will outline some of the unique elements that can
program; ideally, the new scheduling and budgeting drive variation in labor scheduling.
tool would be able to run “what if” analyses for any
Sebastien Calais is an associate partner in McKinsey’s Paris office, Andrew Davis is a partner in the Chicago office,
Daniel Läubli is a partner in the Zurich office, and Bill Mutell is an associate partner in the Atlanta office.
1
Philip Christiani, Sebastian Gatzer, Daniel Rexhausen, and Andreas Seyfert, “How to untap the full potential: An integrated—not isolated—view
on cost,” September 2019, McKinsey.com.
2
Praveen Adhi, Tiffany Burns, Andrew Davis, Shruti Lal, and Bill Mutell, “A transformation in store,” May 2019, McKinsey.com.
3
Raj Kumar, Tim Lange, and Patrik Silén, “Building omnichannel excellence,” April 2017, McKinsey.com.
4
“Employment situation summary,” Bureau of Labor Statistics, October 4, 2019, bls.gov.
5
Chris Marr, “States with $15 minimum wage laws doubled this year,” Bloomberg Law, May 23, 2019, bloomberglaw.com.
scheduling) and streamlining their inventory stocking discontinued. Further, a deeper understanding of
processes. However, most still take a narrow view net margin and labor implications in distribution
of what costs they can optimize, focusing on activities centers and stores can inform decisions about
the store can influence and accepting upstream whether to add or remove shelf space from a given
activities and decisions as constraints. SKU. The extra labor cost required to stock the
shelf between less frequent deliveries may be
To reach the next level of cost efficiency, retailers offset by transportation cost savings.
must expand their focus outside the four walls of the
store. Only the most advanced look for efficiency at A comprehensive view of cost can also inform
the intersection of store operations, merchandising, investments into enhanced capabilities such as
supply chain, and transportation to adopt a total-cost automation. For example, if a distribution center can
view—that is, the sum of cost components across be outfitted to build custom pallets that match a
the value chain (Exhibit 1). By considering underlying store’s layout, frontline staff would spend less time
costs, from how products are chosen to how they’re sorting products and moving between aisles.
stocked, in our experience retailers can expand the
scope beyond costs addressed in their brick-and- It is important to recognize that these efficiencies
mortar stores by 50 percent. These underlying costs will lower costs in some departments but
are also more likely to yield efficiency because they may be cost-neutral or increase costs in others;
have not been scrutinized as much as in-store costs. accounting for these cross-functional effects
will be critical to success.
A total cost approach can reveal a host of
unrealized efficiencies (Exhibit 2). For example,
with input from store operations, merchandising Success factors for bending the
can adjust the store’s promotional calendar by cost curve
category and product to incorporate both the Four primary factors are crucial to bending the cost
expected incremental margin as well as the curve through a total-cost approach: governance
store labor required to change price tags and and executive alignment, cost transparency, data and
build promotional displays. Given this more analytics capabilities, and key performance indicators
comprehensive view of cost, some promotional (KPIs) and incentive alignment.
activities will be seen as unprofitable and thus
Category and product promotional Extra shelf space is added for fast-moving Product is purchased from vendors,
profitability is adjusted to account for SKU A to enable stocking all product at shipped, and stocked in shelf-ready
store labor costs to replace price tags and once. The store labor savings are greater packaging, which makes it easier for
build promo displays. This makes some than the lost margin from removing SKU stores to handle and outweighs the extra
promotions unprofitable, and they are B’s shelf space. vendor costs.
discontinued.
SO SC SO SC SO SC
M M M
The store receives less frequent deliveries The business case on whether to invest Promotional displays are built upstream in
to optimize transportation cost—the in distribution-center automation is the distribution center or at the vendor,
savings outweigh the extra labor needed amended to include store savings from reducing the time it takes store employees
to manage bigger shipments. stocking product that arrives in better- to set up.
organized pallets.
SO SC SO SC SO
M M SC M
Exhibit 2
The total cost of handling a product is determined by considering cost at each step of the
value chain.
Introduce to
Review category Create planogram Plan demand distribution center Receive and stock
and prepare to ship
Example New SKUs to Number of facings Safety stock Location in the Store processes
decisions introduce distribution center for stocking
Shelf depth Minimum for new SKU
Number of stores presentation
Space for category Placement of
for new SKU quantity Mode of shipping overstock (eg,
introduction to the store (case back room vs top
or individual) shelf vs elsewhere)
Frequency of
store delivery
Impacted cost Cost of goods sold, Store labor cost to Distribution center Store labor cost from Store labor cost
components write-offs, shrink replenish between picking cost based stocking full cases to stock product
shipments based on amount of vs individual units on shelves and
on shelf capacity product shipped return overstock
to back room
Inventory holding
cost of safety
stock and minimum
presentation
In addition, the business owner of this new process Each SKU’s journey should be mapped and
should be selected with care. Ideally, they should broken down into cost-component steps. Each
reside outside of functions that own a meaningful step includes multiple iterations based on how it
number of cost components; finance is often a good is executed. For example, in–store labor cost is a
option because it lacks a direct stake in where costs component with at least two iterations based on
are incurred. Store operations is another viable how a product is stocked—as a full case or individual
option, as it is furthest downstream in the process. units. Identifying where a product goes and stocking
Praveen Adhi is a partner in McKinsey’s Chicago office, where Aneliya Valkova is an associate partner; Vishwa Chandra is a
partner in the San Francisco office; Karl-Hendrik Magnus is a partner in the Frankfurt office.
by Manik Aryapadi, Ashutosh Dekhne, Wolfgang Fleischer, Claudia Graf, and Tim Lange
© NicoElNino/Getty Images
Supply chain of the future: Key principles in building an omnichannel distribution network 23
S U P P LY C H A I N
Exhibit
The omnichannel supply chain of the future has seven key elements that combine best
practices with digital innovation.
Customer–centric supply chain strategy
Key organizational enabler for the Key physical flow capabilities that
company and its people—captures ensure competitive cost
supply chain potential and delivers structures and reliable quality
exceptional customer value. while managing complexity.
Customer–centric supply chain strategy How can we differentiate ourselves — Sustainability: How can we create a
from competitors? sustainable supply chain using best
— Supply chain strategy and
practices, such as supporting the
segmentation: How many supply — Assortment and complexity
circular economy and using sustainable
chain segments are required to deliver management: How can we tailor the
raw materials and packaging?
the supply chain mission? What is assortment to a retailer or to a channel
the objective of each supply chain (for example, online only)? How is the
segment—responsiveness versus product portfolio managed? Network and ecosystem of the future
efficiency? — Risk management: What are the key — Supply network: What is the physical
— Customer–backed service aspirations: supply chain risks? How can we best flow of goods through the network?
What is the customer offering across prepare for supply chain disruptions? What are the different product–supply
different segments? Where does speed What are the best proactive mitigation speed models, and what is the impact on
matter versus flexibility and services? strategies and contingency plans? the supplier and production footprint?
— Supplier management and product supply with customer demand Omnichannel fulfillment: Transportation
collaboration: How are suppliers in stores, DCs, and with partners? and logistics service provider (LSP)
managed and integrated to support Ensure the right amount of capacity management
an agile upstream supply chain that along the different segments of the SC? — Transport management: What is
responds quickly to changes, as — Sales and operations control tower: needed to manage transport operations
required by the omnichannel customer? How can we align the different efficiently in an increasingly demanding
— Distribution network: Is the distribution organizational entities and plans at world? How do we keep transport cost
network designed for each channel key milestones? Manage and decide under control? Create end-to-end
individually or is an omnichannel on trade-offs? Allocate and prioritize transparency of product flows?
network beneficial? customers, channels, and orders in — Logistics service provider sourcing
What is the right composition of case of constraint? and management: What are the right
distribution centers (DCs), new node — Distributed order management: How logistics partners for the different
types, and partner locations? can we ensure real-time visibility and supply chain segments? How do we
— Inventory-sharing concepts: How accessibility of inventory across all best source and manage LSPs to get
can inventory be shared across channels and locations? Find and competitive rates and services?
channels? Does each channel have access the right fulfillment node to
its own inventory? What is the best fulfill customer orders efficiently? Operating model and change
governance and business model for management
these concepts? Omnichannel fulfillment: Node — Processes: How do we design supply
— Customer collaboration: What are key operations chain processes to support omnichannel
areas for customer collaboration that — Warehouse management: How can optimization? How can digital innovation
could improve information exchange we achieve warehouse excellence in a be integrated in the process design?
and product flow along the value chain? more complex environment? Leverage How do we accelerate decisions?
Where should partners be employed to automation to increase speed, quality,
drive and access innovation? — Structures: How can we adjust the
and efficiency? Should DCs be organizational structure to capture
operated in house or outsourced? cross-channel benefits and make
End-to-end (E2E) planning and — Return flows and processing: How can change happen? Avoid silos between
information flow we manage returns in an efficient and channels? Use zero-based thinking in
— Demand planning: What are the effective way? Optimize return flows organizational sizing?
different demand signals in the across the network? Which decisions — Capabilities and mind-set: Which
omnichannel environment, and how can on flow of goods can be made by which additional skills are needed to enable
they be captured to predict demand parts of the value chain? the future organization? Where
potential by leveraging advanced — In-store operations: How can we enable should an agile way of working be
analytics? How can we combine them the whole downstream supply chain used and how? How can we best
into an E2E marketplace perspective? for omnichannel? Optimize in-store address the cultural change toward
— Inventory management: What is the layout and processes to enable local omnichannel behavior?
optimal inventory level at each stage of fulfillment while securing a great — Performance management: How
the value chain—DCs, stores, partners, customer experience? should performance of the E2E
etc.? How can we actively manage supply chain be measured? How
inventory to increase availability and can we incorporate the omnichannel
keep cash requirements under control? dimension, measuring the joint
— Supply and replenishment planning: performance rather than individual
How can we best synchronize the channels? Adjust incentives to enable
the right behavior?
