Arab Existentialism: An Invisible Chapter in The Intellectual History of Decolonization
Arab Existentialism: An Invisible Chapter in The Intellectual History of Decolonization
Arab Existentialism: An Invisible Chapter in The Intellectual History of Decolonization
YOAV DI-CAPUA
students, teachers, and journalists who came to celebrate a national event. “Duktura fi-l-Falsafa,” al-
Ahram, May 30, 1944, 2.
2 Even though major texts on decolonization do not focus on the Middle East, it was nonetheless
an essential player in this process. Mark T. Berger, “After the Third World? History, Destiny and the
Fate of Third Worldism,” Third World Quarterly 25, no. 1 (2004): 9–39.
1061
1062 Yoav Di-Capua
colonization (New York, 1998); David Birmingham, The Decolonization of Africa (London, 1995); John
Springhall, Decolonization since 1945: The Collapse of European Overseas Empires (New York, 2001); and
Martin Shipway, Decolonization and Its Impact: A Comparative Approach to the End of the Colonial
Empires (Malden, Mass., 2008).
6 Taking solidarity and resistance to colonial Europe as the overarching subject matter of their
books, scholars of Third-Worldism further reduced the complex process of decolonization to the level
of a power struggle. See, for instance, Vijay Prashad, The Darker Nations: A People’s History of the Third
World (New York, 2007).
John Darwin, Britain and Decolonisation: The Retreat from Empire in the Post-War World (New York,
1988); Dietmar Rothermund, The Routledge Companion to Decolonization (Hoboken, N.J., 2006); Pra-
senjit Duara, ed., Decolonization: Perspectives from Now and Then (London, 2004); James D. Le Sueur,
ed., The Decolonization Reader (New York, 2003); Robert J. C. Young, Postcolonialism: An Historical
Introduction (Oxford, 2001); Christopher E. Goscha and Christian Ostermann, eds., Connecting His-
tories: Decolonization and the Cold War in Southeast Asia, 1945–1962 (Stanford, Calif., 2009). However,
for some attempts to account for the role of ideas beyond anticolonial nationalism, see Clive J. Christie,
Ideology and Revolution in Southeast Asia, 1900–1980: Political Ideas of the Anti-Colonial Era (Richmond,
UK, 2001); and James D. Le Sueur, Uncivil War: Intellectuals and Identity Politics during the Decolo-
nization of Algeria (Philadelphia, 2001).
8 As one critic put it, “It would be useful if post-colonial scholarship made more effort to situate
these writers within the class structure of their home societies and the cultural context of a transnational
intelligentsia so as to avoid simplistic generalizations that their work embodies some nationalist or ‘Third
World’ essence.” Dane Kennedy, “Imperial History and Post-Colonial Theory,” in James D. Le Sueur,
ed., The Decolonization Reader (New York, 2003), 1–22, here 17. Having said that, the Subaltern Studies
Group and a few others in South Asia have tried to “rehabilitate” local thought and capture the mental/
spiritual world of the subaltern. Their consequent claim was that the subaltern did not behave as a
colonized subject and retained his or her own notions of community, politics, and culture. Hence their
argument that colonialism involved dominance without hegemony. Ranajit Guha, Dominance without
Hegemony: History and Power in Colonial India (Cambridge, Mass., 1997); Sudipta Kaviraj, The Unhappy
Consciousness: Bankimchandra Chattopadhyay and the Formation of Nationalist Discourse in India (Delhi,
1995).
9 Tackling some of the same problems, Frederick Cooper observed that “Colonial history in the
era of decolonization suffered a double form of occlusion. From the 1950s into the 1970s, the idea of
modernization occluded the colonial. In the 1980s and 1990s the idea of modernity occluded history.”
Cooper, Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History (Berkeley, Calif., 2005), 53. Recent schol-
arship includes Piero Gleijeses, Conflicting Missions: Havana, Washington, and Africa, 1959–1976 (Cha-
pel Hill, N.C., 2002); Matthew Connelly, A Diplomatic Revolution: Algeria’s Fight for Independence and
the Origins of the Post–Cold War Era (Oxford, 2002); Todd Shepard, The Invention of Decolonization:
The Algerian War and the Remaking of France (Ithaca, N.Y., 2006); Frederick Cooper, Decolonization
and African Society: The Labor Question in French and British Africa (Cambridge, 1996); Gary Wilder,
The French Imperial Nation-State: Negritude and Colonial Humanism between the Two World Wars (Chi-
cago, 2005); and Karen Bouwer, Gender and Decolonization in the Congo: The Legacy of Patrice Lumumba
(New York, 2010).
AS GERMAN FORCES HEADED TOWARD Paris in June 1940, the Russian émigré phi-
where he joined an established cohort of French scholars, including Émile Bréhier and Louis Rougier.
This time he would stay until 1940. As a token of recognition for Lalande’s unflinching commitment to
Egyptian education, the Islamic philosopher Mustafa Abd al-Raziq conceded the position of chair to
him. Abd al-Rahman Badawi, Sirat Hayati, 2 vols. (Beirut, 2000), 1: 61–62; Muhammad Mubarak, al-
Jabiri: Bayna Turuhat Lalande wa Jan-Biyajih (Beirut, 2000).
12 After becoming public in 1925, Fuad University voraciously absorbed new academic disciplines
and experienced a rapid process of academic professionalization. Donald Malcolm Reid, Cairo University
and the Making of Modern Egypt (Cambridge, 1990).
13 Given his status as a foreign intellectual whose major academic degrees were from Germany,
Koyré was unable to find a permanent position at a major French university. This was one of the reasons
why he, and many other European intellectuals, periodically traveled to teach in Egypt. This was the
third time that Koyré had been invited to teach in the university’s Department of Philosophy. While in
Egypt he worked for the Comité national d’Égypte de la France libre. Badawi, Sirat Hayati, 1: 62. For
Koyré’s biography, see the online archive of the Centre Alexandre Koyré at the École des hautes études
en sciences sociales, www.koyre.cnrs.fr. Ethan Kleinberg, Generation Existential: Heidegger’s Philosophy
in France, 1927–1961 (Ithaca, N.Y., 2005), 59.
14 The phenomenological open-ended manner of thinking departed significantly from the theoret-
ical cognition of knowledge and moved toward the practical concerns of everyday life. This shift was
entirely new to French philosophy of the 1930s, which was still focused on Bergson. Indeed, aspiring
intellectuals such as Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Raymond Aron were bored by Bergsonian philosophy
and were ill-prepared, philosophically speaking, to deal with the realities of the 1930s. As Aron succinctly
put it, in German philosophy he “found everything I could not find in France.” Kleinberg, Generation
Existential, 89. J. J. K. [Joseph J. Kockelmans], “Phenomenology,” in Robert Audi, ed., The Cambridge
Dictionary of Philosophy (Cambridge, 1999), 664 –666.
15 Koyré later held a position at the École pratiques des hautes études. Kleinberg, Generation Ex-
istential, 59.
16 Quoted in Tom Rockmore, Heidegger and French Philosophy: Humanism, Antihumanism and Being
had been seen in France as an outdated romantic philosopher. Koyré’s journal covered the same terrain.
He was aided by other graduates of Husserl’s circle, including Jean Hering, and by Émile Bréhier, who
also taught in Cairo. Michael S. Roth, Knowing and History: Appropriations of Hegel in Twentieth Century
France (Ithaca, N.Y., 1988), 2–9, 97.
