Eurocode Design Example Book
Eurocode Design Example Book
2
CHAPTER 1. Why midas Gen
3
CHAPTER 2
2.1 Overview
(1) General
Material Properties
Section table for the application of Ultimate Limit State Check
(2) Ultimate Limit State Check
Resistance of cross-sections
Buckling resistance of members
(3) Serviceability Limit State Check
Vertical deflections
Horizontal deflections
Dynamic effects
2.2 General
(1) Material Properties
The nominal values of the yield strength (fy) and the ultimate strength (fu) for structural steel
1
CHAPTER 2. Steel Design Algorithm
(2) Section table for the application of Ultimate Limit State Check
Limit States
Cross section SB
Yielding FB(1) LTB
Strong axis Weak axis
Note
FB: Flexural Buckling, SB: Shear Buckling, LTB: Lateral-Torsional Buckling
(1) Torsional Buckling and Torsional-Flexural Buckling are not evaluated.
(2) The thickness of two webs should be identical, and the member type should be “column” for the weak axis shear
buckling check.
2
CHAPTER 2. Steel Design Algorithm
Compression
- Design compression resistance
𝐴𝑓𝑦
𝑁𝑐,𝑅𝑑 = 𝛾 For class 1,2 and 3 cross sections
𝑀0
𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑦
𝑁𝑐,𝑅𝑑 = For class 4 cross sections
𝛾𝑀 0
- In the case of unsymmetrical Class 4 sections, the additional moment due to the eccentricity of
the centroidal axis of the effective section is considered in midas Gen.
Bending moment
- Design bending resistance
𝑊 𝑝𝑙 𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑐,𝑅𝑑 = 𝑀𝑝𝑙 ,𝑅𝑑 = For class 1 or 2 cross sections
𝛾𝑀 0
𝑊 𝑒𝑙 ,𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑐,𝑅𝑑 = 𝑀𝑒𝑙 ,𝑅𝑑 = For class 3 cross sections
𝛾𝑀 0
𝑊 𝑒𝑓𝑓 ,𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑐,𝑅𝑑 = For class 4 cross sections
𝛾𝑀 0
Shear
- Design shear resistance in the absence of torsion
𝐴𝑣 𝑓𝑦 3
𝑉𝑝𝑙 ,𝑅𝑑 = 𝛾𝑀 0
- The shear area Av is calculated based on the clause 6.2.6 (3) as per EN1993-1-1
- Rolled I and H sections, load parallel to web: A − 2bt f + t w + 2r t f
- but not less than Design elastic shear resistance is not applied.
Shear Buckling
- The shear buckling resistance for webs without intermediate stiffeners is calculated, according
to section 5 of EN 1993-1-5, if
3
CHAPTER 2. Steel Design Algorithm
ℎ𝑤 𝜀 235
> 72 𝜂 𝜀=
𝑡𝑤 𝑓𝑦 𝑁 𝑚𝑚 2
ℎ𝑤 𝑡
𝑉𝑏𝑤 ,𝑅𝑑 = 𝜒𝑤 𝑓𝑦𝑤 3𝛾 𝑀 1
𝑏 𝑓 𝑡 𝑓2 𝑓 𝑦𝑓 2
𝑀𝐸𝑑
𝑉𝑏𝑓,𝑅𝑑 = 1−
𝑐𝛾 𝑀 1 𝑀𝑓 ,𝑅𝑑
I-cross-sections with equal flanges and bending about the major axis
𝜌𝐴 2
𝑤
𝑊 𝑝𝑙 ,𝑦 − 𝑓𝑦
4𝑡 𝑤
𝑀𝑦 ,𝑉,𝑅𝑑 = 𝛾𝑀 0
2
2𝑉 𝐸𝐷
𝜌= −1 Torsion is not considered when calculating ρ
𝑉𝑝𝑙 ,𝑅𝑑
𝑀𝑉,𝑅𝑑 = 1 − 𝜌 𝑀𝑐,𝑅𝑑
4
CHAPTER 2. Steel Design Algorithm
0.5 ℎ 𝑤 𝑡 𝑤 𝑓𝑦
𝑁𝐸𝑑 ≤ 0.25 𝑁𝑝𝑙 ,𝑅𝑑 𝑁𝐸𝑑 ≤ 𝛾𝑀 0
For doubly symmetrical I- and H-sections, allowance is not made for the effect of the axial force
on the plastic resistance moment about the z-z axis when:
ℎ 𝑤 𝑡 𝑤 𝑓𝑦
𝑁𝐸𝑑 ≤ 𝛾𝑀 0
The following equations are used for standard rolled I or H sections and for welded I or H
sections with equal flanges:
𝑛 −𝑎 2
for 𝑛 > 𝑎 : 𝑀𝑁,𝑧,𝑅𝑑 = 𝑀𝑝𝑙 ,𝑧,𝑅𝑑 1 − 1−𝑎
N Ed M M
+ M y ,Ed + M z ,Ed ≤ 1 for Class 1,2,3 & 4 sections
N Rd y ,Rd z ,Rd
5
CHAPTER 2. Steel Design Algorithm
- My, Rd and Mz, Rd are replaced by My,v,Rd and Mz,v,Rd respectively in the above criterion b) to
consider shear effect.
