DEGREE PROJECT, IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND

OPERATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, SECOND LEVEL

STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2017.

Managing Emotions in Project Teams

The Impacts of Emotions on Project Teams: The
case of a Swedish Project-Based Organisation
AUTHOR: Patrick Ndubuisi Eze

KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT

 TMT 2017:6

www.kth.se

i
Title: Managing Emotions in Project Teams- The Impacts of Emotions on
Project Teams: The case of a Swedish Project-Based Organisation.

Author: Patrick Ndubuisi Eze.

Faculty: School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Applied

Mechanical Engineering.

Programme: Master of Science - Project Management and Operational

Development.

Supervisor: Sven Antvik.

Examiner: Torbjörn Eriksson.

i
This page has been left blank on purpose

ii
 Acknowledgements

The writing process of this thesis has been a journey, yet fruitful. Therefore, I would like to
recognise and appreciate those who have made this journey a success and worthwhile.

I would like to sincerely thank my parents, Mr Damian Eze, and Mrs Anne Eze, for their
words of encouragements and prayers.

Many thanks to my supervisor, Sven Antvik, for this work, would not have been a success
without his proper guidance, understanding and patience. Also, for demonstrating a high level
of professionalism and emotional intelligence. I would equally like to extend my gratitude to
all the teachers in my programme, for the knowledge they have bestowed on me during my
studies.

My very special thanks go to the management and staff of Sandvik Materials Technology, and
the Global HR of Sandvik AB, especially those who took the time to participate in the
interview process, for their huge contributions to this work. You people were cooperative,
kind, accommodating and always willing to assist me. I am very grateful for that.

To my fellow students, your constructive criticism and advice have contributed immensely to
this work. Lastly, I will not forget the inputs of my friends, who assisted in the structuring and
proofreading of this thesis.

Thank you all.

Stockholm, April 2017.

Patrick Ndubuisi Eze.

iii
 Abstract
Much research has focused on the prowess of project teams, but the roles emotions play in

them have attracted little attention. Hence, this study was to identify the impacts of emotions

on project teams and explore ways of managing them. A qualitative study was adopted, using

a case study approach in conducting 11 face-to-face interviews at Sandvik Materials

Technology. The research found that emotions like passion, grief, mood and anxiety have an

impact on project teams. The effects of these emotions are: greater commitments, lack of

confidence from project failure, positive or negative mood, and occupational fear,

respectively. Further, the study identified emotional intelligence as a useful tool for managing

emotions. It suggests that Sandvik Materials Technology should introduce a mandatory

training on emotional intelligence for all its project team members, and create the right culture

for it to flourish.

Keywords: Emotion, Emotional Intelligence, Projects, Project Teams, Project-Based

Organisation.

iv
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements .............................................................................................. iii
Abstract................................................................................................................. iv
List of Figures ..................................................................................................... vii
List of Tables ....................................................................................................... vii
List of Acronyms ................................................................................................ viii
1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background ....................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Research Question ............................................................................................. 2
1.3 Goal ................................................................................................................... 2
1.4 Scope and Limitations ....................................................................................... 2
1.5 Disposition......................................................................................................... 3
2 Methodology ................................................................................................... 4
2.1 Research Philosophy/Paradigm ......................................................................... 4
2.2 Qualitative Research Design ............................................................................. 5
2.3 Inductive Approach ........................................................................................... 5
2.4 Case Study ......................................................................................................... 6
2.5 Data Collection and Analysis ............................................................................ 7
2.6 Reliability and Validity ..................................................................................... 7
3 Theoretical Framework ................................................................................... 9
3.1 Emotion ............................................................................................................. 9
3.2 Emotion and Projects Teams ........................................................................... 10
3.3 Emotional Intelligence .................................................................................... 11
3.4 Project .............................................................................................................. 14
3.5 Project -Based Organisation (PBO) ................................................................ 16
3.6 Project Teams .................................................................................................. 17
3.7 Conceptual Model ........................................................................................... 20
4 Empirical Findings ........................................................................................ 21
4.1 Sampling Criteria for Selecting Respondents ................................................. 22
4.2 Ethical Considerations ..................................................................................... 23

v
 4.3 Sandvik Materials Technology (SMT) ............................................................ 24
4.4 Interviews at Sandvik ...................................................................................... 24
4.4.1 Emotion and Attachments................................................................................... 25
4.4.2 Project Failure ................................................................................................... 26
4.4.3 Communication .................................................................................................. 27
4.4.4 Team’s Performance .......................................................................................... 27
4.4.5 Other Observed Emotion .................................................................................... 28
4.4.6 Project Manager’s Action and EI ...................................................................... 28
4.4.7 Mechanism/Training for Managing Emotion ..................................................... 29
4.4.8 Summary of Empirical Data ............................................................................... 31
5 Analysis ......................................................................................................... 33
5.1 Humans are emotional ..................................................................................... 33
5.2 Passion ............................................................................................................. 33
5.3 Grief................................................................................................................. 34
5.4 Mood ............................................................................................................... 35
5.5 Anxiety ............................................................................................................ 36
5.6 Leadership Training ........................................................................................ 36
5.7 Summary of Analysis ...................................................................................... 38
6 Conclusion..................................................................................................... 39
6.1 What are the impacts of emotion on project teams? ....................................... 39
6.2 How can these emotions be managed? ............................................................ 39
6.3 Recommendations for Further Research ......................................................... 40
Reference List...................................................................................................... 41
Primary Data: Interviews ........................................................................................................... 46
Appendix 1: Interview Questions ........................................................................ 48
Appendix 2: Interview Transcripts ...................................................................... 49

vi
List of Figures
Figure 1: Thesis Structure ............................................................................................... 3

Figure 2: The methodological approach of this thesis .................................................... 8

Figure 3: Relationship between a project and stakeholders .......................................... 15

Figure 4: Tuckman and Jensen five stages of group development. .............................. 19

Figure 5: Connection and interaction between a project manager and project team
members ........................................................................................................................ 20

Figure 6: Using emotional intelligence to manage emotions ....................................... 20

List of Tables
Table 1: The four domains and 18 competencies of Daniel Goleman’s model............ 14

Table 2: Organisational Structures and their influences on Projects ............................ 17

Table 3: Information about the interview and respondents .......................................... 23

vii
List of Acronyms

EI: Emotional Intelligence

HPO: Head of Project Office

KT: Knowledge Transfer

KTH: Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan

PBO: Project-Based Organisation

PM: Project Manager

PT: Project Team

SMT: Sandvik Materials Technology

SPM: Senior Project Manager

viii
1 Introduction
This introductory chapter will serve as a platform to give an insight on the subject matter.
This involves a description of the background, research question, goal, limitation and
overview of the structure of this study.

1.1 Background
From time immemorial, projects have always been a part of the history of humanity (Ekstedt,
et al., 1999, p.50). Moreover, in the last decades, projects have metamorphosed in various
sectors of the economy as a popular way of organising works (Lindgren and Packendorff,
2009), thereby playing important roles in organisations (Chipulu, et al., 2014). This change is
evident as a large number of organisations now carry out their works through projects, due to
the rise in competition, the need for the flexibility, and time constraint (Jerbrant and
Gustavsson, 2013). Therefore, organisations who conduct most of their business activities
through projects are Project-Based Organisations (Bartsch, Elbers and Maurer, 2013; Pemsel
and Wiewiora, 2013).

Amid stiff market competition, Project-Based Organisations also known as (PBOs) must
acknowledge that the human factor is hugely significant to the success of a project (Sunindijo,
Hadikusumo and Ogunlana, 2007). As argued by Cooke-Davis (2002), people run projects,
and that makes the human factor a critical success factor in a project. An important aspect of
the human element that is crucial to Project-Based Organisations is a project team. As noted
by Hacker (2000), project teams are formed as a response to the rapidly competitive global
market environment and complexities in executing projects. These challenges make it
inevitable to assemble a project team, given the skills and different experiences they convey
to a project. Hence, increasing number of organisations are beginning to recognise that to
improve competitiveness, it is crucial to identify the success factors of a project team (Scott-
Young and Samson, 2008). Many factors play a role to either promote or hinder team process.
One of those factors according to Berg and Karlsen (2014, p.449) is “emotion”.

Peslak (2005, p.251) argues that “human beings are emotional creatures”. Since project team
members comprise of humans, it is natural that they sometimes exhibit their emotional side.
Given that the human emotion sometimes fluctuates, the chances are that it could affect their
state of mind and the outcome of their activities at workplaces. The inconsistency of the
human emotion underscores the need for organisations to understand the causes,
characteristics and the consequences of these feelings (Fitness, 2000, p.147). Project teams
are not exempted from these consequences because their human nature will always be
influenced by emotions, which certainly shapes their behaviour (Baumeister, et al., 2007).
Similarly, Nezlek and Kuppens (2008), see emotions as the central component of the human
life, which impacts significantly on the way people function both positively and negatively.
These influences of emotions illuminate the depth, at which emotions can control our lives,
that of the project team, and by extension, the projects they execute. Therefore, the will to
understand and manage these emotions are crucial in making an informed decision (Peslak,
2005). Understanding and controlling emotions is supported by the findings of Clarke (2010),
1
which suggests that emotional awareness plays a role in strengthening behaviours and
decisions that have the possibility of affecting inter –personal relationships in projects.

As leaders of Project-Based Organisations seek to explore new ways of achieving project

success, there are several critical success factors in a project to be considered. Some
researchers (e.g., Chua, Kog and Loh, 1999; Cooke-Davis, 2002; Scott-Young and Samson,
2008) in their studies have all identified several success factors in projects, but none have
viewed the role of emotion as a factor. Although emotions and projects have been studied by
(Berg and Karlsen, 2014; Dainty, et al., 2005; Lindgren and Packendorff, 2009; Whitty,
2010), there is not much consensus on the precise role emotion plays in the success or failure
of a project (Berg and Karlsen, 2014; Peslak, 2005). In the same vein, Clark (2010, p.615)
argues that literature has devoted little attention on the impacts of emotions on projects.
Peslak (2005) advocates the need for a concerted study of the influence of emotion and its
development on performance and team process. This study will attempt to ascertain the
influence of emotions on project teams and seek ways to manage them.

1.2 Research Question

Considering the above background, this study will concretely address two fundamental
questions:

I. What are the impacts of emotions on project teams?

II. How can these emotions be managed?

The first question seeks to identify the various roles emotion plays on project team members.
As such, the second question will assist in mapping out a mechanism for managing these
emotions. In seeking answers to the above fundamental questions, it is necessary to note the
importance of project teams, as they are the human factors that drive projects. Therefore,
project teams will play a significant role by serving as the base in achieving this.

1.3 Goal
The main goal of this study is to examine the impacts of emotion on projects teams, and ways
of managing them. This goal will be accomplished by looking at the roles emotion play
among project team members in carrying out project. In addition, this study hopes to create
more awareness and attention on the roles emotions play among project teams, specifically to
PBOs, given that research in this area is limited.

1.4 Scope and Limitations

The following parameters will describe the scope and limitations of this study: This study is
centred deeply on the roles and management of emotions in projects teams; therefore, greater
emphasis will be assigned to emotions. In describing the roles and management of emotions
in projects teams, it is of great significance to note that this study will obtain data not from
any team, but those that have been involved in projects or have project experience. Therefore,
Project- based organisations (PBOs) will exclusively serve as the source of primary data,
considering that they carry out their businesses through projects.

The followings are limitations and out of scope activities of this study: Data gathering for this
2
research will focus on organisations only within Sweden, which could make it difficult to
apply its findings to organisations in other countries of the world. Even at that, it could be
equally difficult to generalise its findings on all PBOs in Sweden, considering that just one
organisation in Sweden will serve as the source of data. This study attempts to explore the
role of emotions in project teams; it is imperative to acknowledge that aside emotions, there
are other factors that could have an impact on projects teams.

1.5 Disposition
This study will employ the use of Six Chapters. Chapter one will consist of the introductory
aspect of this study, involving the background information, the fundamental question for this
research, and the goals and limitations. Chapter two of this research will comprise of the
method chapter, where the philosophy, idea and inspiration behind the chosen research
strategy, research design and data collection method will be made known. Chapter three
consists of the theoretical framework where key concepts, definitions and framework will be
revealed through the aid of extant and relevant literature. In addition, a model will be used to
further explain the theory. Chapter four will be the empirical section, which will describe the
interview process and all information regarding the conduct of interview for this research.
This chapter will also talk about sampling technique, and ethical considerations employed
during the interview. Also, empirical data from the interview will be presented. This will be
followed by the analysis in Chapter five, where data obtained from the empirical chapter will
be analysed and discussed, through which findings will be unveiled. Finally, based on the
finding, conclusions will be drawn in Chapter six and path to further research will be
revealed. Figure 1 below illustrates this structure.

Figure 1: Thesis Structure

Source: (own construct).

3
2 Methodology
This chapter will provide the rationale behind the chosen philosophical assumptions, the
research strategy and design, and theoretical direction. It will also highlight the data
collection method and all the methodological processes involved in this study.

2.1 Research Philosophy/Paradigm

Research philosophy is defined as the combination of assumptions and beliefs in knowledge
development (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016, p. 124). When we embark on research,
consciously or unconsciously, we make some assumptions that guide our research. Some of
these assumptions deal with human knowledge, which borders on epistemology. While other
assumptions centre on the reality we come across in our research (ontology).

The Ontological Assumption is a philosophy that relates to social entities and its nature. The
key orientations question whether social entities can be deemed as a reality external to that of
social actors, or if they can be deemed as social constructions from the deeds of social actors
(Bryman and Bell, 2011, p. 20). These different positions of orientations are usually referred
to as objectivism and constructionism respectively in ontology (Bryman and Bell, 2011).
Objectivist view implies that social phenomenon and their purposes exist independently and
not influenced by social actors. Constructionism shares the view that social actors (Bryman
and Bell, 2011) will always achieve social phenomenon and its meanings.

The Epistemological Assumption is concerned with what makes knowledge acceptable,

legitimate and valid, and how knowledge can be communicated to others (Saunders, Lewis
and Thornhill, 2016, p. 127). Bryman and Bell (2011) pinpoint key issues in this assumption,
which questions whether same principals, ethos, and procedures in natural science can or
should be applied in the study of the social world. However, there are two key
epistemological positions, which are positivism and interpretivism. Positivism is the view that
supports natural sciences, which is about creating law-like generalisations using visible social
reality (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016). One of the purposes of theory in positivism is
that it allows for the generation of hypothesis, which is then tested and makes room for laws
to be explained and assessed. Blumberg, Cooper and Schindler (2008) stress that one of the
principals of positivism is that social world is seen objectively, and instead exists externally.

Conversely, interpretivism is an epistemological position with emphasis that physical

phenomena are entirely different from humans because the latter creates meanings (Saunders,
Lewis and Thornhill, 2016, p. 140). One of the arguments of interpretivism (Saunders, Lewis
and Thornhill, 2016) is that human beings and their social worlds are different from physical
phenomena, and should be studied differently. Therefore, there must be a distinction between
social science research and natural science. Interpretivist research holds a purpose that social
worlds and its contexts should be rich in understanding and interpretations (Saunders, Lewis
and Thornhill, 2016). According to Blumberg, Cooper and Schindler (2008, p. 21),
Interpretivists argue that to understand the complexities associated with social phenomena,
simple fundamental laws are just not enough.

This research will focus and follow the path of interpretivist view, rather than the positivist.

4
Reason being that this study is not linked to natural sciences; therefore, hypothesis will not be
tested. Instead, this research will focus on individuals and their interpretations. Also, it is
more associated with qualitative research (Bryman and Bell, 2011, p. 27; Saunders, Lewis and
Thornhill, 2016, p. 168). According to Cottrell (2014, p. 99), “interpretivism is sometimes
also referred to as constructionism, or social constructionism” because it concerns people’s
way of idealising the world. Further, the author asserts that one of the core tenets of
interpretivism is its subjectivity, which accepts that interpretations, research and knowledge
are essentially subjective. Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2016) also assert that interpretivism
is subjectivist, which takes this study to a subjectivist view.

2.2 Qualitative Research Design

In formulating or choosing a research design, it is important to carefully make a
methodological choice that is consistent with the research. According to Saunders, Lewis and
Thornhill (2016, p.165), there are three different research designs. These are Quantitative,
qualitative and mixed methods. Bryman and Bell (2011) describe quantitative as a strategy
that employs the use of quantification when it comes to data collection and analysis. In
Quantitative research, questionnaires are often used for data collection, and analysed using
graphs or statistics that generate numeric data (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016). In
contrast, qualitative research uses words in data collection and analysis, instead of
quantifications (Bryman and Bell, 2011). In this case, non-numerical data like interviews are
often used in data collection (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016). Mixed method, which is
the third strategy, is a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods (Bryman and Bell,
2011; Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016).

Having defined and described the distinctions between quantitative, qualitative, and mixed
method, this study will adopt the use of qualitative research. The motive for this choice is that
this study will not engage in the testing of theories, which is one of the essential features of a
quantitative research; rather, it will generate theories (Bryman and Bell, 2011, p. 27). One
other reason for the choice of qualitative research is that in this study, data collection will be
achieved with the aid of interviews instead of questionnaires. A design can follow the path of
exploratory, descriptive, explanatory or evaluative study, which is influenced by its research
questions (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016). This research will follow the path of an
exploratory study because its research questions usually start with “What” or “How” which
aligns with the research questions of this study. Secondly, the choice of an exploratory
research is borne out of the fact that it gives allowance for an open question to gain insight on
the subject. Lastly, it is flexible and can adapt to change (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill,
2016).

