IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS

ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

1.1 INRUDUCTION TO SUBPRIME PRIME MORTGAGE MARKET

1.2 INRUDUCTION TO SUBPRIME PRIME MORTAGAGE CRISIS

2. CAUSES AND RISK OF SUBPRIME CRISIS

2.1 RISKS INVOLVED IN THE SUBPRIME CRISIS

2.2 CAUSES OF THE CRISIS

3. IMPACTS

3.1 IMPACT ON CORPORATIONS AND INVESTORS

3.2 IMPACT ON STOCK MARKETS

3.3 IMPACT ON FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

3.4 IMPACT ON INSURANCE COMPANIES

3.5 IMPACT ON HOME OWNERS

3.6 IMPACT ON MINORITIES

3.7 SPECIFIC IMPACTS BY FIRM OR SECTOR

4. ACTIONS TO MANAGE THE CRISIS

5. SOME IMPORTANT TIME LINES

5.1 SUBPRIME CRISIS IMPACT TIMELINE

5.2 CENTRAL BANK RESPONSE TIMELINE

6. LIST OF ENTITIES INVOLVED IN 2007 FINANCE CRISES

Page 1
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1.1 INRUDUCTION TO SUBPRIME PRIME MORTGAGE MARKET

Before discussing what is Subprime mortgage crisis, first will understand

what does meant by subprime mortgage

Usually financial institution classifies the borrower into 3 types

1. Prime borrower
2. Subprime borrower

3. Equity class borrower

Subprime lending

Subprime lending (also known as B-paper, near-prime, or second chance lending)

is the practice of making loans to borrowers who do not qualify for the best market
interest rates because of their deficient credit history. The phrase also refers to banknotes
taken on property that cannot be sold on the primary market, including loans on certain
types of investment properties and certain types of self-employed persons.

Subprime lending is risky for both lenders and borrowers due to the combination
of high interest rates, poor credit history, and adverse financial situations usually
associated with subprime applicants. A subprime loan is offered at a rate higher than A-
paper loans due to the increased risk. Subprime lending encompasses a variety of credit
instruments, including subprime mortgages, subprime car loans, and subprime credit
cards, among others. The term "subprime" refers to the credit status of the borrower
(being less than ideal), not the interest rate on the loan itself.

Subprime lending is highly controversial. Opponents have alleged that subprime

lenders have engaged in predatory lending practices such as deliberately lending to
borrowers who could never meet the terms of their loans, thus leading to default, seizure
of collateral, and foreclosure. There have also been charges of mortgage discrimination
on the basis of race. Proponents of subprime lending maintain that the practice extends
credit to people who would otherwise not have access to the credit market.

The controversy surrounding subprime lending has expanded as the result of an

ongoing lending and credit crisis both in the subprime industry, and in the greater
financial markets which began in the United States. This phenomenon has been described
as a financial contagion which has led to a restriction on the availability of credit in world
financial markets. Hundreds of thousands of borrowers have been forced to default and
several major American subprime lenders have filed for bankruptcy.

Page 2
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

Background Subprime lending evolved with the realization of a demand in the

marketplace and businesses providing a supply to meet it. With bankruptcies and
consumer proposals being widely accessible, a constantly fluctuating economic
environment, and consumer debt loan on the rise, traditional lenders are more cautious
and have been turning away a record number of potential customers. [citation needed]
Statistically, approximately 25% of the population of the United States falls into this
category.

In the third quarter of 2007, Subprime ARMs only represent 6.8% of the
mortgages outstanding in the US, yet they represent 43.0% of the foreclosures started.
Subprime fixed mortgages represent 6.3% of outstanding loans and 12.0% of the
foreclosures started in the same period.

Definition

While there is no official credit profile that describes a subprime borrower, most
in the United States have a credit score below 723. Fannie Mae has lending guidelines for
what it considers to be "prime" borrowers on conforming loans. Their standard provides a
good comparison between those who are "prime borrowers" and those who are "subprime
borrowers." Prime borrowers have a credit score above 620 (credit scores are between
350 and 850 with a median in the U.S. of 678 and a mean of 723), a debt-to-income ratio
(DTI) no greater than 75% (meaning that no more than 75% of net income pays for
housing and other debt), and a combined loan to value ratio of 90%, meaning that the
borrower is paying a 10% down payment. Any borrower seeking a loan with less than
those criteria is a subprime borrower by Fannie Mae standards.

Subprime borrowers

Subprime offers an opportunity for borrowers with a less than ideal credit record
to gain access to credit. Borrowers may use this credit to purchase homes, or in the case
of cash out refinance, finance other forms of spending such as purchasing a car, paying
for living expenses, remodeling a home, or even paying down on a high interest credit
card. However, due to the risk profile of the subprime borrower, this access to credit
comes at the price of higher interest rates. On a more positive note, subprime lending
(and mortgages in particular), provide a method of "credit repair"; if borrowers maintain
a good payment record, they should be able to refinance back onto mainstream rates after
a period of time. Credit repair usually takes twelve months to achieve; however, in the
UK, most subprime mortgages have a two or three-year tie-in, and borrowers may face
additional charges for replacing their mortgages before the tie-in has expired.
Generally, subprime borrowers will display a range of credit risk characteristics that may
include one or more of the following:

 Two or more loan payments paid past 30 days due in the last 12 months, or one or
more loan payments paid past 90 days due the last 36 months;

Page 3
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

 Judgment, foreclosure, repossession, or non-payment of a loan in the prior 48

months;
 Bankruptcy in the last 7 years;

Relatively high default probability as evidenced by, for example, a credit

bureau risk score (FICO) of less than 620 (depending on the product/collateral),
or other bureau or proprietary scores with an equivalent default probability
likelihood.

Background information

Subprime lending is a general term that refers to the practice of making loans to
borrowers who do not qualify for market interest rates because of problems with their
credit history or the inability to prove that they have enough income to support the
monthly payment on the loan for which they are applying. The word Subprime refers to
the credit-worthiness of the borrower (being less than ideal) and does not refer to the
interest rate of the loan. Subprime loans or mortgages are risky for both creditors and
debtors because of the combination of high interest rates, bad credit history, and murky
personal financial situations often associated with subprime applicants. A subprime loan
is one that is offered at an interest rate higher than A-paper loans due to the increased
risk. Subprime, therefore, is not the same as "Alt-A", because Alt-A loans qualify for the
"A-rating" by Moody's or other rating firms, albeit for an "alternative" means.

The value of U.S. subprime mortgages was estimated at $1.3 trillion as of March
2007, with over 7.5 million first-lien subprime mortgages outstanding. Approximately
16% of subprime loans with adjustable rate mortgages (ARM) were 90-days delinquent
or in foreclosure proceedings as of October 2007, roughly triple the rate of 2005. By
January of 2008, the delinquency rate had risen to 21%.