Ncr is the elastic critical force for the relevant buckling mode based on the gross cross sectional
properties.
𝜋 2 𝐸𝐼
𝑁𝑐𝑟 =
𝐿2𝑒
Flexural buckling is checked for the L, C, I, T, Box, Pipe, Double L, and Double C section.
Torsional and torsional-flexural buckling is not checked.
Design buckling resistance
𝜒𝐴 𝑓𝑦
𝑁𝑏,𝑅𝑑 = for Class 1,2 and 3 cross-sections
𝛾𝑀 1
𝜒 𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑦
𝑁𝑏,𝑅𝑑 = for Class 4 cross-sections
𝛾𝑀 1
1 2
𝜒= but 𝜒 ≤ 1.0 Ф = 0.5 1 + 𝛼 𝜆 − 0.2 + 𝜆
Ф+ Ф2 −𝜆 −2
Buckling Curve a0 a b c d
6
CHAPTER 2. Steel Design Algorithm
- If the member type is column, C1 is calculated based on the table below. EN 1993-1-1: 1992
Annex.
7
CHAPTER 2. Steel Design Algorithm
1
𝜒𝐿𝑇 = but 𝜒𝐿𝑇 ≤ 1.0
2
Ф𝐿𝑇 + Ф𝐿𝑇 2 +𝜆𝐿𝑇
2
Ф𝐿𝑇 = 0.5 1 + 𝛼𝐿𝑇 𝜆𝐿𝑇 − 0.2) + 𝜆𝐿𝑇
Buckling Curve a b c d
- The method in the Clause 6.3.2.3 and 6.3.2.4 of EC3 are not considered.
Kyy, kyz, kzy, kzz are the interaction factors. These values are obtained from Annex A in EN 1993-1-1: 2005.
Cmy, Cmz, CmLT in Annex A can be either user defined or auto-calculated.
- When the design axial force, NEd is larger than Ncr,z or Ncr,TF, the criteria above are not
applied.
- General method of the clause 6.3.4 is not considered.
8
CHAPTER 2. Steel Design Algorithm
9
CHAPTER 3
Verification Examples
Design Examples using midas Gen to Eurocode3
CHAPTER 3
Steel Design Verification Examples
Loading condition
1
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
SF
Beam Diagram
BM
2
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
2
( ). Check general interaction ratio. Aw = hwtw = 380.8 × 9.5 = 3617.6 mm
1501000 −0.27× 3617.62 /4× 9.5 )× 275
[ Eurocode3:05 6.2.1 (6.2) ] - Class1 or Class2 ⇒ My, V, Rd = 1.0
= 386.8 KN
N_Ed M_Edy M_Edz
-. Rmax1 = --------- + ----------- + ---------
386.8 KNm > 376.5 KNm
N_Rd My_Rd Mz_Rd
= 0.951 < 1.000 ---> O.K. ∴ cross-section resistance to combined bending and
shear is acceptable
( ). Check interaction ratio of bending and axial force
member.
[ Eurocode3:05 6.2.9 (6.31 ~ 6.41) ] - Class1 or Class2
-. n = N_Ed / Npl_Rd = 0.000
Conclusion
-. a = MIN[ (Area-2b*tf)/Area, 0.5 ] = 0.392
A 406 × 178 × 74 UB in grade S275 steel is suitable
-. Alpha = 2.000
-. Beta = MAX[ 5*n, 1.0 ] = 1.000 for the arrangement and loading shown by Fig. 6.13
3
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
[Reference]
L.Gardner and D.A.Nethercot, Designers’ Guide to
EN 1993-1-1, The Steel Construction Institute,
Thomas Telford, 53-55 (Example 6.5)
4
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
5
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
2. Check Axial and Bending Resistance 2. Bending and axial force (clause 6.2.9.1)
( ). Check slenderness ratio of axial compression
member (Kl/i). [ Eurocode3:05 6.3.1 ]
-. Kl/i = 32.3 < 200.0 ---> O.K. No reduction to the plastic resistance moment due to the
effect of axial force is required when both of the following
( ). Calculate axial compressive resistance (Nc_Rd). criteria are satisfied.
[ Eurocode3:05 6.1, 6.2.4 ] NEd ≤ 0.25N pi, Rd
-. Nc_Rd = fy * Area / Gamma_M0 And
= 2937.50 kN 0.5h w t w f y
NEd =
γM 0
( ). Check ratio of axial resistance (N_Ed/Nc_Rd). NEd = 1400 KN
N_Ed 1400.00 Af y 12500 × 235
-. ---------- = ------------ = 0.477 < 1.000 ---> O.K. Npl, Rd = = = 2937.5 KN
γM 0 1.0
Nc_Rd 2937.50 0.25 Npl, Rd = 733.9 KN
733.9 KN < 1400 KN ∴ equation (6.33) is not satisfied
( ). Calculate plastic resistance moment about major axis.