Supply chain of the future: Key principles in building an omnichannel distribution network 25
S U P P LY C H A I N
The seven supply chain building blocks for omnichannel excellence (continued)
Digitization and process automation integrated? How do we integrate into the Internet of Things be deployed?
an ecosystem with our partners? What are the key benefits of these
— Foundational software: What is the
technologies, and how can they enable
required software and tooling needed — Analytics strategy: How can we
omnichannel optimization?
to enable the omnichannel supply contextualize data to conduct
chain? Which optimization decisions relevant analyses? Is operational data
need special tool enablement? consolidated and accessible by the right
decision makers? How can we best
— Data strategy: How can we capture
visualize data and analytics to make
data and use it along the value chain?
them accessible to decision makers?
Build the omnichannel data lake to
link the data from different platforms — Process automation: How can
and systems? How are legacy systems advanced digital tools such as robotic
process automation, blockchain, and
In addition, e-commerce fulfillment is much more Put the customer’s needs first
complex than traditional brick-and-mortar or To start, companies need to adopt a granular
wholesaler fulfillment. When customers can order perspective of what the customer really wants, today
24/7, demand is less predictable and more difficult and in the future. This understanding will inform
to shape. Order sizes are significantly lower, and which channels to serve, which products and services
the number of products offered continuously rises. to offer, and where to offer them. For example, a
The increase in speed and complexity drives up young adult living in a large city, such as London
fulfillment costs. In our experience, an online order’s or New York City, wants to purchase and receive a
cost per unit can easily be four to five times higher newly launched sneaker that a celebrity presented
than traditional brick-and-mortar replenishment on Instagram that same day. However, the customer
and ten times higher than wholesale fulfillment. All does not know where she will be in a few hours, so it is
the while, customers demand a seamless important that she can track the delivery and reroute
omnichannel journey. it at any time. If, for example, she goes to a café, the
shoes are rerouted (via an app) to be delivered there.
Building out the omnichannel experience can bring
huge value for retailers, e-tailers, and vertically Developing this detailed understanding of
integrated players with direct-to-consumer customers requires harnessing customer data. This
business; our research has found that customers information should be combined with customer-
shopping online tend to buy more, and customers behavior insights culled from customer interviews,
that pick up online orders in store often make observations, and the latest research from market
additional in store purchases.⁴ With the seven experts, as well as analyses of competitors’
building blocks of a successful omnichannel supply e-commerce offerings. Advanced analytics can be
chain in mind, the following principles should be used to process all this information and gain a clear
top of mind while working to build the network and understanding of customer expectations.
ecosystem of the future.
4
“Employment situation summary,” Bureau of Labor Statistics, October 4, 2019, bls.gov.
In addition to understanding the customer today, the service offering. This generally involves a rather
companies must also look to the future and rigid and time-consuming approach: three months
stay flexible as the market rapidly changes. For of data collection, six months of modeling, and three
example, while next-day service was novel just months of decision making before implementation.
a few years ago, it is common today. How future This traditional approach leads to a onetime strategy
incumbents and disrupters will shape the market and long implementation times. However, in an
is still unknown. As such, serving the customer of ever-volatile environment with constantly changing
the future requires unprecedented agility—quickly customer needs, evolving partnerships, and newly
adapting to changing customer expectations. developing competition, reacting quickly is critical to
ensure that the supply chain network is responsive,
Forget one size fits all flexible, and efficient.
A deep understanding of customer desires should
be the foundation of defining the strategy and Therefore, companies should remain agile in their
building various customer segments based on thinking and assemble a cross-functional team.
preferences, product categories, and locations.⁵ One best practice is to develop the future supply
This segmentation recognizes that a one-size-fits- chain network in a workshop-based environment.
all approach is a waste of resources. A segmented In practice, this means determining the fulfillment
approach enables the company to prioritize specific options suitable for each customer, product, and
services for each customer group—for example, location segment and defining the required
which speed of delivery to offer for each segment and product flow. Starting with the segment that has
which differentiated services to offer or not. While the most demanding lead time, the best fulfilment
the London customer may expect same-hour service, option needs to be found for each segment while
customers living in remote areas might not mind considering operational needs, such as costs to serve
waiting a few days. Developing this understanding and volume constraints. Once a solution for each
to undergird the strategy is crucial to avoid common segment in each location is defined, it must all be
mistakes, such as offering convenience at a premium combined into one comprehensive service network.
to customers that care more about price or building
offerings that quickly become outdated. Seek partnerships and share resources
In an ever-volatile environment, speed of
Be fast and collaborative implementation and efficient use of resources are
In the traditional supply chain model, companies crucial. Therefore, it is necessary to take advantage
often choose a purely quantitative approach to of existing infrastructure, such as warehouses and
model the perfect fulfillment network needed for retail stores, as well as resources available in the
5
Raj Kumar, Tim Lange, and Patrik Silén, “Building omnichannel excellence,” April 2017, McKinsey.com.
Supply chain of the future: Key principles in building an omnichannel distribution network 27
S U P P LY C H A I N
market. Leading companies are actively seeking a city holding inventory and delivering products to
partnerships, not only along their own value chain customers who order via an app. Products could
but also with players from other industries. Sharing also be manufactured right where the customer is
infrastructure brings synergies—costs and risk are with, for example, 3-D printing techniques. The main
split, for example—and enables better customer advantage of these fulfillment options is proximity
service and faster delivery times. For instance, a to the customer; however, operations are less
player operating department stores may offer efficient and more costly, and they require additional
in-store pickup services to e-commerce companies, capabilities. Indeed, retailers have several elements
and e-commerce companies can offer online order to weigh when considering the variety of fulfillment
fulfillment to department stores. The partners would options available to them (Exhibit 1).
establish commercial terms for compensation,
such as sharing the margin. Connected inventory is Think early about new capabilities and never
another example of using existing partner resources, stop learning
enabling players to offer products that are already To enable the identified solutions, companies must
close to the consumer rather than putting additional carefully consider the new capabilities required to
inventory into the market. This can increase the run their future network and understand how to
availability of certain products with minimal effort build them. Those capabilities include physical flow
from the retailer.6 ranging from operating new node types, such as
dark stores and pop-up nodes, to managing new
Look for innovative fulfillment options transport flows and partners, such as last-mile
When identifying existing assets within a company services. Information flow capabilities such as
and their partners’ networks, it is important to planning demand and inventory, stock visibility in
consider innovative fulfillment options. The types the decentral node network, and distributed order
of fulfillment options a player regards as suitable management should also be implemented (see
depend on the specificities of the market and the sidebar, “The seven supply chain building blocks for
company, but customer orders can be fulfilled omnichannel excellence”). For example, a new
in a variety of ways. Shipping products from a fulfillment solution such as shipping from a dark
warehouse or distribution center is the most store requires new operational processes and
traditional and cost-efficient way. Warehouses systems to run a small-scale node efficiently and
typically have a higher level of automation, handle an agile and efficient structure that supplies it with
significant volumes, and seek locations that small quantities at a high frequency. In addition,
incur low operating costs, such as rural areas or the planning landscape needed to have the right
industrial areas outside of large cities. inventory in the dark store requires new capabilities,
such as demand sensing, dynamic supply allocation,
However, rising customer expectations for faster and capacity planning at each location. Finally,
delivery have triggered the development of more the dark store requires real-time and accurate
innovative fulfillment options. Thus, one should inventory visibility combined with a distributed order
consider that products can also be shipped management system that makes the stock available
directly from the production facility or dark stores— and accessible.
noncustomer-facing miniwarehouses usually within a
city, where products are stored, picked, and shipped This connected fulfillment network should be
directly to consumers. Pop-up nodes are another deployed along an agile road map to enable quick
option; for example, a container placed at a major testing and learning of different node types that
sports event or a truck, van, or bike driving around include capabilities in various locations rather than
6
For more, see “Better service with connected inventory” in this compendium.
Exhibit 1
Ship from Ship inventory Ship from Ship from Ship from Ship from Consumer
factory in transit warehouse or dark store retail store pop-up node
distribution
center
Offshore factory Central DC Ship from own Mobile node Returns utilization
operated by store
Nearshore factory Temporary node
retailer Ship from partner Market production
Decentral DC store 3-D printing
operated by Ship from
retailer or 3PL wholesale-
Decentral DC partner’s store
operated by
partner
Decentral DC
operated by
wholesale partner
Shipment from Products shipped Shipment from Shipment from Shipment from Shipment from Customer returns
factory/ to destination warehouse/ noncustomer- retail stores using nonstandardized used to fulfill new
production facility based on specific distribution center facing back-of-house or node, used on orders
in offshore or customer order or miniwarehouse— in-store inventory as-needed basis
Operated
nearshore country demand sensing small scale, not (eg, special
internally, by Fulfilling walk-in
Typically located automated events)
partner, customer
in low-cost wholesaler, or Located in or purchases Examples:
countries 3PL close to a city/ truck/van/bike,
Can be own
densely populated etc carrying a low
stores, partner
area quantity of
stores, or
products that
wholesaler stores
shoppers order
via app; temporary
DC with a
plug-and-play
concept
Lead time
High Low
Degree of productivity
High Low
Volume-handling capacity
High Low
Inventory-holding capacity
High Low
Supply chain of the future: Key principles in building an omnichannel distribution network 29
S U P P LY C H A I N
Case study
A global brand’s omnichannel success
This global brand is becoming a strong The company then defined the supply chain The key to success was going beyond
omnichannel player and serving its own network to serve the customer segments. modeling and quantitative analysis to
retail stores, wholesale stores, and The company used the existing brand’s involve a cross-functional team that
e-commerce customers alike. Due to player’s and its partners’ infrastructure made sure all relevant elements were
strong past growth—overall revenue grew to integrate traditional fulfillment options, considered. For example, marketing
by 9 percent and online penetration by such as central and decentral warehouse ensured that customer expectations
158 percent from 2012 to 2016—it was shipping. At the same time, it was important were always prioritized, the supply chain
necessary to rethink the entire supply to be very close to the customer and team assessed operational feasibility
chain and work in cross-functional teams replenish retail stores fast, which is why of fulfillment options, the logistics team
to define an omnichannel strategy of the solution included innovative fulfillment played devil´s advocate on transportation
the future. options, such as shipping from a dark costs, and the commercial team expanded
store, retail store, or temporary node. The the partner network.