2.3 Inductive Approach

There are three approaches to theory development. These different approaches are deductive,
inductive, and abductive (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016). The first approach, which is
the deductive strategy, involves developing a theory, which is then strictly tested with the aid
of propositions. It is mostly associated with scientific research, which makes it the dominant
research approach within natural sciences (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016, p. 146).
Conversely, inductive approach obtains a stance in which the outcome of research is a theory,
5
which allows researchers to generalise inferences from observations (Bryman and Bell, 2011,
p. 13). The third approach, which is the abductive strategy, is a combination of deductive and
inductive approach, which entails moving back and forth (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill,
2016). In deciding which approach is suitable and favoured for this research, it is imperative
to observe once again that this study deals with emotion and its impact on the project teams,
hence favours the use of an inductive approach for three reasons. Firstly, emotional matters
require flexibility in bringing out explanations. The deductive approach does not give room
for flexibility in methodology (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016, p. 147). Secondly, in
this research, there will be no theory testing. Lastly, one feature of induction approach is that
it supports the use of data to build theory like conceptual framework (Saunders, Lewis and
Thornhill (2016, p. 145). This study hopes to generate theory inform of a conceptual
framework.

2.4 Case Study

A Case Study approach is a popular research design that is widely used in business research
(Bryman and Bell, 2011), and in social research (Denscombe, 2010). Though natural
advantage is enjoyed by case studies in exploratory research (Gerring, 2004), it is also
suitable for the use of explanatory and descriptive research (Blumberg, Cooper and Schindler,
2008, p. 374). Denzin and Lincoln (2011) admit that the study of case study has existed since
recorded history, thereby accounting for many books and articles in many areas of discipline.
Before furthering to highlight the attributes of a case study, it is necessary to discuss what a
case study is. In doing this, a clear definition will give an insight. Robert Yin, who is highly
famous in case study research, defines a case study as “an empirical inquiry that investigates
a contemporary phenomenon in depth and within its real-life context, especially when the
boundaries between phenomenon and context may not be clearly evident” (Yin, 2009, p. 18).
As noted by Cottrell (2014, p. 163), a case study deals with the study of a phenomenon, or an
entity in-depth. One major similarity about the two above definitions is that they introduce the
need for an “in-depth” study. Denscombe (2010) argues that studying a phenomenon in detail
is an ability of a case study, which is hardly obtainable when using a survey method. This is
the case when a significant amount of time is devoted to investigating a particular instance; it
affords the researcher the opportunity to delve into the research in detail, and to discover
things that could be hard to find using superficial research. Yin (2009, p. 4) points out that a
case study method is used as an avenue to increase knowledge of organisations, individuals,
social and other phenomena. It creates room for researchers to maintain the characteristics of
a life event meaningfully and holistically. A “case” cannot be artificially created for research
purpose; it is usually something in existence. Therefore, it occurs naturally (Denscombe,
2010, p. 54). It is crucial (Denscombe, 2010) to note that the unit of analysis in a case study
can assume various social phenomena. This could be based on a workplace, country,
organisation, industry, and individuals, with distinct boundaries.

Yin (2009, p. 46) identifies four types of case designs, namely single- case (holistic), single-
case (embedded), multiple-case (holistic), and multiple cases embedded. A single-case
(holistic) design is more appreciated for this study, hence adopted. Reason being that the case
in question will be investigated holistically without the involvement of embedded units. A

6
single holistic design is advantageous if there are no identified logical subunits, and when the
case study theories are holistic in nature (Yin, 2009, p. 50). The chosen organisation is
Sandvik AB in Sweden. The reason is that it is a Project- Based Organisation, where most of
its businesses are carried out in projects. One other reason is that is an established
organisation full of professionals in the field of project management. Thirdly, proximity to the
researcher was also a factor. Sandvik AB has three business areas; this study chose to focus
on one area, which is Sandvik Materials Technology (SMT). The reason for focusing on SMT
was because 10 of the participants that indicated interest for interview are from SMT, this
allowed for an in-depth and holistic study of the case.

2.5 Data Collection and Analysis

Data collection for this study was done in two folds, primary and secondary data. Primary
data was gathered through interviews, while secondary data was gathered with heavy reliance
on existing relevant literature like books, articles, and journals. The secondary data was
gathered with the aid of various database like KTH library (Primo), and database from Google
Scholar and Emerald. Interview, which is one of the most common strategies in qualitative
data collection (DiCicco-Bloom and Crabtree, 2006; Bryman and Bell, 2011), was deemed
appropriate for this research. Reason being that this research ultimately deals with a sensitive
topic like emotion, which requires a careful approach to obtain data in an honest and open
way. According to Denscombe (2010, pp. 173-174), the use of interview as a mode of
collecting data is more suitable for gaining insight into people’s emotion, experiences,
feelings, opinions and sensitive issues. Therefore, interviews became appropriate for this
study. Interviews mainly appear in three forms: structured, semi-structured and unstructured
(Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016). A semi-structured face-to-face interview with an
open-ended question was chosen for this study, mainly because it allows for flexibility,
making it possible for respondents to develop ideas (Denscombe, 2010). Also, it is
advantageous in establishing personal contacts (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016).

Data gathered with the aid of interview was analysed using thematic analysis. Braun and
Clarke (2006, p. 79) describe thematic analysis as “a method for identifying, analysing and
reporting patterns (themes) within data”. The advantages of employing thematic analysis is
that it can be applied to any philosophical position, regardless of the position (Saunders,
Lewis and Thornhill, 2016). It is flexible, the method is easy to use, and can be applied in
summarising important features of data. Also, it can be used to display similarities and
differences within a set of data (Braun and Clarke, 2006, p. 97). Braun and Clarke (2006, p.
87) have Identified six steps of doing thematic analysis as follow: Getting familiarised with
data, generate initial codes, search for potential themes, theme review, naming the theme and
creating the report.

2.6 Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are essential elements in judging whether research is of high quality
(Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016). Rigour is what brings out the quality of our research
with the aid of reliability and validity, which without, makes our research look like a fiction
and worthless (Morse, et al., 2002). Although reliability and validity are heavily applied in
quantitative research strategy, its applicability in qualitative research is highly contested
7
(Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016). This is a case where researchers who share positivist
philosophical view tend to favour reliability and validity more as a way to measure quality
than their counterpart who share the interpretivist philosophical view. Yet, solution on the
yardstick for assessing quality in qualitative research is yet to be resolved (Flick, 2009). This
study is geared towards the interpretivist philosophical view. Regardless, this study will still
attempt to assess its quality through reliability and validity. Reliability deals with “replication
and consistency”, while validity deals with how appropriate are the measures you use, how
accurate is the result analysis, and whether findings can be generalised (Saunders, Lewis and
Thornhill, 2016, p. 202). Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2016, p. 244) point that one way to
enhance the reliability of data is by assuring confidentiality and anonymity of participants.
During the conduct of the interviews, respondents were assured anonymity and data
confidentiality. Another way of ensuring a reliable data (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill,
2016, p. 412) is by using audio-record as a means of controlling bias. In gathering primary
data (interview) for this study, due permissions were taken from respondent to have their
interviews recorded, thereby reducing bias.

Ensuring reliability comes with some threats. One way of ensuring that threats to reliability
are minimised (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016, pp. 202-203) is by avoiding participant
bias. The researcher achieved this by making sure that interviews were conducted in closed
space offices and rooms, which ensured that no third party overheard the narratives of
respondents, thereby maintaining anonymity. Another way the researcher minimised threats
to reliability in this study was by avoiding participant error, thus eradicating factors that could
alter the performance of participants. The researcher was able to achieve this by choosing a
less sensitive time by making sure that the time approved for the interviews did not coincide
with the lunch breaks of participants. Instead, times approved for interviews were set way
before lunch, and after lunch. This afforded them enough time without hurrying during the
interviews.

In validating this study, Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2016, pp. 206-207) state that one way
of validating a research is through participant/member validation. This occurs when a
researcher sends back their research data to participants for confirmation and accuracy. In line
with this, interview transcripts from this study were sent back to all interviewees for
verification. Interviewees verified the transcripts as the true reflection of their thoughts.
Figure 2: The methodological approach of this thesis. Source: (Own Construct)

METHODOLOGY

RESEARCH QUALITATIVE INDUCTIVE

PHILOSOPHY STUDY APPROACH

INTERPRETIVISM SUBJECTIVISM INTERVIEW CASE STUDY

8
3 Theoretical Framework
This chapter will with the aid of relevant literature in the subject matter, define and explain
key concepts, e.g., Emotion, Emotion and Teams, Emotional Intelligence, Projects, Project-
Based Organisation, and Project Teams. Finally, with the aid of these key concepts, a
conceptual model will be drawn.

To give an insight on this study, the following terms/concepts: Emotion, Emotion and Teams,
Emotional Intelligence, Projects, Project- Based Organisations, and Project Teams have been
selected to explain emotion and how it affects people, organisations, and the need to manage
them. These concepts make up the theoretical direction of this study, which will assist
significantly in creating meaning and understanding of this research.

3.1 Emotion
One of the hallmarks of our day-to-day life is emotion and the way it is expressed (Graham, et
al., 2008, p. 394). These emotions are often expressed to our partners, friends and close
relatives. Similarly, Baumeister, et al. (2007) point that one of the most powerful encounters
of our daily lives is our reactions to emotion, in which we are likely to acknowledge the
influence of anger, joy, grief, worry and even feelings of love. The authors went further to
assert that a life devoid of emotion is insufficiently worth living, for this will lead to a
deficiency in rich human experience. On the other hand, a life with emotion could sometimes
be characterised with stereotypes that could drive people to act illogically, foolishly and
destructively (Baumeister, et al., 2007).

Emotions are contagious (Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckie, 2002; Parkinson, Fischer and
Manstead, 2005), in that they spread rapidly, creating the possibility of one’s feelings
influencing that of others. This elucidates how our daily lives virtually revolve around our
emotions. For this, one might wonder what is emotion.

The word emotion is very ambiguous, in that there are several ways of viewing it. As argued
by Cabanac (2002) and Kappas (2002), consensus on the definition of emotion is lacking in
literature. This lack of general agreement has ignited scholars and theorist to apply different
interpretations that reflect different meanings (Izard, 2010). Nonetheless, even though there is
no clear consensus on the definition of emotion, this study will mention a few definitions of
emotion for clarity sake, given its ambiguous nature.

Michel Cabanac critically reviewed the perceptions and definitions of several authors on
emotion and proposed a definition that sees emotion “as any mental experience with high
intensity and high hedonic content (pleasure/displeasure)” (Cabanac, 2002, p. 80). According
to the author, the word hedonic in the definition is a term that gives motivational experience
to emotion. In another related approach, Cole, Martin and Dennis (2004, p. 319) extracted
assumptions from various authors on a clear definition of emotion, and came up with an
assumptive definition that emotions “are biologically endowed processes that permit
extremely quick appraisals of situations and equally rapid preparedness to act to sustain
favourable conditions and deal with unfavourable conditions”. However, this research will
lean on the definition of emotion by Daniel Goleman, who defines emotion as “a feeling and

9
its distinctive thoughts, psychological and biological states, and range of propensities to act.”
(Goleman, 1995, p. 289). In light of these definitions, it is then needful to explain how
emotion influences project team members at workplaces. The next sub-chapter will attempt to
do that.

3.2 Emotion and Projects Teams

Emotion plays a strong role in workplaces. Therefore, it is pertinent to understand its
characteristics and consequences at the workplace (Fitness, 2000, p. 147). In grasping the role
of emotion in organisations, it is of great value to delve into the effects of emotion on project
teams and by extension, the projects they carry out.

Turner and Müller (2004) established that there is a close connection between communication
and emotion in a project. This suggests that even though people would prefer and appreciate a
close collaboration in projects, to the extent of empowering the project manager, they are
likely to exhibit mistrust, leading to tight control. The authors went further by mentioning
four emotions that are tied to communication in projects, which are: Trust, interest in project,
perception and progress, comfort and need to control. Emotion can also serve as an avenue for
communication in teamwork, in that it provides ample information regarding the intentions,
reactions and imminent behaviours of team members at workplaces (Elfenbein, Polzer and
Ambady, 2007).

Emotion has been found to influence team’s performance. The work of Sy, et al. (2005 cited
in Peslak, 2005, p. 252) talks about the effects of a leader’s emotion, such as mood and its
influence on performance. Findings from the authors revealed the following: - That when
group leaders showed positive mood, group members also exhibited positive mood. -When
their leader expressed negative mood, group members also displayed a negative mood. They
also argued that groups with leaders that exhibited positive mood, aided group members to
show little negative affective tone, had better coordination, increased positive affective tone,
and less effort when compared to when their leaders displayed a negative mood.
Peslak (2005, p. 251) also identified a link between emotion and project. The findings show
that team members tend to display more positive emotion at the beginning of a project, while
negative emotions increase more than positive emotion at the progression of the project. This
implies that at the start of a project, team members express a high level of enthusiasm and
positive emotion. Eventually, as some negative emotions begin to surface in the life of the
project, negative emotions will increase over time. Similarly, after interviewing 15 project
managers with emotional intelligence training, Clarke (2010, p. 618) found that Project
Managers emotional awareness influenced their decisions on which approach to employ in
different situations like anxiety provoking state. Other findings from the author suggest that
emotional awareness also played a role in the way project managers interacted with their team
members, and impacted on their relationships with their team members. Akgun, et al. (2006)
and Akgun, et al. (2007) also talk about the role of anxiety in a team. Akgun, et al. (2006)
stress that during projects; team members develop crisis and anxiety. Anxiety is described an
“an apprehension, a state of uneasiness or fear about anticipated real or perceived events,
which influences the actions and behaviours of individuals” (Akgun, et al., 2007, p. 629). The

10
authors further stressed that the presence of anxiety could trigger the feeling of insecurity,
frustration and fright within the team (Akgun, et al., 2007, p. 629).
Apart anxiety, project failure can evoke negative emotional reactions on team members
(Shepherd and Cardon, 2009). Some authors (e.g., Shepherd and Cardon, 2009; Shepherd,
Covin and Kuratko, 2009; Shepherd, Haynie and Patzelt, 2013; Shepherd and Kuratko, 2009)
have all attempted to delve into the impacts of project failure on project teams. Project failure
is defined as the discontinuation of a project’s activities due to lack of progress (Shepherd,
Covin and Kuratko, 2009, p. 589). As revealed by Shepherd and Cardon (2009), those
involved in a project failure will likely encounter a negative emotional response. One of the
negative emotional reactions exhibited in the period of project failure is grief (Shepherd,
Covin and Kuratko, 2009). Grief is defined as “a negative emotional response to the loss of
something important, triggering behavioural, psychological, and physiological symptoms”
(Shepherd and Kuratko, 2009, p. 451). Although grief is an emotional reaction to a project
failure, Shepherd and Kuratko (2009, p. 453) acknowledge that not every project failure will
lead to grief, and that individuals that are emotionally intelligent are more efficient when it
comes to grief recovery. Shepherd and Cardon (2009, p. 926) share the view that the
significance of a project to the organisational members will determine how intense their
negative emotional reaction will be in the event of a project failure. Further, they suggest that
although negative emotion can interfere with the learning process, people can better learn
from negative emotional reactions from project failures if they can display self-compassions
like mindfulness, self-kindness and common humanity. The higher the display of self-
compassion by individuals, the lesser the level that negative emotions can interfere with
learning from failure, thereby increasing the motivation to attempt again.

Emotional attachments have been found to play a role in projects. Dainty, et al. (2005, p. 241)
have identified the role of the word project affinity, which they describe as “the commitment
and attachment by stakeholders and participants to projects and their outcomes”. In a bid to
ascertain the role of affinity in projects, the authors examined four projects of different types
and sizes, where they conducted 128 in-depth interviews. It was found that operatives
involved in the cancer research facility, which is one of the four projects examined, showed
that one important factor that induced their attitude and commitment to the project was
project affinity. Operatives who appreciated the project objectives demonstrated a high level
of connection with the project they executed. The authors concluded that the notion of project
affinity could have an emotional dimension.

3.3 Emotional Intelligence

The concept of emotional intelligence (EI) came to light among managers in the 1990s
(Druskat and Wolff, 2001a), and has since garnered amplified interest within researchers due
to its positive effects on team performance (Feyerherm and Rice, 2002). One of the earliest
definitions of emotional intelligence is that of Salovey and Mayer (1990, p.189), which define
emotional intelligence as the “subset of social intelligence that involves the ability to monitor
one’s own and others feelings and emotions, to discriminate among them and to use this
information to guild one’s thinking and actions”. In the same vein, another definition of
emotional intelligence that is worth mentioning is that of Daniel Goleman, who defines

11
emotional intelligence in Goleman (1995, p.34) as “abilities such as being able to motivate
oneself and persist in the face of frustrations; to control impulse and delay gratification; to
regulate one’s moods and keep distress from swamping to think; to empathize and to hope”.
Although Salovey and Meyer were one of those that pioneered the use of the term “emotional
intelligence” (Feyerherm and Rice, 2002), the concept was made increasingly popular by
Daniel Goleman’s work on the subject (Burke and Barron, 2014; Feyerherm and Rice, 2002).
Apparently, these authors have made their marks in emotional intelligence; therefore, this
research recognises both definitions.

