0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views

EE359 - Lecture 2 Outline: Announcements

1. The document outlines the schedule options for making up the missed EE359 lecture, including dates and times. 2. The regular lecture will be held on Thursday with the professor, and makeup times are available on various mornings and afternoons through the following week. 3. The missed lecture covered signal transmission models, path loss characteristics, and the free space and two-ray propagation models.

Uploaded by

Nebiye Solomon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views

EE359 - Lecture 2 Outline: Announcements

1. The document outlines the schedule options for making up the missed EE359 lecture, including dates and times. 2. The regular lecture will be held on Thursday with the professor, and makeup times are available on various mornings and afternoons through the following week. 3. The missed lecture covered signal transmission models, path loss characteristics, and the free space and two-ray propagation models.

Uploaded by

Nebiye Solomon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

EE359 – Lecture 2 Outline Makeup lecture options

l Announcements l Next Thursday


st
l 1 HW posted, due next Friday at 4pm. l Monday (1/13): 11:30-12:50pm w/lunch
l Discussion section and TA OHs starts next week l Tuesday (1/14): 3:00-4:20 or 4:30-5:50pm (+lecture 1:30-2:50)
l Will finalize makeup lecture schedule today l Wednesday (1/15): 9:00-10:20am or 11:30-12:50pm*
l Review of Last Lecture l Regular Time Thu 1:30-2:50pm with Tom giving lecture
l Friday (1/17): 9:00-10:20am* or 3:30-4:50pm
l TX and RX Signal Models l Following Monday is MLK 3-day weekend
l Path Loss Models l Thu 2/20 moved to Fri 2/21 from 3:30-4:50pm
l Free-space and 2-Ray Models l MT week, could do Fri 9am instead Regular
l General Ray Tracing l Tue 2/4 moved to Wed 2/5 11:30-12:50pm w/lunch time
l Single-Slope Path Loss Exponent Model with Tom
l Empirical Models l Thu 3/5 moved to Wed 3/4 11:30-12:50pm w/lunch
l mmWave Models l Could do Wed am or Friday 9am or 3:30 instead
*Pending availability

1 2

Lecture 1 Review Propagation Characteristics


l Course Information l Path Loss (includes average shadowing)
l Wireless Vision l Shadowing (due to obstructions)
l Technical Challenges l Multipath Fading
l Current/Next-Gen Wireless Systems
Slow
l Spectrum Regulation and Standards Pt Pr
Pr/Pt Fast
Very slow
v
l Emerging Wireless Systems
d=vt
Emerging systems can be covered in a bonus lecture d=vt

3 4

1
Path Loss Modeling Free Space (LOS) Model
l Maxwell’s equations
l Complex and impractical
d=vt
l Free space and 2-path models
l Too simple
l Ray tracing models l Path loss for unobstructed LOS path
l Requires site-specific information l Power falls off :
l Single-slope path loss exponent model l Proportional to 1/d2
l Main characteristics: good for high-level analysis l Proportional to l2 (inversely proportional to f2)
l Measurement-based and Standards Models l This is due to the effective aperture of the antenna
l Not accurate; used to assess different designs

5 6

Two Ray Model General Ray Tracing


l Models signal components as particles
l Reflections
l Path loss for one LOS path and 1 ground (or l Scattering
reflected) bounce l Diffraction
l Ground bounce approximately cancels LOS
path above critical distance Reflections generally dominate
l Power falls off l Requires site geometry and dielectric properties
l Proportional to d2 (small d) l Easier than Maxwell (geometry vs. differential eqns)
l Proportional to d4 (d>dc)
l Independent of l (fc) l Computer packages often used
l Two-path cancellation equivalent to 2-element array, i.e. the
effective aperature of the receive antenna is changed.
10-ray reflection model explored in HW

7 8

2
Simplified Path Loss Model mmWave: What’s the big deal?
l Used when path loss dominated by
reflections.
l Most important parameter is the path loss
exponent g, determined empirically.

g
éd ù
Pr = Pt K ê 0r ú , 2£g £8
ëd û
All existing commercial systems fit into a small fraction of the mmWave band

9 10

mmWave Propagation mmW Empirical Channel Models


Massive
(60-100GHz) MIMO (not covered in lecture, not on HW/exams)
l Channel models immature l Early cellular empirical models:
l Empirical path loss models for early cellular systems were based on
l Based on measurements, few accurate analytical models extensive measurements.
l Path loss proportion to l2 (huge) l Okumura model: empirically based (site/freq specific), uses graphs
l Hata model: Analytical approximation to Okumura
l Also have oxygen and rain absorbtion
l Cost 231 Model: extends Hata to higher freq. (2 GHz)
l l is on the order of a water molecule l Multi-slope model
l Walfish/Bertoni: extends Cost 231 to include diffraction
l Current cellular models (LTE and 5G):
l Detailed path loss models for UE (3GPP TS 36.101) and base stations (3GPP
TS 36.104) for different multipath delay spreads, user speeds and MIMO
antenna correlations.
l The 5G model includes higher frequencies (up to 100 GHz).
l WiFi channel models: TGn and TGac
l Indoor and outdoor path loss models with MIMO (4x4 & greater), 40
MHz channels (& greater), and different multipath delay spread.
mmWave systems will be short range or require “massive MIMO” Commonly used in cellular and WiFi system simulations
11 12

3
Main Points
l Path loss models simplify Maxwell’s equations
l Models vary in complexity and accuracy
l Power falloff with distance is proportional to d2 in
free space, d4 in two path model
l Main characteristics of path loss captured in
single-slope exponent model Pr=PtK[dr/d]g
l mmWave propagation models still immature
l Path loss large due to frequency, rain, and oxygen

l Empirical models used in simulations

13

You might also like