The company first conducted intensive fulfillment network consisted of various
market research, including interviews individual solutions per location; for example, The implementation road map was built in
with end customers, store visits, and the company identified a partner e-tailer an agile way to allow for fast testing and
competitive analyses to understand with spare room for additional inventory learning. Individual elements could be
customer expectations of omnichannel in a German warehouse close to major piloted and evaluated quickly to decide if a
shopping and delivery. Customer cities, whereas in Southern Europe it was fulfillment option should be scaled or taken
segments were defined and tied with necessary to establish a partnership with a off the solution space.
specific services and delivery times. department store and use its wider network
of warehouses and stores.
the traditional approach that initiates only when future, see sidebar, “Case study: A global brand’s
all node types and capabilities are fully developed. omnichannel success.”
Building these required capabilities should also
be planned in modular sequence. Regardless of
how the omnichannel distribution network looks, it
is important to stay flexible and adjust to any road Enabling a truly end-to-end omnichannel
map changes, such as an increase in customer experience requires a new way of supply chain
requirements or new logistics service offerings— thinking. The supply chain needs to be readjusted
for example, delivery solutions for fast last-mile based on changing market conditions, and players
delivery. Testing, learning, and adjusting quickly should pursue an agile approach that enables them
should be the credo. to adjust quickly to changing trends, options, and
customer expectations. These principles can help
For an example of a retailer that found success determine the approach to building the network
in building a network and ecosystem of the and ecosystem of the future.
Manik Aryapadi is an associate partner in McKinsey’s Cleveland office, Ashutosh Dekhne is a partner in the Dallas office,
Wolfgang Fleischer is a consultant in the Munich office, where Claudia Graf is also a consultant, and Tim Lange is a partner in
the Cologne office.
A “new normal” has emerged when it comes to the delivery speed that
customers expect in ordering online. The standards have been re-set by
the likes of Amazon and several other market leaders, placing increasingly
more pressure on incumbent players to respond accordingly. We
conducted a broad effort in which we took stock of the current situation,
focusing on Europe and particularly, Germany, from both a market and
consumer perspective. Our analyses show that although the pressure
on incumbent players may appear to be overwhelming, we believe that
retailers have a strategic asset they can leverage in the future: their
dense store network, which provides them proximity and (potentially)
quick access to their customers. But to fully benefit from their network,
omnichannel retailers will need to consider changing gears in four
areas: the local fulfillment network, quick and integrated IT systems, new
store layouts and processes, and a rethink of business economics.
Same-day delivery:
Ready for takeoff
In the past 20 years there has hardly Amazon’s free delivery time
been any business success story like >9 days ~8 days ~5 days ≤2 days
e-commerce. And as online sales have
surged, shipping durations have gone down. 2,945
1,546
775
343
100
0
1994 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020F
46%
Today, people expect to receive their Customers who did not purchase
parcels by the next day. And their an item online due to long
35%
shopping decisions increasingly delivery times
depend on shipping time.
of respondents
Source: UPS
But consumers are still not satisfied. General willingness to pay extra for same-day delivery
Up to half state a general interest in Share of consumers in percent, n=4,700 respondents 100%
same-day delivery, despite limited
willingness to pay > €1 surcharge
United 53
States
for that service. 20
Germany 34
10
+13 p.p.1
extra for same-day
base delivery choice delivery
mainly on speed and
reliability
1
Percentage point difference vs
overall sample of 4,700 survey
respondents across the United
States, China, and Germany.
Alibaba
China
JD.com
93 Amazon same-day
Sanding Same-day
9 52
machines 136 Top 3 competitors— on Amazon
non-same-day
Cologne
Warehouse
coverage
Inhabitants
>1,000,000
Munich
>500,000–1,000,000
>200,000–500,000
Amazon has a very dense delivery network, putting the industry leader far ahead of almost all other major Western retailers with
their same-day offering. For these retailers to catch up, the obvious option would be to invest hundreds of millions of euros or
dollars to match Amazon’s footprint one to one.
Retailer
Competition area Area at risk monopoly area
(Amazon and retailer) (Amazon only) (retailer only)
Population 22 16 7
Purchasing
23 17 7
power coverage
1
Relevant population areas defined as high density (>750 inhabitants/km²) and/or high income (purchasing power >€21,900 per capita); viable market
coverage defined as area within 30 minutes driving time from respective retail location.
50
46%
Top 30 stores could reach
40
30
20
of German population
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Stores
1
Relevant population areas defined as high density (>750 inhabitants/km²) and/or high income (purchasing power >€21,900 per capita); viable market
coverage defined as area within 30 minutes driving time from respective retail location.
Direct transfer of order data between web shop and (in-store) fulfillment
Easy-to-navigate back room set up in line with product demand and characteristics
4. Rethinking economics
Willingness to bear initial extra costs that can exceed €10 per shipment
More than
3x
Intranode 4.40
7.35
2.75
4.45
Fulfillment 8.02 0.87 1.40
0.69
3.73
2.36
Subscription models can cross-finance shipping costs but require high customer
relevance and a broad set of benefits. Retailers that adopt same-day delivery need to
explore various paths to monetize their convenience leadership.
~550
~250 ~120
? ?
Customer GMV
EUR p.a. Non-prime Prime Non-plus Plus Regular Subscribers
Customer orders
10–15 >25 4–5 ? 1–3 ?
p.a.
Membership fee
110 19 ?
EUR p.a.
Member benefits Same-day shipping2 Same-day shipping2
Selected examples Video streaming Early promotion access
Music streaming Return pickups ?
Online data storage Personal style advice
1
US market example. All values converted from USD to EUR at FX $1=€0.91 (rounded).
2
In selected regions. Otherwise premium next-day shipping.
Source: annual reports; press research; Statista
Manik Aryapadi is an associate partner in McKinsey’s Cleveland office, Tim Ecker is an associate partner in the Frankfurt office, and
Julia Spielvogel is a partner in the Vienna office.
by Ashutosh Dekhne, Tim Lange, Karl-Hendrik Magnus, Isabell Scheringer, and Simon Vincken
Exhibit 1
Goods are distributed to end customers over a growing number of network nodes.
Inventory nodes of retailers and manufacturers
Transport
from factory
Manufacturer’s
Wholesaler’s central
warehouse warehouse
Customer
Manufacturer’s
Online retailer’s distributed ware-
warehouse house/stores
Retailer’s Retailer’s
warehouse stores
Inventories can in fact be linked up in a variety be extended to provide retailers access to products
of ways. The simplest model involves shedding that they do not normally stock (along the lines of
transparency on intracompany inventories, an “endless aisle” concept). More complex, but
assuming they are not transparent already. With also more advantageous, are bilateral partnership
transparency in place, the mildest form of connected arrangements in which both partners get access
inventory between two companies is a unilateral to their respective inventory. Ideally, what results
partnership: the manufacturer assists retailers is a virtual inventory pooling several retailers and
faced with out-of-stock articles by delivering the manufacturers. Such a pooling model allows, for
items ordered. Such partnership arrangements can instance, a retailer in Frankfurt to transact a jeans
Exhibit 2
Number of
3: Endless-aisle partnership
participating companies 2 4: Bilateral partnership
2: Out-of-stock partnership
Unilateral Bilateral
Transparency of inventory
Determinants of success: From The location of inventory in the market can also
incentive systems to delivery slips have legal and tax implications (e.g., import duties).
Regardless of the model that the partners choose: Consequently, an advanced assessment should
building a connected inventory concept inevitably be conducted to determine the extent to which a
requires new solutions in sales, the supply chain, specific networking model might be restricted by
and IT that are by no means simple. Furthermore, it is antitrust law in one or several jurisdictions.
important that all parties have sufficient incentives In addition, the partners should enter into clear
to keep goods in stock. Otherwise, the natural agreements in order to offer customers a seamless
tendency is to keep one’s own inventory as low as consumer experience—regardless of which
possible in a bid to lower the risk of excess stocks. company executes the order. The partners need
In addition, it has to be clear who owns the stocks in to align an array of details, such as their delivery
the pool—specifically, who owns the stocks in which and gift packaging, delivery slips, or conditions for
phase of the fulfillment process and at what points returning goods.
ownership—and the associated risk—is transferred
to another partner.
Success stories in other sectors
Transparency is also key to success. It has to The associated complexity of requirements is
be clear at all times which product is where and most certainly one reason why the concept of
in what quantity. This requires a distributed connected inventory is only just beginning to take
order management system capable of interlinking root—although there are already some high-profile
the various nodes in the network and instantly initiatives (Exhibit 3). Other sectors have made far
determining the optimal dispatch point. more progress in this regard.
