Docs PDF
Docs PDF
Docs PDF
MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURE
AND DEPARTMENT OF ROADS
THE GOVERNMENT OF MONGOLIA
FINAL REPORT
SUMMARY
JUNE 2002
JICA dispatched a study team headed by Mr. Kenji Maruoka of Pacific Consultants
International and consisting of Pacific Consultants International and Japan Overseas
Consultants Co., Ltd. to Mongolia, four times between March 2001 and March 2002. In
addition, JICA set up an Advisory Committee headed by Mr. Kenichiro OI of Metropolitan
Expressway Public Corporation between March 2001 and March 2002, which examined the
Study from specialist and technical point of view.
The team held discussions with the officials concerned of the Government of
Mongolia and conducted field surveys at the study area. Upon returning to Japan, the team
conducted further studies and prepared this final report.
I hope that this report will contribute to the promotion of this project and to the
enhancement of friendly relationship between our two countries.
June 2002
Takao Kawakami
President
Japan International Cooperation Agency
June 2002
Mr. Takao Kawakami
President
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Letter of Transmittal
Dear Sir,
We are pleased to submit herewith the Final Report of “The Feasibility Study on Construction
of Eastern Arterial Road in Mongolia”.
The report contains the results of the study, which has been carried out by Pacific Consultants
International in association with Japan Overseas Consultants between March 2001 and June
2002. The report consists of four volumes, Summary, Main Report, Appendix, and Drawings.
The Summary briefly illustrates the findings in the study. The Main Report consists of 17
chapters and presents traffic demand forecast, engineering designs, road maintenance system,
environmental impact assessments, project implementation plan, economic and financial
analysis and conclusion and recommendations for the project implementation. It recommends
that the institutional arrangements for project implementation should be organized as soon as
possible.
We wish to express our greatest appreciation to officials of the Ministry of Infrastructure and
the Government of Mongolia for their assistance extended to the Study Team, and also to the
personnel of your Agency, the JICA Advisory Committee, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, and the Embassy of Japan in Mongolia. The
Study Team sincerely hopes that the results of the Study will contribute to the development of
the road network in Mongolia.
Yours faithfully,
Kenji Maruoka
Team Leader
The Feasibility Study on Construction of
Eastern Arterial Road in Mongolia
ROAD NETWORK OF MONGOLIA Study Area
Khankh
Khandgait
Ulaanbaishint
Ulaangom Sukhbaatar Altanbulag
Tsagaannuur Ereentsav
Baga ilenkh
A 0305
Ulgii Murun Bayan-uul
Khavirga
Darkhan
Dorgon Norovlin
Dayan Khovd
Zavkanmandal Erdenet Sumber
Bulgan Choibalsan
Bayanchandman Baganuur Berkh
Mankhan Tosontsengel Ulaanbaatar
Uliastai Lun
Kharkhorin Undurkhaan
Yarantai Erdenesant
Erdenetsagaan
Bulgan A0304 Tsetserleg Zuunmod Maanti Baruun-urt Bichigt
sum
Choir
Arvaikheer
Altai Bayankhongor Mandalgobi Legend:
Paved road
Sainshand
Burgastai Zamin-Uud Gravel road
Bogd sum
Dalanzadgad
Formed earth road
A0203
MILLENNIUM ROAD Earth road
Center of province
VERTICAL ARTERIAL ROAD Gashuun-Suhait
Shivee huren
Other Abbreviations
1. STUDY AREA Road section from Erdene to Undurkhaan on State Road A0501, approximately 250km in length and four eastern provinces.
2. TARGET YEAR Year 2015 3. ECONOMIC Population in Study Area Thousand 544.1
4. TRAFFIC DEMAND 1,417∼994veh./day FRAMEWORK GRDP per person M Tg./Person 0.507
Annual Growth Rate % 4.45
FORECAST (1,986∼1,484 PCU/DAY)
5. OUTLINE OF FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN
(1) ROAD
• First the route selection was made to select the crossing point of the Kherlen River. The existing bridge and its surrounding was selected
as the most suitable point somewhere in 20 km stretch, considering river morphology, scale of required structures, maintenance, etc.