Number of U.S. Household Properties Subject to Foreclosure Actions During

2007, By Quarter Subprime ARMs only represents 6.8% of the loans outstanding in the
US, yet they represent 43.0% of the foreclosures started during the third quarter of 2007.
A total of nearly 446,726 U.S. household properties were subject to some sort of
foreclosure action from July to September 2007, including those with prime, alt-A and
subprime loans. This is nearly double the 223,000 properties in the year-ago period and
34% higher than the 333,627 in the prior quarter. This increased to 527,740 during the
fourth quarter of 2007, an 18% increase versus the prior quarter. For all of 2007, nearly
1.3 million properties were subject to 2.2 million foreclosure filings, up 79% and 75%
respectively versus 2006. Foreclosure filings including default notices, auction sale
notices and bank repossessions can include multiple notices on the same property.
The estimated value of subprime adjustable-rate mortgages (ARM) resetting at
higher interest rates is U.S. $400 billion for 2007 and $500 billion for 2008. Reset
activity is expected to increase to a monthly peak in March 2008 of nearly $100 billion,
before declining. An average of 450,000 subprimes ARM are scheduled to undergo their
first rate increase each quarter in 2008

Page 4
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

1.2 INRUDUCTION TO SUBPRIME PRIME MORTAGAGE CRISIS

The diagram explains how new model (i.e. Subprime model) leads to mortgage
crisis

How it went wrong

Traditionally, banks have financed their mortgage lending through the deposits
they receive from their customers. This has limited the amount of mortgage lending they
could do. And also Percentage of default and loss suffered by financial institution could
be very minimal and there are only 2 players Viz, financial institutions and investors

In recent years, banks have moved to a new model where they sell on the
mortgages to the bond markets. This has made it much easier to fund additional
borrowing,
But it has also led to abuses as banks no longer have the incentive to check
carefully the mortgages they issue. And the flow chart looks like multiple layer and
number of entity involved in this system, one Player defaulted whole system get disturb.
In present crisis Subprime borrower defaulted their payment installment due to fall in the
prices of house and lands what they owned, fall in the price leads to fall in the bond

Page 5
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

issued by financial institution which linked to subprime mortgage so in this way all
players who ever involved in this new model all are suffered huge loss

Subprime mortgage crisis:

The subprime mortgage crisis was a sharp rise in home foreclosures which started
in the United States in late 2006 and became a global financial crisis during 2007 and
2008.

The crisis began with the bursting of the housing bubble in the U.S. and high default rates
on "subprime" and other adjustable rate mortgages (ARM) made to higher-risk borrowers
with lower income or lesser credit history than "prime" borrowers. Loan incentives and a
long-term trend of rising housing prices encouraged borrowers to assume mortgages,
believing they would be able to refinance at more favorable terms later. However, once
housing prices started to drop moderately in 2006-2007 in many parts of the U.S.,
refinancing became more difficult. Defaults and foreclosure activity increased
dramatically as ARM interest rates reset higher. During 2007, nearly 1.3 million U.S.
housing properties were subject to foreclosure activity, up 79% versus 2006. As of
December 22, 2007, a leading business periodical estimated subprime defaults would
reach a level between U.S. $200-300 billion.

The mortgage lenders that retained credit risk (the risk of payment default) were
the first to be affected, as borrowers became unable or unwilling to make payments.
Major banks and other financial institutions around the world have reported losses of
approximately U.S. $140 billion as of February 2008, as cited below. Due to a form of
financial engineering called securitization, many mortgage lenders had passed the rights
to the mortgage payments and related credit/default risk to third-party investors via
mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDO). Corporate,
individual and institutional investors holding MBS or CDO faced significant losses, as
the value of the underlying mortgage assets declined. Stock markets in many countries
declined significantly.

The widespread dispersion of credit risk and the unclear impact on financial
institutions caused lenders to reduce lending activity or to make loans at higher interest
rates. Similarly, the ability of corporations to obtain funds through the issuance of
commercial paper was impacted. This aspect of the crisis is consistent with a credit
crunch. The liquidity concerns drove central banks around the world to take action to
provide funds to member banks to encourage the lending of funds to worthy borrowers
and to re-invigorate the commercial paper markets.

The subprime crisis also places downward pressure on economic growth, because
fewer or more expensive loans decrease investment by businesses and consumer
spending, which drive the economy. A separate but related dynamic is the downturn in
the housing market, where a surplus inventory of homes has resulted in a significant
decline in new home construction and housing prices in many areas. This also places

Page 6
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

downward pressure on growth. With interest rates on a large number of subprime and
other ARM due to adjust upward during the 2008 period, U.S. legislators and the U.S.
Treasury Department are taking action. A systematic program to limit or defer interest
rate adjustments was implemented to reduce the impact. In addition, lenders and
borrowers facing defaults have been encouraged to cooperate to enable borrowers to stay
in their homes. The risks to the broader economy created by the financial market crisis
and housing market downturn were primary factors in the January 22, 2008 decision by
the U.S. Federal reserve to cut interest rates and the economic stimulus package signed
by President Bush on February 13, 2008. [7] [8] [9]Both actions are designed to stimulate
economic growth and inspire confidence in the financial markets.

Typical model of Subprime crisis in United States Of America :

2. CAUSES AND RISK OF SUBPRIME CRISIS

Page 7
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

The reasons for this crisis are varied and complex. Understanding and managing the
ripple effect through the world-wide economy poses a critical challenge for governments,
businesses, and investors. Due to innovations in securitization, the risks related to the
inability of homeowners to meet mortgage payments have been distributed broadly, with
a series of consequential impacts. The crisis can be attributed to a number of factors, such
as the inability of homeowners to make their mortgage payments; poor judgment by
either the borrower or the lender; inappropriate mortgage incentives, and rising adjustable
mortgage rates. Further, declining home prices have made re-financing more difficult.

2.1 RISKS INVOLVED IN THE SUBPRIME CRISIS

There are three primary risk categories involved:

 Credit risk: Traditionally, the risk of default (called credit risk) would be assumed
by the bank originating the loan. However, due to innovations in securitization,
credit risk is now shared more broadly with investors, because the rights to these
mortgage payments have been repackaged into a variety of complex investment
vehicles, generally categorized as mortgage-backed securities (MBS) or
collateralized debt obligations (CDO). A CDO, essentially, is a repacking of
existing debt, and in recent years MBS collateral has made up a large proportion
of issuance. In exchange for purchasing the MBS, third-party investors receive a
claim on the mortgage assets, which become collateral in the event of default.
Further, the MBS investor has the right to cash flows related to the mortgage
payments. To manage their risk, mortgage originators (e.g., banks or mortgage
lenders) may also create separate legal entities, called special-purpose entities
(SPE), to both assume the risk of default and issue the MBS. The banks
effectively sell the mortgage assets (i.e., banking accounts receivable, which are
the rights to receive the mortgage payments) to these SPE. In turn, the SPE then
sells the MBS to the investors. The mortgage assets in the SPE become the
collateral.

 Asset price risk: CDO valuation is complex and related "fair value" accounting
for such "Level 3" assets is subject to wide interpretation. This valuation
fundamentally derives from the collectibility of subprime mortgage payments,
which is difficult to predict due to lack of precedent and rising delinquency rates.
Banks and institutional investors have recognized substantial losses as they
revalue their CDO assets downward. Most CDOs require that a number of tests be
satisfied on a periodic basis, such as tests of interest cash flows, collateral ratings,
or market values. For deals with market value tests, if the valuation falls below
certain levels, the CDO may be required by its terms to sell collateral in a short
period of time, often at a steep loss, much like a stock brokerage account margin
call. If the risk is not legally contained within an SPE or otherwise, the entity
owning the mortgage collateral may be forced to sell other types of assets, as well,
to satisfy the terms of the deal. In addition, credit rating agencies have
downgraded over U.S. $50 billion in highly-rated CDO and more such

Page 8
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

downgrades are possible. Since certain types of institutional investors are allowed
to only carry higher-quality (e.g., "AAA") assets, there is an increased risk of
forced asset sales, which could cause further devaluation.

