CVX Usrguide
CVX Usrguide
CVX Usrguide
1
Contents
1 Introduction 4
1.1 What is cvx? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2 What is disciplined convex programming? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.3 About this version . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.4 Feedback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.5 What cvx is not . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2 A quick start 8
2.1 Least-squares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.2 Bound-constrained least-squares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.3 Other norms and functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.4 Other constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.5 An optimal trade-off curve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3 The basics 17
3.1 Data types for variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.2 Objective functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.3 Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.4 Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.5 Sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.6 Dual variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.7 Expression holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2
8 Advanced topics 44
8.1 Solver selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
8.2 Controlling solver precision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
8.3 Miscellaneous cvx commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
8.4 Assignments versus equality constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
8.5 Indexed dual variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
E Acknowledgements 65
3
1 Introduction
1.1 What is cvx?
cvx is a modeling system for disciplined convex programming. Disciplined convex pro-
grams, or DCPs, are convex optimization problems that are described using a limited
set of construction rules, which enables them to be analyzed and solved efficiently.
cvx can solve standard problems such as linear programs (LPs), quadratic programs
(QPs), second-order cone programs (SOCPs), and semidefinite programs (SDPs);
but compared to directly using a solver for one or these types of problems, cvx can
greatly simplify the task of specifying the problem. cvx can also solve much more
complex convex optimization problems, including many involving nondifferentiable
functions, such as ℓ1 norms. You can use cvx to conveniently formulate and solve
constrained norm minimization, entropy maximization, determinant maximization,
and many other problems.
To use cvx effectively, you need to know at least a bit about convex optimiza-
tion. For background on convex optimization, see the book Convex Optimization
[BV04], available on-line at www.stanford.edu/~ boyd/cvxbook/, or the Stanford
course EE364A, available at www.stanford.edu/class/ee364a/.
cvx is implemented in Matlab [Mat04], effectively turning Matlab into an op-
timization modeling language. Model specifications are constructed using common
Matlab operations and functions, and standard Matlab code can be freely mixed with
these specifications. This combination makes it simple to perform the calculations
needed to form optimization problems, or to process the results obtained from their
solution. For example, it is easy to compute an optimal trade-off curve by forming
and solving a family of optimization problems by varying the constraints. As another
example, cvx can be used as a component of a larger system that uses convex opti-
mization, such as a branch and bound method, or an engineering design framework.
cvx also provides special modes to simplify the construction of problems from two
specific problem classes. In SDP mode, cvx applies a matrix interpretation to the
inequality operator, so that linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) and SDPs may be ex-
pressed in a more natural form. In GP mode, cvx accepts all of the special functions
and combination rules of geometric programming, including monomials, posynomi-
als, and generalized posynomials, and transforms such problems into convex form
so that they can be solved efficiently. For background on geometric programming,
see the tutorial paper [BKVH05], available at www.stanford.edu/~ boyd/papers/
gp_tutorial.html.
cvx was designed by Michael Grant and Stephen Boyd, with input from Yinyu Ye;
and was implemented by Michael Grant [GBY06]. It incorporates ideas from earlier
work by Löfberg [Löf05], Dahl and Vandenberghe [DV05], Crusius [Cru02], Wu and
Boyd [WB00], and many others. The modeling language follows the spirit of AMPL
[FGK99] or GAMS [BKMR98]; unlike these packages, however, cvx was designed
from the beginning to fully exploit convexity. The specific method for implementing
cvx in Matlab draws heavily from YALMIP [Löf05]. We also hope to develop versions
of cvx for other platforms in the future.
4
1.2 What is disciplined convex programming?
Disciplined convex programming is a methodology for constructing convex optimiza-
tion problems proposed by Michael Grant, Stephen Boyd, and Yinyu Ye [GBY06,
Gra04]. It is meant to support the formulation and construction of optimization
problems that the user intends from the outset to be convex. Disciplined convex
programming imposes a set of conventions or rules, which we call the DCP ruleset.
Problems which adhere to the ruleset can be rapidly and automatically verified as
convex and converted to solvable form. Problems that violate the ruleset are rejected,
even when the problem is convex. That is not to say that such problems cannot be
solved using DCP; they just need to be rewritten in a way that conforms to the DCP
ruleset.
A detailed description of the DCP ruleset is given in §4, and it is important for
anyone who intends to actively use cvx to understand it. The ruleset is simple to
learn, and is drawn from basic principles of convex analysis. In return for accept-
ing the restrictions imposed by the ruleset, we obtain considerable benefits, such as
automatic conversion of problems to solvable form, and full support for nondifferen-
tiable functions. In practice, we have found that disciplined convex programs closely
resemble their natural mathematical forms.
Problems handled exactly. cvx will convert the specified problem to an LP,
SOCP, or SDP, when all the functions in the problem specification can be represented
in these forms. This includes a wide variety of functions, such as minimum and
maximum, absolute value, quadratic forms, the minimum and maximum eigenvalues
of a symmetric matrix, power functions xp , and ℓp norms (both for p rational).
Problems handled with (good) approximations. For a few functions, cvx will
make a (good) approximation to transform the specified problem to one that can
be handled by a combined LP, SOCP, and SDP solver. For example, when a power
function or ℓp -norm is used, with non-rational exponent p, cvx replaces p with a
nearby rational. The log of the normal cumulative distribution log Φ(x) is replaced
with an SDP-compatible approximation.
5
a handful) of SDPs, which yields the solution to the full accuracy of the core solver.
On the other hand, this technique can be substantially slower than if the core solver
directly handled such functions. The successive approximation method is briefly
described in Appendix D.1. Geometric problems are now solved in this manner as
well; in previous versions, an approximation was made.
Ultimately, we will interface cvx to a solver with native support for such functions,
which result in a large speedup in solving problems with these functions. Until then,
users should be aware that problems involving these functions can be slow to solve
using the current version of cvx. For this reason, when one of these functions is used,
the user will be warned that the successive approximate technique will be used.
We emphasize that most users do not need to know how cvx handles their problem;
what matters is what functions and operations can be handled. For a full list of
functions supported by cvx, see Appendix B, or use the online help function by
typing help cvx/builtins (for functions already in Matlab, such as sqrt or log) or
help cvx/functions (for functions not in Matlab, such as lambda_max).
1.4 Feedback
Please contact Michael Grant ([email protected]) or Stephen Boyd ([email protected])
with your comments. If you discover what you think is a bug, please include the fol-
lowing in your communication, so we can reproduce and fix the problem:
• the cvx model and supporting data that caused the error
• the name and version of the operating system you are using
cvx_version
at the MATLAB command prompt; simply copy its output into your email message.
6
cvx will attempt to give helpful error messages when you violate the DCP ruleset, it
can sometimes give quite obscure error messages.
cvx is not meant for very large problems, so if your problem is very large (for
example, a large image processing problem), cvx is unlikely to work well (or at all).
For such problems you will likely need to directly call a solver, or to develop your
own methods, to get the efficiency you need.
For such problems cvx can play an important role, however. Before starting to
develop a specialized large-scale method, you can use cvx to solve scaled-down or
simplified versions of the problem, to rapidly experiment with exactly what problem
you want to solve. For image reconstruction, for example, you might use cvx to
experiment with different problem formulations on 50 × 50 pixel images.
cvx will solve many medium and large scale problems, provided they have ex-
ploitable structure (such as sparsity), and you avoid for loops, which can be slow in
Matlab, and functions like log and exp that require successive approximation. If you
encounter difficulties in solving large problem instances, please do contact us; we may
be able to suggest an equivalent formulation that cvx can process more efficiently.
7
2 A quick start
Once you have installed cvx (see §A), you can start using it by entering a cvx speci-
fication into a Matlab script or function, or directly from the command prompt. To
delineate cvx specifications from surrounding Matlab code, they are preceded with
the statement cvx_begin and followed with the statement cvx_end. A specification
can include any ordinary Matlab statements, as well as special cvx-specific commands
for declaring primal and dual optimization variables and specifying constraints and
objective functions.
Within a cvx specification, optimization variables have no numerical value; in-
stead, they are special Matlab objects. This enables Matlab to distinguish between
ordinary commands and cvx objective functions and constraints. As Matlab reads
a cvx specification, it builds an internal representation of the optimization problem.
If it encounters a violation of the rules of disciplined convex programming (such as
an invalid use of a composition rule or an invalid constraint), an error message is
generated. When Matlab reaches the cvx_end command, it completes the conversion
of the cvx specification to a canonical form, and calls the underlying core solver to
solve it.
If the optimization is successful, the optimization variables declared in the cvx
specification are converted from objects to ordinary Matlab numerical values that
can be used in any further Matlab calculations. In addition, cvx also assigns a few
other related Matlab variables. One, for example, gives the status of the problem
(i.e., whether an optimal solution was found, or the problem was determined to be
infeasible or unbounded). Another gives the optimal value of the problem. Dual
variables can also be assigned.
This processing flow will become more clear as we introduce a number of simple
examples. We invite the reader to actually follow along with these examples in Mat-
lab, by running the quickstart script found in the examples subdirectory of the cvx
distribution. For example, if you are on Windows, and you have installed the cvx
distribution in the directory D:\Matlab\cvx, then you would type
cd D:\Matlab\cvx\examples
quickstart
at the Matlab command prompt. The script will automatically print key excerpts of
its code, and pause periodically so you can examine its output. (Pressing “Enter” or
“Return” resumes progress.) The line numbers accompanying the code excerpts in
this document correspond to the line numbers in the file quickstart.m.
2.1 Least-squares
We first consider the most basic convex optimization problem, least-squares. In a
least-squares problem, we seek x ∈ Rn that minimizes kAx − bk2 , where A ∈ Rm×n
is skinny and full rank (i.e., m ≥ n and Rank(A) = n). Let us create some test
problem data for m, n, A, and b in Matlab:
8
15 m = 16; n = 8;
16 A = randn(m,n);
17 b = randn(m,1);
(We chose small values of m and n to keep the output readable.) Then the least-
squares solution x = (AT A)−1 AT b is easily computed using the backslash operator:
20 x_ls = A \ b;
Using cvx, the same problem can be solved as follows:
23 cvx_begin
24 variable x(n);
25 minimize( norm(A*x-b) );
26 cvx_end
(The indentation is used for purely stylistic reasons and is optional.) Let us examine
this specification line by line:
• Line 23 creates a placeholder for the new cvx specification, and prepares Matlab
to accept variable declarations, constraints, an objective function, and so forth.
