A Patent Review of Arginine Methyltransferase Inhibitors (2010-2018)
A Patent Review of Arginine Methyltransferase Inhibitors (2010-2018)
To cite this article: Xiao Li, Chen Wang, Hao Jiang & Cheng Luo (2019): A patent review of
arginine methyltransferase inhibitors (2010-2018), Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, DOI:
10.1080/13543776.2019.1567711
DOI: 10.1080/13543776.2019.1567711
Review
t
A patent review of arginine methyltransferase inhibitors (2010-2018)
ip
Xiao Li1,2, Chen Wang1,2, Hao Jiang1,2, Cheng Luo1,2*
cr
1
Drug Discovery and Design Center, CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, State Key
Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of
us
Sciences, 555 Zuchongzhi Road, Shanghai 201203, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19 Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China
an
*Corresponding author: Cheng Luo, Drug Discovery and Design Center, Shanghai Institute of
Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 555 Zu Chong Zhi Road, Shanghai 201203,
M
China
Email: [email protected]
Abstract
ed
expression and abnormal enzymatic activity of PRMTs are associated with many human
diseases, especially cancer. PRMTs are emerging as promising drug targets in both academia
and industry.
ce
Areas covered: This review summarizes the updated patented inhibitors targeting PRMTs
from 2010 to 2018. The authors illustrate the chemical structures, molecular mechanism of
action, pharmacological activities as well as the potential clinical application including
Ac
combination therapy and biomarker-guided therapy. PRMT inhibitors in clinical trials are also
highlighted. The authors provide a future perspective for further development of potent and
selective PRMT inhibitors.
Expert opinion: Although a number of small molecule inhibitors of PRMTs with sufficient
potency have been developed, the selectivity of most PRMT inhibitors remains to be
improved. Hence novel approaches such as allosteric regulation need to be further studied
to identify PRMT inhibitors. So far, three PRMT inhibitors have entered clinical trials,
including PRMT5 inhibitor GSK3326595 and JNJ-64619178 as well as PRMT1 inhibitor
GSK3368715. PRMT inhibitors with novel mechanism of action and good drug-like properties
may shed new light on drug research and development progress.
Article highlights
t
ip
This review summarizes the patented inhibitors targeting PRMTs from 2010 to 2018
and illustrates the chemical structures of PRMT inhibitors as well as their biological
cr
activities.
The combination therapies of PRMT inhibitors and immunotherapy antibodies such
as anti-PD-1 or anti-OX40 antibodies show significant efficacy in mouse model.
us
So far, three PRMT inhibitors are being tested in clinical research: PRMT5 inhibitor
GSK3326595 and JNJ-64619178 as well as PRMT1 inhibitor GSK3368715.
New mechanisms of PRMT inhibition such as allosteric regulation need to be further
an
researched for developing inhibitors with high selectivity.
M
This box summarizes key points contained in the article.
ed
Abbreviations:
SAM: S-adenosylmethionine
pt
MMA: ω NG monomethylarginine
pIC50: the negative log of the IC50 value when converted to molar
THIQ: tetrahydroisoquinoline
t
MTD: maximum-tolerated dose
ip
NHL: non-Hodgkin lymphoma
cr
FTIH: First Time in Humans
us
Hsp90: Human Heat Shock Protein 90
1.Introduction
M
Enzymatic methylation of protein fractions was first found in nuclear thymus extracts over 40
years ago [1]. So far, nine PRMTs (PRMT1-9) have been identified in mammalian cells [2-11].
ed
When interacting with the cofactor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) and substrates, PRMTs
catalyze the transfer of methyl groups from SAM to the guanidine of arginine in substrates,
producing methylated arginine and S-adenosyl homocysteine (SAH) [12]. There are three
types of methyl-arginine forms: ω NG monomethylarginine (MMA), ω NG, N’G symmetric
pt
groups. Type I enzymes which include PRMT1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 catalyze the formation of MMA
and ADMA, while PRMT5 and PRMT9 are categorized as Type II PRMTs that induce MMA and
SDMA [15, 16]. Type III PRMT subfamily, which only contains PRMT7, is responsible for the
Ac
modification of MMA [17]. Among them, PRMT1 accounts for up to 85% of protein arginine
methylation reactions and is expressed in a wide range of normal human tissues which
indicates its widespread importance in mediating cellular physiological processes [18-20].
The methyltransferases that use SAM as methyl groups donor can be categorized into 3
classes based on their structures and different types of substrates [21, 22]. PRMTs belong to
Class I methyltransferases and share several conserved motifs including a common β-sheet
structure as well as the “double E” and “THW” sequence motif [23-25]. The catalytic
methyl-transferring domains of PRMTs are highly conserved among eukaryotes within about
310 amino acids [25, 26].Type I and type II PRMTs form a head-to-tail homodimer to induce
enzymatic activities in dependence of the central cavity [27, 28], while type III enzyme
PRMT7 maintains the activity in homodimer-like structure without the central cavity [29].
Apart from the common conserved catalytic domains, PRMTs consist of other specific motifs
that contribute to the interaction between PRMTs and other proteins [30], such as the SH3
domain of PRMT2, the F-box of PRMT9 and the zinc finger domain of PRMT3 and PRMT9 [31,
32].