 Liquidity risk: A related risk involves the commercial paper market, a key source
of funds (i.e., liquidity) for many companies. Companies and SPE called
structured investment vehicles (SIV) often obtain short-term loans by issuing
commercial paper, pledging mortgage assets or CDO as collateral. Investors
provide cash in exchange for the commercial paper, receiving money-market
interest rates. However, because of concerns regarding the value of the mortgage
asset collateral linked to subprime and Alt-A loans, the ability of many companies
to issue such paper has been significantly affected. The amount of commercial
paper issued as of October 18, 2007 dropped by 25%, to $888 billion, from the
August 8 level. In addition, the interest rate charged by investors to provide loans
for commercial paper has increased substantially above historical levels.

2.2 CAUSES OF THE CRISIS

The housing downturn

Subprime borrowing was a major contributor to an increase in home ownership

rates and the demand for housing. The overall U.S. homeownership rate increased from
64 percent in 1994 (about where it was since 1980) to a peak in 2004 with an all time
high of 69.2 percent.

This demand helped fuel housing price increases and consumer spending.
Between 1997 and 2006, American home prices increased by 124%. Some homeowners
used the increased property value experienced in the housing bubble to refinance their
homes with lower interest rates and take out second mortgages against the added value to
use the funds for consumer spending. U.S. household debt as a percentage of income rose
to 130% during 2007, versus 100% earlier in the decade. A culture of consumerism is a
factor. In the early 2000s recession that began in early 2001 and which was exacerbated
by the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Americans were asked to spend their way out
of economic decline with "consumerism... cast as the new patriotism". This call linking
patriotism to shopping echoed the urging of former President Bill Clinton to "get out and
shop" and corporations like General Motors produced commercials with the same theme.

Existing Homes Sales, Inventory, and Months Supply, By Quarter Overbuilding

during the boom period, increasing foreclosure rates and unwillingness of many
homeowners to sell their homes at reduced market prices have significantly increased the
supply of housing inventory available. Sales volume (units) of new homes dropped by
26.4% in 2007 versus the prior year. By January 2008, the inventory of unsold new

Page 9
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

homes stood at 9.8 months based on December 2007 sales volume, the highest level since
1981. Further, a record of nearly four million unsold existing homes were available.

This excess supply of home inventory places significant downward pressure on

prices. As prices decline, more homeowners are at risk of default and foreclosure.
According to the S&P/Case-Shiller housing price index, by November 2007, average
U.S. housing prices had fallen approximately 8% from their 2006 peak. However, there
was significant variation in price changes across U.S. markets, with many appreciating
and others depreciating. The price decline in December 2007 versus the year-ago period
was 10.4%. As of February 2008, housing prices are expected to continue declining until
this inventory of surplus homes (excess supply) is reduced to more typical levels.

THE HOUSING PRICE CRASH

Graph clearly denote the bursting of the housing bubble and crash of housing prices

Role of borrowers

A variety of factors have contributed to an increase in the payment delinquency

rate for subprime ARM borrowers, which recently reached 21%, roughly four times its
historical level. Chart clearly says the rise in delinquency and foreclosures.

Page 10
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

Easy credit, combined with the assumption that housing prices would continue to
appreciate, also encouraged many subprime borrowers to obtain ARMs they could not
afford after the initial incentive period. Once housing prices started depreciating
moderately in many parts of the U.S. (see United States housing market correction and
United States housing bubble), refinancing became more difficult. Some homeowners
were unable to re-finance and began to default on loans as their loans reset to higher
interest rates and payment amounts. Other homeowners, facing declines in home market
value or with limited accumulated equity, are choosing to stop paying their mortgage.
They are essentially "walking away" from the property and allowing foreclosure, despite
the impact to their credit rating.

Mortgage fraud by borrowers from US Department of the Treasury

Misrepresentation of loan application data is another contributing factor. In a

January 13, 2008 column in the New York Times, George Mason University economics
professor Tyler Cowen wrote, "There has been plenty of talk about 'predatory lending,'
but 'predatory borrowing' may have been the bigger problem. As much as 70 percent of
recent early payment defaults had fraudulent misrepresentations on their original loan
applications, according to one recent study. The research was done by BasePoint
Analytics, which helps banks and lenders identify fraudulent transactions; the study
looked at more than three million loans from 1997 to 2006, with a majority from 2005 to
2006. Applications with misrepresentations were also five times as likely to go into
default. Many of the frauds were simple rather than ingenious. In some cases, borrowers
who were asked to state their incomes just lied, sometimes reporting five times actual
income; other borrowers falsified income documents by using computers."

US Department of the Treasury suspicious activity report of mortgage fraud

increased by 1,411 percent between 1997 and 2005.

Page 11
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

Role of financial institutions

A variety of factors have caused lenders to offer an increasing array of higher-risk

loans to higher-risk borrowers. The share of subprime mortgages to total originations was
5% ($35 billion) in 1994, 9% in 1996, 13% ($160 billion) in 1999 , and 20% in 2006. A
study by the Federal Reserve indicated that the average difference in mortgage interest
rates between subprime and prime mortgages (the "subprime markup" or "risk premium")
declined from 2.8 percentage points (280 basis points) in 2001, to 1.3 percentage points
in 2007. In other words, the risk premium required by lenders to offer a subprime loan
declined. This occurred even though subprime borrower and loan characteristics declined
overall during the 2001-2006 period, which should have had the opposite effect. The
combination is common to classic boom and bust credit cycles.

In addition to considering higher-risk borrowers, lenders have offered

increasingly high-risk loan options and incentives. One example is the interest-only
adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM), which allows the homeowner to pay just the interest
(not principal) during an initial period. Another example is a "payment option" loan, in
which the homeowner can pay a variable amount, but any interest not paid is added to the
principal. Further, an estimated one-third of ARM originated between 2004-2006 had
"teaser" rates below 4%, which then increased significantly after some initial period, as
much as doubling the monthly payment.

Page 12
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

Some believe that mortgage standards became lax because of a moral hazard,
where each link in the mortgage chain collected profits while believing it was passing on
risk.

Role of securitization

Securitization is a structured finance process in which assets, receivables or

financial instruments are acquired, classified into pools, and offered as collateral for
third-party investment. There are many parties involved. Due to securitization, investor
appetite for mortgage-backed securities (MBS), and the tendency of rating agencies to
assign investment-grade ratings to MBS, loans with a high risk of default could be
originated, packaged and the risk readily transferred to others. Asset securitization began
with the structured financing of mortgage pools in the 1970s. The securitized share of
subprime mortgages (i.e., those passed to third-party investors) increased from 54% in
2001, to 75% in 2006. Alan Greenspan stated that the securitization of home loans for
people with poor credit — not the loans themselves — were to blame for the current
global credit crisis.