McK Retail compendium
Furthermore, to have the right quantity of the
Connected inventory Take the aerospace industry, for example, where one
right product in the right place, integrated planning
Exhibit 3 of 3 that factors in the inventory levels and forecasts of supplier of replacement parts has set up a program
all partners is also needed. for sharing inventory. Aircrafts have expensive
Exhibit 3
Connected inventory is still the exception in retail—although there are prominent early adopters.
Amazon, Procter & Gamble As early as 2013, Amazon and Procter & Gamble (P&G) joined forces to sell products, such as diapers and toilet
paper directly from P&G’s warehouses, where Amazon set up on-site distribution centers to deliver goods directly
to customers.
Zalando, adidas In 2015, Zalando and adidas launched a pilot project in which one of adidas’ distribution centers was linked up to
Zalando’s inventory system. As a result, not only do Zalando’s customers have access to a larger offering of adidas
products, but adidas can fulfill orders of products that Zalando no longer has in stock.
L’Oréal The cosmetics company L’Oréal offers its customers the option of checking whether a product is available
at an online retailer. If so, customers are directed to the corresponding web shop to make their purchase directly.
YOOX NET-A-PORTER, In 2017, online fashion retailer YOOX NET-A-PORTER (YNAP) and the luxury label Valentino unveiled their Next Era
Valentino program, which provides customers access to both Valentino and YNAP products on a shared platform. The
program is also intended to allow both companies to reciprocally use each other’s logistics infrastructure spanning
central warehouses, fulfillment centers, and boutiques.
Ashutosh Dekhne is a partner in McKinsey’s Dallas office, Karl Hendrik-Magnus is a partner in the Frankfurt office,
where Isabell Scheringer is a consultant, Tim Lange is a partner in the Cologne office, and Simon Vincken is a consultant
in the Brussels office.
by Manik Aryapadi, Ashutosh Dekhne, Tim Lange, Markus Leopoldseder, and Karl-Hendrik Magnus
Exhibit 1
Demand planning
for instance, at checkouts or packing shelves — Better quality of fresh produce and less spoilage.
in individual store departments. On top of that, Thanks to more precise forecasting, retailers can
precision forecasting helps to lower inventory order their goods from suppliers much earlier and
in the store’s stockroom radically—and in turn, with greater accuracy. Consequently, fewer fresh
reduces movement between shelves and the articles are left unsold. Better forecasting also
stockroom. This effect is amplified when shelf means increased planning reliability for suppliers.
space per article is adjusted to the demand They can collect their harvests to match demand
forecast, effectively turning shelves into and thus reduce the field-to-shelf time. As a
efficient storage space. result, retailers can increase the level of freshness
Exhibit 2
100
70
10–20 3
30
13
0–5
1
Varies significantly among retail types.
2
Includes rent and maintenance.
3
Includes labor cost.
4
Impact assumes range of different tools (eg, demand forecasting, inventory management, and workforce management).
process: Who is involved in the process? What changes introduced on the various processes,
tools are they using? How high is the degree of structures, and employees concerned.
automation? Where are there quality problems,
such as with regard to availability and stock In the second step, the use cases have to be
quantities? Once these questions have been assessed by reference to their potential for
answered, it is possible to develop specific use improving revenue, margins, costs, and stocks, and
cases. What is decisive at this stage is a clear the cost of implementation is estimated. Starting
orientation toward business impact, as well as with the preferred use cases, the company then
a precise understanding of the effects of the derives the vision for its advanced planning. The
Manik Aryapadi is an associate partner in McKinsey’s Cleveland office, Ashutosh Dekhne is a partner in the Dallas
office, Karl-Hendrik Magnus is a partner in the Frankfurt office, Tim Lange is a partner in the Cologne office, and
Markus Leopoldseder is a consultant in the Vienna office.
Automation in logistics:
Big opportunity, bigger
uncertainty
As e-commerce volumes soar, many logistics and parcel companies
hope that automation is the answer. But as this second article in our
series on disruption explains, things are not so simple.
1
Michael Chui, James Manyika, and Mehdi Miremadi, “Where machines could replace humans—and where they can’t (yet),” McKinsey Quarterly,
July 2016, McKinsey.com.
estimate, e-tailers are saving $12 to $16 out of to adapt. Many large logistics companies fulfill
every $100 of sales versus their brick-and-mortar e-commerce orders by carving out a corner of
competitors, which explains why their economics warehouses designed for B2B operations. And
work so well.) some logistics companies have at times been willing
to use e-commerce as a loss leader to add business
But even as logistics companies have benefited to their transport divisions. But as volume expands,
from burgeoning volume, the business is not without all such arrangements are coming under immense
its challenges. Many B2B networks are struggling strain. Here, too, automation seems to be an answer.
Automation will affect the supply chain build automation-ready capabilities rather a longer-term prospect, rail operators and
far beyond the walls of the warehouse and than simply automating old processes. And governments are investing in technologies
sorting center; it will change the way goods they can apply better project discipline that lay the foundation. Positive train control
flow across all modes (exhibit). In the first to ensure that automation investments (PTC) is a long-desired step toward an
article in this series, we addressed the account for all attributes of port operations. automated future: its data links allow for
impact of autonomous trucking, a critical real-time automated control of sets of trains.
automation technology, on roads, rails, Of the remaining transport modes, Several European and US railroads have
and ports. And our colleagues recently automation in ocean and air freight is quite PTC schemes in the works, and a few have
produced a detailed look at other forms possible but will probably not move the fully implemented them.
of port automation. They find that while productivity needle much. In rail, automation
ports are accelerating their adoption of will likely begin in terminals, which offer Over time, railroads will continue to search
automation, they are not yet recouping controlled environments and repeatable for opportunities to automate the main
2019
their costs. Moreover, while operating processes. Intermodal terminals will line, but some limits will persist for the
Automation in logistics:
expenses are falling as expectedBig (by 15opportunity,
to likely seebigger
increaseduncertainty
use of autonomous foreseeable future. For example, trains
35 percent),
Exhibit 1 throughput
of 4 is falling as well hostlers to move containers to and from traveling heavily populated routes or
(by 7 to 15 percent). Port operators can trains. Autonomous cranes are also likely to hauling hazardous materials will likely
take several steps to get the most out of emerge in the near term. While the physics continue to need human oversight.
automation. Among other moves, they can of trains makes automation on the main line
Exhibit
2
Rick Braddock, “To compete with Amazon, big-name consumer brands have to become more like it,” Harvard Business Review,
June 14, 2018, hbr.org.
Exhibit 1
Multishuttle system Analytics tools Optical recognition Conveyor connection Management system
Typically used with an Algorithms that help operators Sensors that scan items (often A connection between Analytic and digital systems that
automated storage and retrieval analyze performance, identify on 6 axes) to apply sortation and 2 disparate conveyor systems integrate analytics, performance
system (AS/RS) that moves trends, and make predictions other logics. Examples include a that often uses decision logic reporting, and forecasting tools,
goods (mostly on pallets) in that inform operating decisions, conveyor’s diverts, laser-guided to affect the flow of items. allowing managers to easily
3 dimensions to store and often using machine learning to vehicles, and camera-based Typically, connections integrate control a full system such as a
retrieve items without human improve over time. movement of drones. different systems of flow, for warehouse.
intervention. example push and pull flows.
Smart storage 3-D printing Swarm AGV1 robots Smart glasses Picking robot
Storage solutions that use Also called additive Autonomous guided vehicles Glasses that augment and assist Systems with robotic arms that
advanced analytics and digital manufacturing, this process that operate freely or on digital reality of wearers—for example, mimic human picking motion.
tools to place and retrieve items creates parts by adding layers tracks to bring items (often from by displaying directions to Picking robots can be fixed (with
in the most efficient way, of a material (metal or plastic, a storage rack) to a picking storage locations for picking— goods brought to them) or mobile
adjusting storage media based typically) to create a desired station based on instructions reducing inefficiencies of (traveling to storage to pick
on the product, picking, and shape. from the order-flow software. searching. items).
order characteristics.
1
Autonomous guided vehicle.
Source: McKinsey analysis
day as well as instant delivery, are a potent step in processed 812 million orders, eight times more than
that direction, and logistics companies will have to on a typical day. If logistics companies are to fulfill
carefully monitor the pace of change. customer expectations during peaks, they will have
significant spare capacity for three-quarters of the
A particular challenge of serving e-commerce year. And if they do not build sufficient capacity for
companies is that demand is very spiky, easily peaks, e-commerce giants have further incentive to
doubling around Christmas or Singles’ Day. On build their own capabilities, as Amazon did after the
Singles’ Day 2017, Cainiao, Alibaba’s logistics arm, 2013 Christmas season.
Warehouse automation technologies shuttles moving in three dimensions on rails Autonomous palletizers use robotic arms to
can be broadly categorized into devices attached to the structure. build pallets from individual units and cases,
that assist the movement of goods often using advanced analytics to determine
and those that improve their handling. New handling devices automate the picking, the optimal placement for each box.