• Referring to the existing tracks along the study route, alternative routes were found in three sections, namely Baganuur, Kherlen East and
Tsenkhermandal West. The proposed route was selected through quantitative and qualitative comparison at each section.
(2) PAVEMENT
• ALT-1: (The whole of the project road paved by asphalt concrete) is selected compared with ALT -2: (The road stretch up to Tsenkhermandal
will be paved by asphalt concrete and the remaining road stretch will be paved by bituminous surface treatment). The design of pavement
was conducted every 10km assuming the design CBR (8, 10 & 12 according to ground condition and fill material) and cumulative ESAL.
(3) BRIDGE
• Case-3: (Use of existing bridge for non-motorized traffic + new parallel bridge) was selected because of advantages such as high economy,
short construction period and utilization of existing bridge as temporary bridge during construction.
• PC-T shape girder (33.6m in span length) is applied to the super-structure of Kherlen Bridge because of high economy, short construction
period and less influence of obstacle against river stream. RC-T shape girders (15m & 17.5m in span length) are applied to other bridges.
6. ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN
• Study Road Length: 258.8 km between Erdene and Undurkhaan ● Highway Classification: Category III (as per Mongolian Standards)
• Road Width: 7m [email protected] (total 10m) ● Major Road Facilities: Five road stations and two observation platform
• Kherlen Bridge: Location: 30m down stream of existing bridge
Superstructure: 8-span PC T Girder with 8m effective width and span length [email protected] = 268.8m
Substructure: RC wall shaped elliptical column and beams
• Other Bridges: Superstructure: RC T Girder with 8m effective width, Khujirut River: 15.0m (Replacement due to lack of strength), Khutsaa
River: 17.5m, Tsenkher River: 52.5m, Murun River: 52.5m(Replacement due to wooden bridge), Urt Valley: 15.0m(New Construction)
• New Box Culvert: 29 locations ● New Pipe Culvert: 197 locations
• Establishment of Road Rehabilitation and Maintenance Center with procured equipment in AZZAN and construction of operation depot in
Khentii province for strengthening road maintenance capability.
7. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS(IEE and EIA)
The assessment result concluded the Project is moderate negative impact thought IEE and EIA. Environmental management plans for each major
item of environmental parameters and environmental monitoring programs for the same are made.
8. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND EVALUATIONS
(1) Project Implementation Plan
The study road is divided into six construction sections based on consideration of the villages and connecting roads. The period of 4-year
construction may be justified considering the achievements of other previous projects. Following two schemes are considered within the
project implementation plan excluding Section I which is being constructed by DOR using the Government’s own fund.
Scheme-I: Construction by international contractors selected through tendering in a competitive environment (The highest priority should
be given to Section II and VI because relatively high economic return is anticipated due to the higher traffic volumes.)
Scheme-II: Construction by DOR as a pilot project (Section III, IV and V should be implemented by DOR using the proposed road
rehabilitation and maintenance center.)
Construction Road Project Cost EIRR
(2) Comprehensive Evaluation Section
Period Length (ALT-1) ALT-1 ALT-2
The result of economic analysis, both IP Section 1 (I, II) 2001 - 2005 67.6 km 9,780,675 US$ 17.3% 17.3%
alternatives has sufficient EIRR and IP Section 2 (III, IV) 2003 - 2006 94.4 km 22,053,292 US$ 9.4% 10.6%
is confirmed high feasibility for the IP Section 3 (V) 2003 - 2006 50.0 km 10,229,784 US$ 17.6% 19.0%
project implementation. ALT -1 is IP Section 4 (VI) 2003 - 2005 46.8 km 8,134,068 US$ 23.2% 25.6%
suitable for the project in Total Section 258.8 km 50,197,819 US$ 15.7% 16.8%
consideration of qualitative Notes: ALT-1: The whole of the project road will be paved by asphalt concrete.
advantages compared with BST. ALT-2: The road stretch up to Tsenkhermandal will be paved by AC and remaining will be paved by BST.