• Line 24 declares x to be an optimization variable of dimension n. cvx requires
that all problem variables be declared before they are used in an objective
function or constraints.
• Line 25 specifies an objective function to be minimized; in this case, the Eu-
clidean or ℓ2 -norm of Ax − b.
• Line 26 signals the end of the cvx specification, and causes the problem to be
solved.
The backslash form is clearly simpler—there is no reason to use cvx to solve a simple
least-squares problem. But this example serves as sort of a “Hello world!” program
in cvx; i.e., the simplest code segment that actually does something useful.
If you were to type x at the Matlab prompt after line 24 but before the cvx_end
command, you would see something like this:
x =
cvx affine expression (8x1 vector)
That is because within a specification, variables have no numeric value; rather, they
are Matlab objects designed to represent problem variables and expressions involving
them. Similarly, because the objective function norm(A*x-b) involves a cvx variable,
it does not have a numeric value either; it is also represented by a Matlab object.
When Matlab reaches the cvx_end command, the least-squares problem is solved,
and the Matlab variable x is overwritten with the solution of the least-squares prob-
lem, i.e., (AT A)−1 AT b. Now x is an ordinary length-n numerical vector, identical to
what would be obtained in the traditional approach, at least to within the accuracy
of the solver. In addition, two additional Matlab variables are created:
9
• cvx_optval, which contains the value of the objective function; i.e., kAx − bk2 ;
All three of these quantities, x, cvx_optval, and cvx_status, may now be freely
used in other Matlab statements, just like any other numeric or string values.1
There is not much room for error in specifying a simple least-squares problem,
but if you make one, you will get an error or warning message. For example, if you
replace line 25 with
maximize( norm(A*x-b) );
which asks for the norm to be maximized, you will get an error message stating that
a convex function cannot be maximized (at least in disciplined convex programming):
where l and u are given data, vectors with the same dimension as the variable x. The
vector inequality u v means componentwise, i.e., ui ≤ vi for all i. We can no longer
use the simple backslash notation to solve this problem, but it can be transformed
into a quadratic program (QP), which can be solved without difficulty if you have
some form of QP software available.
Let us provide some numeric values for l and u:
47 bnds = randn(n,2);
48 l = min( bnds, [], 2 );
49 u = max( bnds, [], 2 );
Then if you have the Matlab Optimization Toolbox [Mat05], you can use the quadprog
function to solve the problem as follows:
10
This actually minimizes the square of the norm, which is the same as minimizing the
norm itself. In contrast, the cvx specification is given by
59 cvx_begin
60 variable x(n);
61 minimize( norm(A*x-b) );
62 subject to
63 x >= l;
64 x <= u;
65 cvx_end
Three new lines of cvx code have been added to the cvx specification:
As before, when the cvx_end command is reached, the problem is solved, and the
numerical solution is assigned to the variable x. Incidentally, cvx will not transform
this problem into a QP by squaring the objective; instead, it will transform it into an
SOCP. The result is the same, and the transformation is done automatically.
In this example, as in our first, the cvx specification is longer than the Matlab
alternative. On the other hand, it is easier to read the cvx version and relate it
to the original problem. In contrast, the quadprog version requires us to know in
advance the transformation to QP form, including the calculations such as 2*A’*A
and -2*A’*b. For all but the simplest cases, a cvx specification is simpler, more
readable, and more compact than equivalent Matlab code to solve the same problem.
97 f = [ zeros(n,1); 1 ];
98 Ane = [ +A, -ones(m,1) ; ...
99 -A, -ones(m,1) ];
100 bne = [ +b; -b ];
101 xt = linprog(f,Ane,bne);
102 x_cheb = xt(1:n,:);
11
108 cvx_begin
109 variable x(n);
110 minimize( norm(A*x-b,Inf) );
111 cvx_end
The code based on linprog, and the cvx specification above will both solve the
Chebyshev norm minimization problem, i.e., each will produce an x that minimizes
kAx−bk∞ . Chebyshev norm minimization problems can have multiple optimal points,
however, so the particular x’s produced by the two methods can be different. The
two points, however, must have the same value of kAx − bk∞ .
Similarly, to minimize the ℓ1 norm k · k1 , we can use linprog as follows:
149 cvx_begin
150 variable x(n);
151 minimize( norm(A*x-b,1) );
152 cvx_end
cvx automatically transforms both of these problems into LPs, not unlike those gen-
erated manually for linprog.
The advantage that automatic transformation provides is magnified if we consider
functions (and their resulting transformations) that are less well-known than the ℓ∞
and ℓ1 norms. For example, consider the norm
where |Ax − b|[i] denotes the ith largest element of the absolute values of the entries
of Ax − b. This is indeed a norm, albeit a fairly esoteric one. (When k = 1, it
reduces to the ℓ∞ norm; when k = m, the dimension of Ax − b, it reduces to the ℓ1
norm.) The problem of minimizing kAx − bklgst,k over x can be cast as an LP, but
the transformation is by no means obvious so we will omit it here. But this norm is
provided in the base cvx library, and has the name norm_largest, so to specify and
solve the problem using cvx is easy:
179 k = 5;
180 cvx_begin
181 variable x(n);
182 minimize( norm_largest(A*x-b,k) );
183 cvx_end
12
Unlike the ℓ1 , ℓ2 , or ℓ∞ norms, this norm is not part of the standard Matlab distri-
bution. Once you have installed cvx, though, the norm is available as an ordinary
Matlab function outside a cvx specification. For example, once the code above is
processed, x is a numerical vector, so we can type
cvx_optval
norm_largest(A*x-b,k)
The first line displays the optimal value as determined by cvx; the second recomputes
the same value from the optimal vector x as determined by cvx.
The list of supported nonlinear functions in cvx goes well beyond norm and
norm_largest. For example, consider the Huber penalty minimization problem
Pm
minimize i=1 φ((Ax − b)i ),
The Huber penalty function is convex, and has been provided in the cvx function
library. So solving the Huber penalty minimization problem in cvx is simple:
204 cvx_begin
205 variable x(n);
206 minimize( sum(huber(A*x-b)) );
207 cvx_end
cvx automatically transforms this problem into an SOCP, which the core solver then
solves. (The cvx user, however, does not need to know how the transformation is
carried out.)
x >= l;
x <= u;
before the cvx_end statement in each cvx specification. In fact, cvx supports more
complex constraints as well. For example, let us define new matrices C and d in
Matlab as follows,
227 p = 4;
228 C = randn(p,n);
229 d = randn(p,1);
13
Now let us add an equality constraint and a nonlinear inequality constraint to the
original least-squares problem:
232 cvx_begin
233 variable x(n);
234 minimize( norm(A*x-b) );
235 subject to
236 C*x == d;
237 norm(x,Inf) <= 1;
238 cvx_end
Both of the added constraints conform to the DCP rules, and so are accepted by cvx.
After the cvx_end command, cvx converts this problem to an SOCP, and solves it.
Expressions using comparison operators (==, >=, etc.) behave quite differently
when they involve cvx optimization variables, or expressions constructed from cvx
optimization variables, than when they involve simple numeric values. For example,
because x is a declared variable, the expression C*x==d in line 236 above causes a
constraint to be included in the cvx specification, and returns no value at all. On the
other hand, outside of a cvx specification, if x has an appropriate numeric value—
for example immediately after the cvx_end command—that same expression would
return a vector of 1s and 0s, corresponding to the truth or falsity of each equality.2
Likewise, within a cvx specification, the statement norm(x,Inf)<=1 adds a nonlinear
constraint to the specification; outside of it, it returns a 1 or a 0 depending on the
numeric value of x (specifically, whether its ℓ∞ -norm is less than or equal to, or more
than, 1).
Because cvx is designed to support convex optimization, it must be able to verify
that problems are convex. To that end, cvx adopts certain construction rules that
govern how constraint and objective expressions are constructed. For example, cvx
requires that the left- and right- hand sides of an equality constraint be affine. So a
constraint such as
norm(x,Inf) == 1;
Inequality constraints of the form f (x) ≤ g(x) or g(x) ≥ f (x) are accepted only if f
can be verified as convex and g verified as concave. So a constraint such as
norm(x,Inf) >= 1;
2
In fact, immediately after the cvx end command above, you would likely find that most if not all
of the values returned would be 0. This is because, as is the case with many numerical algorithms,
solutions are determined only to within some nonzero numeric tolerance. So the equality constraints
will be satisfied closely, but often not exactly.
14
results in the following error:
The specifics of the construction rules are discussed in more detail in §4 below. These
rules are relatively intuitive if you know the basics of convex analysis and convex
optimization.
Line 277 of this code segment illustrates one of the construction rules to be dis-
cussed in §4 below. A basic principle of convex analysis is that a convex function
can be multiplied by a nonnegative scalar, or added to another convex function, and
the result is then convex. cvx recognizes such combinations and allows them to be
used anywhere a simple convex function can be—such as an objective function to be
minimized, or on the appropriate side of an inequality constraint. So in our example,
the expression
15
3.6
3.4
3.2
3
norm(A*x−b)
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.2
2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
norm(x,1)
Figure 1: An example trade-off curve from the quickstart demo, lines 268-286.
norm(A*x-b)+gamma(k)*norm(x,1)
16
3 The basics
3.1 Data types for variables
As mentioned above, all variables must be declared using the variable command
(or the variables command; see below) before they can be used in constraints or an
objective function.
Variables can be real or complex; and scalar, vector, matrix, or n-dimensional
arrays. In addition, matrices can have structure as well, such as symmetry or band-
edness. The structure of a variable is given by supplying a list of descriptive keywords
after the name and size of the variable. For example, the code segment
variable w(50) complex;
variable X(20,10);
variable Y(50,50) symmetric;
variable Z(100,100) hermitian toeplitz;
(inside a cvx specification) declares that w is a complex 50-element vector variable, X
is a real 20×10 matrix variable, Y is a real 50×50 symmetric matrix variable, and Z is
a complex 100 × 100 Hermitian Toeplitz matrix variable. The structure keywords can
be applied to n-dimensional arrays as well: each 2-dimensional “slice” of the array is
given the stated structure. The currently supported structure keywords are:
banded(lb,ub) complex diagonal hankel hermitian lower_bidiagonal
lower_hessenberg lower_triangular scaled_identity skew_symmetric
symmetric toeplitz tridiagonal upper_bidiagonal upper_hankel
upper_hessenberg upper_triangular
With a couple of exceptions, the structure keywords are self-explanatory:
• banded(lb,ub): the matrix is banded with a lower bandwidth lb and an upper
bandwidth ub. If both lb and ub are zero, then a diagonal matrix results. ub
can be omitted, in which case it is set equal to lb. For example, banded(1,1)
(or banded(1)) is a tridiagonal matrix.