The importance of emotional intelligence cannot be downplayed. Sunindijo, Hadikusumo and

Ogunlana (2007) assert that increasing number of organisations now see the significance of
emotional intelligence at workplaces. For instance, Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckie (2002)
posit that great leaders are effective, not because of the strategy they employ, nor the input of
their great ideas and vision, but their successes are credited on how rightly they drive
emotions in the appropriate direction. They further explained that leaders could be
exceptional if they understand the role emotion plays in improving the result of businesses,
commitment, motivation and morale. In line with this opinion, Prati, et al. (2003) agree that to
create an effective leadership and enhanced team performance, emotional intelligence
competence is important in organisations. Similarly, Druskat and Wolff (2001a, p.90) talks
about the efficiency of emotional intelligence in team performance, and concluded that “the
most effective teams are emotionally intelligent ones”.

Although the attention on emotional intelligence in recent years has gained prominence, there
are still areas where the study of EI requires more attention. For instance, in project
management, Turner and Lloyd-Walker (2008) admit that little research has been conducted
in this area. Perhaps if more research had been conducted, greater awareness would have
unveiled the degree at which emotional intelligence could influence project management. In
support of this, findings from Turner and Lloyd-Walker (2008) also reveal that project
management success can be increased with the aid of EI capabilities.

Over the years, several authors have attempted to development models for EI, and have come
up with different models. Because of the popularity of Daniel Goleman’s tremendous input in
this subject, this study recommends Goleman’s model. Daniel Goleman in Goleman, Boyatzis
and Mckie (2002), developed a simplified model of emotional intelligence, which comprises
of four domains, namely: self- awareness, self-management, social awareness, and
relationship management. These four domains are accompanied with 18 different
competencies, and these 18 competencies are categorised into two major areas: personal
competence, and social competence. According to Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckie (2002, p.
39), Personal competence involves the capabilities of managing ourselves, which
encompasses the self-awareness and self-management domains. While, social competence
involves the capabilities of managing relationships, which is centred on the social awareness
and relationship management domains. The following shows the definitions and attributes of
the four domains of emotional intelligence model according to Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckie,
(2002).

12
Self-awareness- refers to the ability of us understanding our emotions, our strength, our
limitations, and our values, including our motives (Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckie, 2002).
According to the authors, being realistic and honest with oneself and to others are some of the
attributes of people who possess a strong level of self-awareness. Further, self-aware leaders
tend to have a clear understanding of what they value, and what their goals are, with a clear
direction. Another strong feature of self-aware people is the tendency for them to self-reflect
over things. This enables them to think things thoroughly, thus preventing them from making
hasty decisions.

Self-management- is the second domain in the model. Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckie (2002)
point out that this domain deals with people being able to control their emotions. According
to the authors, the contagious nature of our emotion brings the need for individuals and
leaders to manage their emotions. In this case, a leader’s emotion can equally have
consequences on group members. Therefore, it is necessary for leaders to manage their
emotions first if they wish to manage that of others. For instance, leaders who easily express
their anger, usually create a catastrophe that does not go well within the group. On the other
hand, leaders who comport themselves when under pressure, will ignite a positive feeling that
creates resonance, and enables a conducive environment that promotes comfort, trust and
fairness (Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckie, 2002).

Social awareness- which is the third domain, is mainly focused on empathising with others by
understanding and sharing their feelings (Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckie, 2002). Social
awareness entails giving a listening Ear to others, taking into consideration the opinions of
other, and being attuned to the feelings of others and in turn create resonance. Leaders who
fail to show empathy will likely go off-key and lack the right connection, which consequently
could spark a negative reaction. For instance, leaders can show empathy to the extent of
crying when others are crying in sharing their joy and pain. When leaders are attuned to the
emotions of others, they are likely to know the right thing to say and do at a given time. This
fosters social effectiveness at workplaces (Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckie, 2002).

Relationship management- This is the last but not the least of the four domains, which
emphasises on one's relationship with others. Relationship management is an aggregate of
self-awareness, added with self-management and empathy. Leaders that intend to manage
their relationships with others must first be able to manage their emotions because
relationship management deals with the handling of other people’s emotion. A leader must
show authenticity as a starting point in handling relationships. This involves someone acting
on genuine feelings when dealing with the group. Friendliness is a key in dealing with
relationships, but friendliness is not just enough. Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckie (2002, p. 51)
assert that relationship management has to do with “friendliness with a purpose”, in leading
people to their proper direction.

It is essential to note that the above highlighted four domains and competencies of the
emotional intelligence are not inborn talents in humans. Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckie (2002,
p. 38) argue that these talents develop by learning, which contributes significantly to making
us resonant leaders. Even on that, the authors went further in asserting they are yet to come

13
across any leader that possesses all the EI competencies. However, leaders that are highly
effective usually show “strength in a half dozen or so EI competencies”.
Table 1: The four domains and 18 competencies of Daniel Goleman’s model

Source: Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckie (2002 cited in Burke and Barron, 2014, p. 135)

3.4 Project
According to PMBOK® Guide (2013, p.3) a project is defined as “a temporary endeavour
undertaken to create a unique product, service, or result”. Given that a project has a beginning
and an end makes it temporary. A project is said to have reached its end when it achieves its
main objectives, or when its objectives cannot be realised. Also when the project seizes to
exist when there is no need for its continuation (PMBOK® Guide, 2013)

Projects play significant roles in organisations (Chipulu, et al., 2014), and in mankind’s
history (Ekstedt, et al., 1999, p.50). In most organisations, projects are a central part of their
activities where they heavily invest resources in the development of new products, process
improvements, and the creation of services (Sauser, Reilly and Shenhar, 2009).
The successful management and execution of projects to meet organisational needs are
challenging. Pinto and Kharbanda (1995) view these challenges as both human and technical,
which needs a strategic out-outlook requiring flexibility in addressing conflicts that may arise.
However, just as organisations seek different ways to increment success in their various
projects, the complexities and uncertainties that characterise a project environment make it
hard to establish a success/failure factors (Chipulu, et al., 2014). Therefore, methodologies,
strategies and importantly people are required in managing projects because of their unique
challenges (Pinto and Kharbanda, 1995).

14
Projects can be distinguished using some criteria. Antvik and Sjöholm (2012, pp.12-13)
identify four criteria in distinguishing a project as:
 Managed by Objectives (MBO) – driven by a defined objective, which should be
accepted by every team member.
 Temporary- the existence of a project is determined by the time required in achieving
its objectives. Although projects are temporary, PMBOK® Guide (2013) suggests that
it only applies to the engagement and longevity of the project. Therefore, products and
services that are created by a project could be long lasting. This implies that for
instance, the time and engagement channelled to the project of building a Football
Stadium could last between 2-4 years, which is seen a temporary. The Stadium being
the product of the project could last for more than 70 years, which is viewed as long
lasting.
 Limited- projects are limited, especially regarding resources such as money, time and
others.
 Unique- every project has its uniqueness in that it is not a repetition or copy of
previous work. Some projects can share similarities with other projects; regardless
there is always something different and new in every project.

Stakeholders command significant influence on projects. PMBOK® Guide (2013, p.30)

identifies these stakeholders as project team members and the organisations internal and
external interested entities. They are organisations, individuals or groups with the ability to
affect or be affected by the outcome of a project. Their interest or involvement in a project
could positively or negatively affect the completion or performance of the project- i.e., their
influences are exercised on projects, deliverables and project teams to achieve business
objectives. In light of these growing influences of stakeholders, it is highly necessary for
project managers to identify these stakeholders, and manage their demands to ensure success
(PMBOK® Guide, 2013, p.30). Figure 3 below, depicts the relationships between a project
team and stakeholders in a project.

Figure 3: Relationship between a project and stakeholders

Source: PMBOK® Guide (2013, p. 31).

15
Although projects are temporary organisations, they share a boundary of existence with
project-based organisations (Pemsel and Wiewiora, 2013). In light of the shared boundary
existence between a project and a project-based organisation, discussing the subject: project-
based organisation becomes necessary. The next sub-chapter will attempt to achieve that.

3.5 Project -Based Organisation (PBO)

Project-based organisations, also known as (PBOs) are different organisations using
temporary systems in the execution of their works. Whereby types of organisations like
:(functional, matrix or projectized) can be used to create a project- based organisation
(PMBOK® Guide, 2013). Hobday (2000, p.871) argues that contrary to the matrix and
functional organisation, PBO is more suited to the management of complex products, fast
changing markets, and uncertainties in technology.

Literature attributed to the field of the project- based organisations, has received a significant
growth lately (Nightingale, Fuller and Hopkins, 2011). This growth could explain why several
definitions to PBOs exist today. This study will make use of the definition from Pemsel and
Wiewiora (2013, p.31) which defines PBOs as organisations that use projects to produce the
majority of product and service for their internal or external customers. A PBO could be a
stand-alone organisation where they service external clients or a subsidiary that involves a
huge firm where both internal and external customers are serviced (Turner and Keegan, 2000,
p.132). A project-based organisation is quite different from other organisations. Some of the
features that distinguish it are the Uniqueness, uncertainties and complexities that characterise
the projects they execute (Ajmal and Koskinen, 2008).

There are no standard terms or acronyms used to qualify organisations that carry out projects;
this gives room for many researchers to apply different names to it (Pemsel and Wiewiora,
2013). In some quarters, scholars view it as project-based firms (Gann and Salter, 2000;
Lindkvist, 2004; Prencipe and Tell, 2001), while some would consider it as Project- based
companies (Aramo-immonen, Koskinen and Porkka 2011; Koskinen, 2010). The others as
project-based organisations (Ajmal and Koskinen, 2008; DeFillippi and Leher, 2011; Hobday,
2000; Pemsel and Wieriora, 2013). This study will adopt the use of the name project-based
organisation.

Ekstedt, et al. (1999, p.5) are of the opinion that the application of projects and temporary
organisations is on the rise in the industries and societies. This trend could explain why
Nightingale, Fuller and Hopkins (2011, p.216), have noted that Project- based organisations
command a growing economic influence in different sectors, in particular, “(pharmaceutical,
biotech, and financial services)”. Whereas, they are also found in industries such as “Culture,
service and consulting, high-tech, and industries involving complex products and services”
(Sydow, Lindkvist and DeFillippi, 2004, p.1475). Below, Table two displays the necessary
project related characteristics and different organisational structures in project-based
organisations. It also highlights roles and functions.

16
Table 2: Organisational Structures and their influences on Projects

Source: Extracted from PMBOK® Guide (2013, p. 22).

One major problem that plagues project-based organisations is the ability to effectively
manage knowledge transfer (KT). This lack of proper transfer of knowledge often elicits
project-based organisations to reinvent systems, leading to the tendency to repeat errors
(Wiewiora, et al., 2009). Knowledge transfer, though seen as an important aspect of project-
based organisations, unfortunately, involves complexities (Ajmal and Koskinen, 2008). This
is because project-based organisations are faced with obstacles that hinder knowledge
transfer. According to Ajmal and Koskinen (2008, p.10), these barriers are: time constraints
and tight budgets on most projects, insufficient time for project team members to carry out a
systematic review, and knowledge documentation of their experiences from past projects
because they are immediately recruited to the next available projects. Also, social barriers that
impede clear documentation of experiences and knowledge, like honesty in analysing both
mistakes and failures. Further, Wiewiora, et al. (2009), also identify the absence of
communication within projects that are spread across various geographic locations as a
hindrance to knowledge transfer in PBOs.

3.6 Project Teams

Honts, et al. (2012) argue that team-based structures have become crucial in many
organisations, as there are increasing numbers of organisations transiting their activities from
individual-based work to team-based as a good alternative.

In many organisations today, there exists different types of team, which is subject to the kind
of organisation. Cohen and Bailey (1997, p. 241) have identified four types of teams in
today’s organisations. These are work teams, parallel teams, project teams, and management
teams. For this thesis, this study will mainly focus on project team type. Regardless of the
organisation or team type, it is of importance to have a well-functioning team. Creating an
effective team is more than just a number. Antvik and Sjöholm (2012, p.34) highlight five
distinctive essential features that should be incorporated in a team. These are understanding
the project objectives, there should be a clear expectation for each other, results orientation,
co-operation and trust.
17
The formation of a project team has become the common response to project complexities
and the growing global market competition (Hacker, 2000). Taylor (2010, p.411) defines a
project team as “typically consisting of a group of employees assigned to complete a one-time
project within a target date”. This definition explains the uniqueness and time duration
associated with a project team. PMBOK® Guide (2013, p.35) states that a project team
consists of individuals from various disciplines, and knowledge areas equipped with the
necessary skills to execute a project. These are the project manager, project management
team, and other members whose duty might not necessary be connected to the management of
the project. Cohen and Bailey (1997) assert that they convey these skills, knowledge and
expertise on their tasks. Today, project teams are in service in various industries. Some of
these industries are manufacturing, research and development, telecommunication,
information systems and construction (Chiocchio and Essiembre, 2009).

There is no standard structure for project teams. PMBOK® Guide (2013) argues that the
structure and characteristics of a project team widely varies. Some of the features of a project
team as highlighted by Cohen and Bailey (1997, p. 242) are that they are time-limited, their
tasks are naturally non-repetitive, and at the completion of their mission, they have their
functional units to return to, or engage in another project.

Like every other entity, a project team is guided by a leader. PMBOK® Guide (2013, p.35)
identifies the project manager as constantly the team leader. Antvik and Sjöholm (2012) stress
the importance of a good leadership to the success of a project and argue that bad leadership
constitutes several problems that arise in projects. Burke and Barron (2014) emphasise the
need for project leaders to be cognizant of team’s setup and characteristics in order to lead
them effectively.

Project teams play a vital role in their organisations. Some of these functions have been
accomplishing mission-critical projects for their respective organisations (Taylor, 2010).
Despite their critical roles, a negative aspect of a project team is longevity issue. Taylor
(2010) talks about the employment situation of project teams, stressing that at the completion
of their projects, they sometimes face involuntary exits from their employers due to of lack of
existing projects.

Project teams, like every other team, inevitably pass through different stages of development
before reaching a mature functional stage. There are many existing group development
models proposed by several authors. This study will concentrate on the model developed by
Bruce Tuckman in 1965. This choice emanates from the fact that Tuckman’s model has been
widely acclaimed to be the most referred to and recognised by many kinds of literature
(Bonebright, 2010; Chou and Garcia, 2011; Miller, 2003). Bruce Tuckman in Tuckman
(1965) introduced four developmental sequences of a group, namely: forming, storming,
norming and performing. In 1977, Tuckman and Jensen (1977) added a fifth stage called
“adjournment”. These stages have become a model for many teams regarding developmental
processes. Antvik and Sjöholm (2012, pp.39-40) explain the first four of the various stages of
Tuckman’s model from a project management perspective. These are:

18
  Forming: - The first stage is the team’s formation, where everyone becomes cognizant
of each other. The presence of the project manager and the team’s knowledge of the
project objectives and modus operandi become crucial for the team’s development.
 Storming: - At this second stage, the team begins to work towards the actualization of
the objectives of the project. This is where conflicts arise because of their divergent
opinions. The project manager’s role becomes important at this stage.
 Norming: - From this point, team members have been able to more or less resolve
their conflict issues. They cooperate more to achieve the objectives of the project.
Communication and trust increases among members. The performance of the team
becomes better, and the project manager assumes a more supportive role without the
need to control all the projects details like in the earlier stage.
 Performing: - The team’s development and cooperation in achieving the project's
objectives continue to increase, while the project manager takes a more supervisory
and supportive role.

The fifth stage, which is the adjournment phase, is where the team disbands. Miller (2003,
p.122) argues that the adjournment stage is the less critical stage of the group development
because it is only needed for the disbanding of the group. Because of its low relevance, it is
usually not referred to when carrying out investigations on the model. At this stage of the
group, Miller (2003) further explains that the group focuses on wrapping up their activities.
The group members are happy because of their accomplishments, and the loss of friendships
could get some members depressed.

Figure 4, shows a revised model by Tuckman and Jensen (1977), as cited in Bonebright
(2010, p.114) where the fifth stage is included.
Figure 4: Tuckman and Jensen five stages of group development.

Source: Bonebright (2010, p. 114).

Figure 5, as explained by Burke and Barron (2014) highlights the importance of participation
and empowerment in a true team. This creates an atmosphere for team members to have
adequate authority and autonomy in making their day-to-day decisions. It also paves the way
for team involvement and motivation, thereby boosting accountability and responsibility.

19
Figure 5: Connection and interaction between a project manager and project team members

Source: Burke and Barron (2014, p.179).

3.7 Conceptual Model

The model/diagram in figure 6 below illustrates the relationships and connection between the
concepts highlighted earlier in this chapter.

The model shows that project teams, which comprise majorly of a project manager and other
team members, usually execute projects. However, project teams do sometimes encounter
emotional situations during project phases. These emotional situations encountered stem from
the very fact that projects are run by humans, which makes them emotional. As argued by
Peslak (2005, p.251), “human beings are emotional creatures”. This makes project team
members vulnerable in displaying or expressing their emotions in their line of duty. The term
“emotional situation” in this context is described in this study as any emotion expressed or
displayed by project team members. This emotional display according to Glikson and Erez
(2013, p. 22) appear as either positive or negative emotion, depending on the intention and
interpretation. The model illustrates that these emotional situations take place between a
project manager and team members, or within team members, and they come in positive or
negative form. The model also shows that one way to manage these emotional situations is
through emotional intelligence, especially when the emotion appears negative. Managing
emotions through emotional intelligence is supported by George (2000, p. 1034) which
suggests that one aspect of emotional intelligence is the management of emotion.
Figure 6: Using emotional intelligence to manage emotions

Source: (Own construct).