9.CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
It is concluded that the Study reveals high feasibility for the project implementation. Namely, the project has high technical feasibility, the EIA
concluded there is no substantial or irreversible adverse environmental impacts arising form the project, and it is concluded that the project is
economically viable based on the economic analysis. It is recommended that the institutional arrangement for project implementation should be
taken without delay.
OUTLINE OF THE PROJECT
The Feasibility Study on Construction of Eastern Arterial Road in Mongolia
・Study period :Mar. 2001 - Jun. 2002
・Counterpart Agency :Department of Roads, Ministry of Infrastructure, The Government of Mongolia
2. Objective of Study
Objective of Study is to carry out a feasibility study on construction of Eastern Arterial Road and
to transfer technology to Mongolia counterparts.
3. Study Area
The study area of the Eastern Arterial Road is the road section from Erdene to Undurkhaan on
State Highway No. A0501, approximately 250 km in length. The area influenced by the study
road consists of four eastern provinces of Tuv, Khentii, Dornod and Sukhbaatar as well as the
Kherlen river basin. The target year of the plan is the year 2015, which accords with that of
relevant studies and projects implemented by the Government of Mongolia.
-I-
multi-shifting tracks. The crossing point of the Kherlen River was set in the area of the existing
bridge for both economical and technical reasons. This proposal was agreed with the
Mongolian government in August 2001. The alternative routes were set in the three sections
and the details are given below.
(1) Section A: Baganuur
There are two alternatives in Baganuur area that detour the Baganuur coal mine.
Alternative A-1 is the southern route with railway crossing and A-2 is the northern route
that goes through urban area of Baganuur city. The study team has selected A-2 as the
optimum selection for economical and construction reasons.
(2) Section B: Kherlen East
This is located on the southern end of Nogoon Modot Mountains. Alternative B-1 passes
Ust Valley (south side of the Mountains) and B-2 passes Jargalant Valley (north side of the
Mountains). B-1 was selected as the optimum route for economical and construction
reasons.
(3) Section C: Tsenkhermandal West
This section is located on Khunkh Mountain area. Alternative C-1 passes Bor Khujirt
Pass which is located on the south side of the mountain and C-2 passes Naran Pass on the
north side. C-2 was considered as the optimum route for economical and construction
reasons.
The following two alternative schemes are examined for the purpose of optimum implementation
plan in economic analysis, considering results of LCC analysis, equipment availability and ease
of maintenance.
- II -
Type of Pavement
Section
Alternative - 1 Alternative - 2
Erdene - Tsenkhermandal AC Pavement AC Pavement
Tsenkhermandal - Undurkhaan AC Pavement BST Pavement
After study, Alternative-3 was considered to be the optimum selection considering economical,
technical and periodical reasons. The new bridge to be constructed is planned to be 268.8m
long with 8 spans of 33.6m. It will be located 30 m downstream of the existing bridge. It will
have a carriage way of 8m width. It is also designed to have the structure that is able to satisfy
the design river section (360m long) in the future. Super-structure type is pre-stressed concrete
(PC) T-shaped girder and sub-structure is elliptical shaped re-enforced concrete (RC) wall type
pier with spread foundation.
- III -
a) To provide adequate traffic and warning signs and information at the crossing points.
These are provided to allow children and elder people to cross the road with safety and to
avoid possible risks for drivers and passengers.
b) To use community leaders and public relations to inform the public especially drivers
about safe use of the road during the construction and operation period.
- IV -
(1) Construction Section
The study area is divided into the six construction section as shown on the table in the next
page. The following conditions were assumed considering the characteristics of this
project.
1) Asphalt pavement work is limited to the period of 5 months (May to September) and
earthwork is limited to the period of 7 months (April to October).
2) Stockpiling of aggregates, pre-cast concrete structures and other preparatory works are
carried out through the year.
3) The period of 4-year construction to cover 221.8 km long road improvement may be
justified considering the achievements of the previous projects by other donors.
(2) Implementation Plan for Sections II to VI
Following two schemes are considered within the project implementation plan:
Scheme-I: Construction by contractor selected through tendering.