18 On Alexandre Kojève, see Vincent Descombes, Modern French Philosophy, trans. L. Scott-Fox and
of the 1950s and 1960s: Georges Bataille, Jacques Lacan, Raymond Queneau, Maurice Merleau-Ponty,
Eric Weil, André Breton, and Emmanuel Lévinas. “What happened in that seminar between 1933 and
1939 changed the face of modern French philosophy”; Kleinberg, Generation Existential, 65–66, 69.
20 Originally, Badawi worked with Lalande, who was still committed to Bergson’s philosophy. La-
lande hoped that by teaching his Les théories de l’induction et de l’expérimentation (Paris, 1929), he could
steer the scholarly habits and intellectual orientation of students toward a pre–World War I French
philosophical tradition. When Badawi evinced an interest in existentialism, Lalande instructed him to
shy away from the “moda” of Heidegger and Jaspers and settle for a more canonical topic. After some
negotiation, Lalande reluctantly agreed on “Death in Contemporary Philosophy.” Yet with war raging
in Europe, Lalande decided to leave for France, and Koyré took over his post. Badawi, Sirat Hayati, 1:
63.
21 Hassan Hanafi, “Phenomenology and Islamic Philosophy,” in Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, ed., Phe-
other words, Badawi subscribed to two of the main themes of existentialism: first,
existence precedes essence (i.e., who a human being is [his or her essence] is the result
of his or her choices [existence]); and second, time is of the essence (i.e., human beings
are time-bound, and the lived time that they experience is different from measured
clock time).22 Yet by the time Badawi had come around to this new way of thinking,
of “real” time that eludes mathematics and science and inner life as a kind of duration, the two differed
markedly in terms of their understanding of human subjectivity as the vessel of time. Characteristically
immodest, Badawi preferred to think of his work as “complementary to that of Heidegger.” Badawi, Sirat
Hayati, 1: 179–180. See Badawi, Le problème de la mort dans la philosophie existentielle, 1–7.
23 In July 1941, Charles de Gaulle visited Cairo and enlisted Koyré in the effort to represent the
cause of a free France in the United States. Koyré later held a one-year position at the Institute of
Advanced Studies at Princeton University. He never returned to teach in the Middle East. I. Bernard
Cohen and Marshall Clagett, “Alexandre Koyré (1892–1964): Commemoration,” Isis 57, no. 2 (Summer
1966): 157–166; John Herivel, “Alexandre Koyré (1892–1964),” British Journal for the History of Science
2, no. 3 (June 1965): 257–259; John E. Murdoch, “Alexandre Koyré, 1892–1964,” Proceedings and Ad-
dresses of the American Philosophical Association 38 (1964 –1965): 98–99.
24 Some of Koyré’s colleagues, including Heidegger’s translator Henry Corbin, were Orientalists,
and the possibility of making such intellectual connections was viewed with excitement. Badawi, Sirat
Hayati, 1: 63–65.
25 Ibid., 1: 153–155.
26 Badawi also published a short essay that was based on his dissertation and summarized his phi-
losophy in accessible terms: Abd al-Rahman Badawi, “Khulasat Madhhabina al-Wujudi: al-Zaman al-
Wujudi,” in Badawi, Dirasat fi-l-Falsafa al-Wujudiya (Cairo, 1966), 236–263, here 236.
27 “ . . . in which a relationship is not that of one subject to another or between the subject and things
but a relationship between the subject and itself.” Ibid., 239. See also Abd al-Rahman Badawi, al-Zaman
al-Wujudi (Cairo, 1955), 153–239. Interestingly, with the approval of Taha Husayn, Badawi used the
medieval Islamic term Aniya to Arabize Heidegger’s Dasein.
reflection and responsibility). By the time Badawi had been awarded his doctorate,
he was already being celebrated as Egypt’s first modern philosopher.
It was now 1944, and Badawi was a busy man, traveling, lecturing, and publishing
at an incredible pace. His major project was aimed at achieving an intellectual syn-
thesis between Sufism and existential philosophy.28 He viewed both systems of
taught logic in the tradition of Ibn Sina (980–1037) and offered close, and sometime excessive, readings
of original texts. He was also interested in mysticism, or Sufism, a topic that Badawi would later explore
in connection with existential philosophy. In a way, by attempting to fuse existentialism with Sufism,
Badawi sought to bring his two mentors, Abd al-Raziq and Koyré, together. For Abd al-Raziq’s bi-
ography, see Ahmad Zakariyya al-Shalaq, al-Shaykh Mustafa Abd al-Raziq wa Mudhakaratihi: Aql Mus-
tanir Tahta al-Amama (Cairo, 2006), 13–56. Ibrahim Madkur, “Mustafa Abd al-Raziq: Rais Madrasa,”
in al-Majlis al-Ala li-l- Thaqafa, al-Shaykh al-Akbar Mustafa Abd al-Raziq: Mufakiran wa Adabiyan wa
Muslihan (Cairo, 1982), 7–11, here 8; Badawi, Sirat Hayati, 1: 58–59.
29 Simultaneously, he also perceived individual subjectivity as a starting point for philosophy and,
more broadly, as “the only true existence.” Although up until this point Bergson was quite influential
in Arab intellectual circles, Badawi parted with Bergsonian philosophy, aspects of which he now crit-
icized as mere “logical formulations” of existence. Abd al-Rahman Badawi, al-Insaniyya wa-l-Wujudiya
fi-l-Fikr al-Arabi (Cairo, 1947), 68, 94 –95; Charles D. Smith, Islam and the Search for Social Order in
Modern Egypt: A Biography of Muhammad Husayn Haykal (Albany, N.Y., 1983), especially chap. 6.
30 In Badawi’s words, the goal was to “establish a comprehensive philosophy for our generation.”
fledged analysis of subjectivity. Badawi, al-Insaniya wa-l-Wujudiya, 68–71, 96–97, 103–104, 107–140. See
also his exploration of the “Perfect Man” doctrine in al-Insan al-Kamil fi-l-Islam (Cairo, 1950).
33 The first substantial commentary on Heidegger in any language was written in Japan. Ko ichi
Tsujimura, “Martin Heidegger’s Thinking and Japanese Philosophy,” Epoché: A Journal for the History
of Philosophy 12, no. 2 (2008): 349–357. For a revisionist assessment of the relationship between
Heidegger, East Asian thought, and comparative philosophy, see Stella Sandford, “Going Back:
Heidegger, East Asia and ‘the West,’ ” Radical Philosophy 120 (July/August 2003): 11–22.
34 Philosophical and legal synthesis had been on the minds of Arab intellectuals since the 1890s
and was especially promoted by the famous reformist Shaykh Muhammad Abduh (d. 1905). Friedrich
Nietzsche, The Use and Abuse of History (New York, 1957), 21–22.
35 “Hiwar ma al-Mufakkir al-Taqaddumi Mahmud Amin al-Alim,” Adab wa Naqd 1, no. 21 (1986):
philosophy and was not concerned with the issue of synthesis and compatibility with Islamic philosophy.
While serving as a diplomat during the late 1940s, he assisted Eleanor Roosevelt in drafting the United
Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Habib C. Malik, “The Reception of Kierkegaard in
the Arab World,” in Jon Stewart, ed., Kierkegaard’s International Reception, vol. 3: The Near East, Asia,
Australia and the Americas (Farnham, UK, 2009), 39–95, here 41– 49. For other young Arab philosophers
who applied phenomenology to Islamic philosophy, see Hanafi, “Phenomenology and Islamic Philos-
ophy.”
37 By 1950, Badawi had published fourteen short books on philosophy. His most popular book was
al-Insaniyya wa-l-Wujudiya.
38 The great irony was that in his personal life during the 1940s, Badawi was heavily involved in
radical, and sometimes violent, nationalist organizations. By his own admission, he was a member of the
semi-fascist “Young Egypt,” and early on he had been a Nazi sympathizer. Badawi, Sirat Hayati, 1:
213–223.