Idea from George (2000); Glikson and Erez (2013); Peslak (2005).

20
4 Empirical Findings
This chapter will describe the process of carrying out interviews. This will include the profiles
of the respondents, sampling criteria and ethical issues. Lastly, the presentation of empirical
data from the interviews conducted at Sandvik Materials Technology.

A total of 11 one-to-one interviews were conducted for this study, which has to do with a
meeting between the researcher and the informant (Descombe, 2010). One major reason why
the researcher of this study chose one-to-one interview is that the researcher believes that the
best way to explore emotional matters is through a face-to-face interview. This afforded the
researcher the opportunity to see, feel, and observe the intensity of the interviewee’s
experiences and narratives. This is hard to achieve by using a Telephone interview, Skype
interview or questionnaires.

Out of the 11 interviews conducted, 10 have been carried out with the staff of Sandvik
Materials Technology (SMT), which is the focus of this research. While one interview was
performed with an employee at the Human Resource of Sandvik Group, the parent company
of Sandvik Materials Technology. This brings the interviews at a total of 11. Of all the
respondents interviewed, seven of them are currently Senior Project Managers (SPM), while
three of the interviewees are currently Project Managers (PM). Lastly, the researcher was
fortunate to have interviewed the Acting Head of the Project Office of Sandvik Materials
Technology (SMT). Even on a tight schedule, the Acting Head of Project Office was kind
enough to grant an interview, likewise other respondents. In all, the interviewees were very
accommodating and cooperative. Nine of the interviewees work at the SMT Project Office, 1
of the interviewee works at SMT Technical Service, and lastly, 1interviewee from the Human
Resource of Sandvik Group. The inclusion of one respondent from the human resource was to
assist in getting an insight of the subject from a human resource point of view, especially in
managing emotions. The whole interview process lasted for five days, beginning on the 24th
of October 2016, to the 28th of October 2016. Each interview lasted averagely about
45minutes. The interviewees were given the choice and flexibility to determine which day,
time and location were best suitable for them out of these five days. In all, 10 of the 11
interviews were conducted at the head office of Sandvik Materials Technology (SMT),
located at Storgatan 2, Sandviken, Sweden. The other took place at Sandvik Group, Global
HR office, also located at Sandviken, Sweden. The respondents are highly experienced in
Project Management, which makes them knowledgeable about how project teams work, and
many of them have worked at Sandvik for a very long time. Apart from working at Sandvik
for several years, many of the respondents have also worked in other organisations for several
years.

The interviews consisted of two sections. The first section was aimed at obtaining information
about the respondent’s name, years of experience at Sandvik, current position, estimated
projects involved with so far. They were also asked if as Project Managers, they sometimes
act as team members in other projects, which they are not the ones driving. Many of the
interviewees agreed that even as Senior Project Managers, or as Project Managers, they
sometimes engage in another project as team members. This afforded the respondents the
opportunity to give answers from both a project manager’s perspective and a team member’s
21
perspective. The second section of the interview consisted of the main questions. Seven
questions were asked with some sub-questions. The first five questions were targeted at
understanding the impacts of emotion, while questions six and seven served as a platform for
managing emotions. Respondents were not compelled to answer all questions; they were
instead asked to skip questions which they did not have the answers. This measure afforded
respondents the opportunity to be flexible, and ensured that respondents gave honest answers
and narratives.

4.1 Sampling Criteria for Selecting Respondents

A purposive sampling technique was adopted for this study. In a purposive sampling, the use
of one’s judgement is allowed in deciding cases that satisfy your research questions and
objectives, and it is mostly used for research with small samples such case study (Saunders,
2012; Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016). A purposive sampling strategy used for this
study to determine the case and participants is the homogeneous sampling strategy. This
strategy allows the researcher to concentrate on a subgroup, where members of the same
sample are similar, “such as a particular occupation or level in an organisation’s hierarchy”
(Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016, p. 302). Based on the above premise, the researcher of
this study has applied judgement in selecting respondents for the interviews. Some criteria
were considered in the selection of respondents. One of the criteria used was making sure that
respondents were selected from a Project- Based Organisation. Because, the target group are
project teams, they are more likely to be found in greater number in a Project- Based
Organisation, bearing in mind that project teams are unique and quite different from other
team’s types (Cohen and Bailey, 1997). As mentioned in chapter 2, the researcher specifically
chose to focus on one business area of Sandvik group, which is Sandvik Materials
Technology (SMT). Because most respondents were from SMT, it afforded the researcher the
possibility explore the subject in-depth and holistically. Another criterion considered was that
respondents should have attained the level of at least a Project Manager in the organisation’s
hierarchy. PMBOK® Guide (2013, p. 35) acknowledges a Project Manager as the leader of a
project team. Their vast experiences and knowledge of project matters, makes them suitable.
Also, their high engagement with project teams, and the fact that most of them were once
project team members, makes them appropriate for this interview. This allows the researcher
to gain insight of emotion from a project manager’s point of view, and from a team member’s
perspective. Lastly, respondents must have been involved with quite a number of projects in
the past. The minimum number was pegged at four projects. The idea stems from the
reasoning that the more projects they get involved with, the more they will understand the
project team processes. All the above-highlighted criteria served as the premise at with
respondents were selected. In determining the right number of interviews for this study,
Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2016) admit that identifying the right sampling size is
ambiguous because there are no defined rules. However, according to the authors, the
minimum sample size for a semi-structured interview is between 5-25 (Saunders, 2012; cited
in Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2016, p.297). This study, having adopted the semi-
structured interview, is in line with the minimum required number by having conducted 11
interviews.

22
Table 3: Information about the interview and respondents

INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED AND PROFILES OF RESPONDENTS

NO. POSITION YEARS AT BUSIN.AR INTERVIE EST. NUM WORKED DATE
SANDV. EA W OF PROJ. AS A TEAM OCT
FORM MEMB. 2016

1 PM 9 SMT F-t-F >10 YES 25

2 SPM 19 SMT F-t-F > 10 YES 25
3 SPM 2 SMT F-t-F >30 YES 24
4 PM 16 SMT F-t-F > 50 YES 25
5 HPO 28 SMT F-t-F MANY - 28
6 SPM 22 SMT F-t-F >30 YES 24
7 SPM 27 SMT F-t-F >100 YES 26
8 SPM 22 SMT F-t-F >20 YES 26
9 PM 10 SMT F-t-F >10 NO 24
10 SPM 13 SGAB F-t-F >100 YES 28
11 SPM 16 SMT F-t-F >50 YES 28
Table 3: Source: (own construct)

The table shows that 11 interviews were conducted, which comprised of seven Senior Project
Managers (SPM), and three Project Managers (PM). The table also recognises a high-ranking
manager in the Project Office of SMT, who is the Head of Project Office (HPO), in an Acting
capacity. The reason why the respondent’s column was left blank on the table where it states
if they have “Worked as a team member?” is that the respondent is currently into full-time
management at the moment, but may have been involved before as a Project Manager. All
interviewees are from Sandvik Materials Technology, except one interviewee from Sandvik
Group HR.

The table also does not show any column that contains names of respondents because before
the interviews, many of the respondents opted for their names not to be mentioned. This led to
the omission of names on the table. In maintaining the condition of anonymity, names of
respondents have now been coded. Names shall now take the form of AR1-AR11 (AR1, AR2,
AR3, AR4, AR5, AR6, AR7, AR8, AR9, AR10, and AR11). In this case, A.R means
Anonymous Respondent. The code numbers will be randomly selected and assigned to
respondents, meaning that AR1 may not mean the first interviewee in the table. The F-t-F on
the table means (face to face). While the sign > signifies (greater than).

4.2 Ethical Considerations

In any research, be it quantitative or qualitative, ethical issues will always come to play (Orb,
Eisenhower and Wynaden, 2001). Ethics are the standard rightful behaviour, which manages
the conduct of research, by adhering to the morally responsible ways of doing things
(Blumberg, Cooper, and Schindler, 2008, p. 154). Similarly, Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill
(2016, p. 239) view ethics as “standards of behaviour that guide your conduct about the rights
of those who become the subject of your work, or are affected by it”. Ethics also entail doing

23
what is good and trying to avoid possible harm. In this case, harm can highly be avoided or
curtailed by heeding to the most appropriate ethical principles (Orb, Eisenhauer and
Wynaden, 2001). Some ethical principles to follow when conducting research are highlighted
by Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2016, pp. 243-245), and are as follow below:

Voluntary nature of participation and right to withdraw: - Participants of the interviews were
not harassed to participate in this study; instead, they participated on their volition by
signifying interest, after knowing about the research. Participants of the interviews were given
a choice to determine their level of participation by deciding the day, time and venue for the
interviews. Also, the researcher made sure that participants were not coerced to answer every
question asked. Instead, they were told to skip questions which they had no answer to give.
Furthermore, two participants who earlier indicated interest for the interview could not make
it due to official commitments, thereby giving them the right to withdraw.

Informed consent of those taking part: - All the interviews conducted for this research were
recorded via audio Tapes. Before every interview, the researcher ensured that due permissions
were granted by all the participants of the interview to have them recorded. The researcher
maintained punctuality in making sure that interviews began and lasted as agreed.

Ensuring data confidentiality and maintenance of Anonymity: - Data recordings from

participants shall be treated with utmost confidentiality. Meaning that no third party will have
access to the recordings only the researcher, and by request, the participants. Most of the
participants of the interview opted to be anonymous. In ensuring this, names of participants
have been coded from AR1-AR11, which are randomly assigned. This measure is to make
sure that anonymity is maintained. It is imperative to note that codes AR1 to AR11 can be
allocated to anyone regardless of their position on the above table. Hence, randomness shall
be applied.

4.3 Sandvik Materials Technology (SMT)

Sandvik Material Technology (SMT) is a Swedish organisation and is one of the three
business areas of Sandvik Group. Sandvik Group, being the parent company of SMT, was
founded in 1862. SMT is a world leader in the manufacturing of advanced stainless and
special alloys, industrial heating systems and products, and has three product areas. They
consist of: Wire and Heating Technology, Strip, and Tube, Primary products. They carry out
many of their business through projects. SMT has a strong tradition that is rooted in
innovation and has invested heavily in Research and Development. As at 2015, the estimated
number of employees at SMT reached about 6,500 (http://smt.sandvik.com/en/about-us/).

As earlier mentioned in chapter 2, this research will not focus on Sandvik Group. Instead, it is
focused on Sandvik Materials Technology (SMT) as the case for this study.

4.4 Interviews at Sandvik

As mentioned earlier, names of respondents have been coded to maintain anonymity. Names
and identification will now be displayed using AR1-AR11, where AR= (Anonymous
Respondent). Because they have been randomly coded, AR1 will NOT assume the code name
the first respondent on the Table in this Chapter. Equally, AR11 will NOT be the last
24
respondent on the Table. Profiles of the interviewees indicate that they are experts in the field
of project management, and they have many years of experience with Sandvik. Besides
working at Sandvik for an extended period, some of the interviewees have got a long working
experience with other reputable organisations in Sweden and abroad before joining Sandvik.

Data collected through interviews have been meticulously transcribed, and will now be
presented. The data presentation has been structured using themes from the interview
questions. Each theme reflects each question asked. (See appendix at the end of this paper for
more information on the interview questions and transcripts of respondents).

4.4.1 Emotion and Attachments

The question regarding how respondents see emotion generally, shows that respondents tend
to interpret the word emotion differently. Respondents (AR2, AR4, and AR9) see emotion as
a human thing that is difficult to live without. While respondents (AR7, AR8 and AR10) see
emotion as something inside us, or that comes from the inside. One of the interviewees
(AR1), sees emotion a mood, while another respondent (AR3) views it as something that
happens to us 24 hours, which fluctuates. (AR5) interprets emotion as something that evokes
passion, frustration and anger, while (AR6) translates it as the core of our system. Although
respondents have a different interpretation of emotions, their interpretations refer to humans,
which gives a picture that human beings are emotional. Just as respondent (AR2) puts it:

“All human beings have emotions”.

In a similar vein, when respondents were asked if they had seen or observed team members
expressing emotional attachment to a project and how, most of the respondents (AR1, AR2,
AR3, AR4, AR5, AR7, AR8, AR9, and AR11) agree that project team members do
sometimes get emotionally attached to a project. Even though most of the respondents agreed
to this, there is an exception of two respondents (AR6 and AR10) who share slightly different
views. Respondent (AR6) claims not to have seen anyone expressing emotional attachment to
a project but argues that naturally, the first project of your career is more emotional than fact
based. While respondent (AR10) believes that attachment can occur during a project.
However, thinks that it does not occur to the project itself, but to what the project has to offer.

The question regarding ways at which project team members show emotional attachment to a
project, some respondents (AR1, AR3, AR4, and AR5) admit that team members express
emotional attachment by being passionate about projects. To demonstrate the influence of
passion as an attachment to a project, respondent (AR1) puts it that:

“If you cannot ride a dead Horse, and you are very passionate about this Horse you might
not see that it is actually dead, you try to ride it anyways”.

While respondents (AR2 and AR8) see engagements as a result of fun derived from the
project. For respondent (AR6), you can see it in the way they discuss about the project.
Respondent (AR7) believes that project team members employ fatherhood approach to the
project, while respondent (AR9) argues that people react differently, which largely depends
on the situation. Respondent (AR10) talked about things like the feelings that come with the
position and success as a way of demonstrating attachment. In the case of respondent (AR11),
25
project team members show attachment by asking questions and being punctual to meetings.

On the question of whether or not emotional attachments have an impact on the commitment
of project team members to the project, 7 out of 11 of the respondents (AR1, AR2, AR3,
AR4, AR5, AR8, and AR11) concur that emotional attachment increases project team
members commitment to a project. According to the words of two of the respondents (AR3
and AR5) respectively:

“If they are passionate, they can take the sky down”.

“When they are engaged and passionate, their commitments will be stronger”.

However, respondent (AR9) tends to differ a bit on the role of emotional attachment to a
project’s commitment and opined that the level of commitments could be more or less,
depending on the emotional reaction that comes out. There were no clear answers from
respondents (AR6, AR7, and AR10).

4.4.2 Project Failure

The interviews show that in the event of a project failure, project team members tend to
display emotional reactions, and these reactions occur in different ways. Some respondents
(e.g. AR2, AR5, AR6, AR7, and AR9), posit that project team members feel frustrated when
there is a project failure. Respondents (AR1 and AR10) believe that sadness is what comes to
play when there is a failure. In the words of respondents (AR10 and AR1):

“People get sad because there is pressure in the society for people to succeed”... (AR10).

“Sometimes to get too emotionally attached to a project can be difficult if you need to shut it
down” … (AR1).

Anger has also been identified by some respondents (AR4 and AR7), while (AR4) also
identified sorrow.

“After the first initial anger, there comes a period of little bit of sorrow”… (AR4)

Respondent (AR3) talked about being downcasted. Other emotional reactions identified by
respondent (AR2) are that team members seem to be stressed, afraid, and sometimes cry.
Respondents (AR8 and AR10) say that the personality of the person involved determines the
emotional effects. While respondents (AR11, AR4 and AR9) agree that the level of
commitment to the project determines the kind or level of emotional reaction that will be
displayed.

The next sub-question on project failure was centred on whether these emotional reactions as
a result of project failure could affect project team members in their next project. Answers
from the interviews show that many of the respondents are of the opinion that these emotional
reactions could have an effect on the project team member’s next project. This view is shared
by respondents (AR1, AR2, AR3, AR4, AR7, AR9, AR10 and AR11). In the words of
respondents (AR2, AR10):

26
“They are a bit hesitant; they are not as confident, they question themselves- are my
competent enough?”… (AR2).

“Probably you are going to be a little bit scared when you start your next project”… (AR10).

However, answers from respondents (AR5, AR6 and AR8) slightly differ. Respondent (AR5)
believes the emotional reaction to the next project is subject to how you handle it, while
respondent (AR6) says the reason for the failure will determine their reactions. If the reason is
not the fault of team members, it may not affect them. However, respondent (AR8) thinks that
the emotion from the last failure will not make a big difference in the next project.

4.4.3 Communication
In exploring the influence of emotion on communication among project teams, the results
from the interviews show that all the respondents (AR1, AR2, AR3, AR4, AR5, AR6, AR7,
AR8, AR9, AR10 and AR11) agree that emotion influences communication. To quote some
of the respondents:

“Communication is a way of transferring emotions from one person to another”… (AR9).

“If many people share positive emotion, they tend to communicate more often and
spontaneously. If emotions are more negative, then communications will need a little bit more
support”…. (AR4).

Respondents (AR2 and AR3) see communication as a way of assessing the team’s
performance. In the words of respondents (AR2):

“if you are going to the Fika room, and you listen to the team, you can differentiate if the
project is going well or not. If it is not going well, it is quite silent, you see that they are
pressured”… (AR2).

