0% found this document useful (0 votes)
76 views60 pages

Lecture08 PDF

The document describes the design of an electromagnet to lift a 10 kg mass using a genetic algorithm. It provides specifications for the mass, battery, winding material, magnetic material, and desired size. Design variables include the winding material and dimensions, magnetic material, and core dimensions. Electrical and magnetic analyses are performed to calculate the packing factor, current density, magnetic flux density, and force based on the design variables and material properties. Magnetic equivalent circuits model the magnetic behavior.

Uploaded by

Ezequiel Arias
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
76 views60 pages

Lecture08 PDF

The document describes the design of an electromagnet to lift a 10 kg mass using a genetic algorithm. It provides specifications for the mass, battery, winding material, magnetic material, and desired size. Design variables include the winding material and dimensions, magnetic material, and core dimensions. Electrical and magnetic analyses are performed to calculate the packing factor, current density, magnetic flux density, and force based on the design variables and material properties. Magnetic equivalent circuits model the magnetic behavior.

Uploaded by

Ezequiel Arias
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 60

Lecture 8:

A Design Example -
An Electromagnet
Objective
„ Use a genetic algorithm to solve an engineering
design example

2
The Problem
„ Design an electromagnet to lift a mass.
i
rb

vb

Battery

f
M 3
Specifications
„ Mass
… 10 kG
… 10 cm by 10 cm area
… Magnetic material should not overlap mass
… Must lift from distance of 5 mm
… Gravity is on surface of Earth (G=9.8 m/s2)

„ Battery
… vb = 12 V
… rb = 0.5 Ω
… Current should not exceed 6 A 4
Specifications (Continued)
„ Winding
… Shouldnot exceed packing factor of 0.7
… May use Aluminum (Al) or Copper (Cu)
… Aluminum
„ Density (ρw) = 2701 Kg/m3
„ Conductivity (σw) = 35.4 1 1/(μmΩ)
„ Current Density (jmax) = 6.14 MA/m2

… Copper
„ Density (ρw) = 8900 Kg/m3
„ Conductivity (σw) = 58.0 1/(μmΩ)
„ Current Density (jmax) = 7.62 MA/m2

5
Specifications (Continued)
„ Magnetic Material
… Microsil
„ Bsat = 1.4 T, μ = 15000 μ0 , ρm = 7064 Kg/m3
… Superperm 80
„ Bsat = 0.7 T, μ = 6000 μ0 , ρm = 8069 Kg/m3
… Superperm 49
„ Bsat = 1.2 T, μ = 3500 μ0 , ρm = 7892 Kg/m3

6
Specifications (Continued Again)
„ Size (Mass)
… Total mass of electromagnet should be as small as
possible

7
Electromagnet Dimensions
ww

wb
Depth into
page = d

dw ds

wi

we ws we 8
Design Variables
„ Wire
… Material Type mw
„ 1=Cu, 2=A)
… ConductorCross Section ac
… Number of Turns N
„ Magnetic Material
… Material Type mm
„ 1=Microsil, 2=Superperm 80, 3=Superperm 49)

9
Design Variables (Continued)
„ Core
… Slot width ws
… Wire window width ww
… Slot depth ds
… Wire window depth dw
… End width we
… I-core width wi
… Back width wb
… Depth d
10
Parameter Vector
⎡ mw ⎤
⎢a ⎥
⎢ w⎥
⎢N ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ww = rww ws
⎢ mm ⎥
⎢ ws ⎥
⎢ ⎥ d w = rdw d s
⎢rww ⎥
θ =⎢ ⎥
d
⎢ s⎥ wi = rwi we
⎢ rdw ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ we ⎥ wb = rwb we
⎢ rwi ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ rwb ⎥
⎢ d ⎥
⎣ ⎦ 11
Data Vector
⎡ M ⎤
⎢ G ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ g ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ w ⎥ρ
⎢ ρm ⎥
⎢ ⎥
Ψ = ⎢ σw ⎥
⎢ B ⎥
⎢ sat ⎥
⎢ imax ⎥
⎢ ⎥
J
⎢ max ⎥
⎢ l max ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣ p f ,max ⎥⎦ 12
Electrical Analysis
„ Goal