39 Mourad Wahba, “Contemporary Moslem Philosophies in North Africa,” in Emmanuel Chukwudi
by way of philosophy and added: “I do not appreciate him at all philosophically.” Sirat Hayati, 1: 183.
it was initially met with skepticism by established writers. The text that represented
Sartre in the Middle East was not his major philosophical oeuvre, Being and Noth-
ingness (1943), which was not even translated until 1966, but his 1945 contributions
to Les Temps modernes, which were later delivered as public lectures and published
as Qu’est-ce que la littérature?41 As far as mainstream Arab thinkers were concerned,
41 However, in a series of critical essays on Sartre’s existential philosophy, Naguib Baladi referred
to Being and Nothingness. Baladi, “Jean-Paul Sartre wa mawaqifuhu,” al-Katib al-Misri, April 1946, 427–
434. See also the subsequent articles in June and July 1946, 50–59 and 277–283 respectively.
42 The nahda (Renaissance) was a mid-nineteenth-century project of cultural modernization. Arab
intellectual intellectuals later expanded its meaning to cover the Arab experience of modernity as a
whole. The history, meaning, and scope of the nahda are currently being reevaluated to the extent that
Arab intellectuals often speak of various nahdas. For a standard, but entirely outdated, history of the
nahda, see Albert Hourani, Arabic Thought in the Liberal Age, 1798–1939 (1962; rev. ed., Cambridge,
1989). See also Elizabeth Suzanne Kassab, Contemporary Arab Thought: Cultural Critique in Contem-
porary Perspective (New York, 2009), chap. 1.
43 In Sartre’s classic existentialist novel The Age of Reason (1945), the protagonist, Mathieu, fa-
mously exclaims: “I am not proud of my life, and I’m penniless. My freedom? It’s a burden to me; for
years past I have been free, and to no purpose. I simply long to exchange it for a good sound certainty
. . . I agree with you that no one can be a man who has not discovered something for which he is prepared
to die.” The novel is indebted to the main ideas of Being and Nothingness. Jean-Paul Sartre, The Age
of Reason, trans. Eric Sutton (1947; repr., New York, 2001), 122.
44 Even though it is often understood in this way, Sartre’s notion of commitment was far from a
straightforward call for politics. In fact, it was just one of the essential elements in his quest for au-
thenticity or, in his words, the “complete consciousness of being embarked.” Nonetheless, because Sartre
led a politically engaged life, his non-political meanings of existentialism were easy to ignore. David E.
Cooper, Existentialism: A Reconstruction (Oxford, 1990), 172–177.
45 Taha Husayn, “al-Adab bayna al-Itisal wa-l-Infisal,” al-Katib al-Misri, August 1946, 373–388.
labor was to become the focus of a fierce generational debate. Lastly, maintaining
his focus on his mission to discredit committed literature, Husayn criticized Sartre’s
unfortunate exclusion of poetry and the visual arts from the categories of committed
literary engagement.46
But Husayn also ventured into the political sphere. The overwhelming demand
(as well as other non-representational arts, including music) from the list of committed modes of ex-
pression. Although he later reversed his position, Arab critics of all stripes found the omission of po-
etry—historically a major form of committed expression in Islamic culture—incomprehensible. Anwar
al-Maddawi and Abd al-Wahhab al-Bayati were among those who critiqued Sartre. Al-Maddawi, “al-
Adab al-Multazim,” al-Adab, February 1953, 14 –15; Barada, “Tahawwulat mafhum al-iltizam fi-l-adab
al-Arabi al-hadith,” in Barada, ed., Tahawwulat Mafhum al-Iltizam fi-l-Adab al-Arabi al-Hadith (Beirut,
2003), 8– 47, here 37; Abd al-Wahhab al-Bayati, Tajribati al-shiriya (Beirut, 1968), 37.
47 Husayn never acknowledged the limitations of the nahda to engender positive political change
through ordinary parliamentary life. He had already published Mustaqbal al-Thaqafa fi Misr (The Future
of Culture in Egypt ) (Cairo, 1938), a daring defense of the nahda that was nonetheless oblivious of the
main problems of the postcolonial era. This blindness characterized other nahdawi figures as well and
put them on a collision course with the younger generation, whose belief in democratic constitutional
life was gradually eroding.
48 Salama Musa saw Sartre’s commitment as a model for intellectual action, which he himself prac-
ticed throughout his life. His systematic criticism of the monarchy landed him in jail. Musa, Haula
alamuni (Cairo, 1966), 271–280; Musa, al-Adab li-l-Shab (Cairo, 1961), 12–13.
49 Abbas Mahmud al-Aqqad, Aqaid al-Mufakkirin fi-l- Qarn al-Ishrin (Cairo, 1968), 141–155. See
a reprint of two essays from the late 1940s, al-Aqqad, Bayna al-Kutub wa-l-Nas (Beirut, 1966), 15–33.
50 Originally coined as the Arabic term for the French engagement, iltizam ultimately prevailed at
the expense of the term indiwa. Husayn, “al-Adab bayna al-Itisal wa-l-Infisal.”
51 After the 1952 Revolution in Egypt, however, Badawi was asked to serve on the committee that
drafted the new constitution and contribute his ideas about freedom and duties. That was his only
political engagement with Egypt’s revolutionary regime. This constitution was never implemented.
Malik, “The Reception of Kierkegaard in the Arab World,” 62.
52 David Tresilian, “Ismail Sabri Abdullah: Mapping the Arab Future,” al-Ahram Weekly, July 4,
1991.
53 Contrary to many studies on Third-Worldism, the movement did not simply start with the drama
of Bandung; it began with the formation of an international intelligentsia based in Europe. See, for
instance, Prashad, The Darker Nations.
54 For café existentialism, see Cooper, Existentialism, 2, 12, 96, 170, 171.
55 For example, from Tunisia, al-Shadhali al-Qalibi (future minister of culture), Ahmad bin Salif
(minister of finance), and Mahmud Masadi (playwright and future minister of education); from Mo-
rocco, Abdallah Ibrahim (future prime minister). Badawi, Sirat Hayati, 2: 195.
56 For the postcolonial generation and the Third World, see Samir Amin, Mudhakkirati (Beirut,
2006), 75–89.
and the strict code of social, and in particular sexual, behavior at home periodically
surfaced in his correspondence. In December 1949, he wrote to his Egyptian col-
league Anwar al-Maddawi: “Here they cherish affection and love as part of their
life, whereas we in the East renounce this quality.”57 Visibly scandalized, a group of
visiting Egyptian journalists wrote home that existentialism was not so much a phi-
57 Ahmad Muhammad, Anwar al-Maddawi: Asruhu al-Adabi wa Asrar Masatih (al-Riyad, 1988),
193, 209. See also Suhayl Idris, Dhikrayat al-Adab wa-l-Hubb (Beirut, 2002), 85–87.
58 Badawi, Sirat Hayati, 2: 184.
59 Simone de Beauvoir, All Said and Done (New York, 1974), 378.
60 For a debate on this issue, see “Marakat al-Wujudiya,” al-Adab, November 1955, 72–73.
61 His letters gave his friends the impression that Paris was an endless carnival. Al-Maddawi half-
jokingly inquired: “Are you spending your time in the nests of the existentialists, have you seen Simone
de Beauvoir, have you walked behind the coffin of André Gide?” Muhammad, Anwar al-Maddawi, 190;
Idris, Dhikrayat al-adab wa-l-Hubb, 103.