The highest priority should be given to Section II and VI because they are
located in the surroundings of urban area and relatively high economic return
is anticipated due to the higher traffic volumes. Accordingly, these sections
should be implemented by international contractors in a competitive
environment.
Scheme-II: Construction by DOR as a pilot model
The remaining sections of Section III, IV and V should be implemented by
DOR using the proposed road rehabilitation/ maintenance center.
Scheme-I has advantages in the aspects of using effective, efficient and accountable
procedures to realize the project by fast track method and with less financial burden on the
government. However, no resource except the constructed facilities will be developed and
road maintenance on the constructed section may face both technical and financial
difficulties.
Scheme-II has the possibility to cope with institutional requirements that are issued in the
administration of road. It envisages the growth of the construction industry through actual
practices to cope with incremental demand brought about by the government policy of road
improvement, especially development of the “Millennium Road”.
(3) Implementation Plan for Economic Analysis
The implementation plan for the economic analysis is made to cover the entire road stretch
between Erdene - Undurkhaan because it should coincide with the sections set by traffic
demand forecast. This will allow comparison of the estimated costs and benefit that will
accrue from forecasted traffic demand. The IP section is newly set for the proposed
project implementation plan for the economic analysis. Section-I that is funded and being
constructed by DOR is planned to be completed in 2006. The other sections are assumed
to be done in 4 years as mentioned above. Table below shows the relationship between
traffic section, construction section and the IP section.
Jargaltkhaan -
Traffic Erdene - Baganuur Baganuur - Jargaltkhaan Murun - Undurkhaan
Murun
Section-I Section -II Section -III Section -IV Section -V Section -VI
Construction Erdene - Baganuur - Kherlen Kherlen River East - Tsenkhermandal - Jargaltkhaan - Murun West -
Baganuur River East Tsenkhermandal Jargaltkhaan Murun West Undurkhaan
IP Section IP Section-1 IP Section-2 IP Section-3 IP Section-4
-V-
4.9 Economic Analysis
Project cost as a financial cost is estimated based on the results of preliminary design, quantity
take-off of each work item, and the studies on construction planning and method.
The basic premises of project cost estimates are as follows:
1) The cost is estimated on US Dollar basis, considering the fluctuation of exchange rates
against foreign currencies.
2) The unit cost of each cost component is determined based on the economic conditions
prevailing in January 2002 (US$ 1.0 = ¥ 133 = 1,100 Togrog).
3) Detailed design and supervisory service costs is assumed to be 7 % of construction cost.
4) Unit prices of fill materials and fine/coarse aggregates are estimated by every 10 km,
considering hauling distance of materials from individual borrow pits and quarry sites.
5) Equipment cost is based on the local market price as far as they are available. The cost
analysis is made in case of special equipment that is not available in Mongolia.
The financial project costs for economic analysis including the cost of road section between
Erdene and Baganuur are shown in table below and assumptions of the analysis are as follows:
- The economic analysis was conducted based on IP sections mentioned above.
- The economic costs include the capital and maintenance costs of the project valued in
economic prices.
- The source of quantified benefits from the project is savings in VOCs. To be conservative,
benefits attributable to savings in travel time were not considered. The VOC estimates are
based on the Roads Economic Decision VOC model developed by the World Bank.
Project Cost Construction
Section Road Length AT-1 ALT-2
(Thousand US$) Section
IP Section 1 Erdene-Kherlen River East 67.6 km 9,781 17.3% 17.3% I, II
IP Section 2 Kherlen River East -Jargaltkhaan 94.4 km 22,053 9.4% 10.6% III, IV,
IP Section 3 Jargaltkhaan-Murun West 50.0 km 10,230 17.6% 19.0% V
IP Section 4 Murun West -Undurkhaan 46.8 km 8,134 23.2% 25.6% VI
Total Section Erdene-Kherlen River East 258.8 km 50,198 15.7% 16.8% -
It is now clear that this project can obtain sufficient EIRR (Economic Internal Ratio of Return)
with any of the pavement structure alternatives
- VI -
3) It is recommended that Section III (Kherlen River East - Tsenkhermandal L=49.7 km),
Section IV (Tsenkhermandal - Jargaltkhaan L=44.7 km) and Section V (Jargaltkhaan -
Murun West L=50.0 km) be implemented by MOI/DOR using the proposed scheme of
the road rehabilitation / maintenance center.