In the first group, we’ve already seen sorting, and palletizing of goods. Picking
automated guided vehicles (AGVs) that systems typically include a robotic arm Beyond the machines that mimic human
move cases and pallets. New twists are with sensors that can determine the shape hands and arms, other innovations will
the equipment and software needed to and structure of an object, then grasp it. improve the productivity of people in
retrofit standard forklifts and make them Some devices remain fixed and have goods warehouses. Drones are already in use in
autonomous. The new gear can be switched brought to them (often by AGVs). Others the warehouse for inventory management
on whenever needed—peak seasonal travel to the goods and retrieve and move and outside the four walls for yard
shifts, say—and the forklift can remain them at once. Magazino’s new TORU cube is management. We expect to see much
manual when demand is slower. Other an example of the latter. greater adoption of drones for these uses.
recent technologies include swarm robots Exoskeletons augment human motion
(most famously, Amazon’s Kiva robots) With the e-commerce boom, efficient with mechanical power through gloves or
that move shelves with goods to picking sorting has become increasingly important, additional support for legs. The systems
stations and advanced conveyors that can particularly in parcel operations. Advanced feature electric motors that augment the
move goods in any direction. Advanced conveyor systems use scanners that can person’s own strength to allow them to move
automated storage/retrieval systems (AS/ pick up bar codes on any side of a package more goods (for example, heavier items) or
RSs) store goods in large racks, with robotic to determine the appropriate action. move goods more easily and safely.
Exhibit 2
Internet of Things/smart-sensor
applications
Exoskeletons
Autonomous trucks
Autonomous
guided vehicles
Maturity, in stages
1
Speed of innovation adoption based on maturity.
technologies and solutions. That may change: the have seen purchase prices for the same equipment
industry is in turmoil, with significant M&A activity vary by as much as 50 percent.
underway. Notably, large technology conglomerates
are investing in automation start-ups. For example, Rapid change in shippers’ distribution networks
in 2015, Siemens took a 50 percent stake in Brick-and-mortar retailers are reacting to the
Magazino, a start-up that builds automated picking e-commerce onslaught in part by evolving their
robots. Once the dust has settled, some larger distribution networks into omnichannel systems in
companies that are better able to meet demand may which consumers can purchase and receive items
emerge. Then again, such companies will also have through any channel. They might purchase online
stronger pricing power. and take deliveries at home, the classic e-commerce
model. Increasingly, they can order online and pick
A related issue is some confusion at logistics up in stores. Or they might purchase in-store and
companies about which advanced equipment they receive shipments at home, an option that menswear
truly need. Often the equipment on the purchase company Bonobos and other companies offer. And
order is more expensive than it might have been. We of course, they can still go to the store and walk out
Shippers—the manufacturers and logistics companies that will invest enough of automation investments. Put another
retailers that hire logistics providers in automation to meet their needs. way, logistics companies will seek to share
to move their goods—will also grapple some of the technology upside—and some
with automation in coming years. As Beyond the level of investment, shippers of the risk—with customers.
new technologies come online and and their logistics partners must also
omnichannel delivery becomes more contend with the complexity of omnichannel. Shippers cannot completely outsource
common, most will need to revisit their Take one example: to operate efficiently, the intricacies of automation and the best
long-standing in-house and outsource an omnichannel retailer must either open practices of automated warehouses. To
decisions. Shippers interested in the full inventory system to the logistics be a smart customer requires enough
automation must first determine whether company so that it can route orders knowledge of automation to evaluate bids
they have the capital and know-how to between stores and fulfillment centers or intelligently. Contract logistics companies
invest effectively in automation or whether add steps to the order-routing process to we speak with often see automation listed
it is more economical and easier to determine whether the order remains in prominently, yet typically with sparse
outsource increasingly complex warehouse house or is sent to the logistics company. detail, in requests for proposals. Shippers
operations to a logistics company. The frequently know they want automation but
same uncertainties about omnichannel Supply chain managers should also expect don’t know what kind they need. Getting
that hold back logistics companies’ changes in their negotiations with logistics a fair shake from logistics companies
investments in automation can also partners. As contract logistics players add will require shippers to stay aware of
constrain shippers. However, our analysis more fixed costs in the form of automation, technology trends and understand well
indicates that shippers are investing more their strategic flexibility will decrease. how these might meet their needs.
in automation than logistics companies Shippers should expect their partners to
are, in large part because they cannot find seek contracts in line with the life cycle
with their purchases. On top of that, consumers more frequent tendering and have sought greater
demand ever-faster delivery, which requires more flexibility to respond to rapid changes in customer
local storage capacity, further driving complexity. demand. The trend has exerted significant pressure
Building a supply chain to support an omnichannel on logistics companies. Because they typically
system is highly complex (Exhibit 3). develop sites with a particular customer in mind,
they need to calculate carefully the investment
With all this complexity comes a lot of uncertainty: required to add a new customer. With a significant
Where should new fulfillment centers be built? What initial investment required, logistics contracts are
share of B2C orders should they accommodate? often not profitable for two years. That leaves only
And perhaps the biggest question: How much and a year or so of profit before renegotiations begin.
what kind of automation are ideal? Shippers are Big investments in automation would push the
asking the same sorts of questions (see sidebar break-even point back further, leaving logistics
“The shipper’s perspective”). companies at even greater risk that a customer
would change providers, which would leave the
Too-short contracts facility empty and automation equipment unutilized
Most logistics contracts run for about three years, while the third-party-logistics company searches
sometimes longer. That’s much shorter than for a new customer.
in the past. Shippers have tried to cut costs by
Exhibit 3
Vendor
E-commerce Omnichannel
fulfillment center fulfillment center Hub and Logistics Retail Omnichannel
spoke clusters infrastructure infrastructure
Network strategy Network strategy Network strategy Network strategy
• Use segmented • Locate near hubs • Rely on own • Build smaller
approach to place and competitor footprint of brick- e-commerce
inventory in larger facilities to benefit and-mortar stores fulfilment centers
(regional) and from availability close to customer close to customer
Consolidation in Dark Store with cross- smaller (local, of labor and • Train store
logistics cluster store trained workforce metro) sites collaborative associates to serve Applicability
transportation both e-commerce • For geographies
Applicability and store visits with high population
• National/regional Applicability density
• For low volumes Applicability (metropolitan areas)
• Reduced capital- • For areas around
expenditure retail footprint
investment • Reduced capital-
Customer locker expenditure
or drop box investment
In the future, contract planning might get even more Contract logistics
difficult. E-commerce requires dense networks, The big changes we’ve discussed—the simultaneous
especially in urban areas. But no single customer rise of e-commerce, omnichannel supply chains, and
has the scale to support a full-scale network. new automation technologies—present contract
Logistics companies must therefore build fulfillment logistics with a great opportunity to sharpen its value
centers and purchase automation technology proposition, which has historically relied on one of
before demand is known, let alone contracted. two factors:
course, but when they do, the logistics company’s as it cannot handle the large items, but it is
expertise and market-leading role should attract significantly cheaper to install and often even
replacements, lowering the risk of equipment to operate.
obsolescence. Therefore, logistics companies
should avoid equipment that is specific to only To decide, companies must review two pieces
one customer if that customer is not willing to help of data: the historical mix of parcel sizes and the
shoulder the burden. growth rate of each size. If the data do not yield
a definitive answer, it may make sense to create
Yet superior expertise and support may not be a flexible base capacity of large equipment
enough to make all contracts profitable over their and then add smaller sorters to accommodate
duration. Contract logistics companies should also e-commerce peaks.
get smart about pricing. The power of incentives,
such as adding attractive terms to extend contracts — Which process steps should be automated?
or penalties if contracts are terminated before The most obvious candidate is sorting in the
customized equipment is paid off, is not to hub. The labor-cost savings, especially in the
be underestimated. developed world, make this a relatively clear
case. Unloading and loading in the hubs are
Parcels more complicated. Over the past five years,
For parcel companies, the strategic considerations more equipment for these activities has been
are a little simpler. Increasing demand is a given, developed. Some providers say their gear can
as are rising requirements for speed and reliability. increase the productivity of one employee
Considered that way, there can be little question to more than 3,000 items unloaded per hour,
that parcel companies need to automate. And in from the previous 700 to 1,000 items per hour.
fact, many already have. DHL invested about €750 In our experience, however, this equipment
million in its German parcel network, and United often struggles with the different shapes
Parcel Service (UPS) has announced a long-term and especially the packaging of today’s
plan to invest even more. e-commerce parcels. Plastic bags are the worst
nightmare of many parcel-hub engineers.
But within that imperative, parcel companies face
some subtler questions: When it comes to to the automation of loading,
large parcels are extremely difficult. Just
— What kind of equipment should be installed? imagine a 50-pound sack of dog food landing
Parcel companies around the world have two on a small, delicate box of LEGO toys. The child
choices. One is to install large equipment that who receives the latter will not be happy with
can handle the vast majority of parcels, say its condition. For smaller items, automation
those up to 120 by 60 by 60 centimeters. This has been in place for years, but reviews are
approach puts a high value on flexibility to mixed. Parcel companies are well advised to ask
accommodate a wide mix of parcels. Other manufacturers to showcase their solution with
companies have focused on equipment the company’s parcel mix.
designed for smaller items, as e-commerce
fulfillment features lightweight (less than 5 Apart from hubs, some parcel companies, such
kilograms) items that are typically smaller than a as DHL, have started to automate delivery
shoebox. This kind of equipment is less flexible, bases. Key advantages of this model are more
Ashutosh Dekhne is a partner in McKinsey’s Dallas office, Greg Hastings is an associate partner in the Charlotte office, John
Murnane is a senior partner in the Atlanta office, and Florian Neuhaus is a partner in the Boston office.
The authors wish to thank Knut Alicke, Tom Bartman, Alan Davies, Mark Staples, Adrian Viellechner, and Markus Weidmann for
their contributions to this article.
Next–generation supply
chain—transforming your
supply chain operating
model for a digital world
In a digital age, most supply chains run on old principles and processes.