62 Muhammad, Anwar al-Maddawi, 196, 207, 210; Idris, Dhikrayat al-Adab wa-l-Hubb, 106.
63 M. M. Badawi, A Short History of Modern Arabic Literature (Oxford, 1993).
The present situation of Arab countries makes it imperative for every citizen, each in his own
field, to mobilize all his efforts for the express object of liberating the homeland, raising its
political, social and intellectual level. In order that literature may be truthful it is essential
that it should not be isolated from the society in which it exists . . . The kind of literature which
this Review calls for and encourages is the literature of commitment (iltizam) which issues
from Arab society and pours back into it.66
A near-copy of Sartre’s agenda for Les Tempes modernes, al-Adab’s message spread
through Cairo, Baghdad, and other intellectual centers with incredible speed. Its
premise was that Arab culture was in a state of deep crisis, and that intellectuals
could change that situation through writing.67
One of the most important expressions of these concerns, and the one that Hu-
sayn feared the most, was the accusation by young writers that members of the old-
guard udaba were living in an ivory tower. Over the next two years, a specific debate
about the difference between writers’ “detachment,” “involvement,” and “engage-
ment” would take place in the Arab world.68 As part of their plan for cultural re-
newal, the younger generation reintroduced Sartre’s old question: What do we write,
why, and for whom? In December 1954, Idris invited Husayn to publicly debate these
questions.69
Husayn accepted the invitation and arrived in Beirut for what would prove to be
a famous debate with the literary critic Raif Khuri. They delivered separate lectures:
in “The Man of Letters Writes to the Masses,” Khuri preached iltizam and popular
action, while in “The Man of Letters Writes to the Elite,” Husayn endorsed political
64 Badawi, Sirat Hayati, 2: 194.
65 Muhammad, Anwar al-Maddawi, 231–232.
66 Other parts of the manifesto read: “It is the conviction of this Review that literature is an in-
tellectual activity directed to a great and noble end, which is that of effective literature that interacts
with society: it influences society just as much as it is influenced by it . . . The main aim of this Review
is to provide a platform for those fully conscious writers who live the experience of their age and who
could be regarded as its witness. In reflecting the needs of Arab society and in expressing its preoc-
cupations they pave the way for the reformers to put things right with all the effective means available.”
Quoted in M. M. Badawi, “Commitment in Contemporary Arabic Literature,” Cahiers d’histoire mon-
diale 14, no. 4 (1972): 858–879, here 868.
67 “Mihnat al-Adab,” al-Adab, April 1953, 70–71; “Shakawa al-Adab al-Arabi al-Hadith,” al-Adab,
May 1953, 1–5; “Azmat al-Majallat al-Adabiyya fi-l-Alam al-Arabi,” al-Adab, October 1953, 12–16;
Raja al-Naqqash, “fi Azmat al-Naqd al-Arabi al-Muasir,” al-Adab, November 1954, 8–10, 63–66.
68 For a review of the Iraqi debate in the newspaper al-Naba, see “Muhimat al-Adab wa Wajib
neutrality and what he called elitism.70 Husayn conceded the debate, and the triumph
of iltizam and, respectively, of Idris’s journal was secured. This event also signified
the marginalization of the old-guard intelligentsia and its two leading periodicals,
al-Risala and al-Thaqafa, which ceased publication around that time. With this shift,
there was talk of Beirut’s becoming the capital of Arab thought, at the expense of
As for me, I did not understand existentialism as a philosophy but as a social and political
doctrine which put the values of liberty and responsibility, so urgently needed in the Arab
world, into the center of ethical behavior.76
AS LONG AS IN MOST Arab states a sizable peasantry was still exploited by landed
elites—as long, that is, as social justice was still a central concern—Marxism and
70 For the complete texts, see the May 1955 special issue of al-Adab. See also the discussion in Salma
Jayyusi, Trends and Movements in Modern Arabic Poetry, 2 vols. (Leiden, 1977), 2: 576.
71 “Liman wa Limadha Naktub?,” al-Adab, November 1954, 4 –7; “al-Zaama al-Adabiyya bayna
Bayrut wa-l-Qahira,” al-Adab, February 1954, 69–70; “al-Masuliyya fi-l-Adab,” al-Adab, August 1954,
17.
72 Al-Adab, November 1955, 72–73.
73 For a critical review of the translation, see Halil al-Hindawi, “Ma Huwa al-Adab?,” al-Adab,
osophical works in translation. See, for instance, “Falsafat al-Zawahir,” al-Adab, August 1953, 52–60;
Renè Habashi, “Thalathat Rijal iza al-Abth,” al-Adab, March 1954, 10–15.
76 Verena Klemm, “Different Notions of Commitment (Iltiza m) and Committed Literature (al-adab
al-multazim) in the Literary Circles of the Mashriq,” Middle Eastern Literatures 3, no. 1 (January 2000):
51–62, here 55. Yet in 2003 he defended the reduction of existentialism to iltizam. Suhayl Idris, “Abtal
Sartre: Laysu Kainat Tajridiyya,” in Barada, Tahawwulat Mafhum al-Iltizam fi-l-Adab al-Arabi
al-Hadith, 48–59.
communism remained highly potent forces. Although Marxism was often repressed
and was politically outlawed in Egypt, Syria, and Iraq, it had a solid base of support
among the literary elite.77 Thus it was only a matter of time until these thinkers
reacted to the tide of al-Adab’s existentialism, and to a lesser extent to that of
Badawi. Their reaction was to appropriate existentialism and change its meaning,
73–85; Joel Beinin and Zachary Lockman, Workers on the Nile: Nationalism, Islam and the Egyptian
Working Class, 1882–1954 (Princeton, N.J., 1987), 310–362; Selma Botman, The Rise of Egyptian Com-
munism, 1939–1970 (Syracuse, N.Y., 1988).
78 See Sulayman al-Hakim, Itirafat Shaykh al-Shuyuiyin al-Arab Mahmud Amin al-Alim (Cairo,
2006), 36.
79 For Idris’s invitation letters to Husayn, see Sabir Arab and Shalaq, Awraq Taha Husayn, 1: 246,
17–37, 56–63. See also the introduction by the Marxist Lebanese critic Husayn Muruwa, 5–15.
82 Pierre Cachia, An Overview of Modern Arabic Literature (Edinburgh, 1990), 18–19.
83 The book was originally published in Beirut and was extensively debated there. The first edition
17–19.
did not exist in our old poetry, and the metaphysical revolt against reality as a whole
. . . led us to discover the wretched reality in which the masses live.”85
This discovery prompted Marxists to argue that socially committed literary con-
tent overrode the uncommitted and free-floating nature of intellectual activity and
thus necessitated a new form of expression—namely, socialist realism. A year later,
Camus’s individualism to heart, such as Badr Shakir al-Sayyab, Khalil al-Khuri, and Adunis. Jayyusi,
Trends and Movements in Modern Arabic Poetry, 2: 644 –648.
88 Al-Alim and Anis, Fi-l-Thaqafa al-Misriyya, 63–64.
89 Ibid., 67.
90 The holistic and all-encompassing terms of discussion (“objective truthfulness of human reality”)
Badawi (and of course for Heidegger himself) Dasein was an un-conscious subject and a way of being.
In his 1947 Letter on Humanism, Heidegger strongly disapproved of Sartre’s reading of Dasein. Klein-
berg, Generation Existential, 18.