At present, many substrates of PRMTs have been identified and they play indispensable
roles in the cellular physiological processes. It is well known that PRMTs could mediate the
t
arginine methylation of histones, including H3R2, H3R8, H3R17, H3R26 and H4R3 [33, 34].
ip
These histone methylation marks could regulate different transcriptional pathways
depending on whether the chromatin state is transcriptionally active or silent [35, 36].
cr
Besides, PRMTs could affect other epigenetic modifications by recruiting other epigenetic
modifiers, such as histone acetyltransferases [37]. In addition, PRMTs have a wide range of
non-histone substrates [38, 39]. For example, by methylating the proteins associated with
us
DNA-damage response, PRMTs involve in the DNA repair pathways [40, 41]. Several mRNA
splicing factors were identified as the substrates of PRMTs, which implies the role of PRMTs
in pre-mRNA splicing [42]. PRMTs also act as important regulators in immune system through
an
regulating the methylation of critical immune modulatory proteins [43-45]. Considering the
widespread substrates of PRMTs and crucial functional pathways modulated by PRMTs, the
dysregulation of PRMTs has been linked to various diseases, notably cancer [46-48].For
M
example, the overexpression of PRMT1 has been broadly observed in breast, lung, prostate
and bladder cancer [49].The overexpressed PRMT1 can aberrantly activate oncogenic
transcription [50], which leads to abnormal signal transduction [51].Besides, the
overexpression or enhanced enzymatic activity of PRMT5 may cause transcriptional
ed
repression, uncontrolled RNA splicing and aberrant signal transduction [52], which may lead
to gastric, colorectal and lung cancer, as well as lymphoma and leukemia [49]. PRMTs
aberration can also result in cardiovascular disease. As ADMA and MMA are endogenously
pt
nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors [14], the accumulation of ADMA and MMA reduces
production of nitric oxide (NO), leading to cardiovascular disorders such as elevated blood
ce
pressure [53, 54]. In addition, many other diseases have been correlated with PRMTs
aberration, such as viral pathogenesis, spinal muscular atrophy, neurodegenerative diseases
and metabolic diseases [55].
Ac
Due to the fundamental roles of PRMTs in various diseases occurrence, these enzymes
especially type I PRMTs and PRMT5 have been regarded as promising drug targets. In recent
years, numerous small molecule inhibitors have been reported and many of them have
applied for patents [56-62]. In this review, we summarize the patents of PRMT small
molecule inhibitors and their corresponding indications from 2010 to 2018.
2. PRMT inhibitors
t
structures among these patents show some differences. For compounds represented by
ip
formula I in Patent WO2014153214A1, other than the pyrazole moiety, they also have a
substituent Q moiety (a monocyclic or bicyclic heteroaryl with 1-4 heteroatoms selected
cr
from nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur), while compounds in Patent WO2014153235A2 have a
moiety of 3aH-indene. In another patent WO2016044626A1, though compounds share the
moiety of pyrazole as the inhibitors in WO2014153214A1, the substitutes are replaced with
us
cyclohexenyl, cyclohexyl or tetrahydropyran. In patent WO2018100532A1 submitted by
GLAXOSMITHKLINE IP DEV LTD, the researchers analyzed the co-crystal structure of PRMT1
with one inhibitor produced by the EPIZYME INC and found that the diamine sidechain could
an
occupy the putative arginine substrate site of type I PRMTs, suggesting that the diamine
sidechain may mimic the amines of the substrate arginine residue [66].
With similar structure characteristics, the compounds mentioned above show similar
M
activities toward type I PRMTs inhibition. For compound 1, the biochemical IC50 value for
PRMT1 and PRMT6 is 71.88 nM and 12.61 nM respectively, while for PRMT8, PRMT3 and
PRMT4, the IC50 values reach to thousands of nanomoles. In the cellular level, the
ed
compounds were incubated with RKO (colon adenocarcinoma cells) adherent cells and the
degrees of arginine mono-methylation were detected. In Cell Western (ICW) experiment
showed that the EC30 value of 1 and 2 is 6.979 μM and 3.617 μM respectively, suggesting
pt
these compounds could inhibit protein arginine mono-methylation in cells [57]. In patent
WO2014153235A2, compound 3 and compound 4 show no obvious selectivity among type I
PRMTs. In patent WO2016044626A1, compound 5 and compound 6 show relative strong
ce
activity in inhibiting arginine methylation with the IC50 and RGG-ICW EC30 values of both less
than 0.1 μM. Apart from the compounds elaborated above, other compounds that share
similar structures from EPIZYME are listed in Table 1 [67-73].
Ac
The compounds summarized in Table 1 have similar structural features of the diamine and
pyrazole moieties that are responsible for type I PRMTs inhibition. Structures of
representative compounds in patent WO2014144659A1, WO2014153090A1,
WO2014153172A1 are shown in Table 1. Compounds in these patents are designed to inhibit
PRMT1 The biochemical IC50 value of compound 7 against PRMT1 is 40.03 nM, and the ICW
EC30 value of compound 7 for detection of arginine mono-methylation in RKO adherent cells
is 6.536 μM, indicating its strong activity inhibiting PRMT1. In patent WO2014153090A1, the
biochemical IC50 value of compound 8 is 4.45nM, while the ICW EC30 value for arginine
mono-methylation is 305nM. Compounds described in patent WO2014153208A1,
WO2014153226A1, WO2014178954A1 and WO2016044585A1 could inhibit type I PRMTs.
The biochemical IC50 value of compound 10 against PRMT1, PRMT6, PRMT8 and PRMT3 is
38.55 nM, 16.23 nM, 510.41 nM and 8.06923 μM respectively. In RKO adherent cells, the
ICW EC30 value of compound 10 for arginine methylation is 2.607 μM. For compound 11 in
patent WO2014153226A1, the IC50 value for PRMT1, PRMT3, PRMT4, PRMT6 and PRMT8 is
0.01 μM, 8.93 μM, 3.00 μM, 0.01 μM and 0.76 μM respectively. In RKO methylation assay,
the ICW EC30 value of compound 11 for arginine mono-methylation is 5.61 μM. In patent
t
WO2014178954A1, the activity of compound 12 is also tested both in molecular and cellular
ip
level. The biochemical IC50 values against PRMT1, PRMT3, PRMT4, PRMT6 and PRMT8 are all
less than 1 μM. The ICW EC30 value of compound 12 for arginine mono-methylation is 10.198
μM.