[ Eurocode3:05 6.1, 6.2.5 ] 0.5h w t w f y 0.5 × 467.2− 2 × 19.6 × 11.4 × 235
-. Wply = 0.0022 m^3. = = 573.3 KN
γM 0 1.0
-. Mc_Rdy = Wply * fy / Gamma_M0 = 524.05 kN-m.
573.3 KN < 1400 KN ∴ equation (6.34) is not satisfied
-. N_Ed > 0.25*Npl_Rd = 695.92 kN.
-. N_Ed > 0.5*hw*tw*fy/Gamma_M0 = 573.31 kN. Therefore, allowance for the effect of axial force on the
Therefore, Allowance for the effect of axial force. plastic moment resistance of the cross-section must made.
6
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
Loading condition
7
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
8
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
[Reference]
L.Gardner and D.A.Nethercot, Designers’ Guide to
EN 1993-1-1, The Steel Construction Institute,
Thomas Telford, 66-68 (Example 6.7)
9
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
3.4 I-section beam design under shear force and bending moment
A simply supported primary beam is required to span 10.8m and
to support two secondary beams as shown in Fig.6.24. The
secondary beams are connected through pin plates to the web of
the primary beam, and full lateral restraint may be assumed at
these points. Select a suitable member for the primary beam
assuming grade S275 steel.
Loading condition
SF
Beam Diagram
BM
10
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
11
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
12
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
[Reference]
L.Gardner and D.A.Nethercot, Designers’ Guide
to EN 1993-1-1, The Steel Construction Institute,
Thomas Telford, 74-79 (Example 6.8)
13
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
3.5 Member resistance under combined major axis bending and axial
compression
Loading condition
SF
Beam Diagram
BM
14
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
15
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
3. Check Bending Moment Resistance About Major 3.Bending resistance of cross-section (clause 6.2.5)
Axis Maximum bending moment
( ). Calculate plastic resistance moment about major axis. My, Ed = 2.4 × 58 = 139.2 KN
[ Eurocode3:05 6.1, 6.2.5 ]
-. Wply = 0.0005 m^3. The design major axis bending resistance of the cross-
-. Mc_Rdy = Wply * fy / Gamma_M0 = 179.28 kN-m. section.
W pl ,y f y
Mc, y, Rd = for Class 1 or 2 cross-sections
γM0
( ). Check ratio of moment resistance (M_Edy/Mc_Rdy). 491000 × 355 6
= = 174.3 × 10 Nmm
M_Edy 139.20 1.00
16
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
N_Ed M_Edy M_Edz due to the effect of axial force is required when both of
-. Rmax1 = --------- + ------------ + ------------ the following criteria are satisfied:
N_Rd My_Rd Mz_Rd NED ≤ 0.25 Np1,Rd
= 0.806 < 1.000 ---> O.K. 0.5h w t w f y
NED ≤
γM0
17
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
of EN 1993-1-1))
( ). Check interaction ratio of bending and axial Equivalent uniform moment factors Cmi
compression member. [ Eurocode3:05 6.3.1, 6.2.9.3 N ED
Cmy, 0 = 0.79 +0.21 ψy +0.36(ψy - 0.33)
(6.61, 6.62), Annex A ] N cr ,y
90
-. kyy = 1.046 0.79 + (0.21 1.0 ) + 0.36 (1.0 - 0.33)
1470
-. kyz = 0.609 = 1.01
-. kzy = 0.681 Cmz, 0 = Cmz need not be considered since Mz ,ED =0.
-. kzz = 1.035 M y ,ED A
εy = for class 1,2 and 3 cross-sections
-. Xiy = 0.416 N ED W el ,y
139.2 × 10 6 8300
-. Xiz = 0.771 = = 34.9
90 × 10 3 368000
-. XiLT = 1.000 IT 29820000
αLT = 1 - ≥ 1.0 = 1 - = 0.189
-. N_Rk = A*fy = 2999.75 kN. Iy 36780000
εy αLT
-. My_Rk = Wply*fy = 179.28 kN-m. Cmy = Cmz,0+(1-Cmy,0) =1.01 + ( 1 –
1+ εy αLT
-. Mz_Rk = Wplz*fy = 105.44 kN-m.
