Lecture 3: Observational Avenues in Interference: Newton's Ring
Lecture 3: Observational Avenues in Interference: Newton's Ring
1 Newton’s Ring
Newton’s rings are a particular example of interference fringes formed by thin films. By placing
plano-convex lens on a plane glass plate, a film of gradually increasing thickness from the point
of contact O can be formed as shown in Figure 1. If it is illuminated by a monochromatic light,
interference fringes in the form of concentric circular rings can be observed. These rings are
known as “Newton’s rings”. These fringes are the loci of points of equal film thickness.
Conditions for interference fringe pattern: As shown in Figure 1, the incident light
ray falls normally along P QR and partially reflects back from R. The transmitted part gets
reflected back from S from the upper surface of the glass plate G2 and superposed with the
ray that is reflected from R. As a result the path difference between the two rays becomes 2d,
where d is the width of variable air film at that point. But the transmitted ray is reflected back
by a denser medium. Hence the optical path difference should be
λ
∆ = 2d ± . (1)
2
Hence, the condition for the formation of bright fringes is given by
λ λ
2d ± = 2n ×
2 2
1
Optics Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science
λ
=⇒ 2d = (2n ± 1) , (2)
2
where, n is a positive integer. Similarly, the condition for the formation of dark fringes becomes
λ
2d = 2n , (3)
2
where, n is again a positive integer. Therefore, if the width of the air film is even multiple of
λ/2, then it will form dark fringes, while if the width of the film is an odd multiple of λ/2, then
it will form bright fringes.
Radius of concentric fringes: A fringe of order m will be along the loci of the points
of equal thickness d and hence the fringes will be circular in nature. From the geometry of
Figure 1, we have CR = R, where R is the radius of curvature of the lens and C is the centre of
the circle, depicted on the right side of Figure 1. Also we have CD = R − d. Let the radius of
the mth order bright/dark fringe be rm . So, we have DR = rm . Now from the triangle ∆CDR,
we have
R2 = (R − d)2 + rm
2
=⇒ R2 − (R − d)2 = rm
2
2
=⇒ rm = d(2R − d) ≈ 2Rd [as R d] . (4)
Hence, the radius of the mth order bright and dark fringe is given by
r
bright (2m ± 1)λR
rm = ; (5)
2
2mλR √
r
dark
rm = = mλR . (6)
2
Fringe width of Newton’s ring: Usually, we express the fringe width of Newton’s ring in
terms of the diameter of the ring. Let the diameter of the mth order fringe be Dm . Then the
fringe width is given by
λR
2
rm+1 − 2
rm ×2 λR
βm = rm+1 − rm = ≈ 2 = . (7)
rm+1 + rm 2rm Dm
Nature of the central fringe: For central fringe, there is no air gap i.e., d = 0. Hence the
order number of the fringe is n = 0. This reflects the fact that the central fringe will be dark
in nature.
Replacing with a medium of refractive index µ: If we replace the air medium present in
the gap between plano-convex lens and the glass, by some other material with refractive index
2
Optics Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science
µ (less than the refractive index of the glass) then the optical path difference will become 2µd.
Thus the radius of the mth order fringe will be
s
bright (2m + 1)λR
rm = ; (8)
2µ
s
dark mλR
rm = . (9)
µ
And this change in the radius of the fringes will also cause a change in the fringe width, which
is given by,
λR
βm = . (10)
µDm
Applications: As discussed earlier, changing the material of the gap between plano-convex
lens and the glass, changes the fringe width. Hence by measuring the fringe width for different
materials we can determine their refractive indices. Wavelength of a monochromatic light ray
can also be determined by performing the Newton’s ring experiment.
2 Michelson Interferometer
The Michelson interferometer is an amplitude division class of interferometer i.e., the interfer-
ence pattern is observed due to the division of the amplitude of the incident light, which are
made to interfere later. This interferometer is an arrangement of mirrors and beam splitters,
see Figure 2. There are two mirrors M1 and M2 in this set up, out of which the mirror M2
can move. The light ray is reflected from A travels through the glass thrice before reaching the
screen. So, another glass slab C is often introduced in order to compensate for the additional
path length along M2 .