(2) It is proposed that the project road should be implemented using the recommended
alternative of ALT-1. This will mean that the whole of the project road is paved by
asphalt concrete pavement. Asphalt concrete pavement has many advantages compared to
bituminous surface treatment, especially for high durability and certainty of performance.
(3) It is crucial for MOI/ DOR to levy a toll on Kherlen River Bridges and charge the private
sectors for the privilege of utilizing the roadside spaces to cope with the increased fund
requirement and alleviate the financial burden of the Government. Furthermore, MOI/
DOR should seize the initiative to withhold the revenues from equipment leasing at the
proposed road rehabilitation/ maintenance center and earmark them for road maintenance.
(4) It is important that the development within and along the proposed route should be
effectively controlled to prevent indiscriminate development and to facilitate the realization
of road and road related facilities such as road station and observation platform.
(5) It is recommended that the Government request a donor country to assist in the realization
of the project including procurement of equipment at the proposed road rehabilitation/
maintenance center, using bilateral ODA or loan from a multi-lateral lending agency so as
to alleviate the financial burden of the Government.
(6) The scheme for a road rehabilitation / maintenance center aims to establish personnel
training with construction equipment and machinery required for the road development
within AZZAN and to restructure the existing organization. It is recommended that the
Government request a donor country to assist in the strengthening of a road rehabilitation/
maintenance center by utilizing the system of technical cooperation in the fields of road
maintenance.
- VII -
THE FEASIBILITY STUDY ON CONSTRUCTION OF EASTERN ARTERIAL ROAD IN MONGOLIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
PROJECT AT A GLANCE
MAP OF STUDY AREA
ABBREVIATIONS
PROJECT SUMMARY
OUTLINE OF PROJECT
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Page
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
-i-
3.3 Socioeconomic Framework....................................................................................... S -16
3.4 Traffic Demand Forecast.......................................................................................... S -17
- ii -
6.3 Evaluation of Road Maintenance System .................................................................. S -58
6.3.1 System Improvement Measures .................................................................... S -58
6.3.2 Capacity Building of Road Maintenance ...................................................... S -59
6.4 Estimated Cost of Routine Maintenance for the Project ............................................. S -64
6.5 Road Development Fund .......................................................................................... S -64
- iii -
LIST OF TABLES
CHAPTER 2
Table 2-1-1 Temperature in the Study Area..................................................................S - 3
Table 2-1-2 Observed Daily Precipitation ....................................................................S - 4
Table 2-1-3 Design Discharge......................................................................................S - 4
Table 2-2-1 Road Length by Each Province (2000) ......................................................S - 6
Table 2-2-2 Main OD Pairs .........................................................................................S - 8
Table 2-3-1 Length by Type of Road Surface by Province (2000) ................................S - 9
Table 2-3-2 Overall Evaluation Results for Project Bridges ..........................................S -11
CHAPTER 3
Table 3-1-1 Current Population by Provinces and Capital City.....................................S -12
Table 3-1-2 Employed Population by Provinces During Past Decade ............................S -13
Table 3-1-3 Growth Rate and Share of Employed Population in Total Mongolia...........S -13
Table 3-1-4 GDP Composition by Sectors in Mongolia ................................................S -13
Table 3-1-5 Value of Imports and Exports in Mongolia ................................................S -14
Table 3-1-6 Share of Major Goods Exported/Imported in Mongolia..............................S -14
Table 3-4-1 Traffic Demand Forecast by Year .............................................................S -17
CHAPTER 4
Table 4-1-1 Summary of Geometric Criteria for the Eastern Arterial Road ...................S -19
Table 4-1-2 Minimum Vertical Curve Length...............................................................S -20
Table 4-1-3 Materials and Basic Strength ....................................................................S -23
Table 4-3-1 Design CBR and Pavement Structure by Sections......................................S -34
