Course Code: Bus Stat Course Description: Business Statistics Lecture No.: MLN01B
Course Code: Bus Stat Course Description: Business Statistics Lecture No.: MLN01B
Accounts
Business and
Finance
0 .5 1
Probability:
Classical Method
• Assigning probabilities based on the assumption
of equally likely outcomes
Relative Frequency Method
• Assigning probabilities based on experimentation
or historical data
Subjective Method
• Assigning probabilities based on judgment
Events and Their Probabilities
Example
Experiment: Rolling a die
Sample Space: S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}
0 4 0.10
1 6 0.15
2 18 0.45
3 10 0.25
4 2 0.05
Total 40 1.0
Subjective Method
When economic conditions and a company’s
circumstances change rapidly it might be
inappropriate to assign probabilities based solely on
historical data.
We can use any data available as well as our
experience and intuition, but ultimately a probability
value should express our degree of belief that the
experimental outcome will occur.
The best probability estimates often are obtained by
combining the estimates from the classical or relative
frequency approach with the subjective estimate.
Subjective Method
Complement of an Event
Sample
A Ac Space S
Complement of an Event
The union of events A and B is the event containing all sample points that are
in A or B or both.
Sample
Event A Event B Space S
Union of Two Events
The union of events A and B is the event containing all sample points that are
in A or B or both.
Sample
Event A Event B Space S
Intersection of Two Events
Sample
Event A Event B Space S
Intersection of Two Events
Sample
Event A Event B Space S
Intersection of A and B
Addition Law
P( A B)
P( A|B)
P( B)
After reviewing the promotional record, a
committee of female officers filed a discrimination
case on the basis that only 36 female officers had
received promotions during the past two years.
The police administration argued that the relatively
low number of promotions for female officers is due
not to discrimination but to the fact that few female
officers are on the force.
Conditional Probability
Let
M = event an officer is a man
W = event an officer is a woman
B = event an officer is promoted
Conditional Probability
Let
M = event an officer is a man 1. P(M|W)
W = event an officer is a woman
B = event an officer is promoted 2. P(W|M)
3. P(B|M)
4. P(B|W)
Multiplication Law
Example:
1. (T/F) Your Business Statistics lecturer is Rey Parcon.
2. (MC) The dean of IABF is
A. Mr. Ramil Baldres
B. Dr. Joselito Tem
C. Dr. Alma Emerita Dela Cruz
D. Dr. Marietta Israel
What is the probability of getting correct answers
in Q1 and Q2?
a. P(Red and Blue) with replacement
b. P(Red and Blue) without replacement
c. P(Green and Yellow and Red) without replacement
d. P(Blue and Blue and Blue) without replacement
A political telephone survey of 360 people asked whether they were in favor or
not in favor of a proposed law. Each person was identified as either Republican or
Democrat. The results are shown in the following table:
Application
Prior New Posterior
of Bayes’
Probabilities Information Probabilities
Theorem
A proposed shopping center
will provide strong competition
for downtown businesses like
L. S. Clothiers. If the shopping
center is built, the owner of
L. S. Clothiers feels it would be best
to relocate to the center.
The shopping center cannot be built unless a
zoning change is approved by the town council. The
planning board must first make a recommendation,
for
or against the zoning change, to the council.
Bayes’ Theorem
n Prior Probabilities
Let:
A1 = town council approves the zoning change
A2 = town council disapproves the change
n Conditional Probabilities
Past history with the planning board and the
town council indicates the following:
P(B|A1) = .2 P(B|A2) = .9
Tree Diagram
P(B|A1) = .2
P(A1 B) = .14
P(A1) = .7
c
P(B |A1) = .8 P(A1 Bc) = .56
P(B|A2) = .9
P(A2 B) = .27
P(A2) = .3
c
P(B |A2) = .1 P(A2 Bc) = .03
To find the posterior probability that event Ai will
occur given that event B has occurred, we apply
Bayes’ theorem.
P( Ai )P( B| Ai )
P( Ai |B)
P( A1 )P( B| A1 ) P( A2 )P( B| A2 ) ... P( An )P( B| An )
n Conclusion
The planning board’s recommendation is good
news for L. S. Clothiers. The posterior probability of
the town council approving the zoning change is .34
compared to a prior probability of .70.
Step 1
Prepare the following three columns:
Column 1 - The mutually exclusive events for which
posterior probabilities are desired.
Column 2 - The prior probabilities for the events.
Column 3 - The conditional probabilities of the new
information given each event.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Prior Conditional
Events Probabilities Probabilities
Ai P(Ai) P(B|Ai)
A1 .7 .2
A2 .3 .9
1.0
Step 2
Column 4
Compute the joint probabilities for each event
and the new information B by using the
multiplication law.
Multiply the prior probabilities in column 2 by
the corresponding conditional probabilities in
column 3. That is, P(Ai IB) = P(Ai) P(B|Ai).
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Prior Conditional Joint
Events Probabilities Probabilities Probabilities
Ai P(Ai) P(B|Ai) P(Ai I B)
A1 .7 .2 .14
A2 .3 .9 .27
.7 x .2
1.0
Tabular Approach
n Step 2 (continued)
We see that there is a .14 probability of the town
council approving the zoning change and a negative
recommendation by the planning board.
There is a .27 probability of the town council
disapproving the zoning change and a negative
recommendation by the planning board.
Step 3
Column 4
Sum the joint probabilities. The sum is the
probability of the new information, P(B). The sum
.14 + .27 shows an overall probability of .41 of a
negative recommendation by the planning board.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Prior Conditional Joint
Events Probabilities Probabilities Probabilities
Ai P(Ai) P(B|Ai) P(Ai I B)
A1 .7 .2 .14
A2 .3 .9 .27
1.0 P(B) = .41
Step 4
Column 5
Compute the posterior probabilities using the
basic relationship of conditional probability.
P( Ai B)
P( Ai | B)
P( B)
A1 .7 .2 .14 .3415
A2 .3 .9 .27 .6585
1.0 P(B) = .41 1.0000
.14/.41