• scaled_identity: the matrix is a (variable) multiple of the identity matrix.
This is the same as declaring it to be diagonal and Toeplitz.
• upper_hankel: The matrix is Hankel (i.e., constant along antidiagonals), and
zero below the central antidiagonal, i.e., for i + j > n + 1.
When multiple keywords are supplied, the resulting matrix structure is determined
by intersection; if the keywords conflict, then an error will result.
A variable statement can be used to declare only a single variable, which can
be a bit inconvenient if you have a lot of variables to declare. For this reason, the
variables statement is provided which allows you to declare multiple variables; i.e.,
variables x1 x2 x3 y1(10) y2(10,10,10);
The one limitation of the variables command is that it cannot declare complex or
structured arrays (e.g., symmetric, etc.). These must be declared one at a time, using
the singular variable command.
17
3.2 Objective functions
Declaring an objective function requires the use of the minimize or maximize func-
tion, as appropriate. The objective function in a call to minimize must be convex;
the objective function in a call to maximize must be concave. At most one objective
function may be declared in a given cvx specification, and the objective function must
have a scalar value. (For the only exception to this rule, see the section on defining
new functions in §5).
If no objective function is specified, the problem is interpreted as a feasibility
problem, which is the same as performing a minimization with the objective function
set to zero. In this case, cvx_optval is either 0, if a feasible point is found, or +Inf,
if the constraints are not feasible.
3.3 Constraints
The following constraint types are supported in cvx:
• Equality == constraints, where both the left- and right-hand sides are affine
functions of the optimization variables.
• Less-than <=, < inequality constraints, where the left-hand expression is convex,
and the right-hand expression is concave.
• Greater-than >=, > constraints, where the left-hand expression is concave, and
the right-hand expression is convex.
In cvx, the strict inequalities < and > are accepted, but interpreted as the associated
nonstrict inequalities, <= and >=, respectively. We encourage you to use the nonstrict
forms <= and >=, since they are mathematically correct. (Future versions of cvx
might assign a slightly different meaning to strict inequalities.)
These equality and inequality operators work for arrays. When both sides of
the constraint are arrays of the same size, the constraint is imposed elementwise. For
example, if a and b are m×n matrices, then a<=b is interpreted by cvx as mn (scalar)
inequalities, i.e., each entry of a must be less than or equal to the corresponding entry
of b. cvx also handles cases where one side is a scalar and the other is an array. This
is interpreted as a constraint for each element of the array, with the (same) scalar
appearing on the other side. As an example, if a is an m × n matrix, then a>=0 is
interpreted as mn inequalities: each element of the matrix must be nonnegative.
Note also the important distinction between =, which is an assignment, and ==,
which imposes an equality constraint (inside a cvx specification); for more on this
distinction, see §8.4. Also note that the non-equality operator ~= may not be used in
a constraint; in any case, such constraints are rarely convex. Inequalities cannot be
used if either side is complex.
cvx also supports a set membership constraint; see §3.5.
18
3.4 Functions
The base cvx function library includes a variety of convex, concave, and affine func-
tions which accept cvx variables or expressions as arguments. Many are common
Matlab functions such as sum, trace, diag, sqrt, max, and min, re-implemented as
needed to support cvx; others are new functions not found in Matlab. A complete
list of the functions in the base library can be found in §B. It’s also possible to add
your own new functions; see §5.
An example of a function in the base library is quad_over_lin, which represents
the quadratic-over-linear function, defined as f (x, y) = xT x/y, with domain Rn ×
R++ , i.e., x is an arbitrary vector in Rn , and y is a positive scalar. (The function also
accepts complex x, but we’ll consider real x to keep things simple.) The quadratic-
over-linear function is convex in x and y, and so can be used as an objective, in an
appropriate constraint, or in a more complicated expression. We can, for example,
minimize the quadratic-over-linear function of (Ax − b, cT x + d) using
minimize( quad_over_lin( A*x-b, c’*x+d ) );
inside a cvx specification, assuming x is a vector optimization variable, A is a matrix,
b and c are vectors, and d is a scalar. cvx recognizes this objective expression as a
convex function, since it is the composition of a convex function (the quadratic-over-
linear function) with an affine function.
You can also use the function quad_over_lin outside a cvx specification. In
this case, it just computes its (numerical) value, given (numerical) arguments. It’s
not quite the same as the expression ((A*x-b)’*(A*x-b))/(c’*x+d), however. This
expression makes sense, and returns a real number, when cT x + d is negative; but
quad_over_lin(A*x-b,c’*x+d) returns +Inf if cT x + d 6> 0.
3.5 Sets
cvx supports the definition and use of convex sets. The base library includes the cone
of positive semidefinite n × n matrices, the second-order or Lorentz cone, and various
norm balls. A complete list of sets supplied in the base library is given in §B.
Unfortunately, the Matlab language does not have a set membership operator,
such as x in S, to denote x ∈ S. So in cvx, we use a slightly different syntax to
require that an expression is in a set. To represent a set we use a function that
returns an unnamed variable that is required to be in the set. Consider, for example,
Sn+ , the cone of symmetric positive semidefinite n × n matrices. In cvx, we represent
this by the function semidefinite(n), which returns an unnamed new variable, that
is constrained to be positive semidefinite. To require that the matrix expression X
be symmetric positive semidefinite, we use the syntax X == semidefinite(n). The
literal meaning of this is that X is constrained to be equal to some unnamed variable,
which is required to be an n × n symmetric positive semidefinite matrix. This is, of
course, equivalent to saying that X must be symmetric positive semidefinite.
As an example, consider the constraint that a (matrix) variable X is a correlation
matrix, i.e., it is symmetric, has unit diagonal elements, and is positive semidefinite.
In cvx we can declare such a variable and impose such constraints using
19
variable X(n,n) symmetric;
X == semidefinite(n);
diag(X) == ones(n,1);
The second line here imposes the constraint that X be positive semidefinite. (You can
read ‘==’ here as ‘is’, so the second line can be read as ‘X is positive semidefinite’.)
The lefthand side of the third line is a vector containing the diagonal elements of X,
whose elements we require to be equal to one. Incidentally, cvx allows us to simplify
the third line to
diag(X) == 1;
A*X*A’-X == B*semidefinite(n)*B’;
cvx_begin
variables x(n) y;
minimize( y );
subject to
{ A*x-b, y } == lorentz(m);
cvx_end
The function call lorentz(m) returns an unnamed variable (i.e., a pair consisting of
a vector and a scalar variable), constrained to lie in the Lorentz cone of length m. So
the constraint in this specification requires that the pair { A*x-b, y } lies in the
appropriately-sized Lorentz cone.
20
3.6 Dual variables
When a disciplined convex program is solved, the associated dual problem is also
solved. (In this context, the original problem is called the primal problem.) The
optimal dual variables, each of which is associated with a constraint in the original
problem, give valuable information about the original problem, such as the sensitiv-
ities with respect to perturbing the constraints [BV04, Ch.5]. To get access to the
optimal dual variables in cvx, you simply declare them, and associate them with the
constraints. Consider, for example, the LP
minimize cT x
subject to Ax b,
with variable x ∈ Rn , and m inequality constraints. The dual of this problem is
maximize −bT y
subject to c + AT y = 0
y 0,
where the dual variable y is associated with the inequality constraint Ax b in the
original LP. To represent the primal problem and this dual variable in cvx, we use
the following syntax:
n = size(A,2);
cvx_begin
variable x(n);
dual variable y;
minimize( c’ * x );
subject to
y : A * x <= b;
cvx_end
The line
dual variable y
tells cvx that y will represent the dual variable, and the line
y : A * x <= b;
associates it with the inequality constraint. Notice how the colon : operator is being
used in a different manner than in standard Matlab, where it is used to construct
numeric sequences like 1:10. This new behavior is in effect only when a dual variable
is present, so there should be no confusion or conflict. No dimensions are given for
y; they are automatically determined from the constraint with which it is associated.
For example, if m = 20, typing y at the Matlab command prompt immediately before
cvx_end yields
y =
cvx dual variable (20x1 vector)
21
It is not necessary to place the dual variable on the left side of the constraint; for
example, the line above can also be written in this way:
A * x <= b : y;
In addition, dual variables for inequality constraints will always be nonnegative, which
means that the sense of the inequality can be reversed without changing the dual
variable’s value; i.e.,
b >= A * x : y;
yields an identical result. For equality constraints, on the other hand, swapping the
left- and right- hand sides of an equality constraint will negate the optimal value of
the dual variable.
After the cvx_end statement is processed, and assuming the optimization was
successful, cvx assigns numerical values to x and y—the optimal primal and dual
variable values, respectively. Optimal primal and dual variables for this LP must
satisfy the complementary slackness conditions
yi (b − Ax)i = 0, i = 1, . . . , m. (4)
y .* (b-A*x)
which prints out the products of the entries of y and b-A*x, which should be nearly
zero. This line must be executed after the cvx_end command (which assigns nu-
merical values to x and y); it will generate an error if it is executed inside the cvx
specification, where y and b-A*x are still just abstract expressions.
If the optimization is not successful, because either the problem is infeasible or
unbounded, then x and y will have different values. In the unbounded case, x will
contain an unbounded direction; i.e., a point x satisfying
cT x = −1, Ax 0, (5)
and y will be filled with NaN values, reflecting the fact that the dual problem is
infeasible. In the infeasible case, x is filled with NaN values, while y contains an
unbounded dual direction; i.e., a point y satisfying
Of course, the precise interpretation of primal and dual points and/or directions
depends on the structure of the problem. See references such as [BV04] for more on
the interpretation of dual information.
cvx also supports the declaration of indexed dual variables. These prove useful
when the number of constraints in a model (and, therefore, the number of dual
variables) depends upon the parameters themselves. For more information on indexed
dual variables, see §8.5.