34.9 × 0.189
-. N_Ed*eNy = 0.0 (Not Slender) 1.01 )
1+( 34.9 × 0.189)
-. N_Ed*eNZ = 0.0 (Not Slender) = 1.01
2 αLT
CmLT = Cmy
1−(N Ed /N cr ,z ) 1−(N Ed /N cr ,T )
2 0.189
= 1.01
1−(904127 ) 1−(90415502 )
≥ 1.0 (but ≥ 1.0) ∴ CmLT = 1.00
18
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
+ kyy * --------------------------------- μy 1 Wy
kzy = CmyCmLT 0.6
XiLT*My_Rk/Gamma_M1 1− N ED /N cr ,y C zy Wz
M_Edz + N_Ed*eNz 0.99 1
= 1.01 × 1.00 × × × 0.6 ×
+ kyz * ---------------------------- 1− 90/1470 0.95
Mz_Rk/Gamma_M1 1.33
=0.69
1.27
[Reference]
L.Gardner and D.A.Nethercot, Designers’ Guide
to EN 1993-1-1, The Steel Construction Institute,
Thomas Telford, 81-89 (Example 6.9)
19
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
Beam
Diagram
20
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
( ). Determine classification of compression Internal Web – internal part in bending (Table 5.2, sheet 1):
Parts. C = h - 2tf – 2r = 246.7 mm
[ Eurocode3:05 Table 5.2 (Sheet 1 of 3), EN 1993-1-5 ] c/tw = 246.7/23.0 = 10.73
-. e = SQRT( 235/fy ) = 0.92 Limit for Class 1 web = 33ε = 30.51
-. d/t = HTR = 10.73 30.51 > 10.73 ∴ web is Class 1
-. sigma1 = 201819.634 KPa.
-. sigma2 = 23016.967 KPa. The overall cross-section classification is therefore Class
-. HTR < 33*e ( Class 1 : Plastic ). 1.
21
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
22
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
hw ε
≤ 72 for unstiffened webs
Note. tw η
When calculating shear area for H sections, following η= 1.2 (from Eurocode 3 –part 1.5, though the UK National
equation was applied as per EN1993-1-1:2005, sub Annex may specify an alternative value).
clause 6.2.6(3) a). ε 0.92
Av = A-2btf + (tw+2r)tf 72 = 72 × = 55.5
η 1.2
However, in the example book, following equation was
Actual hw/tw= 277.1/23.0 = 12.0
applied.
12.0 ≤ 55.5 ∴ no shear buckling check required
Av = A – 2btf + (tw + r) tf
For this reason, the difference in shear resistance
occurred. Cross-section resistance under Bending, Shear and
axial force (clause 6.2.10)
5. Check Interaction of Combined Resistance
( ). Check interaction ratio of bending and axial force Reduced plastic moment resistances (clause 6.2.9.1(5))
member. major (y-y)axis:
1−n
[ Eurocode3:05 6.2.9 (6.31 ~ 6.41) ] - Class1 or Class2 M N,y, Rd = Mpl, y, Rd (but M N,y, Rd ≤ Mpl, y, Rd )
1−0.5a
-. n = N_Ed / Npl_Rd = 0.410 Where
-. a = MIN[ (Area-2b*tf)/Area, 0.5 ] = 0.214 n = NEd/ Npl, y, Rd = 34400/8415 = 0.41
-. Alpha = 2.000 a = (A – 2btf)/A = [30600 –(2 318.4 × 37.7)]/30600
-. Beta = MAX[ 5*n, 1.0 ] = 2.051 = 0.22
-. N_Ed > 0.25*Npl_Rd = 1653.88 kN. 1−0.41
⇒ Mn, y, Rd = 1168 = 773.8 KNm
1−(0.5 × 0.22)
-. N_Ed > 0.5*hw*tw*fy/Gamma_M0 = 876.64 kN.
773.8 KNm > 720 KNm ∴ acceptable
Therefore, Allowance for the effect of axial force.
-. Mny_Rd = MIN[ Mply_Rd*(1-n)/(1-0.5*a), Mply_Rd ]
minor (z-z) axis
= 770.79 kN-m.