cr
us
2.1.2 University of South Carolina
To examine whether the inhibitors are able to irreversibly inactivate PRMT1, methylated
substrates formation as a function of time was measured over different inhibitor
ed
concentrations to get resulting nonlinear progress curves. The Kinact/KI value was
determined to be 4.02×106min-1·M-1, indicating that the inhibitory effect was irreversible. By
covalently modifying the active site of PRMT (confirmed by subsequent rapid dilution assays
pt
and dialysis experiments), the compounds show great potency to treat heart disease and
breast cancer. Additionally, the compounds can also be fluorescently labeled to screen PRMT
inhibitors from large compound libraries in fluorescence polarization assay [42].
ce
From 2014 to 2016, the Epizyme, Inc submitted eight patents of PRMT5 inhibitors, which are
listed in Figure 3 and Table 2 [74-81]. For compounds shown in Figure 3, they share the
components of two fused 5- to 6-membered heteroaryl rings (WO2015200677A2) or a
naphthalene, tetrahydronaphthalene (WO2015200680A2) as well as alkyls connected with
an optionally substituted ring (Figure 3). In patent WO2015200680A2, compounds
represented by formula IV have a sulfonyl group between naphthalene and heteroaryl rings
in addition to the shared components. Structural biology showed that the
tetrahydroisoquinoline (THIQ) moiety of these inhibitors could interact with PRMT5 in a
cation−π binding mode, which contributes to the inhibitory effect toward PRMT5 [82].
The compounds in Figure 3 show similar inhibitory potency in biochemical assays, with IC50
values of less than 100 nM toward PRMT5. Furthermore, Z-138 mantle cell lymphoma cells
were incubated with compounds to conduct methylation assay and proliferation assay.
Results showed the ICW EC50 values of most compounds were less than 100 nM, indicating
their inhibitory effects toward PRMT5 in the cellular level. Besides, these compounds could
inhibit the proliferation of Z-138 cells, demonstrating their potential efficacy in treating
t
mantle cell lymphoma. Other PRMT5 inhibitors from patents submitted by the Epizyme, Inc
ip
are listed in Table 2 (Table 2). Their inhibitory effects are evaluated in both molecular and
cellular level. The biochemical IC50 values of compounds listed in Table 2 (20-24) are all less
cr
than 0.1μM, while in Z-138 cell lines, the ICW EC50 values of these inhibitors are all less than
1 μM and the EC50 values of the proliferation effect are all less than 10 μM, indicating the
sufficient potency of these compounds.
us
2.2.2 Ctxt Pty Ltd
an
In patent WO2017153515A1, the compounds from Ctxt Pty Ltd have a structure of C-alkyl
bicyclic amine in which benzene fuses to cyclopentane or heteroaryl rings (Figure 4) [83]. In
biochemical assay, the IC50 values of these compounds are among 19-533 nM, demonstrating
M
their inhibitory activity toward PRMT5 in the molecular level. These compounds were also
tested for potency to inhibit symmetrical dimethylation of arginine in biomarker assay. The
TE11 cell line was incubated with compounds to obtain IC50 values in biomarker assay. Except
ed
for compound 25 in patent WO2017153515A1 whose IC50 value is 430 nM, the other
compounds shown in Figure 4 have IC50 values of less than 4 nM in biomarker assay [84],
suggesting these compounds are effective in arginine methylation inhibition. Other
pt
compounds provided by Ctxt Pty Ltd are listed in Table 3 (Table 3) [85-88].The biochemical
IC50 values of compounds 29-32 are all less than 1μM. To test their potency of inhibition of
the arginine symmetric dimethylation, TE11 cells were incubated with the compounds, and
ce
To invent compounds that compete with the cofactor SAM as PRMT5 inhibitors, PRELUDE
THERAPEUTICS designed compounds that have similar structures with SAM, which share
structures of the tetrahydrofuran-3,4-diol and a purine [89-93]. In biochemical assay, the IC50
values of compound 33 and compound 34 for PRMT5 are 5.01 μM and 2.38 μM respectively
(Figure 5). Besides, dialysis assays of wildtype and mutant (C449S) PRMT5 showed that the
compounds may inhibit the activity of PRMT5 by covalently modifying C449 in wild type
PRMT5. These compounds may be applied to treating lymphoid cancer, hemoglobinopathies
such as thalassemia and sickle cell disease (SCD) and other diseases correlated with aberrant
PRMT5 expression.
In addition to the three institutes mentioned above, there are other companies submitting
patents of PRMT5 inhibitors (Table 4) [94-99]. Some of the compound structures are similar
to those from Epizyme, Inc, while some have novel scaffolds. For example, in patent
t
WO2014145214A2, Ohio State Innovation Foundation provided compounds that have at
ip
least one carbazole moiety. The tricyclic or bicyclic heteroaromatic moiety could form
hydrophobic and aromatic interaction with PRMT5. Besides, a linker moiety with at least one
cr
electron-donating group could form hydrogen bonds with glutamine of PRMT5. As exampled
by compound HLCL-61, the IC50 value of anti-proliferation was 28 μM for 72 h while the IC50
value of H4R3 methylation inhibition is 12 μM. Moreover, in patent WO2018065365A1,
us
Janssen Pharmaceutica NV submitted carba nucleoside analogues as PRMT5 inhibitors. They
also show good potential to treat PRMT5-mediated disorders [96]. Take compound 37 for
example, in biochemical assay, the pI50 value is 5.9 μM, while the ICW pI50 value of A549
cell line is 5.3 μM.
an
Some of PRMT5 inhibitors are mimics of the cofactor SAM. They have the adenosine group
of SAM that is then connected with the peptide substrate’s guanidine moiety. Notably in the
M
structures of these inhibitors, the amino acid moiety of SAM is omitted, which is based on
the findings of Thompson and his colleagues [100]. They mutate the active Arg54 residue
which interacts with the carboxyl group of SAM and find that the catalytic ability of PRMTs is
ed
less influenced [100]. Thus, in the series of SAM-mimic inhibitors, the carboxyl group is
substituted with other moieties that are more selective to PRMTs other than other kinds of
methyltransferases and the conversion of a PRMT cofactor into an inhibitor is done.
pt
Besides, many PRMT5 inhibitors mentioned above have the tetrahydroisoquinoline (THIQ)
group, in which the tertiary nitrogen is engaged in the water-mediated interaction with
ce
residues necessary for enzyme catalysis. The THIQ group can also form a π-π stacking
interaction with the residue of PRMT5 that directs symmetric arginine methylation, further
leading to the residue’s conformational change to accommodate the large THIQ group, thus
the enzymatic activity of PRMT5 is inhibited. Researchers also find that the inhibitory efficacy
Ac
of the compounds is less affected when moieties distal to the THIQ group are changed,
which devotes to the potential improvements in absorption, distribution, metabolism and
excretion (ADME) properties [57].
