Interpersonal Communication Film Paper
Interpersonal Communication Film Paper
Interpersonal Communication Film Paper
Professor Chaaban
the main couple breaks up. Before you can break up though, an interpersonal relationship needs
to be made to connect people. An interpersonal relationship is one which has, “close associations
or acquaintances between two or more people; might be based on love, friendship, family, or
some other social commitment” (Valenzano 115) in which connects them. In the movie “500
Days of Summer,” by Dune Entertainment, it follows the relationship of Summer Finn and Tom
Hansen and its inevitable downfall. The movie uses Attraction Theory, Social Penetration
Theory, the Stage Model of Relationship Development, and the Social Exchange Theory to add
The movie uses Attraction Theory or, “The process of choosing and selecting our
Summer and add detail to their relationship. The theory focuses on three main types of attraction:
physical, social, and task attraction. Physical attraction is, “being drawn to someone's physical
appearance because we like the way the person looks” (Valenzano 118), which the movie depicts
by going in depth on Summer’s beauty. The narrator of the film states, “Summer’s employment
at the Daily Freeze coincides with an inexplicable 212% increase in revenue.… It was a rare
quality, this ‘Summer effect.’” to share the impact, her beauty has on not only our main character
but others she has interacted with. Secondly, social attraction, which is described as, “what we
Emily Reyna
see in the other person as someone with whom we should engage in social interactions
with to become friends” (Valenzano 118). Tom runs into Summer in the elevator and rather than
engage, Tom blasts his music which grabs Summer’s attention because she loves the band he is
listening to and comments her enthusiasm towards it. This minuscule initiation of shared
interests causes Tom to exclaim, “Holy sh*t. I think I am in love with Summer,” which shows
having shared interests and a friendly demeanor can make two people connect easier. Last, there
is task attraction, which is creating a relationship because “we like to work with them and can
count on them to get a job done,” something which the movie did not add. The reason the movie
did not use task attraction is because Summer knows she cannot rely on Tom to get the
proverbial job done by stating, “Tom could be a great architect if he wanted to be” showing her
Theory to “create and maintain a deeper intimacy through mutual self-disclosure” (Valenzano
120) between the main characters. To get to know each other, Summer and Tom discuss their
educational background, and Summer felt comfortable enough to share that her nickname in
college was, “anal girl” because of her OCD. They soon after went out with their office to a
karaoke bar where Tom and Summer shared a deep conversation about her past relationships and
her disbelief in love, specifically true love. As their relationship developed, Summer invited him
over where they laid in bed and she shared all of her deepest secrets, something she has never
done before.
The movie, “500 Days of Summer,” implements the use of the Stage Model of
Relationship Development to bring Summer and Tom together and have their relationship come
convey the stages of growing apart. The first stage of the model is initiating, “taking the first step
Emily Reyna
to interact with someone you are interested in” (Valenzano 124). The movie goes against social
norms by having Summer make the first move and introduce herself to Tom in the elevator and
make a friendly comment towards his taste in music. Soon after, Tom starts a conversation,
“about surface-level interests and topics” (Valenzano 124) with Summer to see if they click in
the experimenting stage. Tom asks about how long she has lived in Los Angeles, shared the
degrees they completed, and Tom introduces his friends to get their input. The office goes to
karaoke night where Tom confesses he likes Summer and their relationship intensifies, the next
step in the model, which is defined as, “investing more time in each other and learn more about a
person’s history, interests, and goals,” (Valenzano 124) something which Summer has never
done before. To show their intensifying relationship, the producer had the narrator discuss the
importance of Summer sharing personal stories by stating, “That wall Summer so often hid
behind, the wall of distanced and casual relationships, that wall was slowly coming down,” and
showing the intensity of their relationship. The movie has the two “developing a sense of identity
for their relationship” (Valenzano 125), by integrating and accompanying each other to a
wedding as a date but still without a label. Tom continued to force affection which blurred the
bonding stage of, “making a deep commitment formally” (Valenzano 125) because Summer
continued to reiterate they are just friends. In the differentiating stage, “partners begin to separate
themselves from each other” (Valenzano 125), which Summer did by using oculesics and
kinesics, eyes and body movement, to send messages of discomfort and discontent with their
relationship. Tom would try to hold Summer’s hand but she would often roll her eyes, look at
him in frustration, and maintained a closed posture. There was not mutual differentiation until
they both entered the circumscribing stage which involves, “living different lives, and
conversations are increasingly limited” (Valenzano 125). What brought Summer and Tom
Emily Reyna
together originally was their shared taste in music, now that there is shared indifference, Summer
and Tom have a hard time discussing their interests and Summer would avoid spending time
with Tom because they constantly fought on where to go when together. Their relationship was
stagnant, “not moving forward or backward in the relationship and not relating on an intimate
level,” (Valenzano 125) and Tom still wanted their relationship to work, but Summer stated,
“What are we doing? Is this normal?” because she knew their relationship was not moving. After
this meeting their relationship took a turn towards avoidance and Summer “actively avoided
interacting” (Valenzano 125) with Tom by quitting her job and not reaching out. Tom still tried
to keep their relationship going by meeting for dinner where Summer terminates the relationship.
In this stage, the “relationship moves to post-relationship” (Valenzano 126), and Summer said,
“Tom, don’t go. You’re still my best friend!” showing she still wants a friendship, but Tom
In “500 Days of Summer” the relationship between Summer and Tom is not defined, but
they still look at each other in a caring and romantic perspective. Social Exchange theory is best
used to define their relationship to explain how the two interact with one another. The theory
suggests that “relationship behavior is regulated by the evaluation of perceived rewards and costs
by both sides” (Valenzano 133) which is true for the treatment towards Summer from Tom.
Summer specifically stated when entering their relationship that she wants nothing serious and
will not put a label on them. Tom accepted her beliefs and at first, the cost of their relationship
was nonexistent compared to the rewards each received. Summer appreciated having someone to
talk to and Tom enjoyed being in a relationship and being able to spend time with Summer. As
their relationship developed, the cost became exponential because of the emotional toll it had on
the two characters. Summer gave Tom hope and deceived him by holding hands, telling him
Emily Reyna
violence to force Summer into an idea of a relationship and emotionally abused her into staying
outweighed the rewards and caused Tom to walk away once Summer ended their relationship.
Forming interpersonal relationships can sometimes cause pain and heartbreak but if Tom
had not met Summer, he would have never pursued his dream job. To add depth to Summer and
Tom and bring them together, the movie “500 Days of Summer,” uses Attraction Theory, Social
Penetration Theory, the Stage Model of Relationship Development, and the Social Exchange
Theory. Using these methods of interpersonal communication, the movie is able to relate to
viewers on a personal level while also maintaining a proper psychological understanding of how
others communicate. While the deeper understanding of their relationship can be subjective, one
can use psychological terminology to develop their own understanding of this idyllic romantic-
comedy.
Emily Reyna
Works Cited
Valenzano, Joseph M., et al. Communication Pathways. 2nd ed., Fountainhead Press, 2016.