22
3.7 Expression holders
Sometimes it is useful to store a cvx expression into a Matlab variable for future use.
For instance, consider the following cvx script:
variables x y
z = 2 * x - y;
square( z ) <= 3;
quad_over_lin( x, z ) <= 1;
The construction z = 2 * x - y is not an equality constraint; it is an assignment.
It is storing an intermediate calculation 2 * x - y, which is an affine expression,
which is then used later in two different constraints. We call z an expression holder
to differentiate it from a formally declared cvx variable. For more on the critical
differences between assignment and equality, see Section §8.4.
Often it will be useful to accumulate an array of expressions into a single Matlab
variable. Unfortunately, a somewhat technical detail of the Matlab object model can
cause problems in such cases. Consider this construction:
variable u(9);
x(1) = 1;
for k = 1 : 9,
x(k+1) = sqrt( x(k) + u(k) );
end
This seems reasonable enough: x should be a vector whose first value is 1, and whose
subsequent values are concave cvx expressions. But if you try this in a cvx model,
Matlab will give you a rather cryptic error:
??? The following error occurred converting from cvx to double:
Error using ==> double
Conversion to double from cvx is not possible.
The reason this occurs is that the Matlab variable x is initialized as a numeric array
when the assignment x(1)=1 is made; and Matlab will not permit cvx objects to be
subsequently inserted into numeric arrays.
The solution is to explicitly declare x to be an expression holder before assigning
values to it. We have provided keywords expression and expressions for just this
purpose, for declaring a single or multiple expression holders for future assignment.
Once an expression holder has been declared, you may freely insert both numeric
and cvx expressions into it. For example, the previous example can be corrected as
follows:
variable u(9);
expression x(10);
x(1) = 1;
for k = 1 : 9,
x(k+1) = sqrt( x(k) + u(k) );
end
23
cvx will accept this construction without error. You can then use the concave ex-
pressions x(1), . . . , x(10) in any appropriate ways; for example, you could maximize
x(10).
The differences between a variable object and an expression object are quite
significant. A variable object holds an optimization variable, and cannot be over-
written or assigned in the cvx specification. (After solving the problem, however, cvx
will overwrite optimization variables with optimal values.) An expression object, on
the other hand, is initialized to zero, and should be thought of as a temporary place
to store cvx expressions; it can be assigned to, freely re-assigned, and overwritten in
a cvx specification.
Of course, as our first example shows, it is not always necessary to declare an
expression holder before it is created or used. But doing so provides an extra measure
of clarity to models, so we strongly recommend it.
24
4 The DCP ruleset
cvx enforces the conventions dictated by the disciplined convex programming ruleset,
or DCP ruleset for short. cvx will issue an error message whenever it encounters
a violation of any of the rules, so it is important to understand them before begin-
ning to build models. The rules are drawn from basic principles of convex analysis,
and are easy to learn, once you’ve had an exposure to convex analysis and convex
optimization.
The DCP ruleset is a set of sufficient, but not necessary, conditions for convexity.
So it is possible to construct expressions that violate the Pruleset but are in fact
n
convex. As an example consider the entropy function, − i=1 xi log xi , defined for
x > 0, which is concave. If it is expressed as
- sum( x .* log( x ) )
cvx will reject it, because its concavity does not follow from any of the composition
rules. (Specifically, it violates the no-product rule described in §4.4.) Problems
involving entropy, however, can be solved, by explicitly using the entropy function,
sum(entr( x ))
which is in the base cvx library, and thus recognized as concave by cvx. If a convex
(or concave) function is not recognized as convex or concave by cvx, it can be added
as a new atom; see §5. √
As another example consider the function x2 + 1 = k[x 1]k2 , which is convex. If
it is written as
norm([x 1])
sqrt(x^2+1)
cvx will reject it, since convexity of this function does not follow from the cvx ruleset.
25
Of course, there is significant overlap in these categories. For example, constant
expressions are also affine, and (real) affine expressions are both convex and concave.
Convex and concave expressions are real by definition. Complex constant and
affine expressions can be constructed, but their usage is more limited; for example,
they cannot appear as the left- or right-hand side of an inequality constraint.
4.3 Constraints
Three types of constraints may be specified in disciplined convex programs:
• An equality constraint, constructed using ==, where both sides are affine.
• A less-than inequality constraint, using either <= or <, where the left side is
convex and the right side is concave.
• A greater-than inequality constraint, using either >= or >, where the left side is
concave and the right side is convex.
Non-equality constraints, constructed using ~=, are never allowed. (Such constraints
are not convex.)
One or both sides of an equality constraint may be complex; inequality constraints,
on the other hand, must be real. A complex equality constraint is equivalent to two
real equality constraints, one for the real part and one for the imaginary part. An
equality constraint with a real side and a complex side has the effect of constraining
the imaginary part of the complex side to be zero.
As discussed in §3.5 above, cvx enforces set membership constraints (e.g., x ∈ S)
using equality constraints. The rule that both sides of an equality constraint must
be affine applies to set membership constraints as well. In fact, the returned value of
set atoms like semidefinite() and lorentz() is affine, so it is sufficient to simply
verify the remaining portion of the set membership constraint. For composite values
like { x, y }, each element must be affine.
In this version, strict inequalities <, > are interpreted identically to nonstrict
inequalities >=, <=. Eventually cvx will flag strict inequalities so that they can be
verified after the optimization is carried out.
26
4.4 Expression rules
So far, the rules as stated are not particularly restrictive, in that all convex programs
(disciplined or otherwise) typically adhere to them. What distinguishes disciplined
convex programming from more general convex programming are the rules governing
the construction of the expressions used in objective functions and constraints.
Disciplined convex programming determines the curvature of scalar expressions
by recursively applying the following rules. While this list may seem long, it is for
the most part an enumeration of basic rules of convex analysis for combining convex,
concave, and affine forms: sums, multiplication by scalars, and so forth.
27
– the difference between a concave expression and a convex expression;
– the product of a concave expression and a nonnegative constant;
– the product of a convex expression and a nonpositive constant;
– the negation of a convex expression.
4.5 Functions
In cvx, functions are categorized in two attributes: curvature (constant, affine, con-
vex, or concave) and monotonicity (nondecreasing, nonincreasing, or nonmonotonic).
Curvature determines the conditions under which they can appear in expressions ac-
cording to the expression rules given in §4.4 above. Monotonicity determines how
they can be used in function compositions, as we shall see in §4.6 below.
For functions with only one argument, the categorization is straightforward. Some
examples are given in the table below.
Function Meaning
P Curvature Monotonicity
sum( x ) i xi affine nondecreasing
abs( x ) |x|
√ convex nonmonotonic
sqrt( x ) x concave nondecreasing
Following standard practice in convex analysis, convex functions are interpreted
as +∞ when the argument is outside the domain of the function, and concave func-
tions are interpreted as −∞ when the argument is outside its domain. In other
words, convex and concave functions in cvx are interpreted as their extended-valued
extensions.
This has the effect of automatically constraining the argument of a function to be
in the function’s domain. For example, if we form sqrt(x+1) in a cvx specification,
where x is a variable, then x will automatically be constrained to be larger than or
equal to −1. There is no need to add a separate constraint, x>=-1, to enforce this.
Monotonicity of a function is determined in the extended sense, i.e., including the
values of the argument outside its domain. For example, sqrt(x) is determined to be
nondecreasing since its value is constant (−∞) for negative values of its argument;
then jumps up to 0 for argument zero, and increases for positive values of its argument.
28
cvx does not consider a function to be convex or concave if it is so only over
a portion of its domain, even if the argument is constrained to lie in one of these
portions. As an example, consider the function 1/x. This function is convex for x > 0,
and concave for x < 0. But you can never write 1/x in cvx (unless x is constant),
even if you have imposed a constraint such as x>=1, which restricts x to lie in the
convex portion of function 1/x. You can use the cvx function inv_pos(x), defined
as 1/x for x > 0 and ∞ otherwise, for the convex portion of 1/x; cvx recognizes this
function as convex and nonincreasing. In cvx, you can express the concave portion
of 1/x, where x is negative, using -inv_pos(-x), which will be correctly recognized
as concave and nonincreasing.
For functions with multiple arguments, curvature is always considered jointly, but
monotonicity can be considered on an argument-by-argument basis. For example,
(
|x|2 /y y > 0
quad_over_lin( x, y ) convex, nonincreasing in y
+∞ y≤0
is jointly convex in both arguments, but it is monotonic only in its second argument.
In addition, some functions are convex, concave, or affine only for a subset of its
arguments. For example, the function
norm( x, p ) kxkp (1 ≤ p) convex in x, nonmonotonic
is convex only in its first argument. Whenever this function is used in a cvx speci-
fication, then, the remaining arguments must be constant, or cvx will issue an error
message. Such arguments correspond to a function’s parameters in mathematical
terminology; e.g.,
fp (x) : Rn → R, fp (x) , kxkp
So it seems fitting that we should refer to such arguments as parameters in this
context as well. Henceforth, whenever we speak of a cvx function as being convex,
concave, or affine, we will assume that its parameters are known and have been given
appropriate, constant values.
4.6 Compositions
A basic rule of convex analysis is that convexity is closed under composition with an
affine mapping. This is part of the DCP ruleset as well:
• A convex, concave, or affine function may accept an affine expression (of compat-
ible size) as an argument. The result is convex, concave, or affine, respectively.
For example, consider the function square( x ), which is provided in the cvx atom
library. This function squares its argument; i.e., it computes x.*x. (For array ar-
guments, it squares each element independently.) It is in the cvx atom library, and
known to be convex, provided its argument is real. So if x is a real variable of
dimension n, a is a constant n-vector, and b is a constant, the expression
square( a’ * x + b )
29
is accepted by cvx, which knows that it is convex.
The affine composition rule above is a special case of a more sophisticated compo-
sition rule, which we describe now. We consider a function, of known curvature and
monotonicity, that accepts multiple arguments. For convex functions, the rules are:
If each argument of the function satisfies these rules, then the expression is accepted
by cvx, and is classified as convex. Recall that a constant or affine expression is
both convex and concave, so any argument can be affine, including as a special case,
constant.
The corresponding rules for a concave function are as follows:
max( abs( x ) )
obeys the first of the six composition rules and is therefore accepted by cvx, and
classified as convex.