PRMT 7 is the only component of type III PRMTs. By modulating the methylation of histones
(H2A, H4R3, H3R2) and non-histone substrates, PRMT7 can participate in many physiological
processes such as chromatin structure modulation, gene expression, signal transduction and
pluripotency maintenance. In patent CN108503623A submitted by Sichuan University (Figure
6), inhibitors are acrylamide derivatives and the reaction condition is moderate which is
beneficial to industrialization production [101]. The inhibitors activity was both tested in
molecular and cellular level, with a minimum IC50 value of 2.1 μM in enzymatic activity
experiments. They also show relatively good efficacy in inhibition of cancer cell proliferation,
which include prostate cancer cell line (PC-3), lung cancer cell line (H2228, NCI-H1975, PC-9,
NCI-H358, Calu-1), lymphoma cell line (Jeko-1), ovarian cancer cell line (ES-2, H08910,
t
A2780S, A2780/T). The pIC50 values of compound 43 for all these cell lines are less than 10
ip
μM, indicating these inhibitors’ medicinal potential of preventing or treating a substantial
range of cancers.
cr
3. Indication patents
us
PRMT inhibitors could be applied as effective drugs in many indications correlated with the
dysregulation of PRMTs, such as cancer, cocaine addiction, renal fibrosis and hematopoietic
differentiation (Table5). In recent years, many patents about combination therapy and
an
biomarker-guided therapy correlated with PRMT inhibitors have been submitted, and we will
introduce them in details as following.
cancer. The combination therapy of small molecule inhibitors and antibodies modulating
immune checkpoint showed moderate survival advantage, indicating the synergistic
interaction of the two agents. Due to the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in
pt
many tumor types, the combination of small molecular targeted therapy and
immunotherapy will be used more extensively in the future.
ce
Notably, results show that a profound combination effect on inhibition of tumor growth
can be achieved through the simultaneous inhibition of Type I and Type II PRMTs,
demonstrating the promising treatment strategies of using both of the inhibitors to enhance
the efficacy in killing cancer cells [66]. It is worth mentioning that to date, almost all
Ac
pan-PRMT inhibitors are SAM analogs, which have poor selectivity and can change global
methylation levels. The off-target effects are inescapable for the use of these compounds in
therapy. While on the other hand, the crystal structures of PRMTs and sequences alignment
demonstrate the other binding cavities are different between Type I and Type II enzymes.
Hence it is difficult to develop pan-PRMT inhibitors according to the substrate binding sites.
If type I and type II PRMTs need to be inhibited simultaneously, it is necessary to combine
their respective inhibitors together rather than developing low specificity inhibitors that
inhibit both type I and type II PRMTs [104].
t
Hsp90 and the ubiquitination degradation of PRMT5 by E3 ligase would be accelerated. As
ip
the expression level of PRMT5 is specifically high in osteosarcoma tissues, the combination
therapy shows significant effects in treating osteosarcoma. In patent WO2011079236A1
cr
submitted by OHIO STATE INNOVATION FOUNDATION, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor
TSA was combined with PRMT5 inhibitor to treat high grade gliomas [106]. As shown by the
biochemical assay, PRMT5 enzymatic activity on H4R3 and H3R8 arginine residues will be
us
improved when the neighboring lysine residues are deacetylated by HDAC enzymes. In the
cellular level, astrocytoma cell lines (U1242 and U251) were treated with either the single
agent or the combination treatment. The combinational treatment showed significant loss of
an
S2Me-H4R3 methylation and significant increase of cell apoptosis compared with single
agent treatment. As PRMT5 expression levels are higher in high grade gliomas, the
combination of PRMT5 inhibitor and HDAC inhibitor may have great impact on high grade
M
gliomas treatment.
GlaxoSmithKline and patent WO2016145150A2 submitted by THE BROAD INSTITUTE INC, the
potential patients are those who have a mutation in MTAP or a decreased level of MTAP
polynucleotide or polypeptide, or both [107, 108].In many cancer types, which include 40%
pt
inhibit PRMT5 activity, so that type I PRMT inhibitors and PRMT5 inhibitors are more
sensitive to patients who have weak PRMT5 activity due to the loss of MTAP. In patent
WO2018100536A1, both MTAP proficient and deletion lymphoma and melanoma cell lines
Ac
were treated with type I PRMT inhibitors. Results showed that the difference of median GI50
between MTAP proficient and deletion cell lines is more than 5-fold. In patent
WO2016145150A2, PRMT5 inhibitor and MTA were used together and showed significant
effect on growth inhibition of tumor cells.
In addition to the loss of MTAP, the gene fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS-related gene (EGR) is
another biomarker for tumor therapy. As the gene fusion can lead to N-terminally truncated
or full-length forms of EGR overexpression [109], accumulating EGR can bind and then recruit
PRMT5 to methylate Androgen Receptor (AR) on arginine 761 (R761). Subsequently, high
methylation level of AR can block its binding to target genes as well as the transcriptional
activity which leads to prostate cancer. As shown in patent WO2016089883A1 that
submitted by NOVARTIS, PRMT5 inhibitor showed selectivity to TMPRSS2: EGR-positive
prostate cancer cells [110].