⎡pf ⎤
⎢ j ⎥ = F (θ, Ψ)
⎢ ⎥ elec
⎢⎣ i ⎥⎦

„ Matlab m-file: Electrical_Analysis.m

13
Electrical Analysis
„ Packing factor
ac N
pf =
ww d w
„ Winding volume (conductor)

(
v w = p f ww d w (2d + 2 wb ) + πd w2 ww )
„ Winding length
vw
lw =
ac
14
Electrical Analysis (Cont.)
„ Winding resistance
lw
rw =
a cσ w
„ Current vb
i=
rb + rw
„ Current Density
i
j=
ac
15
Magnetic Analysis
„ Goal
⎡ B0,1 ⎤
⎢B ⎥
⎢ 1, 2 ⎥
⎢ B2,3 ⎥ = Fmag (θ, i, Ψ )
⎢ ⎥
⎢ B 4,5 ⎥
⎢ fe ⎥
⎣ ⎦
„ Matlab m-file: Magnetic_Analysis.m
16
Magnetic Equivalent Circuit
ww

N0 N1
wb

dw ds
N7 N2

N6 N3 g

N5 N4
wi

17
we ws we
Magnetic Equivalent Circuit (Cont)
Pe

Pvl

Ni
Φ 0 ,1
N0 N1
P0 ,1 Φ1,2
P0 ,7 P1, 2
N2
N7
Phl Φ 2 ,3
P6 ,7 P2, 3

N3
N6
P6, 3
P5, 6 P3 ,4

N5 P4 ,5 Φ 4 ,5 N4
18
Review: Magnetic Equivalent Circuits

19
Magnetic Material Permeances
wb dμ
ww

P0,1 =
ws + we
2 we dμ
P1, 2 = P0,7 =
N0 N1
wb

wb + d w
we dμ
dw ds
N7 N2

P2,3 = P6,7 =
ds − dw / 2 N6 N3 g

wi dμ
N5 N4
wi

P4,5 =
ws + we we ws we
20
Air Gap Permeances ww

(d s − d w )dμ 0 2 μ 0 (d s − d w ) ⎛ πwe ⎞
P6,3 = + ln⎜⎜1 + ⎟⎟
ws π ⎝ ws ⎠
N0 N1
wb

we dμ 0 μ 0 d ⎛ πwi ⎞
P3, 4 = P5,6 = + ln⎜⎜1 + ⎟⎟ +
π
123 144⎝2443⎠
g g dw ds
N7 N2
main face outer face

2μ 0 d⎛ π min(ws , d s ) ⎞ 2μ 0 we ⎛ πwi ⎞
ln⎜⎜1 + ⎟⎟ + ln⎜⎜1 + ⎟⎟ N6 N3 g
π ⎝4 π
3⎠ 14442 3⎠
⎝ 44g4
4g
1444 4244444 N5 N4
wi
inner face front / back faces

we ws we
21
Hor. And Vert. Leakage Permeances ww

1 μ 0 d w d 2 μ 0 d w ⎛ πwe ⎞
Phl = + ln⎜⎜1 + ⎟⎟
3 ws 3π ⎝ ws ⎠ N0 N1
wb
1 μ 0 dww
Pvl =
6 ds + g
dw ds
N7 N2

N6 N3 g

N5 N4
wi

we ws we
22
End Leakage Permeance ww

wt = d s − d w
μ 0 wt wb (d + 2we ) 1
Pe1 =
wt + wb (2d w + wt + wb ) wt wb
ww +
wt + wb N0 N1
k1 = d w − 2 ww wb

⎧ 2 ww d w > 2 ww
⎪ dw ds
k2 = ⎨ d w N7 N2

⎪ 2 d w ≤ 2 ww

⎡ 4 1 2 2 ⎤ N6 N3 g
⎢ 2k + 2 k k
1 2
3
+ k1 k 2 ⎥
μ 0 (d + 2we ) ⎢ 4

N5 N4
Pe 2 =
wi

8ww2 d w2 ⎢− 2 k 3 k + k1 ln⎛⎜1 + 2 2 k 2 ⎞⎥
4
⎢ ⎟⎥
16 ⎜⎝ ⎟
1 2
⎢⎣ 8 k1 ⎠⎥⎦ we ws we
23
Pe = Pe1 + Pe 2
Nodal Equations
Pe