n−a 2
-. Rmaxy = M_Edy / Mny_Rd = 0.545 < 1.000 --->O.K. For n > a M N,z, Rd = Mpl, y, Rd 1 −
1−a
-. N_Ed > hw*tw*fy/Gamma_M0 = 2873.87 kN. 0.41−0.22 2
⇒ M N,z, Rd = 536.5 × 1 − = 503.9 KNm
Therefore, Allowance for the effect of axial force. 1−0.22
23
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
-. Phiz = 0.5 * [ 1 + Alphaz*(Lambda_bz-0.2) + Lcr = 1.0L = 1.0 x 4.2 = 4.20 m (see Table 6.6)
Lambda_bz^2 ] π 2 EI y π 2 × 210000 × 642.0 × 10 6 3
Ncr ,y = = = 153943 x 10 N
L cr 2 2940 2
= 0.773
= 153943 KN
-. Xiz = MIN [ 1 / [Phiz + SQRT(Phiz^2 - Lambda_bz^2)],
30600 × 275
1.0 ] ∴λ= = 0.23
153943 × 10 3
= 0.789 π 2 EI y π2 × 210000 × 203.1 × 10 6 3
-. Nb_Rdz = Xiz*Beta_A*Area*fy / Gamma_M1 = 6640.85 Ncr ,z = = = 23863 10 N
L cr 2 4200 2
kN. = 23863 KN
30600 × 275
∴λ= = 0.59
( ). Check ratio of buckling resistance (N_Ed/Nb_Rd). 23863 × 10 3
-. Nb_Rd = MIN[ Nb_Rdy, Nb_Rdz ] = 6640.85 kN. Buckling curves : major (y-y)axis
2
N_Ed 3440.00 ϕy = 0.5 x [1 + 0.34 x (0.23 - 0.2) + 0.23 ] =0.53
-. ---------- = ------------- = 0.518 < 1.000 ---> O.K. 1
∴ χy = = 0.99
0.53 + 0.53 2 − 0.23 2
Nb_Rd 6640.85 0.99 × 30600 × 275 3
Nb,y, Rd = = 8314 10 =8314 KN
1.0
8314 KN > 3440 KN
∴ major axis flexural buckling resistance is acceptable
[Reference]
L.Gardner and D.A.Nethercot, Designers’ Guide to
EN 1993-1-1, The Steel Construction Institute,
Thomas Telford, 89-97 (Example 6.10)
24
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
3.7 I-section beam design under shear force and bending moment
The 457 X 191 UB 82 compression member of S275 steel of Figure 3.28a is simply supported about
both principle axes at each end (Lcr,y = 12.0 m), and has a central brace which prevents lateral
deflections in the minor principle plane (Lcr,z = 6.0 m). Check the adequacy of the member for a
factored axial compressive load corresponding to a nominal dead of 160 KN and a nominal imposed
load of 230 KN.
Loading condition
&
Beam diagram
25
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
26
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
27
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
= 845.80 kN.
[Reference]
N.S. Trahair, M.A. Bradford, D.A.Nethercot,
and L.Gardner, The behavior and Design of
Steel Structures to EC3, Taylor & Francis, 89-91
(Example 3.12.1)
28
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
Loading condition
&
Beam diagram
29
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
Af y L cr ,z 1 6000 1
( ). Determine classification of compression Internal λz = = = = 2.050
N cr ,z iz λ1 (3.83× 10) 93.9 × 0.814
Parts.
< 2.322
[ Eurocode3:05 Table 5.2 (Sheet 1 of 3), EN 1993-1-5 ]
Buckling will occur about the major (y) axis. For a rolled UC
-. e = SQRT( 235/fy ) = 0.81
section (with h/b ≤ 1.2 and tf ≤ 100 mm), buckling about
-. d/t = HTR = 20.35
the y-axis, use buckling curve (b) with α = 0.34
-. sigma1 = 0.085 kN/mm^2.
-. sigma2 = 0.085 kN/mm^2. 2
Φy = 0.5 [ 1 + 0.34 ( 2.322 – 0.2 ) + 2.322 ] = 3.558
-. HTR < 33*e ( Class 1 : Plastic ). 1
χy = = 0.160
3.558 + 3.558 2 −2.322 2
2. CHECK AXIAL RESISTANCE.
( ). Check slenderness ratio of axial compression member which is much less than the guessed value of 0.5.
(Kl/i). [ Eurocode3:05 6.3.1 ]
Second section choice.
-. Kl/i = 134.7 < 200.0 ---> O.K.
-. Nc_Rd = fy * Area / Gamma_M0 = 2353.65 kN. Try a 203 203 UC 52 with A = 66.3 cm , i y = 8.91 cm, , tf
2
30
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
[Reference]
N.S. Trahair, M.A. Bradford, D.A.Nethercot, and
L.Gardner, The behavior and Design of Steel
Structures to EC3, Taylor & Francis, 91-92 (Example
3.12.2)
31
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
Loading condition
&
Beam diagram
32
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
33
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
Note.
The difference in buckling resistance occurred since
currently midas Gen does not consider ‘r’ value for
rolled box section. This can be improved in the future
version.
[Reference]
N.S. Trahair, M.A. Bradford, D.A.Nethercot, and
L.Gardner, The behavior and Design of Steel
Structures to EC3, Taylor & Francis, 92-93 (Example
3.12.3)
34
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
35
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
( ). Calculate axial compressive resistance (Nc_Rd). N.S. Trahair, M.A. Bradford, D.A.Nethercot, and
[ Eurocode3:05 6.1, 6.2.4 ] L.Gardner, The behavior and Design of Steel
-. Nc_Rd = fy * Aeff / Gamma_M0 = 3271.45 kN. Structures to EC3, Taylor & Francis, 141-142
(Example 4.9.1)
36
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
37
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
[Reference]
N.S. Trahair, M.A. Bradford, D.A.Nethercot, and
L.Gardner, The behavior and Design of Steel
Structures to EC3, Taylor & Francis, 142-143
(Example 4.9.2)
38
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
39
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
40
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
[Reference]
N.S. Trahair, M.A. Bradford, D.A.Nethercot, and
L.Gardner, The behavior and Design of Steel
Structures to EC3, Taylor & Francis, 143-144
(Example 4.9.3)
41
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
0.5
ε = √(235/345) = 0.825
( ). Determine classification of compression outstand
cf/( tf ε) = (400/2 – 10/2 – 6) (20× 0.825)
flanges.