93 He joined al-Thaqafa al-Watanaiyya. Klemm, “Different Notions of Commitment,” 56.
94 Husayn reiterated a standard nahdawi view according to which literary form (shakl ) is indepen-
dent of theme and content (madmun) and must remain that way. His article “Surat al-Adab” was orig-
inally published in the daily newspaper al-Jumhuriya on June 5, 1954. It was republished in Taha Husayn,
Tawfiq al-Hakim, who was the subject of much criticism, made one last call for rea-
son, balance, and moderation.95 His plea went unanswered.96 For its part, al-Adab’s
editorial line was critical of the Marxist attempt to appropriate iltizam, diminishing
the importance of the individual and using class, and class warfare, as the ultimate
bearers of iltizam.97 Thereafter, the meaning of iltizam, and of existentialism more
WITH THE CHANGING OF THE intellectual guard in the early 1950s, it dawned on young
Arab intellectuals that they were part of a Third World community of fate, with a
shared set of cultural, socioeconomic, and political challenges. However, even after
the Third World discovered itself at the 1955 Bandung Conference, its existence as
a viable community was almost entirely rhetorical. Separated geographically and
facing the multiple political challenges of the Cold War, until 1960 it existed mainly
as a community of speeches.99 Egypt’s revolutionary radio station Sawt al-Arab, “the
Voice of the Arabs,” was the ultimate manifestation of this rhetorical existence. All
of that changed with the Algerian War of Independence, which gave Third-Worldism
a healthy dose of reality and a unity of global purpose. At the center of this de-
velopment was the Arab intelligentsia, which now used the legacy of iltizam in con-
junction with Third-Worldism to articulate the Arab experience of decolonization
in global terms. Sartre’s enthusiastic involvement in this movement created the il-
lusion of a united front bound by his ideas and their creative reformulations in the
Arab lands.
Early on in the process of decolonization, Jawaharlal Nehru, Gamal Abd al-
Nasser, Sukarno, and Kwame Nkrumah spoke often of responsibility, sacrifice, and
freedom. These familiar themes indeed underlined the Third World struggle for
liberation, but they were intellectually tied to particular projects of nationalism,
Khisam wa Naqd (Beirut, 1977), 72–79. Richard Jacquemond, Conscience of the Nation: Writers, State,
and Society in Modern Egypt, trans. David Tresilian (Cairo, 2008).
95 Ibrahim Fathi, “al-Sira al-Dhatiya al-Siyasiya li-Abd al-Azim Anis,” Alif: Journal of Comparative
to the cultural needs of the young: “[My usage of] the word equilibrium should not be taken here literally,
to mean balance, symmetry, or even moderation and intermediateness . . . [Rather], in this book, equi-
librium means the movement of both acceptance and opposition to another [human] undertaking.”
Tawfiq al-Hakim, al-Taduliya: Madhhabi fi al-Haya wa-l-Fann (The Equilibrium: My Creed in Life and
Art ) (Cairo, 1955), 121.
97 Al-Adab’s editors had been aware of the Marxist interest in existentialism since 1953. Anwar
postcolonial mashriq (East). Verena Klemm, “Ideals and Reality: The Adaption of European Ideas of
Literary Commitment in the Post-Colonial Middle East—The Case of Abdalwahha b al-Baya tı,” in
Stephan Guth, Priska Furrer, and Johann Christoph Bürgel, eds., Conscious Voices: Concepts of Writing
in the Middle East (Beirut, 1999), 143–152, here 147. Many young intellectuals, including the would-be
judge and critical thinker Tariq al-Bishri, found their inspiration in Marxist iltizam and readily tied their
political future to it. Al-Bishri, Shakhsiyat wa Qadaya Muasira (Cairo, 2002), 71–75.
99 Emphasizing the rhetorical existence of Third World political solidarity and its struggle to come
into its own does not mean that their Cold War challenges with regard to capital, goods, expertise,
armaments, and political backing were not real and meaningful.
which only atomized the experience of decolonization rather than expanding it. In-
deed, until 1962, when Sartre, Fanon, and others invented an “analytic strategy of
moving from the Algerian situation to the universal struggle between colonized and
colonizer,” there was not much to hold on to by way of forging an integrated in-
ternational front for decolonization.100
one American and the other Leninist, see Odd Arne Westad, The Global Cold War: Third World In-
terventions and the Making of Our Times (New York, 2005), 8–72.
101 For Nasser’s grip on Middle East politics and “his threat” to U.S. interests, see Salim Yaqub,
Containing Arab Nationalism: The Eisenhower Doctrine and the Middle East (Durham, N.C., 2004).
102 Gamal Abdel Nasser, The Philosophy of the Revolution (Cairo, 1955).
103 Robert Malley, The Call from Algeria: Third Worldism, Revolution, and the Turn to Islam (Berkeley,
Calif., 1996). For the impact of the Algerian revolution elsewhere in the international arena, see Con-
nelly, A Diplomatic Revolution.
104 Sartre’s goal was not to illustrate how existentialism was compatible with orthodox Marxism but
to offer a slight correction to Marxist ideology and show how ideas about freedom and individualism
could reinvigorate it. For the Arab understanding of this move, see Muta Safadi, “Sartir bayna al-
Wujudiya wa-l-Markisiyya,” al-Adab, December 1964, 4 –6, 73–74. See also “Jawlat al-Fikr,” al-Jum-
huriya, March 2, 1967, 16.
105 Paige Arthur, Unfinished Projects: Decolonization and the Philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre (New
(Beirut, 1964).
108 The report focused on Poland. “Communist Revisionism and Dissidence,” U.S. National Archives
109 See the Arabic translation of Sartre’s Colonialisme et néo-colonialisme : Jean-Paul Sartre, al-
“I have never seen Sartre so fascinated and moved by a man.” Fanon died from leukemia six months
later. Lanzmann, Le lièvre de Patagonie (Paris, 2009), 363.
112 In his Sartre on Cuba (Westport, Conn., 1961), Sartre brought the Caribbean and Latin America
on board with this process. Frantz Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth (New York, 1963); see Sartre’s
introduction, 7. Noureddine Lamouchi, Jean-Paul Sartre et le Tiers-Monde: Rhétorique d’un discours an-
ticolonialiste (Paris, 1996).
113 Richard Wolin, The Wind from the East: French Intellectuals, the Cultural Revolution, and the
issue of al-Hilal. For an analogous understanding of Sartre and Fanon and the role of the Third World
intellectual in Iran, see Negin Nabavi, Intellectuals and the State in Iran: Politics, Discourse, and the
Dilemma of Authenticity (Gainesville, Fla., 2003), 67–106; Hamid Dabashi, “The Poetics of Politics:
Commitment in Modern Persian Literature,” Iranian Studies 18, no. 2/4 (Spring–Autumn 1985): 147–
188.
115 As an Arab revolutionary put it, “a revolution without thought and ethics is nothing but chaotic
this ethos was partially indebted to Albert Camus. Borrowing Camus’s notion of
metaphysical revolt against reality, Abd al-Wahhab al-Bayati wrote: “Whether
for the individual or for society as a whole, the revolt against life is the first step in
the revolutionary process.”117 Camus’s idea of commitment to a life of revolu-
tion even after the revolution was officially over was compatible with the political
117 B. G. Garnham, “Albert Camus: Metaphysical Revolt and Historical Action,” Modern Language
Review 62, no. 2 (April 1967): 248–255; Bayati, Tajribati al-Shiriya, 23. See also Klemm, “Ideals and
Reality,” 143–152.
118 However, Arab revolutionary thinkers debated the question of the revolt’s causes when some
ascribed it to the individual, and others, mainly Marxists, to socioeconomic conditions. “Kamu wa Naz-
riyat al-Tamarrud,” al-Adab, August 1960, 22–27. One of the main aims of Arab socialism was to reform
the Arab subject. The state-endorsed socialist art of Abd al-Hadi al-Gazzar beautifully illustrates this
point. Liliane Karnouk, Modern Egyptian Art, 1910–2003 (Cairo, 2005). See also Abdel Hady El-Gazzar:
The Egyptian Painter’s Official Web Site, http://www.a-elgazzar.com/ar/.