Apart from cancers, PRMT inhibitors can also be used to treat many other forms of
disorders. In patent CN105125571A submitted by Sichuan University, the PRMT1 inhibitors
AMI-1 and MTA were used together to reduce the level of H4R3me2a, which could inhibit
the transcriptional expression of Cdk5 and CaMK II, and subsequently relieve the cocaine
t
addiction [111]. Tongji University also reported that PRMT1 inhibitors like AMI-1 could be
ip
effective in treating renal fibrosis (patent CN107375257A). As the increased activity of
PRMT1 will enhance the level of H4R3me2a and stimulate the TGF-β signaling pathway and
cr
then lead to the occurrence of renal fibrosis due to the increased expression of α-SMA,
collagen and fibronectin, the use of PRMT1 inhibitors would relieve syndromes of the renal
fibrosis.
us
4.Conclusion
an
From 2010 to 2018, type I PRMT inhibitors and PRMT5 inhibitors have been reported in
many patents. Based on the interaction mode of enzymes and substrates, type I PRMT
inhibitors are designed to contain a moiety of ethylene diamino that mimics the amines of
M
substrate arginine. Such inhibitors may compete with natural substrates to bind to type I
PRMTs and inhibit their methylation activity. Some of the type I PRMT inhibitors show
sufficient potency against PRMT1, PRMT6 and PRMT8 with IC50 values at the nanomolar level
ed
and have selectivity against PRMT3 and PRMT4 with IC50 values at the micromolar level. Type
I PRMT inhibitors that are mainly provided by the Epizyme, Inc show relative strong
inhibitory activity and indicate that they have great potential in treating cancers and many
pt
other disorders. PRMT5 inhibitors are designed to occupy the peptide substrate binding sites
or be mimics of PRMT cofactor, SAM. The biochemical IC50 values of PRMT5 inhibitors are at
the nanomolar or micromolar level, which indicates that PRMT5 inhibitors may have good
ce
The disease that may be treated by PRMT inhibitors include but are not limited to cancers,
muscular disorder, autoimmune disorder, neurological disorder, vascular disorder, metabolic
Ac
disorder, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, kidney failure, renal disease, pulmonary disease.
Besides, PRMT inhibitors could also be used in combinational therapy or therapy with
biomarker provided. PRMT inhibitors also demonstrate significant efficacy on cocaine
addiction and renal fibrosis in animal models.
5.Expert opinion
According to the crystal structures, the surface grooves of PRMTs that provide
accommodation for substrate peptide backbones are wide and shallow. The structure
features indicate inhibitors that are designed to mimic the arginine residue may have weak
selectivity among different PRMTs. Such situation is the same with the SAM-mimic inhibitors.
Therefore, other sites such as allosteric cavities that regulate PRMTs activity can be regarded
as novel drug targeting sites. It is important to incorporate the structural information of all
types of PRMTs when developing selective PRMT inhibitors.
t
Based on co-crystal structures of type I PRMTs and their inhibitors, the inhibitors occupy
ip
the substrate binding sites, which indicates that they may compete with peptide substrates,
While noncompetitive pattern of inhibition with respect to substrates is documented in
mechanism of action studies [112]. The contradiction between analysis based on crystal
cr
structure and biological experiments provokes a lot of discussion. One interpretation is that
the combination of inhibitors may change enzymes’ conformation. In crystal structures of
us
type I PRMTs with inhibitors, the N terminus α-helix was totally folded and the binding
pocket for the substrate was locked. Thus in the presence of inhibitors, the peptide would
not bind the cavity even at high concentration [113]. It can also be explained that with a
an
complex of substrate, inhibitor and PRMT may form without prominent penalty of free
energy [114]. Another explanation illustrates that though inhibitors occupy the substrate
binding pocket, the substrate may interact with PRMT additionally outside the catalytic
cavity and be added with methyl group [60].
M
on phase 1 clinical trial to conduct a dose escalation study assessing its safety,
pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary clinical activity in subjects
with advanced or recurrent solid tumors and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. On another phase 2
pt
clinical trial, GSK3326595 is tested as an oral treatment for human subjects with relapsed
and refractory myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML),
ce
and hyperproliferative acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In addition, another PRMT5 inhibitor
JNJ-64619178 is also on phase 1 clinical trial to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD)
in subjects with relapsed/refractory B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or advanced solid
tumors. The structures and activities of the two PRMT5 inhibitors in clinical trials are shown
Ac
in Figure 7. The inhibitor JNJ-64619178 is designed to occupy the binding sites of SAM
cofactor and guanidino substrate simultaneously. The IC50 value toward PRMT5/MEP50
complex is 0.14 nM and many cell lines are sensitive to JNJ-64619178 treatment [115]. The
inhibitor GSK3326595 is designed to occupy the binding site of substrate peptides and that is
confirmed by the co-crystal of GSK3326595 and PRMT5/MEP50 complex, indicating that the
inhibitor is competitive with substrate peptide. GSK3326595 has a strong inhibitory potency
with the IC50 value of 6.2 ± 0.8 nM. Besides, the inhibitory potency would increase when
extending the preincubation time, revealing a mode of slow binding inhibition. Apart from
the strong activity, the selectivity of the inhibitor is satisfying too, with > 4000-fold selectivity
over any other methyltransferase (20 methyltransferases tested, including PRMT9) [116].
It is worth noting that PRMT1 inhibitor GSK3368715 is on First Time in Humans (FTIH)
study in subjects with solid tumors and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The clinical
trial of GSK3368715 was first posted on September 12, 2018. Unfortunately, we haven’t
found the chemical structure of GSK3368715 with available database. With the prosperous
development in the field of PRMT inhibitors, more and more investigations will pour into
discovery of more potent and selective compound leads, which is such challenging that more
t
accurate, effective designing and evaluating methods need to be developed.
ip
So far, many approaches have been invented to promote the hit identification of PRMTs
including virtual screening techniques and high throughput screening methods, which
cr
account for the discovery of many micromolar and submicromolar small molecule inhibitors.