As another example, consider the sum function, which is both convex and concave
(since it is affine), and nondecreasing in each argument. Therefore the expressions
sum( square( x ) )
sum( sqrt( x ) )
are recognized as valid in cvx, and classified as convex and concave, respectively. The
first one follows from the first rule for convex functions; and the second one follows
from the first rule for concave functions.
Most people who know basic convex analysis like to think of these examples in
terms of the more specific rules: a maximum of convex functions is convex, and a sum
of convex (concave) functions is convex (concave). But these rules are just special
30
cases of the general composition rules above. Some other well known basic rules that
follow from the general composition rules are: a nonnegative multiple of a convex
(concave) function is convex (concave); a nonpositive multiple of a convex (concave)
function is concave (convex).
Now we consider a more complex example in depth. Suppose x is a vector vari-
able, and A, b, and f are constants with appropriate dimensions. cvx recognizes the
expression
sqrt(f’*x) + min(4,1.3-norm(A*x-b))
as concave. Consider the term sqrt(f’*x). cvx recognizes that sqrt is concave and
f’*x is affine, so it concludes that sqrt(f’*x) is concave. Now consider the second
term min(4,1.3-norm(A*x-b)). cvx recognizes that min is concave and nondecreas-
ing, so it can accept concave arguments. cvx recognizes that 1.3-norm(A*x-b) is
concave, since it is the difference of a constant and a convex function. So cvx con-
cludes that the second term is also concave. The whole expression is then recognized
as concave, since it is the sum of two concave functions.
The composition rules are sufficient but not necessary for the classification to be
correct, so some expressions which are in fact convex or concave will fail to satisfy
them, and so will be rejected by cvx. For example, if x is a vector variable, the
expression
sqrt( sum( square( x ) ) )
is rejected by cvx, because there is no rule governing the composition of a concave
nondecreasing function with a convex function. Of course, the workaround is simple
in this case: use norm( x ) instead, since norm is in the atom library and known by
cvx to be convex.
31
square_pos is nondecreasing, so it can accept a convex argument. Thus, the expres-
sion
square_pos( square( x ) + 1 )
is mathematically equivalent to the rejected version above (since the argument to the
outer function is always positive), but it satisfies the DCP ruleset and is therefore
accepted by cvx.
This is the reason several functions in the cvx atom library come in two forms:
the “natural” form, and one that is modified in such a way that it is monotonic, and
can therefore be used in compositions. Other such “monotonic extensions” include
sum_square_pos and quad_pos_over_lin. If you are implementing a new function
yourself, you might wish to consider if a monotonic extension of that function would
also be useful.
x ^ 2 + 2 * x * y + y ^2
will cause an error in cvx, because the second of the three terms 2 * x * y, is neither
convex nor concave. But the equivalent expressions
( x + y ) ^ 2
( x + y ) * ( x + y )
will be accepted. cvx actually completes the square when it comes across a scalar
quadratic form, so the form need not be symmetric. For example, if z is a vector
variable, a, b are constants, and Q is positive definite, then
( z + a )’ * Q * ( z + b )
32
will be recognized as convex. Once a quadratic form has been verified by cvx, it
can be freely used in any way that a normal convex or concave expression can be, as
described in §4.4.
Quadratic forms should actually be used less frequently in disciplined convex pro-
gramming than in a more traditional mathematical programming framework, where
a quadratic form is often a smooth substitute for a nonsmooth form that one truly
wishes to use. In cvx, such substitutions are rarely necessary, because of its support
for nonsmooth functions. For example, the constraint
sum( ( A * x - b ) .^ 2 ) <= 1
norm( A * x - b ) <= 1
With modern solvers, the second form can be represented using a second-order cone
constraint—so the second form may actually be more efficient. So we encourage you to
re-evaluate the use of quadratic forms in your models, in light of the new capabilities
afforded by disciplined convex programming.
33
5 Adding new functions to the cvx atom library
cvx allows new convex and concave functions to be defined and added to the atom
library, in two ways, described in this section. The first method is simple, and can
(and should) be used by many users of cvx, since it requires only a knowledge of the
basic DCP ruleset. The second method is very powerful, but a bit complicated, and
should be considered an advanced technique, to be attempted only by those who are
truly comfortable with convex analysis, disciplined convex programming, and cvx in
its current state.
Please do let us know if you have implemented a convex or concave function that
you think would be useful to other users; we will be happy to incorporate it in a
future release.
function y = deadzone( x )
y = max( abs( x ) - 1, 0 )
This function works just as you expect it would outside of cvx—i.e., when its argu-
ment is numerical. But thanks to Matlab’s operator overloading capability, it will
also work within cvx if called with an affine argument. cvx will properly conclude
that the function is convex, because all of the operations carried out conform to the
rules of DCP: abs is recognized as a convex function; we can subtract a constant from
it, and we can take the maximum of the result and 0, which yields a convex function.
So we are free to use deadzone anywhere in a cvx specification that we might use
abs, for example, because cvx knows that it is a convex function.
Let us emphasize that when defining a function this way, the expressions you
use must conform to the DCP ruleset, just as they would if they had been inserted
directly into a cvx model. For example, if we replace max with min above; e.g.,
function y = deadzone_bad( x )
y = min( abs( x ) - 1, 0 )
then the modified function fails to meet the DCP ruleset. The function will work
outside of a cvx specification, happily computing the value min{|x| − 1, 0} for a
numerical argument x. But inside a cvx specification, invoked with a nonconstant
argument, it will not work, because it doesn’t follow the DCP composition rules.
34
5.2 New functions via partially specified problems
A more advanced method for defining new functions in cvx relies on the following
basic result of convex analysis. Suppose that S ⊂ Rn × Rm is a convex set and
g : (Rn × Rm ) → (R ∪ +∞) is a convex function. Then
is also a convex function. (This rule is sometimes called the partial minimization
rule.) We can think of the convex function f as the optimal value of a family of
convex optimization problems, indexed or parametrized by x,
minimize g(x, y)
subject to (x, y) ∈ S
epi f = S + ({0} × R+ ) ,
where 0 ∈ Rn .
In cvx you can define a convex function in this very manner, that is, as the optimal
value of a parameterized family of disciplined convex programs. We call the under-
lying convex program in such cases an incomplete specification—so named because
the parameters (that is, the function inputs) are unknown when the specification is
constructed. The concept of incomplete specifications can at first seem a bit compli-
cated, but it is very powerful mechanism that allows cvx to support a wide variety
of functions.
Let us look at an example to see how this works. Consider the unit-halfwidth
Huber penalty function h(x):
(
x2 |x| ≤ 1
h : R → R, h(x) , (8)
2|x| − 1 |x| ≥ 1.
We can express the Huber function in terms of the following family of convex QPs,
parameterized by x:
minimize 2v + w 2
subject to |x| ≤ v + w (9)
w ≤ 1,
with scalar variables v and w. The optimal value of this simple QP is equal to the
Huber penalty function of x. We note that the objective and constraint functions in
this QP are (jointly) convex in v, w and x.
We can implement the Huber penalty function in cvx as follows:
35
function cvx_optval = huber( x )
cvx_begin
variables w v;
minimize( w^2 + 2 * v );
subject to
abs( x ) <= w + v;
w <= 1;
cvx_end
If huber is called with a numeric value of x, then upon reaching the cvx_end state-
ment, cvx will find a complete specification, and solve the problem to compute the
result. cvx places the optimal objective function value into the variable cvx_optval,
and function returns that value as its output. Of course, it’s very inefficient to com-
pute the Huber function of a numeric value x by solving a QP. But it does give the
correct value (up to the core solver accuracy).
What is most important, however, is that if huber is used within a cvx specifica-
tion, with an affine cvx expression for its argument, then cvx will do the right thing.
In particular, cvx will recognize the Huber function, called with affine argument, as
a valid convex expression. In this case, the function huber will contain a special
Matlab object that represents the function call in constraints and objectives. Thus
the function huber can be used anywhere a traditional convex function can be used,
in constraints or objective functions, in accordance with the DCP ruleset.
There is a corresponding development for concave functions as well. Given a
convex set S as above, and a concave function g : (Rn × Rm ) → (R ∪ −∞), the
function
hypo f = S − Rn+ .
In cvx, a concave incomplete specification is simply one that uses a maximize ob-
jective instead of a minimize objective; and if properly constructed, it can be used
anywhere a traditional concave function can be used within a cvx specification.
For an example of a concave incomplete specification, consider the function
36
function cvx_optval = lambda_min_symm( X )
n = size( X, 1 );
cvx_begin
variable y;
maximize( y );
subject to
X + X’ - y * eye( n ) == semidefinite( n );
cvx_end
If a numeric value of X is supplied, this function will return min(eig(X+X’)) (to within
numerical tolerances). However, this function can also be used in cvx constraints and
objectives, just like any other concave function in the atom library.
There are two practical issues that arise when defining functions using incomplete
specifications, both of which we will illustrate using our huber example above. First of
all, as written the function works only with scalar values. To apply it (elementwise) to
a vector requires that we iterate through the elements in a for loop—a very inefficient
enterprise, particularly in cvx. A far better approach is to extend the huber function
to handle vector inputs. This is, in fact, rather simple to do: we simply create a
multiobjective version of the problem:
This version of huber will in effect create sx “instances” of the problem in parallel;
and when used in a cvx specification, will be handled correctly.
The second issue is that if the input to huber is numeric, then direct computation
is a far more efficient way to compute the result than solving a QP. (What is more,
the multiobjective version cannot be used with numeric inputs.) One solution is to
place both versions in one file, with an appropriate test to select the proper version
to use:
37
variables w( sx ) v( sx );
minimize( w .^ 2 + 2 * v );
subject to
abs( x ) <= w + v;
w <= 1;
cvx_end
end
Alternatively, you can create two separate versions of the function, one for numeric
input and one for cvx expressions, and place the numeric version in a subdirectory
called @double. Matlab will call the @double version only when its arguments are
numeric, and it will call your cvx version in other cases. This is the approach taken
for the version of huber found in the cvx atom library.
One good way to learn more about using incomplete specifications is to examine
some of the examples already in the cvx atom library. Good choices include huber,
inv_pos, lambda_min, lambda_max, matrix_frac, quad_over_lin, sum_largest,
and others. Some are a bit difficult to read because of diagnostic or error-checking
code, but these are relatively simple.
