Acc 223a - Answers To CH 10 Assignment PDF
Acc 223a - Answers To CH 10 Assignment PDF
Acc 223a - Answers To CH 10 Assignment PDF
Exercises
Exercise 1
Requirement 1
Direct labor.............................................................................. 7
Direct labor................................................................................... 7
Variable manufacturing overhead ................................................ 2
* The variable cost of goods sold could be computed more simply as: 16,000 units × P27 per
unit = P432,000.
Exercise 2
Requirement 1
Requirement 2
The difference in net operating income can be explained by the P50,000 in fixed manufacturing
overhead deferred in inventory under the absorption costing method:
Exercise 3
Requirement 1
Under variable costing, only the variable manufacturing costs are included in product costs.
Note that selling and administrative expenses are not treated as product costs; that is, they are not
included in the costs that are inventoried. These expenses are always treated as period costs and are
charged against the current period’s revenue.
Requirement 2
Sales..................................................................... P18,000,000
Less variable expenses:
* The variable cost of goods sold could be computed more simply as: 9,000 units sold × P1,000 per unit =
P9,000,000.
Requirement 3
The break-even point in units sold can be computed using the contribution margin per unit as follows:
Selling price per unit ........................................................................ P2,000
Fixed expenses
Break-even unit sales =
Unit contribution margin
P7,500,000
=
P800 per unit
= 9,375 units
Exercise 4
Requirement 1
Under absorption costing, all manufacturing costs (variable and fixed) are included in product costs.
Less ending inventory (1,000 units × P1,300 per unit) ..... 1,300,000 11,700,000
Note: The company apparently has exactly zero net operating income even though its sales are below
the break-even point computed in Exercise 3. This occurs because P300,000 of fixed manufacturing
overhead has been deferred in inventory and does not appear on the income statement prepared
using absorption costing.
Exercise 5
Requirement 1
Fixed expenses:
Fixed manufacturing overhead ................................ 600,000
* The variable cost of goods sold could be computed more simply as: 8,000 units sold × P310 per
unit = P2,480,000.
The difference in net operating income between variable and absorption costing can be explained by
the deferral of fixed manufacturing overhead cost in inventory that has taken place under the
absorption costing approach. Note from part (1) that P120,000 of fixed manufacturing overhead cost
has been deferred in inventory to the next period. Thus, net operating income under the absorption
costing approach is P120,000 higher than it is under variable costing.
Problem 1
Sales P20,700,000
Sales P26,100,000
Sales P26,100,000
Production 9,800,000
Reconciliation
Total P10,842,500
Problem 2
Requirement 1
Honey Company
Sales P280,000
Requirement 2
Honey Company
Sales P280,000
P170,500
Variable 28,000
Fixed 20,000
P 48,000
Problem 3
Requirement 1
The unit product cost under the variable costing approach would be computed as follows:
Direct materials ................................................................. P 8
Direct labor ....................................................................... 10
With this figure, the variable costing income statements can be prepared:
Year 1 Year 2
Requirement 2
Requirement 1
P1,000,00
Sales.............................................................. 0 P 800,000 P1,000,000
Requirement 2
a.
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
b.
Requirement 3
Production went up sharply in Year 2 thereby reducing the unit product cost, as shown in (2a). This
reduction in cost, combined with the large amount of fixed manufacturing overhead cost deferred in
inventory for the year, more than offset the loss of revenue. The net result is that the company’s net
operating income rose even though sales were down.
Requirement 4
The fixed manufacturing overhead cost deferred in inventory from Year 2 was charged against Year 3
operations, as shown in the reconciliation in (2b). This added charge against Year 3 operations was
offset somewhat by the fact that part of Year 3’s fixed manufacturing overhead costs was deferred in
inventory to future years [again see (2b)]. Overall, the added costs charged against Year 3 were
greater than the costs deferred to future years, so the company reported less income for the year
even though the same number of units was sold as in Year 1.
Requirement 5
a. Several things would have been different if the company had been using JIT inventory methods.
First, in each year production would have been geared to sales so that little or no inventory of
finished goods would have been built up in either Year 2 or Year 3. Second, unit product costs
probably would have been the same in all three years, since these costs would have been
established on the basis of expected sales (50,000 units) for each year. Third, since only 40,000
units were sold in Year 2, the company would have produced only that number of units and
therefore would have had some underapplied overhead cost for the year. (See the discussion on
underapplied overhead in the following paragraph.)
b. If JIT had been in use, the net operating income under absorption costing would have been the
same as under variable costing in all three years. The reason is that with production geared to
sales, there would have been no ending inventory on hand, and therefore there would have been
no fixed manufacturing overhead costs deferred in inventory to other years. Assuming that the
company expected to sell 50,000 units in each year and that unit product costs were set on the
basis of that level of expected activity, the income statements under absorption costing would
have appeared as follows:
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Sales
P1,000,000 P 800,000 P1,000,000
Cost of goods manufactured @ P16 per unit ... 800,000 640,000 * 800,000
** 10,000 units not produced × P12 per unit fixed manufacturing overhead cost = P120,000 fixed
manufacturing overhead cost not applied to products.
Problem 5
Requirement 1 (a)
Under absorption costing, all manufacturing costs, variable and fixed, are included in unit product
costs:
Year 1 Year 2
Direct labor 6 6
Requirement 1 (b)
Year 1 Year 2
Requirement 2 (a)
Under variable costing, only the variable manufacturing costs are included in unit product costs:
Year 1 Year 2
Direct labor 6 6
Variable manufacturing overhead 3 3
Requirement 2 (b)
The variable costing income statements follow. Notice that the variable cost of goods sold is
computed in a simpler, more direct manner than in the examples provided earlier. On a variable
costing income statement, this simple approach or the more complex approach illustrated earlier is
acceptable for computing the cost of goods sold.
Year 1 Year 2
Variable expenses:
Variable cost of goods sold (8,000 units x P20 per unit) P160,00 P160,00
0 0
Fixed expenses:
Requirement 3
The reconciliation of the variable and absorption costing net operating incomes follows:
Year 1 Year 2
Problem 6
Requirement 1
Fixed expenses:
Fixed manufacturing overhead ............................................... 250,000
Requirement 2
The difference in net operating income can be explained by the P50,000 in fixed manufacturing
overhead deferred in inventory under the absorption costing method:
1. D 11. B
2. B 12. A
3. B 13. C
4. B 14. D
5. B 15. B
6. C 16. A
7. A 17. C
8. B 18. C
9. A 19. B
10. A 20. C