(F1 − Ni )P0,1 + F1 Pe + (F1 − F2 )P1,2 = 0 Pvl

(F2 − F1 )P1,2 + (F2 − F7 )Phl + (F2 − F3 )P2,3 = 0 Ni


Φ 0 ,1
N1
N0

(F3 − F6 )P6,3 + (F3 − F4 )P3,4 + (F3 − F2 )P2,3 = 0 P0 ,7


P0 ,1 Φ1,2

P1, 2

(F4 − F3 )P3,4 + (F4 − F5 )P4,5 = 0 N7


N2
Φ 2 ,3
Phl

(F5 − F4 )P4,5 + (F5 − F6 )P5,6 = 0 P6 ,7 P2, 3

N3

(F6 − F7 )P6,7 + (F6 − F5 )P5,6 + (F6 − F3 )P6,3 = 0


N6
P6, 3
P5, 6 P3 ,4

F7 P0,7 + (F7 − F2 )Phl + (F7 − F6 )P6,7 = 0


N5 P4 ,5 Φ 4 ,5 N4

24
Nodal Equations (Cont)
⎡ P0,1 + Pe + P1, 2 − P1, 2 0 0 0 0 0 ⎤
⎢ − P1, 2 P1, 2 + Phl + P2,3 − P2,3 0 0 0 − Phl ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 − P2,3 P6,3 + P3, 4 + P2,3 − P3, 4 0 − P6,3 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
P=⎢ 0 0 − P3, 4 P3, 4 + P4,5 − P4,5 0 0 ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 − P4,5 P4,5 + P5,6 − P5,6 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 − P6,3 0 − P5,6 P6,7 + P5,6 + P6,3 − P6,7 ⎥
⎢ 0 − Phl 0 0 0 − P6,7 P0,7 + Phl + P6,7 ⎥⎦

F = NiP0,1 P −1
1st column

[F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 ] = F T

25
Fluxes
Pe

Φ 0,1 = ( Ni − F1 ) P0,1 Pvl

Φ1, 2 = ( F1 − F2 ) P1, 2 Ni
Φ 0 ,1 N
N0 1

Φ 2,3 = ( F2 − F3 ) P2,3 P0 ,1 Φ1,2


P0 ,7 P1, 2
Φ 3, 4 = ( F3 − F4 ) P3, 4 N7
N2
Φ 2 ,3
Φ 4,5 = (F4 − F5 )P4,5
Phl
P6 ,7 P2, 3

Φ 5,6 = ( F5 − F6 ) P5,6 N6
N3
P6, 3

Φ 6,7 = ( F6 − F7 ) P6,7 P5, 6 P3 ,4

Φ 0,7 = F7 P0,7 N5 P4 ,5 Φ 4 ,5 N4
26
Flux Densities ww

Φ 0,1
B0,1 =
wb d N0 N1
wb
Φ1, 2
B1, 2 =
we d
dw ds
Φ 2, 3 N7 N2
B2,3 =
we d
N6 N3
Φ 4,5 g

B4,5 = N5 N4
wi d wi

we ws we
27
Force
„ Using co-energy techniques and assuming
magnetic linearity it can be shown

∂P3, 4 ∂P5,6 we dμ 0 μ 0 dwi 2μ 0 d min(ws , d s ) 2μ 0 dwe wi


= =− − − −
∂g ∂g g2 g (g + πwi ) 4 g (4 g + π min(ws , d s )) g (g + πwi )

∂Pvl 1 μ 0 dww
=−
∂g 6 (d s + g )2

28
Force (Cont.)
⎡0 0 0 0 0 0 0⎤
⎢0 0 0 0 0 0 0⎥⎥
⎢ ∂P3, 4 ∂P3, 4
⎢0 0 − 0 0 0⎥
⎢ ∂g ∂g ⎥
⎢ ∂P3, 4 ∂P3, 4 ⎥
∂P ⎢0 0 − 0 0 0⎥
=⎢ ∂g ∂g ⎥
∂g ⎢ ∂P5,6 ∂P5,6 ⎥
⎢0 0 0 0 − 0⎥
⎢ ∂g ∂g ⎥
⎢ ∂P5,6 ∂P5,6 ⎥
⎢0 0 0 0 − 0⎥
⎢ ∂g ∂g ⎥
⎢⎣0 0 0 0 0 0 0⎥⎦
29
Force (Continued)
∂L
∂g
[ ]
= N 2 P012 P −1
1st row ∂g
[ ]
∂P −1
P
1st column
+N
2 ∂Pvl
∂g

1 ∂L 2
fe = − i
2 ∂g

30
Setting Up Constraints
„ Less than function
⎧ 1 x ≤ xmax
⎪⎪ 1
ltne( x, xmax , Δx) = ⎨ x > xmax
x −x
⎪1 + max
⎪⎩ Δx

31
Setting Up Constraints
„ Greater than function
⎧ 1 x ≥ x min
⎪⎪ 1
gtne( x, x min , Δx) = ⎨ x < x min
x −x
⎪1 + min
⎪⎩ Δx