Table 4-3-2 Results of LCC Analysis...........................................................................S -35
Table 4-3-3 Salient Feature of Each Pavement .............................................................S -35
Table 4-3-4 Alternatives for Implementation Plan.........................................................S -36
Table 4-4-1 Evaluation of South Route C-1, C-2, and C-3 ...........................................S -37
Table 4-4-2 Characteristics of Super Structure Types for Kherlen Bridge .....................S -38
Table 4-4-3 Designated River Section for Bridges ........................................................S -39
Table 4-4-4 Standardized RC/ PC T Shape Girder for the Project.................................S -41
Table 4-4-5 Standard Scale of RC T Girder for the Project...........................................S -41
Table 4-4-6 Design Standard for Culverts (Pipe & Box)...............................................S -42
Table 4-5-1 Outline of Bridges.....................................................................................S -44
Table 4-5-2 Outline of Box Culverts ............................................................................S -45
- iv -
CHAPTER 5
Table 5-5-1 Summary of Environmental Impact Assessment of the EAR Project...........S -56
CHAPTER 6
Table 6-3-1 Budget and Personnel of DOR ..................................................................S -60
Table 6-3-2 Personnel of AZZAN Corporation and State Stock-shared Road
Maintenance Company of Khentii Province...............................................S -60
Table 6-4-1 Annual Required Fund for the Study Road ................................................S -64
Table 6-5-1 Revenue of the Road Fund ........................................................................S -65
CHAPTER 8
Table 8-3-1 Required Equipment List for Road Rehabilitation and Maintenance Center......S -73
Table 8-3-2 Relationship between Traffic Section and Construction Section .................S -75
Table 8-4-1 Financial Project Cost...............................................................................S -77
CHAPTER 9
Table 9-1-1 Construction Period by Each Section.........................................................S -78
Table 9-1-2 Vehicle Operating Costs in $ per vehicle km..............................................S -78
Table 9-1-3 EIRR Base Case.......................................................................................S -79
Table 9-1-4 EIRR Sensitivity Tests: Total Section of ALT-1........................................S -79
-v-
LIST OF FIGURES
CHAPTER 1
Figure 1-3-1 Study Area ...............................................................................................S - 2
CHAPTER 2
Figure 2-2-1 Road Network ..........................................................................................S - 6
Figure 2-2-2 Comparison of Daily Traffic Volume by Year...........................................S - 7
Figure 2-2-3 Desire Line of Existing OD Pairs ..............................................................S - 8
Figure 2-3-1 Result of IRI measurements between Erdene and Undurkhaan ...................S -10
CHAPTER 3
Figure 3-2-1 Mining to be Developed along the Project Road in Future..........................S -15
CHAPTER 4
Figure 4-1-1 Proposed Typical Cross Section................................................................S -21
Figure 4-1-2 Proposed Standard Cross Section of Bridge...............................................S -22
Figure 4-2-1 Conditions of Kherlen River......................................................................S -25
Figure 4-2-2 Location of Each Alternative Route...........................................................S -27
Figure 4-2-3 Detailed Location of Alternatives at Section A ..........................................S -29
Figure 4-2-4 Profile and Location of Main Structures of the Alternatives .......................S -30
Figure 4-4-1 View of C Routes Crossing Kherlen River.................................................S -36
Figure 4-5-1 Road Length and Location of Bridges and Box Culverts............................S -46
CHAPTER 5
Figure 5-2-1 Service Area with Gas Station and Restaurant...........................................S -47
Figure 5-2-2 Slope for Cattle Crossing and Signs ..........................................................S -47
Figure 5-2-3 Tree Planting near by Settlement Area for Environmental Mitigation .........S -49
Figure 5-2-4 Observation Deck and Panoramic View for Traveling Passengers..............S -50
CHAPTER 6
Figure 6-3-1 Proposed Road Rehabilitation & Maintenance Center in AZZAN ..............S -63
CHAPTER 8
Figure 8-2-1 Location of Each Construction Section......................................................S -70
Figure 8-3-1 Construction Planning for Sections II to VI ...............................................S -74
Figure 8-3-2 Project Implementation Time Schedule......................................................S -76
- vi -