Respondent (AR3) says that as a Project Manager, when you listen to your team members
discussing your project from afar, through their emotional reaction, you can tell if the project
is going well or not.

The interviews also show that communication is an avenue to celebrate a milestone in a

project. As cited by respondent (AR5):

“Sometimes also, the communication can be engaging and positive because we share
something like a milestone, and we celebrate!”

4.4.4 Team’s Performance

When respondents were asked about the effects of emotion on a team’s performance, almost
all the respondents (AR1, AR2, AR3, AR5, AR6, AR7, AR8, AR9, AR10 and AR11) agreed
that emotion does have an impact on project team’s performance. This can be further
elaborated in the words of respondent (AR10):

“I would say emotion is one of the largest contributors to team performance,

because it is central to every person”… (AR10).

27
 Respondent (AR4) seems to have a little different view to this. The respondent believes that
if a project has just one dedicated member, this might negatively affect the team. This could
have a different or limited effect on performance.

The next question is a sub-question, which talks about the influence of a leader’s mood. The
interview results show that all the respondents (AR1, AR2, AR3, AR4, AR5, AR6, AR7,
AR8, AR9, AR10 and AR11) concur that a leader’s mood does have an impact on the project
team. These impacts have been illustrated in many forms. For instance, going by the words of
some of the respondents:

“If you have a Project Leader or Manager that is nervous, the team gets nervous”…
(AR3).

“If I come with a negative energy into the room, that has an impact on the project team”...
(AR2).

“If I am moody and sad, it affects and set the standard for the other ones”… (AR7).

“If you are in a bad mood, you better say sorry pals today I am in a bad mood, do not think
about it, it just happens sometimes”… (AR10).

4.4.5 Other Observed Emotion

The question on whether there are other emotions not mentioned that could have an impact on
the project team reveals that respondents identified some emotions, as they affect project team
members. Although not all the respondents could give answers to this question, quite a
reasonable number came up with answers that relate to their experiences and that of others.
Respondent (AR1) pointed out that emotional problems emanating from private lives could
affect a project. (AR3) mentioned burn-out from project members who are too engaged
because of their passion for a project. (AR4) stated fun at work from achieving a brilliant
technical solution. (AR5) talked about fear of losing jobs during re-organisation, which could
be transferred to a project. (AR6) identified hesitation to work with some members in a new
project because of past emotional experience from other projects. (AR8 and AR10) mentioned
a lack of motivation and competition among project teams respectively. While respondent
(AR2) added that bad feelings from a project do affect team member’s health sometimes,
hence, they fall sick. According to the respondent:

“In a project, it can be very emotional”… (AR2).

4.4.6 Project Manager’s Action and EI

The question on how project managers act when they observe or see a negative emotional
reaction, with the tendency to influence the team, generated several answers. The interviews
reveal that most times, project managers usually take measures to quell any form of negative
emotion that may arise among team members. Some of the respondents (AR3, AR8, and
AR9) stress that project managers first assess if the emotion has a positive or negative
dimension before they act. When it is positive, they encourage it. When they appear negative,
they take actions. For respondents (AR1 and AR11), some project managers would like to
swap team members to different positions. (AR4) argues that some react to the situation,
28
while some are task orientated and choose to disregard. (AR5) posits that some project
managers would prefer a separate feedback section. Respondents (AR2, AR6, AR7, AR10
and AR11) are of the opinion that project managers would like to listen, talk, discuss, or
communicate. Just as some put it:

“The good project managers are the ones that are empathetic and take the time to listen”…
(AR2)

“Firstly, I try to listen to what is going on or what is causing the emotion”…. (AR7).

When respondents were asked if they have heard or come across the term Emotional
Intelligence, 10 of the respondents (AR1, AR2, AR3, AR4, AR5, AR6, AR7, AR8, AR9 and
AR10) have all heard or stumbled on the word emotional intelligence. Only respondent
(AR11) seemed not to have heard or come across the word Emotional Intelligence. (AR3)
happens to be familiar with it via the Sandvik leadership programme, while (AR2) claims to
have had the competence or training from the IT department of Sandvik. In quoting the
respondent:

“Emotional intelligence is one of the key top priority competencies that I have”… (AR2).

“I have seen project managers become angry, frustrated, and start to scream”… (AR2).

When respondents were asked if they view emotional intelligence as important to the
organisation, the interviews indicate that all the respondents (AR1, AR2, AR3, AR4, AR5,
AR6, AR8, AR9, AR10 and AR11) agreed that emotional intelligence is important. In their
words:

“To be a good Project Manager or a good leader, I think it is important to have a high skill in
emotional intelligence”… (AR1).

“I think it is very important to any organisation”... (AR10).

“Emotion intelligence is not something we talk about, we don’t have the label, we only talk
about successful or not successful project manager”… (AR5).

“If you walk into a major stakeholder that you know or have heard is moody, you caught that
stakeholder on the wrong day, you do not realise it and you keep pushing, that stakeholder is
going to be pretty mad at you and could stop the project or seriously damage it. If you have
the sense, you can sense that ok, this is the wrong day I will go back tomorrow. Just that easy
act may be really important to the project. So, it needs this skill to be able to judge this.”…
(AR9).

4.4.7 Mechanism/Training for Managing Emotion

This question deals with understanding the mechanisms or training used by Sandvik in
managing emotions. The interview results indicate that respondents (AR1, AR2, AR3, AR4,
AR5, AR6, AR7, AR8 and AR9) stressed that Sandvik has a leadership training for project
managers, where an aspect of it talks about self-awareness, in which emotions and some
elements of emotional intelligence are being discussed. Respondent (AR11) talked about
29
Sandvik having an education that touches very little on emotions, which the respondent
attended about ten years ago. (AR6) mentioned discussing with bosses on issues like emotion.
While respondent (AR9) also talked about Sandvik having a project model, which is a
framework for managing projects but is also used to partly manage emotions arising from
projects. Respondent (AR2) says that the leadership training educates leaders on emotional
intelligence, while respondent (AR4) believes that the leadership training contains emotional
intelligence, “but not completely about emotional intelligence”…. (AR4).

On the first sub-question, respondents were asked about the effectiveness of the leadership
programme in managing emotion. Respondents (AR1, AR5 and AR11) point that the
leadership programme is not very efficient in handling emotions, while respondent (AR7)
sees it as not effective because naturally, emotions come from within which makes it difficult
to manage. Respondents (AR6, AR8, and AR9) view the training as effective. Respondents
(AR3 and AR4) are of the opinion that its effectiveness largely depends on the individual and
the individual’s emotional intelligence competence. Respondent (AR2) thinks it is effective
on lower level of management, not at the higher hierarchy level because the training was
changed to focus on transformational leadership and emotional intelligence only 5 years ago.
When managers from higher hierarchy started as managers, the focus was not on emotional
intelligence. Below are the words of some respondents:

“I would like to have the ability to measure or see when the pressure is too high, and that has
very much to do with emotional intelligence I think”. “To moderate emotions I think is more
important. That is not something we talk about every day; it is what gives us result every
day”... (AR1).

“I do not know if all project managers have attended this type of training. They are available;
we could do more as a company”… (AR5).

“From an emotional point of view I do not think it is so effective, since it is not such a clear
topic, it is more up to the individual to use that ability. We are very unaware and immature in
emotional intelligence”… (AR5).

“If you are not aware of the emotional impacts on your team or on your staff, you are maybe
not able to see the importance of emotion”... (AR11).

“We have a little bit of old fashion way of managing”… (AR11).

Some of the respondents (AR1, AR2, AR5 and AR11) interviewed advocate that the
leadership training should be extended to other project team members, not just the project
manager. According to respondent (AR5):

“This is a company with a lot of Engineers, and Engineers tend to always lean on facts. If
you throw in a topic like emotions, then they think of Simpsons”.

Lastly, respondents were asked to choose what mechanism or way they would propose in
managing emotions.

Respondents (AR1, AR2, AR4, AR5, AR9, AR10 and AR11) all favour that emotional
30
intelligence should be applied as a way of managing emotions in the organisation. In quote,
respondent (AR2) says:

“Emotional intelligence is a critical success factor! The more young people come to Sandvik,
the more important it becomes”. “If you keep emotions inside yourself or the group, you will
come to a point where it erupts”.

However, respondents (AR6 and AR8) support that the current system should be maintained,
while respondent (AR3) would prefer mentorship to be introduced.

4.4.8 Summary of Empirical Data

Emotion and Attachments: - The views of respondents on the meaning of the word emotion
show that their definitions validate the fact that emotion is a human thing, thereby
establishing the fact that human beings are emotional. - Most of the respondents agree that
project team members sometimes develop an emotional attachment to a project, or to what the
project stands to offer. These attachments increase their level of commitments to the project.

Project Failure: - In the event of a project failure, project team members display different
forms of negative emotional reactions like frustration, anger, sadness, sorrow, stress, fear, and
sometimes they cry. This very much depends on the reason for the failure and their
commitment to the project. - Most respondents believe that these negative emotional reactions
resulting from project failures will affect team members in their next project. While some
respondents believe that the reason for the failure will determine the way team members will
handle subsequent projects.

Communication: - All the respondents interviewed concur that emotion does have an impact
on communication among project team members. Respondents view it as a way of
transferring emotions from one person to another. However, the smoothness of
communication is determined by the display of positive or negative emotion.

Team’s Performance: - The interviews show that almost all the respondents agree that
emotions have a significant impact on the performance of project teams. They see emotion as
one of the largest contributors of performance. - All the respondents interviewed accept that a
leader’s mood does affect the mood of the team. The leader’s mood sets the standard for the
project team.

Other Observed Emotions: - A number of the respondents highlighted some emotions,

which they deem important as having an impact on project team members. These emotions
stem from team member’s private lives, burn-out from work, fear of losing jobs during re-
organisation, fun at work, hesitation to work with some team members because of past
experiences, lack of motivation and health issues emanating from bad feelings from a project.

Project Manager’s Action and EI: - When project managers observe that some certain
emotions could affect the team, they assess if the emotion is positive or negative. When
negative, they listen, swap team members, or use feedback session to discuss or communicate.
When emotion is positive, they encourage it. - Most of the respondents claim to have heard of
the term emotional intelligence in different capacities. They all stress that it is important to
31
the organisation.

Mechanism/Training for Managing Emotion: - Sandvik has a leadership training

programme which talks about self-awareness that discusses emotional matters. Some see it as
effective, while some as not effective. - Some respondents suggest that the training should be
extended to team members not just project managers. -More respondents advocate that
emotional intelligence should be completely adopted in managing emotions. While two
respondents canvassed support for the status quo to be maintained.

32
5 Analysis
The empirical data gathered in Chapter 4, will be analysed to make sense of the data. This
will be achieved by thematically analysing them (Braun and Clarke, 2006) as highlighted in
Chapter 2. In doing this, one important fact to note is that qualitative studies are densely rich
in data; therefore, greater attention will be channelled to focusing on relevant data through
themes (Creswell, 2014, p. 195).

The analysis has been structured and organised based on the refined emerging themes from
the empirical data. These include: Humans are emotional, Passion, Grief, Mood, Anxiety, and
Leadership Training.

5.1 Humans are emotional

The findings from the empirical data show that all the respondents seemed to have an idea of
what emotion entails. This question became necessary to see how respondents perceive the
term emotion and to analysis their interpretations of emotion. Although their views were
divergent, they still share several similarities. Some of the similarities illuminated by
respondents are that humans cannot isolate themselves from emotion. Humans will continue
to express emotions in their daily life. Judging by the opinions of the respondents, it is
paramount for project teams to come to terms that no matter how professional and diligent
they are in discharging their duties, emotions will always control some of their actions
because it is the core of our system. This draws the need for project team members to see
emotion as a critical aspect that could affect their jobs. Just like respondents (AR2, AR4, and
AR9) have pointed out that emotion is hard to live without in our lives. Graham, et al. (2008,
p. 394) share this view by stressing that the expression of emotion in our daily lives is among
the hallmarks of human beings. A similar view is also shared by the research of Baumeister,
et al. (2007) which indicates that a tough encounter of our daily lives is emotion, in which a
life without emotion is worthless. If emotions are part of our daily lives as humans, therefore,
it is logical to acknowledge that all humans are emotional in nature. Just as respondent (AR2)
expressed, “All human beings have emotion”. The findings conclude that emotions cannot be
separated from humans. Hence, humans are emotional.

5.2 Passion
The empirical data reveals the prevalence of emotional attachment expressed by some project
team members during the execution of projects. Most respondents (AR1, AR2, AR3, AR4,
AR5, AR7, AR8, AR9 and AR11) seem to agree that some team members convey emotional
attachment to a project, or to the benefits accrued to the project. This is demonstrated by team
members exhibiting a high level of passion for a project. However, it is interesting that these
attachments come naturally when team members embark on their first career project as argued
by respondent (AR6), thereby arguably pointing to the fact that all project team members
expressed emotional attachment during their first projects. However, to some like (AR10), it
is not really about the project itself that evokes the passion, it is the benefits that come along
with the project like success, or hierarchical position. The fact that majority of the
respondents admitted that project team members do sometimes display emotional attachments
during a project validates the work by Dainty, et al. (2005), which argues that emotional
attachment does play a role in a project. It is important for project team members to be
33
mindful of the fact that being too passionate about a project might sometimes turn out
negative. This occurs when a project obviously can no longer continue due to lack of
progress; team members continue to engage in that project without knowing. In the view of
(AR1) “If you cannot ride a dead Horse, and you are very passionate about this Horse you
might not see that it is actually dead, you try to ride it anyways”.

Most of the respondents have also argued that being emotionally attached to a project
increases commitment among project team members. There seems to be a pattern among
respondents as all of those in favour that team members sometimes express emotional
attachments agreed that it enhances their commitments to the project. This is evident in the
words of respondents (AR3 and AR5) respectively: “If they are passionate, they can take the
sky down” “When they are engaged and passionate, their commitment will be stronger”.
These assertions are also supported by the findings of Dainty, et al. (2005) which show that
operatives of a project that displayed a high level of connection were more committed to the
project.

5.3 Grief
The findings from the interviews have shown that when project team members experience a
project failure, they display some negative emotional reactions. Although, judging by the
reactions of respondents to a project failure, show that team members react differently. The
failure makes them express various kinds of emotions, which tends to take a negative form.
For instance, team members express frustration, anger, sadness, sorrow, fear, and sometimes
cry. All these emotional reactions to a project failure have been classified as grief because
they are negative in nature. As revealed by Shepherd and Kuratko (2009, p. 451), grief is “a
negative emotional response to the loss of something important….” The empirical data shows
that there are many reasons why team members grief in the event of a project failure. An
instance is a situation where passionate team members who are emotionally attached to a
project, find it difficult to let go the project, even when it is clear that the project can no
longer continue. As added by a respondent (AR1), “Sometimes to get too emotionally
attached to a project can be difficult if you need to shut it down”. The high level of pressure
on team members to succeed makes it hard for them to absorb any form of failure. Some of
these projects are so important that some team members would like to take advantage of its
success to uplift their careers. Therefore, the pressure to succeed in these projects becomes
non-negotiable. Just as stated by respondent (AR10), “People get sad because there is
pressure in the society for people to succeed”. The intensity of the emotional reaction will tell
how important the project is (Shepherd and Cardon, 2009, p. 926). The establishment of grief
as an emotional response to a project failure supports the findings of Shepherd, Covin and
Kuratko (2009), which state that grief is an emotional reaction exhibited in the period of a
project failure. However, it is important to be conscious of the fact that not all project failures
can lead to grief. Some respondents pointed out that some factors will determine if a project
team member will display any emotional reaction in the event of a project failure. These
determinants are the level of commitment channelled to the project in question, and the reason
why the project has failed. Sometimes, when the cause of the discontinuation of the project
has nothing to do with team members, they may find it hard to grief over the project,

34
especially when it has nothing to do with competence. This view is stated clearly by Shepherd
and Kuratko (2009, p. 453) that some project failures may not lead to grief. In observing the
emotional effects of these failures on subsequent projects, project team members who have
experienced grief from a project failure tend to be affected when they embark on their next
projects. The majority of the respondents have highlighted this problem as an issue that is of
great concern in the sense that team members show hesitation, and are scared to execute their
next project. These diminish their confidence level if nothing concrete is done to address the
situation. “They are a bit hesitant; they are not as confident, they question themselves- are my
competent enough?”… (AR2).

5.4 Mood
The interview findings underscore the importance of a leader’s mood on project team
members. With no iota of doubts, all the respondents talked about the significance of the
mood of the leader, and how contagious it could be to the team. A leader’s mood at a very
given time has been described as the standard feeling of the team. For instance, the nervous
mood of a project manager/leaders could be transmitted to the team, thereby creating an
atmosphere characterised by fear among team members. It is crucial for project managers or
leaders to express optimistic moods, especially when projects are not going as smoothly as
planned. The expression of an optimistic mood will empower team members with hopes and
will encourage them to strive harder in the face of crisis in the project. The contagious nature
of our emotions gives room for the possibility of one’s feelings influencing that of others
(Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckie, 2002; Parkinson, Fischer and Manstead, 2005). “If you have
a Project Leader or Manager that is nervous, the team gets nervous”… (AR3). “If I come
with a negative energy into the room, that has an impact on the project team”... (AR2).