32
Geometrical Constraints
„ Recall, magnetic material should not overlap
mass

c1 = ltne( ws + 2we , lmax ,0.1lmax )

c2 = ltne(d , lmax ,0.1lmax )

33
Electrical Constraints
„ Packing Factor c3 = ltne( p f , p f ,max ,0.1 p f ,max )

„ Current Density c4 = ltne( j, jmax ,0.1J max )

„ Current c5 = ltne(i, imax ,0.1imax )

34
Flux Density Constraints
„ Back of U-Core c6 = ltne( B0,1 , Bsat ,0.01Bsat )

„ Back of Legs c7 = ltne( B1, 2 , Bsat ,0.01Bsat )

„ Front of Legs c8 = ltne( B2,3 , Bsat ,0.01Bsat )

„ I-Core c9 = ltne( B4,5 , Bsat ,0.01Bsat )

35
Force Constraints
„ We must lift mass (and I-core)

f req = ( M + wi d ( ws + 2we ) ρ m )G

c10 = gtne( f e , f req ,0.01 f req )

36
Performance Metrics ww

„ Total mass
m1 =
(2d s we d + ( ws + 2we )( wb + wi )d )ρ m + wb

p f (ww d w (2d + 2 wb ) + πd w2 ww )ρ w
Depth into
page = d

dw ds

wi

we ws we

37
Fitness Function
„ Combined constraint
c = min(c1 , c2 ,L c10 )

„ Fitness Function
⎧ 1
⎪⎪ m + ε c =1
f = ⎨ 10 1
⎪ ∑ ci − 10 c < 1
⎪⎩c =1
38
Code Organization
„ Design Codes
…Electromagnet_Design.m
„ GOSET

…Electromagnet_Fitness.m

ƒ Electrical_Analysis.m
ƒ Magnetic_Analysis.m

39
Code Organization (Cont)
„ Supporting Routines
… Electromagnet_Drawing1
… Electromagnet_Drawing2
… Electromagnet_Design_Review
… Electromagnet_Design_Multirun
… Electromagnet_Design_Multrun_Review

40
Electromagnet_Design.m (1/3)
% Electromagnet Design
%
% Written by:
% Ricky Chan for S.D. Sudhoff
% School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
% 1285 Electrical Engineering Building
% West Lafayette, IN 47907-1285
% E-mail: [email protected]

% Set Up Population
GAP = gapdefault;
GAP.fp_ngen = 2500;
GAP.fp_ipop = 500;
GAP.fp_npop = 500;
GAP.mc_alg = 4.0;
GAP.dt_alg = 3;

% Set Up Migrations
GAP.mg_nreg=5; % number of regions
GAP.mg_tmig=100; % mean time between migrations
GAP.mg_pmig=0.05; % probability of a individual migrating

% Units
mm=1.0e-3;
cm=1.0e-2;
41
Electromagnet_Design.m (2/3)
% Problem Requirement Data
Psi.M = 10; % Mass of object (Kg)
Psi.G = 9.8; % Gravity (m/s2)
Psi.g = 0.5*cm; % Gap Width (m)
Psi.rhow = [ 8900; 2701]; % Wire - Kg/m3
Psi.sigmaw = [ 58.0; 35.4]*1e6; % Wire - A/Ohm
Psi.jmaxw = [ 7.62; 6.14]*1e6; % Wire - A/m2
Psi.descw = ['Copper '; 'Aluminum']; % Wire - Description
Psi.bmaxm = [ 1.4; 0.7; 1.2]; % Steel - Bsat, T
Psi.rhom = [7064.1; 8069.4; 7892.1]; % Steel - Density Kg/m3
Psi.myum = [ 15000; 6000; 3500]; % Steel - Perm., (relative)
Psi.descm = ['Microsil '; ...
'Superperm 80'; ...
'Superperm 49']; % Steel - Description
Psi.imax = 6; % Maximum current, A
Psi.lmax = 10e-2; % Maximum length
Psi.pfmax = 0.7; % Maximum packing factor
Psi.vb = 12; % Battery Voltage
Psi.rb = 0.5; % Battery Resistance