Borrowing Under a Securitization Structure

Role of mortgage brokers

Mortgage brokers don't lend their own money. There is not a direct correlation
between loan performance and compensation. They have big financial incentives for
selling complex, adjustable rate mortgages (ARM's), since they earn higher commissions.

Page 13
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

According to a study by Wholesale Access Mortgage Research & Consulting Inc.,

in 2004 Mortgage brokers originated 68% of all residential loans in the U.S., with
subprime and Alt-A loans accounting for 42.7% of brokerages' total production volume.

The chairman of the Mortgage Bankers Association claimed brokers profited from
a home loan boom but didn't do enough to examine whether borrowers could repay.

Role of mortgage underwriters

Underwriters determine if the risk of lending to a particular borrower under

certain parameters is acceptable. Most of the risks and terms that underwriters consider
fall under the three C’s of underwriting: credit, capacity and collateral. See mortgage
underwriting.

In 2007, 40 percent of all subprime loans were generated by automated

underwriting. An Executive vice president of Countrywide Home Loans Inc. stated in
2004 "Prior to automating the process, getting an answer from an underwriter took up to
a week. "We are able to produce a decision inside of 30 seconds today. ... And
previously, every mortgage required a standard set of full documentation." Some think
that users whose lax controls and willingness to rely on shortcuts led them to approve
borrowers that under a less-automated system would never have made the cut are at fault
for the subprime meltdown.

Role of government and regulators

Some economists claim that government policy actually encouraged the

development of the subprime debacle through legislation like the Community
Reinvestment Act, which they say forces banks to lend to otherwise uncreditworthy
consumers. Economist Robert Kuttner has criticized the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act
as contributing to the subprime meltdown. A taxpayer-funded government bailout related
to mortgages during the Savings and Loan crisis may have created a moral hazard and
acted as encouragement to lenders to make similar higher risk loans.

Some have argued that, despite attempts by various U.S. states to prevent the
growth of a secondary market in repackaged predatory loans, the Treasury Department's
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, at the insistence of national banks, struck
down such attempts as violations of Federal banking laws.

In response to a concern that lending was not properly regulated, the House and
Senate are both considering bills to regulate lending practices.

Role of credit rating agencies

Credit rating agencies are now under scrutiny for giving investment-grade ratings
to securitization transactions holding subprime mortgages. Higher ratings are theoreticall

Page 14
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

y due to the multiple, independent mortgages held in the MBS per the agencies, but
critics claim that conflicts of interest were in play.

Role of central banks

Central banks are primarily concerned with managing the rate of inflation and
avoiding recessions. They are also the “lenders of last resort” to ensure liquidity. They
are less concerned with avoiding asset bubbles, such as the housing bubble and dotcom
bubble. Central banks have generally chosen to react after such bubbles burst to minimize
collateral impact on the economy, rather than trying to avoid the bubble itself. This is
because identifying an asset bubble and determining the proper monetary policy to
properly deflate it are not proven concepts. There is significant debate among economists
regarding whether this is the optimal strategy.

Federal Reserve actions raised concerns among some market observers that it
could create a moral hazard. Some industry officials said that Federal Reserve Bank of
New York involvement in the rescue of Long-Term Capital Management in 1998 would
encourage large financial institutions to assume more risk, in the belief that the Federal
Reserve would intervene on their behalf.

A potential contributing factor to the rise in home prices was the lowering of
interest rates earlier in the decade by the Federal Reserve, to diminish the blow of the
collapse of the dot-com bubble and combat the risk of deflation.

3. IMPACTS
3.1 Impact on corporations and investors

Page 15
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

Average investors and corporations face a variety of risks due to the inability of
mortgage holders to pay. These vary by legal entity. Some general exposures by entity
type include:

 Bank corporations: The earnings reported by major banks are adversely affected
by defaults on mortgages they issue and retain. Companies value their mortgage
assets (receivables) based on estimates of collections from homeowners.
Companies record expenses in the current period to adjust this valuation,
increasing their bad debt reserves and reducing earnings. Rapid or unexpected
changes in mortgage asset valuation can lead to volatility in earnings and stock
prices. The ability of lenders to predict future collections is a complex task subject
to a multitude of variables.

 Mortgage lenders and Real Estate Investment Trusts: These entities face similar
risks to banks. In addition, they have business models with significant reliance on
the ability to regularly secure new financing through CDO or commercial paper
issuance secured by mortgages. Investors have become reluctant to fund such
investments and are demanding higher interest rates. Such lenders are at increased
risk of significant reductions in book value due to asset sales at unfavorable prices
and several have filed bankruptcy.

 Special purpose entities (SPE): Like corporations, SPE are required to revalue
their mortgage assets based on estimates of collection of mortgage payments. If
this valuation falls below a certain level, or if cash flow falls below contractual
levels, investors may have immediate rights to the mortgage asset collateral. This
can also cause the rapid sale of assets at unfavorable prices. Other SPE called
structured investment vehicles (SIV) issue commercial paper and use the proceeds
to purchase securitized assets such as CDO. These entities have been affected by
mortgage asset devaluation. Several major SIV are associated with large banks.

 Investors: Stocks or bonds of the entities above are affected by the lower earnings
and uncertainty regarding the valuation of mortgage assets and related payment
collection. Many investors and corporations purchased MBS or CDO as
investments and incurred related losses.

3.2 Impact on stock markets

On July 19, 2007, the Dow Jones Industrial Average hit a record high, closing
above 14,000 for the first time. By August 15, the Dow had dropped below 13,000 and

Page 16
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

the S&P 500 had crossed into negative territory year-to-date. Similar drops occurred in
virtually every market in the world, with Brazil and Korea being hard-hit. Large daily
drops became common, with, for example, the KOSPI dropping about 7% in one day,
although 2007's largest daily drop by the S&P 500 in the U.S. was in February, a result of
the subprime crisis.

Black Monday has pushed the Indian benchmark among the worst performing
stock indices in 2008. The year-to-date return for the BSE Sensex is a negative 13.55 per
cent and the Nifty is down 15.47 per cent for the same period.

In comparison, the US Dow Jones Industrial Average slipped 8.79 per cent,
Nasdaq 11.77 per cent and the diversified S&P-500 has tumbled 9.75 per cent this year.

While the US benchmarks have been declining since mid-December, the Indian
equities were able to withstand the bear’s onslaught till now. But large-scale selling by
foreign institutional investors over the past week has shaken the confidence on Indian
bourses too.

European stock indices such as UK’s FTSE, German’s Dax and France’s CAC
have tumbled as much as the Indian bourses. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng also witnessed a
sharp fall of 14.5 per cent in the year so far.

Major markets were pummelled, led by banks and mining companies, as concern
that the US will fall into a recession caused major panic among global investors.

Even emerging markets – Brazil, South Korea, Mexico and Russia, have
witnessed a fall in the range of 10-13 per cent this year.

Despite domestic problems, Indian neighbours – Pakistan and Sri Lanka – have
performed better than most of the countries. Karachi’s index dipped only 2.02 per cent.

Thanks to strong crude prices, West Asian stock indices in Amman (Jordan),
Kuwait, Abu Dhabi have generated positive returns in 2008.

Among others markets, Ecuador, Mauritius and Nigeria are also in the positive zone.