A few leaders can show us how a new operating model can answer the
demands of today—and tomorrow.
by Manik Aryapadi, Ashutosh Dekhne, Christoph Kuntze, Tim Lange, and Andreas Seyfert
Exhibit
A close look at an income statement shows the impact of supply chain performance.
Income statement of superstore, illustrative Supply chain’s impact
Operating profit
1
Cost of goods sold.
Next–generation supply chain—transforming your supply chain operating model for a digital world 63
S U P P LY C H A I N
New supply chain operating model challenges all dimensions of the supply chain
The strategic objective is clear: more revenue, lower costs, satisfied customers.
To get there, companies must align their operating model with the demands of the digital world, entailing scrutiny of all dimensions of
the supply chain: structures, processes, and people. By asking core questions along these dimensions, it is possible to determine the
cornerstones of a next–generation operating model.
Consideration is the increasing pressure on supply and can concentrate on value-adding activities.
chain functions in terms of cost and productivity. McKinsey studies have shown that current
New market conditions frequently result in a growing technologies could automate an average of
number of products, warehouses, and logistics 45 percent of human activities.
service providers, requiring more frequent and more
detailed planning. This also creates calls to scale However, innovative technologies and methods
up personnel resources in indirect functions like place new demands on the capabilities of employees,
scheduling and distribution management. management, and IT infrastructure along the supply
chain: all three elements need to be continually
Finally, the use of new digital technologies and realigned to reflect the latest trends. Companies
advanced analytics also affect supply chains that do not respond to these challenges by radically
design, creating both opportunities and challenges. reshaping the structures and processes of their
Advanced analytics allow more precise planning, supply chain will extract few of the benefits that the
and efficiency and effectiveness also rise when transformation promises.
planners are freed up from repetitive tasks
Next–generation supply chain—transforming your supply chain operating model for a digital world 65
S U P P LY C H A I N
the digital requirements, companies can identify Following these seven guidelines can help
the most important roles in the company and manufacturers and retailers get their supply chain
staff them with the right amount of talent. operating model in good shape for the future. A next-
generation model creates the right preconditions to
7. Build up dynamic capabilities. Capabilities optimally benefit from the opportunities associated
and role profiles should be aligned to the with digitizing the supply chain. Companies can thus
requirements of new technologies and obtain a lasting competitive edge.
processes; particularly critical are data
scientists (experts in the development of This article is adapted from a version that originally
analytical solutions and algorithms) and appeared in Akzente.
digital translators (employees at the interface
between business and analytics). Yet not
all capabilities can be built up internally—
partnerships can generate best-of-best
solutions, allowing internal resources to
be concentrated on company-specific
competence areas, such as the development
of forecasting software for special product
groups or markets.
Manik Aryapadi is an associate partner in McKinsey’s Cleveland office, Ashutosh Dekhne is a partner in the
Dallas office, Christoph Kuntze is a partner in the Miami office, Tim Lange is a partner in the Cologne office, and
Andreas Seyfert is a senior knowledge expert in the Berlin office.
Beyond procurement:
Transforming indirect
spending in retail
If retailers treat indirect costs as an opportunity for business
transformation rather than just a procurement matter, they can boost
return on sales by as much as 2 percent.
For retailers seeking to cut costs and generate In doing so, retailers are shaving as much as 10 to 15
cash for growth investments, indirect spending can percent off their annual indirect spend, capturing
be a big untapped opportunity. Indirect costs—the impact worth 1 to 2 percent in return on sales, and
goods and services that retailers purchase but seeing a more than 15-fold return on the cost of their
don’t resell—are equivalent to 10 to 15 percent of NFR-sourcing team. We’ve found that the value at
sales on average, and most retailers know that their stake is remarkably consistent across retailers—
indirect spending is far from optimized. But while even at those that have been working on reducing
recognizing the potential is easy, capturing it has indirect costs for a long time, whether in-house or
proven stubbornly difficult. with external support.
Exhibit 1
By addressing the full cost base, a retailer can double the scope and savings of its
indirect-costs program.
Typical breakdown for a €10 billion retailer, € million
300 2,000
100
200 Capital
Supplier- expenditure
300 Private-label managed
packaging costs
200
Rent
900 Marketing
procurement policies and use only preferred vendors, and reports to help category managers monitor
maverick spending will be reduced or even eliminated. spending. One retailer had recently streamlined
Savings across the organization can be more easily its headquarters organization but found
tracked. The retailer can better negotiate vendor through AI-supported spend mapping that
payment terms and cycles to its benefit. many of the costs had crept back in through
the use of contractors and temporary labor.
Most important, a cross-functional team will be Once the retailer generated the spend cube
better placed to pull category-specific demand- using an agreed taxonomy, it could lock down a
management levers, which influence what the baseline and see how much it was spending on
retailer buys. In our experience, these levers deliver contracted versus uncontracted vendors.
as much as half of the potential savings—or even — Consumer insights. A retailer used digital
more for mature companies because negotiating consumer surveys and crowdsourced competitor
for lower prices yields diminishing returns over benchmarks to understand, address, and retest
time. The biggest opportunities are often in areas consumer perceptions of store cleanliness.
that many retailers consider out of scope, such Which areas of the store did consumers notice
as marketing (by using a return-on-investment most? Which areas did they hardly notice at
approach, for instance) or logistics (using levers all? Analysis showed that the parking lot and
such as inventory reduction or network redesign). the sidewalks were perceived as clean enough,
so instead of hiring a cleaner to do a thorough
A retailer seeking to optimize logistics spending cleaning multiple times a day, the retailer cut
tasked a cross-functional team with redesigning back to once a day, with store associates doing
its distribution network. The team was able to spot checks every few hours. The surveys
reduce end-to-end costs by selectively increasing also revealed places—such as fitting rooms
certain logistics costs. For example, it switched and the shoe department—where the retailer
some deliveries from sea to air in order to gain sales could invest in more frequent cleaning to boost
and reduce markdowns. It also increased delivery customer satisfaction. The business-insights
frequency for some products and stores while team then measured the exact impact of these
decreasing it for others. adjustments on the retailer’s sales.
The use of digital and analytical tools — Design to value. A retailer reduced the cost
Digitization has revolutionized every business of its paper shopping bags by 25 percent by
process and will continue to do so; indirect sourcing redesigning them. Through digital analysis of
is no exception.¹ Today, leading retailers are using basket size, product dimensions, and data from
digital and analytical tools in the following areas to cashier surveys, the retailer determined the
achieve dramatic reductions in indirect costs: ideal dimensions of a shopping bag based on
the distribution of physical volume and weight
— Spend visibility. Advanced digital solutions, of products. Further digital analysis—along with
powered by artificial intelligence (AI) and input from cashiers, baggers, and vendors—
machine learning, enable retailers to rapidly helped the retailer arrive at the substrate
and accurately map the relevant spend base composition that would give the shopping
into granular categories, shedding light bags the right levels of puncture strength and
on exactly who spends how much on what. tensile strength.
Cutting–edge digital procurement solutions — Clean sheeting. Digital clean-sheeting
can pull purchase-order (PO) and invoice tools can reduce indirect costs by as much as
data from multiple systems to create a “spend 40 percent in a category. Such tools typically
cube,” automatically generating benchmarks feature algorithms for determining costs
on pricing and specs, as well as dashboards in various NFR areas, dynamic databases
1
For more on digital solutions in procurement, see Pierre de la Boulaye, Pieter Riedstra, and Peter Spiller, “Driving superior value through digital
procurement,” April 2017, McKinsey.com.
Exhibit 2
Through clean sheeting, a retailer saw that it was paying more than the ‘should cost’ for labels
on its water bottles.
Key assumptions
Outbound
SG&A, Profit logistics
Overhead, R&D
Batch other
setup, manufactur-
Machinery scrap,
ing
Inbound Labor
tooling costs
logistics
The elements of successful supplier collaboration story is communicating why savings are needed
include focusing on a limited number of suppliers to and what they will be used for. Allowing business
deliver the highest return on investment, establishing units or functions to reinvest part of the savings
a robust value-sharing agreement at the outset, can increase motivation. (One initiative leader at a
creating a dedicated supplier-collaboration team retailer put it this way: “Half goes to the CFO, but
separate from (but aligned with) category managers, the other half we get to keep.”) The head office
and building a disciplined performance-management should, of course, have enough visibility into the
and benefits-tracking system. reinvestments to ensure they align with corporate
priorities and generate strong returns.
One retailer, when retendering its contracts for
outsourced warehousing, required suppliers to Intelligent target setting also helps foster
submit proposals for improving the joint warehousing understanding across the organization. Targets
operation. Based partly on these proposals, the should be based on detailed diagnostics, including
retailer reduced its supplier count to two, allowing benchmarking against a relevant peer set.
for closer collaboration while maintaining some Otherwise, stakeholders will reject the targets
competitive tension. The retailer built continuous- as arbitrary; there’s also a risk of damaging the
improvement targets into the contracts, with business by pushing it into “slash and burn” cost
gainsharing incentives for the suppliers. It also cutting. The diagnostics should yield not just
invested in a “lean warehousing” team that works a single target—such as, $100 million in cost
closely with the suppliers to build capabilities. savings—but also a set of quantified initiatives.
Targets should include cost ratios (for example,
logistics spending as a percent of sales) rather
Getting it done than just absolute numbers to ensure that cost
Retailers must embed these new ways of working efficiency genuinely improves even when the
into daily tasks. To sustain behavioral change, they category experiences tailwinds. (For example, a
must use all four parts of the “influence model” decline in logistics costs due to a decline in sales
(Exhibit 3).² isn’t really an improvement.)