[ Eurocode3:05 Table 5.2 (Sheet 2 of 3), EN 1993-1-5 ] = 11.5 > 10 but < 14, and so the flange is Class 3.
-. e = SQRT( 235/fy ) = 0.83 cw/( tw ε) = (1540 – 2× 20 – 2× 6) / (10× 0.825)
-. b/t = BTR = 9.45 = 180.3 > 124 and so the web is Class 4.
-. sigma1 = 0.016 kN/mm^2.
-. sigma2 = 0.016 kN/mm^2. A conservative approximation for the cross-section
-. BTR < 14*e ( Class 3 : Semi-compact ).
moment resistance may be obtained by ignoring the web
( ). Determine classification of bending Internal Parts. completely,
[ Eurocode3:05 Table 5.2 (Sheet 1 of 3), EN 1993-1-5 ] so that
-. e = SQRT( 235/fy ) = 0.83 Mc,Rd = Mf = (400× 20)× (1540 – 20)× 345/1.0 N
-. d/t = HTR = 148.80 = 4195 KNm.
-. sigma1 = 0.015 kN/mm^2.
-. sigma2 = -0.015 kN/mm^2.
A higher resistance may be calculated by determining the
-. HTR > 124*e ( Class 4 : Slender )
42
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
-. Aeff = beff * tf = 4000.000 mm^2. (737.6 – 10) + (1540 – 2× 20) × 10/12 + (1540
2 3
-. yeff = beff/2 = 100.000 mm. – 2 × 20)× 10× 1540/2 – 737.6) – 219.6 × 10/12
2 3
43
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
[Reference]
N.S. Trahair, M.A. Bradford, D.A.Nethercot, and
L.Gardner, The behavior and Design of Steel
Structures to EC3, Taylor & Francis, 144-145
(Example 4.9.4)
44
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
flanges. 0.5
ε = √(235/355) = 0.814
[ Eurocode3:05 Table 5.2 (Sheet 2 of 3), EN 1993-1-5 ] η =1.2
-. e = SQRT( 235/fy ) = 0.81
hw = 1540 – 2 20 = 1500 mm
-. b/t = BTR = 9.45
ηhw /( tw ε) = 1.2× 1500 / ( 10 0.814)
-. sigma1 = 0.016 kN/mm^2.
= 221.2 > 72 and so the web is slender
-. sigma2 = 0.016 kN/mm^2.
-. BTR < 14*e ( Class 3 : Semi-compact ).
α/ hw = ∞/ hw = ∞, kτst = 0
kτ = 5.34
( ). Determine classification of bending Internal Parts. 2 2
τcr = 5.34 X 190000 X (10/1500) = 45.1 N/mm
[ Eurocode3:05 Table 5.2 (Sheet 1 of 3), EN 1993-1-5 ]
-. e = SQRT( 235/fy ) = 0.81
λw = 0.76 X √(355/45.1) = 2.132 > 1.08
-. d/t = HTR = 148.80
Assuming that there is a non-rigid end post, then
-. sigma1 = 0.015 kN/mm^2.
-. sigma2 = -0.015 kN/mm^2. χw = 0.83 /2.132 = 0.389
45
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
[Reference]
N.S. Trahair, M.A. Bradford, D.A.Nethercot, and
L.Gardner, The behavior and Design of Steel
Structures to EC3, Taylor & Francis, 145-146
(Example 4.9.5)
46
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
The simply supported 610 X 229 UB 125 of S275 steel shown in the right figure has a span of 6.0m
and is laterally braced at 1.5m intervals. Check the adequacy of the beam for a nominal uniformly
distributed dead load of 60 KNm together with a nominal uniformly distributed imposed load of 70
KNm.
Loading condition
SF
Beam Diagram
BM
47
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
Note.
Shear resistance is calculated with an error of 6.46% due to the difference in shear area, Av. In the example
book, the minimum value of shear area ‘ηhwtw’ was not considered whereas it was considered in midas Gen.
(6.2.6 (3) EN 1993-1-1:2005)
48
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
kN. The maximum MEd occurs at mid –span where VEd =0,
and the maximum VEd occurs at the support where
( ). Check ratio of shear resistance (V_Edz/Vpl_Rdz). MEd = 0, and so there is no need to check for combined
( LCB = 1, POS = J ) bending and shear. (Note that in any case, 0.5Vc,Rd = 0.5
-. Applied shear force : V_Edz = 558.00 kN.
1171 = 585.5 KN
V_Edz 558.00
> 558 KN = VEd and so the combined bending and shear
-. ---------- = ------------ = 0.446 < 1.000 ---> O.K.
condition does not operate.)
Vpl_Rdz 1251.90
Note.