3
Optics Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science
Here the path difference is given by ∆ = 2d cos θ (see Figure 3). If the bean splitter is an
uncoated slab of glass, then the ray to mirror M2 gets reflected from denser to rarer medium,
while the ray from mirror M1 is reflected from rarer to denser medium. Thus there will a phase
difference of π and the condition of destructive interference will be 2d cos θ being some integral
multiple of λ. On the other hand, if the bean splitter has some coating on its one side, then
both the reflections are from rarer to denser medium and hence no relative phase difference
exists. Thus for constructive interference we have the following condition
2d cos θ = mλ . (11)
where m is an integer. For a fixed value of the angle, the fringes form a circle and hence
concentric fringes are concentric circles in this case. The two sources S1 and S2 , which are
co-linear, combine to give total intensity at P . Thus for constructive interference, we obtain
(recall the computation in the first lecture),
p p
x2 + y 2 + (D + d)2 − x2 + y 2 + (D − d)2 = 2m (λ/2) = mλ
p
=⇒ x2 + y 2 + (D + d)2 = m2 λ2 + x2 + y 2 + (D − d)2 + 2mλ x2 + y 2 + (D − d)2
p
=⇒ 2mλ x2 + y 2 + (D − d)2 = 4Dd − m2 λ2
2 2 2 2 (4Dd − m2 λ2 )2 4D2 d2 m2 λ2
=⇒ x + y + D + d − 2Dd = = 2 2 − 2Dd +
4m2 λ2 mλ 4
2 2 2
4d m λ
=⇒ x2 + y 2 = D2 −1 + − d2
m2 λ2 4
m2 λ2 4d2
2 2 2
=⇒ x + y = D − −1
4 m2 λ2
4d2
2 2 2
=⇒ x + y ≈ D −1 [as D2 m2 λ2 /4]
m2 λ2
s
4d2
bright
=⇒ rm =D −1 . (12)
m 2 λ2
4
Optics Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science
For dark fringes to be formed, the path difference should be (m + 1/2)λ. Thus the radius of
the dark circular fringes is given by
v" #
u
u 4d 2
dark
rm = Dt 2 − 1 . (13)
m + 21 λ2
2x1 = m1 λ1 = m2 λ2 , (15)
2x2 = n1 λ1 = n2 λ2 . (16)
This yields,
2d ≡ 2(x2 − x1 ) = ∆mλ1 = ∆nλ2 , (17)
where ∆m = n1 − m1 and ∆n = n2 − m2 . As discussed before, the transition from one
consnance to another requires, ∆n = ∆m + 1 and this leads to,
2d 2d
− =1
λ2 λ1
2d
=⇒ ∆λ = 1
λ1 λ2
λ2
=⇒ ∆λ = , (18)
2d
where, we have assumed λ1 ≈ λ2 = λ.
5
Optics Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science
3. Refractive index and thickness of a film: To determine the refractive index or the
thickness of a thin film, the film is placed in the path of the interfering rays. As a result
an extra (µ − 1)t optical path difference will be introduced, where µ is the refractive index
of the film and t is its thickness. This in turn causes a shift of the central fringe, which
is again made coincident with the cross wire by moving the mirror M2 by a distance d.
In that case (assuming θ ∼ 0), we have,
2d = 2(µ − 1)t
=⇒ d = (µ − 1)t . (19)
So if we have the information of either the refractive index or the thickness of the film,
then the other one can be easily determined.
4 Fabry-Perot Interferometer
the amplitude of the incident wave with angle of incidence θ be A. Let r and r0 be the reflection
coefficients for the waves reflected from the outer and inner surfaces respectively. Similarly, let
t and t0 be the transmission coefficients for the waves transmitted inside and outside the film
respectively. Then from Stoke’s theorem, we have
r = −r0 , (20)
6
Optics Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science
r2 = 1 − tt0 . (21)
Therefore, the amplitudes of the first, second, third, . . . transmitted rays will be Att0 , Att0 r02 eiδ ,
Att0 r04 e2iδ , · · · , respectively where δ is the phase difference between two successive rays. The
phase difference δ is given by
2π
δ= × 2d cos θ . (22)
λ
If the angle of incidence is small then there will be large number of transmitted waves and the
resultant amplitude of the transmitted rays will be
where, I = |A|2 is the intensity of the incident light. For notational convenience, let us define
F ≡ {4r2 /(1 − r2 )2 }, which yields,
−1
IT 2 δ
= 1 + F sin (25)
I 2
It is evident that the resultant intensity varies with the phase difference. When phase difference
is integral multiple of 2π, we have maximum intensity, given by (IT /I)max = 1. As a special
case, let us define the phase difference to be δ1/2 , when we have IT = (I/2). Thus δ1/2 reads,
1 1
=
2 1 + F sin 2 δ1/2
2
δ1/2
=⇒ F sin2 =1
2
−1 1
=⇒ δ1/2 = 2 sin √ . (26)
F
On the other hand, if the phase difference is an odd integer multiple of π, then we have the
minimum intensity of the transmitted light, given by
2
1 − r2
IT 1
= = . (27)
I min (1 + F ) 1 + r2
7
Optics Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science
2d1 = m1 λ1 = m2 λ2 . (29)
Suppose, the width of the gap is increased to d2 from d1 such that the coincidence of the
maxima is achieved again. So, now let (m1 + p)th order fringe of wavelength λ1 coincides
with the (m2 + p + 1)th order fringe of the wavelength λ2 . Hence
2(d1 − d2 ) = N λ . (32)
Here cos θ = 1, as we are using the central fringe . Therefore having the knowledge of
(d1 − d2 ) and N , we can determine the wavelength λ of the light being emitted from the
source.
8
Optics Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science
2d cos θ1 = mλ1 ,
2d cos θ2 = (m − 1)λ1 [for next bright fringe] .
But, suppose (m − 1)th order fringe of wavelength λ1 coincides with mth order fringe of
wavelength λ1 − ∆λ. Then,
Hence, we have
λ1 = m∆λ ,
λ1 λ21 λ2
=⇒ ∆λ = = ≈ 1 . (34)
m 2d cos θ1 2d
Thus, if we have the information about d and λ1 then the wavelength difference ∆λ can
be easily determined.