In recent years, the X-ray crystal structures of most PRMTs have been resolved, which greatly
us
accelerate the modification of PRMT inhibitors based on the structural information.
Nevertheless, though enormous inhibitors have been developed, only three inhibitors are
currently in clinical research. Therefore, we suggest some additional approaches for the
an
development of novel PRMT inhibitors. First, since the limited structure characteristics may
impose restrictions on drug permeability, drug absorption and bioavailability, novel chemical
scaffolds need to be poured into the preliminary hit identification of PRMTs. Second, in
cellular and in vivo validation system of PRMT inhibition needs to be developed. When the
M
inhibitors are exposed to the cellular environment, they may be transformed by the
metabolic systems and present different effects compared with the in vitro system, including
reduced potency or increased toxicity. Therefore, it is important to develop and improve the
ed
in vivo target validation assays of PRMT inhibitors to ensure their safety and effectiveness.
Third, as PRMTs participate in many biological processes by methylating histones and diverse
nonhistone substrates, the network in which PRMTs play regulative roles is very complicated.
pt
It may be more efficient to develop inhibitors targeting one specific pathway in which PRMTs
have aberrant activity. The biological functions of PRMTs need to be further studied and the
design of PRMT inhibitors would be more specific toward certain regulative pathways.
ce
Funding
Ac
This paper received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(81625022, 91853205, 81430084, 81821005). K. C. Wong Education Foundation and Chinese
Academy of Sciences (XDA12020353 and XDA12050401), Science and Technology
Commission of Shanghai Municipality (18431907100).
Declaration of interest
The authors declare that they work for the Drug Discovery and Design Center, CAS Key
Laboratory of Receptor Research, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute
of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The authors have no other relevant
affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest
in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This
includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert
testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties
Reviewer disclosures
Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to
disclose
t
ip
References
cr
Papers of special note have been highlighted as either of interest (*) or of considerable
interest (**) to readers.
us
[1]. Paik WK, Kim S. Enzymatic methylation of protein fractions from calf thymus nuclei.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1967 Oct 11;29(1):14-20.
an
[2]. Cura V, Troffer-Charlier N, Lambert MA, et al. Cloning, expression, purification and
preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of mouse protein arginine methyltransferase 7.
Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun 2014 Jan;70(Pt 1):80-6.
M
[3]. Chumanov RS, Kuhn PA, Xu W, Burgess RR. Expression and purification of full-length
mouse CARM1 from transiently transfected HEK293T cells using HaloTag technology. Protein
Expr Purif 2011 Apr;76(2):145-53.
ed
[4]. Frankel A, Yadav N, Lee J, et al. The novel human protein arginine N-methyltransferase
PRMT6 is a nuclear enzyme displaying unique substrate specificity. J Biol Chem 2002 Feb
1;277(5):3537-43.
[5]. Rho J, Choi S, Seong YR, PRMT5, which forms distinct homo-oligomers, is a member of
pt
t
Chem 2016 Oct 15;24(20):4949-60.
ip
[14].Bedford MT, Richard S. Arginine methylation an emerging regulator of protein function.
Mol Cell 2005 Apr 29;18(3):263-72.
[15].Trojer P, Dangl M, Bauer I, et al. Histone methyltransferases in Aspergillus nidulans:
cr
evidence for a novel enzyme with a unique substrate specificity. Biochemistry 2004 Aug
24;43(33):10834-43.
us
[16].Pahlich S, Zakaryan RP, Gehring H. Protein arginine methylation: Cellular functions and
methods of analysis. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006 Dec;1764(12):1890-903.
[17].Feng Y, Maity R, Whitelegge JP, et al. Mammalian protein arginine methyltransferase 7
an
(PRMT7) specifically targets RXR sites in lysine- and arginine-rich regions. J Biol Chem 2013
Dec 27;288(52):37010-25.
[18].Gary JD, Lin WJ, Yang MC, et al. The predominant protein-arginine methyltransferase
from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 1996 May 24;271(21):12585-94.
M
[19].Katsanis N, Yaspo ML, Fisher EM. Identification and mapping of a novel human gene,
HRMT1L1, homologous to the rat protein arginine N-methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1) gene.
Mamm Genome 1997 Jul;8(7):526-9.
ed
[20].Tang J, Frankel A, Cook RJ, et al. PRMT1 is the predominant type I protein arginine
methyltransferase in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 2000 Mar 17;275(11):7723-30.
[21].Huang R, Ding Q, Xiang Y, et al. Comparative Analysis of DNA Methyltransferase Gene
pt
t
perspectives and the physiological role in humans. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009 Jul;66(13):2109-21.
ip
• This review summarizes the structures and functions of PRMTs and their potential to be
drug targets.
[32].Nicholson TB, Chen T, Richard S. The physiological and pathophysiological role of
cr
PRMT1-mediated protein arginine methylation. Pharmacol Res 2009 Dec;60(6):466-74.
[33].Blanc RS, Richard S. Arginine Methylation: The Coming of Age. Mol Cell 2017 Jan
us
5;65(1):8-24.
[34].Lee DY, Teyssier C, Strahl BD, Stallcup MR. Role of protein methylation in regulation of
transcription. Endocr Rev 2005 Apr;26(2):147-70.
an
[35].An W, Kim J, Roeder RG. Ordered cooperative functions of PRMT1, p300, and CARM1 in
transcriptional activation by p53. Cell 2004 Jun 11;117(6):735-48.
[36].Shilatifard A. Molecular implementation and physiological roles for histone H3 lysine 4
(H3K4) methylation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008 Jun;20(3):341-8.
M
[37].Molina-Serrano D, Schiza V, Kirmizis A. Cross-talk among epigenetic modifications:
lessons from histone arginine methylation. Biochem Soc Trans 2013 Jun;41(3):751-9.