Being human, it is sometimes natural for project managers to be in a battle with their
emotions, putting them in a difficult situation that makes them express a sad mood. Situations
like this can be overcome by the leaders sending signals to other team members about the
state of their mood, using it as a way to allay fears and nervousness that may arise, and create
a happy and productive environment. Respondent (AR10) shares this view by saying: “If you
are in a bad mood, you better say sorry pals today I am in a bad mood, do not think about it,
it just happens sometimes”. The findings of this interview on the contagious nature of a
leader’s mood on project teams correspond with the findings of Sy, et al. (2005 cited in
Peslak, 2005, p.252) that the mood of a leader does have an impact on the mood of the team.
The study further found that leaders who displayed positive mood, aided group members to be
better coordinated, with increased positive tones when compared to leaders who displayed a
negative mood.

The impacts of mood can be extended to communication and performance. Some respondents
stressed that emotion plays a role in communicating a team’s performance. The interviews
show that project managers sometimes use the mood state of a team as a means of
communication to ascertain the level of situation and progress within the team. This aids
project managers to know if the team is under pressure or not. Respondents (AR2 and AR3)
share same opinion on this matter. “If you are going to the Fika room, and you listen to the
team, you can differentiate if the project is going well or not. If it is not going well, it is quite
35
silent, you see that they are pressured”… (AR2). Elfenbein, Polzer and Ambady (2007) argue
that communication done using emotional signals are useful in providing information about a
team’s intentions and imminent behaviours. This could explain why some respondents like
(AR2 and AR3) have stressed the importance of using the mood of the team as a
communication tool to gain insight on their level of performance in a project.

5.5 Anxiety
Empirical evidence reveals that anxiety has been identified to have a high impact on project
team members. Akgun, et al. (2007) refer to anxiety as a state of apprehension that paves the
way for uneasiness or fear that influences individual’s actions and the way they behave.
Project team members sometimes experience anxiety. Anxiety state like fear has been
identified by respondent (AR5) as an emotion team members express in the event of a
reorganisation. This implies that the news of a reorganisation triggers the feeling that some
project team members could lose their jobs or be redeployed to other positions which they see
as unpleasant to them. The fear of reorganisation by team members can equally be conveyed
to a project, which could influence the project. Anxiety state like uneasiness has also been
identified. Respondent (AR6) stressed that some project team members show hesitation in
working with some team members due to previous experiences with them. In this case, past
emotional experiences can propel uneasiness and discomforts among team members, which
could disrupt team formation in a particular project. Even if they are coerced to work
together, there could be a breakdown in communication within the project. Anxiety state in
the form of apprehension also plays a role in the health of project team members. Respondent
(AR2) mentioned that sometimes project team members do fall sick as a result of bad feelings
they experience from a project. These bad emotional feelings could sometimes get them
apprehensive about the project. Competition among team members according to respondent
(AR10) could also invoke anxiety among project team members. The thought of team
members out-performing their colleagues or under-performing could cause apprehension. The
role of anxiety on project teams validates the fact that projects come with emotion. Akgun, et
al. (2006) uphold this view by noting that crisis and anxiety are some of the problems team
members face during projects. Further, Akgun, et al. (2007) note that these anxieties lead to
insecurity and fright on project team members. This goes further to validate the notion that
projects can be emotional. In the words of respondent (AR2): “In a project, it can be very
emotional”.

5.6 Leadership Training

Virtually all the respondents mentioned the Sandvik leadership training as a programme
aimed at breeding future leaders at Sandvik. This training contains an aspect called self-
awareness, which is embedded with emotional matters and elements of emotional
intelligence. However, there seem to be different views among respondents on the emotional
content of this training. For instance, respondent (AR2) asserts that the training educates
leaders on emotional intelligence, while respondent (AR4) believes that it contains emotional
intelligence, “but not completely about emotional intelligence”. Apparently, there are traces
of emotional intelligence in the leadership training. For instance, self-awareness, which is an
aspect of the leadership training, is one of the four domains of emotional intelligence

36
according to Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckee (2002). Also, empirical evidence from
respondents (AR2 and AR7) reveals that one of the approaches that project managers employ
in addressing emotional situations within the team is by listening and showing empathy. In
their words “The good project managers are the ones that are empathetic and take time to
listen”… (AR2) “Firstly, I try to listen to what is going on or what is causing the emotion”….
(AR7). Listening and being empathetic are some of the components of the social-awareness
domain of emotional intelligence by Goleman, Boyatzis and Mckee (2002). The interviews
show that there seems to be some disparity in the competence level of emotional intelligence
among project managers at SMT. Although respondents say that the self-awareness part of the
leadership training talks about emotions and has elements of emotional intelligence,
respondent (AR2) claims to have a full competence in emotional intelligence. This raises
questions on the uniformity of the training among project managers at Sandvik. The words of
respondents (AR2 and AR5) validate this disparity in knowledge and competence level of
emotional intelligence among project managers: “Emotional intelligence is one of the key top
priority competencies that I have”… (AR2). “Emotion intelligence is not something we talk
about; we do not have the label, we only talk about successful or not successful project
manager”… (AR5). Perhaps, one reason to explain this disparity could be the timing of the
training. It is said that the leadership training was changed to focus on transformational
leadership and emotional intelligence in the last five years, according to respondent (AR2).
All respondents seem to know the usefulness of emotion intelligence, as they agreed to the
importance of it to any organisation. To buttress this point, respondent (AR1) says: “To be a
good Project Manager or a good leader, I think it is important to have a high skill in
emotional intelligence”. This is in line with the views of Prati, et al. (2003) and Sunindijo,
Hadikusumo and Ogunlana (2007) which argue that for leadership to be effective, emotional
intelligence competencies are crucial to the organisation.

The effectiveness of this leadership training in handling emotional matters was met with
mixed reactions by respondents. Quite a good number of respondents have expressed doubts
on its effectiveness probably because they feel they do not have as much competence as they
should have. Some even complained of the system being old fashioned. In the face of this,
there were a few respondents who canvassed for the status quo to be maintained. Though
respondent (AR2) claims to have the emotional intelligence competence; it appears there is a
lack of clarity on the subject among project team members…. “From an emotional point of
view I do not think it is so effective, since it is not such a clear topic, it is more up to the
individual to use that ability. We are very unaware and immature in emotional intelligence”
… (AR5). “We have a little bit of old fashion way of managing” … (AR11).

Nonetheless, many of the respondents, drum support for emotional intelligence. They have
proposed that they would prefer emotional intelligence in managing emotions at Sandvik
because they value the advantages that come with it… “I would like to have ability to
measure or see when the pressure is too high, and that has very much to do with emotional
intelligence I think”. “To moderate emotions I think is more important. That is not something
we talk about every day; it is what gives us result every day”... (AR1). It is surprising that this
training according to some respondents (AR1, AR2, AR5 and AR11) is created for future
leaders; there is no similar mandatory training for ordinary project team members who are not
37
leaders. A project team comprises of human beings, who are also emotional, regardless of
their status in the team. The training for other team members could create a better
understanding between project managers and team members in emotional matters.
Particularly, when there are so many Engineers at SMT, coupled with the recruitment of more
young employees without prior experiences… “This is a company with a lot of Engineers,
and Engineers tend to always lean on facts. If you throw in a topic like emotions, then they
think of Simpsons” … (AR5). “Emotional intelligence is a critical success factor! The more
young people come to Sandvik, the more important it becomes”. “If you keep emotions inside
yourself or the group, you will come to a point where it erupts”… (AR2). Assembling a
project team where every member is emotionally intelligent is supported by Druskat and
Wolff (2001a, p. 90) because it enhances team performance, and “the most effective teams are
the emotionally intelligent ones”.

5.7 Summary of Analysis

After a carefully analysis of the interview data, the findings have emerged and will be
summarised. (1).The analysis shows that respondents demonstrated a clear understanding of
the word emotion based on their various experiences. Emotion is something inevitably
encountered in the daily lives humans, as such; the findings reveal that humans are emotional.
(2). Passion, for instance, is one strong emotion expressed in a project in the form of
emotional attachment, which triggers and enhances the commitment of those who are
passionate during projects. (3). When a project fails, some project team members involved
experience grief. The intensity of the grief will depend largely on how passionate and
committed they are to the project and the reason for the failure. If the grief is not addressed
before subsequent projects, team members may lack the full confidence to embark on their
next project. (4). The study also identified the influence of a leader’s mood in the team. It
promotes the fact that leaders should be wary of how they express their moods or face
creating an emotional environment that consequently fosters nervousness or negative feelings.
The mood of the team also serves as a communication tool for project managers to ascertain
the state of the team. (5).The findings further show that anxiety like fear; apprehension and
uneasiness have an impact on project team members. Fear is expressed during re-
organisation. Uneasiness is exhibited in the form of hesitation by some team members to
work with others due to previous experiences. Moreover, apprehension due to bad feeling
encountered during a project, which consequently impacts on their health. Competition also
triggers apprehension in that project team members would like to gain a competitive edge
over others to boost their careers. (6). The study reveals that Sandvik has a leadership training
programme that talks about emotional matters through an aspect of the programme called
self-awareness. The leadership training already has elements of emotional intelligence
embedded in it. The findings indicate that almost all the respondents have heard of the word
emotional intelligence, but seem to lack the competence, and in some cases, they are unaware
of how it works. Some of the respondents feel that the leadership training is not so effective in
managing emotions. Hence, many of the interviewees support having emotional intelligence
training and competence. They are also rooting for the training to involve every project team
member.

38
6 Conclusion
In this chapter, conclusion will be drawn by providing answers to the two fundamental
questions mentioned in chapter 1, based on the findings of the analysis of this study. This will
then be followed by a path to possible further research.

This study was aimed at unveiling the effects of emotions on project teams and finding ways
to manage them. The study sought to provide answers to two fundamental questions as they
border on emotions, which are:

I. What are the impacts of emotion on projects teams?

II. How can these emotions be managed?

With the aid of interviews from Sandvik Materials Technology (SMT) focusing on project
teams and relevant literature, the above questions will now be answered.

6.1 What are the impacts of emotion on project teams?

This study has been able to show that as humans, we will always be consumed by emotions.
The way we handle these emotions will determine how useful or detrimental they can be to
our private lives and the organisations we find ourselves. In this regard, project team
members are equally not exempted from the web emotions. For instance, displaying emotion
like passion for a project can have a great impact on project team members in that it broadens
their commitment to the project. A project failure has also been found to impact strongly on
project team members involved in the project. This triggers different negative emotional
reactions, which consequently makes them to grief over the failure of the project, or to the
benefits accrued to the project. The impact of emotion like grief on some project team
members is that their confidence level becomes low when they embark on their next project if
nothing concrete is done to enable their recovery. The mood of a leader is very contagious in
that it influences the mood and activities of the team. It is also a communication tool to
measure the state of the team by project managers. The impact of a leader’s mood is that it
serves as the standard feeling in the team, which can lead to a positive feeling, or evoke a
negative energy on the team. Another emotional reaction expressed by project team members
is anxiety. One of the impacts of anxiety on project team members is that it creates an
atmosphere of fear during reorganisation. Fear that they may lose their jobs or be redeployed
to unfavourable departments. Another impact of anxiety is that it stirs up uneasiness that
makes some team members hesitant to work with some of their colleagues dues to their past
experiences. Also, anxiety has an impact on the health and well-being of project team
members, by making them apprehensive over the bad feelings they encounter while executing
projects. Lastly, competition among project team members leads to apprehension caused by
anxiety in their quest to out-perform other team members to enhance their careers.

6.2 How can these emotions be managed?

This study has identified emotional intelligence as an effective way to manage these
emotions. In view of this, SMT is on the right track by having a leadership training
programme that has an aspect called self-awareness, which is an element of emotional
intelligence. This indeed explains why some project managers have demonstrated emotional
39
intelligence competencies like listening and showing empathy during emotional situations. In
light this, there seems to be a disparity among project managers at SMT regarding their
knowledge about emotional intelligence, as some appear to have an idea of how it works.
While some of them have little or no knowledge of it. This brings to question, the uniformity
of the self-awareness training. However, some Project Managers at SMT have endorsed the
need to have various competencies of emotional intelligence, and have expressed the desire to
have these skills.

One importance of this study is that it has been able to establish that projects do come with
emotions, that makes project team members emotional. However, for SMT to effectively
manage emotions among its project teams, more works need to be considered. A major
consideration is for SMT to introduce a mandatory training programme in emotional
intelligence for all project managers geared towards equipping them with various
competencies. It is even more imperative for project teams as whole to have these training.
Project teams are unique and different from other of teams. This means that at every new
project, team members might be faced with the challenge of being selected to a new team
where the members are unfamiliar to them. The one competence that could ensure a good
relationship with their new team members is emotional intelligence. Therefore, this training
must be extended to the entire project team members, not just to project managers alone. This
will assist immensely in minimising the impacts of grief caused by project failure, enable
leaders to express the right mood, and reduce the effects of anxiety. After all, authors have
stressed that teams that are emotionally intelligent, appear to be the most effective. It is of
great importance for SMT to acknowledge that for this training in emotional intelligence to be
effective, the right cultural atmosphere must be introduced by the older generation of leaders
in the hierarchy. If the leaders can lead by example by adhering to this training, younger
generation at SMT will learn greatly from them in applying these competencies.

6.3 Recommendations for Further Research

There are some potential areas where further research can be conducted on emotion as it
affects project teams.

 Given that this research was directed at just one of the three business areas of Sandvik
AB, further research should be conducted concentrating on the three business areas of
Sandvik. Many interviews should be conducted to determine the effects of emotion on
project teams at Sandvik AB as a whole.
 Another area of further research worth considering is to conduct a multiple- case study
research involving a Project- Based Organisation from Sweden and a Project-Based
Organisation from another country that is culturally different from Sweden. In this
case, both findings will be compared to ascertain whether culture plays a role on the
effects of emotions on project teams.

40
Reference List
Ajmal, M.M. and Koskinen, K.U., 2008. Knowledge Transfer in Project-based Organizations:
An Organizational Culture Perspective. Project Management Journal, 39(1), pp.7-15.

Akgun, A.E., Byrne, J.C., Lynn, G.S. and Keskin, H., 2007. Team stressors, management
support, and project and process outcomes in new product development projects.
Technovation, 27, pp.628-639.

Akgun, A.E., Lynn, G.S. and Byrne, J.C., 2006. Antecedents and Consequences of
Unlearning in New Product Development Teams. The Journal of Product Innovation
Management. 23: pp.73-88.

Antvik, S. and Sjöholm, H., 2012. Project Management and Methods. Studentlitteratur.
ISBN: 978-91-44-08094-9.

Aramo-Immonen, H., Koskinen, K.U. and Porkka, P.L., 2011. The significance of formal
training in project-based companies. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business,
4(2), pp .257-273.

Bartsch, V., Ebers, M. and Maurer, I., 2013. Learning in Project-Based Organization: The
role of project teams´ social capital for overcoming barriers to learning. International Journal
of Project Management, 31, pp.239-251.

Baumeister, R.F., Vohs, K.D., DeWall, C.N. and Zhang, L., 2007. How Emotion Shapes
Behaviour: Feedback, Anticipation, and Reflection, Rather Than Direct Causation. Society for
Personality and Social Psychology, 11 (2), pp.167-203.

Berg, M. E. and Karlsen, J. T., 2014. How Project Managers can encourage and Develop
Positive Emotions in Project Teams. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business,
7(3), pp.449-472.

Blumberg, B., Cooper, D.R. and Schindler, P.S., 2008. Business Research Methods. 2nd ed.
McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN: 978-0-07-711745-0.

Bonebright, D.A., 2010. 40 years of storming: a historical review of Tuckman’s model of

small group development. Human Resource Development International, 13, (1), pp.111-120.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Quality Research in
Psychology, 3, pp.77-101.

Bryman, A. and Bell, E., 2011. Business Research Methods. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford
University Press ISBN: 978-0-19-958340-9.

Burke, R. and Barron, S., 2014. Project Management Leadership: Building Creative Teams.
2nd ed. Chichester: John Willey. ISBN: 978-1-118-82541-9.

Cabanac, M., 2002. What is emotion. Behavoural Processes, 60, pp.69-83.

41
Chipulu, M., Ojiako, U., Gardiner, P., Williams, T., Mota, C., Maguire, S., Shou, Y., Stamati,
T. and Marshall, A., 2014. Exploring the Impact of Cultural Values on Project Performance:
The Effects of Cultural Values, Age and Gender on the Perceived Importance of Project
Success/Failure Factors. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,
34(3), pp.364-389.

Chiocchio, F. and Essiembre, H., 2009. Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review
of Disparities Between Project Teams, Production Teams, and Service Teams. Small Group
Research, 40(4), pp.382-420.

Chou, S.Y. and Garcia, D.C., 2011. Group Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the Stages
of Group Development. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(10), pp.3-15.

Chua, D.K.H., Kog, Y.C. and Loh, P.K., 1999. Critical Success Factors for Different Project
Objectives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(3), pp.142-150.

Clarke, N., 2010. Projects are Emotional. International Journal of Managing Projects in
Business, 3(4), pp.604-624.

Cohen, S.G. and Bailey, D.E., 1997. What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness
Research from the Shop Floor to the executive Suit. Journal of Management, 23(3), pp.239-
290.

Cole, P.M., Martin, S.E. and Dennis T.A., 2004. Emotion Regulation as a Scientific
Construct: Methodological Challenges and Directions for Child Development Research.
Society for Research in Child Development, 75(2), pp.317-333.