Mortgage lenders and home builders fared terribly, but losses cut across sectors,
with some of the worst-hit industries, such as metals & mining companies, having only
the vaguest connection with lending or mortgages.

Stock indices throughout the week

Page 17
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

3.3 Impact on financial institutions

Many banks, mortgage lenders, real estate investment trusts (REIT), and hedge
funds suffered significant losses as a result of mortgage payment defaults or mortgage
asset devaluation. As of February 19, 2008 financial institutions had recognized
subprime-related losses or write-downs exceeding U.S. $150 billion.

Other companies from around the world, such as IKB Deutsche Industriebank
have also suffered significant losses and scores of mortgage lenders have filed for
bankruptcy. Top management has not escaped unscathed, as the CEOs of Merrill Lynch
and Citigroup were forced to resign within a week of each other. Various institutions
follow-up with merger deals.

Page 18
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

Write-downs on the value of loans, MBS and CDOs by Financial institution

Company   Business Type   Loss (Billion $)  

Citigroup investment bank $24.1 bln [65] [66] [67]
Merrill Lynch investment bank $22.5 bln [68] [69]
UBS AG investment bank $18.7 bln [70] [71]
Morgan Stanley investment bank $10.3 bln [72] [73]
Crédit Agricole Bank $4.8 bln [74]
HSBC Bank $3.4 bln [75]
Bank of America Bank $5.28 bln [76]
Deutsche Bank investment bank $3.1 bln [78] [79]
Barclays Capital investment bank $3.1 bln [80]
Bear Stearns investment bank $2.6 bln [81] [82]
Swiss Re re-insurance $1.07 bln [86]
Lehman Brothers investment bank $2.1 bln [87] [88]
JP Morgan Chase investment bank $2.9 bln [90] [91]
Goldman Sachs investment bank $1.5 bln [92] [93]
Credit Suisse bank $3.7 bln [96]
Société Générale investment bank $3.0 bln [109] [110]
BNP Paribas bank $0.870 bln [111] [112]

Businesses filing for bankruptcy

Business   Type   Date  

New Century Financial subprime lender April 2, 2007
American Home Mortgage mortgage lender August 6, 2007
Sentinel Management Group investment fund August 17, 2007
Ameriquest subprime lender August 31, 2007
NetBank on-line bank September 30, 2007
Terra Securities securities November 28, 2007
American Freedom Mortgage subprime lender January 30, 2007
Inc

Page 19
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

3.4 Impact on insurance companies

There is concern that some homeowners are turning to arson as a way to escape
from mortgages they can't or refuse to pay. The FBI reports that arson grew 4% in
suburbs and 2.2% in cities from 2005 to 2006. As of Jan 2008, the 2007 numbers were
not yet available.

Impact on municipal bond "monoline" insurers

secondary cause and effect of the crisis relates to the role of municipal bond
"monoline" insurance corporations. By insuring municipal bond issues, those bonds
achieve higher debt ratings. However, these insurers used premiums to purchase CDO
investments and have suffered significant losses, which brings their ability to insure
bonds into question. Unless these insurers obtain additional capital, rating agencies may
downgrade the bonds they insured or guaranteed. In turn, this may require financial
institutions holding the bonds to lower their valuation or to sell them, as some entities
(such as pension funds) are only allowed to hold the highest-grade bonds. The impact of
such a devaluation on institutional investors and corporations holding the bonds
(including major banks) has been estimated as high as $200 billion. Regulators are taking
action to encourage banks to lend the required capital to certain monoline insurers, to
avoid such an impact.

3.5 Impact on home owners

According to the S&P/Case-Shiller housing price index, by November 2007,

average U.S. housing prices had fallen approximately 8% from their 2006 peak.
However, there was significant variation in price changes across U.S. markets, with many
appreciating and others depreciating. The price decline in December 2007 versus the
year-ago period was 10.4%. Sales volume (units) of new homes dropped by 26.4% in
2007 versus the prior year. By January 2008, the inventory of unsold new homes stood at
9.8 months based on December 2007 sales volume, the highest level since 1981.

Housing prices are expected to continue declining until this inventory of surplus
homes (excess supply) is reduced to more typical levels. As MBS and CDO valuation is
related to the value of the underlying housing collateral, MBS and CDO losses will
continue until housing prices stabilize.

As home prices have declined following the rise of home prices caused by
speculation and as re-financing standards have tightened, a number of homes have been
foreclosed and sit vacant. These vacant homes are often poorly maintained and
sometimes attract squatters and/or criminal activity with the result that increasing

Page 20
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

foreclosures in a neighborhood often serve to further accelerate home price declines in

the area. Rents have not fallen as much as home prices with the result that in some
affluent neighborhoods homes that were formerly owner occupied are now occupied by
renters. In select areas falling home prices along with a decline in the U.S. dollar have
encouraged foreigners to buy homes for either occasional use and/or long term
investments. Additional problems are anticipated in the future from the impending
retirement of the baby boomer generation. It is believed that a significant proportion of
baby boomers are not saving adequately for retirement and were planning on using their
increased property value as a "piggy bank" or replacement for a retirement-savings
account. This is a departure from the traditional American approach to homes where
"people worked toward paying off the family house so they could hand it down to their
children"

3.6 Impact on minorities

There is a disproportionate level of foreclosures in some minority neighborhoods.

About 46% of Hispanics and 55% of blacks who obtained mortgages in 2005 got
higher-cost loans compared with about 17% of whites and Asians, according to Federal
Reserve data. Other studies indicate they would have qualified for lower-rate loans.

3.7 Specific Impacts by Firm or Sector

Wall Street investment banks and other financial institutions around the world
have also been affected. On June 20, 2007, Merrill Lynch seized $800 million in assets
from two Bear Stearns hedge funds that were involved in securities backed by subprime
loans. The two funds are now essentially worthless

American Home Mortgage Investment Corporation (AHMI, Melville, New York)

filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy on August 6, 2007, after a layoff of its employees the week
before. Accredited Home Lenders reported on August 10 that the company expected to
see up to a $60 million loss for the first quarter 2007

On 8 August 2007, Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation (MGIC,

Milwaukee, Wisconsin) announced it would discontinue its purchase of Radian Group
(Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) after suffering a billion-dollar loss of its investment in
Credit-Based Asset Servicing and Securitization (C-BASS, New York City). C-BASS is
seeking to restructure its financing. The MGIC-Radian transaction would have been a
$4.9 billion deal.

Later, on August 9, French bank BNP Paribas stopped valuing three of its funds
and suspended all withdrawals by investors after United States subprime mortgage woes
had caused "a complete evaporation of liquidity".

Page 21
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

Goldman Sachs' $8 billion Global Alpha hedge fund, its largest, reportedly lost
26% in 2007. Later, on August 13, the company announced that a group of investors
invested more in its Global Equity Opportunities fund by infusing $3 billion after it lost
28% of its total value in one week. Also, Citigroup has reported taking $700 million in
losses in its credit business in July and August 2007.

On August 14, several media outlets reported that another fund, Sentinel
Management Group, suspended redemptions for investors and sold off $312 million
worth of assets. Three days later, Sentinel filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
amid ongoing legal action with respect to this move.US and European stock indices
continued to fall. Later that same day Thornburg Mortgage, a jumbo mortgage lender,
announced they were delaying their dividend after facing margin calls and disruptions in
funding mortgages in the commercial paper and asset-backed securities markets.
Thornburg shares fell over 46% in trading on the NYSE.