2
For more on the influence model, see Tessa Basford and Bill Schaninger, “The four building blocks of change,” McKinsey Quarterly, April 2016,
McKinsey.com.
Exhibit 3
UND
ERS
TA
NG N DI
LI NG
DE
O
AN
M
D
LE
CO
RO
NV
• Senior sponsorship setting
I CT
of initiatives • External visibility
ION
• Early wins • Test and learn
S
• Training level tracking
TA
ISM
L
EN
AN
TA
N
CH
D E
SK M
IL L AL
S RM
FO
NFR initiatives and targets, the people involved in the Reinforcing with formal mechanisms
initiatives see that their work matters and even has Company goals should be translated into personal
the power to influence their company’s stock price. targets. One retailer created a simple timeline of
when initiatives were expected to deliver impact,
Along the NFR journey, there will be times when using the top end of the impact range estimated for
stakeholders resist change for fear of negatively each initiative. The resulting quarterly figures became
affecting sales. A test-and-learn culture can targets for the relevant executives, whose bonuses
overcome this. A first step can be to show mock- were partly dependent on hitting those targets.
ups or samples of proposed changes. One retailer’s
procurement team recommended using thinner, To follow up on progress against targets, many
cheaper paper for marketing materials. It overcame retailers instinctively go for a monthly cadence
resistance from the marketing department by of follow-up meetings. But, in our experience, a
having samples printed on the thinner paper weekly program-management rhythm is much
and using blind testing to demonstrate that the more effective for driving the pace of initiatives and
materials were just as effective. bringing about cultural change. During the weekly
meeting, the team reviews all initiatives but focuses equivalents (FTEs) working for 12 months. Company
on only a few, either on a rotating basis or to help leadership had to stop or pause other initiatives to
those that need additional support. create the required capacity. While 40 FTEs might
sound like an enormous investment, the retailer
Initiatives should be tracked not only against recouped the cost of those employees’ yearlong
milestones but also on progression through “imple- efforts about 50 times over in recurring savings.
mentation levels”: an initiative begins as an idea,
matures to a business case, becomes an approved Neither the program leader nor the team members
decision, gets implemented, and is ultimately can be expected to have all the relevant category-
converted to “money in the bank.” The expected specific expertise. Our research shows that
impact of initiatives can be appropriately “discounted” retailers have eight times the indirect spend per
when they are in earlier stages. Implementation- procurement professional compared with other
level tracking gives the program leader and sectors, which means their level of expertise in
steering committee a more accurate picture of any particular category will be relatively shallow.
when impact will be delivered and which initiatives Therefore, tapping into internal and external
need what kind of support. Linking this tracking to category experts is crucial. One grocery retailer
ongoing budgeting, forecasting, and performance- discovered that one of its project managers
management processes yields greater transparency had been a refrigeration engineer for 25 years.
in profit-and-loss performance. The company brought him into a team tasked
with reducing the life-cycle cost of refrigeration,
Developing talent and skills heating, and cooling assets by 30 percent in two
An NFR program needs a capable program leader years. The team achieved the goal in six months
and a supporting team. The program leader, and did so with simple solutions—for example,
who will likely come from a line role, should know changing the type of price tags used in refrigerated
the business well and have the respect of top shelves so that the tags wouldn’t fall off and clog
management. Given this individual’s talent and the drain. This change saved the retailer more than
leadership skills, it won’t be an easy decision for $600,000 a year.
senior executives to free him or her up to lead the
program. But the sacrifice will pay off. Capability building is also key. The best companies
use a combination of classroom training, e-learning
Still, without sufficient resources for each initiative, tools, and on-the-job coaching. In our experience,
the program will struggle. Colleagues from each many NFR professionals who receive functional
function or cost category will need to dedicate and category-specific training and mentoring
10 to 20 percent of their time to the effort. For one immediately double or triple their effectiveness.
$10 billion retailer, delivering $200 million in savings A phased train-the-trainer approach—in which
required a program leader and about 40 full-time the sourcing team receives training during a pilot
Stefon Burns is an associate partner in McKinsey’s New York office, Ella Burroughes is an associate partner in the
London office, Steve Hoffman is a partner in McKinsey’s Chicago office, and Alexander Merklein is an associate partner in
the Vienna office.
Rethinking procurement
in retail
For retailers, procurement is no longer solely a matter of negotiating
“A” brands. Private labels and verticalization are trending. Advanced
approaches and tools help get procurement in shape for the future.
advantage—vis-à-vis brand manufacturers but also — Capabilities. Agile procurement teams need a
other retailers. broader range of competencies. Negotiation
tactics are no longer such a decisive factor;
As verticalization increases, so too does the more important are analytical skills, especially
importance of procuring resources and raw materials. in the disciplines of advanced analytics and
Retailers with in–house manufacturing capacity can machine learning, coupled with an extensive
no longer simply pass on prices to their customers. understanding of products.
Instead, they have to ensure the supply and capacity
utilization of their production facilities. Not only does — Tools. Retailers have long operated with sell-
that make the task of procurement more demanding, off and margin analytics that ideally also factor
it also involves far more complex processes. in additional agreements such as advertising
subsidies. However, that’s not enough in the
current environment: procurement officers
need a detailed understanding of how much
Agile work structures are needed
value can be created with each product and
The new trends have a wide-ranging impact on the
what prices are actually feasible in the market,
procurement function. Established power plays
including for well-established products beyond
in negotiations with brand suppliers have become
their “brand bonus.” Also needed are highly
more difficult. Indeed, as retailers have lost their
professional requests for quotations for product
ability to monopolize touchpoints to customers,
development, manufacturing, or collaboration
they have also lost their most powerful negotiation
agreements with suppliers. This is only possible
argument in some areas. Brand manufacturers have
with the assistance of digital processes and a
known how to take advantage of this opportunity:
toolbox that supports procurement in the retail
they have professionalized their customer
sector with new procedures and technologies.
management and today have access to data–based
customer knowledge that had long been exclusively
controlled by the retail sector. In contrast, many
retailers have changed little in the way they manage New tools for every purpose: From
their procurement activities and are seeing their the parametric cleansheet to the
past negotiation power dwindle. In order to restore negotiation cockpit
the level playing field with manufacturers, they As they seek to optimize their procurement
have to revolutionize their procurement functions at functions, today’s retailers have at their disposal a
multiple levels simultaneously: large spectrum of methodological approaches and
digital analytics tools—not just for the procurement
— Organization. Conventional procurement of private labels but also for products produced in
management dependent on a few core house, for nonretail goods, and for the procurement
suppliers is no longer enough. Clever retailers of industrial brands. Some of these tools should
set their procurement organizations on a far be standard equipment in every retailer’s toolbox,
broader footing and, in particular, endow them given that they provide the fact base needed for
with greater agility. Category specialists are making the best possible procurement decisions.
replaced by agile, cross-functional teams that Such tools include analytics tools for determining
link procurement to other functions, such as spending and price variance, a supplier positioning
product development, category management, matrix, and the cleansheet—an essential tool
and supply chain management, and that set the for shedding transparency on complex product
foundations for successful procurement based categories. Beyond that, tried-and-true tools
on sprints. are also used as needed, such as guidelines for
Exhibit 1
For each step in the procurement process, there are approaches and tools for optimization—
both digital and classic ones.
Overview of key tools along the purchasing value chain
algorithm-based machine learning is used to can use to predict the purchasing prices of wheat,
develop complex demand forecasts or agronomic for instance.
predictive models, compile global cost curves, or
Insights 2019 analyze market conditions based on geodata. To Many tools touched on here can be used both
Rethinking procurement in retail
this end, the tools combine an array of data on in contract manufacturing and in the in-house
Exhibit 2 of 2 market trends or developments in the weather and production of private-label goods. However, they
commodities markets that procurement officers differ in terms of their range of influence. They
Exhibit 2
Labor 0.05
Machinery 0.01
Profit 0.04
Quoted 1.13
–29%
1
Sales, general, and administrative expenses.
Source: McKinsey analysis
Why the effort pays: Big The effort is certainly worth it. After all, the
savings potential costs of procurement or manufacture of articles
A closer look at the levers in procurement clearly make up as much as 75 percent of the retail
shows that private labels offer procurement officers price. Professional procurement management
substantially more opportunities for influencing the with advanced method-ologies and smart tools
product than industrial brands. Accordingly, there can make a substantial contribution toward
are greater opportunities for reducing costs and cutting these costs—by more than 10 percent in
widening margins. It is possible to capture quick the case of private labels. Retailers should not
savings through the procurement price alone. A miss this opportunity to stretch their margins
cleansheet analysis again helps determine the extent and maneuver into a stronger market position—
of the potential: in the procurement of a mass article— because the competition does not sleep.
in the illustrated example, a candle for home use—the
Patricio Ibáñez is a partner in McKinsey’s Cleveland office, Alexander Merklein is an associate partner in the Vienna office,
and Daniel Rexhausen is a partner in the Stuttgart office.
© making_ultimate/Getty Images
Exhibit 1
Integrated
FM
Bundled
Standardized
Full outsourcing of
wide range of
Consolidated noncore services
Bidding out
multiple and management
Outsourced services in
Alignment of One partner per site
service levels same RFQ with that typically
In house across sites to opportunity for performs major
Pooling of
lowest acceptable one supplier to services with own
volumes across
level, which also deliver more staff
sites, which is
Outsourcing of treats employees than one service
tendered by the Synergies in
McK on Retail 2019 noncore tasks on central alike in exchange for
delivery and
Own staff trends case-by-case
Six emerging procurement
extra rebate
management
Levers
performing basis
Exhibit 2 of 3 function
noncore services
Exhibit 2
6.2% p.a.