38
6 Semidefinite programming using cvx
Those who are familiar with semidefinite programming (SDP) know that the con-
straints that utilize the set semidefinite(n) in §3.5 above are, in practice, typi-
cally expressed using linear matrix inequality (LMI) notation. For example, given
X = X T ∈ Rn×n , the constraint X 0 denotes that X ∈ Sn+ ; that is, that X is
positive semidefinite.
cvx provides a special SDP mode which allows this LMI convention to be employed
inside cvx models using Matlab’s standard inequality operators >=, <=, etc.. In order
to use it, one must simply begin a model with the statement cvx_begin sdp or
cvx_begin SDP instead of simply cvx_begin. When SDP mode is engaged, cvx
interprets certain inequality constraints in a different manner. To be specific:
• Inequality constraints involving vectors and scalars are interpreted the same;
i.e., elementwise.
• There is one additional restriction: both X and Y must be the same size, or one
must be the scalar zero. For example, if X and Y are matrices of size n,
39
• Note that LMI constraints enforce symmetry (real or Hermitian, as appropriate)
on their inputs. Unlike SDPSOL [WB00], cvx does not extract the symmetric
part for you: you must take care to insure symmetry yourself. Since cvx sup-
ports the declaration of symmetric matrices, this is reasonably straightforward.
If cvx cannot determine that an LMI is symmetric, a warning will be issued.
So, for example, the cvx model found in the file examples/closest_toeplitz_sdp.m,
cvx_begin
variable Z(n,n) hermitian toeplitz
dual variable Q
minimize( norm( Z - P, ’fro’ ) )
Z == hermitian_semidefinite( n ) : Q;
cvx_end
cvx_begin sdp
variable Z(n,n) hermitian toeplitz
dual variable Q
minimize( norm( Z - P, ’fro’ ) )
Z >= 0 : Q;
cvx_end
Many other examples in the cvx example library utilize semidefinite constraints; and
all of them use SDP mode. To find them, simply search for the text cvx_begin sdp
in the examples/ subdirectory tree using your favorite file search tool. One of these
examples is reproduced in §8.5.
Since semidefinite programming is popular, some may wonder why SDP mode is
not the default behavior. The reason for this is that we place a strong emphasis
on maintaining consistency between Matlab’s native behavior and that of cvx; and
the use of the >=, <=, >, < operators to create LMIs represents a deviation from
that ideal. For example, the expression Z >= 0 in the example above constrains
the variable Z to be positive semidefinite. But after the model has been solved and
Z has been replaced with a numeric value, the expression Z >= 0 will test for the
elementwise nonnegativity of Z. To verify that the numeric value of Z is, in fact,
positive semidefinite, you must perform a test like min(eig(Z)) >= 0.
40
7 Geometric programming using cvx
Geometric programs (GPs) are special mathematical programs that can be converted
to convex form using a change of variables. The convex form of GPs can be expressed
as DCPs, but cvx also provides a special mode that allows a GP to be specified in
its native form. cvx will automatically perform the necessary conversion, compute
a numerical solution, and translate the results back to the original problem. For a
tutorial on geometric programming, we refer the reader to [BKVH05].
To utilize GP mode, you must begin your cvx specification with the command
cvx_begin gp or cvx_begin GP instead of simply cvx_begin. For example, the
following code, found in the example library at gp/max_volume_box.m, determines
the maximum volume box subject to various area and ratio constraints:
cvx_begin gp
variables w h d
maximize( w * h * d )
subject to
2*(h*w+h*d) <= Awall;
w*d <= Afloor;
h/w >= alpha;
h/w <= beta;
d/w >= gamma;
d/w <= delta;
cvx_end
As the example illustrates, cvx supports the construction of monomials and posyn-
omials using addition, multiplication, division (when appropriate), and powers. In
addition, cvx supports the construction of generalized geometric programs (GGPs),
by permitting the use of generalized posynomials wherever posynomials are permitted
in standard GP [BKVH05].
The solvers used in this version of cvx do not support geometric programming
natively. Instead, they are solved using the successive approximation technique de-
scribed in Appendix D.1. This means that solving GPs can be slow, but for small
and medium sized problems, the method works well.
In the remainder of this section, we will describe specific rules that apply when
constructing models in GP mode.
41
• A feasibility problem, consisting of one or more constraints.
7.2 Constraints
Three types of constraints may be specified in geometric programs:
• An equality constraint, consrtucted using ==, where both sides are monomials.
• A less-than inequality constraint <=, < where the left side is a generalized posyn-
omial and the right side is a monomial.
• A greater-than inequality constraint >=, > where the left side is a monomial and
the right side is a generalized posynomial.
7.3 Expressions
The basic building blocks of generalized geometric programming are monomials,
posynomials, and generalized posynomials. A valid monomial is
• a declared variable;
• a call to one of the following functions with monomial arguments: prod, cumprod,
geo_mean, sqrt.
• a valid monomial;
• a call to one of the following functions with posynomial arguments: sum, cumsum,
mean, prod, cumprod.
42
A valid generalized posynomial expression is
• a valid posynomial;
• a call to one of the following functions with arguments that are generalized
posynomials: sum, cumsum, mean, prod, cumprod, geo_mean, sqrt, norm,
sum_largest, norm_largest.
43
8 Advanced topics
In this section we describe a number of the more advanced capabilities of cvx. We
recommend that you skip this section at first, until you are comfortable with the basic
capabilities described above.
12 cvx_solver sedumi
13 cvx_solver sdpt3
14 cvx_solver
We have found that SDPT3 is much more reliable for problems that use second-order
cones, which include problems involving absolute values, quadratics, power functions,
and norms. SDPT3 is currently in very active development; so if you encounter a
problem that SDPT3 cannot solve but SeDuMi can, please send us a bug report and
we will forward the results to the authors of SDPT3.
44
• cvx_precision default: standard = ǫ1/2 ≈ 1.5 × 10−8 , reduced = ǫ1/4 .
• cvx_precision high: standard = ǫ3/4 ≈ 1.1 × 10−11 , reduced = ǫ3/8 .
• cvx_precision best: standard = 0, “reduced” = ǫ1/2 (see below).
In function mode, these calls look like cvx_precision(’low’), etc. The best preci-
sion setting is special: it instructs the solver to continue until it is completely unable
to make progress. Then, as long as it reaches at least the “reduced” precision of
ǫ1/2 , it may claim a successful solution; otherwise, it returns a cvx_status value of
Failed. An Inaccurate status value is not possible in best mode (nor, for that
matter, in low mode, which sets the standard and reduced precisions to be identical).
The cvx_precision command can also be called with either a scalar or a length-
two vector. If you pass it a scalar, it will assume that as the standard precision, and
it will compute a default reduced precision value for you. Roughly speaking, that
reduced precision will be the square root of the standard precision, with some bounds
imposed to make sure that it stays reasonable. If you supply a vector of values, then
the smallest value will be chosen as the standard precision, and the larger value as
the reduced precision.
The cvx_precision command can be used either within a cvx model or outside
of it; and its behavior differs in each case. If you call it from within a model, e.g.,
cvx_begin
cvx_precision high
...
cvx_end
then the setting you choose will apply only until cvx_end is reached. If you call it
outside a model, e.g.,
cvx_precision high
cvx_begin
...
cvx_end
then the setting you choose will apply globally; that is, to any subsequent models
that are created and solved. The local approach should be preferred in an application
where multiple models are constructed and solved at different levels of precision.
If you call cvx_precision in function mode, either with a string or a numeric
value, it will return as its output the previous precision vector—the same result you
would obtain if you called it with no arguments. This may seem confusing at first,
but this is done so that you can save the previous value in a variable, and restore it
at the end of your calcuations; e.g.,
cvxp = cvx_precision( ’high’ );
cvx_begin
...
cvx_end
cvx_precision( cvxp );
45
This is considered good coding etiquette in a larger application where multiple cvx
models at multiple precision levels may be employed. Of course, a simpler but equally
courteous approach is to call cvx_precision within the cvx model, as described
above, so that its effect lasts only for that model.
46
The consequences of inadvertently using assignments within a cvx specification
can cause subtle but critical problems. For example, let A, C ∈ Rn×n and b ∈ R be
given, and consider the simple SDP
minimize Tr(CX)
subject to Tr(AX) = b (14)
X 0
1 n = 5;
2 A = randn(n,n); C = randn(n,n); b = randn;
3 cvx_begin
4 variable X(n,n) symmetric;
5 minimize( trace( C * X ) );
6 subject to
7 trace( A * X ) == b;
8 X = semidefinite(n);
9 cvx_end
At first glance, line 8 may look like it constrains X to be positive semidefinite; but
it is an assignment, not an equality constraint. So X is actually overwritten with an
anonymous, positive semidefinite variable, and the original X is not constrained all!
Fortunately, this particular error is easily caught and prevented by cvx. When
cvx_end is reached, cvx examines each declared variable to verify that it still points
to the variable object it was originally assigned upon declaration. If it does not, it
will issue an error like this:
We hope that this check will prevent at least some typographical errors from having
frustrating consequences in your models.
Of course, this single check does not prevent you from using all assignments
inside your cvx specifications, only those that overwrite formally declared variables.
As discussed in §3.7, other kinds of assignments are permitted, and may be genuinely
useful. But in our view they should be used sparingly. For instance, consider the first
example from §3.7:
variables x y
z = 2 * x - y;
square( z ) <= 3;
quad_over_lin( x, z ) <= 1;
47
The following alternative formulation, which declares z as a formal variable, is nu-
merically equivalent:
variables x y z
z == 2 * x - y;
square( z ) <= 3;
quad_over_lin( x, z ) <= 1;
([Stu99]). This problem minimizes a weighted sum of the main diagonal of a positive
semidefinite matrix, while holding the sums along each diagonal constant. The pa-
rameters of the problem are the elements of the vector b ∈ Rn , and the optimization
variable is a symmetric matrix X ∈ Rn×n . The cvx version of this model is
cvx_begin
variable X( n, n ) symmetric
minimize( ( n - 1 : -1 : 0 ) * diag( X ) );
for k = 0 : n-1,
sum( diag( X, k ) ) == b( k+1 );
end
X == semidefinite(n);
cvx_end
If we wish to obtain dual information for the n simple equality constraints, we need
a way to assign each constraint in the for loop a separate dual variable. This is
accomplished as follows:
cvx_begin
variable X( n, n ) symmetric
48
dual variables y{n}
minimize( ( n - 1 : -1 : 0 ) * diag( X ) );
for k = 0 : n-1,
sum( diag( X, k ) ) == b( k+1 ) : y{k+1};
end
X == semidefinite(n);
cvx_end
The statement
allocates a cell array of n dual variables, and stores the result in the Matlab vari-
able Z. The equality constraint in the for loop has been augmented with a reference
to y{k+1}, so that each constraint is assigned a separate dual variable. When the
cvx_end command is issued, cvx will compute the optimal values of these dual vari-
ables, and deposit them into an n-element cell array y.