On August 15, the stock of Countrywide Financial, which is the largest mortgage
lender in the United States, fell around 13% on the New York Stock Exchange, its largest
one-day decline since the 1987 stock market crash, on fears that the company could face
bankruptcy. This comes a day after Countrywide said foreclosures and mortgage
delinquencies had risen to their highest levels since early 2002.

Concerned customers of Northern Rock queuing to withdraw savings from the

bank due to fallout from the subprime crisis
Rams Home Loans Group, an Australian lender, announced on August 16 that the
company was unable to refinance short-term debt as buyers stayed away from the credit
markets. The company said they were unable to sell AUD$ 6.17 billion of extendable
commercial paper, which is the company's largest source of funding for loans. Rams
shares fell as much as 41% on the Australian Stock Exchange. A AUD$ 140 million
private sector bailout by Westpac was announced on October 2 due to the lender's
inability to refinance its loans. The deal valued Rams at AUD$0.40 per share.

On August 29 the Australian Hedge Fund, Basis Capital's "Basis Yield Alpha
Fund" applied for bankruptcy protection. Investors in the fund are unlikely to get any of
their money back as the fund falls under the weight of its exposure to subprime credit in
the US.

United States, Asian, and European stock markets also continued to struggle with
the turmoil in the credit markets into early September. A report on existing home sales
released on September 5 said that the number of Americans buying existing homes had
dropped by its largest amount since 2001, when the report first came into existence.
Earnings estimates from investment banks such as Lehman Brothers and Morgan Stanley
were cut significantly. Homebuilding stocks, such as Lennar and D.R. Horton, continued
to decline.

On September 7, a report by the US Labor Department announced that non-farm

payrolls fell by 4,000 in August 2007, the first month of negative job growth since
Page 22
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

August 2003. The number fell well short of expectations, as analysts were expecting
payrolls to grow by 110,000. The Dow Jones Industrials fell by as much as 180 points on
the news. Cited as a reason for the unexpected weakness in the job market are the
problems in the housing and credit markets.

On September 13, British bank Northern Rock applied to the Bank of England for
emergency funds caused by liquidity problems. Concerned customers produced "an
estimated £2bn withdrawn in just three days".

On October 5, Merrill Lynch announced a US$5.5 billion loss as a consequence

of the subprime crisis, which was revised to $8.4 billion on October 24, a sum that credit
rating firm Standard & Poor's called "startling".

4. ACTIONS TO MANAGE THE CRISIS

 Lenders and homeowners both may benefit from avoiding foreclosure, which is a
costly and lengthy process. Some lenders have taken action to reach out to

Page 23
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

homeowners to provide more favorable mortgage terms (i.e., loan modification or

refinancing). Homeowners have also been encouraged to contact their lenders to
discuss alternatives. Corporations, trade groups, and consumer advocates have
begun to cite statistics on the numbers and types of homeowners assisted by loan
modification programs. There is some dispute regarding the appropriate measures,
sources of data, and adequacy of progress. A report issued in January 2008
showed that mortgage lenders modified 54,000 loans and established 183,000
repayment plans in the third quarter of 2007, a period in which there were
384,000 new foreclosures. Consumer groups claimed the modifications affected
less than 1 percent of the 3 million subprime loans with adjustable rates that were
outstanding in the third quarter.

 Credit rating agencies help evaluate and report on the risk involved with various
investment alternatives. The rating processes can be re-examined and improved to
encourage greater transparency to the risks involved with complex mortgage-
backed securities and the entities that provide them. Rating agencies have recently
begun to aggressively downgrade large amounts of mortgage-backed debt.

 Regulators and legislators can take action regarding lending practices, bankruptcy
protection, tax policies, affordable housing, credit counseling, education, and the
licensing and qualifications of lenders. Regulations or guidelines can also
influence the nature, transparency and regulatory reporting required for the
complex legal entities and securities involved in these transactions. Congress also
is conducting hearings help identify solutions and apply pressure to the various
parties involved.

 The media can help educate the public and parties involved. It can also ensure the
top subject material experts are engaged and have a voice to ensure a reasoned
debate about the pros and cons of various solutions.

 Banks have sought and received additional capital (i.e., cash investments) from
sovereign wealth funds, which are entities that control the surplus savings of
developing countries. An estimated U.S. $69 billion has been invested by these
entities in large financial institutions over the past year. On January 15, 2008,
sovereign wealth funds provided a total of $21 billion to two major U.S. financial
institutions. Such capital is used to help banks maintain required capital ratios (an
important measure of financial health), which have declined significantly due to
subprime loan or CDO losses. Sovereign wealth funds are estimated to control
nearly $2.9 trillion. Much of this wealth is oil and gas related. As they represent
the surplus funds of governments, these entities carry at least the perception that
their investments have underlying political motives.

 Litigation related to the subprime crisis is underway. A study released in February

2008 indicated that 278 civil lawsuits were filed in federal courts during 2007
related to the subprime crisis. The number of filings in state courts were not
quantified by are also believed to be significant. The study found that 43 percent
Page 24
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

of the cases were class actions brought by borrowers, such as those that contended
they were victims of discriminatory lending practices. Other cases include
securities lawsuits filed by investors, commercial contract disputes, employment
class actions, and bankruptcy-related cases. Defendants included mortgage
bankers, brokers, lenders, appraisers, title companies, home builders, servicers,
issuers, underwriters, bond insurers, money managers, public accounting firms,
and company boards and officers.
 Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 : President Bush also signed into law on
February 13, 2008 an economic stimulus package of $168 billion, mainly in the
form of income tax rebates, to help stimulate economic growth.

Bush Administration plan

President George W. Bush announced a plan to voluntarily and temporarily freeze

the mortgages of a limited number of mortgage debtors holding ARMs, declaring "I have
a message for every homeowner worried about rising mortgage payments: The best you
can do for your family is to call 1-800-995-HOPE (sic)" The correct number is 1-888-
995-HOPE. A refinancing facility called FHA-Secure was also created. This is part of an
ongoing collaborative effort between the US Government and private industry to help
some sub-prime borrowers called the Hope Now Alliance.

The Hope Now Alliance released a report in February, 2008 indicating it helped
545,000 subprime borrowers with shaky credit in the second half of 2007, or 7.7 percent
of 7.1 million subprime loans outstanding in September 2007. A spokesperson
acknowledged that much more must be done.

During February 2008, a program called "Project Lifeline" was announced. Six of
the largest U.S. lenders, in partnership with the Hope Now Alliance, agreed to defer
foreclosure actions for 30 days for homeowners 90 or more days delinquent on payments.
The intent of the program was to encourage more loan adjustments, to avoid foreclosures.

The U.S. Treasury Department is working directly with major banks to develop a
systematic means of modifying loans for a significant portion of borrowers facing ARM
increases, rather than working through loans on a case-by-case basis.

President Bush also signed into law on February 13, 2008 an economic stimulus
package of $168 billion, mainly in the form of income tax rebates, to help stimulate
economic growth.

