Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 30 views

    Turbidity Comparison Between The Coagulants: Table 1.1

    Uploaded by

    Siti Maimunah
    The document contains results from jar test experiments comparing aluminum sulfate and ferric chloride as coagulants for water treatment. Table 1.1 shows that aluminum sulfate achieved the lowest turbidity of 6 NTU at a dosage of 4 mL. Table 1.2 shows that ferric chloride achieved the lowest turbidity of 5.5 NTU at a dosage of 4 mL. Graph 1.1 and Table 1.3 show that generally ferric chloride performed better than aluminum sulfate in reducing turbidity. Graph 1.2 and Table 1.4 show that ferric chloride resulted in higher pH than aluminum sulfate. Graph 1.3 and Table 1.5 show that ferric chloride performed better in reducing color,

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Turbidity Comparison Between The Coagulants: Table 1.1

    Uploaded by

    Siti Maimunah
    30 views3 pages
    The document contains results from jar test experiments comparing aluminum sulfate and ferric chloride as coagulants for water treatment. Table 1.1 shows that aluminum sulfate achieved the lowest turbidity of 6 NTU at a dosage of 4 mL. Table 1.2 shows that ferric chloride achieved the lowest turbidity of 5.5 NTU at a dosage of 4 mL. Graph 1.1 and Table 1.3 show that generally ferric chloride performed better than aluminum sulfate in reducing turbidity. Graph 1.2 and Table 1.4 show that ferric chloride resulted in higher pH than aluminum sulfate. Graph 1.3 and Table 1.5 show that ferric chloride performed better in reducing color,

    Original Title

    Result Jar Test

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document contains results from jar test experiments comparing aluminum sulfate and ferric chloride as coagulants for water treatment. Table 1.1 shows that aluminum sulfate achieved the lowest turbidity of 6 NTU at a dosage of 4 mL. Table 1.2 shows that ferric chloride achieved the lowest turbidity of 5.5 NTU at a dosage of 4 mL. Graph 1.1 and Table 1.3 show that generally ferric chloride performed better than aluminum sulfate in reducing turbidity. Graph 1.2 and Table 1.4 show that ferric chloride resulted in higher pH than aluminum sulfate. Graph 1.3 and Table 1.5 show that ferric chloride performed better in reducing color,

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    30 views3 pages

    Turbidity Comparison Between The Coagulants: Table 1.1

    Uploaded by

    Siti Maimunah
    The document contains results from jar test experiments comparing aluminum sulfate and ferric chloride as coagulants for water treatment. Table 1.1 shows that aluminum sulfate achieved the lowest turbidity of 6 NTU at a dosage of 4 mL. Table 1.2 shows that ferric chloride achieved the lowest turbidity of 5.5 NTU at a dosage of 4 mL. Graph 1.1 and Table 1.3 show that generally ferric chloride performed better than aluminum sulfate in reducing turbidity. Graph 1.2 and Table 1.4 show that ferric chloride resulted in higher pH than aluminum sulfate. Graph 1.3 and Table 1.5 show that ferric chloride performed better in reducing color,

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Result

    Table 1.1 : Result using Aluminium Sulphate as coagulant in JAR test experiment
    Dosage of
    0 2 4 6 8 10
    coagulant (mL)
    JAR 1 2 3 4 5 6
    Parameter (blank)
    Turbidity (NTU) 14.0 9.5 6.0 5.7 8.0 13.0

    pH 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5

    Colour (Pt/Co) 230.0 190.0 100.0 90.0 95.0 110.0


    Table 1.1

    Table 1.2 : Result using Ferric Chloride as coagulant in JAR test experiment
    Dosage of
    0 2 4 6 8 10
    coagulant (mL)
    JAR 1 2 3 4 5 6
    Parameter (blank)
    Turbidity (NTU) 14.0 6.5 5.5 6.0 7.0 9.0

    pH 5.0 6.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0

    Colour (Pt/Co) 230.0 130.0 50.0 60.0 100.0 150.0


    Table 2.2

    Graph 1.1 and Table


    Turbidity Comparison between the Coagulants 1.3 shown
    14

    12
    Dosag
    Al2(SO4)3 FeCl3
    Turbidity (NTU)

    10 e
    0 14.0 14.0
    8
    2 9.5 6.5
    6 4 6 5.5
    4 6 5.7 6.0
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    8 8.0 7.0
    Dosage of Coagulants (mL)
    Al2(SO4)3 FeCl3
    10 13.0 9.0

    Table 3.3
    comparison of turbidity between result of JAR test using Aluminium Sulphate and Ferric
    Chloride as coagulant.

    Graph 1.2 and Table 1.4


    pH Comparison between the Coagulants shown comparison of
    8 pH between result of
    JAR test using
    7.5
    Dosag
    Al2(SO4)3 FeCl3
    7 e
    6.5 0 5.0 5.0
    pH

    2 5.5 6.0
    6
    4 6.0 7.5
    5.5
    6 6.5 7.0
    5
    Graph 4.1
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 7.0 6.5
    Dosage of Coagulants (mL) 10
    Al2(SO4)3 FeCl3 7.5 6.0
    Table 5.4

    Aluminium Sulphate and


    Ferric Chloride as coagulant.

    Graph 6.2
    Graph 1.3 and Table 1.5
    Colour Comparison between the Coagulants shown comparison of
    colour between result of
    225
    JAR test using Aluminium
    200
    Sulphate and Ferric
    175 Chloride as coagulant.
    Colour (Pt/Co)

    150
    125
    100
    75 Dosag
    Al2(SO4)3 FeCl3
    50 e
    25 0 230 230
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    Dosage of Coagulants (mL) 2 190 130
    Al2(SO4)3 FeCl3
    4 100 50
    6 90 60
    8 95 100
    10 110 150

    You might also like