This example admittedly is a bit simplistic. With a bit of careful arrangement, it
is possible to rewrite this model so that the n equality constraints can be combined
into a single vector constraint, which in turn would require only a single vector dual
variable.3 For a more complex example that is not amenable to such a simplification,
see the file
examples/cvxbook/Ch07_statistical_estim/cheb.m
in the cvx distribution. In that problem, each constraint in the for loop is a linear
matrix inequality, not a scalar linear equation; so the indexed dual variables are
symmetric matrices, not scalars.
3
Indeed, a future version of cvx will support the use of the Matlab function spdiags, which will
reduce the entire for loop to the single constraint spdiags(X,0:n-1)==b.
49
A Installation and compatability
cvx requires Matlab 6.1 or later.4 Primary cvx development is performed using an
Intel-based Mac running Matlab 7.4, with additional development performed on the
following platforms and Matlab versions:
For purposes of testing and support, we have access to most other versions of Mat-
lab for Windows, Linux, and Mac (both Intel and PowerPC). The one significant
exception is version 7.0.0, so we cannot provide support for it.
Version 7.0.0 has exhibited numerical problems for at least one user; the problems
were eliminated by upgrading. We have also identified another issue using cvx with
Matlab 7.0.1 and 7.0.4; workarounds are provided in §A.4 below.
Precompiled MEX files are included for Windows (32-bit), Linux (32-bit), and
Intel Mac OS X. For other platforms, the MEX files will be compiled during the
setup process; see §A.2. For platforms other than those listed above (e.g., Solaris,
HPUX), cvx is quite likely to work, but we are unable to provide support.
2. If you have been running a previous version of cvx, remove it or move it out
of the way—say, by renaming it cvx_old—before proceeding. DO NOT allow
the new version of cvx to be unpacked on top of the old.
3. Unpack the file anywhere you like; a directory called cvx will be created. There
is one important exception: do not place cvx in Matlab’s own toolbox directory.
(If your previous installation of cvx was placed there, you’ll need to move it
out of there.)
4. Start Matlab.
5. Change the current directory to the location of cvx. For example, if you un-
packed cvx.zip on your Windows machine into the directory C:\Matlab\personal,
then you would type
cd C:\Matlab\personal\cvx
4
Previous versions of this manual stated that cvx required Matlab 6.0 or later; we have since
discovered that version 6.0 is not sufficient.
50
at the Matlab command prompt. Alternatively, if you unpacked cvx.tar.gz
into the directory ~/matlab on a Linux machine, then you would type
cd ~/matlab/cvx
cvx_setup
at the Matlab prompt. This does two things: it sets the Matlab search path
so it can find all of the cvx program files, and it runs a simple test problem to
verify the installation. On some platforms, it compiles MEX files as well (see
§A.2 below). If all goes well, the command will output the line
(among others). If this message is not displayed, or any warnings or errors are
generated, then there is a problem with the cvx installation. Try installing the
package again; and if that fails, send us a bug report and tell us about it.
7. If you plan to use cvx regularly, you will need to save the current Matlab path
for subsequent Matlab sessions. Follow the instructions provided by cvx_setup
to accomplish that.
mex -setup
at the Matlab prompt and answer the questions that follow. If necessary, consult
documentation for Matlab for details on this process.
51
posts bug fixes to the software without updating the version number (currently 4.0
beta). Therefore, it is important to be sure that any newer version of SDPT3 that
you might wish to use was downloaded after you obtained cvx.
The file name, line/column numbers, and variable name may differ, but the error
message remains the same. The example that produced this particular error is a
simple inequality constraint
p >= -5;
u >= 0
in the same model causes no complaint. So we cannot offer you a precise set of
circumstances that cause the error.
Fortunately, the workaround is very simple: simply remove all of the extra space
in the constraint. In this example, changing the constraint to
p>=-5;
eliminates the error. You may still indent the constraint as you wish—just remove
the intermediate spaces.
We have no idea why this workaround works, but it does—reliably.
52
B Operators, functions, and sets
B.1 Basic operators and linear functions
Matlab’s standard arithmetic operations for addition +, subtraction -, multiplication
* .*, division / \ ./ ./ .\, and exponentiation ^ .^ have been overloaded to work
in cvx whenever appropriate—that is, whenever their use is consistent with both
standard mathematical and Matlab conventions and the DCP ruleset. For example:
• Two cvx expressions can be added together if they are of the same dimension
(or one is scalar) and have the same curvature (i.e., both are convex, concave,
or affine).
Numerious other combinations are possible, of course. For example, the use of the
exponentiation operators ^ .^ are somewhat limited; see §B.2 below.
Matlab’s basic matrix manipulation and arithmetic operations have been extended
to work with cvx expressions as well, including:
• Concatenation: [ A, B ; C, D ]
A number of Matlab’s basic functions have been extended to work with cvx expres-
sions as well:
conj conv cumsum diag dot find fliplr flipud flipdim horzcat
hankel ipermute kron permute repmat reshape rot90 sparse sum
trace tril triu toeplitz vertcat
Most should behave identically with cvx expressions as they do with numeric ex-
pressions. Those that perform some sort of summation, such as cumsum, sum, or
multiplication, such as conv, dot or kron, can only be used in accordance with the
disciplined convex programming rules. For example, kron(X,Y) is valid only if either
X or Y is constant; and trace(Z) is valid only if the elements along the diagonal have
the same curvature.
53
B.2 Nonlinear functions
What follows are two lists of nonlinear functions supported by cvx: first, a list of
standard Matlab functions extended to work with cvx; and second, a list of new
functions created specifically for use in cvx.
In some cases, limitations of the underlying solvers place certain restrictions or
caveats on their use:
• Functions marked with a dagger (†) are not supported natively by the solvers
that cvx uses. They are handled using a successive approximation method,
which makes multiple calls to the underlying solver, achieving the same final
precision. (See §D.1 for details.) If you use one of these functions, you will be
warned that successive approximation will be used.
• Functions involving powers (e.g., x^p) and p-norms (e.g., norm(x,p)) are marked
with a star (⋆). cvx represents these functions exactly when p is a rational num-
ber. For irrational values of p, a nearby rational is selected using Matlab’s rat
function. See §D.2 for details.
• ⋆ norm: norms for real and complex vectors and matrices. Convex. The one-
argument version norm(x) computes the 2-norm for vectors and induced 2-norm
(maximum singular value) for matrices. The two-argument version norm(x,p)
is supported as follows:
– For vectors, all p ≥ 1 are accepted, but see Appendix D.2 for more details
about how cvx handles values other than 1, 2, and Inf.
– For matrices, p must be 1, 2, Inf, or ’Fro’.
54
– If p is a variable and x is a constant, then polyval(x,p) computes a linear
combination of the elements of p. The combination must satisfy the DCP
rules for addition and scaling.
– If p is a constant and x is a variable, then polyval(x,p) constructs a
polynomial function of the variable x. The polynomial must be affine,
convex, or concave, and x must be real and affine.
• ⋆ power: x^p and x.^p, where x is a real variable and and p is a real constant.
For x^p, x and p must be scalars. Only those values of p which can reasonably
and unambiguously interpreted as convex or concave are accepted:
Negative and odd integral values of p are not permitted, but see the functions
pow_p, pow_pos, and pow_abs in the next section for useful alternatives.
• † power: p.^x and p^x, where p is a real constant and x is a real variable. For
p^x, p and x must be scalars. Valid values of p include:
• berhu(x,M): The reversed Huber function (hence, Berhu), defined as |x| for
|x| ≤ M, and (|x|2 + M 2 )/2M for |x| ≥ M. Convex. If M is omitted, M = 1
is assumed; but if supplied, it must be a positive constant. Also callable with
three arguments as berhu(x,M,t), which computes t+t*berhu(x/t,M), useful
for concomitant scale estimation (see [Owe06]).
55
• det_inv: determinant of inverse of a symmetric (or Hermitian) positive definite
matrix, (det X −1 ), which is the same as the sum of the inverses of the eigenval-
ues. When used inside a cvx specification, det_inv constrains the matrix to be
symmetric (if real) or Hermitian (if complex) and positive semidefinite. When
used with numerical arguments, det_inv returns -Inf if these constraints are
not met. Concave.
• huber(x,M), defined as 2M|x| − M 2 for |x| ≥ M, and |x|2 for |x| ≤ M. Convex.
If M is omitted, then M = 1 is assumed; but if it supplied, it must be a positive
constant. Also callable as huber(x,M,t), which computes t+t*huber(x/t,M),
useful for concomitant scale estimation (see [Owe06]).
• inv_pos, inverse of the positive portion, 1/ max{x, 0}. Inside cvx specification,
imposes constraint that its argument is positive. Outside cvx specification,
returns +∞ if x ≤ 0. Convex and decreasing.
56
• lambda_min: minimum eigenvalue of a real symmetric or complex Hermitian
matrix. Inside cvx, imposes constraint that its argument is symmetric (if real)
or Hermitian (if complex). Concave.
• norm_largest( x, k ), for real and complex vectors, returns the sum of the
largest k magnitudes in the vector x. Convex.
57
2 2
1.6 (x −1)
envelope
1.4
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
−0.2
−1.5 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
Figure 2: The polynomial function p(x) = x4 − 2x2 + 1 and its convex envelope.
58
• quad_over_lin, xT x/y for x ∈ Rn , y > 0; for x ∈ Cn , y > 0: x∗ x/y. In cvx
specification, adds constraint that y > 0. Outside cvx specification, returns
+∞ if y ≤ 0. Convex, and decreasing in y.
• sum_largest(x,k) sum of the largest k values, for real vector x. Convex and
increasing.
B.3 Sets
cvx currently supports the following sets; in each case, n is a positive integer constant.