The difference in shear resistance occurred since the
midas Gen consider the additional condition when
calculating shear area as per EN1993-1-1:2005, sub
clause 6.2.6(3) a).
Av = A-2btf + (tw+2r)tf but not less than ηhwtw
[Reference]
N.S. Trahair, M.A. Bradford, D.A.Nethercot, and
L.Gardner, The behavior and Design of Steel
Structures to EC3, Taylor & Francis, 209-211
(Example 5.12.5)
49
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
Check the imposed load deflection of the 610 X 229 UB 125 of right figure for a serviceability limit of
L/360v.
Loading condition
SF
Beam Diagram
BM
50
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
[Reference]
N.S. Trahair, M.A. Bradford, D.A.Nethercot, and
L.Gardner, The behavior and Design of Steel
Structures to EC3, Taylor & Francis, 223 (Example
5.12.18)
51
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
Loading condition
SF
Beam Diagram
BM
52
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
200 × 10 3 45.0
2. CHECK AXIAL RESISTANCE 47.2 × 10 2 × 275 /1.0
+
132 .8
= 0.493 ≤ 1
( ). Check slenderness ratio of axial compression member
And the cross-section resistance is a adequate.
(Kl/i) [ Eurocode3:05 6.3.1 ]
-. Kl/i = 83.3 < 200.0 ---> O.K.
Alternative approach for cross-section resistance.
Because the section is Class 1, Clause 6.2.9.1 can be
( ). Calculate axial compressive resistance (Nc_Rd).
used.
[ Eurocode3:05 6.1, 6.2.4 ]
No reduction in plastic moment resistance is required
-. Nc_Rd = fy * Area / Gamma_M0 = 1298.00 kN.
provided both
NEd = 200 KN < 324.5 KN
( ). Check ratio of axial resistance (N_Ed/Nc_Rd). 2 3
= (0.25 47.2 10 275/1.0)/ 10
N_Ed 200.00
-. ----------- = ------------ = 0.154 < 1.000 ---> O.K. = 0.25Npl ,Rd and
Nc_Rd 1298.00 NEd = 200 KN < 202.9 KN
0.5× (256 .0 – 2 × 10.9) × 6.3 × 275
=
1.0 × 10 3
( ). Calculate buckling resistance of compression member 0.5h w t w f y
(Nb_Rdy, Nb_Rdz). [ Eurocode3:05 6.3.1.1, 6.3.1.2 ] =
γM 0
. Beta_A = Aeff / Area = 1.000 And so no reduction in the plastic moment resistance is
-. Lambda1 = Pi * SQRT(Es/fy) = 86.815 required.
-. Lambda_by = {(KLy/iy)/Lambda1} * SQRT(Beta_A)
= 0.960
53
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
54
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
1.6 1.6
2− Cmy 2 λmax − Cmy 2 λmax 2 npl −
( ). Check ratio of moment resistance (M_Edy/Mc_Rdy). Wy Wy
1− N ED /N cr ,y 1−200 /1417
( ). Check ratio of moment resistance (M_Edz/Mc_Rdz). μy = = = 0.952
1− χ y N ED /N cr ,y 1−0.693 × 200 /1417
M_Edz 0.00 μy 1
-. ------------- = --------- = 0.000 < 1.000 ---> O.K. kyy = CmyCmLT
1− N ED /N cr ,y C yy
Mc_Rdz 32.73 0.952 1
= 0.975 × 1.0 × =1.091
1− 200 /1417 0.990
N Ed M y ,Ed 200 45.0
+ kyy = + 1.091×
N b ,y ,Rd M c,y ,Rd 900 132 .8
= 0.222 + 0.370 = 0.592 <1
And the member resistance is adequate.
5. CHECK INTERACTION OF COMBINED RESISTANCE
( ). Calculate Major reduced design resistance of benging
and shear. [ Eurocode3:05 6.2.8 (6.30) ]
-. In case of V_Edz / Vpl_Rdz < 0.5
-. My_Rd = Mc_Rdy = 132.82 kN-m.
55
CHAPTER 3. Steel Design Verification Examples
N_Ed
-. Rmax_LT1 = ----------------------------------
Xiy*N_Rk/Gamma_M1
M_Edy + N_Ed*eNy
+ kyy * ------------------------------------
XiLT*My_Rk/Gamma_M1
M_Edz + N_Ed*eNz
+ kyz * ----------------------------------
Mz_Rk/Gamma_M1
N_Ed
-. Rmax_LT2 = ---------------------------------
Xiz*N_Rk/Gamma_M1
M_Edy + N_Ed*eNy
+ kzy * ------------------------------------
XiLT*My_Rk/Gamma_M1
M_Edz + N_Ed*eNz
+ kzz * ----------------------------------
Mz_Rk/Gamma_M1
= 0.373 < 1.000 ---> O.K.