42
Electromagnet_Design.m (3/3)
% Genetic Mapping
% mw ac N mm ws rww ds rdw we rwi rwb d
GAP.gd_min = [ 1 1e-8 10 1 1*cm 0.1 1*mm 0.1 1*mm 0.2 0.2 1*mm];
GAP.gd_max = [ 2 1e-4 1e3 3 10*cm 1.0 20*cm 1.0 5*cm 2.0 2.0 10*cm];
GAP.gd_type = [ 1 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ];
GAP.gd_cid = [ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ];

% Solve Problem
[fP,GAS]= gaoptimize(@Electromagnet_Fitness,GAP,Psi,[],[],[]);

% Get Final Answer and Plot


final_parameters = GAS.bestgenes(:,end);
f = Electromagnet_Fitness(final_parameters,Psi,23);

% Save run
s=input('Type 1 to Save Run ');
if (s==1)
save samplerun
end

43
Electromagnet_Fitness.m (1/7)
function fitness = Electromagnet_Fitness(param,Psi,figNum)

% ELECTROMAGNET_FITNESS
%
% fitness = Electromagnet_Fitness(param,Psi,x)
%
% Inputs:
% param = design parameters
% Psi = data vectors
% x = optional input to print out extra information
%
% Outputs:
% fitness = fitness value
%
% Written by:
% Ricky Chan for S.D. Sudhoff
% School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
% 1285 Electrical Engineering Building
% West Lafayette, IN 47907-1285
% E-mail: [email protected]

44
Electromagnet_Fitness.m (2/7)
% Map to nicer variable names
mw = param(1);
ac = param(2);
N = round(param(3));
mm = param(4);
ws = param(5);
rww = param(6);
ds = param(7);
rdw = param(8);
we = param(9);
rwi = param(10);
rwb = param(11);
d = param(12);

45
Electromagnet_Fitness.m (3/7)
% Computing the width of winding (ww), depth of winding (dw), width of the
% I core (wi), and the width of the back of the U core (wb)
ww = rww*ws;
dw = rdw*ds;
wi = rwi*we;
wb = rwb*we;

% Electrical Circuit Analysis


[pf, j, i] = Electrical_Analysis(param,Psi);

% Magnetic Analysis
[B01, B12, B23, B45, fe] = Magnetic_Analysis(param,Psi,i);

% Constraints
lmax = Psi.lmax;
pfmax = Psi.pfmax;
jmaxw = Psi.jmaxw(mw);
imax = Psi.imax;
bmax = Psi.bmaxm(mm);
rhom = Psi.rhom(mm);
rhow = Psi.rhow(mw);

46
Electromagnet_Fitness.m (4/7)
c1 = ltne(ws+2*we,lmax,0.1*lmax);
c2 = ltne(d,lmax,0.1*lmax);
c3 = ltne(pf,pfmax,0.1*pfmax);
c4 = ltne(j,jmaxw,0.1*jmaxw);
c5 = ltne(i,imax,0.1*imax);
c6 = ltne(B01,bmax,0.01*bmax);
c7 = ltne(B12,bmax,0.01*bmax);
c8 = ltne(B23,bmax,0.01*bmax);
c9 = ltne(B45,bmax,0.01*bmax);
f_req = (Psi.M + wi*d*(ws+2*we)*rhom)*Psi.G;
c10 = gtne(fe,f_req,0.01*f_req);

% find the aggregrate constraint


c = [c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6 c7 c8 c9 c10];
cmin = min(c);

% design objective
m1 = (2*ds*we*d + (ws+2*we)*(wb+wi)*d)*rhom + ...
pf*(ww*dw*(2*d+2*wb)+pi*dw^2*ww)*rhow;

% compute the fitness


if (cmin == 1)
fitness = 1/(m1+1e-6);
else
fitness = sum(c)-length(c);
end

47
Electromagnet_Fitness.m (5/7)
% if more than 3 arguments, plot the result
% and write a report
if nargin >= 3

format short g

disp('Parameters');
disp(['Parameter 1: Wire type ',Psi.descw(mw,:)]);
disp(['Parameter 2: Wire cross section is ', num2str(ac), ' m^2']);
disp(['Parameter 3: Number of turns is ', num2str(N)]);
disp(['Parameter 4: Magnetic material is ', Psi.descm(mm,:)]);
disp(['Parameter 5: Slot width is ',num2str(ws*100),' cm']);
disp(['Parameter 6: Winding width is ',num2str(rww*100),'% slot width']);
disp(['Parameter 7: Slot depth is ',num2str(ds*100),' cm']);
disp(['Parameter 8: Winding depth is ',num2str(rdw*100),'% slot depth']);
disp(['Parameter 9: End width is ',num2str(we*100),' cm']);
disp(['Parameter 10: I width is ',num2str(rwi*100),'% end width']);
disp(['Parameter 11: Base width is ',num2str(rwb*100),'% end width']);
disp(['Parameter 12: Depth is ',num2str(d*100),' cm']);
disp(' ');