119 Interestingly, however, although on various occasions Camus, a self-defined non-existentialist,
criticized Sartre’s excess of individualism and his “propensity toward monologue rather than dialogue,”
in the Arab world he was mostly indistinguishable from Sartre. Jeffrey C. Isaac, Arendt, Camus, and
Modern Rebellion (New Haven, Conn., 1992), 121.
120 Bayati, Tajribati al-shiriya, 31.
121 By the mid-1960s, Palestinian guerrilla fighters, and scores of other fighters around the world, had
adopted this revolutionary ethos. For instance, Ghlib Halsa, “al-Haribun min al-Huriyya,” al-Adab,
February 1960, 36– 43; Taha Riyad, Filastin: al-Yawm la Ghadan (Beirut, 1963). This intellectual ge-
nealogy helps to explain how people such as Nelson Mandela and Yasser Arafat found themselves
together in postcolonial Algeria struggling in different arenas for what they saw as the exact same cause.
According to Mandela, who visited the National Liberation Front (FLN), “The situation in Algeria was
the closest model to our own in that the rebels faced a large white settler community that ruled the
indigenous majority.” Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom (Boston, 1994), 259. For the military and dip-
lomatic support that the FLN rendered to Arafat’s Fatah movement, see Alan Hart, Arafat: A Political
Biography (Bloomington, Ind., 1984), 133–134.
122 “al-Huriya al-Wujudiya fi al-Sanawat al-Akhira kanat Nazwa,” al-Jumhuriya, March 5, 1967, 12.
123 Bertrand Russell was also appreciated, but his analytical philosophy offered little guidance in the
way of liberation. For Sartre as an Arab hero, see Idris, “Nahnu wa Sartir,” 1; Arthur, Unfinished Projects,
173.
IN HIS 2001 NOVEL Papa Sartre, Ali Badr revives the Iraqi existentialist scene of the
1960s and its veneration of Sartre. The story’s protagonist, Abd al-Rahman, is “the
Sartre of the Arabs,” the man whom “Sartre dispatched to save our nation.” “We
are going to make of Baghdad another Paris; we will turn it into the capital of ex-
istentialism,” he promises his followers.124 In the end, it did not quite work out that
cafés’ life.” Sami Mahdi, al-Mawjah al-Sakhibah: Shir al-Sittiniyat fi -l-Iraq (Baghdad, 1994), 37.
129 Other famous cafés were Hasan Ajami, al-Bayruti, Shatt al-Arab, al-Braziliyya, Yassin, al-Shah
Bandar, al-Rashid, Umm Kultum, and al-Jamahir. Faiz al-Haidar, “Ahya Baghdad wa Maqahiha al-
Shabiya Manba al-Adab wa-l-thaqafa,” http://www.yanabeealiraq.com/articles/faiz-alhider181108.htm.
130 Fadil al-Azzawi, al-Ruh al-Haya: Jil al-Sittinat fi -l-Iraq (Damascus, 1997), 103.
131 Husayn Mardan, “al-Ihda,” in Mardan, al-Amal al-Kamila, 2 vols. (Baghdad, 2009), 1: 11; and
widespread. The Egyptian literary critic and poet Luwis Awad gently insinuated that iltizam was cul-
turally destructive, and the critic Muhammad Mandur and others agreed. Al-Adab, March 1962, 109;
Badawi, “Commitment in Contemporary Arabic Literature,” 870; Muhammad Adib al-Amari, “al-
Hayah wa-l-Iltizam,” al-Adib, April 1962, 2; Amari, “al-Ilham wa-l-Iltizam,” al-Adib, July 1962, 2; Muta
Safadi, “Multazimun am Mutasibun?,” al-Adab, February 1960, 61. Even as far away as Bahrain, un-
committed writers were attacked for their position. Qasim Hadad, “An al-Iltizam,” in Barada, Tahawwu-
lat mafhum al-Iltizam fi-l-Adab al-Arabi al-Hadith, 126–132. Idris rushed to defend his original cause
in its pure Sartrean interpretation, arguing that they preached for iltizam and not for ilzam (coercion).
Suhayl Idris, “Adabuna la Thawri,” al-Adab, January 1960, 1–2. Even Idris’s level-headed al-Adab took
a political stand and supported the brutal suppression of Iraqi communists: Faiz Saigh, “Marakatuna
ma al-Shuyuiyya,” al-Adab, June 1959, 1–3.
134 Azzawi, al-Ruh al-Haya, 78.
135 In 1974, the Bath Party and the communists established a National Front, which brought the
to revolutions, morality, society, sex, regime, religion, poetry and writing . . . I wanted
to believe in a new revolution that would wash itself of the blood that had always
adhered to it.”137 This mission statement united the Iraqi sixties generation and their
quest to destroy “the old world and its various institutions such as the state, society,
family, gender, and even poetry.”138 In the search for a new Arab selfhood, these
British nationalism appeared to them naı̈ve and simplistic. Azzawi, al-Ruh al-Hhaya, 122–123.
140 Ibid., 14. Merleau-Ponty and Neruda also figured strongly. Ibid., 51; Mahdi, al-Mawjah al-Sakhi-
bah, 22.
141 Many of them engaged in highly abstract conversations about why we live and die and why we
write. Lines such as “Existence exists not for my sake but for its own” were not uncommon. Mahdi,
al-Mawjah al-Sakhibah, 149, 170–171. Concomitantly, in the eyes of their critics, the existentialist scene
was nothing more than melodramatic role-playing tantamount to exhibitionistic “posing” and “acting
out.” Sami Mahdi, a Bathist, charged existentialists with eclecticism and philosophical superficiality. He
acknowledged that their aim was “to find humanistic truth and decipher the enigma of its existential
angst,” but he scorned their posing. Ibid., 221. Muhsin Musawi also found several inconsistencies in Iraqi
existentialism. Musawi, The Postcolonial Arabic Novel: Debating Ambivalence (Leiden, 2003), 183.