[Reference]
N.S. Trahair, M.A. Bradford, D.A.Nethercot, and
L.Gardner, The behavior and Design of Steel
Structures to EC3, Taylor & Francis, 330-333
(Example 7.7.2)
56
CHAPTER 4
Step
00
Contents
Step
00 Overview
Eurocode 3 Steel Design Methods
1. The program finds optimal sections for gravity loads (Design > Steel Optimal Design) and
also finds optimal sections for lateral loads (Design> Displacement Optimal Design). With t
he combined use of the two, the user should find optimal sections.
2. The program checks strength and serviceability based on the sections defined by the user
and the design code selected by the user (Design > Steel Code Check). Also, the program
searches and proposes sections which satisfy the design conditions entered by the user.
Then the user can update the sections referring to the sections proposed by the program.
1
CHAPTER 4. Steel Design Tutorial
Step
4,000
5F
4,000
4F
4,000
3F
4,000
2F
5,000
1F
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
Figure 2. Structural Plan (2~Roof) (unit: mm)
Step
00 Overview
Static
• For roof
Load 3 Live Load Live Load
Superimposed Dead Load: 5 kN/m2 Cases
Wind Load
4 Wind X-dir
Live Load: 1.5kN/m2 (in the global X-direction)
Wind Load
Wind loads 5 Wind Y-dir
(in the global Y-direction)
• Basic Wind Velocity: 26 m/s Seismic Load
Response 6 RX
Spectrum (in the global X-direction)
• Terrain Category: II
Load Seismic Load
Cases 7 RY
Seismic loads (in the global Y-direction)
• Ground Type: B
2
CHAPTER 4. Steel Design Tutorial
Step
00 Overview
Applied Sections
These are the sections assumed before design updates.
• Beam
• Column
• Brace
Step
01 Step . 1 Open the model file and perform analysis & Steel Design Code
Procedure
3
CHAPTER 4. Steel Design Tutorial
Step
Procedure
Generate Load Combinations
4
The program automatically
creates design load combinations
which can be also modified or 5
deleted by the user. 6 2
4 Option: “Add”
Step
Procedure
Enter Unbraced Length 5
3
3 Select “1: IPE 500” & “IPE 600.”
7
4 Click on “Add” button and “Close”
button.
4
8
5 Design > General Design
Parameter >Unbraced Length
6 Option: “Add/Replace”
4
CHAPTER 4. Steel Design Tutorial
Step
Procedure
3 Option: “Add/Replace”
Step
Procedure
Enter Equivalent Moment 5
Factor (CmLT)
6 Option: “Add/Replace”
5
CHAPTER 4. Steel Design Tutorial
Step
Procedure
Assign/Confirm Serviceability
Load Combination Type
Step
Procedure
If the element’s local x-axis is
Enter Serviceability Parameters 5
parallel to the global Z-axis, the
6 element is considered as a
1 View > Select > Identity
column. If the element’s local x-
2 Select Type: “Element Type” 7
axis is parallel to global X-Y
3 Select “BEAM.” 2 4
plane, the element is
4 Click on “Add” button and “Close” 3
8 considered as beam. All other
button.
elements except for columns
5 Design > Steel Design
and beams are considered to
Parameter > Serviceability
4 be braces.
Parameters 9
6 Option: “Add/Replace”
7 Selection Type: “By Selection”
8 Deflection Control For Beams: “L 10
/ 250” 11
9 Deflection Control For Columns:
“h / 300”
10 Deflection Amplification Factor: “1”
11 Click on “Apply” button and
“Close” button.
6
CHAPTER 4. Steel Design Tutorial
Step
Procedure
Steel Code Checking (1)
2 Click on button.
3
4 Click on “Graphic” button.
Ultimate Limit State Check Results Serviceability Limit State Check Results
COM: Critical ratio by axial force and bending moment (Yielding & Buckling) Beam: Vertical deflection
SHR: Critical ratio by shear force (Yielding & Buckling) Column: Horizontal deflection
2
4
Step
Procedure 1
Steel Code Checking (2)
7
CHAPTER 4. Steel Design Tutorial
Step
Procedure
Change the NG sections (1)
1 Click on button.
5 Select “HEB340.”
1
6 Click on “Change” button. 6
Step
Procedure
Change the NG sections (2)
5
5 Select “HEA280.”
8
CHAPTER 4. Steel Design Tutorial
Step
Procedure
Change the NG sections (3)
Step
Procedure 1
Change the NG sections (4)
9
CHAPTER 4. Steel Design Tutorial
Step
Procedure
Updated the Design Sections(1) “Properties Before Change” represents the sections used in the analysis.
Step
Procedure
Updated the Design Sections(2)
10
CHAPTER 4. Steel Design Tutorial
Step
Procedure
Change the Section with
Low Ratio (1)
2
Step
Procedure
Change the Section with
Low Ratio (2)
11
CHAPTER 4. Steel Design Tutorial
Step
Procedure
Change the Section with
Low Ratio (3)
3
6
Section ID. 2 are all above 0.5.
12