[38].Guo H, Wang R, Zheng W, et al. Profiling substrates of protein arginine
ed
[41].Du W, Amarachintha S, Erden O, et al.. The Fanconi anemia pathway controls oncogenic
response in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by regulating PRMT5-mediated p53
arginine methylation. Oncotarget 2016 Sep 13;7(37):60005-20.
Ac
t
[49].Poisson LM, Munkarah A, Madi H, et al. A metabolomic approach to identifying
ip
platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res 2015 Mar 26;8:13.
[50].Herrmann F, Pably P, Eckerich C, et al. Human protein arginine methyltransferases in
vivo--distinct properties of eight canonical members of the PRMT family. J Cell Sci 2009 Mar
cr
1;122(Pt 5):667-77.
[51].Le Romancer M, Treilleux I, Leconte N, et al. Regulation of estrogen rapid signaling
us
through arginine methylation by PRMT1. Mol Cell 2008 Jul 25;31(2):212-21.
[52].Deng X, Gu L, Liu C, et al. Arginine methylation mediated by the Arabidopsis homolog of
PRMT5 is essential for proper pre-mRNA splicing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010 Nov
2;107(44):19114-9.
an
[53].Bouras G, Deftereos S, Tousoulis D, et al. Asymmetric Dimethylarginine (ADMA): a
promising biomarker for cardiovascular disease? Curr Top Med Chem 2013;13(2):180-200.
[54].Rochette L, Lorin J, Zeller M, et al. Nitric oxide synthase inhibition and oxidative stress in
M
cardiovascular diseases: possible therapeutic targets? Pharmacol Ther 2013
Dec;140(3):239-57.
[55].Aletta JM, Hu JC. Protein arginine methylation in health and disease. Biotechnol Annu
ed
Rev 2008;14:203-24.
[56].Dillon MB, Bachovchin DA, Brown SJ, et al. Novel inhibitors for PRMT1 discovered by
high-throughput screening using activity-based fluorescence polarization. ACS Chem Biol
pt
[58].Sack JS, Thieffine S, Bandiera T, et al. Structural basis for CARM1 inhibition by indole and
pyrazole inhibitors. Biochem J 2011 Jun 1;436(2):331-9.
[59].van Haren M, van Ufford LQ, Moret EE, Martin NI. Synthesis and evaluation of protein
Ac
t
[66]. GLAXOSMITHKLINE IP DEV LTD. Combination therapy. WO2018100532A1 (2018).
ip
[67]. Epizyme Inc. Prazole derivatives as arginine methyltransferase inhibitors and uses
thereof. WO2014178954A1 (2014).
[68].Epizyme Inc. Arginine methyltransferase inhibitors and uses thereof. WO2016044585A1
cr
(2016).
[69].Epizyme Inc. Pyrazole derivatives as PRMT1 inhibitors and uses thereof. WO
us
2014144659 A1 (2014).
[70].Epizyme Inc. Pyrazole derivatives as PRMT1 inhibitors and uses thereof. WO
2014153090 A1 (2014).
an
[71]. Epizyme Inc. Pyrazole derivatives as PRMT1 inhibitors and uses thereof. WO
2014153172 A1 (2014).
[72].Epizyme Inc. Arginine methyltransferase inhibitors and uses thereof. WO 2014153208A1
(2014).
M
[73]. Epizyme Inc. Arginine methyltransferase inhibitors and uses thereof. WO2014153226A1
(2014).
[74].Epizyme Inc. PRMT5 inhibitors and uses thereof. WO 2014100695A1 (2014).
ed
the Identification of PRMT5 Tool Compound EPZ015666. ACS Med Chem Lett 2016 Feb
11;7(2):162-6.
[83].CTXT PTY LTD. Tetrahydroisoquinolines as PRMT5-inhibitors. WO 2017153515A1 (2017).
[84].CTXT PTY LTD. 3-oxa-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane derivatives and thier use in the treatment
of cancer and hemoglobinopathies. WO 2017153519A1 (2017).
[85].CTXT PTY LTD. Tetrahydroisoquinoline derived PRMT5-inhibitors. WO 2016034675A1
(2016).
[86].CTXT PTY LTD. Tetrahydroisoquinolines as PRMT5 inhibitors. WO 2017153513A1 (2017).
[87].CTXT PTY LTD. PRMT5 inhibitors. WO 2017153518A1 (2017).
[88].CTXT PTY LTD. Pyridine derivatives and thier use in the treatment of cancer and
hemoglobinopathies. WO2017153521A1 (2017).
[89].Prelude Therapeutics Inc. Selective inhibitors of protein arginine methyltransferase 5
PRMT5). WO2017218802A1 (2017).
[90].Prelude Therapeutics Inc. Selective inhibitors of protein arginine methyltransferase 5
(PRMT5). WO2018160824A1 (2018).
[91].Prelude Therapeutics Inc. Selective inhibitors of protein arginine methyltransferase 5
(PRMT5). WO2018152501A1 (2018).
t
[92].Prelude Therapeutics Inc. Selective inhibitors of protein arginine methyltransferase 5
ip
(PRMT5). WO2018152548A1 (2018).
[93].Prelude Therapeutics Inc. Selective inhibitors of protein arginine methyltransferase 5
(PRMT5). WO2018160855A1 (2018).
cr
[94].CANCER THERAPEUTICS CRC PTY LTD. 2-(hetero)aryl-benzimidazole and imidazopyridine
derivatives as inhibitors of asparagime emethyl transferase. WO 2014128465A1 (2014).
us
[95].Ohio State Innovation Foundation. Inhibitors of PRMT5 and methods of their use.
WO2014145214A2 (2014).
[96].JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA NV. Novel monocyclic and bicyclic ring system substituted
an
carbanucleoside analogues for use as PRMT5 inhibitors. WO2018065365A1 (2018).
[97].Indiana Univ Research And Technology Corporation. Small molecule protein arginine
methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) inhibitors and methods of treatment. WO2018081451A1
(2018).