1,884
1,599
1,314
1,134
972
846
Case study
© Visoot Uthairam/Getty Images
One large retailer was seeking to prioritize be handled through a shared-services specifications and then selected suppliers
tasks that could be handled more cost- model with high utilization of internal labor. that best matched the retailer’s needs. This
effectively by a third-party vendor. Its Outsourced categories were defined by approach reduced facilities-management
team compiled a list of categories that current specifications and, separately, spending by 15 percent, which was
should be kept in house as well as those by the essential level of service for the reallocated to support the organization’s
to outsource. In-house categories were organization. It put out an RFP for the investment strategy.
determined based on which tasks could outsourced categories with two types of
Case study A global financial institution was techniques, and invested in stakeholder
spending $450 million annually to maintain management. With the insights gained
its thousands of locations around the world. from this process, the company was able
Its fragmented supplier base included to consolidate its facilities-management
more than 10,000 vendors across about a spending from dozens of suppliers to just
dozen categories. To assess opportunities one vendor, while standardizing business
for outsourcing, the institution undertook a processes and service quality. Adopting
scoping and prioritization exercise, sought integrated facilities management helped
to gain greater transparency into spending reduce costs by more than $150 million
categories, applied advanced sourcing over three years.
Case study
Case study
© yoh4nn/Getty Images
A mining company sought to increase rig tenance for each component. To support Its efforts paid off handsomely: the company
uptime and reduce maintenance spending, a predictive maintenance deployment, the created an end-to-end system with
which accounted for 25 percent of operating company focused on five building blocks: real-time data collection, storage, and pro-
expenses. An analysis determined that cessing to enable predictive maintenance.
— Strategy
top drive and pipe handling accounted for These capabilities enabled it to reduce
— Technology
40 percent of all downtime and 10 percent of maintenance spending by 27 percent while
all maintenance spending. It then conducted — Capabilities increasing revenue from services thanks to
a thorough “digital teardown” to estimate — Organization higher reliability.
specific opportunities in predictive main- — Processes and procedures
Case study
© Westend61/Getty Images
Leading companies are in the process among other tasks. The promise of such
of integrating robotics into their facilities- robots is threefold: beyond the opportunity
management operations for tasks such as to reduce operating expenses, these
floor cleaning, window washing, and power machines could free up existing staff to
washing. Innovations in early stages of focus on higher-value activities while
development include robots for security mitigating some of the risk associated with
patrol, lawn mowing, and snow removal, these tasks.
Case study
© Westend61/Getty Images
Actions companies can take now Assess the organizational maturity and
Facilities management leaders can’t simply flip a capabilities needed to manage vendors and
switch to harness these trends. Some companies support digital technologies
will need to adjust their strategy, organizational Capabilities, both from a relationship and content
capabilities, and culture. And considering that a few standpoint, are important. Vendor relationships
of these trends are still in their infancy, executives can be built by acting on stakeholder satisfaction
should focus on laying the foundation. Several surveys, organizing joint meetings with suppliers,
actions can help. and managing supplier performance as a team.
Organizations can develop content-based
Elevate facilities management to a C-level capabilities by introducing supplier-led training
priority (with a focus on COO/CFO engagement) on digital technologies and investing in external
Many industries have traditionally kept facilities expert trainings. For instance, a client set up
management on the back burner, but this category a meeting cadence between suppliers and
can be a gold mine of savings. One company, for stakeholders to identify and address issues
example, was under pressure to reduce costs, but every quarter.
the procurement team was skeptical of addressing
facilities management because of sensitivities Build the business case for investment in
within the organization. The indirect procurement selected trends
team asked for support from the CPO and COO to Companies can support the adoption of emerging
back a transformation of facilities management, technologies by doing controlled pilots. Projects
and this support created an actionable pipeline of that apply AR to simple tasks and experiment
savings for the next three years. with the IoT can get the organization acclimated
to technology. Successful pilots can provide the
Establish a cross-functional team business case for scaling; a similar rationale can
True cross-functional collaboration between be used for opportunities to integrate robots. The
procurement and operations is required to create hotel industry, for example, is adopting robots for
sustainable impact. Companies should form a bell service and housekeeping through pilots in
team that includes the COO, CIO, a facilities- certain hotels.
management leader, a strategic-sourcing leader
(for facilities management or innovation), and a Partner with IFMs, and set up a robust
project–management office leader, among others. governance mechanism
Without alignment, facility-management initiatives A company can view IFM suppliers as a partner to
face a difficult path. One company’s procurement achieve savings and manage portfolio, but it must
team identified savings during the RFP process and first establish a robust governance mechanism
moved to adopt integrated facilities management, to maintain trust with suppliers. A regular auditing
but some stakeholders were not on board. During cadence can ensure that any savings are contributing
implementation, an operations team found that to the bottom line. In addition, companies should
the prescribed specifications were not aligned make decisions collaboratively with IFMs on
with its equipment. Within a few months, the IFM topics such as specification standardization and
contract was nullified after disagreement between computerized maintenance management system
procurement and operations. In another company, (CMMS) technology. At one manufacturer, a factory
procurement leaders were adamant about pursuing manager set up a regular auditing cadence to
IFM. Although it was the right strategy, they first review IFM initiatives with the finance team to ensure
sought to gain alignment and support from the that savings flowed to the bottom line.
operations team before the process kicked off.
Stefon Burns is an associate partner in McKinsey’s New York office, Ella Burroughes is an associate partner in the London
office, Steve Hoffman is a partner in the Chicago office, and Alexander Merklein is an associate partner in the Vienna office.
© julief514/Getty Images
at such a granular level that a small team of teams, shows just how differentiated the new
developers can support the process from structure can be (Exhibit 1).
beginning to end. This approach obviously
enables “tearing down the walls” between 2. Set up “tech chapters” as new structures
business and IT. The granular structure also within IT
creates an opportunity to connect each of The establishment of product teams usually
these products and development teams requires a change of the classical IT structures
with a counterpart from the business. This with leaders at the division, department, and
type of connection typically increases the team levels. One option that is currently used
effectiveness of the product teams. Thanks by many companies is to replace the classical
to their cross-functional staff, such teams can structure with so-called “tech chapters” that
drive further manage the professional development of
McK Retail compendium 2020 development independently and
be measured against the concrete business employees in the product teams and recruit new
End of IT
results of their work. An overview from one tech specialists. Typically, chapter leads do not
Exhibit 1 of 2
retailer, which has been transforming toward influence the content of product development
such a structure with approximately 90 product (the “what”). They focus on the methodology and
Exhibit 1
The end of centralized IT: small, effective product teams handle technological development in
each business unit.
Allocation of product teams to a retailer’s commercial units
1st level 2nd level Allocated IT product teams (selected)
Customer Acquisition
Product search and advising Product presentation Electronic price display
Recommendation engine Web landing pages
Checkout
Product search Product configurator
Service
Loyalty
Support Finance
IT security Identity management
HR
Data warehousing and User support
IT platform reporting Development support
Analytics
Exhibit 2
The technology-driven organization lives from the close interplay between product owners,
which determine “what” development will entail, and the tech chapters, which determine “how”
it will be done.
Target structure of a technology–based retail company, illustrative example
UX¹ designer
Architect
Developer
...
1
User experience.
the need for manual operations and pave New organization, new challenges
the way to migrate to a DevOps setup, where Tearing down the walls between business and IT by
most product teams are responsible not implementing the transformation steps described
only for developing their products but also for here can unleash vast potential. Experience shows
running them. that the resulting setup enables companies to
develop and use new technologies much more
In general, we see two alternatives for how efficiently (see sidebar, “Suddenly fast and reliable:
companies have implemented a modern How two retailers benefit from restructuring their
technology organization: IT setup”). At the same time, it frees the classical
IT function to focus exclusively on cross-cutting
“Big bang” refers to changing the full setup all at technology topics. Central-expert teams therefore
once. This approach has the advantage of a short coexist alongside the tech-chapter leads to
implementation timeline; however, it also requires a make decisions on system architecture, ensure
huge amount of preparation and bears a high risk of data security, and manage relationships with
disrupting daily operations. major technology partners. Responsibility for
infrastructure, such as cloud computing and data
“Step by step” starts with selected domains and pipes, is another overarching concern that is an
is followed by a sequential roll out. This approach important enabler function.
enables a test-and-learn environment and provides
enough time for the affected employees from the Demands on the CTO as the organization’s ultimate
business functions to understand and adapt to the technology authority increase as well. The new
required changes. In most cases the step-by-step model requires far greater business foresight,
approach will be the preferred choice. since the CTO must provide the right impetus for
The experiences of two European retailers technical solution for deliveries to prioritizing requirements when their
show the potential that reorganizing end customers—from the online shop responsibility expanded from
technology structures can set free: to the management of merchandise, simply operating solutions to shaping
inventories, and the delivery fleet— them as well. At the same time, this
— After making the organizational within ten months. The solution went put the responsibility of deciding on
changes, a housewares retailer was live on schedule as a result. potential benefits and costs in one
able to complete an order-management place—an important prerequisite for
module, which had fallen months In both cases, the key to success was making technology decisions from
behind schedule, within budget and in entrusting operational decision makers a business perspective.
less than two months. from the business with the product owner
role working with their product teams.
— A food retailer using the new structure It quickly became clear that they could
managed to develop an entire be far more targeted in identifying and
Marcus Keutel is a partner in McKinsey’s Cologne office, Gautam Lunawat is a partner in the Silicon Valley office, and
Markus Schmid is a partner in the Munich office.
January 2020
Copyright © McKinsey & Company
McKinsey.com