142 Iraqi existentialists thought of the “gap” between these two freedoms as “the absurdity of being.”
of revolt and estrangement and expressed strong longing for the emergence of an authentic unitary Arab
individual or subjectivity, in which everything has its demonstrable place and value. The absurd in these
dramas is based above all on two themes: detachment/alienation and violence. Sad Allah Wannus, who
was trained in France, was one of the most prolific existentialist playwrights of the mid-1960s. His 1965
play Glass Café (al-Maqha al-zujaji ) vividly depicts the tragedy of human existence with strong references
to Arab reality. After the 1967 defeat, he used absurdity as a sharp tool for sociopolitical criticism. Other
important playwrights were Walid Ihlasi, Farah Bulbul, and Ali Uqla Ursan. Ewa Machut-Mendecka,
Studies in Arabic Theatre and Literature (Warsaw, 2000), 86–96; Nadim Maalla Muhammad, al-Adab
al-Masrahi fi Suriyah: Nashatuhu, Tatawwuruh (Damascus, 1982), 62–165. In fiction, similar influences
existed in the writing of the Egyptians Naguib Mahfouz, Mustafa Mahmud, and, most interestingly,
Sonallah Ibrahim. Heavily influenced by Camus’s The Stranger, Ibrahim’s experimental novel The Smell
of It famously introduced into Arab literature the alienated ex-convict protagonist who has been reduced
by his aimless life to a set of mechanical daily actions, such as eating, getting dressed, smoking, and joyless
sex. Crushed by the authoritarian state for his politics, he is the exact opposite of the committed na-
tionalist hero of the 1950s and 1960s. His angst is the outcome of living in “bad faith” under the sway
of an alienated state and away from the authentic existence that decolonization promised. In addition
to Sonallah Ibrahim, a sense of metaphysical revolt underlies Awlad Haritna (1959; English trans. Chil-
dren of Gebelawi [London, 1981]), which is an allegory of mankind’s religious struggle to achieve har-
criticism was the existentialist feminist cry against patriarchy. In 1958, at the young
age of 22, the Lebanese writer Layla Baalbakki released her debut teen-angst novel,
Ana Ahya (I Live!). It tells the story of Lena, a nineteen-year-old girl-woman with
a thirst for freedom. She does not share the Arab nationalist fever of her times:
Frankly, I am not smart enough to find a solution to the problems of Palestine, Kashmir, or
This is no simplistic teenage nihilism. Her radical individualism reflects her broad
horizons, and what follows constitutes an attack, an open revolt, against the Arab
sociopolitical order. She rebukes her greedy and sexist male colleagues. She rebels
against the prison-like institution of the Arab family, with its authoritarian father
figure and its double standards for the sexuality of men and women. She hates her
father’s authoritarianism and denounces her mother, who “knows nothing of life
except sharing a man’s bed, cooking his food, and raising his children.”145 In revolt
she finds her authenticity, her voice, and a hope for freedom. She talks only of her
own freedom, sexuality, thoughts, needs, and wishes. Known at the time as the “Fran-
çoise Sagan of the Arabs,” Baalbakki was accused of nihilism, radical individualism,
and egoism.146 Her tirade against patriarchy and her call for sexual liberation even-
tually became a public scandal, which landed her in jail for “offending public mo-
rality.”147 As she demonstrated, decolonization begins with the self, continues with
the family, and is then extended toward society.
Existentialism was also present in the work of the Palestinian writer-in-exile
Ghasan Kanafani. In 1963, Kanafani published his much-acclaimed novella Men in
the Sun, in which three Palestinian refugees decide to sneak across the Iraqi border,
drawn by the riches of Kuwait.148 They meet the elder Abu Khaizuran, a veteran
political leader in the lost land of Palestine who is now a truck driver. When he
promises to smuggle them in his truck’s empty water tank and guide them safely to
Kuwait, they agree. However, the three men never make it to Kuwait. They lose their
mony and justice. Absurdist themes characterize much of Mahfouz’s writing from the 1960s, when the
promise of rational national politics reached its dramatic limits. His 1961 novel al-Mustahil (The Im-
possibility) features an estranged protagonist whose father suppressed the emergence of his selfhood.
Striving to find meaning in life, he ultimately revolts against societal conventions, especially those related
to sex. Having an affair with his married neighbor, he comes to realize the absurdity and impossibility
of their relationship. Haim Gordon, Naguib Mahfouz’s Egypt: Existential Themes in His Writings (New
York, 1990). Another relevant novel of the time was Mahmud Diyab’s al-Zilal (The Shadow, 1964), in
which a selfish protagonist endorses existentialism as “meaning for everything,” which leads him to
embrace an unconventional and highly relativist personal morality that damages society. Ali B. Jad, Form
and Technique in the Egyptian Novel, 1912–1971 (Oxford, 1983), 295–307; Samia Mehrez, Egyptian Writers
between History and Fiction: Essays on Naguib Mahfouz, Sonallah Ibrahim, and Gamal Al-Ghitani (Cairo,
1994), 39–57; Stefan G. Meyer, The Experimental Arabic Novel: Postcolonial Literary Modernism in the
Levant (Albany, N.Y., 2001), 16.
144 Layla Baalbakki, Ana Ahya (Beirut, 1963), 45.
145 She calls her father an opportunist war profiteer and a “shadow of a human being.” Ibid., 15,
19–20, 112–113.
146 Anis Sayigh, al-Adab, May 1958, 59.
147 Samira Aghacy, “Lebanese Women’s Fiction: Urban Identity and the Tyranny of the Past,” In-
ternational Journal of Middle East Studies 33, no. 3 (November 2001): 503–523.
148 The three were Marwan, whose father abandoned the family for another woman; Asad, who was
escaping an arranged marriage and the Jordanian authorities; and Abu Qais, who, in dire need of support
for his family, lost his small fortune to traitorous Iraqi brokers of cheap Palestinian labor.
lives in that water tank, succumbing to thirst, heat exhaustion, and suffocation while
their guide spends time joking with the Kuwaiti border police. The novella closes
with the driver’s memorable cry when he realizes what has happened: “Why didn’t
you knock on the sides of the tank? Why didn’t you say anything? Why?”149
In this allegory of the Palestinian tragedy of 1948, with the failure of the Pal-
IN LATE FEBRUARY 1967, Sartre and Beauvoir arrived in Cairo, where they were
greeted at the airport by Egypt’s progressive intellectuals.153 For Egyptians, their
two-week visit was an intellectual holiday (farah fikri ), and more than twenty new
publications on existentialism were released for the occasion.154 For improved mar-
ketability, some book covers even depicted nude women, which Sartre found shock-
ing.155 Although Lutfi al-Khuli and his wife Liliane (the same Liliane whose father
had deplored public kissing) hosted Sartre and Beauvoir during their stay, it was
149 Ghassan Kanafani, Men in the Sun and Other Palestinian Stories, trans. Hilary Kilpatrick (Cairo,
1991), 56.
150 Meyer, The Experimental Arabic Novel, 28.
151 Barbara Harlow, “Readings of National Identity in the Palestinian Novel,” in Issa J. Boullata and
Roger Allen, eds., The Arabic Novel since 1950: Critical Essays, Interviews, and Bibliography (Cambridge,
Mass., 1992), 89–108; Orit Bashkin, “Nationalism as a Cause: Arab Nationalism in the Writings of
Ghassan Kanafani,” in Christoph Schumann, ed., Nationalism and Liberal Thought in the Arab East:
Ideology and Practice (London, 2010), 92–112.
152 This new form of commitment to the Palestinian cause motivated Kanafani’s intellectual, political,
and guerrilla labor on behalf of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. He was killed in 1972
by Israeli agents.
153 The couple were invited to Egypt by al-Ahram’s editorial team when they learned that Les Temps
modernes intended to send an investigative delegation to both sides of the Arab-Israeli conflict and
publish a special issue on their findings. Given the mounting military tensions in the region and the
importance of European public opinion, both Arabs and Israelis wanted to influence the final outcome
of this visit. In his capacity as managing editor of the journal, Lanzmann joined the tour. Lanzmann,
Le lièvre de Patagonie, 396– 404.
154 Ruz al-Yusuf, February 27, 1967, 50; al-Akhbar, March 5, 1967, 16.
155 Al-Jumhuriya, March 3, 1967, 10.
FIGURE 1: This screen shot from Al-Ahram Weekly features a series of photographs taken during Sartre’s and
Beauvoir’s 1967 visit to Egypt. Al-Ahram Weekly On-line (Cairo), no. 47 (April 13–19, 2000), http://weekly
.ahram.org.eg/2000/477/bk6_477.htm. Most of the pictures were taken by Liliane al-Khuli, who, along with her
husband, hosted the French couple and traveled with them.
1088 Yoav Di-Capua
nonetheless a semi-official visit that included a meeting with President Nasser. Sartre
pleaded with him to release some communist prisoners. Nasser did. They traveled
across the country as if they were heads of state. They saw the Aswan Dam (where
locals mistook Sartre for Fidel Castro), visited the heavy industrial plants, and trav-
eled to remote villages that had recently purged themselves of feudalism.156 They met
156 The couple visited Kamshish, where, as a result of popular resistance to landlords, a symbolic
victory against feudalism had been achieved the previous year. Ibid.