The Federal Reserve

Within the Federal Reserve, Chairman Ben Bernanke signals towards making
interest rate cuts. In early 2008, Ben Bernanke said: "Broadly, the Federal Reserve’s

Page 25
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

response has followed two tracks: efforts to support market liquidity and functioning and
the pursuit of our macroeconomic objectives through monetary policy." Tougher
regulatory standards are proposed. Additionally, a freeze of interest payments on certain
sub-prime loans is announced. On January 22, 2008, the Fed also slashed a key interest
rate (the federal funds rate) by 75 basis points to 3.5%, the biggest cut since 1984,
followed by another cut of 50 basis points on January 30th.

Central banks have conducted open market operations to ensure member banks
have access to funds (i.e., liquidity). These are effectively short-term loans to member
banks collateralized by government securities. Central banks have also lowered the
interest rates charged to member banks (called the discount rate in the U.S.) for short-
term loans. Both measures effectively lubricate the financial system, in two key ways.
First, they help provide access to funds for those entities with illiquid mortgage-backed
assets. This helps lenders, SPE, and SIV avoid selling mortgage-backed assets at a steep
loss. Second, the available funds stimulate the commercial paper market and general
economic activity. Specific responses by central banks are included in the subprime crisis
impact timeline.

Expectations and forecasts

As early as the 2003 Annual Report issued by Fairfax Financial Holdings
Limited, Prem Watsa was raising concerns about securitized products:

"We have been concerned for some time about the risks in asset-backed bonds,
particularly bonds that are backed by home equity loans, automobile loans or credit card
debt (we own no asset-backed bonds). It seems to us that securitization (or the creation of
these asset-backed bonds) eliminates the incentive for the originator of the loan to be
credit sensitive. Take the case of an automobile dealer. Prior to securitization, the dealer
would be very concerned about who was given credit to buy an automobile. With
securitization, the dealer (almost) does not care as these loans can be laid off through
securitization. Thus, the loss experienced on these loans after securitization will no longer
be comparable to that experienced prior to securitization (called a ‘‘moral’’ hazard)...
This is not a small problem. There is $1.0 trillion in asset-backed bonds outstanding as of
December 31, 2003 in the U.S.... Who is buying these bonds? Insurance companies,
money managers and banks – in the main – all reaching for yield given the excellent
ratings for these bonds. What happens if we hit an air pocket? Unlike..."
The legacy of Alan Greenspan has been cast into doubt with Senator Chris Dodd
claiming he created the "perfect storm" Alan Greenspan has remarked that there is a one-
in-three chance of recession from the fallout. Nouriel Roubini, a professor at New York
University and head of Roubini Global Economics, has said that if the economy slips into
recession "then you have a systemic banking crisis like we haven't had since the 1930s"

On September 7, 2007, the Wall Street Journal reported that Alan Greenspan has
said that the current turmoil in the financial markets is in many ways "identical" to the
problems in 1987 and 1998.

Page 26
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

The Associated Press described the current climate of the market on August 13,
2007, as one where investors were waiting for "the next shoe to drop" as problems from
"an overheated housing market and an overextended consumer" are "just beginning to
emerge."Market Watch has cited several economic analysts with Stifel Nicolaus claiming
that the problem mortgages are not limited to the subprime niche saying "the rapidly
increasing scope and depth of the problems in the mortgage market suggest that the entire
sector has plunged into a downward spiral similar to the subprime woes whereby each
negative development feeds further deterioration", calling it a "vicious cycle" and adding
that they "continue to believe conditions will get worse"

As of November 22, 2007, analysts at a leading investment bank estimated losses

on subprime CDO would be approximately U.S. $148 billion. As of December 22, 2007,
a leading business periodical estimated subprime defaults between U.S. $200-300 billion.

Alan Greenspan, the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve, stated: "The
current credit crisis will come to an end when the overhang of inventories of newly built
homes is largely liquidated, and home price deflation comes to an end. That will stabilize
the now-uncertain value of the home equity that acts as a buffer for all home mortgages,
but most importantly for those held as collateral for residential mortgage-backed
securities. Very large losses will, no doubt, be taken as a consequence of the crisis. But
after a period of protracted adjustment, the U.S. economy, and the world economy more
generally, will be able to get back to business."

On March 20, 2008 the Organization for Economic Cooperation and

Development downgraded its economic forecasts for the United States, the Eurozone and
Japan for the first half of 2008.

5. SOME IMPORTANT TIME LINES

5.1 Subprime crisis impact timeline

The subprime crisis impact timeline begins with a context that includes the Dot-
com bubble, Early 2000s recession, United States housing bubble, and the bubble burst
(market correction) in 2005 which resulted in the subprime crisis itself in 2007 and its
consequences.

Context and summary

Page 27
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

 2001–2005: United States housing bubble (part of the world housing bubble)
 2001: US Federal Reserve lowers Federal funds rate 11 times, from 6.5% (May
2000) to 1.75% (December 2001).
 2002: Annual home price appreciation of 10% or more in California, Florida, and
most Northeastern states.
 2004-2005: Arizona, California, Florida, Hawaii, and Nevada record price
increases in excess of 25% per year.
 2005–ongoing: Market correction ("bubble bursting")
 2005: Boom ended August 2005. The booming housing market halted abruptly for
many parts of the U.S. in late summer of 2005.
 2006: Continued market slowdown. Prices are flat, home sales fall, resulting in
inventory buildup. U.S. Home Construction Index is down over 40% as of mid-
August 2006 compared to a year earlier.
 2007: Home sales continue to fall. The plunge in existing-home sales is the
steepest since 1989. In Q1/2007, S&P/Case-Shiller house price index records first
year-over-year decline in nationwide house prices since 1991. The subprime
mortgage industry collapses, and a surge of foreclosure activity (twice as bad as
2006) and rising interest rates threaten to depress prices further as problems in the
subprime markets spread to the near-prime and prime mortgage markets. The U.S.
Treasury secretary calls the bursting housing bubble "the most significant risk to
our economy."
 February–March: Subprime industry collapse; more than 25 subprime lenders
declaring bankruptcy, announcing significant losses, or putting themselves up for
sale.
 April 2: New Century Financial, largest U.S. subprime lender, files for chapter 11
bankruptcy.
 July 19: Dow-Jones closes above 14,000 for the first time in its history.
 August: worldwide "credit crunch" as subprime mortgage backed securities are
discovered in portfolios of banks and hedge funds around the world, from BNP
Paribas to Bank of China. Many lenders stop offering home equity loans and
"stated income" loans. Federal Reserve injects about $100B into the money
supply for banks to borrow at a low rate.
 August 6: American Home Mortgage files for chapter 11 bankruptcy.
 August 7: Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton proposes a $1
billion bailout fund to help homeowners at risk for foreclosure
 August 16: Countrywide Financial Corporation, the biggest U.S. mortgage
lender, narrowly avoids bankruptcy by taking out an emergency loan of $11
billion from a group of banks.
 August 17: Federal Reserve lowers the discount rate by 50 basis points to 5.75%
from 6.25%.
 August 31: President Bush announces a limited bailout of U.S. homeowners
unable to pay the rising costs of their debts. Ameriquest, once the largest
subprime lender in the U.S., goes out of business;