48
Electromagnet_Fitness.m (6/7)
disp('Constraints');
disp(['Overall width is ',num2str(100*(ws+2*we)/lmax),'% allowed']);
disp(['Overall depth is ',num2str(100*d/lmax),'% allowed']);
disp(['Packing factors is ',num2str(100*pf/pfmax),'% allowed']);
disp(['Current density is ',num2str(100*j/jmaxw),'% allowed']);
disp(['Current is ',num2str(100*i/imax),'% allowed']);
disp(['Back core flux density is ',num2str(100*B01/bmax),'% allowed']);
disp(['Back end core flux density is ',num2str(100*B12/bmax),'% allowed']);
disp(['Front end core flux density is ',num2str(100*B23/bmax),'% allowed']);
disp(['I core flux density is ',num2str(100*B45/bmax),'% allowed']);
disp(['Force required is ',num2str(f_req),' N']);
disp(['Force produced is ',num2str(100*fe/f_req), '% required']);
disp(' ');
disp('Metrics');
disp(['Mass is ',num2str(m1),' Kg']);

figure(figNum);
clf;
Electromagnet_Drawing1(param,Psi);
figure(figNum+1)
Electromagnet_Drawing2(param,Psi);

end

49
Electromagnet_Fitness.m (7/7)
function p = ltne(x,xmax,delta)

if x <= xmax
p = 1;
else
p = 1./(1+abs((xmax-x)./delta));
end

function p = gtne(x,xmin,delta)

if x >= xmin
p = 1;
else
p = 1./(1+abs((xmin-x)./delta));
end

50
Sample Evolution
1
Normalized Value

0.5

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Parameter Number

2
f:B(b) Md(g) Mn(r)

-2

-4

-6
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Generation 51
Evolution – Best Fit Individual
„ (Matlab Demo)

52
Parameters
„ Parameter 1: Wire type Copper
„ Parameter 2: Wire cross section is 7.8519e-007 m^2
„ Parameter 3: Number of turns is 585
„ Parameter 4: Magnetic material is Microsil
„ Parameter 5: Slot width is 7.1906 cm
„ Parameter 6: Winding width is 97.7656% slot width
„ Parameter 7: Slot depth is 0.96031 cm
„ Parameter 8: Winding depth is 97.8117% slot depth
„ Parameter 9: End width is 1.2104 cm
„ Parameter 10: I width is 49.2545% end width
„ Parameter 11: Base width is 52.2008% end width
„ Parameter 12: Depth is 3.7947 cm 53
Constraints
„ Overall width is 96.1141% allowed
„ Overall depth is 37.9474% allowed
„ Packing factors is 99.3753% allowed
„ Current density is 99.4713% allowed
„ Current is 99.1917% allowed
„ Back core flux density is 99.442% allowed
„ Back end core flux density is 50.9116% allowed
„ Front end core flux density is 49.215% allowed
„ I core flux density is 99.6887% allowed
„ Force required is 99.5053 N
„ Force produced is 100.3524% required
54
Metrics
„ Mass is 0.86127 Kg

55
0.15 Profile View 0.15

0.1 0.1

0.05 0.05

0 0

-0.05 -0.05

-0.1 -0.1

-0.15 -0.15

-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1


56
3-D View
0.02

0.015

0.01

0.005

-0.005

-0.01

-0.015
0.02

0 -0.05
0
-0.02 0.05

57
Design Repeatability
„ Repeat design 25 times:
Parameter Min/Mn Max/Mn Std/Mn

mw 100.00 100.00 0

aw 95.26 102.05 1.46

N 93.95 106.16 3.48

mn 100.00 100.00 0

58
Design Repeatability
Parameter Min/Mn Max/Mn Std/Mn
ws 88.44 110.01 5.06
rww 97.93 100.72 0.57
ds 92.18 105.86 4.07
rdw 96.46 101.94 1.46

59
Design Repeatability

Parameter Min/Mn Max/Mn Std/Mn


we 88.55 109.82 5.93
rwi 90.00 109.26 5.06
rwb 89.55 108.78 5.17
d 83.18 118.91 9.02
Fitness 97.55 102.00 1.09

60

You might also like