157 Beauvoir, All Said and Done, 375–376.
158 “Muqabala Adabiyya ma Sartir,” al-Adab, January 1966, 5.
159 However, Beauvoir’s recollection of the meeting with the Palestinians was highly negative. She
blamed them for their own condition. Beauvoir, All Said and Done, 38. Lanzmann, too, recorded a
disappointing meeting, during which “Each Palestinian phrase was a chant of war.” Lanzmann, Le lièvre
de Patagonie, 402. For Egyptian coverage of Sartre in Gaza, see “Sartir wa-l-ma’sa fi Ghaza,” Akhir Saa,
March 15, 1967, 70.
160 Sartre asked for a minimum of three hours to discuss philosophy. “Sartir Yatalaq ala Hadith li
Mahmud Amin al-Alim an al-Wujudiya wa-l-Ishtirakita,” Al-Jumhuriya, March 3, 1967, 10. Of great
interest, but unfortunately outside the scope of this article, was Beauvoir’s intellectual reception by
Egyptian feminists. See “Milaf Khas: Hiwar Sartir wa Simone,” al-Talia, April 1967, 117–137.
161 Sana Fath Allah, “al-Falsafa al-Markisiya,” Al-Akhbar, February 28, 1967, 9; Ismail al-Mahdi,
existentialist-Marxist whose teachings were compatible with socialism and communism. For the summary
of their exchange, see Al-Jumhuriya, March 3, 1967, 10. Husayn was not invited to meet Sartre. Al-
Jumhuriya, March 14, 1967, 12.
163 In large part, the Arabs’ surprise was due to the absence of any serious attempt to understand
Sartre’s position that the Jewish condition was an element of the general human condition, with im-
portant positive consequences for Zionism as a legitimate project of Jewish authenticity. His 1948 Ré-
flexions sur la question juive was never translated into Arabic. At the time of his visit, only one critical
article appeared in the press, and it was not followed up. Al-Jumhuriya, March 4, 1967, 5.
164 The Jordanian and Syrian press were already critical of Sartre and charged him with doublespeak.
Amnon Kapeliuk, “Sartre in the Arab Press,” New Outlook 10, no. 4 (May 1967): 29–33.
Middle East crisis.”165 Then came the devastating war. Lutfi al-Khuli spent the first
weeks of June 1967 in Paris and thus missed the war.166 He was aware of the defeat
but did not know any of the details. According to an Arabic newspaper headline, the
Americans and British were fighting alongside the Israelis. That report was inac-
curate, but it sounded plausible to Lutfi.167 He also knew that Nasser had resigned,
THE MULTILAYERED STORY OF Arab existentialism raises two primary questions that
substantiate the meaning of decolonization. First, what intellectual tasks did exis-
tentialism accomplish that anticolonial nationalism could not? Second, what hap-
pens “inside decolonization” when ideas such as existentialism that were created in
one historical context move to another and yet another context? In answering these
questions, we can see that decolonization was a transnational process rich in intel-
165 CIA, Intelligence Memorandum, June 2, 1967, NARA, CIA-RDP79T00826A002000010078-8.
166 Al-Khuli believed in Arab socialism and Third World power, but unlike many of his preaching
comrades, he was not given to slogans or flat thinking. He was also not an existentialist and, in his
writings, has largely avoided this trend. Yet along with the defeat itself, his critical engagement with
Sartre and Beauvoir was instrumental in the fall of Arab existentialism.
167 Al-Ahram, June 7, 1967, 1.
168 Lutfi al-Khuli, Hiwar maa Bertrand Russell wa Sartir (Cairo, 1968), 78.
169 Sartre denied the allegations and reiterated his support for “the struggle of Arab nations, in-
cluding the Palestinians, toward freedom and progress.” “The only thing to which I principally object,”
he added, “is war itself.” In a second meeting, Sartre remained equivocal and said that he had been
misunderstood. He condemned elements in Zionism, but not Zionism as a whole. He objected to some
Israeli policies, but not to the overall conduct of the state. He refused to condemn Hertzel’s Zionism
and to judge it by the moral standards that he himself articulated in the cases of Algeria and Vietnam.
He also could not see how his unconditional support of the state of Israel was in sharp contradiction
to his famous condemnation of neocolonialism. Ibid., 111–112.
170 A month earlier, she had said that Liliane “knew nothing whatsoever about the Jewish question
as it existed in the West.” Beauvoir, All Said and Done, 382, 402.
171 Eventually, Fanon’s widow, Josie, decided not to publish a new edition, and thus Sartre’s preface
was canonized with the text itself. Lanzmann, Le lièvre de Patagonie, 365.
172 Shortly thereafter, on a different occasion, Sartre said that he would never abandon Israel and
that “I know that my stance earns me the enmity of certain Arabs, who cannot understand that one is
unable to be at the same time for Israel and for them.” Jonathan Judaken, Jean-Paul Sartre and the Jewish
Question: Anti-Antisemitism and the Politics of the French Intellectual (Lincoln, Neb., 2006), 185; al-Khuli,
Hiwar maa Bertrand Russell wa Sartir, 80–81, 111–112. For Sartre as a traitor, see Edward Said, “My
Encounter with Sartre,” London Review of Books, June 1, 2000.
lectual cross-pollination, and not simply an atomized transfer of power from a sink-
ing empire to a newly formed nation-state.
Anticolonial nationalism was undoubtedly successful in creating a sense of com-
munity and opposition against colonial rule, but in all other respects it was intel-
lectually limited. The versatility of existentialism compensated for this lack. In its
S. Elshakry, “Knowledge in Motion: The Cultural Politics of Modern Science Translations in Arabic,”
Isis 99, no. 4 (December 2008): 701–730; Elshakry, “The Gospel of Science and American Evangelism
in Late Ottoman Beirut,” Past and Present 196, no. 1 (August 2007): 173–214.
174 For the many methodological challenges of “traveling ideas,” see Edward W. Said, “Traveling
Theory,” in Said, The World, the Text, and the Critic (Cambridge, Mass., 1983), 226–247; Said, “Traveling
Theory Reconsidered,” in Said, Reflections on Exile and Other Essays (Cambridge, Mass., 2000), 436– 452.
175 During his visit to Cairo, Sartre hinted that Arab existentialism borders on propaganda and pop-
ulism. “Al-Kuttab Yunaqishun Sartir,” al-Jumhuriya, March 8, 1967, 12; Rushdi Salih, “Sartir wa Rihlat
Umrihi,”al-Akhbar, March 5, 1967, 16; “Ma al-Muthaqqafin,” al-Talia, April 1967, 146.
intellectual context.176 A recent collection on the literary heritage of the Cold War
makes this point obvious and shows how, much as in the Middle East, the heritage
of Latin American intellectuals has also gone unnoticed.177 In failing to acknowledge
how this universal intellectual matrix shaped the global 1960s, and in focusing solely
on anticolonial nationalism and/or “ideology” (Marxist, socialist, or other), decolo-
revisionist Journal of Cold War Studies acknowledge the intricate transnational nature of that era.
177 Jean Franco, “The Excluded Middle: Intellectuals and the ‘Cold War’ in Latin America,” in An-
drew Hammond, ed., Cold War Literature: Writing the Global Conflict (London, 2006), 226–241.
178 Left-wing international terrorism during the 1970s by groups such as the Japanese Red Army,
Baader-Meinhof, the IRA, and multiple Palestinian organizations was a direct outcome of the trans-
national intellectual affinities that were formed during decolonization. For more on such connections
in French history, see Wolin, The Wind from the East.