Cooke-Davis, T., 2002. The “Real” Success Factors on Projects. Journal of Project
Management, 20, pp.185-190.

Cottrell, S., 2014. Dissertations and Project Reports: A step by step guide. Palgrave
Macmilan. ISBN: 978-1-137-36426-5.

Creswell, J.W., 2014. Research Design: International Student Edition. Sage. ISBN: 978-1-
4522-2610-1.

Dainty, A.R.J., Bryman, A., Price, A.D.F., Greasley, K., Soetanto, R. and King, N., 2005.
Project Affinity: The Role of Emotional Attachment in Construction Projects. Construction
Management and Economics, 23, pp.241-244.

DeFillippi, R. and Lehrer, M., 2011. Temporary Modes of Project-Based Organization within
Evolving Organizational Forms: Insights from Oticon’s Experiment with the Spaghetti
Organization. In Project –Based Organizing and Strategic Management. Advances in
Strategic Management, 28, pp.61-82.

Denscombe, M., 2010. The Good Research Guide for small-scale social research projects. 4th
ed. Open University Press. ISBN: 978 0 335 24138 5.

42
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., 2011. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th ed.
London Sage. ISBN: 978-1-4129-7417-2.

Dicicco-Bloom, B. and Crabtree, B. F., 2006. Making Sense of Qualitative research: The
Qualitative Research Interview. Medical Education, 40, pp.314-321.

Druskat, V.U. and Wolff, S.B., 2001a. Building the Emotional Intelligence of Groups.
Harvard Business Review, pp. 80-90.

Ekstedt, E., Lundin, R.A., Söderholm, A. and Wirdenius, H., 1999. Neo-Industrial
Organising: Renewal by action and knowledge formation in a project-intensive economy.
London. ISBN: 0 415 20334.

Elfenbein, H.A., Polzer, J.T. and Ambady, N., 2007. Team Emotion Recognition Accuracy
and Team Performance. Research on Emotion in Organizations, 3, pp.87-119.

Feyerhem, A.E. and Rice, C.L., 2002. Emotional Intelligence and Team Performance: The
Good, the Bad and the Ugly. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 10(4),
pp.343-362.

Fitness, J., 2000. Anger in the workplace: an emotion script approach to anger episodes
between workers and their superiors, co-workers and subordinates. Journal of Organizational
Behaviour, 21, pp.147-162.

Flick, U., 2009. An Introduction To qualitative Research. 4th ed. Sage. ISBN: 978-1-84787-
323-1.

Gann, D.M. and Salter, A.J., 2000. Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the
construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29, pp.955-972.

George, J.M., 2000. Emotions and leadership: the role of emotional intelligence. Human
Relations, 53(8), pp.1027-1055.

Gerring, J., 2004. What is a Case Study and What Is It Good for? American Political Science
Review, 98(2), pp.341-354.

Glikson, E. and Erez, M., 2013. Emotion Display Norms in Virtual Teams. Journal of
Personal Psychology, 12(1), pp.22-32.

Goleman, D., 1995. Emotional Intelligence: Why it Can Matter More than IQ. Bloomsbury
Publishing Plc, London. ISBN: 0 7475 2830 6.

Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. and Mckee, A., 2002. Primal Leadership: Learning to Lead with
Emotional Intelligence. Boston, Mass, Harvard Business School Press.

Graham, S.M., Huang, J.Y., Clark, M.S. and Helgeson, V.S., 2008. The Positives of Negative
Emotions: Willingness to Express Negative Emotions Promotes Relationships. Society for
Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), pp.394-406.

43
Hacker, M., 2000. The Impacts of Top Performer on Project Teams. Team Performance
Management: an international Journal, 6(5/6), pp. 85-90.

Honts, C., Prewett, M., Rahael, J. and Grossenbacher, M., 2012. The importance of team
process for different team types. Team Performance Management, 18(5/6), pp.312-327.

Izard, C.E., 2010. The Many Meanings/Aspects of Emotion: Definitions, Functions,

Activation, and Regulation. Emotion Review, 2(4), pp.363-370.

Jerbrant, A. and Gustavsson, T.K., 2013. Managing project portfolios: balancing flexibility
and structure by improvising. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(1),
pp.152-172.

Kappas, A., 2002. The science of emotion as a multidisciplinary research paradigm.

Behavoural Processes, 60, pp.85-98.

Koskinen, K.U., 2010. Organisational memories in project-based companies: an autopoietic

view. The Learning Organization, 17(2), pp.149-162.

Lindgren, M. and Packendorff, J., 2009. Love, hate and projects: On passion, obsession and
depression in project-based work’. In: 25th EGOS colloquium, July 2-4, 2009 Barcelona,
Spain.
Lindkvist, L., 2004. Governing Project-based Firms: Promoting Market-like Processes within
Hierarchies. Journal of Management and Governance, 8, pp.3-25.

Miller, D.L., 2003. The Stages of Group Development: A Retrospective Study of Dynamic
Team Processes. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20(2), pp.121-134.

Morse, J., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K. and Spiers J., 2002. Verification Strategies for
Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. International Journal of
Qualitative Methods, 1(2), pp.13-22.

Nezlek, J.B. and Kuppens, P., 2008. Regulating Positive and Negative Emotions in Daily life.
Journal of Personality, 76(3), pp.561-580.

Nightingale, P., Fuller, C.B. and Hopkins, M.M, 2011. Projects, Project Capabilities and
Project Organizations. Project-Based Organising and Strategic Management. Advances in
Strategic Management, 28, pp.215-234.

Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L. and Wynaden, D., 2001. Ethics in Qualitative Research. Journal of
Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), pp.93-96.

Parkinson, B., Fischer, A.H. and Manstead, A.S.R., 2005. Emotions in Social Relations:
Culture, Group, and Interpersonal Processes. New York: Psychology Press.

Pemsel, S. and Wiewiora, A., 2013. Project Management Office a Knowledge Broker in
Project-Based Organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 3, pp.31-42.

44
Peslak, A.R., 2005. Emotions and Teams Projects and Processes. Team Performance
management: An International Journal, 11(7/8), pp.251-262.

Pinto, J.K. and Kharbanda, O.P., 1995. Lessons for an Accidental Profession. Business
Horizons, pp. 41-50.

Prati, L.M., Douglas, C., Ferris, G.R., Ammeter, A.P. and Buckley, M.R., 2003. Emotional
Intelligence, Leadership Efectiveness, and Team Outcomes. The International Journal of
Organizational Analysis, 11(1), pp.21-40.

Prencipe, A. and Tell, F., 2001. Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge
codification in project-based firms. Research Policy, 30, pp.1373- 1394.

Project Management Institute., 2013. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge
(PMBOK® Guide). 5th ed. Newtown Square: Project Management Institute. ISBN: 978-1-
935589-67-9.

Salovey, P. and Mayer J.D., 1990. Emotional Intelligence. Baywood Publishing Co., Inc.

Sandvik: About Us (Online) Available at: http://smt.sandvik.com/en/about-us/ (Accessed 23

January 2017).

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., 2016. Research Methods for Business Students. 7th
ed. Pearsson Education Limited. ISBN: 978-1-292-01662-7.

Saunders, M.N.K., 2012. Choosing Research Participants, in G. Symons and C. Cassell, ed.
The Practice of Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges.
London: Sage. pp.37-55.

Sauser, B.J., Reilly, R.R. and Shenhar, A.J., 2009. Why Project Fail? How Contingency Can
Provide New Insights- A Comparative Analysis of NASAs Mars Climate Orbiter Loss.
International Journal of Project Management, 27, pp.665-679.

Scott-Young, C. and Samson, D., 2008. Project Success and Project Team Management:
Evidence from Capital Projects in the Process Industries. Journal of Operations Management,
26, pp.749-766.

Shepherd, D.A. and Cardon, M.S., 2009. Negative Emotional Reactions to Project Failures
and the Self-Compassion to Learn from the Experience. Journal of Management Studies,
46(6), pp.923-949.

Shepherd, D.A., Covin, J.G. and Kuratko, D.F., 2009. Project Failure from Corporate
Entrepreneurship: Managing the Grief Process. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, pp.588-
600.

Shepherd, D.A., Haynie, M. and Patzelt, H., 2013. Project Failures Arising from Corporate
Entrepreneurship: Impact of Multiple Project Failures on Employees` Accumulated Emotions,
Learning, and Motivation. Journal of Production Innovation Management, 30(5), pp.880-895.

45
Shepherd, D.A. and Kuratko, D.F., 2009. The Death of an Innovative Project: How Grief
Recovery Enhances Learning. Business Horizons, 52, pp.451-458.

Sunindijo, R.Y., Hadikusumo, B.H.W. and Ogunlana, S., 2007. Emotional Intelligence and
Leadership Styles in Construction Project Management. Journal of Management in
Engineering, 23(4), pp.166.70.

Sydow, J., Lindkvist, L. and DeFillippi, R., 2004. Project-Based Organizations,

Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial. Organization Studies, 25(9),
pp.1475-1489.

Taylor, T., 2010. The Challenge of Project Team Incentives. Compensation & Benefits
Review, 42(5), pp.411-419.

Tuckman, B.W., 1965. Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin,

63(6), pp.384-399.

Tuckman, B.W. and Jensen, M.A.C., 1977. Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited.
Group & Organization Studies, 2(4), pp.419-427.

Turner, J.R. and Keegan, A., 2000. The management of operations in the project-based
organization. Journal of Change Management, 1(2), pp.131-148.

Turner, J.R. and Müller, R., 2004. Co-operation on Projects Between the Project Owner as
Principal and the Project Manager as Agent. European Management Journal, 22(3), pp.327-
336.

Turner, R. and Lloyd-Walker, B., 2008. Emotional Intelligence (EI) Capabilities Training:
Can it Develop EI in Project Teams? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business,
1(4), pp.512-534.

Wiewiora, A., Trigunarsyah, B., Murphy, G.D. and Chen, L., 2009. Barriers to Effective
Knowledge Transfer in Project-Based Organizations. In: Proceedings of the 2009
International Conference on Global Innovation in Construction Proceedings, 13-16 September
2009, Holywell Park, Loughborough University.

Whitty, S.J., 2010. Project Management Artefacts and the Emotions They Evoke.
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3(1), pp.22-45.

Yin, R.K., 2009. Case Study Research Design and Methods: Applied Social Research
Methods Series. 4th ed. Sage. ISBN: 978-1-4129-6099-1.

Primary Data: Interviews

Acting Head of Project Office at SMT (anonymous) 28th of October, 2016.

Project Manager at SMT (anonymous) 24th of October, 2016.

Project Manager at SMT (anonymous) 25th of October, 2016.

46
Project Manager at SMT (anonymous) 24th of October, 2016.

Senior Project Manager at Sandvik Group AB (anonymous) 28th of October, 2016.

Senior Project Manager at SMT (anonymous) 24th of October, 2016.

Senior Project Manager at SMT (anonymous) 25th of October, 2016.

Senior Project Manager at SMT (anonymous) 26th of October, 2016.

Senior Project Manager at SMT (anonymous) 26th of October, 2016.

Senior Project Manager at SMT (anonymous) 28th of October, 2016.

Senior Project Manager at SMT (anonymous) 28th of October, 2016.

47
Appendix 1: Interview Questions
Interview Questions
1. What is your view about the term “emotion”?
 What is your observation on project team members having emotional attachments to
a project?
 In what way, have you, or any team member you have worked with, expressed
emotional attachment to a project?
 Does this attachment to a project impact on a team or team member’s commitment
to the project?

2. What type of emotional reaction do project team members express in the event of
project failure, especially projects that are critical to the organisation?
 How can this emotion or emotions impact on their next project?

3. Does emotion influence communication among the project team, how?

4. What is your observation regarding emotions having an effect on a project team’s

performance?
 Does a leader’s mood influence the mood of the team? How?

5. What other impacts not mentioned, have you observed that emotion can have, or
has had on the team, according to your experience?

6. How does a Project Manager act when an observed emotion could have had an
inpact on the team?
 Have you heard of the word “Emotional Intelligence” (EI)?
 How important do you think E.I is or could be to this organisation?

7. What mechanism does Sandvik have in managing emotions?

 How effective is this mechanism?
 How can it be improved?
 What kind of mechanism would you propose in managing emotional
situations in this organisation?

Note: Please, if there is anything or term you do not understand, it will be explained during the
interview.

48
Appendix 2: Interview Transcripts
Participant: AR1
1. Sees Emotion as a mood. If you are in a good mood, it is easier to perform than when you are
in a bad mood. Believes that team members sometimes express emotional attachment to
projects. It shows that you are passionate about what you do. The problem is that sometimes
people drive projects that cannot fly for too long. “if you cannot ride a dead Horse, and you
are very passionate about this Horse you might not see that it is actually dead, you try to ride
it anyways”. Admits that emotional attachment increases commitment to the project.

2. In regards to a case of a project failure, the respondent points out that if they were
emotionally attached to that project, their level of emotions rise immensely like sadness.
“Sometimes to get too emotionally attached to a project can be difficult if you need to shut it
down”. This could affect them in their next project if they immediately move to a new
project. But when team members take time before engaging in other projects, that could
lessen the effect of their last experience.

3. Believes emotion affects communication. When projects are going good, you can have an
easier climate in the team. When there is stress, there is tendency to trigger blame culture.

4. The respondent agrees that emotion can affect team’s performance. Posits that team members
perform better in a balanced mood. Though, some perform better when the stress level is
high, while some perform better when they are in control. Thinks that a leader´s mood does
influence the mood of the team. If the leader is happy, then you have a positive feeling in the
group. When the leader has a bad day, it can affect the team. They are hesitant to ask
questions. “The leader mirrors the group”

5. We are humans, therefore our private lives matter. When Project Managers have emotional
problems in their private life, it could affect the project. Technical change in the market can
also have an impact on project team. For instance, when team members embark on a project,
and towards the end they realise that the project or technology is no longer in vogue, making
the project almost useless. In this case, project team members tend to be hesitant in
embarking on other projects.

6. When Project Managers observe that some displayed emotion could affect the project, the
Project Manager needs to sort out the emotion even to the point of swapping team members.
The respondent has heard the word Emotional Intelligence, but not sure what it is. After
explanation, the respondent believes that “to be a good Project Manager or a good leader, I
think it is important to have a high skill in emotional intelligence”.

7. Sandvik has a leadership programme which talks about self-awareness and emotions.
Believes that the leadership programme from an emotional point of view is sometimes
effective, and sometimes not depending on situations. Sandvik also sometimes arranges a
psychologist to assist when there are emotional crises. The respondent would like to have the
ability to measure or see when the pressure becomes high. “I would like to have the ability to
measure or see when the pressure is too high, and that has very much to do with emotional
intelligence I think”. “To moderate emotions I think is more important. That is not something
we talk about every day; it is what gives us result every day”. Would propose emotional
intelligence in managing emotions. Admits emotional intelligence is embedded in the
leadership model, but not completely described. Would also like the training extended to
team members. Believes that emotion is what can make or break a team.

49
 Participant : AR2
1. The respondent´s view about emotion is that “All human beings have emotion”. Respondent
admits that some people show emotional attachments to a project. From experience, the
respondent posits that team members display emotional attachment to a project by exhibiting
a high level of engagement through their eagerness to show at work, punctuality, and
overwork, as a result of the fun they derive from the project. Admits that this attachment
increases their commitment to the project.
2. According to the respondent’s experience, team members who experience project failure tend
to be stressed, afraid, frustrated, and even cry. These emotional reactions do affect them in
their next project. For instance, “they are a bit hesitant; they are not as confident, they
question themselves- are my competent enough?”.
3. The respondent agrees that emotion influences communication within the project team. “if
you are going to the Fika room, and you listen to the team, you can differentiate if the project
is going well or not. If it is not going well, it is quite silent, and you see that they are
pressured”.
4. The respondent believes that emotion does affect project team performance. Gave an instance
that re-organisation could have a direct consequence on team’s performance.
Totally agrees that a leader’s mood has an impact on the team’s mood. “if I come with a
negative energy in to the room, that has an impact on the project team”. Says people express
different emotions during the project phases, which can be positive or negative feeling.
5. Another impact of emotion on the project team recognised by the respondent is its effects on
team member’s health. They sometimes fall sick for a long period because of the bad feelings
they get from a project. “In a project, it can be very emotional”.
6. When asked about how project managers act on managing emotional situations among the
project team, the interviewee stated that there are two categories of project managers. One
that is attentive, listens and dialogues. The other does not care to talk about things, which is
usually based on fears because they think it’s hard to talk about that. “The good project
managers are the ones that are empathetic and take the time to listen”. The respondent thinks
it’s important to have self-awareness. “I have seen project managers become angry,
frustrated, and start to scream”.
The interviewee seemed to know a lot about emotional intelligence, the respondent got the
training from I.T department. “Emotional intelligence is one of the key top priority
competencies that I have”. Believes emotional intelligence is extremely important in this
organisation, and sees it as a critical success factor of project management, especially to
younger generations coming.
7. Sandvik has a leadership programme where they educate their leaders in emotional
intelligence. Believes the emotional aspect of the leadership training programme is only
effective on lower levels of management, but less effective on the higher hierarchy. This is
because the leadership programme was changed to focus on emotional intelligence and
transformational leadership only five years ago. When people from higher hierarchy started
as managers, the focus was not on emotional intelligence.
The respondent proposes that there should be a requirement for those project managers who
have acquired this knowledge from the leadership programme to start applying them, as a
way of enforcement. Would like the tools and techniques taught in the basic leadership
programme, be used by all managers, especially top management. Unfortunately, they have
not attended that training. Also, proposes that emotional intelligence be a required training
for team members who are not project managers because we are all humans. But then, the
right culture must be there to create a conducive environment for people apply it. Emotional
intelligence “is a critical success factor! the more young people come to Sandvik, the more
important it becomes”. “If you keep emotions inside yourself or the group, you will come to a
point where it erupts”.

