Nsba Basics of Steel Bridge Design Workshop

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 19

4/26/2020

Conceptual Layout
and Framing Plans
Francesco M Russo, PhD, PE
Michael Baker International

So … you want to design a steel bridge


• How and where do you start?
• Lots of important decisions to make
• span layout
• girder spacing
• splice locations
• cross frame locations
• preliminary girder sizing
• …and no hard math

1
4/26/2020

First … Let’s Pick the Bridge Type


Steel I-Beams Steel Box Beams
(Tub Girders)

• Less common
• The most common
• More frequently used
steel bridge by far for curved applications

I-Girder Bridges … some useful considerations


• If you “color inside these lines” simple analyses like line girder
methods are applicable. (important for later discussions on SIMON)

• Beam spacing <= 16 ft … Common


• Span Length <= 240 ft … Common
• 4 or more beams … Common

2
4/26/2020

Preliminary Design Resources

AASHTO / NSBA Design for Constructibility


Guidance and Rules of
Thumb
• Spacing
• Plate Thickness
• Material Availability
• Flange & Web Sizing
• Bracing
• Details

3
4/26/2020

NSBA Online Resources

From the Continuous Span Standards


Note – some predesigned layouts
are available
• Narrowest spacing 7’-6”
• Widest Spacing 12’-0”

Many span choices with center


spans from 150 – 300’

Spans assume end span = 78% of


center span

4
4/26/2020

Sample Design (I know you cant read this)

FHWA Resources

5
4/26/2020

Bridge Layout
• Let’s start at the beginning
• How wide?
• Generally “we” don’t decide
• There are “highway engineers” for that
• How long?
• Many possible constraints to consider
• How many spans?
• Simple / continuous / etc.

Bridge Layout
How many beams / what spacing ?

6
4/26/2020

Spacing & Overhangs


Goal – relative force / material balance between beams

S S S S

0 . 28 S 0 . 28 S
TO TO
0 . 35 S 0 . 35 S

General Thoughts on Beam Spacing


From the NSBA G12 Document consider the following:
• Owner preferences and limitations
• Cost of steel fabrication, transportation, and erection
• Deck thickness and forming methods
• Provisions for future widening
• Vertical clearances

Also provisions for redecking (beam in the middle ?)

7
4/26/2020

Typical Transverse Section


Example cross-section
• 40 ft roadway + 2 barriers at 1.5 ft = 43 ft out to out
• “X” beams @ “S” on center + 2 overhangs @ 0.28-0.35 “S”
• For a 4-beam section
• 3 beams at “S”
• 2 OH at 0.28 – 0.35 S
• S max = 12’-1” S min = 11’-7”
• For a 5-beam section
• 4 beams at “S”
• 2 OH at 0.28 – 0.35 S
• S max = 9’-5” S min = 9’-2”

From the NSBA Span Weight Curves

8
4/26/2020

Girder Spacing – Some Final Thoughts


• Always provide the same size interior/exterior girder
• Wider beam spacing tends to be more economical
• Balance this with the deck costs
• Use tools like SIMON (presented later) to explore different
numbers of beams and determine a reasonable solution
• There is rarely a “best” solution
• Find several “good” ones and make a choice

Span Layout – the “Balanced Span” Arrangement


Continuous spans preferred for multi-span bridge
In a balanced span, positive moments are nearly equal

Balanced Span Arrangement


“Balance” is achieved with end spans 75% - 82% of center span

9
4/26/2020

Balanced Span Example – 3 Spans, 616 ft Total Length


Solid Red Line – Balanced
• End span length ≈ 0.8
center span
• +M in end span ≈ 1.2
center span value

Blue Dashed Line –


Unbalanced
• End span length ≈ 0.93
center span
• +M in end span ≈ 2.5
center span value
• +M in end span ≈ 33%
greater than balanced
span value

What Size is the Girder ?


• A function of span
• A function of available depth
• A function of spacing
• A function of fabrication and shipping limitations

10
4/26/2020

Depth to Span Ratio


Composite Section
Suggested minimum overall depth of
composite I-beam:

0.040 L Simple spans DECK

0.032 L Continuous spans

L = total span length

AASHTO LRFD Article 2.5.2.6.3

Depth to Span Ratio


Bare Girder
Suggested minimum depth of I-beam portion only:

0.033 L Simple spans


0.027 L Continuous spans
L = total span length
•These rules – and those on the prior page –
generally lead to girders too shallow to be
economical
•Make the girder deeper if possible, but be
practical (less than 10ft deep)
AASHTO LRFD Article 2.5.2.6.3

11
4/26/2020

Minimum Web Thickness

(tw)min = 7/16”;
tw
½” preferred

Flange Proportioning Limits


bf
 12
2t f
AASHTO
D
bf  LRFD
Article
6
6.10.2.2
I yc
0.1   10
I yt
L
bf  AASHTO / NSBA Suggestion
85

12
4/26/2020

Bracing Considerations
• Determine a suitable
brace type
• Determine a
functional layout
• Old rules still good
rules
• i.e. the old 25 ft
rule

Selection of Beam Bracing


Brace
spacing
influences
flexural
strength

But don’t go
crazy

13
4/26/2020

Spacing Requirements

Closer Spacing Larger Spacing

Lower cross-frame forces Larger cross-frame forces

Lower lateral flange Larger lateral flange


moments moments
Higher compression-flange Lower compression-flange
capacity capacity
Higher cross-frame cost Lower cross-frame cost

Spacing Requirements
Preliminary Spacing – Straight I-Girder Bridges

Simple Spans & Positive Moment Regions in


18 to 25 ft
End Spans

Positive Moment Regions in Interior Spans 24 to 30 ft

Negative Moment Regions 18 to 24 ft

14
4/26/2020

Layout
Skews ≤ 20 degrees, may
be placed parallel to
supports

Skews > 20 degrees, must


be placed perpendicular
to girders and typically
placed in a contiguous
pattern
AASHTO LRFD Article 6.7.4.2

Field Sections / Splice


Locations

Again from G12

15
4/26/2020

Where does the splice go ?


People generally
say the splice
goes “at the
point of
inflection”

What does that


mean?

FHWA SBDH Example 1

• 3-span continuous steel I-


beam bridge
• 140-175-140
• 40’ roadway (43’ out to out)
• 4 beams @ 12’ center and 3’-
6” overhangs

• Does this make sense ?

16
4/26/2020

Typical Section

3.5’ = 0.29S

Span Layout
3 Spans, 140-175-140 (0.8L – L – 0.8L)

Balanced Span Arrangement


End spans 75% - 82% of center span

17
4/26/2020

Field Section Lengths

Conclusion
• Major design decisions we just made drive the cost of the
entire project
• Once these choices are made, the engineer has just locked in
a major component of the price of the job
• Important to spend time “optimizing” this aspect of the
design
• To reiterate, there isn’t a “perfect” solution. Study a few
“good” ones and make a choice

18
4/26/2020

19

You might also like