Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 227 views

    GED 105 Readings in Philippine History Finals: Batangas State University

    Uploaded by

    Gio Llanos
    The document outlines requirements for a research project on a topic in Philippine history. Students must submit: [1] A typed research document with sections on introduction, background, argument/evidence, summary/conclusion, recommendations, and bibliography. [2] A video presentation no longer than 8 minutes where each group member states their position on the topic in relation to the 2019 midterm elections. The research document and presentation will be graded based on rubrics evaluating organization, content, grammar, neatness, and timeliness.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    GED 105 Readings in Philippine History Finals: Batangas State University

    Uploaded by

    Gio Llanos
    227 views2 pages
    The document outlines requirements for a research project on a topic in Philippine history. Students must submit: [1] A typed research document with sections on introduction, background, argument/evidence, summary/conclusion, recommendations, and bibliography. [2] A video presentation no longer than 8 minutes where each group member states their position on the topic in relation to the 2019 midterm elections. The research document and presentation will be graded based on rubrics evaluating organization, content, grammar, neatness, and timeliness.

    Original Title

    Phil-Hist.-Finals.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document outlines requirements for a research project on a topic in Philippine history. Students must submit: [1] A typed research document with sections on introduction, background, argument/evidence, summary/conclusion, recommendations, and bibliography. [2] A video presentation no longer than 8 minutes where each group member states their position on the topic in relation to the 2019 midterm elections. The research document and presentation will be graded based on rubrics evaluating organization, content, grammar, neatness, and timeliness.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    227 views2 pages

    GED 105 Readings in Philippine History Finals: Batangas State University

    Uploaded by

    Gio Llanos
    The document outlines requirements for a research project on a topic in Philippine history. Students must submit: [1] A typed research document with sections on introduction, background, argument/evidence, summary/conclusion, recommendations, and bibliography. [2] A video presentation no longer than 8 minutes where each group member states their position on the topic in relation to the 2019 midterm elections. The research document and presentation will be graded based on rubrics evaluating organization, content, grammar, neatness, and timeliness.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Republic of the Philippines

    BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY


    Pablo Borbon Main II
    Rizal Ave. Extension, Batangas City

    COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE & FINE ARTS

    GED 105 Readings in Philippine History


    Finals

    The student will be given a particular topic and expected to submit a research document with the
    following part:

    I. Introduction
     brief introduction of the topic (not more than 5 sentences; researchers should use
    their own words)
    II. Background of the Topic
     explanation of the topic (a mixture of own words and from the references used)
    III. Argument and Evidences
     state your main point/argument/claim
     provide evidences that support your argument/claim such as advantages or
    disadvantages; pros and cons
    IV. Summary and Conclusion
     researchers to formulate their own argument, considering if they are against or in
    favor based on the presented evidences.
     explain the basis of their own argument
    V. Recommendation
     recommend possible solutions to the problem or improvements/amendments to an
    existing program or law to address any gaps (at least 5)
    VI. Relevance and Importance
     the significance of the topic to the current socio-economic condition of the country
    VII. Bibliography
     list of all the references used in the research document
    VIII. Video Presentation
     group members to create a video where each member will state his/her reason why he/she
    would vote in the 2019 midterm elections. His/her statements should be in relation to the
    topic that was assigned to their group; video should not exceed eight (8) minutes; click links
    below for sample videos or look for Art Forces of the Philippines videos on Youtube:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDiYv-PuC0s https://www.youtube.com/watch?
    v=hHVoIMuNSIs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDyXgO_ytPM

    The grading of the research document will be divided into two parts. The video presentation and
    content of document: maximum of 20 pts. for the video presentation and 60 pts. for the content of
    the document, a maximum of 80 pts.. The said document and video will be graded based on the
    given rubrics.

    RESEARCH DOCUMENT

    Criteria Excellent Very Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement


    Organization Good organization; Organized; points Some organization; Poorly organized; no
    points are logically are somewhat points jump around; logical progression;
    ordered; sharp sense jumpy; sense of beginning and beginning and
    of beginning and end beginning and ending are unclear ending are vague
    (9-10 pts.) ending (7-8 pts.) (5-6 pts.) (2-4 pts.)
    Content, Quality of Clear statement of Some success in Attempts to define Argument &
    Information argument & defining the the argument; some evidences are not
    evidences; accurate, argument & information are clearly defined;
    complete & useful evidences; some inaccurate & not useful information
    information; examples facts & useful; incomplete & are missing;
    complete & correct other useful wrong citation of references are not
    citation of information; some references; major cited; major ideas
    references; ideas are citation of ideas are not are unclear leaving
    summarized & the references; may need summarized or the the reader with no
    reader was left with to refine summary or reader is left with learning
    full understanding of final idea vague ideas
    the topic (31-35 pts.) (21-30 pts.) (11-20 pts.) (5-10 pts.)
    Grammar, Usage, No error Only one or two More than two errors Multiple errors
    Mechanics, Spelling errors distract from
    (5 pts.) (4 pts.) (3 pts.) understanding (2pts)

    Neatness Typed; clean; neatly Typed; clean; neatly Typed; no report Simple typed; poorly
    organized with a organized; no report cover; followed only organized; did not
    well-designed report cover; followed 1 or 2 of the follow any of the
    cover; followed all some of the instructions instructions on how
    the instructions on instructions it will be presented
    how it will be
    presented (5pts.) (3-4 pts.) (2 pts.) (1 pt.)
    Timeliness On time (5 pts) A day late (3pts) Two days late (1pt) A week late (0 pt.)

    Video Presentation
    Criteria Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fair Poor
    Content / Clear statement of Clear statement of The content does not Content lacks any
    Organization purpose or objective, purpose or objective, present a clearly purpose or objective
    creative, convincing, somewhat organized stated objective, is and a clear point of
    organized and and somewhat vague and does not view
    related to the related to the support the topic
    assigned topic assigned topic
    (8-10 pts.) (6-7 pts.) (3-5 pts.) (1-2 pts.)
    Quality The video was well Video was Video was made, but There was no video,
    edited and moves completed and had very little if any or it was totally
    smoothly from one contained all editing. Video was unedited with no
    student to the next required items. very fragmented and transitions or audio
    with proper use of Editing was not done choppy with little to support of any kind.
    transitions. Audio as well as it should no audio
    and other have been. Video is reinforcement
    enhancements were still somewhat
    well used. No choppy. Audio and
    background noise; other enhancements
    has good lighting; were utilized, but not
    student’s voice is for maximum effect.
    distinctly heard
    (8-10 pts.) (6-7 pts.) (3-5 pts.) (1-2 pts.)

    For the format of the research document: font: Arial, font size: 11, spacing: 1.5, margin: 1 inch each side, paper
    size: 8.5x11. The said document should have a cover page with the title of topic, section and names of group
    members. The typewritten document and the video presentation should be saved in a folder of the class USB.

    You might also like