50
 Participant: AR3
1. We have emotions 24 hours a day and seven days a week, and it goes up and down, you have
good days and bad days. The respondent agrees to the fact that team members sometimes
express emotional attachment to projects. For those who do not have basic experience to
carry out a project, that can be compensated by passion. These attachments increase their
commitment. “If they are passionate, they can take the sky down”.

2. In the event of a project failure, project team members feel downcasted. This will have an
impact on their next project. Members see it as a learning experience for the next project, if
they can control it.

3. Respondent believes that emotion does influence communication. If you have two people
who do not share same chemistry, it definitely influences communication. When there is a
good chemistry within the group, communication becomes better. As a Project Manager,
when you listen to your team members discussing about your project from afar, through their
emotional reaction, you can tell if the project is going good or not.

4. Accepts that emotion can absolutely affect project team performance. Agrees that a leader’s
mood can influence the mood of the team. As a Project Manager, team members look up to
you the way you react in crises situation. “If you have a Project Leader or Manager that is
nervous, the team gets nervous”.

5. When project team members are too engaged, they hit the wall. Because some team members
are very passionate about their jobs, they get burned out because they love their work. Also,
for team members who do not like their current projects, they tend to be less engaged and less
passionate, making them emotionally worn out.

6. When Project Managers observe that some emotions could have an influence on the project,
they act based on the kind of emotion. If it is positive, they do not have to act. When the
emotion is negative, they must act. It is important for Project Managers to have a mixed team.
The respondent claimed not to have heard the word emotional intelligence, but is familiar
with how it works through the leadership course. Thinks EI is very important to this
organisation.

7. Sandvik has a leadership programme that deals with self-awareness. How effective the
programme is largely depends on that person who has attended the programme. Respondent
would propose mentorship as a better way of managing emotion. Believes that team members
should have mentors before they embark on any project.

51
 Participant: AR4
1. Respondent´s view on emotion is that “we are human beings, human beings have
emotions, and we don’t turn them off just because we go to work”. Regarding emotional
attachments, respondent believes that people fall in love with some technical solution
leading to attachment. You can see they are attached in the way at which they show
passion, and do loads of job. “Of course, absolutely!”, they commit more to the project.

2. Emotional reaction to a project failure depends on the initial commitment. People who
were not committed tend to not care so much. Committed ones tend to express anger and
sorrow, it depends on the individual. “After the first initial anger, there comes a period of
little bit of sorrow”. If the negative feelings are not addressed, it negatively impacts on
their next project. If addressed properly, it improves the next project.

3. “If many people share positive emotion, they tend to communicate more often and
spontaneously. If emotions are more negative, then communications will need a little bit
more support”.

4. If the project has just one member that is committed to a specific solution in a project, it
might negatively affect the team. Unless the positive experience is shared within the
team, it has different or limited effect on performance. A leader’s mood impacts on the
mood of the team. If a leader is not committed or positive, that mood sends a message to
others not to be committed. “The leader sets the standard”.

5. Fun at work is another emotional reaction that can occur within project team members.
This could be as a result of a brilliant technical solution to a customer’s need or people
enjoying being in project or line roles.

6. Project managers handle emotional situations in the team differently. They are humans,
this makes them sensitive to other people’s emotions, while some are task oriented not
seeing people’s emotions or choose to disregard them. The respondent seems to know
about emotional intelligence, agrees by saying “In general I would say it is important”

7. Sandvik has basic leadership training for project managers which emotion is part of it.
They contain emotional intelligence “but not completely about emotional intelligence”.
This training can be effective depending on the emotional intelligence competence of the
person involved. Would propose getting it more integrated in everyday life, and with
follow up.

52
 Participant: AR5
1. Emotions could be engagement, passion, frustration and anger. Believes that emotional
attachment to a project happens. “We have engaged and passionate project members so we
do our best to fulfil the goal of the project”. Respondent agrees that emotional attachments
increase commitment. “When they are engaged and passionate, their commitments will be
stronger”.

2. Project team members seem to be frustrated when there is a project failure, because the long-
term vision of the project has been truncated. The effects depend on how you handle the next
project. If handled in a good way, it creates new enthusiasm and new engagement with
lessons learned.

3. Emotion “influences a lot” in communication. Not everyone communicates as it should be.

“This makes some avoid communication because some project members are not in agreement
with each other”. When there is anger and frustration, then the communication could be loud.
“Sometimes also, the communication can be engaging and positive because we share
something like a milestone, and we celebrate!”. This depends on the emotion.

4. When a team is happy, they can easily collaborate as colleagues. This makes the result of the
project much better. Believes the project manager’s mood influences the team. When a
project manager shows optimism in the project, this positive feeling reflects on the project
team. On the contrary, when a project manager expresses doubt about a project, it creates
confusion and loss of focus among the team.

5. Another emotion experienced by team members are external emotion, like fear of losing jobs
during re-organization, regardless if the project is going smoothly. This external emotion
could be transferred to the project, thereby affecting the project.

6. Based on experience, the respondent chooses to have separate feedback sections with project
members when handling emotional issues among the team. Respondent has bumped into the
word Emotional Intelligence, but does not know so much about the subject. Believes the
difference between a good project manager and a bad project manager is their ability to have
high awareness and emotional intelligence. Believes it will be beneficial to Sandvik.
“Emotion intelligence is not something we talk about, we don’t have the label, we only talk
about successful or not successful project manager”.

7. Sandvik has leadership training for managers which comprises of self-awareness. “I do not
know if all project managers have attended this type of training. They are available, we could
do more as a company”. “We have quite a lot of project managers who run smaller projects
as part of their job, but they are not attending this project management training.” “The
results of the project they run are quite poor”. Does not think the leadership training is
effective from an emotional point of view. In the respondent’s words... “From an emotional
point of view I do not think it is so effective, since it is not such a clear topic, it is more up to
the individual to use that ability. We are very unaware and immature in emotional
intelligence”. The respondent would propose that project team members should have basic
knowledge of different type of emotion and how to manage them. “People are different, some
are introverts and some are extrovert”. “This is a company with a lot of Engineers, and
Engineers tend to always lean on facts. If you throw in a topic like emotions, then they think
of Simpsons”.

53
 Participant: AR6
1. Sees emotion as the core of our system. The respondent has not seen anyone expressing
emotional attachment to a project, but argues that it is natural that the first project in your
career is more emotional to you than fact based. When team members are emotionally
attached, you can see it through their Eyes, and the way they talk about the project.

2. When there is a project failure, team members tend to be frustrated. This makes them to be
more careful with their emotion in the next project. This depends on the reason for the project
failure. If the failure is not the fault of the team, emotionally, it does not affect their
confidence.

3. Emotion affects communication. When team members feel relaxed, it fosters good
communication. If there is a tensed situation, it affects communication. Also, when Project
Managers are too dominant, this hinders them from hearing the truth about the true state of
the project from team members.

4. Yes, emotion does affect a team’s performance. Joy and happiness will improve performance.
Believes that a leader’s mood does affect the mood of the team, especially when the team is
new. When the team has worked longer and gotten used to each other, then it has little effect.

5. Other emotional impact on project teams is that some team members are hesitant in working
with some members in a new project because of their past emotional experience in other
projects.

6. As a way of addressing emotional issues in a project, Project Managers tend to talk to the
parties involved to understand why it has occurred, and discuss with them about a possible
solution. The respondent seems to have heard of the word emotional intelligence, believes it
is of somewhat importance to the organisation.

7. On the way emotions are handled in Sandvik, the respondent opined that you have your boss
to talk to in situations like this. There are also regular meetings with the bosses which
addresses this. Believes the Sandvik way of managing emotion is effective. Would propose
that the current way be maintained.

54
 Participant: AR7
1. Sees emotion as something that comes from the inside. An overwhelming sense of
something you would like to express. Project team members tend to be emotionally
attached when they have invented something; they tend to have this fatherhood approach
to the project. A case where an inventor of a project expresses frustration and anger over
the termination of the project because management failed to grasp the goodness of the
invention and the business opportunity accrued to it.

2. When there is a project failure, Project team members are angry and frustrated, and
sometime they can feel a certain relief if they have been deeply involved and are trying to
get to somewhere without success. In their next project, the last failure could affect them
in a way that makes them not wanting to strive harder.

3. Emotion has an impact on communication in a way that when there is anger, other
members tend to back off, or keep a distance.

4. Another emotional impact on project team is when a team member experiences private
issues at home, or when there is conflict within project team, this influences the project
team deeply. Regarding Project Managers influence on a team’s mood, respondent agrees
totally that the project manager’s mood influences the team’s mood. “If I am moody and
sad, it affects and set the standard for the other ones”. When there is a positive attitude, it
tends to be nicer.

5. ------Skipped
6. On how Project Managers address emotional situations, respondent says that “Firstly, i
try to listen to what is going on or what is causing the emotion”. Most times, it has to do
with miscommunication or misunderstanding. The respondent seems to have heard of
emotional intelligence, but not in detail.

7. Sandvik has leadership training programme where emotion is part of it like self-
awareness. Thinks that the leadership training is not so effective when it comes to
emotion. The respondent is not so convinced that the leadership training if very effective
when it comes to handling emotions. This is because naturally emotion comes from
within, which makes it a bit difficult to manage.

55
 Participant: AR8
1. Views emotion as something that comes from the inside, due to what you hear or see, and
cannot be controlled. On team members having emotional attachments to a project, the
respondent agrees to have observed that. Says it can be seen in the way the team is highly
committed to the task, and are more engaged to the project. Believes that emotional
attachment increases their commitment, depending on the situation.

2. If a project has failed, team members react differently. This depends on the personality of the
person. This will determine how affected you will become emotionally. Respondent believes
that the project failure will not have big influence on team member when they embark on a
new project.

3 Regarding the impact of emotion on communication, the respondent sees it as indirect.

Respondent is of the opinion that without communication, you can have emotional reactions
in the team. You can also have emotional reactions if you communicate something that is not
in line the project.

4 Respondent believes that emotions can affect a team’s performance. This is part of how you
are engaged and committed to the project. Emotions are the result of how teams are
committed. Respondent agrees that the mood of a Project Manager can influence the mood of
the team. When a leader is angry, it affects the team.

5 On other emotions that could impact on project team members, the respondents pointed out
that when team members are not motivated, or feeling the project, it reduces performance of
the team.

6 When a Project Manager observes that some emotions could affect the team, the project
manager needs to analyse the reaction, and see if the emotion is positive or negative. The
respondent has heard of the world emotional intelligence, but not directly. Believes that in
general a manager should first be able to manage their emotion before that of others. Agrees
that it is important to an organisation.

7 Sandvik has a general leadership programme, which part of it has to do with emotion. As a
way of managing emotion in Sandvik, the respondent proposes that the current leadership
programme on emotion is effective and should remain.

56
 Participant: AR9
1. The respondent views emotion as a human thing, that humans cannot live without, which
sometimes appear better or worse.
The respondent agrees to have witnessed emotional attachment from team members. Posits
that being emotionally attached to a project is almost necessary, or you do not drive the
project the way you should.
On how people express emotional attachment, the respondent believes that people react
differently. Could be if a project is stopped, or changed in a major way or when a project is
successful closed.
Their commitment to the project could become more or less, depending on what kind of
emotion that comes out.
2. In the event of a project failure, people express different emotions, which depends on the
reason for the failure. If the circumstances are such outside the project’s own control that the
project is not possible to carry out, then team member’s express frustration or a bit of relief.
If is because of lack of commitment within the team, you probably have a non-emotional
reaction which might not matter to team members because they were not committed. This
could probably have an impact in their subsequent project. Team members go to the next
project with their last experience at the back of their mind. They may be hesitant, or ask some
more control questions.
3. On regarding the influence of emotion on communication, the respondent concurs that
emotions do affect communication. “Communication is a way of transferring emotions from
one person to another”. When emotion is expressed at a certain stage of the project, or
something is failing or breaking, that influences communication in a completely different
manner.
4. Regarding emotion having effect on team’s performance, the respondent agrees that emotion
does have an effort on team’s performance.
Believes that a leader’s mood does influence a team’s mood. If a leader is happy or sad,
chances are that your mood will get better or worse.
5. Skipped
6. On how project managers act on observed emotions, respondent believes that a skilled Project
Manager uses emotion to his or her advantage and that of the project. They sense emotions,
and when the emotions are positive, they try to encourage them to bring the project forward.
Equally, when they sense negative emotions, they correct them before they escalate.
The respondent knows about emotional intelligence. Stresses that emotional intelligence is an
important skill for Project Managers to have. “If you walk into a major stakeholder that you
know or have heard is moody, you caught that stakeholder on the wrong day, you do not
realise it and you keep pushing, that stakeholder is going to be pretty mad at you and could
stop the project or seriously damage it. If you have the sense, you can sense that ok this is the
wrong day I will go back tomorrow. Just that easy act may be really important to the project.
So, it needs this skill to be able to judge this.”
7. Sandvik has a project model, which is a framework for managing projects from start to finish.
It is there to partly manage emotions that could come out of the project. Sandvik has a
leadership programme for several steps depending what kind of leader you are. It covers self-
awareness and emotion, also how you manage teams.
The respondent revealed that the project model as regards to managing emotion is reasonably
effective. Would propose that greater emphasis should be placed on the importance of having
good and right leaders in the organisation that are capable of leading. Also, to have a strategic
framework, that gives a clear understanding of what people’s assignments are. For the
respondent, a good leader from an emotional point of view is the one that has an emotional
intelligence competence.

57
 Participant: AR10
1. Emotions are things that happen inside; it is a connection between your thoughts and
physical expression, and a reaction of something. Respondent agrees that emotional
attachment can occur during a project, not to the project itself, but to the things that come
along with the project. Things like the feeling of a position, success, and other good
feelings that are accrued to a project.

2. People react differently to project failure, depending on the person. “People get sad,
because there is pressure in the society for people to succeed”. Again, that depends on
the person. If you think it was your fault, you tend to analyse what went wrong, and
“probably you are going to be a little bit scared when you start your next project”.
People who see the failure as not being their fault, most times do not have the opportunity
to learn from the experience.

3. Emotions influence communication in the team “very much”. There are many things
going on within the team. Things like competition which makes people careful not to be
treaded on. Some people try to dominate in discussions. These things create emotional
reactions like anger, people feeling belittled, pride, and not being appreciated for your
opinions.

4. Believes emotions can very much affect team’s performance. “I would say emotion is one
of the largest contributors to team performance, because it is central to every person”.
Believes the project manager’s mood affects the team. If the project manager feels things
are not going as planned, the team members feel that. “If you are in a bad mood, you
better say sorry pals today I am in a bad mood, do not think about it, it just happens
sometimes”. They will understand why you are acting that way as a leader.

5. Competition within the project team could have an impact on the project. This leads to a
win or lose situation where winners are happy, and losers tend to be unhappy.

6. Regarding dealing with emotional situations among the project team, respondent
acknowledges that it depends on the situation, but the project manager should engage in
discussion to ascertain the problem. The respondent seems to know about emotional
intelligence, and asserts that emotional intelligence is important. In the respondent´s word
“I think it is very important to any organisation”.

7. The respondent would propose emotional intelligence as an efficient tool in managing

emotion.

58
 Participant: AR11
1. Emotion is important in our lives. Our emotions guild us when we meet people. It is a main
part of live. Regarding emotional attachments, respondent stressed that everyone expresses
emotional attachment to a project. Team members demonstrate this by always promoting the
projects, asking questions and always being in the meetings. This increases their commitment
to the project.

2. During a project failure, respondent believes that team members react differently depending
on their level of commitment to the project. Usually, it is a disaster for those who love the
project.

3. On emotional impacts on communication, the respondent says that if a project manager

speaks to team members wrongly, team members will not work happily.

4. Emotion affects performance of a team when team members are emotionally stressed.
Respondent agrees that a leader’s mood affects the mood of the team. If a project manager is
mad, it can affect others. A leader should be enthusiastic, and promote the project regardless
of the problem.

5. Question 5 was skipped.

6. Project managers tend to handle emotional situations through communication with team
members involved by bringing the case on the table. In some cases, team members are
swapped. Sometimes project managers try to avoid conflict by shying away from resolving
these issues. The respondent seemed not to have heard of the word emotional intelligence, but
after much explanation, the respondent believes it important to the organisation.

7. In managing emotions, Sandvik has an education that touches on emotion very little, which
the responding took about 10 years ago. Respondent believes that the education is not very
effective in managing emotion. “If you are not aware of the emotional impacts on your team
or on your staff, you are maybe not able to see the importance of emotion”. “We have a little
bit of old fashion way of managing”. The respondent would propose that a chapter in
Sandvik´s project module education should focus on people and emotion, like emotional
intelligence. Suggests that training should be extended to team members, not just project
managers because team members are also emotional.

59