M
[98].SHANGHAI INST MATERIA MEDICA CAS. Compound having PRMT5 inhibitory activity,
preparation for compound, and applications thereof. WO2018161922A1 (2018).
[99].ARGONAUT THERAPEUTICS LTD. Tricyclic compounds for use in treatment of
ed
[101]. Sichuan University. Compounds inhibiting PRMT7 and their preparation and
application. CN108503623A (2018).
[102]. GLAXOSMITHKLINE IP DEV LTD. Combination therapy. WO2018100534A1 (2018).
ce
[105]. UNIV JINAN. Composition for inhibiting growth of osteosarcoma by targeting PRMT5
(protein arginine methyltransferase 5) and preparation method thereof. CN105497034A
(2016). [106].UNIV OHIO STATE RES FOUND. Compositions and methods for cancer detection
and treatment. WO2011079236A1 (2011).
[107].GLAXOSMITHKLINE IP DEV LTD. Methods of treating cancer. WO2018100536A1 (2018).
[108].BROAD INST INC. Selective treatment of PRMT5 dependent cancer. WO2016145150A2
(2016).
[109].Sun C, Dobi A, Mohamed A, et al. TMPRSS2-ERG fusion, a common genomic alteration
in prostate cancer activates C-MYC and abrogates prostate epithelial differentiation.
Oncogene 2008 Sep 11;27(40):5348-53.
[110].NOVARTIS AG. Compositions and methods for diagnosis and treatment of prostate
cancer. WO 2016089883A1 (2016).
[111]. UNIV SICHUAN. Application of PRMT1 (protein arginine N-methyltransferase 1)
inhibitor to preparation of drug for treating cocaine addiction. CN 105125571A (2015).
[112].Blat Y. Non-competitive inhibition by active site binders. Chem Biol Drug Des 2010
Jun;75(6):535-40.
[113].Wang C, Jiang H, Jin J, et al. Development of Potent Type I Protein Arginine
t
Methyltransferase (PRMT) Inhibitors of Leukemia Cell Proliferation. J Med Chem 2017 Nov
ip
9;60(21):8888-905.
[114].Eram MS, Shen Y, Szewczyk M, et al. A Potent, Selective, and Cell-Active Inhibitor of
Human Type I Protein Arginine Methyltransferases. ACS Chem Biol 2016 Mar
cr
18;11(3):772-81.
[115].Brehmer D, Wu T, Mannens G, et al. Abstract DDT02-04: A novel PRMT5 inhibitor with
us
potent in vitro and in vivo activity in preclinical lung cancer models. Cancer Research
2017;77(13 Supplement):DDT02-04-DDT02-04.
[116].Gerhart SV, Kellner WA, Thompson C, et al. Activation of the p53-MDM4 regulatory axis
an
defines the anti-tumour response to PRMT5 inhibition through its role in regulating cellular
splicing. Sci Rep 2018 Jun 26;8(1):9711.
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
Table 1. Other Type I PRMT inhibitors submitted by Epizyme, Inc
t
ip
cr
WO2014153090A1
us
an
M
WO2014153172A1
ed
pt
ce
Ac
Table 1. Continued
WO2014153208A1
t
ip
WO2014153226A1
cr
us
an
WO2014178954A1
M
ed
pt
WO2016044585A1
ce
Ac
Table 2. Other PRMT5 inhibitors from Epizyme, Inc
t
ip
WO2014100716A1
cr
us
an
M
WO2014100719A2
ed
pt
WO2014100730A1
ce
Ac
WO2014100734A1
Table 2. (Continued)
WO2016022605A1
t
ip
cr
us
an
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
Table 3. Other PRMT5 inhibitors from Ctxt Pty Ltd
t
ip
WO2017153513A1
cr
us
an
WO2017153518A1
M
ed
pt
WO2017153521A1
ce
Ac
Table 4. PRMT5 inhibitors from other institutes
t
CS CRC PTY
ip
LTD
cr
14A2 proliferation
IC50 = 28 μM (72h);
us
OHIO-STATE H4R3 methylation
INNOVATION inhibition
FOUNDATIO IC50 = 12μM
N
an
M
WO2018065 Biochemical Assay
365A1 pIC50 = 5.9 μM
A549 cell line ICW
JANSSEN pIC50 = 5.3 μM
ed
PHARMACEU
TICA NV
pt
ce
Ac
Table 4. (Continued)
INDIANA
UNIVERSIT 38: IC50 = 4.3 μM
Y
RESEARCH
AND
t
TECHNOLO
ip
GY
CORPORATI
cr
ON
us
an 39: IC50 = 8.5 μM
M
ed
40: IC50 = 34 μM
pt
ce
INSTITUTE proliferation
OF IC50 = 0.07 μM (12d)
MEDICAL
MEDICA, Anti-MV4-11 cell
CHINESE line proliferation
ACADAMY GI50 = 0.126 μM
OF
SCIENCES
Table 4. (Continued)
ARGONAUT
THERAPEUT
ICS LIMITED
t
ip
cr
us
an
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
Table 5. Details on the indication of PRMT inhibitors
t
PRMT inhibitors and
GSK Combination
ip
anti-PD-1/ OX40
Therapy
antibodies
cr
WO2018100535A1 Anti-tumor Combination of Type II
us
PRMT inhibitors and
GSK Combination
anti-OX40 antibodies
an Therapy
Table 5. (Continued)
Therapy
ce
PRMT5 inhibitors
t
Therapy HSP90 inhibitor (17-AAG )
ip
CN105125571A Cocaine addiction PRMT1 inhibitors
cr
Sichuan University (AMI-1, MTA)
us
CN107375257A Renal fibrosis PRMT1 inhibitor
Tongji University an (AMI-1)
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
t
ip
cr
us
an
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
t
ip
cr
us
an
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
t
Figure 7. PRMT5 inhibitors in clinical research
ip
cr
Figure and table legends:
us
Table 2: Other PRMT5 inhibitors from Epizyme, Inc