Page 28
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

 September 1–3: Fed Economic Symposium in Jackson Hole, WY addressed the

housing recession that jeopardizes U.S. growth. Several critics argued that the Fed
should use regulation and interest rates to prevent asset-price bubbles, blamed
former Fed-chairman Alan Greenspan's low interest rate policies for stoking the
U.S. housing boom and subsequent bust, and Yale University economist Robert
Shiller warned of possible home price declines of fifty percent.
 September 14: A run on the bank forms at the United Kingdom's Northern Rock
bank precipitated by liquidity problems related to the subprime crisis.
 September 17: Former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan said "we had a bubble in
housing" and warns of "large double digit declines" in home values "larger than
most people expect."
 September 18: The Fed lowers interest rates by half a point (0.5%) in an attempt
to limit damage to the economy from the housing and credit crises.
 September 28: Television finance personality Jim Cramer warns Americans on
The Today Show, "don't you dare buy a home—you'll lose money," causing a
furor among realtors.
 September 30: Affected by the spiraling mortgage and credit crises, Internet
banking pioneer Net Bank goes bankrupt, and the Swiss bank UBS announced
that it lost US$690 million in the third quarter.
 October 10: Hope Now Alliance was created by the US Government and private
industry to help some sub-prime borrowers.
 October 15–17: A consortium of U.S. banks backed by the U.S. government
announced a "super fund" of $100 billion to purchase mortgage backed securities
whose mark-to-market value plummeted in the subprime collapse.[19] Both Fed
chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson expressed alarm
about the dangers posed by the bursting housing bubble; Paulson said "the
housing decline is still unfolding and I view it as the most significant risk to our
economy. … The longer housing prices remain stagnant or fall, the greater the
penalty to our future economic growth."
 October 31: Federal Reserve lowers the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to
4.5%.
 November 1: Federal Reserve injects $41B into the money supply for banks to
borrow at a low rate. The largest single expansion by the Fed since $50.35B on
September 19, 2001.
 December 6:President Bush announced a plan to voluntarily and temporarily
freeze the mortgages of a limited number of mortgage debtors holding adjustable
rate mortgages (ARM). He also ask Members Of Congress to: 1. pass legislation
to modernize the FHA. 2. temporarily reform the tax code to help homeowners
refinance during this time of housing market stress. 3. pass funding to support
mortgage counseling. 4. pass legislation to reform Government Sponsored
Enterprises (GSEs) like Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

5.2 Central Bank Response Timeline

Page 29
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

Central banks around the world have begun coordinated efforts of their own to
increase liquidity in their own currencies to stabilize foreign exchange rates (thus
stemming a further fall in the American dollar and diminishing any incentive to sell them
off) and prevent the probable significant global consequences a run on the American
dollar would cause. It marks the first time the American, European, and Japanese central
banks have taken such actions together since the aftermath of the September 11, 2001
terrorist attacks.

As of August 10, 2007, the United States Federal Reserve (Fed) has injected a
combined 43 billion USD, the European Central Bank (ECB) 156 billion euros (214.6
billion USD), and the Bank of Japan 1 trillion Yen (8.4 billion USD). Smaller amounts
have come from the central banks of Australia, and Canada.

Fed injected $30 billion to ensure the effective Federal funds rate trades at the
target rate (it had begun to trade significantly above target). It later injected $38 billion to
lower the effective federal funds rate and continued to inject various amounts thereafter.

The European Central Bank (ECB) injected €61 billion, and the Federal Reserve
injected $68 billion into their respective banking systems on Friday, 10 August 2007 in
order to calm their markets, on top of the €95 billion the ECB had injected on Thursday,
9 August 2007. The Federal Reserve further injected $24 billion into the US financial
system that day. On 13 August, the ECB injected another €47.67 billion into the banking
system and noted that credit conditions were "normalizing" while the Bank of Japan
injected another ¥600 billion.

On August 17, the Federal Reserve cut the discount rate by half a percent to
5.75% from 6.25% while leaving the federal funds rate unchanged in an attempt to
stabilize financial markets.

A September 5 report by Barclays Capital stated that since the Federal Reserve
and European Central Bank had injected funds into their respective financial systems,
conditions in the credit market have gotten even worse, not better. The LIBOR rate, the
interest rate that banks charge each other rose to 5.72%, the highest it had been in seven
years. However, the Beige Book, a survey compiled by the Federal Reserve about
business conditions in different parts of the United States, concluded that the credit
crunch has had a "limited" impact so far on the rest of the economy

On September 6, after having already injected billions of dollars over the past
weeks, "the Federal Reserve added $31.25 billion in temporary reserves to the US money
markets..the latest move to keep credit markets from drying up." These reserves are
temporary loans to banks, using securities as collateral. The loans must be repaid within
two weeks.

December 11th, Fed sets up TAF as an added tool to alleviate financial strain.

Page 30
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

6. LIST OF ENTITIES INVOLVED IN 2007 FINANCE CRISES

A list of companies, non profits organization, governmental and quasi-governmental

agencies involved in the various economic and financial crises of 2007. This is
categorized by sector with the entity's largest interest.

United States
National Builders

1. Beazer Homes USA

Page 31
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

2. Hovnanian Enterprises
3. Lennar Corporation
4. KB Home
5. NVR
6. Pulte Homes
7. Toll Brothers

Real estate and appraisal

1. Coldwell Banker
2. Prudential Real Estate

Associations

1. American Society of Appraisers

2. Appraisal Institute
3. National Association of Home Builders
4. National Association of Realtors
5. Real Estate Counseling Group of America
6. Urban Land Institute

Subprime lenders
1. New Century Financial Corporation
2. American Home Mortgage Investment Corporation
3. Accredited Home Lenders
4. Countrywide Financial
5. Northern Rock (UK)
6. Ameriquest
7. E*TRADE
8. Option One
9. American Freedom Mortgage, Inc.

Other lenders
1. Washington Mutual
2. Suntrust
3. Luminent Mortgage Capital
4. Aegis Wholesale
5. 1st National Bank of Arizona
6. GreenPoint Mortgage
7. Velocity Commercial Lender
8. Fremont Investment & Loan
9. ResMAE Mortgage Corp

Page 32
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

Insurers
1. Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation

Banks
1. BNP Paribas, , France
2. JPMorgan Chase, USA
3. Citigroup, USA
4. Credit Suisse, Switzerland
5. Deutsche Bank, Germany
6. IKB Industriekredit-Bank, Germany
7. Bear Stearns
8. Sächsische Landesbank, Germany
9. Goldman Sachs
10. Lehman Brothers
11. Netbank, USA
12. Banca March, Spain
13. UBS, Switzerland
14. Northern Rock, UK
15. HSBC, UK
16. Merrill Lynch . USA

Credit rating agencies

1. Moody's
2. Standard & Poor's
3. Fitch Ratings

Governmental and quasi-governmental

Central Banks

1. Federal Reserve Bank

o Federal Reserve Bank of New York
2. European Central Bank
3. Bank of Japan

Government sponsored enterprises

1. Freddie Mac, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

Page 33
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

 www.economist.com

 http://news.bbc.co.uk

 http://wikipedia.org

 www.livemint.com
 www.investopedia.com

 www.federalreserve.gov
 www.marketwatch.com

 www.bloomberg.com

Page 34
 IMPACT OF SUB PRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS
ON GLOBAL ECONOMY

 www.securitisation.co.in

Page 35