Second Language Acquisition: Krashen's Hypotheses of His Monitor Theory
Second Language Acquisition: Krashen's Hypotheses of His Monitor Theory
Fetsi
This states that there are two independent types of knowledge about a second language that
are internalized in two different ways. With ‘acquired ‘knowledge, ‘we are generally not
consciously aware of the rule of the languages we have acquired .instead we have a ‘feel’ for
correctness. Whereas ‘learned ‘knowledge can be referred to as, ‘conscious knowledge of a
second language, knowing the rules, being aware of them, and being able to talk about
them’(1985).
In Krashen’s view, the two types of knowledge are used differently. The acquired system is
usedto produce utterances whereas the learned system checks the correctness of these
utterances.
This states that elements of a language are acquired in a predictable order which cannot be
altered by instruction.
The learned system (mentioned above) acts as a monitor and serves to alter the output of the
acquired system. In order that the monitor may work, three principal conditions must be met.
The monitor needs time , a focus on form and an appropriate knowledge of the rule.
In order to move from one point in the ‘ natural order’ of acquisition to the next, learners must
receive ‘comprehensible input’, Krashen (1985). This ‘comprehensible input’ must be at a
level ahead of that possessed by the learner.If it is at the same level ,it is not useful in aiding
acquisition. Krashen called this input ‘i+1’, stating , ‘ we move from i our current level to i+1
the next level along the natural order , by understanding input containing i+1’, (1985).
1
Third year G1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Psycholinguistics Mrs Bounab & Dr. Fetsi
Krashen assumed the existence of an innate mental structure called a Language Acquisition
Device (LAD) which handles both first and second language acquisition. Comprehensible
input activates this device.