• nonnegative(n):
Rn+ , { x ∈ Rn | xi ≥ 0, i = 1, 2, . . . , n }
• simplex(n):
Rn1+ , { x ∈ Rn | xi ≥ 0, i = 1, 2, . . . , n,
P
i xi = 1 }
59
• lorentz(n):
Qn , { (x, y) ∈ Rn × R | kxk2 ≤ y }
• rotated_lorentz(n):
• complex_lorentz(n):
• rotated_complex_lorentz(n):
• semidefinite(n):
Sn+ , X ∈ Rn×n | X = X T , X 0
• hermitian_semidefinite(n):
Hn+ , Z ∈ Cn×n | Z = Z H , X 0
• exponential_cone:
• geo_mean_cone(n):
n
( )
Y
Gn , cl (x, y) ∈ Rn × Rn × Rn | x ≥ 0, ( xi )1/n ≥ y
i=1
60
C cvx status messages
After a complete cvx specification has been entered and the cvx_end command issued,
the solver is called to generate a numerical result. The solver can produce one of five
exit conditions, which are indicated by the value of the string variable cvx_status.
The nominal values of cvx_status, and the resulting values of the other variables,
are as follows:
• Solved: A complementary (primal and dual) solution has been found. The
primal and dual variables are replaced with their computed values, and the the
optimal value of the problem is placed in cvx_optval (which, by convention, is
0 for feasibility problems).
• Unbounded: The problem has been proven to be unbounded below through the
discovery of an unbounded primal direction. This direction is stored in the
primal variables. The value of cvx_optval is set to -Inf for minimizations,
and +Inf for maximizations. Feasibility problems by construction cannot be
unbounded below.
It is important to understand that the unbounded primal direction is very likely
not a feasible point. If a feasible point is required, the problem should be re-
solved as a feasibility problem by omitting the objective.
• Infeasible: The problem has been proven to be infeasible through the discov-
ery of an unbounded dual direction. Appropriate components of this direction
are stored in the dual variables. The values of the primal variables are filled with
NaNs. The value of cvx_optval is set to +Inf for minimizations and feasibility
problems, and -Inf for maximizations.
In some cases, SeDuMi is unable to achieve the numerical certainty it requires to make
one of the above determinations—but is able to draw a weaker conclusion by relaxing
those tolerances somewhat. In such cases, one of the following results is returned:
The values of the primal and dual variables, and of cvx_optval, are updated identi-
cally to the “accurate” cases. Two final results are also possible:
• Failed: The solver failed to make sufficient progress towards a solution. The
values of cvx_optval and primal and dual variables are filled with NaNs. This
result can occur because of numerical problems within SeDuMi, often because
the problem is particularly “nasty” in some way (e.g., a non-zero duality gap).
61
• Overdetermined: The presolver has determined that the problem has more
equality constraints than variables, which means that the coefficient matrix
of the equality constraints is singular. In practice, such problems are often,
but not always, infeasible. Unfortunately, solvers typically cannot handle such
problems, so a precise conclusion cannot be reached.
The situations that most commonly produce an Overdetermined result are discussed
in §D.3 below.
62
D Advanced solver topics
D.1 The successive approximation method
Prior to version 1.2, the functions requested most often to be added to the cvx
function library were those from the exponential family, including exp, log, and
various entropy functions. Unfortunately, cvx utilizes symmetric primal/dual solvers
that simply cannot support those functions natively; and a variety of practical factors
has delayed the use of other types of solvers with cvx.
For this reason, we have constructed a successive approximation method that
allows symmetric primal/dual solvers to support the exponential family of functions.
The precise nature of the method will be published elsewhere, but we can provide
a highly simplified description here. First, we construct a global approximation for
exp (or log, etc..) which is accurate within a neighborhood of some center point
x0 . Solving this approximation yields an approximate optimal point x̄. We shift the
center point x0 towards x̄, construct a new approximation, and solve again. This
process is repeated until |x̄ − x0 | is small enough to conclude that our approximate
is accurate enough to represent the original model. Again, this is a highly simplified
description of the approach; for instance, we are also monitoring the dual problem as
well to guide our judgements for shifting x0 and terminating.
For other values of p = pn /pd , cvx generates a number of 2 × 2 LMIs that depends on
both pn and pd ; we denote this number by k(pn , pd ). (A number of internal variables
and equality constraints are also generated, but we ignore them for this analysis.) An
empirical study has shown that for p = pn /pd > 1, cvx achieves
where the α(pn ) term grows very slowly compared to the log2 term. Indeed, for
pn ≤ 4096, we have verified that α(pn ) is usually 1 or 2, but occasionally 0 or 3.
Similar results are obtained for 0 < p < 1 and p < 0.
63
The cost of this SDP representation is relatively small for nearly all useful values of
p. Nevertheless, cvx issues a warning whenever k(pn , pd ) > 10 to insure that the user is
not surprised by any unexpected slowdown. In the event that this threshold does not
suit you, you may change it using the command cvx_power_warning(thresh), where
thresh is the desired cutoff value. Setting the threshold to Inf disables it completely.
As with the command cvx_precision, you can place a call to cvx_power_warning
within a model to change the threshold for a single model; or outside of a model
to make a global change. The command always returns the previous value of the
threshold, so you can save it and restore it upon completion of your model, if you wish.
You can query the current value by calling cvx_power_warning with no arguments.
minimize Trace D
subject to W + D 0 (16)
D diagonal
n = size(W,1);
cvx_begin
variable D(n,n) diagonal;
minimize( trace( D ) );
subject to
W + D == semidefinite(n);
cvx_end
n = size(W,1);
cvx_begin
variable D(n,n) diagonal;
64
minimize( trace( D ) );
subject to
0.5 * ( W + W’ ) + D == semidefinite(n);
cvx_end
E Acknowledgements
We wish to thank the following people for their contributions to the development of
cvx: Toh Kim Chuan, Laurent El Ghaoui, Arpita Ghosh, Siddharth Joshi, Johan
Löfberg, Almir Mutapcic, Michael Overton and his students, Art Owen, Rahul Pan-
icker, Imre Polik, Joëlle Skaf, Lieven Vandenberghe, Argyris Zymnis. We are also
grateful to the many students in several universities who have (perhaps unwittingly)
served as beta testers by using cvx in their classwork. We thank Igal Sason for catch-
ing many typos in an earlier version of this document, and generally helping us to
improve its clarity.
65
References
[AG01] F. Alizadeh and D. Goldfarb. Second-order cone programming. Techni-
cal Report RRR 51-2001, RUTCOR, Rutgers University, November 2001.
Available at http://rutcor.rutgers.edu/pub/rrr/reports2001/51.ps.
66
[Owe06] A. Owen. A robust hybrid of lasso and ridge regression. Technical report,
Department of Statistics, Stanford University, October 2006. Author’s in-
ternal draft.
[Stu99] J. Sturm. Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over
symmetric cones. Optimization Methods and Software, 11:625–653, 1999.
Software available at http://sedumi.mcmaster.ca/.
[TTT06] K. Toh, R. Tütüncü, and M. Todd. SDPT3 4.0 (beta) (software package).
http://www.math.nus.edu.sg/~ mattohkc/sdpt3.html, July 2006.
67
Index
affine function, 28 ruleset, 5, 25
AMPL, 4 deadzone function, 34
array variable, 17 defining new function, 34
assignment, 46 diagonal matrix variable, 17
disciplined convex programming, see DCP
banded matrix variable, 17 dual variable, 21
bug report, 6
epigraph, 35
complex variable, 17 equality constraint, 46
composition, 29 examples, 8
concave expression, 23
function, 28 expression holder, 23
constraint, 11, 13, 18 expressions, 23
bounds, 11, 13, 18
equality, 14, 18, 46 feasibility, 18, 26
inequality, 14, 18 feedback, 6
nonconvex, 14, 16 function, 19
set, 19 cvx libary, 53
convex affine, 28
function, 28 composition, 29
cvx, 4 concave, 28
functions, 53 convex, 28
installing, 50 deadzone, 34
operators, 53 defining new, 34
precision, 61 epigraph, 35
status messages, 61 generalized posynomial, 41
cvx begin, 8 Huber, 35
cvx clear, 46 hypograph, 36
cvx end, 8 monomial, 41
cvx expert, 63 monotonicity, 28
cvx optval, 10, 18 objective, 9
cvx pause, 46 posynomial, 41
cvx power warning, 63 quadratic, 32
cvx precision, 44
cvx problem, 46 GAMS, 4
cvx quiet, 46 generalized geometric programming, see
cvx solver, 44 GGP
cvx status, 10 geometric program, see GP
cvx version, 46 geometric programming mode, 41
cvx where, 46 GGP, 41
CVXOPT, 5 GP, 4, 41
mode, 4, 41
DCP, 4, 5
68
Hermitian matrix variable, 17 problem
Huber function, 35 dual, 21
hypograph, 36 feasibility, 18, 26
infeasible, 22
inequality overdetermined, 64
constraint, 18 python, 4
matrix, 39, 40
infeasible problem, 22 QP, 4
installing cvx, 50 quadratic form, 32
quadratic program, see QP
Lagrange multipler, 21
least squares, 8 SDP, 4, 5, 19, 39
linear mode, 4, 39
matrix inequality, see LMI SDPT3, 5, 44
program, see LP second-order cone, 20
linprog, 11 second-order cone program, see SOCP
LMI, 39 SeDuMi, 5, 44
Lorentz cone, see second-order cone semidefinite, 19
LP, 4, 5 semidefinite program, see SDP
semidefinite programming mode, 39
Matlab, 4 set, 19
maximize, 10, 18 SOCP, 4, 5, 20
minimize, 9, 18 solver
mode changing, 44
GP, 41 status messages, 61
SDP, 39 successive approximation, 63
monotonicity, 28 symmetric matrix variable, 17
MOSEK, 5
Toeplitz matrix variable, 17
nondecreasing, 28 trade-off curve, 15
nonincreasing, 28
norm, 9 variable
norm(·,1), 12 array, 17
norm(·,Inf), 11, 14 banded matrix, 17
complex, 17
objective function, 9, 18 declaring, 17
nonconvex, 10 diagonal matrix, 17
operators, 53 Hermitian matrix, 17
output structure, 17
suppressing, 46 symmetric matrix, 17
overdetermined problem, 64 Toeplitz matrix, 17
platforms, 50 variable, 9, 17
posynomial, 41 variables, 17
powers, 63 version information, 5
precision, 61
YALMIP, 4
changing, 44
69